TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JJHall_ID Archive

View 3 posts and 91 comments by JJHall_ID on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

Move away from where, the United States? And where to, one of the numerous countries that will cooperate with US officials when it comes to child support? No, the answer isn't to run away, it's to raise awareness of the issue so that laws can be corrected.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 08:16 PM
23

Did you even watch the video? At least one of them was named literally out of the blue as the father when the mother filed for state benefits. He had exactly zero choice in the matter, yet he was ruled financially responsible for that woman's children, is having his wages garnished, and has been in and out of jail due to lack of payment. How is it not slavery that he's being forced to hand over a large portion of his paycheck every single time, to a mother that fraudulently named him as the fath…
/r/MensRights02/12/19 06:53 PM
8

No, but it can sure help. I don't know how true this is, but I read it a while back and it seems pretty plausible. https://www.craigslist.org/about/best/sea/274495936.html
/r/MensRights29/12/16 06:47 PM
3

If I'm reading the list correctly, women can have a sterilization procedure covered under preventative health care, which is available at no cost. That option is not available for men, despite it being the preferable method (less pain, less invasive, faster recovery, less expensive) than women's procedures.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 11:05 PM
–

There is /r/Egalitarianism which would probably fit the bill perfectly.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 03:05 PM
1

That's low man, very low. :-)
/r/MensRights17/08/15 10:54 PM
1

I didn't go through his history at all, I just saw what looked like a relevant issue and posted it over here.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 02:31 PM
1

Even if her alleged attacker wasn't already cleared, hell even if he was actually tried (in a court) and convicted, this STILL wouldn't have been an appropriate venue for her to "protest" and cause this sort of spectacle. The college should not have allowed her to continue this insane mockery for as long as they did, let alone during graduation. They should have disallowed her bringing the mattress into any of the buildings from the start, as it disrupts other students actually trying to learn. …
/r/MensRights22/05/15 02:26 PM
24

Not only one family, but she has disrupted and possibly ruined the ceremony for every other graduate there, male or female. If my child was one of the graduates I'd have been furious with the university for even entertaining the thought of allowing this spectacle. What should be one of the proudest moments of these kids' lives so far is now one one of the most embarrassing.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:59 PM
24

This is worse because her claims have been proven to be false. At least UFO sightings are usually left unsolved.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 07:55 PM
2

Her pass was denied, she didn't get off the hook for DUI via her claim. It just didn't turn into a /r/justiceporn case like it would have if she were charged and convicted.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 10:38 PM
-3

There is a big mixture. I'm in the middle ground really. It was done to me. Meh, I don't really care. I made that choice for my son, and I still stand by that decision for reasons I've explained elsewhere in this thread. Is it a practice that should be stopped in the long since it is usually unnecessary? Yes, I'll agree with that.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 06:58 PM
-2

I'm with you. I don't think it is nearly as serious of an issue as some make it out to be, but who am I to put down someone's passion? I was cut and I don't have any complaints. There could be some pleasure and sensation I'm missing, but I have no complaints about what I do have. When my son was born, our pediatrician asked what we wanted to do. I asked him what his opinion was, as I knew there was some controversy but was not up on the topic. He said medically there was no reason to do so, but …
/r/MensRights21/04/15 06:45 PM
3

Maybe the marriage is over, and he doesn't know it yet. Maybe her attempt at isolating him is so that she has time to prepare a divorce, without giving him any time to prepare a defense himself. This could all be under the promise of "if you do this we can fix this and be happy again" all the while she is only preventing him from speaking with his friends, who she knows will tell him to just lawyer up and get out.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:49 PM
1

Kudos. While I don't think coming to those conclusions could be considered "bad faith" as there is certainly enough evidence for a reasonable person to make that assumption, it could certainly erode the confidence in the other answers which are very clear with no assumptions being made.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:45 PM
2

I know it is if it prevents communications with emergency services, such as a spouse pulling the phone out of a wall socket (remember those?) to prevent the other from calling 911, or even just hanging up on the call.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:10 PM
1

I don't think she is in the right on anything, so to be clear I'm not taking her side. However she never claimed to be him when posting on his Facebook, so I don't think ID theft would be an accurate claim. Unlawful access of computer resources probably, as I think Facebook's TOS specifically forbids anyone but the account owner from logging in and using the service. That alone should get her life in prison, right? /s
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:49 PM
4

Threaten to take his children away or harm them? I think you can call this a Yes, based on one of the comments referring to details being left out to protect a kid. She is implying that the child will be harmed by releasing the information. A reasonable person can come to the conclusion that this fact is most likely being held over the victim's head. I think this could also change your "unclear" to "clear red flag" for Intimidation as well.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:42 PM
4

If he agreed to it by his own free will as a way to try to make amends for what he has done, then absolutely. Based on the tone of the gal, I don't get the feeling that she is giving him a choice in the matter. She didn't say "We've agreed to have any contact with outside people go through me first while we rebuild our relationship," rather she said "a lot has happened and I'm in control now" along with threats of calling the police for trespassing for anyone who shows up. She makes comments lik…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:23 PM
10

This is abuse even if he cheated. I could completely understand her forbidding any contact with the person he cheated with if that is what happened, but to cut him off from the rest of the world, that is abuse plain and simple. The comment towards the bottom was absolutely correct in that if the gender roles were reversed there'd be police called in and a huge outbreak of support from people trying to rescue her from the abusive situation. I don't own my spouse, nor does she own me. I don't have…
/r/MensRights15/04/15 02:14 PM
3

Sure she does. Fair for women. Nothing to do with fairness among women and men. I think she was very clear on that position.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 09:39 PM
17

No, they're fine. Remember, women can't rape. /s
/r/MensRights30/12/14 09:22 PM
9

Ever done anything and regretted it later yourself? Nobody can ever truly be 100% of their own thoughts and intents.
/r/MensRights30/12/14 09:18 PM
1

You're absolutely right. As a polyamorous married male, the numbers are already stacked against me, so when I'm actively dating I want to be sure I'm dismissing someone for the right reasons. It all just depends on your perspective I guess.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 05:17 PM
2

I have some very good friends who identify as "feminist" and they are very well-rounded and polite people. We've had constructive conversations around what "feminism" really is, and we agree that we can see each others' sides. They absolutely understand the bad reputation feminism as a whole is receiving due to all of these brats who want extra privileges "in the name of equality." They understand that what true MRAs are after is equality, as is true feminism. Both sides are tainted by the vocal…
/r/MensRights26/12/14 04:31 PM
1

I like to think it's like the unsolvable circular mathematics equation used to bring down the Borg on ST:NG. Eventually their minds will just shut down. Or their heads will explode like a Fembot on Austin Powers...
/r/MensRights26/12/14 04:14 PM
3

I've repeated this numerous times now, but this is why I feel "feminism" as a term needs to be abandoned by those that actually favor equality for both genders. I agree with you in that true feminism at it's roots was an equality movement, but it has been hijacked and has now morphed into something only vaguely resembling what it was. Let the tumbler SJWs have the term feminism, they've already taken away what little equality it stood for anyway. Start identifying as egalitarian (or a similar te…
/r/MensRights20/11/14 10:09 PM
1

The first [has to have earned enough money w/his wife to be able to take time off work,] would earn him respect. Everyone would know he's made enough money that he has the ability to take time off. The second [he has to take paternity leave from work] means someone is paying for him to sit around and just have fun with his kids. That seems like a pretty sexist comment to me inside the context of "I don't find it sexist to encourage men to work. If that wasn't your intent then I misunderstood it,…
/r/MensRights14/11/14 12:00 AM
1

I also don't find it 'sexist' to encourage women to work. For a woman to not work and to stay at home with her kids, she either has to have earned enough money w/her husband to be able to take time off work, or she has to take maternity leave from work. The first would earn her respect. Everyone would know she's made enough money that she has the ability to take time off. The second means someone is paying for her to sit around and just have fun with her kids. Everyone chooses their quality of l…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 05:06 PM
1

This right here is why I feel the original true feminist movement needs to abandon the term "feminism" and move to a gender-neutral term like egalitarianism. The "organized movement" and "self-identified leaders" as you put it have corrupted the original intent and spirit of feminism. Just like we as MRAs try to distance ourselves from TRP and PUA groups, true feminists need to distance themselves from the radicals who are unfortunately "stealing" the name. Abandoning the "feminist" moniker woul…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 02:53 AM
9

I think a more accurate analogy would be forcing the 10 year old girl to have her breasts removed against her will.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 05:57 PM
2

I was at a concert, Lillith Faire to be exact, about 15 years ago. I worked for a local radio station at the time. At one point our station manager left to go to the restroom, and came back a few minutes later laughing his ass off. He said he was in the bathroom using the urinal, when a couple of ladies came in. They said "Don't mind us, the lines are mile long for the ladies' room." He laughed it off and said "I have a wife and 3 daughters, I'm not too worried about it, just remember to put the…
/r/MensRights04/11/14 12:10 AM
1

Over time something may begin to select for it. If people start to choose mates that don't exhibit these behaviors, there is your selection event. Even if that never happens, the rest of the point is still valid: don't act upon those feelings and treat everybody with respect.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 02:20 PM
1

I don't see it as toxic, no worries there. Personally I hope to never see it. I know too many people whose lives have been a living hell due to being told by the religious people in their life that they are evil for being who they are. I don't want my son or daughters having sex before they're married, or at least mature enough to make responsible decisions and be able to accept the consequences if they choose to engage. I don't work towards that goal by making them promise things they don't eve…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 05:27 PM
3

I agree completely. Despite the fact that we're wired to fill these roles in nature, our society has evolved to negate many of these innate desires. We've evolved as men to not strip down and do a ritual mating dance every time we see an attractive woman, despite our minds seeing her and thinking "Wow, she's hot!" Women have evolved to not seek out a group of males and watch them fight for breeding rights once a month, despite their increased libido and physiological evidence of being fertile. I…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 05:20 PM
3

I've not seen one in person either, only the news articles. A quick Google search does turn up a Facebook group for a purity ball held in Midland, TX. The summary says 2010, but I didn't actually visit the group to see if it is an annual event.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 05:12 PM
10

I was speaking, partially tongue-in-cheek, about the purity pledges and purity balls that have been in the news over the last couple of years. These are predominantly in highly-conservative Christian areas. Again I'm being a little bit facetious, but the whole "I promise my virginity to you daddy" concept while exchanging rings in front of a congregation, dressed in clothing appropriate for a bride and groom on their special day just creeps me out a bit.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 05:08 PM
3

I think you and I have pretty similar feelings on feminism. At it's core, I think it does serve to help both genders. Unfortunately it has been hijacked as of late and has changed into a crusade to give women more choices that they traditionally haven't had (good) but without the responsibility that comes with making those choices (bad.) This is one of the reasons I support dropping the term feminism for a gender-neutral term like egalitarianism. Removing the gender from the term would help both…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 03:40 PM
26

Biologically when animals are acting on instinct, this is completely true. We as humans have evolved to have sentience and intelligence that is used in many cases to override our instincts. Most animals will run from a fire. We purposefully make them, both for utilitarian reasons and for recreational purposes. Instinct tells us to walk away from the edge of a tall structure or cliff. Some humans strap on a parachute or a bungie cord and jump off. In the majority of the animal kingdom, males are …
/r/MensRights30/10/14 03:31 PM
6

Thank you. I hope you have a great relationship with your child and that they know nothing but love from you, regardless of the circumstances that brought them into the world. If your ex is still the same person, I'm sure your kid will see it someday on their own and maybe then some of their history will be appropriate. Keep your stick on the ice as Red Green would say.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:43 PM
2

Yes, that raises another good point in that the amount of access to the children is also greatly imbalanced as it sits. Combine this with the lack of choice fathers have throughout the process and it becomes a very hard pill to swallow. The question now is how do we remedy the situation.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 10:39 PM
33

I hope he doesn't. It isn't the kid's fault. I'm sure the kid has no doubt that mom and dad no longer get along, but telling the kid he/she is a result of mom's deception and that dad never wanted the kid in the first place could be devastating to them.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:25 PM
6

Let's take the opposite side of the coin then, and just flat out ban abortions. Once the child is conceived, both parties share equal responsibility. Now women will again be up in arms about taking away the right to agency over their own bodies/lives, but you've brought equality back into the equation. The problem here is that you aren't wrong on your points, but there is no good current solution without men coming out with the short end of the stick. When unplanned pregnancy occurs (assuming no…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:21 PM
20

Some states are 24 I believe, so you're absolutely right.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:58 PM
3

I think the strikethrough was appropriate. Gender of the rapist doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 09:23 PM
2

Wow. What a horribly-designed website. People are used to scrolling up and down to view content. I'd like to smack the designer that decided scrolling up and down means things fly in from the sides. Why someone would want to take a perfectly intuitive UI and make it non-intuitive is beyond comprehension.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 02:52 PM
3

Out of curiosity, are some of the comments asking if you're doing the "Man enough to wear pink" think in conjunction with breast cancer? Which is a horrible statement to make when supposedly touting equality by itself...
/r/MensRights20/09/14 06:58 PM
1

That sounds familiar, but I couldn't tell you for sure without going back and finding the article.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 06:44 PM
6

I seem to recall a story a year or so back where the person was a security guard on a campus and was either gay or asexual. Either way, he had zero interest in women, let alone incentive or motive to rape. Anyway, due to an interraction with some female college students, he was accused of rape. The official charges went nowhere, but was still a stressful time for him, and the company wound up moving him to another assignment because of the tensions it would cause to have him around the original …
/r/MensRights19/09/14 06:05 PM
2

I would modify it to say that if they voluntarily come forward maybe the punishments are halved. This should help those already incarcerated on false charges as the false accusors still have a large incentive to come forward now rather than continuing to risk carrying the lie. Edit to add: There should also be no statute of limitations, so that there is always a chance for the victim to get justice. This would be even more controversial, but I'd say they need to be added to the sex offender list…
/r/MensRights19/09/14 05:54 PM
4

This used to make me so mad (well, still does) back when I was a new driver. My insurance cost significantly more compared to the gal that totaled the driver's ed car. Why? Because I was male. My insurance agent said it was "statistically" due to males being more agressive drivers, more likely to engage in street racing or other competitive driving, and more likely to be in a crash accordingly. Personally I think this is a classic /r/pussypass situation. When in school I got two speeding tickets…
/r/MensRights16/09/14 08:13 PM
7

She may not be pressing for support. In a lot of cases, if the mother goes on assistance, the state will recoup that cost from the father in the form of child support. The article mentions "the person seeking" only in reference to laws regarding no conviction to nullify the support. This is very likely a case of the state pursuing the victim "on the mother's behalf" without her even being involved in the decision. She's still scum for raping the victim and hiding the existence of his child from …
/r/MensRights05/09/14 04:33 PM
24

My dad was forced to get a job by the judge when my parents divorced. He wasn't earning enough as a farmer as the judge thought he should be able to, so the judge set an amount higher than my dad earned. He was forced to go find another job on top of farming so he wouldn't be in contempt and/or lose his driver's license. This was Idaho, in the USA. It wasn't based on a 60K income, but having seen that same scenario in action, I have no reason to doubt OP's story.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 06:31 AM
5

I think you're right here. Not all of them are clearly (alleged) criminals, but some of them are. The 21 year old male having sex with the 16 year old girl is a criminal according to law. It was specifically mentioned in the show that he was old enough to not be covered by the "romeo and juliet" laws of her state. This is literally a text book case of statutory rape, even if she says she consented. It could also be argued that as an adult at the party, he could be responsible for the alcohol she…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:26 PM
7

Hey, it works on Dora the Explorer. Say "Swiper, no swiping!" two or three times, he says "Oh, man!" and walks away. Why shouldn't it work on everybody else?
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:47 PM
1

Out of pure curiosity, I wonder what the rad-feminist "infection" rate is? Which has better odds, a woman being feminist or a man rapist? Just to be clear I'm not advocating that we should view all women as rad-fems, any more than all men should be viewed as rapists. This is merely a "shower thought" sort comment. My wife and my girlfriend are both amazing women so the last thing I'd ever do is lump them in.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:30 PM
3

You have no idea what I want, you're not inside my head. I may not have been clear, but I'm not saying I don't want those women punished. I absolutely do. They deserve it, they committed a grave irreparable injustice to the man they wrongfully put behind bars. In all fairness they should be subject to the same punishment they wrongfully put the man through, and then some, in order to set an example that it is absolutely NOT OK to falsely accuse someone of a sexual crime. Now, please explain to m…
/r/MensRights15/07/14 02:16 PM
2

No, I'm not saying that. I don't have a solution that doesn't potentially mean more suffering for the innocent.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:41 AM
4

Their train of thought: Hmm, if I come forward, I may be let off with a warning, or I may get a small charge. Even a misdemeanor charge of fraud would be enough for me to lose my job. My friends that supported me will think I'm some kind of liar. What if I had to spend a month in jail? I could never do that! What would my family think? If I keep my mouth shut, that guy only gets another 7 years in prison before he's let out anyway. He's already been in there for 7, so what is 7 more years for hi…
/r/MensRights15/07/14 03:42 AM
5

The flip side to this is if these women coming forward after a false accusation are charged, it may discourage others from coming forward. This would cause more needless suffering of innocent men in prison. It is a complete catch-22. A woman of the mindset that caused her to false-report years ago will nearly certainly be of the mindset that would prevent her from doing the right thing now by admitting guilt, if it meant near certain incarceration for herself. Until we have infallible "lie detec…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 10:22 PM
1

I'm not arguing that, I couldn't agree more. I do think it is an important distinction though since it was brought up as a comparison to the original topic.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 09:05 PM
104

In this case isn't it technically the girl's parents and not the government compelling the exam, since they're giving the consent on her behalf?
/r/MensRights09/07/14 08:13 PM
3

Insurance...
/r/MensRights01/07/14 08:18 PM
2

Thank goodness police didn't find some poor guy that happened to meet her description in the area. If so, chances are the statement would not have been recanted, and some innocent man would be trying to defend himself. Edit: spelling.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 04:05 PM
3

You're probably right. At least one, if not both.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:52 PM
2

No, I simply said I hope it is possible. It may not be.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:51 PM
19

Any feminist or "women's issues" conferences being held at any Doubletree venues in the near future? Sounds to me like Doubletree is opening themselves up to a clear-cut case of discrimination if they don't require organizers of pretty much all similarly-sized events going forward.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:29 PM
2

Probably in for a long recovery either way. I feel for the victim, her family, and the families of the girls that did this too.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:17 PM
3

I couldn't have said it better myself. These were a couple of misguided kids without proper parental supervision. They should be treated as such regardless of their gender. I would ask the same if it were two boys of the same age. They need some extreme and immediate mental health support.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:10 PM
21

These girls are as well. I just hope they're able to get some decent mental health services and can become productive "normal" members of society some day.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:07 PM
2

The article says it was attempted murder. All of the other articles I found with a quick Google search concur. It sounds like the victim survived.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:06 PM
6

I should have said "advised her to get on welfare." They said if she goes on welfare the state can then go after him on their own behalf rather than her behalf, and it makes it much easier to get her direct support at that point to. This was over 20 years ago when I was around 12 years old anyway, so a lot of the details beyond that are a bit fuzzy by now. In this case I think it was warranted. His income was irregular, and he was able to further "hide" most of it by having my grandparents accep…
/r/MensRights15/05/14 09:46 PM
5

I can't say how hard it is to get support out of women, but I can say how easy it was for my parents' case. My dad farmed and therefore didn't have a regular income. The state had my mom get on welfare just so the state could then go after him to repay them for the welfare. Once they did that, the judge forced him under threat of contempt (and therefore jail) to go get a "9 to 5" job. Mind you this was all before the divorce was even final. I know this is only one specific case, but it is certai…
/r/MensRights15/05/14 08:38 PM
1

Why? It is her choice, and her right to make that decision for herself. That is sexual freedom/equality at its finest. Honestly I don't think you can find a more perfect example of feminism than a woman choosing to exchange her sexuality for cash. Patriarchy wouldn't "allow" her to do that as her innocence would "need to be protected at all cost!" Now if she were forced/coerced into prostitution this argument wouldn't apply, but from what OP said she is doing all of this of her own free will.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 03:58 PM
1

I think this is the most rational comment I've seen here. Relationship with a co-worker, probably not the wisest decision, but it is actually very common and works more often than not. Relationship with older married man, no problem, to each their own, as long as his SO is aware and OK with it. Money exchanging hands probably makes it illegal, but from a libertarian standpoint what she does with her own body is her business, so no probem there. As long as older man and co-worker are aware that s…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 03:51 PM
5

They're directly related. Men's mistreatment with regard to child support and it's enforcement is a direct result of abuse of the system by women. I do agree that the focus should be on positivity with regard to men's rights, rather than the negativity of women's abuses. Unfortunately it is a lot easier to pick apart a negative situation than to bring a positive situation to the forefront. Negativity sells newspapers.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 07:20 PM
10

The counter to that is we are in fact fighting for some rights. One of the biggest is the right to fair and unbiased treatment by law enforcement and the courts with regard to family/custody, domestic violence, and rape accusations. Those aren't just "issues" but in fact meet your definition of "civil injustices and legal inequality." There are legal changes that need to be met in those areas of the MRM. A very solid argument can be made that men are in fact "oppressed victims" in these cases. A…
/r/MensRights16/04/14 07:14 PM
11

I would have simply replied "Being polite and helping another human being." Temptation would be there to not only let the door go, but to actively pull it shut so he had to re-open it himself.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:54 PM
2

TL;DR: On top of the general MRA issues we've all heard, I've witnessed a family member get taken to the cleaners by the highly biased family court because he was the man in the situation. Wall of text incoming, please be warned. First of all, I want to make it clear that I'm all for equality in general. Men aren't superior to women, and women aren't superior to men. Anyone who argues otherwise is delusional. I hold doors open for women when I approach a building, but I do so for men too. It is …
/r/MensRights14/04/14 05:13 PM
1

Absolutely. Take a look at your cell phone bill sometime. "Regulatory recovery fee" and all sorts of fees that look like government-required fees, but in reality they're all just tacked on by the provider because they can. Nobody complains because they look "official." When they do complain they're told to pay it or pay their ETF and cancel their account.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 02:24 PM
3

Yes, service charges are just a way to increase their profit while "appearing" to have a lower price, and they're bogus all the way around. The fact that there is higher service charge on the more expensive ticket didn't shock me in the least. It's all BS no matter which you look at it.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 10:43 PM
20

My guess is the service charge is a percentage of the ticket, so I didn't think twice about that part.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 07:55 PM
2

I actually disagree with maternity spaces too. Pregnant women are encouraged to walk and get exercise, it is good for them, as it is for all of us. In the cases where there are medical issues, such as pre-eclampsia, they're either put on bed rest and shouldn't be shopping anyway, or they've given temporary handicap parking permits to use.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:45 PM
-5

I've commented on this subject before, but it's quite relevant here so I'll share again. I'm cut, and I don't know the difference, but I'm 100% satisfied with how things work. Could it be better? Don't know, don't really care. I don't hold anything against my parents for making the choice. When my son was born, our pediatrician asked what we wanted to do. I'd heard some of the debates, but knowing that it didn't negatively affect me, I didn't read much into the hype. Religion wasn't a factor in …
/r/MensRights06/01/14 06:10 PM
2

You're mirroring my feelings exactly. Kinda like opening/holding a door open for someone. If I'm the first person to a door and there is someone behind me, I open it and hold it open for them, regardless of whether they're female or male. I do it to be a decent human being, not to say I need to hold the door because the person is too feeble to do it themselves. To be honest I'm kind of looking forward to the first time some feminist chick tries to give me shit over holding a door for her and I g…
/r/MensRights24/12/13 04:27 PM
2

I don't think you're a pushover or anything like that. I just think the issue is more far-reaching than you originally thought. You are a good person, and it takes guts to make the choices you made, putting someone else's reputation ahead of your own well-being.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 06:43 AM
3

I had not noticed that it was in response for someone else calling you that, so I'll withdraw that statement. I tried to respond in another thread but I think it got lost by a browser glitch, so I'll put the gist of it here since this has context as well. Another reason you should consider fighting back against it, even this far after the fact, is that someday later it could still come back to bite you. What if you go for a job that needs a security clearance and/or extensive background check? T…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 09:13 PM
2

Actually I find your term "mangina" a bit offensive in this context, and it takes a LOT to truly offend me. The whole point of the MRM is for equal footing. That term right there does more harm to that ideal than anything else that has been said in this thread. Think about it for a while, I think you'll understand why. I do wish you the best, and it sounds like you're well on the road to recovery from this issue. On the other hand I do wish you'd consider bringing a civil suit against the woman,…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 06:50 PM
1

You're right. Up to a certain percentage of those expenses (which should be in the child support order) should count towards the support amount. I agree with you that timing wise it shouldn't matter what money is spent where, as long as 100% of the child support received is spent on the child's needs. I do agree with /u/dzogen that 100% of the funds spent for child support should be accountable. Anything above and beyond the allowed sharing of household expenses from above should be backed up by…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 01:56 PM
1

Wow that is just crazy. I don't see how she could have possibly come to the conclusion that violating a contract like that would work out better for her in the end. Sounds like you're lucky to have finally gotten out of that relationship.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:49 AM
4

Just to play devil's advocate, how did you file without knowing if she took the credit if you were supposed to work it out together? I agree she shouldn't have filed for the credit without consulting you, but it seems like you shouldn't have filed either unless she had already stated she was not taking the credit. I'm not taking sides here, just curious how this scenario happened.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 08:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter