TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JJVamps Archive

View 1 post and 69 comments by JJVamps on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

JJVamps/r/MGTOW18/10/19 09:53 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I have spent far less to get laid with regular women than I would have to for the equivalent in a sex worker. Dates can/are typically very cheap, you get someone cool to chill with, they actually desire you, and (at least for me) you typically hit more than once and the next times are literally free. Unless you’re into some freak shit then girls are actually quite accommodating. Plus there’s sites for freaks who want to get it on. I feel like people who post this stuff just can’t get laid in gen…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 05:24 PM
1

Some do think it’s bad, or it’s weakness.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 09:52 PM
1

The act itself, being penetrated. There’s nothing else really to explain. Sure other factors like size difference, demeanour, being active or passive, will change things. But just looking at the action itself, being penetrated is a little submissive in my opinion. There’s nothing really to explain about it, it’s just what I think.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 09:51 PM
1

I never said the active partner is submissive, I said the action itself is. It doesn’t really matter to me if the active partner is the one receiving or giving.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 08:30 PM
1

It’s not the end all be all but it’s a factor. I’m not sure how this is confusing for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 07:53 PM
1

Yes. How does me saying that mean penetration is the “end all be all”?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 07:22 PM
1

I never said it was?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 07:16 PM
1

Like I said I just think the action is inherently a little submissive, not that other factors can’t change things. The point of my comment is that the act of penetration is inherently a little submissive, even in the scenario where the girl is acting dominant doesn’t change the fact that the penetration itself is submissive to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 05:40 PM
1

Like I said, being active or not is a role but not the end all be all. I don’t get how the guy working harder is “submissive” due to that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 05:37 PM
1

I’m only answering because the question asked, it’s not like it’s the first thing I’m thinking of when I’m engaging in sex either. I agree with the pegging, I could never do it for a variety of reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 05:20 PM
1

I said it plays a role, not that it’s the end all be all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 05:18 PM
1

That doesn’t change my opinion. Just because he can doesn’t mean that the action isn’t inherently a little submissive (again, in my opinion).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 04:54 PM
0

I do, like yeah if I have to pick one or the other I would say the girl giving oral would be in a more submissive position, but it doesn’t feel as significant to me for whatever reason. I literally said that I think being penetrated is more submissive, so yes. I do think passivity plays a pretty large role as well though. I would feel submissive because I’d be getting penetrated. I don’t get penetrated when I do oral with a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 04:49 PM
-1

From me using my brain and the logic that makes sense to me. I think that in an intimate setting when a person penetrates another it’s a little submissive. You’re “taking it” rather than “giving it.” There’s plenty of porn that has the woman in a more dominate role but that doesn’t change my opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 04:44 PM
0

I literally never said it was Edit: I’m confused on what you’re trying to say. You wonder why submissiveness isn’t bad?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 04:41 PM
1

I would still say it is inherently submissive. I think the guy can “relinquish” control and let himself feel submissive.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 04:25 PM
1

I would still say it is inherently submissive yes. I think the guy can “relinquish” control and let himself feel submissive.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 04:24 PM
0

I mentioned far more than just physical size. Physical size plays a role, yes. It depends on the interaction, most times I would say no. If it’s an intimate interaction then yeah probably. I’m not often in intimate situations with people bigger than me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 04:23 PM
0

As for oral, no. I’m sure if I were to suck off a man I would feel a little submissive. When a girl is riding I’m still the one penetrating, though that’s not to say that the woman could be more dominant when riding. I think if the guy “relinquishes” some control then they could feel and get into feeling submissive with the girl on top. I don’t really feel dominant when giving oral no. I would say it’s more restricted to sex, but logically speaking following my logic receiving a massage would be…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 04:20 PM
-2

Edit: I forgot to say earlier, but no to 1 & 3. As for 4 I explained why I say yes to the submissive aspect. Being penetrated is submissive because it’s a passive manoeuvre. They don’t really have to (and most women don’t) actually have to do anything. Submissive isn’t bad but the movement of receiving something and not having to do anything is inherently more submissive than actively doing the penetrating/work. There’s also the aspect of the penetrated one is typically smaller/weaker than the p…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 04:12 PM
5

Being penetrated is submissive because it’s a passive manoeuvre. They don’t really have to (and most women don’t) actually have to do anything. Again, submissive isn’t bad but the movement of receiving something and not having to do anything is inherently more submissive than actively doing the penetrating/work.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 04:08 PM
2

Most prostitutes simply don’t have that extreme overhead you imply. That’s where you got things wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 06:49 PM
3

When men say that it typically means they don’t want a supermodel, extreme outlier girl. It doesn’t mean they don’t expect to be attracted to their partner, expect their partner to have qualities such as being caring, loving, a good partner. And in that aspect I’d be completely fine if someone picked me (I am a guy but just saying).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 08:32 PM
1

Yeah ik, I definitely misread. But I still think that isn’t a BMI of 28. I’m not as good at BMI as bf% though.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 02:41 AM
1

I wouldn’t call Anthony Joshua “shredded,” he’s lean for sure but he’s about 13-15% bodyfat. “Shredded” is close to bodybuilding stage weight. But yes, women typically like lower bf men. Not stage lean, but noticeably works out just has some fat. They just don’t know the amount of work it takes to get to that stage, and most people don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 09:11 PM
2

Women just don’t typically understand what’s achievable naturally and most people in general have no idea what different bodyfat percentages look like. I’d argue most regular people in general don’t understand what’s achievable naturally. From my experience girls like guys that clearly look like they workout and are between 15-25% bodyfat.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 09:08 PM
1

You’re insane if you think that’s 28% body fat Edit: Misread. I still don’t think it’s 28 BMI but I’m nowhere near as good at guessing BMI as bf%.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 09:03 PM
1

It’s actually not. It’s takes a while to build that muscle, but he looks bigger because he’s mid 20’s body fat. Anyone with some muscle could bulk up to 20% or higher and look massive. TLDR, it’s impressive yes, but not “very difficult to maintain naturally.”
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/25 09:02 PM
1

How are you going to get that sex? Being “good at sex” requires being sociable, good at talking to girls, comfortability around girls, things that are pretty damn important in a relationship. Most people who post here don’t even have those basics covered.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 08:37 AM
1

I hate when women think they’re more “emotionally intelligent” but can’t handle men’s emotions or control their own emotions. The reality is neither gender is significantly more emotionally intelligent, we just show emotions vastly different. If most guys in your life are telling you that when they open up women are turned off/stop talking to them/break up with them then it’s probably true. It’s not to “get pity sex” or to “wallow” it’s simply that when they open up they get rejected from their …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/25 07:26 PM
2

I was using hyperbole, yes some people do say that obviously. I was also more talking about online discourse, not what someone may say in real life. The people who said that to you, which is obviously horrible, were they in-person or online?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 07:36 PM
1

Except no one says “choose better” to women who got beat once or had a bad ex. They say it when EVERY ex was “abusive” or a “manipulator.” If she can’t see the trend among guys she’s picking after EVERY relationship she’s ever been in, yes, she should pick better. This is already said about guys. The ones who go on the dating shows and go to 3rd world countries? People clown them for being surprised when the girl they marry is inevitably a gold digger when it was obvious. If every single girl a …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/25 12:43 AM
–

Except it is, because they say it when there isn’t other women to “hype up.” I’m also not saying most women think other women are 10’s, I know the whole performative “she’s a 10” girls do when in a group setting. I’m talking about a genuine belief that most girls are cute/attractive in some way vs the same not being true for men. Anecdotally I’ve asked girls about this and most legitimately think all/majority of women are cute at least while disagreeing most/majority men aren’t. I’m not talking …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 11:55 PM
–

Because it happens? Not sure what you’re trying to get at with that. Attractive men with subpar women happens Attractive women with subpar men happens Pointing out those things happen doesn’t discredit or disprove what I just said.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 11:08 PM
–

If either sex overstates their attractiveness more it’s definitely women, they often think every girl is cute/attractive and think most guys are average or below average. Most guys can recognize when they’re ugly or not very desirable which leads to the gym, or new hobbies, etc etc. Though of course delusional people on both sides exist it is definitely more common in women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 10:50 PM
4

So men are supposed to provide for a woman because they don’t enjoy sex and having sex with their man is a chore that only he enjoys? Got it. Question for you, what would a man supposedly gain? If there’s no reason for a woman to go 50/50 because they’ll also have responsibilities around the house why should a man provide everything? Just for sex? A good egalitarian relationship will have roughly 50/50 on everything, not just finances. Split chores around the house, cleaning, dishes, etc etc. Yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 10:50 PM
4

The context of the “man who marries her” in the text is ambiguous at best in my opinion. I obviously read it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 05:53 PM
5

Wouldn’t it have been so much easier to just say that initially instead of acting all snarky for no reason? To answer your question, no, I don’t think the prostitute would be “worth more” in a marriage setting in my opinion (if I had to choose between one of the 2). The prostitute likely has done disgusting things because they were paid to do so, whereas the slut just had regular sex with (hopefully) a higher quality of people at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 05:06 PM
8

Clearly if I’m asking then it isn’t clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 06:36 AM
15

Valuable in what way? In terms of societal benefit? In terms of dating? In terms of sleeping around?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 05:28 AM
1

Are you really asking why humans with an innate drive for a partner, want a partner? For a lot of guys after years of trying it ISN’T worth trying for low quality dating prospects. I mean people go on apps for example and both genders complain about how bad it can get. Guys get annoyed at girls who don’t reciprocate, and no reciprocation isn’t sex necessarily. Reciprocation is showing genuine interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 06:37 AM
1

You can’t like someone unless they have the exact same hobbies/interests as you? My point still stands, men and women naturally have different hobbies and interests generally. This has never stopped people before.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 06:45 PM
2

Did you not just edit your comment? Because it didn’t say that before. Either way, it’s quite normal for a girl to have more friends that are girls and have interests that are more aligned with girls. Wouldn’t that attract more men? Men typically don’t like masculine women. Also you have no hobbies or interests a man would be interested in? Like even Tv shows?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 03:43 PM
1

Being attractive “clashes with a lot of men”? Care to explain how?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 03:04 AM
0

Not sure why the first part is brought up, like most women don’t want to do sex work and I’m not sure how that applies to being a gold digger? Gold diggers can have jobs. You can also be a “gold digger” for someone who doesn’t necessarily have a ton of money, as it’s more about the mindset and what you’re trying to get out of the relationship. If you’re a girl and you’re only going out with certain guys for free food then you’d be gold digging. I do agree the term is overused in many cases, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 02:31 AM
2

I don’t go out for my way to be friends with women, because I don’t particularly see a point. I have enough friends so I’m not going to push for another lukewarm friend. If we’re in a situation where me and a girl do end up becoming friends, cool. But if I’m in a dating app or ask you out and you say no but say “we can still be friends” I’m going to say no every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 08:32 PM
21

You can’t really ask this question of a straight man and get a real answer. It’s impossible to really know what the answer would be because a straight man can’t imagine a life without the base instinct of attraction to women. Thinking of being attracted to a man is weird and they can’t relate to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 05:05 AM
3

Women aren’t considered as unattractive as men, even if they are the same attractiveness. Do some women have issues with dating? Of course. But most women’s dating issues (at least in the sense of being able to attract someone) is mostly self-inflicted. Like they are extremely socially introverted and can’t talk to people, they aren’t approachable, they have standards that are unreasonably high, too self-conscious, etc. So yeah, women have dating problems, but most of the time it’s self inflicte…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/24 02:38 PM
1

Yea cause Reddit is the perfect example of every guy in the real world. Go outside, actually talk to a guy in real life and you might be surprised. How am I “cruel and angry”? You were chatting shit and now are surprised when someone corrects you? I’m just correcting a statement you made that wasn’t accurate, if anything I could say you’re the “cruel and angry” one. Get off Reddit and actually talk to people. Reddit is a horrible representation of men or women in the real world. Most people in t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 02:50 PM
-3

You think guys don't filter for more than just looks? How f*cking shallow are you? You think most men don't care at all about personality? That's just wrong. Most people care about looks and personality, especially if they are the same looks-wise. Each gender has the assholes, so don't say that all men are one way when you aren't the same as all other girls.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 01:41 AM
-1

You are far mistaking the looks and matches the average guy gets. The average guy is not waiting for 9/10s or 10/10s because they "seek the best."
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 01:30 AM
1

Do you think they’re the only ones perpetuating this? If there wasn’t a bunch of women that were also perpetuating a gender war the red pill stuff would die down. But both groups needlessly fight and pitch the opposite gender against each other 🤷🏾‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 08:45 PM
1

You underestimate how desperate a lot of guys are. The average woman absolutely has more choices. This is assuming a decent sized city etc etc. the average woman could hop on Tinder, get 100+ matches and go on 3 dates a week if they cared to. The thing is women generally don’t care to. Edit: nowhere did I say the local celebrity or “fun guy” didn’t have options. They do, and I agree it’s a lot. I’m just saying the woman has more. Whether the woman plans to actually utilize it is up to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 12:04 AM
1

I’m not saying he won’t be able to get women. I’m saying it will be less so than the average woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 12:02 AM
6

Depends how big the male celebrity is, it seems like a lot of people in the comments think you (OP) are referring to like Usher or Patrick Mahomes or starting lineman/QB at Michigan. In cases like these obviously the celebrity. However, I took it as more of a local celebrity. May be rich, but not many people would recognize his name nationally. In this case I think the woman would have more options.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/24 07:17 PM
1

Be real with yourself, the only real difference is the title
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/23 02:57 PM
2

The "manosphere" as you put it doesn't define "dating down" as just looks. It can be status, money, knowledge, ornwhatever else the girl cares about. In that sense they would be "dating up". I personally think the whole date within your attractiveness is stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/22 05:10 AM
12

There's a big difference between not wanting to date and preferring masturbation to sex. Dating is a chore, a lot women (and men) are assholes that just leave cause you have some mental health problems, money problems, or they don't return affection, etc. It's hard to find a good person and it makes sense why someone would be discouraged from dating, nothing to do with porn really. In fact, you know it's a bad sign when someone would rather watch porn then go through the effort of dealing with a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/21 03:57 AM
1

There might be something else there than just sleeping around, but I'm not a therapist or anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/20 06:40 AM
1

I don't think you've disproved the 80/20 concept at all. Now I need to mention, it is a concept, it's probably not a hard 80% and 20% for casual sex. You've just proven that the 80/20 rule goes both ways. "20%" of women also get saute after by "80%" of men. That's just how the dating world works. Women just get more overall interest (especially online) which makes it seem like they don't have the same kind of rule. This is anecdotal, but "80%" of women also aren't dateable I'd say. From all the …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/20 06:03 AM
2

I wouldn't say I'm a chad, but I don't necessarily have a big issue getting women interested most of the time, sleeping with them is a whole different thing. I did see a similar post on this thread, but a lot of women also just aren't relationship material. Being willing to sleep around isn't always a good determination of LTR status either. I usually find the women who have strung me on and didn't let me get all the way were people I actually connected with on a deeper level, but they would jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/20 06:59 AM
0

First of all, I know what Incel means. I've already said this in another post but I don't agree with the incels that say things like all women should be raped, die, or more. Being involuntary celibate (for whatever reason) does not inherently mean entitlement, it simply means they cannot/have not had sex and they attribute that to various reasons. Now you're the one pretending to be able to read minds, if I shouldn't neither should you. Being an Incel does not mean that you are a bad person. Thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 08:42 PM
0

I don't mean just physically, lots of women view the average guy as below them, so will on average aim higher or be less willing to "settle". Does this mean that all or even most women do it? Probably not but it's a large chunk and needs to be mentioned. Guys who are truly nice don't think they're entitled to sex, and they don't go around spreading misogynistic lies like "women only want men for their money." It's not just MGTOW or incels having problems, genuinely nice guys all over the world h…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 07:41 PM
5

It is a very common thing, look at most studies, women will rank average men as much less attractive than them, even if they are the average girl. Just because a chunk of men can have the same liberties as women doesn't mean that applies to the majority, like it does for women. No one's pretending that girls don't want to get laid, the OP even concedes to that. But you can't lie and say that the dating market isn't heavily skewed towards women. And usually women don't have the same sexual desire…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/20 09:17 AM
5

This! I agree, men have the potential to be major assholes, especially as being the bigger, more powerful gender. But a majority of men choose not to be, and to be decent human beings. I just don't understand how they justify themselves, then get mad when men retaliate, like you did in your case
/r/MGTOW18/10/19 10:23 PM
9

The comments the people say to this poor man are fucked. I don't know if I could hold myself back from beating this woman in this scenario. She has absolutely no care for what her stupid child did to this OP, and is too stupid to think about what her kids are saying before acting on 'muh feelings' and calling the cops.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/10/19 07:05 AM
3

I will agree, she's allowed to her own opinions, but she shouldn't be surprised at all when all the hot guys don't want to date her. You see this happen all the time with women (and even some men) who are generally considered less attractive for one reason or the other, expecting too much. Your dream man/woman won't fall into your lap, especially if you're not considered attractive to the general population.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/08/19 12:52 AM
2

Naw, she was with at least 16-18 yr Olds so they would have had cars
/r/MGTOW08/08/19 09:24 AM
6

Girls are horrible for this shit. Pretty much every girl I've talked to will put no effort into messaging me (as the guy) first. Even if I'm dating them, or they show actual interest in me.
/r/MGTOW14/07/19 06:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter