TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Iwanttoliveinspace Archive

View 9 posts and 669 comments by Iwanttoliveinspace on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Let's be honest, you don't actually care about downvotes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 05:24 AM
1

Where was this comment on the threats of downvotes that I was given from BPers? Start being fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 05:21 AM
1

nap complete You sound a lot like every other BPer on here. Not as a moderator should be. (As in, not emotionally engaged) Which stands to reason, as the sub was started by a BPer, that ended up quitting and deleting their account because the "stress of it all was too much".
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 05:18 AM
0

It makes complete sense. People in this subreddit, claim to be harassed when challenged. That was the first time I've actually written that I was being harassed. Also, case closed? Lol You're a mod in a subreddit, not a high court judge.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 01:04 AM
0

On the condition that you enforce such rules with others. Also, you aren't harassing me, I said that to see what you did. Apparently it's a done thing in this subreddit that if someone makes a point, you can claim harassment and the person is magically meant to give up. I didn't think it actually worked before now
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 12:49 AM
0

Now you are harassing me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 12:41 AM
0

So, wouldn't that mean that my initial response saying how men are all pedos and evil is actually something you are now trying to prove as semi-truth?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 12:25 AM
0

If you disagree with something, write out an argument explaining why. That's what this sub is for. It's a debate sub. Yes, I did actually give my view on the question from OP. To which, OP responded highlighting the loaded question and circle jerking I was talking about. If you are so against people circle jerking (which undoubtedly you are, with both sides of the argument), why is BP circlejerking given a pass, or a RP requesting for citation is seen as harassment, while my sarcasm is viewed as…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 12:19 AM
0

Setting up strawman arguments? I simply said it wouldn't bother me. You asked for people's views, and I gave mine. Why are you attacking my view?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 12:10 AM
0

I was expressing my opinion as well. Or is my opinion less valid than that of OPs? Would you like to explain exactly how you would like me to respond to people that would allow me to follow your policing, sorry, moderating, of the conversation?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/16 12:00 AM
1

And neither is posing a question with the sheer intent to agree with one side of the answer and not the other. THAT is circlejerking. Which OP just did.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 11:41 PM
1

Remember when I said that the question you posed was loaded, and you were waiting for someone to walk into the trap? You just proved I was right.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 11:40 PM
0

Oh please. It was clearly a sarcastic remark, and not circlejerking.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 11:17 PM
2

Doesn't bother me in the slightest. Why would the gender of a babysitter denote added danger?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 11:10 PM
0

Penis and men are different things. And saying that "you don't like men" isn't a personal attack, it's an assumption I've made. A personal attack would be if I said that you were a "man-hating retarded bitch". Saying that you hate men, based on your post history, isn't an attack. It's an observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 09:46 PM
2

I've read your post history, you don't like men. Therefore, I'm guessing your post is a loaded question and you are waiting for some poor sucker to wander into it. Also, I'm not sure how my answer wasn't coherent, seeing that you could come to the conclusion that you didn't agree with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 09:04 PM
1

Do PPD men lean homophobic? Did they associate this exercise with seeming gay or overly feminine? Hang on. You can't say that, because men didn't post pictures of men, they must be afraid of gay people. That's just shitty logic. Maybe men don't rate other men on attractiveness because they don't see men in that way? Maybe women find rating each other's attractiveness because women are more likely to have tendencies to find other women sexually attractive than men are with men?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 08:40 PM
10

MGTOW. That's the easiest way to look at the Red Pill in an "ethical" way. I live my life for me. I don't neg girls, I don't lead them on, I decline any advances so they know where they stand with me. All my money and time is mine, and no-one else's. Is there anything fair in the world? Well, in a word, no. However, when you view the world as a meritocracy (which, fundamentally, it is), you can realise that hard work (in the right direction) pays off. The problem is when a man puts his effort in…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 10:26 AM
4

I'd have made myself take the Red Pill much, much sooner.. Meaning that I went MGTOW earlier than I did, and just not bother with women in an intimate context. Thinking where I've got myself to in the past 4ish years being MGTOW, I can only imagine where I would have been (either financially, or career-wise) had I never bothered with relationships in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 05:19 AM
-3

Am I incapable of basic logic? Are you seriously asking that after your chain of blabbering insanity? You are associating one crime, with a completely different crime. Not only that, but you changed the numerical figure from 98% of people (it doesn't specify the URL to the source, and in your own words, doesn't specify children) in your citation to 95% in your claim for underage porn (which you still haven't provided a citation for). How fucking dare you say I don't have the capability of basic …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 03:24 AM
-3

Sexual slavery is a completely different crime than children in pedophillic porn. Also, the number is different. You still haven't cited the "fact" of 95% of pedo porn is girls. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 03:08 AM
-4

I'm pretty sure that I didn't say that, nor did I say that there were sites where women posted pics of boys. What I said was that women can also be pedophiles, but you are avoiding that completely for some reason. What YOU said was that 95% of the pictures are of girls, which means drumroll please the burden of proof is on you to back up your claim, not on me to prove that the complete opposite is true. (That would be a "black or white logical fallacy" for those playing at home.) So no, dear, I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 02:27 AM
-8

Female pedophiles are just far more rare. Facts. Hamster-mode: Engaged! So, from what I can gather from your approach, because female pedophiles are less common than male pedophiles, we should just ignore that they exist and refer to pedophiles as men. But, of course, you have male friends, and therefore don't want to say all men are pedophiles. However, don't mention that women can be pedophiles. Dark web, Reddit, something something. Facts. And 95% of the dark web underage are girls? Facts? Ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 01:53 AM
-6

Again, society treats female pedophiles differently to male ones. This can result in a discrepancy in the reporting of figures. However, you shouldn't be directing your sustain of pedophilia at those men, you should be directing your sustain at those pedophiles, as they can include women. But specifically referring to the male pedophiles, you are adding to my point; society practically accepts female pedophiles, which results in the underpunishment and underreported numbers that hey make up.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/16 01:33 AM
-8

I'm not sure what you're getting at. So men are all pedophiles due to a small percentage on a subreddit?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 11:51 PM
-7

"The Internet" Hmmm. Haven't observed that women can be pedophiles? Perhaps that's because society is rather lenient on female pedophiles, and therefore it's not publicised how some women are as fucked up as some men are?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 08:56 PM
-7

It is safe to say men are attracted to even younger girls. I remember on body building dot com, most of the guys seemed to think 'women' 'peak' between 15 and 18. It's safe to say that your statement is unbelievably biased and against men. Do you actually think that men are all pedophiles? If so, wouldn't they all already be hanging around schools? Last time I checked, people (because men and women can both do fucked up shit with kids) that are so sexually into children, don't particularly follo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/16 10:04 AM
3

Also brain damage according to a few things I've read around the news. It's not just teeny weeny melons
/r/MGTOW30/01/16 12:50 AM
1

Indeedy. Of course, there is a difference between equal opportunity (which is what I imagine you mean), and equal in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 07:35 AM
1

I would say that, from a RP point of view, Blue Pill is about men being equal or at least slightly subordinate to women (she says she wants to go out to an Italian place, you nod and say "yes ma'am" and you pay for the meal too). From the TBP point of view, I would say that they see BP as anti-TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 04:25 AM
0

You know, for such a down to earth, good guy you certainly sound rather RP.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 02:12 AM
1

This. Left wingers (which TBP seems to be), will start what appears to be a debate, but if the views are challenged (whether effectively or not) they resort to shaming, and logical fallacies to try and "win". Now, I'm certainly not saying that TRPers are all excellent debaters, there's some real dumbasses that identify as RP (just like the other side that have idiots that are anti-RP). However, there does seem to be a higher amount of bad debaters (or those lacking in logic, and relying on The F…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/16 02:01 AM
2

Malicious doesn't mean provable false. An accusation that isn't easily proven false can still be a malicious accusation; that is to say an accusation intended to cause harm. In that kind of case, the harm would be to the man's reputation.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/16 06:39 AM
2

However, he then has to deal with soul-torturing loneliness, lack of intimacy, an inferior financial situation, reduced life expectancy, reproductive failure, and never being desired by a woman BAAAHAHAHAHHA Soul-torturing loneliness? What the shit are you taking about? MGTOWs aren't hermits, they just don't have romantic relationships with women. Inferior financial situation? MGTOWs usually have a MUCH bigger disposable income than men in relationships. I have a great income, real estate invest…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/16 12:27 PM
2

Ok, thanks! I was wondering which "side" it was started from, as it were
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 07:34 PM
2

That's not entirely legal. An employer has no right to know what someone is doing outside of work hours. Many employers do encroach on that though, and because nobody actually stands up for their rights, employers get away with it. (That is assuming, of course, that the Internet activities weren't illegal in nature)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 07:33 PM
4

Just out of curiosity, what pill did they identify as? (If any) Assuming it wasn't just "purple"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 05:00 AM
2

What I think about free speech and whether it is considered a human right akin to bodily autonomy is actually irrelevant. Bodily autonomy. Lol Laws about free speech vs. free speech as a human right draw from the same principle with different levels of enforcement, if that makes sense. You can make something legal without recognizing it as a human right. See also the ability to, oh, smoke pot on your lawn. Smoking an illegal substances has zero to do with free speech. Shit analogy. You're simply…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 01:55 AM
2

A sponsor and employer are different things. A sponsor is paying someone to represent a brand in the public eye. I can understand how a sponsor would, should the public perception be altered due to a comment, wish to cancel the sponsorship. This would likely be part of the sponsorship contract. However, an employer has no right to control the actions of their staff when the staff are not within the hours of employment, or are not representing the company they work for. For example, neither of ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/16 12:26 AM
3

And the terms of a lease don't include that the tenant gives their political views to the landlord. The landlord isn't allowed to stipulate such things in the lease.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 10:58 PM
3

I mean exactly what I said. It's not an idiosyncratic view. Plenty of folks would say the same. If you're actively interested in how Wittgenstein percolated into jurisprudence - the interpretation of law - then HLA Hart is a good place to start. In your world, human rights may be super-simple, but good luck finding a lawyer, philosopher, academic, rapporteur, or even persecuted person in need of protections who thinks it's as simple as you do. Grow up. I see you completely avoided answering a di…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 01:22 PM
5

What I am doing is commenting that there is nothing in the fabric of the universe that means that the library of congress, UN charter, or anything else, are evidence that there is a human right to free speech in the sense of a normative prerogative or claim, except insofar as you stipulate that that is what is to count as evidence. That is part of the process of giving a rule of inference for the concept of human rights. Lol, here we go again, using waaaaaaaay more words than required to attempt…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 01:13 PM
4

doesn't know what the point is writes a massive post rebutting the point. Anyway, my assertion was the governments don't give the right to free speech. An American seemingly took offence to that, and I was retorting that other places have the right to free speech. I then cited the UN charter on free speech being a human right. And then the library of congress, also saying the same thing. Then you came along and started talking about you conversing with chemists. That being you up to speed, pumpk…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 01:00 PM
5

But I don't have anything to say. I need you to provide raw material. If you want to play another round, say something silly, like your gibberish account of what a rule of inference is, and then I'll explain why it's gibberish, and then you can misunderstand and (fail to) post to /r/iamverysmart, and the circlejerk continues You never addressed my original assertion. You jumped in and started talking utter bullshit, taking the frame of conversation elsewhere. Would you like to return to the poin…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 12:46 PM
4

Hahahah Please keep writing shit, this is hilarious. Also, the parts where you've moved completely away from the original point is A grade comedy
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 12:40 PM
5

A rule of inference simply establishes a particular transition between propositions. You can, of course, have rules of inference that deal with causal inference, but those are nonstandard and typically Bayesian. It's not a "type of logic" and neither I nor any logician will have any idea what you mean by "fallacious as it may be" Big words. Long sentences. Total bullshit. I'm guessing you have zero background in any of philosophy/mathematical logic/linguistics/anything that would mean you don't …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 12:27 PM
5

What? I asked you a very simple question. I'm awaiting an answer. That answer could be an honest 'I don't know what a rule of inference is' - which is okay - but your reply makes no sense at all. A rule of inference, you condescending little shit, is saying that because one thing happens, you infer another. It's a type of logic (fallacious as it may be), where a person says A happened, so B must be true. And that was why I answered as I did. I don't even necessarily disagree with your positions,…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 12:14 PM
7

And your landlord is free to terminate your lease if you're a renter. Can you cite this law that they can end your lease on grounds of what a renter says, please?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 12:10 PM
4

How is stating that the amendment protects the right, then inferring that it doesn't give the right? Well, it's very clear due to that it never states that it is allocating the right to the citizens, it's is quite clearly saying that it's protecting an existing right that individuals already have.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 12:04 PM
5

http://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/what-does The first amendment doesn't give the right to free speech, it simply protects it. How is that so hard to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 11:58 AM
4

You're talking about a government impinging on the human rights. Also, you clearly think all rights are from a government. Which, frankly, is incorrect. No matter what bullshit chomping at the bit you do, including jumping into this back and forth, you're still wrong. Xx
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 11:48 AM
5

'Human rights' sans a government granting them are about as meaningful as a photo of a burger is to someone starving. You're an idiot too. So a human right is not able to be granted by anyone other than a government? Are you that stupid? So if someone is born in a country that has a government overthrown, they have no right to say what they think?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 11:33 AM
4

You really don't think that freedom of speech is a human right? Let me ask you; at what point in someone's life do they receive their right to free speech? (I ask, because, if it's a government issued right, there must be a specific point where the right is received) Also, if the right to free speech is given in the first amendment, why is there mentions of protecting the right to free speech in English law from the 1600s?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 11:03 AM
6

Hahahahahahhaa Typical American. Here's the American Library of Congress saying the same thing. Stop being a stereotype. Think before you act.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 10:51 AM
6

http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/documents/eu_human_rights_guidelines_on_freedom_of_expression_online_and_offline_en.pdf Free speech and the right to express your opinion, is a human right. Point number one on that link. Calm your tits.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 10:42 AM
4

Seems like you have a problem with me talking though, clearly. I was commenting on the previous person wanting to know what their tenants thoughts and did. That's illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 10:38 AM
5

No. You failed 10th grade history. Free speech is THE FUCKING GOVERNMENT not preventing you from talking. Free speech is not getting fired for saying stupid shit on the internet. Wow. You're an idiot. Free speech is a human right that is available in MORE THAN JUST AMERICA. However, because you're an idiot, you think that the right is given in the American first amendment. It's not. That amendment protects the right to free speech, it doesn't give the right. A human right is different to a gover…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 10:28 AM
6

Because that is punishing people for their right to think something. People have a right to have an opinion, yes, sometimes that opinion might be something you disagree with, but that's what free speech is; supporting someone's right to think and say their opinion. You can debate their opinion, you can ignore their opinion, but to "expose their ways" says that you want to discriminate against someone for their views. Which is illegal. You have no right whatsoever as a landlord to know the politi…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 03:23 AM
2

The guy doesn't need to seduce his wife, he needs to work out what to do after all the things that were said.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/16 12:21 AM
3

Well, I didn't put it like that, I used the narrative of TBP. But, just to clarify, the TBP alternative is "don't be so beta"? That's confusing, as that sounds like TRP advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 09:32 PM
5

Instead of bashing TRP over this, under the same circumstances, with all things said the same, how found a BP person advise he deal with what happened? Again, the both said the same things, no changing history, what is the BPs take? I'm curious because, if the TRP advice is horrible hate speech, what's the alternative?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/16 09:18 PM
1

Fallacy. Fallacy. Fallacy. Is that all people can say these days? You know what a fallacy fallacy is? Look that up. The line you say is a strawman, isn't. It's an opinion. You said that feminism only addresses men taking up more space, not obese people. Both people take up space (you still haven't clearly said how much space you think is "too much"), but you only address the part where men are the culprit. Even if I had actually said what you claim, that doesn't justify you assigning me opinions…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 08:16 PM
1

Fucking hell. You're still going with this. And this time you're doubling down on your black or white fallacious logic. You can't disprove one argument, simply by demanding someone disprove yours, that's also a fallacy of burden of proof. Ok, let's have a short lesson on debate. The point of a debate is to discuss either for or against an assertion. If you are making as assertion, you support it. And vice versa. In the case of a CMV thread here, the emphasis is on others to change the view, ie, …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 08:00 PM
3

What IS the agreed meaning? Because so far I've heard these definitions of "hypergamy" The dictionary definition is that women try to date/marry a man of higher class/caste. That is the agreed meaning of the word. a) Women want to dump me for a richer guy b) Women want to dump me for a cooler guy c) Women want to dump me for a handsomer guy d) Women will date me if I can prove I'm their objective superior ...none of which, I might as well note, is anything close to the dictionary definition of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 12:12 PM
2

Not a strawman. A strawman is a false representation of the other persons argument to make it easier to beat.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 07:36 AM
1

You're the one who has the burden of proving women are all liars when they say altruism makes men more attractive. The original assertion was mine. The original assertion was not women are all liars. What you did there is a strawman argument. You falsely claimed my original assertion was something else and fought against the false assertion. You also have the burden of proving creative people don't find more sexual partners than the average, because there are a lot of artists fucking out there s…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 07:35 AM
1

That is why the bluepill is mocking them. Your claim that we don't have a rebuttal to redpill claims is a lie, when I showed you one. It wasn't a rebuttal you idiot, you simply had another theory. A rebuttal disproves the original assertion.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 07:20 AM
1

So, no counter evidence, or really, counter-argument. A repeated demand that the redpill/MGTOW definition of hypergamy be treated like it's an established hard science the point to this thread, you small-minded imbecile, was a CMV thread. You didn't change my view. I never said it was a hard science either, I said it was a word with a meaning. Are you being stupid on purpose?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 07:04 AM
4

That's correct. Much like when you misquote someone em without proper formatting to show that you took a sarcastic line, and turned it into something else. But it really doesn't hide how weak your position is. Neither does intentionally misquoting someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 07:02 AM
6

It's an abbreviated quote, and yes, claiming I'm arguing against hypergamy when I've argued the redpill has a very limited understanding of the concept is a strawman That's not what a strawman fallacy is. If you can't actually debate my real arguments, then you've already lost the debate. Your real arguments? You're claiming a fallacy on the meaning of a word, and you're using a fallacy type that wouldn't apply. You've hit light speed hamstering velocity.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 06:49 AM
1

You're still relying on crude AWALT stereotypes, and ignoring peer-reviewed research due to your inability to imagine more than one personality for billions of individuals on the planet. You keep saying peer reviewed like it counters the meaning of a word. You're comparing a theory, to a word with a meaning. Saying that the theory, negates the meaning of a word. Unfortunately for you, that's not how English works.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 06:47 AM
7

That's an edited quote, and, it's not a strawman argument. One more time - you guys don't factor in everything people look for in finding the best possible mate, and that's why you're trading in deceptive pseudo-science. I haven't said a word about whether hypergamy itself is yes, yes. Hush now you're going around in circles across two different threads.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 06:42 AM
10

You again. eye roll Yes yes, hypergamy, despite being a word with an agreed meaning is entirely made up. Except it's not. It's a real thing. I'm not saying all women act on it, doesn't mean it's not a real thing. As for not being able to explain successful BP relationships, you didn't ask me. But, seeing that you did, BP relationships have a dynamic that, because they exist, must mean they work, right? Doesn't mean they're for me though.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 06:21 AM
1

Your rebuttal was essentially "I disagree, BECAUSE WIMMIN IS EVIL!" Absolute nonsense! Where did I write that? There's no need to refute it. Anyone as blinded by hate as you are, has nothing to offer. Have a good day, if you can. Blinded by hate? What the hell are you talking about? Now you fall into the usual response to losing an argument of trying to insult me. Your childish games aren't working. You still didn't rebut my assertion. I mean it - you could probably use a few Assumptions. My lif…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 06:02 AM
1

You are aware that you STILL haven't countered the original assertion? You've simply said that because I don't agree with another theory, that contradicts my assertion, my assertion must be wrong. In the words of Bill Burr, once a woman starts changing the topic of the argument, you've won. Take a knee, run out the clock. Have a great day
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 05:48 AM
1

As you've agreed that hypergamy is real, then we can't keep going on and on. You've agreed that my assertion is correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 04:50 AM
1

No, you just said "it's pseudo science".. That's zero proof. That is, in every scenario, your opinion. You then quoted a study that creative people get more sex, which is, yet another theory (just like the hypergamy is a theory). But having two different theories doesn't, by their nature, cancel each other out. I asked how your scientific claim wasnt pseudo-science, and you just responded by demanding that I defend the original assertion. That isn't you "playing a little rough", that was you sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 03:51 AM
1

Defend it now? Are you new here? This is a Change My View post, that means that you are meant to change my view. Not demand that I add to the conversation that I started. Stop being a petulant little child, and either change my view, or start your own thread, because I don't need to defend the original assertion, you idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 03:24 AM
1

So, you consider hypergamy to be pseudo-science, but a study saying that the more creative someone is, the more sexual partners they have, isn't pseudo-science? What is the difference between the history of hypergamy (before TRP was a "thing"), and the study that you just quoted?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 02:46 AM
14

Hypergamy isn't a myth. It's a theory on how women will always try to marry/date/fuck a man of higher, or at a minimum, equal social status/caste to themselves. TRP state the basis of what they believe that hypergamy is rated on (such as wealth, social power). The way that TBP will explain this is just a rewording of the statement; "Women try to get the best guy they can, just like guys try to get the best girl they can" This is correct, but the only way it differs from hypergamy is that it does…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 02:11 AM
1

Ok, how would a women who is leaving for a "better option" define a "better option"? I would say that the women would see an option as better on the grounds on the hypergamous that TRP have at the base of their theory. I'm not talking about when or if a woman leaves though, I'm specifically saying that TBP can't say that the hypergamous nature of women isn't real, because they can't actually rebut it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 02:07 AM
1

I made the decision, because you have said that you only address things that affect women, that men do. That's a genderisation of issues (or selective campaigning due to the gender of the perceived cause). There's no getting around that. Feminism is only about campaigning against things that you see men doing, not campaigning for equality or better rights. Therefore, any person that isn't a women, is a target for feminism. Hence my distaste for it as a movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 12:50 AM
2

You know, I was with you for a lot of that post. I appreciated your views, and the construction of your points. I was going to rebut the idea that a "small percentage of humans take up too much space" and was about to say that if it's such a small percentage, why aren't you focussing on bigger things where you think women are hard done to. But then you finish, by saying I'm not being mature, in a way that made you also look immature. Look, let's put it this way; We aren't going to agree - I don'…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/16 12:35 AM
3

Unless, of course, the women is fat because she doesn't give a shit about not being fat. Which then leaves a guy with a fat women who he doesn't find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 11:21 PM
2

The reason that I think you are making it a gendered issue, and the reason I bring up overweight people is this: If it were about a person taking up too much space by having their legs apart, you'd have to include overweight people who have their legs together due to being obese. That you specifically say this is about men makes it that you gendered the issue into men are taking up too much space. This is why feminism is taking up this "cause". Because you don't like men. If it were actually abo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 11:14 PM
3

Taking the RP has made me go MGTOW. I still interact with women in the workplace and after-work social functions, but I don't flirt (or accept flirting in my direction), and I don't have sex or date anymore. I also just won't take bullshit comments from women who are just being bitchy. I call them out on it, and make them realise that their mystical vagina magic doesn't work on me lol The results from that have been a life with a lot less stress, more disposable income, and more free time away f…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 10:17 PM
1

I would imagine that a self-respecting man, would approach the situation the same way a self-respecting woman would if the roles were reversed..
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 10:13 PM
1

Either way first you need to define what you mean by 'hypergamy'. And don't give me any of that READ THE SIDEBAR shit, we all know how that ends from the AWALT 'debates'. I've given a large number of definitions of hypergamy in this thread. I've not once asked someone to read the side bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 09:53 PM
1

your definition of hypergamy is pretentious psuedo-science. Ok, now we are getting somewhere! Why is it pretentious pseudo science? In what way can you show that is the case?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 09:51 PM
1

People being overweight isn't a gendered issue, so it is outside of feminism's purview Could it be that you've made it a gendered issue, when it shouldn't be, simply because feminism doesn't like men? Because doing that would be incredibly rude and offensive, and also unproductive and stupid. Oh, and also isn't a feminist issue. and telling a man that he isn't sat appropriately (according to your standards) isn't rude? Further in the space topic; how do fat people move their obese thighs togethe…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 09:50 PM
1

I didn't bother watching. Assumed that a YouTube link isn't really going to be moving the debate in a direction of resolution. Edit: watched the video, and I'm guessing that you are trying to imply that I'm asking for a binary response? I'm not, I'm trying to get a response to a specific thing, but the comments I've been getting are vague, and away from the point I was making.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 09:09 PM
1

Your rebuttal was that you aren't taking it seriously. You literally wrote that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 09:08 PM
1

Name calling, now? Really? That's the level you've gone to? No wonder you can't debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 08:58 PM
1

How completely expected. Just admit you're all about the hate, already. I asked for the rebuttal. You said that you just aren't taking it seriously. Don't try to play this into me being hateful.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 08:48 PM
1

If a woman doesn't cheat, or move on, for hypergamous reasons; Why do women cheat or move on to another man?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 08:40 PM
2

For example, feminists do want women to sign up for the draft, and to be allowed to fight in combat roles, but the military is still resistant to the issue. The US military has said that women can be on the front line. They aren't resisting a thing. Can you cite a feminist article saying that they want women in the draft? I can't seem to find any at all. But I can sure cite articles that are suddenly against a draft at all, written by feminists. Or perhaps where Hillary Clinton said that women h…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 08:39 PM
1

So your rebuttal is to not take it seriously? Like a two year old covering their ears and yelling so they can't hear you. That's a debate rebuttal is it? Just don't bother typing then, (and subsequently deleting most of your comments due to being called out on stupidity)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 08:34 PM
1

Perfect example of why and how BP rebuttals are all brushed away by RP. You guys are content to stay within your echo chamber and believe in your "science" on a faith basis ah, this bullshit again. No dear, I was trying to debate the point. To get an understanding of the rebuttal against a particular thing. To have a discussion like adults. But, no, typical BP/lefty/SJW ends up name calling and accusing me of being in an echo chamber.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 08:31 PM
1

The reason I want you to stay on point is because, well, the only way a BP, Lefty, she knows how to debate is by reframing the entire argument. And then, before you know it, you've headed off in an entirely new direction where the original assertion isn't covered at all. The point of a debate, is to debate the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 08:29 PM
1

Sure, that's totally the problem here.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 11:49 AM
1

Are you replying to a thread where all the other side comments were deleted? What are you thinking that you're doing here?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 11:48 AM
1

Hypergamy in the sense that they want to date someone they can look up to, someone to admire? Or is rich. Or is more stereotypically "alpha" than the surrounding guys. You make it sound so wholesome. women just want a guy to admire. How does that work when the guy is old, but rich? Does the women admire him? Or the access to his money? Problematic here is that mostly it's worded as if women are the only ones that leave their partner for a better one or that every women is a cheating slut for the…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 10:16 AM
1

I'm sure you do. Yes, yes. But, back to the original point, do you have a rebuttal against the concept of hypergamy that is the core of TRP theory?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 09:08 AM
1

I've literally no clue what you're even trying to say at this point. (Other than you seemingly are doing what every Leftie, feminist, and SJW do, by derailing the argument into the wilderness so the original assertion is never discussed) Run along. No time for silly little games here.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 09:07 AM
1

I'm going to go out on a limb about what it really 'is a matter of'. It was a textbook response from a poster whose identifying trait is that he loathes women (MGTOW). He at least avoids them out of derision. He then puts it into practice onto female who strays into his vision. It's the MGTOW sub's main shtick, and by your own admission your identifying trait here (flair). I get it. You didn't see the "Females crossing" road sign pop-up on the way into this sub space. Using Mozilla Firefox can b…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 08:21 AM
3

If you support women's rights, even in a limited context, we welcome you as an ally on that cause, even if we disagree on everything else. Trust me, I'm not an ally. I want equality. True equality. No mandated gender outcomes, no complaining about a wage gap that only exists through shitty maths, and a demand that women must sign up to the draft. Women shouldn't just have the rights of men, they should have the responsibilities of men, that they currently aren't campaigning for. Women keeping a …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 07:24 AM
1

Well, I would have thought my original assertion of "TBP doesn't have a rebuttal" would imply that I have no idea what their issue is. However, TBP has an issue with the TRP "game theory" which is based upon an understanding of hypergamy, and how to manipulate your own "rating" to get girls that are following hypergamy to get, what they believe, are higher grade men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 07:21 AM
1

This isn't a matter of thick or thin skin, it's a matter of staying on point. I've also been here for some time, but thank you for the passive aggressive advice. Asking you to stay on point has zero to do with tone policing. Tone policing is about, surprise, tone, not asking someone to stay on point.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 03:51 AM
1

Or this one, or this one Pretty much any dictionary where it defines the word. Let's not narrow it down, as dictionaries give the definition of the word, and they all align
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 03:33 AM
1

You didn't address the point of the post. You started talking about MGTOW, not TRP's views on hypergamy. And, other than my flair, there was no assertion regarding MGTOW in the original post. Asking you to stay on point isn't being rude, I would, however, consider it rude to go off topic, and feel offence when asked to remain on point.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 03:31 AM
1

I disagree. TRP says that hypergamy exists, and it's about (in this context) a woman seeking a man of higher class. TRP simply says that women rate the men of the factors I've mentioned before. Saying that women rate men on things like social status, or wealth, doesn't disprove, or change the meaning of, hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 03:05 AM
1

That's not actually the definition of the word, though. Therefore, we can't really debate about whether or not TBP has a rebuttal against TRP's theory of hypergamy, when you give the word a different meaning to it's actual definition
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 02:56 AM
1

So, we are going to have to ask: How is the TBP meaning of hypergamy different to TRP's view of hypergamy?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 02:45 AM
1

Forget about BP, bud but I'm trying to give you a rebuttal to TRPs version of hypergamy Which one are we going with? Ignoring BP? Or including BP in the "BP don't have a rebuttal"? You have also previously said that you "agree with hypergamy" but not the TRP version of it. There is only one version of hypergamy. It's not a made-up word by TRP, it has a meaning, and that meaning is the meaning that TRP imply. TRP just state the things that women rate as important and (for want of a better word) t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 02:36 AM
1

Seeing as the thread was specifically relating to TBP's lack of rebuttal on hypergamy, no, let's not divert off somewhere else.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 02:24 AM
4

It is also addressing concerns about men taking up more than their fair share of space on a crowded train. More than "their fair share". What about women that leave bags on seats? What about obese people that ate themselves into needing more space? At what point does it stop being about someone taking up more than their fair share and just become men should move out of my way because I have a vagina? The whole concept, where it's thought that the "issue" of men taking up space on public transpor…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 02:10 AM
1

Yes, I can see you are definitely here for the debate. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 02:03 AM
2

Nope. My view is that TBP don't have a rebuttal or an argument against the TRP core theory of hypergamy. Therefore, they just shame, mock, and use (self-confessed) satire, to attack the entire TRP concept. So far, this thread has shown that, when highlighting a single core of the TRP philosophy (in this case that women are hypergamous in nature), TBP-side debaters have tried to include all parts of TRP to say that the whole thing is wretched. Which kind of proves my point: TBP has no argument ag…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 02:02 AM
2

So according to you, he only needs to be in a higher socio-economic class, physically more attractive, or more confident? He doesn't need to be all three? As evidenced by old, fat guys who are millionaires, having women who are with them for their money. As for the rest of your post, you don't seem to understand what a CMV post is about. The OP makes an assertion, and commenters try to put together an argument to change the OPs view. However; Isn't it readily observable that women don't drop the…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 01:09 AM
1

So just to be clear, you don't want me to change your view on how TBP and TRP interact, and what the purpose of TBP is? You finally stated, after a lot of back and forth, that the CMV post was regarding TBP not having a rebuttal against TRPs hypergamy theory. You said you agreed. Now, you've changed your mind and I said "I don't want you to change my view" on the purpose of TBP. I'm not blue pill, but I'm perfectly willing to discuss hypergamy with yo I severely fucking doubt that you could keep…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/16 12:28 AM
1

derail the conversation? shit dude, we AGREE. i'm just trying to help you understand how your writing is a mess if your main point truly was "someone argue with me about hypergamy" I would imagine that the title of a post, is the main item that is being stated. The contained text within it is the fill in to the original assertion. As you are, quite literally, the only person that seems to have a lack of understanding about how this works, as everyone else just jumped in to try and debate it, I'm…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 11:42 PM
1

Careful you don't get the bends coming up from that deep comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 10:43 PM
1

"TBP don't actually have a rebuttal to the hypergamy claims of TRP" Pray tell, how could I have been more clear that the discussion point, was about hypergamy and TBP's lack of rebuttal to TRP's view of it? It isn't incoherent at all, you're just trying to (again) derail the conversation into being about semantics.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 10:43 PM
1

Then why do you come here? If debate is a waste of time?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 09:56 PM
1

And I stand by the fact that I specifically stated that the post was about hypergamy. Tech writing class aside, you keep derailing the conversation into something that it's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 09:56 PM
1

Can you guys really not understand that the way you talk about those things is the bigger problem than what you claim? That's a throwaway line, because it's a rhetorical question from your part. You don't back it up. So I'm going to disregard. You then go onto talk about numerous quotes and respond to those quotes. Including a weird pseudo rape comment: (Your quote of me;) I'm not saying RP men are superior to women, just that TBP don't want to admit they turn themselves into subordinates (Your …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:16 PM
1

Wasn't asking for views on MGTOW. Please stay on point, don't derail the debate. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:06 PM
1

You seem to be picking things out of my writing that everyone else understood. Also, you seem to be agreeing with me. So, thanks(?)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:05 PM
1

if you want someone to rebut TRPs claims about hypergamy, then post something about that. I did. That's exactly what I did. In the thread, genius, that you are in. if you were serious about finding their argument, you'd be looking in PPD That's exactly were we are. and you'd have no problem finding it I beg to differ. With the amount of people turning into a conversation about everything in TRP, and you seemingly being in another reality, I'm having many troubles indeed.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:04 PM
1

So I can't have a CMV for one aspect? Didn't see that in the rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:03 PM
1

I'm not sure what value your last comment had to the topic, other than for you to have another "spread your cheeks" comment. I mean, I get that you are making that a Tagline, but adding it twice in a row seems a bit like overkill. Also, my point was about them not having a rebuttal against a certain point, not that they exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:02 PM
1

Again, I wasn't asking for a rebuttal to the whole of TRP. Please stay on point, don't derail the debate. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:00 PM
6

Yeah man, that's actually my point. They don't debate against the core ideology of RP theory, because it's basic sociology. They claim it's satire (I know it isn't, that's why I said it was "self claimed"), because then, they don't have to be able to give a rebuttal against the fundamental points of RP. PUAs aside, the ideological basis of RP is, in my and many other men's experiences, correct. The point to my post was to see if they could provide an actual reason why they disagree other than, a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 09:33 AM
7

That women are hypergamous and will rate men against, and will seek a man that is higher than their "class/caste". TRP manipulate this, by using TRP theory to "game" the woman rating the man as a higher grade, and therefore agreeing to sex/relationship due to seeing that man as being in a higher class/caste than them. And if the woman is given the opportunity to be "with" a different man, who is of an even higher class/caste than the man she is with, she will do so. Class/caste in this sense wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 08:39 AM
2

Hypergamy isn't specifically about cheating (although, it does explain - to some point - cheating by women). Also, using a personal statement that you don't do it, isn't actually a rebuttal to the statement, sorry. There's no way that you morality can be confirmed or denied.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 05:39 AM
5

So, you'll be able to give an example that shows that TRP theory that women are hypergamous is false...?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 05:33 AM
4

I mean, just on the topic of hypergamy for example. Maybe we are just more logical, or have more life experience, but we know that in general hypergamy (as defined by terpers, not the correct definition) is the norm for both men and women. Terpers insist that women are not loyal only insofar as it is in their own interest - wealth, looks, status. And then they say AWALT to apply this to all women. However, many men are also hypergamous, just in different ways. Plenty abandon their old wives for …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 04:01 AM
5

No it doesn't. It says (in order): What TRP is (it includes a brief outline that hypergamy exists, but doesn't say how it's wrong) Why the author thinks TRP is bad for men. Links to posts on how TRP "ruins relationships" Why they say TRP is sexist. This doesn't in any way, shape, or form, give a clearly defined argument as to the TRP theory that women are hypergamous. As women's hypergamy is a fundamental core of most of the TRP "game theory" or reasons why guys go MGTOW, to say that it gives as…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 03:46 AM
10

I.... I can't even.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 03:26 AM
5

The word, hypergamy, originated there. That's why I said that the word derived from there. Derived is an adult word, meaning, "comes from" Just like other words started in other places. You are aware that words start in different places, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 03:18 AM
5

I got caught up in the fact that you clearly don't know what hypergamy means. Hypergamy is, specifically, nothing to do with being unhappy in a relationship. It's derived from women in India wanting to marry as high up the caste system as they can, using means that they have, as a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 03:02 AM
9

If you want a rebuttal, post a CMV here and you'll get one. Maybe even from me, if I disagree. This is a CMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 02:59 AM
6

I'm "fixated" on hypergamy because that was the point of the post, I even wrote the word hypergamy in the title. And as /u/moodyprism point out, you didn't actually argue against the RP philosophy of hypergamy. Hypergamy isn't about leaving the current relationship because you are unhappy, it's a theory that women see out the best male that they can (on the grounds of the TRP asserted "alpha traits") For those playing at home, here is the definition of hypergamy
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 02:52 AM
2

Not sure if sarcastic or not. But, I'm leaning towards sarcasm... :)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 02:48 AM
5

Please stay on point. This wasn't a question about how BP give advice, it's specifically asking what the argument is when TBP say that TRP's view of hypergamy is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 02:26 AM
6

If you could just quote the parts where you put your clear argument against the TRP theory of hypergamy.... That'd be great.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 02:23 AM
5

How is it wrong? You must have a reason other than "you're just wrong". Otherwise, you are confirming to my orginal assertion - You have no rebuttal or argument against TRP theories, so you resort to name calling, shaming tactics, and call it satire.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 02:20 AM
5

Nope. I was asking for TBP to explain the argument against TRP's view of hypergamy. As TBP claims that the shaming tactics they use is "satire", I assert that the reason they only use shaming/satire, is because they actually have no constructed argument to rebut against TRPs claim of hypergamy. All you did was say "here's the BP advice", which I didn't ask for.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 02:14 AM
1

I'm saying that, to say that TRP's view of hypergamy is wrong, requires a fundamental understanding of what TRP means when they say the word hypergamy. Therefore, they must be able to debate the point. To go into the semantics of the word (whether it's a TRP term, or in a sociology context) turns the conversation into "what does TRP mean when they say hypergamy". I would assert that TBP know full well what TRP means, but they just don't have a full rebuttal to the view of hypergamy in the TRP co…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 02:12 AM
1

Ah, but, I would say that TBP disagree with the claims of hypergamy that TRP has (even with a different scope). However, they are unable to argue clearly against them, without relying on the "you're just wrong" type argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 02:04 AM
2

You have given us BP advice (that I didn't ask for). And have said that TRP is a bad philosophy because their views are wrong. You still didn't actually give an argument other than attempting to shame RP, or saying that it's wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 02:02 AM
2

I agree with that comment.. It's important to remember that not all BPers are on TBP, but I would say that a lot of TBP subscribers are BPers (as they disagree with the TRP theories). Thanks for your input /u/Xemnas81 !
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 01:59 AM
5

I think that debate, should someone has an aversion to another's view point, is warranted. To say that "sometimes it's not needed" is falling back into the point that I made: TBP don't have a valid argument against the TRP claims of hypergamy. (EDIT: also, that this subreddit exists, and that you are here, suggests that debate is warranted)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/16 01:41 AM
1

Sort of, but you actually said it as a statement for others. You didn't word it as a personal thing (eg "I've found having women in my life is a plus") you said that "Having lots of women in your life is a plus". Hence the request to provide evidence of your claim. Thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 10:53 PM
2

I see you didn't attempt to explain the benefits of having a woman in my life. And no, mine want an opinion, I have a fine life. That's just a statement about my life. If I said that you would have a better life with a certain thing in your life, that would be an opinion because I don't know anything about your life to make such a claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 07:46 PM
5

I have a question about a statement made by you: Having lots of women in your life is a plus... How can you back that statement up with hard facts, because it sounds like an opinion to me. I don't have that many women in my life (apart from co-workers, and they are just co-workers), and I'm doing fine. What tangible benefits am I going to see, should I get more women in my life?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 04:47 AM
3

I think that, if there was sufficient support for H-Dawg, purely on the basis of her being a woman, she would have been put forward for voting before now. As much as feminists complain about women not being representative of the voters, women just aren't voting for women. The complications of her private email server, sheer inability to debate without going off on a tangent, says that she's going to crash and burn - assuming that she isn't dragged up on charges due to breaking laws with her emai…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 04:42 AM
2

Perhaps I'm a bit slow today... What does HSW stand for?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 04:24 AM
1

That article screams single and don't want to admit that guys don't want to keep dating me. Women can say all the things they don't want in a guy, but if you followed that list, there's no men that would actually fit into the tiny little box that remains. They are searching for the perfect guy, and in that, I mean a guy who is at almost worshippable level. Which is just hypergamy in full effect. Because they all (that contributed to the article) think that they are worth such a perfect guy, they…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 10:16 PM
8

This isn't a political movement. Stop thinking we have a point to prove.
/r/MGTOW16/01/16 11:31 AM
3

Well, I stopped contact with my family about 14 years ago. I think family is who you want it to be. I have very close male friends that I consider like brothers (even though they are from different countries to me). I don't have a sexual partner, but I'd imagine some could see them as family, but it depends on your context of family
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 11:26 AM
0

Someone just found Wired magazine and thinks they know security. eye roll
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 06:45 AM
1

I think men normally try to assert they are higher in the chain, than assessing if others are higher. If that makes sense. Ummm, lemme re-phrase If a man wants to check if he's the alpha doooood, he is more likely to attempt to assert dominance by putting down the other guys, but it's to put them down, not see if they can come back at them. When a woman shit tests, she's checking that her assertion that dooooood X is alpha as fwark, and will shit test him to check that he can come back as an alp…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/16 05:57 AM
1

Conor McGregor got a cut of the Pay Per View fees for his most recent bout. There's estimates he could have got upwards of $5m for it.
/r/MGTOW15/01/16 11:27 PM
1

I have a great career, go overseas on holiday every year (as well as a domestic holiday), six-figure income, can do whatever I want in my free time, have my own house so a stupid level of disposable income. So, yeah.... I'd say I'm pretty happy. Also, RP/MGTOW
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 10:37 PM
6

Yes. But, she was a batshit crazy manipulating bitch who craved drama. She then tried to blame me for it. I was most likely purple at the time, as I was in the transition to Red Pill. That and a few other observations at the time sent me full MGTOW.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 10:34 PM
1

90% of it is women hating circle jerk eh? A full 9 out of 10 posts is women hating? Sure... You can think that if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 11:22 AM
1

There are threads on MGTOW about life improvement, as well as threads about the types of circumstances that brought them to MGTOW. There are a lot of propaganda pieces saying how MGTOW are all women haters and misogynists, I've seen pictures that people claim are from MGTOW, but a reverse image search only shows the image posted to tumblr and feminist blogs. There's a misconception about what MGTOW is and what it's for.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 10:54 AM
1

I disagree with that. Feminism demanded equal rights to men, which they have (name a right a man has that women don't), but they're still around and have a subreddit. MGTOW subreddit can also be a place for men, there's not really that many places that men can hang out without having women try to join in. Setting up a rule for how long someone wants to be there, for whatever reasons they choose, isn't down to anyone. Certainly not you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 10:41 AM
1

Those posts have been made, and there's occasional investment advice as well. However, the basis for MGTOW is, as I see it, an overdose of the Red Pill. So you have to appreciate that there's going to be a lot of guys who are shitty with the whole deal. However, an average guy, in an average job, if he removed women in a romantic context from his life, would find himself with more money, more time, less stress, and a better quality of life (at least as far as I see it). I do have a blog (that I …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 10:25 AM
1

Yeah, MY own way. I can do whatever the fuck I want. Currently, that includes owning my own house, having a sweet career, and annoying BP, feminists and generally bad debaters on here when I'm bored. I'm not aware of an actual system that I have to follow in order to show that I'm not following a system...?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 09:24 AM
4

You're the one that asserted it. Don't be bouncing it back on me. Why does a man need vagina in his life? And why are you annoyed by someone else's life choice? Neither of those things seem grounded in reality (Addendum: I think the lack of response proves my point; There is actually no requirement for a man to have a vagina in his life - there is zero negative impact from not having one in your life and, in fact, there are actually positive results from avoiding them
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 04:04 AM
5

Giving up on women completely is a feat only capable by disillusioned fuccboi's who've been burned too many times in the past. Most healthy males desire females...whether or not relationships are detrimental. I'm not saying MGTOW is unmanly because they want to avoid marriage and relationships, but because some of y'all want to avoid women altogether...which is fucking stupid and reeks of butthurt. You seem far too angry about MGTOW. As in, beyond normal reasonable person angry. Also, why do you…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 03:40 AM
2

Well, you are mistaking porn searches to the real world. If we take into account the porn searches, where MILF shows high in the US, and we compare it to the OK Cupid data in the OP link, we can see that there is a disconnect. Spending a short while watching porn of an older women is completely different to wanting to actually date one. Men simply aren't searching for older women in the OK Cupid data, and to suggest that a guy rubbing one out to a porn star is comparable to a guy wanting to date…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 02:45 AM
2

Citation for that one being the first or second most popular search term please. Because I did a super quick check here and you appear to have pulled that "fact" out your ass (Edit) I actually search by country and it appears in the US it was search term number two... Beaten out by those cursed pre-wall teens. But, seeing that most countries arent searching for MILF high in their terms, I think we can call that an anomaly.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 02:10 AM
5

Not putting words into your mouth at all. Mgtow - bitter, women haters, insecure, failure with women. TRP - social impairments, socially deprived, Asperger's syndrome, incompetent. You insulted both sides with similar insults for being at either end of the spectrum. How about you realise what you wrote, and rebut instead of going on the offensive?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 01:14 AM
2

No true Scotsman, anyone? I'm mgtow, and I'm here (admittedly, it's because I enjoy making arguments against people in general) It's nothing to do with being "hung up on women", it's about having a healthy understanding of just how much a woman would fuck up all my shit, if I allowed one into my life. Having an understanding of something risky isn't obsessing over it, it's just understanding something risky.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 01:11 AM
5

Hahahahahahahaa Today, /u/another1another1 will be showing us all how to judge others with a bias, and ensuing that the same judgement can be reached from completely opposite points. Pay close attention to the ability they have in reducing the ability not to want women in your life to not being a real man. Yet, they also manage to say that having many women in your life means you also aren't a real man. For good measure, they also say others are "hamstering" in the outward accusation to prevent …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 01:04 AM
2

And your shitty haircut? /s
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 12:54 AM
1

No one is entitled to attention from anyone else.. Women aren't entitled to attention either.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/16 12:53 AM
2

Ah, the atmosphere being harnessed would mean mechanical interaction to harvest power. Mechanical things need to be maintained, where as solar is passive. I've really thought it through
/r/MensRights14/01/16 09:41 PM
1

The reason that someone would use an argument (or avoid another argument) with logic that is fallacious, is simple: They allowed emotion to get in the way of rational thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/16 12:17 PM
1

Well, I think that we all knew, already, that you aren't an astronaut.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 11:46 AM
2

Actually, interesting thing, astronauts have never taken "space ice cream" into space..
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 11:38 AM
2

Then I don't need to answer :)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 11:37 AM
1

Oh all right.... Shucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:59 AM
2

He plays hard to get more than any women... I mean, always saying how precious his ring is? Seriously
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:54 AM
1

You won't "understand" my "joke" most likely "because" you keep "using" inverted "commas" in a way to try and be "condescending". Lighten the fuck up.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:49 AM
1

Thank you for agreeing with me :D
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:37 AM
1

I can't compare to the average guy? Well, you seem to not understand what a joke is. You see, a joke isn't about tame shit. If a joke is about normal life, it is usually about the bad parts of life. If it's not about the bad parts of life, then it's usually bringing a strange thing into the juxtaposition of normality. At no point does a joke have to be funny to everyone. Dane Cook is a fine example of that, as he isn't funny to anyone. (See? That was a joke as well. I thought I'd point it out fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:36 AM
1

They are attracted to the money.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:28 AM
1

Women will bang rich guys, so that they can extract money from them. Hypergamy 101.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:25 AM
1

Get your feefees in a twist too defensive delusional But also: disagree with feminist rhetoric (I corrected your spelling for that one) However, despite saying that, you've pretty much covered a gamut of the techniques that feminists use against men. I've heard them all before, and they don't work on me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:23 AM
1

That's kind of my point... Hypergamy in a nutshell.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:20 AM
1

Oh damn! I forgot about the "you're an insecure man" approach! Are you going to go through the entire feminist repertoire of man-shaming? Or will you realise that it's rather retarded to have posted in Men's Rights, and then end up trying to shame a man like a typical feminist?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:12 AM
1

Ah, yes. The ol' I judge you to be socially inept, and therefore, it makes me feel better to say that you are MGTOW, because the thought that a normal, professionally-employed, man, actually going MGTOW makes me consider that there might be something fundamentally correct with MGTOW, and therefore, TRP views. Is that all you have? Come on, tell me I've got a small dick, or I couldn't get a woman if I tried, or perhaps you can say that I'm a misogynistic Right Wing extremist... Come on bitch, you…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 10:07 AM
4

Honey? Ha, no. Sorry, not only am I not, but your condescending attitude doesn't do anything for me but make me realise that you wish your life was as good as mine. Early 30's, six-figure job, side investments in stocks and real estate. Divorced. Slept around for basically all my 20s, and then realised that women serve no positive purpose in my life. They bring nothing of value to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 09:53 AM
3

And there's only a few hot chicks, the rest are fat and smashed through the wall ages ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 09:50 AM
1

Wow, you must be super fun at parties. I'll remember not to crack jokes when you're around.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 09:49 AM
5

Ironic that he's able to still fuck pretty, young, girls..... With the aid of blue pills.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 08:01 AM
1

Hugh Hefner (and his many playboy girls that he bangs) would like a word with you about this "male wall" as you describe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 07:53 AM
2

You go girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 02:03 AM
10

I'm not sure proclaiming you go girl! necessarily aligns with your assertion that: nowadays promiscuity in men is just as bad as it is for women emphasis added by me Unless, of course, you are saying it isn't bad at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 01:59 AM
6

Step 1: Get a vasectomy early on. Step 2: Don't get caught in a pregnancy trap (even if a condom breaks) Step 3: Enjoy all your money yourself. (Not that I actually have sex anymore, but the vasectomy certainly reduced my stress to almost zero when I was)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 01:49 AM
3

Oh shush. Personal stories aren't citations.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/16 01:46 AM
1

I think they don't mind long posts when they see the person is getting angry and slipping. But a long post filled with reasons they are wrong? Well, that just won't do, will it? ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 09:29 PM
2

You wrote a novel and expected me to fight your hamster. I'm not interested, just keep spinning your wheel, but I won't be wasting any effort That's a novel to you? Also, spinning my wheel? Fight my hamster? Those are terms specifically for people who go around in circles (not that you would know if I did or didn't, because you seemingly didn't read my post (sorry, I mean novel). I've given reasonable rebuttles to your wild claims at each and every turn, and you went off on a tangent practically…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 09:15 PM
2

Titan is a moon and further away from the sun meaning crops would be more difficult to grow to sustain a population in the early stages of its development. Yes you could use a combination of red/blue LEDs to grow plants, but that would require you carry them and that you take a power source with you, due to the shitty amount of power available at that number of AUs away from your only solar power source in the solar system. Also, this post was 54 days old, or are you actually from Titan and the …
/r/MensRights12/01/16 09:13 PM
1

Reread the OP? That is specifically talking about actions two people in TRP did in another subreddit. You asked me why I would subscribe to TRP when they talk like this, I answered that question completely. Then you changed it to being about the femalehate subreddit, which I don't subscribe to, and you tried to say my rhetoric was awful and I didn't really want a discussion. Now you are asking some vague question of what are they asking of readers? Who are "they" in your question? TRP or OP? Rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 09:07 PM
7

No, you were talking about TRP being a religious cult. I gave credible reasons why it wasn't. You have zero rebuttals or argument against the points I made. So you picked one single thing where, I might add, you said that they would just throw you out the church. (Islam doesn't do that, and it's not rhetoric, it's the religion.). But, if you would like to take one small point that I made, wave your arms in the air and scream that I don't want to have a discussion, despite the fact that I've been…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 12:20 PM
10

As for spirit or god, not a requirement for religion. A religion is a belief system not based in fact, which requires you to take things on faith, which terp does. I disagree that all of the parts of TRP is only agreeable if you have faith within it. I was drawn to Red Pill and MGTOW from my life experiences resonating with the things that were being spoken about openly in the RP and MGTOW area. The things that I agree with in RP are not "on faith", they are things written by a separated group o…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 11:53 AM
11

Me, myself? I don't believe in any form of spirit or god. If you mean how is TRP not religious? There is no requirement to pray, pay homage, or worship, the theory of TRP. I'm free to agree with, or disagree with, any parts of TRP as I so wish.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 11:06 AM
1

Hang on a moment. You commented this: I'd like to understand why someone would participate in a sub that endorses hateful contributors and content, while claiming not to share that hate and expressing resentment at being associated with that hate. Implying that you were talking about a subreddit that I subscribe to. Now, suddenly, we are talking about a subreddit called /r/femalehate? I don't recall, at any point, saying that I subscribed to that subreddit (most likely, you know, because I don't…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 08:42 AM
1

Yeah. Most people can do this. But this thread isn't called "Why do you hate women? Oh you don't hate women? Yes you do because someone else said they hate women." I understand that, however: I'd like to understand why someone would participate in a sub that endorses hateful contributors and content, while claiming not to share that hate and expressing resentment at being associated with that hate. That was the point I was replying to. I directly asked you what your question was, as I had alread…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 08:25 AM
1

I am able to seperate things I don't like or agree with, from things I enjoy reading about. I have this amazing talent for not going on a triggered-I-need-my-safe-space psychosis, because I'm a functioning adult. Do you support everything written in subreddits that you frequent? No, of course, that would be absurd. I don't consider some remarks that are said by others to be representative of my own views. I'm not sure why you consider that they are...?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 07:49 AM
1

Perhaps I mistook you suddenly leaping into a conversation half way through as someone with a point to make. What is your reason for jumping in then?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 07:33 AM
14

Here is the definition of a cult. We aren't religious, so that get's rid of 1, 6, and 7 Numbers 2, and 4, might have something in that we share a belief in some parts of the theory. 3 is a bit wild, as I don't think following a subreddit is devotion as such. And 5 is out the window, as we don't have a thing that is sacred. However, judging by this list, Blue Pill ideals, and even feminism, are also cults. I'm not sure what your point was? (Unless you confused "cult" with "religious", which a lot…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 07:29 AM
1

Do you think that ECs in TRP speak for all of the people that subscribe to TRP? If so, why do you think that an unelected person represents the entire group? If you don't think that is the case, why did you jump into this conversation to seemingly infer otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/16 07:12 AM
1

Are they actually saying ECs speak for you? well, they seem to think that, because I subscribe to TRP, that I concur with all things said there. And that, somehow, everything that said is representative of my thoughts. Or asking for an explanation about why you'd subscribe to a sub that makes ECs out of explicit misogynist? Yeah, actually, exactly like that. See, this is the problem. As an adult, with complete control of my faculties, I'm able to ignore the parts of TRP that I don't agree with. …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 09:53 PM
-1

What's the debate? Pretty sure this isn't the right subreddit for hug giving.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 07:51 AM
1

I believe in gender equality. Best you look out for that drunk driver that's going to swerve off the road any second.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 05:43 AM
2

I'm not brushing anything away other than the other person says that those ECs speak for me. They don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 04:12 AM
3

There is a tag that is used (albeit sparingly) within TRP that is for MGTOW, there's also one for Men's Rights. To say that you can define MGTOW as not part of Red Pill, is flawed. The Red Pill, in it's base, is an understanding of the hypergamous nature of most women (some would say all women, but this isn't a place for that discussion). With the specific statement that you gave for TRP, is doesn't state anything whatsoever to do with hating women. So, you drop one level and go for the posters …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 01:57 AM
3

For the average joe/joette, they should have an understanding that there are multiple areas of TRP; Picking up girls, MGTOW, understanding hypergamy, etc. To say that specific people represent everyone isn't fair, there's more than just the part that hates women, that makes up TRP. Just like feminism has more than just the RadFem section, feminism has parts that, if compared to the views of RadFem, would seem strangely separated from the (perceived) core of the movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 01:45 AM
3

You make a good post but again , if I want to ask questions about a terpers views, why should I value your views more then the people who are in charge? The people who the mods actively support? If we're going to use the no true scotsman, we're not going to get anywhere. You seem to be giving the people in question more credit than I do. There's just no logical reason to give more weight to your views when discussing specifically trp reddit theory. Sounds like you actually want the people who yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 01:38 AM
3

So let's recap: You know tons of TRPers that don't hate women If someone follows RP theory, they must support the views of specific people in TRP You like some parts of TRP I'm not dismissing any criticism, I'm dismissing criticism that is badly put together. You say that their opinion has more weight than mine - but, I ask, to who? Because I don't follow TRP to gets points and be promoted, I subscribe to TRP (and other subreddits) that I enjoy reading parts of. To say that if I accept some part…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 12:45 AM
2

Again, you're making an assumption that all TRPers support that person. You're also assuming that the people you are talking about are leaders of the RP theory. I subscribe to TRP, and I consider a lot of the thoughts and concepts regarding hypergamy and the like to have a basis in the modern world. That doesn't mean I hate women. Nor does it mean that I follow those people that you've spoken about. You then go on to say: Why do the trp mods not do some sort of check to verify their badged up me…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 12:33 AM
2

That's an apex fallacy. You're assuming that all people that subscribe to the RP theory see these people as "leaders". Do you agree with everything that your country's president/prime minister/leader does? Of course not, there's questioning that takes place. You are making a wild assumption that because these people are viewed by some as endorsed people, that all people see their opinion as the truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 12:22 AM
1

Because not all TRPers hate women. You're using some people that do hate women, and applying that rule to those that don't. This is a fallacious argument. It would be like me saying that, because some feminists used the hashtag "killallmen", that all feminists hate men. This would also be a fallacious argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 12:16 AM
1

You are concerned that people claim that TRP is hateful, and then go on the claim that TRP is hateful. You didn't actually answer my question though; If a man hated women, why is that bad? And if you have no view on that question, or are saying that it's not bad, why do you have concern over the people that you claim hate women?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/16 12:09 AM
2

Two statements: Some feminists hate men too. This is a conversation between two people, not an entire group. One question (and I'm asking this for an actual, thoughtful, answer.. Not to troll): Why would it be bad for a man to hate women?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 11:37 PM
2

It does indeed.. Thanks for agreeing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 11:22 PM
2

judging someone before there is actual proof happens a lot in society I thought that you said that it was outliers and not a growing trend to be concerned about? Now it's happening a lot? You're very confusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 11:16 PM
1

Although, I must admit, it is a very difficult problem. I mean, we on reddit do it too, we love to rage at things, even if they aren't proven to be true. Did you just say that I'm raging over something and then completely dismiss the evidence I've provided and say that not of it is true?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 10:59 PM
1

So, with your lack of worry over it becoming a growing trend being one thing... Do you think it is worth worrying about the men that face jail time and life-ruining actions from false rape accusations? (I'm not on about the growing trend theory, because that de-humanises the victims of false-accusations. I'm specifically asking for your view on those men facing false charges).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 10:50 PM
2

When I say "I don't worry about it", I mean: "I don't think this is a large trend and a feminist conspiracy". Apologies if that wasn't clear. It wasn't clear in any way shape or form. Because you clearly said that YOU weren't worried. But, when challenged, you suddenly change the entire meaning of what you said into an expansive phrase, instead of a direct one that you were called out on. Again, usual feminist tactic. Be accountable for what you said, don't just change it's meaning when challeng…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 10:39 PM
2

Citation 1 Citation 2 Citation 3 Men's lives can be ruined by false rape accusations. But, you aren't worried about it. Do you know what the word acceptable means? It's means you accept what's happening. If you aren't worried about it, you accept it. You find it acceptable. The three stories above are different men that faced issues, so stop being so blatantly dismissive and saying "it's always the same men". And the reason it's "all you want to say about it" is because you have no basis for you…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 10:20 PM
1

Don't sigh at me. I'm making good points and your insinuation of superiority isn't welcome here. The comparison between crimes is irrelevant, you are saying that the numbers are low, and therefore it's acceptable. The rule (attributed to Blackstone in the 1700s) which is the basis of "innocent until proven guilty" states that it's better for 10 guilty persons to go free, than one innocent person suffer. A man falsely accused of rape has his name dragged through the mud for all to see. He will us…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 10:07 PM
1

So, now you are saying that there aren't consequences for false rape accusations? Ok, fair enough. However, you still think that a man's image isn't tarnished after being accused of rape? As for the comparison to murder, I've no idea what you are talking about as far as a "large trend in society"? I'm not aware of 41 people a day claiming they were murdered, and the legal system finding out later that they weren't dead
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 09:49 PM
2

No, I didn't mean men. 41 men a day are being falsely charged with rape. You said that there are consequences to stop such things happening. So, as I keep having to ask because you keep diverting the argument into murder (which is a completely different crime); Where are the women facing the consequences of accusing 41 men a day in the US of rape that they didn't commit? I'm not sure how I can write that clearer for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 09:41 PM
2

Bring murders into this is a complete and utter diversion from the point I was making. Also, claiming that only 1 in 16 leads to a conviction discounts your previous assertion that the conviction rate is 50%. You also claimed that there is punishment for the women making false claims, which is why I still ask; Where are the 41 women a day in the US being charged with false rape accusations? Or, are you saying that imprisoning 41 innocent people a day, solely on the word of another, is acceptable…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 09:27 PM
2

Ok... So here we can see that the number of rapes that were recorded was 173,610 Assuming that the number recorded above is after the false rapes were sorted out, it takes the figure (adjusted for the 8% total false accusations) to 188,706 (rounded down from .522) Therefore, we can see that in 2013 there were a total of 15,096 false accusations in the US alone. That averages out to 41 men accused of rape a day, who were completely innocent. Now, if you could just find me those 41 women a DAY tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 09:16 PM
2

So, what percentage of cases are false claims? Take a guess....
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 09:06 PM
2

Like I said, it happens, but I really don't think it happens often. If girls could do this without consequence, it would happen more often, wouldn't it? Enough crazy girls who have a score to settle with a man You think that there's consequences for the girls that do this each time? No. Certainly not every time. It's minimal consequences at best. "Mattress Girl" tried to get a guy expelled from uni, she even dragged a mattress around as a protest. All evidence points towards no rape occurring. N…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 09:00 PM
5

Friend of mine was accused. Named in the media due to being accused. Lost his job, couldn't pay his home loan, so he lost his house. Spent two months in jail awaiting trial. Then, the girl said he wasn't even present. He was released to a shell of his life. It doesn't take a conviction of rape to ruin a man, just an accusation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 08:36 PM
1

what are you a python programmer? brush up on your polymorphism buddy. Not much of a reader, are you? I just told you I wasn't a programmer. However, I know that claiming that call orders are incorrect and trying to relate a normal debate comment to the relevance within a programming language doesn't really have relevance to the point I was making. I wasn't making a reference to an object, nor was I making any calls. Now, if you'd like to return to normal English syntax, instead of trying to sou…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 09:48 AM
1

I don't need to, I don't work as a programmer.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 09:39 AM
1

Well, they're out there. I've found out after not getting a couple of roles, that it was because of "diversity requirements", but I was more than qualified.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 09:34 AM
1

T p /--& bp Tbp
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 09:12 AM
2

"The sidebar" You might need to narrow that statement down, somewhat.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 09:06 AM
2

I'm clearly not alleging that there's no sexism or racism. I literally just said that there can be such things, in both directions. Do you not understand that the things put into place actively discriminate against people for things that they have no control over, so that other people can benefit from things that they have no control over? That, in case you aren't keeping up, is the thing you are claiming to be fighting against. I believe that you live in Australia (judging from previous posts, …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 07:48 AM
2

You don't think that, just maybe, men have to deal with sexism too? Man and a woman go for a job in a company that has mandated gender outcome minimums (must have at least a certain number of women in a team). The company needs a women in the role. It's impossible for the man to get the role, simply because he's a man. That's gender discrimination. There's also mandated race outcome minimums in lots of places. Sometimes, it's impossible for a white person to get a role, simply for being white. B…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 07:31 AM
2

This changes nothing. A not insignificant proportion of people are sexist and racist. Someone who has the exact same history as you will have the problem of dealing with them on top of all the problems you deal with You don't know shit about the problems I've dealt with. You know what, it's people like you that fuck shit up for everyone. You claim to be fighting the oppression and patriarchy and racism and all that, but when told about a workplace where people are successful based on talent and …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 06:26 AM
2

No, they are saying that if you were a woman, or black, you would at some stage in your career met someone sexist or racist who would have, despite your long work hours, promoted someone else ahead of you. Or thrown your resume in the bin etc. I purposely didn't add something to my history, for when someone who doesn't understand a meritocracy, commented. My direct manager is a woman. As is her manager. I work with people that aren't white, I work with people who's first language isn't English. …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 06:00 AM
2

Hahaha Have an Upvote
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 04:19 AM
3

Lefties do. It's why Germany had a massive influx of migrants.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 03:39 AM
2

The narrative is that men get everything they have in life because they are men. This is pure nonsense. I'm from a poor neighbourhood in England, I had a shitty childhood.. But, I studied hard, I forged a career and changed jobs for 12ish years, staying near the bottom rungs of the ladder. I moved internationally and started working my fucking ass off, without claiming overtime, to get noticed. I now am fairly high in the IT sector, have an income well into 6 figures (dollars), with a stock and …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 03:39 AM
1

Respect, and self-respect are completely different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 03:06 AM
3

"No one wants a Muslim culture" Apart from, you know, muslims.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 03:05 AM
7

I disagree. If it were satire, you wouldn't get such heated debate from BPers as to how wrong TRP is. Also, most of the TBP subreddit posts revolve around "look how bad this redpiller is, just look!", which isn't satire at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 02:38 AM
5

The red pill has so many men who do not respect women. It gets men who are entitled, hurt, bitter, and angry. Biased approach and instantly putting any man down that doesn't conform to your viewpoint. Great start. These men do not respect women. People earn my respect. They don't get it based on having a vagina or a penis. However, they follow their well respected members and seem to adopt their worldviews. Maybe such members are respected by some (not all) because they make good viewpoints? The…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 12:55 AM
0

Why am I arguing with someone that believes in a patriarchy
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 12:43 AM
2

Hang on. Whoa there. Didn't live under a patriarchal religion? Remind me, when was the last female emperor of Japan?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 12:33 AM
6

I would begrudge a strawman. If that helps your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 12:31 AM
3

Japan has a thriving hook up culture? Never heard of herbivore men, then? Or Japan's massively declining birth rate?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 12:26 AM
2

If by holding frame, in this context, you mean staying on point; Yes, I always try to stay on point. But, I also enter into debate/discussion/generally poking holes in theories against Feminists, SJWs, and the "Left". Mainly because one of two results can occur: Either I or they, successfully change the other persons view or understanding of the opposing view. Or They go around and around, faster and faster (aka, Hamstering, as in, a hamster on a wheel) trying to prove their point without concre…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/16 12:21 AM
1

I don't really care.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 09:07 AM
1

I know. And that's because you are invested in the concept of women having value, and you don't want that destabilised. I'm not here to convince you otherwise, you can assign a value to anything you want, I should have no bearing on the value you give something.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 09:02 AM
1

If you were going to sell me dog shit, the value would be zero. I don't want dog shit. And I don't want a woman in my life. So their value is zero too.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 08:56 AM
1

If I was going to sell you a piece of dog shit, for $50. What is the value of the dog shit to you? If you buy it, it's worth $50 to you. But, it has no intrinsic value. It's value to you is completely different to the intrinsic actual value that another person would place on the dog shit. I understand that you are trying to use semantics and re-wording things to somehow say that I attach a value to women in my life. But, I don't. They serve no positive purpose for me, they have no positive value…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 08:45 AM
1

Then they have value to you. They just aren't worth the cost. Now you're just trying to twist and manipulate my words, to try and have me say that women have a value to me. They don't. Value is not a net figure. It represents how much you're willing to pay for something Let's look at this another way; If I am going to sell you a $20 bill. It's price is $20. It's ongoing cost is $0. It's value to you (as you can swap it later for goods and services) is $20. If I'm going to sell you a $20 bill, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 08:30 AM
2

I'm not being pedantic at all. But, am I sexually attracted to women? Yes. I am. I just don't act upon that urge. And I didn't say they are worthless, I said they have no value to me. There's a difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 08:19 AM
2

Are you sure? It sounds like women do have value to you, you just perceive the cost to be higher. Value, cost, price. Three different things. You buy a boat for a purchase price The mooring, fuel, and upkeep are the cost of ownership. Being able to go sea fishing and holidays on a lake are the value I get from the boat, and I consider the value to be higher than the cost and price. Women have a price in the money i would have to spend in dating and courting them. The continuing purchasing of gif…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 08:06 AM
2

Restricting the supply of diamonds is creating real scarcity, though. Scarcity is subjective - for the consumer, the resource genuinely becomes more scarce. Indeed, scarcity is subjective. But, the knowledge that things aren't as rare or special as they appear, reduces the items worth to that buyer. When I realised that the cost of having a woman in my life, for example, and I also realised that she was behaving the way most women behave; the value of a women in my life fell to zero. Scarce or n…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 07:48 AM
2

Restricting the supply is faking scarcity. I'm also not competing with other men. I'm not sure that you read my post at all, I clearly said that the scarcity of women don't any make them valuable.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 07:12 AM
6

Often, it's thought that diamonds are valuable because they are scarce. However, diamonds aren't scarce, it's a scam that De Beers created to keep the prices high. Imagined scarcity does increase perceived value. It doesn't, however, change the item's actual value. Having scarcity doesn't give value to an item, it's intrinsic worth it set by its value(s). Which is to say, a motorcycle to me is valuable because I enjoy riding them, but to a person that is a quadriplegic, a motorcycle has no value…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/16 03:50 AM
1

It is these days in first world countries. Third wave feminism - what is it fighting for then?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 09:08 PM
2

Well, you'd be wrong. That's what I am.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 05:06 AM
1

If they can't control their urges, sure. But we Scottish MGTOWs are the real deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/16 02:23 AM
20

Just for the sheer fact of how much disposal income you'll have when GYOW, it's a convincing reason. The ones who think MGTOW are just sad guys, don't realise that they still are basing their status upon the attention they get from women. Once you take into account the lower stress levels, ability to do whatever you want (pretty much), and seemingly having more time away from work (no picking her up/dropping her off) and you don't just have more money, you have more quality time. I was married a…
/r/MGTOW07/01/16 10:25 PM
3

If your dick has a curve to the left or right, do this; (Assuming a left curve as you look down at it) Put her on her right side on the bed, her top (left) leg bent at the hip and the knee (imagine the CPR recovery position. Straddle her bottom, right, leg and enter her. Your hands go on her left hip, and then you can rock her hips away and towards you. While grinding a bit. The curve should (unless you're super small) hit the spot bang on. You're welcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 09:06 PM
1

If a man is MGTOW, they wouldn't have slept with her; regardless of her being overtly wanting to sleep with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 08:54 PM
3

But maybe the only way to attract the nicer girls is to be a nicer guy yourself. If that's "beta" or maybe "gamma", then that's fine. Because being "alpha" sounds like a miserable, vicious, competitive existence. There's the "Omega" type guy too, you know. You and your friends don't all have to be jocks that have to impress each other. My friends are all decent guys, or I wouldn't be friends with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 06:11 AM
3

It's just a funny name that stuck really... Chad Thundercock. Like, it conjures up an image, and it's almost the same image that everyone sees in their mind (within slight variations for cultural/locational bias)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 04:40 AM
1

Thundercunt is alright... But there's something awful about the term flange... D'Chadwynna Thunderflange.. Compromise? (Addendum) Holy shit, I just remembered I had a friend called Chad. But he was a massive fucking dork. (No surprises really, I work in IT)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 04:34 AM
7

And if a daughter; Chadetta Thunderflange.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 04:30 AM
1

I don't get the reference, sorry..
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 03:11 AM
1

Sounds like someone lost their pseudo-mother to a horse, and now hates horses.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 02:15 AM
2

no but I never said they'd much rather fuck a horse than a human lol. Neither did I. Now you're just making shit up. Are you sure you aren't a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 02:05 AM
2

Ah, sounded like you were just being sexist and playing the perpetual victim card. My mistake.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 02:03 AM
2

You act intentionally obtuse and exaggerate it No, mate. You wrote this line: She'll drop you way before she drops her horse. You're competing with a 10 inch dick and a creature with much more muscle mass than you. I didn't exaggerate it at all. But, back to the question you keep avoiding; What happens with girls if we killed every single horse in the world? Would they suddenly stop being crazy?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 02:01 AM
2

So, the hambeast initiates the action (flirting) and becomes the victim?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 01:58 AM
2

If she had said her age truthfully, this situation could have been avoided. There's a point were "victim blaming" actually becomes "maybe you fucked up and should accept responsibility for your actions".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 01:57 AM
2

Here's a crazy theory for you: Girls that are spoiled from a young age are the most crazy and think that they should be princesses. The families that are able to provide such a level of such spoiling, are usually wealthy. Wealthy people can afford horses. Girl that ends up being crazy, also has the financial ability to own a horse (from her family). That sounds pretty logical to me. Sounds a lot more logical than: Horses are muscly and have big cocks, therefore girls choose them over men Side th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 01:49 AM
2

Personal first hand experiences are not citations. Because some horse girls aren't crazy (as you've said), and some crazy girls aren't into horses (as you've also admitted), there is no causality link between them. (This is basic isolation testing 101) It sounds like you have shitty taste in women, and don't want to accept responsibility that your judgement in girls is flawed. You still haven't been able to clearly explain to me why you are happy that horses died in a fire. Because, if I'm hones…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 01:41 AM
2

I make a fairly decent side income from horse betting.. I'm not sure what this guy's problem is lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 01:30 AM
1

How, exactly, are horses contributing into making girls crazy? Correlation and causality are completely different things - you seem to have a problem with working out which is which.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 01:21 AM
2

Then what the fuck are you saying? Or, alternative question; Why are you happy that horses died in a fire? EDIT: The other common-denominator in your previous relationships with these crazy girls, is, well, you. Maybe you should die in a fire? Do you see how that's some stupid logic?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 01:14 AM
1

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Ok, ok... Sweet Jesus What, exactly are you saying that horses are doing? Trying to bring down the patriarchy? Or, are you saying that if we kill all horses, girls will stop being crazy?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 01:06 AM
2

No, it really doesn't come down to that at all. You're kind of implying that horses are causing girls to go insane. But, not all crazy girls ride horses. It's shitty logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 01:02 AM
6

Holy shit that some retarded logic. Are you saying that horses cause girls to become crazy?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 12:55 AM
4

Horses destroy humanity. Wait, what?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 12:52 AM
13

I'm not sure disliking horse-girls means that you should be happy about animals dying in a fire. That's a bit weird, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 12:41 AM
2

First powered flight wasn't very far, didn't take too long before flight became normal. Don't play it down, advances are advances! Also, human babies aren't any more complicated than other mammal babies. Vertebrates are basically the same functions (for the most part)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/16 12:35 AM
2

If you consider parts of feminism to be too extreme that it's just trolls, you must buy-in to some things that feminism says? For example, something that is not being ignored due to you thinking that it's not "extreme enough", you must, therefore, think that anything not ignored is valid...? Therefore, if you are not disregarding any part of TRP, you must consider all of TRP to be valid enough that you don't disregard any of it?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 11:33 PM
1

Well, you seem a bit behind the 8 ball; http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/03/120302101543.htm
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 11:26 PM
1

feminist frequency has been making a small fortune that they can't seem to explain where it's going to. Pro-victim feminists get paid to write opinion pieces and interviews. The benefits that feminism is fighting for, gives economic pluses to women. You won't get shit, my friend, you have a penis.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 10:26 PM
-1

There's already technological advances in making "fake" wombs that can bear children. Rinaldo went the surrogate route for his child (to raise the kid on his own). The power that you're talking about wont be around for much longer. Then it's going to become a meritocracy for real. (I hope)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 10:23 PM
7

I stumbled across some videos on YouTube and they really resonated with my experiences with women. Not just in personal relationships, but also with interactions in day to day life. I was divorced at the time, but its not like it was a recent burn or anything like that. (The divorce was from me leaving because I wasn't happy in anyway) After overdosing on the red pill and just went straight MGTOW. I now find that just living my life as I see fit is extremely fulfilling and I can pretty much do w…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 08:38 PM
1

Aaaaaaaand, I get it now! Because you decree that the extreme side of TRP isn't "extreme enough to ignore" then ALL of TRP should be held accountable, but anything that feminism says that is downright hate speech is able to be disregarded! How does that logic not sound like the rantings of a lunatic?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 11:18 AM
1

Yeah, no thanks. Not worth the cost.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 11:03 AM
2

That's what you meant by 'feminists'. You wouldn't know a non-extreme feminist if she turned you down for a date. I'd imagine that, as per my flair, you'd realise the redundancy of your attempt to belittle me. But, no, you still tried to say it. Nice try. No cigar. (my Quote)Hang on, are you saying that, because a certain group's extreme side is so extreme, we should disregard it? (your quote) Yes. Let's ignore the sheer bias in that, and perhaps suggest that you also ignore the parts of TRP tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 10:57 AM
1

So again. Not "again". You were talking about SJWs in your previous comment. Not feminists. Because the extreme side of feminism is farther off the scale than TRP is off their side. Hang on, are you saying that, because a certain group's extreme side is so extreme, we should disregard it? How does that even make sense? I would put 'feminists' on par with the KKK or ISIS. So all feminists are the equivalent of KKK or ISIS? I thought you just said that we should disregard the extreme parts of femi…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 04:13 AM
1

On the bell curve of crazy I'd say TRP is closer to center than SJWers. Didn't answer my question whatsoever. So, again. Why is it that the things that are on the extreme side of feminism and BP able to be ignored as "just the fringe areas" (or similar), but the extreme parts of RP are representative of the movement as a whole?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 04:05 AM
1

Allow me to sort out that looping for you: Feminism conflicts with itself on a number of points. A lot of areas, when probed, make zero sense. It's all about emotions, not logic. This next part is going to really be polarising, but here goes: If women were everything that feminism tells them they are, there wouldn't be feminism in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 04:00 AM
2

I'm not upset at all. I'm pointing out the fact that the rule that some want applied to TRP suddenly becomes a bad idea, when it's applied to feminism. No one can seem to explain why this double standard is acceptable by people on your side of the deal. So, I ask, why is it that the things that are on the extreme side of feminism and BP able to be ignored as "just the fringe areas" (or similar), but the extreme parts of RP are representative of the movement as a whole? Can you explain that for m…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 03:52 AM
1

You actually listen to or pay attention to the femnazis SJWers? "Ignore the trolls" applies to real life as well. We went through this whole PC/Feminism BS a while ago. It lasted ~6 years. It went away. (First episode of South Park's current season covered it rather well). Stop giving them the satisfaction of reading them and getting outraged at it. Most women don't follow that narrative. If I should just ignore the things I disagree with, why do women and BPs concern themselves with RP theory?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/16 03:26 AM
2

And the hashtag "killallmen" is the most extreme I can think of from feminism. I am using that as it trended on Twitter. Explain again why applying the same rules to feminists doesn't work? Oh yeah, because if I critique them, I must be a misogynist!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:34 PM
1

i understood that it was a joke, but for your joke to be effective it has to make a point. Jokes don't have to make a point. They can make a point, but thanks for your comedic input; you're clearly hilarious. (See? That was a comedy tactic called "sarcasm". Because you actually seem like the least fun person I might encounter today.) it seems that the point you were trying to make is that the idea that brains aren't divided by sex means that there must be no gender which means that feminists wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:32 PM
3

Not really. TRP often puts the ideas forward that women are all mindless social media addicted attention junkies who have no real hobbies or capacity for rational thought. They will use anything for their own gain or to get attention, even the deaths of relatives (there was literally an entire post on this! And it got the frontpage of TRP too). An entire post! One! Are we judging a community group by every post that is made by them? If so, why do feminists want to kill all men? (It's fallacious …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:03 PM
1

Source for this claim please.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 09:00 PM
1

you can't just cover up a nonsensical joke by saying the entire thing was sarcastic, but nice try. so, you admit it was a joke, and then say it wasn't. Hmmmm. i don't see how this study explains that men aren't in touch with their emotions, or how it claims the opposite, could you explain? Sure I can. Emotions are in the mind. Therefore, the bullshit claim that women are "more in tune" with their emotions is, well, bullshit. Same brains, same emotions. Not sure how this study backs up the differ…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 08:58 PM
19

You're assuming that, because they are a cliche stereotype, that they aren't normal. But, people are not all cliches walking around. A lot of women fit into the idea that RP puts forward, just in slightly different ways to each other. RP is a generalisation that fits a basic rule. Sure, there's outliers at either end, but you get that in a population. Edit: When I get downvoted in this sub, without an actual rebuttal, I know that, somewhere, a purple haired tumblrina is fuming at what I wrote. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 01:20 PM
1

I should remember to use "/s" for the hard of understanding. Still, at least this study explains why women say men aren't in touch with their emotions like women. Oh wait, shit, it fucks that whole claim up.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 01:11 PM
1

It's semantics. The clusters show that male and female type brains exist, but within shades of grey. To say "there is no male or female brain" is correct, but only because you are ignoring the clustering of results. Edit: Actually, no, let's go with what you say instead. Then all the feminists complaining about a lack of women in boardrooms can finally shut the fuck up, because we're all the same gender! YAY! Victory and I don't have to miss out on a job because I have a dick and they needed a v…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:43 PM
2

lol ok. The conclusion at the end is by a scientist who also did the following study C.L. Wright and M.M. McCarthy (2009) PGE2-induced masculinization of brain and behavior requires protein kinase A, AMPA/Kainate and metabotropic glutamate receptor signaling. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(42):13274-82. Source The science itself is saying that there isn't a polar opposite in the brain structure, which (as per most things in nature) you'd find that there is a gradual scale with two clusters towards …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:05 PM
3

Ok, same as what I thought too Thanks! I enjoyed that chat :D
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 02:26 AM
4

Hypothetical question for you, as I can't see flaws in your argument, but I'm interested in where this goes. If someone unable to give consent forced sex with someone able of giving consent, who (if either) committed an offence? (Just curious on your thought train on it, is all)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 02:10 AM
3

Well okay, how about this. If you are incapable of wanting something, aren't you also incapable of not wanting it? Like the desire either way is just not there. Are you saying that rape doesn't occur in the animal world, simply because animals don't have the capacity to decline sex? Wouldn't that translate to say that if someone was incapable of consenting/declining sex, then they can't be raped? That seems like some ill-thought logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 01:55 AM
4

The squeaky wheel gets the grease Only when you cater to the complainers. My view is, it the wheel is squeaking; replace the wheel.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 01:38 AM
4

That doesn't really explain how animals can't feel violated at all. We can see this, because the inference from your point is that if sex is about procreation, they can't want sex. And if they can't initially want sex, then sex can't be rape? That doesn't make sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 01:26 AM
3

Didn't really need a passive aggressive statement at the end there, just because I caught out your bullshit, did it?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 01:12 AM
3

See? All you need to say is that you said something that was pointless and without reason, and then we wouldn't have gone down this rabbit hole. Have a good day.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 01:00 AM
3

I'm not sure how sending a video of two cats raping another cat proves anything as to why you thought highlighting an inter-species intelligence comparison was unable to be completed? You still haven't answered that question. Instead, you are flying off on a tangent. So, to bring us back on point; Why is a comparison of intelligence between animals and humans unable to be done, as you've now asserted that animals rape too?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:57 AM
3

So animals consent with grunts, or the females initiate rape? You're becoming very confusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:46 AM
3

I don't understand what you mean by that. Please explain
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:39 AM
4

So what was the relevance of your initial statement that said: you cannot compare the intelligence of humans to the intelligence of other animals If you are now saying that animals can rape?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:33 AM
8

On the basis that they can't feel violated? Can I ask; how did you come to the conclusion that animals can't feel violated?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:30 AM
7

You implied that intelligence is a factor in whether sex can take the form of rape. From that, you can say that you think that animals (who you consider lower intelligence even though your reasoning on this was incorrect) cannot rape or be raped. If this is true, then yes, it is correct that at some point in the evolution of species that became modern humans, that sex that would be considered rape today, couldn't have been considered rape, as they weren't at the intelligence of the species we ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:28 AM
4

Hey, it's just a question from what they said... Calm down
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:25 AM
6

So you can't rape someone that doesn't have the mental capacity to feel violated?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:22 AM
7

I think you completely missed the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:19 AM
5

So, you're saying that we are more intelligent as a species? Also, you're wrong. Shrews have the highest brain to body mass ratio of all vertebrates. Source
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:15 AM
3

Why do you say that?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:13 AM
3

The 'jargon and lingo' are descriptive of theory that has been developed in the RP sphere. Some of those theories haven't really been vocalised (at least not outside of academia) before RP. Therefore, the 'jargon and lingo' attributed to it are the names of the parts that make up the theory. It's like saying, "explain why things fall down, but don't give me that gravity jargon". The words used are part of the terms and theory. You can't separate it very easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 11:58 PM
1

Let's break that comment down. I already conceded that I interpreted it as, "Oh well then your point seems to be that only men contribute?" No, you changed the attack from "Women don't contribute", then to "Only men contribute", to a third option, "people don't notice men contributing". You've changed your attack, yes, but you didn't concede anything, you just reloaded and changed tact. And because I asked for evidence of your claim, you added; I may have assumed You may have? No, you did. Accep…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 10:56 PM
1

Now your changing the words to try and be successful. But, no. Cite your source where I said (as you claimed) that women don't contribute. That's a wild accusation to make if you then immediately just change the tact when questioned. Cite where I said women don't contribute? Cite where I said only men contribute? You can't, because you're making bullshit claims to make an ad hominem attack instead of responding to my arguments.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 10:38 PM
1

Where did I say women don't contribute? Please link to the post where I actually said that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 10:26 PM
1

I'm not American. And if you mean "planning and building the cities so people live near schools", who's doing the building? Oh yeah, men. Thanks for indirectly proving my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:44 PM
1

And you get there, how? Just because you don't see or appreciate those men in those (male dominated) industries, doesn't mean they don't do valuable work. Who builds and fuels the power stations that powered the hospital? Or built the hospital in the first place? What about the UPS (uninterrupted power supply) that's needed should power fail before the generators kick in? All designed and built by men. Again, you're just unsure the sheer amount of things that "just work" that men do. All the thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 08:42 PM
3

I like that! Have an upvote
/r/MGTOW04/01/16 06:37 AM
2

Really? That's your retort? Hahahhahaa You had about an hour to plan something to jump in with, and that's the best you came up with? A complete and utter fallacious argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 05:29 AM
1

Women are getting more and more things in their favour, chasing happiness, that seems to constantly ellude them. This study has show a decline in women's happiness year on year, despite the things they are getting. Side note, America also has the highest pet cat population. Should women get paid even more for the same work? Probably not, but only because an increase in the depressed, unmarried women sector, is likely to cause a vast increase in the number of pet cats. And frankly, I worry about …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 04:29 AM
4

Try driving on a road that hasn't been maintained to carry patients in an ambulance to the hospital. Or perhaps men in the power plant disappeared, enjoy your hospital in the dark with an inability to sterilise things. What about the schools? Well, the kids need to get TO the schools. This usually means school buses for a lot of the western world, now imagine roads that are failing or are unsafe for the school bus. I don't think you've thought through the amount of work that men in those areas d…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 04:13 AM
3

Please point to the power station and communications infrastructure that wasn't built by men...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 04:09 AM
1

Exceptions to the rule, don't disprove the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 04:06 AM
-1

Their degrees are also in fields that aren't going to get them high salary jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 04:05 AM
21

There's a saying (usually said about women): Don't listen to what they say, watch what they do However, I feel that this can be applied to both genders. I understand that you want to avoid confrontation by being irrational, however, I think that you'll find that this will likely cause more confrontation. A woman's/feminist's irrationality stems from the fact that they are emotionally-driven beings. This is why women that are arguing becomes more than just an arguement, and turns into a "let me g…
/r/MGTOW04/01/16 03:52 AM
1

No probs. I understand that it can sometimes be a knee jerk reaction to assume someone talking critically about women should be branded as a misogynist. I'm used to that by now! Have a good day/2016 :)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 12:25 AM
1

I didn't say it was bad, as lingn as everyone is aware of what's happening. I was just pointing out what the deal was. The other person was just chucking a fit over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 11:22 PM
1

Most women are hypergamous. Most men seek beauty. I didn't say that it was a problem, the other person was just denying that it happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 11:21 PM
1

Reread your comments. You state from the beginning that she's attracted to him / what he is. You agree she would have sex for the money. He is rich and has the money. I stand by it, you're just pissy because you've realised that I'm right. And are using a whittled down version of my argument to hamster-wheel your way into winning. But no, I asserted that most women will have a sexual relationship with a man simply because he is rich. You taught against it, saying how the woman isn't sexually att…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 08:25 PM
0

Let me clue you in. Women don't need to be sexually attracted to a man to let a penis in. I hope you enjoyed this lesson in biology So, are you saying they could have sex for another reason?! Oh my goddddd like whatttttt? Money. You fucking dumbarse. You're now arguing my point for me! hahahhahaa They are having sex with THAT GUY, IN PARTICULAR because he has money. That's why they are with him. That's why they seduced him. That's why they went for him. They were attracted to the money.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 08:01 PM
0

Holy shit. Are you actually trolling? Or just so dumb that you don't understand? So, someone (in this hypothetical scenario, a woman) can find a number of things in a person (in this case, a man) attractive. The word attractive isn't solely about sexual attraction. This is not just about looks. If you think that a man has to be physically attractive for a woman to have sex with him, and there's nothing else that a woman can find attractive (like, money, for example), I would imagine that you wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 07:34 PM
6

"Hey guys, I'm pretty happy being single. I'm gonna stay that way" If they love you, they'll support you. If they don't understand, go your own way anyway. If they crap on about "waaaaah, we want grandkids" tell them to adopt.
/r/MGTOW03/01/16 10:30 AM
2

I think that drama and conflict are slightly different.. Conflict would be clashing against an argument point to challenge the view, where as drama would be starting something for the sheer ability to point at yourself and say "OH MY GOD VICTIMMMMMMMM"
/r/MGTOW03/01/16 07:28 AM
3

Sargon has made a few whopping mistakes because he seems more interested in "getting the scoop" sometimes. Good example would be his livestream with Kate Brooks (that nutcase bitch from the Oxford Uni debate). He interviewed her and she talked about how she was surprised to find people didn't like her after that talk. Diana Davison (YouTube channel: Feminism LOL) did a couple of rebuttals, but Sargon seems to want to not admit he jumped the shark.
/r/MGTOW03/01/16 07:25 AM
3

Sargon seems more against SJWs than women fucking shit up for men (of course, the 3rd wave feminism group is starting to mingle with the SJWs lately). Try Spetznaz... He's pretty ok. Considered thoughts and good pace and tone (where as sandman's pace and tone drives me crazy after about 3mins)
/r/MGTOW03/01/16 07:19 AM
1

So women do go for money? Surely, omg, surely they can't go for someone that isn't attractive? Unless, oh wow, unless you've been bastardising the use of the word attraction?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 05:02 AM
1

So women never go for a guy with money? They never go after a man who is rich? They are never attracted to the money? Ever?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/16 01:28 AM
1

I know it's for money. Jesus fucking Christ. Women chase money in men, because they are, for the most part) gold digging whores.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 11:42 PM
1

You've completely re-framed my point so that your retort is valid. Strawman.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 11:41 PM
1

It's because it's female porn and women find men in their physical prime (between 20-32) to be the most attractive. You keep going back to the physical thing. Why are younger women with older guys then?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 11:19 PM
1

Fucking hell. She. Is. Attracted. To. His. Money.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 11:18 PM
1

Fucking hell. Attraction isn't just looks. Women can be attracted to a guy because he looks good, or has a nice body, or because he's in a place of power, or because he has money. Stop thinking that women are only attracted to looks, like most men are. They don't think the same as guys do.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 10:49 PM
1

I understand that. And you're actually agreeing with my point. Women, if given a chance with an old rich dude, will fake love, have sex, spend time, do anything he wants. For money. Addendum: I just realised that you're a feminist. There's really no point acknowledging you from this point forward.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 10:21 PM
1

Lol, you mock me but remember this. Empathizing with other humans is one of the most important skills you will ever learn. why do you even think this is true? I don't give a fuck about anyone, and my life is going pretty fucking awesomely. Maybe you think it's true, because that's pretty much the only skill set you have?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 10:17 PM
1

You are simply devaluing emotions that you do not understand. I don't understaaaaaaaand guys. The feeeeeeels! Look, if a homeless guy says "nice ass", he's a creep. If a millionaire Hollywood actor says the same thing, he's confident and "knows what he wants". Creepy is a word describing the reaction, not the action. How else do you explain that houses can be creepy?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 09:21 PM
1

She's attracted to the money.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 09:18 PM
2

She's attracted to money. An ability to provide.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 09:17 PM
1

And if that guy were living in a trailer, it'd be a horror story. If women aren't attracted to rich old men, why do so many of them have young girls, to the point that it's cliche?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 09:16 PM
1

She IS attracted to him. She's attracted to WHAT he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 02:04 PM
1

Women can fake attraction to rich unattractive men If a rich but visually unattractive man doesn't understand this [...] that says more about him than her. Well, excusing the fact that the woman in your scenario is spending her life with someone she's not attracted to simply because he has money, sure. And this is the basic thing, hypergamy is real. And women hate that men are starting to finally figure that out.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 01:01 PM
6

Again, you're completely misunderstanding what the word "creepy" is describing. It's NOT describing the action of the man. We know this, because the actions of the man, are interpreted as either creepy, or not creepy, depending upon her view of the man's status/looks/wealth. If the status/looks/wealth of the man can change the decision of if the same action is creepy or not, then the action wasn't actually the creepy thing. The creepy-rating is given by the woman's view on the man's worth. How c…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 12:33 PM
4

The very definition of "creepy behaviour" isn't just to do with the behaviour. One guy that says something is a creep, but if Brad Pitt said/did the exact same thing, the same hypothetical woman wouldn't find it "creepy". Creepy isn't descriptive of the act, it's descriptive of the reaction to the act.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 10:09 AM
5

Yeah, I figured that you had no substance to put in a retort.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 02:45 AM
4

So you made a comment in reply to me, about a completely different source to the one I referenced? How does that make any logical sense?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 02:37 AM
1

It's the exact same attraction. And that a woman can be attracted to someone that is visually unattractive says more about women, than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 02:31 AM
5

Your comment makes no sense. I'm assuming you are trying to be passive aggressive, or being sarcastic?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 02:29 AM
10

Good point. Women would do something much more public. Such as this
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 01:52 AM
11

Women often publicly make comments about men (for example, calling them a creep for doing something that, if they were a billionaire, would suddenly be acceptable behaviour). Isn't this equality?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 01:42 AM
1

It really depends on your view of what is useful.. You've stated that this theoretical women has made more money and obtained resources that she would in a "traditional" route. This is only true, if, you are judging success in a view of being wealthy, not necessarily in her getting a life partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 01:39 AM
3

Media plays to what is the general consensus of society. Older women (in the RP term - Post Wall), have no purpose to a society that needs to reproduce. (I'm referring explicitly to the inbuilt natural response to stimulus that humans have).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 01:34 AM
2

I completely agree! However, OP's assertion that women see a man's appearance as the paramount thing that they are attracted to, is proven false in such a situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 01:24 AM
5

Facial aesthetics are paramount for getting laid if you're not rich or high status as a guy. Facial aesthetics are paramount for getting laid as a girl. Guys have fall back points (have/spend money, or assert a high status/give the impression of an alpha type guy). Girls don't have fall back points. So no, guys don't have their features as a paramount. Why else are billionaire elderly guys banging young women? Cos money and status beats everything else as far as women are concerned.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 11:43 PM
2

Fuck yeah man!
/r/MGTOW01/01/16 10:04 PM
3

Hang on. Wait a sec. Did they just say that you were misogynistic, and THEN they gave you something? Did you just work out the key to actually winning from the patriarchy? That's fucking incredible that they don't even realise what they did.
/r/MGTOW01/01/16 12:41 PM
2

He's nobody's man. Nu-huh z-snap
/r/MGTOW01/01/16 12:37 PM
1

Thanks mate! Originally from a different country, and moved here around 15 ish years ago. Also, I thinks it's one of a few countries that the people are so welcoming, but the country itself wants to kill you lol
/r/MGTOW01/01/16 08:59 AM
3

I've been spending some quality time on Battlefield 4. Nothing says Happy New Year like an AK to the face
/r/MGTOW01/01/16 12:04 AM
3

That was kinda my point. Happy New Years :)
/r/MGTOW31/12/15 09:55 PM
3

Did that one first, then Bill Burr, now churning through Louis CK!
/r/MGTOW31/12/15 01:13 PM
1

Why are you still talking to me?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 06:46 AM
1

Immediately? No. All species? No. Are you using fallacious logic from a few specific circumstances where the animal tries to hide their illness or weakness, realises they can't hide it anymore and leave the area? Yes, yes you are. No matter what you try to say to prove your point, I still disagree with you. I will always disagree with lefty bullshit as its founded in The Feels. My basic rule is, if someone thinks that The Patriarchy actually exists, as in, they actually think I get shit just bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 09:39 PM
1

And an inability to get a job somewhere that requires a clean criminal check. Want to work in a bank in any capacity? Not anymore. What about in any area where honesty is a fundamental requirement? "What's the time in jail for?" "Making shit up" "The door is that way"
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/15 06:21 AM
2

Hello everyone. Iwanttoliveinspace here. This upvote is for /u/tykusstarcraft. And this is what he had to say. nope dude is off his fucking rocker
/r/MGTOW30/12/15 12:53 AM
3

I love his response to a pre wall girl, letting her know exactly what's going to happen as she crashes into those bricks... http://youtu.be/IU_3b2_33vI
/r/MGTOW30/12/15 12:45 AM
0

The hormone testosterone does not do this. You are talking about instinctive behaviours that other animals exhibit, yes, but they are also not driven by testosterone Please explain how male animals show this, but females don't. In fact. Never mind. I think I just hit the point where I literally don't give a fuck about retarded lefty feminist theory bullshit anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/15 12:29 AM
1

Testosterone is not influencing men to repress their suffering. That's cultural, and it's something that RPers and MRAs talk about all the time. It does exactly that. If a male of a mammal species is clearly wounded, in pain, unwell, others will see that weakness and attack him. This instinct has remained, and is not culturally created. I'm curious, how do women get to say they go of female instincts, but if a man does something from his instincts, it's suddenly cultural? Your double standards a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 11:17 PM
1

Doing it for any reason is fine. Including women. Implying I have the style for women And I imagine in a couple of years your preferred style will have changed again. To whatever Cosmo said is 'in' that year. Again implying I'm only having this style for women. Others will draw their own conclusions. Or, you know, they could fucking listen and not be conspiratards. Meeehhhhhhhh everything is for the womennnnnnn. The only one coming across as precious at the moment is you mate. I'm just explainin…
/r/MGTOW29/12/15 02:48 PM
4

As the radfem Cathy "Bug" Brennan once put it, "gender is a war on women." Hahahahhahahahahahaa
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 02:33 PM
2

You said you grow the beard 'cause of laziness...and in the same post tell us about how you heavily style your hair... Cutting my own hair takes a total of about 10mins. Once a week. Shaving means I have to do it everyday. Sorry precious, your shitty idea of what I do in the bathroom doesn't fit The image of a guy with a lazy man wild beard...and a very fashion orientated hairstyle...that just doesn't fit. Doesn't fit what? You can do whatever you want with your style. But a congruent reasoning …
/r/MGTOW29/12/15 02:32 PM
5

This is very confusing. So a person who is a straight white cis gendered guy. What is his: Sex Gender identity Gender And which one is the one that is the patriarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 01:58 PM
5

But if gender is a social construct, I could decide to be a different gender. However, that wouldn't make me have those traits of the other gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 09:41 AM
3

Aboriginal, by the looks of it
/r/PussyPassDenied29/12/15 07:55 AM
4

The article seems to suggest that she withdrew consent two years later....
/r/PussyPass29/12/15 07:48 AM
1

Pretty sure that diamonds have an industrial purpose though... For example, it's the only substance that's remotely easy to obtain to cut the sapphire glass on my watch
/r/MGTOW29/12/15 04:58 AM
7

Women also feel pain more than men. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-3143347/Women-suffer-pain-men-discovery-lead-n-painkillers-say-scientists.html I feel both these articles fuck up the concept that "gender is a social construct"..
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 04:45 AM
2

Unless "you" (in this case) are a 10 year old boy in a church.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 10:06 PM
1

haha ok... back on track from your shitty comparisons. Feminism started with a movement to get rights that women didn't have (neither did working class men either, but that was never the narrative). Since then, they entered into the third wave of the movement, and this has included the idea of intersectionality. This concept basically means that all things that a person is, cannot be separated from the person (a person might be a woman, black, and gay, for example) and therefore the 3rd wave of …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 09:56 PM
1

The theory of general relativity is different from the "theory of gravity". In that Gravity is termed a law. So no, I don't believe that you have the faintest idea what a theory is, when you applied the term to the law of gravity.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 08:55 PM
2

You seem angry and judgemental. But, if by Nazi SS haircut, you actually mean a side part with a fade down to zero on the side, yes. I do. I also cut my hair myself. Why do I have that style? Not for women, it's because I like how I look with my hair this way. And feeling good about how you look, results in higher confidence in yourself. Which, in turn, lets me hold frame when some little shit thinks that they can make a sweeping statement about something they don't like, and hasn't actually tho…
/r/MGTOW28/12/15 08:53 PM
10

Oh please, it's obvious! And now you want to get into an argument over it, so you can blow off steam...
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 08:00 AM
12

Post wall That explains the bitterness.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 05:31 AM
0

Then yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:54 AM
2

It means that you posted this same question yesterday in AskReddit.. Also, post history has massive conflicts in position on arguments. Basically, you are likely posting to start an argument. For example, basically bragging about deep throating your cousin's husband is kind of not in the same train of thought of oh no, am I used up?!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:35 AM
3

Bait post detected.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:30 AM
6

Technically gravity is still "just a theory" You clearly don't understand what a scientific theory is. Please don't use science to try and support your argument, when you clearly don't understand the use of the word theory in a scientific context. The AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science), the world's largest scientific society, has this explanation of what scientists mean when they use the word "theory": " A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspe…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:19 AM
5

The point I'm making, is that you are saying that a positively-framed generalisation is good for feminism. But, a negatively framed generalisation for RP, is also good. I would call that biased reasoning. Also: We can't even get that about gravity. -_- Wat?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 04:08 AM
6

Well it depends on the generalisation. How does it depend on the generalisation? As a general rule, how could I know if a generalisation was true, or not? EDIT: I ask, because it sure sounds like you think generalisations about feminism are only ok, if they are positive.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:57 AM
8

Would this mean a generalisation about feminists could be true? (using the same logic)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:44 AM
3

De Beers also cleverly made women put a high amount of emotional attachment into diamonds, therefore reducing the second hand market to almost nothing. Keeps the retail price of new diamonds high.
/r/MGTOW28/12/15 03:39 AM
13

Let us count the ways you are a biased piece of work: Go over to MRP and see guys who have gotten fat and lazy... Guys, in other words, who are failures. I hope you are fit and in shape, and conforming to beauty standards? A truly blue pill man would be a functioning member of society and not a fat slacker. Again with the fat thing. are fat people not members of society? Sounds like someone has an issue with hambeasts, not just men. TRP helps these losers stop sucking by giving these men an excu…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/15 03:34 AM
3

Nothing to do with supply.. It's marketing (which girls fall for) and pricing according to what the buyer will pay (and girls think that expensive means "good"). Look at designer handbags, or diamonds.. Neither are actually rare (google "De Beers Cartel" if you think diamonds are rare), and they are priced through the roof. Women are easily affected by advertising (which is why an astonishing number of pages in women's magazines are just ads). They're like magpies.
/r/MGTOW28/12/15 03:23 AM
3

Here's the thing... Let's assume it was true (I know it's not, but bear with me)... IF they only earn 79c for every man's dollar, and they have to be told to buy the "male version" of things, that must mean that, on 79c to a dollar, they can still afford the "female version". Either way, they don't understand responsible economics.
/r/MGTOW28/12/15 02:50 AM
3

I'm looking into this option myself, but maybe a 2-3 shipping containers.. Seems like a good, cost-effective idea.. :)
/r/MGTOW28/12/15 02:37 AM
9

I shave maybe once a week. But, that's simply because I'm lazy as fuck. To say that the only reason a guy doesn't shave daily is for the womenz is a bit narrow-minded
/r/MGTOW28/12/15 02:29 AM
1

Sociopaths have no empathy for others. I'm unsure what you're implying. Do you mean sociopaths are emotional? Where are you getting that conclusion from? (And I don't mean the dumb self-diagnosed tumblr sociopaths "like omg I'm like sooooo socio")
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/15 10:20 PM
2

This video was the thing that started my trip through the rabbit hole (whilst shoving red pills into my face)... I still check back and watch it again ever so often, to keep my head in the game and knowing what is going on around me.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:26 AM
1

Maybe I'm just drunk, but pretty much every segment, apart from the "male privilege" one, are things women do.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:14 AM
7

Overdoing anything is bad for you. That doesn't mean that, in moderation (which is different for everyone) the same thing can be fine. Just because some people have a low tolerance for masturbation, doesn't mean that it's bad. I'll bang one out if I'm stressed, and I consume porn to help things go efficiency (as it were). Perhaps if someone finds porn unhealthy, they might have just over-consumed it beyond their personal threshold.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 06:07 AM
5

Ewwwwww
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 06:03 AM
1

HAHAHHAA
/r/MGTOW22/12/15 08:19 AM
1

If I can't have sex with a car, I can't have sex with a robot. (I would, however, attempt to bang the shit out of a Ferrari 458.. But that's another story lol)
/r/MGTOW22/12/15 07:35 AM
12

You skipped the other comment I made. It's ok. You're late to the party.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 07:34 AM
2

Wanna know the ultimate key to having a reason to stop girls in their tracks? Wear a wedding ring. Word of warning, some women will hit on you, purely because you look married. But, just show the ring and say that you are taken (you are, but to yourself) and you get off Scott-free.
/r/MGTOW22/12/15 07:31 AM
7

I'm not sure we'll ba having sex with robots. I mean, you don't have sex with a fleshlight. You use it to masturbate with. They are hijacking the word "sex" in this context to try and make it more than it is.
/r/MGTOW22/12/15 07:29 AM
16

An hour ago. You're getting closer. Keep trying.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 07:23 AM
14

/r/Iamverysmart
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 07:11 AM
-8

Because a lot of women are a bit dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 07:03 AM
48

I did discuss it. I gave my view. I see those who commit a crime as to have a low value to society. Because, you know, we are in a society where crime is a Bad Thing. Just because I don't agree with the proposed idea doesn't mean I didn't discuss it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:42 AM
51

We're not here to discuss YOUR values, which you arbitrarily assign You're here to ask for people's input. Therefore, part of that is my values I assign. That's how discussion and debate works.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:37 AM
63

I assert that the moment that someone commits a crime against another person, they lose their value. Regardless of the level it was at. That goes for if they murdered someone, stole from someone, raped someone. If they committed a crime that would normally attract a jail term, they have no value in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 06:15 AM
13

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/accessory_after_the_fact Read it and stop using Wikipedia as a legal resource.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:57 AM
21

Merely knowing about a crime does not make you an accessory. You have to aid in some way, be it emotional, financial, etc You aided by not reporting it seeing that you knew all the information and didn't act. Stop being an idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:55 AM
27

Ok. Well... To answer your initial question. If a man rapes a woman, it doesn't matter what status level his Bros think he is, nor does it matter if he's attractive.. He committed a crime, and the foundation of a civilised society is that such people are given a trial to assess their guilt and administer punishment. It is also part of that foundation that someone that is aware of a crime having been committed and doesn't act, is an accessory after the fact, and is also guilty of a criminal offen…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:42 AM
23

You've clearly thought about it, and consider what he did to be ok. Or are you changing your mind on that now?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:36 AM
32

But it's ok cos he's hot stuff, right? You're fucking retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:33 AM
31

Did he have to punch any others in the face to get laid?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:31 AM
42

I'm stunned by his complete lack of shit giving. I didn't actually think people like that existed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:30 AM
30

Yes you do. Or you wouldn't have proposed that "real rapists are not just low value men". As far as I can tell, you don't want your buddy being a low value man, so you are trying to assert that he's still "an alpha bro".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:27 AM
41

HAHAHAHAHA Still with the White Knight? Really? Lemme point something out for you here, champ; You are trying to shame me into a title (in this case "white knight") because I don't agree with you. You are avoiding having your views challenged and are avoiding direct questions. You are refusing to allow yourself or your friend to accept responsibility for his action and your inaction on what occurred. You are, basically, acting like an SJW feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:21 AM
43

You're avoiding the answer, because you see my point. It's a hypothetical. Try to, just for a moment, not being a knuckle-dragging alpha-wannabe, and answer to hypothetical question.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:13 AM
39

Lemme ask you a different question; If I raped you. And punched you in the face. And threatened you until I finished. Is there any situation in which you are to blame for that?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:09 AM
85

I think you have taken the Red Pill theory too far, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:06 AM
66

Do you really think that your friend isn't to blame for what he did? If so, why is he not to blame?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 05:04 AM
83

Ok, I get that you said that, because you think that I'll recoil in horror and agree with you. But this isn't White Knighting. It's going along with the laws of a decent first world country. Now, if your story was saying that the girl lied about him raping her, and if I agreed, that would be White Knighting. However, saying that he is a rapist, after he admitted to being a rapist is being a normally-functioning member is a first world society.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 04:59 AM
102

Moralism is inappropriate And insult to the complexity of human social and sexual dynamics The guy raped someone. What is complex about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 04:44 AM
43

I've never heard of that before. And I completely disagree with it. OP and his mate are just scum.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 04:29 AM
64

Are you blaming steroids or her now? I'm finding it difficult to keep up. If she asked for it, and he felt no remorse, why did he confess to you? Because he knew it was fucking wrong, that's why How are you not reporting that guy? You are what causes people like me issues when I try to say rape culture isn't real. You should be ashamed of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 04:24 AM
95

provoked him into it? What the fuck? He raped her. He punched her in the face. He threatened her. And had sex after she said no. That is the very definition of rape. How the fuck could she have provoked rape? What the fuck?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 04:19 AM
17

Cannot agree more with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 04:12 AM
106

I'd probably say that your friend is, what I would call, a rapist. As in, he committed the crime of rape. A rapist is just that, not a high/mid/low value man. They're just a rapist. I'm not sure why that would be difficult to interpret. And, side note, judge that fucker. None of this "two sides" bullshit. He punched a girl in the face and threatened her while he raped her. The fuck, man?!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 04:11 AM
2

Haha no worries champ
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 03:36 AM
4

all the power I don't think you interpreted her post the way others did
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 03:29 AM
3

Ok, let's discuss that point without resorting to you claiming I'm afraid of transgender people (which is what you just did). If genders can be "misidentified" at birth (due to the prevailence of a penis or a vagina) then you must understand that your question of a government full of women is redundant. Who are you to say that the people you see as men in the government aren't being potentially misidentified by you? Did they all state that they are men? How do you know that they aren't hiding th…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 02:48 AM
7

Fair enough. Not really sure what you want from this?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 01:54 AM
8

That's plain fallacious logic. Saying that "when men are left to their own devices, children are deformed" is ridiculous. Are you saying that all medical advances that worked didn't fail only because a woman was overseeing the matter? That's pure lunacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 01:45 AM
3

They aren't anti-transgender. I clearly stated that to have a discussion about women in government depends upon the description of a "woman". The first part of my answer was in regards to gender being polarised, which is what this debate usually takes the path of. And, the second part was if gender is a social construct. Tell me, how is that anti-transgender? Are you saying that transgender people need to do more than identify as a woman? Are you saying that they need to take other actions to li…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 01:39 AM
7

Ok, allow me to ask, in regards to the following statement by yourself: If a woman surrenders complete control to the man in the relationship, he can make idiotic decision after idiotic decision and put things in jeopardy Why have you phrased it to say that men don't make idiotic decisions only when a woman is around.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 01:16 AM
4

Women have been in government, and are in government. 50%(roughly) of voters are women, but they aren't just voting for women because they have matching genitals; They are voting on merit. If a government was, in today's world, entirely made up of women, I could only surmise that this was achieved through a mandatory outcome requirement, instead of voting those people in. Therefore, I would be scared shitless, as people were only put into place because of the genitals that they possess, instead …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 01:11 AM
7

I understand that you said that, but you also said that if a guy doesn't want to be with you, then he's wrong and therefore not upto your standard. You are setting up that the relationship can only begin if the guy is besotted with you from the get-go. This kind of guy would likely be of the Blue Pill variety, and therefore, not likely to call you out when you are wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 01:02 AM
15

You've posted this to get confirmation from Red Pill people that you are, indeed, dominant and not "weak and submissive". You then assert, in the last paragraph, that should someone disagree with your views, you are better than they are. So, how would Red Pill explain these views in a woman? Easy; You are likely someone that is not very successful in getting the man that you want (rich/successful/attractive/whatever), and are saying that, should such a man turn you down for being so overtly aggr…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 12:57 AM
3

I've found RP theory to be rather empowering. I did go the full way of MGTOW with my RP dose, however. I agree with complete gender equality (as in, no get out of jail cards for either gender), I also am socially active, but try not to involve myself sexually or emotionally with women. Please either explain why my version of the RP is bad to women, or kindy restrict your argument to the specifics of the RP theory you dislike. To say all RP is as you claim, would be like me claiming that all femi…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/15 11:55 PM
3

Or to, upon being told you need to go to war having been on the draft as a women, suddenly go to bars in the hope of getting knocked up. The moment women are told to go to war due to a draft call, the birth rate will spike 9 months later.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 04:32 AM
1

Easy answer to that: Have male only and female only teams. Seperate for the sake of ability, but send them all to the front. (Yes, I'm aware that the female troops are likely going to be decimated, but hey, equality means everyone has a chance to be shot at or drive over an IED, amiright?)
/r/MensRights18/12/15 04:30 AM
2

Feminism: "WE WANT EQUALITY IN ALL AREAS" Society: "Here you go, also, you'll need to go work in the crap areas like the sewage department and garbage collection" Feminism: "WE WANT EQUALITY IN ALL BOARD ROOM AND HIGHPAYING JOB AREAS" Society: "Ok, fair enough, also you need to go to war as well" Feminism: "WE WANT EQUALITY IN ALL BOARD ROOM AND HIGHPAYING JOB AREAS AND DON'T WANT OUR LEGS BLOWN OFF" Society: "That's not equality" Feminism: "We have vaginas and tits, favourable treatment please"…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 04:22 AM
0

Here is the underlying issue for the love that 3rd wave feminism has for transgender people: If gender is a social construct, and you can change it at will, there are two possibilities from this: A woman that changes the gender she identifies as to being a man instantly becomes a potential rapist (to use the rape culture narrative), and a man that changes the gender he identifies as to being a woman instantly stops being so. If the above is true, and the identification of gender is the deciding …
/r/MensRights18/12/15 04:09 AM
2

Refrigerated containers. Preinsulated. ;)
/r/MGTOW13/12/15 07:17 PM
2

Shipping container. Go that route. Just YouTube search "shipping container tiny home" and you'll see amazing stuff.
/r/MGTOW12/12/15 09:51 PM
2

To the men who run the college. Agents of patriarchy UNITE! Mwuhahahaahaaaa
/r/MGTOW12/12/15 09:27 PM
12

"Only a doctor can tell you if you're healthy or not" Until they say that you are unhealthy, and then you chuck a spaz for being fat-shamed.
/r/MGTOW11/12/15 03:55 AM
1

I think that you are a self-entitled fuckwit that thinks he is the smartest person in the room You might be the fuckwit here, mate. I wasn't the person that said what you are replying to.
/r/MGTOW10/12/15 10:57 PM
2

There's speculation that he runs Feminist Frequency. Which says a lot, in that feminists need a guy to get shit done.
/r/MGTOW10/12/15 08:32 PM
0

Necessary evidence for satire? Wait, what?
/r/MGTOW10/12/15 08:29 PM
0

Apart from when it's two dozen Krispy Kremes. Then it's likely because she didn't get something from a man.
/r/MGTOW10/12/15 08:28 PM
2

Climate change greenies talk about burning coal and all that crap. Or don't you understand how this kind of thing works?
/r/MGTOW10/12/15 08:22 PM
14

I second this. Cutting off contact with my mother and sister was one of the best decisions I've made. My sister chased guys that had jobs that paid well, moving upto the next one and the next one, before finding a guy with promise and breaking up his marriage so she could snag him with kids. Then, somehow managed to get him to take her surname when they eventually married. My mother, meanwhile, has managed to somehow avoid criminal charges from defrauding men from their money with promises of wo…
/r/MGTOW08/12/15 05:28 AM
2

I remember this girl I was banging, pre me ODing on Red Pills, and she was a bit chubby. Great sex, so I ignored that her ass continued moving after I'd stopped. Anyway, she always used to strike poses and say "everyone wants some of this business..." about herself. When we parted ways, she said it during the finger-wagging-I-think-I'm-black-but-in-just-a-fat-white-girl moment... But this time I responded... "Good job there's enough to go around then." They really do mark themselves up waaaaaaaa…
/r/MGTOW08/12/15 05:08 AM
1

Nice opening. Not aggressive at all. However, I now get the way that you were meaning. Perhaps the sentence construction could have been a little more overt to your meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 01:04 AM
1

TBPers think that their ideas come from truth, while RP ideas come from the bitterness of rejection, a need to feel superior, pseudoscience, and hatred. Let's just see that sentence about red pill again... RP ideas come from the bitterness of rejection, a need to feel superior, pseudoscience, and hatred. Action close up time, brought to you by our sponsor... RP ideas come from the bitterness of rejection "Yeah, Dave, I now see that as a definitive inference, and not a supposed train of thought, …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/15 12:06 AM
1

"RP ideas come from the bitterness of rejection" Yeah, you didn't phrase that one as TRPers think, did you?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 11:55 PM
1

Certainly RP ideas come from somewhere, just like BP ideas come from somewhere. That doesn't really say much, though. Surely it says that some level of thought went into both viewpoints? But, I'm sure you'll get to how both have good but both can be flawed. TRPers think their ideas come from truth, while BP ideas come from pedestalization, the feminine imperative, feminism, and wishful thinking. I'm beginning to like you! BP ideas are certainly about just sucking up to women. Not sure where you'…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 11:32 PM
0

Yes, re-affirming our beliefs gives a comforting feeling of stability in a universe that is inherently unstable. Makes one feel safe. I was just going to say that it's re-affirming in that most blue Pillers seem to be in full on hamster mode most of the time. Makes me happy that I chose the red pill and saw things as they really are.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 02:58 PM
4

see the RP theory as more than just a pick up type of idea, I use it in my day to day life as a way of understanding how women interact with me. It helps me avoid conflict with them in work, and "see through the bullshit" as it were. As for why I come here, well, I like to see how people talk about the subject. I find the way that each side (again, in the most part) very different, and re-affirming for me and the life choice I've made.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 02:32 PM
6

Because, my friend, when you take a big enough dose of the red pill, you go MGTOW. Hence my flair. I'm here because this is a place of debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 02:14 PM
0

They're still likely going to be a pain in the ass with something.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 02:13 PM
2

Well, at no point did I claim RP to be good or bad. Only that it may have a basis in the way that women behave, for the most part...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 02:12 PM
5

Still wouldn't approach women. The only thing they can add to my life is sex, and drama. Lots and lots of drama. I'd rather just focus on my career and myself. Thanks. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 10:01 AM
0

Redefine feminists as people who fight for equal rights. Most MRMs agree with equal rights, and they are feminists fighting for equal rights for men and women Perhaps I'm missing those articles. Can you cite a few articles where feminists have done something for men's rights? Not one or two, but surely there's a few points that show this as true, right? EDIT: Downvoted and the post and comments deleted? I guess asking for evidence of claims was too much!
/r/MensRights05/12/15 07:55 AM
0

I think most people associated with MRM are feminists in that they agree with equal rights. TL;DR: Call them crybullies instead of feminists. These two statements clash. But, feminists don't fight for men's rights. If they did, they'd be egalitarianists, not feminists. Perhaps the playing field could be a little more level if the extremists were called out instead of equating psychopathy with feminism The playing field isn't uneven because we say that, the playing field is uneven because today's…
/r/MensRights05/12/15 07:44 AM
1

Perhaps becky the valley girl needs to harden the fuck up and face shit like an adult.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 07:37 AM
1

Don't worry, it won't happen. If a draft was put into place in a time of war, we'd just have a sudden massive number of pregnant women of fighting age.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 07:33 AM
2

Er. Ok. Doesn't really address the discussion points. Just belittles those who don't think the same as you. Thanks for your input? /s
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 06:03 AM
2

I'd say that I was assuming that women's behaviour is in line with red pill theory. (As in the assumption that they all try to get alpha-trait men... Not really that they are feminist)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 04:52 AM
4

I never insulted you. You are offended by my statements yet you are perfectly OK with a site that says single moms are subhuman filth and women are teenagers. It is astounding. You are making a whopping assumption here. My flair shows me as MGTOW. You claim not to be insulting me, but instantly jump to the conclusion that I think single mothers are subhuman filth. Strawman argument, with a squeeze of personal attack. If you want to have a serious conversation you need to say something that deser…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 03:58 AM
4

Im asking a question, in order to start a conversation. Why are you being so aggressive instead of just engaging with the conversation? You've done nothing but aggressively attack me and my statements. Try being more open to conversing instead of just committing ad hominem attacks on those you disagree with...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 02:39 AM
3

To summarize what you're saying: Women are the primary caregivers. Therefore, men consistently get taught bluepill ideas. The fact that redpill ideas replace bluepill ideas means that there must be something really good about redpill ideas. There has to be, for men to turn to them despite everything they've learned. Is that about right? No. I was proposing that RP must come from somewhere. And I was attempting not to start a discussion to work out where it comes from.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 02:01 AM
5

I take it you completely skipped over the scientific theory section where I said that previously gained knowledge is then applied to other situations. In fact, let's not go back and forth, let me ask: How do you propose that RP theory came about?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 02:00 AM
2

you're making a comparison with scientific experiments where there are direct stimuli that we can account for that have very specific consequences. Human mating and bonding does not resemble this How so? I'd say that human mating is no different to animal mating. After all, we are a species that lives in caves and hunted for food. Animals, for all purposes. That kind of natural urge for tens of thousands of years, surely can't vanish within a few hundred. Can it?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/15 12:39 AM
1

twisting things around, a favorite pastime of TRPers in this sub I disagree with that. Completely. What the RPers are doing is something called holding frame. They are keeping the debate on point. Far to many BPrrs in this sub try to derail the topic by bringing up the feels of a hypothetical person, or try to avoid answering a direct question that conflicts with them being the best white knight they can be. Before you react in a way that means that you are just withdrawing from the debate, try …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/15 11:50 PM
1

You missed where I explained that the female pecking order is made up between them on beauty. And then confirmed via the male they can get. I was then comparing it to how human females who spend all their time doing thing including; make up, hair extensions, fake nails, coloured contacts, fake boobs, fake tan... But the women who bagged a Hollywood star or a millionaire? Those girls are special and other women want to know about them via television and magazines. Also, not made up on youth? Wher…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 08:23 PM
15

Ok. I'm going to retort, with the quotes from your original post, to show that your premise/question is biased and nonsense. First up; A belief reasonably common among Red Pillers, but near-ubiquitous among MGTOW and also common in other "bitter males" This shows that you believe that any man that believes the things you are complaining about, and you are complaining) are not worthy enough to be listened to. You open with an ad hominem attack, for shits sake. Anyway; But for all the talk of the …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/15 10:03 AM
1

And again, you avoid the same rhetoric. Getting dizzy there, hamster?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 06:00 AM
1

And now, White Knight 2015. Let's address the issue, again. That you keep avoiding, again. Because you avoid the reverse of the rhetoric you're spouting, again. As some women have been found guilty of statutory rape of minors, using YOUR same logic, we can teach all children to be cautious around women IN CASE they are statutory rapists. This is using the EXACT SAME LOGIC you are trying to force, and you MUST agree to this, if you agree to your logic too. That you don't understand that I QUOTED …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/15 04:51 AM
1

Look back at what you wrote? Fallacious argument? Did you even read what I wrote? I QUOTED you. I switched around the genders, but the words are otherwise identical. But suddenly, it's a fallacious argument? Then your argument was fallacious to start with. Like I said. You're not debating because you can't answer your OWN rhetoric when reversed back to you. You've previously cited YOURSELF as evidence. You claim that, when the nth degree is taken towards women that it's bad, but the nth degree w…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 08:35 PM
1

I see you STILL don't want to agree with that statement, likely because it goes against your Blue Pill, White Knight bullshit. Let's try again cupcake. You want all women to assume all men might be a rapist, because some are rapists. So; Because some women have been found guilty of statutory rape of minors, we can say that it's safest for children to assume ALL women are statutory rapists of minors. Think of the kids man, think of the kids. Also, comedy moment, the thing that I wrote was actuall…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 08:22 PM
1

You wont say that kids should be cautious around women, knowing that some women have been found guilty of statutory rape of minors... So, for that reason, there is nothing wrong with children being cautious around women they don't know. Do you agree with such a stance for children to take?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 06:12 AM
1

I'm not sure what you're trying to prove here, but there is nothing wrong with children being cautious around women they don't know. Why are you arguing otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 06:05 AM
1

I'm sure you aren't but you are avoiding a question, which I'll now just resort to asking until you give an answer: If some women have been found guilty of statutory rape of minors, is it safest to assume that all women are therefore statutory rapists of minors?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 05:54 AM
1

Again, Strawman. I'm advocating that we say that someone is a rapist until after they are found guilty. And, again, I'll ask my question you are avoiding If some women have been found guilty of statutory rape of minors, is it safest to assume that all women are therefore statutory rapists of minors?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 05:50 AM
1

Reddit’s GoneWild is supposed to be a supportive, sex-positive community. The amateur porn subreddit prides itself as a mutual admiration society, where people, mostly young women, can post revealing photos for a quick thrill and complimentary comments in the hundreds. Which supports my position and why I go there. Supportive. Sex-positive. That's me. However, your quote from the article has the following next line: But that’s not always the case. So, you know, out of context and all that. Also:…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 05:43 AM
1

who claimed that ALL men are rapists? You are the only one using absolutist terms here. Yet, you also state that it's safe for women to assume that all men are possible rapists. You seem very, very confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 05:39 AM
1

That's a shitty analogy, as you are comparing a species of animal that doesn't have a socially constructed concept of laws and "do well unto others". Dogs also don't have an understanding of moral consequences for their actions - They work on a primal sense of understanding. Basically, you've used a shitty strawman arguement. However, just to bring up a point that you've still ignored (so I'll make it bold so you can see it): As women also have been found guilty of statutory rape of minors, so i…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 05:30 AM
0

Ok, a bit childish, but lets continue. This would be a citation of an article proposing that the feminist narrative is stating that gonewild can be perceived as misogynistic. That's my citation of what my assertion of what feminism (or at least the narrative/rhetoric) believes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 05:25 AM
0

But, you cited yourself for a question related to the tenents of feminism. Thats not how citation works.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 05:04 AM
0

Did you just cite your own opinion as citation for a fact? what the....
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 04:53 AM
1

I want the basic principle of Western law to be upheld. The basic principle being that a person is innocent until proven guilty. So yes, I want to be declared a non rapist. Just like I expect ALL people to be declared a non rapist. Unless there is evidence beyond reasonable doubt that they committed a crime. However, judging by your train of thought, you don't think that this basic principle should be followed when it comes to the crime of rape (but only when men are the supposed rapist). I noti…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 04:52 AM
0

You do understant that, according to feminism, sexualising women (like in the gonewild subreddit) is a misogynistic thing? Doesn't that mean, according to your flair, that you are beta?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 04:45 AM
1

Hang on a minute; Are you actually saying that a man can accidentally rape someone? Wtf. How completely out of control are you of your own thoughts and actions, that you think other men can accidentally rape someone? Holy shit. You're hung up on this absolute "ALL men are rapists" thing which is so general it's ridiculous. What if you prove your point, do you walk away smiling and saying "NO men are rapists"? No. You're completely missing the point. I'm saying that rapists are rapists. Some wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 04:41 AM
1

Well, your comments aren't rebuked at all, because (drum roll please) the girls are trying to get attention due to them wanting to confirm that their self-perceived SMV aligns with their male-perceived SMV. Mate, /r/gonewild is the typical group of girls and guys that prove Red Pill theory about SMV is correct. That's my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 04:34 AM
5

Ok :)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 02:43 AM
2

literally zero chance That's some overly-expansive, SJW-type speak, right there. I'm pretty confident that you haven't come here for debate, you've come to just be angry at any that you perceive as being "wrong".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 02:20 AM
3

Women are more likely to be the primary care-givers of children. Which covers what you just raised. But, to bring you back on point (which I tried to do before), OP is asking a specific question. The question is relating to the homeless people seen in dodgy areas of a city, they always seem to be male. This is a question of personal experience, that you are trying to divert with stats. Anyway, the link in the comment you JUST replied to, isn't an MRA blog. You asked for another study, I gave one…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 02:18 AM
2

Now you are requesting information that could dox a user.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 02:05 AM
6

I'm unsure why we have to read between the lines for statistics for one source that you disagree with, but another source that you agree with isn't to be questioned...? But, here's another source with similar figures: http://homeless.samhsa.gov/ResourceFiles/hrc_factsheet.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 01:49 AM
4

And you now give the usual SJW type retorts. Try again mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 01:45 AM
6

I'm not in a bubble. I'm simply saying that the statistics that are used in australia to give those percentages are possibly skewed. Also, according to Malcolm Turnbull, only women can be victims of Domestic Violence: Quote: "The issue of family violence, or domestic violence as it's often called – which is just violence against women, which is the way I would prefer to describe it – is an enormous one," he said. Source: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/malcolm-turnbull-to-g…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 01:31 AM
3

It's a discussion. Why does everything have to so polar with non-RPers? Either support women completely, or you hate women. But, apparently, RPers are the ones that are full of hate and blind to other views.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 01:18 AM
4

I'm one of them? And you posted something I didn't write. Your citations are very confusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 01:12 AM
3

http://www.homeless.org.au/statistics/ These statistics are for those staying in SAAP facilities. It doesn't actually take into account the number sleeping rough. Finding actual Sleeping on the street with no sheltered support stats in australia is quite hard. Note: These stats could actually show that women sleeping on the streets are provided shelter more than men (assuming that Australia follows most first world countries and most homeless are men (over 75%)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 01:09 AM
4

It's a discussion/debate. Not just hating. Thanks though
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 12:58 AM
3

It's not so much the recovery from being homeless that means women escape it, but more that there are things that women can do to prevent ending up in that situation before they get there. A woman can be looked after by a man much more easily than a man can be looked after by a woman. Because of this deep-seated conditioning between the genders (in a mass generalisation, of course), women can avoid becoming homeless easier than a man can. Also, remember, a homeless woman has very little actual S…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 12:45 AM
5

Which country is that? Citation please so we can all work on the same information
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/15 12:29 AM
1

Not really... Most rapes are perpetrated by rapists that the woman already knows. Assuming that "all men are potential rapists" and you know them, they are statistically more likely to be raped by you than a stranger. Also, side note, not sure how you have the balls to have a Flair saying Misogyny is beta when you are also putting weird pervy comments on /r/gonewild in between posting here. That's some serious quantum-state Blue/Red shit, right there.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 11:45 PM
1

To look at things another way, in this post, you spoke about how assuming all people are robbers is acceptable, due to "all people being robbers given the right circumstances". This was likened by yourself to being similar to how a man can become a rapist. Therefore, we can infer from your statements, that any man can become a rapist, given the "right circumstances". Because of that, there must be a specific set of circumstances that would make you into a rapist. Do you agree with that? If you d…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 11:28 PM
1

Mate, you have specifically said it's acceptable for all men to be viewed as possible rapists. Now you've got a problem with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 11:07 PM
1

Your biggest problem here is that you're talking about women add if they're some kind of borg and all share the same mind. It's weird, like you never actually talk to women or are unsure how to deal with them. If you're truly worried about this, why not stop viewing women as an enemy you must be vigilant against and start treating them like human beings with their own opinions and feelings that deserve to be taken into account? But, assuming all men are rapists is totally fine...? Surely you see…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 09:12 PM
1

Well, for one thing I never get the vibe that women are edging away from me because they feel I might be dangerous. I make sure to go out of my way to try and make people around me feel at ease. I'm not aggressive or domineering with strangers, that's assholishness. But, you have already said that women should view men as possible rapists. Therefore, you are a possible rapist, no matter what you do to make them feel better about you being a haven't-taken-that-last-step rapist. Secondly, I don't …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 08:26 PM
6

Ok, so. Here's the deal. You need to understand the basics. (A physicist was once quoted as saying "explain as if I have unlimited intelligence, and zero prior experience", so I'm going that way here). The concept of "all women gets to profit from being a woman" doesn't mathematically work out. It can't, because it works on the underlying assumption, that all women would get enough to live on from a man/men/dat patriarchy. However, the way the the monetary system works, doesn't allow this. Mainl…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 08:19 PM
3

It's amazing how incapable a strong independent woman is, when faced with a jar that has its lid jammed on....
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 07:49 PM
1

Just going to point out that sexual harassment and rape are completely different things. And the whole thing of not minding how you are viewed, mate, really? You don't mind women, all women, assuming you are a rapist, simply because of your gender? Truly astounding. Personally, I prefer the "innocent until proven guilty" concept, but I suppose that's not for everyone. Just remember one last thought: rapists are scum. Like all violent criminals are scum. You have no objections if a woman turns to…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 07:07 PM
1

I am male. Never been interested in raping anyone. But, women should view you as a potential rapist? How do you feel about that? 1) How many men do you know that struggle daily with accusations of rape? I've known three different guys falsely accused of rape. It's ruined their lives, even though they did nothing wrong. One didn't even know his accuser. 2) How many women do you know who have been raped or sexually assaulted by men? No women I know, have told me something that resembles rape. I ca…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 07:29 AM
1

Lemme ask you a couple of questions; 1) Are you male? If yes; when did you first manage to overcome the desire to rape someone. If not a male; do you actually think men have to constantly hold themselves back from committing rape? That is absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 05:52 AM
1

Again? That was the first comment I've made. Anyway, you are saying that murdered children aren't real world consequences? What I'm saying is: Let's assume all men are rapists, no issue with that, as long as all other possibilities are also taken to the nth degree.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 04:19 AM
0

Using that thought process (with is a complete slippery slope argument), we can say that, because almost some women murder their children, we need to remove children from mothers in case they are murderers. It would keep all children alive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/15 03:36 AM
1

You mean coitus? In reference to....?
/r/MensRights19/11/15 03:26 AM
11

One woman said: "I've got a male mate, a good-looking, well-paid accountant. He's athletic, a good catch, but he's given up on women. He reads about false-rape cases and he thinks sex isn't worth the hassle." And here, gentleman, we have a woman who is appealing to other women with her dismay. What to do? This guy is amazing but I can't snag him! Well, we can note that the first thing she states is that he's not butt fuck ugly, then, once that's out the way, she gets to the clincher: He has a go…
/r/MensRights19/11/15 03:14 AM
9

Holy shit. Spent 4 mins in that sub wishing it was a sarcastic take on feminism. But no, it's the usual drivel like "why don't they just leeeeaaaavvvveeeeee?!" Well, we did. Then you followed because you need a target for your bigoted hatred, so you linked back to your argument against men's rights, and then someone complained that we haven't left. That's like kidnapping someone and then asking them why they are tied up in your basement.
/r/MGTOW12/11/15 08:17 PM
3

In a few months, it'll fail. These bullshit experiments always do. Just laugh loud, and clear, when it does
/r/MGTOW12/11/15 11:52 AM
8

I guess maturity alludes others.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/15 11:44 AM
1

There's actually a Survivor like series which had men and women split. The men built shelter, started fishing, finding food and water. You know, SURVIVING. And the women in their camp had no shelter, are all their rations allocated for the period they had to start to find food and water. Spent all day sunbathing and arguing. It's the most amazing depiction of why "things" are never made completely by women. Buildings? Trains? Everything in life had a man either design it, or make it. There isn't…
/r/MGTOW05/11/15 10:04 PM
1

Let me ask you a question. Why do lesbians go against biology? (Using your logic, they are doing it all wrong too)
/r/MGTOW05/11/15 10:01 PM
4

Because, women are hostile. Don't believe me? Make a throwaway with a male-ish tinge to the name, then go to twoX, or a feminist subreddit and just simply ask the same question here. Then realise your answer
/r/MGTOW05/11/15 08:42 AM
1

I'm in a bit of a monk mode tbh. But this girl just never gets it when I don't bite with her attempts to seduce. Hence why my responses are blunter than a blunted blunt thing.
/r/MGTOW04/11/15 12:27 AM
3

Yup. The story they posted says she was charged. So, not sure how they don't know that
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/15 08:22 PM
2

Are you from Eastern Europe?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/15 08:18 PM
10

I think it's more of a "fuck, this is the easiest assault case we've ever had, all on film, guy isn't hurt, and this girl is crying like a baby." I laughed at her being arrested and her crying too
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/15 08:18 PM
10

The woman, believed to be in her 20s, has been charged with assaulting police over the incident that saw Act Supt Cooper's glasses broken, a Victoria Police spokeswoman said. Nope. She got charged. Aus police love charging people. Especially when the case can't be lost. This case is a done deal.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/15 08:16 PM
1

The woman, believed to be in her 20s, has been charged with assaulting police over the incident that saw Act Supt Cooper's glasses broken, a Victoria Police spokeswoman said. She's charged. Yes a guy would have been arrested rougher, but, at least she's now going to have "assault on a police officer" on her record.
/r/PussyPass03/11/15 08:15 PM
5

The woman, believed to be in her 20s, has been charged with assaulting police over the incident that saw Act Supt Cooper's glasses broken, a Victoria Police spokeswoman said. Nope. She got charged. Aus police love charging people. Especially when the case can't be lost.
/r/PussyPass03/11/15 08:14 PM
9

Tell us, oh magic future-watcher, how do we avoid the wars that now one else has noticed yet? What is it that made us right this time about no more world wars, but were wrong after WW1? We are waiting for your wizdommmmmm
/r/MGTOW31/10/15 09:16 AM
11

Good point. Don't record anything and hope for the best guise. /s
/r/TheRedPill29/10/15 06:26 AM
14

Can I ask... Why are you here? At what point in life so you think that women are taught (perhaps subconsciously) about SMV? About how to manipulate men? About how they are princesses and girl powahhhhh? At 20? Maybe 25? No, it's from birth. Get over yourself man
/r/TheRedPill28/10/15 08:27 AM
2

Just hit 98k Looks like we'll get to see the end result after all. I'm eager to see it tbh
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 08:16 PM
1

Me too. Hence my username lol
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 07:14 PM
3

Friend of mine once relayed a story of him trying to bang some crazy girl who (apparently) "simply wouldn't bite his dick hard enough". I was like "holy shit WAT" Turns out he likes them to "bite the shaft like you're trying to get into an unpeeled banana". He's the kind of weirdo that is teaching women weird shit for the rest of us.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/15 05:28 AM
2

Sounds like the concept of "The Game" that people think is still a thing. I think that someone can say that they identify with the Sigma status, simply because they are identifying it for themselves. To claim something for others' approval for the claim, is something that (according to the differences between Sigma and Alpha) an Alpha would do. As in, they could try to claim alphahood and hope betas re-enforce their alpha claim I work in IT and see that shot all the time. Some beta dude asserts …
/r/TheRedPill26/10/15 08:21 PM
2

Holy shit that was amazing. I think I love you bro
/r/TheRedPill26/10/15 08:06 PM
2

+1 vote for races and shit.
/r/MGTOW26/10/15 12:53 AM
5

Will hacks and cheat codes be available? gets credit card ready /s Honestly though, this is how I try to view life in general, but it can be hard to stay focussed at times, having something written down could help a vast number of guys. If you need any help, lemme know :)
/r/MGTOW25/10/15 11:45 PM
8

That's complete BS. Some mothers are complete sociopaths. Mine certainly was, and so is OPs, it seems
/r/TheRedPill20/10/15 12:14 PM
1

Must have been your immediate use of insults that drove me to disregard anything you said.
/r/MGTOW16/10/15 08:20 PM
6

It can be brought down to this: They don't want equal opportunity, they want equal outcome. The first requires that you compete, the second one means you can flunk school, ride the cock carousel, not plan for anything, and still get a career at the end of it.
/r/MGTOW14/10/15 09:02 PM
2

It's the wear and tear of warp speed space travel.
/r/MGTOW14/10/15 08:53 PM
4

This is where we are headed, chaps. A world were forced gender parity is mandated, even though they admit that the men being fired are the qualified people! (Although, I am curious when half the women in nursing and teaching get fired. And when we force women to work in the mines)
/r/MGTOW14/10/15 08:49 PM
0

Lemme get this straight fucktard (I assume we are using insults now, fuckface?) Are you saying that if a women puts a comment here, you can't ignore it? Are you that weak that you have to pander to her female ways? Go. Your. Own. Way. This is not an anti-feminist subreddit, at least as far as I'm concerned, it's a MGTOW subreddit. If you feel that having some women talking, that we all have a right to ignore, is an echo chamber, I think you've lost your mind. You think NOT banning women is a fem…
/r/MGTOW13/10/15 08:11 PM
4

Why?
/r/MGTOW13/10/15 09:13 AM
1

More than 5 mins... And the questions are very loaded
/r/MGTOW08/10/15 07:51 AM
3

I think, from today's conversation, that it's more that they want me to agree that they made the right choices. They can't understand how they didn't go the way I went, and transfer that on me.
/r/MGTOW08/10/15 07:47 AM
19

So, you are saying that MGTOW is only for guys that aren't as amazing as you with "the laydeez"? Ummm, no. I think that you've completely misunderstood the point of this movement. And the point is in its title. Men going their own way. Not the way of society's demands they marry and have kids, not the way that appeases your standards of what you think a man is... Our own way. Example, today, three guys from work were telling me that they can't understand how I am not married with kids. I replied…
/r/MGTOW08/10/15 07:33 AM
5

Stereotype all men into being violent rapists. And then complain about women being stereotyped.
/r/MGTOW01/10/15 11:42 PM
1

I saw her in person once. It was hilarious Front row seats with a female friend of mine. I wore a tshirt that said "to women from God", and my friends tshirt said "I should be in the kitchen" I think Gail dines almost exploded.
/r/MGTOW14/09/15 10:52 AM
1

I wonder if she argues the point when it's evident that more sex toys are bought by women? Porn is (mainly) for men, because we are visual, toys are (mainly) for women, because they are physical.
/r/MGTOW14/09/15 02:08 AM
2

What about non celeb endorsed.... http://www.glaceice.net
/r/TheRedPill14/09/15 01:11 AM
6

I like that point, I've realised the intent before, but seeing the line "they are being out competed by pictures" actually puts into words my thoughts.
/r/MGTOW13/09/15 03:24 AM
10

I think it certainly hints that even such a hardline feminist knows that the main value most women have is sex. Taking our sexual gratification from another source removes their value.
/r/MGTOW13/09/15 02:43 AM
9

Because prison time is much worse.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/09/15 06:37 AM
1

Far too much bible quoting here man. I'm not religious, but each to their own, until they tell me what I'm doing is all God fearing and shit. Nah man.
/r/MGTOW11/09/15 12:14 PM
2

This is fucking genius
/r/MGTOW09/09/15 09:47 AM
1

Holy shit there's so many different fonts, underlines, bolds, and italics (along with a stupendous amount of images) that my computer almost crashed. For the love of the internet, don't go to that site
/r/MGTOW09/09/15 09:42 AM
2

I think you'll find I fed that troll a god damn housebrick. I go along with the, "feed a troll a housebrick and destroy their argument and they'll consider if coming back is a good idea" approach. :)
/r/MGTOW05/09/15 04:33 AM
3

My panties aren't in a knot. I answered with valid points, as you agreed.
/r/MGTOW05/09/15 01:30 AM
3

A challenge! First point, she stole a police car, assisted a felon, and still got let out on bail (http://m.newser.com/story/212410/police-wife-steals-cop-car-with-husband-cuffed-inside.html), we already know that she considers running from the police an option and therefore may run again (not sure why she got bail) so that is backing up the disproportionate punishment/legal treatment men and women get. However, I digress. The point here, is that you are saying that this woman who committed a cr…
/r/MGTOW05/09/15 01:21 AM
1

Not every lion is going to eat me. I still don't climb into the zoo enclosure to pet them. Learning an approach of doubt is a natural thing to keep the animal feeling the doubt alive. Have you ever tried to walk right up to a bird with a sandwich and it just flew off? It flew off because you might attack it. The MGTOW approach is no different. It's all about approaching women with the assumption that they are going to fuck you up, sure maybe that approach isn't always accurate but, like the bird…
/r/MGTOW05/09/15 12:48 AM
1

He got arrested. She stole the cop car they put him in to try and escape. Pretty simple man.
/r/MGTOW05/09/15 12:43 AM
9

She'd fit in here /r/iamverysmart
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/15 12:24 PM
1

You should watch the whole set. both those people are actors and they are planted to see how people react.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/15 01:10 AM
0

Still had to get that last word in though. As if you are the one closing the argument? No, that's not how this works. You are able to withdraw from the discussion at any point, as am I. However, to attempt to play the "higher than thou" card and state "I'm done conversing with you" strikes only to show that you want to be perceived as on a higher status to me. My request for you, like you made a request of me, is to consider something: Perhaps, just perhaps, my stance is the right one for me. Ha…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/15 12:59 AM
0

Am I meant to thank you for not being offended? Saying that not having sex is the only sure-fire way of avoiding STDs and unwanted pregnancy is factually correct. Not being involved in women is the only completely successful way to avoid being manipulated and used for what I have, is also factually correct. (I've used the first statement as a comparison) You can be upset with MGTOW, you can try and refute the movement, but you can't deny the underlying premise; The only way to know 100% that you…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/09/15 12:13 AM
0

but, I'm talking about what you said.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/15 11:40 PM
0

How can you not see that you are attempting to put me down in that message? "something is wrong with them" "considered outcasts" I don't understand how you can type that, and not understand that you're being offensive?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/15 11:05 PM
-2

Not sure that paragraph was needed - a passive aggressive comment about how I don't think love and family is worth it? Really? You couldn't just say "it's good that you're happy"? Look, love is something pushed as a requirement to be a "happy adult" but it's not the case. I don't need to give/receive love to be a happy and successful person. I understand that some people don't feel that they are able to achieve things without a companion, but everything I've done in my adult life, I've done alon…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/15 09:53 PM
1

Basically... The author has wrote that Anita Snorlax was hard done to and that was the gamergate fiasco. They're ignoring that gamergate was originally about shitty game companies bribing journalists for good reviews. And it was only when Snorlax arrived on the scene, did it become about her getting attacked. She was attacked due to railroading the discourse into how she was a victim. That wasn't very TL;DR. Sorry. Hate that bitch.
/r/MGTOW02/09/15 10:22 AM
6

It means "stupid". Not retarded, not unable to know what's going on... It's a PC way of saying, "she's a fucking idiot". Still, pretty sure an idiot male pedo is going to jail, so this is still all kinds of messed up
/r/PussyPass02/09/15 09:26 AM
5

She's not mentally deficient, or she'd be found unable to be tried. So, the point stands. Find a man, found guilty of similar crimes in the same state that was allowed to not go to jail. The whole thing is fucked up.
/r/PussyPass02/09/15 09:24 AM
-2

Despite your points, men still get the hard end of the deal when it comes to legal battles over finances or family. It's still the best option to avoid allowing women into my life (like other men following MGTOW) which allows me to avoid the problems with women making false accusations of rape, making claims on my money, making claims on my property, and generally making my life full of stress. I get that you want to stand up for women, I completely understand, but I just can't trust any of them…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/15 09:08 AM
0

Nice "if this then that" argument. But, who said this was hearsay? Every female I've been close to (including family members) has been a manipulative woman. Literally, every one of them. If you think that bringing up the rape argument works, you seem to misunderstand that women rape too. In fact, women get away with rape, and child molestation, at a rate that is fucking shocking. What about abuse? Why not call me a wife beater instead? Well, if retort with a request that you check out the domest…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/15 07:23 AM
1

You're only upset about the weight thing because you were chubbo. However, you are doing something about it (I checked your history), so that's great. But, claiming alpha, or attempting to say someone isn't alpha, are the only sure fire ways of looking subordinate as fuck. Check out nature docos, the real alpha gorilla does nothing until challenged, all the weak ass non-silver backs are the ones fighting each other, trying to be the dominant one. I'm not downvoting you though, because, deep down…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/15 06:53 AM
0

NAWALT is a myth.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/15 06:43 AM
5

Because if the women were smart enough to trick a man in the first place, they wouldn't need to order the jizz from a catalog. They have to counter the retardation somehow.
/r/MGTOW02/09/15 06:15 AM
3

She's going to take half his muscles. Somehow. I might not have thought this through.
/r/MGTOW02/09/15 06:12 AM
2

Damn straight bro. In glad that I have encounters like that from time to time, proves that I've made the right choice.
/r/MGTOW30/08/15 10:53 PM
7

Excellent. You believe in equality. This isn't an equality subreddit. It's MGTOW. M = Men. Not women, men. You are fighting as if we are MRAs or something. You're completely in the wrong place.
/r/MGTOW30/08/15 01:32 PM
2

How very passive/aggressive of you. But, here is the correct answer: Men didn't get together and have a vote. That forum is nothing to do with us. If you wish to associate us with them in such a negative prose, I would like to counter; Are all women who claim to support MGTOW such fucking childish idiots when they get told that they can't take part?
/r/MGTOW30/08/15 01:29 PM
6

You also said that you thoroughly read the rules before joining. Make up your mind. Also, couldn't you have just opened with that fucking question? Why the massive story? Why all the complaining? You just wanted drama. Like all women.
/r/MGTOW30/08/15 01:11 PM
2

What the fuck do you want from us? You've said nothing other than screaming that you were hard done to. What. Do. You. Want?
/r/MGTOW30/08/15 01:02 PM
4

So what's your views? Share those instead of crying like a fucking baby, and maybe you wouldn't face hostility everywhere you go.
/r/MGTOW30/08/15 12:52 PM
6

Look. You are personifying the point that men go MGTOW. You are forcibly trying to join a forum, they said no (forum rules aren't law, the mods can do what they want). The fact that you are taking this so hard, and changing the story (joined by mistake/read the rules before joining) speaks volumes about the person you are. What do you want us to do? Fight your battles for you? Because you can't email the mods there yourself? Fuck you. Fight your own god damn battles in a logical way, not running…
/r/MGTOW30/08/15 12:51 PM
9

How do you not understand that this is the kind of bullshit they were avoiding by closing your account? Jesus Christ, I've only known you exist for an hour, and I already find tolerating you difficult.
/r/MGTOW30/08/15 12:20 PM
3

Omg my hero lol Thanks for spotting that one
/r/MGTOW30/08/15 12:16 PM
4

Can I ask, why is it such a problem for you? Why is it so important that you are in that forum, if you joined it by mistake?
/r/MGTOW30/08/15 12:08 PM
4

They do have a right to have no female members. Or are you saying that men going their own way, need to allow women to go with them?
/r/MGTOW30/08/15 11:21 AM
2

Incest. Pumping kin. Geddit?
/r/PussyPass30/08/15 05:18 AM
0

Bugatti went bust (then bought by another company for cheap) Steve Jobs drove a brand new mercedes. He did it as a least every 6months to allow him to not need a license plate. Apologies, but nothing irritates me more than badly posed self-help advice. Otherwise, thumbs up.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/15 03:07 AM
1

I like to point out that hetro guys can't cheat unless a girl is sleeping with him, which leads to only two outcomes: The girl knows he's heating with her, and fucks him anyway (as in, girls are just as bad) Or They don't know at all and believe everything he says (as in, they don't have an inquisitive cell in their minds, or are flat out stupid) They can't win lol
/r/MGTOW28/08/15 02:18 AM
1

I wasn't sure what you were saying, because your sentence construction abilities are on a par with a goat. Your first comment literally made zero sense. Anyway, onto the rebuttal; I'm assuming that you are ignoring the headline of the article? The blatant man-blaming for the issue? This is the point I was making.
/r/MGTOW26/08/15 09:44 PM
1

I'm not sure what you're saying, sorry
/r/MGTOW26/08/15 01:29 PM
1

Don't forget that the female profiles are all "guest" profiles. Even the real women want the man to pay before they've even met!
/r/MGTOW20/08/15 10:35 PM
1

GTOWMA
/r/MGTOW08/08/15 05:02 AM
1

I wouldn't buy a Trump RoboCunt. It'd have the weirdest pubic hair
/r/MGTOW08/08/15 04:50 AM
2

RoboCunt - Tumblrina Edition (Shipped in parts so the FedEx guy doesn't get a hernia)
/r/MGTOW08/08/15 04:49 AM
2

They already do - vibrators
/r/MGTOW08/08/15 04:48 AM
2

Apart from the male penis robots that are vibrators... Because every women asks those for consent before switching it on
/r/MGTOW08/08/15 04:47 AM
2

This. So much, this. It was that moment. Her being so upset that tears were bouncing off the table (to the point I had to get a paper towel after she left), to instantly switching to another emotion. No one truly that upset can just snap out of it.
/r/MGTOW06/08/15 08:43 PM
2

Yeah, if I'm having a day of stress at work, I search her pics on FB and have a giggle about how much of a Land Whale she has become. Lol
/r/MGTOW06/08/15 05:30 AM
2

Funny thing is, the women are also super judgemental with which Indian men they want to interact with: http://www.mansworldindia.com/talk/tinder-taming-great-indian-male-2/ It's very fucking irritating in that piece, because it's on about men that are complaining that they aren't getting action, but I'm fucking positive that there's some ugly bitches not getting any D on Tinder! Let's ban vibrators as well!
/r/MGTOW06/08/15 05:13 AM
14

I was with a girl that I thought was love, she knew everything about me, including that I have Bipolar. One day, I caught her flirting like crazy with someone she worked with, I said that I wasn't happy about it, and she started sobbing like crazy and saying how she was innocent. I pointed out that crying like a lunatic was distracting us from a simple conversation and instantly (and I mean INSTANTLY) she stopped crying, looked at me with a pouty mouth and a fake concerned look and said.. "Do yo…
/r/MGTOW06/08/15 04:57 AM
2

It's not beta at all. If you truly think that "alpha" means that you need to return the hostility, then you aren't Going Your Own Way. You're simply consumed by hatred. It's all very well to point out when someone is supporting women as a whole and being a white knight, but reverting into being a complete mouth breathing jock and saying to anyone that isn't preaching hatred that they are beta is just fucking stupid. Also, side note, being so angry all the time can lead to depression and suicide.…
/r/MGTOW02/08/15 09:41 AM
0

I think you missed the part where she rags on girls that only bang men for money.
/r/MGTOW01/08/15 07:44 AM
3

free inhabitant is in reference to the laws before the constitution. It's for slaves that were then freed to live as they saw fit. It was actually for saying "you can now not have to follow the instructions of a slave owner". All that got over written when the constitution came in to being. TL;DR She read some stuff online, was stupid and didn't investigate properly.
/r/MGTOW01/08/15 07:35 AM
1

Exactly! They didn't even attempt to "get me onside".
/r/MGTOW29/06/15 05:30 AM
1

Instead of throwing insults (which I didn't in my question) answer it This is my point, feminists seem unable to engage in the questions that show women in positions other than powerful. But men are in non-powerful positions too.
/r/MGTOW28/06/15 05:34 PM
3

Son? Lol
/r/MGTOW28/06/15 05:31 PM
1

Thank you! That's the kind of answer I was hoping for. Perhaps foolishly, I wanted to save the mainstream feminist movement from me thinking that the whole thing was rigged; and to do that, I really needed a thoughtful answer. I do understand that my question was highly stress-inducing to them, but that was the point of asking it. You see the genuine answer when you instigate the stereotype. For /r/feminism, I wanted to see how they reacted to women in demeaning jobs that made them actually equa…
/r/MGTOW28/06/15 05:27 PM
3

No reason at all. Just "you're banned. If you'd like to ask why, message a mod" My point throughout this, is to see the differences in approach. Feminists ban me without argument. And some guys here try to talk to me as if I'm completely retarded or inexperienced. (I'm actually mid 30s, been burned by marriage and a couple of shorter relationships) I understand that the feminist movement is fundamentally flawed, but I wanted to prove to myself that the MGTOW movement was filled only with 'thinki…
/r/MGTOW28/06/15 05:19 PM
2

Yeah, I mean. I guess I realised that it was going to happen... But not even an argument. It's very "you aren't assisting the circle jerk" type mentality lol
/r/MGTOW28/06/15 07:32 AM
2

You seem to completely have misunderstood the point of me posting here.
/r/MGTOW28/06/15 07:26 AM
10

Well... I (stupidly) thought I could engage them in conversation. I'm kind of glad they did ban me though, makes me realise that the MGTOW movement is fundamentally correct :)
/r/MGTOW28/06/15 07:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter