TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JFConz Archive

View 0 posts and 108 comments by JFConz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Out of nowhere to be an ass. Go fuck yourself, bub. I'm living a happy life just to spite you. Sorry you're miserable.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 10:50 AM
1

Are there any male sex dolls yet? Just curious.
/r/MensRights06/12/18 04:52 PM
7

I thought the fact that it was a screen shot was crap. Link to an article. EZPZ.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 11:06 AM
5

Both in school and while employed, I have been discouraged from using the word "significant" in any technical paper or discussion.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 01:55 PM
7

"I can't believe they're making such a big deal about this."
/r/MensRights26/08/18 10:35 AM
1

The agenda is to get people to vote - your initial point.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 01:40 PM
1

Good point. False statements are acceptable provided they are motivating people to act according to my will / ends. Got it, thanks.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:16 AM
1

I have no beef, am not original commentor. Maybe it's an attempt to avoid being data-mined or subjected to advertisements. Edit: 's
/r/MensRights20/08/18 12:11 AM
1

Why do you want them to have clicks so badly?!
/r/MensRights19/08/18 10:06 PM
86

I'm some pretending-I'm-middle-class nobody. No old money, no family business. I would absolutely love to be eligible for all the perks I've seen over the years for woman and people of color. Alas, I am just a white man who was born several generations too late to get any imperialism on, a few decades to late to get away with binge drinking on the clock, and just in time to be made feel like I am somehow an asshole because old money (and their friends/family) has essentially won this game of mon…
/r/MensRights21/05/18 09:19 PM
9

Must have been while you were fistin' me?
/r/MensRights26/04/18 10:44 AM
39

/u/sknabcv2 (will delete if you request, apologies if take offense) Because when a man does it to a woman hes an evil bastard. When a woman does it to a man its because he deserved it. When my ex stabbed me in the chest. A half inch from my heart with a steak knife. When I was having emergency open heart surgery. When the doctors were telling me I had a 5% chance of making it through that. That I'm a walking miracle. When I was at home recovering, barely able to care for myself for months there …
/r/MensRights06/04/18 09:56 PM
1

Pure gold...sand.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 09:03 PM
0

Sarcasm. You'd already mentioned that several times.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 07:17 PM
2

Saw that, crazy.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 05:42 PM
2

Discrimination: different expectations based on sex or gender. Feel free to mention that the degree requirements haven't changed though.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 11:24 AM
3

My old favorite was: What is the limit of an engineering degree as GPA approaches zero? A business, liberal arts, etc. degree.
/r/MensRights29/03/18 11:22 AM
23

Quit being inherently more violent. (Is a joke.)
/r/MensRights16/03/18 10:53 AM
1

Assuming you're correct, I guess I am referring to a recent post not containing the latest addition. I believe the content layout changed from a vertical to a horizontal presentation also.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 07:18 PM
-6

Not even. This is a repost from not even three days ago. No one get's google search results like that - it's not a screencap. To me the information portrayed in this meme is not credible and serve little more purpose than to evoke an emotional response and fuel the circle jerking.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 11:39 AM
11

Escalators! Escalators! Escalators!
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:15 PM
6

Personally, I love the contrived following of the "rule of threes".
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:14 PM
2

Like I like to remind people: There are exams for a reason, but some portion of people will always barely squeeze by. There are great doctors, good doctors, marginal doctors, and doctors who will lose their license. Ethics, generally, I would agree is independent from intelligence or career choice. Like how professional baseball players are still above average basketball players or bowlers, I believe those who rigorously seek to understand and sharpen their intellect are generally better than av…
/r/MensRights15/02/18 01:12 PM
2

Not that they can't, I just tell myself they're less likely. I choose to believe those who were inclined to pursue objective truth have the strength to continue to seek it when elected.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 10:29 AM
3

Rational thinkers getting involved in municipal budgeting and policy is a great thing. We need people who have ideals and don't care enough about money to sell their soul for it.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 01:07 AM
4

That's great and all, but I don't hold a lot of weight with someone being a woman. It's much more important to me that someone have a background in some branch of science who is already comfortable with the ideas of transparency, scrutiny, and data-based decision making.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 07:40 PM
2

There has been a surge in scientists getting involved, so we have that going for us.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:38 PM
28

The one we deserve?
/r/MensRights14/02/18 01:54 PM
2

This can't be true! Someone get me a fact checker.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 06:33 PM
2

I'll just keep my two dollars, thanks though.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 12:03 PM
6

She's obviously just protecting herself from oppressive men who want to sit.
/r/MensRights24/01/18 11:58 AM
10

Way to focus on the important issues.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:48 PM
9

Ahh, I did not catch that though I love that movie. I thought he was referring to the movie "The Red Pill", which I thought was, like, entirely about the Men's Rights movement.... edit: movie has an "i" in it.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 11:25 AM
2

? This sub went nuts when that movie was released.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 11:05 AM
3

What the fuck is wrong with me? Don't you notice me anymore?
/r/MensRights16/11/17 05:23 PM
1

Is trying to reach out to the whole internet.
/r/MensRights07/11/17 01:44 AM
51

In my past, I had been worried I had contracted an STD. Even when I would search (google) "X symptoms in males/men" the first couple of hits included things like "vaginal discharge" and other things relating exclusively to women.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:01 PM
72

Can confirm. Never choked a woman until my wife asked me to.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 11:07 AM
1

Thanks for taking the time to write out that reply. I found your insights interesting, especially since I am so far removed from the subject! I am comforted in knowing there are psychologists who strive for objectivity and accuracy in reporting.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 09:38 PM
7

I regretted choosing circumcision within the first year. I hope my son doesn't come to hate me.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 10:53 PM
1

Not sure what you mean by the first sentence, so I am going to skip it. I also don't know the context in which you studied "excitation voltages", are you referring to an intro to circuits course? Or is this referencing electro-therapy? I am referring to a test circuit example, though there are measurement devices translate many different physical effects to an electrical effect. As for your last statement, I agree. The problem of sample significance is present in any field of academic study and …
/r/MensRights23/04/17 09:30 PM
2

I think the real problem, not mentioned, is the nature of psychology as a science. The sample is (typically) incredibly small compared to a given population. It is incredibly hard to draw a purely objective conclusions from the "data". It's not as if we are measuring an excitation voltage and a current response. Psychology tries very hard to be objective as a science, but the nature of the study is inherently not so.
/r/MensRights22/04/17 10:01 PM
4

I'm all for cameras there too, but public schools typically are full of more people and are more regulated by public policies. I guess privates would have the money for cams, but publics can't afford the lawsuits or lost staff.
/r/MensRights17/04/17 12:22 AM
29

I second this motion. If it's a public school, you would think this is default. They already have them on buses.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 09:34 PM
1

I'm not really sure. Language of "stupid people" is still language, I suppose. I think it comes down to how prolific the new spelling/word/meaning becomes. One person saying "on fleek" is kind of stupid. An entire demographic using "on fleek" is accepted language evolution. In closing, this whole conversation is so fetch.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 09:38 PM
5

Triggered.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 10:43 AM
13

Languages evolves. When's the last time you visited ye olde shoppe? Edit: "Languages evolves." facepalm
/r/MensRights13/04/17 10:42 AM
3

It really would be corporate best practice to record AV on all 1 on 1 meetings.
/r/MensRights31/03/17 10:42 PM
4

Might be 61% of women, 49% of men. Not sure.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 05:25 PM
3

Instincts are a real thing, right?
/r/MensRights23/12/16 12:25 PM
36

"Man fails to research person and makes faulty assumption based on less than 140 characters" Moral of the story: never give suggestions for any reason.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 01:41 PM
8

The funniest thing for me is that there are just as many products "for women". Like the fact that products marketed toward men are somehow ridiculous, while products made softer or covered in pink and purple "for women" are super-legit.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 03:12 PM
2

Well that makes a lot of sense, pretty sure mine was affecting back payments though. Previously, no payments were set up, but when I was unable to give what the mother was asking, she ended our "civil agreement" and opted to set up a support order, so then I was covering a few weeks of back support and future payments. Perhaps it depends on the state.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:35 PM
19

They originally based my child support on an assumed income. I contacted the local DHS office and set a meeting to discuss my actual income. At the time, I was in college working around 25-30 hours a week at a restaurant. It wasn't a problem at all to have the support changed to reflect my actual situation.
/r/MensRights26/05/15 06:13 PM
55

Are women fitting a certain role that men aren't? Why is there even a desire to attract one sex over the other?
/r/MensRights17/05/15 04:04 PM
1

I thought it just meant sarcastic. I can't keep all the subtle nuances of internet language straight. Sorry if I offended you.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 01:09 PM
1

No one should ever be offended. /s
/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:23 PM
1

Your first quote of me ended with "over my circumcision" which highlights the personal nature of my feelings toward my own penis. To not be furious over something I couldn't control in my past and choosing a different future I consider to be distinct. Though perhaps you are correct about my track record in this forum, as I do try very hard to avoid setting my mind on one answer to questions that are not of a calculating nature. This fluidity occasionally causes me to rethink my stance upon the a…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 01:00 PM
0

I was wondering how long it would take for you to show up. Believe me, I get it that so many are pissed off about their missing foreskin. You all can complain all you want, but I'm not going to waste the time or money trying to get mine back, let alone try and make someone else feel inferior for having/not having a foreskin. I hear you and your kin, I really do. For reasons such as consent, I'm not planning on circumcising my children. I've researched the roots of the practice, and I feel it is …
/r/MensRights06/05/15 09:51 PM
0

I'll probably get down-voted to oblivion, but from the past few years of trying to participate in the discussion on /r/mensrights all I see the subreddit as now a combination circle-jerking of a dead horse. I see the same stories posted a dozen times in a week, with the same hive-mentality comments. I'll admit there are some arguments that I feel have merit and I stay subscribed to see some of the new stories and discussion, but many times I feel the discussions become a round of "here, heres" w…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:32 AM
3

You don't have to be ugly to slap on a sweet mustache and curly wig. If you're skinny, I guess you could just call yourself Blake Anderson of Workaholics. My legs are too long to be a successful Danny DeVito, unfortunately. That would be great.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 03:44 AM
5

I would agree with that. The only costume I pad my package for is my Ron Jeremy costume.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 01:42 AM
-17

Muscles represent strength of body (before, I would say, they are taken as a sign of sexuality), especially to a child, and I think are not an overly sexualized body parts like breasts. What if her costume was some adult woman figure and she wanted padded breasts to better feed her fake children or something? Odds of that being the case are slim, yea, but isn't that indicative that the problem is the sexualization, not the image of breasts? When I was a child, I wanted to be strong; I had costum…
/r/MensRights03/05/15 11:48 PM
3

What's stopping them? Glass ceilings?
/r/MensRights18/04/15 04:47 PM
2

I always wondered what words were for.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 05:49 PM
5

Maybe I'm just an asshole, but I've always considered the idea of majoring in women's studies to be what I call "story telling". You spend 4 years listening to experts in the field in order to be qualified to tell people about what you've learned. It is an endless cycle of story (propaganda) telling. Am I missing something? What does a degree in women's studies qualify you to do besides teach women's studies? I guess it could be a jump-off for graduate work in psych or social work, but it just s…
/r/MensRights12/04/15 05:48 PM
13

Studies are conducted by people and depending on the nature of the sampling, it is very possible to have a non-representative sample of the population. Further, the conclusions drawn from the data as well as the actual data reduction methods may be subject to personal bias. Look at studies looking at the effects of coffee/caffeine. Some studies say coffee is bad for health for varying reasons, others say coffee is good for your health. It really depends on the integrity and motivation of the per…
/r/MensRights11/04/15 03:34 PM
1

Fertilize that egg yourself, ladies.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 02:53 PM
1

Evidence of this can be seen by the lack of men with post-traumatic mental health issues. We can only hope after generations of allowing women to fight for their country, women will gain the psychological equipment you assert that they lack.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 12:08 AM
1

Or, one might consider making it a priority to train the world's women how to negotiate salary better.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 08:05 PM
4

Nah, just train every soldier to the standard for the position being held. Train every gunner the same, every scout the same, every sniper the same. (Not that I know anything about the separate duties in a squad) You either leave training a successful, competent member of a team, or you are re-trained or sent packing. The answer is not segregation, but defined expectations.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 08:10 PM
16

Except if members of your squad aren't pulling their weight it endangers the entire troupe. I would want to be surrounded by competence.
/r/MensRights05/04/15 04:16 PM
2

I read the other day that psychology is a female-dominated. I think I read it on reddit and I can't remember where well enough to link a source. I am probably full of crap. If the second half of my first sentence is true, then: hmmm. (curious hum)
/r/MensRights04/04/15 10:05 AM
1

Ahh. For sure, thank you.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 08:24 PM
3

Hm.. not terribly surprising that she gets flak from social justice warriors and the like. I don't follow what you're saying about the rule/exception. If you have the time, would you mind elaborating?
/r/MensRights01/04/15 08:21 PM
1

Hence prefacing with "I think" not "I fucking know". Thanks for the research starting point. So what I found about Kellogg is that he advocated for circumcision as a means to curb masturbation (HA, that worked). His lifetime ended 1943, long after the start of circumcision. Kellogg is by no measure the originator of circumcision, he just seems to be responsible for bringing it to the US. The only data I found shows the introduction of circumcision in the US around 1870-ish, when Kellogg would ha…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 08:18 PM
5

I found this refreshing. Hats off to this wonderful person. I hope in the near future that feminism is completely absorbed into what non-misandrist feminism is: egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 07:51 PM
-3

You're definitely not the only one, bro. I don't feel that way, but I commented on this topic before and was attacked by men who think like you and feel very strongly about it. To answer your question, I think it's legal because it was fairly common practice and has roots in religion. Also, and I may be misinformed, but I feel like this outrage concerning foreskin is reasonably new/modern. Feel free to provide me with information otherwise, this is just my impression having not actually looked i…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 06:57 PM
1

I didn't like to take showers after gym in school. I wasn't required to shower though, they just let me be a smelly kid.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 01:52 PM
2

hmm. did not realize that. Thank you
/r/MensRights30/03/15 06:48 PM
1

Honestly, I'm a little surprised this came out of Clinton's mouth. I think she is really trying to get those lady-votes. Absolutely absurd.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:54 PM
1

Yea, I'm exaggerating. If I could prevent a death(of someone I cared about) with mine, I might. I'd like to think I'm strong enough to make that choice if I was given the opportunity. Exaggeration is my go-to method for showing holes in ideas. I think of it like zooming in, if it's solid at first glance, it must be universally solid right? Not usually.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 12:52 PM
4

Yes, those poor women, the primary victim, having to deal with losing their husbands, fathers and sons. I'd much rather lose my parent, significant other and sibling than die. /s
/r/MensRights29/03/15 10:43 AM
1

Thanks for actually bringing some literature to the table. I'm not trying to say everyone should be circumcised, and it seems the doctor I've spoken to about it really only made the points about HIV transmission rates, which you've provided a claim against. It does not make any sense to me that a penis with a little less flesh transmit disease any less.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 03:46 PM
-13

I hate this argument. Hate it. Not the piercings are mutilation, that is just absurd. Pierce your own vagina with consent, woogoo to you, not mutilation, pierce someone else's without their consent, yea then I would say that is mutilation. Rather... The removal of a small strip of flesh at the end of a penis is not on the same order of magnitude as the removal of an entire clitoris or set of labia. For the record, before anyone jumps on me for hating men or something, I am a person with a penis.…
/r/MensRights18/03/15 10:45 AM
1

I like what you're saying.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 08:26 PM
2

Perhaps men as a whole should keep consent forms handy, though it wouldn't be legally binding if she was drunk, right? If he is just as drunk, it is mutual rape, as consent is considered impossible while intoxicated?
/r/MensRights09/03/15 12:29 PM
1

I don't think hitting a woman is any more wrong than hitting any person. Violence outside of consenting combat is not acceptable regardless of what sits below the belt. To assert that, in any circumstance imaginable, a man should never strike a woman is to assert that women are somehow above men. By the post title quote, a man should not defend himself from or seek retribution for wrongs committed by a woman. While we are at it, shall we say that there is no setting in which a woman should be ja…
/r/MensRights07/03/15 01:04 PM
6

"the default assumption that women have given their consent to sex" ha. ah haha. this is entirely reversed. Average male to average female: "Sexy times?", "Probably not" Switch that around, female to male: "Sexy times?", "Probably yes"
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:22 AM
2

Best use of religion to date!
/r/MensRights02/03/15 07:18 AM
5

Jobs?
/r/MensRights01/03/15 05:18 AM
2

I think the intention of the post was to be a silver bullet to the feminist in question. The person replying hoped to give examples that she might actually care about, assuming "any man" did not hold any value. Just like you might target an insult to hit a specific insecurity of a victim, say calling a body-builder a saggy-armed 'roid-head. While the insult is not completely descriptive (or necessarily accurate), it might hit harder than calling the person an idiot with a bad vocabulary.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 06:29 PM
18

Funny thing about feeling, they don't always coincide with reality. We should seek to understand our feelings, what spawned them, and act according to that analysis rather than an immediate reaction to the feeling itself.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 03:42 AM
11

I'm in the 4-year program majoring in undeclared with a minor in general knowledge. By google's reporting of liberal arts, it legitimately is general knowledge (needed to take part in a civic life). I'm genuinely surprised by that definition.
/r/MensRights17/02/15 03:39 AM
1

Perhaps add "any man" to the list so you feel included.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 01:06 PM
5

Shenanigans. Chivalry/being a gentleman does not mean assuming the expense of a first date. If true equality is to be reached both parties should pay for their meals unless the phrase "let me take you out to dinner" is used. "Would you like to have dinner?" is not an invitation for a free meal, but an invitation for company. But given that she spends money on cosmetics, it is totally justified o expect a free meal. /s Clearly this "lady" has never bought a nice men's suit to look fine in.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 09:21 AM
1

I seriously hope that you are right.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 01:43 PM
7

In one of the halls on my campus there are two single-occupant bathrooms about 5 feet from each other, one for males, one for females. Well this particular day I really had to pee and the male's one was occupied and I was given a "Tis gonna be a while" from the inhabitant. With no shame at all I walked over to the female's toilet, knocked as is polite, and when silence met me, I entered and relieved my bladder. When I came out there was a lady waiting. She kind of looked at me like I was doing s…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 11:33 AM
1

I was refused access to my campus's climbing gym for the same reason. For a while they had two-dollar Tuesday, which became two-dollar Thursday when women's climb was moved to Tuesday. I was pretty busy during that time and it was my only day to get climbing, I had been looking forward to it for a while. Needless to say I was bummed out. It further bugged me because ideas like this are put into policy in order to make a "safe, comfortable" environment for women who don't feel comfortable around …
/r/MensRights10/02/15 11:23 AM
17

Let's combat misogyny by condemning every male, even before they are born. Feminism.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 03:05 AM
1

Perhaps harassment in the general legal sense takes habit, I am not sure. Sexual harassment as mentioned by the Navy and most companies I've been with consider even one unwanted advance/gesture/phrase. The point I failed to include, which you so awesomely have, is that the rebuff is needed, unless for some reason attempts at fraternization are banned from your workplace. My first attempt to invite the nice lady to sexy times when she has no interest is my bad judgement, the second and beyond the…
/r/MensRights09/02/15 12:15 PM
1

Misogyny, from the Greek misos, meaning hatred, and gune, meaning woman. Literally woman-hate, it has been adopted to cover a variety of behaviors or ideas. I like to see the origins of words and how their meanings have changed through time.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 02:20 AM
3

Typical feminist argument: A man cannot be the victim of harassment or sexism. Further, white people cannot be discriminated against on the basis of their race. Somewhere along the way it started being taught to people that if you are not a minority or if your demographic was historically oppressive, even in this day and age you cannot be a victim in any way, shape, or form. Hooray for equality.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:17 PM
4

By most definitions harassment is any unwanted sexual behavior directed your way, e.g. "Nice bulge/tits". Harassment becomes assault when physical contact occurs, e.g. an ass slap or other grope, etc. Source: Sexual harassment and assault training with the Navy.
/r/MensRights08/02/15 07:14 PM
2

Are you not reading what I've said? Any employer should be responsible for the quality of their employees. When an individual acts outside the policies of an employer, the individual is obviously at fault and should hold responsibility for compensating the victim. The employer also holds some responsibility in a case of repeated failures of an individual to act according the policy. Ultimately, the taxpayers are responsible for allowing their governing agency to commit habitual acts of injustice…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:32 PM
9

No, I do not blame taxpayers, the citizens. Individuals need to be held responsible for their actions, but when corruption and misdeed has become the norm in what is meant to be a just institution, the institution has failed. It seems we're seeing a lot more less-than-righteous officers make the news in the past year and I think that the parties responsible for hiring and training officers should be doing their best to hire ethical people and demand a certain level of professionalism from their …
/r/MensRights06/02/15 12:18 AM
17

The state has the burden of training and employing effective, just police officers. A failure to maintain a force of justice is a failure of the state.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 11:29 PM
2

I will never respect and industry that "earns" its bread by talking about, mocking, and sensationalizing people.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 02:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter