TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JakeArcher39 Archive

View 1 post and 201 comments by JakeArcher39 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Marriage/DivorceJakeArcher39/r/MensRights11/05/17 04:12 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The reason, primarily, why this works, is that this guy is hot. Hot guy doing X thing is interesting to a lot of women. If it was some weird looking, skinny fat dude with a crooked nose approaching them doing magic tricks, they're not going to be impressed in the same manner.
/r/seduction08/07/25 08:13 AM
28

The only people I've ever heard say that phrase, and even discussion such an idea, is feminist women. The issue with modern feminism is that its modus operandi is based on the socio-cultural context, norms, and pop-culture of decades gone by, and attempts to apply that context, norms and culture to the present day. As much as many feminists might like to believe otherwise, It's not the 1980s anymore, and the 'locker room' and 'frat boy' cultures that were prevalent in our father and grandfather'…
/r/MensRights12/11/24 04:07 PM
3

Agree. This is before we also consider the fact that, generally-speaking, women do not find it appealing when men are unconfident / unsure about consensuality in the moment of sexual escapaes. It's, essentially like, an unspoken / non-verbal expectation that the man needs just, well, "get it", and if he's repeatedly checking-in with her / asking if he can progress, proceed or do X thing, the woman will find it off-putting, as it signifies that he lacks social perceptiveness and sexual experience…
/r/MensRights11/11/24 02:54 PM
4

The issue is that women's reaction to men's issues is generally to simply tell men "go to therapy", because that's what works for women, it's what women enjoy. Therapy could work for men, but not necessarily in the same way that it does for women. Women feel like they've solved problems by simply talking about those problems. Oftentimes moreso than actually solving the problem! (seen it countless times haha). Men are much more utilitarian than women, psychologically-speaking. Therapy is very fem…
/r/MensRights11/11/24 12:04 PM
13

Agree. Especially in this current socio-cultural milieu of men being pretty much as guilty-until-proven innocent (in relation to sexual harassment / assault). A lot of these Gen Z guys would repent / apologise for things they literally haven't done, if accused by a woman, purely through fear of A) potential backlash or cancellation, otherwise, and B) being gaslit to believe that they actually have done something bad, even if they have not. Having a drunken one night stand is a common uni experie…
/r/MensRights11/11/24 11:57 AM
31

A lot of young Ukrainian women have in fact done essentially the opposite, and left the country, and are currently in Western Europe, the UK, instead. I've met a few during nights out, and seen quite a few on dating apps. Which, in a way, I don't blame them for wanting to be somewhere more safe, but also, it's a huge double standard seeing as Ukrainian men are expected to uphold their traditional role as protectors / defenders / cannon fodder and remain in Ukraine fighting and dying in the trenc…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 08:33 AM
1

It's truly baffling. One of the top comments one of the main posts on TwoXChromosomes that I saw, saw "Why have you have failed us again, men.?" Now, I'm no political genius, but I'm pretty sure that consistently demonising 50% of the population for years, calling them trash, useless / worthless, 'kill all men', calling them toxic, all potential rapists / murderers, and so on, isn't a particularly effective strategy for getting said 50% of the population to vote for "your side". > Liberal / femi…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 06:43 PM
1

Anybody who went to high school knows this. Such environments are a microcosm for the most unadulterated aspects of human behaviour in all its raw, tribalistic beauty and unpleasantness. Think about it, who was it at school who were the most socially vindictive, the most manipulative, the most 'cliquey', the biggest 'in vs out-group' proponents, and the biggest "you can't sit with us!" purporters? It was girls, demonstrably. Mean Girls is quite literally a tongue-in-cheek but very real dramatisa…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 06:35 PM
4

Precisely. As a man, I couldn't even fathom withholding physical intimacy from my partner (someone who I love, or at the very least, like a lot and respect a great deal) for something socio-political like this, let alone the outcome of a fucking election vote. Like, it's not even really about the 'sex' (aka act of P in V), but moreso about the closeness and physical bonding / intimacy that is an integral part of a romantic relationship. A couple not having sex is a couple who're also probably no…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 06:17 PM
2

It's also hilarious irony that their shtick / narrative for years has essentially been "men are trash" and "we don't need no man" to then turn around and essentially go "Erm, yeah, actually, we do need you, and...like...it's MANLY to wanna support women!....So, erm....support us....please?" The meltdowns on TwoXChromosomes are a microcosm of this. Democrat women out en masse bemoaning who "men have failed them". It's like, ok ladies, if you want men to support you and be your 'ally', maybe it's …
/r/MensRights06/11/24 03:28 PM
2

Surely this goes to show that, like, pandering to woke women / feminist women / liberal women who harbour these 'men are trash' viewpoints, just doesn't actually work in regards to them genuinely respecting you, loving you, and finding you attractive. Because they'll still end up doing absolutely crazy nonsense like this. At least if you're a man who holds his ground at not caving to women in relation to such issues in the hopes of obtaining some scraps of sex, you'll be able to avoid such women…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 03:06 PM
1

I haven't seen Seinfeld, what do you mean?
/r/MensRights06/11/24 03:03 PM
3

Sad thing is, these men won't know what / why the issue is. These women won't actually communicate any of their 'outrage' to their husbands / boyfriends. They'll just refuse any sort of physical intimacy with them, with zero explanation, and their probably already brow-beaten and mentally defeated, emasculated husbands / bfs will just resign to accepting that they've done something to personally offend their partner, and will scratch their heads for weeks wondering what exactly what offense was …
/r/MensRights06/11/24 03:02 PM
1

Why? This was literally the normal prior to like, the last 10-20 years in Western countries though? The vast majority of our grandparents' generation of women, and even our parents' generation, were not partnering with, and marrying, men for their height, abs, Instagram follow-count, and wealth. Sure, they probably found a tall muscular superman-type guy attractive, but not at the expense of character, and certainly not as an 'ideal' for boyfriend / marriage material. The primary value-markers f…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 09:13 AM
2

I think it's a balance for a lot of such hot women (in terms of being able to have their cake and eat with promiscuous party-girl youth, and then settling down with rich, attractive husband later down the line). It can be a bit of a knife edge, and you see it with a lot of such women. Firstly, only the truly beautiful *and* charming / feminine women are able to optimise both the 'party girl youth' and then 'trad wife womanhood' phases in a way that they are actually happy with. Most girls who ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 05:19 PM
1

Where do you live? This seems like a smaller town / city thing. I live in Europe, in a big city, and never, ever seen this sort of 'rotating hookup culture' at a certain bar or place, like you're describing here. Seems almost like a sex-club removed from wider reality, lol. Definitely applicable to the average person or location.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 04:31 PM
1

See, women say things like this, but then you look at the guys who they hook up with that they're calling "average" and it's laughable, because they'll be attractive, above-average guys. It's the same thing as the girls who say "My BF isn't a Chad, it was his personality that drew me in" or whatever, and then turns out that said BF is 5,11 or 6ft", in-shape, pretty handsome, full head of hair, has a good job, is intelligent, etc. What a lot of women view as an "average guy" is essentially just t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/24 04:29 PM
1

Degree of truth in that, for sure. But I find it less so, in non 'western, cities. I've been to Eastern Europe for example and it's a different playing field out there.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 06:48 PM
1

That's good! More women need to have that attitude. He's a lucky guy. And that is a cool job for sure. Unfortunately the UK has been so impacted by TV shows like love Island and celeb culture, in the last 10 years there's been a huge shift. So many young women focus on things that A) are important in the media, B) what looks good on their Instagram, and C) what other women want. When I was at college for example, girls didn't really care much about height. I'm 5'8 and had girlfriends pretty cons…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:36 PM
2

Most men start thinning by their 30s, so yeah, you've just immediately discounted like 50/60% of men at least hahaha
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:18 PM
0

But that's kind of the point that RedPill / Manosphere guys are making - women such as yourself (not super hot, as you claim), can match with super hot guys on a dating app, and if you WANTED TO, could have sex with them. You're just choosing not to (I guess because you don't just want a ONS, which is fair). The discussion was never that average / below average women were able to settle down with those hot guys. Quite the opposite. Let's say you were a woman who wasn't so clued-up on all this. Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:17 PM
1

But a significant % of people don't meet IRL for hookups, and utilise purely dating apps for their ONS / casual relationships (primarily for ease, I guess). I would actually go so far as to say that, especially in urban areas, dating apps are becoming the 'norm' or 'main' avenue for hooking up. There is a really prevalent narrative pushed consistently on social media and pop culture nowadays about how 'women don't wanna be approached' (in public) and 'leave women alone' and 'don't talk to random…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:11 PM
2

That's your bf / husband? Lmao. North American women are really not as picky as a lot of men think. Maybe in NYC / LA, but other than that, compared to Europe, nope. No way any of the English women I know IRL would date a guy that far below their own looksmatch (your husband is probs a good guy with a decent job, stellar personality, etc, but speaking purely looksmatch here).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/24 02:00 PM
2

What a lot of women fail to recognise is that the men they're going on dates with men who are in the top brackets of men in terms of attractiveness. These men have lots of options, especially if they're using the apps, and so they generally don't care about dismissing a woman / date if she does something annoying, or if the guy just gets bored. The men who are lonely are the average guys and below average guys (actually a pretty big % nowadays, given women's standards in modern dating). The guys…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/10/24 12:02 PM
1

Well, terror is really just all in the mind. Look at how Covid was so media manifested. (It did exist, but if we didn't have the media pumping out fear-mongering and updates every 5 minutes, people would've been a lot more at peace during that period, and a lot less fearful). Apply this to the context here - women are constantly told that they should fear men, that literally any and every man is a rapist / murderer lying in wait, and that if a random man tries to talk to them, he has nefarious i…
/r/EverydayMisandry22/10/24 10:37 AM
5

Agree. This is essentially the place / mentality I'm at also. Sure, I'm frustrated and unhappy with the current situation between many young men and young women, but effectively being the 'opposite side of the coin' to the feminists and types of women who peddle the "we don't need no men" and "men are trash" narrative, is not the answer, and all it ultimately does it add more fuel to the fire and further sows discord amongst the sexes. So yes, we do need each-other, but we need each-other's good…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 04:51 PM
6

100%. If you replace 'men' with literally any other identifier / group, it immediately exposes how discriminatory of a phrase it is. Not to mention, if you try to tell women that "Well, those same small % of men who are violent, actually harm / kill other men at a statistically higher rate than they harm / kill women", their response is essentially just "Well, it's still men causing the issue, so it's a 'you' problem. Like...that's not how this works? A person being stabbed / mugged / murdered /…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 04:29 PM
9

This mindset towards men's bodily autonomy does not start and end in / with the US though, that's part of the point. Look at Russia v Ukraine for a very real, recent and ongoing example of an active situation that dismisses men's bodily autonomy and rights to not just freedom of choice, but literally freedom altogether (including freedom to, well, just survive - the casualties in total of that ongoing conflict are pretty insane, and ultimately, very pointless).
/r/MensRights21/10/24 04:03 PM
4

I don't see how this sort of dynamic can exist without descending into some sort of revolt / rebellion / mass exodus by the bottom %s of men (well, basically most average men, tbh). Socio-culturally and politically, men, particularly young men, are incredibly motived by A) feeling 'needed' by both society and by women, and B) the ability to obtain a female partner who meets their minimum criteria (so, like, not an overweight, feminist single mother of 3). Men generally-speaking don't really have…
/r/MensRights17/10/24 07:39 AM
3

It's their most common mechanism. They do it to other women too. The entire 'incel' terminology now is effectively just shaming from women towards men they view as losers. It doesn't mean involuntarily celibate in the literal sense, it's just a shaming word, a bit like how girls would say "Hah, virgin!" to boys they disagreed with / had an altercation with in the earlier 00s.
/r/MensRights16/10/24 07:58 AM
10

It also behoves men of those respective western European countries not to give these Ukrainian settler women a free-ride simply because they're a pretty foreign damsel in distress. It's disrespectful to Ukrainian men who are fighting and dying in the trenches. I went on a Hinge date last year with a girl, had no clue she was Ukrainian until i met her in person, but I was a bit taken aback after that. She said she wanted to meet a nice guy in London, find love, settle down, bla bla bla. Personall…
/r/MensRights16/10/24 07:50 AM
2

I'm not sure what you mean? As in, have a kid with a British man then take the baby to Ukraine? My point was that a lot of the Ukranian women who would / should be supporting their countrymen in whatever capacities they can, are not, and are instead in Europe or the USA or whatever.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 06:23 PM
3

A lot of them are already abroad in Europe and getting dicked down by men in those countries, whilst the men who they went to school / college / worked with are dying in the trenches. There's quite a few in London, spoken to some in bars / pubs etc. I've seen them on Hinge too.
/r/MensRights15/10/24 06:12 PM
2

Men want big boobs, just like women want men who are funny, but neither of those things are a deal-breaker for the vast majority of people. However, women do have very strict deal breakers, for things like height, which I can't think of anything that men have which is comparable and applies across the board for like 99.9% of men. Maybe it's super high bodycount in women? But even then, whilst most men wouldn't want to marry a woman who has slept with like 100+ dudes, many would still be willing …
/r/AllPillDebate07/10/23 08:28 AM
1

Society itself, even. Society is simply just 'shelter' en masse. The very first, earliest huts/shelters made by humans millions of years ago would've been constructed by men to help protect their women and/or children, or to impress and help provide a better life for potential women in the tribe/group who were yet to find a man.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 09:41 AM
1

A fantastic recent design by a woman was the 'anti-manspread chair'. https://www.whimn.com.au/talk/people/woman-wins-design-award-for-antimanspreading-chair/news-story/462fa16674c14a79e8d1a54b670f4b91 Such innovation. Much progress. So ergonomic. Where would we be as a society if we did not have chairs designed to force our legs to be squeezed against our balls!?
/r/MensRights05/10/23 09:39 AM
6

Her theories - or anyone who argues such things - do not hold water, if you actually have a modicum of understanding of sociocultural and biological human history. Effectively every aspect of civilisation has been, and current is, designed with the primary purpose of protecting and providing for women, and making their lives easier. Why do we think that women have always been shielded from war, and from engaging in physically laborious and/or dangerous jobs? It was never about a desire to "supre…
/r/MensRights05/10/23 09:29 AM
3

This is my contention. The double standard. I'm honestly all on-board with the notion of being able to laugh at ourselves, and playful banter between the sexes/genders should be a key part of our interaction. However, let's not kid ourselves, multiple of these 'boy math' posts were body shaming, which would - if a man posted something equivalent and it went viral - result in him getting the girlboss and woke mobs coming for him and cancelling him. Women in the comments of the Buzzfeed article se…
/r/MensRights03/10/23 09:35 AM
12

You're not wrong. It's certainly common behaviour - in varying degrees - for most women under 30. There are still genuinely feminine, good-natured, supportive young women out there, but they usually tend to be difficult to find because A.) they don't really frequent the standard approved 'outlets' for meeting women these days (aka bars, parties and dating apps lol), and B.) such women are like gold-dust so tend to get snapped up very quickly, at a young age, by 'higher value' men.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 07:56 AM
1

There is effectively zero indication that a woman would do something like this, until it happens. I agree with the sentiment of taking accountability for the people you choose to date, but like, I've had the sweetest, most feminine women become absolute harpies and compulsive liars (about me / the relationship) off the back of a break-up. Women don't tend to walk around advertising "I will drag you over the coals if we end badly". Realistically, it's probably not even something that most of them…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 02:02 PM
–

Not at all. I never dismissed the fact that culturally/socially it's ingrained in women to take pride in their appearance and grooming. I disagreed with your notion that it's a 'reddit rage' story-inducing thing for a woman to have an opinion on how a man dresses/looks. It isn't 1967. Men literally pay money to style / image consultants (usually women) to help them define a more tailored aesthetic identity based upon what women like (or what the style/image consultant says to them that women lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 04:03 PM
–

Glasgow and Cardiff aren't representative of European women though. Not even representative of British women. Urban environments tend to just be 'fatter' in general, and compound this for the 2 aforementioned cities where there's a pretty high rate of social and economic inequality. The average person who lives in Glasgow and Cardiff are not very healthy. They tend to eat consume alot of fried foods, fast foods, and booze, as well as getting minimal exercise.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 03:58 PM
–

Besides, a man telling a woman how to dress, groom and style themselves better? Ooh boy would that make a good Reddit rage bait story Would it? Women's opinions on what they (women) find attractive in mean's appearance is an entire sub-industry, particularly on social media. There's people on YouTube who's job is literally making videos and being 'consultants' about this (Courtney Ryan for example, although she's more recently stepped award from fashion and grooming advice into more clickbaity g…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/23 03:37 PM
3

Why does being on Reddit =/= not a catch?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 06:37 PM
5

Yeah this is basically it. The majority of people have no desires to prevent women from engaging in things like OF, or having a hoe phase, or being promiscuous online for likes/attention. However, the majority of people will still, regardless, have a reaction to said woman doing said thing, and it's generally going to be a negative one. You cannot divorce actions and consequences... In a liberal society such us ours, sure, you're free to do as you please (within the confines of the law), but oth…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/23 06:34 PM
1

I have had feminists unironically tell me that men being forced into war is not gender based oppression, which only suggests that their definition of oppression is problematic and nothing more. The reason why things like this are the case, is because - unfortunately - many feminists dismiss men's systemic issues off the back of said issues being primarily manifested, and maintained/upheld by other men. So their response is effectively some version of "Well, you're a man and its other men control…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 02:53 PM
2

Wasn't there reactionaries bitching about stories of women breaking up with men over their reaction to the Barbie movie No clue, as I don't follow the social media subculture around the Barbie movie. But, I mean, if you're breaking up with your partner over their reaction to a movie (irrespective of gender), I'd have to question whether you've the emotional maturity and resilience to actually warrant being in a relationship to begin with... Because that's...erm...pretty wild. I think slimey, ina…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 02:38 PM
1

Let's look at it from the perspective of "Getting through the door". There's a positive and negative for both genders, respectively. Men's general approach is an "open door" to most women, and a "why not?" mindset to opening it, aka, they need a decent reason to close it to a woman. This means that for most women, getting through men's 'door' is pretty easy, which in turn ensures a near-constant stream of validation/attention from men, but on the flipside, means that its tough to know whether th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 10:45 AM
15

the 1-10 scale is garbage. You may as well say "X person is a 6/10 to me" The caveat of 'to me' is the entire point - virtually every single person's idea of what a 5,6,7,8,9/10 etc represents to them, varies from the next person's. Even in my own social circle / male friend group - we all have wildly different tastes in women outside of, like, the obvious things that 99.9% of people find attractive as a baseline aka not a criminal, isn't obese, has all limbs, facial features etc in the right pl…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 10:35 AM
-5

"Is visibly aging" - well, the dude is in his 40s. Do you expect him to look like a K Pop boy band star haha? Tbf, this is the entire issue with the whole premise of the "1-10 scale" of attractiveness" - outside of a few baseline traits that 99.9% find appealing, attraction is too nuanced, subjective and context-dependent for a single number out of 10 - everyone will disagree on what that number should be. For instance, you find Ryan being 'very feminist' an attractive / plus point. A lot of wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 10:33 AM
1

Well, outliers will exist obviously. I'm just speaking in generally terms. Define 'unattractive' anyway. Oftentimes when I hear people say this, i'll question it, and then they'll reveal that the guy was like 6,2" and strongly built or whatever, he just didn't have a 'good looking face'. Being tall/big as a guy is inherently attractive to like 99% of women, especially if you're the intimidating/dominant/badboy type.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/23 10:27 AM
10

Lmao. Many such cases. The women in the replies here decry "it's not all women!", and nobody is denying that. Quite clearly, not all women date men like this. But it's enough of a % to be a phenomenon that men have picked up on, and that you can readily see across play out in the real world. Social media is great for trend analysis like this because people expose their L's. Gen Z women in particular seem to have zero boundaries / sense of 'private life' when it comes to what they post on TikTok …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 07:41 PM
0

I never said men don't have reproductive rights. I'm talking about accountability for both parties. You can't be 'responsible' for a stranger's actions. You can just try and mitigate unpleasant actions from happening to you. Im not responsible for getting robbed, but I can take precautions such as not walking down alleys at night, not waving my.phone around at 3am in the street, not wearing expensive jewlellary in poorer parts of town, keeping aware of my surroundings etc. No clue what you're go…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 06:52 PM
2

Do you want bring out some sort of source/statistics? You don't need to be a sociologist to know that the rates of single motherhood in African American communities are insanely high, and when you compound that with other factors that underpin those communities (including gang culture, poverty, genuinely toxic masculinity) it's a recipe for disaster.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 06:49 PM
1

Wtf are you on about. Not even gonna bother giving you a response. Jfc
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 06:46 PM
-2

Ding ding ding, we have a winner!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 06:45 PM
1

You're failing to account for the fact that some men just dgaf about their consequences and will just nut inside a woman for the sheer pleasure of it, and then dip, if she allows him to do so. Yes, an individual with responsibility for their actions would obviously either use protection or ensure his partner was on protection, etc, but we cannot apply that to the entire human population. Women are the 'gatekeepers' to sex, biologically. If you let just anyone into your house, you cannot be shock…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 06:41 PM
0

Depends on the context. If you're dating someone who you know is A) a cheater in the past, or B) just a questionable individual, you can't be shocked when you get cheated on. It's less about "anyone's fault" but more so about accountability for your own partner choice. The issue with the deadbeat fathers situation is that so, so many women who end up as single mums choose to get pregnant by loser guys, by criminals or just dudes who are outright toxic. Obviously they don't deserve to be abandone…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 06:35 PM
0

Most deadbeat fathers are manifested by couplings where the man never intended to commit, and the woman likely knows that, she just dgaf cos the guy is hot and she wants his babies, and probably hopes that she can just lock him down after. People dance around this in pleasantries but it's the reality of the situation. African American communities in the US are a microcosm of this. Woman chooses of her own volition to get knocked up by the hot fuckboy who is literally a criminal Hot fuckboy crimi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 06:30 PM
12

They're not. The entire point is that the type of women who get knocked up by 'deadbeat dads' are the type of women who ignore the man's glaring red flags and scumbaggery because he is hot/tall/dominant/charismatic. There are plenty of women who willingly let themselves get impregnated by literal scum of the earth criminals, because those criminals nevertheless possess other traits that the women find appealing enough to overlook the fact that the man is....ya'know...a criminal.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 06:27 PM
6

The main issue is that, biologically - and by virtue, psychologically and socioculturally - men and women are valued/desired and admired for different things, at a base-level. Men just aren't valued inherently for their physical appearance alone, in the same way that women are. In addition, youth is a commodity that is incredibly valuable to women specifically (from the standpoint of attraction), not men. An attractive young man cannot expect to post a 'cute selfie' and get the same level of val…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 01:27 PM
3

Women experience the world through solipsism - aka they are the centre of the universe and their own perceptions/feelings about everything take precedence over anything else, including cold, hard facts at times. This is beneficial for them from a survival standpoint, evolutionarily speaking. That said, in our modern society, it often manifests in a sort of "I'm special and unique and a queen" mindset, which in turn leads to a sort of delusions of grandeur for alot of women in dating (especially …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 11:55 AM
9

Many women have low self-esteem and end up tolerating bad relationships because they don't think they deserve better. To a degree, yes, but its moreso that they give free passes / overlook red flags for men who are hot. Virtually every time I see, or hear about, an instance where a woman is in some form of toxic, unpleasant or outright abusive relationship, the guy in question will be tall, ripped, or just otherwise very physically attractive. Many women, particularly in the 18-25 age range, wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/23 11:38 AM
0

The issue with the whole 'orgasm gap' debate and associated studies, is that it takes something that's quite nuanced and very individual-dependent, and tries to define it via data and stats alone. There's not much point doing that considering: A.) Different women orgasm in different waysB.) Some women's orgasm is massively affected by whereabouts they are in their monthly cycleC.) Some women's orgasm is massively affected by their mental state / psychological feelings towards the sex, their part…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 11:54 AM
9

Is he? In my experience, most women can/will have an increased, or decreased sexual attraction with a guy based upon her overall chemistry with him. Obviously she still needs to find him 'bangable enough' on a base-level to begin with, but outside of this, it's very much dependent on how she feels about you as a whole. How do you think that sexual relationships form between a man and woman who didn't immediately want to jump eachother's bones? Because it developed over time... On the flipside, w…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/23 09:56 AM
2

Throughout history, some of the most masculine of men built entire palaces or even kingdoms for their woman. I wonder how such men would feel about being referred to as weak or beta for actively expressing their affections for a wAhmen. A man protecting and providing for a woman who reciprocates his interest isn't a "simp", lol It's literally just the standard masculine-femimine dynamic that has existed since the dawn of time. Throwing money at some random Thot on Twitch whilst she licks the mic…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/23 03:58 PM
4

Re your last part - it really depends on what your value in a woman, and the type of relationship you're looking for as a man. If by "dancing monkey" we are meaning - entertaining and charismatic, and a little goofy, then yes, I do need my woman to be that way, if I'm to consider her as a long term prospect. A woman doesn't need to be entertaining in order to just get laid, but that's kind of irrelevant imo, because the benchmarks.for a woman's ability to get laid are so, so low (and not worth c…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/23 03:53 PM
3

It's odd, tbh. Sure, some guys out there dgaf about a woman's intellect, humour and charm and will literally just date her on the basis of her being passably physically attractive enough. But like...do you want to date those guys!? It implies that women, generally, are just going to take the path of least resistance and have no desires of their own to maintain themselves / present themselves as, like, ya'know, a well-rounded, interesting and engaging person to be around. "Oh, well, some guys wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/23 03:47 PM
4

Unless you're literally some sort of 1% man, being the "chaser" and "activator" in the dynamic of initial dating is just par for the course as a man. If you cba with putting in that work, that's fine, but there's no point whinging about the fact that you need to make moves in order to develop a romantic relationship with a woman. Especially a woman who is attractive, intelligent, and feminine. Sure, you might end up with a decent gf / partner out of sheer luck/chance, but the old adage "faint he…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/23 03:41 PM
1

Yeah, but you're applying rationality and 'chance of success %' to the mental equation here. Because you're a man, and men approach sex/dating opportunistically. We undertake a sort of 'cost-benefit analysis' when deciding if its worthwhile approaching / trying to court a woman. If our perceived chances of success are low , we tend not to bother as see it as wasted time/energy. Women, for the vast majority, do not do this. Their own perceived attractiveness / actual attractiveness doesn't really…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 01:57 PM
1

In regards to 'has ambition' and 'has goals', I'm always curious about this, because I often hear women talk about it but i'd say like 95% of the time it just means "he needs to have a good job". Which imo, isn't the be-all-end-all of ambition and goals in life. I've met loads of men through work, mutual friends etc who have great paying jobs and are really career-focused, but they're overall just dull, uninteresting people who don't seem to have much going on in their life other than their job.…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 12:09 PM
2

There are no high value women in their 30s. The only correct answer, when applied universally. It's all about social context. If you're some girl who works for a video games company and enjoys D&D nights on the weekends, then the type of guy you're going to want to date, and your definition of 'high value' is going to be wildly different from a girl who lives in Miami and is a wannabe social-media influencer. Obviously there are over-arching markers of attractiveness and unattractiveness, but ou…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 11:56 AM
1

A man not being a bad person =/= being a desirable prospect to women. In fact, many women actively go for (either consciously or subconsciously), men who are demonstrably not good people, on the basis that that man is hot, or gives her the tingles.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 11:39 AM
1

What (straight)men say about what they find appealing vs unappealing in women, is more accurate an indicator than what other women say/think men find attractive, lol. Remember - alot of the beauty standards pertaining to the 'ideal image' pushed by the media and celeb culture, is to appeal 1) to (straight)women, and 2) to gay men. This is why, for example, the stick-thin, gaunt model-esque figure has always been pushed by the fashion industry and Hollywood circles, yet quite demonstrably, the va…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 11:29 AM
3

For many women though, the inability to get the "men they want" = "not getting men". They're only really bothered about attracting/getting the small pool of men who they deem as the suitable dating prospects. The fact that some overweight, unfeminine woman with poor hygiene can still get a multitude of matches on Tinder within a single day of having the app, is ultimately irrelevant, because they won't be the type of men that she wants. Men are alot more opportunistic, so are prepared to sleep w…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 10:52 AM
4

Most women don't get actively hit on if by 'in public' you mean places like the shops, supermarket, library, generally out and about etc. Bars can be 50/50, depends on the age and context of the place really. In large part, because the average guy nowadays is really cautious about how he interacts with women from a romantic perspective, as a result of the 'MeToo' movement and the general media narrative of "just leave women alone". Virtually every woman i know IRL met their current bf via either…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 10:46 AM
7

Exactly. Men generally don't approach / hit-on women unless they're A) very attractive and have positive reinforcement from the world that they are indeed attractive, B) given some sort of explicitly clear 'approach me' flag/signal from a woman (which basically never happens unless the guy is very attractive - i've had girls I know IRL tell me about how they 'give men signals' and its laughably subtle, e.g. "I look at him for 0.5 seconds longer than I would do otherwise!") Compound this with the…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/23 10:43 AM
1

Bit belated reply, but yeah. I doubt in your example here, she'd even sleep with him tbh unless he was a true Chad (which she can likely get similar in NY by just jumping on bumble or whatnot). The main example of women I've seen doing the female version of the Passport Bros is the middle aged wives with the cuck husbands who go to places in the Carribbean and Africa for sex holidays with really hung local guys (again, this has zero to do with actually dating the foreign men - it's basically jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 09:09 PM
6

Can't these woman also go abroad out of the same desperation that drives men abroad? They could, but the strategy and context would be completely different for them. Western men are benching on the fact that they have resources and status that makes them an attractive dating-prospect. to the women in these other countries. Basically, they want to have the same leverage they had back-in-the-day (1950s and prior) in the West, where women primarily just sought a "decent hard-working guy". These for…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 09:54 AM
3

Yeah fair, i didn't see the 'pump and dump' bit (still can't?), but I agree that even older women can easily find casual sex if they want it. But that's not really an indication of any genuine value in that women - alot of women will sleep with basically anything, tbh. The amount of relationship suitors is more telling of a woman's value than the amount of sexual suitors.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 09:46 AM
5

I'm not trying to make anyone feel like anything. Sure, older people can find love, but it's undeniably harder vs if she were younger. An anecdote about your mum doesn't change the reality that most men aren't going to want to get into a relationship with an older woman. Also, when we're talking about "worth", less people finding you attractive doesn't = less worth as a whole. This is a subreddit primarily dedicated to discussing the modern dating / gender-relations situation. Obviously people h…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 09:44 AM
13

I honestly have no idea. When I look around at my social circle, most of the women I know are simply not in a place to get marriage any-time soon. Not only do they not want to, but more importantly, they just lack the emotional maturity and agreeableness to be able to last more than a few months were they to actually get married. Let's not pretend that young men are much better, either. Most of my male friends are not marriage-ready from a financial and resources perspective, as well as an overa…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 09:38 AM
0

Unlike Japan and Kore (and indeed pretty all of the Western world), China still has a pretty solid culture of 'enforced monogamy', and a strong degree of shaming-culture related to that. There very individualist, neoliberal mindset underpinning the Western zeitgeist right now - which maintains "just let people do what they want, bro!" - is effectively non-existent in China. Instead, their zeitgeist is underpinned by attitudes similar to what we had back in the 1950s and prior; if you're not in a…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 09:26 AM
2

That makes me wonder, lets say ratio of heterosexual male:female is 1:1..then wouldn't men also be single by the same proportion Yes. But there's other factors to consider. Firstly, that women will be chasing after and/or sleeping with the same, small group of attractive guys (Look into West Elm Caleb; that's a great example of what's happening en masse). Secondly, more men will go abroad to find girlfriends / wives.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 09:14 AM
2

Yeah, but they likely won't commit to her, which - if we're being realistic - is what most women ultimately want; a long-term, stable relationship. You really think that the average 40+ y/o woman is happy just being some weekend booty-call for the rest of their lives? Come on.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 09:11 AM
–

Yeah, and I think it's something that we generally have become alot worse at doing since we started - not to sound like a Boomer, but - "spending so much time on our phones". This moreso applies to Gen Z, but I've definitely noticed it amongst my own age group (latter 20s) as well, myself included. It's sort of been a slow creep to the point where it's just ubiquitous. Humans are simply alot more "online" and "virtual than we were even compared to only 10 or 15 years ago. As a result, we are les…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 06:08 PM
–

I don't particularly agree. Someone may be the initiator, or not, to a relationship, for a variety of reasons and the contexts can vary massively. This doesn't necessarily have much bearing on how they're going to behave throughout the course of the relationship, if a relationship does indeed develop off the back of that initial interaction. I'd actually argue that the initiation is more about how introverted vs extroverted the person is. Considering women are rarely the initiators to begin with…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 01:16 PM
2

Which sounds great, until you realise that biologically/naturally speaking, women only find a small number / certain type of men genuinely attractive (as in, the guy they'll notice in a room of people and go "Wow, who's that, I wanna know more about him!" Nearly all the other men in the room will be basically invisible to her, or perhaps more accurately, not seen as a potential romantic/sexual prospect. The purpose of monogamy and marriage being a sort of social obligation in society, and women …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 01:03 PM
1

How do you know it's just for sex? How does a guy distinguish himself from the men "just wanting sex" when he shoots his shot with a woman? This is the problem with how over-saturated the online market is for women. You're literally so inundated with attention that you collectivise it all as "just a bunch of guys wanting sex". One of my best friends got married from a guy she met in Tinder. Like, unless you get to know someone over time via mutual friend group or whatnot, and end up developed mu…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 07:45 PM
3

Wait, do you genuinely think that men don't desire a woman who interests them and is interested in them? Of course they do. The point behind the "men are happy to date the restaurant server" is that we don't prioritise career in the first instance when looking for people to date. As in, there's nothing stopping someone who works at a cafe from being that "interesting person" who we wanna date. So, it's not really about saying 'any ol' woman will do' but more about keeping options open because yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 05:33 PM
3

Yeah this is the main difference tbh. Rejection is rejection regardless of gender. But it's far easier to 'bounce back' and remind yourself that you're 'hot shit' when - within a space of literal minutes - you can return to your Hinge/Bumble/Tinder/Insta dms and move onto the next option on the list of 97 men you've got in your matches list/inbox. The vast, vast majority of men do not have this luxury. For all of my friends who are single, dating is a long, arduous and thankless game of going fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 05:17 PM
1

Numerous reasons. I'll to be somewhat brief: Higher levels of neuroticism (generally) - this correlates to anxiety, emotionality and insecurity, which are the banes of accountability Higher levels of agreeableness (generally) - this often results in a sort of 'hive mind' or 'group think' like approach to how women communicate, particularly to / in-front of other women. The street interviews and podcast interviews where a bunch of women are asked what they'd rate themselves out of 10, and the una…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 05:05 PM
2

Where are you getting these stats from? And how do we know if these men are even reporting on this accurately? If they consider themselves liberal or progressive, then likely they'll answer as wanting to choose the sexless relationship with kids over the bachelor life with sex, because it's what sounds more progressive and more liberal. However, what I'm talking about is not men wanting sex with 'anything they can find'. What a warped perception. It's about sex being a pre-requisite to an romant…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 04:55 PM
0

Sure, don't disagree with that re religious sects. But that's a different discussion - we aren't talking about those here, we are talking about modern, liberal college environments. The alternative to liberal college party lifestyle isn't religious fundamentalism. Degeneracy can, and does, exist in more than one sociocultural sphere.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 04:48 PM
2

Appeal to extremes fallacy. We obviously aren't talking about sex workers when we are discussing the average man and women who want to get into a long-term relationship lmao... My point is, someone working at a call-centre or warehouse doesn't mean they love making phone calls, or stacking boxes. It's just a job they do to pay bills. They very likely have ambitions and hobbies completely irrespective of their job. Ftr, I don't necessarily think that a girl who works at Hooters or sells sex toys …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 04:44 PM
5

ding ding ding! That's it, really. The 'Hero syndrome'. It's not about infantilisation (like other people here are saying). It's really about a sense of protectiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 04:22 PM
3

It is, unless the woman is very physically unattractive. This is coming from straight men, btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 04:19 PM
1

who is she? What are her interests and her skills? What is important to her? You'd find that out by taking her on a date. I'm of the disposition that one's occupation isn't inherently reflective of who they are as a person. Most people don't have particularly interesting or empowering careers. They just have a job that gives them the money they want to do the things they genuinely enjoy. Hence, your occupation isn't necessarily the defining aspect of your identity. It can be, of course, but it u…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 03:14 PM
2

Yes I often see this cycle of women picking 'bad men' as a result (or so they tell me) of previous traumas. Which I am sorry for. However, I do also see plenty of women from stable, loving families actively choosing to date absolute fuckboys and badboys and then getting surprised/confused when those men turn out to be exactly the type of men that the big red-flag on their foreheads said they were from day 1. Imo, this all stems back to unhealthy polarity between the masculine and the feminine in…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 03:08 PM
1

Should a woman care what her husband does for a living? It’s part of his identity. Yes, but that's because women and men aren't attracted to the same things. Women and men prioritise different things when looking for partners. In this instance, a man's income/profession matters way more to women, than a woman's income/profession matters to men. As long as she's kind, feminine, attractive and they have a good vibe/chemistry, a well-off guy with a good career would be quite happy to date the woman…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 02:42 PM
0

Not sure what you mean by 'clip your wings'? Do you mean in terms of the man being the pimary breadwinner? Or the fact that she has confidence in him to 'lead'? A woman being submissive to her man doesn't mean he's gonna scold her like a dog when she misbehaves. Pretty much every woman in my social circled who went from living the single, carefree, casual-sex lifestyle to building a life and home with one good man, is a demonstrably happier, more fulfilled (and empowered) person now. Contrary to…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 02:28 PM
1

I think this is moreso the Blackpill. The RedPill is more concerned with 'self-improvement' overall. Aka, if you're short - don't let your height define you, improve in other areas. The Blackpill on the other hand will maintain that if you're short, it's 'over' for you romantically. Ftr, it is undeniable that women almost universally find taller men more attractive, and balding largely unattractive. Of course, this doesn't mean that literally no women at all will date short or bald men, just tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 01:30 PM
1

Europe, Scandinavia, Canada, Australia, NZ, etc don't exist I suppose. I do love it when Americans think the world is literally just the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 01:25 PM
0

The essence of submission is giving over your will to someone else's better judgement. Sure, but that doesn't mean that women are, or should be, helpless baby deer in the headlights who're absolutely clueless about how to maintain their own lives or finances in the absence of a decent man in their life yet. The woman I'm dating currently is feminine, submissive (in her behaviour, mindset, and her confidence in me to lead and make decisions etc). This doesn't mean that she sits around waiting on …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 01:22 PM
9

Modern college environments definitely do facilitate that liberal, left-leaning, and somewhat degenerate mindset in the people (both young men and women) who don't have strong convictions already and who are predisposed to that sort of lifestyle. However, its a ridiculous idea that every woman going to college is engaging in hook-up and party lifestyle to anywhere close to the degree to what alot of RPers seem to imagine is the case. Alot of this is all just sensationalist nonsense. Fresh & Fit …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 01:14 PM
6

Thank you. I feel like, surely we could flip this question and ask it to women and we'd see a similar result? As in, if you proposed to women (let's say like a sample size of 1000) whether or not they'd be happy to get into a romantic relationship where they would have ZERO sex, I imagine that a significant % of them would not be in the 'No' camp. The idea that men who are horny dogs and women don't really care about sex is odd, and archaic. The women I'm dating atm has a ridiculous sex-drive, s…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 12:54 PM
6

It's not a 'subscription', but a pre-requisite, aka one of the uncompromisable requirements for a man to enter a romantic relationship and stay there. Men want to partner with women in committed relationships for many reasons outside of just getting laid. But getting laid has to be part of the deal for like 99.9% of men. On the flipside, women generally will have a pre-requisite that a man be able to 'provide' (resources), in order for her to agree to getting into a committed romantic relationsh…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 12:47 PM
1

Tell me you're a cuck without telling me you're a cuck. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 12:05 PM
0

I'm not sure how gravitating towards partners who find you more attractive = "not making your own decision", but ok. Men tend to base their dating choices on what they think will give them the most success. Men are the sexual pursuers generally, so our choices in life will be somewhat related to what we think will get us a decent gf / wife. Virtually all males of animal species do this. Male birds will spend days building the best looking nest in the hopes of attracting a female bird. Or they'll…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 12:04 PM
2

In humans, male life is cheaper than female life. You only need 1 man to repopulate an entire village/community. Millions of sperms, just one egg... As such, women have a greater 'self preservation' drive than men do. If that woman is having sex with that bf, her reptilian hindbrain will likely consider herself as potentially pregnant (regular sex wouldn't generally resulted in pregnancy pretty quickly throughout 99.9% of human existence - birth control is a very, very modern phenomenon and does…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 11:05 AM
17

It doesn't. Women do this for children. The hierarchy of biological protective order goes (for mammals, at least): males > females > offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 10:46 AM
1

Men and women (generally) perceive reality, and themselves, via completely different dichotomies. Which is precisely why IMO there will be no middle-ground or agreements achieved from the current 'gender war' discourse, as both sides are coming at it from their own respective dichotomy/perception. Men expect women to think/act/perceive like men and then get annoyed when they don't, and vice versa for women with men. Despite what the current sociocultural zeitgeist and woke media narrative might …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 10:45 AM
1

Explain what? My comment is self-explanatory.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 09:14 AM
5

This is so weird. This is like the white western guys who say "Asian women are more submissive!". You cannot seriously sit there and unironically claim that the only men who are 'socially conservative and scientifically liberal' are non-white men. There are tonnes of Caucasians who share your beliefs, where I live in Europe is full of them. Funnily enough, in my country, the people who were the most anti-vaccine (and generally hold 'anti-science') sentiments, are Muslim, Indian and Middle-Easter…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 08:43 AM
5

This stuff is actually so gross man. How little respect for yourself, and for your nation/people, do you need to have as a woman to do something like that lol. The old dudes who go to Thailand and shack up with some barely-out-of-school local girl aren't much better either, tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 08:37 AM
32

The classic "women are beautiful effect". This all really just stems off the back of men and women's respective roles/identity in society. Men are perceived as primarily utilitarian / functional, and so any flaws, issues or complaints from their end is seen as something resulting from some self-made problem (or at best, something that they need to look 'internally' to fix). Women are perceived as more whimsical, and in many ways 'oppressed', and so any flaws, issues or complaints from their end …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 08:23 AM
6

The main thing is about respect, and perception of masculinity. Men who are 30 or going into their 30s, are simply going to be perceived in a different way by women, to men in their early to mid or even late 20s. Younger men are seen as less serious, less experienced, less confidence and less capable overall, by virtue of their youth. Of course, maturity is a sliding scale. When I first started work at 21, I came across some 30 year olds who in many ways were even more immature than I was, howev…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 08:11 AM
–

It's terrifying from the perspective of our own sense of usefulness, and identity as humans. Men are utilitarian by nature - we want to feel needed, and respected for our roles as such, in the same way as women want to be wanted. But by virtue of modern sociocultural systems, this part of our nature and sense of identity is, for all intents and purposes, redundant. Men would literally build a house with their bare hands for a good woman if she inspired him to do so. Now, we have men wanting to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 10:22 PM
3

What standards do you think these are? Genuinely? Most men just want a woman who is feminine, isn't fat, and is pleasant to be around. There are the super-online guys who want/expect a very traditional, beautiful, high-value woman (barefoot and pregnant, etc) with a low body count or a virgin, whilst they themselves are nowhere NEAR the sort of man who would be deserving of such a woman. But most men are more realistic about their options. Myself for example, I'm not a virgin, and my bodycount i…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 10:10 PM
1

It wasn't one sided though, it leveled the playing fields and gave men a leverage that otherwise wouldn't exist. Women's advantage is inherently that men want to sleep with them. Most men will want to sleep with most women. The fact that slap-bang average women get 100+ matches on Tinder is evidence of this. Men do not have that luxury, as modern society is now showing, women only find a small subset of men actually attractive (10-15% of so). Women rate most men on dating apps as "below average …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 10:00 PM
3

1000%. The job of a woman is basically irrelevant to most men. As in, it's a largely neutral factor of the attraction unless it's something genuinely cool like she is a zoologist for rare species of lemur or some shit. Most men would be happy to date the lawyer equally to the girl who works down at the local coffee shop - providing they met whatever general standards of attractiveness were important to that man (looks, personality, vibe, values etc). The issue is as you say - men are acutely awa…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 09:28 PM
5

No, that's just who most women are attracted to - men that're their financial and social superiors. Men are aware of this, and so they respond accordingly. The guy earning £60k knows that the women he went to university with earning around the same as he does, are looking to date guys earning £80-£100k. So he aims lower and goes for women in lower income jobs. He does this because there's a higher chance of success for him. The job is irrelevant tbh. Men aren't intimidated by women who are lawye…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 09:23 PM
0

Anyone who isn't some terminally online trad LARPer is well aware that women work a multitude of jobs, and that in 2022 it's basically a necessity in virtually any couple for both partners to work. The discussion around 'career women' and the issues surrounding that are mainly relating to two factors. Firstly, it's about dating success. Higher-income women filter their own dating pool, the more 'career driven' they become and the more money they earn. Which in turn makes the dating market even m…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 09:17 PM
10

Well, I'd say that most men do recognise that the reality is, in 2022, the vast majority of couples are going to need to have both partners contributing towards the financial income. Ultimately, unless you are a genuinely high income dude, you simply cannot expect to have a 1940s style set up where you bring home 100% of the bacon and your gf/wife is a full time homemaker. it's just not realistic with the current state of inflation, property/rent prices, and so on. The dynamic generally does fav…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 09:06 PM
2

They aren't in charge. They just benefit from modern, neolibrtal progressivism and late-stage consumer-capitalism. The current (western) sociopolitical and economic hegemony (which includes its establishment, education system, pop culture, media, etc). generally tend to maintain a narrative of "women good, men bad". Why? Well, at present, it benefits the elites, the super rich and those in charge to have a society where men are disillusioned and emasculated, the traditional family unit is breaki…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 08:25 PM
1

The fetishisation and idolisation of youth generally is a big cultural issue imo, definitely manifests the biggest in gen z. There's a portion of the current generation of 18-25 y/os who have this really toxic 'Peter Pan' mindset, wherein they wanna stay forever as some 21 year old TikTok influencer. I mean, the very idea that the "30s" are the declining era of your physical appearance as a man is just wild to me lol. Its literally the decade that statistically men start to become the MOST attra…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 08:12 PM
1

Yeah its actually worrying how few guys are aware of this... It's continually framed from a place of "Woo her? Huh, well that's alot of effort, why can't she just be turned on by my presence alone, like I am with her?" Well, newsflash, male and female sexuality and sexual expression isn't the same. By and large, to feel genuinely turned-on, women need to feel safe, wanted and stimulated (mentally as well as physically). This is very hard to do if there's no active effort to date / woo / seduce h…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/23 11:02 AM
1

Is it? How many guys can - realistically and consistently - obtain 'fresh pussy' on a weekly, or even monthly basis? Very few, especially younger men. Sexlessness is hugely on the rise for men. A significant % of men go months on end, even years without dates, let alone sex, so I don't think its a particularly viable strategy unless you're in the top bracket of attractiveness/status/wealth and so will ensure your options going forward. For the average man, a LTR / marriage is still probably his …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/23 10:50 AM
1

Well, this is just the traditional 'split' of the gender roles in terms of household responsibilities. In most couples where the woman oversees laundry, shopping, groceries etc, the man oversees DIY, mowing the lawn, sorting out the bins, and (usually) being the main financial breadwinner. It's funny how when the woman asks her man "Honey, the lightbulb is out, can you fix it?" or "Looks like something is up with the toilet, could you take a look?" he doesn't view her as a child and become less …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/23 10:47 AM
3

It's a 2-way street. Chicken and egg...does the guy get 'fat and boring' because he can tell his wife is not putting the effort, or does the wife not put in the effort on her end because she can see her husband slowly becoming more slobbish, fat and boring? Column A and Column B. Why would a guy bother to 'keep dating' a partner/wife who actively shows him disinterest, doesn't make him feel masculine, and doesn't respond well in the bedroom anymore?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/23 10:44 AM
2

Perhaps you're asexual? Could be a possibility. Or you may be demisexual - aka, you only really desire intimacy after forming a genuine, stable connection with someone first.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 08:18 PM
5

Agree about safety, which is one of the key reasons why casual sex isn't (usually) very beneficial for women in terms of their pleasure. Sure, an experienced guy might know more about sex generally, but that isn't gonna compare to a woman being with a guy who she falls in love with / has feelings for and they have a great chemistry, know each other incredibly well, etc. That's a whole different level and I say that as a man who experienced that. A man who cares about the woman to some degree is …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 08:13 PM
5

Honestly curious, where do you live?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 07:59 PM
5

Its really weird. I feel like every guy who reads this has the response of "huh, well I wash my ass, who the fuck are these guys who don't?". Which leads me to the conclusion that one of these things cannot be true. Either the women are lying, or the men are. Or, for whatever reason, there's a massive correlation between men who have X attractive traits that women like with men who don't wash their ass. It is a head scratcher though. I often see/hear the stories women come out with about the hyg…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 07:58 PM
3

How do you think it works?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 07:51 PM
6

The entire societal infrastructure that women rely on to be "independent" is literally created, upheld and maintained by 99.9% men. Yes, men might need women from a social perspective, but women need men from an infrastructural perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 07:50 PM
6

Sure. This may change by the time your 30. I wager that it will. Its no weakness to admit that you'd like to have a partner to share life with. It took me some time to recognise that for myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 07:48 PM
5

Acting like what... Buying his wife/gf jewellery, flowers or gifts? Showing up at her work as a pleasant surprise because (well,. theoretically) they're in love? Jeez what a simp. Jokes aside, there are loads of women at my workplace who get treated like this and observably, they like it. If you're a woman who finds it annoying when your man buys you a necklace, then, I mean, you probably just don't really like him, or you have some self-work to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 07:43 PM
4

This is such a weird take lol. Women initiate divorce more than men because they're generally pickier, and generally have more options than men. That doesn't mean that partnered women ARENT overall happier than single women. Hot young women remaining single isn't an indicator that "women don't need men". It just means they're holding out for the best possible prospect because they're high value. However, these women will very likely have most, if not all, elements of their lifestyle supported / …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 07:34 PM
5

Studies are literally just many observations collected into one group. And...wait...do you think that studies cant be biased to result in specific outcomes? That happens all the time. For instance, the studies about red meat causing heart disease were lobbied / supported by - surprise surprise - vegetarian and anti-meat organisations and companies. The studies showing that butter is bad for you were lobbied by margarine companies. My point is to not discard your own critical thinking skills and …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 07:24 PM
2

Unite with shorter men. Most women express some sort of height requirement, which particularly for younger women is often around 5'10 at the lowest. If you're shorter than this as a man, you need to have serious compensation in other areas to have even a comparable shot in the dating market as your average 6"2 guy gets for simply existing as his tall self. The most infuriating thing ofc, is that for alot of men, they're deemed as "short' despite being objectively average. I'm between 5'7 and 5'8…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 06:48 PM
1

5'5 - 5'7 is pretty much average for younger women now in western countries. I live.in the UK and I'd say 75%-80% of "Zoomer" girls I see are around my height (I'm 5'7"). Bearing in mind this isnt in heels either as they all wear trainers/ running shoes now. Its honestly not uncommon I see a younger white woman who is 5'8" to 5'10. Skinny blonde beanpoles are everywhere amongst the student types of seems, god know what they're feeding the kids. I'm only 29 but the disparity in height between the…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 06:36 PM
8

This thread is basically proof that if women actually suffered anything close to the body shaming / physical discrimination that men get, particularly around height, there'd be a mass societal movement/shift to ensuring they were catered for.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 06:31 PM
7

I do it for educational purposes only haha. Its pretty dire though, admittedly. Yeah fair, I just meant generally tbh. I see people on social media all the time constantly dismissing demonstrable, observable trends just become some academic paper hasn't been released to confirm that "yes guys, this is actually happening!". So have a point of contention with it 😆
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 06:25 PM
14

That's very young so saying you've been single all your life is a bit of a moot point. Alot of people don't get into relationships until their 20s, it's perfectly normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 06:23 PM
1

It all depends tnh. Human variance is real and context matters. At the end of the day, whilst there are obviously markers of value that apply to most people (like lower body count being better than high body count for women),.only YOU as an individual can determine truly what 'value' looks like in a relationship, and to what degree certain flaws might detract from that in your partner. Statistics do show that the lower the previous partner count for a woman, the less likely she is to get divorce…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 06:11 PM
12

You're 20...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 05:43 PM
9

I would say, the more accurate reality - is that the men that women choose to date (or moreover, the men they find more attractive), tend not to be particularly affectionate to them, or generous lovers, because they have lots of options and other women who also want them, so he doesn't have much incentive to be selfless and generous with her. Because there's 10 others waiting in line. In addition, such men have likely ALWAYS had women interested in them, and not had to work very hard for sex, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 05:42 PM
19

1 in 3 women over 30 are on some sort of anti-anxiety, anti-depression / mental-health meds. Nearly 50% of women over 30 (in western countries) are childless and not married - the highest statistic thus far since such records began. This isn't an accidental correlation. Just go onto TikTok and see the droves upon droves of women having full on breakdowns and meltdowns and recording it. You don't see women in stable relationships with decent, masculine men, and women who are mothers (with the fat…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 05:35 PM
3

Key bit of context in there XD Remember lads - the only thing between between creepy and flirty/flattering is how attractive she finds you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 01:51 PM
–

The reality is, alot of it is simply down to chance and circumstance. We can try and reduce everything to statistics and figures but at the end of the day, human lives are far more varied and context-dependent than any study can account for. I mean, I see objectively degenerate individuals in long-term relationships all the time. There are complete losers who have had a gf / wife for years. Jesus, there are literal criminals who have women after them. On the flipside, there are men who, on paper…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 01:01 PM
5

Your body and your house just aren't the same lol. In your house you're expected to a certain degree of privacy as it's behind a closed door. It's not the same as you sitting on a bench at the mall. If someone comes up to you a book store and asks you for the time, that's quite obviously not the same as someone banging on your door to ask for the time when you're home alone, by any social measure or perception of societal standards. I agree re your comments around naturally being inclined to fav…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 10:52 PM
1

You wouldn't...? I don't think you understood my comment properly. I'm agreeing that waiting to have sex is ok. You would obviously need to have a solid chemistry with someone OVERALL if you're dating them for 4 months. You can have sexual chemistry and tension without actually having sex with someone. Slightly confused also as to your reply, as it completely contradicts your original comment in which you were saying you couldn't understand why people refuse to wait for sex in something long ter…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 10:42 PM
1

I think you misunderstood but ok. Agree to disagree - basically, men and women aren't the same and that's ok. Is my point. Sexual polarity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 10:38 PM
2

Agree to an extent, but I think it depends on 1) how long you're going to wait, and 2) what the context is. People who are used to having lots of casual sex for instance, will be less inclined to withhold it, than someone who has just had 1 or 2 LTRs their whole life and nothing else. For instance, with my ex gf of 4 years, we didn't sleep with eachother for perhaps 4/5 months of knowing eachother. We started dating after about 1 month, and definitely knew we liked eachother. If anything, it mad…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 07:24 PM
15

How is it a good comparison? Your home is a refuge, it's your property, with a closed door and a place of security. So someone knocking on the door realistically should have a reason to do so. Simply speaking to someone in public, is just that. Even if the aim IS to get your phone number or ask you out for a coffee. You're in a public environment, humans are social animals - you can't divorce living in the world from being interacted with. Well, you can, but you'd need to become a complete hermi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 07:00 PM
4

But statistically it literally is a small % of men who assault/harass women. It's just that those % of men do it indiscriminately and to numerous women. Let's say in a bar of 1000 men and 1000 women you have 10 creeps out of the 1000 men. In just several hours, those 10 creeps could quite easily make a significant % of the 1000 women in that bar very uncomfortable. Magnify this on a societal scale and you have the situation at large. Until said men do something that gets them arrested, they'll c…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 06:54 PM
1

Thanks for the info (re both posts), appreciate the insight. Yeah I've heard of that book. It's a bit strange, in that in my own experience, I've never had any issues with arousal in women once I get them to the 'we are going to have sex' phase. Once the deal is sealed, I'm confident in my abilities. I mean, I love foreplay, love the build up, and love going down on women moreso than I love receiving oral myself. I've developed the understanding that sex is a bit like a dance - how it's going to…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 06:48 PM
1

Where tf did you meet these people? I had one similar situation with a work colleague but I mean, that developed somewhat slowly over time lol
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 05:06 PM
1

You say this, yet women actively select for men based upon social status, wealth, intellect and so on all the time lol. Women's attraction to men doesn't just boil down to their hairline lol. If it did, I wouldn't have had my last 3 relationships seeing as my hair started thinning at like 22 🤷‍♂️. Weinstein is just generally gross. Physically and personality-wise. Not the best example to use as to why women (supposedly) don't like older guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 05:03 PM
1

This is masculine and feminine polarity and its beautiful :) We definitely get lost in a sea of stereotypes and too much online discourse, but this is male female Interaction in its rawest form. The softness of her against his roughness, how he brings stability to her chaos, but her chaos creates beauty that gives him something to fight for.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 04:54 PM
2

I see this take all the time, and it's quite weird. A white woman getting lip filler doesn't mean she's "trying to look black". Firstly, this implies that plump lips are a universally African trait, when they're obviously not. You can find men talking about women's beautiful lips in Ancient Roman poetry ffs. Big booty, again, is just a sign of fertility generally, and if you look at Medieval and Renaissance European art, all the women depicted as ideal beauty standards had pretty broad hips and …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 04:43 PM
11

Various factors imo. There's more to hypergamy than simple economic status. On a purely primal level, many women would still find the 6'4, ripped, confident black guy who has no job and bums about as a part-time drug dealer more attractive than the 5'5 meek Asian, ex-Harvard finance analyst on $200k a year, despite the latter having obviously more socioeconomic status. Secondly, black women are VERY in-group. Historic sociocultural factors mean that they'll often still prefer to date a lower val…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 04:38 PM
1

Agree with most of this. I'm curious as to how you approach this strategy to "mental sex"? Do you use innuendos, or say anything overtly sexual? I'm generally flirty with everyone - positing good vibes, that is - but it's not necessarily sexual. I suppose crossing the line from "flirty" to "seductive" is where I struggle because of fear of being seen as a weirdo, or getting called out for harassment. Particularly when we are involving random women in public like as you say at the grocery store o…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 03:15 PM
4

Only works if youre decent looking. Otherwise it's just a recipe for harassment lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 11:02 AM
2

No, most women ARE interested in casual sex. Casual sex objectively, aka, sleeping with a man who you have no obligation to. Most women refer to this as "dating" or "im seeing him". Casual sex doesn't just equal a drunken hookup or ONS. Its the women who've been sleeping with that hot guy back in their home town on and off for months, every time they return home for the weekend. Its the women who have a "thing" with that older guy and are just seeing where it goes. The women who think they're lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 11:01 AM
1

Bit late to the party here, but I'd say that this really just depends on the individual. There's a large enough % of women who'll still happily sleep with, or even short-term date, men who they find off-putting from an intellectual / personality-based perspective. Purely on the basis of said men being hot enough for her to shrug and go "well, yeah, he's dumb, but I want his dick anyway" or "yeah, he treats me like crap, but he's super hot, soo". I have female friends in my own social circle who …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 03:12 PM
1

Yes we CAN measure everything Have you got any sources/citations/studies which show that everything/anything is quantifiable and measurable via surveys and data? Thanks
/r/MensRights06/02/23 05:17 PM
1

There is no way you are not a troll. Holy moly.
/r/MensRights06/02/23 05:15 PM
6

Do they? Sure, he surrounds himself with OF models, Romanian stripper-come-girlfriends, and Insta-model wannabes who are desperate for some clout...but how genuine is any of this? And even if some of them do profess to 'love' him, it's not exactly a big W, because why as a man would you even want such women for anything other than no-strings sex? Tate is massively hypocritical in that he constantly rails against the vices and degeneracy of modern and the current dating culture, as well as the hy…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 11:11 AM
1

What peer reviewed studies can you cite Go outside and touch grass ffs. You don't need a 'peer reviewed study' to make an observable and demonstrable statement about the world. Using 'muh studies' as the sole benchmark as to whether or not an idea has any basis in truth, is such a reductive way to approach sociocultural issues, and the world at large. Not everything can be quantifiable by specific, measurable data, but doesn't mean they aren't real or don't exist. People who use "got a citation …
/r/MensRights06/02/23 10:43 AM
1

people who are coming from broken homes that are f****** all over the place? This is mostly just a result of their environment. Where I live, the poorest areas have the highest rates of teenage pregnancy and overall, the birth-rates within the 16-30 age bracket in those communities far exceeds the same age bracket for, say, the middle class communities. This isn't because those people are all 'Chads' and 'Staceys' living existences of sexual success. It's because they grew-up in, and live in, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 10:39 AM
1

I'm not really sure what you're trying to put forth here? That promiscuous people / people who engage in casual sex and casual relationships aren't all bad people, and that some people who have monogamous relationships with traditional gender roles are bad people? Well, yeah, obviously. Your sex and dating predilections aren't inherently synonymous with your overall moral/ethical disposition. Although, of course, we can probably say that there's an overall correlation between someone who only ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/23 10:27 AM
2

The current woke narrative maintains that Misandry doesn't actually exist, because men are the 'oppressor' class which means that they're exempt/protected from prejudice due to their privilege and control of "the system" (patriarchy). Obviously, this views reality through a purely infrastructural and systemic lens, and treats individual issues as irrelevant. It's a clever get-out clause employed by all aspects of the progressive / identity politics ideology. It's why you can't argue with the peo…
/r/MensRights04/02/23 10:17 PM
15

Putting legislation in place to criminalise something that's subjective / based on emotional response is genuinely quite dangerous. It's the sort of stuff that went down in Stalin's Russia - you think/said the wrong thing (or even just seem like the sort of person who would, so, better safe than sorry).
/r/MensRights04/02/23 09:48 PM
3

This is what literally what it is. It's when you look into the W.E.F. and how all western governments and the media they push is all aligned in denigrating the traditional family unit and gender roles, that the pieces start to come together. It does seem a bit tin foil hat at first but the more you read into it, it makes perfect sense from a sociocultural strategy point of view.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 09:46 PM
1

So do you want to obtain a slim, young, hot wife as an average man? This is the issue. Incels and redpillers desiring women way out of their league. Like if you're an average Joe chubby dude, why are you expecting anything other than an average Joe chubby wife? You're missing the point anyway, which is that the blackpill maintains that you LITERALLY CANNOT GET LAID as a man in the modern day unless you're physically attractive. It's not just boomers lmao. I have friends in their mid 20s and late…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/23 05:38 PM
1

What do you mean "like who"? Do you want a list of random names like Bob Johnson from the corner store, Kevin Tyler from the local pharmacy, and Chris Huntson from the car salesroom? Literally just live in the real world, walk around any public busy spaces, work in any large company with various people of various ages and you will see countless men who are average out of shape guys with wives and girlfriends. The majority of these men are obviously not players pulling 22 y/o Insta baddies every …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 02:51 PM
2

Why are you pulling out dictionary definitions for words on a discussion about immaterial, subjective things? Submissive is a dogwhistle term used by men to want a gf/wife that they can impose upon, without having a partner with equal reasoning. When u say sit she sits when u say go down on your knees and bark like a dog she does dat too because religious belief/low self esteem. All of this is literally just your projection of what you perceive things to be, and what you believe that mem (suppos…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 12:55 PM
1

Yeah, you'll get alot of matches on OLD as a Chad regardless of your awkwardness/social skills, because all that people have to judge you on is your photos and few lines of bio. However, as soon as you start going on dates and expose the fact that you act like an autist, a lot of women won't wanna take things further. Sure, some might shrug and say "well, i may as well just sleep with him this 1 time cos he's hot", so he'll probs have a few flings, but it's unlikely he'll develop any genuine or …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 12:36 PM
1

Pretty much nail-on-the-head tbh. Congrats on figuring our the elusive mystery that is "fulfilling the human male's relationship requirements" haha. Indeed, men (generally speaking) do not require a whole range of specific/complex things from a woman, but as you say, the things they do want, are very important, and most likely a dealbreaker if 1 of those things are absent. For example, let's say a man Is dating a woman who has enthusiastic sex with him, regularly, and makes him feel physically l…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 12:14 PM
1

You're claiming my list is purely 'personal' and then just responding with your own personal, individual preferences/biases lol. traditional values - likely men who lean conservative like u would want that Not really. I'd also caution against falling intro the trap of defining human beings by political parties. It's really limiting, generalising and unnuanced. People are way, waaay more complex than whatever set of ideals the 2 main sides of the modern political spectrum hold. By 'traditional' I…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/23 11:40 AM
9

Yeah absolutely. I'm an average guy at best lookswise but had a couple gfs and a few casual relationships which (imo) were primarily the result of my social abilities. Either in that, I met them through a wider social circle (which wouldn't exist if you were some social awkward basement dweller), or managed to pique their interest in conversation at a bar/public place. I actually met my ex at a bookshop lol. A proper Chad will nearly always be socially adept and confident as a result of positive…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 05:57 PM
0

Well, obviously there will be a degree of variance from man to man in terms of the type of woman he likes to spend time with. It's a balance, because I'll admit there's a degree to which certain men still adopt the misogynistic "seen not heard" mentality towards women, which they sometimes use the "I don't like loud/talkative women" as a cover for. Basically, these type of guys don't like a girl with opinions or who speaks her own-mind. I'm not referring to that - that's attractive to any genuin…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 05:12 PM
5

Yeah agree. It's mostly just down to whether, as a man, you'll willing to wait and / or put in the work to find the type of woman who finds your quirk/s appealing (or just doesn't care about them). For most men, they crave sex so badly (fair enough, don't we all) that they often settle for women who aren't their emotionally/personality ideal, but those relationships don't tend to last...for obvious reasons, as those women don't actually accept the guy for who he is; quirks and all.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 04:50 PM
20

Those two things can cancel each-other out, as well. I know guys who are quite good-looking physically, but just kind of dull/uncharismatic people, particularly around women. On the flipside, I know a few guys (i like to think myself included in this category) who aren't the best looking, are average height or even below, yet don't do too badly with women because are people-persons, outgoing and extroverted, and try to create a good vibe in any situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 04:45 PM
15

Respectively, if a woman finds your quirks an 'ick' (unless those quirks are genuinely weird, like the Spongebob one), then she ain't for you. Yes, woman are quicker to disqualify men for weirdness/quirks, but I know tonnes of regular-looking guys who are dating or have dated women and they're both into each-others weirdness and they weird-out together. Why tf would you wanna be with someone who you can't let loose and have a laugh with? I'm not saying you need to show her your vintage star-wars…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 04:43 PM
2

Agree with this, but I don't think that's what the sort of women who say things like "the audacity of the mediocre man" or "give the confidence of an average man" are referring to. Those comments / memes stem off the back of the idea that men have inherent, endless privilege and are unshakably confident to the point of arrogance, regardless of their looks/abilities (which, obviously, is BS). In regards to your examples of gendered 'privilege' in the workplace, you can apply this equally to both …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 03:29 PM
4

Sure. Booksmarts and common sense aren't always synonymous. But generally-speaking, a guy who has a decent job, is well-educated or even just a guy who is well-cultured and understands about the world, isn't gonna find an air-head woman attractive. I went on a date some years back with a girl whilst I was living in California for a summer. I was telling her about when I'd been to Portugal for a long weekend (I'm from Europe), to which she responded "Oh wow, you went all the way to South America …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 03:15 PM
23

Any advice for women is usually along the lines of what not to do This is because, generally speaking, men are sexual opportunists. Unless she is really not his type physically, most men are gonna see a woman and treat her as a 'potential prospect' providing she doesn't expose some glaring red-flag once he gets talking to her. Men tend to approach women romantically/sexually with the mindset of "why not", and then from that standpoint of "why not", they need a decent reason not to continue engag…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 12:59 PM
11

Absolutely. There's that common meme statement that women on social media use; "Give me the confidence of a mediocre white man". Whilst it's obviously used in primarily light-hearted discourse, it nevertheless speaks volumes about how the average woman perceives the average man. The average / mediocre 'white' guy is not particularly confident, especially in today's socioculture where he's told he's the root of all social ills and guilty for the sins of his great-great-great-great-great-great gra…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 10:16 AM
3

It's not necessarily about 'chasing' per se. Most women don't really "chase" men in the literal sense of the word at all. They simply exist in the world and get advances made towards them by men, and they either refuse or accept those advances (based on various factors). With bullies/jerks, women tend to acquiesce/cave/submit to their advances/persistence, even if at first they're not particularly "interested". Why? Well, could be a number of things. Perhaps his persistence is attractive to her,…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 10:07 AM
2

Yes. Both men and women do this respectively, unless they carry out sufficient enough self-reflection / introspection to come to the recognition that the way they perceive the opposite sex isn't particularly healthy, or conducive to genuine, long-lasting relationships. Without that introspection/reflection however, men and women (particularly when they're young) generally tend to view eachother as little more than a set of ideals, a projection of their own romanticised view of what 'man'/'mascul…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 10:01 AM
4

100% agree. On an individual level, as shown here in the comments, women who are virgins / have very low bodycounts may comparable want a man who also has a low bodycount. This makes sense from a perspective of values and shared mindset when it comes to sex - there could definitely be some compatibility issues between, say, a 25 y/o woman who's had 1 boyfriend since highschool, and a 31 y/o man who spent his 20s partying and being a fuccboi and has had a string of one-night-stands. But IMO the d…
/r/RedPillWomen29/12/22 02:07 PM
4

Amongst young women and young men, a lot of young women are actually out-earning men their own age now. Girls are also getting higher grades in school and more likely to go to university than men. The issue here ofc is that the vast majority of women do not want to date or marry a man who earns the same or less than they do. Women may try to deny this but it's a simple observable fact of reality. The more 'career-driven' and 'boss-bitch' these young women become, the more they pigeon-hole themse…
/r/AntiFeminists03/09/21 08:45 AM
2

Society is downstream from biology and psychology. Why do you think it is that women have historically been perceived as the 'homemakers' and men the 'breadwinners'? It's not some nefarious plot by the patriarchy, the society we live in wasn't just conjured up in a room by a bunch of dudes who were like "Hah, let's oppress all the women by making the gender roles X,Y,Z!" Think about how humans lived as hunter-gatherers for like 99% of our existence on this planet...that psychological hardwiring …
/r/AntiFeminists02/09/21 04:35 PM
1

Exactly. This isn't even about gender tbh, either. A girl I dated briefly from Bumble a couple years back used a similar opening line on me. I think my profile bio at the time had a list of some hobbies and things I'm good at, and she said something along the lines of me 'having lot's of talents / skills and so there had to be some major flaw I was hiding / compensating for, and she wanted to find out what it was'. That then led into a great, light-hearted opening convo of back-and-forth about '…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 03:03 PM
10

Yeah, but the crux of this situation is that this woman thinks throwing a sucker-punch as hard as she can at someone's face is an appropriate response to said person making a lewd gesture / movement behind her. In no context is that a justifiable or appropriate response, at all. Only time I'd say yeah fair enough she has grounds to slap him out is if he randomly approached her from behind and started trying to grope her or whatever. Like, lets say the dude was doing a dumb sexual dance behind he…
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/21 02:40 PM
7

"The toilet sign which pro men activists claim is offensive" - this line really irks me. Its only 'claimed' to be offensive, and by 'pro men activists' at that (who in the media are not at all taken seriously); aka its not really offensive at all. If it was directed at women, the offensiveness of the sign wouldn't be a claim - it'd be an unequivocal fact.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 02:50 PM
13

As someone who isnt from the US, american male circumcision is a bit of a mystery to me. I was in a relationship with an american girl for a few years, and she told me how shocked she was upon seeing my uncut dick, as every previous guy she'd been with had been circumcised. In the UK, a baby (or child) is circumcised if its a medical necessity, such as the foreskin is too tight and causing infections as the penis can't be cleaned, which is understandable. But is there any point in doing it willy…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 06:48 PM
2

As an English guy, I can confirm that UK girls can be annoyingly uptight. Possessing both that stereotypical British reserve and the standard western girl's inflated sense of self lends them to very very very rarely approaching guys. You have to approach them, but that's a piece of piss when they're drunk. In fact, the only UK girls I've been approached by at University were drunk, and I can count them on one hand. It's frustrating though, because they're generally not even that attractive, but …
/r/TheRedPill09/03/16 05:09 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter