TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JSutt771 Archive

View 0 posts and 49 comments by JSutt771 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

There are so many factors that go into that kind of scenario that it's quite impossible to get a true unbiased study completed. People here are going to downvote me and read into what I said, but the message is that you're young, you haven't been able to gain the experience for yourself necessary to make a generalized assessment like this, and what you're experiencing is the exception. Not the rule. There's another comment here telling you your only options are the trades or military. C'mon...us…
/r/MensRights12/08/22 02:45 PM
-6

You're barely old enough to be in the workforce, had two jobs your entire life, and you saw one grocery store where only two guys are employed and the rest are girls. Sorry kid, you have no basis to make grand sweeping decisions about how things are. Men are no only used to do the heavy lifting or look scary. Some of the scariest security guards (real security guards, not minimum wage grocery store cops) I've met are women. There are a lot of men in a lot of jobs that aren't manual labor. I get …
/r/MensRights12/08/22 02:08 PM
2

The irony of this is absolutely golden. You can't make this shit up...
/r/MensRights12/08/22 01:06 PM
2

"Why does he not care that his dick is small?" Because it works just fine for me. It being small is not a me problem. It's a you problem!
/r/MensRights11/08/22 01:31 PM
3

"There's no reason to hit a woman! No reason. There's just no reason." Oh c'mon! I can give you fifteen right off the top of my head! You could wake be from a drunken stupor and I could give you like, nine! It's not that there's no reason, you just don't do it.
/r/MensRights05/08/22 06:53 PM
5

I mean, if she was open about her intent to see other dudes and you were "open and not controlling" (read: you consented) then it isn't cheating, is it...?
/r/MensRights04/08/22 02:53 PM
2

Iron Man started out as a typical billionaire playboy. He partied, he took advantage of women, and wasn't exactly what you would call a role model. Then he was attacked, kidnapped, and nearly killed. That experience opened his eyes and he began his journey as Iron man. He had his ass kicked in every. Single. Movie. At one point cap says he's not the one to lay on a wire and make the sacrifice play, then in endgame that's exactly what he does. Superman started as an orphan. He never fit in with o…
/r/MensRights04/08/22 11:37 AM
-1

I respectfully disagree. Whether she is cheating or not, if OP feels the need to check her phone, or check on her in any fashion, then the trust is gone and the relationship is over anyway. If OP checks her phone and finds something, then they're right and it's over. If OP checks her phone and doesn't find anything then they are going to assume they didn't find anything "this time" or they just didn't find anything "here".
/r/MensRights03/08/22 02:28 AM
-4

Don't want to be pregnant? Don't have sex! See? Isn't that simple. *Girl gets raped and is pregnant* *Girl gets abused by father/step-father/uncle, etc. and gets pregnant* *Countless women who DO want to be pregnant and DO want to be mothers experience life-threatening complications that WILL kill both mother and child* So...just avoid those scenarios at all costs and women will be fine, right? It's that simple...
/r/MensRights19/07/22 11:08 PM
1

Thank you for the NSFL warning. I'm at work and totally would have googled that! lol I'll check it out when I get home.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:53 PM
2

Right, well. You do you my man. Not gonna go in circles with you like everyone else has already. Best of luck to you.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:49 PM
10

Men can't get pregnant. Trans men can get pregnant. See the difference?
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:14 PM
4

Truthfully, my man, circumcision isn't the end of the world. It's not like they cut the whole damn thing off (they didn't...did they? I hope not...) That's not to say it's right, moral, ok, etc. I'm not advocating for circumcisions here, what I'm saying is it's a molehill, not the mountain you're making it out to be. There are plenty of other things men have to worry about. This is not the hill to die on...
/r/MensRights14/07/22 07:10 PM
19

That's the neat part! They weren't voted in! They bought the position.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 02:13 AM
116

He did say no. Multiple times. Isn't that all it should take? That's what all the women say.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:32 AM
11

Legal reasons, sure. Way back when, my wife and I were not married and neither of us had plans to get married. The subject had been brought up and we both agreed..."why?" Neither of us were religious, neither of us really cared for the whole ceremony thing, it just didn't make sense. Then we both lost our half-way decent jobs at the nearby casino and times got real hard real fast. I eventually made the decision to go back to school on a state grant but that meant I was going to have no insurance…
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:48 PM
2

You're missing the point. The argument made to me, for guys being on the hook even if they don't want the child, is that they're just as invested. When the tables are turned, however, suddenly it's not a fifty fifty deal amymore.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 06:47 PM
12

I had a conversation, with a woman, about this not too long ago. What if the woman is pregnant, the guy wants to abort, and the woman says no? my body, my choice. Ok. So why does the man have to be on the hook for child support and the like, then? It takes two to make a baby. He was there too. He's half responsible for the baby! Ok. Now switch it around. The woman is pregnant, she wants an abortion, but the guy wants his kid. my body, my choice. But...didn't you just say the guy was half respons…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 01:29 PM
4

It only applies to Reddit in that you can say what you like on Reddit and the gov't can't come and arrest you because you said something bad about the gov't. It has absolutely no application to being banned from a sub. Even if it's a political discussion. As long as it's not the gov't banning you, you have no 1st amendment rights here.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 04:12 PM
8

C'mon man...First Amendment only protects you from the gov't if you trash talk them. It doesn't apply to Reddit.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 02:15 PM
-134

Or we can read the article and understand the rule was put into place because of the respirators they had to wear, and a beard prevents a proper seal
/r/MensRights06/07/22 12:43 PM
3

You can tell who in this thread read the article and who is reacting to the title.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 12:34 PM
52

Men's rights not getting the attention you think it deserves is not a reason to take someone else's rights away. That's ass backwards. You're 100% correct that involuntary circumcisions shouldn't be a thing. You're 100% correct that men get shafted in divorce court. However, those are not reasons to deny someone else the rights they should have. Trying to take someone else's rights away just makes them want to take yours away. They aren't listening to you which makes you not want to listen to th…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 05:46 PM
2

It'll be his very BIG problem when the husband finds out...
/r/MensRights30/06/22 11:32 AM
2

What We the People in the want in the bible belt also differs from what We the People want in the bible belt. There are societal differences within the states just as there are between states and regions. That's the whole point of pro-choice. Every person has to decide what's right for them and their particular situation. Roe v wade being overturned isn't about illegal abortions, it's about if the right to bodily autonomy is protected by the constitution. If that's a "no" then it becomes a slipp…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:57 AM
5

After seeing this, I'm so glad my son wants to pursue online college. He's not going to have to deal with this...whatever it is.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:34 PM
37

I say this about a lot of protests and riots that take place. "What do you expect to accomplish by going on a sex strike and denying your husband sex? Did your husband assist in overturning RvW? Was he instrumental in its reversal? If not, then why is he being punished?" Kind of like when George Floyd was murdered. People in Washington started stealing tvs from Walmart. What did Walmart do to facilitate George being murdered and how does stealing that TV help him or his family? Oh...it doesn't. …
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:32 AM
5

I feel that it should be a choice. The debates that ensue inevitably devolve into one side trying to get the other side to justify every. single. possible. scenario that ever has, does, or could exist and that's just not feasible. The solution, imho, is the right to choose. It's the individuals' responsibility to assess their own specific set of circumstances and make a choice based on those circumstances. A single sweeping law saying "No" is not going to properly cover every situation and it's …
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:23 PM
7

If you really believe women will pay a dime of child support, you haven't been paying attention
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:53 PM
1

First off: Don't mind the folks here who are disregarding your efforts because this is a men's forum. There are two sides to every story and you can't get to the bottom of a problem without one side opening a dialogue with the other and you're never going to gain new perspective on a situation until you look at it from a different angle. Now, your question. Attractive women get a ton of guys asking them out while unattractive (conventionally) women get overlooked... Um....well, YEA! That's kind …
/r/MensRights23/06/22 07:29 PM
15

Because perception is reality. If anyone in power perceives you have any little bit of non-inclusiveness then you're automatically a bigot to be shunned.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 11:39 PM
7

Walk into any business or company that has concern for its image and make the statement that women are not as physically capable as men and you'll find out real quick how easy it is to have your career ruined.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 11:36 PM
2

Record as much as possible when you're around her. Legal or not. It's only "illegal" to record someone where they have reasonable expectations of privacy. If it's "not legal" to record her at work that just means the recording isn't submissive as evidence in a court of law. Your boss's office is not a court of law.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 12:40 PM
892

Yep. I was called in for being flirtatious at work. I told them they can't write me up for that, they need to clearly define the behavior I'm in trouble for. Being "flirtatious" is too ambiguous. Turns out it's because I smiled and said good morning to people as I passed them on the way in to work. So I stopped. No more smiles, no more greetings. A month later I was called in for creating a hostile work environment. We can't win this game, so I don't even play anymore.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 01:45 AM
36

Try telling any man who's been through a divorce that the law is gender neutral.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 02:31 PM
1

Used to work at a catholic hospital. Some people were chill af, others thought you were the spawn of Satan if you weren't religious. So glad I'm out of there.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 01:09 PM
4

A colleague of mine was once written up and terminated from employment because he told a female coworker that her hair looked nice. She didn't report him or take offense, a DIFFERENT woman, who wasn't even part of the conversation, reported him. I was once written up because "it has been said you're very 'flirtatious'." Come to find out, it was because I smiled and said hello to people as I passed them in the hall. Some lady in an office I passed by got offended because she was never addressed (…
/r/MensRights03/06/22 06:29 PM
0

My pleasure. Its also my two cents. As always, don't take Reddit posts as gospel. We aren't lawyers. Best of luck, friend!
/r/MensRights02/06/22 08:22 PM
2

The plea deal is the charges are dismissed and I have to do anger management and good behavior for “a period of time” So, they drop the charges and you go to anger management. Anger management will be easy for you to complete because the whole thing is bogus anyway. Show up. Coast through. Wash your hands of it. The good behavior bit is the same, that's not an issue because you didn't do anything wrong to begin with. It's not like you're in trouble all the time... I didn’t do it and there is no …
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:18 PM
16

“This is basically the end of MeToo,” Dr. Jessica Taylor, a psychologist, forensic psychology Ph.D., and author of two books on misogyny and abuse, tells Rolling Stone. “It’s the death of the whole movement.” If this is all it took to end it, then it wasn't all that great to begin with.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 02:00 PM
8

I went through this at my last job. I was a sysadmin for a company. Had zero real-world experience, had only done desktop support in the past, and got hired in to the sysadmin role. Within a month everyone, including my team lead, had moved on (it wasn't a bad place to work, they all just received better opportunities.) So, I put on my big boy undies and set to work keeping the fires to a minimum. They got me a team lead, although he was non-technical, within two weeks and we kept the ship saili…
/r/MensRights31/05/22 05:23 PM
-1

We know the tactics used by many self proclaimed feminists. If you are an MRA you can’t get laid. You are incel. Let’s shame you. I think it’s time to shame women who talk equality and sit on their duffs expecting to be served by the world. If you're going to resort to the same tactics they're using then you're insane to think you're going to be received differently than they are, while simultaneously proving their point. If you want a different result, you need to try a different solution. On t…
/r/MensRights31/05/22 05:13 PM
1

Yea, but these guys are making outright false claims, actively trying to misconstrue information, arguing with the judge after rulings have been given, etc. One of AH's lawyers were told "what, if any..." is not a cure all." She retorted back, "but it is a cure all". These lawyers are fools. You're right that they have crappy tools to work with, but even so, they're still trying to use the crappy screwdriver as a hammer.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 01:16 AM
46

That's true, but Heard's lawyers are absolute clowns. Even if the roles were reversed and Heard was a victim, they're still garbage lawyers.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 04:48 PM
12

I believe Jocko Willink, a SEAL, even said the best way to come out on top is to avoid the fight altogether. It doesn't matter how big or tough you are, or how well trained you are, or how experienced you are. It only takes one lucky shot and you could be dead.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 06:48 PM
6

It's a fantastic idea. Instead of a GoPro or a voice recorder, you can just use your phone.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 01:40 PM
4

It's a jab at some movie out there about a woman kidnapping and raping men. As I understand it, the movie is supposed to be a comedy of some kind. But if you make a movie about men raping women, there's nothing funny about it and it's a drama.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 12:28 AM
7

If your name and face are being circulated which would damage your credibility and reputation, AND the claims they are making are false, AND the damage to your reputation has cost you damages such as losing a job, not being selected for a job interview, loss of customers, etc., then you may have a case for libel/slander, but you gotta talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 12:24 AM
62

Innocent until proven guilty only applies in criminal court my guy. You're dealing with social justice. The rules don't apply here. The ladies got people on their side and they've made up their minds. Nothing you can do. Now...if they slander or libel you, that's a very different situation.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 12:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter