TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Isellmacs Archive

View 0 posts and 193 comments by Isellmacs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This isnt liberalism, its progressivism. I understand there is a huge overlap on many issues between the two groups, but this isnt one of them. Liberalism is about equality "=" whereas progressives advocate for equal or greater ">=" and while it might seem almost the same, the idea of "all people should be treated equally..." is quite different when you tack on "except white men."
/r/MensRights03/08/18 08:17 PM
3

She made some exceptionally racist comments, and they want more of that.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 02:40 PM
6

Keep in mind, that in social justice they redefine the word racism as power + prejudice. They also redefine the words 'power' and 'prejudice' as well.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 02:38 PM
2

I don't get the logic with non whites not being able to be racist against white people, if anything, that's what a racist would think. That's exactly how it works. It's racists being racist and justifying their racism with the idea that if they spin it hard enough, they can convince weak-minded people that it isn't racist.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 02:35 PM
11

Is she though? Isn't a phobia an irrational fear?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/07/18 01:56 PM
6

I don't think OP is a mod. Not sure why he's saying this as I routinely see posts on here claiming to be from women. The value of an argument should stand by itself. No need for a safe space if you're in the right.
/r/MGTOW26/07/18 11:12 AM
2

Gold x3, double posted to bestof and front page within a couple hours!
/r/MGTOW18/07/18 04:39 PM
4

Seconding this request for more information.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/07/18 01:17 PM
2

She could give AIDS to her "soulmate" from unprotected sex with strangers but she doesnt care. The last line cuts off where she says she scheduled an appointment. It might've been for STD testing. She may actually care about this.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/07/18 01:13 PM
5

Agreed. Competition breeds excellence, and often innovation. It can also be entertaining. Nothing wrong with it.
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 01:56 AM
7

That's not how birth works.
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 01:52 AM
8

Don't forget that she was literally crying over this text.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/07/18 02:35 PM
12

Your like "I want this I want that", but never I offer this and that. Your all take take with no give. At your age you have very little to offer in a relationship. Your window for a life long relationship may very well have past years ago. Get a cat. Sometimes your lifes purpose is to be a warning to others. My favorite.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/07/18 02:32 PM
5

Yet fits the bill for 2-3 lesbian couples I've encountered, depending upon solid the "outback" part of that needs to be.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/07/18 02:21 PM
81

That's probably what will have to happen in the future. That costs money though, and if it's never been a problem before, why bother? Terrorist attacks can hit anywhere, however, is it really worth it to the average barber to spend a bunch of money to try and protect against them, if they have never happened? This guy will probably lawyer now after the fact.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 01:47 PM
27

The woman lawyer probably just spied some easy money. Most lawyers are fairly ethical, but there are still plenty of them that aren't and destroying a mans business for her own profit is a certainly not beyond the pale for some.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 01:43 PM
5

More like #hetoo
/r/MensRights11/07/18 12:31 AM
1

Harressing her isn't appropriate.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 12:28 AM
1

And toxic masculinity!
/r/MensRights11/07/18 12:25 AM
7

And patriarchy.
/r/MensRights09/07/18 12:56 AM
24

Effectively, yes. Though if we're going to start arbitrarily defining gendered traits as "toxic" it needs to go both ways. I think there are "toxic" men and women, but its not their genders that make them that way, but the life experiences that shape them. Of course the real problem is defining what "toxic" even means in this context. Its a social justice term, and they like redefining common words with different, yet similar meanings.
/r/MensRights06/07/18 06:26 PM
22

hey alapnignire they all ignore?
/r/MensRights04/07/18 04:20 PM
9

Identifying as a gender isn't the way you act, it's a self identity. For those who are trans, it usually starts at puberty. A boy that young probably wouldn't identify as anything, but prior to being an adult, he would definitely know if there was something different, even if unable to define it. Actual transgenders (not transtrenders) don't make a choice to identify as the opposite gender to their bodies, they simply do. Those two try and force kids to be trans are disgusting and abusive. That …
/r/MGTOW29/06/18 03:20 PM
2

Eh it probably works. I'm pretty tall so I don't have to lie, but I've been lied to about boob size often enough, and still hit it anyway once I found out the lie.
/r/MGTOW29/06/18 03:06 PM
4

What an I? Listed on the birth certificate?
/r/MGTOW28/06/18 07:15 PM
12

Social Justice Warriors (SJW) is more accurate than "extreme liberals." SJW very much hate liberals for being equal opportunity instead of equal outcome. Righties might not see much distinction, but there is definitlely a distinct difference.
/r/MGTOW27/06/18 06:44 PM
1

So whats with the ((( )))?
/r/MGTOW27/06/18 06:17 PM
8

I think they ban lurkers too on occasion.
/r/MGTOW27/06/18 06:16 PM
3

Not surprised to the SPLC hategroup on that list.
/r/MGTOW27/06/18 05:31 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/unpopularopinion/comments/8po1kz/fuck_the_mods_at_roffmychest_for_defending/ Link without the mobile cancer.
/r/MGTOW27/06/18 05:28 PM
3

But seriously OP, please do. Just to prove there ain't no double standards. If you think there is a double standard, why not investigate it yourself?
/r/MGTOW27/06/18 05:27 PM
3

Due process. The answer is due process through innocence until proven guilty. Actual evidence is needed.
/r/MGTOW27/06/18 05:07 PM
23

Better anology might be him going to a strip club, and fucking a stripper, then getting his ass beat by the strippers jealous BF, after the GF told him it was over if he went to a strip club.
/r/MGTOW26/06/18 12:30 AM
-5

Does it say she didn't goto the police? Even if she did, she would still probably want to turn to her BF (now-ex) for support.
/r/MGTOW24/06/18 01:37 PM
13

It's the most common female fantasy? Two things women like, even of they don't admit it are powerful men and freedom from responsibility. Actual rape doesn't end up quite like those fantasies, but that's what fantasy and porn are for, right? So women like rape porn because it gives them a taste of the fantasy without any of the negatives that come with the reality of it.
/r/MGTOW24/06/18 01:35 PM
5

Step 1: Go to Hong Kong Step 2: ??? Step 3: Prostitute Not sure what step 2 is either, actually.
/r/MGTOW23/06/18 04:50 PM
7

Hes evading PoundMeToo career ending moments.
/r/MGTOW23/06/18 03:14 PM
1

The government is a tool of the powers that be.
/r/MensRights22/06/18 12:11 PM
1

How did this post get downvoted? The sources are indeed in the corner.
/r/MGTOW22/06/18 12:00 AM
2

I think that's the point?
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:11 AM
4

It used to be taboo for men to go topless. Men marched and protested and the laws were changed. Now men can go topless in public, but at the same time, we can't complain about being seen topless in public. Some women also wanted to go topless in public. A lot of women are against that though, as it devalues the sexual power that breasts hold in society; it would be reducing female privilege. Even today there are still women who want to go topless, and some actually do. They typically do complain…
/r/MensRights17/06/18 11:06 AM
1

A straight white dude would certainly be fired. In a college setting a black dude might be able to stretch some SJW excuse, but I'm guessing he'd still be fired too.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 10:58 AM
6

A big difference between MRA (equal rights) and Feminism (empowerment only for women) is that MRA don't reject or subordinate women who want equal rights for men. You don't have to sit in the corner quietly and obediently as an "Ally" you can just be a good person and (even as a woman) advocate for equal rights for men.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 02:58 PM
3

Be the change you want to see in the world. One of the most fundamental things that everybody should strive for.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 02:53 PM
1

Yeah I noticed that too. Never gave in though, and it effectively ended any chance of getting back together as the child-support-trap aversion killed it.
/r/MGTOW16/06/18 12:10 AM
11

"Yes, I realise I'm at the bottom of any man's dating pool The bottom is way scarier than this.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/06/18 12:18 PM
6

You want them to pick a better name?? That's Nevaeh gonna happen.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/06/18 12:15 PM
7

Mostly government. Finding the right man has different qualifers when you're guarenteed to have the government support you on the taxpayers dime.
/r/MGTOW14/06/18 12:17 AM
3

MGTOW is a different level than Incel. Incels can't get laid, and many have hang-ups due to the constant rejection damaging them when seeking relationships. Here, we are simply not seeking any sort of long term relationship. Many can get laid, and do, we just gotta be careful and aware of the risks. We don't chase the pussy, we don't put women on a pedastol, we just do our thing. We are, so to speak, strong independant men that don't need no women. Sometimes we have women for comfort, but we don…
/r/MGTOW12/06/18 11:39 PM
2

I dont get why caring about women's rights makes you apathetic to men. It doesn't. Caring about women's rights isn't the same thing as feminism. Feminism is toxic, but it's certain possible to care about women's rights and male rights as the same time. You just can't care about both and be feminist.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 02:30 PM
9

Its to reduce the amount of defrauded fathers from evading child support for kids that aren't theirs. The goal isn't truth or justice, its sticking somebody else with the bill. Women get rewarded either way, its just a question of who pays for it.
/r/MGTOW08/06/18 10:09 PM
3

Basically, I think only part to add is that its despite evidence.
/r/MGTOW08/06/18 10:07 PM
15

Bowsers a chad and is backdooring princess peach and spanking that ass and she loves it. Mario is just her ride home after bowsers spent his load(s) and her ass is too sore to walk by herself.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/06/18 02:56 PM
3

The news usually ads descriptors as a style of writing, however, they don't want to outright state "muslim man" as they are trying to downplay or omit that part and direct the heat and blame towards the two white men.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/06/18 02:45 PM
11

It's a class warfare tactic; convince the other side through concern trolling that raising public awareness actually does something. People can feel like they are comributing without actually doing something, a win for both sides, only not really. Solution and actions are what matters. Men are 50% of the population; it's no secret that we've got a raw deal going right now.
/r/MGTOW08/06/18 12:22 AM
3

twin of rachel maddow David Hogg?
/r/MGTOW07/06/18 07:25 PM
3

There is a difference between flirting and harassment. And the difference is entirely subjective, and able to change days, months or even years down the road. While I agree it would be important to define clearly, with the standards in use today, it's essentially impractical to define clearly.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 02:34 PM
1

Accepting the nature of women for who they are, the experiences and the culture that shape them and make them as they are, doesn't need to involve hating them. Hatred doesn't solve problems, it just makes them, or makes them worse. It's fine to ridicule when they act awful, and rediculing them for their specific awfulness is certainly fair. There is a difference from directing such at their actions, as opposed to their genders. This may not be a safe space, but focused hatred directed at women i…
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 12:52 AM
1

Re educating them that pussy doesn't define acceptance, that society will accept them as they are once they let go, will help. This is a two stage process. They gotta let go, and we gotta be willing to accept them. That's why it's important to welcome and encourage all men. Incell can be MGTOW as any other man, and I think they will grow as men through the experience.
/r/MGTOW06/06/18 12:26 AM
4

No evidence of the moon landing in their study either; glad we could finally put that one to rest.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 08:37 PM
57

Is because feminism isnt about equality; feminism is about the empowerment of women. Sure feminists have pursues goals where inequality, real or perceived, could be balanced through female empowerment. They also, however, have pursed the promotion of inequality, where it resulted in female empowerment. If feminism was truely about equality, they would be promoting equality for men too. When you say you want equality, but are only ever in favor of equality when it benefits you, and contrastly in …
/r/MensRights05/06/18 08:34 PM
6

It's pretty typical; women seem to be the biggest critics of women.
/r/MGTOW04/06/18 02:48 PM
1

Even if not punishing the 10 guilty enables the suffering of 15 more innocents? Is 15 innocents suffering better than 1 innocent suffering?
/r/MensRights30/05/18 06:38 PM
1

It could, or it could deter more false accusation from even happening than it could shield the recanters. Given the nature of things, its unrealistic to say we could know without trying.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 02:37 PM
3

there should be some exception to punishment when the guilty party comes forward to free an innocent person, so that we don't incentivize keeping innocents in prison through the silence of those who have falsely accused. Which incentivizes the false accusations in the first place, and is what we have now. Doesn't seem to be working very well, does it?
/r/MensRights30/05/18 01:36 PM
1

I think he's trying to say there is no difference between masturbation over a 17 year old vs actually raping a 7 year old, and pre-emptively mocking those who would suggest there is a difference between those two things and getting on the sex offender registry for peeing in public.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 01:34 PM
2

The law is a deterrent. The idea would be to deter false accusations in the first place, not enable false accusers to ease their conscience after the unrepairable damage has been done.
/r/MensRights30/05/18 01:29 PM
11

Why do you feel empthy for the falsely accused who have their lives ruined even after proofing themselves innocent is mutually exclusive with empathy for women who have, in fact, been actually raped?
/r/MensRights29/05/18 05:38 PM
19

The freedom to act, dress and speak in a slutty manner without prohibition, consequence or judgment. To overly simply things, its the desire to have their cake and eat it too.
/r/MGTOW29/05/18 05:25 PM
2

Willingness doesn't factor in. The government will step in and take it by force.
/r/MGTOW26/05/18 02:59 PM
1

Correct. Its a mildly insulting way of referring to heterosexuals.
/r/MGTOW25/05/18 10:39 PM
1

My hookups have varied greatly. Crazy in head: crazy in bed is a very real thing in my experience. There is also truth to the idea that you arent paying for sex; you're paying her to leave afterwards.
/r/MGTOW25/05/18 09:04 PM
1

An old buddy of mine used to do this. He said to went to asain massage places and checked for girls who didn't wear pants (like whore a skirt, dress etc.) while doing massage. I dunno if that helps much. Its kinda sad, 'cause I gave him a bit of shit for it at the time. I feel bad about it now as i'm more aware of how lucky I am (tall, handsome, good teeth and hair etc) in the genetic lottery. He was a shorter guy, and I always figured he could find the right girl if he tried hard enough. Naive,…
/r/MGTOW25/05/18 07:49 PM
1

Whats with people using "mongoloid" recently? Like, what do you think this term means?
/r/MGTOW25/05/18 07:34 PM
2

They won’t be satisfied until all betas are imprisoned and Chads rule the Earth.
/r/MGTOW25/05/18 07:16 PM
2

Don't forget the pound (#) symbol. Its PoundMeToo.
/r/MGTOW25/05/18 06:53 PM
4

If they aren't asking, are they really people of conscience?
/r/MGTOW25/05/18 06:43 PM
1

If you're a MGTOW then you're doing it wrong. Getting busy on the first encounter is what you should be expecting. A MGTOW doesn't refuse sex on the first date in order to avoid the trap; we grab the baconburger they used as bait, enjoy eating it and then move on before the trap even closes. Either they rearm the trap with more baconburgers in which case we continue eating and dodging the trap, or we both move on and they try and trap somebody else. Its ok to eat the offered bait, you just avoid…
/r/MGTOW25/05/18 03:45 PM
24

Hence the banning. Strange to see this in MGTOW though.
/r/MGTOW25/05/18 02:50 PM
2

Thank you. Some very insightful comments mixed in on that sub.
/r/MGTOW25/05/18 01:48 AM
6

I think you are confusing the notion that some people have take the word gender and redefined it mean social construct with the notion that the word has always and exclusively meant just that. Inventing new definitions of existing word can eventually impact the lingusitic uses, but its not automatic nor does it automatically supplant other definitions.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 07:47 PM
1

It's not too had comparatively. Some women are far worse.
/r/MGTOW23/05/18 03:05 PM
1

Men lift the seat up to pee, but women put it down to pee. If its always down then they don't have to touch it to pee... just like we wouldn't have to if it was always up...
/r/MGTOW23/05/18 03:05 PM
14

We never actually broke up. It was 2 different women, but both times it was as simple as "This is important to me, I made no secret of being a gamer and if you can't accept me as a gamer, you aren't the right one for me. You know where the door is; make your choice." Neither one left; both acknowledged they were being unreasonable in trying to make ultimatums and we had great makeup sex. Ironically one of them seemed to get addicted to makeup sex, and seemed to constantly be trying to start craz…
/r/MGTOW23/05/18 02:31 PM
14

I've had this ultimatum twice now. Both times this is what I picked. Neither time did the relationship end over it.
/r/MGTOW23/05/18 01:07 PM
3

Much of the divide is urban vs rural. The different lifestyles lead to different world views, which fosters different politics.
/r/MGTOW23/05/18 01:04 AM
1

It's the high-heels for men haircut.
/r/MGTOW23/05/18 12:48 AM
2

All of society as well.
/r/MGTOW23/05/18 12:44 AM
2

I don't think being dishonest is a good way to change minds. Even if you win - you lose. You don't have to be dishonest to be diplomatic.
/r/MensRights22/05/18 02:04 AM
20

Man shaming is ok.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 02:17 PM
10

I would love to see this in action.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 02:17 PM
25

Feminism considers male sexuality as being inherently bad.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 02:15 PM
6

Women have had a 50% higher college education rate for like, 40 years now. It's long past time to end favoritism.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 01:52 PM
5

If you've got a public education view on feminism that makes sense. Once you realize that historically feminism has always been kinda like it is today, it's apparent that public education presents a narrative history of feminism that is very pro-feminism, and omits anything that isn't glorifying it.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 01:42 PM
5

It never really did. Feminism was always about female empowerment and one thing they strived for was equal or better rights for women. Women already have equal rights; if feminism was purely and exclusively about equal rights, this sub wouldn't even need to exist and feminists would've been marching in the streets demanding equality for men. That ain't happening though; what we have are feminists wanting more power for women, which is natural since its not about equality, but about empowerment. …
/r/MensRights20/05/18 01:40 PM
8

the same way being "anti-mens rights" Feminism. The term for being anti-mens rights is feminism. And its entirely allowed to exist on twitter.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 08:51 PM
7

Its more accurately gendercide then genocide.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 08:48 PM
2

There are no shortage of examples in which feminists fight against equal rights for men. Tell me, how many examples can you show in which more feminists fought for mens rights than against?
/r/MensRights18/05/18 08:28 PM
3

I know many hard working women, including some who work harder and longer hours than me. Thing is, they also make more than I do. When looking at a statistic like 77% female vs male, it ignores entirely how hard a person works. Women on average have a wide variety of factors for why they make less. The big issue with equality here, is that women who work just as hard, just as long and with just as much experience as a man... actually make a little bit more than men do. Take away the gender aspec…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 07:53 PM
7

Those don't impact wages, while the male horses packs are all relevant to wages.
/r/MensRights18/05/18 07:43 PM
17

Feminism in education had induced a certain revisionism that washes a lot of the history of feminism of its more distainful past. It's not that feminism used to be better than it is today, it's that most of us weren't around then, and feminists have rewritten the history books at school to cast feminism of the past in the most generous light possible.
/r/MGTOW16/05/18 02:09 PM
5

They clearly agree with and endorse her message.
/r/MGTOW15/05/18 01:17 PM
3

It's one thing for her to practice hate speech and demand men kill themselves, it's another for her to be keynote speaker for a suicide prevention charity.
/r/MGTOW15/05/18 01:07 PM
0

It's cultural Marxism. It's origins are college feminists (or those who manipulate them) recasting themselves as the oppressed underclass fighting against an oppressive upperclass. Only they've defined women as the underclass and men as the upperclass, and disregard actual economic class.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 01:45 AM
5

Its more the obligation to notify the other person you are withdrawing consent and want to stop.
/r/MGTOW14/05/18 06:09 PM
2

Agreed. I think "faith" in god is just a substitute for "faith" in a system that has impacts that aren't easily understood, or won't be felt for generations. Decades ago we saw the rise of feminism, but it was not the first, second etc time the world had seen it. It seems good (whats wrong with equality?) at first, but rots the foundation of our society and inevitably leads to a fall.
/r/MGTOW14/05/18 02:33 PM
5

Commercials denigrating men existed before 2005 as well. It's been going on for decades. The Commericals are trying to be funny by telling a joke. The men are the punch line. They aren't allowed to use women as the punch line, because feminists would complain. So they use men instead, since feminists don't complain about that, 'cause equality.
/r/MGTOW12/05/18 03:01 PM
1

Commercialist propaganda (advertisements) are indeed a form of propaganda. I doubt there is a truely nefarious end; more likely the desired result is remembering the commercial and overtime being conditioned into remembering the product. It's all about mindshare.
/r/MGTOW12/05/18 02:57 PM
4

I doubt it. We need look no further than alchohol to see that consent is a double standard within feminism. A man that is blackout drunk who gets taken advantage of by a less or non-intoxicated woman is a rape scenario. The woman is still the victim though, even if the dude is passed out, and cannot give consent, the woman can still withdrawn her consent and charge the dude with rape.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 02:00 PM
3

Consent can not been withdrawn retrospectively. Its past existence can be denied in the present. In feminist ideology, there is no statute of limitations on consent; it can be withdrawn in the future, years in the future, based on whim.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 01:57 PM
39

This is why feminists try and have rape defined as purely male; so that they have an out for their double standards. Its the same as saying you can't be sexist against men, and that Misandry isn't a real thing. When confronted with hypocritical double standards, as opposed to self reflection and correction, they just try and redefine words instead. When feminists are confronted with the facts, they abandon honesty and integrity in favor of the illusion of being correct, even going so far as dema…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 01:52 PM
10

A friend of mine (when I was younger) said to be that indecent propositions will be rejected about 7/8-9/10 times. Which sounds bad to dudes who get discouraged by rejection. Otherwise that's like a 10-12% success rate. Proposition 10 women, and there is a fair chance one of them will be DTF. Feminists don't speak for all women, and women being half the population, are a very diverse demographic will all kinds of people who have all kinds of opinions, ideas and desires. Even a minority of women,…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 03:56 PM
14

What I don't understand is what is it exactly do the feminists want in regards to catcalling? Do they want to force people to stop? Yes. That would involve thought and speech policing. Careful, you're making the feminists wet. There can be a case made within the workplace, however, in the public square that would be an infringement on the first amendment. Feminists wouldn't care. They are in that camp of "free to say what I like, not free to say what I don't." So my question still stands, what e…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 03:53 PM
15

Going MGTOW does not phase them. MGTOW isn't about women; its about men.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 03:40 PM
6

You mean r/incels? It got banned awhile back, and now it's members are in other subs like this one. Setting aside the irony of a woman bitching about incels being in a men's subreddit, what did they think would happen when they kicked incels our of their safe space? Of course they are going to go elsewhere.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 03:38 PM
1

Got a link or screencap(s) of some of the good stuff?
/r/MensRights07/05/18 11:41 PM
4

The problem is the unequal standards (advocated by feminists; so much for "equality") of responsibility while intoxicated. Even if she'd on,u had a single drink and he's blackout drunk and wouldn't normally consent, the guy is still to blame and the women isn't blamed.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 06:23 AM
1

English is based on Latin and many of our words reflect that. Misogyny is a combination of misos (hatred) and gyny (female) and does, in fact, mean hatred of women. There is no inclusive link between prejudice and misogyny. You can be prejudiced and not misogynistic and vice versa. Misogyny is actually pretty rare, though it does exist. Just like Misandry (andry=male) exists, but is uncommon.
/r/MGTOW06/05/18 02:56 PM
3

He did, according to the story.
/r/MensRights04/05/18 08:33 AM
6

Delusion is a drug; it can make you happy for the duration of its sweet embrace, but eventually you have to return to reality, and the consequences can be devestating. Recovering addicts and divorcees look back at the shattered remains of their lives, and the good memories that have already faded, and wonder if it was really worth it. Marriage: not even once. Just say no.
/r/MGTOW03/05/18 02:48 PM
2

Sentences served concurrently is effectively standard practice. It's pretty rare to have sentences served consecutively. I have no doubt it isn't a joke as such. That's just the way things typically work and is quite normal.
/r/MGTOW02/05/18 01:30 AM
18

While expecting, and feeling entitled to, the girls getting everything, just like always.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 02:37 PM
11

Well like the exclusive use of male-only playgrounds where girls aren't allowed. Oh wait, it's the other way around.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 02:31 PM
2

IMO its the results of destroying the incels sub. They had to go somewhere and most of reddit is entirely unsympathetic to men in general and harbor an irrational hatred towards incels.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 09:38 PM
6

I doubt they would refuse. Women's hairdressers are typically more expensive and not really a better cut than men. If they are heavily booked they'll still try and work you in. Source: have used women's hairdressers for routine cuts. Was overpriced and of average quality; they didn't balk at all.
/r/MGTOW20/04/18 02:13 PM
3

It's a twitter trend. The idea is that every woman has experienced some form of "sexual abuse" and that any woman who thinks they haven't just needs to relax the standards of what counts until she can say "me too!" The problem of this isn't new; the idea that any accusation against a man is automatically believed, and leads to his social destruction and in some cases suicide. Note that evidence isn't required, and even irrefutable proof that the claim is made up doesn't reverse any of the damage…
/r/MensRights12/04/18 02:32 PM
8

Wouldn't that just be a male only workplace? Even if it was a mix of MGTOW and (to borrow a trumper term) cucks wouldn't it be about the same?
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 03:02 PM
29

Ultimately it's a way of keeping the lower classes in a state of strife against each other. Many of the mega rich have it so well, they only fear an uprising of the power. And it makes them paranoid and induces them to create a surveillance society, to outlaw the ability of the poor to own weapons and to introduce various draconian policies all in a form of class warfare. Or at least that's the way it works historically when the the upper class gets too rich. This is just history repeating itsel…
/r/MGTOW08/04/18 02:30 PM
4

Social justice courts often disallow the accused of presenting evidence in his defense.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 02:47 PM
8

Domestic violence is a good example of this.
/r/MensRights06/04/18 10:42 AM
17

Why are they promoting such a divide in sexes when they’re supposed to be bringing them together. Class warfare. The struggle between classes has been deflected into a struggle (amongst the lower classes) of various political identity groups. Turn women against men and watch everybody forget that class struggle is mostly an economical thing, not a race, gender, political or sexual orientation thing. Yet men are misportrayed as being the substitute for the wealthy class, and women as the oppresse…
/r/MensRights06/04/18 10:39 AM
7

You won't find many who will argue with that. This post is more highlighting how it goes both ways, but nobody cares when a woman (justifiably) makes more than a man, even though histrionic screeching ensues when a man (again, justifiably) makes more than a woman. Most men have long accepted that life ain't fair and we aren't all going to get equal pay. Part of equality of opportunity is acceptance that equally out of outcome isn guaranteed, and that isn't not misogyny, racism etc. purely becaus…
/r/MensRights04/04/18 05:24 PM
32

said UVM debate director Helen Morgan-Parmett. How utterly shocking this would come from a woman with a hyphenated last name.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 07:38 PM
47

I think there is some truth here. It's not an uncommon sentiment that women didn't really come out so well on the (allegedly) equal opportunity workplace. It was great to have 2 incomes, for a generation, but then cost of living adjusted to require 2 incomes. Many working mothers I know would love to have their husbands make 2x and they be homemakers instead of diluting the price of labor and having to balance both work and family. For countless generations one of the most fundamental and import…
/r/MensRights03/04/18 07:34 PM
8

Yes, and it was a good comparison too. Welcome to healthy, non-toxic masculinity. Don't complain about it.
/r/MGTOW02/04/18 10:18 PM
6

Is it whiteknighting to avenge your own daughter? It wasn't some random chick on the Internet...
/r/MGTOW23/03/18 05:28 AM
3

I'd say number one is it is used as a weapon by the democrats in their war against our civil rights. Number two is the idea that its a quick, clean death most of the time and if the alternative after guns are all completely banned by the democrats, is too painful or troublesome then they would suffer longer, perhaps long enough to get better somehow. Though really number two is just an excuse for number one most of the time. It's all about fatcat democrats bankrolling the war against our freedom…
/r/MensRights20/03/18 08:14 PM
2

The right wants to build maximum security asylums for the criminally insane and lock them up in rubber rooms for life before they kill, Minority Report style. Where are you getting that from?
/r/MensRights20/03/18 08:08 PM
9

That's fucked feminism.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 08:04 PM
4

Now before you write me off as a simpleton and muh gun rights. Ok... I'm not saying ban all guns. I just think people should only be able to own bolt action and revolvers Either a simpleton, a tool or both. I didn't write you off immediately, but it only took a couple sentences before you naturally reached that point.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 08:03 PM
17

And that plenty of men who commit suicide are fathers who got screwed by the above. Feminists are totally fine with 'smashing the patriarchy' and destroying the lives of men. Just as long as they don't kill themselves with a gun!
/r/MensRights20/03/18 07:31 PM
18

Why do you think that whole "men are oppressors" and "oppressors can't be victims" train on thought came about? It's not a new argument and they just invented some twisted idea to justify the double standard while trying to pretend like its not actually a double standard.
/r/MensRights19/03/18 06:53 PM
4

This post stands on its own and doesn't rely on TD as any sort of authority or anything. Nobody here is saying "as the Donald once said, there is a YouTube video..." If nobody said anything I wouldn't even notice there was a cross post there.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 09:19 PM
28

Why do you feel that this being posted there invalidates it?
/r/MensRights16/03/18 03:04 PM
5

She might be part Jewish, part Asian or part Native American, all of which would make her a woman of color.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 05:52 PM
2

That short hair looks terrible. Why??
/r/MensRights15/03/18 02:48 AM
5

Seconding this, but mainly because I can barely read it it's so pixelated.
/r/MGTOW15/03/18 01:16 AM
1

Wouldn't that just inspire them to ask 'Are you gay?'
/r/MGTOW06/03/18 03:50 PM
3

I'm not insulting the electorate. I'm stating accurately that they are dumb Pick one.
/r/MGTOW06/03/18 05:52 AM
2

Challenge... declined?
/r/MGTOW06/03/18 05:47 AM
2

Agreed. As long as the prostitution is entirely consensual, I see no conflict between this woman being a feminist and uh, pimping? for prostitutes. And the erotica is protected speech.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 11:15 PM
1

I agree on the neurological part, but on a physical level, I find myself thinking of people in their mid 20's as kids. And a woman in her mid 20's, doesn't seem like a woman in the same way as when I was in my 20's. I often have to check myself in that represent, less I come off as patronizing to younger people.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 10:41 PM
1

Biggest problem I see about the right age, is that it's so subjective. What I thought at 20, 30 and 40 changed. The old math of half your age +7 has been pretty true. When I was a teen, 16-17 seemed old enough. By 30, it seemed like teenagers probably shouldn't have sex, and by 40 the early to mid twenties seem 'too young' to me. I can admit and understand my age bias, but it's hard to set a magic number when everybody looks at things different based on their own age.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 10:00 PM
3

"If you have to even ask why you should vote for Hillary, you're a racist, misogynistic and a nazi beyond redemption, and not even worthy a response." "Lol if you have any question at all about voting dem, you're probably a white male who's going to vote republican anyway. We can win without your vote and we don't want it!"
/r/MensRights04/03/18 08:18 AM
2

Truth is females aren't held to actual aesthetic standards by males, in pretty much any species. I wonder if incels would still be a thing if they were? As is, there isn't a woman so unattractive she can't hook up, assuming she relaxed her standards enough.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 01:46 AM
5

There are entire industries devoted to taking advantage of adult men's own sexual impulses. I remember some stripped being interviewed on HBO or Showtime long time ago, and she was asked about her being a victim of exploitation. Her response was that if anybody was being exploited if was the men. She did her little dance and they just lost their heads and started giving away all their money. Really made me rethink things.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 01:42 AM
2

Yeah I'd say a lot of 14-18 are ready, while many who are 18+ really aren't. The laws exist to take the cautious side just incase. The problem of course is that teenagers have and will continue to disregard such things if they think they are ready, even if they haven't really understood the ramifications of an unplanned pregnancy or an STD.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 01:38 AM
4

Gay men are on the fringe of social justice privilege and very well might receive death threats, which could be acted on.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 01:36 AM
2

I think its important to remember that pedophilia is an exclusive attraction to pre-pubesence. Yes, a pre-pubescent minor doesn't know what they want, but I see a lot of the commentary of this situation is because a woman hooking up with a 14 isn't technically a pedophile, as by 14 most boys have crossed the threshold into being young men. Note: I'm not advocating hooking up with a 14 yo. As far as raping a willing adult, it largely depends upon the woman. As long as she doesn't withdraw consent…
/r/MensRights04/03/18 01:33 AM
2

Age makes a huge difference too. At 14, you'd be considered a man in some cultures, and while you don't have the emotional maturity of an adult, neither do most 18 yo these days. I think very few people would share the same conclusion if the boy were like, 7 or so.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 01:27 AM
2

Ignoring how there are some teenage girls who actually have the same fantasy too. That's the real double standard is my take-away from these situations.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 01:23 AM
2

Feminist objectification, like many common words in social justice, has a pretty loaded meaning. It's generally mutually exclusive with the acceptance of that 'womans*' personhood and humanity. That is, by thinking she's hot, you're objectifying her and saying she's not a person and her only value is a sex object. *Men can't be objectified because objectivification is a form of oppression, men are oppressors and men cannot be oppressed; thus men cannot be objectified.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 01:21 AM
2

I read it as: it isn't allowed to consider a woman pretty.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 01:15 AM
2

Plenty of women help others without expecting something in return, as well as plenty of men who won't do the same? How is this MGTOW?
/r/MGTOW03/03/18 03:48 PM
4

If they are less white, then that's a good thing, since it reduces whiteness and increases diversity. An unspoken goal is to reduce white populations in white majority countries in order to promote multiculturalism and diversity.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 03:03 PM
8

Yeah. An immutable characteristic like being black isn't the same thing as a faith-based doctrine.
/r/MensRights03/03/18 03:01 PM
2

Often enough a man who encounters warmth from another man will receive it as a genuine kindness, and reciprocate. I think a big difference with women is they receive warmth from a man as either something they are entitled to via female privilege, or that the man is hitting on/sexually harressing her, and deserves or requires a cold response to put him in his place. The advantage of being the choosing gender is all the men come to you, while the disadvantage of being the choosing gender is that a…
/r/MensRights25/02/18 01:50 PM
2

Did you mean competitiveness? I'm not sure what you're envisioning for incivility directly inducing higher productivity.
/r/MensRights25/02/18 01:44 PM
3

If an article on the Internet showing men aren't to blame for everything is all it takes to shake your faith in equal rights for men, are you really "all for supporting men" in the first place?
/r/MensRights25/02/18 01:25 PM
1

The freedom to do something that has a risk, isn't the same thing as promoting that risk.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 03:53 PM
3

I later found out towards the end of my job (I got a better job so resigned) that majority of the female teachers were on 20% more than the men, absolutely disgusted me.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 06:52 PM
11

Employers don't pay employees for effort; they pay them for results. If a woman does "work twice as hard" for the same results she deserves equal payment for equal results. The effort factor isn't important to employer though.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 06:47 PM
2

Not anti-woman, but anti-relationship I would think. I think people mistakenly think pence is MGTOW even though he isn't.
/r/MGTOW15/12/17 01:51 AM
1

Within the heart of every InCel is a strong independent man who don't need no woman. They just need help finding that inner strength. Of all the redditor demographics, I can't think of one that needs this sub more than incels. If incels were caterpillars, this sub would be about how to become a butterfly. I, for one, welcome ex-incels looking to be their own men.
/r/MGTOW12/12/17 02:44 PM
9

It's fine, as a man, to be as emotional as you want to be. It's your life. The problem comes when women want to dictate to men how emotional they should be, specifically but not exclusively, when they say men should be more emotional while at the same time disrespecting men who are more emotional.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 08:37 PM
40

Double standards. I didn't mention should. When it comes to legal consequences "should" doesn't matter; reality is all that matters. Feel free to punch out women as a man to prove me wrong.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 03:49 PM
59

Are you a woman? Yes, but possibly with consequences. No? Definitely not.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 02:55 PM
28

He's mocking racism = power + privilege that social justice espouses. It's worth noting that while they are putting forth this alternative definition of racism, that it's definitions of "power" and "privilege" are also alternative versions of the common English words "power" and "privilege." While the social justice definition of power is complex, it can be crudely summarized as institutional power, as opposed to individual power. Effectively: women don't control every aspect of society so they …
/r/MensRights09/12/17 02:55 PM
21

This is the best advice in the thread. Normally I'd leave it at upvote, but this demands more. Make sure you are diplomatic and empathetic about it; such a thing can be very emotional for women and it's a touchy subject. Definitely have this talk, and if she gets pregnant after refusing plan B, definitely dump her and demand a paternity test to make absolutely sure it's yours. You'll be paying for this mistake for a couple decades so it's worth making sure it's yours.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 01:57 AM
3

Very well said and observed. Male role models are quite rare these days, which makes them all the more valuable. That feminist complained about not seeing a female teacher as a role model, but that isn't the same thing as young boys do have female role models much as young girls have male role models. They aren't the same thing though, and while its perfectly fine to have female role models as a young boy; its even more important to have male role models. We live in a society that tells young gi…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 07:53 PM
5

Men used to not be able to go topless either. They had to fight for that right; they did and won. The sexualization of the male chest has been vastly reduced as a result. Most men don't care. Some women have fought the same battle, however, the sexualization of the female breasts is a very powerful thing for women, and so its not nearly as universally accepted as a good thing. Many women don't want to give up that power just so they can normalize female toplessness.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:57 PM
1

The idea, and to be clear I'm not saying I agree, is that its encouraging to see "your gender" succeed and to know that its possible. Seeing mostly men implies (not proves) that its harder for women to succeed at that level and is discouraging to women.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:53 PM
1

Male privilege is a social justice term and means something similar yet different than the normal meaning of the word.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:48 PM
1

Privilege is one of those newspeak words that has a different meaning that makes it confusing to understand to the uninitiated. Privileges are usually advantages that you earn. In social justice, a privilege is a disadvantage somebody else has that you don't, based off nothing you've done and is unavoidable. The basis of privilege is white privilege, and it comes from rich and sheltered white college students being so sheltered from hardship they don't understand what it means to be black and po…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:27 PM
1

You mean his policy of never being alone with a woman unless its his wife? He will be with women when his wife isn't around, as long as there is somebody else around too.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:42 PM
2

Men feel like we have a right to not have our rights dismissed as just 'men's feelings.' You can definitely put that in your report. I just spent a bunch of time replying to some other feminist woman, got most of the post crunched due to word limit and she deleted her post by the time I finished. You can check my recent post history and read it. Not sure how much it'd answer you since it was a slightly different topic, but at least I wouldn't have completely wasted my time if you found some valu…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 10:29 AM
1

I've typed out far too much in a passing comment and lost a good chunk due to max word limit. But I think the principled part is the best place to start. I remember in high school I had an English teacher who bad mouthed men. I had several in fact, but one specific class there was a young woman who always talked back, asking why it was ok to say such things and pointing out it wouldn't be ok if the roles were reversed. I always had mad respect for her. The guys would get suspended for such back …
/r/MensRights18/11/17 09:58 AM
2

I don't normally post here but I find this an interesting question asked in a civil manner so I'll throw in my perspective So going back to basic principles, let's assume that feminists genuinely do want equality for women. Principle is a good word, and I think that's the fundamental difference. Most feminists are unprincipled and while I've met my fair share or principled feminists, they are a minority amongst the self-declared feminists. I think part of that is many women who have a principled…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 09:56 AM
2

As I understand it, he had morning after wake up sex with her without using a condom. She started to worry about STD after a few days but he was off the grid and unavailable for contact. After she went to the police to get help contacting him they files charges the first time. She objected (allegedly) to the charges and they were dropped the first time. The current suspicion (there are no charges currently) is probably political. They can't easily charge him for rape as the woman is unwilling to…
/r/MensRights20/12/10 11:41 PM
1

I don't know if it possible, but I can't think of a way. A year long leave of absence is a pretty big deal. As I understand it, there aren't many jobs for professional scientists compared to amount of prospective scientists wanting to enter the field. Pregnancy is an optional part of a woman's life. She might want to have a career and have a family, but that is a desire, and isn't a mandatory thing. Take gender out of the equation for a moment. Should a woman who has 3 children, and took the tim…
/r/MensRights30/11/10 11:52 PM
3

But... if men choose that stance and we get it... won't we be in the exact same boat but with women getting the short end of the stick again? Sure, if we repeal everything and go back to the way it was. As Bosniac32 noted, the goal is still equal rights for everyone. The point of creating inequality by the feminist movement, to my knowledge, was to change the way future generations think about these things. As a post-feminist Liberal, who believes in equal rights, it has succeeded. The pendulum …
/r/MensRights28/11/10 08:42 PM
7

Isn't that exactly what feminists say to justify their special treatment? Yep. They also got that special treatment; that's why men's rights need more protection at the moment.
/r/MensRights28/11/10 05:55 PM
5

...false rape accusations and alimony and a loss of economic rights is what you get for having ancestors you've never met and can't name that were born into privilege that you never enjoyed because you aren't rich. FTFY Feel free to blame me for how I was born. Judge me based on the color of my skin. Judge me based on my gender. But, recognize that since i've never enjoyed the wonderous privileges of which you speak, that I didn't live as a king 1,000 years ago with a harem and slaves, that I fe…
/r/MensRights27/11/10 11:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter