TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jakkol Archive

View 0 posts and 25 comments by Jakkol on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Should have replied "Least you could do is be 18 and virgin". Thing with weight is that there is substantial amount in 98%cases where you can do something about the weight thing. Height is outside of your control. So best target their age etc to have a fair comparison.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/19 07:56 PM
1

Reason is that there is practically no demand for that because it really isn't a issue that effects women. If what you say is true then you are very much an edge case of either being very very ugly, but even then you should get attention for flings if your body is in shape. Impossible to tell for sure without seeing a photo. Or you are not meeting men at all. Assuming you are not just putting your standards way up. Which huge amount of women tend to do. Simply put yourself out more, and don't be…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/19 08:05 PM
1

Wouldnt that just prove his point about life being so much harder? If your forced to have 11 and 14h days and still not get rich or atleast well off then your pretty much proving his point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 07:25 AM
1

You seem to act like their somehow comparable, their not sex is mutual where as the woman seeks to only take and is selfishly evil when gold digging without redeeming qualities. If you wanted to draw any comparison between the 2 you would have to compare gold digging to rape where as male takes the sex without it being mutual. You seem to hint that you think that gold digging is a valid form of mate selection and procreation or "dating tactic" if so then rape is as well in your world. This is al…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/19 07:14 AM
1

How on earth are you comparing sex and gold digging? What goes on your head to equate the 2? Sex is mutual. Gold digging is one way street.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/19 10:05 PM
0

I take that as yes. All laws are criminalizing moral choises at the end of the day. To act like adultery is somehow not a crime against their partner and violating their rights is just crazy and utter injustice. We have copyright infringement as a crime but not adultery let that sink in. The insane thing here is how it isn't already a criminal offence. Also there are already domestic violence laws and the concept of rape in marriage exists in law, so any argument that state should not mettle in …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 06:08 PM
0

Why is murder criminalised then it also restricts personal freedom, or having slaves that is also another thing I can't do without it being illegal? Is justice foreign a concept to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 10:08 AM
0

No they are open relationships. Marriage is between 2 people. Open marriage is an oxymoron.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 09:57 AM
1

This is just insane. If the wife can't satisfy the husband to a point where inexperienced 20year old is doing it better, then its on her not the husband. Overall its female adultery or females not performing their part of the sexual side of marriage that are the problems that need a fix for society to start getting even little bit healthier again. Not to even mention the removal of ability of women to be able to wield the power of the state against their husbands whenever its getting rough and t…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/19 09:51 AM
5

Men don't want a woman who is not attracted to them. Putting on fake effort would be that. Men only do that to get casual flings. And the women mentioned in OP want relationships not flings. If a woman only looks for a man putting on this fake charade then they should not be surprised he is not interested in a relationship
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/19 08:06 AM
12

So you spend money on yourself... and then somehow think this is the same as spending money on dates... What kind of crazy pills are you on? This is like saying that if you get a car thats also in the dating expenses category.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/19 07:10 AM
3

Your understanding of sarcasm is worse than their understanding of womens anatomy. Even if they were serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/19 04:35 AM
1

Think a lot of traditionalists would say so. I wouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 01:45 AM
2

If they didn't have double standards they would have no standards at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 01:33 AM
3

Why you assume the SAHM would have a well paying job if she was a career woman instead? If she was provided a lifestyle more expensive than her market value then she has nothing to say once the person financing her lifestyle above her own means stops doing that. This like saying a parent needs to continue paying their childs bills to infinity because the child got used to growing up to a certain living standards. Utter insanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 01:27 AM
2

They would have at minimum fault divorces. Mostlikely no or very hard to get divorces.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 01:20 AM
2

If you agree to become a SAHM and then treat your husband so bad that he leaves you. You agree to not receiving anything. Alimony is just another vehicle women use to escape responsibility. The husband has funded years of you just sitting at home raising kids. He is the one who should be getting refunds on the wife. Especially if the wife is the one initiating or at fault with the divorce she should pay back everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/19 01:17 AM
2

HOUSEHOLD/FAMILY INCOME. Meaning the whole family not just the man. You are digging for men that make as much as a whole average family where both partners work at least somewhat. Are you looking to stay at home and not work at all? The current society and economy are build on concept of both working. The wages are balanced around that to a fairly high degree. Also are you completely opposed to the idea that you would make more in the relationship? Maybe have a stay at home husband? This whole m…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 09:09 PM
2

Happy cake day btw
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 08:39 PM
1

Unless you can somehow magically increase the supply of your definition of "good men". Then this point is completely moot in regards to SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 08:06 PM
2

You absolutely are gold digger 60k is FAR above average income. And you say you want only a good guy and then proceed to define good guy as having this kind of money... Meaning you think men who make less are not good. Overall you sound like your in denial and have constructed this worldview to bridge the gab between your vision of the world and unrealistic expectations to reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 07:48 PM
1

This really should be changed to "public housing for women who can't financially support their children" and "public housing for men who can't financially support children they didn't necessarily even consent to having".
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 04:02 AM
8

forms fro sex in the millitary Im talking about consent forms for a baby not for sex. Baby should absolutely require one as the woman is using mans DNA beyond the sex part. The woman is responsible for her body and to make sure she doesn't get pregnant without having consent for having a child from the man. Its about time woman became equal and had responsibility put on them instead of being treated like children.
/r/MGTOW17/11/18 10:35 AM
7

Having sex with someone is not the same as consenting to a baby FFS. If women wants to keep the baby she should always have signed consent from the male to his DNA. No form? Abortion.
/r/MGTOW17/11/18 08:56 AM
3

Even if these streamers only invest 40% of the money they keep getting. They will be making far far more than he ever will.
/r/MGTOW02/11/18 08:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter