TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jaded_Concentrate_49 Archive

View 2 posts and 16 comments by Jaded_Concentrate_49 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Probably not. Longing for women and dating is primarily about hope and excitement. Actual relationships tend to end in failure, hurt, and disappointment. So it would increase actual problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:49 AM
39

It also denies that there are far more women sugaring than exists sugar baby websites. Older men simply have more money. Feminists complain that men are “using young women” which is, of course, a lie, and requires you to believe women are so stupid they don’t know men like sex and give women money to do it with them. Far more sugar babies exist than people think.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 09:47 PM
2

Why do red pill guys say “all single women are going to die alone with cats”? That’s not so much a “red pill” point as it is a trad cuck point. Trad cucks are the ones assuming all women want marriage and babies and trad sucks, which not all women do. It’s a technique to make women settle for men to make babies by spreading FUD. Again that’s not red pill, those are political trad cucks who glom onto red pill like they do everywhere else. It’s all just politics and pushing religious quackery. I’m…
/r/MensRights20/04/24 09:39 PM
12

Gay rights are gay rights including men, women, and transgenders. Most men’s rights grievances affect men of all kinds, but more specifically the disparity between men and women in employment discrimination, the legal system, society and culture, and politically. Not necessarily sex partners, which is more a lgbtq thing. Unless a specific men’s right issue, like conscription, also applies to gay men, it really doesn’t have the same basis, such as societal gynocentrism. There no system elevating …
/r/MensRights20/04/24 09:22 PM
7

The “arguments” I’m hearing are just classism and racism and not about what might make a woman happy. Just what makes daddy happy for his own financial and political leanings.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 07:56 PM
7

Disagree. 1) women absolutely know who they’re dating. Women who say “he changed” or “he was pretending to be nice” are ignoring that they absolutely knew that at the time and actively chose him because of those traits. Those “bad” traits are sexy and exciting. 2) men cannot choose for women as they will always choose a sexless femme boy because of bias and pedestal placing of the woman, so will make sure he’s a boring dweeb accountant losing his hair so he’s “safe”. 3) women prefer someone they…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 07:30 PM
2

I don’t care. Women who enjoy sex are in my wheel house. Although I agree with a lot of red pill, the whole conservative virgin fetish seems really beta to me. Why would I actually care if she had sex with ugly vs. hot guys? Has zero impact in my life. He’ll throw in fifteen abortions too. It has zero to do with me. But then I find virgins cringe, unlike the red pill who puts a hymen on a pedestal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 07:25 PM
7

1 Standard trope. Kids won’t look up from their phones so they can’t talk to each other, which is just saying older people don’t understand how younger people communicate. 2 Multiple jobs makes women not be able to date anyone but rich hot guys. Sure. That math checks out. Funny how they can make time for some people and not others. 3 This is certainly true is stupid places like china that was all trying to decimate their population, but no one ever accused commies of having high IQs. Doesn’t ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 01:56 PM
8

Recruitment of more members a d funding requires more and more wild claims, which at this point is just hate. That’s all they can do is recruit based on hate as they have no actual battles.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 01:19 PM
18

Anything about toxic masculinity should probably be ignored. Although one could come up with specific psychological issues based on perceptions or trying to “fit in”, the phrase was used to try and get around accusations of feminists being man haters. Instead they invented “toxic masculinity” which means, “we don’t hate men, we just hate anything that has to do with being a man”. So they invented a phrase and hijacked a concept to push their man hating under a fiction.
/r/MensRights20/04/24 02:43 AM
1

Spam
/r/MensRights20/04/24 01:33 AM
0

It’s not an uncommon story for some women to maintain the relationship when they’ve checked out. When guys check out the more ghost and disconnect, when women check out you won’t realize it until they bail out and go. I’m sure women will claim some excuse like they’re worried about violence or something, but many women will do this as they prep to hit the silk. It’s just how some people are.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 01:05 AM
3

Many men give women the ick for minor things they aren’t aware of, and women tend to be a lot more in tune with “ick” things. As such, many women check out of relationships for some time before ending them, whereas many men will leave immediately.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 12:59 AM
29

Not really. Rights are the result of advocacy and politics and the legal system. Not a tool for data analysis. AI doesn’t stop quota hiring, they showed that at google where AI was selecting men as candidates. AI doesn’t stop movies from depicting men as evil.
/r/MensRights19/04/24 11:39 PM
2

Yet you’re banned anyway, so it is hate.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 02:54 PM
18

You’ll learn criticism is hate. If you know anything about Stalin’s regime in the Soviet Union, anything below blind worship would get you sent to a gulag. That’s the world you live in.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 02:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter