TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ishouldbepolite Archive

View 0 posts and 32 comments by Ishouldbepolite on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

No, there are no men accusing Cardi B. There was a single man who posted a story on social media but immediately laughed off the idea when contacted, said it was a hoax he lifted from another person. And then that other person also went on the record as the story being made up. Meanwhile about 60+ victims of Cosby gave direct actuatable evidence in the form of sworn statements, and even Cosby himself supported by statement in official investigations the idea that he drugged women, but denied tha…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 04:21 PM
1

If she did it. Even if you ignore the 60+ victims victim accounts, Cosby himself when asked about his cases in a court gave more direct actuatable proof and incriminating evidence about him drugging women, then she gave in that interview. We've only have her untrustworthy words in this regard in a setting where bragging about crimes you didn't commit is common place. Cosby alluded to drugging women against their knowledge in one of his cases (but claimed it wasn't for rape) While I myself wouldn…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 04:01 PM
2

If it happened. We've got proof that with Cosby it did. But there is currently no proof that'll stand up in court that Carli B did. the guy that "came forward" was a self admitted hoaxster who immediately said it was made up when people started asking and that he stole the story from another person, who also says they made it up in response to hearing her claim. Meanwhile carli B will say while questioned is that she was bragging for image reasons as an entertainment figure. Which might actually…
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 03:41 PM
0

So besides lying on the facts of the case you're also too retarded to understand that a jury unable to reach a verdict means something different then that she lied. Moron.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 02:11 PM
-1

I love how you're leaving about half of the article out. So by now you're just lying to keep your little fantasy alive. Not interested in your intellectual dishonest bullshit. Bye felicia.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 06:35 PM
-1

Jesus fuck. You literally know fuck all about the situation and are making random stuff up so you can declare her a liar. Seriously read the fucking article first before humiliating yourself. Ignorant moron.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 04:06 PM
1

laying on top. Laying not sitting or riding. You're the one that made up she was riding. But you knew that. You're just dishonest.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 01:16 PM
0

Oh, I must have dozed off and unwittingly mistaken an article about a specific trend for an article where two women got an appropriate punishment according to normal sentencing guidelines for a terrible crime. No, wait. I didn't.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 11:16 AM
-1

Yeah that would be retarded, so why are you calling me that, instead of your fellow retards?
/r/MensRights22/09/17 06:55 AM
-1

You might wish that was the case, but it isn't. people have been using this specific case as an example of women getting lesser punishment. So now you can start angrily calling names and try to twist things but you're just full of bullshit.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 06:26 AM
1

You do realize that you can shift people around when they're out right? Especially if they're already right against you to start out with. Not to mention that you don't actually have to support somebody completely and can prop somebody up with pillows and blankets. But no worries, I get that your mind is already made up and has settled on the outcome you personally like best.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 11:48 PM
1

While passed out?
/r/MensRights21/09/17 11:07 PM
1

Seeing your comment history and just how much hate you have for things and people I am amazed. Especially when seeing the type of things you hate. Thanks!
/r/MensRights21/09/17 11:01 PM
1

And again somebody who doesn't get the difference between a specific case (The one we're talking about) and statistics! Good grief.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 10:46 PM
1

Good grief, we're talking about a specific case here...
/r/MensRights21/09/17 10:41 PM
1

It does, cheers though.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 07:05 PM
2

Np worries and I get it, I just also think there is some gender related hostility mixed in as well.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 06:47 PM
1

Yeah, that's brain damage and it's a horrible crime. Not denying that, but the charge is specifically that a man would get 3 times as much time for it, while this would be a very standard judgement against men too. This case isn't on this sub because it's actually related to mensrights, it's because they are horrible hateable women.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 06:11 PM
-4

You can argue all you want. The law has specific definitions and is following those. And in this case those definitions have nothing to do with this sub.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 06:03 PM
0

I don't think he was, because not a single person treated it like that untill after getting called out on it. Have you even read the other comments, they clearly where mad at women. I think you're covering a whole lot of bad behaviour in this sub with the mantle of love for your cause. I agree with you that many issues men face are underadressed. That's why I'm happy with the other subreddit discussing men's lib. issues, where you can discuss the actual topics with out all the hate against the o…
/r/MensRights21/09/17 06:02 PM
3

I am arguing that unlike what originally was said this isn't an example of it. And you're reply is... "You're wrong! because in other cases it still exists" You're right it does, but this post has still fuck all to do mensrights.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 05:53 PM
-1

How strange that nobody before being called out on that said as such. Nope instead they were arguing that it was pussypjass material. Only after people from the Frontpage came in people like you try to pretend it was meant as proof of equality instead of an op portunity to get angry at horrible "females". So yeah... These women are pretty easy to hate. But let's not pretend this was posted for any other reason
/r/MensRights21/09/17 05:34 PM
0

That was the whole point of the person I reacted too. You know? The comment I left where you said I was wrong saying that men wouldn't get 3 times the time directly? Seriously do you even read the comments you replied to?
/r/MensRights21/09/17 05:31 PM
0

And that's relevant for this post how? Why not post such a case instead then?
/r/MensRights21/09/17 05:28 PM
0

Strange that people only began to argue that after being called upon it. Before it was just a rage fest with people arguing it was pussypass material. And even now plenty still argue men would have gotten more.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 05:27 PM
1

Why then is the vast majority arguing these people got off too lightly and that men would have gotten 3 times as much? From what people actually are saying it's clear that the majority of them didn't upvote because of that.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 05:24 PM
-5

That's because the death penalty is not murder just like manslaughter isn't. According to the law you are wrong and since we are talking about equality before the law that is the whole fucking point.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 05:22 PM
-5

So studies done on general trends prove that in this specific case men would get 60 years? Yeah, that's not how statistics work sparky
/r/MensRights21/09/17 05:04 PM
6

So wait, your guess is this is posted here for people to get angry about because it was dealt with equally? That would still be bizarre.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:49 PM
17

Is that so? I did an google check and a 20 years jail term it's almost always either multiple victims or murder. So yeah. This doesn't seem to have jackshit to do with gender.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:31 PM
-8

It's not. But what the fuck does it has to do with men's right?
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:17 PM
-13

And what do you have to show for your idea that men would get 3 times more time for this? Gutfeelings aren't exactly proof you know. Male murderers often get 20 years and that's for outright murder.
/r/MensRights21/09/17 03:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter