TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

J_esbian Archive

View 0 posts and 11 comments by J_esbian on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Pardon me, I sort of meant that it doesn't interfere with the ability to partake in sexual activity as female circumcision does, thanks for the correction (:
/r/MensRights14/01/14 10:19 AM
-2

I'm not defending it, I'm just pointing out why the post doesn't 'say it all'
/r/MensRights13/01/14 05:43 AM
-9

It's called that because 'female circumcision' can involve sewing up a womens vaginal opening and only allows urine and menstrual fluids through, controlling her sexual activity. Male circumcision removes skin and does not control the male's sexual activity, and it is also in the bible, unlike Female circumcision.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:47 AM
0

I literally spent 20 minutes writing a response, and then decided it was not worth my time. I feel like I have covered what I wanted to and unlike you, I researched every argument I put forth. I researched the stats and facts that you mentioned and they seemed to be either exaggerated or pulled out of the blue. I have considered your points, unlike you have mine and you have failed to respond with any understanding of what I have been saying. Good day to you.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:20 AM
-1

Oh I forgot that one country can accurately represent a global stance. Consumer spending and voting more-those are interests. If you say women vote more, why do they? Because maybe more women than men want to vote? That has nothing to do with gender equality, whether or not they choose to vote. In response to your comments on shelters, here in Australia, the issue with homeless shelters is not gender equality, but funding. After reading that post on f vs m shelters, I do agree that there is an i…
/r/MensRights12/01/14 08:10 AM
0

Because women started behind, they have to catch up. I completely believe EVERYONE deserves equal opportunity and if you fight for the rights of one group, then why not others? But I also try to keep an open mind.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 02:03 PM
3

I never said they were. And wanting equality for women is gender equality, who are feminists fighting for women to be equal with? Men! It's gender equality- men and women should receive equal treatment, and that's exactly what feminists fight for.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 01:28 PM
-2

Seriously? God I hate the ignorant side of reddit
/r/MensRights11/01/14 01:27 AM
3

No I wasn't trying to insinuate that. At all. Feminism is just a specific line of humanitarianism. Feminism isn't defined as 'using emotion to reach truths' and if that were the case then it wouldn't work. Feminists are rights activists, and the manner of which they go about it cannot be generalised as each individual feminist acts of their own accord. Being a feminist simply means that you believe and act to bring forth gender equality. It just happens that female was the gender that started be…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 01:23 AM
0

It's called feminism because females are the ones that had less rights than men. The focal point was to bring forth equality, by lifting women to equality, not bringing both genders to a meeting point of equality.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 04:30 PM
6

See, these types of posts are great and all, and I don't need feminism either, because I am surrounded by people who believe in equality, but it's not necessarily individual women who need feminism, it's our whole gender. The only issue I have with posts like these is that they place themselves above feminism, as if they are better than that, as if being a feminist is something to be ashamed of. Which completely brings us back to square one.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 04:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter