TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JGH8763 Archive

View 7 posts and 155 comments by JGH8763 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

The concept that a monogamous-minded man is not alpha is a recent construct. 60 years ago alpha men were marrying trophy wives. No, that's the recent construct. Look at the entire history of human sexuality, and the cross-cultural differences in human sexuality. And if you look at the guys who were commonly considered alpha males in the US 60 years ago - Elvis, James Dean, Hugh Hefner, Brando, even James Bond - they weren't guys who represented monogamy in the slightest. They were guys who ran t…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 04:05 PM
-2

You are in the wrong sub if you expect equal representation. I'm just saying that people shouldn't shame non-monogamy and sexual promiscuity, the way I don't shame people for wanting to be monogamous and have few sexual partners. It's both. You don't have to marry anyone if you don't want to. But if you do, marrying that kind of woman is truly a bad idea. I was pointing out that he contradicted himself by saying TRP is about description rather than prescription, and then immediately giving me hi…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 03:28 PM
-1

What makes someone a "concern troll", by the way? Someone who shows concern? Because I'm clearly not as concerned as the guys making all these posts. I'm not the one one some activist crusade.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 03:18 PM
-1

Oh wow. One survey you didn't cite proves everything. You dumb fucking faggot pussy bitch. Insults accomplish a lot. Fuck fuck fuck.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 03:13 PM
-1

Just because 95% of people say something is true, doesn't make it true. In Muslim countries where sluts are stoned to death who does the stoning, men or women ? In western countries who is against prostitution the most, men or women ? In modern society, both men and women shame women for being sluts (and praise men for being sluts). That's the point I was trying to make. Who does it more or less is debateable, but it's a bit of a quibble. 6,8 and 9 There are so many variables and so many differe…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 01:00 PM
-1

Are you suggesting that a MGTOW is "less alpha" than a guy in an exclusive LTR? Cos.. he's probably getting less action. Not sure what you mean. But yea, men in the beginning of a monogamous LTR may be getting a greater quantity of sex than single guys spinning plates, for instance (though later on in the relationship it will almost certainly decrease), but single guys...get to spin plates. There are different measurements of sexual success - quantity and quality of sex, quantity and quality of …
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 12:38 PM
-3

If you want a carousel weathered, hardened skank for anything other than pumping and dumping, your business. Girls who are good at sex are great to have on rotation. But you can't expect to keep a leash on them. No one can have all their sexual needs satisfied by one person. It is about knowing the truth, not about to marry / not to marry. Tell that the author of this post, and the rest of this forum. TRP is about sexual strategy; knowing the truth about how human sexuality works, and discussing…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 10:01 AM
-1

It is women that shame sluts, not men. I don't know what to say other than "you're wrong". Living among people for a few days or doing a search on this forum should give plenty of evidence to the contrary. An alpha dog will fuck anything No. If you fuck a girl who's not attractive, that lowers your value. That's why, when guys bring home a fat girl, they usher her in like an attorney ushers in a shamed celebrity to the court house. They don't want people to see. an alpha dog will make sure that …
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 09:45 AM
-1

Looks like the anti-slut part of TRP has been trying to take over lately. There's been a spike in anti-slut material this past week. Too bad. It's petty activism. For a community of men seeking to be alpha males or just fully self-actualized men, it doesn't fit to be so dedicated to monogamous long-term relationships. They are distinctly not alpha and not manly. A monogamous long-term relationship is the goal of the female mating strategy, not the male mating strategy. If you want an example of …
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 07:35 AM
-1

Damn. I can't even get any matches on Tinder. I'm a 6 in terms of looks and I put my best photos up.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 05:22 AM
1

No, because I don't think promoting monogamy has anything to do with improving civilization, and I don't think preferring non-monogamy is inherently nihilistic or hedonistic.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/14 12:52 PM
0

TFW you realize you're a Cultural Marxist for thinking sex is fun.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/14 10:51 AM
-1

I wasn't trying to convince anyone to be non-monogamous, just saying it's a viable alternative. To each his own. will just result in beta males dropping out of civilization I know what you mean by that, but I disagree. But again, I don't feel like getting into the great debate.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/14 05:55 AM
-2

I don't know what to say other than "you're wrong", but I don't really care to get into an argument about the science of whether humans are naturally monogamous or non-monogamous. The science is pretty clear and available for anyone who is interested, and people can draw conclusions from their own personal experience. But I don't think any of that matters, to an extent. People should do what they want to do. TRP is about sexual strategy. Trying to convince everyone to be monogamous is political …
/r/TheRedPill05/08/14 04:28 AM
1

I think the schism is more "guys who give a fuck about monogamy" vs guys who don't.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/14 03:51 AM
-6

Non-monogamy doesn't destroy relationships, it preserves them. Non-monogamous relationships are statistically much more successful than monogamous ones.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/14 03:45 AM
1

You're looking at it from the perspective of someone who values monogamous relationships. A good portion of guys here don't. And they shouldn't, because humans are naturally non-monogamous. Having an open relationship allows you to have several girlfriends, and to fuck other girls whenever you want. Also, sluts are great, because they fuck guys who might otherwise have sexual frustration. If everyone fucked everyone, the world would be a much better place, to say the least. We could have colonie…
/r/TheRedPill05/08/14 03:40 AM
1

You don't have to read "red pill" material to have a good understanding of its concepts. An evo-psych major, for instance, would pick up on everything almost instantly, because "red pill" is based on evo-psych more than anything. "Red pill" is nothing new. It's just a borrowing and repackaging of concepts from different areas.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/14 10:36 AM
-1

Women are bisexual, men aren't.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/14 06:13 PM
-1

I actually think it's the opposite. Yea, women need attention, but men need sex. Not having an active sex life is not healthy, at all. The average person has sex 2-3 times per week. And women can easily get attention from and have sex with other women, until a desirable man comes around.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/14 07:07 AM
8

Attractiveness is what determines physical superiority, and women are inherently more attractive, so they're physically superior. Yea, guys can beat women up, but then they go to jail. Why? Because women are favored over men. Women have higher social status, so while you can beat them up if you want, you will be punished by society. They're allowed to beat you up, though. So much for physical superiority. Also, yes, guys can do a lot of physical stuff better than women, but they're usually doing…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 11:18 PM
33

If you were born with a vagina, you would have the freedom to fuck pretty much whoever you want. You could also choose to be a slut and have lower standards. An average guy has to work hard as hell to fuck one girl who is barely even attractive. An attractive guy has a similar level of freedom that women have. It's good to be born a woman or an attractive man. They're the ones with the best survival and reproduction rates, the best well-being. Being born an average man sucks, a lot. Just because…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 10:41 PM
0

Good title by the way. I literally had the same exact thought yesterday.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 07:44 PM
17

Women want to be dominated. If you learn about what women are attracted to, if you interact with lots of women frequently, even if you read /r/sex and so on, you learn that that's probably the main thing women want - to be dominated; that's the main kind of sex women want, certainly. Well, rape is the ultimate form of domination. If you establish consent first, it's not domination. (You can have domination "play" and establish a safe word and all that, but domination is when you do something to …
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 07:22 PM
1

By cuckolding, I don't mean cheating. Yea, people are shit, they cheat, they're naturally non-monogamous, etc., but cuckolding is another beast. Cuckolding is when a woman denies a man sex and he watches her fuck another man instead. Usually the woman is someone he's close to, and he doesn't necessarily need to actually watch them fuck, but at least have knowledge while maintaining some degree of proximity to her. In my experience, that's the most painful feeling there is, aside from physical ha…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 07:59 AM
2

Being open minded to non-monogamy and fetishes is one thing, but that's not quite the situation here. His GF suggested cuckolding, and cuckolding is essentially the worst thing you can do to a man aside from physical harm. If the guy suggests it as a fetish, that's one thing, and a whole other tangent, but he didn't. She essentially suggested that he let her fuck other guys in front of him. That's all she suggested. She didn't even suggest an open relationship so he can fuck other girls. Suggest…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 01:06 AM
2

Yes, all women are bad people, if all women are hypergamous. Maybe some women can fight the instinct, like men can fight the instinct for violence, but to the extent that a woman is hypergamous, she is a bad person. Women have other good qualities, obviously - I'd kill myself if women weren't around - but hypergamy is a bad quality to have. And it's not really how they're programmed by society, it's just their natural instinct. The mating conditions they find themselves in - having a natural abu…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 10:30 PM
1

It makes me dislike women, though, even if they're attracted to me. Being hypergamous makes you a bad person, in my opinion. I would prefer it if it women just went on looks, like men do. That would be more understandable and respectable.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 06:47 PM
-1

Eh, let's just mark it up to perspective. I think it would be lower value to have a sister who got messy, "I need to go home", vomit drunk. It would be higher value to be in a pack of guys who get sexually selected. From the woman's perspective, she's a fucking animal, she doesn't care about a sensitive guy with good family values, she cares that a guy has high social and sexual status. You roll with guys that pull, that means you probably pull. And that's going to attract the girl more. I think…
/r/seduction08/07/14 03:54 AM
-1

Cool people hang around guys who pull. If you pull, you're not really "ditching" your wingman. Same as if your wingman goes and talks to a girl alone. All he's doing in both scenarios is isolating the girl in order to seduce her, which is necessary. Saying your friend was bringing home his sister because she got too drunk would be more DLV than what I suggested.
/r/seduction06/07/14 04:45 PM
4

Reddit is fucking nerds. I don't like it anymore. Probably because I'm sick of being sort of nerdy and every time I come on here it's a bunch of nerd shit, even on the good subs. Red Pill is excluded to a degree.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 05:27 AM
0

"He went home with someone." Also makes it seem like that's an OK thing to do. Lying always makes me more anxious than I want to be. Lying takes a lot of energy. Especially when you're trying to do it to cover up being a loser. Making the truth sound good might be the better option. There are always virtually limitless of options for re-framing and DHV. But yea, girls like guys who are hot and popular, that's probably the main 2 things they like, so seeming unpopular is probably a bad thing.
/r/seduction06/07/14 03:17 AM
0

One of my main goals in life, and the goal of a lot of guys, and something quite a few pick-up instructors do, is to essentially retire and travel the world, and if you're traveling the world alone, you'd virtually always be getting girls while alone, so you'd always be at bars/clubs/wherever alone. Act as if you're living that life. Act as if you're traveling the world, getting everything you can out of the world, and getting girls, which should always be a part of every guys life. Going to a b…
/r/seduction06/07/14 02:47 AM
0

Her "hours" of research obviously weren't very effective, as one of he main points made in this forum is that we shouldn't pay attention to what women say as much as what they do.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 02:10 AM
1

Negative association. That was the main point of this article. Highlight the less popular, most disliked, divisive associations with TRP, such as the more extreme, unfortunate expressions of right-wing political ideology and of course Elliot Rodger. I've always though that the political shit isn't appropriate here and should go in the Men's Rights forum or elsewhere. I felt like I knew less after reading that article than I did before. She's a bad writer/journalist. But she's a feminist so she's…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 02:02 AM
0

Swearing AT someone is counteractive. Swearing for emphasis can be somewhat helpful, if lazy. It's not arguing semantics in the common sense. I'm saying that people here should use words people actually understand, and terms that already exist, rather than circle jerking with their own secret e-language. There are good points made in this forum, but it's often in that snide tone of nerds on internet forums making fun of something. It's gross. If we're talking about sexual strategy, there are few…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 04:23 PM
0

I know what "hamster" means. That's not what I was asking for clarification of, to repeat myself again.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 06:17 AM
0

You're bad at detecting bias then, at least in this case. I like picking up girls, but the terminology in "pick-up" is stupid as fuck. Same in this case. We only criticize things we give a shit about.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 06:13 AM
3

If TRP concepts did become more accepted/mainstream/whatever, male-female dynamics would only get even more brutal than they are, and we would need additional dosages of red pills, and they would become even harder to swallow. It would basically just make things a lot harder than they already are. Women would increase their mating standards, and men would have higher standards of competition. The red pill illuminates the dark side of human mating, so if that dark side becomes much more illuminat…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 06:04 AM
-9

You're ridiculous for thinking that we have to cater to you, make your life easier by giving it to u in easy to swallow,bite sized chunks! I'm just gonna assume your a woman... You're here to hate monger more than try to get an understanding of trp.... All assumptions, all of them wrong.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 08:52 AM
-27

You're wrong and gross. Stop talking to me.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 08:49 AM
-5

I do get it. Sometimes I just want clarification, like now. I was just making the point.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 08:45 AM
-13

Oh, swearing. That helps. "Hamster deniability" isn't in the sidebar, so I was asking for clarification. And my point was that the whole glossary was stupid and counteractive. And I didn't look up "obfuscate", to correct your assumption. These concepts already exist, already have terms, and don't need cute, snide little names and a glossary.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 08:39 AM
-21

"Hamster deniability" isn't in it. And it's also ridiculous, which is the point I was trying to make. Just use normal words so people know what you're talking about.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 08:21 AM
-12

? Evo psych, social psych, attraction, sexology, etc. material. There are lots of studies, articles, books, classes, etc. on this stuff.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 08:18 AM
5

Among the left, aspects of minority movements can be criticized, but once you touch feminism, the conversation changes into what an asshole you are. This has just been my experience talking with people among the left, specifically the radical left, for many years. Race and other things are sensitive issues, but feminism is by far the most untouchable. Nothing will get you attacked and publicly shamed more.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 08:10 AM
-9

Having a good vocabulary isn't nerdy and lame. Creating your own special lingo for your own special club - that is. It's like the pick-up lingo. You can easily replace every term with an everyday term that people actually understand. You can tell the pick-up and red pill communities were started by nerds because of the acronyms and terms they use. It's really circle-jerk-ish.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 05:56 AM
28

Feminism is the one thing in our political discourse that isn't allowed to be criticized, even among the most radical, critical parts of the population. This is sometimes explicitly stated. If there truly is a "third rail" in Western civilization, it's most definitely feminism. You criticize it, you're done. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out, given Banksy's extremely high degree of positive regard.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 05:12 AM
-36

hamster deniability Can you explain in non-dumb-red-pill-lingo terms? This lingo does more harm than good. I'm very familiar with red pill concepts in common or academic terms, but the dumb e-lingo often confuses even me and generally obfuscates significant concepts. It's also nerdy and lame, as is virtually all internet forum lingo. Also, Banksy hasn't outed himself as an anti-feminist. Being critical of something isn't being anti-.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 05:02 AM
2

Did it work? You still hitting it? I get the whole "fuck me or fuck off" thing. It's my life's motto. But as long as she let me fuck her at least a few times, we had good sex, I was satisfied, she was satisfied, then eventually she wanted to break things off and actually gave me a good, honest reason, then wanted to stay friends afterward, I would be down with that. I think the hidden motive behind the whole "fuck me or fuck off" thing is validation. You didn't get the validation you wanted, so …
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 09:52 AM
-1

Seems more like your own philosophy/hypotheses rather than actual science. You can't just make up what constitutes SMV. We know, scientifically, what kind of men turn women on the most, and the kind that get the most sex.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/14 03:50 AM
-1

Above reading, I would prioritize dressing better, grooming yourself better (major factors when it comes to looks, and looks are king), practicing interacting with women, meditation (optimizes your thoughts, behavior, composure, and thus your interactions with women), and at least a few other things.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/14 03:09 PM
-2

He never said he fucked her.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 11:32 PM
2

Wanting a guy to compete is not the same as wanting to fuck him. Getting a price from another dealership is not the same as wanting to buy from that dealership. Women want to get the largest amount of options possible, then select from those options. Which means they want to attract the largest group of men possible, have them compete with one another, and select from that group of men.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 09:54 PM
3

Just trying to get another guy competing for her.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 07:34 PM
-1

Some girls do like the guy who puts them on a pedestal, tells them they're beautiful every day to the point that it's sickening, etc., because they like the attention and so on, but only for a short amount of time, plus they'll still desire men who are better looking, have higher status, and are more sexually popular. But the guys who get laid a lot, they tend not to do that, obviously. But insecure girls might go for a pedestaler for a little while. Just worth noting.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 07:33 PM
1

Yea. Look at her actions, not her words. Then just apply Occam's Razor - simplest explanation is probably the correct one. If you go by her words, you can get mislead by her rationalizations, plus she herself said she's confused about what motivated her to do what she did. Lizard brain kicked in and she's trying to justify it. It's like if you give in to temptation and eat a Big Mac while trying to be on a diet, then you reach out to your dietician and said that McDonald's messed with your head …
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 07:23 PM
-1

That's a good, though-provoking point. So do you recommend working in a night club or a similar environment, or do you recommend frequenting them as a patron instead?
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 09:00 AM
0

It's not society's fault. Women are just attracted to sexual inequality. They are attracted to a dynamic in which a very small percentage of men get all the sex and the rest of the men get none. It's all because of female attraction. Whether they can help it or not, I don't know.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/14 07:23 AM
5

Is this based on any science?...because it seems ridiculous. Young guys with better bodies, more testosterone, higher sex drives, etc. are going to be more sexually attractive. Older, resourceful, established men are going to be more attractive for relationships for older women (late twenties, thirties, +) and the occasional adventure for young women. The main guys fucking girls in their teens and early twenties aren't 35 year old guys, they're guys in their teens and twenties, usually only a li…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/14 07:07 AM
0

Women do have a somewhat strong sex drive, but it's not directed towards a large quantity of people, like mens' sex drive is, it's only directed towards the one or the few men that women sexually select. It's still not as strong as mens' overall, though. Women worship alpha male cock, and every other guy is essentially dead to her. Women have a fairly strong sex drive, but it's contained within the boundary of that dynamic.
/r/TheRedPill22/06/14 01:32 AM
20

Unattractive girls (feminists) trying to legally make every attractive girl feel like a slut. "That ought to put an end to this hook-up culture that I can't be a part of."
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 03:42 PM
-1

"Why Women Have Sex" is the largest collection of studies on female sexuality I know of. Check it out if you want some evidence. "75%" is just to get the point across.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 03:51 AM
-1

How often do you get laid? What kind of girls do you pull? What keeps you motivated to live? If you have to stand on the sidelines and watch 9s and 10s pull virtually every girl you're into, isn't that torture? I think part of the problem is that I have no one to talk to about any of this, plus I don't get any positive reinforcement from girls, only interactions that reinforce my negative beliefs.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 12:16 AM
-1

It's virtually impossible to break into the top 10% if you're not born into it. Tyler is one of the few who did. But trying to be like Tyler is like trying to be like Michael Jordan. I'm not saying it's not worth trying, but I have tried, a lot. Get laid or die trying, that's what I've been saying for years, and it hasn't fucking worked. I think it's the end of the road. And if 9s and 10s can just go on Tinder and fuck every girl without even trying, and fuck hundreds of girls a year if they wan…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 11:50 PM
-1

They do not care NEARLY as much about "facial aesthetics" as you do. This is just wrong. It's been proven scientifically, and through the experience of myself and virtually every other man on the planet. If you can't see it, I don't know what to say. Physical characteristics are like 75% of sexual attraction, and that's for women (for men it's like 95%), and facial aesthetics are the most significant aspect of those physical characteristics, height being the second. Guys value different physical…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 11:37 PM
-1

Attraction is everything. Being attractive as a human being is what makes you successful as a human being, in every sense. And sex is the number one motivator in life. If you're not getting laid, you're not going to be happy. And if you're poor or you hate your job, you're not going to be happy. This is basic, common sense stuff. People have base needs that have to be met in order to be content or happy.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 11:31 PM
-1

It's just my face. I have a fat, round face. Even if I get down below 15% BF so you can see my abs, my face is still fat, round, and dopey. Girls fucking hate that. The top 3 things they are sexually attracted to, in order, are bilateral symmetry, a well-defined jaw, and height.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 11:26 PM
-1

Everything other than being successful with women is boring and pointless. It's just spinning your wheels, or giving up.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 11:16 PM
-2

I just tried this recently and I'm actually sort of pleased that it didn't work. I went online, got a pic of a model, and I tried saying all sorts of stuff to girls, and I only got numbers from 2 fatties (for one, my opening line was "I'm going to hate fuck your face and make you gargle my cum." She is hitting me up non-stop right now, but she's like a 2. It's weird having a girl beg you to hate fuck her face.) I got a lot of matches, but found that just saying anything to girls doesn't work at …
/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 08:57 PM
6

That actually is a point I hadn't considered, but there's probably some truth to it. Thanks. People do everything for sex. It's our main driver in life - survive and reproduce, genetic success. While the male mating instinct is to fuck as many women as possible, but especially the young ones with good ratios, the female instinct is to filter, filter, filter - attract as many men as possible, let them compete amongst themselves, and then filter through them. Females' main driver in life is to att…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 08:46 PM
-2

Everything else is boring. I like being with women. I do self-improvement but only to get women. A man needs to be sexually successful first, other things can come later. Sex is the primary motivator in life.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 08:40 AM
-1

It's nearly impossible to achieve that, though, and looks are by far the biggest factor when it comes to attraction.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 08:37 AM
-1

How is it trivial? Sex is the primary motivator in life.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 08:09 AM
1

If you're a fairly good looking guy facially, you can get a better physique, you can gain higher status, and you can get more money, which could put you in that top percent. If you're not a good looking guy facially, you're pretty much fucked. edit: And I've been rated pretty thoroughly as a 5-6 facially.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 08:08 AM
0

What can be done to be successful despite the 90/10 rule? It's mostly based on looks, completely based on looks when it comes to Tinder. So, I suppose only guys who are 9s and 10s can use Tinder successfully? It's impossible to increase your looks past a certain point, so I suppose lesser guys are just doomed to a lack of sexual success in that venue.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 04:05 AM
2

It all has basis in evolutionary psychology.
/r/seduction18/06/14 03:13 PM
10

Women want sexual inequality. It's what they're attracted to. They see a guy with lots of girls, they want him, they see a guy with no girls, they don't want him. 90% of female ancestors have been reproductively successful, while only 30% of male ancestors have. Women want alpha males, and alpha males are defined by sexual popularity. Other than looks, displaying sexual popularity is probably the number 1 way to attract women. It's also called pre-selection. In the sexual selection process, if w…
/r/seduction18/06/14 10:29 AM
3

Everything you said can be summed up as: Women are inherently more desired and more attractive than men, so they are going to have more favorable conditions for survival, development, reproduction, success, contentment, happiness, etc. 90/30. Remember those fucking numbers. 90% of female ancestors have had genetic success, while only 30% of male ancestors have. That alone explains virtually everything about male-female dynamics.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/14 07:29 PM
2

I need to see that study. The implications of those numbers being even roughly accurate are profound and would say a lot, if not everything, about human behavior.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/14 01:43 AM
2

That's the mating position she's in. No point in attacking her for it. Those with an abundance of options are going to have higher standards, and are going to focus on filtration (thinking about what values they want to consume) rather than provision (thinking about what values they can provide). The 5% of guys in society who women are actually attracted to are the same way.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/14 01:36 AM
0

Experience has taught me that this is a massive pile of shit. If you express that you like a girl, it lowers her value for you, because you've gone towards the scarcity end of the mating options spectrum. It shows that you have less options, in terms of quantity and/or quality. If you don't like her, it shows you have more, better options. Women are brutal when it comes to this stuff. Even after strong physical escalation or sex, expressing that you like a girl will turn her off to you. Physical…
/r/seduction13/06/14 04:30 AM
1

Dimorphism is the way testosterone shapes the face, gives it more masculine features - prominent brow, strong wide jaw, angular rather than round, etc. Fair is a useless word in this world, especially when it comes to sexual dynamics and attraction.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 03:52 PM
1

It's not about honor, it's about living a shitty, unsatisfying life - having a sex life that is extremely different, like night and day, from that of your better looking male peers, even your close friends. It's hard to stay positive about life when you can't bag a 7 but your more attractive friends are fucking every 7-10 in the city, which is often how it goes.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 03:46 PM
1

Women are more socially skilled than men, at least in certain ways. They depend on social support for survival much more than men do. So it's no surprise that the more socially dependent, socially skilled sex has their mating preferences/tactics socially accepted, while the other sex has their mating preferences/tactics socially shamed or outlawed. "The greatest trick the devil ever pulled is convincing the world he doesn't exist." That quote applies pretty well to a lot of female sexual prefere…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 03:36 PM
1

Social media just allows for a hyper-evolution of already existing human dynamics. There's no sense in trying to avoid it. Technology is going to provide avenues for this hyper-evolution regardless. FB, Twitter, IG, SnapChat - more/better avenues will keep being created. Avoid them all, and you're out of the loop, unaware of what kind of shit is actually going on in the world these days. Hook-up culture can't be studied in science labs, but can be studied by being in certain social media loops. …
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 11:52 PM
1

Height is one aspect of looks / physical attractiveness. Being short just subtracts points from your 1-10 physical attractiveness score. Being both tall and facially dimorphic are hugely important factors for a guy to be physically attractive.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 08:30 PM
1

be sweet and sensitive...be the “perfect boyfriend,”...give backrubs and footrubs I actually kind of like doing those things. The other stuff is right out, though.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 04:23 PM
2

Some men can only go so far. If you have an unattractive face, there's not much you can do. You can have a great physique, you can be very assertive and confident, you can be popular and have a good amount of money, but you'll still only be a 5-6 because of your face. Looks are by far the most important thing when it comes to sexual attraction, for men and women. My opinion is that if a man is a 5-6 physically, even after getting in good shape, he should just commit suicide, because his sex life…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 04:09 PM
3

shame beta males. Perhaps it would even be beneficiary on a reproductive and evolutionary level to "creep-shame" and mock these dudes in order to maintain the 80/20 rule. Beat weak guys while they're down and make sure they get no sex, while fawning over and worshiping the top 10% alpha males who'd get away with all those creepy behaviors women claim to hate. You answered your own inquiry better than I was going to. Women are especially savage when it comes to sexual selection. Mass beta cuckold…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 03:42 PM
2

Real life anecdotal examples can only provide so much insight. There's also the phenomenon of more physically attractive girls being more sexual, just because they've gotten so much sexual attention from men over the years that it's become a big part of their identity. That phenomenon also exists, again, to a certain degree. There are also 10s who won't touch a dick unless it comes with a ring and a $100K salary. There's also all kinds of social conditioning to consider. There are a lot of varia…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 03:16 AM
37

Women are just as animalistic as men, but in certain areas, women are much more savage than men. People talk about the 80/20 rule. I think it's more like 90/10 - 90% of women are fuckable, whereas only 10% of men are fuckable. The way men treat the 10% of women they don't want to fuck - that's how women treat the 90% of men they don't want to fuck. However, women are much colder to that 90% than men are to that 10%. This is because women's sexual strategy is more about filtration and making sure…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 07:15 AM
1

The only success I've had has been in-person rather than online. When I can interact with a girl, I can get something going, because I can be very assertive. If it's her just looking at my resume, I've got no chance. I think online dating is heavily about looks, money, and status, and I have none of those things. I've been trying the online dating thing for about 5 years, and have never gotten laid once. I've only had one date, and she never responded afterward. Tinder has been a joke. The only …
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 05:31 AM
4

Your post reminds me of a few of Julien Blanc's (RSD) videos. He talks about how he'll do anything to get laid, even beg. He'll use any tactic that works, no matter how beta it may seem. If it works, it works. He's one of the most sexually successful people I know of. As long as the sex is good quality, the women will keep coming back. If you convince her to give you pity sex, then fuck her better than James Deen would, she'll keep coming back, and she'll tell her friends, and they'll all want t…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 12:09 AM
1

Good answer. Getting through most of your sexual bucket list, notch count, and quality count - I think those are probably the 3 main things to consider. Serious relationships and falling in love are important, though, IMO, and should be on everyone's sexual bucket list. Having kids could also be important, as that's the primary factor for sexual success in terms of evolutionary science, but a lot of guys don't want kids due to child support laws and that's understandable. How old are you? I'm 28…
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 11:54 PM
1

Hamster is to this forum what creep is to feminists. Even if it doesn't make sense, call someone a hamster and it invalidates everything they say or do.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 02:54 AM
0

Just because I ask someone's opinion doesn't mean I'm letting them define me.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 04:28 AM
-2

That is the opposite of a direct or valid answer. I acknowledged the relativity and subjectivity, and you crudely restated it. And the last bit...please. When someone starts with unfounded personal attacks, they've probably lost the argument. I wasn't attacking you personally, I was criticizing the type of response you posted. I think we're all pretty firmly disillusioned here, brutally aware of where we stand in the socio-sexual hierarchy. EDIT: And I wasn't demanding, I was asking. And my "fra…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 04:18 AM
-3

He didn't, and it doesn't seem like I'm the one getting feelings. Calm down honey, it'll be OK.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 04:13 AM
-8

I think the worst part of Reddit is when people post questions, and then people criticize or insult the person for asking the question, often without even attempting an answer. Why would you even bother? If you don't the question is helpful, downvote or just move on. People seem so eager to tell others that their concerns are irrelevant or don't matter. It's like they're trying to satisfy their own ego via condescension. Some people never feel sexually successful, but have fucked over 100 women.…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 10:24 PM
6

I think you sometimes have to use more than 6 words in order to maintain or build interest. You may otherwise come off as boring.
/r/seduction19/05/14 02:46 AM
1

Do stuff that people like - there's a reason musicians and movie stars are at the top of all women's "want to fuck" list. It's because they're exposed to those guys. Women like celebs. I don't care about popularity either, which probably makes us good people - that we don't care about seeking power and status - but women don't like good people, at least not sexually. But you don't necessarily need to be someone people like, you just need to do things that people like. There's lots of ways to bec…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 05:30 PM
2

What should ugly guys do then? Kill themselves?
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 05:13 PM
1

Do you have any actual scientific evidence for any of this?
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 10:49 PM
1

/r/weightroom
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 04:58 AM
1

This isn't worth giving a fuck about. Is this the male version of tumblr now, where guys collectively freak out because some nobody girl, someone who has no mass platform whatsoever, just another nobody on a social media site, said a thing they don't like? Grow the fuck up. It has no significance. If someone on TV with millions viewers said this, it might be noteworthy. It's like when an army of 100K tumblr feminists freak out at some nobody with 16 followers. It's not indicative of cultural pro…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 04:57 AM
1

High Plains Drifter, starring Clint Eastwood. Most red pill movie I've seen.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 03:33 AM
1

There has to be a transition to 'champion mode', like 'trying to get into champion mode but haven't gotten there yet, but clear-headed and knows the avenue to success, and not wasting time on distractions and fantasy...mode'. I think most of us here are in that mode. 'Grind mode'?
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 02:27 AM
1

Problem is, you need sex in order to motivate you to keep going; to keep living; to keep you from being bitter and stressed, which prevents you from getting anything done; to keep you from killing yourself. You can't get shit done without proper dopamine regulation, and you need sex for proper dopamine regulation. It's a catch 22. Sexual satisfaction is at the bottom of the hierarchy of needs, self-actualization is at the top. If guys in their mid-to-late twenties who haven't gotten laid much, a…
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 02:20 AM
1

I may be wrong, but I thought of this forum more as descriptive than prescriptive. If there is going to be discussion of prescriptions, there are going to be factions, and venturing into idealism will be almost inevitable. I thought this forum was based on the rejection of idealism and instead strictly describing what works and what doesn't. If we're going to describe what works and what doesn't in terms of sexual strategy, I don't think we should bother valuing other men's sexual strategies as …
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 12:36 AM
7

"Creepy" is just a more socially acceptable and more effective (in terms of mating strategy) way of saying "gross". However, while increasing LMS is important, especially looks, following the advice of pick-up, which is to say increasing the amount of interaction you have with women and expressing yourself more (verbally and physically, which includes being sexually assertive) is also important, and crucial - if you don't follow that advice you won't get laid even if you have extremely high LMS.…
/r/TheRedPill05/04/14 10:53 PM
2

If you want a good anti-feminist female comedian, check out Natasha Leggero.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/14 10:34 PM
1

It's more about her not being funny and less about proving an evolutionary psychology hypothesis to be true. I think it is true, but just looking at a bad set from a sheila isn't proof.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/14 10:33 PM
2

I like Sarah Silverman.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/14 10:29 PM
1

Your comment doesn't belong in this forum, it belongs in a forum about how great conservative marriage is. It's idealism. I could argue how good open relationships are, but that isn't relevant to this forum either.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/14 10:13 PM
2

This post/thread is an example of why I like this forum. But unfortunately, this forum often veers way off into men's rights activist idealistic bullshit. It should not be about idealism. It should be about the rejection of it.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 03:35 AM
1

Facial aesthetics are mostly dependent on testosterone levels during adolescence. That's when facial dimorphism takes place. You're not healthy during adolescence, you're (un)fucked for the rest of your life. Kids who do drugs and eat like shit during that time end up unattractive for the remainder of their life. Obviously, the genes of the parents are hugely important, but besides that...
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 03:26 AM
7

The money factor is over-rated. It's partially just an indicator of status. Money is less of a sexual stimulant and more of a relationship stimulant. Source: social psychology, specifically plethysmograph studies. Looks and status are what's key. Money is sort of under the umbrella of status, and popularity is a much more effective indicator of status than money, as are personality traits like assertiveness, aggressiveness, etc. Being a rich, dumpy, dweeby tech nerd isn't going to make girls wet…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 03:20 AM
0

Really, though, I think most of society pretty much depends on alcohol for an active sex life.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 02:31 AM
1

What if you don't really like people and haven't met anyone you would want to be friends with but still want to get laid?
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 02:29 AM
1

Where are you introduced to these girls? Also, what are the minimum material resources a guy should have to be able to get laid frequently? I have my own place, my own car, but no furniture and barely any wardrobe because I ate and lifted my way out of most of my clothes. I feel like I know how to play the game, so to speak, I just can't afford the cost of admission.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 01:50 AM
1

Basically, don't capitulate to her mating strategy, be assertive with yours.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 01:39 AM
-8

you're right. The student should discipline the teacher. I didn't say or imply that. why are you defending a bitch about to send the teacher into that system on fake charges I wasn't. Maybe you're the one who has a problem with reading.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 03:44 PM
-9

If you think our legal system provides justice and healthy discipline, you need to get a clue. And what evidence do you have that her mother is a slut? And how is being a slut a bad thing?
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 02:29 PM
-12

This subreddit has gone way in the wrong direction. You're not a hero by going beyond self-defense to unnecessarily fuck a girl's life up even more. I don't think this is even relevant to this sub.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 01:46 PM
2

Has this ever actually been studied?
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 06:12 PM
2

Do men use language more precisely?
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 06:27 AM
3

Not every man wants to have power over others, or have a much higher degree of wealth than others, not by a long shot. Psychopaths and sociopaths do, though. Social intelligence is not what separates alpha males and beta males, again, not by a long shot. It's one relatively minor factor.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 06:24 AM
1

"Game" (I dislike the term) is partially about displaying personality traits indicative of high value men. Yes, looks are most important, but you have to do what you can with what you have. Pick-up is just about interacting with lots of girls and being more sexual with girls. I don't think anyone can correctly say that there's anything wrong with that. It's going to maximize your chances for sex no matter how attractive you are.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 06:11 AM
2

It's a very important, often-used term in the mating process in our society. It's one of the most frequent methods in which females reject males. It's very much worth studying and interpreting.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 06:00 AM
2

Being good-looking, thus displaying high testosterone, good health, and good genetics, is more important than displaying "alpha" behavioral traits, at least when it comes to sex rather than long-term relationships. That's basic EP.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 05:55 AM
2

Sex is a necessity. Gotta do what you can with what you have.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 05:45 AM
1

hoodwink Assuming malice isn't good. Assuming anything isn't good, and one should always suspect incompetence before malice. And trying to talk about political authority is irrelevant. Authority is authority, be it economic, political, whatever. You can't plausibly deny that anarcho-capitalists support hierarchy and authority. Ownership of any kind is inherently hierarchical. It's a person saying "these resources, resources which you depend on for survival and development, belong to me, and if y…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 04:19 AM
1

They're on the far right wing of the so-called anti-authoritarian spectrum, along with anarcho-capitalists. The problem is that they support authoritarianism, which is why they're wrong. The other end of the anti-authoritarian spectrum is anarcho-communists, who support getting rid of both state and capitalist hierarchy.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 02:18 AM
1

How is this relevant to this forum? I thought this forum was largely about the irrelevancy of idealism. Espousing political or economic prescriptions is idealism. Also, I would hypothesize a correlation between fat people and right-wing views as well, and a correlation between intellectuals and left-wing views.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 02:10 AM
1

The second part was sarcasm.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 01:37 AM
1

except that this book is one of the three recommended to anyone who wants to get into standup or comedy writing. So? we should watch tv and steal from comedians, just like Carlos Mencia did. Amazing idea, bro. Yes, that's exactly what I said and exactly what I recommend doing. your ignorance...is superior to my knowledge What knowledge? How is it ignorant to say that you can't explain to someone how to be funny? That is my over-arching point. You have to steal from people, like Carlos Mencia. Th…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 01:17 AM
1

How is "slutty" the opposite of "correctly"? Sluts are fun, they make the world a better place.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 12:12 AM
1

Assumptive idiocy. Yea, because a book on how to be funny is stupid and almost certainly ineffective, that means all books are, exactly, so typical of me, a typical American. It will probably make you seem like a robot or an alien or a psycho-/socio-path who is trying to imitate human humor.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 11:28 PM
5

Never, ever, ever read a comedy book. Watch or listen to comedians like Louis CK, Patrice O'neal, Bill Burr, Colin Quinn, Dave Attell, Patton Oswalt, Greg Proops, Zach Galifianakis, and other similar comedians. You'll learn a lot more about how to be funny.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 08:52 PM
1

I'm sure there are videos online of guys successfully approaching girls in the gym, if you need some assurance/encouragement.
/r/seduction25/02/14 01:45 AM
2

Truly conventional, societal "wisdom" - the prevalent social norms, say don't approach anywhere besides certain bars at certain times (singles bars), and via online dating sites. Those are now commonly considered to be the only acceptable venues for approaching a girl you don't already know, the only places where you're not considered a creep. Pick-up exists to 1. get better within those boundaries and 2. expand those boundaries, because they're bullshit.
/r/seduction25/02/14 01:43 AM
1

Lots of good points made. Thanks y'all. It was what I needed to read, aside from the few asshole-ish comments.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/14 02:06 AM
1

just her hamster spinning off the rails What do you mean by that?
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 05:56 AM
-7

Well, fuck you too, then. I explicitly said this was non-specific. Fuck this forum. I get mocked and insulted for asking a serious question.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 01:28 AM
1

I don't think this is merely hamstering. I think this is an important thing to understand, partially since it's on the tip of every woman's tongue every day.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 01:24 AM
2

If someone does something offensive, the best thing you can probably do is to just grab the girl and exit the situation. However, that won't help your dignity. If the girl doesn't understand the legal minefield you walk through, she's an asshole and should be nexted. I doubt that most girls operate this way, though. I think that on a primal, biochemical, sub-conscious level, their attraction to you would be reduced, even if they can intellectually, logically, consciously acknowledge the likely c…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 06:26 PM
1

I was speaking about a basic concept of Christianity, rather than literal understanding of every word of holy writings. And it's really surprising to me, that there are enough people taking it literally to make this disclaimer necessary. High-rank clergymen themselves say that holy wirtings should be perceived as parables, rather than the records of actual events like God taking actual rib from actual Adam and creating actual Eve from it. That wasn't the case until science showed that the creati…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 02:22 PM
1

Christianity is awful as a description of the world What do you mean by that? It makes descriptive statements about the world that are wrong, the most obvious example being the creation story. ...and as a prescription for the humanity. I actually disagree. Basic concepts provide a good direction, although some ideas are indeed dated by now and the Christianity in its current form needs a bit of chiseling... It's dated because we realized it had bad moral prescriptions, and have since accepted mo…
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 10:10 AM
2

Christianity is awful as a description of the world and as a prescription for the humanity. If we reject religion, we can just have moral philosophy.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 09:34 AM
14

Yes, we're glorified cavemen, in a sense, but let's not glorify our caveman-ness. Don't act like any of this red pill shit is a good thing. Yes, it's a good thing to recognize it, to realize that the respective dynamics exist, and to then act accordingly, but let's not act as if it's the ideal way for humanity to function. Quite the opposite. It would be nice if humans were nice, rather than the savages we are now. We should understand our savage nature, not rationalize it.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 02:10 AM
1

Every individual who has had any degree of success ought to attribute most of their success to the efforts of others. Every single one.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 02:04 AM
0

That's what I did. Seems like that's what I do every weekend, though. It's like, you need to get laid in order to motivate you, so it's a catch 22.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 02:46 PM
1

What if you have no friends, or money, or bar/club attire, or furniture? FML. So fucking depressed right now.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/14 11:38 PM
2

I like to be honest about why I'm approaching her. That's given me the most success. I don't approach girls because I think their hair is cute or because of something about their outfit. I approach them because their bodies make me want to fuck them. That's the cause of attraction, and I think I can speak for most guys when saying that. Honesty and openness are important. Also, you have an entire interaction to set yourself apart from other guys. I'm of the belief that openers don't matter, part…
/r/seduction09/02/14 04:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter