TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

IrishFeeney92 Archive

View 3 posts and 117 comments by IrishFeeney92 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

In typical “facts don’t care about your feelings” fashion. I urge everybody to look up the demographics of the pro-life campaign Majority are women
/r/MensRights15/04/25 12:21 PM
6

Due to modern technology 85% of roles can be done by both genders. It’s time we stopped allowing this BS to flourish
/r/MensRights08/03/25 12:41 PM
157

Don’t be fooled into thinking the right wants to uplift men. Neither the left nor right are interested in truly helping us, only serving their own needs
/r/MensRights24/02/25 10:47 AM
29

Sounds like two very interesting first cases to trial this new law
/r/MensRights19/12/24 11:29 PM
4

You’re ignoring one major part to this and it’s a huge flaw in your logic…... If I’m previously advantaged (even though not, because I wasn’t born in the times when I was supposedly advantaged - but alas, let’s assume I am for the sake of the argument)…..and the laws of today now Disadvantage me to make up for some historic wrong I had nothing to do with, by your own admission I’m still Disadvantaged rather than on equal footing. Equal footing is the goal, and it should be, but me being disadvan…
/r/MensRights03/12/24 07:02 AM
1

Yes but because they’re boys they’re not evil dangerous men and thus, deserving of sympathy
/r/MensRights13/11/24 06:08 AM
93

Schrodingers feminist - A woman is simultaneously a victim and empowered, until something happens. Then she chooses which state benefits her the most…
/r/MensRights22/10/24 06:24 PM
0

Yes but that’s in individual countries choice. It’s one thing to label a single country but it’s a complete false equivalence to draw a comparison between the ECJ and a single countries policy (that doesn’t actually have to adhere to it)
/r/MensRights07/10/24 04:58 PM
1

I can’t find one either - lmk if you do
/r/MensRights07/10/24 10:40 AM
1

I’m open to correct on this, but as far as I can search - The ECJ never ruled on Russian men NOT being eligible for asylum with that basis. Only individual countries, so it’s nothing like OP is tryna make out on his title - the technical details are important
/r/MensRights07/10/24 10:39 AM
9

Fighting age is a way to lump all men together and collectively remove empathy by labelling them as potential combatants
/r/MensRights19/09/24 04:25 AM
38

No…… far far less in number. True love marriages will always last and work, but they’re becoming more and more rare
/r/MensRights28/07/24 07:33 PM
23

Let’s touch base. I’d love to do something similar for my field (cyber security) and I would be curious to see how you go about it all
/r/MensRights06/07/24 07:12 PM
48

Real talk I’d happily make a small donation for a good cause if you can point me towards something you’re involved in or is close to your heart
/r/MensRights06/07/24 06:54 PM
2

/u/TheTinMenBlog - with all the outrage in Ireland at the moment about “gender based violence” it’s always interesting to see how little attention things get when the victims a man
/r/MensRights26/06/24 07:52 AM
2

Confirmation bias. People with reason to doubt will inevitably get it tested more. You need to also include everyone else to get the stay for the general population
/r/MensRights09/06/24 04:47 AM
-6

It’s inherent in your original statement. It can’t be a double standard if it’s not the same thing, you’re asserting they are the same by making that statement. Back to school with ya
/r/MensRights06/06/24 02:39 PM
-1

Never argued it wasn’t a thing. I know full well it is. It’s not comparable to female PPD post birth. To equate the two is pure stupidity
/r/MensRights06/06/24 02:23 PM
-5

Jesus what a dumb comment. You’re saying men experiencing these issues is the exact same as a woman physically birthing a child and all the hormonal and chemical whirlwinds that come along with it? So I.e there’s no difference between female PPD and Male PPD? THINK about the implications of such a ridiculous statement. You’re actually arguing that male and female Mental health is essentially the same and hormones don’t matter You’re delusional if you think men can experience the same negative em…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 02:21 PM
-28

It’s not a double standard. Men can’t give birth so we can’t have the same experiences. It’s only a double standard when the situation is directly reversed. It can’t be - you’re clutching at straws with this one I’m afraid
/r/MensRights06/06/24 10:37 AM
6

There’s a confirmation bias in there. That stat is based on men who have a reason to doubt paternity. It would be much lower if you tested every relationship
/r/MensRights25/03/24 12:27 PM
5

https://www.reddit.com/r/iamatotalpieceofshit/s/paKDZ6fV8w Watch the reactions of the girls. The idea women haven’t/don’t get involved in sick shit is pure misandry. Humans are terrible to each other regardless of gender
/r/MensRights16/03/24 03:31 AM
47

Imagine a male using the old “mental illness” card for mitigating factors after choking his female adult partner. Literally be laughed out of court. All above board here though ☕️🍵
/r/MensRights28/02/24 02:31 PM
1

Most conflate misandry with only women. In the same way women can have internalised mysoginy, men can and do have internalised mysandry and hence, these laws are predicated on it
/r/MensRights09/02/24 05:58 PM
-7

It’s technically misandry but not in the way most assume. It’s a law that was implemented by men in power and has been around for thousands of years. We KNOW why it’s there, it’s needed, you can’t blame the modern day issue we see on the fact that women in power haven’t decided to change it. Sure, they should help us, but they’re more likely to do away with it than conscription for both.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 06:41 AM
2

Ok, all the best with your treatment
/r/MensRights18/01/24 05:20 AM
4

I got vaccinated a few years back because I decided that the small chance of preventing it was good. The research is limited however, the general medical consensus for other types of viruses is that it can still help your immune system to get a vaccine even if you have already been naturally exposed to the virus beforehand.
/r/MensRights17/01/24 08:51 PM
2

How do you know you were exposed? How do you know your cancer is HPV related? (I thought there was no test)
/r/MensRights17/01/24 08:49 PM
17

We are expected to be competent. If you give a chimp a bicycle and he learns to ride it, everyone claps
/r/MensRights09/01/24 08:10 PM
67

The last sentence is sickening “A conviction was not recorded”
/r/MensRights23/11/23 06:20 PM
10

90%+ were
/r/MensRights24/08/23 03:58 PM
81

This is really fuckin sad 😞
/r/MensRights24/08/23 02:58 PM
1

Because men judge other men more harshly. That’s an evolutionary fact so it’s no surprise that this is the case. Weirdly enough men are also more likely to vote to convict rapists than women. There was a huge thing a while ago about Jury’s being 50:50 until they realised this would be more of a favour to the alleged defendants than the victim. They wrongly assumed the women would automatically side lore with their counterparts but failed to consider they could be more easily swayed and emotional…
/r/MensRights23/08/23 12:58 PM
-1

Explain to me how them words contradict what I’m saying oh wise sage 😂😂😂 I don’t know the reasoning. I’m proposing a possible explanation. It’s certainly better than assuming institutional sexism like you, who is also proclaiming to know the ins and outs of said Spanish tax system in doing so Man I’m done wasting time with you. One of the biggest idiots I’ve ever come across on the internet. Congrats 😂
/r/MensRights21/08/23 04:48 PM
3

They immediately move the goalposts and switch from “can’t walk alone” to “more likely to be sexually targeted” Yes that statement is correct, but which one are you using because the first one is NOT in your favour…..it’s emotional and hyperbole like all their slogans
/r/MensRights21/08/23 04:46 PM
0

You’re most likely correct, it’s also based on outdated gender roles. So it’s likely a policy build on legacy data as opposed to what the ideal “modern” men and women should look like. Personally I believe it should be 35 for both ages. You could argue it’s discrimination. You could also argue that it’s necessary for women because of simple biological limitations and trauma as a result of having children. The point is, that this issue is not black and white, as the OP has suggested with his orig…
/r/MensRights21/08/23 04:44 PM
-1

I never said I agreed with it. You’re assuming by me stating these potential explanations that I’m advocating for them. Showing your own biases there 🤡
/r/MensRights21/08/23 04:41 PM
1

Guys a raging lunatic 😂
/r/MensRights21/08/23 04:03 PM
-2

The reason behind it is because child bearing (which only happens to women) and most likely occurs multiple times before 35 will negatively effect a woman’s ability to start or run her business. It’s a compassionate allowance for life circumstances. While you could definitely argue it should be afforded to men (afterall, if you want men to burden the responsibility equally to women then you have to encourage them to take a bigger role in the household) - the simple fact is they still physically …
/r/MensRights21/08/23 04:02 PM
-2

It’s an outlandish claim that would be the very definition of sexism should it be true - we all know men collectively pay tax as a group due to choice etc. but to suggest that men pay more tax for being men without any sort of source is insanity Living up to your username with that response Lad
/r/MensRights21/08/23 02:06 PM
-2

You need to provide sources for that claim
/r/MensRights21/08/23 01:51 PM
7

This is not just feminism. These laws are leftover from 60s USA when men worked and women didn’t, they made sense back then but they haven’t evolved with the times. Modern men & Feminists are not willing & reluctant to change them because they benefit yes, but the root cause comes from the tradcon “single income household” times.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 06:56 AM
10

They’ll say it’s “unnatural for a mother not be involved” despite proudly promoting surrogacy and gay adoptions……not that I personally have an issue with either of them, I’m just pre-emoting their BS arguements
/r/MensRights11/07/23 01:24 PM
15

I never bought the idea that it was only ever men who were bad and sex pests. PEOPLE in power are bad, and are sex pests. The more women we see in powerful positions over the next few years the more this is going to start becoming increasingly highlighted as such
/r/MensRights26/06/23 12:03 AM
5

The UKs “female offender” strategy in action. I’m serious, look it up
/r/MensRights09/06/23 07:28 AM
1

Are the houses tax payer funded? Not North American and unsure of the context….or is a private donor/funding?
/r/MensRights25/05/23 08:09 PM
3

You can’t compare nudes to public pictures dudes post on their profiles. They aren’t even on the same planet of disrespect
/r/MensRights20/05/23 08:55 PM
16

Sounds like you might have justification to file a case. You can’t complain about it while willingly complying and doing nothing
/r/MensRights18/05/23 03:51 PM
7

It’s a great video and very well explained, but the issue itself is also self castrating. Most women want the economic equality (which is perfectly reasonable) - having said that, when it comes to mate choice, they are not going to choose anybody who is economically lesser than them. So they lose out that way. You just can’t have it all, and both sex’s need to accept that
/r/MensRights18/05/23 11:28 AM
35

Why’s the cost double for men? And why are you supporting a business that does that?
/r/MensRights18/05/23 11:27 AM
-6

Let’s be real. The sub is an echo chamber. It has a lot of problems with assholes who take away from the true point of the sub. Having said that, Every sub on Reddit is an echo chamber. And they also have the same issues. This just happens to be a minority echo chamber
/r/MensRights14/05/23 03:06 PM
31

They also try to justify it with the usual bullshit along the lines of “ it’s usually a preemptive strike against a male who sees them as weak because they’re a female”…..okay so that makes it better…
/r/MensRights08/05/23 08:30 AM
15

Because “No uterus no opinion” wasn’t just a slogan about 1 topic
/r/MensRights07/05/23 04:01 AM
4

I’m currently reading “man up” by Jack Urwin. - it’s a leftist-soft cock hit piece on manliness and “lad culture” commonly found in Europe. He makes SOME good points….but I made it 22 pages In Before I wanted to throw it out the window. This guy was rejected by most men and outside of the cliques most of his life and he hates them for never having accepted him. Its really hurting my will to consciously read books I know I’ll disagree with
/r/MensRights05/05/23 12:16 PM
0

Exactly 100% agreed
/r/MensRights30/04/23 02:59 PM
-2

He was previously released from prison (which means he was already a convict) + harassed & physically intimidated a woman on a train by blocking her from leaving, and because he “stared” in the process of doing it, these guys jump at a particular narrative. Context is important and they are being incredibly disingenuous stating that’s why he got 22 weeks.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 01:57 PM
3

“A man who refused to stop staring at a woman on a train in Berkshire has been jailed. Dominik Bullock sat next to his victim on a train from Reading and began staring at her intently, police said. The woman asked him to stop staring several times as it was making her feel uncomfortable, but he refused. She asked Bullock to move as he was blocking her exit, but he refused again and said she would have to climb over him. The victim, who was visibly upset, continued to ask Bullock to move out of h…
/r/MensRights30/04/23 11:36 AM
6

He didn’t get 22 weeks for staring. Read the rest of what he did. It was pure Intimidation and harassment and you’re only telling 1/3 of the truth
/r/MensRights30/04/23 09:15 AM
12

That’s our fault though so it doesn’t count. But women’s mental load is also our fault apparently. It’s all very tiresome
/r/MensRights31/03/23 08:32 PM
1

If they just changed that one word I’d have no problem supporting the statement. It’s so insidious to describe them as primary victims
/r/MensRights02/03/23 07:29 PM
5

Sounds like he definitely deserved to be fired then
/r/MensRights24/02/23 08:30 AM
1

Gotta disagree with the sub on this one. Highlighting “unprecedented” levels is not dismissive of males issues. In fact, showcasing that these “normal” levels are changing helps to highlight problems societies might face in the future. It doesn’t downplay or take away from men’s issues. That’s an entirely separate, albeit relevant argument you can make when comparing the stats and public reactions directly
/r/MensRights15/02/23 07:31 PM
37

I recently saw “men’s aid Ireland” detail how many females they helped last year. Despite having female only resources dedicated through “Women’s Aid” - who actively go out of their way to inform the public they don’t help men. So even women are consuming mens only resources in Ireland. It’s a fucking joke
/r/MensRights12/02/23 07:30 PM
32

Wholeheartedly agree. It gives people ammo to ignore our very serious and worthwhile concerns. We need to call it out more
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:55 AM
5

A woman was also arrested for murdering a 5 year old in Coventry today. “Teach women not to murder kids” - let’s see how that slogan goes down
/r/MensRights06/01/23 06:48 AM
7

90% of the victims of the protest in terms of imprisonment and murder have been male……
/r/MensRights09/12/22 02:43 PM
3

You clearly haven’t read it, she asked permission to change the scene and it was granted by the producer and Brad Pitt. Nothing to see here this time
/r/MensRights09/12/22 02:20 PM
4

Notice the shift from the use of the word equality to equity over the last 5 years. So fucking sinister…..
/r/MensRights10/11/22 02:03 PM
6

What’s worse is I see the book has 5 star reviews. That needs to be corrected
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:37 AM
9

She around 31k likes on her initial tweet. That shit is widely supported
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:16 AM
23

I firmly believe it’s about family. The GOAT originally retired at the peak of his career but the competitive man inside him just couldn’t leave it be and he got FOMO and decided to go back on his word and rejoin the sport. It’s the going back on his word and putting his family second. What more is left for him to accomplish? At this point, the same character attributes that made him super successful are coming back to bite Him, in the form of a negative family outcome.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:53 PM
1

You’re right I did misunderstand…..God dammit man put it in quotes!
/r/MensRights22/08/22 04:48 PM
1

Agree with it all except “slight inconvenience”. My personal viewpoints on that topic are in line with theirs. It ain’t a slight issue at all in almost all cases, but discussing that here detracts from my point in this thread
/r/MensRights22/08/22 04:48 PM
0

Ironically, I’ve had to specify who exactly I mean because I got the “not all women” treatment……imagine them shoes on the other foot what the reaction would be
/r/MensRights22/08/22 04:46 PM
1

Your last point is literally what I’m saying. Problem is they don’t want to help us. They have 0 respect for mens issues and they disregard it as a male problem…..But they want us to help them
/r/MensRights22/08/22 04:45 PM
1

Thanks, you just proved my point!
/r/MensRights22/08/22 04:43 PM
5

So you can Martyr yourself? It ain't that easy fella.....
/r/MensRights22/08/22 02:44 PM
1

I happen to agree with you on that topic, but being a keyboard warrior seems to be your whole skit so I’ll leave you to it
/r/MensRights22/08/22 02:05 PM
1

I disagree. I believe that In the same way not supporting female equality harms men, equally so not supporting male equality harmed females, it just struggling to understand WHY they don’t see it that way.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 01:40 PM
1

Good comment. Allow me some time To digest the new info and I’ll respond thereafter
/r/MensRights22/08/22 01:39 PM
1

Hence the edit for clarification Assbuttsphincter
/r/MensRights22/08/22 01:37 PM
11

Good call
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:29 AM
3

I think that’s a bit reductive. They can help us and support us IF they share our common beliefs & goals. The issue is do they share them? or are they just trying to “help” us so they can actually just help themselves by changing us. (That’s not to say there aren’t negative things men as a group need to change)…….Its just the inverse of the male feminist sexual strategy
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:26 AM
1

Thanks for your response. I can only speak for myself and my own opinion on this topic of course, I don’t speak for the sub. You may get a far better response if you asked this as a post in itself. Alas, Based on your response, I think we are already off to a potentially rocky start. There are some good points you make and things I massively agree with. The DV & Mental health stuff. On the other topics, I am assuming of course based on the key words you have raised, and the manner in which you r…
/r/MensRights22/08/22 11:22 AM
1

You’re assuming it’s not working. They are winning and succeeding in their plan so watching back passively is not going to get the results you hope for IMO
/r/MensRights22/08/22 10:18 AM
1

Fair comment
/r/MensRights22/08/22 10:17 AM
10

Really positive to see all round
/r/MensRights22/08/22 05:35 AM
1

It’s called The Female Offender strategy. Specifically designed to reduce custodial sentences for females
/r/MensRights05/08/22 08:06 PM
1

Just wait until you hear about the crown prosecution services policies of convicting less women on the basis that they are women. I shit you not
/r/MensRights05/08/22 07:47 PM
1

Bro that’s not a red flag it’s a fucking Parade in the red square. You’re allowing your wrong brown to make this decision. If you can’t forsee a future where you share the same ideals there IS no future.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 06:39 AM
1

Agreed however, the issue they are highlighting that women uniquely have to go through is very real. As somebody who has females in my family who genuinely can’t move due to endometriosis and similar issues monthly, it makes sense to have this little bit of extra help for them. My thoughts on this are that it is a very real issue however, the approach to accommodating it is way off and will actually result in a further gender gap. They could expand already existing paid sick leave legislation to…
/r/MensRights24/07/22 08:02 AM
9

After reading it, does anybody suspect it was written by a man? It comes accros as a book of irony and forewarning to me......
/r/MensRights27/05/22 03:43 PM
7

Me too please
/r/MensRights27/05/22 12:30 PM
10

Look at the language that they always use. Women & kids. Young girls etc......The only way they care for Males is when they collectovely group them or describe them as young boys/children. It's simply because they are not a threat to them. It's disgusting.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 06:16 AM
2

Make sure to let these idiots know on their social media accounts their bullshit wont fly. We gotta start pushing back against these mysandrists publicly
/r/MensRights17/03/22 06:20 AM
140

Yet a man who would leave a women who could not help him have any biological children of his own would be absolutely scathed in the same scenario
/r/MensRights24/01/22 01:03 PM
1

In the article however, in the bill it doesnt specify - so it can be interpreted both ways. It doesnt specifically mention misogyny or misandry. If it only mentioned one over the other that would be unequal of course, but that's not the case this time round.....the bill is linked above and you can see the wording for yourself
/r/MensRights17/01/22 02:28 PM
1

Eye opening stuff
/r/MensRights13/01/22 07:53 PM
1

Thanks for the link. Its written in such a way that it is applicable to both genders. It was rejected and withdrawn. As usual the MSM dont report it that way and the frequenters of this sub jump on it because they just read the word misogyny and were blind to the rest of it.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 05:43 PM
1

Could you point me to the draft of the bill please. Interested to see the wording
/r/MensRights13/01/22 03:51 PM
-2

While I think its ridiculous, and it will be hard to prove intent. It literally says misandry will also be a hate crime too. No idea what the issue is here. Unless the law ends up being unequally enforced (which is likely of course) - theres no point complaining just yet......
/r/MensRights13/01/22 02:50 PM
-4

Confirmation bias. You're conveniently ignoring those who condemn it in favour of what supports your beliefs. The media outlets you quoted, you shouldnt expect any less from
/r/MensRights31/12/21 03:00 PM
-2

You're mad if you think FDS is praised. I've seen numerous threads on the front page this week alone where people were commenting how disgusting it was, and they were in the top comments.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 09:13 AM
-1

They've sided with the accusers because they support their right to make claims? That's such a reach. This isnt a verdict, merely they believe the women have a right to be heard. Jog on mate
/r/MensRights22/12/21 12:23 PM
3

Sames too!
/r/MensRights20/12/21 01:21 PM
4

Its disgraceful! Hopefully the prisoners win their case. The positive point I'm seeing is that at least it's being reported on as a discriminatory thing. Usually it would be hidden or not reported on. And that's good progress in my view
/r/MensRights20/12/21 08:08 AM
1

It’s about restitution for perceived wrongdoings of the past
/r/MensRights07/04/21 04:22 AM
2

They allow that to happen. They gotta take responsibility for that........Lol who am I kidding that won’t ever happen 😂
/r/askTRP21/06/20 01:23 PM
1

!RemindMe 2 weeks RemindMe! 2 weeks
/r/TheRedPill03/04/18 08:15 AM
1

You hit the Nail on the head.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 09:47 AM
2

This instagram post reminded me to login and give her a 1 star review. Cheers Amy!
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/17 09:50 AM
7

I dont disagree but It sure plays a massive part in it though. Men are capable of putting feeling aside and thinking more logically because we are built that way. Women are emotionally driven and its much more difficult for them to do this.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/17 11:05 PM
1

Id be very grateful if you shared it! I do something similar with my books but at the moment they are all hand written, I should type them up and share them like this!
/r/TheRedPill21/07/16 10:52 AM
2

Is there any other useful summaries like this? or maybe even a subreddit for this type of thing?
/r/TheRedPill20/07/16 07:55 PM
2

I would like to read the notes!
/r/TheRedPill12/10/15 02:15 PM
3

Does she actually have a bf or was she just shit-testing you?
/r/seduction24/07/13 01:01 PM
1

Keep us updated dude!
/r/seduction24/07/13 11:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter