TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jack92783 Archive

View 7 posts and 115 comments by Jack92783 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

I'm confused- is the problem that he called them beautiful or that he just assumed that they were female? This modern world is confusing.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 05:01 AM
2

The counter-argument is going to be "Well, you're forcing her to undergo the procedure to transfer the fetus to an artificial womb". That being said, it perhaps opens the door for legal revocation of parental status somewhere down the line- that's why I thought it was interesting enough to post about.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 06:51 AM
3

That's what Margot Cleveland at National Review said, in less measured terms: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/450008/artificial-wombs-abortion-ugly-truth-behind-my-body-my-choice "Let that sink in for a moment: Abortion law is “fragile” and “dated” because, while an artificial womb would give a woman “control of her own body,” it could still force her into “parenthood.” Stripped of its niceties, what Brown wants is a constitutional right to a dead baby." They have no use for a world where …
/r/MensRights01/08/17 06:37 AM
1

Imagine how many problems would be solved if all bathrooms were gender neutral. Imagine the bandwidth saved by reddit, among other things. "NO THE EVIL THINGS WITH THE PENISES WILL RAPE ALL THE HUMANS"
/r/MensRights27/06/17 08:56 PM
1

Thanks for the detailed responses, they were very interesting to read. The issue with kids is a delicate one and part of me still wonders if a 12 year old is capable of making that sort of major life decision. Obviously, though, 12 is a far different story than 4 (In the interest of full disclosure, I felt a strong "womb envy" or whatever it's called for a month or so when I was 6 years old, and am glad that nobody took me seriously. Do you know of any studies discussing whether the standard for…
/r/MensRights26/06/17 07:07 PM
2

If you wouldn't mind my asking you a couple questions that I find interesting: Is your preferred gender one of the mainstream two (m/f) or do you fall into the QAAIP* whatever part of the alphabet soup? You mention that you have been clinically diagnosed as dysphoric. Blair White has coined the phrase "transtrender", which seems to address a similar topic. Do you believe that there is such a thing as a "transtrender"? Do you think that there are people who cynically decide to don the attire of a…
/r/MensRights25/06/17 11:46 PM
1

And without even wearing her jockstrap. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cG3K5346Uag
/r/MensRights25/06/17 04:37 PM
1

No, I don't, actually. I wasn't alive when principled adults abolished slavery, after lengthy debate over the issue. Whether schools should even have uniforms is its own topic, that has been fought over time and time again over the course of the last hundred years or so. I do think it's wise to reexamine traditions on a regular basis and decide whether or not they're still relevant. But ultimately, the question needs to be asked whether more damage will be caused by capitulating to these little …
/r/MensRights24/06/17 09:15 PM
1

My initial thoughts on this were mixed. On the one hand, the policy was distinctly unfair. Especially given all the nonsense made by feminists with regard to "oppressive air conditioners being used to keep women uncomfortable given their preferences for warmer temperatures than men" or whatever it was a couple years back. On the other hand... if the school had been following decades or centuries of tradition with their uniform, changing it because a bunch of snot-nosed little middle school shits…
/r/MensRights24/06/17 07:53 PM
1

Good for Castle Face. For turning this thing into a thing, you've given them the necessary public exposure to self-publish and self-promote for the ~50% of Americans that disagree with the opinions of Hollywood and the recorded music industry. Edited: had the name of the label wrong.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 07:13 PM
1

Maybe it's time to sell my A4.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 06:59 AM
2

Consider this: You bring down the "male average salary" for the company/position, and if you were paid more they'd have to pay every female worker more as well to achieve equity, especially since they're the focus of attention having recently defended/settled that lawsuit. Sorry, you're probably SOL.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 01:07 PM
6

I imagine that a couple of them would identify as gay men if that wouldn't lead to their murder.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 11:47 AM
1

That's the definition of a "Gross", ie. a dozen dozens.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 05:21 AM
2

Exactly. Between yeast infections STDs and other medical events, and women of all ages (mostly older), body shapes and levels of hygiene, there's an awful lot of disgusting vaginas, just like there's an awful lot of disgusting examples of every excretory, eliminatory, or secretory body part. If all someone cared about was cheap thrills, there's less expensive (medical school costs ~$80k/year), less risky (malpractice suits, claims of inappropriate behavior), and less stressful (medical school, i…
/r/MensRights23/05/16 10:02 AM
3

Most successful evolutionary strategy for women: Mate with most sexually desirable man available for good genes, receive financial support and parenting from the available man with the most resources available, for good schooling, clothes, etc. Divorce allows for said financial support to be achieved from the resource-holding man while creating progeny with the desirable man. It's a cruel, but effective, strategy.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 03:54 AM
0

The issue is that the leading feminist organizations (like NOW) have long-since thrown all their cards in with the political left, including on all of the issues that affect men and women equally. That doesn't equate to communism, or indeed even socialism, but tends to push the country further in the direction of the latter. In an ideal world, and, indeed, in the past, the ACLU, Anti-Defamation League, and even NOW were willing to criticize either side of the political spectrum in pursuit of the…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 01:46 AM
3

If she wants the same pay as Kevin Spacey, she's free to ask for it, regardless of what character she plays or doesn't play. That's how negotiations work. Robin, you asked for a raise, they said "No", and a reasonable person would choose to continue negotiating, accept their refusal, or decide that other projects offer greener pastures. Negotiationis a process in which you and your employer weigh the merits of employing you, the risk of your actual departure, the cost of your departure, and the …
/r/MensRights20/05/16 01:38 AM
2

I've always been worried about this as a 30 year old white guy when driving my very openly gay 14 year old Asian nephew around. The optics must be terrible from an outsider's perspective.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 02:22 AM
1

You're close, but not quite there. These stories prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that it's generally understood that we don't live in a rape culture, and that it's generally understood that being seen as a victim is advantageous. The troubling thing is that there are plenty of stories that these girls could tell with the same general effect that wouldn't ruin someone else's life irreparably, even if they were dead-set on lying about it. "I had an abortion and I was so upset about it that I coul…
/r/MensRights02/05/16 02:19 AM
1

Please tell me the point that you thought I was making, so I know how to respond. All I was saying is that the data can be construed multiple ways. For example: "In 1999, out of 200,000 people, there were 21.8 suicides, of which 81.6% were male. In 2014, out of 200,000 people, there were 26.6 suicides, of which 78.2% were male. Thus, there was greater gender parity in 2014 suicides than there was in those from 1999". Alternately, and much more likely to be used on nightly news programs, "The cha…
/r/MensRights01/05/16 10:25 PM
1

We have taxes because we have public spending, to be used on public goods and services, ie. things that there is no way for people to purchase for themselves. The textbook example is national defense. There's no way for a private citizen to fund national defense on their own behalf, nor is there a way for the citizen who wants less of it to only have F-15's defending the airspace over their property rather than F-22's to have that happen. Something that anyone can buy for herself for $15/mo is n…
/r/MensRights30/04/16 05:19 PM
4

Under the assumption that you're being honest here, I'll give the answer as it pertains to North Carolina in particular. North Carolina defines the gender as "biological gender", but then clarifies that as being the gender found on someone's birth certificate. In Florida, that requires hormonal therapy to have taken place, but not necessarily surgery. In other places, that requires surgery to have taken place. In yet more places, it is absolutely impossible to modify the birth certificate, but o…
/r/MensRights30/04/16 04:36 PM
3

You know, that argument would make a whole lot more sense if we were living in, say, Iran, where men and women were never in enclosed spaces with one another without at least one male chaperone. Men and women are together in elevators, train cars, alleyways, etc. Ample opportunity for a predator of either gender to grab someone of their preferred gender with ill intentions. So, really, the "predation" argument is extremely weak. The "Privacy" argument is equally weak. Your privacy is the same re…
/r/MensRights30/04/16 03:06 PM
-1

How did I leave that out at all? I put the numbers cited in the article right in my post, and specifically cited the gender disparity in suicide-rate as being indicative of a problem.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 12:44 PM
-4

The statistics in the article seem to suggest that male suicide rates have increased by 17% over their previous number, while female suicide rates have increased by 45% over their previous number. 5.8/4.0 = 1.45 20.8/17.8 = 1.169 The gender gap in suicides is a gigantic problem. The dramatic increase in suicide rates in both men and women over the last 15 years is a gigantic problem. But the claim that "Men's suicide rates have increased more dramatically than women's suicide rates" is questiona…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 09:32 AM
6

That's the secondary point. The major point is that telling rape victims "If you're the victim of a crime, the police will treat you terribly and nobody will believe you, and you'll be humiliated" serves no purpose except to demotivate victims from reporting the crime to which they were subjected and curry righteous indignation for political purposes.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 09:25 AM
46

Not to mention "You're ruined, you're spoiled, nobody will ever want you again. Lots of women in your position kill themselves, it's now the only thing you are- a rape victim, this is now the foremost fact of your life, etc." Rape is a terrible, unforgivable crime. But... don't you think victims might have better prognoses if they weren't constantly told how traumatized they're supposed to be?
/r/MensRights28/04/16 11:35 PM
2

You guys realize that in demeaning the physical attractiveness of the accuser (Implication being "Who would possibly want to rape her? Obviously fake hehehehe") you're hurting the cause, right? Rape is about violence/hatred/despoilment, not sexual attraction.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 11:31 PM
2

It's sort of fucked up, isn't it? "It's better for ten guilty men to go free than for one innocent to be punished", but not when the victim is in a politically-favored group. You see the same thing with other parts of the SJW movement, also: On the one hand, they're calling for reform to the criminal justice system to make it far more difficult to indict/convict the accused. On the other hand, they want to achieve "equality" by convicting every cis-gendered heterosexual white male they can find,…
/r/MensRights28/04/16 11:25 PM
1

This isn't anything new. Hofstra rape case all over again. "Clearly something bad happened to this girl, and so these five young men should have their lives ruined so that she can feel that 'justice has been served'" was an argument that was made by "serious" talking heads.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:29 PM
1

I am a conservative MRA.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 04:22 PM
2

This just in- radical left feminists don't understand economics. Hint: You get paid to inconvenience yourself by doing something you wouldn't do for free. The bigger the inconvenience, the more you get paid. Woman wears an embarrassing outfit (or at least, an outfit embarrassing to the reporting journalist), or lack thereof, for 6 hours, 5 days a week,and makes $100k/year. Man spends months on end, 24 hours a day, away from his family and friends, in the middle of the fucking ocean on a platform…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 09:08 PM
6

The third listed thing is the most important thing- Don't Talk to the Police, and that goes multiple times over your lawyer is not present. Don't volunteer anything. Given the nature of this sub, I'm guessing we're mostly discussing false rape accusations. If you admit to having had sex with your accuser, you've already made half of their case for them, since everything else comes down to subjective perceptions and recollections of pillow talk. At some point, you may have to admit to one or more…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:35 PM
2

Sharon Irons was the woman's name in that case, if you want to look itup. I don't remember the guy's.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:27 PM
3

That's exactly the point- this puts in clear contrast the mistaken belief that so many people seem to have that having possession of a penis makes someone a violent rapist animal incapable of distinguishing right from wrong, and that belief is shared across both sides of the political spectrum. It's infuriating.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 03:01 AM
22

*Meredith Hellicar, one of the authors of the Bain and Co report, told Radio National there was still a cultural barrier for companies when it came to providing flexible workplaces. "[Men] are experiencing similar forms of discrimination and prejudice that women experienced 10 or 15 years ago," she said.* Or, alternately, women never experienced any discrimination on the issue, but rather 10-15 years ago were offered a brand new fringe benefit from which men have been excluded since day one. It'…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 12:24 PM
7

It depends. Seeing multiple divorces and alimonies take place in my family between equally affluent partners started the process when I was 10 or so. BUT what really sold it for me was when I was 15 in US Government class and starting to wonder why it was that men had zero options if the condom broke, other than paying for 18 years or fleeing to a non-extradition country.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 04:31 PM
1

I'm missing something here. The title of the article says that she "unloads" on him, sure, but what are the actual quotes. "We think our daughter should have primary custody". Ok, most parents would say that. "We want what's best for our grand-daughter" OK, most parents would say that too. "We wanted him to be involved in our grand-daughter's life, but he never responded to our contacts, then came out of the blue serving papers". I can see how that would be somewhat distressing. The lawyer's a s…
/r/MensRights09/01/16 09:58 AM
2

Tens of millions of women have done the same thing as this woman. Just because she has no aspirations now doesn't mean that she won't find something to give her satisfaction in 5, 10, 25 years. If she wants to build a family with your relative, so much the better. Isn't it preferable to do it before the biological clock starts ticking loudly and threatening chromosomal disorders, then work on a career later? She can and should do whatever she damn well pleases.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 01:16 AM
3

Perhaps I shouldn't have used Ken White's title for the title of the article, instead using one of the lines from the article. "Everyone who reads Jessica Valenti's column and believes it is now stupider about First Amendment law." I just found it the most viewpoint-neutral (White is a first amendment law geek, not a political pundit) and well-reasoned commentary on the issue. The fact of the matter is that it shows Valenti shamelessly equating speech with violence, and trying to criminalize it …
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:54 PM
2

Since it never happened to me, I can't pretend to imagine how being used by a teacher, even an attractive one, would have affected me emotionally during my high school years. Neither can most of the 17,000 people liking this image.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 03:55 PM
0

Can't say I'm horribly surprised. The clarion call of the male feminist is "Women are just as good as men... plus you can fuck them"
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:51 PM
9

You're not. I heard the same thing when I was growing up. It's altogether too easy to forget that most boys grow up being told that they should never, under any circumstances, hit a woman, but the reverse is not the case. And similarly that the difference in size and strength between members of each gender is minimal until puberty. Mothers and fathers, teach your daughters and sons never to hit anyone.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 12:51 AM
4

Isn't it cute how seriously high school students take themselves these days?
/r/MensRights16/10/15 05:33 PM
0

I read it as the opposite. He was saying that doctors assume that women have a lower threshold for visibly displaying the pain that they feel, and so assume that the man who is clearly in agony is in a more serious predicament than the woman who is displaying the same signs. Either way, the fault is really on the ER being excessively busy.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 03:17 PM
6

Every man has had an erectile response when he didn't necessarily want to have sex. Every man has, even moreso, had an erectile response when he didn't want to deal with the consequences of engaging in sex with the particular person in question. I wouldn't consent to a one-night stand with someone who I knew had HIV/herpes, but I still might find them attractive.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 03:03 PM
2

There's no excuse for the attending physician to have just left the building without checking on her tests, but I don't know where the author got the idea to blame societal problems for the issue rather than the staff at that particular, terribly overtaxed, ER. Also, it seems like a large part of his point is that his wife has a higher than normal threshold for pain, and the hospital staff didn't know that, despite his desperate histrionics in the waiting room. Nobody likes to see a loved one in…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 02:55 PM
1

All of these stories annoy the hell out of me. Have none of these (male) people ever had an erection that did not constitute immediate desire and consent to engage in sex with a present party? For example: There are plenty of very attractive women with herpes/HIV. They might, under some circumstances, provoke an erectile response. But, I would be unlikely to wish to consent to sex. From that, admittedly extreme starting point, you open up a whole host of other circumstances in which an erection …
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:39 AM
1

Lack of an option for men in the case of an unwanted pregnancy. If a condom breaks, antibiotics disable weaken his or her birth control and it happens just as the female partner is ovulating, she can do whatever she wants. Get the Kirby salesman to try out a new attachment, keep it for 12 months then give the thing away, or, of course, ruin the life of the man with whom she was engaging in consensual sex by forcing him to contribute 40% of his income to the cause for the next 18 years of his lif…
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:05 AM
1

Wow, I made the list. I'm frankly surprised.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 02:58 AM
1

That's a really shitty situation to be in. I can't claim to know what the right answer is, but hopefully some day you'll be in a place where you can celebrate the momentous, forever life-changing, event that is birth with a woman you trust and love, who trusts and loves you in return. I don't know that anything good could conceivably come from having you in the delivery room, though obviously if a medical question were to come up regarding your son's treatment and his mother was unable for whate…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 12:42 AM
2

Serious answer: I had a ton of crap in the passenger's seat, and a mazda3 is not well set up for scotting over the center console. Console's a bit wide and high, seats are a bit narrow, and the leg tunnel comes quite a ways out from the firewall. I didn't think of sitting in the passenger seat, because, as mentioned, the lady was in her car with the engine on and talking on her cellphone. Also, I figured that I had 2 minutes to wait at most. "Oh hi honey, yeah, the thing just ended, I'm on my wa…
/r/MensRights19/07/15 12:33 PM
2

As an unattractive man, I once stood outside in the rain for 20 minutes because I didn't want to be maced / labeled creepy by the cellphone-wielding woman whose car was blocking my driver's side door.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 10:09 PM
14

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/07/10/no-the-oregon-bakers-werent-fined-for-publishing-the-complainants-home-address-or-for-otherwise-publicizing-the-complaint-against-them/ Asshole thing to do, sure, but not why they got awarded damages: "The Commissioner concludes that complainants’ emotional harm related to the denial of service continued throughout the period of media attention and that the facts related solely to emotional harm resulting from media attention do…
/r/MensRights18/07/15 12:18 AM
2

Why are men excessively cautious in the presence of female acquaintances, doing their best not to show any sort of negative or excessively positive emotion, be it anger, excitement, sadness, frustration, whatever... ... when men are seen as being loose handles that will rape/assault/demean/objectify/etc at the drop of a hat? I wonder.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 02:23 AM
1

What's with the scare quotes, DailyMail? "Speaking about the victim, Mr Smith said he add learning difficulties, adding: 'His need arose from a general developmental delay" The kid was developmentally disabled. Of course he was vulnerable to a predator like this woman. He was not, emotionally, a 17 year old.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 11:41 PM
3

Her explanation of why she hates men is fairly comical. Basically, different men like different things, she lacks her own persona, and has had piss-poor luck trying out different styles with different men (Or, to be a little bit more generous, has heard/read something about men who don't like girls with different, contradictory character traits). This site's probably a parody, but if it isn't, I feel for the author, as someone who, also, is not universally appreciated.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 09:41 PM
1

I fucking hate these stories. "X outraged over Y which provides an option to Z" Look, if you don't want to use the app... don't use the fucking app. Why is this news? It's like CNN with their fucking "Twitter trends of the day" segment. I honestly don't care, how about you show some actual news and not what a bunch of idiots with free time on their hands happened to make up to bitch about today?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 10:36 PM
1

Women are going to grad school more than men. STEM graduate degrees are much more frequently funded than non-STEM, which rely more heavily on student loans. Primary investigators get more funding with a more diverse group of ancillary investigators: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2007/nsf07046/nsf07046.jsp (Broaden participation of under-represented groups, for example,by establishing collaborations with students and faculty from institutions and organizations serving women, minorities, and other group…
/r/MensRights13/07/15 10:04 AM
23

In this case, the poster isn't damaging, the policy is. The poster is just trying to keep young men from making life-destroying mistakes. I actually kind of applaud them for making the double-standard clear.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 12:34 PM
26

I'm not saying that women should be happy about their friends, sons, neighbors and husbands dying.... ...but World Wars I, II, Korea and Vietnam were major coups for women in the workplace, filling essential roles that were left absent by the conscription or death of the men that were previously filling them. She also ignores the fact that men above or below the age of conscription also suffer the same loss and pain of losing loved ones, while men of conscription age actually died. How exactly a…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:04 PM
3

Explain to your sister that prison inmates are under the care and protection of the state. They literally get locked up with their abusers by the people who are entrusted with their protection. What happens to inmates should be one of our utmost concerns, since we are depriving them of their liberty for the sake of public safety.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:57 PM
1

Many MRAs tend either libertarian or statist. Either governmental pressure should be applied everywhere to even the scales, or it should be applied as minimally as possible when it comes to gender issues. There's also traditional-gender-roles conservatives and hard-left wingnuts. Basically, it's pretty representative of society as a whole, just somewhat skewed.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 07:50 PM
1

Why admit to the sex in writing and get rid of the first and possibly most-significant hurdle your future accuser will have in putting you behind bars?
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:45 PM
1

Even if you don't go that far... rape seems to be defined as "Intercourse that a woman, at any point, regrets". Accusing the male participant of "rape" would seem to serve as almost prima facie evidence that she regretted the encounter. So, absent the complete falsehood of intercourse having occurred at any point, the charge is logically valid. It's up to the justice and legislative systems to work out at what point the logic becomes ridiculous, although there will likely be a long period of dar…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 10:06 PM
3

To be fair, with how expansive the definition of rape has become, there's no such thing as a false allegation.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 08:23 PM
2

This is just another example of further trying to cut the pie of "the oppressors" into an even smaller and smaller chunk. Now, wealthy, cis-gendered, attractive, socially-competent white men who don't happen to be triathlon stars are part of the oppressed classes. And I say this as a soft-spoken, socially awkward male with a high voice that probably plays right into this article's target demographic outside of my general political leanings.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 08:17 PM
1

This is a tough issue for me. While on the one hand, I bear no animus towards transgendered adults (for the sake of argument, I'll say over 16), I can't help but get a little bit offput when you're discussing possibly-transgendered people before they undergo puberty. On the other hand, Hormone Replacement Therapies and the like are much more effective, and the transgendered children will have a much easier time of "passing" in adulthood if they never undergo the secondary sexual development that…
/r/MensRights02/07/15 06:14 AM
1

How do they not realize that this is going to cause a whole new wave of "victim-blaming". It's basically requiring the alleged offender to blame the victim in his defense. "How do you know she was consenting" "Well, she immediately showed interest in me at the bar, and when I suggested that we find a quieter place, she immediately agreed. At my apartment, she stripped down to her underwear and started rubbing against me. Her nipples were hard, and she kept kissing me. Her genitals became wet, an…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 05:33 AM
2

One part of this whole ordeal that really bothers me is Ivan Oransky's involvement. As a scientist, Oransky's blog RetractionWatch is one of my favorite sites. It focuses on getting out the truth behind retractions, questionable research ethics and intellectual dishonesty in the world of scientific journals. And yet, here he found himself as one of the leaders of the brigade to destroy the career of a brilliant and honest scientist over a distasteful series of jokes. He leapt at the chance to si…
/r/MensRights28/06/15 08:18 PM
10

I've mentioned this before, but a local university with a 51% Female/49% Male student body put up a sign boasting about the fact that 77% of their students choosing to continue into advanced degree programs were female. At least this person's honest in their aim to achieve their goal through dissuading men from entering academia, rather than aiding women further. And it's hard to say what further aid there could be, with special math/science programs for girls as young as second grade. Which of …
/r/MensRights13/06/15 09:31 PM
4

I wouldn't call it "pity" so much, but he's managed to put himself in a position where his viewpoints are "special" or "diverse", and he's taken steps to prove that he's actually the person with that sort of uncommon viewpoint. I'm sure that he wishes that he was treated like a man, but from what it sounds like, he isn't. He's treated as some sort of exhibit by the manipulative people in his life and he just hasn't realized it yet.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 01:44 AM
4

In that case, you can condemn them even more. It's not the Washington Post, per se, it's the Volokh Conspiracy (libertarian legal blog) which is hosted by the Washington Post. None of this appears in the printed copy.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:26 PM
7

Both of her articles (as well as Professor Adler's on the VC) were very good and would resonate with a number of the participants here. She found herself horrified by the way that both women and men in on college campuses were willingly throwing away their sexual autonomy in the name of "protection" by the forces of administration, and that so many women were coming to believe that they were victims because of miscommunications and poor choices of partner. In her day, when she had a later-regret…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 05:46 PM
-4

Why didn't you just say "I present as male, and I am biologically male, but I'm still unsure exactly where I fall on the gender non-binary. Don't discriminate against me because I'm not wearing women's clothes currently," or "I'm a trans-man, and I'd like to see you prove otherwise" and get the bike parts for your wife and daughter without further embarassment?
/r/MensRights29/05/15 05:09 PM
1

It's his decision to get a vasectomy or not, but in his situation I would probably wind up telling my wife about it. Especially if I knew that she had been pregnant/had a miscarriage. I can't help but think that she'll have some mental health issues if she suddenly becomes unable to become pregnant after a miscarriage. Especially since being a mother seems to be so important to her. It's a tough situation since both parties have been dishonest with one another about their plans for the next 20 y…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 03:35 AM
1

My biggest problem with the Bechdel test is the whole "talk about something other than a man" angle. If they were lesbians and spent the whole damned movie talking about their respective love interests? By definition, passes the test. Why should sexual preference be the determining factor on whether or not a movie is oppressive?
/r/MensRights21/11/14 07:22 AM
3

Not to mention being bombarded with propaganda about how easy they have life at the same time that they're facing the same economic crises as everyone else (perhaps even to greater degree, given homeless rates, college attendance rates, employment rates, etc, though that's not relevant to the point). So, someone fails to succeed at something that everyone else is saying should be so super easy for them. I'll bet that helps their dignity a lot.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 07:38 PM
1

It's a terrible business decision, but it's their decision.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 04:40 PM
2

There's a reason that defamation laws (at least in the US) distinguish based on whether the "victim" (for lack of a better word) is or is not a public figure in the field in which s/he's being criticized. Twitter has every right to ban whoever they want to for whatever reason they choose. It's their service and they can use it to whatever end they so choose (At least, for the moment: See Willock vs. Elane Photography for an indication of how this might change in the future). But it's a stretch t…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 10:14 PM
1

Like I commented in another thread recently: That is the equivalent of winning the evolutionary lottery for a woman- have an attractive and intelligent man provide the sperm while having the wealthy husband provide for it/educate it/raise it. No sense getting worked up about it, it's a built-in instinct.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 10:04 PM
22

"As one female space professional wrote: "Don't these women and their male cohorts understand that they are doing the damage to what/whom they claim to defend!?" I wish they gave the name of the space professional- she gets it.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 10:00 PM
1

Women have more incentive to cheat than men do. Having a financially successful husband support a child from a more intelligent, sociable and attractive sperm donor is like winning the evolutionary lottery. There is no longer the possibility of spreading your genes through knocking some poor woman up and disappearing, though.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 02:46 AM
4

This is the flipside to gamergate: Narrative television, for whatever reason, is made primarily for women, by-and-large, and probably always has been.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 01:35 PM
3

Found at a college where I work: A sign that was proud of the fact that 70% of the undergraduates that moved on to graduate education were female. No, not proud that 70% of their female students chose to further their education. Proud that their male undergraduates (the school is about 51% female to 49% male) were discouraged from doing so.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 07:43 AM
2

Sorry, my fault. I made assumptions based on the URLs that turned out not to be true.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 03:29 PM
3

I agree. I feel sorry for this poor woman. She's so scared of men and their purported ability to devalue and destroy her that she never thinks about where she got the idea that they have the power to do so. Hint: the power for men to damage you so badly through their very existence, through the act of looking at you, talking to you, being in your very presence, comes from the fact that you have been taught that said men, in fact, have that power. They don't, not unless you believe it.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 07:27 AM
0

Only if there is a continuous video record of the child between the moment it popped out and the time if the dispute.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 09:16 PM
2

"I cannot allow a situation in which the children at an older age and their friends can chance upon web-based insults to the mother ... or anything else that the father decides to publish from time to time in association with their name." So he's hoping that the children will just forget their father's name?
/r/MensRights07/11/14 12:42 AM
2

Facebook isn't anonymous. EDIT: Furthermore, the comments on Reddit are pretty reasonable for the most part as well, unless you count the ones from men like "I daydreamed about a teacher doing just that to me." Dreaming about something and actually having it happen to you are not the same thing.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 09:26 PM
10

Out of curiosity, I took a look at the responses to this question on WDEL's facebook page. Every person said that the female predator should be held to the same standard.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:06 PM
6

Elaine Zundl, dean at the Douglass Project for Rutgers Women in Math, Science and Engineering. “Teachers always tell you not to use it, but the reality is that everybody uses it,” she said. ... This should be just about as annoying to a serious academic as the idea of intentionally compromising the objectivity of the website to promote a preferred narrative. This isn't science, this is humanities. It's entirely reminiscent of the sole poli-sci course I took while in college where, during a group…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 05:03 PM
5

The more serious the offense, the more difficult it should be to prove it (and the more seriously the privacy of the accused should be taken before a conviction is reached). It should be pretty goddamn clear-cut.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 04:57 PM
2

Here's another paternity case, from the Oklahoma Supreme Court this time, also dealing with adoption: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/10/27/facebook-pregnancy-notifications-and-a-fathers-right-to-object-to-adoption/ The question is in the URL: Does a Facebook message count as legal notification that the impregnated female has been impregnated, so as to allow the father to express paternal interest. The court decided: "Instead of contacting Father directly, Mother lef…
/r/MensRights06/11/14 04:53 PM
3

Exactly, identity politics is the culprit behind all of this confusion. Government should strive not to unduly benefit or harm anyone's ability to make his way in the world.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 11:38 PM
1

This honestly doesn't make sense to me. Not only is a Massachusetts republican pretty far to the political left already, but your vote doesn't matter since it's going to go blue anyway. Why add to their mandate instead of making a firm statement of "You no longer even pay lip service to representing me, so I'm not going to vote for you"?
/r/MensRights04/11/14 08:58 PM
-7

Really, what I think we need is a discussion of AVfM being based in Texas. URL-squatting, brand dilution, the rest of that is just a distraction. They're based out of Texas for crying out loud.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 04:41 PM
3

Here's the thing: Feminism is about the removal of rights from a large section of the population: Right to freedom of expression, right to property, right to due process... Somehow, they think that disenfranchising their adversaries gives them a happier existence than simply expanding individual rights across the board. And they're winning because... abortion (something with which men's rights folks by and large have no conflict, except insofar as the impregnated female has sole discretion over …
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:26 AM
140

Evidently, you've never had to clean public bathrooms. Women's restrooms are always far smellier and dirtier than their male equivalents.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:42 PM
0

I don't get why only men were allowed to fantasize about ejaculating on their sexual partner. Also, I'd love to know how they couched the question about "I have fantasized having sex with someone much older than I am", since if it was honest it would comprise just about every person who wasn't in a coma during their adolescent/young adult years, not just 1/3 of women. Ask that question at a convent and you'll get a 100% affirmative rate. It's also great that more than twice as many men have fant…
/r/MensRights03/11/14 09:07 AM
1

Along with my disagreement with this particular test, I disagree with the premise of this poll, that being that because of someone's political orientation they don't deserve to have an opinion on one of the more troubling issues of our generation. For what it's worth, I scored 6.50/-3.18, but am honestly extremely surprised that I'm not further to the east, and, especially the south.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 09:46 PM
1

Link seems to have gotten eaten while posting this, so here's the amazon page for the book: http://www.amazon.com/Unlearning-Liberty-Campus-Censorship-American-ebook/dp/B00F21VXV2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1414877989&sr=8-1&keywords=unlearning+liberty
/r/MensRights01/11/14 10:27 PM
3

No, you weren't right to be pissed off. She was honest and you should cherish her for that.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 10:17 PM
4

I know next to nothing about avfm or this drama, and haven't watched the video to which he is responding, but... I'd have a beer with this guy- intellectual honesty is important to me and I know entirely too well how easy it is to piss off your compatriots when trying to explain why an argument they're raising is intellectually lazy.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 11:07 PM
2

Well, speaking as a fat, tall, socially awkward male with a high voice and a lisssssp, I got the message loud and clear.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 09:07 PM
2

You won't receive an answer. And do you know the reason why? Because the Democrat party has been achieving great success as the "Party of Victims' Advocacy" for quite some time now, and the biggest imaginable coup for them was convincing 50% of the population that they were all victims of oppression at the hands of males, especially white males. Over the course of the last 20 years, or more, feminist organizations have been more loyal to Dems than they have been to women. Just ask Tammy Bruce wh…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 05:44 PM
2

I am not a lawyer: Here's the thing- one could easily argue that consent was an affirmative defense to the charge of rape, like the veracity of the statement is to a charge of libel, or self defense is to a charge of battery/murder. However, the difference here is that getting shot is always injurious. Getting libeled is always injurious. It's only justified if it's acting in defense of yourself or others, or if it happens to be truthful. To say that consent must be proven would be to claim that…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 11:00 AM
3

Another example of this: A few years ago, the Harvard Law School Review decided to take into consideration demographic factors when choosing who it selected to become editors. So, More support during early development, more interest-piquing, extracurricular activities, etc. Then, more support during high school from guidance counselors, teachers, etc, all trying to support a more equal workforce. Then, a little nudge being given on applications to high-end colleges, and possibly more support bei…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 05:18 PM
3

The other thing not being considered when the statistics come out is lagtime. 70% of a school's graduate program in molecular biology, for example, might be female. These are the people that will be the tenured professors, but not for another 15-20 years from the time that they're admitted to grad school. And yet, people post statistics talking about the number of female tenured chemistry/physics/hard biology professors in the status quo as justification to further imbalance things in yet anothe…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 05:04 PM
1

The name "Sharon Irons" has never been mentioned on /MensRights. http://www.nbcnews.com/id/7024930/ns/health-sexual_health/t/sperm-gift-keeps-giving/ Dare I hope that circumstances like these might fall under the British definition of "rape", as well?
/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:47 PM
4

I thought female politicians were frowned upon if they didn't have families. I also seem to remember a lot of vicious attacks directed at the most recent woman to run for senator in my state, the vast majority of which were aimed at her by fellow women. It's a bit of an odd catch-22. The real "symptom of male oppression" in politics is that men can take whatever view they want to, while on the campaign trail, but if a woman happens to step off the garden path she's immediately eviscerated from a…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 04:36 PM
6

Oh, I wasn't attempting to pass judgement at all. Simply pointing out that not everyone feels that way. You have as much right to choose with whom you end up, based on whatever factors you find important, as anyone else does.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 04:24 PM
2

I would personally have no real problem with raising another man's kid, especially if the "other man" was out of the picture. However, I'd like to spread my own genes one day, though, so it might have to do with her reluctance to have another (similar to how it might depend on her reluctance to have her first kid).
/r/MensRights22/04/13 03:32 PM
0

See, the thing that gets me about that response is this: At least in this forum, men en-masse aren't supposed to feel guilty or responsible for a hypothetical rape that happened, for the sake of argument, yesterday by some asshole that used a computer, used the internet, owned a cellphone and a car, had flown on an airplane and was in hoc to an oppressive mortgage. But at the same time, they're supposed to feel guilty for wrongs committed 150-300 years ago, by people who could not possibly conce…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 05:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter