| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | How to get banned from /r/Feminisms: Suggest that you can be both egalitarian and feministIf you're using RES (Reddit Enhancement Suite) just click and drag on the photo. | /r/MensRights | 13/05/14 04:15 PM |
| 11 | Never made sense to meThe deep religious traditions of some religions have no bearing on human rights in the US or the reason why Circumcision is practiced in the US by those not of those religions. You already acknowledged it yourself. The reasons circumcision 'works' isn't because circumcision necessarily has any effect, it's because it influences the culture of an area. In your case it's only effective if you prefer dry sex and don't use protection in specific parts of Africa. Everywhere else the study is not repr… | /r/MensRights | 01/05/14 09:55 AM |
| 3 | "Men with large testicles are less involved fathers, while small-balled guys are more nurturing: study." The study of 70 men (!!!) used to dehumanize an entire gender.They used an MRI scan. | /r/MensRights | 11/09/13 01:44 AM |
| 3 | Woman holds men hostage for sex. Everyone thinks this is hilarious. Imagine if the sexes were reversed...They did post the reasoning for "Why". Both the man and police say Boyd's medication had recently been changed. If her medication was for psychological reasons it may have had a great deal of impact on her behavior, but they didn't share her medical history. | /r/MensRights | 18/08/13 09:16 AM |
| 9 | "I swear they was 18!" actually works, if you're a womanThey do have different laws. I'm not sure where in Australia this occurred, but it appears there is only one area where there is no defense against having sex with a minor. Practically all of the others have defenses based on believing the underage person is legally aged. So unless there's a distinct court bias that doesn't show up in the laws, then this case would've gone the same if it were a man or a woman accused of the crimes. Source: http://www.aifs.gov.au/cfca/pubs/factsheets/a142090/ | /r/MensRights | 02/05/13 04:38 PM |
| 1 | I present you: The gender equality act of Norway (Fails in the first paragraph)It's covered in Section 21. Exceptions may be made from the provisions of the first paragraph if there are special circumstances that make it obviously unreasonable to demand that the requirements be fulfilled. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/13 02:45 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter