TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JRoberts18 Archive

View 0 posts and 24 comments by JRoberts18 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I kind of understand it and do agree that it exists but not as something only women experience. Everyone encounters times when they want to leave a conversation with someone but don't know how because the other person just keeps talking. It happens to everyone and definitely isn't misogyny like feminists would like to make out.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 01:14 PM
14

To add to this women do have high pay, high prestige fields they dominate like clinical psychology, dentistry, a few healthcare fields including pharmacy, public relations, authors, veterinarians. There are loads and I found all of them in 5 minutes on Google, it simply serves their ideology to maintain this idea of women being oppressed in the workplace. The pay gap exists in statistics but it is all due to different choices made by men and women. In addition, there is a gender pay gap in the o…
/r/MensRights08/08/22 02:17 PM
1

I know but at least there's some progress, don't knock it.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 05:53 PM
2

I saw one the other day in a toilet in the UK where it was telling men that in a gender neutral way that even if you were flirting it wasn't consent. As in if you are a man or woman if you are flirting you haven't given consent. Made me quite happy to see that especially since it also provided a hotline for help as well.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:49 PM
2

But it was also primarily poor men who were forced into manual slave labour and who died in factories, mines and war. Women weren't expected to do any of that. Feminism has redefined history into a sex war where there was not one, everyone equally suffered regardless of sex. Saying women didn't have access to schools is false, the aristocracy were primarily tutored and girls often were, there were many queen's in Europe. People have suffered regardless of sex for religious reasons and for beauty…
/r/MensRights07/07/22 05:58 PM
4

There's no need to be rude, it's possible to have a debate and disagreement without insults. Also the world isn't just America. If you want to talk about men's rights and women's rights you have to look at the whole world. And on the whole across the world the trend is not women Vs men or even black Vs white it is rich Vs poor
/r/MensRights07/07/22 05:36 PM
14

In the UK, only a tiny percentage of men were allowed to vote until women were granted the vote. Historically it has not been men oppressing women it has been the rich and powerful oppressing those with less wealth and power. Women definitely weren't granted many rights but pretending only women didn't have those rights is ludicrous, the truth is that most people had no rights at all until the last couple 100 years.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 04:41 PM
2

Not an MP, it's in the house of lords. I think I saw a post on this sub like a day or two ago with their names on though
/r/MensRights10/06/22 12:54 PM
2

I once got marked down on a presentation I had to give that decided an official end of school grade (GCSE in the UK), I am pretty certain it was due to my topic choice of 'the crisis of masculinity' and my female teacher marking it was extremely feminist. I know I was marked down because the grade she gave me and the one I got after the exam board checked grades were not the same, I was given a higher grade by the unbiased ex board but my feminist teacher marked me down. The only thing I can thi…
/r/MensRights04/06/22 05:42 PM
50

It's insane, she assaulted him and then the fucked up people of Reddit gaslit him into thinking it was his fault because he's a man.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 05:30 PM
6

What??? We have all seen the pictures of Johnny's finger with the end missing and the phone calls of her gaslighting him, the evidence is clear that she is far worse.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 04:36 PM
1

Patriarchy is simply a word which ensures that feminists are right 100% of the time no matter the evidence brought against them. Men benefitting = patriarchy, men suffering = patriarchy. It is a completely empty term that essentially makes feminism completely unfalsifiable.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 07:56 AM
2

Full is definitely wrong, I can only speak about the Bible but there are only a few passages which are very discriminatory whilst most of the Bible is very equalitarian. Some of the most important people in the Bible are female, like the Virgin Mary. Religious books are not the 'most sexist' they are only presented that way to discredit religious belief which is very equalitarian but has historically been used by people to justify their discrimination.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 07:37 AM
4

Yeah, this is why no one should use hormonal birth control. The best birth control anyway is abstinence on the part of men and women. But you are coming here and telling men they are weak because they don't want those side effects when they have only one other option that can easily be tampered with ( and there are many cases of this). Women have far more choices in terms of birth control, IUD, female condom etc. Your responses to this clearly show that you don't care about or possibly even hate…
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:43 PM
4

People who have a stable relationship but don't want children.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:35 PM
4

If you actually read anything about male birth control you will find all of these side effects and more, with historically much lower efficacy. When in a clinical trial people start killing themselves and not being able to have children ever again you can't then proceed to make that drug commercially available.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:35 PM
3

No they are not always reversible, they are only sometimes reversible. There are significant side effects to female birth control but clinically it was ruled that the efficacy of them was an acceptable trade off but up until now male birth control has had equally as bad side effects (worse in some cases) but much lower efficacy so the harm caused by them was unjustifiable given the lack of efficacy.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:31 PM
8

I've done some research into this Davidson, N. 'Life Without Father: America's Greatest Social Catastrophe'. Policy Review, Winter 1990, pp. 40-45. Popenoe, D. (1997) 'Life Without Father.' Annual Conference of the NCFR Fatherhood and Motherhood in a Diverse and Changing World Sutherland, A. (2014) 'Yes, Father Absence Causes the Problems it is Associated With' The institute for Family Studies, 4th February These are just a few of the studies and articles I found.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 05:30 PM
4

Yeah, there are some people who identify as feminists who are more equalitarian but a lot of those still assume the existence of stuff like patriarchy which is based on largely anti-male sentiments which don't align with reality
/r/MensRights01/03/22 05:33 PM
3

Just find someone who cares, I know plenty of women who care aboit men's rights and abuse suffered by men, and I also know men who have made disgusting comments about teenagers enjoying and wanting to be raped. So it doesn't really matter what gender the person is as long as they care and will listen and help impartially and without bias.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 05:20 PM
9

Slavery isn't white against black, all people throughout history have enslaved other people. The Egyptians owned slaves, the great wall of China was built using slave labour. Secondly, the only reason you're finding the analogy racist is because you are looking for racism, so that you can argue against them by just calling them racist this isn't having a debate this is just sad.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 10:23 AM
20

The victim isn't irrelevant when the claim being assessed is that women are being killed more often than men. Because this is the claim being assessed the only reason to bring up the gender of the perpetrator is to detract from the fact that more victims are male.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 11:42 PM
46

Female is in most countries but there might be sone where it isn't. But male genital mutilation without consent and almost always without any sort of anaesthetic, which if done to any other body part would be abuse, isn't illegal.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 11:29 PM
15

Your right but that's not the point, the perpetrator's gender is completely irrelevant.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 11:24 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter