TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Ixodia Archive

View 0 posts and 113 comments by Ixodia on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If some uneducated bum who's never been to college suddenly came up to me and claimed that he's proved P = NP, would I be wrong to be skeptical? Sure, there's a slim possibility that maaaybe the man or woman is a genius who toiled away in academic obscurity, but how likely is this? There are grounds to doubt his/her credibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/18 12:52 AM
1

Okay, so by your own admission you're fat, and sexually unsuccessful. Perhaps an incel. And you have the nerve to come up with trite little pieces of advice for other men like Another moral is treating women with excessive respect and empathy. No, treat her like a firm parent would treat a disobedient child. Be assertive, but not over the top. Be cold. Do not show emotion. Do not be her emotional tampon; she has beta-orbiters for that. If she's into you, slap her ass. Then she'll want you more. …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/18 12:12 AM
5

My mother never 'needed' a man - she was an independent working woman who supported her disabled father, stay-at-home mother, and several siblings before she ever married my dad. I don't 'need' a man - I'm receiving an excellent education in a very practical field which will enable me to be relatively successful in life if I work hard enough at it. Same goes for many of my female cousins, who're all doctors, engineers, and in other STEM fields. I like to think neither men nor women 'need' each o…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/18 07:31 PM
1

I have no words. You must have been raised by a pretty shitty mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/18 07:16 PM
1

Your average woman's hotter than your hot woman...
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/18 05:15 PM
1

An attractive personality is not a virtuous personality Yeah, no. 'Virtue' is necessary but not sufficient for attractiveness in LTRs - if you don't have it, you're not going to be a very good long term partner, but having it does not guarantee you're going to be any good for an LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/18 04:52 PM
1

Oh, sorry! I meant Elon Musk - why would you characterize him as a high beta? In terms of his track record with women, he seems very much an emotionally unavailable, workaholic alpha who keeps jumping from one hot woman to the next. Otherwise, I agree. A blue pilled NATURAL alpha is ideal.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/18 10:41 PM
1

Why a high beta, and not an alpha?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/18 10:19 PM
4

OP should have been born a rich Arab in the middle of bumfuck, Saudi Arabia if his ideal society consists of 'alpha' men with a mini harem of on average four wives. In fact, it's not too late. He can still convert to Islam and relocate, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/18 10:08 PM
1

Not everything one does has to be at the expense of somebody else. You don't need to be unkind or indecent to somebody, or less empathetic of somebody else's needs/wants in order to be independent and assertive. Sometimes, your interests come into conflict with somebody else's. In which case, too bad, it sucks to suck. Being a kind/decent/empathetic person doesn't mean surrendering your needs/desires in order to satisfy somebody else's - that's just called being a pushover. You can safeguard you…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/18 03:56 AM
1

I think of openness and gentleness as good qualities, but neither attractive nor unattractive when considered independently of the bigger picture. You know what IS attractive? The qualities of being independent and assertive, not submissive or subservient or spineless. If you can manage these, then kindness, decency, empathy are cherries on top of an already excellent cake. Not particularly compelling in and of themselves, but definitely welcome when the prerequisites are met. Edit: The answer i…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/18 02:31 AM
1

I think it's got to do with the type of personality you have, and the way you were raised. If you're the sort to go to clubbing, you're more likely to have friends who do the same. If you'e the sort of person to think that it's low-class and trashy behaviour, then you're more likely to have friends who behave similarly. The former will think it's rare to be the latter kind of person, the latter will think the former kind of person is not as common as everyone seems to think they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 01:18 AM
1

I'm in the 20-25 age range, never been to a bar or clubbing in my life. None of my three best friends have either.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/18 01:08 AM
1

Do you want to be more specific in telling me exactly how it is bad logic and how I'm 'logicking incorrectly'? Say I make a blanket statement like 'lying is never right.' Because it's a universal statement, all I have to do if come up with one situation in which lying is not wrong. Like if you're in Nazi Germany, hiding your Jewish neighbours, but you lie about it when the authorities ask you if you know where they've disappeared to. Same applies to blanket statements like 'manipulation is never…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 06:00 PM
1

You're asserting that 'manipulation is not wrong.' But what do you mean when you say that? Do you mean that a) manipulation is never wrong, or that b) manipulation is not wrong for some subset of cases, such as those you've illustrated in the OP? Let's take a). It would only take one counterexample to show a universal statement to be false - u/Scatre proposed that the specific case of coercion which he illustrated in his example is a form of manipulation and is wrong. If this is true, then the a…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 05:42 AM
1

The decline in honest, brave, and intelligent men is also encouraged by women in our society. Why don't you blame Eve while you're at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/18 02:00 PM
1

Obviously everybody has innate biases. A person who knows theirs and does not let it get in the way of recognizing objective reality is the sort of person I'll settle for being. There's some research that suggests that the distribution for males has a higher variance for males than females. Some others suggest that there is none when a factor analysis is done. All said and done, whether the male distribution has a higher mean or variance due to innate biological characteristics is up for debate.…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/18 02:07 PM
1

I don't really seek to construct any alternative reality. Even if it did turn out that the average woman was intellectually inferior to the average man in the fields I spoke of, it wouldn't really affect me. I've always been very confident of my skills, as an individual. From my lived experience, I don't see that my male friends are any better than me in terms of ability, in programming or applied math or physics. Obviously, though, I am a woman, and I'd like it to be true that intelligence in w…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/18 05:14 AM
1

I do, when it comes to intellectual ability, especially as it concerns math, CS, engineering, the natural sciences, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/18 08:01 PM
1

For decades, the US has attracted foreign students who represented the richest demographic in their respective countries, and the intellectual cream of the crop. I doubt that this will stop being the case anytime soon, but shouldn't the US be concerned about the declines in applications from international students that have already become apparent? This is particularly interesting: http://www.nfap.com/pdf/New%20NFAP%20Policy%20Brief%20The%20Importance%20of%20International%20Students%20to%20Ameri…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/18 06:51 PM
1

Yeah, they've always seemed like pretty much the same people to me. For instance, a Pakistani friend of mine told me she has extended family in India from before the Partition (her ancestral village was in India, but her great-grandparents left for Pakistan during the Partition, but the rest of the family didn't) and that still visits them. On an individual level, very few Pakistanis seem to have any animosity toward Indians, or Indians against Pakistanis, at those I've met outside of South Asia…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/18 05:25 AM
1

Aside from religion, what really do you believe is the difference between Indians and Pakistanis?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/18 09:03 PM
1

Why 'two (and only two)' rather than 'at least two'?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/18 08:50 PM
1

I'm glad it's worked out for you!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/18 08:50 PM
1

I'm glad it's worked out for you!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/18 08:47 PM
1

Let's say we have a 16 year old and a 26 year old. Maturity and experience will tip the balance of power far in favour of the older individual, even if neither party means it to. One is still in high school, living with their parents, has never worked a real job in their lives, etc. The other has probably graduated university, living independently, on their own income. The former is a child. The latter is an adult. I have trouble imaging that there could be any real chemistry there, aside from t…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/18 02:35 PM
1

I think it's inherently creepy because of differences in maturity and life experience. There's a lot of development that occurs between 16 and one's mid twenties. The ability to drive a car is very different skill and responsibility than the ability to conduct a healthy relationship that contributes to the happiness and interests of both parties involves. It's comparing apples and oranges.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/18 04:39 AM
1

If you're somebody in your mid twenties, and an underage girl hits on you, it would still be 'creepy' for you to respond and actually fuck her. Some underage girls are immature and naive little idiots, but you've the advantage of being older and hopefully more mature; the 'right' thing to do would be to politely reject her, and move on. Might be a good idea to do it over text or something to protect yourself, if she's the psychotic type. Same thing applies when underage boys bit on women in thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/18 04:53 PM
1

Yes, most women are status seeking, and some women are attracted to dark triad traits in men (as are men in women). However, I don't see a clear connection between status and the possession of dark triad traits in human beings as it relates to mate selection.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 10:14 PM
1

You keep making assertions without any justification whatsoever.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 09:48 PM
1

I don't follow. How does it give rise to such a conclusion?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 09:12 PM
5

No, that's dodging it. You believe one group of women are more insecure than another because AWALT? You believe one group of women put up more last minute resistance than other because AWALT? You believe a specific group of women crave cock and are thus easy because AWALT? You make not an iota of sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/18 01:59 AM
2

I meant blue pilled women were more insecure and thus easier. Why do you think they are more insecure? Red pilled women tend to put up more last minute resistance. In what sense do red pilled party women put up more last minute resistance? Blue pilled women crave cock How do you come to this conclusion?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/18 01:39 AM
1

I'm preeetty sure you claimed earlier that blue pilled women were 'sluttier.' You're contradicting yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/18 01:21 AM
1

And these red pilled women are less 'slutty' than blue pilled women?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/18 01:04 AM
5

Are average, below average and nerdy girls the sluttiest of all due to their low self esteem? I'm talking about the entitled, feminist ones who know deep down they're not the hot shit, but have a false sense of confidence from feminism. What about those? Either entitled, feminist, average or below average nerdy girls have low self esteem or they don't. First you imply that they have low self esteem, now you're implying they have inflated self esteem which is falsely inflated by feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/18 12:56 AM
1

You're asserting that average or below average women who are nerdy are more likely to have low self esteem, and that women with the lowest self esteem will be the most promiscuous because low self esteem causes promiscuity. As to the first, I can't really say, because I don't really see a relationship between beauty and self esteem. I also don't see a relationship between nerdiness and self esteem. As to the second, I don't know if self esteem is the best predictor of promiscuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/18 12:45 AM
2

I mostly don't believe in the MBTI, but lack of forethought and impulsive behaviour reads as perceiving rather than judging to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 10:47 PM
1

No one likes to feel like a fool.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 02:59 AM
1

I think one of the reasons women find repulsive the idea of a guy learning specific tools and tricks designed to get women to have a relationship with him is because they fear genuinely liking somebody only to find out (after they have invested so much of themselves) that it is all a facade and that this person does not even exist, that he treated them as a candy machine where all he had to do was figure out what buttons to push to make the candy fall out. You hear all the time about women falli…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 02:04 AM
1

I think Shakespeare agrees with you! "Assume a virtue, if you have it not. That monster, custom, who all sense doth eat, Of habits devil, is angel yet in this, That to the use of actions fair and good He likewise gives a frock or livery That aptly is put on. Refrain tonight, And that shall lend a kind of easiness To the next abstinence; the next more easy; For use almost can change the stamp of nature.” -- Hamlet
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/18 11:26 PM
1

Woah. Most women, when they say they're attracted to a man, are probably honest in the moment. Attraction can and does fade for many people in LTRs, for reasons neither party can help. Women can and should leave men they're no longer attracted to, just as men should leave women they're no longer attracted to, provided they've no young children, etc. It would be dishonest to pretend attraction where it doesn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 02:37 AM
7

Same for me and my female friends in high school and college too.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 02:25 AM
1

Okay, the percentage of men women find attractive is smaller than the percentage of women men find attractive. So what? This is the case for biological and/or evolutionary reasons neither women nor men can help. Women don't consciously choose to be more discriminating than men, and men don't consciously choose to be less discriminating. I'm not sure why people are so intent on blaming women and praising men for something that they have no influence over.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 02:22 AM
1

She doesn't really. All she's asking is for the guy not dress sloppily, not be a couch potato, not be much older than her, and not be completely bald. I have the same requirements, minus the bit about balding, and I don't think it's too much to ask for.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 02:00 AM
1

Better solution: cast a genjutsu on the entire world.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/18 07:53 PM
1

Good for you. But most people who have a pessimistic mindset hind behind fatalism to justify poor decision making.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/18 07:35 AM
1

Even if it is true, the only way to preserve any modicum of sanity and happiness is to live your life pretending it is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/18 07:22 AM
1

Why do people spend time thinking about biological determinism and other fatalistic views? It's depressing and utterly unproductive. If it is true, then you may be fucked through no fault of your own if you got the short end of the stick, but if isn't true and you believe it is, and you believe you've got the short end of the stick, it's a self fulfilling prophecy, and the person who's fucked you up is yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/18 06:41 AM
1

Hermione said nothing about how Victor asked her out, I believe. It was the third person narrator who gives us this information.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/18 05:47 AM
1

I don't think so. He hung out in the library for days before he worked up the courage to ask her out. That's the behaviour of a guy who is a little bit to shy to outright ask out the girl he genuinely likes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/18 05:42 AM
1

I bet she wasn't wearing make-up or anything in the library when Victor asked her out.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/18 05:38 AM
1

Not really. She just wasn't into makeup and stuff like Lavender and Parvati were. If you recall, she cleaned up extraordinarily well when she attended the Triwizard tournament with Victor Krum, who was nothing if not an alpha.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/18 05:34 AM
1

No girls liked Snape because he was a resentful awkward loner in Slytherin, a death eater in the making who hung out with idiots like Avery and Mulciber and developed dark arts spells like sectumsempra in his free time.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/18 05:24 AM
1

It's a burden, in my view. Ignoring biology for a bit, it's bizarre that people's happiness depends so much on having a romantic or sexual relationship with somebody else, on having children within that relationship. It's bizarre that people would devote so much time and energy, so much of their lives, to that pursuit. The main problem with romantic and sexual desire is that is depends on a second party to fulfill them; most people can't fulfill their own romantic and sexual desires. This depend…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/17 09:02 AM
4

Is this or is this not a debate space? I'm not sure why people are kicking such a huge fuss about using an apparently combative or aggressive tone. And I don't agree that she's being pedantic either. Trying to build an argument is next to useless when you're trying to build it with ill-defined words. Strong arguments are built on precise language. No body who wants to build a strong argument will want to deliberately use imprecise terms unless they want to hide behind it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/17 05:28 PM
1

Plus women basically need to be in a relationship with a man to be happy. A single woman is usually miserable and constantly complains about not having a man, whereas a single guy is happy as a clam and does his own thing. Have you ever heard of these people who call themselves 'incels'? They're very single, and definitely not as happy as clams.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/17 02:38 AM
3

You must be kidding. "They don't know what they're talking about'' can be used by almost anybody to describe the people they disagree with, and to justify silencing them. For instance, I could decide that you're ignorant and don't know what you're talking about, and delete your thread so no one Is exposed to what I view is your stupidity. Do you reaaally think this is a good policy?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/17 03:44 AM
1

Congrats!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/17 03:24 AM
1

...Men and women have been living in coexistence since before they were even human men and women. Personally, I think that men and women who reject the other gender and refuse to get along are the real plague. Think radfems, MGTOWs, some MRAs, and other extremist groups of this nature. I think we're meant to complement each other, balance each other out.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/17 03:09 AM
1

Oh, I see. I thought you meant that men don't generally have platonic female friends, but that they do in cases where they've known the women from like childhood. Thanks for the clarification!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/17 12:21 PM
1

But what about friends you make in adulthood?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/17 11:59 AM
1

I said this in reply to someone else first, but many men argue that it matters less that they cheated on their girl friends and wives because they love them, and not the women they had a ONS with. What do you think about this?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/17 11:50 AM
1

You can't really love someone if you are willing to let other people sleep with you I've heard men argue that it matters less that they cheated on their girl friends and wives because they love them, and not not the women they cheated with. What do you think about this?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/17 11:43 AM
1

Don't men have close female friends they find unattractive, the way many women have close male friends they find unattractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/17 11:15 AM
1

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/17 11:08 PM
1

You're not making any sense. You're saying that the word monkey, when specifically used to describe coloured people, won't get redefined if it's tabooed? No one's said that the word 'monkey' should be tabooed. 'Monkey' as it's currently defined is perfectly alright.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/17 12:12 PM
1

As a coloured person myself, thank goodness for that! But this association is still prevalent today, and is deeply rooted in history. This tendency to associate darker skin with a closer relationship with apes become very popular when scientific racism became a thing after Darwin in the eighteen hundreds, and this perception has been rooted in the west ever since. Few people call Caucasian or East Asian people monkeys... it's coloured people who're largely the target of this particular racist in…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/17 09:50 AM
1

Sorry, I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/17 06:00 AM
1

Where are you getting these numbers from?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/17 05:45 AM
1

Where I am, I probably know some girls who're like the female equivalent of the stereotypical guy in CS.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/17 05:44 AM
1

That's phenomenally racist. I haven't done any research on this topic, but my gut feeling is that there are several factors in play here, probably the least of which is genetics. For instance, all else being equal, a person who's been well fed throughout their life, has been formally educated, exposed to a well developed society, and so on, is probably going to be quite a bit more intelligent than someone who often goes starving, hasn't had the privilege of attending the sort of elementary and s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/17 05:27 AM
2

Well reasoned!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/17 12:56 AM
1

That's super depressing. It just reminded me of this single, actually: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnlvPoDU5LY
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 07:55 PM
1

Thank you!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 07:44 PM
2

Fair enough, I see where you're coming from.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/17 06:52 PM
1

I agree. She seems like the sort of person who lets her actions be governed by the fear that she might in the slightest hurt somebody's feelings - as though people are children who're easily traumatized by even the most insignificant little boo-boos and incapable of dealing with their emotions. Yeah, empathy's a good thing, but not when it makes a dishonest person out of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/17 01:58 AM
1

Do you believe those two qualities are negatively correlated?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/17 08:09 PM
1

I don't think I ever said that "not being fat and having minimal makeup skills" makes me hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/17 09:10 AM
1

As a nerdy girl who's doing a degree in applied math, I disagree. They exist, but they're only in demand if they're hot, as with any other non-nerdy girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/17 08:59 AM
1

Two people may be bystanders to some event, and their interpretation of what exactly just happened will differ depending on their set of beliefs and experiences, ie. their biases. That's what everyone is arguing. No one can observe objective reality directly, only piece together a mental model of it. Different people will form different mental models depending on what they believe and have experienced, even if their eyes see the exact same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 10:49 PM
1

I think it's great for getting laid, but terrible for sustaining a long term relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 04:12 PM
6

My ongoing habit of lurking on r/relationships tells me that there are a lot of men who do exactly what you claim comes more naturally to women. Without hard stats, it's difficult to make claims of the sort you're making.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/17 01:44 AM
1

Yeah, I absolutely do believe that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/17 12:33 AM
1

the "test-retest unreliability" is because self-reporting tests will always be unreliable. if the user does not know himself well enough to answer the test correctly, it's on the user, and maybe also on the way the test was written. it does not refute the validity of the cognitive function model. Yet the five-factor model has managed better repeatability. there being "little scientific evidence" about it does not mean it is fake. absence of evidence =/= evidence of absence. even today, science i…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/17 12:31 AM
1

The four function model that is the foundation for the MBTI has very little scientific evidence corroborating it. It just about fails the standard for test-retest reliability. Indeed, people who don't believe in the validity of the MBTI must not be very smart.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/17 08:24 PM
1

What if the older man was a 6'0" doctor, engineer or lawyer with chiseled abs, a solid group of successful friends, and has been to multiple countries in the world? I'm young and in school to enter one of those three professions you've listed. Why would I go for an older man in those professions when I could marry a successful man who's not only in those professions but also my own age? Not to mention that if I work hard, I could be a hot woman having exactly that level of success on my own, plu…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/17 07:16 PM
1

In her 20s while the guy is also in his 20s reeks of female butthurt about men having a significantly easier time dating younger No. These are my concerns about dating somebody at least 5 years older than I am: He's probably got way more life experience than I am. I'm afraid he'd dismiss my thoughts and opinions on account of my relative inexperience. He'll probably more success in his career than I do on account of his age, and thus more resources, and that's not conducive to him treating me as…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/17 06:53 PM
1

If you were my age, it would be significant to you as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/17 06:12 PM
1

What, specifically, is bullshit? Regarding women raping men, I literally said, I'm not saying it's okay. Men do harassed and raped by women. Harassment should be equally punished regardless of gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/17 04:51 PM
1

I find this view deeply depressing, and it's not representative of the marriages in my family (I quite literally don't know a single person in my immediate or extended family who've divorced). But assuming what you say is true, is it not true that a man will only stay with a woman so long as she's the best he can get? For instance, if you have a girlfriend, but you meet a new girl who's more beautiful and a better personality, and she's interested in you .
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/17 03:20 PM
1

I'd be creeped out too. My main concern would be that he's dating younger, more inexperienced women specifically because they can't see red flags women his age can, or because he wants to take advantage of them in a way he can't take advantage of women his own age.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/17 03:03 PM
1

Tend to beat their children? What? Can I get a source for that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/17 02:53 PM
1

I think that when a man is harassed by a woman to some degree X, versus when a woman is harassed by a man by some equivalent degree X, the latter case is seen as more threatening and thus worse because it's probable that the man is bigger and stronger than the woman and could do some serious harm if he wished it, whereas in the former case, the harassment is less threatening because it's probable that the woman is smaller and weaker than the man, and couldn't do serious harm even if she wished i…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/17 02:37 PM
1

Is this body language off putting because it makes you feel that this behaviour is just routine, that you're just a number in the sea of men she's had, and the sea of men she'll probably have after you? Because this is the exact off putting feeling I get when I meet Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/17 02:13 PM
2

A 16 year old boy is still a child. A 60 year old woman is an adult.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/17 03:45 AM
1

Doesn't it bother you that the quality* women you steal were disloyal enough to trade to abandon her partner for you? How could you trust that she wouldn't do the same thing to you? *I believe a quality woman is one who, among other things, has a good moral compass and sense of loyalty.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/17 02:55 AM
1

If I was on that boat with people I loved so much that I couldn't bear to live without them if they died, I'd move heaven and earth to get them on a life boat. If I failed, I'd refuse to get on a life boat. It's all of us, or none of us. I'd raise my voice about equality because one of those people is male, and he'd die if I didn't advocate for men getting on that lifeboat too.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/17 01:54 AM
2

Some sources say that the personality traits that the MBTI uses to categorize people are correlated to various degrees with the those the Big 5 uses. So, I'm not sure it's entirely useless. The MBTI gets a lot of flak for its reliability, as it rightly should, and there's no scientific evidence for the four function model. The Big 5, unlike the MBTI, passes the standard for repeatability much, much better. The best MBTI type for a partner is someone who also knows that it is bullshit. This made …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/17 09:48 PM
2

Good for your mom! I love happy old marriages. The story's similar on this end too. My mom and dad tell me that she was a doormat early in their marriage, and he used to be very authoritarian. But he's mellowed out over the years, and these days, there's nothing he hates more than seeing my mom upset. If I ever marry, I want to have a marriage like what my parents have now. They're so sweet.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/17 07:54 PM
1

Wow, my mom is xSFJ, and she's more of the 'giver' in her relationship with my dad, who's an INTJ. But I actually think she's the reason my parent's marriage has lasted - she's always the one who compromises and apologizes, even when it's the other person at fault. I don't know a nicer person than her.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/17 07:45 PM
1

Wow! A friend of is an ENFJ. Anyway, they're probably the most charismatic, sincere, hard working person I know. Could be a bit manipulative, but genuinely sensitive to the emotions of other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/17 06:33 PM
1

Is it the palpable sense of arrogance? :P Just kidding, confidence is attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/17 05:50 PM
1

How come? Is it the manipulativeness?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/17 05:43 PM
1

Assuming the MBTI is valid, I think in general for a man, INTJ/ENTJ is ideal, and in general for a woman, INFJ/ENFJ. Personally, I'm an INTP, and for me, I believe the ideal would be an ENFJ or an ENTJ. But I believe that the MBTI lacks validity, so my saying all this is moot.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/17 02:46 PM
1

There are many men and women who don't party, don't go to bars, etc. And I think a lot of potentially good partners are invisible in the dating scene because of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/17 04:26 AM
1

Don't put yourself down. :(
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/17 11:01 PM
1

It may largely have to do with the way I don't go out of my way to talk to people. As to dating, I think that as with friendship, the greatest hurdle is to find somebody with similar areas of interest or a complementary personality. The first is difficult if your interests don't seem align with other people's. Otherwise, it's difficult to find a subject for conversation. As to guys being expected to take the lead... yes, that's unfair. Being expected to take the lead is a unpleasant burden.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/17 03:04 PM
1

Sadly, it describes me too. Small social circle of dwindling friends I don't meet often, spend all my time studying, browsing the internet, and sleeping. I don't know how to put myself out there either. Sometimes I imagine I'll live my entire life like a ghost just drifting through the world and die without any fanfare. Hopefully not, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/17 01:58 PM
1

If there's anything life's taught me, it's that it's my own job to be my biggest cheerleader. After all, no one else is there to do it. Me being pessimistic and beating myself down is me failing myself in that regard. After all, the world gives me enough shit without me giving myself shit as well. A lot of people have trouble finding partners because they don't have a wide social circle to begin with, and don't venture out of it at all. I have attractive friends in engineering who basically don'…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/17 03:46 AM
–

If some day you want to do research on this topic... I do, but not when I'm in the midst of exam season. But you can't preemptively declare that it can't play any important role. To make it more precise for you, if I say that of A, B and C, C plays plays the least important role then I am saying that importance(A) > importance(C) and Importance(B) > importance(C). I haven't preemptively declared it doesn't play any important role. That's like saying importance(C) = 0. My gut feeling is based mos…
/r/PurplePillDebate
–

Unity too. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate
–

There's a subtle but important distinction between criticizing a culture by calling it disgusting (which in this case it really and truly is), and calling the people who practice it 'semi-retarded monkey people.' The former isn't racist, but the latter is. Yeah, don't care, I'll keep calling baby-gang-rape cultures disgusting, feel free to call that racist if you so desire. Yeah, you can keep doing it. Another fun fact: South Africa is the baby rape capital of the world due to the inbred retards…
/r/PurplePillDebate
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter