TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Istronomius Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by Istronomius on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Cool so you have the same criticisms for the girl scouts too then? Because they exclude boys
/r/MensRights23/03/26 12:55 PM
2

The other side also never addresses the contradiction of men preferring larger breasts, asses, wide hips, etc in women because those are mature traits and it destroys their argument Just like how muscles and height would destroy your hypothetical argument (I know you're making a point) They hyperfocus on specific preferences from men because they're misandrists
/r/MensRights20/03/26 02:21 PM
2

How? He's pointing out double standards if you read the full post. Nowhere is he actually calling women pedos for liking these traits
/r/MensRights20/03/26 02:19 PM
2

The other side has counter examples too What about men liking curvy women with big asses and breasts? Those are mature traits, some even developing more after childbirth Yet people hyperfocus in young traits that men prefer to call them pedos If you read OP's post in full, they're pointing out hypocrisy and double standards, not actually accusing women of being pedos for liking these traits
/r/MensRights20/03/26 02:19 PM
2

What is incorrect about what they're saying?
/r/MensRights20/03/26 02:16 PM
3

Here's an alternate explanation than just "ur fat" You probably also have minimal ab musculature. Try training your abs directly You need muscle to show it lol
/r/seduction01/10/24 08:08 PM
9

I find those subs are very ban happy if you disagree with them enough One or two comments and it's just a deluge of downvotes But any more disagreement and you risk a ban And I don't even mean espousing any ideology. It's simple stuff like "I don't agree this is an example of a badly written/drawn woman and here's why". As expected, it's an echo chamber.
/r/MensRights12/08/24 03:52 PM
19

That's TERF home base, does it surprise you? Lol
/r/MensRights03/08/24 01:03 AM
12

Lesbians have passion without sex, which is where the violence comes from. And like most women, they have a strong need to make a home This doesn't logically follow though. Why would passion without sex result in violence? IMO the best explanation for higher domestic violence rates among lesbians is because women tend to report it more, or are more aware of what constitutes domestic violence (for example, a man might think "she only hit me once a week, it's not abuse") Since there's two women in…
/r/MensRights01/08/24 09:45 PM
14

Imagine if the comments were praising War Machine for beating up his wife Christy Mack for cheating You'd see a trillion video essayists speaking about how misogynistic society is. A strange double standard always arises when it comes to physical assault for cheating.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 08:18 PM
29

It's interesting how they try everything in their power to center men as the oppressors and women as oppressed; can't let men have a slice of the oppression pie. Essentially: if you suffer, it's your fault, if I suffer, it's your fault too. I usually like to respond to these arguments with "is it zionism when neo-nazis burn down a synagogue as well?" Crickets every time.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 10:09 AM
6

Is that really because of 4B tho? Most developed countries have an issue with population decline from various socioeconomic reasons Believing this is the cause of 4B just affirms the false belief that Korea is experiencing population decline because of misogyny.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 04:14 PM
10

I'd say it has more in common with MGTOW
/r/MensRights22/07/24 04:10 PM
0

"I'll" is short for "I" will They are admitting to being mentally ill lmao
/r/MensRights22/07/24 04:08 PM
4

Homophobia is misogyny I find this claim strange coming from them because in almost all instances the legal penalty for gay sex is worse than the one for lesbian sex. And most homophobia is aimed at men anyways. Listen to homophobic preachers talk, It's almost always something about men. I left another comment in this thread about it, but it really feels like a slave master claiming they're actually the oppressed ones rather than the slaves because the slaves have free food and shelter.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 06:55 PM
5

I have heard arguments that discrimination against men who receive anal sex is essentially a form of misogyny because the man is sexually receptive in the same manner as a woman I've noticed this strange dichotomy more as time goes on. Another example of this is the claim that women are oppressed because the English language has exclusive nouns for female members of a profession, but the male ones can be applied to both sexes (actor vs actress for example) But you can easily argue how that's act…
/r/MensRights21/07/24 06:52 PM
2

However, instead of directing their efforts towards criticisms of and activism against capitalism, nationalism, patriarchy, and other oppressive systems that are the cause of those issues, they simply blame women and feminism for their problems. They don't always blame feminists for their problems. A lot of their criticisms are against internalized misandry. Esp with stuff like combat slavery and male genital mutilation. Sometimes feminists are actually to blame. The Duluth model (which allows p…
/r/MensRights17/07/24 12:22 PM
9

Obviously because of patriarchy! /s
/r/MensRights17/07/24 11:10 AM
2

People would react differently to a scene of a man shoving a woman down stairs, and hearing her loudly thump against the floor, as horrifying And this sub would (rightfully) criticize those people as this isn't a case of misogyny. You're doing the same thing FemFreq did with these Sarkeesian level takes. Your line of reasoning is only valuable when responding to Sarkeesian lvl takes to illustrate their insanity. You don't want to end up like them, because it will in turn make their claims valid …
/r/MensRights15/07/24 08:51 PM
11

I think it's important for us to avoid bringing up stuff like this unless it's a response to some FemFreqency lvl takes to illustrate how ridiculous their points are. For example, some of those ppl will claim that violence against women in media is shown oftentimes in a more gruesome manner and more frequently, which they deem as misogyny Stuff that OP pointed out is a great response to that. But if you bring it up unprovoked you're actually opening yourself up to attack with the same insane fem…
/r/MensRights15/07/24 02:56 PM
1

Although I agree "patriarchy" doesn't exist, this is a poor argument. They can easily argue it's just not as severe in the west at least, and thus women can get away with stuff like this. Use the Socratic method instead. The best argument against them is to bring up a couple men's rights issues (genital mutilation, conscription) and ask them to prove it's due to the patriarchy. They will give some points, but you should then elaborate further what proof they have for these issues being caused by…
/r/MensRights13/07/24 12:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter