TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JCSledge Archive

View 0 posts and 125 comments by JCSledge on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I think people should live their family life however they see fit. Policing other families is weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/26 03:59 PM
2

When you are out in public, do you like to be approached by salespeople all the time trying to get you to buy stuff? Same concept
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/26 06:43 PM
0

People that are bothered by this AND stay in the relationship need therapy to figure out why they are so insecure. If it bothers you then leave the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 04:56 PM
3

Ok fair lol
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 02:36 PM
13

Why are yall so obsessed with stigmatizing anyone? Maybe the answer to homosexuality being stigmatized is to stop stigmatizing it, not adding other groups to be stigmatized
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 07:36 PM
0

Why can’t they ever take responsibility for what they consume and their thoughts/actions? Why do they always have to blame someone else for what they do?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/26 01:21 AM
1

Because it proves it’s of men’s own doing. When you put out statistics you have to examine the why to get meaning. It means the issue is not “why do men choose to commit violence against men at rates higher than they do women” it should be why are men so often the ones committing this violence? Men saying to women “we kill you less often” isn’t the flex you’re making it out to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 03:00 PM
1

“Men are more likely to be victims of violent crime” ok cool now do which sex is more likely to commit the violent crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 02:56 PM
4

Well for one most men vastly overrate their ability to attract desirable women but even if true this harms the vast majority of men way more than it harms women. Younger men lose out on potential partners and then cry about hypergamy while older women are “losing” a partner that really didn’t want to be with them in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 03:23 PM
1

There’s a huge campaign and movement against hiring people based on gender and focus on hiring based off of merit. Hiring on merit is basically what DEI is, since we used to discriminate against a lot of groups. This doesn’t qualify as a discrimination that men face that they are supposed to deal with on their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 03:38 PM
1

There’s a huge campaign and movement against hiring people based on gender and focus on hiring based off of merit. Hiring on merit is basically what DEI is, since we used to discriminate against a lot of groups. This doesn’t qualify as a discrimination that men face that they are supposed to deal with on their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 03:38 PM
1

what discrimination problem are you talking about though? can you provide an example? this is what I've been asking for a few questions and if you can provide an example.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 12:10 PM
1

Yes. You have to listen to them explain it. When people with power discriminate against others it’s ultimately up to those doing the discrimination to stop it. But let’s not get diverted, can you provide one example of a discrimination men face and are expected to deal with on their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 03:46 AM
0

They aren’t saying for average men to fix the problems powerful men cause for average men. They are saying it’s up to the people in power, men, to fix the problems and we should collectively pressure them to do that. It’s the entire “the patriarchy (referring to the few men in charge) is also bad for the vast majority of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 03:19 AM
3

Can you provide some examples of this discrimination that men face and are expected to deal with on their own?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 04:31 PM
1

No we don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 04:05 PM
5

Well your “if….” Is incorrect also. If men are being discriminated against then that also should be spoken out against. There’s two possible solutions here that are equal: No one should have to deal with discrimination. Everyone should have to deal with discrimination. Why would we choose the latter?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 03:38 PM
3

Why are you singling out women here as if they are the only ones? If there are groups of people that are discriminated against then that should be spoken out against as well. Aside from promoting meritocracy discrimination should always be frowned upon.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/26 03:28 PM
1

Are you drunk?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 01:44 AM
1

What topic do you even think we are debating and what side do you take and what side do you think I take? Because it seems like you’re imagining stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 01:09 AM
2

It literally does not. Also when I talk about the people in charge you think I meant Kamala Harris or Hillary Clinton? Your sights are set too low. I’m talking about the billionaires that sign their contributions and tell them what to do. So name a woman in that group, even though that’s not the definition. No one said women running for office means they don’t have power.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 12:23 AM
1

So you think my participation in debates with other people automatically means I consent to debate with you? Debates typically require opposing views so we topic have you made up to think I’m debating you about?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 11:57 PM
1

I never consented to a debate 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 11:50 PM
1

I never consented to a review of evidence with you. You’ll have to find someone else interested in that topic. I would have probably been more obliged had you stated a purpose but this doesn’t interest me anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 11:48 PM
1

Yes. In news articles, there’s plenty on the leopardsatemyface subreddit. Would you kindly get to the point of your barrage of questions?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 11:39 PM
1

Because they said so. Why would I think they are lying?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 11:31 PM
1

How is it moving the goal posts when that’s what the topic has been the whole time? Also why is it that men that will never be a part of the patriarchy are the ones that defend it the most? Patriarchy meaning zero women is just wrong and deflects the topic. However it still applies to the US. Can you name a woman you think is at the top with the billionaire oligarchs that buy the politicians?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 11:30 PM
2

We are talking about in the context of the United States. Germany having a female chancellor or England having had a queen doesn’t change what the US does. If the oligarchy is 99% men and 1% women does that somehow make it less a patriarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 09:10 PM
1

Definitely agree. And when the democrats and republicans both work for the interests of the oligarchs it really doesn’t matter to them who wins, but as long as they keep us fighting between democrat and republican instead of oligarch vs working class people then they win since they pay for both the Ds and the Rs. My evidence for this is you’ll never see the Ds fight the Rs as hard as you see the Ds fight the people like Sanders and Mamdani.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 09:03 PM
2

An oligarchy of men that makes rules to benefit the men at the top is a patriarchy. Patriarchy stems from the word for father which refers to one man at the top of the family. Patriarchy doesn’t mean men have it better than women. It means a handful of men have set up the rules to their benefit over all the other men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 08:58 PM
1

Im not excusing or defending them. I’m pointing out just how much actually has to be overcome in that society. It’s backwards
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 08:55 PM
2

We also have the perception that republicans and conservative economic policy is better for the economy. Historically the further right we go the worse the economy gets. The credit card cap would actually be a good progressive policy. No tax on overtime and no tax on tips are great progressive ideas. We just said that’s what we were doing but we didn’t do it. Policy that puts more money in the hands of the public is good progressive policy which makes sense considering our economy is based on co…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 08:49 PM
1

Even the appearance of being a liberal is a sin to them. They say they can’t even criticize republicans without getting blow back. It’s completely jacked up. Also our current administration is raiding our election offices so they are about to know how we voted.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 08:30 PM
5

America in the grand scheme of things is shifted to the right. What we consider center point is considered right by all measures of political scale. Regardless of European or whatever. Just political belief in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 08:26 PM
2

I see what you are saying and i think a lot of people would find themselves center or left of center. But the politicians we all elect? Most are right of center. Off the top of my head there’s maybe a handful of politicians that are left of center. Most elected democrats aren’t blue collar working class people, they serve their wealthy donors and enact policy to benefit them, which is right wing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 08:25 PM
2

Absolutely this. There’s people that voted for maga because they didn’t want to be labeled as a liberal by their acquaintances.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 08:22 PM
1

They should abandon it but it’s because it harms them as well. We have this perception that the patriarchy is men favored over women. And in some terms that’s universally true, such as the pay gap. However a better description of the patriarchy is one man setting the rules to benefit them over 99,999 other people made up of men and women. For example with the pay gap, sure working class men tend to make more money for the same job, but it’s also detrimental to both the men and women if the patri…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 08:01 PM
1

I would argue the patriarchy doesn’t even benefit the most attractive and socially dominant men, only the most wealthy and powerful. It doesn’t benefit a good looking person that makes a million a year. It benefits an older male dominated generation where that annual income is nothing to them. Granted the former surely has a better life then most, but it’s not because of patriarchal ideas like women shouldn’t be allowed to vote. The people that benefit from the patriarchy are so far up that none…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 07:27 PM
2

Oh no, Democrats in America are definitely right of center. Bernie Sanders is left of center. America considers Bernie Sanders to be far left.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 07:22 PM
2

As a progressive it’s frustrating that people don’t see that corporate influence over policy making as one of the main things we fight against. Sanders has been railing against that specifically his entire life. With DEI all it means is you can’t discriminate. A persons race/sex/gender shouldn’t count against them. Study after study shows that it does historically count against them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 07:16 PM
2

We aren’t talking about democrats or republicans, we are talking about progressive ideas. Neither party are progressives. Democrats are just diet war mongering corporatists. Your complaints about regulations are valid but it’s not the regulations that are the problem, it’s the corporatists interest government that lets these corporations buy their way out of it. That being said the individual worker is meaningless to a corporation, they care about maximizing profit and will put your safety (this…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 05:25 PM
8

Of course progressive policies benefit men, especially of working class people. In fact they benefit all working class people. Labor union protections, access to trade and college education, access to healthcare, clean air and water, regulations on food safety, osha regulations on workplace safety equipment, publicly funded schools and fire departments, time and a half for overtime, equal access to voting rights, basically all of the amendments to the constitution, those are all progressive poli…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 03:28 PM
5

You’re entire premise is based off of the fact that progressive policies are not aligned with the interests of the vast majority of men and that the patriarchy is aligned with the interests of the vast majority of men. If you hold those premises to be true then yea, it’ll seem weird and confusing. If you think about the counter to those premises, it makes more sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/26 01:23 PM
15

Agreed. Nothing really to add except this is an exceptionally stupid post. This person should sue their school district.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 03:43 PM
1

If this is happening to you all the time then perhaps it’s you that are making poor choices in the people you associate with. That doesn’t make it the norm or the start of a slippery slope.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 07:22 PM
0

Are we talking about specifically the American patriarchal system? That was my impression and if is it has always been for just a select few men, not everyone. Despite the idea of “all men are created equal” that didn’t apply to the natives, black men, or even non property owning men for a long time of American history. This very post is asking if women should have rights in our system and asks if women having rights hurts men. Aside the obvious “should women have rights” obviously showing what’…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 01:07 AM
1

However the concept of “giving women rights” as if it should even be a debate is nonsense. Can you define for me “what is a woman”? And then use that definition to explain to me why that definition means they should have less rights?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 04:12 PM
1

The concept of “giving women rights” leading to raised expectations for men would not even be a thing if we lived in a society where women’s rights were a thing to be given, which is a prominent characteristic of the patriarchal system in the US. The whole root of the problem stems from this comically skewed tiered system and is a way that it harms everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 04:09 PM
0

My critique of the patriarchal systems harming men has nothing to do with traditional masculine standards and has everything to do with a small number of men that hold power and use that power to their advantage at the detriment of everyone underneath them, both men and women. The only way this happens in a democratic society is if the few select in power can get the majority fighting against each other (men’s rights vs women’s rights for example) and vote against their best interests. For examp…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 03:49 PM
-1

No it doesn’t imply all men. It implies a system created by a few select men with power. When we say patriarchal system we aren’t referring to the guy making 60k/year doing a blue collar job, we aren’t even talking about the doctor making 400k/year. It refers to a very small number of men who hold power and use it to harm everyone underneath them, both men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 03:44 PM
9

An excellent summary as to how the patriarchal system hurts most men as well as women. That most men and women are fighting over it by design.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/25 12:28 PM
-1

“What does feminism do for men?” Is the exact type of stuff that shows why we need feminism. Feminism isn’t about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 07:01 PM
2

Why does it bother you when people talk about the things that men with power do? They aren’t saying you do it. Why do you relate to the ones actually causing harm more than the victims? That’s the whole point of the idea that the vast majority of men are also victims of the patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 09:16 PM
1

It would be better for the percentage of men that do these things to stop allowing themselves to be fed the hate filled algorithms of social media, improve their performance in schools and work, and strive to do good to make the world a better place for everyone to live in. Not isolate
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 12:39 PM
4

I wouldn’t go as far as avoid them like OP suggests but decentering women is a great idea. You see it all the time in PPD… men are so worried about what women will think, say, or do. They give up so much of their attention when they should be focused on themselves. Have you tried not caring or caring about other things? And I don’t mean avoid talking to them, avoid helping them or even avoid being their friends. If you do that you are still putting way too much energy, albeit negative energy, in…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 11:16 AM
-1

Dating sites tend to be poor representatives of the general public. Also how many men get themselves ruled out by being conservative? It’s not always just looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 01:25 PM
1

Without top down control it’s just someone’s opinion. If they don’t have any control, why would men care what they think? For example, imagine you like peanut butter and strawberry jelly sandwiches. And a bunch of women say that isn’t a masculine thing to like. What kind of man are you if you stop enjoying that particular sandwich just because of their “influence”. It’s weak behavior and certainly not behavior of a leader. At least if they could hypothetically enforce you not being able to get t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 07:39 PM
1

Enforcer is in OPs title and is the premise of their question. If it was merely influence that’s an even worse argument. At least with enforcer, there’s real power behind it. With influence? You can turn that off like changing the channel.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 06:58 PM
1

Enforcer implies control not influence.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 08:45 PM
2

Your inability to say “No” only hurts you. Learn to tell people no and be ok with it then you don’t have to worry about what others expect. If they expect something you say no to then walk away.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 01:31 PM
1

I just can’t understand the appeal of all the hard work it takes to perform to something you aren’t to impress women who you don’t even really like. If certain women have those personality traits are they really the type of woman you want to be with? I’d just as soon be myself and if that attracts no one it’s still better then playing pretend to attract someone who I don’t have the same values as.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 12:08 AM
1

That’s performative. Playing a role for the crowd which isn’t being authentic to one’s self. Which means who you perform as, how your live your life, is dictated by others.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 11:34 PM
-2

If you are willing to allow women to define masculinity over whether or not they happen to be attracted to it then you aren’t a real leader. You don’t even have control over deciding what traits you should have.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 06:04 PM
-1

Because you aren’t really the leader if you are only allowed to do because you are catering to what you believe women want. It means you can have it taken away if women decide to do so because you allow women to decide how masculinity is defined.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 05:08 PM
1

It definitely is. If you allow women to enforce masculinity and you define masculinity as leading then you are asking women to allow you to lead and therefore aren’t actually leading anything. It’s like when a young child wants to play pretend he is a policeman so his mom gets him a costume and toy gun and tells him “he’s the big boy leader” but only for as long as she will allow it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 04:04 PM
-1

How can masculinity be defined as “supposed to lead” if it can also be simultaneously defined and enforced by women? Seems contradictory.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 03:22 PM
1

Because of a Sabrina carpenter song? Idk man maybe don’t give them so much power over you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 02:53 AM
1

Maybe society does, maybe society doesn’t. But either way, why do you care? It doesn’t change anything except you letting something else get to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 02:08 AM
1

Why do you care what they say? There’s objective truth and then there’s what people say. No reason to give more weight to the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 07:59 PM
2

How can it be misandrist if it’s talking about one specific person?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 03:54 PM
1

The question in the title asks about the time line or the impact of AI girlfriends. It’s completely reasonable to answer either one when prompted with “or”
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 04:11 PM
4

A man with high standards doesn’t care what society says about his choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 01:50 PM
–

Yep compatibility is a real thing and so often we see in PPD mostly men complaining about what clearly are incompatible women and what they think and saying how they should deal with it. The best way is don’t waste your time or energy trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. I just move on and drop it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 03:22 PM
–

Honest question, why do you care so much if she gets your point or not? You gave your opinion, she gave hers, and so that should be the end of it. All this stuff is extra.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 02:23 PM
19

Men are better off not caring if people have inflated egos. This list reeks of desperation, trying to change who you are for “inflated ego women” Have you tried “not caring?”
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 04:41 PM
2

Naw it’s best to stop worrying what other people think and just be however makes you happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 12:32 AM
21

I read an article in the Atlantic talking about a Morse code station, that doesn’t mean there’s an uptick in people using Morse code as a means of communication.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 03:34 PM
6

Is there really a huge uptick? Social media isn’t life and most people are out living their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 03:31 PM
1

The only reason 🍆 enhancement surgery exists is because the man saw another one and felt inadequate.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/23 02:50 AM
2

Who is paying for all these tests that a lot of people don’t want or need? What if neither parent wants the test, can they opt out or will the government forcibly take a sample of their dna?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 10:11 AM
7

Why does it need to be mandated though? If a person wants a paternity test then get one but i don’t see why you have to make everyone else do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/23 02:36 AM
0

You’re conflating two different issues into one. Self worth is how one values themselves, you’re talking about external validation of worth in your examples.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/23 10:54 PM
1

You are agreeing with me then saying I make zero sense. I believe, like you said, men are capable of controlling their own actions. OP is saying how they are is because of women. Since we both agree that men are able to control themselves, if they become whatever OP says they become, it’s because of them controlling their own actions, not because women made them that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/23 09:06 AM
1

Women aren’t responsible for the behavior of men. If that were the case then it says men have no control over their own actions and makes them weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/23 06:16 PM
–

Andy was made fun of by other guys and this is an example of men needing to be better.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 02:11 PM
1

The incentive is you don’t have to be something you aren’t to impress someone who doesn’t like you anyway. That’s performance and selling yourself out.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/23 01:15 PM
3

It’s not safe to ever get black out drunk
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 06:48 PM
3

Men really need to stop caring about what women care for and just live their life.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/22 08:04 PM
1

Understood. That’s a risk you take when you decide to have children with someone. Given that having children requires two people and you can’t control the actions of another adult then you’ll never be able to guarantee the kids won’t grow up in a broken home. That part sucks but it’s the reality of life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 11:23 PM
1

Women only have that power if men give in to it. A woman breaking up with someone shouldn’t be the scariest thing in a guys life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/22 05:05 PM
1

Men fear rejection. Women fear assault, rape, and murder.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 02:03 PM
9

The primary concern isn’t the “petty stuff” but will he react violently or aggressively if rejected?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/22 12:51 PM
1

Meh I wouldn’t worry about it. You get a lot of people speaking for what “good men” want but like, how would they know?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 06:58 PM
3

The issue here is intention. If you are being the “funny and respectful person” for the sole purpose of getting laid then people, both men and women, will pick up on it and the fakeness makes people less attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/22 03:01 PM
3

Well if Kevin is right that beauty is cheap then what does that make Derulo? Some dude with money that cheats. Not HVM.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 11:04 AM
4

The logic here is faulty in that it assumes a woman who isn’t married is so because she wasn’t picked. Maybe she’s unmarried because either she wants to be or none of the guys she dated ended up being what she considers marriage material. She could just be picky. I’m sure that picky women bother lower value males but that’s probably not what she is interested in.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/22 03:55 PM
1

Don’t. Work on yourself, develop your lifestyle, cultivate friendships, don’t worry what other people think of you or how you should be. Also don’t be a dopamine slave.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/22 06:00 PM
2

Test or not test people should do whatever they want and stop worrying about what other people think.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 01:55 PM
4

Why is it a problem if we aren’t sustaining the population? People having less kids is a good thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/22 12:23 PM
1

Well if that’s absolute then any father who wants to be in the child’s life has had all their rights stripped. After all it’s “her child” as you say.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 09:44 PM
1

"So yes, they are absolved of responsibility IF THEY CHOOSE leaving the woman to decide if she wants to take responsibility for it or not." ​ This reads like you are saying the man has the first choice of financial abortion and then the woman gets to chose. That's what "leaving the woman to decide" implies. What if the woman decides she doesn't want to abort the child but she also doesn't want to raise or support the child before the father decides to financially abort the child? What is the res…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 08:57 PM
1

Let’s not sugar coat it. Both sides are not just “at fault”. Both sides are cruel to financial abort a child. But that’s not even the issue brought about by OP. OP even states not to consider the well being of the child. OP is about absolving men of any responsibility of the child after birth and is in fact banking on the fact that the mother assumes all care and responsibility solely for the child even if it means financial hardship, a life of poverty, and not knowing ever who one of the child’…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 07:41 PM
2

Since neither parent is forcing the others decision as you said then neither parent is responsible for the other parent’s decision. So a woman isn’t choosing to bring a child into the world without a parent because it’s not her responsibility that the father decided to financially abort. This shows how absurd the idea of financial abortion is in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 07:12 PM
3

Why is it cruel for a woman to financially abort a child and not cruel for a man? Is there a distinction between a mother and a father doing it? I would argue it’s equally cruel for either parent to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 06:52 PM
0

Gotcha. So that’s what I was getting at. So we should make it so that both parents, for whatever reason, can financially abort a child? Then what happens to the child?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 06:37 PM
-1

OP is suggesting that dads should be able to do that. My question is, if we allow dads to do that can we allow moms to do that too? As for your question, nothing is stopping the dad from doing that, just as nothing is stopping the mom from doing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 06:16 PM
0

Well men don’t have the choice to tell women what to do with their body at any point in time, not just when she is pregnant. So I don’t understand the basis of “well if I don’t get to tell her what to do when she’s pregnant then I should get something for that” when you never at any point got to tell her what to do with her body. Now if you want to make the argument that a man should be able to financially abort a child based on its own merit and not the merit of losing control you never had, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 05:55 PM
–

Why only men? Can women have financial abortions and force the dad to raise the child alone with no financial support from the mother?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 02:08 PM
2

OP what are your thoughts on n number?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 06:24 PM
2

These kind of topics come up all the time. It’s really simple, if a person, man or woman, is uncomfortable, concerned, whatever then just leave them alone, keep your amateur psychological assessment to yourself, and go about your day.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 12:37 PM
2

High
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 11:40 PM
1

I’ve never asked a partner how many people she’s been with. I don’t get why people think it’s such a big deal. Granted I’ve had one semi short relationship end early because she didn’t like my answer when she asked me how many partners I’ve had. I thought that was weird but if she had a problem with that then It’s good the relationship ended early.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 11:29 PM
1

Some people will care and judge harshly. Others won’t care at all. If a man or woman is judging you based on how you live your life then they probably aren’t going to be able to offer you a good relationship so no reason to care what they think. Honestly this kind of stuff is just a way for one person to make them feel better about themselves and anyone who does so at the expense of their partner should be avoided.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 03:14 PM
1

If that’s your view don’t marry. Others have reasons to marry. Maybe it’s for tax purposes. Maybe it’s religious purposes. Everyone is different. Just don’t set yourself up for failure. Honestly if you are scared of marriage ruining you you best avoid it or level yourself up. Basically don’t have kids you can’t afford and don’t marry someone you can’t afford to divorce. You’ll be better off that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 11:43 PM
1

If that’s your choice then live your life. No one is forcing you to get married. If you decide to get married, and get ruined because of it, well you shouldn’t have got married. Then re-evaluate your mistakes and come back better next time. I won’t put myself in a scenario where someone else can make an arbitrary decision to ruin me. And if I do I’m only going to blame myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 11:31 PM
1

You only submit yourself if you allow yourself to be submitted to it. Such as getting married when divorce would ruin you. Recognize your situation and don’t marry if you can’t afford all the results of it. If you do you’re giving up your own freedom. And be the one that determines your own freedom.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 11:25 PM
1

Wrong. The best way to have control is to live your life so that you are fine regardless of what happens. If you can afford child support have a kid. Otherwise don’t. Only get married if you can afford divorce. We need to stop demanding society change because we can’t deal with the consequences of our actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 11:19 PM
2

Well you are talking about a lot of consequences about choices that you make. You should be aware of the consequences of marriage, or having a child, and understand you aren’t forced into any of them and you can chose to either not do that or set yourself up so you are ok if things go wrong. Personal responsibility is the key to your freedom.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 11:15 PM
1

That’s contradictory to your last reply to me. You noted the financial impacts are there regardless of marriage. The superior choice for men is to only have children you can comfortably afford or don’t have them at all. Don’t rely on society, the court system, etc to determine your financial future. Take care of it yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 11:08 PM
1

Well it’s not involuntary. You can chose not to have a child. The why is because you chose to have a child. Whether or not the how affects you is dependent on what you did as a man to prepare yourself for that situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 10:58 PM
1

Women aren’t having children by themselves. Men are involved too. I would suggest that if you are a man and are concerned about having a child ruining you financially regardless of the means then either don’t give the woman the opportunity to have the child or work to set yourself up so that you won’t be ruined financially. That way no matter what happens you did your best to protect you and your child.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 10:50 PM
2

Perhaps both parents should place value on their child being raised by their own parent and not a paid stranger. And understand that that comes with a cost, in this scenario an opportunity cost of loss wages from the parent deciding to care for their child 24/7. And bearing this cost does have value and should be protected.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 10:37 PM
3

Isn’t that true for both parties? Couldn’t either parent decide to be stay at home unilaterally?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 10:32 PM
5

“The mommy track” comes with a high opportunity cost that isn’t addressed in OP. Especially for a person with a career, losing that income for the full time job of being at home.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/22 08:58 PM
6

Georgia’s heartbeat law has a rape exemption. But you have to have filed a police report. What happens to the incidence of false rape allegations when: A. It’s the only way to get an abortion and B. The abortion centers have a financial motivation to encourage women who want an abortion to file a police report ?
/r/MensRights16/05/19 06:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter