TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jackal00 Archive

View 0 posts and 60 comments by Jackal00 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
42

No man would ever get it done if you did that. Your point being?
/r/MensRights04/07/22 11:45 PM
3

Believe me mate, nothing is the same at 33 as it was when I was 23. Sadly 33yr old you can't be here so I'll just say, as one internet stranger to another, don't let fear ruin your life. At your age I made the decision you are facing now and she and I are as happy together as I can imagine being and our first child is sleeping soundly in her nursery. I made that decision because I felt I knew her well enough that she wouldn't do something horrible to ruin my life as she cared about me.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 01:01 PM
2

How is it "relatively harmless"? You are talking about cutting off a very sensitive part of the body. Just because YOU consider it less important, doesn't make it disposable. How would you feel about having your earlobes cut off? Doing it to a helpless baby who can't fight back or voice their objections (you know, besides the blood curdling screaming) doesn't make it less horrific. I'm also perfectly ok with telling people what they can or can't do when its about protecting helpless babies from …
/r/MensRights21/05/21 12:29 AM
3

But things do go wrong, quite often as it turns out. That in itself should be ample reason for it to only be performed where it would actually improve the quality of life of the person getting it done. Look at the other comments in this thread that defend the practice. So many of them parrot the same nonsense about it "looking better" and it being "cleaner". Its cultish to say the least. The kind of reflexive defense that people jump to when they don't want to admit they were wronged. Noone is s…
/r/MensRights20/05/21 02:40 PM
7

What the hell kind of reasoning is that? Circumcision is wrong and no amount of religious or cultural significance excuses it. I don't give a flying fuck what "judaism as a whole" has to say on the matter. We don't allow virgin sacrifices to the big glowy thing in the sky, why should we allow cutting the skin off of babies genitals?
/r/MensRights20/05/21 02:02 PM
0

False. Apparently it was someone else's to do with as they please. Atleast for a while after you were born.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 08:18 AM
11

So fix the religion!
/r/MensRights20/05/21 08:16 AM
8

I know right!? My wife and i have just had a baby girl, at no point did either of us think: "man, this would be easier to clean with some of the excess skin cut off." Just seems kinda fucked up man
/r/MensRights20/05/21 08:13 AM
7

If it's a complete non-issue then why does it feature so prominently in the comments of people who are for it? It's like they need to imply that uncircumcised penises are inherently dirtier. The looks better argument is kinda dumb too if I'm being honest. They look virtually identical when erect and when limp the uncircumcised penis has a little sheath of skin to cover the end. Are we concerned about wind resistance or something?
/r/MensRights20/05/21 08:11 AM
14

Ok, i gotta know. What exactly do people mean by easier to clean? I'm uncircumcised and all i do is pull back the skin and wash it like any other part of my body. Its no harder than lifting my arm to get at my arm pit. Yet people bring it up constantly like its a big factor. I don't get it.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 06:09 AM
12

The women blaming and other silliness on this sub aside, this post is satire. It is drawing parallels between the reasoning used to justify circumcision as "medically advantageous" and another medical issue which could be completely erased by cutting off a body part which people are arbitrarily opposed to removing. You on the other hand seem to think that using the old war cry of "grow up", which people have been using to attack men who do not conform to their vision of manhood, is somehow going…
/r/MensRights05/12/19 09:51 AM
16

Hypocrisy. I bet it's the hypocrisy. Double standards and such, you know.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 09:40 AM
0

So how's that all working out for you now that trump has admitted on live TV to all the illegal stuff he's been accused of regarding ukraine?
/r/MensRights23/11/19 12:01 AM
1

I'm going to picture you saying that entire comment as an old gypsy woman, fingers clasped around her crystal ball. Do you do horoscopes? I'm an Aries.
/r/MensRights22/11/19 04:10 AM
-5

And I'm betting you come bearing a wealth of information, sources and proof to back up everything you just said. After all noone would just randomly show up in a thread to hijack it with their right wing conspiracies with only the vaguest connection to the subject at hand. would they?
/r/MensRights21/11/19 11:24 PM
4

Just add masculine presenting and you're sorted.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 05:52 AM
3

Thank you, sir. I only hope more people read you comments. It saddens me to see the kind of poisonous bullshit that OP is trying to push get more traction in this community.
/r/MensRights21/09/19 01:42 AM
6

Only a dick can fuck an asshole.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 10:06 AM
1

So reading up on it. He supported third trimester abortion in the event of an un-viable featus or severe deformity. In the event that the abortion caused the mother to go into labour then the doctors could resuscitate the baby if the family wished. The whole conversation with the doctor thing sounds like one of those "politician filling in blanks" moments. I can see why people would be upset about it but the other guy was being pretty hyperbolic.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 01:59 PM
7

including after birth What the fuck are you on about?
/r/MensRights14/08/19 09:41 AM
1

Wow I feel silly. Should have read my own source better. Moving on. Had a look through the wiki article you posted and the source used for shootings in the US only shows one incident in 2001?! Is what I get for being hyperbolic. Despite what the media says, America is statistically safer now than it was even 5 years ago when it comes to violent crimes and mass shootings. So, why is there such a focus on these deaths and not deaths in general? Do you only care about gun deaths? Why not? Should we…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 08:28 AM
1

That's a blatant distortion of the facts pushed by both the gun violence archive and the mass shooting tracker (websites that have ADMITTED to inflating their numbers and been called "unreliable sources" by many mainstream media sites). https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/active-shooter-incidents-2000-2018.pdf/view Feel free to find me a single year that according to that report hasn't had atleast 52 mass shootings. Do you honestly want the police to have the power to detain someone simply on th…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 04:12 AM
4

^
/r/MensRights10/08/19 12:37 AM
3

^
/r/MensRights10/08/19 12:37 AM
0

So the only reason someone was able to walk into a Walmart and spray a bunch of people with his AK-47 is because the police weren't enforcing the law at the time!? The police aren't omnipotent. Even the most competent police force couldn't prevent such an event without having been told where it was going to take place before hand. The mans mother called the police and expressed her concerns about her son only to be told that it was not illegal for him to own the gun. Even if the police had taken…
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:12 PM
-1

Right, these mass shootings are just an inconvenience that will sort itself out. No sense diverting important resources away from the real crimes.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 09:50 PM
0

Maybe so. Seems like that makes it even more important that people like them aren't able to buy these weapons in the first place.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 09:48 PM
-7

Sure, but it does mean that when an angry disenfranchised young man's mother calls the police because she is concerned about him buying an AK-47, they won't reply with "well, he's allowed to own it" and ignore her call because she didn't explicitly say he is going to go kill some people.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:08 PM
4

What about all the times that the practice has led to permenant damage and issues for the person being circumcised. Botched operations causing infection and excess damage to the glans happen all the time and have permenant repercussions. Your argument relies on the practice being harmless and risk free to the infant but it isn't. Just because you are one of the lucky people who haven't had to suffer is not a justification.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 03:05 AM
1

Right, because white men are the only ones being alienated by modern society. They are the only ones who feel like women are automatically suspicious of them. They are the only ones who feel like they aren't welcome in the business world. You're so busy rushing to defend the "white people point" that you missed my point entirely. This issue is not about how white men are being pushed to commit shootings. Hell, the collage that people keep posting is plenty of evidence that this is not an issue t…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 11:58 PM
1

So... exactly what I said. This isn't a white mens problem but one that affects men of all races?!
/r/MensRights07/08/19 11:47 PM
-1

Way to read the wiki article you posted bonehead. Says right there that the guys attacked armed guards, had an undercover agent follow then there because the FBI was on to them AND they were taken down by an off duty police officer. Not some retard with the 2nd amendment stuck up his ass. How about the incident at the Pulse nightclub where random fuckwits with guns fired back at the shooter and, surprise surprise, just managed to cause more mayhem and damage. How does that fit in with your shit …
/r/MensRights07/08/19 01:46 PM
1

Alright I'll bite. What evidence have you got about literally any of what you just claimed? The Democrat bit the socialist bit, any of it let's hear it.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 01:05 PM
-2

Great. Now we'll have two retards firing their gun in a crowded place while the police deal with the issue. Not like we have a real world example of exactly how useless you "good guys with guns" are in these situations.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:41 PM
-3

Yet you posted a comment that expressed almost the exact opposite on the issues of gun control. If you didn't want to be mistaken for someone pushing what anon is dribbling then you should have found another way to Express your point. As opposed to posting the ramblings of some fool on 4chan and labeling them facts.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 10:30 AM
-6

More of a lunatic than someone making excuses for the nutjobs who keep killing crowds of people? Feel free to refute my point if you have something worth saying. All you've got so far is the same old false flag shit that feminists and mysandrists have been throwing at us for years like "grow up" and "you sound like a lunatic". I agree quite a bit with a lot of what the post was saying about mens issues. It's when they try to make it into a white mens issue that I start to see red flags. These is…
/r/MensRights07/08/19 09:56 AM
-11

This post is clearly aimed at pushing a white supremacist view. This shit does not belong on this sub. The point they make in the post is far from exclusive to white men. Men of all races face these same issues so fuck off with this yallqaeda shit.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:58 AM
0

"One we've had a good mass genocide, then we will do something about the rampant gun violence in our country"
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:55 AM
1

Ah, the American way. "We aren't the worst in the world. So we should do nothing about the issue."
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:54 AM
-1

The second amendment was written in a time where single shot muskets were the only guns that any normal citizen was likely to have access too. How about you stop the bullshot pedantry about what constitutes an assault rifle and acknowledge that any weapon that makes it possible to gun down 14 people in 30 seconds is a fucking problem.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:52 AM
-2

Everyday I watch this sub turn into another right wing circle jerk. The downvotes on your comment make me sad for the state of our movement. Yallqaeda are a cancer on mens rights. They hijack every issue to push their bullshit.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 05:50 AM
1

How would legalising prostitution be sacrificing everything else? The way I see it, legal and regulated prostitution would be more beneficial to men than women. A legal and preferably free market supported means for men to opt out of intrinsically dangerous relationships with women who expect something beyond simple financial compensation. No more pressure to indulge bullshit mind games in order to satisfy the primal urge to mate. The black market issue will of course still persist to some degre…
/r/MensRights02/08/19 05:29 AM
1

I guess, my less extreme view on the whole thing would seem feminist to some. What I am saying is that more than one issue can be worked on at a time. Cooperation seems the more logical answer if, as you say, we are simply outnumbered. It seems strange to me that your primary opposition to this idea is that it could help women. Despite its potential to help men and boys who are currently in need of help. Believe it or not the vast majority of women are not out there trying to find a man whose li…
/r/MensRights02/08/19 02:40 AM
1

How does it make a way forward for men when it's quite literally dating by another name? Men will still have the option of simply not participating. Normalising it in society just means it opens up another option for men. All the risks are still borne by men, it's still extraction of resources, and men still have no legal protection from wrongful or fraudulent paternity claims. You can hardly expect it to ever not involve an exchange of resources. Sex as an act is physically demanding and time c…
/r/MensRights01/08/19 11:55 PM
5

On the other hand legalising and normalising prostitution can be a way forward for men. Allowing men to opt out of the dating game without having to forgo sexual relationships. Same for women really though it's generally much easier for women to find sexual relationships without the need of dating and courtship. I don't think prostitution in and of itself is exploitative. Forcing it into a black market and turning it into a place for lawless people to control is.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 01:29 PM
17

Now imagine what you'll learn in another 2 years. Pretty telling of someone's mental development when they are able to put together a pattern like that and completely fail to realise what it says about what they think the know.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 07:57 AM
7

The whole "weak to cry" thing is generally just a way to shut younger boys down. It's often expressed as a jab at some part of their identity, whichever works on them. Like calling boys sissy or gay or whatever. I think what you experienced with your female co workers is a typical reaction that I have seen in men and women. Which is to ignore the emotions as they are inconvenient but you can't just tell a grown man that he's a sissy. Every time a feminist offers an opinion on it, they go on the …
/r/MensRights27/07/19 02:40 PM
2

Its incredibly hard to take that first step of opening up. All I can say is it's something he has to work out on his own. Once he's ready then he'll need your help to see that his feeling are important and don't need to be pushed down to not inconvenience others. Thank you for being there for him as best you can. My wife and I have our share of problems but we both care about each other which makes all the difference in the world. It sounds like you're doing your best and I hope he reciprocates …
/r/MensRights27/07/19 02:32 PM
286

Grew up being told that it was weak to cry and all the old lines people seem compelled to use on little boys because they're uncomfortable with us having feelings. Struggled with my emotions for a long time because of it. Until I met my wife who didn't recoil from my emotions. From there I worked out that having feelings wasn't wrong and I was able to learn how to deal with them healthily. Anyone who shames young boys, or girls for that matter, is a joke and shouldn't be allowed to deal with chi…
/r/MensRights27/07/19 08:04 AM
4

Can't help but this those puny wedges on her chair wouldn't stop me sitting comfortably. Shit I've sat in chairs like this one pictures and find if pretty comfortable to put a leg over the arm rest.
/r/MensRights21/07/19 01:10 AM
10

Lawyer. Lawyer. Lawyer. You should have never talked to the police without your lawyer present. There is a good chance you have already done major damage to your case by talking to detectives without lawyer present.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 12:33 AM
3

Not even that far from their current rhetoric. Condom broke? That's assault! Hell I'd bet money there would be a case where a man gets jail time for using such a contraceptive without informing his partner.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 06:15 AM
3

Eternity as the plaything of a giant toddler. That's what this kid had to put up with.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 10:19 PM
-1

You're the one dancing around trying to push the whole life at conception shtick. Frankly I'm impressed you've gone this long without referencing the bible as justification.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 07:17 AM
0

Yeah, but if you follow that logic then using hand sanitizer should be considered a war crime.
/r/MensRights12/01/19 03:15 AM
17

By that same logic the justice system may falsely convict someone who was innocent. Therefore the only thing you can say about the convicted rapists is that what happened is unknown. Do you see the problem here? The legal system has to be black and white. Any accusation must be subject to the burden of proof required by the law. This is why all the bullshit attempts to make rape into some fuzzy grey area, which can be manipulated to suit a narrative, are only going to make things worse for victi…
/r/MensRights28/07/18 11:25 AM
1

Nobody accepts those excuses from me at my job why should they be ok in this situation. Also in future I'll be sure to make it clearer that I'm making a joke
/r/MensRights17/07/16 12:49 AM
1

Not to mention the claim that it only sometimes leads to orgasm. I mean for that much money that should be fucking guaranteed.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 11:42 PM
6

I can only speak from personal experience but here is my take on "climbing the employment ladder". I have worked for plenty of different bosses, managers and other people in positions where their job is to delegate tasks to other people. In my experience (which is worth nothing, I know) the difference between a "leader" and someone who is "bossy" is simple; a leader builds respect and people will tend to follow a leader they respect, a bossy person demands obedience from others which ruins any c…
/r/MensRights11/02/14 05:13 AM
9

Going by her position in the choke hold; she did no get into the position whilst defending herself, let alone with a head injury. I can only infer that when they claimed he slammed her head into the ground, it was when he dropped. Basically I'm saying he didn't necessarily instigate the fight. Further the whole incident seems even more sketchy when you take into account that she asks her friend to call her father in law rather than the police (or ambulance for that matter). If you have other sou…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 11:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter