TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jaktenba Archive

View 0 posts and 3,698 comments by Jaktenba on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,698 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Any work that can be done remotely is by definition not hard work, but I'll grant you the benefit of the doubt that you meant you have a good work ethic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 11:14 PM
4

The world doesn't revolve around you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 11:10 PM
–

Women also weren't responsible for paying back credit. So tell me, why would a bank give an account to someone they couldn't legally pursue to get back their money?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 12:14 AM
–

Oh yes those darn fascists and their nostalgia. They're nothing like us luddites that want to kill all the evil racist whiteys for taking us down this destructive path away from the great times of the noble savage, who only worked a couple days a year, had plenty of leisure time, and was given all necessities freely.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 12:11 AM
–

"Interesting" by definition very few people can ever be "Interesting". Unless of course what you actually mean is "likes what I like"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 12:05 AM
–

Lol, keep living up to your name. There hasn't been any explosion if women becoming nerds. Just a bunch of posers forcing their way into a community they hate, and then demanding it change to fit their desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 12:03 AM
–

So you're a sexist. That's interesting to hear. So you must think it would be completely acceptable if no man on the planet enjoyed anything with a female protagonist?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/23 12:00 AM
–

Go ahead and explain how it's possible to exclude someone from a hobby that can be enjoyed alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 11:59 PM
1

Empathy is not telepathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 10:46 PM
1

That's not how empathy works, but okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 10:46 PM
1

Lol, "chilling a few times" isn't getting to know someone. So since you think women should get to know the guy first, you shouldn't have any problems with not having sex at that point.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 10:40 PM
1

The overall consensus, in historical times, was that black people were unintelligent, savage, and didn't feel pain, and consequently they were enslaved and treated, to completely understate it, poorly, for centuries Completely false, but I wouldn't expect a liberal to actually know anything about history. Africans were enslaved long before Europeans started sailing around.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 10:35 PM
1

Oh so I guess I'm not a man, and I'm not over 200lbs, and I'm not over 6 feet tall. Because if I said what I was apparently I would actually be the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 10:03 PM
2

So you don't believe in the idea that women can grow to love men they aren't immediately attracted to? You need to have a talk with the women on here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 09:59 PM
3

Unless you're a woman, then you can be coy
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 09:57 PM
2

If you were dating them, it's not the same situation as OP described.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 09:56 PM
0

Claiming that women only dislike "nice guys" because they weren't upfront, implies that had they been upfront, the woman would have dated, or at least fucked, the man. This is clearly asinine nonsense. So if the woman wouldn't get with him if he was upfront, then that means she clearly already disliked him before his "oh so terrible" personality was even a factor. Therefore, your premise is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 09:52 PM
0

Claiming that women totally would have dated, or at least fucked, these men if they had been upfront. Is asinine. And if you agree that they wouldn't have gotten with these men if they were upfront, then you ate admitting that they disliked them from the start. Therefore, their disdain can not be from the men being "nice guys".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 09:48 PM
2

Yet you had no problem being "friends" with them and raking in all the free goods and services.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 09:46 PM
3

Lol I'm pretty sure OP is a guy, and they made that clear in the post, but sure thing. You're the one that understands it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 09:41 PM
0

Lol, yes how dare a man not be 100% confident in everything he does. Does he think he's some kind of human or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 09:39 PM
1

Lolby calling the favors "inappropriate", you've revealed that there were no secrets being kept. You knew exactly what was going on, and just milked him for all he was worth.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 09:37 PM
-1

Yes, but you said when women want a relationship they let it be known. That would mean that they actively pursue relationships, but they don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 09:33 PM
5

The only difference is whether or not the woman thinks he's hot.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 09:26 PM
3

"Interesting"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 09:20 PM
7

Lol, go ahead and keep pretending 99% of people aren't "boring". Which really just means "likes things I don't like".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 09:18 PM
0

Did you type this out to the person I replied to? Regardless, none of this changes the fact that women are allowed to murder their children, they are allowed to drop them of at safe havens, and said safe havens were invented solely because so many women would literally throw their babies away.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 11:57 PM
0

other people want that. So again, it's exactly as I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 11:54 PM
–

They weren't single, they were liars. It's not complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 11:52 PM
–

False, if you have a fuck buddy, you aren't single
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 09:57 PM
-4

Lol, acting like mothers aren't legally allowed to murder their children, or even just abandon them without providing a reason. A system set-up specifically because so many women murder their own children.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 05:28 PM
1

The expense alone is a great reason to wait The expense is completely dictated by your own vanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/23 05:25 PM
1

where are her guts Someone apparently doesn't think skinny people exist. Newsflash, organs don't actually take up that much space.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/23 12:12 AM
0

Art should make people feel something Nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/23 12:08 AM
1

windshield wiper; Completely false, so I highly doubt any of your other examples are factual.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/23 12:05 AM
1

And how does immigration work? Oh that's right, by people in other countries having children. So the answer is still "make babies".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/23 12:01 AM
1

I have kids. I don't regret them I enjoy them, but their sacrifice is only necessary because of my selfishness It's why I don't have biological children- If they're not biologically yours, then by definition they do not suffer because of your choices. If you want to be a weird doomer about this topic, they suffer because of their real parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/23 12:00 AM
1

Ah yes, the magic solution, just replace the population. Newsflash, you weird xenophile, even if we were to agree that this is a fine solution, it only works because the people of other countries are having children. If they followed our lead, we wouldn't be able to headhunt from them. So the actual solution is still to have children.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/23 11:48 PM
1

xactly why more women aren’t going into his field. Why would you risk going somewhere you know you will be biased and discriminated against when you need to get a job and start getting money. Because if you were actually good at it, you'd be hired by someone that understands the "2+2" of economics, or you'd just do it yourself like all the male entrepreneurs.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/23 11:38 PM
1

That’s fine if you believe it was women’s inherent limitations keeping them from doing anything useful Even if we accept the nonsensical theory of patriarchy, that pretends life was as easy even 100 years ago as it is today, it too says that women's weakness is what held them back. After all, if women weren't weaker than nen, then how could men hold them back.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/23 11:35 PM
1

So after 4 years, it's no longer difficult? Or are you going to now move the goalpost continually until we reach the age of majority?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/23 11:25 PM
20

Do we only strive to self-improve because so we can impress someone else to have sex? That they open up new doors of opportunities, and new people to befriend and interact with? You really typed both of these sentences, damn near back to back, and yet didn't notice the contradiction?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 11:16 PM
6

How about I report back on your nonsense first. Oh wait, I've literally never mentioned Reddit to a woman before and I do work a full-time job with constant overtime. Gee, I thought you said that would make me drown in women, yet here I am, maidenless.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 11:10 PM
8

Women are far less picky about body type in general. Bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 11:05 PM
1

I don't know about you, but I don't typically allow strangers to just do as they please in my yard. As much as you need it to be so, most of us aren't basement dwellers trapped in some hellish concrete jungle where you can only find grass in select areas. Your advice to people watch could be marginally helpful, if you have no qualms about looking like a creep in public.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 10:55 PM
1

Ah, a conwoman taking money from the desperate. You're basically a WWII veteran 🫡
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 10:49 PM
1

from bantering with a store clerk to cold approaching people on the street. Yeah, just harrass workers and bug strangers. What could possibly go wrong with that plan?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 10:47 PM
1

Except that's always been nothing more than a strawman for cowards that ironically enough don't want to leave their own comfort zones. Newsflash, it's not only men that live with their parents, who disagree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 10:42 PM
2

Yeah brother, just travel the world forcing others to interact with you till you until you find that one group of people that will
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 10:39 PM
5

letting things happen naturally That's a funny way of saying "attempting to force a conversation with a woman". The natural course of events is that you don't say anything to her, and of course she most definitely doesn't say anything to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 10:29 PM
2

You say in a thread where basically everyone is just looking down on the nerds. Give me a break.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 09:41 PM
1

most average women like average men Tell that to the divorce rates. In short, the average men who are more successful with women touch grass. False. It's far more complicated than that, as you already explained.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 09:35 PM
1

Yup because the only way to be "fun" is to bring an alcoholic junkie
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 09:21 PM
1

Keep pretending like these men are just out in public boasting about their magic sexism that is so much worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 09:15 PM
2

Lol, your attempts to call out "nerd sexism" would go over a lot better if you didn't prove them true in your attempted "counter"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 09:13 PM
1

I have literally worked inside of industrial furnaces. We're talking places where your boots are melting while you work, and they have to have someone keep track of how long your in the hole so you don't die from the bad air (and incase the place collapses on you they know who to send apology letters to). The place is full of alcoholics, and plenty dabbling in other drugs. They make good money just to turn around and blow it. Though admittedly I don't know anyone that's done method, but on top o…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 08:56 PM
2

Go HANG OUT with PEOPLE Gee, why didn't I think of just forcing myself into the social settings of other people. It's not like women keep prattling on about how it's harrassment for a man to even look in their direction with explicit permission signed in triplicate, with the caveat that she can nullify said contract at any time without even telling him she has chosen to change the deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 08:37 PM
1

Human problems are actually very simple in general, but the solutions can get a bit "messy" for the squeamish.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 08:25 PM
–

non-binary Going to stop you right there. No such thing. You aren't some super unique special snowflake. No matter what you do, you will always be a man or a woman. And that was decided by nature before you were even fully formed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 08:19 PM
–

and also illegal. Lol, and just how far are you willing to go with that nonsense? Is cheating fine since it's not illegal? And what do we do with things that once were illegal, but now are legal? How could such a mistake have been made?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 08:16 PM
–

The human race will continue without every single person having sex No fucking shit. The human race will also continue without every single person being able to eat or drink, doesn't stop those things from being needs. The difference here really seems to be that y'all think if something is a need, then we should enslave others to provide it. I on the other hand don't believe in safety nets built on slavery, so there's no cognitive dissonance for me to call sex a need.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 08:05 PM
–

Women still get slut shamed regularly Tell me more about how women don't slut shame men. Just because you call them "dogs" or "pigs" doesn't change the fact that you're doing the same thing in the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 07:59 PM
–

Women want orgasms. Women want lots of orgasms. The average man doesn’t care or know how to bring the average women to orgasm. That's pretty funny considering the stats on how women are terrible at giving themselves orgasms. Also, if women were so gung-ho about sex, but just learned to forgo actually having it with men, they'd make and consume a lot more porn. Also also, how the hell can you claim all of this, and then turn around and claim it "isn't worth their time" for a woman to teach a man …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 07:49 PM
–

There’s nothing about my response that indicates I’m not interested in a good faith discussion. Except for you know the part where you claim one would only need/want a sex toy is if they "can't control their urges". Oh and the part where you claim there's no such thing as a "decent human being" that struggles to find a partner to have sex with
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 07:44 PM
–

being forced to pay money and being forced to let someone else use your body are hardly comparable. They quite literally are you... how do you think people earn the money that is then stolen from them by the likes of personal such as yourself? They work, which requires use of their bodies. Sure they could refuse to work technically, but it doesn't take a very large percentage of the population refusing to work to lead to collapse.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/23 07:37 PM
–

Instead of inviting me to a private chat like a weirdo, just reply here if you want an explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/23 01:03 AM
–

and no matter its difficulty it's physically tiring and a huge time suck. False
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/23 12:46 AM
–

If he's so subpar, why is he doing better than you?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/23 12:44 AM
–

I'd argue most of the women here are just terrible at doing even basic tasks. My mother was basically a narcoleptic that spent nearly every waking moment glued to her computer. Raising children and doing housework in a modern western household is so easy, children can do it. If cleaning house takes you 50 hours a week, every week. You're either terrible at cleaning or a beat freak, in which case your standards don't count.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/23 12:43 AM
–

Newsflash, you just destroyed your own argument, but of course you don't see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/23 12:36 AM
–

I don’t think it’s a secret that men seem to hype up the amount of work they do ( Lol. That's rich, considering women claim to be shopping (as a chore) for several hours every single week. Not to mention the undeniable fact that women work fewer hours outside the home, even when they're "full-time". But yeah, it's men that are lying about how much work they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/23 12:29 AM
–

it lasted a couple of months before she admitted she is out of her mind bored So housework actually isn't difficult, and women are just whining to whine? Who could have guessed?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 11:51 PM
–

I mean, if we assume this is all true, and that despite your hours, you're actually paying exactly one-third of every single bill for the household, along with providing at least nearly all your own food, then that makes you kinda ...
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 11:46 PM
–

Except women clearly do mind regardless of how much they work, or else this wouldn't be such a large talking point because the stats that don't even include unemployed people (so the numbers aren't being skewed) show that women are vastly more likely to work fewer hours in all circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 11:41 PM
–

If that was true, then they would have asked in the first place. Now sure, once you've started doing something regularly, people might get miffed if you suddenly stop doing it. But that's a different matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 11:37 PM
1

I don’t believe for one moment that women never worked This Going out to work paid work outside the home rather than getting married the moment you leave your parents’ home says otherwise. You can't blame me over the fact that you clearly claimed women have never been able to do paid work. And it shows in the fact that when I tell you women have always worked outside the home, which obviously means they were getting paid, you start talking some nonsense about how they aren't paid for doing chore…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 09:35 PM
–

You say this as if we don't operate under the Duluth model, which means that even if she quite literally started it, he would still be the one arrested.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 12:48 AM
2

They recently had Charleston white on their show who is a rape and domestic abuse advocate.He admits to raping women So you have video and audio evidence of someone admitting to a serious crime? And you're here, instead of talking to the police? He tells a woman to go cry outside I don't see what such a minor slight has to do with the serious issue you have brought up. ignores the conviction rate for rape Actually, he probably pays more attention to it than you. You act like every single accusat…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 12:33 AM
2

We should have a world where you can swim with starving piranhas, but I still won't shed a single tear for you if you cut your hand and jump into a swarm of piranhas.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 11:53 PM
0

Going out to work paid work outside the home Women have always worked outside the home. The only real difference is that work was different in the past when we didn't have modern technology. Household chores used to actually be work. You couldn't just toss your clothes and dishes into a machine. The fact that feminists tell such bullshit lies, and that you so blindly believe them shows us where the problem lies.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 11:43 PM
1

Okay, but that just proves that personality isn't a primary determining factor.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 11:52 PM
1

Dude, you literally used the word "tall" in this comment. You need someone else to be shorter than you to be tall.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 11:51 PM
1

That's basically what all complaints about other people boil down to. What is the complaints of misogyny, but complaints that misogynists have the free will to be rude?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 11:49 PM
1

Or stop having women I assume you meant "hating". And in that case, that would be the "you have to force them to change" part that you quoted.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 11:46 PM
1

It's alright, 8d never have the lead dinner wh8le my sister I'd home. At worst I'd give myself alcohol poisoning, but I quit drinking like half an hour before I threw up, and since my Vacation ends tonight, I won't carry on. After all if I don't pay the bills , no one else will.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 01:17 AM
1

Looks yne only thing I like more than rum is hard cider because it don't tastes do bad when you're throwing it up.. but obviously I'd never bother to get another pet beverage I'm simply too tired as it is. Funnily enough if I'd turned my cousin down. In the first place I wouldn't have the puppy, and I may not even feel as bad, as I'd never have gone 15k in debt when hid dumbfuck dog attacked mine. But life is ad it is, spelling mistakes included. Nit you're right it's nice to vent. The last time…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 12:44 AM
0

It's too late for that. Let's see, the glass is about 5oz when full, and I've had 3 glasses of Bumbu. But it's not like I maxed it out even once. Though I may as well finish the bottle. And heck, I got some cleaning done even if the music hits a little different. I don't know why I even bother. I'm basically guaranteed another decade. After all, who else could I entrust my "puppy" to? Sure, she hasn't technically been a puppy for a few years, but she'll always be my puppy. My brother and sister,…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 11:09 PM
3

LOL. As much as I hated my first martial arts class (was either Taekwondo or Hapkido) as an overweight kid, and even realizing now that the dojo wasn't very good (they really did just promote based on time, not skill) I wish I hadn't had to stop after my grandma's house fire. Thinking on how differently things may have gone if I'd kept going, isn't pleasant. Or if my mom hadn't made me quit try-outs for the soccer team in middle school all because I forgot one fucking homework assignment at scho…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 07:49 PM
4

Women always talk about "terrible personalities", yet the men with the worst personalities aren't the ones struggling to get women. Not only do they find the majority of success, they do so well that women flock to them. Are you really going to sit here and claim OP has a worse personality than Andrew Tate or Ted Bundy?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 07:40 PM
1

Well gee, then I guess it's a good thing that I never used the word OPPRESSION.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 07:16 PM
1

unless your personality is the equivalent of a bag of dicks. So you don't consider Tate's personality to be the equivalent of a bag of dicks? Because that's the only way this "advice" would be relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 07:03 PM
3

This is true, but the problem is that women's attraction is reactionary. If every single man improved themselves, women wouldn't be satisfied, their standards would just raise even higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 07:01 PM
1

It doesn't get much lower, but there is a little more room on the expendable rack.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 07:00 PM
2

Then women do a terrible job at it. You say women totally discriminate based on personality, character, and morals, yet the men most vilified by women, also happen to be the men with the most women chasing them and agreeing to be with them. If women actually discriminated based on those factors, then these men would be the least successful. At best women consider these factors secondary. I will grant that women most definitely discriminate based on interests. That's why all the geeks and nerds a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 06:59 PM
1

The only similarity between being forever alone and in a dead bedroom, is the lack of sex. A dead bedroom still gives you a partner to spend time with.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 06:55 PM
1

It is discrimination, you just don't know the definition of the word. Also by definition it is being done to them by women. Things don't "just happen". People choose the actions they take.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 06:51 PM
2

You choose which banks you go to for loans, but the bank is still the one with all the real power in the dynamic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 06:50 PM
2

Divorced men always rush to get married again while a woman will be content being single . No, that woman will find a new boyfriend, but not marry him, because if she did so her alimony would be cut off. Real men don't complain about women all day This is literal misandry, so your complaints about misogyny become invalid. Not that they were particularly valid in the first place, because plenty of women do make posts here, and comment first in threads in response to other women or men they agree …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 06:42 PM
1

Also u/EulenWatcher, blame my momentary retardation, but I just realized you specifically chose the one definition that you foolishly thought made your point. Discrimination The act of discriminating. The ability or power to see or make fine distinctions; discernment and then your definition As we can see, simply picking one thing over another is discrimination, and it can be neutral or even good. If you pick the red car over the blue car, just because you like red, that is neutral. If you choos…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 06:36 PM
2

Proof women aren't (REDACTED). Anytime you choose one thing over another, you are discriminating between the two. Discrimination is only "bad" if the reason for your choice is based on prejudice that society, or the person you are discussing with, disagrees with. We in fact do discriminate against everyone for housing, but that discrimination is supposed to be based solely on their personal ability to pay. Though you of course have things like people who choose to sell their house for less to a …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 06:33 PM
1

Nope, just an extreme example. But someone couldn't even understand the definition of "discrimination", so this is to be expected.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 06:18 PM
1

It's always funny when people include religion in these discussions. You know they either belong to that religion, or they're just virtue signaling. Especially when the mention Islam in the same breath as women and LGBT. You know, two groups that the Islamic religion is known to treat poorly. I mean this Yes, they need to change if they don't want hate. Is true, no matter how much you try to ignore the reality of the situation, but it's especially true of the choices people make. We don't want t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 06:14 PM
1

You're free to refuse to sell your broken tv unless someone is going to give you $1 million for it, and others are free to talk about how delusional you are, and suggest a different sale price if you actually want to get rid of the tv.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 06:03 PM
1

prejudicial treatment Prejudicial Biased, possessed, or blinded by prejudices Prejudice The act or state of holding unreasonable preconceived judgments or convictions. An adverse judgment or opinion formed unfairly or without knowledge of the facts. Irrational suspicion or hatred of a particular social group, such as a race or the adherents of a religion Next you and u/ffandyy are going to try and tell me there's no such thing as a "positive consequence", because the only time you hear the word …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 06:00 PM
1

Okay, but that doesn't address the topic. Why is "a woman waiting for the right man" considered the same as "a woman with little to no libido"?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/23 01:43 PM
-1

It's not insane if you actually think about it. The stereotype of male virgins is someone that spends a lot of time thinking about sex. No one assumes that a male virgin has a low libido, or that he will force his partner into a dead bedroom.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/23 03:50 PM
1

Did you or did you not fail at not having sex willy-nilly? If you did fail at that, did it not require the oh so hedonistic men to help you? So what of that is "uncivil"? Though hey, congratulations on figuring out a way to make moderation somewhat anonymous.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/23 03:19 PM
1

Except the desire to not date them is very clearly the issue. Because it doesn't fucking matter why you don't want to date someone, that is your choice. And even if we go with your gobbledygook comment, you could still treat them politely (you are not owed respect) despite finding them disgusting. But it is nice that despite your pitiful protests, you have clearly agreed with my comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/23 03:08 PM
0

and know all of the information What information are women lacking? Why do you constantly insist that women are braindead and incapable of observing the world and putting two and two together? I mean, in my line of work I do come across many people that are clearly only alive because society coddles them, but I know that's not everyone, and it's not just women. The only thing that matters in this regard is that having sex willy-nilly vastly increases the chance of contracting an STI, resulting i…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/23 02:46 PM
1

Utter nonsense. We are talking about sex here, maybe learn to focus on the topic at hand. How does a woman being chaste, prevent her from taking a hot bath or reading a book? It doesn't, so this is just nonsense to bring up. Many women’s pinnacle of sexual pleasure also seems to reside closer to ‘meaningful sex with a trusted partner’ than ‘orgies every Wednesday.’ Nice "women are wonderful" bullshit. If this was actually even halfway factual, we wouldn't even need to have this discussion, espec…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/23 02:39 PM
0

It honestly couldn't be simpler. You're the one claiming it's bad to be married with kids, if your a young woman, because obviously men are perfect and can't be taken advantage of, while all women are just little retards that need protecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/23 02:29 PM
1

Oh, so it's not "fatphobic" to not date fat women (because let's be honest, no one is fighting for fat men)? Is it not "transphobic" to not date a transperson? I'm not surprised that your denial of such obvious reality nets you upvotes on here. Even in subs like this, the bullshit always seeps in.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/23 02:27 PM
0

It's very simple. We are talking about a specific set of morals. Someone can be very virtuous in one specific area, but less virtuous in others, even to the point that overall they don't count as virtuous. However, sins in one area do not erase virtues in another.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/23 02:19 PM
1

Well that's where you're wrong. Ignoring your denial of reality, you don't know the first thing about me nor my sexual history. But we could even ignore that to stay on point. How does shaming people for not wanting to date other people equate to trying to garner respect for the group being rejected? Where was the respect lost? You're just a flat out liar. I don't have to date you to respect you, so calling me some kinda -ist or -phobe has nothing to do with wanting respect, and everything to do…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:35 PM
2

You would prefer single motherhood for the sake of some nonsensical transparency about exchanges? Why is it that the people arguing for women, are always the ones claiming women are too stupid for their own good and so the genius men need to step up to protect the women from themselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:20 PM
2

Since you came here, I will only respond here. You are claiming that chastity for women is hedonistic. Therefore you are arguing against women being chaste. Therefore you are arguing for women to be whores, a.k.a. you are arguing for hedonism. If you wish to claim this isn't true, then your post has no reason to exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:15 PM
3

Yes, we shove fat women in lingerie in people's faces to gain "respect". Sure thing pal.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:07 PM
10

Hmmm, I'm the fatest in my friend group, and I wouldn't really call any of my friends overweight (though I most certainly am), none of us live with our parents, we don't typically wear graphic T-shirts though jeans are a staple, and I know for certain that 2 of us earned more than 40k last year though the other 2 may have made less than 40k, and all of us are struggling. Only the youngest of us had a girlfriend last year and she went a bit crazy on him and they split up. Though if we are using t…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:00 PM
2

How do you agree with someone complaining about "hedonism" while simultaneously advocating for hedonism?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:35 PM
9

You can't use "hedonism" as a "bad" thing, while outright advocating for hedonism.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:33 PM
1

Lol, this comment is almost as nonsensical as your claim that there's a shortage of men that would accept money from women to have sex with them. Not to mention the weird insinuation that all other forms of escorts are legal in NY.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 02:45 AM
3

I was permabaned from the entire site for saying surgically created genitals don't give you the same feeling as the functional genitals one is born with. (Yes I was a little meaner than that, but I certainly didn't use any slurs) Granted, my appeal, which worked, was literally just me saying that it was hard to defend my comment when they wouldn't even let me see what I said in my ban message.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 11:15 PM
1

Nah, they're constructed just fine, it's your limitation that doesn't allow you to see that. And again, you haven't answered the simple question "Is self-defense toxic?" Self-defense requires violence, but it doesn't require aggression.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 03:16 PM
1

NISVS 2011 NISVS 2015 My understanding is they stopped doing these surveys, but these are the ones I did long ass breakdowns on. And no, I'm not going to do that shit again. But there is this article on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 03:01 PM
1

You may be able to recognize the words, but you clearly can't understand them. Or else you wouldn't have wrote the first comment I replied to.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 02:39 PM
1

I never said Ukraine started the war And I never said you did. But notice how you ignored the important question here. But whatever, I will be gracious in understanding that your Dutch ass clearly only has minimal understanding of the English language.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 02:38 PM
1

and that people are simply focusing on what they see as the most pressing or urgent issues Under no definition would the smaller issue be the most pressing one. Especially with my example of homelessness where homeless women are more likely to couch surf, and homeless men are more likely to literally be on the street. Oh absolutely, because clearly the only reason anyone would ever advocate for one group's issues is out of pure, selfish disregard for the issues of others When they literally are …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 07:43 PM
1

And how tf can violence be neutral? It never is. FFS, I used Ukraine as an example since it's in the post, but maybe this will work. Do you consider self-defense to be toxic? as an expat. You probably shouldn't be voting at all then, what makes you think you can speak for people actually living in the country?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 07:39 PM
1

and that addressing one group's issues doesn't necessarily mean ignoring or dismissing the issues of another group. Says the person whose entire argument is women's issues are being ignored and dismissed. Though it's funny that you would only claim this when looking at issues where women are advantage. If 3/4 of homeless were women, and people were focusing on men, you would be the first to use that as proof that women are being dismissed or minimized.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 07:32 PM
2

He didn’t say anything about bad marriages. Simply by mentioning arranged marriages, most people imply a bad marriage, especially for the woman. Though upon rereading the comment, I can see how you come to the conclusion you presented. Maybe I just misread it the first time.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 07:29 PM
1

You think it's just a coincidence that women's experiences and frustrations are often dismissed or minimized by society Clearly you don't see, because I never said that. It's totally absurd to think that there might be structural and societal factors at play that contribute to the way women are treated and perceived, and that these initiatives are in place to address and rectify those issues You can't claim women's problems are dismissed or minimized, and then admit that there are initiatives th…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 07:27 PM
2

Because gender representation matters, False, but if you truly believed so, you would vote for it, or run yourself. Also I never said whatever you are quoting either. So don’t make stuff up. You may not have said those exact words, but that sure as hell is what you meant, as evident by the first part I directly quoted here. And violence is the toxic masculine version of aggression which is a masculine trait. First, you have that backwards. Violence is neutral, the Ukrainians are most certainly u…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 07:19 PM
1

Because there are only two options, slut or homebody.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 07:12 PM
2

If you actually understand arranged marriages, then you certainly would count them. Sure there are bad examples, but do you really believe people care so little for their children that they would want them to be in a bad marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:27 PM
2

Makes more sense to have more respect for the woman who sleeps with lots of 10s In what way? If you have already established that men don't have standards, what is there to respect in the woman simply saying yes? I get what you're saying from the male side, though I already don't particularly respect male sluts either, regardless of what the women they're sleeping with look like. But I can understand the very simple concept that he had to put in work to get any of those women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:23 PM
2

An accused rapist is your example of how easy it is for law-abiding men to get sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:19 PM
2

And you have to learn how to read. His jab at incels wasn't really directed at the comment he responded to.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:16 PM
1

Why would a guy have to get around, to hear about a woman's past. Even if your argument is that male slots know the signs of a female slut, that doesn't preclude chaste men from learning the signs in less direct neans.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:12 PM
2

Ah yes, a relationship built on lies is surely the best and most stable.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:10 PM
4

Lol! First, the term "incel" only came around recently. Second, there's only a huge difference if you choose to add all kinds of nonsense. While an incel doesn't have to be a virgin, and a virgin can be one by choice (or even asexual, which would pretty much preclude them from being an incel), they often overlap. The most basic definition of "incel" is simply: someone that is INvoluntarily CELibate. So if you were married, and your partner was in a coma, you would be an incel if you wanted sex a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:07 PM
3

It's not hypocrisy because it's not the same. As another commenter wonderfully put it, you wouldn't treat a trust fund kid the same as someone who started lower class (or even middle class) and was able to rise to upper class. They are both rich, but the journey wasn't the same. Also, if this is all about your soggy knees (over something you have complete control over, by the way), then would penis shaming be misandry? Or we can keep it more on point and ask if calling men "dogs" or "players" in…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 03:26 PM
1

If you're not a slut, and have no desire to be a slut, then you wouldn't care about slut shaming. But you seem to not understand why people get praise for doing something difficult, so...
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 03:18 PM
2

It seemed to work for women
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 01:53 PM
4

Ah it's always refreshing to see an "intelligent" woman pretend she still doesn't have the vote. After all if women could vote, then why would the gender of the politicians in power matter? it's men's fault that women voted for male politicians that turned out to be warmongers. Also, leave it to a feminists to define all negative traits as masculine, so that even when they have to admit a woman did something bad, the can still blame men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 01:47 PM
7

Why didn't you just enlighten us with the numbers? Is it because it's less than a drop in the bucket, but at least there's something there. Not that it changes the fact that those women have the choice to serve, not an obligation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 01:40 PM
15

since the politicians who start wars are men. And who votes for those politicians? That's right, women. Women make up the majority of registered voters. They quite literally could put anyone in office that meets the requirements for running.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 01:36 PM
1

Well depending on how recent it was, he's not wrong. And yes, dating a widow is prone to risk, because typically she would still be with her husband if not for his death. You have to fill her husband's boots, and she's not delusional for wanting that. As opposed to a woman that was dumped (or never really in a relationship). A widow will struggle more than a childless woman, but she won't struggle as much as a single mother.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:45 PM
0

Nah I'm fucking his wife too. No one seems to get that. Nope, we get it, it just doesn't matter. All swimgers are cucks, but not all cucks are swingers. You fucking his wife, doesn't magically make your wife unfucked by him. Also, I mean you're the one that chose to use the example of making your wife tell a lone man, that she wanted to suck his dick, and you paraded her in front of your friend, without him bringing a woman for you to look at. But hey, I guess those were just Freudian slips.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:28 PM
1

I'm a cuck because I find it disgusting to share one's partner? Sir, you really have no understanding of what a cuck is, do you?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:23 PM
1

Did you not say people shouldn't insult people for failing to be attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:22 PM
0

I'm sorry, since when do all women work for Disney? And ignoring that, why do we act like "revenge porn" is a serious issue if most women don't have risqué pictures?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:21 PM
3

I haven't been around much recently, but I have been subbed for quite awhile. Widows are always treated differently from single mothers, which makes sense because the children of widiws tend to turn out better than the children of single mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:14 PM
2

And I'm sure it's just a coincidence that women's experiences and frustrations are often dismissed or minimized by society. Lol, that's why we have all these initiatives for women, even when men clearly suffer worse from the same predicament, because society dismisses women?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 11:53 AM
5

It's a strawman for me to use my personal experience with a man who has rubbed my back, kinda out of nowhere, either because he's just a touchy guy or he's secretly bisexual and trying to signal that he wants me? The problem with your argument is that unless some starts kissing your ass, you're just going to claim they refuse to even look at the situation. I bring up the fact that even according to the CDC's surveys, only a very small percentage of people reported being sexually assaulted, and t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 11:48 AM
0

Why would anyone be jealous of a cuck who shares his wife? All swingers are cucks, but not all cucks are swingers.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 02:47 AM
1

You're a Republican that dreams of your wife being used by other mean, you are by definition a cuckservative. Go ahead and try to claim this is an ult, I comment on everything on here
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 02:33 AM
1

your own narrow-minded, self-righteous perspective The only one acting like that is you. You bulk at the OP because of the term used, despite the fact that 1, his wife could literally refuse at any time, and the only "punishment" would be potentially the dissolution of the relationship (though from the way you phrased your first comment, it sounds like you think people should be allowed to cheat without fear of "punishment"). And 2, she is free to express concerns afterwards without punishment. …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 02:22 AM
2

Sure they will
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 01:57 AM
0

You know, you could have hit me with that a few years ago. But nowadays I barely look at porn, and even masturbation is highly infrequent because of how much I work, and that I have roommates and can't close my bedroom door as the pets need to be able to get in and out.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 01:55 AM
1

You mean mainstream feminism where every ugly man is a rapist in waiting?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 01:49 AM
-1

This is just a genderbent copy of another post about men contributing to society. That's why it sounds so stupid, because she didn't actually put any thought into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 01:45 AM
1

Unless the husband died on a gang shootout, no one is going to fault the woman for being a widow
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 01:36 AM
6

Considering women weren't allowed to work Completely false. At best women were barred from physically demanding jobs where they would be surrounded by lower class men, and from the high status jobs. But there were plenty of jobs available to women, and even those considered only available to women. The real situation was that taking care of a house, especially with young children, was much harder and far more time consuming, so one parent needed to stay home. weren't allowed to own property I gu…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 12:04 AM
2

You're on an American site, that is mostly used by Americans. So yes fuckwit, you should expect people to use imperial units. Also, you're whining about "pounds" but not "feet/inches"?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 11:25 PM
4

Well no, because women have no trouble getting free sex from above average men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 11:23 PM
1

One specific situation is not the same as being under "constant threat". Let's assume I infact had been attacked in the past by an escaped zoo animal. Would I suddenly not be paranoid for believing it's only a matter of time till it happens again?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 11:22 PM
1

Until they leave Dusney, then suddenly they all seem to follow the same path.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 11:13 PM
2

Assuming she just used a timer (or voice commands), it's not that impressive. And I don't see how it could be done any other way.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 11:11 PM
1

as long as she's with me she's not doing that so why do I care That's what you think
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 11:10 PM
0

The statistics are readily accessible. If I constantly lived in fear that a jaguar would escape my local zoo and attack me in my home, would I be "under threat" or "paranoid"?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 11:08 PM
3

My source? On the fact that the more recent a memory is, the more accurately you can recall it, even with a leading question used as a prompt? Or do you mean the CDC's data?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 11:06 PM
1

you don't have any uniquely attractive traits, Because getting drunk every weekend is "uniquely attractive"? It's fine to admit you don't find those traits attractive, but to claim the niche hobbies are somehow the non-unique ones is outright ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 11:02 PM
5

I mean, if you've had several relationships, you aren't "forever alone". If you're being asked out on dates, but turning them down, you're certainly not forever alone due to any discrimination or barriers to success or happiness. The simple fact is that this, I'm sure it's just a coincidence that the women in this subreddit are expressing similar frustrations to those of men. Is an outright lie. They aren't expressing similar frustrations. They are frustrations the next level up, from the ones e…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 10:54 PM
4

If women didn't consider sex a need, there wouldn't be any debates about abortion, and sluts wouldn't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 10:36 PM
5

Ah yes, a hyper intelligent, rich fuck, telling me how wonderful and easy life is. That's exactly what I wanted to read today.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 10:15 PM
3

Well, I don’t really measure my height frequently Your height doesn't really change once you've reached adulthood. And most men in my experience usually know their dick size. Do they? Like I'm sure most men have gotten curious, but then you've got the question of how they actually measured it, and whether or not they got an accurate measurement.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 10:01 PM
6

Having even one of those characteristics would be definition male the man "above average", unless he is seriously below average in another aspect.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:58 PM
11

As a union steward, I had to sit in on a harrassment claim, where the woman (who works in a kitchen) was upset that a coworker had noticed dog hair on her lower back, and pointed it out to her. First, she didn't understand why that could be an issue because of its location, then she assumed the coworker must have been looking at her ass. So forgive me if I don't consider it worth the hassle, and would rather not risk making a woman feel uncomfortable just so I can feel love.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:46 PM
12

So you think all jacked gat men are rapists, or what? Because I have this habit of not assuming people are rapists, especially because I've looked into even the self-report numbers that never go to the police. So I wouldn't automatically be freaked out by this hypothetical man. Also, I do know this one guy, recently divorced, who is a bit touchy feely, in okay shape but old, and while I have wondered if he may be bisexual, I've never worried he was going to follow ne home and try to have his way…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:39 PM
4

I have literally broken down the CDC's intimate partner violence studies in comments, myself, to show that the rate of (attempted) rape between men and women is actually almost identical. It's only when you lead women on with questions about things that happened several years, or even decades, ago that the nu.bers start to diverge. And yet, no one seems capable of comprehending the difference and just go "but the numbers"
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:32 PM
7

A threat is the potential to harm. Depends on context. By this definition, my dogs are certainly "threats" to me, a 60+lb pit bull could do some serious damage, even to a man of my height and weight. But I don't consider my dogs threats, because I know the odds of them randomly attacking me are astronomical. Likewise, women are very rarely the victims of random acts of violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:28 PM
3

If you’re fat, obese and a man then no one is hitting on you. Let’s be real. Unless you're still in a school setting and it's a prank. I admit I have had my ass grabbed by classmates before, and had one "confess" her feelings for me even though we never really talked. Maybe it was genuine attraction, but as a fat nerd, I had to assume there were ulterior motives.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:16 PM
2

You're not under constant threat, you're just paranoid.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:13 PM
1

Unlawful - I guess applies in some countries Mist countries don't allow abortions after so many weeks, unless there's a substantial risk to the mother. Killing - removing support that is needed to live is generally seen as letting die rather than killing Tearing a baby to pieces isn't merely cutting off support. But go ahead and try that bullshit with a baby outside the womb and see how fast you get charged with homicide due to neglect. Human - a foetus isn't an entire human but just has some pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:09 PM
1

It certainly does in basically every country on Earth depending on when and how it's performed.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:36 PM
1

That's cute, but all you did was say "I deny it", so there isn't anything for me to rebut.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 06:34 PM
1

There's nothing to rebut. I made a throwaway joke comment So now you admit that I was correct all along? Truly a titan of intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:46 PM
1

Murder: the unlawful killing of a human.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:45 PM
2

quasi attempt to fairly give back to women who sacrifice their careers to serve men following a divorce Bullshit. There's nothing fair about enslaving someone else because you hot bored. Go ahead, get a real job, and see how well you can quit of your own volition and force them to continue paying you for not working. Not to mention the nonsense behind the idea that your entitled to any particular lifestyle. Funny how you aren't magically entitled to that lifestyle if you stayed married and your …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:43 PM
1

You don't think it's logical that when you have a username or flair that is linked to well known ideas, for people to make assumptions based on that? It's a good thing you don't live around many poisonous foods, or you would have perished long ago. Also, I notice you haven't really rebutted anything I've said in this thread. You merely claim to have "observed" the age of a fictional character, that could literally look like anything and be any age on the positive side of infinity. So it seems my…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:16 PM
1

It's very reasonable, and the only reason we have survived so long as a species.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:12 PM
1

Lol, you tell me to go do something else, which I was already heading to bed, and then YOU come back an hour later to respond to me AGAIN, even though I hadn't replied yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:10 PM
1

If they don't want a baby, then I guess they'll have to wait for menopause, or one of them is going to need to make an appointment for some tieing or snipping.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:09 PM
1

Well obviously you can type lies, it doesn't change anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:07 PM
1

You don't have to murder someone else to treat your broken leg. Not that your example would be worthwhile anyhow. If you actually wanted something comparable, you should use some moron jumping off their roof, and in that case I definitely think they should be 100% responsible for the bill. No insurance of any kind should cover it, but again no one has to be murdered, so as long as they can pay up, they can get treated.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:06 PM
1

I don't usually pay attention to usernames, so I didn't realize I was having like 5 different arguments with you, till I broke my own rule and looked at your profile. You call this "bent out of shape", I call it even better proof that you're a woman, than your posting on 2xC. It's honestly hilarious. You try to insult me for not having sex with women. Implying that a man only has worth if he can convince a woman to sleep with him. Which is antithetical to your later comment where you tried to in…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 04:06 AM
1

The reason I’ll never believe that the body count/n count discussions are based on preference and not insecurities is because how many times I’ve been told by non-black women how they get asked this question You wrote this. Your failure to understand your own writing does not expose any flaws within me. But it is cute that I would be accused of only being capable of reading at a 3rd grade level. It is literally impossible for you, a nobody on the internet whining about "racism" because supposedl…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:45 AM
1

Fucking pansy
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:38 AM
1

I have literally told you that I would only have vaginal sex, protected or otherwise, if I was looking to have a child. Though I most certainly would complain about alimony, because the child would be mine, and no one, least of all someone that merely spread their legs for a night, deserves to be paid after they quit their job.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:38 AM
1

Oh, we are adding illiterate to your list of "qualities"? I'm a full blown faggot. Well, maybe not full blown since I'm not a whore, but close enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:35 AM
1

Hate? Yes. As any reasonable person would. If you don't want your discussions to be colored, don't announce your allegiance to a moronic group.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:34 AM
1

Why type if you can't read? I've already addressed all of your concerns, aside from birth control failing. To that point, oh fucking well. Again, vaginal sex is not a necessity, so you knew the risk, and you chose to take them (because clearly you've pivoted off of using rape as your scapegoat here), so you have no valid excuse to kill the baby.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:33 AM
1

Well no, I understand that women are retarded, so I knew I was shouting into the void you call a skull. While the point may be exaggerated for effect, you can't deny that most women think men should at least do 50/50 housework (though yard work doesn't count, so really the man would be doing more work) even if he's working 60 hours/week and she's only doing 20.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:30 AM
1

Boyfriend doesn't automatically mean sexual partner (funny how you can only comprehend that half the time). That said, drugs show up on tests, so unless you're a junkie, that would be easily provable. The hard part would be proving that it was specifically the drugged rape that got you pregnant, though I'm sure most people would be willing to err on the side of caution.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:27 AM
1

Thanks for agreeing with me that you are in fact a moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:24 AM
2

Oh, so it's fine to tell men to not have sex, but expecting women to opt out if they aren't ready for a baby is sexism? Or are you just so illiterate, you failed to notice that I'm literally arguing that people (which includes the man, but he's not the one given carte blanche to murder babies) shouldn't have vaginal sex if they aren't prepared for the natural consequences?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:23 AM
1

Oh no, I guess I've been outed, and now everyone knows that I have no worth because no queen has deemed me worthy of the magical pussy. Even if I wasn't gay, you'd still be a fucking moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:20 AM
0

and who do their fair share Except your definition of "fair share" is "brings in 90% of the income, does 60% of the household chores, and maybe gets to kiss your ass if he's been a particularly good boy for the past year"
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:18 AM
1

So it's not a generalization for you to claim that all men who are worried about n-count, are actually just racist, or at least idiots that have fallen for the propaganda that you claim to not push?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:12 AM
1

I mean age can't be observed in anything but extremely vague generalities, so yes. Though I admit I don't know the character, so maybe she is canonically 12, but while rad fems love to claim they like anime/manga, their demands to change literally everything about it, prove they don't. So forgive me if you're the one exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:11 AM
2

Man, women sure do believe some tall tales. I guess that's why so many of you believe in the wage gap.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:03 AM
2

Just say you want to murder babies.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:01 AM
-2

Not surprising you lack critical thought. You made a post where you use generalizations to whine. Then someone responds to your generalizations with other generalizations. Your response is "that never happens" Proof is presented that it does in fact happen "But I'm a special snowflake, so that generalization doesn't count"
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:00 AM
2

Yup, when women are failing, men must change (or at least give them free stuff). And when men are failing, men need to change
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:58 AM
2

Imagine being married to someone that doesn't appreciate your efforts. The only winning move really is a warm lead meal.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:55 AM
3

Wow, body shaming from a rad fem. Imagine my shock.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:51 AM
1

You mean those other things that are in the news? And bitch, I've never assaulted a toddler, but I guess you have since you seem to think it's no big deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:49 AM
-1

Whine all you want, but generalizations will never go away. You being an exception holds no weight in a discussion that you started with fucking generalizations you goddamn moron.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:45 AM
1

No, no, I should thank you for proving my point. But hey, it's always nice to have an out after you've lost.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:43 AM
2

Learn biology please, there is no uterus in the ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:42 AM
1

Only in very specific circumstances. Just like it is legal to kill people in general, but only in specific circumstances.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:41 AM
0

You are a buffoon. My suggestion is, "don't try to make a baby until you're ready for it". Your suggestion is "make all the babies you don't want, and then just murder them, because your momentary pleasure is the most important thing in the world".
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:40 AM
1

You guys are acting like I said to just be a dumbass and hope for the best. Because that is what you originally said, and now you're just back pedaling.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:37 AM
1

The women you meet will be unique every time, and more importantly, their reactions to you will be unique. If this is true, then this As such, there is quite literally, and I really mean literally, nothing better than learning through action and experience Is bullshit. If I gave you a truly random number generator, no matter how many times you tested it, you would never be able tell me what number it will spit out next, even if it only pulled from a small amount of numbers (as opposed to infinit…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:33 AM
1

Yes because if you're not in the 1% you're a useless sack of shit
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 02:26 AM
1

Just read the comments on your own post numbnuts. There's at least one black guy playing into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:54 AM
0

If you think it's a punishment, then don't have vaginal sex, moron. As the other commenter said, it's easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:49 AM
2

Good? Did you think you made some point here? The only thing you actually did was tell the world that you don't know where babies come from. While I believe in abstinence till you are ready for a child, that only apply to the one type of sex that can actually create a child. Mutual masturbation, anal, and oral, are all 100% risk free sexual interactions that will never cause you to even consider abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:47 AM
1

Abortion because you willingly had vaginal sex knowing you didn't want or couldn't afford a child, isn't healthcare. Not that it actually matters, because no you aren't entitled to healthcare you slave owner wannabe.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:44 AM
1

Except your right to bodily autonomy ends at the next person you fucking moron. Your right to bodily autonomy only extends to you choosing to not have vaginal sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:42 AM
1

The conviction rate for rapes is incredibly low. Well when you wait 5 years to even levy the accusation, what the fuck do you expect? How do you expect women to prove that they were raped? Maybe by reporting it right away? I know, what a mind blowing concept. Though I will grant you, that if the rape wasn't particularly violent because the woman complied with threats or small showings of force, then it would basically be unprovable. Which is something you actually want, unless you think the witc…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:38 AM
1

No one deserves to die Newsflash retard, we all will die. Now I could potentially agree with you that no one deserves to be MURDERED, but we all deserve to die, and we all will.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:29 AM
2

Then maybe we ought to start fostering things like wealth equality and parental support so that women aren't forced into something very horrific and also unnecessary. Or you could literally just not have fucking sex you retarded whore. Why should you be able to rob other people just because you "had" to let some guy raw dog your pussy? A jury can't even hardly tell for sure if someone was raped at a specific time, Well, when you wait 5 years to even make the accusation
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:28 AM
-1

Are you slow? It may be awkwardly written, but the point is plainly obvious. If sex is something one is entitled to, especially penis-in-vagina, a.k.a. baby-making sex, then you chose to murder a baby because you were too lazy to do literally anything else. It's worse than choosing to drive drunk after you've already gotten drunk. It's more akin to deciding you're going to drive drunk, before getting drunk.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:25 AM
0

Yes, let's use the 1% to validate the 99% of morons who only live by the foolish grace of others, considering how fucking retarded they clearly are.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:22 AM
0

Well it's not real for one, but two, it depends what you mean by "okay with". An artist is free to make a story where someone beats their spouse for no reason, but that doesn't mean I would pay to consume that art.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:14 AM
2

I wouldn't be able to sustainably endure that with my husband for long. So either you're gay, or a woman. And in both cases, it makes all your previous comments in this thread invalid.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:07 AM
3

He followed your nonsense perfectly, but I can see why the weaker sex would balk at the idea of not being able to exile anyone they so desire on a whim, justified or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 01:04 AM
1

Well yes, as you broaden the term into nothingness, of course eventually everyone will fall under its useless definition
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 12:56 AM
3

When was the last time you had your penis measured by, well anyone but yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 12:49 AM
0

Lol, you use a lack of travel, or at least a lack of living in a large city, as an insult. Then when presented with the fact that neither of those things makes someone intelligent, this is all you can say? Not that surprising.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 07:08 PM
1

If you were as educated as you claim, you wouldn't be a socialist, and you'd realize the bodily autonomy argument stops the moment the woman chose to have vaginal sex. Abortion is quite literally the avoidance of responsibility, so clearly you don't believe in women being responsible for their actions.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 07:05 PM
1

Oh you're one of those types. The kind of person who feels entitled to enslave others so you don't have to take responsibility for your actions. I should have seen that coming with the elitist bullshit you keep spouting. Though for the record, so you can't crawl into your little hole feeling like you won, I agree with vaccines that work, but it is a person's right to bodily autonomy to choose for themselves if they want to take it. Am I "antivax" for not getting the flu vaccine, ever?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 03:57 PM
1

You get plenty of understanding and compassion, what you want is more free gibs because you're just a poor wittle girl. Granted you haven't personally made any of the outrageous demands plenty of women make using their periods as an excuse (at least not here). But you can't simultaneously claim they aren't a big deal, but then also demand people fawn over your poor self.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 03:54 PM
0

I would agree that everyone has baggage, it's a fact of life. And not all baggage is bad, much like how consequences can be positive, people just tend to use the word a specific way. But, the longer you live, the more baggage you will collect, and the higher the chances that some of it will be detrimental. There's also the factor of how the baggage effects different aspects of your life. Baggage over being scammed by a fake homeless person, isn't going to effect your future intimate relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 02:15 PM
0

So everyone is exactly the same until they reach the age of 25? Or at least 12, to be generous? Imagine thinking you need to read nonsense to see something that you ought to glean from every social interaction you have. You could try to argue that personalities don't solidify till the age of 25, but that would be ridiculous as well because people change after they've turned 25 as well. I'd say you're the one that needs to do a little more research. Like maybe into the recent scandal with the pee…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 02:09 PM
1

If you can't look at all the PSAs and warnings in popular media and make use of them, you very much so are "intellectually disabled". there’s simply no way for you to make everyone ok with that. There is not a single topic in existence that everyone will agree upon. So that's a bit of a moot point. My only point is that you poison the well from the jump, by insisting that every age gap involves a man being a raging abusive shitbag who exploits young women (Side note, I like how you tried to pret…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 01:58 PM
1

That's a damned lie and you fucking know it. "Cougars" and "sugar mommas" do not get anywhere near the same flack as older men and "sugar daddies". For fuck's sake, female child molesters/rapists don't even get the same flack as male child molesters/rapists, even if they also target girls (and we don't even need to mention the slack women get if they prey on boys).
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 01:45 PM
0

There is not a single child, let alone adult, that doesn't have a personality. What you actually mean is when they start agreeing with me
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 01:36 PM
1

That's mighty elitist of you, especially considering how social media has shown us the levels of braindead celebrities are. You know, those people that travel the world and live in the biggest of cities?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 01:23 PM
0

Just like a woman, to want her cake and eat it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/22 01:21 PM
1

Lol? Are you stalking my replies now? Granted, I don't have a lot of experience being the OP, but I don't think you get notified of every response to every comment. Also, the even funnier part is, if you believe this then you've already disproven your own whining. This would be the perfect example of why men want younger, less experienced women, and have nothing to do with all the predatory bullshit you couldn't help but force into it. Nor the supposed insecurity that women love to go on about
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 10:59 PM
1

You're right, it's not gender specific. But I'm not the one arguing that women are stupid and easily manipulated.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 10:55 PM
0

Hmm, you can respond to my comment (no matter how poorly), but you missed the guy that actually complimented you, if in a bit of a roundabout way?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 10:48 PM
1

Then what is this magic experience that she is missing? By the age of 23, I had already dealt with burying my mother, fighting my abusive ex-step-father for custody of my underage siblings, bought 4 graves (because the price is only ever going to increase), owned a car, took over mortgage payments, and locked in a decent whole life insurance policy. If we hadn't had to pull the plug on my mother, I would have all of that minus the grave sites and fighting, but with the upside that I would be in …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 10:41 PM
1

If she chose to have no skills, that is her problem. And frankly it's no one else's job to support a God damned adult. Again you do nothing but infantilize women. And we all know you wouldn't argue for alimony to be awarded if the genders were reversed. Not that you actually should, but at least you would be consistent.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 10:28 PM
2

As opposed to giving it away to dozens of other men who only want a night or two with her?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 10:25 PM
4

He's the "annoying and stupid" one, but you're the cheater. What is an unreliable narrator, Alex?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 10:24 PM
-1

Oh no, a literal nobody on the internet said "ew", I guess it's time to cave and completely rework my life around what some stranger thinks. Maybe y'all have a point that women are nothing more than retarded damsels till they've made the same mistake one thousand times. I mean, there must be some reason behind why you would think it is this easy to manipulate someone. And the only reason I can think of is that you must have been that easy to manipulate, and so you project it onto everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 10:19 PM
0

So periods are no big deal and women should quit whining about them already?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 10:15 PM
1

I can't do the reading for you
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 10:10 PM
-1

lip’s chance you become that shitty ex No you [redacted for the feelings of pansies], because I don't see myself as a shitty person.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 10:10 PM
2

Your only "point", if you can even call it that, is to infantilize women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 10:06 PM
-4

Yes yes yes, all women are just perfect helpless damsels and if a man dares not make 100x the national average for the wealthiest country in the world, then he's a loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 10:02 PM
2

Why do all of you who are "defending" women, just keep claiming that they have room temperature IQs, and "need" to fuck around for 20 years with guys that only want sex from them, in order to finally figure out what they want from relationships? Even with all your whining that these older men will be lazy, I'd still say they sound like a better path forward.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 09:57 PM
5

And yet so few men actually get to experience casual sex. So clearly this isn't a problem caused by men. Obviously women have their own agency, and have no problem turning men down and making them wait (though you'll still cry out the other side of your mouth about hoe much of a helpless damsel you are), so it doesn't matter if men have a desire for casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 09:54 PM
2

it can mean predatory behavior to take advantage of someone without experience All I hear is that you think women are too retarded to protect themselves or learn from the mistakes of others, or really learn from their own mistakes until they've repeated them a few hundred times.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 09:50 PM
3

The only way they ever got anything was because our economies and cultures made women reliant on them to survive. Nature made women reliant.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 09:45 PM
5

What a load of nonsense. Everyone has their own personality, it's quite literally impossible for them not to. Just because you disagree with someone, doesn't mean the magically turn into some weird robot. This is no different from a "jock" insulting a "nerd", or an ugly person insulting an attractive person.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 09:39 PM
10

If you wish to interpret it that way, you do you, but everyone is specifically talking about how they don't want to deal with the baggage from past experiences. Not about trying to trick someone into think8ng they're better than they really are.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/22 09:33 PM
0

Nice try, 2/10. Even if we ignore that women are naturally less hairy than men, and the whole social conventions around men and women that make bearded men a norm and bearded women abnormal, you chose the wrong person to direct that at, because I prefer men to women in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/22 06:17 PM
0

If I give you the benefit of a doubt here, you've literally just expressed that you are the most superficial person in the world. But we all know you wouldn't have dated this guy if he shaved his beard.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/22 05:16 PM
-4

Then I guess it's a good thing that that's not what he said.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/22 01:40 PM
-2

It's very easy to tell, because the mainstream argument is that men have to put up with sexless relationships, or else "clearly" all they wanted was sex, and they must never have seen her as a person. And we don't even need to go into the whole "body positivity" <sup>women</sup> <sup>only</sup> movement, now do we?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 07:59 PM
2

do your hair, wear nice clothes but i don’t think that’s got much to do with appearance. That is literally all appearance. "Nice" clothes and a fancy hairdo have nothing to do with hygiene.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:40 PM
13

Sure, if we completely ignore the fact that women are less likely to accept their actual match.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:35 PM
1

Clearly that isn't important, or known bad actors wouldn't be constantly getting relationships despite having their bad actions immortalized in the news.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:33 PM
3

telling them to not be pudgy and wear nice clothes and be presentable is fine, that’s the bare minimum for almost all humans Clearly it isn't, but thanks for outing yourself and showing how you've just been typing nonsense this whole time about how women tooooootally don't really care about appearances, and just want a man that will respect them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:32 PM
1

Imagine not dating a man simply because he has "too much" testosterone. Don't bother, it's clear this wasn't the reason you refused to date him, because it's such a miniscule thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/22 06:25 PM
6

And despite what you think, where prostitution or associated activities are illegal on both sides, prostitutes are way more likely to be targeted by police than johns, which goes against your theory that they're more accepted. Your conclusions is wrong, because apparently you have a 1st grader's understanding of how law enforcement works. The prostitutes are far more visible than their customers. It's the same as drug dealers versus users.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 03:09 PM
0

If all you're looking for is sex, then it's not a date. No matter how much you try to twist yourself into knots over it.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 03:04 PM
13

Funny you can see this with men, but you infantilize women and demonize sex, by insisting that basically no woman would willingly get into sex work. It's also funny how somehow poor and desperate men are able to find non-sexual employment.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/22 02:58 PM
10

If they're dating or fucking you, it is their business
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/22 01:53 AM
1

Lol, I'm back bitch. Fucker got me "permanently" suspended for this comment. Yet an appeal, where I literally just pointed out that I had no way to defend myself because Reddit wouldn't even show me the "offending" comment I typed, and boom, I'm back. Though it is funny that they didn't reverse the removal of the comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 01:53 PM
1

The nuance is provided by the person. Though I feel there was some whewre else where OP claimed the numbers would be separated by act.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 08:39 PM
2

You don't have to say it, you ninny. We are discussing societal level claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 08:36 PM
6

So it's different when you do it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 08:35 PM
2

Why must you speak in riddles? Are you saying that it's not the same for a guy to be on the receiving end, as it is for a woman? Because I assure you, I was talking about being on the receiving end.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 08:34 PM
2

How praytell are you being scammed into anal sex? Fucking LOL. And that's without going into how great anal sex is anyhow.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 09:16 PM
7

So the vast majority of women on the planet?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 09:13 PM
1

Trans people have also noticed this after transitioning. How can they notice something they don't experience? You can not compare the abominations made for them to the genuine article.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 09:05 PM
3

So are women just trying to avoid "punishment" when they call men horn-dogs?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 09:01 PM
1

Funny how you would instantly recognize all of that as the bullshit it is, if we were to talk about how men are depicted. Claiming men are slaves to sexual desire is just a fact, but claiming the same of women is just an evil attempt to oppress those poor poor women that can't do anything for themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 09:00 PM
1

I mean, the n-count would reveal cheating, at least to the most affected individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 08:32 PM
1

Why do people keep saying this stupid shit? Rape is literally involuntary SEX. So yes it would count as sex for her. Now, thinking individuals can understand that there is a difference in being raped and willingly having sex, so it won't matter much, though it will put some pressure on victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 08:28 PM
1

That sure was a lot of meaningless hot air. Especially when your gripe boils down to being upset at other people being upset. Your rant holds no water because caring about a woman's body count is thousands of years old at minimum. You could argue it comes from paternal insecurity, but you'd have to show how insecurity is a bad thing in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 05:52 PM
7

As others said long before you commented, it's a meme reference to a video game. It's also clearly being used as a substitute for the word "incel", since that stuff can get flagged.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:43 AM
0

When will this nonsense die? Everyone judges, literally every thing. If you didn't discriminate, you'd be dead. We can argue about which judgements are valid, and point out that they could be wrong, but don't act like you don't judge or that doing so is bad altogether.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/22 12:41 AM
1

You'll have to ask someone else. I take as much pride in being a man, as I do in every other undeniable and unchangeable fact about myself that I had no hand in creating. Just in case you need it spelled out, that is I take no pride in it whatsoever because I didn't choose it and I can't change it, and I have no desire to change it even if the option existed. I could just as easily throw this back at you though, because there is little more pathetic than self-delusion and denying the reality pla…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/22 10:36 PM
1

Because part of being a man is not running from your problems, that's a female position. Though I guess that does lend validity to the pathetic excuses that actually follow your advice. It is also a bit amusing to imagine a history where when feminists started whining, instead of listening to them, people just told them that clearly they hate being women and should just get a sex change.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 11:05 AM
1

Women sure love to "womansplain" men to men, so why wouldn't it be viable the other way around?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 02:26 AM
1

A place where women think they have the monopoly on what love is? But that's every where, so it's not a very good definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 02:24 AM
1

I didn't say it did.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 01:45 PM
17

Also why are there 106% men? Because you're misreading the data. Note how it says "A top quality", not "THE top quality". As in there are multiple top qualities. So the data also doesn't say that 2/3 of men want an intelligent wife over a sweet one. Which should be obvious because those traits aren't mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 05:48 PM
2

Presumably there's a reason Jack would be denying her sex, so she is going behind his back in that scenario. It'd be like dating a militant vegan, never mentioning your enjoyment of meat, and eating it when not with them. Sure, maybe you'll give up meat for them, but how long? It's all but inevitable that Abbey will cheat on Jack eventually. The first time he says he isn't in the mood, her old fwb will be getting a call.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 04:29 PM
12

You have to have a base level of intelligence before someone can convince you of such a simple thing. I mean you don't even understand why people would view different groups differently. The first problem with your single mom question, is that you are automatically assuming the guy bailed. There are more scenarios that could lead to that outcome. Though we can discount death/murder of the father to an extent since, iirc, widows do better than single mothers. Either way though, blaming the absent…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/22 04:20 PM
3

What a wild story. You go from making your boyfriend wait, to throwing yourself at some rando within two weeks. No wonder your ex didn't see a future in that relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/22 09:06 PM
1

You mean the outright lies of feminists? Well there is the "wage gap". First off, it's the typical twisting of words. Despite the fact that they can only get this "wage gap" by comparing all working men, to all working women, they like to pretend it magically boils down to "less pay, for the same work, in the same area". What feminists are actually talking about is an earnings gap. However, they don't want to use that word, because everybody would immediately start asking the obvious questions. …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/22 12:10 AM
1

Nope, it is solely about empowering women, which is why they cheer when college enrollment switches to majority women. Feminists do not and never have cared about raising men up where they fall behind.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 04:49 PM
1

You quite literally are downplaying it, by first and foremost, pretending that all FGM is just the worst version, and by throwing out bullshit talking points about male circumcision.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 04:48 PM
1

Feminists, by contrast, will at least respect you enough to listen to you, even if they tear you a new asshole and vehemently disagree with you. Oh yes, because when you think of "listening" and "respecting" someone, you think of completely disregarding everything they say because they're just a privileged asshole blind to reality. Also, in order to "tear you a new asshole", they would have to actually speak fact, rather than blatantly lie about things that don't even pass the sniff test.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 04:42 PM
1

Delusions of the highest order Coming from the fal that apparently lies awake at night thinking about men she barely interacted with over the internet, to the point that you think you know everything about their beliefs and worldviews. Those guys were/are idiots, but it means nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 04:29 PM
0

Yeah, idiots tend to have a hard time understanding when they're being insulted for being an idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 04:18 PM
1

So they end up doing exactly what they think feminists do to men. *what everyone with a brain knows feminists do to men. Feminists are the ones who pushed for women to get primary custody (and now they pretend that was the patriarchy being sexist against them). Feminists are the ones who pushed for men being the assumed aggressor in domestic disturbances, even if he called the cops and is the only one with injuries. Feminists also made up the wage gap, as a way to lie about the earnings gap. Fem…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 04:10 PM
0

How you define it is irrelevant. What matters is how it's defined in general discussion and how it actually operates, because talk is cheap.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 04:02 PM
3

You start at go, you make it halfway across the game board, and then I just move you back to go. Where are you now?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 08:05 PM
1

A big part of modern socialist beliefs is that humans should be treated less as a product not more. Then they don't understand socialism. It is impossible to not turn the people into slaves for the "common good" under socialism.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 07:43 PM
6

Lol, do you not know what distributing products under socialism entails? Here's a hint, forcing people into acts that they don't want.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 07:41 PM
2

The score is only hidden for a day or so
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 07:12 PM
1

I think you’ve assumed that social adeptness = behaving like Jesus. It doesn’t mean behaving like Jesus or behaving like Lucifer. It‘s agnostic in that sense. Sure, but you're not just talking about "social adeptness", you keep bullshiting about "personality". So tell me, who's really the one "telling on themselves"? Because personality is reflected in your behavior, so it shouldn't matter if criminals, or even just assholes, are "socially adept" and good looking. Their objectively terrible pers…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/22 11:05 AM
1

It’s much harder to see and accept abuse for what it is when you trust a person (male or female). Oh, since I know you that means that you knocking my teeth out doesn't count as abuse. I know firsthand how dumb people can be, but come on now, even I have more faith. Also the vast majority of women do not stay with abusive partners. Funny that there's so much whining about it. Typically the answer is that supposedly these women have no choice but to stay, not that most have no trouble leaving and…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 06:58 PM
1

Bullshit, you don't know the personality of celebrities. Though with how stupid women are, I'd believe you if you said they thought they knew the actor's personality based on one role he played.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 06:46 PM
1

That sure is an interesting tag. I assume you think every white man is capable of visiting nonwhite countries constantly? Or are you saying white women are such massive sluts that it's impossible to exist around them without getting sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/22 06:38 PM
1

What in the world are you on about? You were agreeing with the nonsense notion that people don't naturally desire to have lovers. Now you're saying men have to seek out women, but why would they do that if they can have a perfectly fulfilling life without them?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 11:18 PM
0

I don't know how to make it any clearer. I quoted you saying women are greedy, and then I cut out the bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/22 11:15 PM
9

False. If this were true, we would have died out long before we discovered fire.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 03:13 PM
1

You'll always be compared to literally everyone because that's how the human brain works.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/22 03:00 PM
1

as a guy you should expect that women want to see you do more. We want you to be ambitious. And we really want to look up to you. No, you're just greedy and impossible to satisfy. You can't even grasp the concept of being content. Probably why there's more monks than nuns.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/22 06:42 PM
1

Again, all this nonsense you extrapolated out of thing air just to make it seem like having literal dick-measuring contests, isn't a weird thing that next to no one participates in. Also, by definition, choosing winners is an act of judgement, so maybe at least try to not wrap yourself up in your little rants.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 10:37 PM
1

Learn to read. My comments aren't edited. Everyone can see that there is no "backtracking" involved here. Which is why you magically don't quote me saying it (not that that actually matters since you can "quote" whatever you want) and you cut off this last quote before the part where I repeat what I actually said the first time. But I guess that's asking too much considering the revisionist history you put forth.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/22 10:25 PM
0

Damn, how did I miss this reply? You are free to have your opinions on what is and isn't boring, but it is a bit mind blowing that you think someone who doesn't want to spend the evening measuring dicks must be a boring person. As if every party includes literal dick measuring.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 06:46 PM
0

it was not unconstitutional IT literally is, as there is nothing in the constitution relating to abortion. And Laws are supposed to be made by the legislative branch, not forced in by the judicial branch. So don't pretend you give a fuck about men's rights Who's the one pretending? My main point for bringing it up in this instance is because it's relevant to the discussion. You're the one who went "Who cares about felons?" and then did a 180 and said that if they serve their time then they shoul…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 06:42 PM
1

How the fuck is this comment considered to be "promoting hate"? Hey u/PPDMods how did this comment get to stay up if Reddit thinks it "promotes hate"? At first I thought y'all were just being petty and giving me a back-to-back temp ban for calling you whiny. But no, Reddit gave me a temp ban over it, 5 days after I posted it, and didn't delete it? What the hell?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 06:23 PM
1

A planet is merely a chunk of rock hurtling through space, it being "healthy" is akin to a moral consideration, not something bound by science.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 06:17 PM
1

Temp-banned And I would argue that only applies to extreme fetishes, and especially the ones that require a partner to try. Even your masochist example sounds odd, as the person could have canned themselves, and if they didn't, then that means they never actually experimented, so would be disqualified from the point I wrote originally. And then we have to ask just how many people are in those communities, including the ones that wrongly assume they would like it, and for how many of the ones who…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 06:03 PM
1

Temp-banned The problem here is clearly a disagreement over definitions, and you being unable to even comprehend my view. Be honest here, would you apply this same definition of "equality" to any other team based activity? In any other instance, would you honestly say that every member should have the exact same amount of say, even if they don't provide the same amount of input? You see, I understand your view. You think one partner should be allowed to be a NEET (Not in Education, Employment, o…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 05:57 PM
1

Got temp-banned Or, men can continue doing what they already do, and what most women seem to prefer. In the end, someone has to be putting food on the table. If you can afford for both parents to cut back on work, so there is more overall family time, and that's what y'all want, literally no one is going to stop you. However, a lot of people can't afford to do that, and even fewer are willing to take the hit to their lifestyle for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 05:47 PM
1

Late because temp-ban The majority of pro-life people are willing to allow exceptions for rape. Stop hiding behind rape victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 05:44 PM
0

It literally was a right until just a week ago lol No, it was an unconstitutional mess beforehand. It meets exactly zero definition of "rights". Women vote at a higher percentage, but not by a huge margin Nice try, but considering the ratio between genders is rather evenly split (in fact last I knew it favored women), far more men are denied their right to vote (due to criminality), and you only need a 50.0000000000000000000000001% victory to win; you have no excuse. nd women are more likely to …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 05:40 PM
0

Man, see this is why whiners need to stop demanding temp-bans, this would have been more fun if I could have replied in a timely manner. you're just making shit up Nah, we literally had a "metoo" case about a woman who thought she was "raped" because she agreed to a three-way with her friends after having dinner at their place, as she "didn't want to ruin the mood" or some bull, by turning them down. If you agree to sex, it's not rape. We can make exceptions for threats of bodily harm to oneself…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 05:25 PM
1

Sorry, got a week ban and then just stayed away from Reddit for a bit. I didn't say war crimes, just regular crimes. And while I understand that not only criminals get into relationships, it's simply mentioned to disprove your claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 05:10 PM
1

What statistics are you looking at? Because the number of crimes committed don't even come close to equaling a majority of men. And that's if we pretend every criminal only ever commits one crime.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 09:20 PM
1

Well that's a complete lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 09:17 PM
2

the planet would be healthier with fewer humans", which is a fact Not a fact. AND does not mean anyone is calling for mass executions. If anyone made a similar comment about women, you'd be screaming to have them jailed.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 09:12 PM
1

and most people, including women, told him that it was a really bad, unethical idea .. Why are you lying when we can all see the comments?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 09:11 PM
2

Part of this is places like TRP , and the failed RPers in Incels created an environment where a mans worth is measured in the amount of sex from different women he can get. Lol, a man's worth has always been tied to the attention he gets from women. Now you can argue that it's the man's worth that earns him the female attention, but it's a distinction without a difference. In the end, if women thought he was valuable, they would give him attention. If his value doesn't earn attention, then at be…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 08:43 PM
1

You need people around you to build you up, This is at odds with your claims regarding self-esteem being 100% unaffected by others.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 08:13 PM
6

I agree with OP, but all men are just insecure losers Sure thing toots. This is what we call "shaming language". Only one problem, shame only works if the person you're trying to shame agrees with your premise, or cares about your opinion of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 07:08 PM
1

It's not necessarily feminization, but it really just all depends on what the career aspects are like for each person. Newsflash, most male dominated jobs aren't as flexible and don't care as much about "work/life balance".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 07:04 PM
2

Lol, funny how housework doesn't stop single men from getting good paying jobs and moving ip the corporate ladder. Also women don't want men that are their equals, though they sure do want someone better than them to treat them like an equal while simultaneously refusing to give up any of the benefits they get for not being equals. For instance, if the man is bringing in a larger share of the income, then as equals he would get more say in how the money is spent, but women demand a 50% say, but …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 07:01 PM
2

Then I come on PPD and see the most cringey stuff and I gotta say, it does lower my opinion of men in general. I'd say the same about women, but y'all get to post it in mainstream places and say all the same shit irl.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 06:37 PM
1

Man, maybe women really do need all these handouts, if they have the same mental faculties as you. There are more grants and welfare programs available to women than men. Even with women doing better than men in some of these areas. Then there's the sentencing gap between the sexes. Women are less likely to be arrested, charged, tried, or convicted of crimes, than a man committing a similar crime. Then, even if by some miracle this female criminal is convicted, she will also face a lighter sente…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 05:19 PM
0

Abortion isn't a right. And for all your whining about about who is and isn't a politician, there are more female voters than male. So why are you blaming the male politicians for following the will of their female constituents?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 05:06 PM
2

Roe v Wade never should have existed in the first place. If you psychos want to murder babies so badly because you think vaginal sex is a human right, then you should have actually went through the fucking legislative branch like you're supposed to. Instead of cheating and trying to circumvent the system.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 04:58 PM
1

Like marital rape was literally legal in all states until 1975, Well no, the idea was that it was impossible for a man to rape his wife. Because, since rape is so hard to prove, the only viable way to prosecute it, in all but the most extreme and violent cases, is to ask "How likely is it that this woman would agree to have sex with this man, at this time?" Like even 20 years ago shit like coercion and blackmail would have been debated on if it was rape or not, Define "coercion", because it seem…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 04:50 PM
3

Why won't this ridiculous notion die? You don't have to personally experiment something to know how you feel about it. It's like the idea that all virgin women must be prudes, because "obviously" if they weren't prudes then they would be whores, clearly there is no in-between. You can get a good idea of what you like sexually, through exploring with masturbation and pornography. And then you can discuss this with a potential partner. Yes, there will likely be things that you thought you'd love, …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/22 04:39 PM
2

It's not about the who, it's about the type. No one would complain if the hypothetical woman was dating men like them in the past. It's when there's a sudden and very notice shit in the type of man they date.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 05:14 PM
2

Ah yes, the people with problems talking to people are the ones with "stinky" personalities. Not the people that treat others like trash and commit crime for fun, because hey at least those guys have no trouble yelling at strangers.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 02:35 PM
1

Am I "doubting" myself when I say that I can't lift 50 tons? If not, then I have no doubts about myself or my abilities. I know exactly what I can and can't do presently.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/22 02:30 AM
1

And my point is, labeling the queer "community" as "all-inclusive", is where you fucked up. Well and calling it a "community" in the first place. If the only thing I share with you is a sexuality, then we aren't a community.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/22 03:47 AM
1

You're damn right that number is lower, but that's my whole point. Cost of living can vary wildly in the States. Heck even just between cities in the same state. So this minimum wage that you're proposing could never be one flat number. Then there's just the general question of how you're defining someone's ability to support themselves. How much food are they allowed to eat? Heck are they allowed to buy all organic nonsense, or do they just need to be able to afford the bargain brand stuff? How…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/22 03:42 AM
1

Except a woman can divorce a man because she has cheated and found someone else. So it still ties in perfectly with talking about divorce. You're the one claiming that a woman can never simultaneously be at fault for the divorce and be the one that files.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/22 03:29 AM
1

Well no, they're just too stupid to realize their own bias. It would be like if I said I have no preference for the color blue, but then every car I bought "just happened" to be blue, obviously I would be biased to the color blue.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/22 03:27 AM
1

It's real simple. Do you know how there's a racial sentencing gap? Which is partly why it's disingenuous to point to crime stats and claim black people are evil. Well there's also a gender sentencing gap, and it's even larger than the racial one. And part of this gender sentencing gap is that women are more likely to be let off with a warning, if they are arrested their charges are more likely to be dropped, if they are charged they're less likely to be convicted, and even if convicted they typi…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/22 03:22 AM
2

The way you try and make it sound is that bi people are all just dick loving straight girls who are lying about liking men and pretending to like women just to piss you off for some reason. Its weird dude. Talk is cheap. And deny it all you want, but claiming bisexuality is an easy way to try and get in on the fact that major corporation and some politicians are pandering to the lgbt "community". If you've never even attempted to date someone of the same sex, then what is even the point of claim…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/22 03:06 AM
1

LOL. Do you think I care if some rando calls me biphobic? You can't shame someone that has no relation to you nor reason to want your praise.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/22 02:51 AM
1

What the hell is a "plastic art"? And say what you will, there may be some wiggle room, and I have no trouble admitting that how someone acts can have an effect, but unless you're using filters, if I'm attracted to the picture, I'll be attracted to the real thing. Now sure, the personality may make me not want to go through with it, but that doesn't suddenly make the person ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/22 02:38 AM
1

First of all, what other comment? I may have confused someone else's comments with yours, since I was on mobile and scrolling during breaks, so I guess we'll just ignore this part. Can you imagine inviting someone who took that event that seriously? I can't imagine thinking a fun way to spend the evening would be asking a bunch of guys to whip their dicks out so me and my friend can measure them to see who has the biggest. And I am a foggat, so it's not like it's because I don't enjoy seeing ano…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/22 02:35 AM
1

There is noting uncivil about the comment you replied to. And the thing is, you can control your fat distribution to some degree. First off, there's always more exercise and less food. Then there's simply focusing the exercise you do, to target the areas where you don't want the fat. So it can be a minor character flaw, though it will depend on the exact circumstances, and how that fat person treats other fat people. I get the struggle, I have my own weight issues, but I won't lie about why they…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/22 02:29 AM
1

Attraction is partly innate so if she’s naturally not attracted to guys who take care of themselves but can’t help desiring hotties; Contradictory nonsense. If she "can't help" dating the "hotties", then clearly she IS naturally attracted to the guys who "take care of themselves".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/22 02:23 AM
1

How about no. If you have a problem, you are free to mute me or whatever functions Reddit has for cowards who don't know how to just ignore a conversation they're done with. Had you not replied, I would not be replying now.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/22 02:21 AM
1

I will certainly agree that people with a larger friend group seem more trustworthy, though I don't see how it's easier to talk to someone that's constantly surrounded by others, than it is to talk to someone that's by themselves or only has a couple people with them. If you make a bad impression on the loner, you still have a chance with the popular crowd, but if you mess up with the popular people that can have greater ripple effects, not to mention just having to deal with looking stupid in f…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/22 02:19 AM
1

Mobile games won’t replace console games. But some “gamers” get retarded about calling mobile gamers gamers. You say that, but practices made popular in mobile games have been creeping more and more into Triple A games. However, even if there was no need for concern on that front, console gamers and mobile gamers are not the same. Maybe it's stupid to call console gamers the "true gamers", but there is a difference, so that difference will be noted. It's not that much different from separating g…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/22 02:14 AM
2

Implying women never cheat, or that if they do it was the man's fault.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 12:53 AM
2

and a minimum wage that a person working 40hrs could at least support themselves bare minimum. You're going to have to be a lot more specific than that. I make just under $20/hour, but I was able to support myself, my grown sister that was unemployed, 3 large dogs (50lbs minimum, and I wasn't buying cheap food for them), 5 cats (again, the food isn't the best of the best, but it's not cheap either), and help out my brother. Now yes, I was living off of credit, but that was only because I had to …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/22 12:51 AM
7

I mean, we are. How do you know more men commit violent crime? Because more men are sentenced for committing violent crime. But if women aren't even being charged for their crimes, let alone convicted for them, then that dataset is tainted. Also, most people don't commit violent crimes, so you would be looking at a minority of the population anyhow, which doesn't disprove the idea that most people can be shitty people (as that is a much lower bar than, violent criminal).
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 10:14 PM
4

Okay, but why are men on average taller? Oh that's right, because they're the ones that are more likely to have children. And why is that? Because women prefer them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 10:08 PM
1

This just makes your other comment sound like complete bullshit. Why would anyone believe all that downplaying about how little it matters, when you're out here literally doing side by side comparisons and crowning the winners?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 10:00 PM
2

Seems like a contradiction if women report being more likely to date tall men, but sometimes there's no correlation between height and dating frequency for men. Clearly there's data that hasn't been collected.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 09:49 PM
0

And? No one has any control over what they're attracted to either.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 09:17 PM
3

woman was significantly more likely to message that unattractive man Message him first? Or just reply to the messages he sent her?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 09:13 PM
4

False. If more men "took better care of themselves", then women would simply adjust their standards to be even higher. If we believe everyone was considerably shorter in the past, then women's height preferences are a prime example.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 09:06 PM
4

The graph that doesn't specify if it's talking about "messaging first" or "replying"?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 09:02 PM
2

Aren't we talking about the house situation she mentioned? If so, then it sounds like the only way you think he could have "listened" is if he j7st let her "steamroll" him. Because there is no compromise in that situation, only one of them could get what they wanted. And in the end, since he's the one paying for everything, it's ridiculous to say he doesn't get the final say on the matter. We don't know what arguments she had against that house, aside from claiming it's "ugly". If that was her o…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 06:26 PM
1

The definition of "loser" is vague and worthless for any discussion due to varying from person to person.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 05:45 PM
1

At minimum a college education would least ensure financial independence Oh really? Then why are so many college grass just a bunch of babies whining about how they're stuck in debt?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 04:41 PM
1

u/operapeach point came through perfectly clear to me, but maybe that's because I'm a gay guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 03:08 PM
1

Your problem is having that nonsensical notion that all queer people are interchangeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 02:59 PM
3

Apparently you might be the one that doesn't understand how majorities work. You only need greater than 50% if you're looking for a super majority. As for determining majority here, it depends on how you want to link the data. "Met Online" is such a broad category, that it clearly isn't fair to keep all other points separate from each other, but the differences in the other points are so great that it may not be right to lump all of them together. In general I would break them into two categorie…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 01:59 AM
5

I don't know if it's possible to get any good data on this. From my understanding, women have a tendency to create an account, use it for a bit, and then delete (maybe because they found someone, maybe they just got bored). But then they come back later and make another account or reactivate their old one. So at any one time there may be more men than women, but overall the gap may not be as large, though I'd still assume it exists to some extent.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 01:41 AM
3

If you were able to survey every man and every woman that lived, and for simplicity's sake, we only count heterosexual encounters, both genders would have the same average n-count. The important question is, how was that average reached? For a real simple example, let's say we have 5 men and 5 women. If 1 man has sex with all 5 women, and the other 4 men remain virgins, then the "average" n-count is 1, for both genders. But that number isn't actually representative of the average man in our exam…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 01:33 AM
2

Once again you advocate for men to try getting into and then slipping out of the friendzone.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 01:16 AM
1

Then I misunderstood your mention of some big dicked dude in that first comment talking about this guy. So his only "good" quality is that he is dominant? Though really this conversation is only making less sense as time goes on. OP clearly stated that the man had to be dominant if he wanted to be memorable. And your counter evidence is a dominant obese guy with a small dick? It worked a lot better when you claimed you were the dominant one during PiV, though I guess that could be thrown out if …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 01:03 AM
1

Aggression and doing something "harder" go hand-in-hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:57 AM
2

Well then you are simply wrong. Even this sub-Reddit we are on right now practices gatekeeping. And undoubtedly, you as well practice it in virtually every aspect of your life. You wouldn't let someone who exclusively rides motorcycles, join your bicycle race, would you? IF you did, you would quickly see your bicycle club turn into a motorcycle club. It's the same with gaming, I mean have you heard the nonsense going on with Diablo Immortal? As I told Decoy, if you don't gatekeep, then either yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:56 AM
2

Completely false. Without gatekeeping, you are left with a ruined environment full of nothing but lowest common denominator slop at best. At worst, others will muscle in, change it to fit them, and then force you out and practice gatekeeping themselves. Funnily enough, video games are a great example. Nobody was actually stopping women from playing video games, in fact gamers wanted nothing more than a gamer girl waifu. And in return we get Anita Sarkesians coming in with a list of demands, clai…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:45 AM
0

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm You say that, and yet that sounds like just as toxic of a relationship, but still she stays and nags instead of leaving.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:39 AM
0

I will simply redirect you to my second sentence again.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:34 AM
1

If they're not related, then that means you're just poisoning the well and now back-peddling on your conflation of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:26 AM
3

Only a virgin is capable of lying about their virginity. And no matter what, they are still a virgin, so the act is being done by a virgin, so it qualifies as "acting like a virgin"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:18 AM
1

Ah, the problems with not living on Reddit, morons delete their accounts so responses can do nothing. That aside, for anyone else that stumbles upon this little thread, try to think of the last time you saw an official advertisement for porn, that wasn't on a porn site, in a porn video, or in some other porn medium like a picture/book/magazine. Maybe there are still some ads on TV, but even then they were usually only on "adult" (though not necessarily pornographic) channels and usually only lat…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:16 AM
1

Then you know that slow and steady actually can be much better.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:10 AM
1

If he is thrusting "harder and deeper" then he is by definition being rougher than the previous thrusts. And you specifically said you need that to be driven "wild".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:08 AM
1

In that case, it fails completely. Your two examples were Seen as objects, entire value on looks Pregnancy But isn't a difficulty, especially when the scale is so far skewed. Average women are still considered extremely valuable This is a choice, which you are free to never experience Of course, we could just put all that aside and talk about how that wasn't even really the topic of their comment. The discussion was about why a man owning a sex bot is seen as an embarrassment. It wasn't till the…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:07 AM
1

I should mention that he's 5'8 and obese but he does not struggle for pussy, like at all. You already mentioned he had a big dick, so this doesn't really help with anything. It just pushes the size queen narrative. Though it certainly does change the perception of your story. As for the story itself, I mean obviously this isn't a porn forum, but you've given us nothing to work with. Though what little you do provide, just pushes the narrative that women actually want to be manipulated, especiall…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 11:53 PM
1

I mean if he directly lied to you, then fair enough for you to be upset about it. I separated the questions, because I don't feel that simply not mentioning something (but also not avoiding it if it comes up) shouldn't be a big deal. Though there certainly are exceptions but that would be for very serious topics.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 11:45 PM
2

I mean, I guess we could argue over whether lying actually changes anything, but by definition they are still a virgin and therefore doing what a virgin (them) does.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 11:41 PM
1

because the premise of his thread is that it’s impossible to make a good sandwich with tomatoes because supposedly all patrons dislike them. False, the premise is that only sandwiches with tomatoes won't be enough. Do you have any idea how fucking pissed I’d be if a waiter brought me food without taking my order? Not applicable, because you did order a sandwich, you just didn't ask and the waiter didn't mention that there was tomato on said sandwich. Of course, considering what we're trying to m…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 11:40 PM
1

It's certainly rougher than thrusting softer and shallower. So by definition, and by comparison, it would be "rough sex".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 11:32 PM
1

Your reply is very gate-keeping. There's nothing wrong with gatekeeping.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/22 05:19 PM
-2

Well maybe try not being unreasonable, and then your partner might take what you say into consideration. I don't actually care about the ins and outs of your relationship, but you left yourself wide open for that one. It is funny though how you assume there's no possibility that the woman could be the one in the wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 01:49 AM
1

Women get annoyed when they are always expected to decide where to eat or when they always have to make plans. Sure sounds like a load of bullshit to me. How in the hell could a LIVING creature get fed up with deciding what food they ingest? But for all your whining about the natural order (the strong command the weak) being "evo psych", you sure are quick to fall on it yourself to give excuses to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 01:46 AM
1

If you don’t believe in yourself not matter how good of a person or choice you think you are, why would any woman trust you enough to feel the same? Presumably because women are their own people that don't need men to do all the thinking for them, but I guess they can't think for themselves apparently. It is always a good laugh though, to see women claiming they have all these magical abilities to sense if a man isn't perfect, yet then we hear all this whining about how so many of the men, women…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 11:01 AM
1

That's not misogyny. Even if we just assume your analysis is correct, it's not men's fault if women have a lower standard. Just like it's not women's fault in the west that men have a lower standard. And the latter certainly wouldn't be misandry. Of course logic dictates that females will be pickier than males, and an overabundance of males (or shortage of females, however you want to frame it) will inevitably exasperate that natural tendency.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 10:42 PM
4

No. Because I don’t waste time on people who aren’t interested in me. If asking for a phone number is the only way to show interest, then why the fuck would he want your number when you did literally nothing? You show 0 interest in him, but he's supposed to ask you out regardless? Now I'm certain you're rewriting everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 05:19 PM
1

Or there’s another deeper reason more men don’t just leave the game. I'm sorry to be the one to inform you of this, but even children can understand that this is the answer. It's called evolution and the desire to procreate, and it's hardwired in. Then there's the deadly poison known as "hope", which is arguably as bad as "fear".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 02:32 AM
2

And why should anyone care about your opinion in this regard? The answer is, they shouldn't unless they wanted to date you, or at the least wanted to be your friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 02:29 AM
1

You very much so said men had it easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 02:25 AM
1

Lol, damn
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 02:23 AM
1

You keep mentioning prostitutes, as if that isn't illegal in the US (where most of the people on here are from), and like they don't have other potential problems that would make someone think twice about hiring them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 02:23 AM
2

Humans are crazy good at spotting fake humans, to the point that very realistic robots very often trigger feelings of uneasiness and discomfort in humans during basic interactions with such robots This makes no logical sense, as we would have had no way of developing this trait. It would have to be a secret trait that was literally useless for however long you think humans have existed, yet for some reason managed to persist till now when it may start to be useful.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 02:19 AM
5

You seem to have completely misunderstood. OP was saying that men see virginity as a good thing, in women. Not that they see it as a good thing in other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:50 AM
8

To answer your original question, being a virgin isn’t a red flag. Acting like one is. It is by definition impossible for a virgin to act like anything but a virgin
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:44 AM
5

If it was soooo important to your decision to sleep with him, why didn't you ask? Or are you saying he lied to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:40 AM
2

Someone has never heard of edging it seems.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:28 AM
1

No, your the one who is unable to comprehend. They are quite literally saying that if they never got dominant sex, they wouldn't like the partner. That is not at all the same as saying they don't have a preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:24 AM
2

So he should assume his wife is a liar? I don't know chief, that sounds pretty misogynistic to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:22 AM
1

, it was you thinking you knew what women like better than they did. Except what they liked was the opposite of gentleness, so it quite literally was his gentleness that made him a bad lover. If they had liked gentleness, he would have been just fine. This nonsense is like saying "It's not the fact that he didn't like tomatoes that made your sandwich bad, it's that you didn't ask if he liked tomatoes." If the man in my analogy liked tomatoes, the lack of communication would not magically make hi…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:20 AM
2

How exactly are you being brainwashed into wanting something you don't actually want, when that thing is barely advertised and no one is forcing you to consume it. People choose the porn they want to see.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:13 AM
2

My best was dominant at When we did PIV I was the dominant one So he wasn't dominant
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:08 AM
2

So you require rough sex to be driven wild? Why haven't the mods deleted this comment for not challenging OP's view?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 01:06 AM
10

that I lost my virginity in my teens and that have had a good dating / sex life ever since You got lucky while young, which gave you confidence, which got you success, which bolstered your confidence. You're absolutely useless to someone that didn't get lucky young, so lacks the confidence needed for success, which means it just gets worse from then on. As for your claims to be autistic, just barely touching the low extreme doesn't say much.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/22 12:46 AM
1

Creating a lie isn't worthy effort.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 01:30 AM
1

Ah yes, a "two way thing" in which only one partner ever has to compromise. That's definitely the correct definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 01:26 AM
1

just suffer through it. 🤔 so sex isn't something women enjoy? Because the circumstances required for me to consider participating in any task I ENJOY as "suffering" are so extreme, that they could only occur once in a decade at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 01:25 AM
1

There is quite literally no way in hell that you live with someone and don't do things with them. And by definition, everything you do with your partner is something you are doing "as a couple". So I guess your definition of "dates" is clearly a lie just to make yourself sound better.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 01:22 AM
1

Ah yes, more men must be perfect at everything, because how dare he think he can be a human and be worthy of a relationship. And you fucks have the audacity to claim it's men asking women to be superhuman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 01:16 AM
1

And yet men sure seem to owe women quite a bit. Alimony can not be described in any truer way than you owning your ex for as long as said alimony is enforced.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 01:05 AM
0

Yes yes yes, literally everything is always the man's fault. If you're just going to parroting everyone else's bullshit, why even bother?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 12:57 AM
2

If all of this were actual factors, then you would see it manifest at similar rates in men. Or really it should be higher in men seeing as men are much more likely to work higher stress jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 12:53 AM
1

No, that's reality, but it must be nice to be so privileged that you think stress should be rare at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 12:48 AM
1

Except this clearly isn't a thing because we can look at men who have little, to no experience, and yet are very much so interested in sex. You're the one arguing the difference is negligible, if you even admit it exists, so you have to explain the disparity.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 12:44 AM
1

Even today, if even a goddamn film is speculated to be female-cebtric, men on the internet protest in their droves (or outright refuse to watch it). This doesn't happen, any where. Though I guess it depends on whether you actually mean "female-centruc" or just "films with female leads".if the former, there's no protesting, but it's not that odd that most men would choose a different activity. The latter, history shows that having a female lead doesn't stop men from watching it and enjoying it. B…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 12:41 AM
0

you value me as a person They haven't kicked you out and think I’m hot They want to have sex with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 12:33 AM
3

So what exactly is the purpose of dates, if you're supposed to already know every little detail about each other?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 12:16 AM
0

Oh, so "just" become friends with everyone and anyone who is female, remotely your type, ages 18 - 23. and then if any of them send out the magic nonsense "signals" (that they use due to their cowardice) that look exactly the same as them just being friendly (and "how dare you" if you get them mixed up), that's when you make your move? Yeah, that's totally not just a bunch of nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/22 12:10 AM
1

She literally said that she wanted him to do the entertaining. There is no leap being made.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:05 PM
1

Also isn’t it better for her to not date a guy whose personality she dislikes so he finds someone who likes it Oh, it's definitely better for both of them that they don't date. As to the bad-mouhting, do I really have to explain to you how using solely negative language about someone is bad mouthing them?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 05:00 PM
1

Yes, they "didn't click" because she wanted him to be her dancing monkey. Though there's no "horror" in that, the problem only starts when women and simps try to pretend that isn't what's going on.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 04:12 PM
1

Except clearly she wants to be the "boring" one
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 04:10 PM
8

showed that women still messaged Messaged first, or just replied? And how did these replies/messages go? swiped significantly more men across the scale apart from that 20% I'd have to look at the numbers again before I can say anything about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/22 07:34 PM
-1

This is pure speculation in the absence of information. Maybe, doesn't make it wrong though. Hell, just yesterday I overheard some women talking, and the one was bad mouthing her last date because "his personality was bland" and she doesn't "want to be the one who has to make things interesting".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 11:07 PM
1

Because 90% of the time, the past comments/posts are unrelated. If you're hunting through someone's past remarks, then clearly you have no faith in your own words and just want a reason to dismiss your opposition. And if you're going to quote a fictional character, at least quote the author so the words have some credibility. Especially if the quote is about choice, you know, that thing that fictional characters lack?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 11:01 PM
1

And smart poor is fine cuz usually they're on the path to become financially comfy. Lol, what was that about not hanging out with gold diggers? But hey, it's always nice to see a woman admit to what she really cares about, even if she doesn't realize it herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 02:06 AM
3

How are you harrassed by other people saying things that you'll likely never see unless you hunt it down or get it shoved in your face by people you agree with? The existence of FDS sure didn't silence any of the Redpill guys on this sub. Of course, I don't really buy into cyber harrassment in the first place, especially if users have the ability to mute and/or block others.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 04:28 PM
1

If you’ve ever killed a living breathing animal by hand you’d know what it feels like to take a life. It weighs on your soul, and will give you new perspective on life when you have to kill something in order to eat when you want meat I have killed a few creatures in my time, though never because I wanted to, and I always made quick work of it. Well aside from that one possum where I didn't have the tools on hand to make that quick. And yes it did weigh on me for a time. That said, apparently yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 09:30 PM
1

If that's true, then so be it, but in that case, we should rethink legislating it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 09:19 PM
1

That would depend on the cause of the miscarriage. Obviously there are times when fetus dies through no fault of the mother or anyone else. You wouldn't charge someone for manslaughter if their roommate passed away in the middle of the night due to natural causes.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 09:17 PM
8

I mean, I've never been choked but surely there's a reason auto erotica asphyxiation is a thing. My understanding is that it provides some type of high, either from the limited oxygen or because of the rush of oxygen returning.
/r/AntiFeminists24/04/22 10:28 PM
1

So in other words, you don't actually have any idea how much "revenge porn" exists of men, because men aren't as effected by it. Why would I care if a woman put out a recording of us having sex? Now since it doesn't work, smart women won't bother with it. Bit the stupid women, who fell for the feminists nonsense about there being no mental differences between men and women, surely might.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 05:42 PM
0

Well yes, having free reign to commit murder so as to avoid being inconvenienced in any fashion, most certainly would count as a privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 05:25 PM
7

Gay men were more likely to require medical attention and suffer injuries as a result of IPV. So this just says men don't hold back against other men, like they would with a woman, and/or men are more likely to fight back against an abusive man.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 05:08 PM
1

That source doesn't focus solely on "lifetime" stats. If you think it's acceptable to ignore the more accurate statistics, then you can't whine about me ignoring the less accurate statistics.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 04:36 PM
1

You keep mentioning the "lifetime" statistics, but those are so prone to error as to be worthless. Especially when we compare them to the "past 12 months". If every year, roughly the same number of men as women are being raped, then how do the lifetime numbers become so different?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 03:10 PM
1

Ah, I disagree with you so I must just be glued to Fox News. Funnily enough, isn't that a rather typical response from someone in your position? And even more so, isn't that exactly how Fox would claim you would respond? I mean, you must know better than me, after all, you wouldn't just throw out wild accusations with no actual experience on the subject at all, would you? But what can I expect? I mean after all, you sure seemed pretty sure about your claim that the "West coast is simply better l…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 07:56 PM
1

more women are sexually abused and harrassed. Not according to the CDC, as I already told you. But hey, you like to ignore everything, so why are you even bothering to reply? LOL "Hey buddy, I see that you're getting your ass kicked, but it would be toxic of me to step in. You need to learn to protect yourself, or life will be worse for you. No hard feelings eh? Have a good day you two."
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 07:52 PM
1

The only one lying to themselves would be you. As I said, if so many women are "left wing", then there would be no right wing states. Hell, we take voting away from some criminals, and most criminals are men. So if we also had most women being left, then how are there still any right wing politicians? Let me guess, you also believe in the wage gap? And before you get too whiny, yes there is an earnings gap, but that's not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 07:43 PM
1

Well no, I wouldn't qualify it as rape, because I'm not an idiot. The part you are missing, because I left it out, is I never got past oral with a gal, but I did go all the way with another guy. You also keep running with this slut nonsense, despite my already telling you it doesn't fit. Obviously a child experimenting is not comparable to a late teenager or adult choosing to sleep around. That said, I am not the type to sleep around, as I feel I already mentioned, but that may have been to some…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 07:40 PM
1

So, you think BLM speaks for all black Americans, or what? There is absolutely no reason that I should not be allowed to criticize any movement. The only one throwing out racist sentiments seems to be you. For fuck's sake, apparently all you saw was the "BLM" in my comment, because if you had actually read it, you would clearly see that I didn't say anything about black Americans as a whole. I only talked about the organization and used one example of a person they got behind. Would it have been…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:54 PM
1

West coast is simply better living Well this is objectively false, but I see your problem. I haven't spent much time in the south. My state is in the north, and most of the other states I visited were also in the north.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:48 PM
1

Listen here toots, red state men don't care if a baby murderer doesn't want to have sex with them. But it is funny that you seem to think you can speak for all women, when the pro-life movement is mostly made up of women (it's men who tend to be neutral on the topic, for what should be obvious reasons, even to you), and since women are actually the majority, that means they are what's keeping red states red. I'm sure you'll go on about your internalized soggy knees, but these women clearly disag…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:45 PM
1

LOL, you know, you could simply read what I have wrote, instead of being a retard. I mean for fuck's sake, I have already made it clear that I can compromise on abortion with women that are the victims of rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:36 PM
1

There's no deep thought behind admitting that most people will be at or below the average levels of everyone else. It's really just about as basic as basic gets. And you didn't really address the point. "Women like interesting men", but what exactly is it that they find "interesting" about these men, and why? It seems they only find it so, because that's what they have been told to do all their lives. As for the traveling bit, there's nothing to apologize about. I was lucky enough to get to see …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:29 PM
1

No, it doesn't show that, unless you're one of those crazy people who think men and women are perfectly the same on the inside, and therefore we just need to fix all these broken girls, I mean bad boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:05 PM
1

Two obvious problems with your example. One, this already happens just as it did in your case. And two, just because YOU do not offer some small assistance, doesn't mean she is unable to get assistance. There is nothing stopping her from requesting it herself. Also, if she denies your assistance and is then hurt, then it is really no different from you not offering help in the first place. Arguably, it could make her feel worse, as she won't be able to blame you for not offering to help, the bla…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 05:59 PM
1

but it’s not a walk on roses for most women either (sexual assault, rape, violence, kidnapping…) So, you have a list of exceedingly rare CRIMES, and not even all of which you can actually definitively say are worse for women. Despite your claims that women are the main targets of sexual assault/rape, you have no way to prove this and the statistics aren't entirely on your side. For at least 2 years in a row, the CDC found that men and women were sexually assaulted at the similar rates, in fact m…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 05:50 PM
1

Nope, they were the spearheads from the start. Because newsflash, poor women already had to have jobs outside of the home, unless they had far too many young children, in which case they were busy doing the actual hard work that child rearing and housekeeping was before modern appliances.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 05:26 PM
1

Regardless, I doubt you would say that a man who spends a lot on a date once has to spend exactly that much on every subsequent date or he’s not really interested Bravo, without realizing it, you did unconsciously understand what I typed. I very clearly said that women have a pass to stick their hands in the fire once. The debate is about how often it truly is ONLY one time. If the man in your example spent hundreds of dollars on every date, across multiple women, then you would have to be stupi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 05:23 PM
1

What's another phrase for "not interested in romantically"? Oh right, "not having feelings for". So she is "good" at separating feelings that she doesn't have? But when she actually does have these feelings, then she is completely incapable of separating them. separating feels from sex". If she could separate her "feels from sex", then she would have no trouble having sex with someone she liked, even knowing he may just leave afterwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 05:11 PM
1

And where exactly is this "armpit"? You know, I thought about mentioning more about my city, though I want to keep it vague and I didn't think you'd have trouble with such basic concepts. I live in one of the largest cities in my state, not some backwater town of 300 people with nothing in it. Sure we may not have as much readily available entertainment as SoCal, but there is plenty to be had, and no where near the same rate of drugs, criminality, nor homelessness. And really, how can it be good…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 05:04 PM
1

LOl, come now. You are the one who thinks women, who apparently won't even bother reporting real rapes, are suddenly going to start reporting every instance of consensual sex as a rape, just in case they get pregnant and want to abort? And I'm the one incapable of critical thought. But listen here, abortion isn't about "bodily autonomy", that's only what idiots too stupid to actual comprehend the situation say. We all know pregnancy is a possible result of sex. If you consented to sex, then you …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 04:55 PM
1

Unfortunately, I lost my virginity well before I was 10, but back when I did date, yeah I wasn't rushing for sex. Sure I may have the fantasies ever know and then of having a harem, or being with a slut, but I've never even bothered attempting to make those realities. Also, your point about only having sex if you want kids is ridiculous. Now yes, I would never condone my wife getting an abortion (unless it was fairly certain that she would die in childbirth), so I would be prepared for that poss…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 04:51 PM
1

Thanks for the Bill Maher clip that actually proves the Red Pill's points. Though I don't know what it has to do with "men being unimpressed with cooperating".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 04:41 PM
2

What is there to disagree with? It's a simple fact that every choice you have made in the past, along with the choices of others, is what has lead you to this point right now. If you had had a different past, made different choices, you would not be reading my late reply whenever you get to it. It works exactly the same with everything else in life. I guess you may be trying to argue about how people can change, but even that is still dictated by the choices they made previously.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 04:32 PM
1

LOL, sure thing
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 04:29 PM
1

horniness inhibits rational thinking in adults Does it though? I mean, you're dangerously close to making an argument that I'm sure you very much would disagree with here. Though you do save it a little bit by tacking on the "low impulse control" bit, but that in itself has nothing to do directly with horniness, and you're just making women look even more like children.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 04:29 PM
1

What the fuck are you on about? She brought up BLM, and it's not my fault if that organization does nothing but focus on race, to the point of ignoring context. Though it works very well, as I said, because feminism does the same nonsense with sex. If a man kills a woman, they don't bother to ask why, they just assume he only did it because she is a woman, as if that is actually the case in any but the rarest of circumstances. Sure in a detached way, it may be connected, but it is hardly ever th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 04:26 PM
1

Well of course, I won't agree with someone who is blatantly wrong. The only difference between gender and sex, is that sex is very narrow and specific, whereas gender is is more broad and general. Gender simply attaches culture to sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 04:18 PM
1

Men commit more crimes, A small percentage of men commit crime. So explain how something that almost no men partake in, is indicative of the nonsense known as "toxic masculinity".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 11:17 PM
1

You don't demonstrate any fundamental signs of emotional maturity. You're one to talk, when everything you've said her is about how women have no emotional maturity and think of men as nothing but slaves that ought to be able to read her mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 11:09 PM
1

On the other hand, men need to do a better job holding other men accountable and assisting women who find themselves in an abusive or dangerous situation. And what more can men do? You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make them drink. It doesn't matter how much assistance men offer, if women refuse to make use of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 10:34 PM
1

Feminism was pushed by socially inept, abused women in the beginning. 🤣 what was that about "integrity"? Feminism was pushed by bored housewives that had little to do because their rich husbands employed maids.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 10:29 PM
4

and have very uninteresting lives. By defining the vast majority of people will lead "uninteresting" lives. Though maybe the real question should be why the nonsense that is generally considered "interesting", is thought of s such. For instance, you mentioned travel, I have had the chance to travel, I don't see what is so interesting about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 10:24 PM
2

🤣 fucking what? Did you seriously just try to claim that the drive to reproduce is actually "the creative drive"?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 09:55 PM
1

Uh huh, so why is your anecdote worth more than the endless anecdotes of horrible men having no trouble finding girlfriends, and the other commentor's anecdote of their friend who clearly isn't sexist or suffering from a "victim mentality" (though can we take a moment to have a hearty laugh at women complaining about men having a "victim mentality" when y'all constantly pretend the world is more dangerous for you,despite every stat in existence saying men are far more likely to be the victims of…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 12:45 AM
1

You're one to talk, consider going off of looks is the stupidest way to try and figure out who parented a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 12:00 AM
1

You'd have to be a moron to think that men have no care for whether or not they like the women they are with. And have sub-room temperature levels of IQ to think the women have no say whatsoever. If she doesn't like him, then how exactly is the relationship/sex occurring?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 11:42 PM
2

Most men are obese Not in the US%20than%20men%20(6.9%25).), though it is close, and women aren't that far behind men play video games Women like to claim they're 50% of gamers, so this shouldn't be an issue. But let's be honest, if video games didn't exist, there's movies and television. And before them we had tabletop role playing games, board games, and books. don't make enough money to sustain himself, let alone dressing up nice and taking women on dates. Why do women deserve a random man's m…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 11:34 PM
1

So explain how there is more porn, and it's more readily available, yet there is less rape. Or do you think there is more rape now in 2022, than there was in the 1800s, or any other time in history when you would claim women were treated as nothing but property? This is quite literally no different from claiming that Mortal Kombat, GTA, and CoD make children into violent murderers, despite the fact that murder rates have been on a downward trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:58 PM
0

Well you'd have to be a woman to think something so stupid. If we say 50% of men are criminals (the actual amount would be much lower, but we'll use this for simplicity's sake), and the world population is 50/50 on gender, then that would mean only 0.51% of women commit crimes (or abot 20.4 million women, which is much better than the 2 billion men in the example). You ain't all angels full of love and empathy, no matter how much you bullshit about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:55 PM
1

Not particularly specific at all, especially when OP (you know, the person being replied to) has made the stupid claim that you can't watch porn and have sex irl. And just the general view that only "losers" watch porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:43 PM
0

This is exactly why I've never understood what men see in porn.. They see hot women. It's not complicated, but hey, you're agreeing with an idiot who doesn't know the definition of the word he's throwing around, and he thinks it's impossible to watch porn and have sex irl. So I can't say I'm surprised by your inability to think creatively or critically.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:40 PM
0

it reduces gray matter, is similar in addictiveness to hard drugs, trains you to only get off looking at a screen, if you grip your dick too hard you can't get up for real sex, drains you of important nutrients Except none of this could possibly be limited to specifically digital porn, aside from the moronic claim that it makes people unable to get off without a screen. Every last one of these, if true, would be problems with masturbation in general, and even with having actual sex. The computer…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:34 PM
1

But the pornstar isn't your girl. It's like claiming you're cucked because that cute girl you saw on the street has a boyfriend/husband. She's not yours, so you can't be cucked by her. But I can agree with your last sentence, when we have idiots so passionate about topics they clearly lack any understanding of.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:30 PM
1

At least we know what "cucking" actually involves, instead of being so retarded that you mix up cuckoldry with voyeurism.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:27 PM
1

If you're staring at the cock, then you're doing it wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:25 PM
1

It doesn't, but what can we expect when you don't even know the difference between voyeurism and cuckoldry?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:24 PM
1

To who? Is it "gross" for a gay person to watch straight porn? What about all these women into watching gay men go at it? But no matter your answer, let me let you in on a secret. No man gives a single fuck if someone thinks it's "gross" for him to watch "lesbian" porn. And I used quotes, because let's be honest, most of those women aren't lesbians, and may not even be bisexual. They're just doing the old "gay for pay".
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:22 PM
1

Lol, people really choose to live in places where their money is worthless? I've never broken $50k in a single year, yet I have a nice 2 story house with a mere $500/month mortgage.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:15 PM
1

Because we have brains and don't need to use drugs to hide how pathetic we are?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:11 PM
1

sincerely, a man who doesn’t have crippling self-hatred Sure pal. Is that why you too are on Reddit, attempting to shame people you don't know with impossible scenarios? But hey since you asked the other guy, I haven't spoken to my mother in over 6 years. Of course, she happens to be dead, but what a minor detail, amirite? And I spent the afternoon cutting down trees, does that count as "touching grass"?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 11:08 PM
1

Why is the subreddit misspelled
/r/AntiFeminists28/03/22 06:29 PM
7

The second sentence is true. That doesn't mean the first is as well.
/r/AntiFeminists27/03/22 06:16 PM
1

Sex with possible love interest: more likely to fall in love and have your heart broken. So in other words, she actually can't separate sex from feelings at all, despite you claiming she's "good" at it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 11:28 AM
1

If it's so irrelevant, why would she lie about it? Because it's actually completely relevant. If she told him, "oh I have casual sex all the time, heck I've even been doing so while we've been dating. I'm just making you wait for vague and arbitrary reasons." Then like any rational person, he would end the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 11:25 AM
1

You can't keep making comments like this, and then whine about people not giving you enough credit. The "reason to lie" is so far beyond obvious, that it's impossible to miss. H wants sex, and he feels that M's constant rejection is a sign of disinterest. So in order to keep H on the hook, M lies about why they aren't having sex. If she told him the truth, that she was making him wait for vague and arbitrary reasons, then he would wise up and end the relationship. You can whine all you want abou…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 11:18 AM
0

The only ridiculous thing here, is women's constant desire to portray themselves as bumbling buffoons. Maybe if she was still in high school, or that "one time" truly was only one time and it was the first relationship she ever had, then it's believable that it doesn't tell us anything about her. But outside of those parameters, it tells us that any man she makes wait, she deems lesser than the men (because no one is going to believe it was only once in any other circumstance) she didn't make wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 10:49 AM
1

Our past dictates our future
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 10:42 AM
1

Okay, but then it becomes a chicken or the egg thing (even if everyone with a brain knows that a chicken must have hatched out of a non-chicken egg first). Did they always have "bad" personalities, and that's why they couldn't date? Or where they unable to find dates and therefore their personality deteriorated?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 11:41 PM
0

women are not as desperate for sex so they’re willing to shoot for the best without settling for just any sex with some average or below average guy. Then why aren't the vast majority of women sexless virgins hunting for their prince charming? If sex is so unnecessary, and they'll only ever give in to the best, then they should be doing everything but having sex with random men. And the laws of nature that dictate most men will be average or below, would mean that the vast majority of women woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 11:29 PM
1

I mean, this isn't even true though. For one thing, you don't get rich by wasting money. Plenty of rich people will buy reasonably priced clothing for good quality. On the other hand, plenty of poor people will spend money they don't have, on over priced garbage to give the illusion that they are well off, and as a result keeping themselves from actually being well-off.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 11:25 PM
1

Men aren't the ones complaining about Superman being an Adonis with impossible musculature. Don't project women's inability to separate fiction from reality onto men. Also, I like how you tack on that "No one is immune" line, after going on about how men are so much worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 11:21 PM
1

However if he had a massive chip in his shoulder from a bad breakup and anger issues women with an abundance of desirable traits will likely reject him. Unless again if this woman for example came from an abusive home where his behavior was normalized. Except all of this is disproven by even a cursory glance at, well anything relating to women. Plenty of women with no history of abuse, and with "an abundance of desirable traits", will want their own little fixxer-upper project. Also, youy haven'…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 11:18 PM
2

Big tech is owned by men Apex fallacy, and no one knows who you are, so trying to poison the well by calling the sub "cringe" is useless. Insults only work if the person is already insecure about the issue, or they care about your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 11:01 PM
1

I mean the sub was called toxic, so maybe we can let that one slide. But they did claim there's just a bunch of "bois" (could be seen as an insult against their maturity by using "boys" instead of "men") who somehow have never talked to women, which is a clear connection to all the other insults that u/Hoosker-Doos mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 10:58 PM
1

Here ya go
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 10:16 PM
2

My bad, since I took so long replying, I just thought I had linked it, though I was on my phone with the original reply, so I should have known I didn't. Give me a minute.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 10:01 PM
1

Why would I ever call myself a feminists? That aside, if you had the ability to define these words, then you would take the wind out of the sails for many of these "transphobes". I'm a firm believer that men make the best women, but it's simply a fact that they aren't actually women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 09:55 PM
1

And? You listed 5 things as if all 5 were necessary. I simply addressed the most egregious ones, which happened to be more than half your list. Have approached 1000 women (this'll take about 2 years) I don't see much wrong with this advice, outside of the fact that it's a completely arbitrary number. Why shouldn't they have to approach 10,000 women before being "allowed" to use the incel label? After all, 2 years (I am a bit curious as to where you got that number from, it's more than 1 woman a …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 09:53 PM
1

If you aren't in a place where you showcase your dancing skills, they're irrelevant. You may try to argue some nonsense about it changing how you move in general, but it's just that. As for being able to fight, again, unless you are in a situation where you think it will matter, it's not going to show through. If you don't foresee a fight occurring, then you will not have any damage done to your "confidence". I guess if you're only interacting with hoodrats or trailer trash, and therefore in con…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 09:43 PM
1

then why did she say yes? Because it being "inappropriate" only matters if the other person doesn't like you, or wishes to get back at you later. Are you trying to imply that if she had asked you out, you would have told her no, solely because it's considered inappropriate by "polite society"? The second cousin wasn’t eager to actively betray the first, but she was still receptive. the first cousin was the dramatic one who liked to start shit and presumably still does. The second cousin did even…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 09:37 PM
1

So every man that asked you out, was good to you, but every man (or should I say "boy" since you mentioned school?) that you asked out, treated you bad? I mean, without numbers there's nothing to go on here (especially if I'm reading it correctly that you're only experience asking men out was in high school or earlier). Putting that aside though, why is it that women can show interest without taking the risk, but men apparently aren't capable of doing so? Another question to ask would be if you …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 09:14 PM
1

I didn't say she was attacking a specific man, and she most certainly was including looks in that general raising of the bar. Though, even if she would be fine with a troll of a man getting with a supermodel, so long as he was far better in other areas, it still doesn't address the fact that she thinks all women, regardless of looks and/or personality, should be demanding higher standards of their partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 09:05 PM
1

If you know they can't follow through, and that even if they somehow managed to, it would be ineffective, then it's not a "threat". Sure block whoever you want, I simply don't see why you would lie about your reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 09:00 PM
1

Where is the luck? That would imply that the existence of the calendar is somehow a danger to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 08:55 PM
1

I think you should offer a link and time to the part you think I agree with. I have no idea what you mean by this. I already quoted you saying that women who move to the first world, and then start acting like first world women aren't "bad women". And the entirety of the joke is about a woman being moved to the US from Africa, and then demanding half of her husband's assets in divorce (and you can't even argue alimony here, because clearly she did nothing to make Chris wealthy, as he was already…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 08:54 PM
1

I'd be okay with that as long as the dad is forces to undergo the same physical consequences up to and including death. Just because I think all of a sudden men like you would change your tune and it would be hilarious. Again, I have no love for male whores, so the only reason I would "change my tune" is because the situations are different, and therefore, like anyone with a brain, I treat them different. Also, getting an abortion because it's too inconvenient for you to have a baby, is doing it…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 08:49 PM
1

Your tactics fail because you don't understand the first thing about my motives. Firstly, I have no love for male whores, though the situations are not comparable. A man doesn't have to take any time off because he got someone pregnant, where as a woman does have to take the time off. That said, it's not about shame or punishment, simply natural consequences. It is not your employer's job to work around choices you made off the clock, that have no connection to your job. If you can negotiate mat…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 08:32 PM
0

Maybe she's wiser and doesn't want to have risky sex anymore. You can only believe this, if you simultaneously believe that most women are brain dead retards, floundering through life. You don't burn your hand 50 times before "wising up" and realizing you shouldn't stick it in a fire. You do it once or twice at most, and the majority of people never have to do it personally because they can learn from the experiences of others. . If a woman doesn't feel like sleeping with you early like she did …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 06:49 PM
3

I mean, isn't that roughly Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson's measurements? No one would refer to him as overweight.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 09:53 PM
1

Define "daughter". Or "girl". Or "woman".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 09:34 PM
5

Being able to cook, dance, and fight don't mean shit if you can't get the girl in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 08:41 PM
1

Yes because the proper response is to coddle women and encourage their inaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 07:02 PM
1

Lol what? Like walking into the cold water slowly, by the time its up to your chin its not hard to let go and start swimming ... Everyone knows that the best way is to jump fully into the water. What kind of crazy person recommends slowly freezing every section of your body individually? Not to mention that the freezing is unpleasant and something you want ended quickly, not an enjoyable experience that you want to last. So it's a terrible analogy in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 06:59 PM
1

Women make moves on guys that exert traits those women want. Or if he's simply hot... Doesn't mean she doesn't adore her bf just because she wouldn't approach him... That's literally what it means.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 06:55 PM
1

Why would any sigma waste his time approaching a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 06:54 PM
1

what if her shit was complicated and she’s really interested but not really available? Then you asking her out is worthless. What if I hired her for a professional service and it would be inappropriate for her to ask me out? Then it would be even more inappropriate for YOU to ask her out. what if i were her cousins ex? If either of you care about that, then I don't see how you initiating makes it better.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 06:49 PM
1

bc you’re more secure, will decrease the chances of cheating so much No correlation ,and most certainly not causally related.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 06:46 PM
1

Wrong. Feminism is solely about lifting up women where they are, or at least perceived to be, lower. It has nothing to do with lifting up men were they lag behind (and even frequently cheers such a result, a la college enrollment and graduation rates). Therefore, it is not about equality nor equal rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 06:38 PM
1

This would be fine, if women didn't talk out of both sides of their mouths about "IOIs" and try to play small meaningless actions off as some grand gesture. Literally the entire point of "IOIs" is so the woman can pretend she wasn't actually interested if the guy doesn't notice or rejects her, in order to protect her own ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 03:19 PM
1

But these "IOIs" are stealth bomber level, and if you mistakenly think you picked one up, then you're the bad guy for assuming these innocuous actions could ever imply attraction.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 03:15 PM
2

If there's no "courage" involved in approaching (as implied by you putting it in quotes), then women would do it constantly rather than sitting around waiting to be chosen. The problem with your "reasoning" is that clearly women aren't much better off with waiting on the man, especially if all the feminist fear-mongering is to be believed. If the problem exists both in the status quo and in the proposed change, then it can't be used as an argument for either side.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 03:11 PM
4

So I assume you are anti-makeup, anti-plastic surgery, and against clothing like padded/push-up bras? And that's before we get into the idea of people putting their "best foot forward" which can be seen as a trick.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 03:01 PM
2

So what stops men approaching from being "pickmes"? Not that sitting around waiting for someone to literally pick you, changes anything in that regard.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 02:54 PM
0

And you believe no woman ever likes the man who approached her, less than he likes her? There is literally no way for anyone to win here. Of course, it's also odd that you're still in this oh so terrible marriage, where the only bad thing you have to say is he's not as attractive as you and likes you less than you like him. Which again, the latter is literally always going to be the case. The odds of two people liking each other the exact same amount is astronomical, and that's without going int…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 02:13 PM
1

The problem is with her overall approach. Heck, look at her response. She is upset with people (though she assumes only men are doing it, because cone on, we all know no woman has ever done anything even mildly wrong) calling the woman ugly, and saying her husband is too good for her, lookswise at least. But she refers to the husband as being attractive, and she specifically mentions raising the bar for men (though she isn't considering all the consequences of that, for brevity sake, just think …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 02:22 PM
2

So, you think the "bar" needs raised on men, but what, it doesn't exist for women? I'm not going to hate on their relationship, it would be hypocritical since my last girlfriend was bigger than me (though at least some of that was due to the height difference). That doesn't negate calling out people who say men need to do this and that, but women are free to do whatever. it makes my day to see they live in your head rent free I mean, the same argument can be turned against you about the men you …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 02:14 PM
2

You aren't in danger of some nobody on Reddit. Not that blocking said person would do anything to save you anyhow. Now if you mean, you don't want your fee fees hurt, then maybe it will work.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 02:00 PM
1

Is that really true though? Clearly if he never complimented you, or said you looked bas, he would soon lose you. So he still has to flatter you, even if he doesn't believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 01:53 PM
1

Careers with no possibilities for self-growth, like cashier, I guess that would depend on your definition. Hell I started BELOW cashier, literally hired in as a bagger. And yet it only took me 3 years to become a department manager (and that time could have been shortened if I was higher up on the seniority ladder). Now I don't know if I'm ever going to bother going further, mainly because the next step doesn't come with a large enough raise to justify the extra work and stress. And ignoring car…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 12:03 AM
4

Are they? As I'm scrolling most seem directed at men. Though, putting that aside, everyone seems to be listing the same jobs, or ones with similar problems. So I don't see where you're finding it difficult to have a job and pay 50% of the bills.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 08:13 PM
0

Whether or not someone is a "loser" is 100% decided by other people. One is not a "loser" because of the actions they take, but because people have deemed those actions as the qualities of "losers". The actions themselves are irrelevant and subject to change.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 01:26 PM
1

It's not complicated, and I don't know why you referred to the OP, and then quoted your own comment, including the portion I quoted. You spoke of women's empathy for men returning. I pointed out that it is impossible to return, because women aren't magic empathy creatures, and clearly have no empathy for men in the first place. The rest of the comment is in relation to this little tidbit, though more so to the part of the OP that you were agreeing with I don't know how much solace this estimatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 12:14 AM
1

Eddie Murphy is an actor/comedian. Why offer him as an authority? The best jokes always have some truth to them. The point I was making is that people have been aware of this phenomena since at least 1987, as evident by him having that skit. I can't tell if this is supposed to be condescending or genuine. Does it matter? Either way the point is true and you yourself obviously agree with it. You yourself said they weren't "bad women", so what were they?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 12:02 AM
1

In a paragraph, explain why you decided to comment this Because you're acting like a whiny snowflake who thinks sexual assault (so not even rape, like most fools would go to) is somehow the worst crime imaginable, and therefore needs to be treated differently from all other crimes. There, one sentence is all I needed. defends men who directly made statements enabling rape and sexual assault No, I haven't defended this at all. But thank you for admitting that if someone says they think you gave y…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:55 PM
1

So why did you use soap as your example, instead of, you know, hobbies like we were discussing. Surely you must have a ton of examples of hobbies where one gender would totally love to do them in general, but they don't solely because of marketing. Though honestly, I'd even question the example you provided. Thanks to idiots, I have done quite a bit of research on the "pink tax" (which I know you aren't directly talking about, but your example, if true would be the perfect counter). So I know th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:30 PM
1

we find him attractive because of his personality even if he isn't conventionally handsome No, you find him attractive because he is attractive, even if he doesn't meet the conventional standards. we may not find the handsome player unattractive And thanks for admitting and proving it here. No one would argue against the idea that personality can ruin an attractive person for a long-term relationship. The argument being made, by many of the women here, if not you specifically (this is what I get…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:24 PM
1

Reddit is fucking up as usual, so here's a part two to finish things Oh so are you against sick leave as well? Any man that gets a surgery should be fired right? I'm not a leech, so of course I am fine with companies not offering sick leave. I don't know what point you thought you were making here, but let me let you in on a secret. There is no law saying companies have to offer sick leave, and there is no real push to make such a law. On the other hand though, companies do get backlash and face…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:19 PM
1

So "murder" is okay if it was rape? It's more understandable. Or would you truly insist that if someone was forced to kill another, at risk of being killed themselves (or having others killed), that they should be charged the same as a person who murders just for the fun of it. For all your talk of me being the one doing "black and white" thinking, you're the one that has no room for nuance. Incest matters because of unequal power dynamics and grooming, You would have to prove these, and you can…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 11:16 PM
1

All your link does is prove why women shouldn't be in the workplace. I mean how fucking pathetic do you have to be that you think your paranoid feelings of "discomfort" give you the right to tell others how to behave. Especially when we're talking about something that was in place long before you cursed the environment with your whining? The workplace isn't "hostile" to you, because they refuse to bend over for you, you're being hostile to the workplace. If you don't like it, then you can get th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 10:57 PM
1

Well I'm a nobody on the internet, so if you had any intelligence, you wouldn't defer to me in the first place, regardless of your purity whining about sexuality and dating.
/r/Divorce_Men14/03/22 10:50 PM
1

If you're talking about the Ukrainian, I can understand where all your projection about stupidity is coming from. I mean, how brain dead do you have to be to not understand how quickly women will sell their bodies for power and/or money? Not to mention all the pointless virtue signaling, these women weren't fawning over him just a few months ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 10:49 PM
4

There is no correct way to apply the nonsense of women being murdered for being women. Even if you try to compare whether or not a man would have been killed in the same circumstances, it's still not typically JUST because they're women.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/22 09:20 PM
0

But a huge chunk of those “hurt, angry” men were the ones telling me my SA was my fault I mean, any crime that isn't a completely random act of violence, can be blamed in some part on the victim. That's how life works. Of course, this is assuming you're not just whining about that "she was asking for it" nonsense, because newsflash if someone thinks you asked for it, that means they don't think you were assaulted. Which isn't the same as saying they're okay with you being assaulted. It would be …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 02:31 AM
1

If this happened, women's empathy and concern for these men would probably return You can't return what you never had in the first place. But what can anyone expect from women who think it's too much to ask that a woman actually likes the man she chooses to date/marry? Instead of lying to him, and looking for every excuse to spurn his advances without actually causing him to leave, or at least being able to claim the moral high ground if he leaves anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 02:17 AM
-1

Man, this sure takes the cake. there aren't enough people wiling to break the law, so people who are willing to break it, don't have a problem with breaking other laws as well. This means if it was legal, we would just have even more people breaking the other laws. Are you really that ridiculous?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 02:07 AM
1

) so they came home (US) relocated, arranged citizenship for their wives and some family members, and are now divorced. These weren't bad women either. It just was so much change on both sides or something. It's a big deal. You're right, they weren't "bad women", they were simply "women". Eddie Murphy had a whole skit about this in 1987. If you bring her to the 1st world, she's going to adapt to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 01:12 AM
2

Well make up your mind. Should men be leaving the dating market, or should they stay in but just accept a dead bedroom where they give everything and get nothing in return?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 01:00 AM
1

So you think companies don't want as many people as possible buying their products? Marketing has fuck all to do with hobbies being segregated by gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 12:55 AM
1

Lol, those call-back "studies" are as poorly formulated as the wage gap studies. But since you're so focused on race, I'm sure you believe that nonsense as well. There are groups that do better on average than "Anglos" in the US, which wouldn't be possible if race were the end all, be all, that you view it as.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 12:41 AM
0

No, the first statement is not contradictory. Why can you not have great chemistry and great communication. Is that just too much to ask of a man? You misunderstand. The statement is not contradictory to itself. It's contradictory to the second quote. As for your story, it just sounds like nonsense with how vague it is, but of course, I am not asking for the details.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 05:50 PM
1

I mean, there is vanilla NSFW stuff. Though that doesn't really matter. I would say you clearly lack a rational perspective, since you are fine with your daughter being around what you must consider a bad mother, and you think everyone that looks at porn is a pedophile.
/r/Divorce_Men09/03/22 05:47 PM
1

It's a harassing environment for there to be pictures of naked women on the walls, No it's not. That's just someone being an absolute whiny moron. You are not harassed by the existence of pictures unrelated to you. Good lord, I will never understand this desire to water down crime. it's discriminatory for everyone who *doesn't* get promoted for having sex with a corporate officer when someone *does* get promoted for having sex with that officer. Every promotion is discriminatory by nature. Thoug…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 05:45 PM
1

Expecting someone to take such a significant and life altering/ending risk is not appropriate, Once again, no one is expecting women to take this risk. They are free to not get pregnant in the first place. That's not even adding in other complications (rape, Yeah it's bad, and why I would make an exception, as she had no choice in the matter. incest, Irrelevant if it wasn't rape abusive partner So the "abusive" partner will allow her to get an abortion, and she'll do that, but she's going to sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 05:40 PM
1

I’m not “whining”, I’m explaining. And as for her, I suspect she wants to be loved by her boyfriend, not just told he’d much rather fuck someone else, but she’ll do if he can’t have what he prefers. Except by your assessment, he prefers literally everything, so this makes no sense. That's why there was that second line following up that question. If you bothered to take your own advice and actually read what I wrote, I listed out a bunch of the ways a man would “prove himself hot” You mean all t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 05:34 PM
2

Clearly we didn't read the same comments on this post. Because all your fellow women are going on about how they magically "matured" into finding ugly/average men with good traits hot, and no longer finding any previously hot men attractive, despite their traits (or because they all magically have the same bad traits). And that's before we even touch on the fact that very clearly sexual attraction is considered optional. Unless you wish to claim that sugar babies and trophy wives always find the…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 05:04 PM
1

The ridiculous comments you have been making in this thread. You're "reasons" for women not wanting to have sex with men they are supposedly attracted to, and in relationships with where sex should be a natural occurrence, are nothing more than excuses, so said woman does not have to admit that she doesn't actually find her husband attractive or love him. Because if she admitted that to herself, or worse to her husband, then the relationship would end, and she would lose the benefits that she sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 04:59 PM
1

LOL, I mean, I don't entirely disagree that my mom was an idiot, but fortunately my intellectual capabilities have been proven to far surpass hers, at the very least. Now, as for the ability to comprehend things, maybe you should learn to comprehend that not every reply will be solely in regards to a single comment in a thread. My reply does not connect well to your comment on it's own, but when we consider the trite you wrote leading up to this comment, it starts to make sense. There is literal…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 04:55 PM
0

And you need to accept that not being valued only for your looks isn’t a bad thing. There's a big difference between not being valued ONLY for your looks, and not being valued for your looks at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 09:55 PM
1

Nah those are irrelevant. It's not like she thought she enjoyed the act until she "matured" or left the ex. She clearly knew after the first time that she didn't like it. But she was so infatuated with the ex, that she didn't even broach the subject for fear of being rejected. The new guy though, she could easily replace him, so there's no point in putting up with anything she doesn't like.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 09:13 PM
1

Insert Arthur meme here. People don't need a reason to lie on the Internet. That aside, the entire premise is ridiculous, though if it were true, I would understand why women find it so bad for men to date women younger than them. Though it does call into question why women would simultaneously claim there's no intellectual/mental difference between the sexes, and why they would fight so hard to allow such pathetic and easily pressured people into holding such important responsibilities. The pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 09:09 PM
1

Women generally marry men that they can communicate with and have a good physical chemistry But that's contradictory to Women have ended up married to the wrong man for lots of reasons, If the former is true, then the latter would be extremely rare. Unless you're just flipping the script and saying men are the conniving ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 08:40 PM
1

my political beliefs changed. But that makes you an outlier, and therefore not the norm, which calls into question anything else related to this. Most people don't change much politically throughout their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 08:28 PM
1

But you trust the woman who would date him, to look after your daughter? You haven't actually given any information to suggest he would try anything illegal, so you just come off looking like a prude.
/r/Divorce_Men02/03/22 06:07 PM
3

The only "maturing" being done, is simply accepting the hard realities of life. She could get the hot guy for sex, but wasn't good enough for commitment, so now she goes for the less attractive man in order to get said commitment. Even if we buy your notion that attractive men are just airheads, then it simply changes to, she finally learned she couldn't "fix" them, so know she goes for the guy who is beneath her, that she won't have to put any effort into. Unless of course, you want to say that…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 12:30 AM
5

She literally admits that there's no way they would be dating, if they hadn't met how they did.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 12:22 AM
1

Again, men think almost anything is hot enough to fuck Then there's nothing for you or her to whine about? Even if he'd never made his comment, this would still be true, so it changes nothing. Though I really don't get your problem with him saying he wishes he could have got with her sooner. You keep magically changing the wording to him wanting any hot 20-year old, when he was specifically talking about her. If he had made these comments while looking at another woman, then your comments would …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 12:22 AM
1

The only "change" going on, is acknowledging that you can't have what you want. There's no "maturing", just getting punched in the gut by reality. I guess, if you want to take such a worthless stance as "I didn't put my hand in the fire a second time because I "matured".", then sure, but know that it is worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 11:59 PM
3

The only one detached from reality, are the women like you with all these bullshit excuses. Let's use your own example, if you met a blonde with the perfect personality, you aren't going to suddenly love him. And even if you chose to delude yourself, because you know he would be good for you in the long run, you're still never going to truly love him, and then you will seek out every excuse possible to spurn him as much as you can without actually driving him away.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 11:48 PM
2

You can bullshit all you want, but nothing actually changes about what you want from a relationship. Women just going from being brain dead, believing they can change the hot guy if need be, to being practical, and lying to the guy they think they can fool. No woman "matures" into no longer finding hot men attractive. The fact you would even type such obvious bullshit, is truly astounding.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 11:40 PM
2

I mean, you could at least check the username. Going further than that, she has her own YouTube channel.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 11:17 PM
5

something or women for some reason mature very slowly. What makes this funnier is that girls tend to mature faster than boys, and there are plenty of examples of women using this as a win. Which is also funny, because a slow maturity typically leads to a better overall outcome. Bugs mature within hours or days, wouldn't say it does them much good.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 10:46 PM
2

Is it really a sign of "maturity" though? Especially if they have little to no choice in the matter? There's also of course the question of if their values actually changed, or if they're just suppressing them out of pragmatism.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 10:22 PM
5

People that are super ugly can look beautiful when you get to know them. People that are super beautiful can look ugly when you get to know them. Nah this is straight bullshit. You can get past the halo effect once you truly know someone, and realize that just because someone is ugly, doesn't make them a bad person, and just because someone is beautiful, doesn't make them a good person. But you're never going to see the "super ugly" person as beautiful (unless of course they actually change thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 10:17 PM
1

All you know about this guy is what his girlfriend claimed, and she agreed with everything he said. So where does the "piece of shit" bit come in?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 10:12 PM
1

Harassment has to be unwanted by definition. So the examples you provided, clearly aren't harassment. As to your whining about women being propositioned to prostitute themselves in exchange for a job, clearly, they weren't the most qualified if the employer was willing to risk losing them over asking for a bribe. But of course, you've never taken the half-a-second necessary to consider that perspective. It's like if you get pulled over for speeding, and the cop says "Hey, I won't right you a $10…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 09:28 PM
7

So "critical thinking" wasn't invented till 1875?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 12:06 AM
2

Yeah, because life was more dangerous and the population was small. They were also closer to communists than capitalists, but they had no qualms about cutting off dead weight, and you had to be closer to those in your tribe. The circumstances are just too different.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 12:03 AM
1

Lol, talk about strawmen. No MRA says men should be allowed to sexually harass women. At worst it's simply a disagreement over what constitutes sexual harassment.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 06:38 PM
6

in the broader scope of sexuality and gender, i would definitely argue that of any sexuality is under attack it’s women’s. Maybe 1% of porn is made with women in mind, and even that is off the mark. How is that an example of "women's sexuality under attack"? I'd also say we have to come to an agreement about what we're defining as porn. Erotica seems to prefer women, and drawn porn is all over the place. Being "ignored" isn't the same as being attacked. And that's assuming women are being ignore…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/22 03:04 PM
–

Granted, rereading it, I was a bit off base. But you still did outright state that one can't be a freak and a virgin at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 03:25 PM
1

You know what, that's actually a fairly good comparison. Though I would say there are problems with it. Unless you were 100% not at fault, it wouldn't really be comparable to murdering a child that inconvenienced you due solely to the actions you took. And I assume, there already are other punishments in place for this. Wouldn't your scenario count as some form of manslaughter at the least? Sure the government won't force you to donate to your victim, but you will be punished regardless of wheth…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 03:17 PM
–

lol men also want this though. they want a virgin girl who is somehow simultaneously a freak. I mean, isn't the stereotype of male virgins that they are depraved porn addicts? So it's perfectly possible for someone to be a virgin and yet not be a low libido, missionary only with the lights out, type. And that doesn't even address your implication that "freaks" have a problem with relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 10:04 PM
2

Got it, sexuality is 100% genetics with no nurture to be found but your brain is completely designed by environmental factors with no "nature" to be found, so it's society's fault if you're stupid or make bad decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 04:42 PM
1

Except I myself literally said that but okay. Man it sure is great how people so unable to understand basic things get to be therapists. And people honestly wonder why men wouldn't want to pay for this?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 04:13 PM
1

Somebody that you forced to need your body. Funnily enough, is this not the same argument that could be made for men who "force" their wives to quit working, and then refuse to give them anything in the divorce? At least in that case, the wife actually has a choice in the matter, unlike the baby human you created just to get off on murdering.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 02:54 PM
1

Youre not disclosing your race, not correcting being called white Would you accept any claim to the contrary? You see the problem here is, you have no ability to comprehend what you read. Just like I don't know how to prove that there are white women who have dated nonwhite men mainly out of their white guilt (which is just an obvious fact, when you work with such large numbers, there's bound to be at least one), there is no way for me to prove my race to you. Any picture I post could be stolen …
/r/AntiFeminists23/02/22 02:38 PM
1

You discredit yourself by claiming there's any science involved in "non-binary" people. How would you even apply science to something that is completely man made with no tangible elements? Sure, we could invent any number of genders, but the more you invent, the stricter their definitions will have to be. At least with transpeople, you can try to make claims towards men and women having different brains, but if this is true, then they are most certainly not equals on a mental level. So you're go…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 02:24 PM
1

Look, I can't speak to your vague secondhand reports. However, women choosing to not approach men, is not evidence of men being privileged. Neither are men thinking they can "sexually harass" women, a "privilege". You really ought to learn the definition of words before throwing them around. That aside, the funny thing here is you don't actually even know that the men weren't "harassed" (I keep using quotes because basically none of your examples actually show harassment, because harassment is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 02:11 PM
1

Because "muh current year" doesn't mean shit? Who cares if it's 2022?
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 05:57 PM
1

Oh your one of those people. There's no such thing as non-binary people. Man and woman encompasses literally everything, there is nothing outside of those options. Unless you think people have to follow strict rules or else they don't qualify as a man/woman. And now that certainly sounds like toxic and "artificial" hierarchies to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 05:20 PM
1

"Toxic masculinity" is nonsense. You don't want to help men, you want to turn them into women. But that was clear from how you down talk veterans that your supposed to be helping. Your entire philosophy is "Men have no value unless women like them, so if a man can't convince a woman to be with him, then he's clearly just a garbage human"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 03:46 PM
1

Because there is no evidence of this, in fact this comment is fueled by insecurity on your part basically its your wya of rationalizing why a white woman would sleep with a non white man because youd rather not face the reality that theyre attracted to non white men as well. I don't see how I could provide any proof for this, that you couldn't just wave off as a one-off or fake. I didn't say it was a majority of interracial bm-ww relations. Also, you may want to reconsider your standpoint, as my…
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 03:43 PM
1

So you're saying you are being "sexually harassed" by women? No? Then maybe you can understand that my comment had nothing to do with assuming that all investors were male. As for the assumption of straight, that's not a privilege, it's just a fact that most PEOPLE are straight. Now if we want to address why gay men may be less likely to advance on another man, or why women don't proposition men, we can do that. But it's a different discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 03:20 PM
1

So if women are just as likely to sign up to be tested on, and doctors have no special affinity for women, then why is most of the testing being done on males?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 03:16 PM
2

Even if she's looking for a ltr, he's leaving the next day, so that wasn't going to work anyway Exactly, so why is she wasting time with him? It's like saying you want to lose weight, but then going to the all-you-can-eat buffet you saw advertised, and making good on that phrase.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/22 08:42 PM
1

Except the only two examples of "personality" you gave are humor and intelligence. Nerds tend to be quite intelligent, that didn't stop the stereotype of them being ugly and having no success with women. As for humor, it's so subjective as to be a worthless metric.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/22 08:29 PM
1

Your strong response to my reply suggests that you have a lot of trauma work to do Sure thing, yet your strong responses don't say anything about you
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/22 05:40 PM
1

Gee, I wonder why the male workers don't get complimented or propositioned by the other males. Surely this is the great mystery of out time, and unlikely to ever be solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 06:04 PM
0

and usually the SAHP ends up getting much less than they need to maintain an independent household As they should. You don't get to quit your job, but continue to have them finance your life. Even if you're fired, you may get a severance package, but it won't last forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 05:54 PM
1

Anti-abortion sentiment is deeply rooted in religion Imagine thinking life only matters because of religion. I guess they were right about Atheism. I still had to fight when customers asked for a second opinion Literally just customers being customers. If you're not at the top, and don't give them what they want, then they're going to try to go over your head. I'm a six foot, 280 pound man, and still have to deal with that nonsense. Stemming from female competition for men which is a patriarchal…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 03:25 PM
1

No they aren't, just because you fell for the clear nonsense where they claim any murder of a woman was done because she was a woman, doesn't mean it's true. It is very rare that someone will kill another person just because the victim is a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 02:07 PM
1

You don't have the right to murder someone for inconveniencing you because of your own choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 02:04 PM
1

we are literally the same species so it makes so sense at al Man, it's always surprising what supposedly smart people can say. Chihuahuas and Pitbulls are the same species as well, and technically can mate with each other. That doesn't mean there aren't some serious differences between them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 12:45 PM
1

Okay, but when did she start dating her husband? It's easy to say "Oh it only took 3 years of marriage.", but you have to get to the marriage part first. Well preferably, because if we were just talking about getting pregnant, that can be done basically whenever.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 12:43 PM
0

More like men are the ones willing to sign up to be used as lab rats, and doctors don't feel as bad about potentially doing irreparable harm to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 12:38 PM
1

Then why are you upset at a bot giving you a correction in a non-rude way?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 03:16 PM
5

Nice sidestep. Even if we say men had more rights, which is debatable depending on how you're defining rights, they had responsibilities to go alongside them, for instance signing up for the selective service in exchange for the right to vote. That's the thing about history, despite feminists revisionism, it wasn't that men had all these privileges and women had little to no rights. It was a tough and dangerous world, without modern conveniences, were men and women had their own rights and corre…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 01:49 PM
8

Is that why men peacefully protesting for the right to vote were assaulted and murdered, and then only given the vote on the condition of selective service. While women committed literal terrorism, were treated with kid gloves, and then given the right to vote free of charge?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 01:26 PM
1

You mean the truth? Most people don't date outside of their race, regardless of what race they are. And there are "white" women that go out of their way to sleep with non"whites" to relieve their "white guilt" (and non"whites" that play into this by accusing "white" women of racism if they reject them), and said women certainly aren't of the traditional variety. The only other thing would be the "looking Mexican", but that's "brown face" so you should be against that as well.
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/22 05:06 PM
1

I see feminism as equality, Do you know where you are? Biology never made us to be housewives, and it also didn't make men to be workers. I mean, it kind of did. FFS, our immune responses have even evolved differently. Now, of course housework used to be actually difficult, unlike today where you have access to all these modern appliances and indoor plumbing, yet women act like they're breaking their back for 18 hours every day. Speaking of the modern world, it's really the only reason men and w…
/r/AntiFeminists14/02/22 04:59 PM
1

It doesn’t matter what lifestyle they choose to live. A child deserves a percentage of the money This is a non-statement, as any amount of money given would be a percentage. My side fits perfectly in with this argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 04:01 PM
2

the islamophobia never ended. The fact that term even exists shows the contradiction in your statement, especially when it is used in mainstream media. No one refers to hate against Christians as some kind of phobia, and the Jewish religion is open to criticism one just has to be careful about being construed as attacking the ethnic group. This isn't to say people don't or can't attack Islam, but it's frowned on in the mainstream. I mean hell, there was all that whining over some putting up flie…
/r/AntiFeminists10/02/22 03:23 PM
4

Hunter-gathers are more communal based, in ALL aspects; Childcare, food, vagina access, etc. Anway TL;DR caring about access and usage of vaginas only started to matter when people settled down on a plot of land and started claiming shit. You mean when people stopped having access to them? Not that this is all the relevant, because the group still wouldn't approve of fooling around outside of the group. Every creature on this planet exists for one reason, and that is to reproduce. Now the ways d…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 12:36 AM
12

Lol, yeah ask brainwashed idiots about a view you know is counter to their religion. That's how you get the real answers after all. Look, it's not complicated, there are only two relevant terms. "Paternal uncertainty" & "dual mating strategy". If the man cares about sticking around and investing in children, he's going to care more about promiscuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 12:18 AM
13

It's called a dual-mating strategy. Men that have no plans for commitment, don't care as much, because they invest little. Paternal uncertainty is only relevant to men who will stick around and invest in the child, so they are the ones concerned with promiscuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 12:13 AM
1

No, not in general, or at least, not the idea of it. But how it's actually applied in the real world is a problem. Though that last comment was more focused on alimony than child support, and a refutation of your claim that mothers should get primary custody and then be subsidized by the father, rather than just giving the child to the person who can actually afford to have them. Look you can make all the claims you want about how hard it is to raise kids, but my mom did fuck all for me and my s…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 06:47 PM
1

A child that is a product of a rich person should live the same exact lifestyle. You do realize that being rich doesn't mean you live a "rich" lifestyle, right? Bad decisions come with consequences. That’s how life works. The courts agree with me for a reason. Yeah, get back to me when mother's aren't allowed to throw their babies away with zero consequences. Or when women don't get to quit being a wife, but still get to keep all the benefits and continue to get paid for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 05:39 PM
1

You said yourself she was the primary caretaker of the kids even when they were together so why wouldn’t she continue to be their primary caretaker? Because she can't afford it. The only naive one here is you, considering you're apparently completely ignorant of the fact that father's used to get default custody, precisely because they could afford to care for the child. It wasn't till life got easier (thanks to men) that some feminists started whining about not being able to end a relationship …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 05:32 PM
1

Ah yes, when you're too incompetent to actually argue your side, just resort to insults. Isn't it odd to believe something so fiercely and yet not be able to stand up to any scrutiny?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 05:21 PM
0

I like how you focused on the abortion aspect, especially how you added so much to it that I didn't say, but ignored the other two options that men also don't have access to. And look, you really don't want to go the route you're attempting, unless you either are anti-abortion, or you don't mind being a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/22 05:18 PM
5

Yup, it's "femicide" all over again.
/r/AntiFeminists03/02/22 11:34 AM
2

If you wish to claim that facts and reality are "childish", so be it. Though your lack of any argumentation should show who is the actual childish one in this scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 12:40 AM
1

Seems you're a bit slow. Notice, I didn't say she consented to being in a relationship or having sex with the guy. Also, you can harp about informed consent all you want, but if society truly cared about it, we wouldn't understand the term "fine print" in the way we currently do. You sound like a rabid feminist, barking about how if the man lies about his job, then he has raped the woman. Informed consent is tertiary to our society, at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/22 12:38 AM
1

Kids and teens aren't the same thing, no matter how much you want to disingenuously lump them together Not that your argument really pans out, regardless of how much I agree with what you actually said, regardless of what you thought you said. There'd be no such thing as a "spoiled brat" if adults had no trouble telling kids no. A 16-year old and a 20-year old aren't that far apart, hell depending on how their birthdays fall, they could have been 19 and 16 when the relationship started. And cert…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:45 PM
0

But eightTEEN and nineTEEN year olds are both adults and teens, should they never masturbate, or else they are touching a teen as an adult? It's not even that I particularly disagree with this particular point, you should simply be able to formulate it in a better way. Though you'd be a flat out liar if you want to claim that no 15-17 year-old looks like an 18+ person, and so we have to take into account the context in which these people know each other and how they met. If you're picking someon…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:35 PM
1

Being nice means doing something without the expectation of a reward, ! or doing something is the reward. Ah, almost had to call you out on that. No one does something "nice" that provides them with nothing in return, even if the return is nothing more than a good feeling about one's superiority over those who don't do said "nice" things. For example picking up a friend from the airport is a nice thing to do, and you would be doing it because A you want to help a friend out and B you want to spe…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:12 PM
0

Wrong. What exactly is "unfair" about a rich person paying the same as a poor person for their child? By definition, from the view of the child at least, both paying the same is the "fair" option. It's certainly not "fair" that the poor kid is poor just because his father was, while the rich one gets to be rich just because his mother was conniving enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:04 PM
1

That doesn't sound like a fact. In fact, it sounds like the opposite, otherwise known as an opinion. But if we're talking about cruelty, isn't it cruel to force a child to grow up in poverty, especially while others live in luxury? You have to pick a side on this issue, or else you have no ground to stand on. Either every child is only entitled to a minimum amount (potentially zero) or every child deserves to live in the lap of luxury. Either way, every is forced to pay the same amount, and no o…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 11:02 PM
1

Except the options available to each party aren't the same. Women can get the morning after pill, abortions, or even legally abandon their children with no consequences. Men just have to rely on the mercy of the woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 10:58 PM
1

I mean, it wasn't really possible for most women to do "the same things as males", but not because of "muh patriarchy", but because of the reality created by biology and a lack of technological development. Instead, the women went out and did their own things.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 10:56 PM
1

Maybe your page wasn't refreshed, or there's two deleted accounts in this thread, because they already said all men are "Johns".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 10:51 PM
2

While u/redback-spider may not have worded it very well, their point isn't childish. Marriage is just about the only contract one can break, while still reaping all the benefits. If your boss fires you, he doesn't also get to force you to continue working for him for free simply because he and your coworkers were "accustomed to the lifestyle". Much the same, if you quit your job, you can't force your boss to continue paying you regularly just because you are accustomed to receiving a paycheck. G…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 10:49 PM
1

I'm not sure what that has to do with internalized misogyny because It's real. I'm not going to say there's never been an instance of someone internalizing bigoted feelings towards themselves based on immutable characteristics. However, that doesn't change the fact that women don't dislike other promiscuous women for understandable evolutionary reasons, and it has not a damn thing to do with hatred of women as a whole. The women you're talking about are very traditional women No, what I wrote ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 10:25 PM
2

The thing is, it just doesn't compute. Like, I understand what you're saying but it seems so nonsensical. Maybe a comparison will show how people that agree with me see it, I just wish I could have responded earlier so others would actually be able to chip in. If I was on a date with a woman, and decided it wasn't going to work out long term, then I wouldn't turn around and suddenly invite her to an expensive event that we would both like, that I was considering going to but hadn't necessarily m…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/22 10:16 PM
1

You really don't realize how pathetic your argument is, do you? Just replace age with gay people or an interracial relationship and how people have reacted to those in the past and even now. And your "development" argument would be an entirely case-by-case problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 04:17 PM
4

But your entire argument was "it's illegal so it's bad", to which a better argument would be the existence of clearly bad laws, like laws against interracial or gay relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 04:12 PM
7

By "secondary school" they mean "high school" or grades 9-12. But you're right, maturity isn't really linked to age, and if 16 year-olds are so easy to manipulate, then I guess they shouldn't be dating at all, for fear that they will coerce each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 04:08 PM
1

The first one is worse, because a 16 y.o. teen is still a minor and they've been groomed by an adult. You don't know that. Ignoring the fact that "grooming" is such an idiotic concept (the vast majority of people "groom" their partner, because if you aren't doing nice things for your partner,you're unlikely to have them for long), you're pretending that no teen girl has ever made the first move on an older guy. How does the guy "groom" the girl, if she started it?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 04:05 PM
3

Teenagers brains are not fully developed. They say you're brain isn't finished developing till 25, so why are you so "gross" and calling an 18 year-old an adult, when clearly they're a "baby"? They are babies. They're not, and it actually is gross that you would compare even a 6 year-old to a baby. The difference between them is so vast, that you would have to be clinically retarded to actually believe they were anywhere near the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 03:55 PM
2

Because the only point in words is to convey information, so you need to use them properly? Because there's a big difference between a preteen/child and a teenager, especially a mid-late stage teenager?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 03:43 PM
1

Of course, what monster would ever want to spend time with the person they love, just because? Every smart person treats their lovers like emergency services, something they only care about when they need them, and barely interact with them any other time.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 10:24 PM
1

You really buy that nonsense? Even with her post and other comments?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 02:54 PM
1

There's no such thing as "genuine altruism". Nobody does "good" things without some benefit, even if it's something as small as simply feeling morally superior for having done "good".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 02:51 PM
1

I like him a lot, honestly would even go in a date with him, Sure you would. That's certainly not how you've portrayed things, neither in the post itself, nor in any other comment I've seen from you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 02:39 PM
-1

🤔 you think men are so terrible, yet you put yourself alone in a guy's car for about an hour? Where do women get this paranoia from? I mean, you willingly make yourselves vulnerable despite thinking every man wants to assault you, yet men are far more likely to be the targets of violence. If these two facts in conjunction don't show you that women are loved, catered to, and protected by society, as opposed to the claims that the patriarchy hates women and just wants to torture them, then I would…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 02:36 PM
0

Not mature enough to understand that being nice for the purpose of having a relationship isn't how any of this works. Exactly, because nice guys don't get relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 02:31 PM
3

Yes a euphemism for sex, not dating or a LTR.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 02:09 PM
1

Nobody does anything for free. Even if they do it anonymously and it's not a tax right off, they're still ony doing it for the sense of feeling like they're a good person. And if it's not anonymous AND involves someone you personally know you'd have to be seriously deluded to think you didn't do it for something in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/22 02:06 PM
1

I agree with you for the most part, but you are either ignorant or a liar by omission. You have ignored the possibility of a woman poking holes in condoms, or just straight up lying about her own birth control or infertility. Sure, if the guy provides his own condoms, this becomes a very small worry, and if he inspected them every time before using them it would eliminate it fully, but even someone like me understands how ridiculous that would be. Then there's the theft of the sperm, whether fro…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 03:17 PM
0

Just because you can petition a change, doesn't mean you will be granted it. But you obviously haven't thought much about this, so since I'm on mobile, I will just suggest you look at my reply to the person that agreed with you in this thread
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 03:05 PM
12

The child of Drake deserves to live a life of luxury Do they? Why? And if children "deserve" a certain lifestyle, why do we allow poor people to have as many children as they wish? What about rich people that don't live a stereotypical rich lifestyle (probably one of the main reasons they are rich)? Are we going to tell them how to spend their money? Also you're completely wrong about this nonsense Also acting like CHILD support is something for women. The money is first and foremost for the mot…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 03:04 PM
1

No the reason is biology you pampered fool. Why do people constantly pretend like life was always as easy as it is nowadays? Men and women had different rights AND responsibilities, that arose from the abilities nature provided to them. Women did work outside the home, but they didn't have as much time available because taking care of a house, growing one's own food, and raising children was much harder without modern appliances. Then, add on to that that many of the jobs available outside the h…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/22 02:59 PM
20

This would be more believable l, if you hadn't admitted that you are in fact using sex as a reward, by making someone you actually like, wait until you're sure he won't run off. If sex isn't a reward, then why are you making them wait, instead of getting to the oh so not special fun times. And your argument about how sleeping with the guy you don't actually like won't result in being shunned, has no basis in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 05:16 PM
26

There's a difference between simply having a sexual past, and literally saying that you would have been more likely to have sex with your "oh so special" bf/husband if you had liked him less.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 05:10 PM
3

Disagreeing with you doesn't mean people hate women. Women dislike promiscuous women for basically the same reason men dislike promiscuous women. It's called "parental uncertainty" and it's a hard-wired evolutionary trait. Men don't want to have to worry about wasting resources on a kid that isn't theirs, and potentially never having their own children. And women don't have to worry about their men being stolen, or getting fewer resources for her and her kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/22 01:06 AM
2

There is nothing "romantic" about you, or your partner banging someone else. Now, you could try to argue that if you and your partner are participating in a threesome or orgy, then maybe some romance could be found, but if you're separated from each other, then you have no argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 11:21 PM
0

How about that worker stop whining and quit to start his own business. It's easy, at least according to right wingers. I mean, there are a large number of small businesses started every year, but it'd be a lot easier if people didn't blindly follow the already established businesses push to install restrictions that increase the startup and maintenance costs.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 11:13 PM
1

Either your conflating numbers from different states/countries or your looking at individual numbers and then looking at numbers created by combining multiple individual numbers together. Dead bodies aren't exactly known for being easy to hide. According to the FBI, there were 14,123 murder victims in 2018. Out of those 14,123 only 3,180 were women (though there were 29 victims whose sex couldn't be identified). So that means 10,914 men were murdered in the same year, or over 3x the number of wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 11:03 PM
1

Bullshit, these "nags" get daytime television shows. They go onto major news networks and land roles in major Hollywood productions. Society most certainly supports them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 10:45 PM
1

Way to miss the point, but unfortunately for your pitiful shaming attempt, I don't even think women are worth that. I'm your proverbial "good boy" a.k.a. the sensitive coward that has always been so worried about making women uncomfortable, or coming off as a creep, that I only ever asked out one woman I had known for a year (by giving her a letter, thereby allowing her the maximum ability to ignore the situation if she so chose), and have only had 1 girlfriend (and no they aren't the same perso…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 10:29 PM
1

That's funny, because if you knew anything about evolution, then you would know we are a social species, and like every single creature and plant on the planet, we exist merely to live long enough to reproduce. That is the purpose behind everything we do and think.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 10:20 PM
1

Except that's exactly what the women here are demanding. They want men to only approach them, when they want approached, but they aren't going to act any differently or go to different places to actually let the men know, when they do and don't want approached. They merely expect the men to read their minds. Case in point, bars/clubs and the like used to be where men were told to go to perform cold approaches, but now women constantly whine about how they're not there all dolled up for men to ap…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 10:18 PM
1

Help how? To prolong the suffering known as life, while causing even more suffering by denying what little pleasure one can squeeze out of it? Think what you will of my outlook, but the simple fact is I have seen no successful outcomes in any direction. The men that I know who are better than me fitness wise (which admittedly is basically all of them, as bad as that may be) tend to run the gambit on their success with women, and even of those that are able to continually get relationships and/or…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 10:09 PM
1

Yeah, "romantic saps" don't go "swinging".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 08:32 PM
0

Unions don't magically create money. You have to understand the company you're in, or all unionizing will do is make you, and all your coworkers, unemployed. Also, fuck unions for protecting worthless employees that just make everyone else's job harder, and holding back better workers.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 05:59 PM
1

No, I don't think I will blame the infinitesimally small number of men that develop deep friendships, which takes fucking years, for women taking any opportunity to claim all men are evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 05:25 PM
1

Cold approach in selected venues designed for socialising (clubs, bars, parties etc) You've been here far too long to not know that women constantly whine about being approached at bars and the like, because they're there to have fun, not date.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 05:19 PM
1

Clearly u/Urbantexasguy hasn't been here long either because all the women on here do is bitch about how they don't want to talk to any man irl unless they somehow magically already know them. They don't want male friends trying to be more than friends, and they don't want male coworkers to bother them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 05:17 PM
1

Yes because we all know "women are wonderful", just the sweetest of angels, every single one.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 03:13 AM
1

BULLSHITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT. No one ever does anything "for themselves", unless it actively pushes other people away, or they outright turn others away when they mistakenly think that the action was done for them. If a man gets into shape, and then accepts propositions from a woman, then he did not get into shape "for himself", he did it for her. to do it for himself, he would need to tell her to fuck off (though maybe in kinder words).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 02:59 AM
1

See here's your problem, you don't understand that men have to initiate this whole thing. If the man isn't actively seeking out a relationship, he isn't going to get one. Therefore being single doesn't have to have anything to do with "commitment issues" or being unbearable.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 02:52 AM
1

LOL, but 90% of the "complaining" you mentioned is justified.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 02:44 AM
1

Man, with all these very specific mentions to "boys", I have to question if it's a coincidence that you have "map" in your username.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 02:30 AM
1

If the site is 70+% men, then any site with 50% women is heavily skewed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 02:05 AM
1

I think that some men will complain about their women watching such movies, and men will at least not agree to participate while still leering at any women who puts on their team's basketball jersey and saying "wow she's so cool, why can't you like cool things like she does?". Oh come off it with this bullshit. Women constantly complain about what men do as well, and ask why their partners can't be like some other guy that checks a few boxes that they don't. You are taking a human issue, and pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 12:47 AM
1

Does it matter if u/TrueStorms is correct? Shouldn't it matter more to you that you're being lied to and manipulated because we've evolved to care more about the problems women face, despite how much feminists will screech that men don't care about women? The people claiming the moral high ground by saying they're the most empathetic and caring among us, are not just ignoring the bigger problems that effect more people, but actively downplaying them while exaggerating their own pet projects. Do …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 12:22 AM
1

Not sure about the US, but in Russia there's stats showing that a half of killed women were murdered by their partners. Okay, now actually tell us how many women are being murdered, rather than hide behind the fact that women are very unlikely to be the victims of random acts of violence. Which isn't the greatest shield in the world, but of course you're not thinking of it from that lens.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/22 12:08 AM
1

Understand what? That women think they're entitled to never be talked to unless they desire conversation at that exact time? Even though this would require the person talking to them to be a mind reader, or would require women to be the "creeps" initiating conversations when the other person may not want to talk?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 06:45 PM
1

Really now, it's time to evolve. Don't mention evolution when you clearly know fuck all about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 06:36 PM
1

Really now, it's time to evolve. Don't mention evolution when you clearly know fuck all about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 06:36 PM
3

So he just pretended to be your friend so he could become your lover? Or you were the creep and bugged this random man, but it's okay because you didn't ask him out?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 06:31 PM
3

. I just want random men I don't know to leave me alone. Fair enough, though we've lived in that type of society before, and women didn't seem too happy with it. But fine, let's try again and make some tweaks. So where can men ask women out? It can't be random places like the grocery store or coffee shop, as you have already made clear. It can't be at work, because you've made it clear, despite the little lie here, that you don't want any man asking you out, regardless of whether or not you know…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 06:22 PM
4

Plenty of women already know what it's like to be invisible for not fitting men's high standards of attractiveness. 🤣 one minute you'll claim men will fuck anything, so him being attracted to you means nothing. And the next you turn around and claim men are some terribly high standards for attraction. All you have to do is look to porn. You'll find every single body type represented in porn made for men, but porn made by women for women tends to stick to one or two body types of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 03:41 PM
3

Someone needs to take a biology and evolution class. You want to whine about how "unfair" nature is to women? Fine, but at least get your facts right and quit blaming men for existing as part of a dimorphic species, where the males don't just constantly rape the females and they do provide benefit to said females and offspring.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/22 03:28 PM
1

It is gender free, but it doesn't include "made to penetrate". Think of it this way, under that definition, would one be a rapist if they made someone else stick their finger in their ass? No, because the definition does not include forcing the victim to penetrate the attacker, or someone else. It just widens the definition so that if the rapist uses an object or their fingers/tongue, then they will be declared a rapist (which is gender neutral, unless it comes to oral sex, then it still has to …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 04:50 PM
3

If a man doesn't want to ask a woman out, it won't work out. Y'all are welcome to assume the same for women, but that's not what experience shows nor is it what happens most often in society. Except most relationships in fact do not work out, so you haven't proved anything by appealing to society.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 04:39 PM
2

You must not have seen that thread, or misunderstood what I wrote. A man can do whatever he wants, but if he wasn't born with the appropriate features, then as u/SpicySinnersSandwich pointed out, it's not truly going to help him in the long run. You might get the relationship, but she isn't going to really be attracted to you, or want to have sex with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 04:37 PM
1

Lol, the definition you provided doesn't include "made to penetrate". What the hell are you smoking? It is literally solely focused on penetrating someone without their consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/22 12:17 AM
1

But I thought you claimed you already receive quality offers? Also your other comment is exactly what people expect from a FDS user. Delusional self-agrandizing claims that make no sense. If you are so great and get so many offers, including good ones, why aren't you off the market? Finally, your whining about what people assume FDS users are like, is merely the inverse of what FDS users claim men are like, so who cares? Tit for tat, turnabout and fair play and all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 08:06 PM
3

And honestly, how would the WOMAN know she wants to full-on date a guy if they didn't talk first? Sure, women can and should start all the conversations we want, but I advise not fully asking a man out. If you know you want to go out with him, why doesn't he know? Why doesn't he feel the same? Because it ain't going to work out, that's why. All of this can be flipped just as easily for men. Newsflash, you simply having a vagina doesn't magically make you worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 06:00 PM
4

Except the recent thread on who women find attractive proves that men can't make themselves more appealing, unless they actively hindered the appeal they were born with.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/22 05:55 PM
8

You put that, as if to imply a contradiction, but clearly the point was that he doesn't want a single mother. Literally child free at the moment, not "child free" as in the lifestyle of never wanting kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 10:35 AM
1

My apologies. You are correct, and I don't know why that slipped my mind. I could see the usefulness in having a secondary label for the more volatile groups, though they would still be incels, in the same way the groups you mentioned are still Muslims. Man I feel stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 11:49 PM
0

This in itself should defeat your claim that because I quoted Vox, I'm black pilled. That was never my point. My only point was that Vox is trash, and considering some of your comments, I wouldn't have been surprised if you actually followed them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/22 11:47 PM
1

Yes, that is the definition. Maybe explain that to u/Potential_Plate2538 who said they don't want to count incels as incels, if they aren't hateful. OR maybe, after seeing another comment by them, they mean the hateful ones shouldn't be called incels, but either way it's ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 01:46 PM
2

What? I mean it's not like a lot of time has passed, but even if it had, you could have simply reread your comment that I replied to.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/22 01:36 PM
-4

Lol Plenty of incel and misogynistic men have said shit like this to me in person, Thanks for telling everyone you're a boldfaced liar. 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 12:43 AM
8

But that's stupid. How about instead of doing backflips trying to figure out how to exclude an incel from the term because he's not radical enough for you just learn to admit what an incel actually is, and not just use it as your go to shaming tactic/boogeyman.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 12:41 AM
0

Not unexpected, but fucking LOL Women ... have to unlearn the male gaze Men need to learn what the female gaze is Typical "women are wonderful" bullshit. Why should men learn about the female gaze, if "gazes" are bad? And if gazes aren't bad, why would women have to "unlearn" it?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 08:39 PM
1

What the hell are you talking about? Skeletor is buff as fuck.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 08:25 PM
0

? Did you just not read what you quoted or what? Seems you're the one that needs help here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/22 03:42 PM
1

Imagine quoting Vox. Though it's certainly par for the course with your other comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/22 03:51 PM
1

If you say so. I used to go to the local mall all the time when I had more disposable income than financial sense, and I've never seen anyone perform a cold approach there. Now, I have seen a couple women working at the grocery store get approached by customers, but I'd wager I've seen it less than 10 times, despite working fulltime at said grocery store for over 8 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 03:58 PM
4

Your entire rhetoric is male identified And yours is "female identified". You aren't giving men advice to help them, you're telling them to do what benefits women. And hey, more power to you, no one really expects a woman to sacrifice anything of value, just don't lie and pretend you are telling men what's best for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 03:51 PM
7

and care for their children. You mean ignore their children while the internet, daycare, and school does all the raising? Maybe you'll put a smidge of effort into the first kid, and then dump all your tasks onto them as soon as they're old enough. But don't worry, I mean as a woman, no one truly expected you to have any principles or consistency, but thank you for proving that with your reply in the other thread about how you won't reject the benefits of modernism for yourself, but will still de…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 03:05 PM
11

That's all well and good, assuming you actually take on the role of a traditional woman entirely, and not just cherry pick the bits that are beneficial to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 02:47 PM
1

Do you think abortion should be allowed in cases of rape, incest, or if the person is a minor? Would you be fine with only having abortions in those scenarios? Or would you still demand more, thereby forcing the pro-every-choice-but-abortion side to compromise, while the pro-abortion side doesn't have to? If you wouldn't be fine with abortions only in special cases, then why even bring it up, except to use those people as shields? But to answer the question. Yes, I would be okay with abortions f…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/21 12:11 AM
1

Is there not something inherently immoral about people of means becoming parents to the children of poor people around the world?" No. You have to prove what would be immoral about it, not the other way around. Adoption should be a last resort and should be about finding appropriate families for children, not children for families Again, you'd have to argue why it isn't. I mean, I can't even fathom how you think some deranged selfish woman that wants to murder babies is a "good family for childr…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/21 10:51 PM
1

Men will never have the 177262 million likes women will get because women simply do not simp that hard If women were so concerned about commitment, they'd simp even harder. Good job on ruining your own nonsense argument. But what can one expect from a racist, sexist, that believes her own paranoia? You don’t have to worry about being strung along for sex Not entirely true on it's own, there certainly have been cases of women just wanting sex and the guy wanting more. But that aside, men have to …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/21 07:57 PM
1

I mean, it quite literally is a "subjective anecdote". It very well could be objective fact that you got UTIs while with him, that cleared up when y'all broke up, but it's still just an anecdote and you don't have the proof that it was causal rather than correlative. As for "wanting to defend people who don't wash regularly", that's literally just more subjective nonsense, and worse than that, not something u/kindlyyes nor myself can know. You didn't tell us how often he washed, just that you di…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 09:59 PM
1

Ah yes, because everything else loses sensitivity, but somehow vaginas are magically immune from atrophy. I mean, I will grant that measuring sexual sensitivity is rather difficult, just as measuring pain tolerance is difficult, but to suggest that vaginas are immune to the natural decay that literally everything else suffers from, is outright ridiculous. And notice, I haven't even actually agreed with what u/Vicky-3 typed. My original point in this was merely that you brought up unrelated nonse…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 09:31 PM
1

You're the one who said nonsensical feel-good bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/21 09:10 PM
0

If he "didn't smell bad", can you truly say he "did not shower or brush his teeth as often as he should"? Maybe if he was often sick, then you could make that argument. But without either of those two criteria being met, you're presenting subjective nonsense as objective fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/21 10:29 PM
0

That literally has nothing to do with the idea that it can lose sensitivity. Maybe actually follow along with what's being stated?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/21 07:05 PM
1

Instead of men harping on how to be attractive and being upset about how attractiveness is making or breaking their sexual success, I do wish there was more focus on how men can be better PARTNERS. Better people. Wow crime rates have dropped to zero thanks to this message from the Gods that no mere mortal could have ever conceived of on their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/21 12:12 AM
1

Yes, yes, women only ever do "wrong" if by some magic they are "corrupted" by a man. Saying "pickmes" wouldn't be bad if men didn't enable it, is literally no different from the reverse. Without these "pickmes", those men wouldn't be able to cheat, either. And if you want to put forth some nonsense about how it's acceptable to knowingly get someone to cheat because you don't owe the cheated anything, then we can just broaden the discussion to include women that cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/21 12:07 AM
3

But Asians and blacks don't mix?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/21 11:29 PM
0

And then get cheated on because they're at work too much. Yeah, I don't need you to tell me that, I already knew the answer. I asked it of u/WestsideMoonWalker because of the part I quoted.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 04:52 PM
3

Getting sex isn't the same as being lusted after. The only person who "lusts" after water, is one that has been trapped without it for too long. Anyone else may take water, even if it's not the only option, but not because this is what they truly want. They would want something with more taste, like juice, soda, or even alcohol, but they know it's not good for them or they can't afford it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 04:51 PM
1

It means exactly what I wrote. You keep parroting this feminist revisionism of history (as you would know if you read my whole comment). It is not that women were "oppressed" throughout history, it is that men and women had their own separate roles, which resulted in different responsibilities and rights. Of course, the fact that women were handed more rights and given less responsibilities every time they whined about it, shows that the oppression claim is nonsense. If women were oppressed, you…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 04:47 PM
1

But that is antithetical to what you were responding to. I said women prioritize a provider, and your response is "they should look for more than money, or they'll somehow end up in a situation where they are the provider"? In this case, broadening their scope is what might lead them to being the breadwinner. I'm also not sure what exactly was supposed to be projection in my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 04:37 PM
1

Married women are a significant portion of those that get abortions, the majority I think. I don't know what would cause you to think that, a quick search reveal that married women are the minority of abortion havers, though I guess they could be lying, especially if the baby was possibly from an affair It should be in the adoptee's best interests This implies you think death is a better alternative to being adopted as a baby. I can't agree with that. And again, I specifically made the differenc…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 04:34 PM
1

It does seem like those that choose not to pursue relationships also are less educated and earn less overall by a pretty significant amount. Are these men making more because they're in relationships, or do they get relationships because they earn more?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 03:25 AM
1

You should probably hold off on calling others children until you actually learn your history, instead of just blindly buying the bullshit feminist revisionism.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 03:17 AM
5

I’m an average looking guy half the fun is seeing that crazy lust Pick one. People don't "lust" after "average".
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/21 02:47 AM
1

What else is there to mention? Men don't want to be stuck in sexless marriages. A man might be willing to stay with a wife that was in a horrible accident, preventing her from ever having sex again, but that would be a sacrifice on his part, even if a willing one. It would be akin to a man stepping into the line of fire for his partner, it's not something he ever wants to be necessary, but that won't necessarily stop him from doing so if the time comes. And clearly men have more parameters than …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 04:36 AM
1

I actually don't really disagree with you here (though your previous comments make this a contradiction of yourself), which is why I suggest everyone follow my list. Men that aren't ready for a child should also, abstain from PiV sex, if that is too much then only do it if they know for a fact that they or their partner is sterile, and if that is too much then use a condom It's not like the choices are "perform rocket surgery" or "get an abortion". These are very simple solutions to prevent the …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 04:18 AM
3

The problem is men get upset when women associate men as sex-crazed horn dogs . Suddenly they’re offended. Because it's not the same thing? That's like saying that since women prioritize a man being able to provide for them, they're all gold-diggers.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/21 03:09 AM
1

Sounds like it from your last comment. I thought you were saying it was okay for people to get abortions just because, so long as they did it within 24 weeks. This latest comment makes it seem like you're only fine in extreme cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 09:12 PM
1

It's part of what we do, determine if we have the capacity for a child and act accordingly. Clearly this is a lie, or else you'd use that space between your head and follow the list I provided. Go ahead and keep telling me how pathetic women are, and expect me to come back with anything other than, "Welp I guess men really should make all the decisions for them, since according to you they're too fucking stupid to make their own choices." But I don't expect any intelligence from someone that thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 04:19 PM
1

Oh, then I'm not sure why we're arguing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 04:14 PM
1

Because you've failed to understand my point. I have never said that "the fetus's life supersedes the mother's", simply the very milquetoast take, that you can't just kill people because they're inconvenient to you. There are at minimum 4 things a woman can do to ensure she doesn't get pregnant, a 5th drastic option she can add, and at least 4 of those options are available to men (the drastic option is one of them). In the case of rape, all but 2 of those options have been completely circumvent…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 02:26 AM
1

You can say you're in STEM all you want, the fact that you think I just called sex a crime proves your certainly didn't get there by doing the work, at best.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 02:09 AM
1

I'm sure. After all, how could a woman possibly compete with an effeminate man?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 02:08 AM
1

The problem here is that the taking of a human life isn’t always considered murder by society. It’s the job of the courts to look at each situation individually, and they don’t always rule taking a human life as murder. True enough. However, so far as I am aware, the only time you are allowed to intentionally kill another human, is when that human poses a threat to yourself or someone else, and you did not incite said threat (so you can't try to assault someone, and then claim self-defense when …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 01:55 AM
1

The issue is either you actually think it's murder so you wouldn't want to "murder" a "baby" even in a rape case, even if she's only 11 years old. I don't know what would give you that impression. I have no qualms about using lethal force in defense of oneself and others. Would I take pleasure in helping an 11-year old girl get an abortion? Not in any way, but I would not deny it, as an 11-year old is not developed enough for a baby, even if they have started their period. This has more to do wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 01:45 AM
1

You used the reasoning of women I'm not sure what you mean by this, since you didn't quote it. If you mean the first section (as I assume you do), then read it again, because I didn't say anything about "reasoning". If the last part, then "poll" is our current laws on murder and how that's different from slaughtering farm animals. Is a fetus a human life? Yes What is a human life? A "creature" with human DNA. It's really not complicated. I’ve gone through them again and again. Come at me The onl…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 01:29 AM
1

If it should be forced for us women You chose the appropriate quote for why you're speaking nonsense, yet couldn't even understand it. So let me spell it out for you. Taking responsibility for your actions, isn't the same as being forced to do something against your will. Hell, by your logic, we should outlaw prisons, because surely criminals don't want to be in jail, so why should we force them to accept the consequences of their choices? How am I a lazy stupid fuck for not working AND you are …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 01:23 AM
1

Yes, a human fetus is a developing human with its own DNA. And? That doesn’t negate that women need to have the right to terminate a pregnancy. Kind of does, I mean it's only the distinction made between why murder (and even just killing in general) is considered bad, and why it's fine to slaughter thousands of farm animals every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 12:52 AM
1

I doubt such a case would happen, I mean I'm a gay Libertarian after all, and I feel I could at least manage to get any daughter of mine to take at least one of the three options available before abortion even becomes an option. That said, I also would question how you know what 15 year-olds getting abortions belong to Republican parents and which ones belong to Democrat parents? You know, so we can actually judge the numbers and see if this is happening with any regularity. A very quick search …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 12:50 AM
1

What should happen in rape cases? What about rape? Tell me, if we agreed rape babies could be aborted, but that's it, would you concede, or would you move the goal post again? What do you think pregnancy and birth does to a person? Humans have been giving birth since long before we were human, so you're going to have to rub your two brain cells together a little harder if you want me to care. Should we be able to take your spare kidney against your will to save another person's life? If I though…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 12:30 AM
1

Because you aren't allowed to murder people because they inconvenience you? And y'all want to say it's the Republicans that are immoral? Here's some advice, though I don't know how you could have missed it seeing as you have access to the internet. If you don't want a kid, then don't have PiV sex. If you're more beast than man, then use contraception. And if you're too stupid for that, or just want to be extra sure, then get plan B the next day. All these choices available to you, and yet for so…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 12:25 AM
0

LOL, until you went full retard, yeah it was basically fine. I mean, we already charge third-party murderers and abusers with killing the fetus, so you haven't really added anything. Men should pay child support from conception The only problem here, would be proving which man is the father. if a woman takes out life insurances on her foetus she should be able to claim it in case of miscarriage or stillbirth. This would have to be up to life insurance companies. I mean no one owes you life insur…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 12:19 AM
1

Learn what a "right" is. Your lack of intelligence aside, no one who is against abortion, is also against child support. The argument there is, if the woman has complete say in the birth, and she is even legally allowed to steal the sperm from the man (rape underage boys, poke holes in condoms, or take used condoms out of the trash; all of which she can then receive child support for, even when said boy is literally too young to legally work), then equality would be allowing men an out as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 12:11 AM
1

It’s interesting how you put a number of <5%, as if the poll said so, That's not what I did. I used the reasons given by women for getting an abortion. Honestly, I think it's even less than 2%, but I went with 5 to give myself a buffer. The abortion argument is a philosophical one No it's not. Hell these two what is life? When does it begin? aren't even philosophical questions. As to the others, they've already been answered, and I can assure you that you don't want to rehash them, as there's on…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 12:08 AM
2

Well if you're stupid, expect to be called stupid. I mean, you and u/CFinCanada actually believe abortion is a right, and you have the nerve to talk about any thing related to intelligence? If I were to waste my time on a woman, it certainly wouldn't be some braindead bimbo that doesn't even understand what a "right" is.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 12:05 AM
1

How many times have you donated your liver? I've donated just about everything else I can. The only immoral one here would be the retards too stupid to use any choice besides abortion, which is why pro-"choice" is nothing more than pro-abortion. That should be goverment protection based and guaranteed Nope. The only guarantee in life is death. You don't get to rob others because you're a lazy stupid fuck. And when it comes to employment or other things we need just to live You aren't owed a job.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 12:01 AM
0

That's patently false If it were true, then your taxes wouldn't work
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 11:57 PM
1

Well, at least you continue to prove the retarded portion.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 11:56 PM
1

Empathy for the first one (incest is irrelevant to me unless it was rape), and for the other there's no point in losing two lives. These aren't difficult concepts, and there's no hypocrisy to be found, I'm also a firm supporter of self-defense even if you have to kill a dumbfuck for acting out.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/21 11:56 PM
1

But they're not "underfunded".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 03:59 AM
0

I mean abstinence is quite literally the only 100% effective way to not get pregnant, and if women waited till marriage, then men would have to as well. For someone that's all about education, you don't seem capable of very much critical thinking. The very fact that you think most women getting abortions are doing so because they were simply too stupid to know about all the contraceptives that are constantly heralded on every tv station and in every movie, is really beyond ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 03:58 AM
0

I thought you said you were smart. What kind of self-respecting person with any intelligence would use such a ridiculous term as "You cannot make this up."?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 03:52 AM
1

Here's a tip, if you don't want to be put in a cage, don't break the law. Got to say, it's odd that a legal immigrant would simp for people that spit in his face, and pretend that human trafficking was suddenly solved so there's absolutely no way anyone could be trying to use a child as cover to cross a border illegally.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 03:49 AM
-1

Lol, it always comes out. No matter how much y'all screech about every -ism and -phobe in the book, if people don't conform to what you think a "proper" minority should believe, it's fine to go full -ism/phobe on them. And all that while being a moron who doesn't even understand what Roe v. Wade actually says, and supporting murders of convenience for people too stupid to prevent a pregnancy in the first world. Granted, the child probably is much better off dead than being born of such brainless…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 03:44 AM
-1

not anti-abortion, 🤔 murderers discussing morals? Very curious. they're not let the hungry starve Literally donate more to charity, but sure they're the ones that will let the hungry starve. Totally not the group that refuses to help unless forced to by threat of police violence. they're not someone should be free to discriminate based on someone's religion/gender/sexuality Literally everyone discriminates on these bases. Sure, you likely only mean very specific forms of discrimination, but cons…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 03:38 AM
0

who support a pussy grabber How prudish of you. What is wrong with a man grabbing a woman's pussy with her consent? Don't tell me you didn't actually listen to the quote and just blindly believed like some kind of religious person. decrease government services, protections and suppor So you're admitting women just want to use the threat of violence to rob men?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 03:31 AM
-8

Abortion isn't a right. But hey, I'm also wondering why any man would date someone too retarded to know what rights are and that murder is bad. 🤣 "Follow the science, but not the science that very clearly tells us that all HUMAN fetuses are unique HUMANS with their own DNA".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 03:27 AM
0

don't think you can argue that AOC and MTG are driven by money and power 🤣 yes miss "tax the rich but I'm going to support people that evade taxes" sure isn't motivated by money. Let me guess, you also have no problem with all your other heroes hoarding money and refusing to live their principles unless they can force everyone to live them. There's nothing stopping rich lefties from donating large chunks of their money to charity and living in cheaper areas, yet they choose to become the very ri…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 03:26 AM
0

Are you claiming you would be fine with limiting abortions to just those <5% of abortions? No? Then why'd you even bring it up?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 03:22 AM
-1

They're all morally bankrupt Says the person that wants to murder people because they were retarded, and said person would be inconvenient to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 03:21 AM
-1

Too bad those things aren't related, but it's not like critical thought is really expected of people too stupid to prevent pregnancy in the modern world.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 03:19 AM
3

It makes perfect sense to anyone with a brain. Most people are accepting of abortion in the <5% of cases where it's being done due to rape, incest, or for the safety of the mother. Why you would pretend that everyone who doesn't want abortion completely outlawed, must therefore be fine with abortions performed all the way up till birth for any reason, is mindboggling.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 03:13 AM
0

The only "control" being taken from your body, is the exact same control you have already given up. Imagine pretending you're making a moral argument, when your argument is that you should be allowed to kill another human because you were a retard and they're an inconvenience to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 03:06 AM
1

You aren't a libertarian if you buy into Democratic nonsense on wealth inequality. Go ahead and tell me how you "combat" wealth inequality while respecting people's freedom. Also, you should have learned long ago that talk is cheap. If they truly cared about these things, they'd do something rather than say "it's fine if I completely abandon my values because the government isn't forcing me to follow them"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/21 03:00 AM
4

I highly doubt that's what is being alluded to, but I guess it is possible. The more likely case would be human trafficking or at least the watered down version that feminists talk about frequently.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen06/12/21 10:38 PM
1

Yes most people are idiots who will claim line B is longer just because everyone else said it was, even if they're certain line A is longer.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/10/21 08:11 PM
1

males are breadwinners in sub 50% of relationships. so more than 50% of men should be contributing the household Pick one. These terms are not interchangeable. And the gender earnings gap is certainly real, and shows that fathers make the most on average while mothers make the least. every stat also says women do an hour and a half of housework per day more than men. You clearly haven't read what's included in these stats. All you should need to know, is that they claim women spend about an hour…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/21 10:34 PM
1

Clearly we aren't on the same page here. You can't be talking about "Baby it's cold outside", because we know what the writer's intentions were with it (plus in the original, the song repeats but with the roles mostly flipped, though it is a different couple). So who are we discussing?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 10:14 PM
1

If she just wanted to enjoy his company, there would be no need for excuses.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 09:36 PM
0

No, people still need to know where the charities are, both to donate and if they themselves need the help. Though that's a bit irrelevant, as your example goes far beyond mere advertisement.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 09:34 PM
1

They do, when single. But when they have to start providing for someone else, it's only fair that that other person contribute to the household. And don't even bother with that "women work too" nonsense, every stat we have says that women work fewer hours, in easier lower paying jobs, that's not an equal contribution.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 09:32 PM
1

Nope, one evening tells you next to nothing. Even a few evenings don't convey much. If one evening was good enough, you'd never hear stories of people unwittingly helping someone cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 09:29 PM
1

Except that's not what you're saying. You're not saying "I'm not horny right now", you're saying "You don't meet my standards for sex".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/21 09:26 PM
1

Men would love to walk in the door w a stranger and have her simp for him for no reason and then leave her and never speak to her again. Not one thing about that is appealing to me. 🤣, okay maybe you personally are like that, but writing that makes it sound like you don't know where the term "simp" comes from. Here's a hint, it's not typically used to refer to how a woman acts towards a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 09:40 AM
2

Look I'm not 100% sure were u/wekacuck was going with this (got thrown off at the rape comment), but it's real simple. Look up the song "Baby it's cold outside". That entire song is one half of the plausible deniability coin. The woman wants to have sex with the man, but she doesn't want to appear easy, and she wants an excuse she can give to her family. I'm sure I've already explained the other side of this coin to you, so we'll leave this here.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 09:37 AM
2

Tell that to all the dead bedrooms that exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 09:24 AM
-1

So nonsense rules invented by the rich, so they can feel justified in mistreating the poor?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 09:22 AM
1

we feed them liquor and then we have a professional auctioneer come in and work the crowd. That's rape. Didn't you make some comment about how important consent is? Also, this is all nonsense, people have no trouble at all donating to women's shelters without receiving anything in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 09:19 AM
0

Ah yes, all the excruciating work of sitting on your ass watching your soaps, while the roomba cleans the floor, the washer cleans the laundry, and someone else makes and delivers your food. Man, no wonder women die so much earlier than men when they lead such difficult lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 09:15 AM
1

The head of women sexually is a desire for the man to believe he is raping her, while she has secretly consented within her own mind, solely to herself. I don't think that's the message you should be sending impressionable men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 09:11 AM
2

Sure, but unless you're discussing a span of months between these two scenarios, you haven't gotten to know or connect with shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 09:07 AM
0

I mean, you yourself admitted your "no" is actually just a "not yet", and you did bring up metoo, which was started as women who willingly agreed to prostitute themselves, revoking consent years after the fact when their undeserved careers started fading.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 09:02 AM
5

When one asks for a drink at his place, women know what he is asking and most women are saying yes when they go over, but have the right to revoke consent at any time should they want to. Even if you responded affirmatively to a direct request for sex, you could revoke it anytime before or during, so this is a complete nonsequitur. The only difference is, if you revoke it before the sex without it being directly requested, then you can act indignant at the idea that you ever intended to have sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 08:41 AM
2

A woman's idea of seduction is merely existing. You don't even get to claim women getting all dolled up is a form of seduction, because plenty will tell you they do it for themselves. If men's version of seduction was the same as women's, we'd have died out long ago, and you're a boldfaced liar to claim otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 08:37 AM
-1

Nonsense and clear bad faith. First off, you already said that agreeing to go home with him means you want to fuck, which means you're already in the mood. You can't want to fuck and not be in the mood, that's contradictory. Second, the plausible deniability is right there blatantly on full display. Since you weren't directly asked for sex, and therefore didn't explicitly agree to it, if you change your mind, you can pretend you never wanted sex in the first place and act outraged that he would …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/21 08:34 AM
1

None of them are cute enough for that I'm afraid.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/21 07:49 AM
1

Unlikely, and certainly not for that reason if it were to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/21 07:48 AM
2

Relentlessly? Nice strawman you've built there.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/21 07:47 AM
4

There is nearly always a power imbalance between any two people, especially if they are of different genders. It's not other people's job to read your mind and deal with your paranoia.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 03:44 PM
1

the woman has to be at work and away from her kid to get free time to herself For the most part, yes, but it also applies to fathers. You can't just put children into stasis when they become inconvenient. You'll have to find somebody to watch them, or allow them to watch themselves if they're old/mature enough (the exact age will vary based on the kid and location). If mothers just allow the father to run around all willy-nilly, that's on them for not putting their foot down. But even then, I st…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/21 05:45 PM
0

Just because you aspire to toil, drudgery, and a lack of self-determination doesn't make the job a piece of cake though, it could just mean you enjoy servitude and didn't like freedom much anyway. And just because you think throwing clothes in the washer is akin to climbing Mount Everest, doesn't make it true.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/21 08:26 PM
1

You expect me to just accept a 7-year old article with literally no links to said "study"? Maybe if I had been a spoiled child and actually was a basement dweller living with my mother, maybe then I would be stupid enough to believe such nonsense, but unfortunately for you none of that is true. I grew up doing the majority of the childcare for my 3 younger siblings (there's a 6 year gap between me and the eldest of them). And I did the majority of the housework, dishes, laundry, yard work, givin…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 11:01 PM
1

There was no rape so far as I'm aware, just a couple of dumb teenagers. She did put in good effort in my youngest stages, but as time went on and she got with an abusive husband, having kids with him, she did less and less. Spending more time on the computer and less time working in or out of the home. She didn't know how to handle kids discovering their own bodies and porn, she was very worried about masturbation "too early", and definitely worried about any of us making or becoming teenage mot…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 10:43 PM
1

You ain't looking hard enough, if you think that's the only hint of a hobby that might be interessting to attract men. The point was simply that it's a hobby you can do at home. Now obviously I can't speak to your local library, but mine found a workaround despite "closing". Even if they had been fully closed, there's always e-books, and I assume most readers have a bit of a backlog on hand (though I guess that depends on how fast you read and how broad your enjoyable genres). As for the price p…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/21 10:31 PM
2

And I don't hate my father. .... . I don't have brothers Missed the point, but at the same time, you've also bolstered it for me. Unless of course this is merely a typo. . I love my husband. I do hate men So despite having a good father, and other men in your life, you still dislike men as a whole. So why would it matter if the women in my life were decent people? I'm sorry about that. For what? One can't even blame her too much. She simply let some jackass impregnate her far too early and then …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/21 12:13 AM
1

Ah, I admit I wasn't entirely sure what you were getting at.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 11:50 PM
3

No Frank Herbert? Can you even call that a collection? But in a more serious manner, if you have so many books, why would you equate the options as being between Netflix and watching paint dry? Hell you've even got a D20 prop there. Though with a hobby like that, it sure would help to be a gold digger.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 11:47 PM
1

You aren't disproving anything. It is an undeniable fact that modern appliances have cut down the time and effort required to do household chores. This helps with child-rearing. Even the actual raising of the children isn't too difficult, ffs it's a job frequently entrusted to teenagers. If being a mother was difficult, my siblings and I wouldn't be here now, yet somehow my mother managed to do it with her ass at the computer desk nearly 24/7 and she certainly wasn't the one doing the chores. An…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 11:40 PM
2

The idea that people assume women are wonderful? Yes that is a phenomenon. Doesn't change anything I've said, nor the stupidity of allowing yourself to fall into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 11:27 PM
3

Don't you have a father or brother to hate? No fucking shit I had a mother, a terrible, lazy, and stupid one, but a mother none the less. You can bullshit about "the thought" all you want, but those of us that use our brains, see through it like a crystal clear lake on a calm day. Life is a never ending series of transactions. Full stop. There is no such thing as a transaction-free interaction. If your husband hadn't taken you on those nice dates, you wouldn't have dated him, so unless you were …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 11:26 PM
2

So what doesn't count as "enjoying life"? There are a number of activities that you can do with little to no cost, especially if it's solo.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 11:07 PM
1

Because you are? I mean, you're the one who claims you either have a useless subscription service or you just watch paint dry. Even if you were just a complete coward who spent all your time in the fetal position because big daddy government said so, you could still read a fucking book.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 10:52 PM
2

Yes, because white people only know "chicken nuggets". No such thing as Italian or German cuisine.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 10:44 PM
2

while she proves with her own existence that we're beyond fair to them. That would only be true if most women acted like her.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 04:07 PM
2

You can pretend all you want, but it's not hard to be a mother in this day and age. You like to talk about how much men hate women, but then have the audacity to act like modern women have it just as tough as women of the past. I have to question if you've ever done manual labor in your life, when you pretend that having modern appliances doesn't make housework and childrearing a thousand times easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 04:06 PM
1

Imagine wasting your time, on a hobby you don't like, just so some skank might decide to grace you with her presence.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 03:43 PM
0

Latinx Anglo-centric racist. But you are right about this It's no different than a Latinx person campaigning for Latin actor to be in a big movie role or on magazine covers imo. They're both beyond retarded, and simply show their own -isms that they can't relate to someone, and use a person as a role model, unless said person looks exactly like them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 03:25 PM
1

So are birds capitalists, or are you going to admit that marketing yourself to potential partners is simply the natural state of relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 03:11 PM
5

Except then the standard will simply rise higher, and what constitutes "ugly" will change.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 03:08 PM
5

Don't play dumb, there's no way you've made it into this sub without knowing what the "women are wonderful" nonsense is. Especially since you so aggressively push it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 09:21 PM
2

Oh so if they're selling themselves for $5 it's better than selling themselves for $1,000?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 09:20 PM
1

Sure, the accuser could be mistaken or not a victim. But is it likely? No. And you know this how? But let's just say women magically barely lie about rape, because they're just absolute angels who would never do such a naughty thing, do you think people should keep their mouths shut about the accused as well? Or is it fine to badmouth them and tear apart their alibis, and then go on to continually insist they must actually be an evil person who just got lucky, if they aren't convicted?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 09:17 PM
8

I seem to notice that most people happily take to my same monogomous and transaction-free sexual wa Just because there's no direct exchange of money, doesn't mean the sex is "transaction-free". Just saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 04:01 PM
8

But it's not 4 people on the whole planet, it's just 4 people that are actually potentially attainable.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 03:50 PM
6

Completely false and just more "women are wonderful" nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 03:46 PM
1

But I'll damn well tell a man who is showing female victims an utter lack of empathy This, is the exact problem. How does said man know this woman is a victim? What's that? He actually doesn't? Oh well then, it's not really so surprising that he treats her like anyone else making claims. You are playing with words to make people shut up without proof. It makes sense that someone who was hurt (or knows the person hurt) would say people are "victim-blaming" them (and in this case it may be true. B…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 01:57 PM
1

If you don't want the question changed to "how likely was the accuser to have consented", then you're going to get even less convictions. So by all means, go ahead and do that, as it's truer to the spirit of "innocent unless proven guilty", but then don't whine about lack of convictions.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 01:45 PM
2

Even as a victim, would you believe me without questioning me? Or would you think twice to defend my assaulter? Many men would, and that's the difference That would entirely depend on what you say. I've been a victim of theft as well, that doesn't mean I'm going to believe everyone fool that tries to say they had 20 original copies of the Mona Lisa stolen from their house. Since we're online and both using pseudonyms as long as you don't say anything super outlandish, I have no problem accepting…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/21 01:28 PM
3

Rape shield laws specifically protect the information about a victim's sexual past, as a victim's sexual past is unduly prejudicial and almost always 100% irrelevant to the current case at hand. Entirely false. It's clear you have little understanding of how rape cases are handled. Outside of very brutal rapes and video evidence or eye witness testimony, it's next to impossible to prove a rape occurred. At best you can prove sex occurred and who it occurred with. What do you do if the accused sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/21 01:13 PM
1

Sorry not paying them, but I did look through the code a little and got this line at least 200 prominent men have lost their jobs after public allegations of sexual harassment. A few, including Mr. Weinstein, face criminal charges. Ignoring that this only focuses on "prominent" men, it literally says that only a "few" of the men fired have had charges brought against them, and that says nothing of convictions.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/21 12:35 AM
1

I mean u/Garth1234567890 isn't wrong, unless you're saying you have tattoos on your body to specify each exact part. He's probably confusing it with the vulva, which isn't that outlandish if he's never played Pokemon, isn't a native English speaker, and/or just didn't pay a lot of attention to the specifics and it slipped because sex isn't sterile. When was the last time you went "yeah lick my vulva" as opposed to simply referring to the vagina as a whole (and likely by some euphemism), if you s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/21 12:27 AM
1

The people who have been exposed in the metoo movement have lost their jobs for credible claims of sexual harassment and abuse If the claims are so credible, then show me the convictions.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/21 12:12 AM
2

Yes, because you realize that you have no defense for "rape shield" laws. Everyone has the right to face their accuser. Accusers who constantly change their story or refuse to cooperate with the police should be treated with skepticism. And that's without going into how biased the naming is, since we don't even know that a rape has taken place until proper evidence and a conviction have been displayed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/21 12:11 AM
2

Why does it matter if they're not 50? Not that cougars and female pedophiles aren't a thing. Hell even I, a fat guy who used to be a fat kid, got my ass grabbed by some of the girls at school, and it's not even like I was one of the charming social types. Now granted, who knows if they were just doing it to be mean or if they actual were looking for something more and expressed it poorly, but the difference between those doesn't mean much for the person being grabbed.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/21 12:08 AM
3

And the only people who believe in privacy rights are criminals.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/21 07:44 PM
3

Believe all women means things like "rape shield laws are good." But they aren't and they literally invalidate your previous statement In the US we have "beyond a reasonable doubt. Rape shield laws exist solely to corrupt the legal system. If they are so good, why are you only applying them to rape accusations?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/21 07:36 PM
2

If that's your definition of harrassment, then everyone, regardless of gender, has been harrassed.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/21 07:34 PM
1

Everyone has a life, and you've certainly no room to dictate what does and doesn't constitute one. But I do wonder why you ask a question when you live the answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 09:21 PM
2

I can't tell if you think all games are Street FightertCall Of Duty, or you just don't recognize the value of puzzles. I lean a bit more to the latter since you seem to act like any genre other than nonfiction is worthless for reading, and you ignore educational television.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 11:58 AM
2

It's literally unheard of, hell you had to make the already extreme nonsense, even more extreme.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 11:27 AM
5

So you're a typical fake nerd that's just appropriating the culture because it's considered "in" now. And in other words, u/User19257 was completely correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 11:08 AM
1

As of ever, you mean? Quite literally, the only way you could ever fix this problem, is if everyone's eyes were modified in some way at birth that it would make it physically impossible for a child to see/read porn of any kind.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/21 10:15 PM
0

Women who watch it are more likely to victim blame and believe rape myths It's not "victim blaming" to disagree that a rape occurred. If you believe porn has such power over people, then you must also believe that video games, tv shows, and movies must be eliminated or at least much more heavily regulated. No more depictions of criminal or unethical behavior. They are told they’re controlling or jealous or insecure Well where's the lie? It’s not an unreasonable expectation that other sexualized …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 05:08 PM
1

You haven't even scratched the surface. There's so much porn out there that's made for free in the first place, and then regardless of origin, people share porn for free all over the internet. Then there's saved porn on devices, and physical copies. Oh and we haven't even discussed using fake ids or stealing someone else's id.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 02:12 PM
2

Because women aren't a hivemind, and adults are free to make their own decisions? Of course, the problem here is that you clearly have a warped definition of "mistreatment". I'm not going to say there's no mistreatment in the industry as a whole, but I'm willing to give u/gimpgirl555 the benefit of a doubt that she doesn't mistreat her actresses. Unless you're religious, I can't see why you would think women aren't allowed to offer sexual services in the same way everyone offers nonsexual servic…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 11:46 AM
–

Oh do tell how humor is a sign of good genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/21 03:29 AM
1

Nonsense. If people were solely stealing cheap bread and bologna then maybe you would have a point. And theft is really the only crime you could link to poverty at all, and there's a lot more crimes than just theft, rape, and murder.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 12:55 AM
1

Well then we just have such fundamentally different definitions that any discussion is useless. There is very little that anyone "deserves" just for existing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 12:53 AM
1

Yes, because I understand how comparisons work, and that they don't have to be one-one.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/21 12:51 AM
3

n a culture that is anti woman 🤣, where exactly is this culture? I mean, sure some communities online, but the real world is all about coddling women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/21 12:40 AM
1

It would be impossible for you to have a high N-count, and not struggle with monogamy. They are linked hand-in-hand.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 03:00 PM
1

I'd say you're being a bit hyperbolic with the theft, and considering the propensity for cheating from promiscuous people (which is still "consensual sex") which can certainly traumatize people, you're clearly just looking for an excuse to not confront reality. Does Stacy need a new daddy that badly?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 02:58 PM
1

By that argument, I hope you work for free, so you aren't some "bum" that needs money to motivate you. I don't really see why the motivation matters, as long as things get done, that's good enough. The only argument I can see from you, would be the idea that men should just want to provide for strangers out of goodwill? Or doing what's "right"? But that only works if we agree on what's right, and even then, I feel confident to say that men still do that much more frequently than women, sure most…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 02:46 PM
0

e don't need to post a study showing murderers are more likely to cheat in order to convince someone not to date them. Not the point at all. The idea, was that you would not get too close to an ex-con, especially a more violent one, for fear that history would repeat. In the same way, it would be foolish to get with someone who clearly struggles with monogamy, and then expect them to not struggle with it. This isn't true at all, it's also not what these stats show. It is entirely true. If they w…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 02:41 PM
1

The hamster is pretending that comparisons can't be made unless they're exactly the same (at which point making a comparison would be unnecessary). I am comparing one action that has a chance of resulting in a bad outcome, to another action that has a chance of a bad outcome. Are you saying that no one can ever stop being a criminal? why is being a criminal so different from being a hoe?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 02:36 PM
2

I guess I can respect that. I agree that a society based around private property and the NAP, would be nice. I simply realize that hierarchies will always form, and there's really nothing you can do about it (your friends and the family you like, will always be above total strangers for instance, through no fault of anyone), especially if you want to respect the NAP. And of course, there are problems with resources being scarce, and the question of if someone gets to them first, it's not really …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 02:34 PM
1

Okay, that got a chuckle, enjoy your upvote.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 02:29 PM
0

I couldn't care less if others "call me out". I'll say it myself, women as a general rule are worthless. Though most men are as well, but it's like 1in 100 versus 10 in 100. That said, there's nothing dishonest about it. The very idea of "internalized (sex/race)-ism", is the idea that if someone dares disagree with you, they must have been just a poor stupid woman/minority who got brainwashed. u/YungxMidorya and yourself can deny it all you want, it doesn't change anything. A woman disagrees wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 02:25 PM
1

Then live in a shack, and use all your wealth to buy buckets and shovels. Only an idiot would follow someone that can't even stick to their own principles. You're almost as bad as organized religion, but at least they give themselves an out by constantly pointing out that no one is perfect. Heck you don't even have to go so extreme. Isn't $75k/year the cut off on happiness generation. Just lower yourself to that, and use everything else to lift up others. Or don't, it is your money after all, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 02:18 PM
1

But you are a hypocrite and you can't just hand wave it. If anyone doesn't actually believe in anything, it would be the hypocrite. And we can see you don't believe in anything, because you don't have to live the life of an "evil rich" person to accomplish your goals. You could live a meager life like your beloved saintly paupers, and direct all extra money to the cause. That doesn't even have to mean merely giving it all away, as you can include spending it for the cause. But buying yourself an…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 02:08 PM
1

because you're sick of being ruled over by people who did nothing but ... start a business Then go start a business and join the "freeloaders".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 02:04 PM
1

Yes, as societies become safer, they relax gender roles, and then things predictable descend into chaos and destruction. This isn't anything particularly new. Even the advances merely follow the trends of technology.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 02:02 PM
1

What? Did you and u/spinsterchachkies just not understand what was typed or are you ....? You can not be a bum on your own, as being a bum requires other people to take care of you. Whether someone fulfilling all your needs (a couch surfer or just all around leech living off family/friends), or getting a bunch of people to give you free money (actually living on the street). And with the later, you would also have to deal with other hazards that the State protects you from, or at least tries to.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 02:01 PM
1

Was something difficult said? You want to say every woman is and always has been unique, but then you turn around and say all men were abusive bastards in the past. You decry women being stereotyped, but nonchalantly go along with the stereotypes of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 01:50 PM
2

You'll also find "multiple good people" who have been thieves, rapists, and murderers; but you'd be a fool to not keep them at a distance. If you have a high N-count you're either incapable of making good decisions and/or incapable of exercising self-control (which circles back to the former). Literally the only exception would be if you were gang raped. The only hamster here is women pretending that their history is irrelevant to their present and future.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 11:45 AM
3

The material conditions? There are no material conditions that make such an imbalance happen. You have to literally ignore ever piece of information available. Even if we pretend poverty causes crime, and throw out a random number like 1 in 100 poor people will commit a violent crime (if poverty is the cause, then there must some consistency), then it would be impossible for that group to commit such a large amount of crime, because there's another group with more total people in poverty that wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 11:32 AM
2

You can't have a society based on anarchy. It's never worked and it never will work.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/21 11:10 AM
2

despite the West being the most successful across many measures. And did the West get successful with or without those roles in place? You've basically just said "Gee, it sure is weird how people are upset that we brought back duels to the death, when we got successful without them." Maybe not as extreme, but the point remains. Of course people are going to be worried about change, especially if they believe the old way is what lead to success in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 04:01 PM
5

No, they're disagreeable. How can you be a bum without anyone looking out for you? You'd just be dead. If men don't get what they want, they either try to take it by force, or leave in search of it elsewhere. It's not that complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 03:21 PM
2

she was lucky if he didn't beat her and kids up. Ah, so men magically fit their unrealistic role, but women were special?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 03:15 PM
1

And how are you getting these stats, especially the ones on healthcare? Are you aware that things like "infant mortality" are calculated differently between countries? For instance if the baby is born alive,and subsequently dies, that is counted as infant mortality in the US; but in other countries the baby has to survive for an arbitrary number of days, or else it is counted as a stillbirth. This means the US will always look worse with all else being equal, but that's the kicker, all else isn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 02:07 PM
1

🤣 imagine believing any system is immune from corruption, but especially a system that reinforces the idea of centralized power and has few qualms with the use of force. Remember, no bad tactics just bad targets.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 01:34 PM
0

Funny how you think "minorities" have to think exactly like you or else there's something wrong with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 01:20 PM
0

It is funny how many rich people claim to be in favor of communism, yet for some mysterious reason can't bring themselves to live by it until a law has been passed forcing everyone to live by it under threat of violence, kidnapping, and death.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 01:18 PM
-1

I'll judge my life as "successful" if I'm able to help in that effort, and if I'm willing to sacrifice my own privileges to give that help. So then why do you need to force others to do so? Put your money where your mouth is and live merely with the basics. For all your big talk, it's not surprising that you yourself are rich. The funny part is how you pretend you're a man of the people. ncluding the billions who will spend their whole lives working incredibly hard at miserable jobs without ever…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 01:15 PM
1

"Fair", you lot love to use that word. How is it "fair" that you should be allowed to rob me, because of your own twisted view on what I should do with my money? The answer of course is that there's nothing fair about it. You simply prefer one form of unfair circumstances over another.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 01:01 PM
1

Do you work for money? Or does it just magically appear in your mailbox? I don't disagree that prostitution is bb-lite, but to claim prostitution is rape, is beyond ridiculous. And that's without even getting into the discussion of the difference of high end "escorts" (who clearly aren't as desperate as a back alley prostitute) nor the fact that prostitution doesn't require an exchange of money (any good or service will suffice).
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/21 12:54 PM
28

Well, if memory serves correct, she was being raped by her father, and we can assume that that had an effect on how she viewed love and sex. But she did still make her choices in life, and one can be a victim and a perpetrator at the same time.
/r/MGTOW227/07/21 05:31 PM
1

I haven't heard much good about Dr. Who or Star Trek, but I can't speak for them personally. The Mandalorian is an exception in this regard, as far as I remember, but it has so many writing flaws that it can't really qualify as a good example.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 05:00 PM
2

Doing the bare minimum of what humans should be doing, According to who? Because even what the OP is talking about already goes beyond "bare minimum". Bare minimum would be simply not actively harming others, but basically everyone already does that, so this discussion would never crop up if that's where we're at. Of course, people may argue about what "actively harming" someone looks like. You could try to claim that not hiring someone is a form of actively harming them, but surely you see the …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 12:07 PM
0

which aren't into heavy patriarchy and screwed traditionalism, But you're into these things, seeing as you don't think women should be allowed to directly trade sex for other goods or services.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 11:58 AM
1

That works out fine, until it gets canceled for not being "inclusive". We can look at instances like Gab being railroaded for the Capital protests, despite the fact that most of the organizing was done on Facebook (and by FBI plants).
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 11:46 AM
2

Lol. Maybe if you'd said "a single movie", but most tv shows are absolute garbage, and they're constantly about putting men in their "place", even when said men are the main characters.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/21 11:39 AM
1

It's not a feeling Lillth, I made plenty of replies on your other post specifically on this study, which you never replied to. The study itself claims attractive men get a lot more messages than the less attractive men, which is the opposite of what that first graph you keep citing says.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/21 05:12 PM
1

Then get off my post. Lol I didn't know it was yours till I saw you with the OP tag. Because you guys think being hot and sucking dick equals good lover. Yes, the person who actually has sex with you is the superior lover. I mean you can make some argument about quality over quantity, but there is a limit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/21 05:10 PM
1

Imagine having women throw themselves at your feet, and yet claiming you don't have any of that "TRP claptrap". But good luck with all this nonsense as feminists fight for cold approaches to be made illegal, and approaching at work or school/college into sexual harassment.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 06:08 PM
-3

think most men on this page have a variety of women looking to date them 😆 I would even wage a guess that 99% of men on here do 🤣 So many times I hear men saying that women’s standards are too high, or they are superficial but in the next breath say : I am not dating her she is fat Not wanting a fat partner isn't a high standard. Or at least it sure as hell shouldn't be, especially since women are supposedly bombarded with messaging telling them not to be fat and they just can't help but be meek…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 06:05 PM
-1

Come on Lilly, you know damn well that that studies bogus. Funny how you never replied to me pointing out how it's impossible for women to mostly message less attractive men and yet the more attractive men receive multiples more messages. If women are messaging less attractive more, it's only because they're counting replies, which is not the argument you're making.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 05:43 PM
2

She came to that conclusion because she's u/LillthOfBabylon. There's no point in trying to talk to her. She just said men have to put up with all women being shitty lovers, but then claims that it's simply men picking shitty lovers, and therefore there must be good female lovers out there. At best, her claim would be that bimbos are shitty partners, but clearly they're the superior lovers.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 05:39 PM
1

That would depend entirely on why they "don't want" kids, and how far their empathy extends. By this argument, then no one should care about anything that won't happen till after their death.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 10:13 PM
5

Honestly, I agree with you. She doesn't have cankles, her arms aren't all flabby, and at least from this angle she doesn't have a double-chin. Sure a side view would give us a more honest look, but unless this is photoshopped to hell, these guys are over exaggerating. And yeah, it is a weird choice for the setting, but then again fat people should be in the gym.
/r/MGTOW23/07/21 08:28 PM
3

The other people would be those who don't share your values and concerns. If everyone who's worried about climate change decides to not have kids, then they'll just be replaced by kids that weren't raised to care about the environment. This isn't difficult, your urge to jump to racism just reveals a guilty conscience.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 06:17 PM
1

Look at the homicide rates You mean the ones that day women are murdered so infrequently as to nearly be statistically irrelevant? look at intimate partner violence stats You mean the ones that say domestic violence is equal, it's just that men are stronger and women are more fragile, so there's a higher chance of her suffering a serious/lethal injury?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 06:07 PM
3

That's not how history worked, but keep acting like you know anything. For starters, women have always worked outside the home. The problem is that life was much harder in the past, plain and simple, housewife took much more time and effort, and work outside the home was generally much more dangerous. It was a natural divide based on the fact that men and women are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 02:57 PM
-1

But the simple truth is that women do value men. Very much. And men’s sense of health and happiness is important. 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 02:54 PM
0

Ha, imagine still thinking women owe you anything just because they said "I do".🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/21 02:52 PM
2

There are so, so, so many women who are perfectly happy dating and marrying I would question this. There is a bit of a chicken or the egg debate here. As a general rule, married men make the most out of any group of people. Now whether this is just because the men women want to marry already make more, or have the right qualities to do so; or women push them to make more (a sorta "keeping up with the joenses" scenario), is not really known. Now sure, some of it is just plain environmental factor…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 02:10 PM
1

I can't speak for the California one, but the US as a whole did have men, women, and then combined. While the female number was lower, the men's one wasn't that much higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/21 02:04 PM
37

Dude, you think $200k/year is normal. A quick search puts median income in California at ~$75k/year, and only ~$40k/year for the US as a whole. I don't disagree with your general point, but your view is clearly skewed.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 10:00 AM
3

but if given the opportunity So now men are evil for going along with women's desires?🤣 Though I guess that's nothing new.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 12:12 AM
1

The government is responsible for making sure that healthcare is affordable No they aren't. The only things the government are responsible for are, handling disputes between citizens when an agreement can not be met, and dealing with other nations.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 10:23 PM
1

It doesn't ignore it, it notices it and realizes that it causes the slow death of most relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 09:57 PM
0

Funny that you idiotic Europeans are the ones unable to see that it's the government's fault that healthcare isn't affordable in the first place, so it's beyond idiotic to give them even more control over it. Funny how healthcare was affordable before the government and insurance companies got involved, but we're supposed to believe that the two groups that fucked it up are the ones being billed as the solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 09:48 PM
2

They are sexual interactions. I meant that it's like people saying those actions aren't cheating since there was no penetration involving genitals. I was a little rushed as my break was ending.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 05:20 PM
2

I mean, this was funny, but I assume they meant if someone else used a toy on them, otherwise a girl fingering herself would get 1 extra N. Shit wrong person, I meant to tag u/Novadina
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 05:16 PM
1

Personally, I'd have to go with the amateur pornstar. Even if I don't entirely agree that girl 1 would have an N of 20, the pornstar sounds more reasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 05:13 PM
6

That's true enough, but it's like saying dry humping and making out are fine, so long as your clothes stay on. Sexual interaction is sexual interaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 02:15 PM
1

No, it's called being realistic and not some dumbass that would jump into a fire pit because hey maybe I magically won't burn like the 70 other times/people who jumped in. Take your head out of the clouds and see the world for what it is. The whole point of my comment is trying to find why relationships fail, so you can avoid causing your relationship to fail.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 11:31 AM
1

With regard to the clothes shopping, I would like to see the studies in question Gee, way to just admit you've never read the studies you tried to tote as fact. As for your first comment. I've done both lines of work, and I'd take retail any day of the week for similar pay. Customers may be assholes, but it's a thousand times better than having your boots literally melt as you're working (not that all manual labor involves repairing industrial furnaces or working with asphalt, but enough does).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 11:16 AM
2

Bullshit. Firstly, women have absolutely no problem with getting with men that have terrible personalities, men that have no problem being misogynistic in public, and who will constantly beat them. Secondly, if these men were alright or even attractive in the eyes of women, they never would have had the chance to fall into this "low self-esteem and insatiable greed" mindset. Of course, point two relies on women actually being humans with the ability to think for themselves, but apparently a lot …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 11:34 PM
2

For me, looking at the way most of these guys talk about women on this sub I am so relieved that they aren’t meeting women because they sound like they’d treat them awfully That's alright, women will still constantly get with men who beat them, just because said men actually are attractive and can talk well.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 11:29 PM
4

I mean, if women are incapable of independent thought, then it seriously was a mistake to give them the right to vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 11:25 PM
3

people not accepting that there’s other types of attraction than simple physical attraction Bullshit, it's very much accepted. The question is what it means for the future of the relationship. Clearly most relationships are doomed to fail, and there must be a reason for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 11:24 PM
1

How has this OKCupid nonsense been constantly pushed? Have any of you actually looked at it? These graphs that Lillith has pushed are impossible considering this graph shown later in the study. Unless of course they've done something to the numbers, but then they're misrepresenting the data because they don't tell us what the fuck they did to the numbers. Also, why is this more recent data never talked about?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 11:20 PM
2

The graph is literally a misrepresentation, or the writer lies about further data later in the study. This graph claims that the most attractive men receive 11x the messages of the least attractive, which is impossible if you look at the first graph. Even the graph for men messaging and rating women doesn't add up.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 11:16 PM
1

I am already collecting You keep using that word. If that's intentional, then the answer is that men don't get free money just for existing. If it's a language issue, then you want to use "earning" in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 11:13 PM
4

Her graph is also bullshit, as shown by another graph later in the study, and as stated by the writer. Which makes me question why this data is constantly used, when the writers flat out contradict themselves. How can only about 1% of messages go to 5s, while literal 0s are getting over 10% of messages, and at the same time 5s are 11x more likely to receive messages than 0s?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 11:09 PM
0

Again, the fact that women do more even if they work the same is proved by research, Except, it's literally not. First off, it's near impossible to find relationships where both partners work the same job for the same hours. Sure, the woman may work the same hours, but 8 hours cashiering is nothing compared to 8 hours of construction work. Not even close. Second, those "studies" about housework are absolute garbage if you would actually bother to read them. They claim women spend several hours E…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 11:05 PM
2

LOL, getting plastic surgery isn't improvement.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 10:55 PM
2

There's nothing exaggerated about it. Which is why you didn't even try to argue against the fact that women hardly message first. And actually, I'd like to thank you. you see, I admit I've never bothered to look too much into this research, but I wanted to see if we were in fact talking about first messages, or just messages sent in general. So I went and had a look. First things first, this graph (number of messages recieved vs recipient's attractiveness) seems a bit odd considering the graph y…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 10:50 PM
1

Fucking LOL millions upon millions of forgotten and ignored that live and die in abject poverty. What absolute bullshit. Sure, if you want to try and extrapolate it to the whole world, but then there'd be no point in discussing literally anything with you. Let me guess, you also compare average rent to minimum wage, and pretend that a significant portion of Americans make minimum wage, and try to support a family of 10 on that single income?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 10:01 PM
1

Not everyone has siblings, and most people lose their parents eventually, some much sooner than others. But it's all irrelevant anyhow, as single people are more likely to commit suicide, regardless of their friend/family situation. And friends ain't going to financially support you while you're sick/recovering from an accident or trying to get a business off the ground. In your specific predicament Oh do tell me more about my predicament. I admit, I'm not super secretive about my life, but you …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 09:55 PM
2

No, I know it makes sense because I have a brain. There's a reason so many people would prefer to live in "poverty" in the US, than to live above the poverty line in most of the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 09:38 PM
3

actually put forth some effort to be a decent human being Ah yes, how could I be so blind. Since I refuse to worship the ground women walk on, it's impossible for me to be a decent human being, despite basically running a halfway house through my own home on my meager income (never grossed $50k in a single year). I've tried to argue this point and explain why women's attraction works differently from men's I bet you've also claimed that men shouldn't treat women differently, nor act like they're…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 07:59 PM
2

Yes yes yes, everything in existence is men's fault, because women merely exist, with no will or independent thought to their names. Simply reacting to whatever stimuli they receive, in a preprogrammed way that they can never diverge from.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 07:50 PM
–

Yup, who cares if he beats you or diddles kids, so long as he doesn't actively know about the manosphere, it's all good.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 05:59 PM
–

And yet we still give him a chance Except you don't. Women barely message first, so what little they throw to men with bad photos, or even actually unattractive men, is statistically irrelevant. We don't even have to go into the fact that we don't know the content nor context of these messages, which would change how the interaction is viewed. And you certainly can't count replies, as that tells you even less than first messages.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 04:41 PM
0

You've got yourself and being happy with that, truly pleased, will make everything else so much easier. Is that why there's millions of stories about how "being alone saved people from depression", or how "people are so glad they were alone when they got sick/into a bad accident", or how "people are glad they had to start a business and do everything themselves"? Oh wait, those stories don't exist. It's all about how having a partner makes life easier and better.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 10:51 AM
0

Hence also millions of people living in poverty while the one percent is filthy rich, Poverty is a relative term, and just because someone has more than you, doesn't mean you don't have enough to live comfortably. You've literally fallen for statistical and emotional manipulation. Or you just think everyone else should pay for your poor choices, hence this nonsense better social security and universal healthcare etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 10:43 AM
4

And, well, I might be wrong, but I think porn is mostly produced by men, so what we see there is what they consider sexy, not women who watch it. This is just our nonsense. It's even worse than whining about how men write the laws on abortion" (when there are plenty of pro-abortion men, and plenty of pro-all-choices-but-one women, so you could still easily wind up with abortion being criminalized), because these "super bad evil men" are trying to make money. Besides, all we have to do is look at…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/21 03:33 PM
1

I'm not disagreeing that it's more mentally taxing for the woman to fuck all your friends. The question here is, what reward is the man getting from being a cuck? ​ So if I suck my man's dick together with another woman, that's lesbian as fuck? Clearly the answer would be yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 01:09 PM
1

A man isn't getting any "money's worth" out of you fucking other men, unless he's literally pimping you out, whether for money or status (like having you sleep with his boos so he can get a raise/promotion). You're advocating cuck shit, and there's no two ways about it. As for this Having sex with a woman is now "gay"? If you're rubbing up against another dude, or staring at him, while fucking a woman, then yes, that's gay as fuck, and they're just using you to pretend they're straight.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 08:19 PM
1

I have my doubts about that. Namely because sharing a woman is quite literally gay as fuck, especially if in any kind of 3way or more. And I should know, because I love my femboys. Though I guess I could agree that if the man doesn't give a single fuck about the woman, he may be fine with having her do things that will make him like her even less.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 09:20 PM
1

He was in jail and convicted. Wrongly, as proven by his release he made a deal to get no jail time by saying they were drugged consensually. Idek how that happened but it did It's very simple, they said "I want drugs", he said "okay" and gave them the drugs. There was evidence No there wasn't. There is no evidence that would survive 11 fucking years. I’m not downplaying anything. Except for when you keep insisting that just because the men aren't killed, that means it doesn't matter, because you…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 09:18 PM
1

Then what are you doing here? This is worse than porn for the youngins.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 05:54 PM
3

And you haven't once thought about why you just so happen to be an exception to the fat disgusting sows Or why you just so happen to magically never get along with an attractive woman that is poly?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 05:26 PM
2

What? Men aren't typically known for their willingness to share.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 04:37 PM
1

Women wanting to sleep with many other men is so unbelievably counter to what I've experienced it's hard for me to believe this isn't the manifestation of some deep seated desire for my relationship to be a failure. Okay, so explain why the relationship would be a "failure" if your wife slept around, yet it's magically not a failure when you sleep around. Like I get the base feeling ofcourse. I don't like the idea of any partner of mine sleeping with other masculine men, but I would have no obje…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 03:30 PM
0

🤣 sure thing buddy. Socialism can work, but only in small groups that enforce banishment for people who don't pull their weight. As for large groups, it could only ever be successful in a post-scarcity environment with robots doing most, if not all, of the menial work, and at that point, it's hard to even call such a situation socialist.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 10:07 AM
-4

Think about Bill Cosby. B You mean the guy being released from jail because there was literally no evidence to convict on? Which means he was wrongfully convicted, and that you don't believe in due process. And if you look at stats, majority of women in domestic violence situations were women with no prior relationship experience. Irrelevant if even true, considering the majority of domestic abuse is reciprocal, and a good chunk of one-sided abuse comes from women. Women abusers have a bit of an…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/21 10:02 AM
1

Maybe not in an overpriced landscape like L.A. or NYC, but there are plenty of cheaper places.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/21 06:05 PM
-1

I’m not blowing the problem out of proportion. I live in the US, mass shootings are a regular issue, violence against women is an every day occurrence. If violence against women is an "everyday issue", then violence against men is an every minute issue. You are blowing things out of proportion, as anyone capable of googling crime statistics can see.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/21 01:43 AM
1

I can't speak for the other guy, but personally I had 5 credit cards before I got into debt (not counting my mortgage and auto loan), but 2 were store specific, 2 were linked to a store but could be used everywhere (1 I used everywhere because of the perks, the other I got used at it's store for "no interest with payment" uses), and then 1 general use card (which was my first credit card). For a very long time I never went more than a month without paying the cards off (and usually not even that…
/r/MGTOW229/06/21 05:47 PM
1

I meant from the perspective of the rando being "traumatized". I've definitely got pissed, but I never turn my mic on when I'm ranting, so I don't have the perspective of the one insulting others over little shit. But, the fact that you think it's "traumatizing" to hear/read some words from a nobody, is all I need to know that this discussion is worthless. You've just proven that men would have no trouble being on the female side of dating (remember the actually point being discussed).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 07:07 PM
1

It has nothing to do with what "should" or shouldn't be. Human rights are not privileges granted to you by the government. They're specifically things you would still have if the government feel apart tomorrow. As u/TheSmallerGambler said there's no such thing as a "right to be healthy", at least not beyond your own decisions. It's like that nonsense feminist argument about a "right to feel safe". There is no such thing. It's also funny, when we consider that many European countries that claim "…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:25 PM
1

Yes, because one of those things you get on your own, the other is being given to you under the threat of violence. It's not a complicated topic. Human rights are things you have regardless of the existence of a government, not privileges granted by the government.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:14 PM
1

You think that shit's a joke? Only if you're actually friends, otherwise it's just whiners venting because they're losing. You nail the difference, who cares if it's just some rando online, but the situation you were talking about is the same thing, randos online. Even in person, the man doesn't necessarily have "power over you", that would depend on the setting, because power is more than just physicality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:07 PM
0

And? The person I was dating had met my mother, it doesn't change anything. And now what, my mom has been dead for a while now, so are all my future relationships going to be worth less because they can never meet her?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/21 06:01 PM
1

The truth is that wages in the United States have been stagnant since the 1970's Is that why everyone lives like kings from just a hundred years ago?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 10:14 PM
-4

basic education, uni and healthcare is free because we see them as human rights Then you don't understand what human rights are.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 10:06 PM
1

See, I just can't comprehend stories like this. You knew the guy for all of one month, if even, and had only been on two dates with him. And you knew he was a single dad, yet you just completely lowered your guard and jumped right into bed with him. Being hot and/or a smooth talker truly does wonders for people. Here I lay, being neither of those things, getting ghosted after a much longer relationship that never progressed past a few kisses and hand holding.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 12:48 AM
1

Because of name calling from randos? You mean the very thing that men do to each other all the fucking time? One of the first things that comes to mind when people think of male dominated spaces, especially when anonymity is involved, like multiplayer video games or internet forums?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/21 12:26 AM
4

The question being ignored is, is the work worth it? OP very clearly subscribes to the "happy wife, happy life" nonsense. He admits the wife could change, but it's up to the man to just accept and accommodate these changes, regardless of how he feels about them. Or else it becomes his fault that the marriage didn't work out. Sure it's technically true to an extent but most people would lay the fault on the person who wants to change the terms, not the person that refuses the changes. For example…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 03:11 PM
2

The opening post? Where the OP claims you can 100% vet a perfect partner? The same OP who goes on to claim it's 100% the man's fault if his wife changes and he doesn't change for her to keep the marriage alive? While also claiming most marriages are happy, healthy, and functional, despite the obvious contradiction from pushing "happy wife, happy life" nonsense? Yeah, that's totally a good post from someone that totally knows what they're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 02:34 PM
1

If you "like science" then you'd hate a study that lumps never married, divorced, and widowed men all in the same basket, as if there aren't significant differences between those groups. This is no different from the bullshit "science" behind the gender wage gap.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 02:19 PM
2

If you believe you can't do something, it won't happen. But don't equate that as reality for everybody when other people are making it happen in their lives. okay, go ahead and command the mountain to move. Itll surely sprout lefs and apologize profusely if you just believe it enough. I never said anything about monogamy in what I was referring to. Yeah, what you actually were referring to is a time of rampant rape, but you claim they were "stable relationships", so it's no surprise the other gu…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/21 02:04 PM
1

Yeah, I'm sure calling other people incels had nothing to do with it.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/21 12:06 PM
1

I mean "femicide" is a play on "homicide", not "genocide", so it could fit. Though typically the implication is that the woman was killed for being a woman, which is usually nonsense.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/21 12:00 PM
1

Well that's because women are typically irrationally paranoid. Sure, if it was late at night and you were in an isolated place, then fear could be justified. But you're talking nonsense in nearly any other circumstance, and the history of how women have been treated tells us they'd be safe, and happily defended if they were aggressed upon.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/21 11:22 AM
2

If your definition of "adult skill" is "random nonsense that changes ever 5 seconds", then sure, I guess fashion would qualify.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 04:24 PM
1

The only bullshit, is you claiming that the breaking of a relationship normalizes domestic violence. And yes, newsflash people can be good in some areas and bad in others.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 10:11 AM
1

A sane person? Someone that thinks people are one-dimensional? Okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/21 10:08 AM
1

Democracy is tyranny of the masses, that's why the US is a constitutional republic.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen22/06/21 10:02 AM
4

That would depend on what exactly their talking about. Most opinions would fall under free speech, and at that point it's irrelevant whether or not you want to hear it (and it's almost certainly an exaggeration that you would never want to hear someone's opinion on your body, just depends on who's giving it). If they're talking about making laws, well that's just democracy. So actually, I can't think of any situation in which they would have a point.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/06/21 12:01 PM
0

While it's a waste of time, I shall enlighten anyone else that may stumble upon this. Rape is next to impossible to prove. Without it being particularly violent, a recording of some kind (though these will be less reliable as "deepfaking" advances more), or a witness coming upon the scene, you could never overcome the burden of proof. The best you can do is prove that sex occurred, but proving it was nonconsensual would be out of the question. So, in order to actually imprison some rapist, the c…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/21 10:44 PM
1

Well is it just a clump of cells or not? Either way, it's still more than is afforded to the man, who may have made many efforts to not have the child in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/21 10:27 PM
-1

Admittedly, "uppity" doesn't really convey what I want to say, but I can't think of a better word. Maybe something like being self-righteous or all-knowing, despite in fact being wrong and/or knowing little/nothing. I could do it clinically, but it wouldn't be as fun, though it might be hard to do it without the sexism, since men seem to have a better understanding of how the legal process works for trying rape cases, so it would be weird to address it to them. But there are some male feminists …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/21 01:17 AM
1

You seem to have missed the point. Humans live only because of pattern recognition and comparing new things to old things. You have basically said that if all you knew was the typical orange/red fire, you would burn yourself on a blue flame, even after seeing it cook meat in a similar fashion to red flames. There is quite literally no way for you to not compare any man you think might be dateable, to well frankly nearly every man you know, or at least general ideas of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/21 01:12 AM
3

Not a problem, those women could give those babies up for adoption, and never have to worry about them again. Women were so often leaving babies out to die that a number of states have implemented "baby boxes" where a woman can abandon her child without responsibility or repercussion (unless there's clearly been abuse) just so the baby doesn't die from exposure. Whereas the men in any of these cases would have to flee and hide from the authorities in order to not be beholdened to the woman and c…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/21 12:06 AM
1

But sacrifices have to be made if you want to have sex and don’t want to have a baby. Or just have literally any kind of sex besides PiV.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/21 11:46 PM
4

Why are women so uppity about rape, yet so ignorant about it as well? Finding a woman that actually understands the, frankly basic, process of prosecuting an alleged rape case, seems to be nothing but a pipe dream. And you have the audacity to act high and mighty because you research for a living. Seems we all should be worried about the results of your labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/21 11:18 AM
–

So women aren't human, nor barely even animals, or is it just you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 01:43 AM
5

Nah, women constantly slap men over the smallest of slights, and that is by definition physical abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/21 02:47 PM
1

If god cared so much, why didn't he deliver your "perfect" man in the first place? Why did he allow the oh so terrible man (that you married and had three kids with, despite supposedly being sexually unsatisfied, but I guess we're just skimming past all the important bits) "mismanage" church funds?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/21 04:55 PM
1

If I'm playing the "dumb bumbling man", then you're playing the "helpless damsel". ​ Also your claim doesn't even particularly go against mine, because I never said men never use manipulation. Explaining how a man might manipulate a woman, doesn't prove that men do it more, despite the fact that men are naturally built with the ability to use more active means of getting what they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 10:11 PM
–

I mean, you can't fix stupid, and it doesn't get much stupider than thinking cold-hard cash is the only form of payment (while ignoring that the wife likely has access to the checkbook anyhow, so she's getting that as well), so why can't those of us with at least two brain cells get some entertainment out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/21 10:00 PM
0

Lol, ignoring the fact that "emotional intelligence" is nonsense with no science behind it, it's funny how normally the claim would be that women are more emotionally intelligent, and yet now magically men are more emotionally intelligent but use it for evil? 🤣 Sure thing, even though this doesn't even pass the smell test considering men don't need to rely on manipulation as much as women
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 02:26 PM
1

Women consistently outperform men at all levels of education. Yeah, because girls are graded with a positive bias for the same answers.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/21 09:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter