TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ItsKaptainKilljoy Archive

View 1 post and 96 comments by ItsKaptainKilljoy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

DiscussionItsKaptainKilljoy/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 10:01 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I think women believe marriage will change their man, and that it will make their relationship "feel" a certain way. When their man doesn't change, and marriage doesn't feel the way they expected, they get disappointed and bounce. I'm basing this on what my ex-wife told me, what my brother's ex told him, and countless other stories I've come across.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 09:30 PM
3

Well said
/r/MensRights12/08/21 06:16 PM
8

It's just cultural lag. Everyone is fighting to change a situation that existed 15 years ago.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 01:08 AM
1

What is with dudes seducing their friends' partners? "hoes before bros" seems to be SOP, apparently.
/r/MGTOW217/06/21 06:47 PM
8

I feel like these articles are motivated by the fear that if we start paying attention to group X we will stop paying attention to group Y. Ironically, the more you try to control what people pay attention to, the LESS credence you enjoy in the eyes of the public.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 12:46 AM
3

As a species, we have a difficult time understanding problems that are interactional - i.e. the aggregate result of multiple individuals reacting to each other. We’re always looking for a single individual to blame - either the dad or the mom. Some people look at single moms and are like “what did she do to end up as a single mom” or saying “what did the dad do wrong to push her away?” Maybe it’s the sum result of two people making less-than-ideal choices in response to each other? Sometimes two…
/r/MensRights08/05/21 11:06 PM
1

The OP acknowledges the differences in feminist ideology, but there is also broad disagreement about strategy. Sex-positive and sex-negative feminists agree on a lot of ideological grounds, but subscribe to different strategies about how women should react to sex. Do you topple the patriarchy by burning your bra or looking fantastic in it? Does prostitution exemplify sex slavery or female entrepreneurialism? Depends on who you ask. There are feminists who agree about the patriarchy but disagree …
/r/MensRights06/05/21 10:06 PM
3

I’d marry her too after all that. I’m happy for you, man. You found one of the good ones.
/r/MGTOW201/05/21 10:49 PM
1

The only conclusion I reach from stuff like this is that everyone is terrible.
/r/MensRights30/04/21 11:02 PM
1

I agree that actions like dating, having sex, and marrying someone mean something, but I don’t think they mean what you think they mean. It doesn’t mean “complete acceptance of the romantic partner.” Women stay in sexual relationships even though they aren’t sexually satisfied by their partner. Women stay in committed relationships even though they aren’t emotionally satisfied. Lots of marriages out there have dead bedrooms, infidelity, toxicity, deception, boredom, conflict - and we know about …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 08:32 PM
3

Reminds me of the quote from the Sufi port Rumi: “life is a balance of holding on and letting go.”
/r/MGTOW225/03/21 09:27 PM
8

I really appreciate your post - I feel like you've taken something really, really complicated and simplified it into a centralized concept.
/r/MGTOW213/02/21 03:21 AM
2

"I've never seen a man red pill in real time" is the funniest thing I've read on this sub. Kudos.
/r/MGTOW208/02/21 11:08 PM
2

You can't go through life freaking out about 16 opinions. If it was 16 upvotes I'd say the same thing.
/r/MGTOW208/02/21 10:19 PM
3

To quote Don Draper, love is something invented by marketing companies to sell nylons. The idea that you are supposed to accomplish all of your social needs with a romantic partner is a social construct - and a very recent one, dating back to the mid 1800s at the earliest. For instance, If you were a Roman soldier, you'd spend 25 years of your life roaming the world with your comrades, and visit your wife only on rare hiatuses until you retired. I've found that having friends, family and dogs ar…
/r/MGTOW204/02/21 01:57 AM
3

If I could go back in time and prevent my marriage to my ex wife, I would. I'd go back and prevent myself from ever meeting her. And I don't hate her, I think she's awesome. We had fun adventures, we had a relatively amicable divorce, and we've salvaged a semi-awkward friendship. But meeting an awesome person wasn't worth the divorce. I could also list 100 silver linings and lessons I gleaned from the situation. But wisdom isn't worth all the pain, stress, and damage to my body. I've been diagno…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/21 01:42 AM
10

It sounds like OP is assuming sexual selection results in "superior" species. Even Darwin noted that's not necessarily the case. Peacocks would probably be a lot more likely to survive if peahens chose "speed" or "size" instead of "a giant fucking fan tail that makes males slow and conspicuous to predators." There are also female fish that choose male fish for arbitrary reasons like colorful scales that seem to boil down to "sheer whimsy" and actually make the next generation LESS likely to surv…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 10:24 PM
8

Let's say you have two roommates : Tony and Thor. Tony is rich and sort of likes Pizza, while Thor is poor and loves Pizza. Tony can afford all the pizza he wants, but he only wants it twice a month. Thor wants Pizza all the time, but can only get it by mooching off Tony, so Thor only gets Pizza twice a month. Tony is privileged in the sense that he has access to as much Pizza as he wants. He never has to deal with wanting Pizza, but not having it. However, I would concede that Thor is privilege…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 02:27 AM
4

Both genders have a pretty narrow window of being dateable. We can haggle and hairsplit about the exact details of that, but big picture: we pack a lot of pressure and expectations and hopes into a 10 - 15 year period of our life span. If you live to be 70, that dateable period is only like 20% of your life. I think we should all be complaining about our common enemy here : biology. Biology fucks us all.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 01:07 AM
1

Interesting research.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 11:50 PM
2

I think OP is ignoring the biological component. Biology throws a giant wrench into men and women’s attempts to love and connect to each other. Cheating causes astronomical pain and suffering every day. People who get cheated on don’t deserve it, they’re often really great people and partners. Cheating happens because it accomplishes a biological imperative, by diversifying your reproductive portfolio, so to speak. If we all focused solely on love and validation and respect, we could just look f…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/20 02:02 AM
1

Yup
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/20 04:01 AM
2

In existentialist philosophy, this vengefulness is called ressentiment. It’s almost as if the ego can only repair itself by invalidating the person who damaged it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/20 08:17 AM
2

No argument there
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/20 07:01 AM
13

So your answer is to do what society says, but just go a little further? Own three houses instead of one? Past 75K, more income doesnt = more happiness. Life isn't about endlessly climbing a social hierarchy, because comparing yourself to other people will ALWAYS make you unhappy, even if you become a billionaire. I think money is important for achieving things you want - family, health, security, travel, fun experiences, or philanthropy or something. But if you approach it as a way to outpace o…
/r/MGTOW209/11/20 12:02 AM
3

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/20 09:59 AM
4

No one should feel obligated to give money, and no one should feel entitled to get money. Same goes for sex, or attention, or commitment. In a healthy relationship, everything should be voluntary. That's what the sociologist Anthony Giddens calls "a pure relationship." It's an ideal, obviously, but that's what people should be striving towards.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/20 08:38 AM
2

Drop the mic!
/r/MGTOW209/10/20 11:46 PM
1

I’m frustrated with late-stage capitalism, but I still go to work every day. The system has me by the balls because a) I need to put food on the table and b) I’m just an individual : powerless to evoke systemic change on my own. I can't change the system, and I can't rewrite my own biological imperatives. So I go to work. Everyone is just responding to incentivization structures. The current situation OP brings up is not the fault of IG models, and it's not the fault of men who look at them. The…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/20 04:00 AM
2

Well you don’t have to have sex with models to learn your way around a clitoris. All men can gain experience from whoever theyre sleeping with, as long as they ask questions and can take constructive criticism with aplomb. I’m sure some women are turned off by a guy saying “what do you want?”, Especially if she’s a sub. But I think there are waaaaay more women who would leap at the chance to be able to say “a little more to the left” and have their guy actually take the advice. Experience in and…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/20 07:30 AM
2

I don’t have a lot of sexual experience with women, but all the experience I have came from asking questions. “Do you like this? How can I do this better? What do you want me to do?” I’ve gotten a Lot of quivering and shaking from my exes by just doing what they said they wanted, rather than making assumptions. So no, I don’t think men suck at sex because “they work so darn much and don’t have time.” It doesn’t take a lot of time to ask a girl what she likes, or read an online forum where women …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/20 07:05 AM
5

I think women have a higher capacity for sexual self-control than men do. They’re more pragmatic about it. That might be partly because women have more to lose. I think that’s also why women are more careful about STDs and contraception than men are, and are more likely to turn down sex even with someone they’re attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 03:53 AM
7

I’m sorry
/r/MGTOW228/09/20 10:21 PM
1

A growth rate that’s slowing its acceleration can still be a lot of growth if you’re starting at a high point. From 2018 to 2019, the American economy’s growth rate shrunk from 5.4% to 4.1%. But that means It still grew by $848 billion dollars. With a) the population levels were facing, even with the declines you mentioned, b) increased levels of consumerism and 3) higher life expectancy, our planet is facing a serious problem. We need populations to start shrinking if we’re also going to be pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/20 01:50 PM
1

Obviously they mean not having kids is LESS selfish than having them. Obviously, we’re all intrinsically selfish for wanting to continue existing and expending resources on ourselves. Theres a spectrum of selfishness, you know.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/20 01:27 PM
2

Damn. Drop the mic
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 10:04 AM
1

Your story about trauma is very relatable. As George Bernard Shaw once said, a second marriage is the triumph of hope over experience.
/r/MGTOW207/07/20 01:30 PM
1

Let's try an example. Let's say that there's two criminals on trial for embezzling money or whatever, and you're on the jury. Both men know they embezzled the money, they're firsthand witnesses and their testimony would shed some light on what happened. But what if the first guy is in denial of what he did and why he did it. He's tortured by cognitive dissonance, and so his mind constructs a narrative that says he wasn't really embezzling, he was just borrowing with the full intention of putting…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/20 10:49 PM
1

It is not logical to take people at their word. The mind frequently misrepresents its thoughts and motivations, in order to a) just feel better about itself or b) navigate social contexts and gain social rewards. Here are some examples: Misrepresenting ourselves to ourselves: introspection illusion illusory superiority egocentric bias Misrepresenting ourselves to others: impression management theory virtue signalling social desirability bias Since people cannot be trusted to represent their thou…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/20 02:46 AM
8

Yes, N-count itself doesn't tell us the reason why. But it almost seems like what you're saying is that N-count can be an indirect red flag - it can indicate that something traumatic occurred preceding the casual phase. One reason people engage in casual strs is because they are going through a phase where they need to control the terms of relationship, in ways that shield them from emotional risk. That's not what it always means, but that's what it can mean. I'm one of those young divorced peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/20 10:30 PM
2

Im very passionate about fallacies, so don't take this as like an angry rant, I'm not coming from a place of judgment or emotion. I'm just about to nerd out, lol. 1) FAE is about situational attributions versus personality attributions. You can speculate about bad faith using either. Either "that man is lying because of the situation he's in," or"hes lying because he's just a liar." Even if FAE says were more likely to do the latter, that doesn't mean bad faith assumptions are about FAE. 2) What…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/20 10:01 PM
5

I agree with what you're saying about the difference in validation, and that's why I'm not freaked out women's N-count, but I think the female advantage in dating also means that women have more opportunities to fall in and out of love and get their heartbroken before they settle down with a guy their age. Some boyfriend / girlfriend relationships are so intense, it feels like a divorce when they breakup. And that's a problem. When a 28 year old woman marries a 28 year old man, chances are, she'…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/20 09:30 PM
1

Do you have any historical examples?
/r/MGTOW224/06/20 11:32 PM
1

I agree with the overall sentiment that social interaction is becoming more risky against the backdrop of cancel culture and the Internet. The cost/benefit analysis is shifting towards the cost column. And the cost column was already pretty dense. However, becoming a grey man to the degree OP recommends bears its own risks and opportunity costs, just like every choice in life. People don't trust you when they don't know anything about you. We become suspicious of people who appear to be conceali…
/r/MGTOW223/06/20 04:41 AM
17

I think you're right that women are motivated to downplay these trends, but that's because they're human, not because they're female. Humans in general have an "extremely strong, pathological need to feel good about themselves". It's called an "ego," and everyone's got one. There's an excellent theory about this phenomenon called "impression management theory." The research suggests both genders engage in impression management, while using varying tactics. For instance, women wear makeup and jew…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/20 01:01 AM
1

Someone said all civilizations throughout history were destroyed by feminism. I said, "I'm not a fan of feminism, but from a historical perspective, that's simply not true." I was banned immediately.
/r/MGTOW221/06/20 06:20 AM
1

Well said.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/20 12:20 AM
14

I don't think commitment or marriage can be used as a gauge of other people's mental health. A more precise barometer of mental health night be whether people are actually happily married - or happily single with many close relationships. Commitment doesn't necessarily mean you're a well-adjusted person. Lots of people get married for the wrong reasons - social legitimacy and "appearances," an anxiety about being alone, a desire to raise kids combined with the mistaken belief that marriage is th…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/20 06:43 PM
3

That makes sense to me
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/20 06:20 PM
6

Well, the way OP is talking about "the laws that are being passed, the ideologies being formulated", that sounded like a silly "cabals meeting in smoky rooms" argument to me. How would women find common ground over access to a scarce pool of powerful men? Sexuality and romance already activate very primal, possessive and competitive emotions in people - not exactly the sort of mindset that leads to strategic collaborative activism. There was already a lot of infighting within feminist activists …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/20 11:41 PM
6

Obviously, individual powerful men and pretty women look for ways to gain access to each other. It's like how Aristotle Onassis said "without women, all the money in the world would have no meaning." But that's a statement about individuals pursuing their own goals. Aristotle Onassis didn't rig society so he could fuck Jackie O. He realized he lived inside a society where rich men get laid, and made a bunch of money to get laid. Jackie O realized she lived in a society where only a powerful man …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/20 10:58 PM
20

I think your argument is punching above its weight by inferring a top-level social restructuring from the fact that reporters talk to athletes. It's like saying Halloween is proof that children are orchestrating society behind the scenes so they can get more candy. I think society is an emergent phenomenon, arising organically from the interactions of billions of people. At its core, it's not designed or organized by anyone. We're a bunch of selfish animals collaborating when it suits us, and vy…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/20 09:42 PM
9

Interesting - I learned something
/r/MensRights11/06/20 10:30 AM
52

Theres a name for this bias, it is called ultimate attribution error "It is also the belief that positive acts performed by ingroup members are as a result of their personality, whereas, if an ingroup member behaves negatively (which is believed to be rare), it is a result of situational factors."
/r/MensRights10/06/20 08:52 PM
4

If someone is tameable, they're not strong, and if someone is strong, they're not going to be tameable.
/r/MGTOW208/06/20 10:42 AM
3

The real mistake is expecting an artificially constructed social system to be capable of maintaining a chocolate meritocracy. The idea of America is you work hard and receive a proportional amount of chocolate, but the reality is, no one gets the chocolate they deserve, and no one deserves the chocolate they get. When chocolate systems are intrinsically unfair, then logically, everyone should stop deriving their sense of self-worth from that system, whether they're male or female. If you care ab…
/r/MGTOW208/06/20 10:18 AM
2

Everyone IS complaining about shameless male thirst. Women complain about fuckboys all the time- as they should. Feminists talk about the "male gaze." #MeToo is about making thirsty men who harass women accountable for reprehensible actions. Laws like Title IX protect college women from stalking. The Bumble app was created to protect women from a tsunami of messages. PUAs talk about "outcome independence." Red pill talks about "taking pussy off the pedestal" and avoiding "one-itis." MGTOW is abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/20 05:20 AM
1

"It takes a village to destroy a child." Damn. That's heavy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/20 11:55 PM
1

Yeah it all boils down to ingroups and outgroups. People feel a sense of loyalty to their gender, almost like a football team. Men and women are like the Eagles and the Cowboys. It's really hard for people to simultaneously acknowledge that both men and women face challenges and disadvantages. Maybe it's mental laziness. Maybe it's just simpler to separate everyone into "us vs. them" and call it a day, then it is to confront the complexity of reality.
/r/MensRights28/05/20 09:35 AM
3

I agree with the first half of your point but you lost me at the end. Second wave feminists used to say, "the personal is political." And they have a point. Our romantic lives are heavily influenced by social, cultural, legal, and technological phenomena. And if you're recognizing that influence but saying we should try to wall off our romantic lives from that external influence, I gotta say, that train has sailed. For better and for worse. Insert "we live in a society..." Joke here. Even our ca…
/r/MensRights27/05/20 10:09 PM
5

It is absolutely insane
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:27 PM
2

Well said
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:24 PM
11

Yes I think everyone benefits. We all passively perpetuate it. Every time I go fishing, I think to myself, "man I'm glad I can just buy a can of tuna someone else caught." The last catfish I caught was basically a single dinners worth of food, but I had to wait for it, catch it, transport it, kill it humanely, saw its head off, gut it with my hands, wash the viscera out of the chest cavity, skin it, fillet it, and cook it. It was gross as hell and took me half a day. And I just went to a river -…
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:22 PM
1

I like to call this idea "the instrumentalization of men," the tendency to treat men as tools or resources or means to an end. Other men and women actively participate in reinforcing this trend, or just passively benefit from it. Lots of people treat men like useful stepping stones to success, rather than human beings. When my grandfather fought in the battle of the bulge in WW2, a lieutenant ordered him to charge up a hill, with no cover, to take a German machine gun nest. My grandfather looked…
/r/MensRights27/05/20 08:47 PM
3

Online dating
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/20 08:37 PM
9

What we really need is to abandon a single one-size-fits-all approach to marriage as a legal agreement. Imagine if every business in the US had to use the same exact contract template. It would grind our economy to a halt! There should at least be two marriages: 1)the current flimsy no-fault divorce situation for people who just want a ceremony and don't actually want to be legally bound by anything 2) a more secure marriage agreement that sets terms and conditions for dissolution. Any spouse ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/20 12:34 AM
1

Fountain valley in Orange county
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/20 03:21 PM
3

I agree. Ive noticed that women give new guys an introductory "free trial period" where the guy just has to show up and he gets affection. Then the woman starts ratcheting up standards and expectations, and both people become unhappier with the relationship. I believe it's because women feel emotionally unsatisfied by the relationship and don't know why, so they assume the guy needs to be doing something more to make her feel more, when it's really just dopamine dynamics. It's a tale as old as t…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 11:49 PM
5

Traffic jams on the 5 freeway? Sociopathic drivers? Overcrowding? Expensive gas? Fake people? Ridiculous laws? I've lived in SoCal all my life and I would leave in a heartbeat if my family would go with me, but alas, they've all put down roots.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/20 10:57 PM
4

You know, the therapists never gave Patton's slap therapy a chance. Maybe slapping is actually a bona fide cure for PTSD and the most patriotic thing we could do to help our vets is to slap the trauma out of them. /s
/r/MGTOW213/05/20 10:42 PM
1

I think the reason why people assume "hey this thing is natural" will be followed with "so this thing is totally morally acceptable, let's get crazy!" is a response to the way stupid people have used the appeal to nature fallacy throughout history. Of course, jumping to the conclusion that someone is about to make an appeal to nature fallacy is a kind of dumb fallacy in and of itself.
/r/MensRights10/05/20 10:40 PM
1

I think fixating on alphas and betas is dumb. Sex is awesome and all, and it's important to our well being, but it's not this important. Fixating on having the most sex possible, or who's having more sex than you, or where you fall on the sexual success spectrum, is such animalistic nonsense. Women are not conquests, they're people. Virgins aren't failures, they're people. Chads aren't demigods, they're just people. Having no sex or some sex or a lot of sex doesn't change your value. These conce…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 12:12 AM
1

Even with the paper, we're still playing pretend. Making a breakup into a more complicated / drawn out process doesn't make people more committed. It doesn't keep people from cheating or leaving. It doesn't cultivate a climate of intimacy, beyond the honeymoon. Positive behaviors strengthen relationships - not the government bureaucracy. The paper merely dictates the timeline and conditions of the breakup. It does nothing to make a couple closer, safer, or happier.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 12:22 PM
3

Well said
/r/MGTOW224/03/20 10:28 AM
3

A skeptic after my own heart! I like the way you think. Here's my counterpoint - If I believe all this as a self-serving narrative, that would be hilariously ironic, but it could be seen as an instance that confirms my point : people self-deceive. (Just anecdotal evidence though.) Secondly, I could be a self-unaware hypocrite - and still be right about this. Trying to undermine my theory by undermining me is an "ad hominem" logical fallacy, and a red herring. Third, "People aren't as skilled at …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/20 12:55 PM
4

I think OP is downplaying some of the negative ramifications of being lied to. “Being lied to” is not just a simple intellectual correction, like “oh I thought that Spielberg directed The Shining, but it was actually Kubrick, silly me.” That’s a very low-impact course correction. Realizing you’ve been misled can involve a subsequent realization that you’ve wasted years and years and years of your life making decisions based on that misconception. Years that you will never get back. This is somet…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/20 08:53 PM
1

Your comment made me lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 02:16 AM
2

This is the best post I have seen on here. You’ve found a way to integrate pan-gender perspectives with empathy, and draw attention to systemic issues of supply and demand that are fucking everyone in the ass with a sandpaper dildo. Thank you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/20 01:58 AM
1

Great comment
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/20 11:17 PM
1

Yeah, so whats your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/20 06:21 AM
1

Underrated comment. Reputational incentives are the only effective counterweight to shitty selfish behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/20 09:20 AM
1

Is this a quality brand of knife? I'm looking for a decent hunting knife but I don't know which ones are worth it.
/r/MGTOW207/01/20 06:56 PM
6

Romantic relationships activate some of the most intensely negative emotional experiences life can throw at you. Divorce is the 2nd most stressful life experience, and Marriage is the 7th, according to the: Holmes and Rahe Stress Scale
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/19 10:54 AM
5

Damn
/r/MGTOW205/12/19 06:03 PM
0

Country songs really push the lie. Literally every song is about a perfect girl who’s just down to hang out sitting on your tailgate and kick back a few beers while looking at a sunset. she’s this angelic being who wears sun dresses all the time and she loves fishing and she’s loyal and sweet and flirty and easy to talk to. There’s No mention of figuring how to reconcile different life goals or preferences, incompatibility, nagging, financial conflict, infidelity, boredom, divorce - none of that…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/19 10:05 PM
1

Marriage is isolating, not MGTOW. “As Chekhov put it, “If you’re afraid of loneliness, don’t marry.” He might have been on to something. In a review of two national surveys, the sociologists Natalia Sarkisian of Boston College and Naomi Gerstel of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst found that marriage actually weakens other social ties. Compared with those who stay single, married folks are less likely to visit or call parents and siblings—and less inclined to offer them emotional suppor…
/r/MGTOW222/11/19 06:37 PM
4

Yeah. Sometimes women sabotage relationships that have potential because they are terrified. A girl once told me she felt safer with assholes because “better the devil you know”. She met a guy who seemed perfect and she ran away from him before she could fall in love and get hurt. She was messed up in the head. Running counterfactuals in your mind (“what if I’d done this? What if I hadn’t done that?”) is nonproductive. Maybe there wasnt a perfect algorithm of words and tactics you could’ve done.…
/r/askTRP31/10/19 11:19 PM
3

your assessment is accurate. I think her childhood is probably 80% to 90% of the cause. Look up the “fearful avoidant attachment style.” Or “childhood emotional neglect syndrome.” And it will probably explain a lot. Your girl sounds exactly like my ex-wife. Women with fearful avoidant attachment styles are even more unpredictable than the average woman. They swing from needy to cold and back to needy every few hours. So dread could backfire in in the morning, but work like a charm in the afterno…
/r/askTRP31/10/19 05:41 PM
8

Ironically it's easier to get there if you don't fixate on the outcome so much. If you pressure yourself with "I have to Climax otherwise this is pointless" then it's harder to Climax. If you just think, "hey let's just see what happens and I'll have a good time regardless of whether I get there or not," then your brain is more relaxed, and youre more likely to finish.
/r/askTRP31/10/19 04:28 AM
7

If they made a Sci fi movie about this scenario called "Into the Pussyverse." I would watch the shit out of that shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/19 04:27 PM
2

Shots fired!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 07:58 PM
4

When you say "What's new?" It kind of sounds like you're saying that because it's normal, therefore we should accept it and stop talking about it. But I thought the point of this sub was to think critically about things that the rest of society takes for granted.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/19 05:23 PM
3

the reason why is because it's not culturally acceptable for billionaires to do that in modern Western culture - hence the illegality of polygamy. However, If you look at men throughout history who were the relative equivalents of billionaires, in cultures that accepted polygamy, they DID have crazy amounts of kids: Here's a sultan that fathered at least 867 children. Ismail ibn sharif
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/19 09:33 AM
1

First of all, I absolutely agree with you that there's a tendency in human beings to try and avoid accountability, and to resent people who point out our mistakes or flaws. Socrates called himself the "gadfly stinging the horse of Athens." Because he was basically a philosophical nagger, and Athens responded by condemning him to death. Ayn Rand said "The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everybody had decided not to see." And our flaws and mistakes are often one of those th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/19 06:54 PM
54

I think your solutions seem kind of unreasonable. Proposing that men quit their jobs, close their bank accounts, or go off the grid is like saying, “don’t complain about red lights and traffic when you could just sell your car! And go live like an animal in the forest. No more traffic!” There are lots of difficult situations that could be bypassed by unplugging and going off the grid, but under a just and reasonable system, honest people wouldn’t have to. That seems to indicate that our system i…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/18 06:58 PM
1

Word
/r/MGTOW29/09/18 07:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter