| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Men Activism.1. It's not ad-Hominem to attack your views and actions. .2. Just because you take that personally, doesn't mean it's ad Hominem. .3. You just used both ad-Hominem, and non-sequitur. You are here, i am here, we are not in an echo chamber. Debate happens when there is no echo chamber. All the main feminist subs are echo chambers, you wouldn't be treated with the respect there like you've had here, you would be banned, probably just for commenting here. | /r/MensRights | 02/11/24 01:52 AM |
| 8 | Men Activism.1. A quick look into the history of women's rights shows that it was men who did much of the work, not a women's collective. .2. The, "collectivism," that can be seen in feminism came by violence, by throwing any non-extremists under the proverbial bus. .3. You have regularly insisted that men cannot be collectivist, and a quick look at history shows that it's not necessary, and then you throw a tantrum and bitch about right wingers when people have questioned you on it. You're not representing… | /r/MensRights | 02/11/24 01:42 AM |
| 4 | Men ActivismI never said I had a side, you're the one who's been here all day insisting that collectivism and voting left is the answer. | /r/MensRights | 02/11/24 01:34 AM |
| 6 | Men ActivismBeing blocked on reddit is not a matter of free speech, they're just choosing not to listen to you. Refusing to hear and understand the other side to a point where you'll take your side's word for it, and protest so loudly that people who actually care can't hear is a free speech issue. Personally threatening anyone who's going to a speech, as with multiple Warren Farrell speeches, is an issue of free speech. Blocking you on reddit is neither a, "tantrum," nor an issue of free speech. This is a … | /r/MensRights | 02/11/24 01:24 AM |
| 9 | Men ActivismIt would help if certain people didn't support the left's authoritarian anti-free speech tactics. Kinda hard to get any information out when you have to have security just to hear related speeches in Academia because of collectivist protestors. | /r/MensRights | 02/11/24 01:17 AM |
| 15 | Men ActivismThese are all panels and speeches related to Men's Rights, and can be considered activism. https://youtu.be/-xUisjHoB_8?si=Dqlz2a5U20oWYRQt https://youtu.be/Z_t701RfOEM?si=aScJDgXoDzjSmb2x https://www.youtube.com/live/ffOPImz4Rp0?si=Hm-W2UjWFHfY2j0X Janice Fiamengo, in this attempted speech, experiences why it's very difficult to talk about men's issues in a non-feminist way, or a way critical of feminism. https://youtu.be/9Yg-f7fC0Uw?si=4zMhEiYicKnrN8Bn There's Honey Badger Radio Here's them co… | /r/MensRights | 02/11/24 01:14 AM |
| -4 | Question for intactivists about FGM to MGM comparisonThe biggest difference is that one is done upon reaching puberty, the other in infancy. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 01/11/24 07:41 PM |
| 9 | Host of “The View” says men are uselessI still think whoopi is a closeted lesbian. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 07:20 PM |
| 2 | What are your complaints with this sub?r/leftwingmaleadvocates But, believe it or not, the right does care more about male specific issues, the left generally only cares if it's a labour issue. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 06:57 PM |
| 0 | What are your complaints with this sub?I think it's alright, relatively decent moderation, this isn't supposed to be a place to vent, but for politics, but mods are mostly relaxed about it. This is not intended to be a safe place, no matter how much some members want it to be, it is a place for debate. I personally think the mods could go harder against extremists like the red pills and mgtows, but as I said, this is a place of politics and debate. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 06:53 PM |
| 1 | men are not a team.People who hate him are normally People who never heard him or read him. They're usually People who are latching onto someone else's judgment, as a collectivist would. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 06:47 PM |
| 2 | men are not a team.What experience do you have in the armed forces? | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 06:45 PM |
| 2 | men are not a team.Collectivism is evil because it relies on altruism and sacrifice for some redundant, "greater good." You can have leftist policies without being a collectivist, you don't need to be one to understand that insurance and social security programs are beneficial to yourself, it just happens to benefit others too. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 06:41 PM |
| 1 | men are not a team.I need you to point out the specific spot, I don't have time to read a whole wiki for this. Sounds like a Dworkinist. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 06:39 PM |
| 3 | men are not a team.Yea, according to Christina Hoff Sommers, there were targeted campaigns against male spaces from different women's lobbies. But the link you gave doesn't explain what Gearhart did to prevent male bonding, seems like she did the complete opposite honestly, gay allied and stuff. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 06:38 PM |
| 1 | Voting rights for menI'll vote democrat if you legally join the Libertarian party, joining parties is the only way to end the 2 party system. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 06:26 PM |
| 1 | Voting rights for menNgl, you do the crime, there are, in fact, more consequences than the time. I'm not sure they should get suffrage back, crime isn't just against individuals, it's against the whole society. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 06:24 PM |
| 1 | Men’s Rights channels by women? (I’ve seen bunch of examples for the opposite, like guys who talked actively to women in a motivational way). I’d like suggestionsAnything with Christina Hoff Sommers, American enterprise institute has some videos. She's was nicknamed, "based mom," when she spoke more often. Brett Cooper has said some things about it. Roma Army and that one redhead i can't remember, but they're controversial, the extremists here call them grifters, but they're just low-brow imo. Sidney Watson has said some stuff about men. ShoeOnHead has said alot. Studio B has the Fiamengo Files 2.0 Dadvocate In my experience it's mostly women who openly … | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 06:18 PM |
| 1 | Why do we always hear about Teen Moms but never Teen Dads?The dad is just the teen who, "knocked her up," (if hes not assaulted by his potential in-laws and his own parents) until after the birth, then people say all sorts of things. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 05:19 PM |
| 1 | Why Men Aren't Voting Your WayWe don't need eggs either, we only need embryos, tested in mice, and we've made artificial embryos, also tested in mice. Human testing is illegal with these things though. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 05:16 PM |
| 1 | Forced military drafting is gender discrimination in the eyes of Feminism, but only when women are drafted as wellI guess there aren't too many Karen DeCrow feminists anymore. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 04:59 PM |
| 2 | Utérus artificielIt is obsolete buddy, that's already been successfully tested in sheep. Additionally, We've learned that the egg isn't needed, just the sperm and embryo, successfully tested in mice. We've also successfully created artificial embryos and tested them in mice. The only thing we don't have is artificial sperm. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 04:29 PM |
| 2 | How can Men unite to drive a constructive gender conversation forward?We needn't convince women, only men. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 04:24 PM |
| 1 | How can Men unite to drive a constructive gender conversation forward?Affirmative action for extended family members aiding one another. The nuclear (2 parent) family destroyed communities like that. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 04:23 PM |
| 1 | How can Men unite to drive a constructive gender conversation forward?Any abortion argument needs to be abandoned by the MRM. Saves time and space. Any trans arguments must be made in support of trans women, the only reason an argument against them exists is because of misandry. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 04:22 PM |
| 2 | How can Men unite to drive a constructive gender conversation forward?It was though, worse really, they would hunt down tax collectors, strip them, and then either poor or dip them in hot tar, before pouring feathers on them, it's called tarring and feathering. They trespassed and dumped what was probably 1.7 million dollars worth of product, in that one major instance. Most of the officers in the Boston Massacre got off because the protestors were literally up in their faces telling them to fire. The period Propaganda was completely outrageous, worse than today, … | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 03:37 PM |
| 1 | How can Men unite to drive a constructive gender conversation forward?Everything done by anyone is, and has always been, done in selfishness; focusing on yourself doesn't mean you should abandon society. Edit: That is especially true for the people who claim to be altruists. IMO. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 11:04 AM |
| 2 | Drafting is just inhumaneNot really, we haven't been able to artificially replicate sperm. We have, however, been able to artificially replicate everything else needed for gestation and birth. We have working artificial wombs, successful testing with sheep. We learned that you do not, in fact need eggs, just the embryo, successful testing in mice We have successfully created artificial embryos, successfully tested in mice. We haven't tested all these together, and human testing is illegal with these things, but the tech… | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 03:50 AM |
| 1 | Drafting is just inhumaneIn the US there is a, "conscious objector," clause. In which you may be placed in non-combat roles in the event of a draft. If are not, and have not been, a pacifist it's really the only way to get it, they'll look at your life in the past to see you really are one. Bonus points if you're in a pacifist religion, or pacifist sect of a religion like christian quakers. But you probably won't get those bonus points if you join it when a draft happens. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 03:41 AM |
| 2 | "And who set that system up?"If you want to get technical about who set the systems up, it was old women and men, so old people. All of it, from the beginning, the elders were the most powerful in nearly every pre- tribal society, egalitarian or not it was the old people. Can't blame them though, I'd want perks too if I could barely walk. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 03:22 AM |
| 1 | How can Men unite to drive a constructive gender conversation forward?It's literally in the definition, it's part of the label, man. And the vast majority of self proclaimed MGTOWS I've met fit the description. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 03:05 AM |
| 1 | How can Men unite to drive a constructive gender conversation forward?WHO THE F&K SAID MGTOWS WITHDRAW AND ISOLATE THEMSELVES? JESUS DAMN CHRIST. It's literally in the definition to separate yourselves from women and society, ergo you might be appropriating the label if it doesn't fit you. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 03:01 AM |
| 2 | How can Men unite to drive a constructive gender conversation forward?The modern state of the red pill is more recent than the movie. | /r/MensRights | 01/11/24 02:48 AM |
| -1 | Question about ‘feminism’I'd be careful with this line of belief, MGTOW and TRP are quite common in MRA circles, we regularly use apologetics against them irl and online. Apologetics are just something that come with larger movements. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/24 11:53 PM |
| 1 | Question about ‘feminism’She didn't say she's a "true" feminist she said she's not one of the mgtows or red pills of feminism, not an extremist. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/24 11:51 PM |
| 2 | Question about ‘feminism’Christina Hoff Sommers, Camile Paglia, and Karen DeCrow are decent. DeCrow at one time called for affirmative action in shared parenting, and favored drafting women. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/24 11:44 PM |
| 2 | How can Men unite to drive a constructive gender conversation forward?TRP, as it is now, is more recent than the movie. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/24 11:24 PM |
| -1 | How can Men unite to drive a constructive gender conversation forward?MGTOW is not good, checking out of society means that you're unwilling to work to help, even for your fellow men, that you're unwilling to write politicians or vote, or lobby, or work with allied feminists like Christina Hoff Sommers. MGTOW is the death of men's rights. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/24 11:23 PM |
| 5 | How can Men unite to drive a constructive gender conversation forward?Activism is an inherently female attribute in Western culture. This is all I'm going to read, if your knowledge of history is so lacking. It wasn't women who lead the US before the revolution, it wasn't women leading the protests, or writing parliament and the king, and the other powers. What do you think activism is? | /r/MensRights | 31/10/24 11:20 PM |
| 1 | How can Men unite to drive a constructive gender conversation forward?You can outwit an enemy, instead of running and hiding. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/24 11:16 PM |
| 1 | How can Men unite to drive a constructive gender conversation forward?That's stupid. With the absence of men, Amazons reportedly kidnapped only a few. Engagement in politics is the only requirement to be engaged in society, it's literally all that is required, MGTOW philosophy is not conducive with lobbying. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/24 11:14 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter