TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JMacPhoneTime Archive

View 0 posts and 90 comments by JMacPhoneTime on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I agree that in general, this is a way to get grifted, but I think its weird to suggest that anyone getting paid to help has no incentive to do so. There are plenty of professions that serve as examples where this isnt the case. Depending on the context, you could make the case that the incentive for the person to help you is so that they demonstrate their ability to help, improving the odds that they will be referenced positively by others and get more work helping different people. I think you…
/r/ExRedPill09/06/22 11:57 AM
1

Theres a difference between looks mattering a looks being everything. The former is true, the latter is not.
/r/ExRedPill04/06/22 10:28 PM
14

Then how would it be any different for men? Most men also seem to want the most attractive women, if somehow given a choice, but will "settle" for less attractive ones. More than 20% of people want 80% of the wealth, but the pareto principle is about what actually happens. Trying to apply it to what people desire becomes an exercise in mind reading. It's no longer really much of a testable observation, unlike things that actually follow the principle.
/r/ExRedPill26/05/22 02:51 PM
15

How does anyone realistically believe that 4 out of 5 women are only interested in the same 1 out of 5 men? Relationships arent some sort of resource to be owned. Most people are in 1 at a time, unlike things like economics where 20% of people holding 80% of the resources actually makes sense as a concept.
/r/ExRedPill26/05/22 02:38 PM
2

Kinda weird to reply to two sentences with a dissertation and then claim you dont want to engage in a conversation, but you do you I guess. FYI, if replies are such a big deal that you have to write disclaimers about it in your posts, theres a "disable inbox replies" option below the post on the desktop version of the site.
/r/ExRedPill24/05/22 02:27 PM
3

I think labeling men as "the provider" is either toxic, or in the sense you're using it, just a pointless label; since the woman is also providing things to the relationship, so both are "the provider", and calling it a man's role is misleading at best. I didnt ask the original question either, I was just responding to your comment about outdated gender roles.
/r/ExRedPill24/05/22 12:58 PM
2

Making women seem like the bad guy because you’re not making enough or insecure about what you’re making … isn’t right either and you can say that his ideas and whatever else you wanna call them will stay around long after he’s gone but you see how karma did him. Maybe…. Just say you can’t provide and protect instead of making it seem like or asking if it is… a toxic thing for a woman want… how about that? And if you don’t know how you can do those things, then maybe you need to take some time t…
/r/ExRedPill24/05/22 12:48 PM
2

But since the beginning of time The Man is supposed to be the Protector and the provider and that hasn’t changed and shouldn’t change in my opinion. Maybe not sole provider, but still the provider. From a scientific perspective, man has not existed since the beginning of time. I'm honestly not sure what about being a man really makes me more capable of providing than women, from a practical perspective.
/r/ExRedPill24/05/22 11:58 AM
26

Fact is, girls and guys care about attractiveness. Practically everyone will acknowledge this. These "pills" seem to try and make this seem more controversial to make them seem like unique truths.
/r/ExRedPill04/05/22 12:42 PM
2

I dont really agree with the choice of "deserve" there. That said, in the context it was used it seems more like "men arent entitled to sex". But yeah, I think talking about love and sex in terms of what is "deserved" is not a good way to look at it. No one really deserves or doesnt deserve sex, because sex isnt some reward you are given.
/r/ExRedPill04/05/22 10:17 AM
5

Women don't owe you sex or love, you don't deserve it." This comments are definitely helpful. Where do you see these comments? I dont see anyone here saying "you dont deserve sex or love" and I dont think many would agree with that. If you think people here are trying to push others into the blackpill, I'm just baffled. I see the opposite. Just go read some threads by that Pomeranian guy, it's full of people trying to dispute his blackpill-ish beliefs.
/r/ExRedPill02/05/22 08:59 PM
3

Or you're just seeing yourself from a really negative angle. What kinds of things do you do for your own entertainment? Also, on another set of comments you mention: and I don't pursue in general. Have you ever put yourself out there or anything? I threw away good chances around your age by assuming people wouldnt be interested and never really took a chance. It was only years later in retrospect that I realized I people might have been interested but I couldn't accept it, so I never took any ch…
/r/ExRedPill01/05/22 05:12 PM
8

I understand that I'm boring, instead of changing myself to attract women lol. Wish I could move somewhere different, a place where women aren't attracted to music stars and having to be "Funny", or "Interesting". Where do people not what their partners to be "interesting"? I cant imagine being with someone who I dont find personally interesting and/or doesnt find me interesting. What would you even do? Talk about things that bore each other and somehow have that improve your life?
/r/ExRedPill01/05/22 04:54 PM
12

I feel like as soon as you let others tell you how you're supposed to be a man or woman, you're already going down the wrong path, no matter the genders.
/r/ExRedPill28/04/22 03:32 PM
2

I find it odd how this ungendered general advice is being twisted into "man up" or treated as if it only applies to men. The person you replied to didnt suggest that guys had to "man up". Things coming easier to others is human experience that everyone will experience at some point. I dont think that's a bad thing to keep in mind.
/r/ExRedPill28/04/22 12:57 PM
15

And apologies, 5 seconds, not 3. It is and legally can be constituted by law, as sexual harassment. ... why link something and then claim it says the opposite? Okay, so how long can you stare at a co-worker without being creepy and without crossing into the realm of sexual harassment? Our experienced sexual harassment attorney in Los Angeles says there is no law regulating how many seconds a worker should stare at his or her co-worker for it to constitute sexual harassment. More often than not, …
/r/ExRedPill27/04/22 10:53 AM
17

You can and will get fired if someone looks at you for more than 5 seconds. How does one become so disconnected from reality that they believe this? If you constantly stare at someone for over 5 seconds after they have asked you not to do it, then maybe there will be consequences. But that's not because you stared for 5 seconds, it's because you kept doing something when others asked you to stop.
/r/ExRedPill27/04/22 10:20 AM
1

You're missing something. Brains take in information and process it, and that activity (like many other bodily reactions) will have an impact on how the cells react. Different external stimuli are going to cause the cells to behave differently and use different bits of genetic information depending on what is happening.
/r/ExRedPill24/04/22 07:16 PM
1

No, our brains determine that, and brains are influenced by a lot more than just genes.
/r/ExRedPill24/04/22 06:15 PM
3

Genetics are everything? They literally control our thoughts and how we think in general. Uh no... the brain isnt just some strand of your DNA you run your thoughts through. Its dynamic. It reacts to the patterns it experiences, which includes your thoughts and senses. It is influenced by way more than just your genes. This might blow your mind, but women's brains also work that way, so their attraction is also way more complicated than just "genetics say women like this".
/r/ExRedPill24/04/22 04:29 PM
5

So much is out of our own control, genetics control looks and personality. You must have a really loose definition of "control". Genetics are just one aspect of who you are. We are also shaped by other things, like our experiences and thoughts. Both of those can be changed and will also have a lot of "control" over your personality and how you present yourself.
/r/ExRedPill24/04/22 04:13 PM
1

For me, it's a bit convoluted, but I'm attracted to confidence in the sense that being able to comfortably talk to a woman makes me much more attracted to her, and I feel a lot more social when talking to confident and outgoing people. I'm not exactly sure why that is, but it's definitely a pattern I've noticed.
/r/ExRedPill14/04/22 08:34 PM
8

What exactly is the "excuse" in what they said? Love is about two people together. What does "every thought action and words said is for someone else" even look like? How would that even change anything that they said? Living your life for someone else doesnt magically make them 100% committed to you no matter what.
/r/ExRedPill10/04/22 05:27 PM
1

Comparing dating to capitalism really doesnt make that much sense. You can look at "supply and demand", but that only can explain some very basic concepts, like that the more attractive people (in a general sense) will have more people willing to date them. After that, capitalism is a shitty comparison, and you cant expect to explain romance as a real market. It falls apart when you realize things like interest and accumulated wealth dont apply. In relationships, stability has it's own value, wh…
/r/ExRedPill14/03/22 01:39 PM
5

What is good about her discovering the red pill?
/r/ExRedPill28/02/22 02:39 PM
1

Why do you get so worked up over people having a different sense of style than you? I'm not a fan of piercings or tattoos either, but like why talk shit about people who are?
/r/ExRedPill01/02/22 07:29 PM
3

This is just the other side of "women only date abusive jerks!" Niceguy BS. A lot of the time, manipulative and abusive people dont show that behaviour right away, and it slowly becomes worse over time so that it is harder to notice. Some of the worst abuse is the abuse that the victims cannot eve recognize from the inside. People can be deceptive. Hell, bad partners might even have the best intentions most of the time, and still do things that harm you or the relationship.
/r/ExRedPill01/02/22 07:26 PM
2

Then why say "give their body" instead of "have sex with"? What wouldnt have been nice about that?
/r/ExRedPill25/01/22 08:12 PM
2

They like nice guys because nice guys do stuff for them but who they often time give their body are usually the opposite of that and it shows in majority of their actions Most women arent "giving their body" they are having sex with men. They are active participants who also want to enjoy it. I'm always super weirded out when people talk about sex like its some possession to be had, instead of a mutual experience.
/r/ExRedPill25/01/22 08:07 PM
9

Right, so it doesnt help either side. You might as well ask why men believe in it, if the only outcomes seem to be miserable men and disadvantaged women.
/r/ExRedPill25/01/22 07:12 PM
17

People believe things that disadvantage them all the time. Hell, I would argue that the redpilled men arent really "benefiting" either. I wouldnt consider being angry, dismissive, and cold to women as an advantage. Sounds miserable TBH.
/r/ExRedPill25/01/22 06:15 PM
20

Redpill is a set of beliefs about women and dating. Why couldn't a woman have those beliefs?
/r/ExRedPill25/01/22 05:08 PM
32

I thought this was for ex redpill men so what do yall as a women have to gain from being here? What are y’all trying to learn exactly or see? For former redpillers and others who recognize the damage caused by redpill. If you are brigading from another subreddit you will be banned. From the sub description. Women can technically be redpilled, and you dont need to have been to recognize the damage it causes.
/r/ExRedPill25/01/22 04:52 PM
8

Abortion doesn't bother me. I'm pro-choice. It would bother me if my mom aborted me or had other abortions. Did you mean "wouldn't"?
/r/ExRedPill25/01/22 11:10 AM
3

It's not super clear, because it doesnt totally follow. Women enjoying sex doesnt mean they would have sex with anyone, so the fact that some people are paid for sex does not mean that other women dont enjoy it from non-paying partners. Also, it seems like you've changed it to "women enjoy sex as much as men", which is not what I am arguing, and would be hard to accurately determine. Women being less willing to have sex makes sense because of the risks, but that in no way means it isnt enjoyable…
/r/ExRedPill19/01/22 08:24 PM
6

But a majority of women having sex arent doing it under prostitution... What about women who go to clubs and have one night stands? They arent getting paid. Why would they do it if it carried all that risk and they didnt enjoy it? By your logic, men dont enjoy sex either because some male prostitutes exist.
/r/ExRedPill19/01/22 07:22 PM
5

Okay, but given that you've never experienced sex as a woman, women do seek sex, and you havent offered an alternative to women doing it for enjoyment, it's not clear how evidence based your stance is. If anything, I would think women going through all that for sex suggests they do enjoy it. It's not like enjoyment is synonymous with having an orgasm, it can still be pleasurable. Also, isnt the "most women dont orgasm" thing in relation to PIV sex? I dont think I've seen stats on how often women…
/r/ExRedPill19/01/22 06:21 PM
5

Did you misread their comment? They said: Why do people do this weird thing where they assume women only have sex for reasons outside of personal enjoyment? You assume women only have sex for reasons outside personal enjoyment? I dont see how listing concerns for women supports your point. With all the risks, it suggests to me that it is very likely enjoyable if women risk their safety for it.
/r/ExRedPill19/01/22 05:12 PM
2

If that’s your prerogative, so be it. In most men, it’s in their DNA to be leaders. Everyone is a leader. So wait, is it something to do with men that makes them leaders, or something to do with DNA everyone has? You seem to bounce between it being a male thing and it being a human thing. And if everyone is a leader, what does that even mean?
/r/ExRedPill19/01/22 03:43 PM
10

First off, it's probably worth mentioning that women are generally still having sex with people they want to have sex with, the same as most men. Now, I'll even work with the assumption that all women have an easier time finding a willing partner they want to have sex with. So let's think about where that leaves us. You say since women have an easier time finding an acceptable sexual partner, and if they have sex with a bunch of people, it is morally wrong. But you need to ask yourself, do you u…
/r/ExRedPill19/01/22 11:48 AM
9

Are the people you're challenging experienced in boxing, or show any signs that they are interested in fighting? Like, I agree saying shitty things online sucks. But it sounds like you're challenging people to fights in contexts where it isnt really related. Just based on what you've said here, it's not even really "cowardly" to avoid fighting you; it's totally rational, because they have no good reason to fight you. Beating someone up doesnt prove that their opinion is flawed, it just shows who…
/r/ExRedPill12/01/22 02:13 PM
1

As far as I'm aware this isnt a super common thing that you should expect in a relationship by default...
/r/ExRedPill10/01/22 01:35 PM
3

Two we all have the same genes just some are turned on and off at the start and based on what experiences and conditioning we went through. This is the study of epigenetics and genealogy. Thus you can say we possess the ability to have and most likely do have a feminine and masculine side. But if you add fact one to this it then becomes we have to cores of energy. Just because genes can be (de)activated based on our environments, that doesnt mean "you can say we possess the ability to have and m…
/r/ExRedPill07/01/22 11:13 AM
5

The hell is an "energy core"?
/r/ExRedPill06/01/22 09:07 PM
6

I think its worth pointing out that her bachelors is in Bible Studies and her masters is in Christian Studies. Not to say she is uneducated or anything, but it is definitely worth noting that neither of her degrees relate to studying behaviour. Also the article may have religious bias.
/r/ExRedPill04/01/22 02:50 PM
3

If it makes you feel any better, "Most guys would do almost anything to get laid." doesnt apply to most guys I've met. Worth noting that OPs profile calls himself a dating coach. Hes in a position where hes a lot more likely to meet guys who are willing to "do almost anything" to get laid. He sees the guys literally willing to pay money for dating advice from questionable sources.
/r/ExRedPill01/01/22 03:07 PM
1

Women I've gotten to know definitely seem to look for different things in men, looks included. I'm pretty sure I've even shot myself in the foot before by thinking women wouldn't find me attractive in general.
/r/ExRedPill30/12/21 03:36 PM
1

Not sure how that really relates to what I said. Just pointing out that "blonde = hotter" for men is not universal. I'm quite sure women work the same way.
/r/ExRedPill30/12/21 02:33 PM
1

It's important to realize that like those other features you say women like, not every man prefers blondes either. Blonde on a woman takes away from the attractiveness to me. Dark hair makes me way more likely to be attracted to them.
/r/ExRedPill30/12/21 01:40 PM
19

The "gave" thing really stuck out to me too, I'm glad it was called out. Even in the comments OP mentions one guy slept with a lot of women while the rest of them "got nothing".
/r/ExRedPill23/12/21 02:16 PM
3

And how are you so sure of this? I'm still quite curious about the questions I had above. What are examples of helpful "copes" that these pills teach you, and what are the "fake words that mean nothing"?
/r/ExRedPill21/12/21 09:23 PM
2

How do you "know your limits" of your social and romantic lives though? People are complicated, and to conclude that you would never have a chance with anyone romantically suggests incredible predictive power (that people dont really possess). Life is complicated and unfair, and as a result, coming up with rigid systems like blackpill basically neglects all of that for the sake of a negative outlook on the future.
/r/ExRedPill21/12/21 04:43 PM
13

What are examples of helpful "copes" that these pills teach you, and what are the "fake words that mean nothing"? It doesn't take any "pilling" to know that this: I'm ugly, low self-esteem and confidence, have no education, status, personality, etc. Is going to give you trouble dating. You dont need to be pilled to recognize those as issues and work on fixing them. As far as I understand the blackpill, it is a super unhealthy "cope" for that, because it seems to basically say "give up, you wont …
/r/ExRedPill21/12/21 01:45 PM
1

I'm a bit confused by these examples, those are all times where women have done the rejecting.
/r/ExRedPill11/12/21 01:46 AM
5

Are you looking for someone who doesn't exhibit any "irrational" behaviour, or is it only after several signs of irrationality that you decide it wont work? Because it's one thing to want a partner you consider rational, that seems like common sense. It's another thing to expect someone to be completely rational about everything. People arent perfect logic machines, and I would even say its irrational to expect people to have no irrational thoughts.
/r/ExRedPill10/12/21 07:21 PM
2

If the options are to be like I am now, or to be like how you come across, I will gladly stay the same.
/r/ExRedPill08/12/21 04:01 PM
2

Again, I think you're projecting. I've never really heard that we operate that way on a subconscious level, or seen anything that supports that.
/r/ExRedPill08/12/21 04:00 PM
5

If you think every guy is walking around constantly having fears about survival and sex, you really need to reevaluate how much you project your own feelings onto others. Those are fleeting thoughts for a lot of people.
/r/ExRedPill08/12/21 01:56 PM
5

You are not a red pill Why even bother to point this out? The subreddit is exredpill. Of course a lot of people here arent going to be redpill...
/r/ExRedPill08/12/21 01:22 PM
2

A story on reddit about someone having coke sniffed out of them doesnt mean it is at all common (or even real), you get that, right? It seems very strange to assume every woman has done absolutely crazy stuff like that. As far as the beta zone goes, it only "exists" because you believe in it and keep yourself there in your head.
/r/ExRedPill07/12/21 11:38 AM
2

It's not gaslighting to read that post from OP and realize it's extremely unrealistic. For one thing, it seems to assume all women are out partying and having wild sex when they are young. You shouldnt have to get to know that many people before it's obvious how exaggerated that is.
/r/ExRedPill07/12/21 11:35 AM
2

Would monolith have been better? Because some semantics aside, hivemind is a pretty relevant term to how they are talking about men and women as if they all decide things the same way depending on gender.
/r/ExRedPill06/12/21 08:24 PM
8

Women do not mate with men that look worse than them and also tend to be lower in social status. How is this a red pill thing?? It's a "red pill thing" because it's not actually a fact, it's just stated as a fact in red pill spaces, and in your comments. Women arent a hivemind, men arent a hivemind. Plenty of women date below their "status" because they dont give a shit about it.
/r/ExRedPill06/12/21 06:58 PM
18

Jesus Christ dude, this incel shit has polluted your mind. Your aunt obviously isnt the arbiter of how all women think. "Beta male" is based on bad science and just used by Redpill and incel groups to keep you feeling like shit and trapped in the group, convincing you that even if you succeed you still actually belong in their crab bucket. All these generalizations about how women all date by 18 and want cute guys isnt actually factual, it's just incel rhetoric meant to keep you feeling like shi…
/r/ExRedPill06/12/21 03:30 PM
2

Not totally sure what you're trying to say here. But comparing getting a relationship to winning the lottery completely neglects the factors that make dating more than stats about men and women on average. Theres no social aspect to winning the lottery. Either your numbers were picked, or not. But for dating, the winning numbers change person to person, and you can keep using your numbers on different draws. It's also not like people in relationships is some rare event. Ugly people do date, but …
/r/ExRedPill03/12/21 02:59 PM
2

I think that trying to generalize women's or men's experiences like that isnt really productive or overly relevant.
/r/ExRedPill03/12/21 02:45 PM
2

I think that trying to generalize women's or men's experiences like that isnt really productive or overly relevant. I doubt you're trying to date a generalization of women, you're probably trying to date an individual woman; so approaching it with generalizations isnt actually too helpful when it comes to connecting with individuals. And how do you determine what counts as an "option" in the first place? Does someone you cant stand being around who is desperate for anyone regardless of compatibi…
/r/ExRedPill03/12/21 02:35 PM
3

I see one of your posts was on IncelExit. Usually generalizations dont go over well there (like "women care more about looks than men", or "women have it easier dating"). Thinking of people as individuals instead of generalizing genders is a good way to actually align yourself with reality.
/r/ExRedPill03/12/21 02:00 PM
1

Do you have any suggestions of personal actions one can take to oppose the dating system? Nothing overly practical, since that kinda depends on how you see the system and what you think the flaws are. It basically comes down to "be the change you want to see in the world". If you think the system is wrong, dont play by its rules (as much as you can, within reason). But obviously we dont always have the opportunity to be the change we want to see, nor do those efforts always lead to anything; but…
/r/ExRedPill02/12/21 08:22 PM
3

Well that's just it. You can accept that the system sucks, and recognize it's probably well beyond your ability to fix on your own. So then you basically have to choose between focusing on that aspect of the system and the anger that comes with it, or doing your best to accept it and move on. And doing the latter doesnt really prevent you from taking personal actions that oppose the system on a personal level; which is arguably a viable way to help cause change if enough people do the same.
/r/ExRedPill02/12/21 05:57 PM
6

why would I accept a broken system? Cause life is full of broken systems, some benefit us, some hurt us. Your options are basically accept it for what it is and do what you can to deal with the consequences, dont accept it and try to change it, or dont accept it and just wallow in anger. The second one is a noble goal if you think the system is broken, but it also ranges anywhere from difficult to impossible to actually fix (and the difficulty you have will also be influenced by those same unfai…
/r/ExRedPill02/12/21 02:57 PM
6

What is the point of talking to anyone? It can be entertaining, you can learn things or share things you've learned. People generally just enjoy social interaction, and women are capable of that too. It seems like you're basically saying "why talk to them if I cant date them?", but do you hold everyone to that standard, or just women? Cause that might be the reason you see them like animals, because in your head you've already "othered" them.
/r/ExRedPill30/11/21 02:27 PM
5

It's like the only things you know about women come from reading things online instead of actually talking to real women. I never really talk about those things, and we still have conversations all the time.
/r/ExRedPill30/11/21 02:19 PM
6

Haha okay. Well good luck being bitter and hating women. I'll just keep enjoying my conversations with "de-evolved" women who have a lot more reasonable shit to talk about than you.
/r/ExRedPill30/11/21 02:08 PM
5

Lmao dude I think you're in the wrong sub. Like how shit are your social awareness skills that you think women are so different that they need to be leashed?
/r/ExRedPill30/11/21 01:59 PM
3

It means that I like her more than she likes me. Her attraction to me is based on her bad experiences with the men she was organically attracted to. I would not be her first choice, but she would be mine. Dude, this is a fucking awful way to look at it. Also, can you really claim that what you find attractive hasn't changed at all as you've grown up and experienced more things? Are the things you liked as a kid the only things you actually like, since they were "natural"? Like maybe I just live …
/r/ExRedPill26/11/21 06:22 PM
3

How is interests changing due to past experience a bad thing? Do you not want a partner who is capable of self-reflection, change, and improvement? Past experiences influence how we see things. It is very possible to not be interested in something anymore after bad experiences. And does anyone even read 50 Shades anymore? I'm 29 and I feel like the book/movie was aimed at women well outside of my age group at the time. You're 5 years younger, so I feel like it would be even less relevant. Also, …
/r/ExRedPill26/11/21 05:18 PM
7

Even the people saying 'they only like bad boys when they're young ' isn't really being fully truthful - some women don't ever like bad boys! Or, and here's another wild idea to throw into the mix, because it's really not clear cut - any given woman (because, it will vary from individual to individual) can really, genuinely, like more than one type of person. Also, OP seems to have the assumption that "they only like bad boys when they're young" actually means "they are still attracted to bad bo…
/r/ExRedPill26/11/21 03:46 PM
4

You could be someone else's cup of tea, but if the likelihood is low - where do you derive confidence from? If I have poor grades and I apply to all of the top tier law schools, should I be confident in acceptance? 5 rejections doesn't mean the other 5 won't reject me necessarily, but it's a pretty good indication. This basically ignores half of what the other person was saying though. Getting dates isnt like getting into a school, because every woman isnt going to be looking at the same "grades…
/r/ExRedPill26/11/21 11:28 AM
14

I'm pretty sure a college campus is not an accurate representation of men in general. The demographic skews younger, and it's also a time where people will feel it's more acceptable to have casual sex. It's like doing that at a nightclub, where people might be more primed to go home with strangers. But also, the reporting in that article gets what I consider strange results. See this: Twenty years later, Hald and Høgh-Olesen (2010) largely replicated these findings in Denmark, with 59 percent of…
/r/ExRedPill22/11/21 03:44 PM
13

I really dislike the advice "Women are humans", of course they are but they are different humans. Men are humans too yet if I asked a random gay guy to have sex with me he would most likely agree, the same applies to straight men with women, it's women who have a problem with this, aren't women humans too? I'm a straight man, and I'm pretty sure I wouldn't agree to have sex with a random woman who asked me either. I would need to spend some time knowing them first. I'm really not sure where thes…
/r/ExRedPill22/11/21 03:25 PM
9

...what does social justice mean here? No one suggested doing this for the sake of "social justice" by any regular meaning of the phrase.
/r/ExRedPill16/11/21 05:10 PM
3

You are literally taking "examples" from people whose situations you seem to know nothing about. You're literally just assuming the situations so that they fit with your red pill beliefs. They arent red pill examples to be reconciled, you are just looking at a few small aspects of peoples lives and then coming up with red pill stories about what caused it.
/r/ExRedPill13/11/21 01:57 PM
4

Most "modern" men I know seem pretty well aware that real life isnt porn. Like I do get that porn negatively impacts some men's perceptions, but I think you're approaching men like way too much of a monolith. I dont think a post about how "social media has ruined modern women" would go well either; because that has the same issue. These things have really varied effects depending on the person and the context around how they use it. Negativity generalizing an entire gender just wedges the gap fu…
/r/ExRedPill12/11/21 06:08 PM
10

I would assume you want him to continue being masculine, successful in his career, earning more money than you, etc? Why would you assume that? Women aren't a monolith (neither are men).
/r/ExRedPill03/11/21 07:02 PM
2

...why would we be lying to people? Dating happens in high school, but not everyone has dates in high school.
/r/ExRedPill01/11/21 11:56 PM
6

Something I learned when listening to Jordan Belfort is, never listen to what a successful self-help guru actually says. So did you ignore what he said, or believe it? I'm kidding obviously, since its not necessarily bad advice, that sentence just reads like a bit of a paradox.
/r/ExRedPill09/08/21 11:47 AM
1

I feel like these polls have terrible options. Your only "yes" option also shoe horns in "but that's just showbiz baby", kinda making it seem that anyone choosing the option that agrees is kinda dismissive still.
/r/ExRedPill07/08/21 01:54 AM
4

If I stumbled onto a website like that I wouldn't give it much attention at all, let alone try their manipulation tactics. So I guess acquiring a persons mental health history isnt important for that, because I wouldn't use those techniques on them anyways... But the poll doesnt really have an option for that.
/r/ExRedPill05/08/21 06:47 PM
3

By their very design they cant actually check if these "Chads" are getting actually any action, yet they take it as proof they can. It's so strange.
/r/ExRedPill02/08/21 02:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter