~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Ashley MadisonAh ok. I was under the impression you had to pay just to get access. Understandable, but their revenue format was actually quite clever given the sort of site they were running. Like nightspots, AM knew women were there draw, and that they don't like paying for shit. Their revenue came from suckers (men) buying bundles of credits, which could be used to contact other users (women.) If a woman using AM was even the least bit cagey, she wouldn't have to part with much in the way of identifying inf… | /r/TheRedPill | 30/08/15 07:20 PM |
| 1 | Ashley MadisonThere may be some women online, but many of those are unattractive and older women with baggage and massive entitlement. That was pretty much AM (and similar "alt lifestyle" sites) in general - a sausage fest that gave even the most mediocre looking middle-aged broads an inflated sense of self worth. It turns out desperate guys will fuck anything with a pulse. As we're all aware, most women make wildly incorrect inferences from this sort of behavior. | /r/TheRedPill | 30/08/15 07:10 PM |
| 18 | Ashley MadisonWhy would they spend money on a site, when they could walk outside and get it for free. They weren't paying. AM's business model basically created a free-for-all for sloots. Women were not the ones paying for credits to initiate contact with potential partners. This is one of the reasons why this hack is so lite on information about female users. It's not simply because a large number of female accounts were fake, or that the place had significantly more male users. Unless someone was unfortunat… | /r/TheRedPill | 30/08/15 06:55 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter