TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jake0024 Archive

View 0 posts and 1,952 comments by Jake0024 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,952 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I was refuting your claim that conscription first existed in the United States in 1917 But I didn't make that claim. I said women didn't have the right to vote when the draft was created Did you reply to the wrong person? It shows how strong my argument is Thinking your argument is strong is a profound condemnation of the state of the US education system No, that is simply false. Women voted in New Jersey in the 1700s ...which doesn't make my claim false. Do you even read what I write before rep…
/r/MensRights29/07/26 02:59 AM
1

Did you forget what sub you're in? What post you're replying to?
/r/MensRights29/07/26 02:03 AM
1

The Enrollment Act of 1863 was a conscription law That's even further before women got the right to vote. Are you trying to switch sides, or are you making my point for me accidentally? The 19th Amendment doesn't mention women actually And? before the 19th Amendment women could vote when their state said they could do so Is this really how weak your argument is? "Women weren't banned from voting in every state, so it doesn't count"? That's all you've got? Never mind the fact women literally were…
/r/MensRights28/07/26 09:42 PM
1

that act came into existence under Elizabeth I. She was a woman Do you actually think cherry-picking narrow exceptions (like women in New Jersey being able to vote from 1790 - 1807) reverses the dynamic of who held power throughout history, or are you grasping for straws to try to preserve your preconceived beliefs? I have now idea what flipping the dynamic means It shows it does imply that who had political power wasn't only men In one state, for half a generation, wow! Really not making the po…
/r/MensRights28/07/26 09:27 PM
1

Elizabethan times a statute regulated impressment as a form of recruitment, and with the introduction of the Vagabonds Act 1597 If you don't want to be drafted into military service under the Vagabonds Act of 1597, don't go back to the 16th century and commit any major crimes. That's what I do. Elizabethan military recruiters hate this one weird trick! Look up women voting in New Jersey in the 1700s Women were able to vote in one state from 1790 to 1807? Wow, that really flips the dynamic of who…
/r/MensRights28/07/26 08:12 PM
1

In the United States there existed a property requirement to vote for a long time That was never federal law, but in practice most states restricted voting to property owners until that was made illegal in 1870 The draft was created in 1917 Women got the right to vote in 1920 those convicted of crimes have historically lost the right to vote That's true for some crimes in some states, but they're also ineligible for the draft so I don't see how this is relevant. felons still lose the right to vo…
/r/MensRights28/07/26 08:00 PM
0

Nope, that's why my reply was on topic.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 05:20 PM
1

Queen Elizabeth I died in 1603 Impressment officially started in 1664 under Edward I, just before the monarchy transitioned to become a mostly ceremonial role We're talking about the modern draft systems this sub likes to trot out to argue men are oppressed today (not 400 years ago)
/r/MensRights28/07/26 02:09 PM
1

All men literally were allowed to vote for the politicians who enact the draft Whether they acted on that right or voted wisely is up to them--but every one of them had the opportunity Zero women had that opportunity
/r/MensRights28/07/26 02:05 PM
-8

Think of it less as bragging about women doing better and instead a challenge for men to rise to the occasion. Nobody's making men apply or graduate from university at lower rates.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 01:54 PM
0

Did you reply to the wrong comment?
/r/MensRights27/07/26 06:12 PM
0

Women's suffrage by country - Wikipedia
/r/MensRights27/07/26 03:48 PM
0

Politicians who were 100% men Women's suffrage by country - Wikipedia
/r/MensRights27/07/26 03:47 PM
-6

You'll need better examples than the draft--which was enacted by men before women had the right to vote on it
/r/MensRights26/07/26 06:24 AM
0

Those men paying 3/4 of all taxes are the wealthiest 10% of the wealthiest country in history Nothing to show for it, really?
/r/MensRights21/07/26 09:18 PM
0

You need to stop looking at ragebait, convincing yourself it represents everyday experience, and driving yourself inro hysterics about it Have you ever met a woman who wouldn't go on a date with someone unless they bought her a car? Then why do you let yourself get fooled into thinking this is a thing?
/r/MensRights21/07/26 09:16 PM
2

wat
/r/MensRights14/07/26 03:26 PM
2

I think that was viewed better than death
/r/MensRights13/07/26 02:39 PM
2

that was basically condemning them to a life of poverty I think that was viewed better than death
/r/MensRights13/07/26 02:44 AM
1

No shit, everyone is treated worse sometimes
/r/MensRights08/07/26 04:42 PM
2

Fundamentally it's just insecurity--they want to be attractive to women in these particular ways, and they're mad they're not. They could find women who don't care about height or income etc but that's not what they actually want.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 05:10 PM
1

Russia and Ukraine have not, ever, hinged "right to vote" on draft Neither has any other country, what's your point? Which the post never even mentioned or alleged to These posts never suggest any solutions, it's always just "there's a genocide against men!" but never any mention of who's committing that genocide.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 12:55 AM
1

men being drafted and people enforcing draft "Men... and people" lmao you know who made the draft but you have to try to hide it because you want to be mad at women
/r/MensRights05/07/26 12:51 AM
2

wat
/r/MensRights05/07/26 12:50 AM
0

On the contrary, women are actually more likely than men to oppose the draft You're demanding they help you fix something that was created when they didn't even have the right to vote And you're threatening to take away their right to vote again unless they help you with it And you have the utter lack of self-awareness to call them entitled for asking your "help" with... not taking away their rights? Immediately after you demand they help you with something they had no part in and have always op…
/r/MensRights02/07/26 10:09 PM
-9

What point did you think I'm trying to prove?
/r/MensRights02/07/26 10:06 PM
-9

Murder offenders in the U.S. by gender| Statista
/r/MensRights02/07/26 09:10 PM
0

lol but you're demanding they help you fix something that was created when they didn't even have the right to vote And you're threatening to take away their right to vote again unless they help you with it You do all this while claiming they're oppressing you
/r/MensRights02/07/26 03:28 PM
2

The ACLU is a civil rights organization, feminism is a subset of that Anyway, you're making my point--most feminists (and other civil rights groups) oppose the draft, and it's better to work with them than to fight against them
/r/MensRights01/07/26 10:45 PM
2

What does that have to do with anything?
/r/MensRights01/07/26 10:14 PM
-8

lmfao keep getting mad at things you made up in your own mind, see where that gets you
/r/MensRights01/07/26 10:13 PM
1

They're not going to work with you on this while they're being attacked on things like the right to vote, reproductive freedom, etc
/r/MensRights01/07/26 10:07 PM
1

When you said there's a genocide against men lol who else do you think would be perpetrating that? Or are you saying you're one of the rare few in this sub who acknowledge these problems are self-inflicted?
/r/MensRights01/07/26 09:51 PM
-7

Isn't it the other way around? Women are carrying their own weight now (financially), so men showing up with just a paycheck isn't enough anymore? I'm not seeing how that indicates more problems for women
/r/MensRights01/07/26 08:52 PM
2

If the women you're meeting refuse to date a man who earns the same income as them (or even asks about that), you should reconsider the type of women you're chasing after.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 08:51 PM
-9

Wtf? Did you reply to the wrong comment?
/r/MensRights01/07/26 08:45 PM
2

This is always going to be a losing talking point because we all know women couldn't even vote yet when the Selective Service was established Is the draft unfair? Absolutely! Are you going to get anywhere blaming that on women? Not with anyone who's ever opened a history book! You're not making life better for anyone with this "men made conscription male-only, so we're going to get back at women by taking away birth control!" shit. Most feminists oppose the draft. If you want to fix things, vote…
/r/MensRights01/07/26 08:25 PM
-12

Feminists absolutely don't think the Ukraine invasion is ok, wtf do you mean? It's fine to point out the unfairness of male-only conscription, but it is odd to blame women when you know a man started the war and men wrote the conscription laws
/r/MensRights01/07/26 08:22 PM
2

Affirmative action was deemed illegal for college admissions Recent executive orders and rule changes have extended some of those changes to employment Affirmative action is not only legal but explicitly required for veterans and disabled people (which is why you see those questions on resumes)
/r/MensRights01/07/26 05:51 PM
1

Why would you ask the question here, of all places?
/r/MensRights29/06/26 03:17 PM
-1

The current President was elected without the support of women.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 06:14 PM
0

Women are allowed to vote for whatever they want--just like anybody else. What point does that make? Who is actually voting for those pro-war policies in practice? Who didn't yet have the right to vote when the draft was created?
/r/MensRights23/06/26 06:13 PM
3

Literally who cares? LGBT people can have kids too. Next you'll say water is wet
/r/MensRights23/06/26 03:50 PM
8

with either a surrogate mother or a (theoretical) artificial womb Yes to the first, no to the latter. You need an egg to make a baby, not just a womb.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 03:49 PM
1

how many WOMEN are involved in the stripping of women of their reproductive rights? Fewer than men Public Opinion on Abortion | Pew Research Center You're the one who claimed it's only men "long since dead," remember? Now you've backpedaled all the way to "well some women do it too"? Is that supposed to make it okay? Maybe we should look at the gender breakdown of who voted to institute the draft? Why then am I deserving of violence and vitriol for things I have never done? Again, that's their p…
/r/MensRights22/06/26 03:13 PM
0

Did you skip reading the thread before replying?
/r/MensRights22/06/26 02:53 AM
1

No it doesn't
/r/MensRights22/06/26 01:54 AM
-1

That's funny given how often feminists LOVE to paint ALL men as "Rapists" or "Abusers" based on the actions of what is essentially the minority of men Sure backpedaled fast from "one person" to "essentially the minority" huh? men long since dead You should check current polls of support for stripping women of their reproductive rights, the percent of women who have been sexually assaulted, etc... when you "return the level of violence" towards men who have done nothing wrong? I think that's thei…
/r/MensRights22/06/26 01:53 AM
0

Do you have a mirror handy?
/r/MensRights22/06/26 01:48 AM
-8

One person doesn't define a movement, but also retribution basically means "to get justice" I'm not sure if you mean to be saying women would be getting justice by returning the level of violence toward men?
/r/MensRights20/06/26 11:19 PM
-5

the act of administering a deserved, severe punishment in return for a wrongdoing, offense, or crime something given or exacted in recompense In general you can't just smash together the etymological roots of a word to get its modern meaning, but in this case "payback" is close enough That doesn't answer the question tho
/r/MensRights20/06/26 11:17 PM
1

What's the response to this? I see a few obvious arguments: Violence doesn't need to be "redistributed" because it's already equal (but there's not a lot of good facts here) Violence doesn't need to be "redistributed" because the status quo is acceptable (despite not being equal) Violence doesn't need to be "redistributed" because it would be better instead to encourage men to be less violent, rather than encouraging women to rise to the same level of violence
/r/MensRights20/06/26 10:33 PM
-17

One person doesn't define a movement, but also retribution basically means "to get justice" I'm not sure if you mean to be saying women would be getting justice by returning the level of violence toward men?
/r/MensRights20/06/26 10:31 PM
0

I addressed the part of your comment that addressed mine.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 07:28 AM
0

Yes
/r/MensRights19/06/26 11:47 PM
-1

You don't know what systems force men to fight and die in war? Educate yourself about basic men's issues.
/r/MensRights19/06/26 11:45 PM
0

The systems that send those men to fight and die were created by men. You're never going to overturn them by blaming women.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 03:19 PM
1

No idea what "furphy" means, and I didn't suggest "wars are an exclusively male thing" (whatever that means). There's absolutely no way female leaders are responsible for more conflicted than male leaders. Why make shit up? Does everything really need to come down to this petty "team sports" BS?
/r/MensRights16/06/26 03:17 PM
-15

You'll never hear a feminist say sexism doesn't also negatively impact men. The systems that send those men to fight and die were created by men. You're never going to overturn them by blaming women. If anything, your best bet is aligning with women who also want to overturn those same systems.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 09:19 PM

You said "women will settle for it." What did you mean by that? You said "I don't belief men or women truly think that every single person available for them to date is absolutely trash to the point where there is literally no options. However women tend to do this more." What did you mean by that? It sounds like you're saying women prefer being single to dating low value men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 08:40 PM

You're the one asking questions relying on the premise that most women prefer being single to dating low value men, remember?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 08:30 PM

You said women are "larping" loneliness. That implies they're faking it--they're not actually lonely. It sounds like what you're actually saying is "women would rather be lonely than date low value men, and most men are low value."
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:18 PM

Do you think being surrounded by people you don't like makes you less lonely?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 06:57 PM
1

"Manosphere" spaces seem to want it to be, but unfortunately they forget women are outearning men (especially among young adults) Young men either need to get back in school and catch up to women's financial success or find something else to offer women. They no longer need your paycheck
/r/MensRights13/06/26 09:00 PM
7

Bingo. The right's messaging supports the wealthy--not men. They actively discourage men from all the things women have done to pull ahead of men (education, etc) because they want the majority of the population uneducated and poor.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 03:23 PM
0

That's what I figured
/r/MensRights11/06/26 03:24 PM
1

Again, I don't know why you're suddenly deciding to flip the table and storm off I'm not aware of anything in the ACA that says "women get free cancer screening but men don't" Can you help me find it or not? Or are you no longer talking about the ACA? My only "agenda" here is "not believing in things that don't exist" so I'm asking you to explain what it is you're talking about
/r/MensRights10/06/26 08:06 PM
2

What discrimination am I trying to justify or ignore? We just talked about how you were arguing against the opposite of what I wrote, so forgive me if I don't believe this accusation either What cancer screenings are covered for women but not men? What free counseling for women but not men? Requiring that insurance cover both mammograms and prostate screenings is not "discrimination" just because either example only applies to one gender We already agreed on several things here, I don't know why…
/r/MensRights10/06/26 06:11 PM
0

I want to see the actual legislation you're referring to so we can see if what you're claiming is actually there, not be referred to a third person's opinion You may have read this book and agree with it, but that doesn't answer my question and you're basically just telling me to go away until I agree with you I can think of good arguments for charging higher rates based on behavior (driving). Can you think of good arguments for charging higher rates based on uncontrollable circumstances of some…
/r/MensRights10/06/26 05:36 PM
0

Great, glad we can agree on that! I agree things like affirmative action and women owned business grants can be sunset now that women have reached (and exceeded) parity with men Can we also agree when they were started (~60y ago) they were a good idea to help "jump start" women's equality in the workplace? I'm not familiar with any advantages provided to women by the ACA. All I can find is a rule saying insurers can't charge women higher premiums (just for being women) and they can't exclude tre…
/r/MensRights10/06/26 04:57 PM
-1

I'm a "pick me" for encouraging men to get off their ass and put in work rather than just being jealous of other people's success?
/r/MensRights10/06/26 04:02 PM
1

If you thought something was a private medical decision between a patient and their doctor you wouldn't want the state getting involved. I really don't understand why so many on the far right can't see that. They're supposed to be the "small government" ones. You don't have to agree with the underlying premise to find the response reasonable given that those people do believe in the premise.
/r/MensRights10/06/26 03:59 PM
1

It's ok to say you're afraid to answer the question
/r/MensRights10/06/26 03:51 PM
3

I don't think most MRAs are left wing. I bet most of this comment section would be mad at you for suggesting that
/r/MensRights10/06/26 02:53 PM
-2

how feminism has created much of the discrimination men and boys face. It’s hard to effectively advocate for men’s rights Genuinely curious about this--the go to issue on this sub is the draft, but we know the draft predates feminism (and women's right to vote or hold office) by almost 100 years I completely agree the draft's continued existence is a good example of sex discrimination, but I don't understand blaming that on feminists, given we know the draft was created by men before women had a…
/r/MensRights10/06/26 02:50 PM
1

I agree, I shouldn't have a say in other people's medical decisions. That has nothing to do with my genitalia (beyond the fact they mean I can never make the decision for myself) You for some reason disagree
/r/MensRights09/06/26 03:50 PM
2

You think the changes you just outlined would have happened without women pushing for them?
/r/MensRights09/06/26 03:44 PM
0

If congress was 72% women and we had a woman president. it still would’ve passed And in that hypothetical world it would make sense for your anger to be directed at women lmfao Thank you for making my point It wasn't drafted by one individual person. Again, whoever told you that lied to you It was co-sponsored by Chrissy Houlahan and Don Bacon It was passed by Congress (72% male) and signed by a male President You're choosing to focus your anger on a single woman That seems to come very naturall…
/r/MensRights08/06/26 11:48 PM
-1

It was co-sponsored by Chrissy Houlahan and Don Bacon. Whoever told you otherwise lied to you (or you are intentionally lying now) The bill was passed by Congress (72% male) and signed by a male President, but you're choosing to focus your anger on a single woman That seems to come very naturally to you
/r/MensRights08/06/26 11:38 PM
0

Neither did I, but your projection is hilarious Reread what you just wrote, just substitute "gender" for "political affiliation"
/r/MensRights08/06/26 11:28 PM
4

Right? lmao dude really went out of his way to say he doesn't want to add to the discussion
/r/MensRights08/06/26 11:27 PM
2

It's literally not.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 11:27 PM
-6

It was sponsored by one woman and one man (a Dem and a Rep) You're blaming the woman It was passed by both chambers of Congress (72% male) and signed by a male President You're blaming one women If you want to march, GO MARCH! Men need to get off their ass and work for what they want--like women have done the last several centuries--rather than just airing their grievances by voting for the candidate who promises to push women and minorities back down "where they belong"
/r/MensRights08/06/26 11:19 PM
0

Why are you making up stories to pretend to be aggrieved by? You can't even be internally consistent in your lie--both those cases (the real one and the one you made up) involve women
/r/MensRights08/06/26 10:24 PM
-2

In practice though, we can just look up who voted for the party
/r/MensRights08/06/26 10:23 PM
1

You think the changes you just outlined would have happened without women pushing for them?
/r/MensRights08/06/26 10:20 PM
2

OP sees not being given extra as a form of oppression
/r/MensRights08/06/26 10:19 PM
2

If you don't want to be part of the conversation, don't.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 09:48 PM
0

Pointing out the other commenter is unserious for dishonestly characterizing these bills as "words games" and their opposition as "bad faith" is not "ad hominem" Your projection is just an illogical and hysterical reaction to cognitive dissonance of realizing your worldview is deeply inadequate Emphasizing 10 different times you were being deeply unserious emphasizes the point: you are acting emotionally, not logically If Republicans were interested in "compromise," they wouldn't have banned abo…
/r/MensRights08/06/26 09:47 PM
-4

As usual, more word games. The Tennessee bill was not at all what you claim... But it's exactly what I claim--a bill that provides exceptions to save the life of the mother. It also provides exceptions for rape and incest. You're just saying you're okay with abortion being illegal in those cases--that doesn't make what I said "word games" This is NOT what the article's headline claims, which is "Tennessee lawmakers defeat abortion bill protecting mother’s life" But that is what they did. You mus…
/r/MensRights08/06/26 06:50 PM
0

Tennessee lawmakers defeat abortion bill protecting mother’s life • Tennessee Lookout NC GOP lawmaker removes name from anti-abortion bill after social media outcry • NC Newsline 'Extremely extreme': NC bill would authorize deadly force against women seeking abortions | wcnc.com Here's the actual bill from NC gov, under the section titled "Life begins at fertilization": Any person has the right to defend his or her own life or the life of another person, even by the use of deadly force if necess…
/r/MensRights08/06/26 05:11 PM
1

What are they "objectively wrong" about? About 3/4 of US adults (for example) are overweight or obese
/r/MensRights08/06/26 05:02 PM
2

Why would you use gender as a proxy for caloric needs? It would make more sense to profile everyone by size / weight and serve them portions accordingly, if that's something you want to prioritize But to answer your question directly, for most developed countries (where people can afford to fly on an airplane), obesity rates are such that a uniform meal size is actually hurting smaller people (statistically, women) the most
/r/MensRights08/06/26 05:00 PM
0

I wouldn't
/r/MensRights08/06/26 03:52 PM
-2

Rhetorically, Republicans are usually nicer lol wut
/r/MensRights08/06/26 03:11 PM
-9

The Republicans aren’t fighting against women Women disagree vehemently. Republicans in Tennessee recently shot down a bill that would allow abortion to save the life of the mother. Republicans in North Carolina recently proposed a bill that would allow the use of deadly force (by random citizens) in defense of a fertilized egg--against the abortion provider, friends and family (ex for driving a woman to get an abortion), and even against the pregnant mother.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 03:06 PM
2

Oh my bad
/r/MensRights08/06/26 03:02 PM
-4

Of course. Men need to come together as a community if they want to fix the issues they see--like women have been doing. Far too many people have this reactionary backlash response--they see women doing better (in college graduation rates, say) and respond by looking for ways to "put women back in their place." Rather than encouraging young men and boys to succeed, they want to take away things women have accomplished for themselves, and (foolishly) start telling young men and boys that college …
/r/MensRights08/06/26 02:49 PM
1

Rhetorically, Republicans are usually nicer lol wut
/r/MensRights08/06/26 02:45 PM
1

My explanation has been the same throughout. If you think it makes less sense now, you're only admitting you never understood the point. And no, I don't single handedly determine policy in South Korea. That's not a thing.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 02:26 PM
1

The situation for women hasn't improved. They continue to suffer exactly the same 100 assaults You're not even making contact with the point. Did you just copy/paste AI slop instead of thinking for yourself? As I very specifically said in the comment you just replied to, the issue is not "is one group more likely to suffer a crime?" but rather "is one group more likely to commit crime against a different group?" You completely missed the point--whether on purpose or out of ignorance, I can't be …
/r/MensRights08/06/26 05:09 AM
0

You literally just accused someone of "misandry" for saying "women need buses in order to not get raped [and] are 90% of rape victims" Do you just never think about the things you write, and prefer to let your hate spew out like this?
/r/MensRights04/06/26 06:36 PM
1

This is a guy who's mad that women don't want to be raped, and calls them sexist for it. He's not worth your time (or anyone else's)
/r/MensRights04/06/26 04:17 PM
0

"Misandry is when people say it's bad to rape women" K bro, maybe it's a good thing you post this stuff anonymously lmao
/r/MensRights04/06/26 04:16 PM
-2

Or get a train car safe from men, that works too. This other guy complaining men also attack men is asking for... what, exactly? A train car free of men (except him)?
/r/MensRights02/06/26 05:57 AM
-5

I already addressed that: the attacker and victim are the same race/group If you're afraid of other men, don't go out in public I guess. Do you want your own train car just for you?
/r/MensRights01/06/26 08:40 PM
-5

If you could find a clear systemic pattern of violence from one group toward another, yeah, you should protect that second group. But you can't find that with race, since most violence is perpetrated within the same racial group. In other words, the attacker and victim are typically the same race. But in theory if the data were different, sure.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 07:35 PM
2

Bingo.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 02:44 PM
-15

I'm not sure what you mean.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 01:33 AM
-13

Why would it remind you of that?
/r/MensRights31/05/26 11:11 PM
-31

How is that comparable to buses everyone can ride and buses for women to be safe?
/r/MensRights31/05/26 11:09 PM
-29

What's the issue? If people want to ride the regular buses, they can. If they want to ride separate buses, they can. Why do you want to force women to ride the same bus as you?
/r/MensRights31/05/26 10:28 PM
21

Why do you think that is?
/r/MensRights31/05/26 10:26 PM
-3

We need to stop telling men education and getting a good job is a waste of time. High school boys all say they want to be influencers and podcasters
/r/MensRights29/05/26 11:13 PM
1

Exactly. The two articles aren't from the same person, and aren't even presenting opposing viewpoints. And yet people are trying to call the entire newspaper a hypocrite (whatever that means) for publishing both.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 04:36 AM
-2

Did you reply to the wrong comment? I didn't say anything like that.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 08:46 PM
1

It's not. If the newspaper only published stories from one side, you'd accuse them of being biased. Publishing opinions defending both sides of an issue is standard journalism.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 08:31 PM
-1

Yes.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 08:25 PM
-4

I feel similarly about yours. You claimed "people never talk about..." but I've experienced it myself. You're dismissing my experience because of your personal biases.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 07:18 PM
-20

That is not my experience
/r/MensRights26/05/26 05:13 PM
-42

On everyone, wdym?
/r/MensRights26/05/26 04:03 PM
19

This is an anonymous article from a person with an AI "boyfriend," not an article by the Telegraph about people with AI partners. It's not hypocritical for two different people to have different opinions.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 03:26 PM
-49

Plenty of people talk about the effects of porn, wdym?
/r/MensRights26/05/26 03:21 PM
1

...right, so why are you trying to exclude your ideology? Is this the thing where your viewpoint is the "default" and everyone else's is an "ideology"?
/r/MensRights25/05/26 10:52 PM
0

An ideology is a structured, coherent set of beliefs, values, and ideas that shapes how individuals or groups perceive reality It's weird how people think "not having any ideology" is some kind of virtue. That would basically mean you don't have thoughts.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 08:51 AM
1

This you? Don't have kids if if can't afford rent and food. Maybe you forgot the conversation you were having. I said children need basic needs like rent and food. You replied arguing with me. If you don't disagree with me, why are you arguing?
/r/MensRights19/05/26 11:30 PM
1

You're literally arguing you shouldn't have to buy your kid food lmafo
/r/MensRights19/05/26 03:16 PM
1

Why not?
/r/MensRights19/05/26 03:15 PM
1

Again, that's what parenting means. You're going off on another hysterical tangent about "what if a parent doesn't support their kids?" Then they're a shitty parent. What's your point? Some hypothetical person not supporting their kids isn't an excuse for you to be a deadbeat too.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 06:05 PM
1

Is your counter really just "it should be socially acceptable to be a deadbeat because I wouldn't have to support my kids if I was dead"? People shouldn't be so stupid and irresponsible as to have kids if they're too much of a deadbeat to support them. For some reason you want that to only apply to women
/r/MensRights14/05/26 06:04 PM
1

I'm saying parents share the living expenses of a child. That's what parenting means. No idea why you're going off on a hysterical tangent about all this other stuff.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 07:37 PM
1

Exactly. Don't have kids if you can't afford child support to pay for its rent and food.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 04:17 PM
5

As opposed to rent, food, etc?
/r/MensRights12/05/26 09:02 PM

Probably because he's still interested tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 09:00 PM
1

Thanks for revealing how wildly dishonest you are (a second time)
/r/MensRights06/05/26 06:35 PM
1

lmao ok so you're changing your story from "there was never any comment" to now "the comment that is clearly deleted is still there for me" lmfao
/r/MensRights05/05/26 10:24 PM
3

I see a deleted comment right under this one. And here's the screenshot in my inbox d22Ypzs.jpeg (505×296) So yeah. You're one of those. And you're aware enough of how embarrassing that is to delete your own comments--and you still try to push your BS anyway.
/r/MensRights05/05/26 09:05 PM

Assholes and players lie and trick women into dating them so they're the ones to blame See how easy this is?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 06:57 PM
3

Oh no... you're one of those Edit: looks like he made a comment arguing tobacco is actually good for you, but deleted it out of embarrassment
/r/MensRights05/05/26 05:50 PM
6

This isn't a conspiracy--new treatments typically take 10-20 years to clear human trials and reach general availability. Your links acknowledge this Here's an article from 2024 mentioning Vasalgel (among other male birth control options), saying they haven't yet begun full human trials. They are currently testing the injection method itself (leading up to full human tests of the product) Here's another article from last month about a similar injectable form of non-hormonal male birth control One…
/r/MensRights05/05/26 04:14 PM
1

Are you saying whether we call 14-year-old males "young men" or "boys" has some bearing on the conversation?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 06:26 PM
2

But now you're arguing against your earlier claim. Despite saying it's a "fact"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 06:26 PM
1

Yes, which is why I pointed out the OP (and your comment starting the thread) were about boys, not men. It's still not clear why you switched to talking about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 06:22 PM
2

It was your claim that childhood influences adulthood *shrug*
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 06:10 PM
2

The switch to adults from when you started your comment with "Boys..." is not at all clear
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 06:06 PM
3

Influences your adulthood by letting your learn from your mistakes
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 05:28 PM
3

You used the word "success" twice in your original post to describe the more misogynistic group...
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 05:23 PM
2

This is about 14-year-olds lol they're all terrified
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 05:22 PM

The fact that anyone can enjoy sex doesn't mean they always enjoy sex. Obviously if you lie to someone to get them to do something for you, you're using them. This is true whether you're "borrowing" money you don't intend to return or trying to have sex with them. Your example where both people agree to casual sex doesn't involve anyone being used. That doesn't mean there aren't other examples where people are. This is really, really simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/26 05:53 AM
0

The draft is slavery You're welcome to be hysterical if you want, but you're still patently dishonest when you claim the party who hasn't yet removed registration from the books is somehow worse than the party actively threatening to reinstate an active draft (and also hasn't removed mandatory registration from the books) Any way you look at it, the right is at least as bad as the left on the draft--and decidedly worse unless you think they're lying about wanting to reinstate the draft thousands…
/r/MensRights28/04/26 08:30 PM
4

So you're saying the 'left' enforces the status quo of slavery laws that allow the government to enslave men at any given time by declaring there is a war. Woah. Whoa* dude. Far out. The existence of the draft is an empirical fact. Neither party has eliminated it. Your exaggerated melodrama isn't a rational reflection of the world. Why don't we sign up women for the military draft then? Because expanding the draft would be a move in the wrong direction. Two wrongs don't make a right. how about a…
/r/MensRights28/04/26 12:16 AM
23

And the right is going to make them worse. The left won't eliminate mandatory draft registration (that hasn't been used in 50y), but the right is actively threatening to reinstate the draft and send you to war.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 08:10 PM

I'm sorry you feel that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 10:07 PM

Are you saying improving yourself is an "unrealistic ideal"? You're as perfect as a human can realistically become?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 10:06 PM

You're basically just saying "women are pickier than men" (no news there), and then deciding rather than improving yourself to better your odds, you're going to declare... the entire future of relationships dead? My guy, wat?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 07:20 PM
1

I did reply. Do you not know what non-sequitur means?
/r/MensRights21/04/26 10:23 PM
0

Then why'd you bother?
/r/MensRights21/04/26 08:05 PM
0

Those lifetime stats are bunk, as many men are raped per year every year by women as vice versa This sentence is a non-sequitur
/r/MensRights21/04/26 03:32 PM
1

Thanks for taking your L
/r/MensRights20/04/26 08:10 PM
2

I pointed out the frequency is incomparable. You pointed out the severity is incomparable. We're both saying they're incomparable.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 03:56 PM
2

0%
/r/MensRights20/04/26 03:34 PM
2

I wasn't the one comparing those two things, remember? You're adding a second reason (in addition to the one I provided in my comment) they shouldn't be compared.
/r/MensRights20/04/26 03:34 PM
-11

Did you mean to reply to the comment before mine?
/r/MensRights20/04/26 05:17 AM
-13

Did you mean to reply to the comment before mine?
/r/MensRights20/04/26 05:16 AM
-25

Are we comparing infanticide (which happens about 500 times a year in the US) to sexual assault (which is so common around 1/2 of women and 1/6 of men experience it in their lifetime)?
/r/MensRights19/04/26 10:47 PM

Did you intentionally switch from "use less" to "none at all" just to be argumentative, or did you forget what you said in your last comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 05:30 PM

I haven't found reducing fossil fuel use to have any impact on my standard of living tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 05:04 PM
0

And it's men doing that discouraging. You're participating in it now--education is hard, education is for girls. Boys and men should just drop out of the system and resign themselves to a life of unemployment and poverty! That's so much easier.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 04:45 PM
1

The only real equalizer for men is status This you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 08:49 PM
3

Whatever attracts women, as far as I can tell from how these guys talk about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 08:48 PM
1

People should stop discouraging men from getting an education and becoming useful to the modern workforce. The idea that education is "feminine" and you need to do manual labor to be "masculine" is misguided and foolish. Do you need a college degree to land a median income job? No, of course not. But it's statistically much much much more likely to happen if you follow the path of least resistance. You can be mad all you want about participating in a "feminized" system or whatever, but conceding…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 04:31 PM
1

I'm not sure where you think the inconsistency lies. Marriage rates are certainly down, but not "under 5%" like you claim. It's actually just over 50% Barely Half of U.S. Adults Are Married – A Record Low | Pew Research Center Women don't want to be single, but they prefer being single to dating a bad partner. If you're trying to oversimplify that to just "dating good, not dating bad" then you're never going to understand the question you're asking. More people are single because women can be se…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 05:19 PM
1

Gen Z grew up with online dating. There were literally whole dating apps like Tinder made for the 13-17 age group (not sure if any are still around) I think they realized early on that it's awful, so they don't participate as much as older generations
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 05:41 PM
-1

Yes, but not the ones that got all weird and turned into Trump supporters. Polyamory is becoming much more common, all the young women are dating the same few young guys who don't creep them out.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 05:24 PM
1

That's how courts work, yeah
/r/MensRights08/04/26 07:48 AM
1

What is a "stalemate" in this context?
/r/MensRights08/04/26 06:40 AM
8

It sounds like they're basically assuming every accusation that doesn't result in a conviction is a false accusation? That's... not how anything works
/r/MensRights07/04/26 03:57 PM
1

wat
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 03:34 PM
2

*rooted, not routed
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 02:40 PM
0

What does this random statement have to do with the discussion at hand?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 05:57 PM
1

Of course not lmap
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 04:42 AM
2

Are these discussions by chance all screenshots posted in RP groups as rage bait? Yes, it would be better if SW was legal so it could be done more safely. Lots of SWers are (unfortunately) victims of trafficking or similar, but that does not by any stretch mean all SWers are victims. Especially not online SWers. No man has ever been pressured, trafficked, or influenced due to their circumstances into paying a SWer. The false comparison here is absolutely wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 03:07 AM
2

If men don't feel sex work benefits them, they should not pay for sex. I don't see the appeal, so I don't partake. I don't seek out sex workers to give money to in exchange for sex. The same is truer for porn and female influencers--they're available without even asking for any money. In what way are you even suggesting they take advantage of men? By... giving men what they're seeking, mostly for free? If you're subscribing to female influencers hoping to get something out of it, you're not bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 02:45 AM
0

Who portrays SWers as victims? That's just more puritanical right-wingers, or maybe radical sex-negative feminists (most feminists wouldn't recognize them as feminists, let alone agree with them)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 02:32 AM
11

Ah but they want to control women, and your suggestion would require them changing their own lives
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 08:48 PM
1

You're literally saying she's compensated by his wages lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 07:51 PM
1

No, they're accurately counting it as unpaid labor You're the one counting is as "service to the husband" when you pretend she's compensated by his wages for her unpaid household labor
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 06:39 PM
1

Again you're counting money the husbands make as money the wives make
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 05:17 PM
1

Hours they're compensated for, yes? At a higher rate than the wives, on average? But somehow you're using the higher earnings of the husbands to argued the (unpaid) extra labor of wives is actually compensated at a higher rate than they make at their actual jobs??
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 04:45 PM

I'm not sure what you mean by "relativizing" but it sounds like you're saying OP can make statements about gender (as long as he's saying men have it harder), but if I make statements about gender I'm being "sexist and disgusting"? It sounds like you just think it's only okay if people say what you want to hear
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 03:35 PM
1

Wtf are you talking about? You're literally looking at data saying wives work more hours (unpaid) and husbands earn more (without the extra hours), and then concluding that means wives are the ones making extra...???
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 03:25 PM
0

Women are less likely to be homeless because most women can find a guy who will let them live with them in exchange for sex Most victims of violent crime are men... but most perpetrators of violent crime are also men (by a much larger margin). Women are disproportionately the victims of violence, by comparison All people who start wars are men. Why should women be sent to fight wars started by men? They're already victims of wars they didn't start as civilians Most people who commit crimes are m…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 05:00 PM
1

Ah, yeah OP seems to just be lazy, or maybe intentionally trying to hide the comparison
/r/MensRights11/03/26 08:50 PM
1

I don't see how it's any more work than what was already done. Again, note OP's post specifically calls out when suffrage happened at the same time. But when they were at different times, it never says which happened first.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 05:06 PM
1

Ok so there's one source with only years for women, and another only for men Wouldn't your post be a lot more useful in illustrating your point if it directly compared both?
/r/MensRights10/03/26 05:46 PM
1

You highlighted which ones happened the same time for men and women, but otherwise you didn't list the years for women. If you're trying to do a comparison, shouldn't you list both numbers for each country?
/r/MensRights10/03/26 05:36 PM
1

This is a common misconception. I know it's repeated in this subreddit daily, but registering for Selective Service has never been a requirement to vote in the US. Both happen when you turn 18, but other than that there's no connection between the two. It is illegal not to register for the draft, but the last person charged for it was in 1986 (and they didn't lose the right to vote).
/r/MensRights10/03/26 05:35 PM
3

This is giving "if my grandma had wheels she'd be a bike"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 05:18 PM
-2

No.
/r/MensRights06/03/26 10:39 PM
-20

mens rights is inherently more progressive than feminism lmao literally "it's different when I do it"
/r/MensRights23/02/26 08:22 PM
0

The point is you should be yourself if you want to keep someone around, because they're eventually going to find out if you're pretending to have all these interests and hobbies you really don't just because you think that will be attractive. You have to be someone actually interesting and attractive to get someone's interest in the first place. If you want to keep it long-term, those interests need to be genuine. It's not that deep, and it's not meant to be some magic bullet that will attract a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 04:11 PM
1

The PM doesn't "send" anyone, they're not a totalitarian dictatorship. A lot of the cleanup was done by elderly volunteers. Many of which were women, yes Since guys on the top of the social pyramid had dicks, it surely was great for other men, wasn't it? Do you imagine that to be relevant? Apex fallacy me all day long, stranger I invite you to point out where I did any such thing
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 06:03 PM
2

Literally everywhere. I dare you to find a feminist group that supports military conscription.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 07:03 PM
4

The PM of Japan when Fukushima happened was a man. Along with every PM of Japan prior to that point, and every PM of Japan after that point until the current PM. But you're probably right, it's women who are privileged...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 07:02 PM
5

In what sense is "women are the fairer sex" either a female privilege or something that sounds negative? In context, "fair" is defined as "beautiful" (not the other definition related to fairness/justice) The statement emphasizes the importance of women's physical attractiveness
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 06:59 PM
1

What women say and do are vastly different things because there are 4 billion women on the planet. Turns out they don't all say and do the same thing. Crazy thought, I know
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 06:45 PM
2

For the record it's not for picking up women it's for understanding and managing your own emotional baggage lmao this needs to be so much higher OP literally wrote: Also if i goto therapy will i start getting laid? And can't figure out why people keep saying he needs therapy *facepalm*
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 06:40 PM
-4

That's a weird kind of learned helplessness
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/25 05:21 PM

It sounds like you replied to the wrong comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 07:38 AM

You're literally just making a baseless accusation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 07:38 AM
1

I've literally never heard a woman complain about that, so...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 12:25 AM
4

Did you reply to the wrong comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 12:25 AM
0

Some women want to be approached at clubs, and others don't. That's not hypocritical. Of the women who want to be approached at clubs, they're probably only interested in talking to 10-20% of the guys at the club. That's not hypocritical. You're just mad that women have preferences and agency.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 12:21 AM
5

You're right, there's no magical way. It's a very mundane and ordinary way--using your mouth to speak.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 12:19 AM
0

It's not women's job to all have the same opinion on everything all the time just to make your life easier
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 12:18 AM
4

Not if you follow the 2 rules
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 12:16 AM
1

Bingo. OP is mad because women don't all have the exact same preferences
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 12:16 AM
5

Only getting interest from women who are interested in you is not a "double standard" A chance of getting rejected when you flirt with a woman is not a "double standard" These are just things you don't like
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/25 12:15 AM
2

Why are you surprised by this at all? Everyone has some level of requirements to hook up with someone (and these will change with your mood) If someone isn't very attractive physically, they need to be more attractive in other ways This is like... meeting people 101
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 07:10 PM
1

I used both terms multiple times as well, not sure what you mean by "rather than" 24 times the length of pregnancy is irrelevant--you're comparing apples to hand grenades. The woman is also giving support for that time period (in addition to the pregnancy) There's no "additional onus" other than the pregnancy. Both have to "vet" their partners. The only difference is women (as the sex that carry the pregnancy) have the right to decide what to do with their pregnancy
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 04:34 PM
-1

Trying to reframe being a deadbeat dad as "paper abortion" won't make it more socially acceptable. There's a fundamental difference between a woman's right to choose to carry a pregnancy to term (before a child exists) and a man choosing not to support his biological offspring. You're right that parents can surrender their rights (ie surrendering the child for adoption). If all you're saying is that once a child is born, neither parent should be able to give it up for adoption without approval f…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 06:39 AM

Nobody cares what you prefer. When men start saying women "lose value" after 5 partners, or after age 25, or because they have a job and don't want to be a housewife, etc obviously that's stupid nonsense and people are rightly going to drag them for it Especially when they make these claims about someone like Taylor Swift, a literal billionaire who would never give these men the time of day, but they act like they would reject her because she's 35 and "her eggs are dried up" or whatever Making f…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 05:14 PM

wat
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 05:07 PM
1

And I said "who cares?"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 04:30 PM
1

Ok but common sense says you're wrong, so
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 07:47 AM
1

Cool. Are you suggesting people should get married simply for a better chance at getting hired for jobs? Or do you think maybe the likelihood of marriage and of getting hired for a job are both downstream from some other factor--like charisma, personality, etc? And being married doesn't actually cause people to get jobs?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 07:47 AM
1

Why would "society" expect married men to try to impress other women?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/25 07:45 AM
1

Ok well I say common sense says you're wrong, so checkmate
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 04:31 PM
1

Again, who cares? Trying to convince men that women will think more highly of them if they... get married and have kids? Why do I care what other women think of me at that point?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/25 04:28 PM
3

Who gives a shit tho? Like am I supposed to get married and have kids to up my status with other women? What weirdly backwards logic
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 04:12 PM
1

while also wanting those men to not have fucked anyone else
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 04:11 PM
1

So you pulled it out of your ass?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/25 07:16 AM
1

According to whom? What makes you think men approaching them isn't punishment?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 06:05 AM
0

So?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 08:25 PM
1

I don't understand the premise. In what world would an extremely charismatic person ever be a loner with no friends or social status?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 06:18 PM
3

"Rule of law" is not a magical incantation you can recite that makes it impossible for me to say things you don't want to hear. I don't think you know how the law works.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 05:42 PM
0

Did you reply to the wrong comment? Or do you really think saying "that hasn't been proven in court" lets you silence anyone saying anything you don't want to hear?
/r/MensRights13/11/25 05:23 PM
2

I'm not even sure what you're saying. People in this group harassed a rape survivor in a group chat, according to your own link. Is your argument just that since they haven't been tried in court for calling someone a "skank" that somehow means we can't talk about it? This is not a good look mate, you're making this sub look bad with this trash.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 05:14 PM
-5

None of the "healthy at every size" rhetoric (or whatever you're referring to) is exclusive to women
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 11:03 PM
0

Based and men-could-learn-something-from-this pilled
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 06:27 PM
3

What on Earth makes you think women don't struggle with confidence, body issues, hair, clothing choices, etc? By all accounts, they put at least as much effort into all of those things as men do (far more, for the latter two)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 06:26 PM
0

Men put far more effort into getting dates. Women put far more effort into dates. Women saying they dress how they want day to day has nothing to do with how they dress when going on a date. They are obviously not the same thing. If they are for you, maybe you should put more effort into dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/25 06:25 PM
2

If women want a partner, they can have one. It's not the "female loneliness epidemic" That said, most women do spend their twilight years alone--between differing life expectancies and typical age gaps, women typically outlive their husbands by ~10 years
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 01:49 AM
2

If men take what they can get in dating, then why should women bother with relationships? What does the first half of this sentence have to do with the second? "If a hungry person takes what they can get, why should a chef bother making food?" How does this follow?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/25 08:06 PM
1

It's great if it's what they've actively chosen, rather than being forced or pressured into
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 03:35 PM

The title and everything that follows. It does reek of toxic masculinity, yes I didn't use the words "fake victim." You're making things up to be victimized by again I didn't say anything about "self-pity" either. Making things up yet again No one does that. You're making things up to be victimized by again Again, didn't say "fake victim" You're right, pointing out bias isn't self-victimization. What you wrote is
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 06:27 PM

You don't have to make yourself a victim like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/25 05:34 PM
1

I'm not sure why "tall, wealthy, or high social standing" is patriarchal. If the genders were reversed, would a female love interest with those same traits be "matriarchal"? What does this have to do with the claim? Are we surprised when women write the male love interest as masculine? What exactly are you expecting? Men can write female love interests as hyper-feminine, but if a woman writes a man as tall, strong, or confident, suddenly that's patriarchal?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/25 01:39 AM
0

STF up if you don't know what you talking about I'll continue talking, then.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 03:00 AM
1

STF up if you don't know what you talking about I'll continue talking, then.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 02:59 AM
-14

There's no appeal. MRA is mainly grievance politics, men who are mad they're unsuccessful with women (incel / MGTOW types). They don't get the sexual attention they feel they're entitled to for existing. That's why they frame their movement as a gender issue, rather than one of social class, politics, etc. Gay men have no reason to feel aggrieved in this way.
/r/MensRights23/10/25 06:10 PM
6

Women bad, especially when they have sex with someone who's not OP
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 05:05 AM
2

Wtf is "N-count"
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 05:04 AM
1

Non sequitur - a conclusion or statement that does not logically follow from the previous argument or statement Everything you've written here is non sequitur. Let's take it from the top. They are trying to convince us that women are happier single and childless when almost all rich women get married What do these things have to do with each other? What's the connection between "happy" and "rich" and what do you think that has to do with marriage or kids? Aren't rich people happier than poor peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/25 04:18 PM
1

it's usually women perpetuating this narrative that women don't enjoy sex, and only do it as a chore or way to award men Women saying men are bad at sex does not mean women can't enjoy sex. It just means they often don't enjoy sex in practice. These are different statements. it's women who are usually perpetuating this idea that all women are asexual or demisexual I have never once heard a woman express this idea. If you hear it frequently, that might be reflective of choices you are making. Say…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/25 09:07 PM
1

What is Lum
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 03:33 PM
1

wat
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 03:32 PM
3

wat
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 03:46 PM
9

OP, apparently.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 06:22 AM
21

"I'm gonna become a fascist because I can't get laid" It's not going to help.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 05:29 AM
3

It's kind of funny you put all these years of observation in but never realized: Women are attracted to physical features, not just clothes and style Women might have different taste in men than you
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 02:00 AM
5

She's only able to cast 1 vote. Blaming her for how millions of people voted is just a giant collective refusal to take accountability.
/r/MensRights06/10/25 01:38 AM
0

They oppose the draft (for men) AND women having different/lower physical fitness standards for combat roles. Which is of course nonsensical. They want the draft to apply equally, but they also want it to be even harder for women to qualify to serve.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 07:25 PM
1

It doesn't only apply to combat roles. Hegseth specifically say his goal is to stop only applying physical fitness and grooming standards to active-duty roles--he wants them applied to everyone, even top generals who are near retirement age. That was like the main thing he focused on. How did you not know that?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 07:23 PM
0

Luckily feminism means they don't have to
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 02:36 PM
2

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 02:35 PM
1

Both
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 02:35 PM
1

Obviously OP is referring to being the primary/sole provider, and the majority can't
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 02:34 PM
1

Do you know what "for example" means? Men are consistently more likely to cheat (for example)
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 02:55 PM
5

I don't think anyone thinks otherwise. When people describe attraction, it's things like physical appearance, confidence, etc. None of that has anything to do with being a good person, which takes much longer to assess than just "do I find this person attractive" Being a good person will help you stay with someone, but it doesn't (usually) help attract them in the first place As to your other specific claims... yes, it's easier to convince someone to treat you better than it is to make someone t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 04:37 PM
1

It doesn't. Men are consistently more likely to cheat (for example)--past middle age, about twice as likely. Obviously the person doing the cheating is less likely to be the one filing for divorce. Somehow you twist that around to blame the one getting cheated on.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 03:09 PM
1

When I say "where other people see happiness," I'm referring to marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 03:06 PM
4

Girls are taught from a very young age that their wedding is supposed to be the happiest and most beautiful day of their life. That's a societally imposed thing, not something you should blame young girls for all collectively just happening to decide to value. It's also a bit odd to suggest this is the cause of most marriage issues. There's a lot of data on this--common issues include adultery, financial struggle, abuse, etc. I've never seen "the woman thought everything would suddenly be perfec…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:51 PM
10

If you're constantly seeing negative patterns where other people see happiness, that's neuroticism.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:44 PM
3

I believe that's the point they were making.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 03:37 PM
1

Did you miss the part I literally put in bold text? No. That's why I added the additional context and explanation you left out. Well men are on average bigger and stronger than women ...so it's okay?
/r/MensRights20/09/25 07:56 PM
1

Your first link says women are (very slightly) more likely to have ever perpetrated domestic violence (28% vs 25%), but significantly more likely to have been victimized by it (35% vs 17%) If self-reported numbers are deemed reliable, these numbers would mean that the men who do commit domestic violence do it much more often (ie, with multiples partners) as compared to women It also says men are about twice as likely to injure their partner during domestic violence as compared with women (severi…
/r/MensRights19/09/25 06:47 PM
0

No one said domestic violence is specifically a male issue, but men do commit the majority of domestic violence. The only rebuttal to that in this thread is people saying "nuh uh"
/r/MensRights19/09/25 02:17 AM
-4

Even if lesbians committed DV at a 10x higher rate than men, lesbians are ~1% of the population, so that wouldn't move the needle on which gender commits the majority of violent crime You're looking at the data and saying "no that's wrong, I know better" without citing contradictory data
/r/MensRights18/09/25 04:46 PM
1

And indeed the life expectancy gap is smaller in the UK US 76.86 (men) 81.85 (women) UK 79.36 (men) 83.21 (women) You don't have to actually be on a 100% carnivore diet to have a higher risk of colon cancer and heart disease. Like I said, choosing a burger and fries over a salad is a problem, especially if it's a regular decision
/r/MensRights16/09/25 02:57 PM
1

It's partly biological and partly social. Smaller, shorter people live longer on average (after controlling for other factors) Shorter people may live longer than most—here's why Women are smaller and shorter on average, so they're going to naturally live a bit longer than men Socially, women have a lot more pressure to stay fit and eat healthy. They go to yoga or for a run every day and choose the salad over the burger and fries Men are more likely to be sedentary, spending hours playing video …
/r/MensRights15/09/25 06:03 PM

wat
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 05:46 AM
1

But you're not describing what women do to prepare for a date, so...?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 06:44 PM
1

What about "all of the above"? Feminism is a huge part of why there is less pressure on women to get married young. Having less pressure to marry and having way more options (including through dating apps) both raise standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 06:27 PM
6

You didn't answer the question. What are you proposing as a "solution"? Are you saying it's "not justified" for women to not be attracted to all men?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 03:16 PM
0

Women only use natural selection to attack men I don't think you know what "natural selection" means. Then even in developed economies communities like Amish , Maga , Hardcover conservative in israel will be much more in number than the liberals If your theory was true, how has that not already happened? Oh right--children aren't carbon copies of their parents' political beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 03:12 PM
1

I'm not the one making a claim comparing the two, remember?
/r/MensRights04/09/25 03:09 PM
1

women are much more free to express themselves atypically Which takes much more time than "expressing yourself typically" Despite the variation in aesthetic presentation This doesn't imply a lack of effort
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 03:06 PM
1

What does that mean
/r/MensRights03/09/25 03:39 AM
3

Top 10% of what? Income?
/r/MensRights03/09/25 03:05 AM

Being tolerant of a group of people doesn't require having sex with anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 03:04 AM
0

Staying fit is obviously a major one--women have much stricter physical beauty standards than men Just considering physical appearance, you can add on top of that makeup, hair, clothes, etc--all of which they spend far more time on than men, and all of which men assume should take no time (and even say they don't care about, because they claim they can't tell the difference)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 02:05 AM
-1

Because of all the stuff they have to do and men pretend takes zero effort ("just existing")
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 06:47 AM
1

There is tons of research into why women are unlikely to report male abusers as well. For some reason, feminists are bad for "denying basic facts," but it's good when you do it.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 06:09 AM
-2

You do realize women would give the same reply in the opposite direction, but with data to back them up? You literally start your comment accusing feminists of denying basic facts, and end it by saying the stats can't be trusted. It's difficult to overstate the level of hypocrisy here.
/r/MensRights29/08/25 10:50 PM
1

Being desperate for something doesn't mean you deserve it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 02:54 PM
-4

I mean, if you look around at the... shall we say tone of comments in this sub for example... it's not exactly a stretch to figure out why people feel that way
/r/MensRights29/08/25 03:44 AM

Bingo. When women say to be "kind" they don't mean: Give them attention (ex by liking all their social media posts) Occasionally offering to do favors Wanting to hang out all the time, but only 1-on-1 Only being "kind" to women you're attracted to And other random things you think you can eventually cash in for sex and/or a relationship. They mean actually being kind without an ulterior motive in mind. If your response to that is "but I tried being kind and didn't get sex," you're not being kind…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 04:24 PM
4

Obviously most people are usually not trying to harm anyone, and some people ignore the law. That's not why we have laws. "Why bother having laws if criminals break the law anyway" just isn't ever a good argument. If you don't have laws against domestic violence, you can't punish people who get caught committing domestic violence (for example). You'd also be tacitly admitting that society is okay with domestic violence.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 03:54 PM
1

Again, that's false. No one has been imprisoned for failing to register for the draft in almost 40 years. I have no idea what you think "career hopes" have to do with voting. The two things have nothing to do with each other, and never did. It's just a piece of disinformation that is commonly spread in this sub. There's no reason to build your position on falsehoods, it only undermines yourself.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 03:42 PM
-1

Wrong again. A handful of states don't allow felons to vote from prison. Nowhere in the US bars felons from voting entirely. And no one has been imprisoned for failing to register for the draft since 1986. Registering for the draft is not a prerequisite for registering to vote, and never was. It's just a piece of disinformation that is commonly spread in this sub. There's no reason to build your position on falsehoods, it only undermines yourself.
/r/MensRights28/08/25 06:17 AM
2

OP listed the same things in the same order, and didn't even mention kindness...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 07:44 PM
-2

Your link says nothing about selective service being a prerequisite for voting. Was that supposed to be your big mic drop moment?
/r/MensRights27/08/25 04:44 PM
-2

Registering for the draft is not a prerequisite for registering to vote. That is a common misconception (in this subreddit, anyway). You become eligible for both at age 18, but beyond that there is literally no connection.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 04:26 PM
-1

It's so sad to see this as the top voted comment. Literally "I don't care about making things better for myself--I want to see people I don't like suffer"
/r/MensRights27/08/25 04:25 PM
2

young men are first withdrawing from higher education at a rate higher than ever before They're also seeing higher unemployment. This is likely why.
/r/MensRights27/08/25 03:05 PM
1

Oh... I see
/r/MensRights26/08/25 07:00 PM
1

Why does the data stop before the last election (2024)?
/r/MensRights26/08/25 06:51 PM
4

Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 06:45 PM
3

We just agreed it's a majority lol
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 06:44 PM
4

Ok so it's true for barely a majority of people (and unknown for the rest)?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 05:02 PM
7

Ah you're technically right, the next chart that breaks down how many currently use dating apps vs have in the past vs never have (totaling 83%) is only for LGBT adults. Either way, a majority. Not some rare exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 04:32 PM
2

I do not expect someone who never really used an online dating app would report in a poll that they used an online dating app, but it's possible some people did do that
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 04:30 PM
1

They're not not attracted to bad men. It seems to be a much less important factor than one would expect.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 04:23 PM
11

83% of Americans under 30 have used a dating app in the past 5 years The who, where and why of online dating in the U.S. | Pew Research Center
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 04:22 PM
-1

You didn't even attempt to prove feminists don't oppose the draft. Instead you pointed to a separate movement (that didn't even exist in the country we're talking about btw) that didn't oppose the draft and saying there were some feminists in it.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 01:46 AM
0

Your argument is that since you found one movement that included some feminists (again, before women had the right to vote), that means feminists collectively are to blame for the draft? lol. lmao.
/r/MensRights23/08/25 05:55 AM
0

Did you reply to the wrong comment? Or is there some part of what I wrote that you think is made incorrect by this quote?
/r/MensRights22/08/25 11:48 PM
-1

You literally changed the subject from the draft being created before women had the right to vote (in 1863) to it being reinstated in 1980 after a 7-year pause. You're not seeing feminists actively protesting the draft because: The draft hasn't been used in more than 50 years, not exactly a pressing issue today Feminists specifically have more important things to worry about, like the repeal of women's reproductive freedoms, proposals to implement mandatory "genital inspections" in women's publi…
/r/MensRights22/08/25 08:56 PM
-6

I pointed out women didn't have the right to vote when the draft was created. You moved the goalposts to the draft being reinstated in 1980, and implied that had something to do with feminists not opposing it. Feminists have opposed the draft all along (since before they had the right to vote). Blaming feminism for the decisions of a political majority that opposes feminism does not seem to me like a rational argument. If you want to know what feminists think about the draft, you could simply lo…
/r/MensRights22/08/25 08:42 PM
0

Those "very real consequences" are things like being ineligible for federally subsidized loans and grants--not losing the right to vote. Women shouldn't face those consequences because no one should be required to register for the draft. Doubling the number of people who have to register is making the problem twice as bad as it is now.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 08:27 PM
1

That's also incorrect. Some states (not all) bar felons from voting while in prison, but no state bars felons from voting in general. The last person imprisoned for failing to register was in 1986, so even if he happened to be in a state that bars felons voting from prison, it would be something that hasn't happened in 40 years. So what you're proposing is just... not even remotely equal.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 08:24 PM
-6

You're right that the draft was temporarily discontinued from 1973-1980 following the Vietnam War (and has never been used since) That doesn't address the point that the draft was created before women had the right to vote (and feminists have opposed it all the while) You're welcome to check who the legislators and executive in 1980 were if you like, but I think you'll find it was not a bunch of women deciding to send men off to war
/r/MensRights22/08/25 08:21 PM
-7

Feminists would agree with you, and go further by adding that no one should be in combat by force. Feminists have opposed the draft since it existed (before they were allowed the right to vote on it).
/r/MensRights22/08/25 06:46 PM
2

That's wildly exaggerated--the actual number is 80-90% of military roles (depending on branch) are non-combat roles. This could change during a conflict of course.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 06:45 PM
-10

Men don't have to sign up for selective service in order to vote. Why should women? It seems to be a common misconception (well, in this subreddit anyway) that since both things happen when you turn 18, one must be required for the other. It's not. It never was. I have no idea where this idea came from.
/r/MensRights22/08/25 06:44 PM
-8

Way more people have aborted female babies to have sons. So what?
/r/MensRights22/08/25 05:30 PM

Most people don't use the words investing and spending interchangeably
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 05:28 PM

You're totes right mein herr, they're definitely not into your for your beta bucks. They want your superior Aryan genetics! Go forth and maintain the strength of the white race by... uhh... marrying a Mexican
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 01:57 AM

Google says they make a pretty median salary for SK. Not sure why you think that's incompatible with beta bucks. And yeah, if you're well off enough to fly overseas to a poorer country to teach English for middling pay, it's a pretty safe assumption that when you go back home you'll be making a lot more than most people in the country you just left.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 01:55 AM
1

What power does a man has to veto the baby? I just explained this. If you don't want a baby, don't make one the woman already has the unborn child inside of her You're asking how to avoid getting someone pregnant after you've already gotten someone pregnant? Do you think this "gotcha" is clever? Veto = abortion as I have defined it Then you're making a circular semantic argument where you define a man's ability to choose whether to have a baby by whether he can have an abortion in order to reach…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 02:47 PM
1

If she has the power to veto the baby They both do. No child, no child support. Easy. inaction is also a choice I agree. So what? that is the is the final decision to be made in whether the baby will be born Yes. Women get pregnant, so they're the ones who decide whether to stay pregnant. That's just biology. What's your point? A man can be involved A man has to be involved. Again, biology. if the final step of terminating the pregnancy is 100% of the woman's choice, then that step reduces his c…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 10:00 PM
1

Did you reply to the wrong comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:49 PM
0

Thanks for admitting what your real point is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:48 PM
2

Men cannot make a choice about a pregnancy Because men don't get pregnant, correct. If medical science ever changes that, men will be able to make all the choices they want about pregnancy. Until then, no, men don't control women's bodies. Men have no rights ??? I don't get to decide what you eat for breakfast. That doesn't mean I "have no rights." It means my rights don't include deciding what you eat for breakfast (as it should be). Similarly, no one gets to decide what happens with anyone els…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:47 PM
1

Same. That's why I'm wondering why you said I "don't need to bring up rape or abortion." I replied to other people who brought them up and pointed out they have nothing to do with the topic. Maybe next comment neither of us will mention them! Men don't need to have control over women's bodies Agreed. You need to let go of that closed minded thinking Again, I'm not the one who suggested that. Are you sure you're not mixing me up with someone else? This has nothing to do with controlling women's b…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:45 PM
2

I noticed you again didn't even attempt to say how being a deadbeat dad is comparable to abortion
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:24 PM
1

I'm not "missing the point," I disagree with it. You have a frozen egg. Your genetic material What does any of this have to do with the suggestion that men should be allowed to be deadbeat dads with no negative repercussions? What you're describing is adoption. One couple is raising another couple's biological offspring. The word for that is adoption. If a man has a child, remarries, and the new wife adopts the child, that's exactly identical to the situation you're describing. A child that once…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:21 PM
2

There's nothing "unequal" about people making their own choices about their own pregnancies. The very next time you get pregnant, you'll have the same right to make any choice you want about your pregnancy (unless conservatives finish banning it).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:11 PM
1

I'm not the one who brought up rape or adoption, remember? The fact men don't have control over women's pregnancies does not in any sense remove rights from men. I don't get to decide what you eat for breakfast. That doesn't mean I "have no rights." It means my rights don't include (and for good reason) deciding what you eat for breakfast. You keep saying you're "advocating for equal rights" but you keep failing to demonstrate any equality between having an abortion and being a deadbeat dad.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:09 PM
2

Having a baby is not 100% a woman's choice--no woman has ever gotten pregnant without a man's involevment. Being pregnant is 100% a woman's choice--only one person can be pregnant. Responsibility does follow having a baby. The argument here is a bunch of guys being mad at that fact. And of course at the end you let your real position slip--you don't want women to have abortions.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:04 PM
2

I'm not the one asking why men can't have abortions.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 04:40 PM
0

They feel the same about you, I'm sure MGTOW rebranded to feminist Wouldn't it be the other way around? Feminism is like 100 years older than MGTOW
/r/MensRights20/08/25 04:38 PM
2

I'm not sure which part you're referring to, since the comment I replied to brought up yet another unrelated issue (adoption), so I'll address it assuming it was aimed at either part. If someone has an abortion, then no one is a parent. If someone chooses to be a deadbeat dad, then there are two parents, only one of whom is contributing anything. The other is a deadbeat. Being a deadbeat has nothing to do with "a right not to have a child." It's having a child and then neglecting your responsibi…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 04:33 PM
2

You choose to have sex and then choose on whether or not to have that baby That's abortion, yeah. Why can't men have the same choices? Men can't get abortions because men can't get pregnant. This is a matter of biology, not "equal rights."
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 04:27 PM
2

No, it’s not adoption. It’s your biological child Right, one couple is raising another's biological children. We call that adoption. You are the parent, not the surrogate Yeah, adoption has nothing to do with surrogacy. Both are choosing to not have a child. No they're not. We just talked about this. One of them is choosing not to have a child. The other is choosing to be a deadbeat dad. Why do you feel only women should get that choice though? I don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 03:42 PM
3

We are not talking about rape Well if you refuse to acknowledge rape, then yeah I can see how you'd conclude it's impossible to force someone to become pregnant. But that's still not what we're talking about. Getting pregnant is what forces you to be pregnant And outlawing abortion is how you force women to remain pregnant when they don't want to be. That's what we're talking about, remember? Abortion? I guess I shouldn't be surprised the replies to a comment promoting "financial abortion" are a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 03:39 PM
4

One of them is choosing not to have a child. The other is choosing to be a deadbeat dad. No, that's basically adoption. Adoptive parents don't get support from the biological parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 03:22 PM
1

You're saying rape doesn't exist? And you're not really even engaging with the point--you're talking about getting pregnant (not being forced to remain pregnant). Abortion has nothing to do with how someone gets pregnant. You also didn't even attempt to explain how that's comparable to being a deadbeat dad.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 03:21 PM
-1

Men have no agency over who they have sex with?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 03:08 PM
2

I have no idea how people convinced themselves these ideas are similar. One is not being forced to be pregnant when you don't want to be. The other means being a deadbeat dad--having no responsibility to your biological offspring. The two things have nothing in common. Using the word "abortion" to describe being a deadbeat dad doesn't make it similar to abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 03:07 PM
6

Sorry, but this just sounds like someone with poor financial literacy. $1M today is worth a lot more than $1M spread over the next 18 years. Even if you just stick it in treasury bonds you'll make 4-5%, so $40-50k/yr for the next 18 years without ever spending any of the money. That's enough to raise a child and still have $1M left when they turn 18. I believe she said she's already had to go through $100k to maintain the lifestyle. All in all this is terrible for the kid. The purpose of child s…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 03:06 PM
3

No that's where you're wrong. Passport bros are not over there begging for dates and waiting to get laid I didn't say they are, so how could I be wrong about that? They're getting women because of their money. That's the definition of beta bucks. It's just Temu Beta Bucks, like I said. They don't have enough money to impress women here, so they go to a third world country where the standards are lower. They know guys on vacation are going to be doing all the cool shit like renting jet skis and b…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 02:43 PM
1

No. Here's what you wrote: he is an authoritarian but fascism is a uniquely totalitarian ideology) and pedophile (probably true) is not the reason men voted for Trump I correctly pointed out that no one said that's why they voted for him, but they are still voting to make the world worse (those are not the same thing). I never said they're doing it intentionally or out of spite (you made that up). There's nothing contradictory here. I have already stated the reason they voted actually has to do …
/r/MensRights20/08/25 12:51 AM
1

it’s a sensible strategy to abandon pregnant mothers since women won’t vote against themselves What does this mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 12:45 AM
-9

K, so... get some friends?
/r/MensRights19/08/25 08:46 PM
3

Bingo. They say they're doing it to avoid being "beta bucks" back home, but instead they're going overseas and throwing around money to attract women there instead. They're Temu beta bucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 08:13 PM
2

There are light-skinned men for them to date back home. The ones who pick an American tourist aren't doing it by accident.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 08:12 PM
1

I think that's because he always had the option to marry a poor girl working at Dollar General, but didn't--either because he didn't want to, or couldn't. He found someone poorer, less educated, and unfamiliar with his country instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 08:11 PM
4

Passport bros are beta bucks. That's the whole point--you go somewhere your (relatively modest) money can impress women who lived their whole lives in poverty, and wait for one to throw themselves at you for a chance to move to a rich country. They're basically trying to replicate pre-WW2 era where women couldn't work and had to pair up with men to provide financially. That's the definition of beta bucks. Those women are with them literally only for their money. Women aren't criticizing passport…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 08:07 PM
1

I'm not sure what point you're making. Some women are happily single, others are unhappily single. Some women are happily in relationships (or situationships), other women are unhappily in them. The same is true for men. It's not the same numbers for men and women, and no one expects it should be. The obsession with the idea of one guy dating 3+ women at a time is a little weird. Are men a little more likely to cheat? Yes, but data shows women are (very slightly) more likely to cheat under age 3…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 06:37 PM
3

That's why there are so many single moms. It's much less common for men to be invested in raising children.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 06:28 PM
6

women are the primary caretakers in the majority of cases And you're ignoring that in your comparison of "9 months of pregnancy vs 18-19 years of financial stress." What about the 18-19 years of stress of being the primary caregiver?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 06:25 PM
5

What biology do feminists "ignore" to achieve equality? Women get pregnant. Men don't. That's why women get to choose whether to have abortions and men don't. If medical science invents a way for men to get pregnant, men will also gain the right to choose whether to have an abortion. Until then you're just tilting at biology.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 06:24 PM
1

I agree, but they always want to be able to wait until after the kid is already born to decide whether they want to be a deadbeat dad or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 06:23 PM
4

Wait til you hear about the double duty women have (always and continue) to pull! Women were given the right to vote, but they weren't given the responsibility of conscription, which still solely sits on men The two things have nothing to do with each other. I'm not sure if you're one of those guys who thinks you have to register for the draft in order to vote, but you don't--that's a common misconception floated around Manosphere type areas. They're completely unrelated. Men have to register fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 06:22 PM
11

Because women tend to care about their children more than they care about scoring points in some culture war BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 05:45 PM
0

No one said that's the reason men voted for Trump. The fact of the matter is they're voting to make the world worse out of spite. Blaming Democrats for how Republicans men vote accomplishes nothing but robbing those men of their agency over their own choices. Repeating "orange man bad" again after I explain why it's irrelevant won't make it more convincing. For someone worrying about the difference between authoritarian and totalitarian (as if that makes voting for him more excusable), you sure …
/r/MensRights19/08/25 05:41 PM
0

The charge of "making the world worse" is leveled at the fact so many men support an orange fascist pedophile. If you're not one of them (which is great), it has nothing to do with you. But that also doesn't mean their complaint is just "orange man bad."
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:35 PM
1

The claim you're making
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:24 PM
0

Even if it was true that all Democrats offer is "orange man bad," that's not a good reason to intentionally vote to make things worse.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:23 PM
1

Anyone can vote how they want (for now), but if they vote to make things worse, they shouldn't complain when someone blames them for making things worse
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:22 PM
1

So you don't have any data, just going on feelings?
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:18 PM
1

Barack "possession of a Y chromosome is an offense worthy of summary execution" And you have the gall to accuse people of misrepresenting Trump lmfao
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:14 PM
1

Trump said yesterday that in 3.5 years all he has to do is start a war and then we don't have to have elections. He's declaring a permanent state of emergency to enforce martial law in cities that didn't vote for him. You can like him or like that he's doing those things if you want to (for some reason), but don't pretend you don't recognize a fascist when you see one. You don't have to hide. Edit: this person replied, and then blocked me so I can't respond. Typical Trump supporter tbh
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:11 PM
1

If you're complaining about being accused of making the world worse, and you refuse to stop voting to make the world worse, it doesn't really seem you have a right to complain. You're doing it intentionally. Vote however you want, but don't complain when people acknowledge it.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:09 PM
0

So, cutting off your nose to spite your face?
/r/MensRights19/08/25 03:03 PM
-18

a voting base that is very misandrist and has been blaming us men for everything that's wrong in the world I don't really see how voting for an orange fascist is going to help shake those charges
/r/MensRights18/08/25 11:02 PM
-8

When you say "it doesn't even exist" what do you mean?
/r/MensRights18/08/25 03:37 PM
0

Correct, I'm not going to waste time "refuting" something you admit you imagined.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 03:29 PM
1

So you're aware of the hypocrisy my comment points out?
/r/MensRights17/08/25 11:32 PM
0

Did you not read even the title of OP's post before replying to this comment?
/r/MensRights17/08/25 11:27 PM
-2

Starting your argument with "imagine" was a funny choice
/r/MensRights16/08/25 10:32 PM
2

Is that number higher or lower than 10, 20, 30 years ago?
/r/MensRights16/08/25 03:30 AM
0

Exactly. Did you mean to switch to making my point for me?
/r/MensRights16/08/25 03:15 AM
-2

Almost half Just Facts: As Many Americans Have Criminal Records as College Diplomas | Brennan Center for Justice
/r/MensRights15/08/25 05:05 PM
-3

Because 99.999% of mothers don't?
/r/MensRights15/08/25 11:27 AM
2

Never thought I'd see a guy complaining about being "husband-zoned"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 11:26 AM
-4

Why do so many men expect women to be empathetic towards them despite being the majority of criminals? It's a two-way street
/r/MensRights15/08/25 11:11 AM
1

Are we looking at the same comment? He's literally excusing male violence by saying they do it because of women.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 06:27 AM
0

That's also false. In many states, felons can't vote while in prison. The last person imprisoned for failing to register for the draft was in 1986, Whoever told you registering for the draft is a requirement to vote lied to you. Men created the draft before women were even allowed to vote.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 06:18 AM
-1

It's a "little known fact" because it's false. Benefits & Penalties : Selective Service System Failing to register is a crime, and can be (in extremely rare cases) punishable by a fine and/or jail time, but you don't lose the right to vote. In most cases you lose eligibility for federal benefits like subsidized job training, student aid, etc. Whoever told you it's a requirement to vote lied to you.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 12:41 AM

Yes, but no one's comparing to denying someone food, they're comparing to wage inequality
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 05:24 PM

Yes that is my point
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 05:08 PM
1

Are we looking at the same comment? He literally said "yeah sure men start and fight all the wars, but they do it for women."
/r/MensRights12/08/25 05:07 PM

Praymantis die to reproduce. They view it as worth while Whole lot of anthropomorphizing here, starting with the assumption a praying mantis can even understand the concept of death, let alone weigh the pros and cons.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 05:00 PM

I agree with you, but this is a bad argument. Something doesn't have to be a life or death issue to be morally wrong. Women won't die if they get promotions at a slightly lower rate than men, that's not why it's immoral.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 04:59 PM

Have you considered that free markets are an economic concept, and pointing out dissimilarities between "dating markets" and economic markets doesn't expose hypocrisy, just a bad analogy? You're also missing the main common factor between the things you're comparing: in both cases a few people at the top get disproportionate "resources." It's just way much extreme in economics than in dating.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 04:56 PM
1

lmao gotcha so when anyone mentions any group of men they're talking about you specifically. When I said "the US Constitution was signed by men" I mean you personally held the pen. But when you mention women you definitely don't mean all women, just feminists or some group of feminists that hold positions you don't like. Just making sure your standards are clear.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 04:41 PM
1

Here's one (you already replied to it) blaming the fact men start wars on women Response to feminists who justify any/all injustices towards men with "But who set that system up" : r/MensRights
/r/MensRights12/08/25 03:38 PM
1

You literally wrote "men were perpetrating that violence ON BEHALF of their tribes/for the benefit of THEIR women and children"
/r/MensRights12/08/25 03:37 PM
1

Cool. Here's their official policy for repealing the draft. RESOLUTION-TO-THE-NATIONAL-ORGANIZATION-FOR-WOMEN-ON-ENDING-MILITARY-DRAFT-REGISTRATION.pdf
/r/MensRights12/08/25 03:36 PM
1

If you didn't blame women, then this thread isn't about you. Why are you making it about you? You wrote "we aren't those men," and as I just explained, no one said you are. Why are you making it about you?
/r/MensRights12/08/25 03:27 PM
0

No one said you are. Get over yourself. Not everything is about you. Maybe instead of blaming women for something they didn't do (and weren't legally allowed a say in at the time), you could... I don't know, join them in campaigning to end the draft? Crazy thought.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 06:58 AM
1

They literally don't, and there are loads of other replies here blaming all women. You should look around.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 06:57 AM
0

Desperate to be victims
/r/MensRights12/08/25 06:56 AM
1

I'm not familiar with that particular group, but the much more common feminist position is that the draft is immoral and should be eliminated. You can of course find a feminist taking any position on basically any issue, if that's your goal.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 06:54 AM
1

A) Have you ever looked at the front page of this sub? Most of the posts were are explicitly blaming women for something or another. B) You're arguing "sure men start and fight in all the wars, but they're doing it for women." You're literally trying to blame women for something you know men are doing.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 06:39 AM
1

Feminists were one of the earliest groups to protest the draft.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 07:57 PM
0

You're still citing an example of men oppressing other men. If you agree this is an issue of class rather than gender, great. If you're still trying to make it a men vs women thing, you're going to keep fighting the wrong enemy.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 07:56 PM
1

What country do you live in?
/r/MensRights11/08/25 07:55 PM
0

"All men till no men" "Men are trash." "Father's are oppressive dictators" I've never heard the 1st or 3rd. Don't even know what the 1st is supposed to mean. I expect these aren't things people actually hear in real life, they just get amplified in spaces like this to feed the rage machine. Are these the examples of misandry? individual women saying they don't like men?
/r/MensRights11/08/25 03:17 PM
-1

Is your argument that, since Cleopatra existed 2000 years ago, women should be blamed for men creating a male-only draft?
/r/MensRights11/08/25 03:12 PM
3

Right, so the idea that women should be expressing gratitude toward all men for eventually letting them vote seems a bit far fetched
/r/MensRights11/08/25 03:08 PM
2

So both groups are men?
/r/MensRights11/08/25 02:10 PM
-3

The most commonly cited example I see of misandry is the draft.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 02:10 PM
-9

Women are probably making those degrading statements because they're tired of men trying to blame women for things men did 100+ years ago.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 01:16 PM
1

What do you think "second class citizen" means?
/r/MensRights11/08/25 01:15 PM
-1

It's just a historical fact that (for example) men created the selective service system. This means you don't get to blame women for it being unfair to men.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 01:13 PM
2

Which someone else would they thank? We're talking about the same group.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 01:12 PM
-20

I agree. Even sillier to blame women for the actions of male tyrants from 100 years ago, but here we are.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 05:36 AM
-5

I didn't say they would, so I'm not sure why you think I'd be wrong about that.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 05:02 AM
-9

This seems like a pretty silly cop-out designed to avoid accountability and rob yourself of agency. People complain about astrology, but you're literally saying "it's not men's fault how we designed things before we even let women have a vote--the universe made us do it!" It's just a historical fact that (for example) men created the selective service system. This means you don't get to blame women for it being unfair to men. You might really want to blame women for it, but history says you can'…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 04:31 AM
-29

"We finally stopped making you second class citizens, and you didn't even say thank you" isn't going to come off the way you're hoping.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 04:30 AM
1

Attractive men don’t have to settle for women they aren’t attracted to as much as we like to believe OP is saying the opposite of that--they don't have to settle for them, but don't mind hooking up with them for a night. Not agreeing with OP btw. I don't think women are more jaded than men. I don't think the modern dating scene is particularly "less fair" in one direction.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 04:09 AM
1

That was much more common in the 80s, 90s, and early 2000s than it is today. Pick basically any family sitcom from that era and you'll find a Homer Simpson style father figure, with notable exceptions like Roseanne and Fresh Prince. Modern film is much more balanced.
/r/MensRights08/08/25 09:01 PM
1

"Moralizing" seems like quite an exaggeration. It's little more than "men who are successful with women deserve to be, and men who aren't don't." That's really all it is. Men who are attractive, interesting, etc are successful with women because those are the things women are attracted to. They didn't necessarily do anything moral (good or bad) to have those traits, they just have them. Demonizing men who are unsuccessful with women (as if they must have done something wrong to end up that way) …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 08:44 PM
1

These are very uncommon opinions, in my experience
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 08:42 PM
0

Because I'm not a moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 07:13 PM
1

?
/r/MensRights06/08/25 05:55 AM
4

Eh, there are some examples of this where I agree, but in general no. The issue is obviously not one cup being left in the dishwasher, it's that she either has to do it or it doesn't get done. She can keep nagging him constantly to help do the dishes, but eventually it gets to the point where it's easier to just do everything yourself than to constantly have to convince someone else to help with chores. You're calling this "putting a lot of unnecessary friction in front of themselves," but that'…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 04:09 AM
2

Neither do most women, despite constantly having the option to.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 01:54 AM
2

Sure, but that's just because they have more options. If guys had the ability to do this, they would.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 06:21 PM
2

Yep. And now they're getting "red pilled" because their childhood cartoon romances don't represent reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 06:02 AM
6

I mean everyone wants to be desirable, but this is more "Disney fairytale romance" like "I shouldn't have to be in shape or even take showers, women aren't shallow like men, so if it's meant to be she'll see me for who I am on the inside"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:36 PM
6

Not quite. They want women to have extremely high standards (low/zero body count) for everyone except them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:24 PM
2

I dunno mate you sounded pretty sure, now you're acting like you have no way to know and it's unreasonable to ask Making hysterical and unfounded accusations like that isn't exactly a good look, especially here of all places
/r/MensRights04/08/25 03:19 PM
4

Based
/r/MensRights04/08/25 03:16 PM
-6

Many young boys have never heard the term masculinity without the word "toxic" put before it wat
/r/MensRights04/08/25 02:23 PM

I don't think pointing out someone else's hypocrisy is hypocritical.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 03:50 PM
1

If you reply to me without addressing anything I said (when I'm pointing out someone wasn't addressing OP's question), yes, you're off topic. That's just what those words mean. Thank you for agreeing.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 03:54 PM
2

Aren't worth it, or aren't willing to be partners?
/r/MensRights29/07/25 03:34 PM
1

And my point is spending your time worrying over something that's extremely unlikely makes you paranoid.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 02:58 PM
1

And I'm pointing out someone wasn't making valid statistical claims about OP's question. If you're not replying to that point, you're off topic.
/r/MensRights29/07/25 02:53 PM
0

How much time do you spend discussing the possibility of being killed by a shark?
/r/MensRights28/07/25 10:12 PM
2

But that's not OP's question
/r/MensRights28/07/25 10:10 PM
3

The chance of being falsely accused of something is independent of the chance anyone believes the accusation.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 04:44 PM
-3

Extraordinarily low.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 04:43 PM
1

Dude's still mad about women's TV from the 90s
/r/MensRights25/07/25 11:05 PM
1

People who talk about "top 20%" have weird priorities. Women go after the "top 20%" the same way men do--we're more receptive to people we find physically attractive. When people say "choose better," they don't mean "date someone hotter." They mean stop dating assholes. So yeah if you filter out 80% of people based on looks and then keep getting upset when you end up dating assholes, the advice of "choose better" doesn't mean to only date the top 10% most attractive instead of the top 20%. What …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 04:17 PM
5

You didn't disprove anything I wrote Everything you wrote was about how women are all sleeping with the same few guys, leaving the rest of the guys single and sexless. The comment you replied to suggests an alternate explanation--women are simply not dating (or sleeping with) anyone. If women were didn't care about relationships we would have far more single young women than men, but its the the other way around Why did you make a claim and then link an article disproving it? The title literally…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 04:26 PM

Andrew Tate is (or was--I don't follow that nonsense) extremely popular
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 02:28 AM

I don't believe that [but] using purposefully authoritarian policy against the enemy simply works And there it is. You don't actually care about this issue, you just want to "own the libs" and you're willing to throw out the Constitution and the rule of law to do it. Since men-only spaces are straight up illegal Again, you are lying by suggesting Boy Scouts was forced to become co-ed. And you just admitted why you're lying--you don't care about principles or the truth, you just want to "win" at …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 02:25 AM

Why are you bringing courts into this? Boy Scouts didn't become co-ed because of a court order (are you being misleading intentionally?), they did it voluntarily. You're demanding Girl Scouts forcibly becomes co-ed And you claim this is evidence of "anti-male bias"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 02:22 AM
0

This seems like patent nonsense. If you're arguing it's a mutually consensual relationship, exchanging money for a relationship/sex, you're welcome to make that argument. Like some kind of long-term escort service. But arguing the woman is taking advantage of the man by taking his money, totally ignoring that the man literally traveled to another country specifically seeking to pay a woman for that exact thing, is absurd. The arguments about women being taken advantage of are specifically becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 08:41 PM

"Kill All Men" is obviously anti-male bias, but it's also extremely niche. Support for decreasing unequal treatment of women is not anti-male bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 08:37 PM

You're describing the Boy Scouts choosing to allow girls to increase enrollment as "anti-male bias" and "anti-male rhetoric." This is why no one takes claims of anti-male bias seriously. These are the examples you give. If the US government stepped in and forced the Boy Scouts to allow girls, and made a law against boys joining the Girl Scouts, you might have a point. In practice what we have is things like Title IX, which says there must be equal opportunities for both boys and girls. If you ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 08:36 PM

Good riddance
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 08:32 PM

Girl Scouts didn't have enrollment issues and didn't choose to open membership to boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 08:32 PM
1

I think everyone knows that...?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 01:22 AM
3

They accepted equality rather than fighting it.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 04:55 PM
3

I think you shouldn't concern yourself with collective ideas about what "men as a whole" are doing. It's not masculine to be worried about trends and fashions. Be as masculine (or feminine) as you want.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 03:48 PM
1

Because that's how men treat it. Nobody's going to change it for us.
/r/MensRights14/07/25 11:36 PM

It seems odd to have sympathy for men's dating struggles when so many of them are self-imposed and it's women who suffer the consequences tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 05:02 PM
0

You're right, but I think their point is "no one would reject a beautiful woman just because she has money" doesn't mean everyone wants a spouse who is wealthy. Something not being a dealbreaker doesn't mean it's something we actively look for. Those are just the two extremes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 04:39 PM
3

Gotcha, I don't really think of that as "overcorrecting" it's more just... lying
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 04:22 PM
2

So misogynists who pretend to be feminists to get laid? I'm maybe just getting tripped up by the use of "overcorrect" it seems like a different thing
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 04:20 PM
8

Do they just strap them to a Roomba or something?
/r/MensRights10/07/25 04:17 PM
1

So it's not that men are "overcorrecting" by becoming feminists, but some are... going too hard into feminism? If the prompt is basically "people who go too extreme into an ideology are too extreme" then obviously you're right, but there's not much to debate there... it's a tautological statement
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 03:59 PM
1

The implicit premise here being "feminism is an overcorrection"? Why not just say that, rather than making it about "men who blindly overcorrect"?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/25 03:55 PM
1

"Incel" isn't an insult on someone's looks.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 05:36 PM
-10

Ah good, the daily "men should be allowed to become deadbead fathers" thread! You are allowed to opt out of fatherhood by not becoming a father. Once you have biological offspring, you have a societal obligation to take care of your children--whether that means helping raise them or provide for them financially, that's up to you. Having children and then doing nothing for them is called being a deadbeat. That's just what that word means.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 02:56 PM
2

I'm not saying you're wrong about any of the data, I'm saying that's not what people mean when they refer to the biological clock. We can even agree most people underestimate the risks, but it's still not what they mean by biological clock The groups older than 30 show people waiting longer to have kids. The 15-25 cohorts drop while the 30-40 groups rise, while the middle 25-30 group stays roughly constant <15 and >45 are all flat at zero because they can't get pregnant--this is what people mean…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 06:07 PM
4

Rises exponentially from... around 0.1% at age 20 to 0.2% at age 35 and 1% at age 40? And then the graph stops because there's no data after that (most women can't get pregnant after 40)? I think it's the latter that people have in mind when they talk about the "biological clock"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 05:30 PM
6

It's less about the heightened risk with older mothers, and more the hard cutoff after which you simply can't get pregnant. Risk goes up with the age of both mother and father, but one is capable of becoming a parent at virtually any age.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 04:58 PM
-8

Tbh men need to stop promoting "all meat diets" if they're going to complain women living longer means some kind of bias toward women's health. Almost everything is designed with men in mind, from the size and positioning of car seats, seat belts, and air bags, to recommended dosages for medication, chemotherapy, etc. If women are accounted for at all they're just treated as "small men." There are only a handful of exceptions to this rule, and those are obvious things like breast cancer, where a…
/r/MensRights08/07/25 04:18 PM
1

RIP OP
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 02:16 PM
-2

This violates the "half your age plus 7" rule, 30-year-old shouldn't be dating anyone younger than 22. OP is a pedo 100% confirmed
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 01:40 PM
6

You're partly right. Women certainly see appeal in casual sex (not every woman, but lots), but the social consequences, stigma, potential physical consequences (STDs, pregnancy, etc) outweigh the benefits. It's also extremely available, so its value is accordingly low. Simple supply and demand. If diamonds rained from the sky, they wouldn't be worth what they are. We'd still like them, but they wouldn't be valuable. Value derives from scarcity. Women don't see value in casual sex because of its …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/25 02:22 PM
2

...nope, they don't Are you saying you think that's a common feminist belief?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 11:13 PM
2

liking the opposite sex as people The idea of liking or disliking an entire sex is mutually exclusive with seeing them as individual people
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 10:48 PM
1

They said it's probably why OP struggles with the opposite sex, not that it's impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 10:47 PM
1

Have you considered the reason everybody here is telling you your perception is skewed is because you're the one living under a rock, not everybody else?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 10:44 PM
3

the same vitriol the averahge feminist has for porn I would say porn stars are more likely to identify as feminists than the general population. The idea that feminists hate porn is just... wild rofl
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 10:43 PM
3

But wouldn't you rather have a woman who knows how to stay in her divine feminine so you can maintain polarity and stay in your rugged masculine or whatever?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 09:22 PM
8

There's a new breed of "traditional gender role influencers" and these are standard buzzwords for them. They say things like "maintaining polarity" and "being in your divine feminine" to make it sound like traditional gender roles are some natural state of being and we have to work to stay in "alignment" with those or whatever. Never mind those ideas being basically mutually contradictory...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/25 07:32 PM
1

It's not
/r/MensRights02/07/25 05:23 PM
1

I prefer the Atlantic
/r/MensRights01/07/25 10:10 PM
0

Huh?
/r/MensRights01/07/25 10:10 PM
0

Because it's wrong
/r/MensRights01/07/25 10:09 PM
-4

Stupid comments are easily dismissed
/r/MensRights01/07/25 07:33 PM
-4

No.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 06:58 AM
-4

No.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 06:53 AM
9

Religious fundamentalist has historically been bad for women. A lot of Christians think this is weird, with arguments like "but Islam is so much worse." Which might be true, but really misses the point. It's worse in the same way that eating shards of broken glass is worse than eating cardboard--not really selling your position, and you shouldn't be surprised when people pass.
/r/MensRights30/06/25 04:18 PM
3

I think you'd be surprised how many women who are into sports will tell you being "one of the guys" often works against them They don't actually want their girlfriend to crush a beer and let out of a big belch
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 03:36 AM
1

Yeah this sounds like bad "Cosmo" dating advice or something from "the game" (or whatever that book was called). The idea is whoever is less invested has all the "power" (and that's supposed to be a good thing)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 03:28 AM
9

Same reason men like having a beer and watching the game with the boys but don't want to have sex with them, I imagine... different criteria for friends vs sexual partners
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 07:26 PM
8

I think it's simpler than that... same reason men like having a beer and watching the game with the boys but don't want to have sex with them, I imagine... different criteria for friends vs sexual partners
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 07:26 PM
4

The average age gap in married partners is about 3 years (the man being older), but "within 3 years of their own age" simply does not match up with age preference data from dating apps. Women Don’t Prefer Men the Same Age & Men Don’t Prefer Younger Women — Here’s the Truth | by David Graham | The Knowledge of Freedom | Medium The Babygirl effect: Dating app users are widening their age range | Dazed Until about age 40, women prefer older men almost exclusively. They set their minimum age prefere…
/r/seduction26/06/25 04:53 PM
7

It's pretty consistent with the general societal view around "slut shaming" tbh. Promiscuous women aren't judged because sex is bad (quite the opposite), only if they've had sex with lots of men. Lesbian sex officially "doesn't count." It's not just men that feel this way--women judge each other exactly the same way. So it's not surprising bisexual men are treated the same. Having sex with women is just normal guy stuff--even if it's a lot of women. But having sex with other men? Immediate red f…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:51 PM
1

You're welcome to discuss it seriously, rather than simply stating your preferences and mocking the vast majority of the population who think differently than you.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 06:24 PM
1

I wish I didn't have to deal with it, but you're not wrong.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 06:23 PM
1

How embarrassing for you.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 03:03 PM
0

No would have been sufficient.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 06:55 PM
-1

lmao
/r/MensRights24/06/25 06:43 PM
0

And you're actually saying you believe those things happen in equal rates to the violent crime committed by men? Like that's something you're admitting publicly to believing?
/r/MensRights24/06/25 06:32 PM
0

This is what OP wrote, and what I'm replying to: "We never see this kind of comments on post where women commit heinous crimes" Like yeah, of course you're not going to see as many comments like these about women. That almost never happens.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 02:43 PM
1

fetuses exist before abortion And don't after. abortion is absolutely a way to avoid the responsibilities of parenthood—specifically unwanted parenthood Along with birth control, sterilization, abstinence... So many ways to avoid that responsibility ever existing Whether responsibility is being transferred or not is irrelevant If someone calls in sick and pick up their shift, I'm responsible for those hours. You can say they "avoided" responsibility by being sick, but the important thing is I'm …
/r/MensRights24/06/25 02:19 PM
0

Why do you think it's an obligation for men? It's a fact about the society we live in. We expect people (even men) to care for their biological offspring. Both parties should agree if a family is to be started Nobody's talking about starting a family. You're the one who keeps saying if a woman decides to keep a baby the man has to be there I literally never said that. she can't be expected to follow through by herself on that decision she made by herself? That would be taking ownership If women …
/r/MensRights24/06/25 02:08 PM
0

This is what OP wrote: We never see this kind of comments on post where women commit heinous crimes When women commit 10-20% of violent crime, it would be unusual if someone focused specifically on that 10-20%
/r/MensRights24/06/25 05:59 AM
-2

So like there's a bunch of dead bodies piling up and no one can say what's happening because there's all these women murderers running around and we just ignore it?
/r/MensRights24/06/25 05:58 AM
-1

So like there's a bunch of dead bodies piling up and no one can say what's happening because there's all these women murderers running around and we just ignore it?
/r/MensRights24/06/25 05:58 AM
-1

So like there's a bunch of dead bodies piling up and no one can say what's happening because there's all these women murderers running around and we just ignore it?
/r/MensRights24/06/25 05:58 AM
-1

If she has an abortion, what responsibility would she be avoiding? You don't have responsibility to things that don't exist. Giving a kid up for adoption you could argue is avoiding responsibility, but responsibility is being transferred between two legally consenting parties.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 05:56 AM
2

anywhere I've lived in the US... Me too. What's your point? Obviously they have a responsibility to their biological offspring. You claimed they don't both have a choice, which is wrong. Now you're saying after the choice is made and they already have a baby, they have a responsibility to take care of it, which is... just a fact? I don't see where you're going with that. just because the woman decided to have the baby No. Her deciding to have a baby has absolutely nothing to do with him unless h…
/r/MensRights24/06/25 05:42 AM
-1

a person who did not consent to parenthood In an unplanned pregnancy, neither party "consented" to becoming a parent. That's not why child support laws exist. It simply misses the entire point. abortion, adoption, and Safe Haven laws, women have multiple ways to opt out of parenthood As I said, all but abortion (for obvious reasons) are available to men. Men, on the other hand, have no equivalent escape They have the exact same options, both before and after pregnancy. Suppose a woman could carr…
/r/MensRights23/06/25 11:39 PM
-1

Is there something I wrote that you disagree with, or are you just here to trade insults?
/r/MensRights23/06/25 11:27 PM
-1

Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it? Oh boy, I can't wait to see how you make a bunch of incorrect arguments that don't even address my point. Right now, only one parent decides if both parties will be responsible, financially or otherwise, for a child Both parties have the same options before and after pregnancy. Pretending otherwise only willfully denies your own agency. With financial abortion men aren't forced into a fatherhood they never agreed to Who's forcing all these men…
/r/MensRights23/06/25 11:24 PM
-1

There are laws to deal with criminals What does that have to do with the topic? It's terrible how comments suggesting collective punishment and dehumanizing of men are not condemned Point me to them and I'll join you in condemning them.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 11:14 PM
2

And?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 11:06 PM
-6

Men commit 80-90% of violent crime (depending on the specific crime). It's not terribly hard to understand why people see that we could have just 10-20% as much violence as we do now and think "gee that would be nice"
/r/MensRights23/06/25 07:09 PM
-15

You said "No" but then didn't disagree with anything I wrote, you just added this idea of "financial abortion." That would be a new choice only one parent has a right to make, and without any compelling reason like being the person who is carrying the pregnancy. That doesn't make sense. You need a compelling reason why men should be allowed to become deadbeat fathers with no responsibility to their biological offspring. Saying "men don't have a say over women's pregnancies" isn't an argument, it…
/r/MensRights23/06/25 07:02 PM
-25

So pick a side: Both parents get exactly the same choices, both before and after pregnancy. she gets to choose. He doesn’t In exactly one aspect, yes. The pregnancy itself, because she is the one who is pregnant. Obviously it would be hideously immoral for him to make decisions about her pregnancy. Are you actually suggesting we change that?
/r/MensRights23/06/25 06:28 PM
1

Obviously. A big part of why age gap relationships exist is because older guys can use their better-established careers to compensate for other shortcomings. Similarly, passport bros have a bunch of unequal power dynamics. That's why people look down on them. You're not going to shock anybody by saying "power dynamics I'm not personally able to exploit are bad too!"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 02:35 PM
1

Yeah this is a super weird take, especially given how these men seek out younger women specifically because all the women his age know better than to date him. "It's okay because women are the sexual selectors" falls apart when a guy's preying on younger women who haven't developed that selection process yet. Shame to see all the top comments are just arguing about how big an age gap is acceptable instead of addressing the main content of what OP's saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/25 02:37 AM
6

You asked someone to start dating you exclusively on your first date, when it was going so badly she was actively swiping on dating apps in front of you?
/r/MensRights22/06/25 05:53 PM
-2

I'd say it should be about both. If you want kids or you just want a casual fling, that's something worth putting out up front
/r/MensRights22/06/25 06:13 AM
1

Yeah, why not? Guys who approach you are more likely than average to be looking for something short-term. Shyer guys who wouldn't approach are more likely to be interested in long-term.
/r/seduction22/06/25 06:03 AM
2

Everyone likes to laugh. The person you're replying to has... something odd going on, either they somehow don't like humor, or are just insecure because they can't make people laugh / worry people are laughing at them instead of with them
/r/MensRights22/06/25 01:09 AM
-1

What a fascinating way to interpret that sentence lol
/r/MensRights22/06/25 01:08 AM
3

Here's a list of celebrations honored in the month of June June Month - National Day Calendar I don't see men's mental health awareness listed
/r/MensRights20/06/25 07:53 PM
1

"Lived experience"? Are you taking a hormone panel every week and tracking that against your libido? Or are you assuming the changes you experience are due to specific hormones because that reaffirms your previously held beliefs, even if they're not in line with the broad medical consensus?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 07:47 PM
2

If "women driver energy" was used for people who are insecure, overcompensating, trying to act macho, then yeah that would be a perfect analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 07:41 PM
2

I don't believe testosterone levels change nearly as much as estrogen or luteinizing hormone, but again none of this is definitive in saying one alone is the sole driver of a trait like libido We also know hormones have different effects in men and women, and others have similar effects but to significantly different degree Basically, it's complicated. Testosterone certainly has a role in libido, and men typically have a lot more testosterone. But there are also other factors than just that
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 07:32 PM
3

I'm not trying to counter everything you wrote, I'm just saying you can't reduce something as complicated as libido to the different levels of a single hormone between men and women I'm also not saying female ovulation is similar to a typical male libido Testosterone can absolutely raise libido in both sexes, but there's no reason to think it does so equally in everyone, and we know the primary hormones affecting women's libido throughout their cycle are estrogen and luteinizing hormone (not tes…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 07:28 PM
2

It implies the energy of men worried about the size of their dick is bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 07:21 PM
1

When women are ovulating (and their libido is highest), we see it's because of increased levels of estrogen and luteinizing hormone Isn't it odd to compare testosterone levels to make claims about women's libido, when testosterone isn't even the main driver of libido for women?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 07:20 PM
7

It's complicated. For example, estrogen isn't a single hormone, but a group of related hormones. Most hormones are present in both men and women, but sometimes in extremely varying levels (more extreme than testosterone) Female libido is highest during ovulation, when they have heightened levels of estrogen and luteinizing hormone. It's odd to compare testosterone levels to make claims about libido when that's not the main driver of women's libido Some are only produced during pregnancy (though …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 07:10 PM
4

We have different hormones and different levels of some hormones Trying to reduce something as complicated as libido to levels of a single hormone is inaccurate
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 06:32 PM
-2

Because the answers to your questions already exist if you scroll up We've gone from "every animal on the planet" to "most mammals" and you responded saying I'm "just looking at outliers." If that was the case, the claim wouldn't have had to change as much as it has
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 05:37 PM
1

Female hyenas are larger, dominant, and compete with each other for males (rather than the other way around). Bonobos and other primates have females actively initiating encounters with males at roughly the same rate as the reverse.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 05:28 PM
1

everyone wants to lean into the edge instances and not the overwhelming observation that, generally speaking, males are more compulsively horny I'm not arguing that. I'm saying the difference isn't explained (solely) by testosterone levels. I didn't read all the replies, just your initial comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 04:55 PM
2

Every animal on the planet has the males pursue and the females get pursued
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 04:54 PM
8

Because it's wrong--testosterone levels don't drive differences in libido between men and women. For women, estrogen spikes during ovulation, increasing their libido. The idea that you can measure the testosterone levels of a man and a woman to tell the difference in their libido ignores the fact that men and women have different hormones.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 04:29 PM
4

You're right about testosterone levels, but wrong to imply that's 1:1 with libido During ovulation, women have higher levels of estrogen and luteinizing hormone, which drives an increase in libido
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 04:27 PM
6

Female hyenas are larger, dominant, and compete with each other for males (rather than the other way around). Bonobos and other primates have females actively initiating encounters with males at roughly the same rate as the reverse.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 04:25 PM
1

"Small dick energy" doesn't mean you have a small dick, it means you act like you do: insecure, overcompensating, acting macho. It wouldn't be so common if men didn't care about appearing manly or how big their dicks are Scroll r/women or r/askwomen etc for threads asking about best/worst sexual encounters. You will absolutely not find women saying "the only thing that matters is dick size--small dicks are always bad, big dicks are always great!" But here you are, writing a post about exactly th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 04:19 PM
1

I think that sounds like a great dream lol
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/25 02:56 PM
11

Obviously framing "talking to people you're interested in" as a masculine thing is going to ruffle women's feathers. You were right to just explain it in plain English. She'd probably have the same reaction to "day game" if she knew where it came from (pickup artists), and rightly so. People should avoid niche in-group lingo, most people find it cringe.
/r/seduction19/06/25 08:45 PM
1

Men increased support for Trump by +1%, vs +2% for women. Hispanic vote increased +13% (for some reason). The election didn't change due to gender differences.
/r/MensRights19/06/25 06:09 PM
2

One is a subset of the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 06:42 AM
6

Men who have multiple relationships simultaneously is hardly evidence of men's lack of desire for relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 10:25 PM
1

You're partially right, but if you think acting desperate is somehow counteracting sexlessness, I've got news...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 10:24 PM
2

Exactly
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/25 03:21 PM
2

Intentions and expectations aren't the same thing. You might intend to start a new workout plan and get a 6 pack by summer (every summer for the next 25 years), but that doesn't mean you actually expect to do it every year. Like another comment says, focus on the process (your intentions), not the outcome (your expectations). Disappointment doesn't come from not having something, it comes from wanting something.
/r/seduction17/06/25 03:54 PM
1

Ok
/r/MensRights16/06/25 09:23 PM
0

Ah, the ol exception that somehow disproves the trend!
/r/MensRights16/06/25 09:05 PM
1

Scent is more likely to hurt you than help you. Just don't smell bad. Smelling nice is bonus points, but probably not going to matter when you first meet someone.
/r/seduction16/06/25 09:03 PM
-45

Google says she was engaged to an MLB player a year later and has been married since 2022.
/r/MensRights16/06/25 04:22 AM
3

It's unlikely to get in a car accident. If you think that means it's impossible so you never wear a seatbelt and disable your airbag, that makes you a moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 07:22 PM
1

Not really. Being afraid of losing a job etc isn't irrational. It's probably very unlikely, but again risk v reward something for every person to evaluate individually. Pretending those risks haven't changed is pointless--they clearly have.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 06:24 PM
-1

If he wants sex he's interested. If you want something different than that you have to talk about it, not just hope he wants the same as you and be worried he might not.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 05:28 PM
1

I'm not the one who just called it a "you problem" *shrug*
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 05:27 PM
1

Did you reply to the wrong comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 05:26 PM
0

That's the opposite of what I wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/25 05:16 PM
6

lmao mate the point is people can end up on the internet, lose their job, etc. Actual real-life consequences. I'm not the one pretending there's just a sudden inexplicable rise in "fear of talking to women / rejection" rather than a rise in actual consequences It's fine if you think pretending that doesn't exist will make your dick bigger or whatever, but I'm not going to bury my head in the sand pretending there's no reason men are less likely to approach Everyone gets to decide whether that ri…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 09:00 PM
13

This is backwards. Men have always been nervous and afraid of rejection. That's not new. The potential for and degree of consequences if you're accused of being creepy, harassing, etc is. It used to be straightforward to talk yourself into it with "the worst that can happen is she says no, and that just leaves me where I'm at now." Now you might (in extremely rare cases) end up in a viral video making fun of creepy/awkward/etc men harassing women in public. There's a different level of "risk" to…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 08:34 PM
5

If he wants sex he's interested. If you want something different than that you have to talk about it, not just hope he wants the same as you and be worried he might not.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 08:31 PM
9

Neither do the women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 08:29 PM
0

Neat
/r/MensRights14/06/25 08:27 PM
0

Cool
/r/MensRights14/06/25 08:27 PM
2

At least you're consistent, I guess. Most men here demand hyper-femininity and then criticize women for having any kind of standards for men.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 06:28 PM
7

Your examples are confusing--names I don't recognize, behaviors I don't really associate with masculinity (I know way more women than men who like country music, for example), etc But overall it sounds like you're defining masculinity based on what you approve of from men in Western countries today, and then declaring men in Western countries are the most masculine...?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/25 06:18 PM
-2

I assume this means you have progressed from your instinctual gratification towards feminine women, then? Or are you just sexist towards masculine women?
/r/MensRights13/06/25 04:50 PM
1

Then we agree you're saying things that aren't in the article.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 02:25 PM
3

Not saying you're wrong, but I don't really think this addresses the question about female "pickiness" being biological vs social
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 05:23 PM
3

My evidence is biology And I'm saying you're wrong lmao You don't have "evidence," you're just stating your opinion and insisting it's backed up by "biology." You are free to argue that there's no difference between male and female sexual drives, motivations, and responsiveness/orientation I'm not arguing that. You are similarly free to act like the risks and rewards of sex and relationships, and the likelihood of each, are identical between men and women I'm not arguing that either. The argumen…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 04:27 PM
3

You're the one making the claim. I'm pointing out there is no evidence for it. We simply do not see women choosing to remain single en masse in the way you're suggesting they do. There's just no evidence for this ever happening. I agree, a scenario where this could happen is purely made up. It doesn't reflect reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 04:08 PM
10

Yes it does Yes what does? This doesn't make sense in reply to anything I wrote. Women are sexually dimorphic almost by default ...again, you're using that word wrong. I provided the definition for you so you don't have to keep doing that. The average five foot ten man who is not fat but not muscular and has an average face literally registers as totally neutral on the sexual dimorphic scale Again, you're not understanding what the word "dimorphic" means. You're also just assuming men are the "d…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 03:53 PM
10

The idea that 90% of women would accept being single permanently is simply not born out by the evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 03:50 PM
9

That seems like a broad generalization. There are certainly women who struggle with dating because they are too selective. Men too.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:59 PM
5

I'd say both contribute. If we for some reason had 10 women for every 1 man in society, women would become much more competitive and less selective about partnering up.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:56 PM
16

You're a woman so you're by default sexually dimorphic (unlike your male equivalent who has to have more obviously stand out attributes to be sexually dimorphic, males are not sexually dimorphic by default by sexually Amorphic I don't think you know what those words mean. dimorphic: occurring in or representing two distinct forms Humans are sexually dimorphic in the sense that men and women are distinct forms. It makes no sense to say women are sexually dimorphic but men aren't. just kinda neutr…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/25 02:55 PM
1

Way to accidentally admit you're "extrapolating" things that aren't in the article lmao
/r/MensRights12/06/25 02:46 PM
0

No, it doesn't. Which you'd know if you read it.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 06:34 AM
1

"Texting phase" does that mean you've not met yet? Or you've already had a date, exchanged numbers, but are still communicating more by text than in person?
/r/seduction11/06/25 07:52 PM
13

Your study confirms Sex-Focused men get the most sex. Not the misogynistic men. It doesn't even do that. This is number of sexual partners, not amount of sex. It makes perfect sense that misogynists have more sexual partners--they're less likely to maintain long-term relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 07:14 PM
1

Yeah I don't know why OP assumes everyone thinks making OF content is feminist, but I really don't know how men consuming OF content would be considered feminist lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 06:26 PM
2

That seems pretty reasonable tbh. Some people don't like their partner watching porn (which I think is silly/insecure), but sending money to one specific person for nudes is... a next level thing. Like at that point it's obviously not just about the porn (which is free and readily available), they're getting something else out of it that they feel is worth paying for. I don't understand what that is, exactly, but I understand being skeptical about dating someone who's involved in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 06:19 PM
1

This is... just bad math. Having 2 kids (rather than 0) increases the birth rate exactly as much as having 4 kids (rather than 2)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/25 04:57 AM
-3

Nothing they wrote is in the article.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 04:36 AM
-1

That's not what this article says.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 04:32 AM
-2

Having men to do an equal share of housework
/r/MensRights11/06/25 04:25 AM
5

Aside from the obvious (companionship, sex, etc)? Women typically do a majority of housework, childrearing, scheduling, etc
/r/MensRights10/06/25 07:51 PM
-14

That's not what this article says.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 02:37 PM
-32

That's not what this article says.
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:56 AM
-28

You see this all the time in feminist/leftist/woke circles I don't. If anything it's the opposite--those are the only groups talking about neurodivergence.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 07:33 PM
12

Like anything else, practice
/r/seduction09/06/25 04:00 PM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights09/06/25 03:11 AM
1

Because when I said "men wrote and voted for the law" you replied by saying I was "ignoring women's involvement." I'm glad to hear you've retracted that
/r/MensRights08/06/25 08:32 PM
1

Oh so your argument is not that women are responsible for the draft even though it was men who wrote and voted it into law? My bad, I thought that's what you were saying.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 07:14 PM
0

That's just what happened historically. Men wrote the law and voted for it. You can't acknowledge those facts and then turn around and blame women for it--but here you are anyway. The existence of some women who shamed men for not enlisting does nothing to alter the fact that men wrote and voted the draft into law. You keep accidentally revealing what your real issue is. You're trying to twist the facts to reach the conclusion you picked out in advance. If your "actual point" is about a differen…
/r/MensRights08/06/25 07:12 PM
1

Right, we agree no one alive (man or woman) is responsible for the draft. But it is still men who are responsible for it. Feminism has never claimed to be in favor of making things worse for women just so men will stop blaming women for things men did. And you keep accidentally revealing your goal here--you don't actually care about the draft, you never talk about it for more than a sentence or two before going back to ranting about how evil feminism is.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 12:01 AM
1

Ah yes, the women who were not yet permitted to vote were secretly so powerful they actually controlled how men voted.
/r/MensRights07/06/25 05:19 PM
1

Opposing the expansion of the draft doesn't make feminists responsible for men creating it in the first place. Not prioritizing men's issues over their own (I'll remind you women still couldn't open their own bank accounts at that time) likewise does not make feminists responsible for the draft (before they had even won the ability to vote on it). This doesn't make it all men's fault either, btw. You insist on framing everything as a fight between men and women, even when it's not and shouldn't …
/r/MensRights07/06/25 05:11 PM
-3

And the other half of the time, it is blaming women (for something they weren't allowed to have a say in)? I can see why they would be defensive. Obviously no one alive today voted on the draft, but that doesn't change the fact that complaining about it as some kind of sexist imposition by feminism is just ahistorical. Feminists hadn't yet won the right to vote when that law was passed. Anyone blaming feminism for that should be rightly mocked.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 08:58 PM
1

"Advantaging women in education" doing a lot of work here.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 07:03 PM
-12

I don't understand why anyone would point that out unless you're trying to blame women for it. If you blame women for how something is set up (like the draft, say), it's perfectly valid to reply with "women did not yet have the right to vote when that was enacted." You can try to change an issue without blaming women for how men set it up. In fact, blaming women for something men did is the best way to never change an issue. You're literally alienating 50% of the voter base from your cause by bl…
/r/MensRights06/06/25 05:51 PM
8

Yes, I know you think that. Why did you argue when I pointed out you're trying to shift all the responsibility onto her? We both know that's what you're doing. Just own it. The problem with cheating is the cheater is never honest. Basically by definition. So when you say "I don't know her situation, maybe it's okay" you're kidding yourself into thinking you have no responsibility. Because you want to do something you know is wrong without feeling bad for it. If she says it's okay, then it must b…
/r/seduction06/06/25 05:03 PM
11

Everyone is telling you not to go after married women and you keep replying with "why doesn't she have a choice?" You're clearly trying to avoid responsibility by putting it all on her.
/r/seduction06/06/25 04:31 PM
12

Yes, it's both your responsibility to avoid cheating. You keep acting like you have zero responsibility if she's into it. It's weird. Have some agency.
/r/seduction06/06/25 04:05 PM
7

Obviously, yes. That doesn't stop it being wrong for either of you.
/r/seduction06/06/25 04:04 PM
6

Zero people said she "can't" make a decision.
/r/seduction06/06/25 04:04 PM
7

If they skip the "soft harem" phase and go straight to the LTR, they're not successful with women?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 03:46 PM
1

Well it's a bit tautological. "Anyone will accept any drawback for a sufficiently large reward" is just saying people are able to weigh pros and cons. Yes, if the pros are sufficient to outweigh the cons, people will accept it. That's what the word "sufficient" means. If it wasn't sufficient, they wouldn't accept it. By definition.
/r/seduction06/06/25 02:57 PM
1

Yes, I understand you explained how you take it--literally. Most people don't use the word "invisible" literally. But yeah, you're making it very obvious you're trying to make some pity party "men have it worse" argument I'm really not interested in having.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/25 05:26 PM

I'd assume they're all at least 21. How old are you for that to be a problem at... bars?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 07:45 PM

Wherever you live, it sounds amazing! Where I'm at, every brewery or bar is at least 2:1 men to women. I've never been to a sporting event that wasn't at least 5:1 men to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/25 07:15 PM
1

Over explaining anything kills the mood. It's not unique to flaws.
/r/seduction04/06/25 05:56 PM
1

Yes, I'm agreeing that when people say "good x" where x is the gender they're not attracted to (typically their own), there is less added subtext. If I'm just looking for a "good friend" or a "good person," I wouldn't have any reason to specify "good woman." That implies something else.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 09:28 PM
1

If you post complaining about women "vetting" you too much, and then make snide comments when people point out the behaviors that make you unappealing to women, I can only say it's up to you to stop shooting yourself in the foot.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/25 03:36 PM
3

When was courtship ever "symmetric"?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 08:29 PM
5

Am I supposed to pick 1 out of the 25, or answer all 25 yes/no? Some of these are positive and some are negative so I assume it's the latter, but ain't nobody got time fo that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 08:29 PM
18

You seem to be using the word to mean the opposite of what she intended. She's saying women are more tribal in the sense that they live in and engage with a community. They share, cooperate, and lean on each other for support. You seem to be using "tribal" to mean "going to war with people who don't look like me." Incidentally, that's the kind of thinking women often use "vetting" to avoid.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 07:32 PM
7

woman seem more accepting of race and sexual orientation than men This right here is why women do vetting lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 07:30 PM
27

Bingo. They've had bad experiences in the past and want to avoid more of them Dunno how OP is confused by this lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 07:29 PM
-2

I certainly don't exist in a society like that lol
/r/MensRights02/06/25 07:23 PM
1

I don't think it's "pseudoscientific" to say people looking at the situation without bias (they're not dating the person and aren't tied to the idea of it working out) can assess more accurately. There are loads of people who consistently pick reliable, trustworthy partners. And there are loads of people who never do, even though every time they meet a new guy their friends always warn "he's bad news." I don't know if they genuinely just can't tell, if it's just what they're attracted to, or if …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 03:01 PM
5

Maybe it is impossible for you to tell, but all your friends who damn well which guys are going to end up cheating on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 06:12 AM
1

Good woman (or good man) is slightly different than good person
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/25 03:09 AM
1

Men’s median would likely be a lot more volatile if the average man’s mindset was “sleep with anyone you can” You just explained that the median for men is higher than women (because they're more willing to sleep with anyone they can--but some men can't, hence the 0s you mention) Then you flipped that around and said "if men wanted to sleep with anyone they can, they'd have a higher median"... but they already do have a higher median.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 09:38 PM
1

If men slept with more women, how would women's numbers stay the same? It's not a "coincidence" that every time a man sleeps with a woman, both their numbers increase by 1
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 07:11 PM
3

Bingo, they don't acknowledge the dangers and risks that come from the behaviors they demand from women (early in dating--promiscuity). They wouldn't suddenly be aware of them if they had a woman's body. The only reason I disagree with you is guys wouldn't all suddenly be into the idea of getting railed by a bunch of dudes, they'd still be wildly homophobic.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 06:47 PM
1

Yes, women are shamed for promiscuity. Men aren't. If men suddenly woke up in women's bodies, they wouldn't be automagically socially conditioned to feel shame for promiscuity. That's the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 06:43 PM
5

that’s also the average number of sexual partners for men, so that kinda destroys the narrative that most guys would be fucking as many women as they can Who says that's not "as many women as they can"?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/25 06:41 PM
2

Might not have much success romantically, but that doesn't mean you should stop talking to women in general. A small group of female friends is good for anybody.
/r/seduction01/06/25 04:53 AM
80

Attractive/popular people don't have to develop personalities or a sense of humor. Common sense. The best people are those who became attractive later in life.
/r/seduction31/05/25 10:44 PM
3

Is this surprising to anyone? It's the same reason women never approach men--they don't have to. If you're constantly getting offers, obviously you're going to become more picky. Why wouldn't you? At the same time, if you're used to getting offers from everyone and suddenly someone says you don't meet their standards, it's going to be more of a "shock" than if you're used to rejection.
/r/MensRights31/05/25 09:45 PM
1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 09:28 PM
1

someone who is only "Kind, and disciplined"???? Those men are NOT struggling to stay single In the post you crossed out "disciplined" leaving just "kind, loving." I agree that's probably not enough, and I'm not sure why it would be. Kind and disciplined, they should be pretty successful in dating. .For me personally, if I ever used or heard the term "good woman" It would not at all be ANYTHING OTHER than the definition that I described You don't think like... attractive? Not important to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 09:11 PM
1

Again it sounds like you're taking the phrase literally. Someone who is approached 10% as often as their friends might say they "feel invisible," but they do not literally mean no one can ever see or talk to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 09:08 PM
0

A large portion of resentful men are that way because they feel or think they are "good" Then they're probably wrong. Your criteria: kind, loving, disciplined, smart, funny, charming. Men fitting this don't stay single long. Being resentful of women in general for not finding you attractive really doesn't mesh with being "good" either. And your thesis is equally true of women. Men and women obviously have different things in mind when they think of a "good woman." Most women aren't trying to hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 08:25 PM
10

Pretty sure previous commenter meant in the context of a first date.
/r/seduction30/05/25 04:16 AM
7

He's not the one who'd get judged for it.
/r/seduction30/05/25 04:16 AM
6

It's not insecurity, it's stroking his ego. The guy is more likely to call her back if he thinks he was special vs if he thinks she hooks up with every guy she goes on a date with.
/r/seduction30/05/25 04:15 AM
1

Those poor pedophile sex offenders /s
/r/MensRights29/05/25 01:34 PM
3

some weak minded fool who will put up with it. That ain't me. You sure? You just said you wouldn't date a hot woman because of the leverage she'd have over you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 01:32 PM
1

Is this a "trans kids" thing?
/r/MensRights29/05/25 01:29 PM
1

Scroll up.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 01:28 PM
-1

You didn't mention anything specifically, you just said "living their best lives." The implications of income inequality are obvious.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 10:44 PM
-5

I’m guessing American men must be living their best lives Again, the question was about gender rights legislation, not ex income inequality etc
/r/MensRights28/05/25 09:59 PM
-8

The question was about changing laws, not societal perceptions *shrug*
/r/MensRights28/05/25 09:23 PM
-13

Other than conscription, these laws are already gender neutral (on the books) in the US.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 09:05 PM
-1

After you.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 07:28 PM
3

Yeah I don't believe you
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 05:34 PM
1

You just said you look at videos of women having sex with dogs every day for entertainment.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 03:04 PM
1

I haven't heard of any supposedly matriarchal society
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 02:57 PM
4

the more power women have, the more egalitarian a society becomes. Isn't that kind of tautological? Like saying the more money you give to poor people, the less income inequality a society has.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 01:45 AM
2

I'm not really sure what your title has to do with your post. It might help if you gave some examples if the issues you think wouldn't exist if female biology was "tuned a bit better," and what kind of "tuning" you have in mind. Like... women wouldn't feel scared to walk around alone at night if they were as strong as men? Sure, yeah, obvious. But like... what other issues do you mean? How else would you "tune female biology"? And why female biology specifically? Couldn't we also tune male biolo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 01:45 AM
0

Somewhat, yes. And why not? If you could date women who were much hotter than you, would you just... not do that, out of some principle of "fairness"? Because "what about the women who are your same level of hotness"?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/25 01:42 AM
-1

It's literally all of the news.
/r/MensRights28/05/25 12:06 AM
1

If blue skies got me worked up enough to complain on reddit about their existence, and I went out of my way to make sure I looked at blue skies every day, yes that would be a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 11:24 PM
-1

Do you think if 25-year-old woman is married to a 70-year-old billionaire, that means she loves and respects him as an equal? Or is it possible to be married to someone without feeling that way?
/r/MensRights27/05/25 08:14 PM
2

Maybe that's your problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 05:48 PM
2

They say women won't buy sex bots women wont pay for prostitutes women aren't perverted women dont watch porn women don't like bad boys Absolutely fascinating how you lump these together like they're all equally supported claims. FORT MYERS, Fla. (WWSB) - A woman in Fort Myers was arrested Wednesday for allegedly making videos of herself having sex with her dog OP, I think you need to understand there's a difference between the absolutely most outlandish stories you can find on the internet abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 02:52 PM
1

wat
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/25 06:34 AM
1

What does this have to do with men's rights being rolled back?
/r/MensRights27/05/25 06:23 AM
-5

No one says that lmao
/r/MensRights27/05/25 05:48 AM
5

And women can wear makeup and push-up bras to make themselves more appealing. It's still the hunger / male sexuality in control--not the target of the desire. Addiction is internal. It doesn't live in the thing you're addicted to. You could get rid of all the nicotine in the world, and smokers would still be addicted to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 01:06 AM
0

When you disagree with someone and then tell them they started the argument, do you consider that honest?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 08:12 PM
2

Who gave birth to and raised all those men? What point do you think you're making? Yeah, there are biological differences between men and women. No one's shocked. Turns out being a good partner means more than just having a job.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 07:46 PM
1

In no sense is this an "underrated" reason. It's the first thing everyone points to.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 07:45 PM
2

You're raising a semantic argument over the extent to which different people getting attention qualifies as being invisible. As you say, using words differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 07:36 PM
4

So this is a "other people get even less attention" thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 07:30 PM
2

They want no more to do with your issues than you do with theirs.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 06:30 PM
2

I can see people answering they are married when they're really just engaged, saying they live with a partner when they really don't (but they spend most nights together), etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 04:09 PM
26

This is completely backwards IMO. Female sexuality has no power over men, any more than junk food has power over fat people. They're slaves to their hunger, not to food. As much as they might want to try to externalize that blame, it lies entirely with them. An Oreo has no power over anyone. Most men seem to figure this out eventually (much later than women do). Women can manipulate men because of male sexuality, but the fact is it only works when the man is open to being manipulated. Men who do…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 04:02 PM
6

Did you think she meant like... literally invisible?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 03:55 PM
1

"You could use education. I recommend a YouTube video" lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 03:12 PM
0

The people screaming about birth rates are always the same people screaming about reversing immigration.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 03:11 PM
1

If your argument requires you to appeal to some tiny marginal fraction of cases where a man is raped by a woman who ends up pregnant, you don't have a good argument.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 03:10 PM
1

I am purposely ignoring your point because your point is not on the topic of reproductive rights. Saying a man's children only exist because "someone else decided" robs men of their agency in whether to have unprotected sex, with whom to have sex, etc.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 03:08 PM
1

According to ex the Census you are either married or not (other options include divorced, widowed, etc). People in their 20s are more likely to be married in their late 20s. Recent data shows the average age of marriage is about 30.5 for men and 28.6 for women Median Age at First Marriage: Geographic Variation, 2022 We can look at actual marriage records, Census data, etc and know this pretty reliably. It shows about a 2-year age gap, as expected That shows that women are (on average) getting ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 03:05 PM
4

Two more factors you didn't include: Not all relationships are heterosexual Women may be more likely to say they are in a relationship or married when they really aren't
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 02:58 PM
24

I think you'd be surprised how successful hippy dudes living in vans are with women lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 02:51 PM
5

I don't think you understand how difficult that would be living in a van lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/25 02:50 PM
0

No, it's not. Choosing not to take care of your children is called being a deadbeat. It's not a "reproductive right."
/r/MensRights23/05/25 01:38 AM
-1

You are again not talking about reproductive rights if there's already a baby. You're talking about wanting to be a deadbeat.
/r/MensRights23/05/25 12:54 AM
1

Why did you write all this without one example of men's rights behind rolled back?
/r/MensRights22/05/25 11:29 PM
-1

Of course they do. You have the right to control all your reproductive faculties within your own body. You don't have the right to control the reproductive faculties of anyone else's body. "Opting out of fatherhood once the child is born" has nothing to do with reproductive rights. That's just called being a deadbeat.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 11:26 PM
1

Don't forget the people telling them education is a scam and a waste of time.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 08:37 PM
0

This obsession with birth rates is creepy tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 08:37 PM

I didn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 07:00 PM

Maybe, but that's not what I wrote about.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 06:53 PM

Those are different words with different meanings.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 06:40 PM

That's not something I wrote. Not sure where you got that from. I said thinking porn is an alternative to a relationship is (rightly) mocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 06:24 PM

"Woke are people who think their ideas are good and other people's ideas are bad" lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 05:23 PM

Learn history. Nope, There are sitting members of Congress openly advocating to repeal the Civil Rights Act that ended Jim Crow.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 05:20 PM

"Coming back"? It didn't go anywhere. Conservatives adopted it as one of their boogeyman insults they don't understand, like DEI and CRT.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 05:20 PM

Why would they? Why would anyone mind a total stranger they don't even know exists not having a relationship? Porn is not an "alternative" to a relationship. People are mocked (rightly) for thinking it should be. Women don't use toys because they can't get laid. They can. They choose to use toys instead (or in addition). "Passport bros" are not looking for women with "traditional values." There are plenty of conservative women here. They're looking for financially desperate women who will marry …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/25 05:15 PM
-8

Because men's rights aren't being rolled back. Women are being banned from access to reproductive healthcare (in some cases, necessary and lifesaving). There's a bill in Congress now that would ban anyone from voting if their last name doesn't match their birth certificate--in other words, most married women would lose the right to vote. The only men's rights issues people bring up are the draft--which hasn't been used in 50 years--and bias in child custody cases. Neither of these issues are new…
/r/MensRights22/05/25 04:31 PM
1

They're literally not.
/r/MensRights22/05/25 06:02 AM

You didn't say "being thrown in a dumpster either," but you felt the need to jump in and call that "extremist rhetoric." My question is why you didn't do the same for OP saying men are "starving to death." It's a little odd you think my comment was more "extremist" than OP's.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 07:59 PM

In the same way we all have the privilege of being able to eat out of a dumpster any time we want to. Some of us just choose not to. I noticed you didn't comment on the analogy of "starving to death" after accusing me of "extremist rhetoric" btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 07:13 PM

Do you think women would be outnumbered 4:1 on dating apps if the experience was actually closer to "an all you can eat buffet" than "being thrown in a dumpster"? Same question for men, if the experience was really like "starving to death." Who's using "extremist rhetoric"?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 06:42 PM

No, I do not see how being willing to see things through both perspectives is unfair. Constantly getting thrown in dumpsters is not a great experience, even if every now and then one of the dumpsters turns out to have something nice inside. This is really just women saying "please stop throwing me in dumpsters" and men responding with "how dare you be so ungrateful? I would give anything to have access to all that free food!"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 06:28 PM

Ok but your comparisons are equally ridiculous. "I am starving... I haven't eaten for a week. Yeah I get it. I was just at a buffet and there was no wagyu beef :/." Receiving unsolicited dick pics by strangers is not "a buffet with no wagyu beef" it's more like "I just got thrown in the dumpster behind a McDonald's." You're calling it a "buffet" because unsolicited nude pics from women is what you want. That's not to say women would be happier getting no attention ("starving," in your analogy), …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 03:41 PM
5

when a man has knocked up a woman, he suddenly has very strong opinions about her getting an abortion. The leading cause of death for pregnant women is not abortions. It's the men with very strong opinions about the pregnancy they caused. Homicide leading cause of death for pregnant women in U.S. | Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/25 03:09 PM
1

Why did you tell me not to pretend something you think is real?
/r/MensRights21/05/25 03:07 PM
1

Feminists, again, are not the ones ignoring oligarchy to foolishly uphold patriarchy.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 03:07 PM
1

lmfao this world you're imagining sounds rad. I would never pretend feminism pushes that.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 05:48 AM
1

Then maybe you should stop doing it?
/r/MensRights21/05/25 05:47 AM
1

Thanks for taking your L.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 12:00 AM
4

They have literally nothing to do with each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 10:56 PM
8

Men are more conservative politically. Women are more conservative with who they date (as in, they avoid their conservative Gen Z male peers)
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 10:03 PM
17

She does that, plus the pregnancy, childbirth, and raising the kid. You are a fundamentally unserious person.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 09:59 PM
21

Leading cause of death for pregnant women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 09:58 PM
11

It's actually scary that you think these things two are comparable. Some men are socially unable to get laid as often as they want Women are legally barred from reproductive healthcare Seriously. Get help.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/25 09:57 PM
1

YOU are implying that ALL of the "Oligarchs" are men How ironic of you to say this immediately after accusing me of a "strawman argument." No, I didn't not say (or imply) that. Ten Key Facts about Billionaires 90 percent of billionaires are male Happy now? the Oligarchy is not EXCLUSIVELY men and that there are mothers, daughters and wives I really don't understand why you're doubling down on this "but the oligarchs have mothers, daughters, and wives" argument immediately after calling it a stra…
/r/MensRights20/05/25 09:30 PM
-20

porn stars are chosen based off who women are attracted to... protectors and providers lmao
/r/seduction20/05/25 04:18 PM
33

Stop looking for girls at the club and being surprised when you only meet girls who are into clubbing.
/r/seduction20/05/25 04:18 PM
-1

So it's okay to focus on hating women rather than the oligarchs oppressing you, because the oligarchs have mothers and wives?
/r/MensRights20/05/25 02:39 PM
1

Having a girlfriend
/r/seduction19/05/25 10:47 PM
-1

The fact men might be oppressed (by oligarchs, for example) doesn't make society less patriarchal. Focusing on being mad at women for pointing out injustices against them is less time spent addressing injustices against anyone.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 10:47 PM
3

It's even simpler than that. It's not their experience and it's not their goal. Men don't think about how hard it is for women to walk around at night without being harassed. Women don't think about how hard it is for men to get casual hookups at a bar. Casual sex is fine as long as two people both agree to casual sex, nothing wrong with that. But most women don't want that, don't try to find it, and don't think about how hard it is for men or women to get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 04:16 PM
2

This is Mt Everest level insecurity, OP. Get therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/25 02:57 PM
2

Because abstinence isn't a solution for not having a baby, it's a solution for not having sex. That doesn't mean it's "important" that women have sex. It means it's important for women to have the right to make those decisions for themselves. In the next paragraph, you're arguing how important it is for women to have sex--specifically, with men who can't get laid. Women's reproductive rights have nothing to do with your inability to get laid. Trying to take them away will not help you get laid.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 03:03 AM
10

Assuming they're in the US, it means they can't go out for a drink together. And probably he's still in college and she's not, so good chance he's broke.
/r/seduction18/05/25 05:32 PM
2

This is... completely made up. She died about 20 years after the "pretending to be a man" experiment.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 11:05 PM
2

There's a lot of happy medium between "I can fix him" and "I'm holding out for The One"
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/25 11:21 PM
-8

Answering a question someone asked you is apparently a logical fallacy now
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:42 PM
2

They could also benefit from doing more to meet women's standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 11:02 PM
-1

Isn't that what you want?
/r/MensRights12/05/25 06:50 PM
0

I bet most places you go have more men than women. Thinking you can extrapolate that to the entire population is... confusing In what sense are women "given" friends or education etc by simply being women? Do you have any idea how the world works?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 06:26 PM
0

Being a misogynist isn't a hobby.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 06:24 PM
0

roflmao
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 06:09 PM
13

the dickpocalypse
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 01:27 AM
1

Right, you have to do more than just "be yourself and wait for a Disney princess to fall for you"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/25 12:12 AM
1

Right. But life isn't a Disney movie
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 11:36 PM
0

If you think dating is equally bad both ways then there's no issue
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 11:36 PM
1

I assumed it meant smelly and gross and you just want to avoid the whole thing
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 11:29 PM
-2

Yes, that's what it's implying. Compared to young men, young women typically: Spend more time working out Have better hygiene Spend more time and money on their appearance Have better posture and mobility Have more hobbies Have more friends Read more Are better educated Earn more money Imagine doing all these things and you're surrounded by men who don't. Why would you want to settle for an out of shape, overweight, smelly, uneducated man with a bad job who can't dress himself properly? What wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/25 04:51 PM
-5

It's not a "dodge" to know eyewitness testimony is famously unreliable.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 06:08 AM
-14

Worth adding context that DNA evidence had been in use for less than 10 years at this point. Rape convictions generally only happen from the "violent stranger rape" cases people might imagine, so this is basically a woman trying to pick out someone who attacked her in a dark alley a week later in a lineup.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 08:28 PM
0

They see it as even more insulting if the person they can't hook up with is sleeping around
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/25 05:44 PM
1

Paraphrasing the video by applying it to women generally, yes. And doubling down on that point in this reply.
/r/MensRights08/05/25 03:44 PM
1

Thank you for making my point.
/r/MensRights08/05/25 03:38 PM
0

The lack of self-awareness is astonishing.
/r/MensRights08/05/25 03:38 PM
-1

You don't see the irony there? "We have to fight, because the women are taking from us!" They are literally describing a zero sum game, just accusing feminists of "starting it."
/r/MensRights07/05/25 09:10 PM
0

Literally the top comment is describing how they need to fight feminism because feminists are treating it as a "zero sum game" (attacking men to improve the status of women) But yeah sure, I'm totally wrong, ok
/r/MensRights07/05/25 08:55 PM
1

lol
/r/MensRights07/05/25 08:51 PM
1

some women 2nd top comment right now: Women: "UGH! Why can't men just LEAVE US ALONE!?!?!?!?" Men: "Understood! we'll stop interacting with you immediately" Women: "Ugh! men don't interact with us anymore! How can we be offended and call them out for their misogyny if they don't interact with us!?"
/r/MensRights07/05/25 06:38 PM
1

You brought up plastic surgery, I pointed out you're talking about outliers, now you're telling me to "zoom out"? I already said in my first comment everybody objectifies resources. Women are a subset of everybody. You don't have to sell me on something I already agree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 05:27 PM
-3

Stop consuming ragebait.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 05:26 PM
0

You're spot on, but I doubt this will be received well here. The main reason this sub exists is people here see this as a zero-sum issue, where any gain for women must mean a loss for men, therefore any movement for women's equality is seen as an attack on men.
/r/MensRights07/05/25 04:04 PM
1

Yes you are. You're literally talking about women getting plastic surgery lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 03:36 PM
1

You are looking at fringe outliers and extrapolating to all women. What point are you making anyway? Some women are willing do more than you to make themselves marketable? Yeah, no shit. What have you tried, other than complaining on reddit?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 03:09 PM
1

This is nonsense. Men and women are both objectified for their bodies and for their "resources." Anyone who's been to high school knows this. There are always "popular" kids who are rich but not good looking, good looking but not rich, funny but not good looking or rich, etc. Your job is to offer something--anything. The idea that you have nothing to offer because you're not rich (or not 6' tall, or whatever) is just blackpill doomerism. I'm pushing 40 now, and I can't tell you how many guys I'v…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/25 02:50 PM
3

When I do see anything from manosphere types these days (increasingly rare), it's always them talking abuot how their "movement" is about to start growing in numbers. Big clue they're struggling to recruit.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 11:48 PM
0

What if I like getting laid?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 07:41 PM

The two main points here are completely correct. The problem comes in when men, rather than directing their frustration in a useful way (better themselves, making themselves more attractive partners, etc), they lash out at women. Talking about how the "male loneliness epidemic" is a result of things like "women joining the workforce" are not reasonable. That's not just "being upset." That is saying you want to ban women from being able to earn money and provide for themselves. You want women to …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 07:03 PM
0

Without compelling evidence otherwise, people being equal should be the default.
/r/MensRights06/05/25 06:01 PM
0

Why not?
/r/MensRights06/05/25 05:25 PM
11

I've gone through a couple periods of my life where I thought like this, but eventually I realized I was living like a lazy slob. Staying up all night playing video games, not showering every day, never going to the gym, getting fat. I probably fit several things you think would exclude me from most women's "type." But I can guarantee you I went from thinking it was impossible, to making healthier choices (going to the gym twice a week, ditching junk food, wearing clean clothes when I leave the …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 10:27 PM
5

Is "not being able to have a credit card" really the biggest example of female oppression you can think of? Not female genital mutilation, honor killings, literally being bought as property? It's fine if you want to point out bad things men had to deal with, but the systems both sexes had to live under were designed by men. It's absurd to suggest the oppression women have faced throughout history was at the hand of anyone other than men. This isn't some kind of "oppression Olympics" thing where …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 07:21 PM
5

You are pretending women have never been oppressed?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 06:32 PM
5

Are you being obtuse on purpose or do you in fact not understand what we're talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 06:09 PM
3

Reading your title I assumed you meant "the idea that society should be allowed to oppress one gender is utterly delusional," which is a very reasonable thing to think. It sounds like you actually mean you think it's impossible for society to oppress one gender, which is an absolutely wild thing to admit out loud to thinking. It's fine if you're one of those people who think all inequality is gone (it's not, but whatever), but you actually write: Men and women have always been equal since the be…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 03:19 PM
13

The fact that men are on average physically stronger than women doesn't change the fact that men and women should be given equal legal rights and status.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 03:16 PM
2

This is stupid. There is no "epidemic" and dating is easier than it has been at any other time in modern history. Seriously, if it's this hard for you, you need to sign off reddit. Get a gym membership. Stop eating junk food. Within a year you'll have girls asking you for your number, I promise you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:12 AM
3

The guy who doesn't have a dog in this fight is the one who doesn't sound objective? Really?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 04:09 AM
1

I'm pretty sure everyone knows this stuff is common.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 07:17 PM
3

Ok but that's not something you get to decide for everyone. You think they're unattractive because of who they have sex with--which by definition means someone finds them attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 05:37 PM
1

Not being homosexual is not the same thing as thinking homosexuals are gross, if that's what you're trying to imply.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 05:35 PM
16

I've heard various reasons. Worry that they'll miss dick and want to leave them for a man, maybe? I've heard some cite STD rates (lesbian sex tends to be the least "risky")
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 06:56 AM
7

Yeah it's not a big deal to say you're not attracted to them. Probably doesn't make sense to call them "unattractive men" though (implying they are objectively unattractive, rather than just not attractive to you).
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 06:54 AM
18

Similarly, a lot of lesbians won't date bi women
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 06:31 AM
16

Yeah, do you think that's a double standard or something? She likes bi men because they tend not to have weird gender role expectations. That's not comparable to dudes lusting after bi women hoping for a threesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 06:30 AM
11

There are different levels of homophobia. Saying you think it's gross definitely registers on the scale. If I said I think it's gross for white women to have sex with black men, that would obviously be racist. Everybody has some level of prejudice (racism, sexism, homophobia, etc), it's better to be honest about it than to pretend you don't feel that way or pretend it's not prejudiced.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 06:28 AM
1

This is part of it, but there are studies that show people's expectations for dating vs cohabitation do not line up. For example when you first start dating, it's common for the man to pay for dates, and the woman to make homecooked meals. These are common courtship practices. If you ask the people who use these practices, they will often tell you they want an egalitarian long-term relationship. They want to share cooking, cleaning, childcare, etc duties. But that's not what they do when they're…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/25 06:48 PM
3

I'm not
/r/seduction23/04/25 07:21 PM
3

It's not growing fast, and governments aren't paying it any attention.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 07:07 PM
3

Are you gay? Are you hanging out with a specific type of women you're not actually interested in? Ie do you meet all these women at nightclubs?
/r/seduction23/04/25 06:11 PM
19

Women generally do not have great advice about dating women. Dating in general, really--they have no idea what pursuing someone is like. If you don't believe me, talk to a bisexual woman who's tired of dating men and see how it's going dating women. They have absolutely no idea what to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/25 07:44 PM

none of that is enforceable under the First Amendment That's their point, yeah. The idea of free speech exists independently of the First Amendment.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/25 03:32 PM
5

They want to be hit on by men they're interested in.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 11:35 PM
1

It's both.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 08:17 PM
4

No one's ever good at something they've never practiced
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/25 08:16 PM
31

it's subtle Yeah, women flirt the way La Croix tastes.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 07:11 PM
75

It's both. Men are taught not to randomly hit on women, and most people lack the social skills to do so gracefully/successfully. Women are fully aware of how stressful it is, which is why they never do it. Virtually all women will tell you they could never just randomly hit on a guy. The stress and disappointment if he said no would crush them. At the same time they expect men to do it, while also saying they don't want to be harassed. None of it really makes any sense. Ladies, if you don't want…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/25 03:46 PM

This is like saying "it's not the KKK making people racist, it's black people!" That's not how anything works. If you point to a few black people committing crimes or whatever and decide to adopt an identity around hating black people (or thinking white people should "go their own way" or whatever), you're just a racist. You don't get to blame black people for your racism--even if you can point to some black people who behave in ways that make you really mad.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/25 04:31 AM
-5

What
/r/MensRights07/04/25 09:57 PM
-6

80% of purchases does not equate to 80% of money
/r/MensRights07/04/25 07:33 PM
-4

What year do you think it is?
/r/MensRights07/04/25 07:13 PM
1

I guess I don't know what you mean by "low value in similar ways" if not for example "both are unattractive" etc
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 06:01 AM
-2

You said "low value in similar ways to them" Women accepting a fat rich bf and men accepting a dumb hot gf aren't similar
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 04:59 AM
1

I don't think that's true. People usually get pickier after having kids and engage in less casual dating. I also don't think the only two options are "virgin" or "single mom." Even ignoring the kid being in the picture, few people would agree a single mom is equally attractive before and after pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 01:55 AM
-1

This is silly. There are well known differences in the things men and women (statistically) prioritize in long-term partners
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 01:43 AM
7

This assumes low value men want more low value women to date. They don't. They want the top 20% of women, just like most women want the top 20% of men. They see a woman becoming a single mother as a wasted opportunity--she might have been a high value woman before, but now she's not, so the pool of women they want to date is smaller. They've always been able to settle for lower value women. They don't want to. Btw the whole "low value" thing is nonsense, but since that's the framing of the quest…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 09:00 PM
1

Sex lasts longer with a condom on lol wut
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/25 07:54 PM
-3

But OP isn't saying "stop worrying about culture war nonsense and focus on the class war." It (the bot) is saying the opposite of that.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 11:55 PM
2

It does of course, but people don't generally look for it until too late in the relationship. Early on people tend to lean into traditional gender roles as part of courtship--men buy dinners and vacations, women make home-cooked meals and clean his place for him. Years go by, they get married, have kids, and now she's confused why he's focusing on his job and expecting her to do all the housework. That was the foundation the relationship was built on. If you want an egalitarian marriage, you hav…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 05:26 PM
1

And I'm pointing out they don't have to have gay sex or go to prostitutes or be particularly attractive to receive offers of NSA sex You bolded Tinder in your post, I'm not sure what you mean when you say you didn't mention it
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:34 PM
0

I mentioned Grindr earlier in the same sentence, and attractiveness 2 sentences later. Way to intentionally miss the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:11 PM
1

What's a "figurative card"? As I said in my first comment, it's almost never a dealbreaker to split the check, but it almost always goes best if you just pick it up without a discussion
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 04:09 PM
4

This is quite silly. Tinder is broadly known as a hookup app because of how common it is for a Tinder date to turn into a ONS. If that was as one-sided as you're suggesting, women would have stopped using it a decade ago. Sure, it might not be as easy as Grindr, but the idea that men only get NSA sex from prostitutes is... just not born out by reality Anecdotally, I deleted dating apps from my phone maybe 6 months ago. I'm not particularly attractive (probably below average). In that time I've h…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 03:58 PM
3

This varies a lot. I've dated women who are really well off (like retired at 30 from a startup) and pay for everything whenever they go out with friends or on a date. Someone who doesn't worry about money isn't going to care about the check. If she's a bartender or a teacher, she's going to be relieved not to have to pay $30 for a date. There are women who expect the man to always pay, but I don't see them all coming from one economic class. Usually they want a man who makes more than them (or e…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 12:29 AM
1

I doubt it's a dealbreaker for almost anyone--nobody's putting in the time to sit through an entire date and then deciding whether to go out again based on whether the check is split. And if it is a dealbreaker, that's probably not someone you want to go out with again. If a date went well and you just put your card on the table and say "do you want to get a drink? I know this cool bar next door" she's probably coming home with you an hour later.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/25 12:23 AM
6

In my experience basically every woman will split the check on a date. Most will even offer when the check hits the table. That doesn't mean it's not a good idea to pick up the bill. I'm well off financially now, and dating is... exponentially better now that I can offer to take my dates to a nice restaurant and not worry about paying the whole bill. That's a shitty reality, but IMO it's more of a rich vs poor issue than a man vs woman thing. I could have been doing this 10-15 years ago, but it …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 07:07 PM
-2

Did you reply to the wrong person?
/r/MensRights28/03/25 03:55 PM
-7

How do you address this forcing trans men with beards and big muscles into women's restrooms?
/r/MensRights27/03/25 09:22 PM
1

Medical schools admitting applicants is not at all like society dictating what field people should be trained for as children...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 09:47 PM
1

lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 04:59 AM
1

That sounds extremely totalitarian tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 01:21 AM
3

You want careers assigned to people by society?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 02:46 PM
2

Did you miss the last part of the sentence?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 02:43 PM
4

You and I are different? Does that mean we should be assigned different responsibilities by society?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 06:09 AM
5

Why would they be any different?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 05:25 AM

If you were constantly hounded by people trying to manicure your nails whether you want them to or not, and the ones you do allow do a bad job and end up hurting you, you might feel differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 09:16 PM
-2

r/MensRights
/r/MensRights12/03/25 04:33 PM
-61

I thought boys were natural leaders
/r/MensRights11/03/25 05:14 PM
1

Wherever you stand on reproductive rights or trans rights doesn't really matter to the point, Trump is just lying to women during women's history month, which I'm frankly surprised he isn't getting rid of as some kind of DEI thing.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 03:03 AM
6

Tbh I'd be much more surprised to hear this about a man than a woman. The default assumption is women want a relationship--if she's still single at 35, there must be a reason! Men like being single "playing the field." They wait longer to "settle down" and don't worry about having kids at 40. A man being single at 35 doesn't raise any eyebrows. I think OP's issue is... something else. that women should stick to dating men their age. On the flip side, men who prefer younger women are universally …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/25 02:57 AM
1

Neither has anything to do with protecting (or pandering to) women
/r/MensRights08/03/25 02:25 AM
2

Trump signing an anti-trans executive order after removing women's reproductive rights is not really the "pandering to women" you might think it is.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 04:17 PM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights02/03/25 03:30 AM
1

I don't know what that is
/r/MensRights02/03/25 03:18 AM
1

You said "Is this how men want to be treated in 2025? I friend if weird, because these are gender neutral things" I guess I can see how you mean "I find it weird that men would want that" or "I find it weird that men should have to say they want that"
/r/MensRights28/02/25 05:21 PM
3

Then why do you "find it weird" for men to also expect basic courtesies like holding doors open for each other?
/r/MensRights27/02/25 05:31 PM
2

Overton window - Wikipedia
/r/MensRights26/02/25 06:12 PM
5

This makes perfect sense actually. If you're already attracted to someone they don't need to do anything to keep you attracted.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 08:51 PM
1

Supreme Court maintains pause on Trump bid to immediately fire watchdog agency head Judge Halts Trump’s DEI Contract Ban—See Full List Of Trump Administration Lawsuits Trump to eliminate 1,600 USAID jobs, place most of workforce on leave - The Washington Post You claiming to either support the fascism or not be aware of the fascism doesn't mean it isn't happening. Btw I noticed you didn't back up your claim about "stopping wars"
/r/MensRights24/02/25 06:46 PM
2

There are loads of better ways to do it, but President Musk would never risk his billion dollar subsidies.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 06:44 PM
0

If the President uses an Executive Order to cut government jobs, departments, or agencies that were established by Congress, that's unconstitutional and illegal. If the President uses an Executive Order to cut regulations that were passed into law by Congress, that's unconstitutional and illegal. What wars has Trump stopped? Just because you like something doesn't mean it's not fascistic.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 05:01 PM
4

You're literally watching the richest man on the planet run the government instead of the President, and you don't want to call it an oligarchy. But what we had before, with billionaires being allowed to donate to politicians... That was an oligarchy? And we're going to fix it by... getting rid of the government workers, and put one specific billionaire directly in control of the government? Talk about out of the frying pan and into the fire.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 04:57 PM

This is profoundly illogical. If I accused you of having sex with dogs, and then told you "if it wasn't accurate, you wouldn't be trying so hard to censor me saying it," what would your response be?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/25 04:44 PM
2

That's effectively the same thing as tax breaks today for people who are married (in the US and many other countries). Whether it's a tax break for being married or extra tax for being single, the effect is the same. But it's to encourage people to get married, hardly the sexual exclusion of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/25 03:13 PM
2

What history?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 10:49 PM
-2

I've never noticed that tbh
/r/MensRights18/02/25 10:46 PM
2

Both. Do you think those are contradictory? For comparison: "You're so picky, acting like you had to settle for the fancy $100/person dinner." If the person was less picky, it wouldn't feel like they're "settling" for what they've got.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 10:16 PM
1

In practice, no--hence the first complaint (women are too picky--though it's obviously not just women)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/25 10:15 PM
1

Nothing happened to it. It's been around for like 6-7 years, but most people didn't hear about it until 2024. Now they don't hear about it anymore and they think something "happened" to it.
/r/MensRights17/02/25 09:38 AM
14

In my answer I'll assume you're genuinely asking out of curiosity to learn other perspectives, not just trying to convince other people to adopt your worldview. 9-5 jobs are no more harmful to women than they are to men. Women generally do not take sick days for their period. Jobs prevent men spending time with their kids too. Some people choose to put their jobs ahead of having kids. Some people choose to have kids instead of having a job. Some people choose to have both. Feminism empowers anyo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 09:13 AM
2

I'm not sure what you're asking. Overall, it's the same people enforcing gender roles in both directions. Very few people who think hunting is only for men will say ballet is also for men, or vice versa.
/r/MensRights17/02/25 08:29 AM
1

I don't really know that this is on topic here, but in general I agree, it's not a big deal, and I barely ever hear people talking about it (which seems like the appropriate amount of attention)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 04:25 AM
-9

In the US, the Selective Service was enacted before women had the right to vote. Blaming women voters for the draft is... extremely ahistorical
/r/MensRights14/02/25 04:02 AM
2

Yes, of course, but probably not in your lifetime. And it won't be... whatever it is you're imagining.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 09:23 PM
-5

When will there finally be a Super Bowl for men?
/r/MensRights10/02/25 01:39 AM
2

Women also fuck, marry, and birth women
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 03:42 PM
1

You're saying sex is a need in the same way blood is a need. This is patently absurd on its face.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/25 05:03 PM
4

The better question is probably whether they would support that relationship model for their children. Would they want their daughter involved with a RPer (naturally polygynous, craving sexual variety, etc)?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/25 11:32 PM
2

That sounds really unfortunate for them I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 05:06 AM
8

Did you paste this from ChatGPT? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 08:12 PM
7

What does that have to do with hypergamy?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 07:04 PM
15

There is no reason to put quantum technology in a sex doll.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 07:04 PM
7

I don't get what the complaint is. You're saying some women like one group of men, and other women like another group of men. Some women move from one group to the other as they get older. That's true of everything in life. You probably have different interests today than you did 20 years ago, right? What's the issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 04:48 PM
-1

Pablo Escobar being married has no bearing on the morality of men or women in general. Women aren't blind or single-dimensional. They understand dating a drug dealer has risks, but it also has benefits. Some women would rather date a drug dealer than a guy who flips burgers at McDonald's. Other women make the opposite choice. Just like you might choose the bimbo cheerleader over the overweight girl who wants to be a surgeon, and other men might choose the opposite. This shit isn't complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 04:54 PM
0

You know that's a dumb argument, right? It's like saying companies would only hire junior engineers if they were able to pay them less, but they don't--therefore junior engineers must get paid the same as senior engineers. It's not only wrong, it's pretending we're blind and can't just check the answer. If a hiring manager views men (or senior engineers) as deserving more pay, then they will hire them for more pay, rather than hiring someone they see as less capable for less pay. That's how hiri…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 05:45 PM
5

Right, they don't actually have any support structures in mind. That's my point
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 05:26 PM
10

Right. Programs like WIC are mainly designed for (and used by) single mothers, but they're open to everyone. The support structures women use are systemic safety nets--helping poor people feed and clothe their children, etc. I'm asking what kind of "support structures" people are thinking about to solve the "male loneliness epidemic"
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 05:06 PM
3

Lots of men and women feel the same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 04:55 PM
7

They see each other as competition and not only unworthy of female sexuality, but actively damaging to it. See all the discourse about "body count." Men are disgusted by each other, they think women are permanently ruined if another man touches them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 04:25 PM
1

Firstly the paygap isn't a thing in any civilised country Of course it is, it's just not 30 cents like some people claim. it's more like 6-8 cents (last figures I saw)
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 04:14 PM
11

You're not wrong, but we're not talking about "support structures" here, right? Like women can get food stamps to help feed their kids if their dad disappears or something, that's a support structure. What similar kind of "support structure" are you proposing for lonely men? Vouchers for hookers?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 04:13 PM
7

No one said it is. Lonely men != society
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 04:11 PM
8

Just saw a video this morning from a WW2 vet in tears about the state of the world falling back into everything he and his friends fought (and many died) against. Some people are happier, others aren't. Anecdotally, my grandma (only grandparent I have left) always asks why I'm not married yet. I say I'm one of the youngest of my cousins, and grew up seeing all my aunts, uncles, and older cousins go through divorce(s). She always laughs and says "that's true, we never had that when I was your age…
/r/MensRights27/01/25 03:56 PM
1

Yep, this. It's all women's fault for "not choosing better," but also it's a crime against humanity when women say they don't find 60% of men sexually attractive, and they want "enforced monogamy" so all those unfuckable men can have state-issued wives Admittedly I don't really get the part about upping your standards and still getting a deadbeat--you didn't really up your standards then, did you? Maybe in some way that doesn't really matter to you in the long run, but...?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 03:49 PM

Understanding what RP men say doesn't make you RP. I understand what Donald Trump says, that doesn't make me Donald Trump.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 07:41 PM
10

But they can never say the two things together, because that would mean admitting they are low value
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 11:33 PM
2

You're completely right, but... why then do you call yourself a red pill woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/25 11:33 PM
1

?? Your position is still just "don't have sex if you don't want kids" and you're still just trying to justify it. Are you afraid to answer the question? Do you know what "compromise" means?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 11:38 PM
1

No, it's the GOP being obtuse on accident. Biden misspoke, he didn't sign an executive order riddled with scientific illiteracy.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 11:35 PM
1

Right, don't have sex if you don't want kids. That's not a "compromise," it's just you saying you want the world to change drastically in a way the overwhelming majority of people do not agree with. Do you know what "compromise" means?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 11:08 PM
1

What "compromise"? Who are you compromising with? All you said is "don't have sex if you don't want to get pregnant." That's not a "compromise," it's just you saying you want the world to change drastically in a way the overwhelming majority of people do not agree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 10:51 PM
0

Right, so you're agreeing. You want pregnancy to be a punishment for women who have sex. You're not disagreeing with that, you're justifying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/25 03:20 PM
0

This completely misses the point of the question. Yes, it's possible to lower the risk of pregnancy, but ultimately the only way for most people to bring the risk to zero is to never have sex (or only have gay sex, I guess). Saying "it's easy to avoid" is to pretend this small risk is actually zero. The far right talks about pregnancy like it should be a punishment for women who had sex because they believe pregnancy should be a punishment for women who have sex. There's nothing more to it than …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/25 10:11 PM
0

A thing they can remedy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 02:33 AM
0

If you can manage the first, the second will happen basically on its own. Speaking from personal experience
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 12:44 AM
-2

Wtf does "potential rapist" mean? Are people all capable of murder? Does that make everyone a "potential murderer"? What are we talking about?
/r/MensRights18/01/25 10:25 PM
0

No one thinks most men are rapists. What does that have to do with comparing rape to something that happens 2 times a year? What does the comparison accomplish, other than suggesting rape isn't a big problem?
/r/MensRights18/01/25 10:24 PM
1

Thanks for taking your L lil bro
/r/MensRights18/01/25 10:07 PM
-1

Did you reply to the wrong comment?
/r/MensRights18/01/25 09:47 PM
-1

Then why did you compare it to something that happens twice a year?
/r/MensRights18/01/25 09:34 PM
-1

I don't get any messaging like that. What are you doing different?
/r/MensRights18/01/25 09:34 PM
-1

He's comparing it to 2 bear attacks a year. What else is the takeaway supposed to be?
/r/MensRights18/01/25 09:33 PM
-2

Then wtf is he saying?
/r/MensRights18/01/25 09:32 PM
-4

Then stop identifying with rapists, I guess? No one's doing it for you
/r/MensRights18/01/25 08:40 PM
-2

I get it, you think rape's not a big deal. Women disagree with you. Agree to disagree, I guess.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 08:39 PM
-8

There are far more than 2 rapes in a year, and no neighborhoods without men, so... odd comparison
/r/MensRights18/01/25 06:51 AM
3

That's the spirit
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 05:21 AM
1

Yes, in exactly the same way ~75% of Americans choose to be overweight. They might not like being overweight, but their actions show they prefer it to what's required to stop being overweight. There are some people with legitimate medical conditions that make it very difficult to maintain a healthy weight, but that's a rounding error.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 05:20 AM
4

Show us how it's done big boy -- I noticed your flair
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/25 05:06 AM
-20

Probably not as tired as women are of being afraid of being raped.
/r/MensRights18/01/25 05:03 AM
1

No one said working out isn't good for you That is exactly what OP described
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 11:50 PM
3

I'd love to see a source for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 09:23 PM
0

This is maybe the most braindead thing I have ever seen on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 09:23 PM
8

In 90%+ of cases, absolutely. There are certainly some people who (to no fault of their own) have a hard time dating--some kind of disability, deformity, developmental issue, etc. Not so say they can't make it work, but they are way more likely to be lonely than everyone else, and it's definitely not self-inflicted.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 08:45 PM
2

Oh please, as if "someone else's opinion" isn't the main reason most people work out Where people go wrong is thinking that person's opinion stops mattering after you've been together for a while, when the exact opposite is true
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 08:06 PM
1

How is a man choosing to abuse a woman the woman’s fault? In that, most abuse happens between sexual partners. I see, so it's equally the woman's fault because she was there when it happened to her?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:26 PM
3

What makes you think it's the BPers making false dichotomies? RPers constantly whine they have to pay child support if they abandoned their children, while simultaneously constantly complaining about the "fatherlessness epidemic." Why do you think men and women are equally to blame when men abandoned their children and women don't? You can say "choose better," but I can't choose what my partner will do. They can. I can try to predict it, but to suggest that's an equal level of responsibility is …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:23 PM
3

Probably because he was only ever working out to attract women, and now he has a girlfriend who tells him he doesn't need to keep working out?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:10 PM
9

These are the same women who are afraid to touch a set of weights because they think holding two 5 lb dumbbells while power walking will instantly turn them into Arnold Schwarzenegger
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:09 PM
3

Honestly, I was with you up until you started whining about how hard life is for white men lmfao Women do want a guy who looks like he spends all day in the gym, but without having to split his time between her and the gym (and spends money like he works 80 hours a week, but actually spends 80 hours a week with her), you're not wrong Fortunately after about age 25 people tend to figure out that's not possible and they get more realistic expectations. There's only so many times you can leave your…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 07:07 PM
2

Did you try Googling your question to see if there are any scientific answers, rather than asking random strangers on a specific subreddit hoping that would be representative of the global population?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 10:45 PM
-1

No one enters a relationships expecting to get cheated on They should. Loads of people start relationships with someone by cheating (either by them, the new partner, or both), then act shocked when cheating happens in the new relationship too.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 04:01 PM
1

TRP is full of hypocrites, of course, but this is a bad example. When they met they were obviously both into each other. One of them got in better shape and more successful, and the other did the opposite. It's not hypocritical for the one working to make their life better to be disappointed the other went the opposite direction. My weight has fluctuated almost 70 lbs as an adult, which was crazy. It happened a lot faster than I thought possible and was hard to fix, but it's certainly doable. If…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/25 04:59 PM
1

K, but we also know the stats on visual pornography are wildly skewed in one direction, vs literotica skewed wildly in the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 09:15 AM
8

The strip club thing was pretty hilarious. "1% of strip clubs are for women, therefore women are just as visual as men!" like... lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 12:38 AM
2

It means you don't like ice cream as much as someone who likes 80% of ice cream.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 12:35 AM
52

Your math would require you keeping that up every month for 20 years. Minus all the time when one sticks around for years, of course (assuming you're not cheating on her a couple times a month)
/r/seduction08/01/25 08:07 PM
5

This for sure. But also 2 girls 1 cup.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/25 03:29 AM
0

You do understand that people over age 25 dating people under 20 means they are dating teenagers?
/r/MensRights08/01/25 03:25 AM
1

Very good memory! I wrote that it is weird and creepy to have a preference for teenagers. That made you upset. Now here we are.
/r/MensRights08/01/25 03:24 AM
-1

Did you forget what comment you replied to?
/r/MensRights08/01/25 02:25 AM
0

Go on, tell us more about how you think men over 25 dating teenagers is a good thing. You're very convincing!
/r/MensRights08/01/25 02:11 AM
-2

Case in point.
/r/MensRights07/01/25 03:11 PM
-6

They absolutely can. Black people and white people have an enormous array of skin colors. Two black people rarely have the same skin color, so I wouldn't see that as a preference for a specific skin color. And you're spot on, it can be easier and more comfortable to date within a shared cultural background. There are lots of black people who grow up in white families/cultures (and vice versa), and there are enormous varieties of culture within the populations of black and white people, so skin c…
/r/MensRights06/01/25 07:44 PM
-12

I think this heavily depends on the preferences lol Okay preferences: Someone within +/- X years of your age Someone within X miles of your house Someone physically fit/active Not so okay preferences: Someone under 21 years of age (you're 25+) Someone with a specific skin color Someone who lets you sleep around (but you won't let them)
/r/MensRights06/01/25 06:36 PM
1

1% of women on tinder, but it would be gross and unfulfilling so they don’t. Why don’t they understand that that’s what women go through, but scaled up? I think the resentment is toward women who treat the bottom 60% of men as gross and unfulfilling...
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 03:28 AM
1

I mean, that is true. They're the ones pushing the traditional definitions of rape (ie, forcing a penis into a vagina) and saying things like "if it's a legitimate rape" it can't result in pregnancy.
/r/MensRights03/01/25 07:39 AM
1

And yet here you are
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 04:57 PM
3

If the only thing you care about in potential partners is how close they are to their "physical prime," then you have a whole other collection of issues people are going to question you for.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 01:35 AM
6

It's not too late to delete this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/24 01:34 AM
1

Almost half of divorces happen before kids, but yeah that can change things
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 11:35 PM
1

How is that saying anything about men in general? The whole point is that it's obviously popular with some men, and those who don't like it don't have to go. Almost like the opposite of a general statement about all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 05:26 PM

Yes, "shitting on men" by... wanting to be able to open a credit card without a man's permission
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 01:13 AM
1

What clubs are these??
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 01:12 AM

This is a discussion about repealing Roe v Wade lmao "shit on men for decades" you will find a way to be the victim in literally any situation
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 12:51 AM

What do you think that has to do with what I said?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/24 12:51 AM
1

Huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 11:24 PM

You don't have to definitively know when life begins to know women should have reproductive rights (unless your contention is we can't tell if pregnant women are alive?) I understand both could be true, but I'm curious why you said one if you seem to not support it and instead now be saying the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 11:20 PM

I literally just said. Also, the melodrama of describing checking a different ballot box as "doing labor" is hilarious
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 11:18 PM

People should protect women's reproductive rights regardless of incentive. You shouldn't need an incentive to do the right thing. "Men do want women to have rights, but don't care about that as much as they care about voting against immigration or for tax cuts for billionaires" is a totally different claim than "it doesn't benefit men."
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:14 PM
2

Ok well no one knows what you're thinking of when you say "those types of bars" because we can't look into your brain
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 09:13 PM
0

If you think bars shouldn't exist or alcohol should be abolished or whatever, that's fine, but I don't really see the point wedging that into this conversation
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 08:51 PM
0

On top of this, I think women tend to have an easier time finding a new relationship, and benefit less from relationships. They do a disproportionate amount of domestic labor, so ending makes their life easier (only cleaning up after themselves)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 08:42 PM

Why did you point out they didn't end up benefiting men if you knew that was never the goal, like that was some great revelation? Just say men prefer women not having reproductive freedom, don't couch it in some "men don't benefit from women having reproductive freedom" justification.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 08:24 PM

They're not the ones who are shocked to discover they don't care about the opinions of men they're not fucking.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 08:22 PM
2

They're bars, not libraries. The business model isn't to keep out people who want to get drunk.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 08:21 PM

I live in a blue state that has already reaffirmed abortion rights in the fall election, and I'm a man, so the impact on me is pretty minimal. Very anecdotally, people seem to be taking birth control maybe a bit more seriously than before, which is maybe a bit of a silver lining.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 07:16 PM

I'm pretty sure it was a conscious decision that female empowerment (in this case, reproductive freedom) was not designed with the benefit of men in mind. It has nothing to do with inability to consider men's perspective, and everything to do with not thinking men's perspective is relevant to women's bodily autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 07:14 PM

The goal of female empowerment is not to benefit old or young men. Maybe you think that's a problem, but that doesn't change the fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 07:13 PM
2

I am trying to give you the benefit of the doubt. You keep responding to things no one said--which is concerning if it's not an accident.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 06:32 PM
2

Did you reply to the wrong comment again?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 06:19 PM
2

Interesting. I have no idea how what you wrote was meant to address anything I said. Doesn't seem anyone else does either. Are you one of those people who thinks one sip of alcohol will make you blackout drunk? Someone mentions "cheap drinks" and you immediately jump to "too drunk to see or think"? The rest of what you said is just... weird incel rage posting
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 05:39 PM
3

Then do that, no one's stopping you
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 05:37 PM
1

K
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 06:22 AM
2

What makes you think my very obvious and plain explanation of ladies' night was "inadvertent"?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 06:21 AM
1

Did you reply to the wrong comment by mistake?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 06:20 AM
1

So?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 06:18 AM
2

It's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 06:17 AM
1

Yes,
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/24 06:16 AM
2

No one said the internet created awful people, but it certainly brings the awful out of people (like this comment), and puts you in direct contact with more awful people than would ever happen in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 09:53 PM
30

It doesn't really matter if it's sexist if it brings more people to the bar. Women go for the cheap/free drinks, and men go in hopes of meeting drunk women. That benefits everyone. The alternative is going to a bar that's full of other men and what... buying drinks for women until one decides to chat with you? I'd rather the bar give them the drinks for free lol I am a little surprised this is considered legal, the obvious analogy is if a bar gave cheaper drinks to white people than any other et…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 09:51 PM
14

You're the only person who said anything about victimhood. If men don't think ladies' night is a good idea, they could simply stop flocking to bars during ladies' night.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 09:45 PM

It's not the honesty, but rather the not wanting a relationship, that doesn't work when dating women
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 08:07 AM
1

My dude, you're missing the point entirely. No one is saying there's a perfect SAT style analogy comparing women to straight men and straight men to gay men. It's literally just about this one thing, meant to give you some perspective on how women feel. And you're ignoring it completely.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 08:06 AM
1

Oof
/r/MensRights26/12/24 02:21 AM
2

Are you really trying to make the UHC thing into a gender issue?
/r/MensRights25/12/24 09:53 PM

I found it does, at least indirectly. Could just be that getting in shape got me laid much more often, which makes lasting so much easier. Either way, definitely a noticeable difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 09:30 PM

You're right, it's 98% under perfect laboratory conditions. The same studies though show 85-87% (I overestimated) during "typical use" Which is to say 100 couples using condoms will have 15 pregnancies in an average year
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 09:59 PM
-1

Bingo. If the sex is good, women are as eager as men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 06:48 PM
2

On a day to day basis, yeah, men's relationships are built on teasing and giving each other shit. But when it comes to serious stuff, men are in my experience far more supportive than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 06:47 PM

That was never specified BichonFriseLover. This is a general post about paying for first dates "setting a bad precedent." Most people (the average couple) will not be "financially in the same boat," that's statistically unlikely.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 06:42 PM
3

Condoms are something like 89% effective when used properly, so...
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 06:06 PM

There's nothing to "admit." I have a high income. Most relationships will be asymmetrical. That's not a bad thing, it's a product of being successful I'm not going to only date women who make as much as me or take dates to Chili's to save $20. I can pay for dates and consistently have a good time with beautiful women. This has zero effect on my finances That's not true for everyone. You should live within your means, but if you make $80k and she makes $30k, you are an asshole if you go somewhere…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 05:27 PM

And my point is that many relationships are inherently asymmetrical financially. If I want to go out for a decent dinner, and my date makes $15/hr, that could be something she simply can't afford without missing some other more important bill she has to pay. So we either change plans to something cheaper, don't go, or she's stressed the rest of the month about paying her bills. Or I just pay for her and we both have a good time. One of those options is better than the others, objectively. And da…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 04:55 PM

I used to think this way, but I've realized it's extremely reductive. I live in an expensive city, and am very comfortable. If I go on a date with a teacher or a nurse etc, that date could be a big stress on their budget. Especially if I pick a nice place or we want to go somewhere for drinks after dinner etc. I'm not interested in adding stress to my date's life, or having them decline drinks because the dinner was already too expensive. But I have the money for that, $40 extra is not impacting…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 04:31 PM
1

I used to think I'd never want to start a relationship with someone who "didn't want to contribute" but realized that's way too broad a brush. I have money to throw around, not everyone does. Paying an extra $20 on a date means very little to me, but it could mean a lot to someone else. If someone is expecting fine dining for a first date, that's a big red flag. There are plenty of cheap (and free) first date ideas if neither of you has the money to afford on extra nights out. If someone insists…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 04:18 PM
2

It's not "wrong" to not disprove something I wasn't trying to disprove. Not all power imbalances are suspicious. This one is.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 01:24 AM
1

The difference is a 20-year-old woman is barely an adult. Women who are short, earn $100k/yr, have a high school diploma, etc are not barely adults. The closest analogy I can come up with would be dating someone with 75 IQ, ex borderline cognitively impaired. Which certainly happens--something like 14% of the population is below 85 IQ, and those people do be fuckin, but if you know a guy who is otherwise perfectly normal and 110 IQ and he's dating a woman with 75 IQ, you're going to raise your e…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 05:07 PM
-16

So why bring up pregnancy at all?
/r/MensRights20/12/24 04:15 AM
0

woooooooooosh!
/r/MensRights18/12/24 06:33 AM
2

Proof women are the real problem: everyone surprised a school shooter is a girl for once
/r/MensRights17/12/24 08:52 PM

Exactly. Assuming the other group has it great because they have the opposite problem isn't a path to success. It's also not fair to assume all women are constantly drowning in offers. Women who have kids, are over 35, are overweight, etc will not appreciate being told they could have any guy they want, because that is not their experience. Similarly, guys who take care of themselves and dress well won't know what you're talking about when you say it's impossible to find a date.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 12:45 AM
1

If I have $10 and I use it to buy my favorite meal, that means I hate all other food?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 10:28 PM
0

So focusing on one thing does not imply hating other things?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 10:10 PM

Obviously men mean women have an easier time with things men struggle with. Dating is an obvious example. Women have a harder time reaching high shelves or being listened to in a business meeting. It's debatable which of these is more important, but that's why we have that old analogy about how a person drowning in the ocean has a very different opinion of water than a person dying in the desert--either group will take for granted the things that are easy for them, and therefore devalue their im…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 10:00 PM
8

That's like saying mathematicians hate art, music, sports, and literature.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 09:55 PM
-8

Walking around topless--wait, no
/r/MensRights16/12/24 09:03 PM
1

I don't think she made any of them pay. It's also not like she's forcing anyone to do anything they don't want to do (any more than they are forcing her)
/r/MensRights16/12/24 03:39 PM
1

It varies in both groups, I doubt there's a significant difference on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 06:44 AM
9

You should visit a country bar sometime lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/24 06:43 AM
47

Some people think all sex work is inherently exploitative.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 04:35 AM
-22

In what sense were they exploited? Do you think they expected to be paid? Do you think they didn't realize what she did for a living?
/r/MensRights16/12/24 04:34 AM
1

When I said "you don't have to" and you argued with me. Right here, in case you forgot! I’m losing my kids to a world of feminism : r/MensRights
/r/MensRights14/12/24 05:24 PM
1

You literally said you want to teach kids the same thing. That's what we're talking about, remember? I’m losing my kids to a world of feminism : r/MensRights
/r/MensRights13/12/24 08:47 PM
0

And you want to be like feminists?
/r/MensRights13/12/24 05:45 AM
-1

I thought the disdain was supposed to be for identity politics, not class politics?
/r/MensRights12/12/24 09:26 PM
0

No one has to teach hate. Did you think that's what I was implying?
/r/MensRights12/12/24 09:25 PM
1

What a wild ride.
/r/MensRights12/12/24 09:14 PM
-2

"Assaulted"?
/r/MensRights12/12/24 09:05 PM
-19

You don't have to teach your kids to hate women just because of a bad experience you had. You don't want them turning into incels, right?
/r/MensRights11/12/24 06:56 PM
-25

Is the implication that there are not male only spaces?
/r/MensRights11/12/24 05:01 PM
0

If you find anyone doing that, I'll join you in calling them asinine. On a related note, thinking every military role is a combat role is asinine.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 03:40 PM
0

Yes, that is what I wrote. Thank you for figuring it out and repeating it back to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 03:39 PM
1

lol so you're not even from the country you're talking about?? No, my "only argument" is not this thing you just made up and nobody in this entire thread said anything remotely resembling. Stop making things up rofl Why do I need yet another source saying the same thing as the two sources we've already looked at? Why don't you present some sources that back up your claims, rather than rejecting the facts unless I present a third source for you?
/r/MensRights11/12/24 03:34 PM
1

"Certain sections"? You realize everyone can tell you're pulling shit out of your ass, right?
/r/MensRights11/12/24 07:10 AM
2

...that's the default behavior toward people you don't know, why would you feel positively or negatively about people you've never met?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 06:59 AM
1

It is literally a minimum. The federal government's goal is to award at least 5% of all federal contracting dollars to women-owned small businesses each year. Women-Owned Small Business Federal Contract program | U.S. Small Business Administration OP's post says the same.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 05:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter