TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jackal_6 Archive

View 0 posts and 35 comments by Jackal_6 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Reads like it's written by an Indian and using Euros to mask it. Pure incel fanfiction
/r/PussyPassDenied29/04/21 05:07 AM
3

I am also deeply disturbed by this post. What kind of psychopath capitalizes every word in a paragraph?
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/20 10:37 AM
1

Not a great example since it bombed at the box office
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/19 11:04 AM
12

1.2% of hispanic or asian girls
/r/MensRights10/12/13 02:59 PM
1

When were you diagnosed?
/r/MensRights16/11/13 04:12 PM
1

I obviously don't care about this nearly as much as you do, so this is my last post. You're falsely pawning the mother's interests off on the child, as if the mother is not culpable for her own choices. No, no I'm not. The child had no say in whether it was brought into this world, or if his mother is a fucking psycho. The state sees it as preferable to leave a child in the custody of a willing parent, and has the right to benefit from both parents. This has nothing to do with men or women, it's…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:30 PM
1

And you still think it's about punishing a man rather than the financial well-being of the child and reducing costs to the state. Why do you think that the child should be put at a disadvantage because of his mother's actions?
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:03 PM
1

You're really not going to convince me to change my position. Allowing men to abdicate parental responsibility opens up a huge loophole for abuse, and does not put men and women on equal footing.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:30 PM
1

What you're suggesting allows a rapist to impregnate a woman and abdicate responsibility for the resulting child. Just think about that. Regardless, you did give me the opportunity to point out that the law supports rapists in collecting child support. Once again, the child shouldn't be punished for its mother's actions. So you would force custody on an unwilling father as your solution. How does that remove the violation of his equal right to reproductive choice? If the mother is the only paren…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 05:54 AM
1

So you think that rapists shouldn't have to pay child support?
/r/MensRights26/04/13 05:15 AM
1

That's not exactly a persuasive argument. What can I say? I think it's ludicrous to suggest that a man can force a woman to give her child up for adoption or abdication. There's no argument to address. It is as much work to add supporting a deadbeat mom to one's workload as it is to add a child to one's household. In my opinion, in that situation, custody should revert to the working parent. Once again, it's a custody reform issue.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:48 AM
1

he deserves the right to enforce adoption or safe haven abandonment whether that is what she wants, or not. I disagree. should the mother choose custody, is no different than mandating that the mother retain custody even when she would choose adoption or safe haven abandonment, should the father be willing to pay support holy fuck, did you just say that raising a child and making child support payments have an equal infringement on a person's life?
/r/MensRights26/04/13 04:40 AM
1

No, women have the ultimate choice of whether the child receives benefits from neither parent. I have no problem with that. If a father has a problem with the mother having custody, he can petition for it and child support.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:20 AM
1

It's not about drafting an unwilling father into the situation. It's about making sure the child has the benefit of both parents, regardless of whether those parents are willing or not.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:15 AM
0

Once again, what you're arguing is a custodial situation. I don't care what the court typically do. Custodial reforms are needed. That's the issue that needs to be addressed, not giving men the option to abdicate parental responsibility.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 02:56 AM
1

If you think that access to abortion is a privelege, I don't really have much else to talk about.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 02:42 AM
1

Well that's a custodial issue, and uttererly irrelevent to the law being discussed.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 02:25 AM
1

Instead, if these deadbeats can't cover their own asses, custody should be taken from them, even if that means adoption without consent. And how many kids are you going to adopt?
/r/MensRights26/04/13 02:07 AM
-1

Giving women access to abortions doesn't doesn't rob men of any rights.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:57 AM
0

And I'm saying that courts don't care. They're concerned with the child's well-being, and keeping costs to the state down--not anyone's ability to exercise a choice in the matter.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:50 AM
0

Abortion--the child no longer exists. No one is responsible for the non-existent child. Adoption--the state is responsible Abandonment--the state is responsible None of these scenarios leave a man caring for the child without support from the mother. Once again, you're missing the point. Judges aren't punishing unwilling fathers. They're simply ensuring that the child isn't punished for having a father who doesn't want to be there.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 10:01 PM
-3

There is no single-parent opt-out scenario. Either the child is the state's responsibility, or that of BOTH parents. You're misreading my post if you think I'm suggesting otherwise.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 08:52 PM
1

Yes, but adoption should still be an option if neither parent is interested in raising the child. And the father should have the option of raising the child while receiving financial support from the mother too. Kinda like the way it works now.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 08:25 PM
-1

If we had a society in which the aborted fetus could be removed from the mother's body, gestated to term, and then given back to her to raise, wouldn't that solve the pro-choice/pro-life argument? I know you're being facetious, but what exactly is your point here? That until we reach that point in society, a) women should be forced to carry to term? Or b) men should be allowed to offload parental responsibilities to the taxpayer?
/r/MensRights25/04/13 08:20 PM
-2

Because babies don't grow in men's bodies. I never said that the law should be applied differently. The woman can still be charged with rape, but the child shouldn't be punished.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 08:11 PM
-3

"I consented to sex but not reproductive sex." Woah, woah, woah. Is the basis of the objection to this law that men won't be able to deny parental responsibilities should a woman impregnate herself without the man's consent? Jesus Christ. This sub is filled with a bunch of self-centred cry babies. Judges make decisions in the best interest of the child, not you. The child didn't ask to be brought into the world through illicit means and certainly shouldn't be punished for it by denying him pater…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 07:29 PM
1

You don't think that if this law was in place, the man would actually have a basis for his rape case? As-is, he consented to a sexual encounter, just not specific sexual acts.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:19 PM
-9

Who fucking cares? Would you rather a girl could ram a dildo up your ass halfway through intercourse and there's fuck all you can do about it? This law doesn't apply only to women, you know.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 02:44 PM
8

You're not ha-ha funny. You're funny like a clown.
/r/seduction31/12/11 08:35 PM
3

You can't wait for it. You have to force it.
/r/seduction21/08/11 08:12 AM
5

Worst strip club ever, I guess.
/r/seduction07/07/11 08:00 PM
10

Sounds like he watches Arrested Development.
/r/seduction07/07/11 07:08 PM
9

Yeah, true enough.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 07:07 PM
-18

Can't really say I was expecting to get voted to the top. I suppose I'm just complaining about the nature of titles around here, i.e. OMG WOMEN CONTROL MY LIFE AND MAKE IT MISERABLE!!! WHY CAN'T I JUST PUNCH THE ONES I DON'T LIKE IT'S SO SEXIST
/r/MensRights06/07/11 06:41 PM
37

Good lord, sensationalism all up in this bitch. So guys who work for either a) high-powered women, or b) men who are in what are perceived as “women’s jobs,” are viewed as less manly, and this impacts both their social standing and earnings potential. There’s a price to be paid for being a trailblazer; for men, there’s also a price to be paid for working for one. THAT'S what the experiment concluded. It's about gender perception, not women punishing men. This subreddit is so full of shit, it's u…
/r/MensRights06/07/11 05:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter