TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jammersault Archive

View 0 posts and 480 comments by Jammersault on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The first sentence is designed to somehow prove that generalisations don't make a rule. That's true, but some generalisations have more validity than others. Providing one example of how a generalisation that doesn't work, doesn't not prove anything accept that the generalisation doesn't work in the example that what was provided. Of course some people just argue against any kind of generalisations being made on principle, while genwtaliaing themselves. Which generalisations have weight and whic…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 02:45 AM
1

Well actually, the more men that avoid feminist women, regardless of whether you agree with the reasons why or not, it does in fact create a problem for women. As we are finding out as more men avoid marriage, more women bemoan that fact, and the more feminists criticise men for it. Funnily enough, feminists don't seem to give a shit much about anything unless it affects women, and that's why they only whinge about men avoiding marriage when it becomes clear it's having an adverse affect on the …
/r/MensRights19/12/17 02:03 AM
2

"I haven't met one who wasn't offended yet".....so a female that has no comprehension of why men may be even slightly hesitant in regards to marriage doesn't really sound like a safe bet to start caving into does it. Quite a reliable red flag I'd say and you're on to it. It's definitely best for men to lay their cards on the table with women straight up. Obviously feminist conditioning actually promotes quite the opposite doesn't it. But when men defy the arse kissing trend they are being shamed…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:24 AM
1

I agree that to truly understand the genders a truthful view on nature and biology is essential. That's where feminism went off the rails right from the very start. Their ignorance and naivety in regards to human nature and biology hasn't improved one iota in time. In my opinion anyone on the MRA side of any discussion accepts these truths better on average than anyone on the feminist side. You're right, ignorance is on both sides when you are talking big numbers of people. I think the reason th…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:02 AM
2

People being able to have conversations are the only way things ever get resolved. Silencing people and policing language just creates division, as we can all see. I'm happy to talk with you. You seem very genuinely concerned about a few things affecting men which is great. I've got a funny feeling since you say you don't demonise anyone for choosing not to be a feminist that you kind of understand why many people including women might be a little suspicious about someone that identifies as a fe…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 12:44 AM
3

And there is a difference between criticising feminism and feminist women and 'denigrating all women'. Criticising and calling out the people that are pushing damaging feminist bulkshit is not denigrating all women. Repeat - IT ISN'T DENIGRATING ALL WOMEN!!! Not all women think this, don't know why you should.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 12:01 AM
3

Feminists label men misogynists for having the ability to blow louder farts. It doesn't matter what men say, or how they say it. Women that are wise enough to see feminism for what it is undersywvd this, don't you? Haven't you worked that out yet? Is 'honestly fuck off' stronger or just more moralistic than a standard old FUCK OFF!? In your opinion people should 'use less harsh language'? If it wasn't for people like you, no one would have any clue about how to campaign for men's rights properly…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 11:54 PM
3

I'll add, generally men that hate their own masculinity are feminists. Generalisations can be meaningful whether feminists like that fact or not.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 11:16 PM
1

Your first sentence can be applied to a million things. Your second sentence although intended to does nothing to qualify your first. By themeselves, those two sentences are fine, but the sum of the two sentences says nothing more than they do individually. The truth is that people generalise, its human nature. Some people think it's perfectly fine to generalise about certain groups and drop a bollock when it happens in other instances. Generally women that hate men, are feminists. Can hardly ar…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 11:15 PM
2

Correct, they do believe they are right, but a bigger number of people think they are wrong. If this wasn't true, there wouldn't be an argument. If this wasn't true feminism wouldn't be getting so much criticism and feminists wouldn't be constantly in damage control trying to convince everyone that they don't hate men.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 11:03 PM
3

The fact that you are fighting against the lies that some feminists tell about DV, Rape Culture, Gender Pay Gap etc etc should make you feel good in yourself. The fact that you realise that some feminists are the only people standing in the way of men and children getting a fair crack in the family law court. Fighting against those things is a very worthy cause, and unfortunately it's very necessary that feminism gets it fair share of criticism in order to do that. Many men that fight for good c…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:52 PM
2

What you described is spot on! I've actually tried to explain that very thing to my feminist sister. Nope! She can't see anything in it at all, no surprise. Feminism is bad for everyone. It is an interesting difference between my two sisters. My younger feminist leaning sister just can not see that she is her own worst enemy. My older sister is definitely more like the women men should want to hang with. I also think that many of the decent non feminist women out there aren't that hell bent on j…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:33 PM
2

I always find it amusing when I hear feminists accuse people of not having a respectful understanding of science. Like, bwaaaaahaaaaahaaaaa!
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:08 PM
1

So it's a bit like a pyramid scheme. It needs an exponential increase in bullshit to feed it. Makes sense, that's what we're seeing.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:43 PM
2

I think we are on the same page yes. I hear what you are saying. Just a quick one for ya. I've got 2 sisters. One is a champion, married a really good bloke, couple of kids, solid as a rock. My brother in law is respected fully by my sister as he should be. Life is good for this sister and her entire nuclear family. My other sister though, well, she's not exactly a complete loud mouth man hating feminist, but she has a shit load of feminist kind of ideas if you know what I mean. So for years and…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:21 PM
2

I don't actively encourage marriage for men buddy. Actually quite the opposite. I fully understand why men should avoid those pitfalls. I'm not bragging, not saying NAWALT. The point I'm making is that men should chose wisely the women they chose to be with. It's much easier for men to chose wisely if they can tell the difference between a feminist man hater and a non feminist man hater. If they aren't educated about feminism they're fucked aren't they! If they've been raised by a feminist man h…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:25 PM
2

I know what you mean. Some men feel the need to pander to women and some don't. In my exierience decent women don't want pandering to and false ego stroking from men. They take that crap from other women all the time. From men they want authenticity, not pretentious bullshit. Decent women that aren't infected with feminism sniff a male feminist arse kisser a mile away. Male feminists aren't attractive to the kind of women that self respecting men want to hang with anyway so I'm with you. I'd rat…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 04:40 AM
1

Yep, totals! Women on average have always struggled in male dominated environments particularly when there is hard work involved. I think that it's ironic that we could end up with a gendered split workforce (and everything else), the very thing they've always fought against. It will be no less problematic but justified though when it's because 'men can't be trusted', and not because of patriachy. Another example of how feminists care less about results than they do about how things look. An una…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 03:48 AM
2

Sounds like a lot of reasons. So this is what I'm passing on to the next person I hear say "I believe all female accusations because why would they possibly have a reason to lie"......nah, couldn't possibly ever be a motivation for a woman to lie. Everyone else on the planet sure, but not women nah.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 03:30 AM
3

6 months regret rape = lawyer, that's why 'shyster' legal firms are starting to 'bank' on false accusations. Police might not believe that false accusations exist, but law people do. These dastardly lawyers that can possibly believe than men can be innocent enough to want to represent them. I mean, it's absurd!!! The feminists should look on the bright side, given that female lawyers are going to be in very high demand for obvious reasons it's going to be a boon for women within the male dominat…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 02:51 AM
3

No but millions of men saying they've been falsely accused and millions of women being found out to be liars means something right? The advertisement may be about 'attracting' men accused of rape but that has nothing to do with anecdotes or credible sources. It's a sign that there is now a very real market for the legal industry to represent men that feel they have been falsely accused of rape. There's more women being exposed as liars every day, it makes sense the legal brains would sniff a dol…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 02:02 AM
6

Yep. Teachers are frustrated because innocent children see through the lies and are starting to ask inconvenient questions. Kids don't have all the answers, yet. Kids never have all the answers, hence why they need guidance in life. But kids have an ability to sense when they are being bullshitted to. Last I heard kids have a tendency to ask questions. Shock horror! The funny thing is that this hasn't been a problem for teachers while the kids were believing all the lies. So kids believing bulls…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 01:30 AM
5

So they started trying selling their bullshit to men. That didn't work quite well enough because as we know, toxic masculinity everywhere. So they evolved into trying to sell this shit to younger and younger men (read: boys) to head of the evolution of toxic masculinity, And surprise surprise, it's being rejected. Wonders will just never cease! It's almost like men inherently don't really believe their masculinity is toxic. Who would have thunk it.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 01:13 AM
1

It doesn't make one ounce of sense! "I contend" that "we cannot" blah blah blah. I guess her meaning of "we" are the people that will agree with that nonsensical statement. And she speaks for all of them. It kind of proves what kind of people they are trying to appeal to doesn't it. This silly woman honestly believes that this is some kind of inspiring, groundbreaking way to look at things. Hahaha! It's an abomination of the English language, that's all it is hahaha !
/r/MensRights18/12/17 12:49 AM
3

Once feminism has propelled women to their rightful position of running everything by filling every decision making position then they won't care too much about how it's mainly men that get hired to do all those privileged dirty dangerous jobs. Once enough men have leant out, stood aside, stood down, and just stopped getting in the way of womens' advancement, men will be allowed to go about building shit and keeping the world running in peace.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 10:36 PM
2

And just like with everything else the feminists failed to think the end result of #MeToo through. They just won't learn from themselves will they. I suppose you don't always have to think things through when you've got a get out clause of blaming someone else for all your failures. Everything they touch turns to shit and their default is to blame men. That's one of the reasons they want as many male feminists around as they can get because the thought of analysing where women might be going wro…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 10:18 PM
1

Ya mean like hiring only men in order to help these women achieve exactly what feminism has supposedly fought against? That is the all male work places slash boys clubs, but this time by their own design. The only reason you could be allowed to hire specifically a male is if there isn't a woman to fill the role, which I guess might happen more often when more women are working in all female environments. So there you have it, the boys club is on its way back, but this time it will exist on the b…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 09:41 PM
1

This is just beautiful this is! ....."I contend that in such a context, we cannot seperate the ways people 'do vegetarianism' from how they 'do gender'".........So she hypothesises within an imaginary context that assigns gender issues to food. Righto.........."Doing vegetarianism in interactions drives social change, contributing to the de-linking of meat from gender hegemony and revealing the resisting and reworking of gender in food spaces". Like what the fuck? Here is one for you lady. Go an…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 07:06 AM
1

Ok, most of the feminists I know are either unhappily married and have nagged their husbands to death or divorced and happily going about alienating their children from their fathers. So I guess we'll just consider the feminists you personally know and the ones I personally know as cancelling themselves out. So that leaves the feminists left that actively fight against shared parenting, demonise masculinity at every opportunity and defiantly stand in the way of people trying to address the issue…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 05:39 AM
5

How about this, "For me, that means a vindictive, terminated employee's false allegations are enough...". Talk about falling on your own sword. 'That's right lady, as unfortunate as you might see it for yourself, it's been going on for a while, haven't you noticed'. It's ironic that a woman is complaining about an outcome that her kind has helped create. The only way to explain her surprise at what she sees as 'unfairness' is to assume that the people like her making these rules literally intend…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 12:12 AM
1

No pike. Lazy bastard forgot the pike.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 11:59 PM
2

I couldn't agree with you more. Feminism and feminists have a lot to answer for. Funny thing is that if the so called patriachy was what they still think it is to this day, feminism would never have been allowed to get off the ground would it? So they've been fighting an imaginary enemy from the get go. Hence the endless false equivalencies they use to support their twisted logic. In the end feminism will remembered for being a pointless waste of everyone's time.....and destroying generations of…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 11:44 PM
6

Beautifully torn apart! Spot on!
/r/MensRights16/12/17 10:27 PM
4

Feminists see all heterosexual relationships as oppressive to women, no argument about it according to them. They see destroying the traditional family unit as releasing women from all that patriarchal oppression and control. That's as far as they get though, they're completely oblivious to the true long term damage this has caused and is causing within our societies. Pointing this out to feminists is pointless though isn't it, they'd argue that the sky is green and the grass is blue if it suite…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 10:18 PM
1

Exactly what you said needs to happen. People need to cease allowing them to have the best of both ways. Only anti feminist kind of people will stand up to the feminist bullshit, I'm happy to be anti feminist. If no one stands up to them, well, give em an inch and they'll take a mile if ya know what I mean. My missus is anti feminist. She sees what the fuck is going on. She's experienced the bullshit that comes her way from feminists. There's no arguments over gender identity politics in our hou…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 07:39 AM
1

I think most people will all agree on all the basic ideas about how to create a better world. More tolerance. More love. More forgiveness. More acceptance. More empathy. More compassion. Less profits for the filthy rich and more fresh water and basic sustainance to a lot of starving people. How has everything got so fucked up when we know that most people on the planet, no matter where they are will agree with these basic principles of good humanity? I think the reason that people in general are…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 06:28 AM
1

So it doesn't help women by pandering to their fickle feminist sensibilities from the get go. Allowing women to believe that feminism is their ticket to empowerment is like giving them a bottle of chardy and a copy of 50 shades of grey. Feeling sorry for women who think feminism will save them creates a problem though doesn't it because as we know, women of any age that have decided to charge down the femmo track can be hard to convince that they aren't doing themselves or anyone else any favour…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 06:08 AM
1

I know. Observable out group bias amongst men proves they clearly feel a common obligation to the protection of weak vulnerable people in our communities. Including women and children. Gotta be careful even saying what I just said because I could get accused of seeing women as weak....I've got a feeling you know where I'm coming from though. And yeah, why should it be seen as such an imposition to expect women to show concern and care for men as a group in general. They care about everyone else …
/r/MensRights16/12/17 05:19 AM
1

I know. Observable out group bias amongst men proves they clearly feel a common obligation to the protection of weak vulnerable people in our communities. Including women and children. Gotta be careful even saying what I just said because I could get accused of seeing women as weak....I've got a feeling you know where I'm coming from though. And yeah, why should it be seen as such an imposition to expect women to show concern and care for men as a group in general. They care about everyone else …
/r/MensRights16/12/17 05:19 AM
2

I know. Observable out group bias amongst men proves they clearly feel a common obligation to the protection of weak vulnerable people in our communities. Including women and children. Gotta be careful even saying what I just said because I could get accused of seeing women as weak....I've got a feeling you know where I'm coming from though. And yeah, why should it be seen as such an imposition to expect women to show concern and care for men as a group in general. They care about everyone else …
/r/MensRights16/12/17 05:14 AM
1

"What idea precisely do you see being targeted?".......doesn't it sound so much more dramatic when they use words like "assassinate" instead of target or challenge. Assassinate sounds so much more murderous than critiquing, but hey if feels right it feels right. Criticising stupid ideas and using logic to do it is like an assassination! That will do me fair dinkum.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 04:50 AM
1

I think we are definitively on the same the page. I can't argue with anything you say there really. I don't go for labels and identifying with things to please other people either. I really struggle with virtue signalling bullshit. I appreciate authenticity. I think the world lacks authenticity and it's been taken over by progressive virtue signalling political correctness. You're right in saying it covers a lot of issues. Racism, sexism, all kinds of important issues are now tied up in knots ov…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 04:30 AM
1

"To this day, most men do not BELIEVE a woman is as 'equal' to them as other men". Clearly you don't seem to respect most men (men on average) very much. Which isn't really unusual for feminists lecturing to men about how to respect women more. Not your husband right. No I bet he respects you enough to know never to argue an opinion about genders that differs from yours. Actually I'm tipping he redirects you enough to know not to argue about you about anything. Am I right? According to you, most…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 03:44 AM
7

I couldn't help but notice how the bloke felt the need to stress in a 'small minority' of cases. The irony of him saying this is that he's implying that almost always women are to be believed. I wouldn't have thought it was really necessary to say, he obviously thought he had to so he doesn't get reemed. What I find most surprising is that it's almost like a shock, it's almost like it's a revelation that allowing exculpatory evidence to be classified as inadmissible actually leads to unfair and …
/r/MensRights16/12/17 02:45 AM
1

Yep. Less 'elligible' men that are acceptable and up to women's standards. Where are all those good marriage material men gone? The ones that have the financial means to provide women with as many choices/decision making opportunities as possible? It's almost like feminism has cut women's noses off in spite of their faces.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 12:55 AM
1

I think there is a lot to your theory. I'm from Australia and although different in many ways our political system is stymied into a bunch of virtue signalers that get nothing done too. People are frustrated here just like there and many other places around the world. I think it's the politically correct brigade that have taken over both sides of politics and without being an expert on all things global, I see a global trend to this. I agree people from different sides need to talk. But the poli…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 12:12 AM
6

Feminists focusing purely on women's issues at the expense of men's is totally understandable and perfectly 'OK'', that surprises no one. What's not OK is that they pass themselves off as being all for the rights of men which they aren't by definition as you point out, and when people point out the hypocrisy and contradiction they shame people into shutting up. Feminists stand in the way of everything men's rights campaigners try to do, but demand to be seen as some kind of shining light of egal…
/r/MensRights15/12/17 11:48 PM
3

Epidemic of feral cats getting by rough on the streets?
/r/MensRights15/12/17 11:30 PM
2

It does doesn't it. Through sheer ignorance and naivety they deny boys what they inherently need. They don't see it as abuse but you're right, that's what it is. It's abuse through neglect. But it's different to the abuse via toxic masculinity that women face all the time. And nowhere near as bad obviously.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 11:08 PM
6

Exactly! "within his own comfort zone and timeframe"....in other words don't waste the time of women including your mother or invade the safe spaces of women with anything that gets your goat. Man up!
/r/MensRights15/12/17 10:42 PM
13

It stems from the 'women can do anything a man can do and better' mindset. That seems to have been around for a while. So they extend it to raising boys into men. Any suggestion that men can contribute anything that women can't, including anything to do with raising sons is now an insult.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 10:27 PM
9

"Her total focus is how her son will interact with women"......all the while being oblivious to the fact that when men legitimately earn the respect of other men it earns the respect of women. As in men having solid respectful manly relationships with other men actually help men have better relationships with women in the long run because women tend to respect these men more on average. It's a total misunderstanding of masculinity and what the average woman wants from it. Thanks to feminism this…
/r/MensRights15/12/17 10:16 PM
1

"when implemented correctly"......there's ya problem right there. The people implementing social justice right now are the progressive left, and they aren't doing a very good job at all. So in theory, maybe, but in reality as it is now, no I'd say it's causing most of the division. It's only the social justice warriors that can't see it.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 12:56 PM
2

Ignorance or dishonesty.......both!
/r/MensRights15/12/17 09:41 AM
2

"Rape appeals to men more than it does to women"........so you are tarring all men with the same brush, exactly what people point out about people like you and exactly what people like you continually deny. How about this.......marrying men for money, having a couple of kids and then fucking off with those kids and taking all possessions and brain washing the kids against their father......this is totally the domain of women. This would be arguably the single biggest issue affecting men. How are…
/r/MensRights15/12/17 08:06 AM
2

Brilliant haha, it's their logic spot on !
/r/MensRights15/12/17 01:32 AM
2

Totally agree. Much of the man shaming comes from other men that have been brainwashed to believe that masculinity is inherently bad. I see young blokes walking around with their heads down and their shoulders slumped, hating on themselves and less than proud of their manliness and it's often these kind of men that lecture to other men about how to be better at being acceptable to women. It's totally arse about psychology, but these are the white knight kind of men that can be dangerous because …
/r/MensRights13/12/17 05:32 AM
1

Yeah it's common. Not all women are difficult or dangerous or toxic or troublesome and no one is saying that all women are. But the truth is that it only takes one! It only takes one pain in the arse high maintenance entitled female to ruin everything for everyone, including all the decent, reasonable women in the vicinity. If anyone points this out, the feminists call you misogynist, if anyone points out that men are 'avoiding' or feel as though they need to tread carefully around women the fem…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 03:09 AM
1

I gather that you will take what ever you like how ever you like and what ever you say it feels like, it is? Am I right? True dialogue is about the truth. What part of what I said was out if context in regards to what you said? You don't like being critiqued do you? You expect everyone to stroke your ego for everything that you say don't you? You don't realise that the world doesn't work that way do you? Sorry what you said gave me the impression that you are a powerless little snow flake kind t…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:38 AM
1

No but there's a few people blaming ALL men for ALL the violence that happens and as far as I am aware they are ALL feminists. Let's not split hairs and do mostly feminists. Men can be happily competitive playing darts, cards, table tennis, tennis, racing cars bikes anything, betting on flies crawling up a wall, seeing who can tell the most disgusting jokes. Men's competitiveness goes to a different level once women become involved, whether you chose to accept that or see it as irrelevant or not…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:29 AM
1

You're not going to teach your niece that the Donald "bragged about sexually assaulting women" are you? Because that would be a lie. He intimated that when you have lots of money (as a man) that women 'let you' grab them on the pussy. You may not like the Donald, but his words imply consent. "Let you"......."They let you"......implies consent!!!! And if you aren't in total denial about the broad range of female nature you'd understand that. That's not bragging about "sexually assaulting women", …
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:04 AM
3

At a place I used to work at it was about 60 blokes and zero women until they employed the first and only woman in the place. She was difficult to start with and made everyone feel uncomfortable. One of my mates approached the management about the concerns he had about working with her and particularly in isolated circumstances with no one else around. They acknowledged his concerns and told him to just ignore her. A while later my mate gets called into a meeting because she had told the managem…
/r/MensRights12/12/17 08:58 PM
0

"there is a plethora of reasons for this kind of behaviour"....."A significant cause of this is the patriachy"................a very considerable amount of violence committed by men is committed on behalf of women, it happens in a multitude of ways. This is is not patriachy. This is often linked to manipulative female nature, that seems to thrive on male competition and getting men to fight their battles for them. That's partly nature, and then it's perpetuated by feminism that insists women are…
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:03 AM
2

As soon as those women stop calling themselves feminists then people will stop referring to them as feminists. It's not the dictionary definition of feminism that's the problem, it's these kinds of feminists that contradict the definition of feminism on behalf of feminism, and all the other 'good feminists' that let them.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 12:13 AM
1

As soon as those women stop calling themselves feminists then people will stop referring to them as feminists. It's not the dictionary definition of feminism that's the problem, it's these kinds of feminists that contradict the definition of feminism on behalf of feminism, and all the other 'good feminists' that let them.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 12:13 AM
1

Yeah so really all a man has to do to be taken seriously as a feminist is not be a male feminist, but get a gender reassignment and be a female feminist instead hahaha.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 12:26 AM
1

Yeah yeah yeah mate, if you want to do something in support of men's rights, why don't you stop telling people how to do men's rights better and go and tell feminists how to stop using lies in order to push their bullshit version of equality. Argue with them about definitions, go on be a devil!
/r/MensRights07/12/17 08:11 AM
1

Yep like I said, read enough of that. Here's a scenario or analogy, run it through you mind under what ever definition you like. My wife dislikes feminism. So she is criticising feminism, and you ya big white knight men's rights campaigner step up and tell her that by criticising feminism that's 'she's generalising about a group of people' and what she says is all conjecture blah blah blah, all subjective blah blah blah, you tell her that criticising feminism is the wrong way to go about creatin…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 06:23 AM
1

The reason your topic got lost was because you incorrectly defined criticising feminism as 'generalising' about feminists or something and therefore a bad thing to do or something. So objectively you were wrong, and started an argument about definitions. That's literally what you did. I read a fair bit of that link you put there. I don't disagree with that, sounds reasonable. It also says that subjective opinions can have facts in there, which is the point i was making. Some subjective opinions …
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:54 AM
1

One last thing before I clock off. "Otherwise people can delegitimise your entire stance because it is based on opinion"......thanks very much for your advice old wise one, but that's why I do try to base my arguments on established fact, and actual real life definitions of words, not made up ones nnnnkay. When you use conjecture and lecture to people about words that you clearly don't understand you undermine you're own stance and you don't need anyone else to do it for you. All the best and go…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:13 AM
1

"This is a baseless claim".....this is your subjective opinion. When people point out that feminists use bastardised stats on virtually everything they do it because they believe subjectively that all the evidence saying so is true. You've just proven that you don't even know what the dictionary meaning of SUBJECTIVE is let alone the broader applications of the word. You should stop moralising immediately, you're really holding yourself back.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 05:07 AM
1

Classic! Absolute classic!
/r/MensRights07/12/17 04:59 AM
1

Just in case you missed it.....SUBJECTIVE: based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes or opinions........if you look up in the thesaurus I'm pretty sure that you won't find anything relating to a subjective opinion being unprovable. Some subjective opinions are based on provable facts, some are based on lies.....you're very welcome.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 04:48 AM
1

That's right. I agree. I do understand how subjectivity works man. We've established that subjective opinions can be based around facts or around lies. Most people that criticise feminism have subjective views that they've formed based in fact. Feminists on the other hand base most of their subjective views based on lies. I hardly think that view is twisted champ. And plenty of people agree with that very subjectivity opinionated opinion. "Look up what subjective means"......haha this is laughab…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 04:42 AM
1

And to add, it's objectively wrong to assume someone doesn't take people how they find them like you have done to me. Just because I criticise feminism and feminists doesn't mean I hate all women nnnnnkay. I'm open to discussing the lies about gender pay gap, domestic violence, rape culture, toxic masculinity etc etc with anyone including feminists. Hey, it isn't just me saying that feminists aren't interested in discussing the lies. They like discussing those things, but not the lies. In their …
/r/MensRights07/12/17 04:10 AM
1

You've used the same irrelevant analogy. It proves subjectivity. It doesn't prove that subjectivity can't be related to truth. In a binary situation that actually matters in the context of how we are talking about subjectivity, when 2 people have different points of view, one persons subjective point of view is going to be correct. (Before you point at that its possible for both people to be wrong, I'll point out that in a binary situation, like the analogy you provided, given only two selection…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:56 AM
1

No, I mean facts. I'm big on facts. I'm not big on dismissing any argument purely on the basis that its subjective and therefore conjecture. I'm not big on bad analogies that actually prove something not entirely related to the context of the original point. In my subjective opinion, that's how progressives derail everything. You can pretend what ever you want, ill stay firm in my view that undeniable facts are supported by undeniable evidence. I'll resist the temptation to pretend that somethin…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:41 AM
7

"People have forgotten how to debate and how scientific evidence and reasoning works"......so true!
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:26 AM
1

Not to take the piss, but stand up to take a leak! Juvenile joke, apologies!
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:13 AM
1

I agree, language and definitions are a part of the process that bringing people together on a consensus. But a consensus isn't always reached because people don't always agree. Language only eliminates differences in subjectivity if people agree. If people don't agree which clearly happens a lot, then again it proves subjectivity. I don't like arguing over semantics, the main thing for me is that I understand the message in what people are saying. If I get what someone is saying, I'm not pullin…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 02:28 AM
1

No the point of you example was to prove that experiences are subjective. Which you proved. But it doesn't prove that differing subjective experiences based on pre agreed on biases change what the actual truth is. It's a binary example of subjectivity. Your example wasn't flawed, it proved subjectiveness. My flip of the coin example also isn't flawed because the point I was making is that switching the result leaves the same binary situation, someone is happy, someone is sad, based on their subj…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 02:02 AM
2

What's your opinion on the lies that feminists constantly push about gender pay gap, domestic violence being gendered, rape culture, toxic masculinity, male privilege etc etc etc? What do you think about the damage that is being done to society by feminists pushing these feminist beliefs? If feminism is so good, why do we not hear more self identifying feminists speaking out about these lies and the resultant carnage it is causing in the lives of not just men and boys but society as a whole? Why…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:31 AM
1

Well at least we agree that feminists can be hypocrites. This is just one example, but it's one of many. Its not just one case. Again, it may be your subjective opinion that it's fear mongering. All humans have the ability to be complete and utter arseholes if they want to. Men and women. Society tends to present men with a punch in the face when they make fuckwits of themselves. No so women. And not only that, they've seemingly successfully conflated crithcing feminism as guilt tripping women a…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:12 AM
1

"It does not mean all feminists are".......I've never met a self identifying feminist that doesn't believe in gender pay gap, rape culture and toxic masculinity bullshit. I've never seen a unicorn with my own eyes either. You're correct, experiences are subjective. In your example, the two people may have had different opinions on the outcome of the game, but these subjective opinions are based on an already agreed upon and accepted bias. The teams they go for. Flip the result, you switch the su…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 12:59 AM
1

Well I guess it's a bit of a which came first the chicken or the egg scenario then isn't it. This is an example, just one example of how a feminist can actually have something to feel guilty about, and when it is pointed out, the pointing out of this is turned into 'guilt tripping' tactics by guess who? Feminists. Because any criticism of feminism or women becomes less valid when it's subjectively defined as 'guilt tripping'. Guilt tripping becomes just another thing that is used against women t…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 12:33 AM
1

If you don't agree with it
/r/MensRights07/12/17 12:14 AM
1

Someone who has 30 years of experience in anything has that experience thanks to all the things they have experienced during those 30 years....."your experience is different than your experiences".....speak for yourself, I consider my experience made up of all my experiences. So you're subjective definition of experience is different to mine. I'll leave it with you to work out how what you're saying is actually undermining and devaluing any of you own arguments......because just like everyone el…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 12:13 AM
1

I don't necessarily see a problem with the fact that people suffer from guilt. I don't approve of baseless shaming tactics, much like the tactics that feminists employ. But you know what? If people do shit things then they should feel guilty about it. Guilt is actually connected to conscience, the most relevant human emotion connected to an individual stopping being an arsehole. No guilt, no conscience, nothing changes. The problem is that very legitimate criticism of feminism gets equated to at…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:55 PM
1

"Experience is feeling based".......no, feelings are feelings based. Experience is one of the most common things that is valuable to every person. Companies look to experience, sporting teams look to experience, political parties look to experience. Experience is exponentially more valuable than no experience. Experience is very very valuable in a very broad sense across our societies, to say that people shouldn't use their experience to calculate which actions they take in future is bad advice …
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:32 PM
1

Feminists want 'equality for women', often at the expense of men. That's the feminist version of equality, not the dictionary version of what feminism supposedly stands for.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:20 PM
1

The clear difference being though that feminists while working for the rights of women, actively fight against men getting a fair go, example - shared parenting. Mens rights campaigners don't see a need to build a system that screws women over. The feminists will disagree of course because they have their patriachy theory that apparently proves what I've just said wrong.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:18 PM
1

Pointing out a tactic is not the same as "utilising" the tactic. To say they are one and the same is nothing more than conjecture.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:00 PM
1

You know what. I don't disagree with you. It is always very important to stick to facts. It's also important not to dismiss things that people are saying on the basis that it isn't valid because it's based on an experience, because some kind of anecdote was provided. Unfortunately this is the very thing that makes feminists impossible to discuss anything with. Say anything that they disagree with or they don't wish to acknowledge and they dismiss it as generalisation........"relying on experienc…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 10:46 PM
3

Totally not disagreeing with you. Can I add that what men can tend to feel is that they can go and talk to a mental health professional and be totally honest and open about all things and the professional will be very understanding, very empathetic and validate those things. Men can tend to find that empathy not replicated in the lives they live, and this realisation can kick in as soon as they walk out of the counselling session and get to the car, turn the radio on only to hear an ad about end…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 10:22 PM
3

Does experience count? What I'm suggesting is hardly more baseless than the old myth that says women have more empathy than men. Surely your familiar with this? Talking about this myth, what that allows women who believe this to do is 'apply' their very own feelings as the reason for what a bloke says he feels. Example, a man makes a statement about something and a woman can tend to try and tell the bloke why he feels a certain way. Then it turns into a debate about who knows more about the blok…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 09:24 PM
3

The first and most obvious difference in technique used is that women's issues are taken seriously. Men are told that male suicide is connected to not sharing their feelings and don't talk about it enough. Then when men actually do express themselves they are told to shut up because they are privileged and don't have anything to 'complain' about or they aren't expressing themselves in the correct way. When men share, it's complaining, when women 'share', it's a completely different story.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 08:23 PM
3

Isn't that ironic. They cannot for the life of their poor little souls comprehend that their silliness and inability to understand so many things that are so basic and obvious is totally connected to why they aren't taken seriously.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 07:30 PM
3

Totally correct. RESPECT !!!
/r/MensRights06/12/17 01:52 PM
7

So all you have to do to convince feminists that the wage gap, rape culture and toxic masculinity is all bulkshit is tell them that you are a feminist? Jeeeeezuz why didn't we think of that? You are a god send you are.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 01:27 PM
3

I'm not scorning anyone....Telling the truth is not abusing statistics but abusing statistics is lying...... Men's rights kinda folk tend to be a hell of a lot better at calling out people for things that actually matter than feminists do...... Not liking feminism and what it stands for doesn't mean I'm not very much in support of my daughters rights, actually quite the opposite......and the reasons I dislike feminism very much put me off being a male feminist.....Maybe it's less 'anti feminism'…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 01:14 PM
3

That's not the kind of power imbalance that ever creates a victim apparently.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 07:49 AM
7

They have sexual power over the 90% of men that are below their standards, it's just not quite enough. If only that last 10% of men would just stop being desirable to women......damn those dastardly powerful men!
/r/MensRights06/12/17 07:38 AM
6

Yep, and even though they partly, for about a nano second, acknowledged his right to feel violated and offended if he had chosen to, that right would no longer be apart of the discussion if he'd slapped her across the face for grabbing him by the junk.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 07:15 AM
12

Makes perfect sense, but once ya take into account that they refuse to recognise their own power (of any kind) and privilege (what's that?) they have that perfectly reasonably logic debunked for us.....80% of the time, it's works every time.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:22 AM
8

What would their explanation be if in that situation of being grabbed on the goollies the bloke instinctively slapped her across the face? Surely they wouldn't say he was lying if he said it was a reflex reaction to having his manhood violated would they? Would they?
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:09 AM
14

I wonder if their attitudes would be slightly different if the scenario included a bloke bitch slapping a woman after she had violated his bodily integrity?
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:02 AM
8

Oh yeah, and also get the feminists to stop hindering attempts to have fairer shared parenting arrangements for fathers. You are fighting for men's rights so i guess you are addressing these issues with feminists. How is that going for you?
/r/MensRights06/12/17 04:12 AM
18

"At you're service!"......great! how do you suggest we get the feminists to stop misusing statistics and telling lies in order to push the myth about gender pay gap, rape culture and domestic violence being a gendered problem?
/r/MensRights06/12/17 04:10 AM
2

Nice of them to come to that conclusion wasn't it. I don't suppose they cared enough to ask why you seemed unhappy. Somehow I've got a feeling it wasn't your happiness that was behind the decision.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 12:43 AM
2

Yes they are, and for very logical reasons, whether the feminists agree or not. And shock horror, some smart female bosses in certain industries are avoiding hiring women too when they can, for the same logical reasons.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 11:34 PM
4

I used to work at a logistics company that employed one woman out of about 60 people. She butted heads with everyone from the time she got there, it wasn't long before everyone did their best to avoid her as much as possible. One bloke got called into a meeting because this woman had told management that he was intimidating her. So they decided to have a face to face and had the 2 of them in a room with all the managers and support people around in an effort to sort it out. A little perplexed th…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 11:25 PM
1

It would need to have the signature of someone who witnessed the signing of the consent card. But once the door closes and the witness is no longer present, she can still say that while she consented to the idea at the 'consent meeting' she changed her mind once no one else was there and that the bloke refused to stop. So I guess the only thing to do is heavily promote orgies so that sex never ever happens without literally having witnesses present. Ridiculous !!!
/r/MensRights04/12/17 09:06 PM
1

I think the principle of what we are talking about is important. Because what happens eventually when you have the speech police slowly take over a platform, certain people will leave. I know myself I'm not hanging around anywhere where there are moralistic people shutting down all kinds of subjects. There are lots of people that just won't tolerate it and eventually disengage. The people that stand against tone policing everything are the kind if people I like to be around. There are lots of pe…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 12:22 AM
1

Feminists will never acknowledge that instinctive side of female nature that can be manipulative and troublesome, because it gives credence to the very real fact that men have valid reasons to firstly be wary of female nature, and secondly exercise their own more logical controlling mechanisms within the bounds of their relationships and do that for the sake of stability in regards to their family. Accepting the instinctive manipulative nature almost drives the discussion towards validating patr…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 09:58 PM
-2

Maybe not literally by definition, but following progressive liberalism for long enough could sure bring on a mental disorder. Trying to juggle constantly contradicting ideas will drive anyone nuts eventually.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 09:38 PM
0

.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 11:29 AM
1

I read the article. Interesting. Interesting in that obviously nothing is that definitive or certain about the theory. I don't think arguing over semantics does much good either and I'm doing that, but I'd be interested exactly how and how many 'studies' or social experiments they actually did. As you noted, as everyone knows, men on average are physically stronger, even when you throw in all those meek men you talk about, not one ounce of 'toxic masculinity' in them but they are in the pool non…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 10:35 AM
1

Men's physical strength has absolutely nothing to do with how much empathy they have. Zero! Trust me. Women have plenty of reasons to cry, and sometimes it's genuine empathy and compassion, and sometimes it's crocodile tears. On site you are familiar with how women will cry much more often than men purely for the purpose of gaining sympathy. In fact, shedding the crocodile tears in order to gain sympathy or deflect their level of responsibility is nearly entirety a female domain. Men can and wil…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 09:53 AM
1

I'm not surprised at all that you 'learned' that in you're college psychology class. With all due respect I wouldn't put too much weight on it. I'm not saying that men are definitely more empathetic either. Just look around, observe and watch. It's not that hard to see the in group and out of group biases related to the genders. Again. I'm not using that as proof that men are definitely more empathetic, but you only have to observe to see that some wornen are actually cold hearted self centred m…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 09:06 AM
2

No, much of it may very well not be conscious, ya couldn't in all good conscience believe in the lies, many of the followers of feminism are naive and ignorant about the guts of it. That's why people have been trying to put them on the straight and narrow and look what happens. Every name under the sun comes out and they all fall under the veil of patriachy. Try and explain how stupid it is and they get offended. That's the problem. Trying to reason with feminists is an impossible endeavour. Man…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 06:35 AM
1

Yep. Totally agree with what you are saying. 100 !
/r/MensRights02/12/17 06:23 AM
0

What a shock. BOOOOOOOORIIIIIIIIIING!!! What a hollow existence it must be having so much confusion gurgling around in what seems to be your very small brain. You know 10 words and understand 3 of em hahaha and have no idea what it is that you stand you. How sad! Well sad for you, but hilarious for everyone else, hahaha you're a funny cunt you are baaaaaahaaaaaaahaha
/r/MensRights02/12/17 02:00 AM
1

I'd actually argue about the empathy example. I think there is much evidence proving that men have an out group bias and show more compassion towards people that are weaker than them. The same studies show women to show a much greater level of in group bias which some people might say proves that women have less empathy towards men than the other way around. Women just 'having more empathy' than men is a feminist myth that is linked to the demonisation of masculinity. You know it makes sense tha…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 01:31 AM
3

I'd actually argue about the empathy example. I think there is much evidence proving that men have an out group bias and show more compassion towards people that are weaker than them. The same studies show women to show a much greater level of in group bias which some people might say proves that women have less empathy towards men than the other way around. Women just 'having more empathy' than men is a feminist myth that is linked to the demonisation of masculinity. You know it makes sense tha…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 01:30 AM
1

Recognising the 'underdog' reality of the situation is essential actually. Because that's what it is. It's only people that believe feminist ideology, like feminists that don't recognise the situation and see a problem with people that do talking about it. Perpetuating the belief that these conversations are full of mysogists doesn't help anything, it only reinforces the very thing that men's rights campaigners are up against, which is of course the perception you speak of. Feminists say they wa…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 01:18 AM
1

Recognising the 'underdog' reality of the situation is essential actually. Because that's what it is. It's only people that believe feminist ideology, like feminists that don't recognise the situation and see a problem with people that do talking about it. Perpetuating the belief that these conversations are full of mysogists doesn't help anything, it only reinforces the very thing that men's rights campaigners are up against, which is of course the perception you speak of. Feminists say they wa…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 01:17 AM
4

Well said. Sticking to the facts is always very important, with everything. It's when the feelings police start dramatising the use of certain words and tones that the facts get thrown aside and it becomes a moral debate about who can and can't say things. It becomes pointless progressive style debate/discussion. It is a sucky situation to be in and yes it's been this way for some time. I think if people can focus more on facts rather than nitpicking over the way people say things or the specifi…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 12:52 AM
3

I know. It's just one of thousands of false equivalencies that feminists base their arguments. They see every right that is granted to a male to be a right taken from women. They've reached this point by equating men's rights to male privilege, and then equating male privilege to the systematic denial of rights for women. It's total bullshit but they believe it. It's imppossible to get ya head around shit that has no logical basis underpinning it in the first place. That's why so many people get…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 12:16 AM
2

Also, as you say, they project their own characteristics on to other people, and it's done in a shaming way so they can attempt to guilt you into conforming. As an old saying goes "when you're neighbour starts preaching, go and count your sheep".
/r/MensRights02/12/17 12:05 AM
2

You've hit a few nails on the head there. Because you have a vagina, they own you. It's offensive that you, as the owner of a vagina don't do and believe what they tell you to. How dare you have or use you're own brain. My wife says exactly the same things. Most of the bullying that women receive is from other women, because as a woman you are supposed to conform. As a woman seeing through the crap you obviously understand why it does nothing for men. I think you are right, feminists don't like …
/r/MensRights02/12/17 12:01 AM
1

Where they define the default standard and police the default standard all at once. Absolutely nothing could go wrong when it's the weaklings that feel entitled to control the system. Nup, nothing could possibly ever go wrong with that, nah.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 11:46 PM
7

Hahahaha, it's hard not to be cynical and sarcastic hahahaha
/r/MensRights01/12/17 11:36 PM
3

Very good point too. I think more people are doing that kind of thing which is good, and more should you're right. I see what you mean but these kind of conversations is how people learn about what is going on. It's hard to write or campaign to anyone if you don't understand the issues. I do agree with a bit less bitching and more DOING, across a lot of things. I reckon though that these conversations where people 'bitch' about things need to be had to a degree, it will inspire more people to ta…
/r/MensRights01/12/17 11:34 PM
3

Well by feminist standards that's virtually impossible to do, without hating yourself to appease them. That's the point.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 11:26 PM
1

Also gold!
/r/MensRights01/12/17 11:24 PM
1

Gold!
/r/MensRights01/12/17 11:24 PM
1

Suggesting that women need emotional guidance by men could be taken as "bring back the patriachy!!! ". And it's not ironic that it can be taken that way by feminists since that is in essence what the so called 'patriachy' was about in the first place. But be careful going there ok, it could get you in trouble. Well it could get you in trouble with the feminists. It probably won't get you into trouble here though.....well not yet anyway.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 11:19 PM
1

"They are often too hysterical to try to understand". By 'they' are you referring to women?.....be careful champ, painting women as overly emotional and unable to understand things might have the feminists come down on you like a tonne of bricks.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 11:16 PM
0

"Soz".......what a soft cock word hahaha. It's just like deja vu all over again. I wasn't expecting anything worth writing down from you mate. You must lead an extremely boring life. Makes sense, you are extremely BOOOOOORING!!!
/r/MensRights01/12/17 11:11 PM
1

It already is a positive thing. I don't speak for everyone but I'm pretty sure that finding this place and having a few things put into perspective without all the lies has been a god send for many men. You point out that some people slag off and paint 'men's rights' as a negative thing. You're doing it yourself. In you're opinion 'men's rights' could be better if we just embrace feminist ideals and talk about things in the 'correct' way. That's sounds very similar to when feminists say "men nee…
/r/MensRights01/12/17 11:03 PM
1

A concern for you. I don't see that much concern from people that throw ideas around on here. Lots of concerns from people like you, and feminists. People who see any criticism of women what so ever, legitimate or not, as misogynistic woman hate. It isn't.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 10:48 PM
5

Very big difference, some people refuse to recognise it. Calling anyone that criticises feminism or feminists a woman hater is their classic go to tactic. People are slowly waking up. Slowly.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 10:44 PM
2

And you at helping perpetuate that 'bad' PR then aren't you.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 10:43 PM
2

So everyone here should just kind of embrace feminism so we don't get in trouble? There are plenty of very legitimate reasons to criticise feminism and plenty of women see the toxicity in it too. Lots of women have sons, and daughters that they don't want to get tied up in the victimhood crap. You're probably in the wrong place if you are tryingto promote feminism as the answer to equality.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 10:41 PM
6

Until feminists stop seeing people campaigning for the rights of men and boys as women haters, feminists will always see men as the enemy. I could be wrong, I just have a hunch that you haven't had too many discussions with devout feminists about the rights, lives and issues of men and boys.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 10:37 PM
4

Wouldn't it be ironic if we all ended up policing ourselves to feminist standards without the feminists here to do it for us.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 10:30 PM
5

If you can even convince a feminist that men aren't the enemy she stops being a feminist, right then and there. Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 10:29 PM
4

Just out of interest, to what standard shall we police ourselves? Yours? Mine? Someone else's? I'm tipping that for you to agree to a standard it would have to meet your standards. Fair enough. Now what happens mate when your standard is different to mine or someone else's. Do we argue everything down to the standard of the person that feels entitled to be most offended? I'll take the risk of being labeled a woman hater, but seriously that is the world feminists want everyone to live in.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 10:21 PM
13

Feminists aren't expected to police their own crowd. It's only men that are expected to police themselves.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 10:15 PM
20

I agree with your sentiments. Can I point out that often people that only want equal rights for men in certain circumstances are painted as wanting to take rights away from women, when that actually isn't the case. Family law court as an example. Clearly biased negatively against fathers, and positively towards mothers. People campaigning to give fathers a better deal in these situations are portrayed as satan, are accused of a long list of things......not recognising female oppression, not figh…
/r/MensRights01/12/17 10:06 PM
32

The problem can be though that some people see legitimate criticism of feminism and certain female behaviours as 'woman hating', I think that is a big part of the problem. I reckon getting rid of all hate would be good in theory, not going to happen in reality, and a lot of people, particularly men get accused of hating women when they don't. I also don't really think that it would matter what people say in regards to the rights of men or how they say it, certain people are always going to paint…
/r/MensRights01/12/17 09:49 PM
1

Play on words !
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:31 AM
8

Haha. The point of the joke has been well understood for a while. I reckon there would be literally hundreds of ways to reword that joke and it stays the same joke. And I use the word joke very loosely.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:31 AM
1

HYPERSENSITIVE - having extreme physical sensitivity to particular substances or conditions - easily hurt, worried, or offended. ......
/r/MensRights01/12/17 01:48 AM
1

SNOT NOSED - a term used for people who are brats, or act like brats. Or just a bitch. Example, someone who calls people names when people point out the contradictory elements to their arguments.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 01:39 AM
1

SUPERCILIOUS - behaving or looking as though one thinks one is to superior to others..........example - 'the words believe and trust mean the same thing you stupid morons'
/r/MensRights01/12/17 01:34 AM
1

PETULANCE - the quality of being childishly sulky or bad tempered.....
/r/MensRights01/12/17 01:30 AM
1

I know you like your definitions, but are still learning since you seem to think that 'believe' and 'trust' having similar connotations is some kind of revelation. So here, dug up a couple of definitions for you......CONTRADICTION - Noun - a combination of statements, ideas, or features which are opposed to one another - a situation in which inconsistent elements are present - the statement of a position opposite to one already made.......COGNITIVE DISSONANCE- anxiety that results from simultane…
/r/MensRights01/12/17 01:26 AM
17

It shows what happens when we have decades and decades of compounding feminist stupidity. If it starts stupid, it's only goin to get stupider.
/r/MensRights01/12/17 12:48 AM
1

Yeah mate fake accusations do affect everyone in the end in many ways. It's a shame the people promoting this kind of shit don't have enough vision to see that. Women can be very constructive, but that doesn't mean I'm not aware of the inherent risks that are potentially lurking if the wrong kind of woman gets her claws into shit. Troublesome women can cause so much destruction, and as you say it's that reason that men become reluctant. Don't feel bad about not having a neutral mindset, it's not…
/r/MensRights01/12/17 12:32 AM
1

Oops gonna do it again....this whole argument is about your contradictory stance. You provided the content of this argument, and you think it's about definitions. Jeeezuz mate. Yep, you need help
/r/MensRights01/12/17 12:00 AM
1

There was nothing hostile about me from the start. I was just pointing out the contradiction in your argument like everyone else. And you got your g-string all twisted and started calling people names. I don't take offense to name calling, I couldn't give a fuck I've got a very thick skin. I was never offense. Still not. Saying things like "you're welcome" is nothing more than a cheeky piss take mate. You can hardly complain about people being sarcastic towards you when you treat people as thoug…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:58 PM
1

No you're saying that 'women should be believed'. Read the long list of other people's posts trying to explain to you that this is contradictory in context of what people are talking about. You just keep nit picking about people's punctuation and whether they wrote two comments instead of one.....what's laughable about that is that you don't even realise that is just a piss weak way of trying to discredit what someone is sayings. Typically cowardly left tactics. Hopefully for you, you might wake…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:45 PM
1

Tut tut megsy. You made I clear from the start that you think 'believe' and 'trust' mean the same. Well done genius! You made it clear that you think women should be believed because you trust them to have no reason to lie. Why would a woman lie? Hahaha. Then you say in an indignant way "I never said men should have to prove their innocence". In the context of the conversation that everyone was having, your statements are contradictory. People pointed that out and you start dictating definitions…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:38 PM
1

Sounds like a lot of incentive to make a shit storm that screws other people around and as we know not much in the way accountability if she gets found out to be full of shit.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:16 PM
7

What a great example of why some men may just be a little reluctant to take on joint projects of any kind with women involved. Nothing can ever go wrong! Good luck mate, hopefully common sense will prevail.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:13 PM
4

Higher pension age, but die younger. The feminists are working on fixing this systemic unfairness as we speak /s
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:08 PM
76

Universe to end next week, women to be worst affected.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:04 PM
1

No you're just saying that women should be believed basically because 'why would they lie'. That belief, and not by accident is connected to men having to prove themselves innocent when there is only a woman's word that he's guilty. You see mate, you might not actually say "men should have to prove their innocence", but when you say "women should be believed as a default"......wait for it.....wait for it.,....,YOU ARE SAYING THE SAME THING !!!!! That is what every person on here has been trying …
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:51 PM
1

Yeah mate, believe and trust are connected through implication. The implication being that someone is telling the truth. How the fuck you think that the semantic definition of these two words have anything to do with anything, or proves anything. It doesn't. I probably knew the definition of those words by about 5 years old. Every single person knows this, and this is the condescending, all knowing attitude you take to .....you take this trivial piece of information and turn that into and argume…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:42 PM
1

"Here's one for ya, not to be a cunt".....aaaah no, that isn't telling you not to be a cunt, that was be saying I was going to say something and didn't mean to be a cunt about it.....so you mistook what I said there. So according to you my comments are 'retarded screeching'....according to YOU. I didn't make personal attacks, it is funny how so many progressive cry babies call people morons and retards when they can't get people to agree and then cry foul when they called out for it and accuse p…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:32 PM
0

Midwife?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:58 PM
0

Space cadet?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:57 PM
0

You're a glazier, that would explain why it's so easy to see through you're faux moral rage.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:49 PM
0

You're an architect, that would explain why things make sense to you but they don't to anyone else.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:45 PM
0

You're a flight attendant? That would explain why you're an air head!
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:43 PM
0

An artist of some kind? Maybe an air guitarist?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:41 PM
0

Chimney sweep? Nah you wouldn't get you're over grown head in there.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:38 PM
1

You work st a sex shop selling rubber dolls and dildos?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:35 PM
0

You work at maccas and it's you're job to put the gherkin on the Big Macs? You run the drive thru at Burger King? KFC?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:31 PM
0

You're a bitter ex circumciser who slipped and got the sack? Baaaahaaaaaa, see what I did there? Baaahaaaaahaaaaa!
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:27 PM
0

You're a road line marker? That would explain the repetitive nature to your language. You're a painter and your brain is fucked from the fumes?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:23 PM
1

You're a juggler. That would explain all the mixed up shit going on in you're head.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:18 PM
1

You're a spoof collector down the local sperm bank?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:13 PM
1

Comooooooon, dying to know! Contortionist? Pole dancer? Chef? You're a chef and your speciality is elephants balls on toast? See what happens when you argue as though other people are stupid and beneath you? You're a window licker? You're a professional window licker, sitting at the back of the bus !!! Odds on.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:48 AM
0

I've got it! I've got it! You're a used car salesman. That explains the smugness. And the selling of shit for an over inflated price......could be it, could be it.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:32 AM
0

Fiction novelist?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:24 AM
0

Ventriloquist? Would explain the putting of words in other people's mouths while accusing others of doing that very thing. Couldn't be could it? I'm right aren't I?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:23 AM
0

Alright, just give meee oooooone more little guess.......is it.....is it.......you're a pillow fluffer? Tell me you're a pillow fluffer, if not can I buy a vowel?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:13 AM
0

You wouldn't be a bull rider or anything ballzy like that, soooooo what about a florist? Mmmmmm, doesn't really grab me as being your kind of gig.....um, um, you're a check out chick?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 11:04 AM
0

You can't be a speed typist then, mmmmmm, maybe you're a sheep shearer. That would explain the repetitive herd think. Comon man what is it? You're a jockey? Mmmmmm, that could explain the little man chip on the shoulder syndrome. Not all jockeys have piss ant syndrome but enough do. Mmmmmmm. Give me a hint you sly devil you.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:58 AM
0

No wait! Could you be a nanny or a child care worker? That would explain the baby taaaaalk mmmmm.....pre school teacher? No! Taxi driver! Your a taxi driver!
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:50 AM
1

Clown? You're a clown? Unlikely since you are about as funny as a car crash hahahaha....mmmm....you could be a sad depressed weirdo clown, mmmmm. Put me out of my misery comon! Are you a clown?
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:46 AM
0

You're a dentist? Used to talking to people all day that have no chance of disagreeing with you. Mmmmm, that could be it, I mean it makes sense.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:36 AM
0

No you are!!! No you are!!! No you are!!! I know you are I said you are but what am I? Ner ner ner ner ner. Hahahaha. What's happened big nuts, has your marsh mellow herd brain gone zimbop and shut down in search of its own little safe space? Woooooiiii !!! Take a couple of deep deep breaths, into a paper bag if you have one near by. Is you're mummy there, maybe she could fetch you a glass of flat lemonade and tuck you into to bed.......ner ner ner ner ner, hahaha, you're a baby!
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:30 AM
0

When someone like you makes no argument and contradicts them silly self all the time, anyone with a brain won't follow, I guess that's what all these people have been trying to tell you. You're so full of moral rage that it clouds you're thinking. Here, I'll spell it out for you......it's impossible to follow an argument when all you do is not provide one, but instead do nothing but contradict yourself by trying to show what a smarty pants you are by playing devils advocate, just for the sake of…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:18 AM
0

Might not be
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:08 AM
0

Haha good for you chumpion, what's that sucking farts out of dead sea gulls or something.......I know you're the sensitive type so it's just a joke nnnnkay princess. You're a marriage councillor right, majored in gender studies? Oops did it again. Baaahaaahaaaa I know I'm a terrible terrible person for making jokes, but I won't feel too bad about taking the piss fully out of a dude like you that calls people morons and retards and dimwits and a bunch of other dumb arsed insults in order to hand …
/r/MensRights30/11/17 10:07 AM
0

Yeah righto mate, you've had nearly everyone saying the same thing to you. You "read the first sentence and stopped". That's either because that's what you do when you think you might be exposed to something you don't like all overly sensitive snowflakes or you just lied and did read it. Hahaha. I know very well how to follow an argument buddy, and I can pick progressive powder puffs like you that contradict yourself all the time and then have a melt down when they get called. The only thing you…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 09:02 AM
1

Haaaa I know it's fairly obvious isn't it. Sticks out like dogs balls. You could explain it a million times and some people will just refuse to get their head around it.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 08:53 AM
0

Haven't you a sassy tongue hahaha. "so fucking do it!" Fuck me dead mate are you serious? Dropping your baby bottle and having a tanty and demanding people 'keep their emotions in check' or what ever the fuck you are on about while calling people names, telling people to grow up. Haaaaaaa that's a good one mate. When people point out contradictions in things people say, it isn't the same as 'misrepresenting' what they are saying. Sorry, not the same thing. If you are going to contradict yourself…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 08:35 AM
0

So start lobbying to get 90% of the male prison population released then if you feel so strongly about it. You'd make a great progressive politician you would.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 07:36 AM
1

Keep your shirt on! You have no business restraining my emotions or anyone else's for a start. You're theory of IT applying to men and women while very noble and egalitarian of you, isn't how it is in real adult land. You get pretty emotional for someone telling other people not to get emotional. News flash! When you are taking about the murder of kids, people can tend to be a little emotional, does that really surprise you does it? You know the best thing to do when you are sick of doing someth…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 07:33 AM
1

Maybe not, but it may act as a prevention in the future to mothers that kill their children, say in an instance to stop their father having them, so out of spite, thinking they can skip jail by using the mental health issues card. See we've saved a shit load of kids from death already.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 07:25 AM
2

Charge her for killing her kid, and stick her in jail. Let's do that in an attempt to limit the numbers of babies lives being lost thanks to short term insanity in mothers. Don't fret, it would all be for a good cause.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 07:16 AM
1

If it's making an impact you mustn't be talking to feminists then because I have never seen a discussion about men's rights go anywhere with feminists. Criticising feminism is not 'bashing' women. It's not even 'bashing' feminism so much as calling feminism for what it is. You still aren't trying to convince men that feminism really has a place for them are you? Um, yeah, a female feminist men's rights activist. Sounds reaaaally plausible.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:52 AM
1

"as a feminist and female MRA".....interesting thought, someone that believes in gender pay gap and rape culture and manspreading and toxic masculinity and thinks it's all bullshit at the same time. That's a new one.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:41 AM
1

Feminists spread hatred perfectly fine all by themselves. If it's someone posing as a man hating feminist, they've done a brilliant job.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:38 AM
1

Jesuz mate, reading that bought a tear to my eye. I can only imagine how heartbreaking it must be to see that happening to you're own son. My heart really goes out to you brother! It's a mindfuck trying to get your head around how someone can be so bloody cruel to anyone, let alone to children. And their own children. The poor kid loves oranges and his own mother took that bit of life's joy away from him, and told him a filthy stinking lie to do it. Unbelievable! She exploited his innocence for …
/r/MensRights30/11/17 06:23 AM
4

I never implied anything of the sort. You aren't talking to a biology denier here. The point is that there are a myriad of catalysts behind male depression, mental illness and brain malfunction. And yes it may be recognised on men but it's not a factor in not incarcerating men for commiting crimes. You only have to have a look at the disparity of punishments and jail numbers by gender to see the difference. I suppose the mental illnesses that give grounds to no guilt are the ones that affect wom…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 05:59 AM
1

"So you believe that all women are liars...". Do you understand the definition of intellectual dishonesty? What was said was, wait for it......."we know that women have reported consensual sex as rape before"........you have to be a complete idiot not to see that these to statements are not interchangeable......How we know for fact that "women have reported consensual sex as rape before" is the millions and millions of men that say they have been falsely accused. You do realise that it only take…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 03:37 AM
1

It's hard for people to admit they've been lied to for years and they've fallen for it. Lots of kids end up hating their mothers when they eventually find out the truth and decide to believe it instead of the shit they get fed. Hopefully, maybe if your son is super close to that truth, the day he crosses that line just a bit might happen sooner rather than later. If he got to a line and consciously stopped there, more than likely he has a sneaking suspicion what's on the other side. I don't mean…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 03:12 AM
1

Wholly shit, sorry to hear this stuff happened, don't feel bad about enjoying her decline, she sounds like the kind of bastard that deserves all she gets. It's a shame your son god dragged into her lunacy though. Was it the moment she threw you under the bus by saying she wasn't in that room the moment you realised she was an evil bitch or did you have an inkling before hand? That must have been a sobering moment when the penny dropped that she'd just fed you to the sharks. Shit situation mate, …
/r/MensRights30/11/17 02:58 AM
17

Does the fact that a big string of life burdens that cause depression and mental illness in men come into it at all? Apart from the fact that fathers can struggle emotionally after the birth of children too, there are shit loads of things that don't affect women that have disastrous affects on the mental health of men. It's possible to attatch some kind of mental illness to most crimes in a round about way. So wouldn't it be fair that we cut short by half the sentence of every man in jail on the…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 02:44 AM
3

Doesn't change the disparity in average sentence for same crime between the genders in Australia unfortunately.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 02:21 AM
2

I like ya style, I might be a bit that way myself.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 02:11 AM
1

You have said "WE should believe women" when they claim they have been sexually assaulted........this is what you have said..........you following? Because here it is.........if you take that position as a default, that means that when a woman says she has been assaulted by a man, that she is believable to the point that the man basically has to PROVE that what she is saying is in fact a LIE !!!!! You still following mate?......so here is yet another example.........because you don't actually sa…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 02:07 AM
1

Yeah that's interesting you say, because in that instance, would it be reasonable to hold the security staff responsible for the statutory rape because clearly they didn't vet her particulars properly, or maybe they were guilty of just 'believing' the underage woman when she lied about her age. The bloke is half pissed in the joint which he is entitled to be, hoping to grab a bit of poontang, which he is entitled to be, isn't a bloke entitled in that situation to presume that people are of age, …
/r/MensRights30/11/17 01:59 AM
1

"It would probably help with your writing too since your comments are getting harder to read, try proof reading". See there is another example of how you just made everything you say there after worth zero. Basically discrediting people's opinions basically by calling them stupid is yet another progressive debating tactic too by the way. So that's 2 reasons I've given you now why you've lost me. You did ask. This statement is coming from someone that's entire argument position is based on a cont…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 01:38 AM
2

And you'd be stupidly progressive and snot nosed enough to count em hahahaha
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:59 AM
2

3 numbers and 8 letters dumb as bat shit!
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:58 AM
1

No mate, not mad. I'm aware that accusing people of being mad is a go to tactic of the snowflake brigade. That shit will literally work on ya progressive self loathing mates, that's the thing that will make you the moral overlord in the circles you hang out in. Calling people out for the stupid idiotic things they say isn't 'lashing out' fella. Yeah mate, I identified you as weak and have been hell bent on 'separating you from your herd' from the moment I didn't lay eyes on you. Yeah you figured…
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:51 AM
2

Hahahaha I'm going to use that if it's ok, like it! Things are circularly fucked up when being an arsehole is perfectly fine if ya doing it in a politically correct way but if not "THAT'S OFFENSIVE!!" What is truly amazing is how so many dimwits get all offended on behalf of someone else all the time, don't realise how pathetic they are and all they have is their self granted high moral ground. ASSHOLARANG! That's a little pisser mate !!!
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:40 AM
0

But isn't it just. He never said women don't lie, he just said they should always be believed because they have no reason not to tell the truth. He's heading for a car crash and is oblivious to it, poor kid.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:28 AM
1

"I have never in my life said that women don't lie, quote me on it if I have"..........maybe not, but what you have said is that "WE" should believe women when they make serious claims on the basis of 'why would women lie?'........comon champ you can do better than that surely. You know that people don't have to actually state a lie to lie right! There is more than one way for people to be dishonest. You know that right? So you agree that women do and can lie, then you lecture to everyone about …
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:25 AM
1

One hundred percent correct. The problem is though, when a 16 or even a 15 year mature girl passes visually as legal age, and say an 18 or 19 or even 20 year old young bloke 'believes her' when she tells him she is 19.......aaaaaand he gives the ferret a run in a totally consensual way thinking he isn't breaking the law aaaaaaand BAM! Jail and the sexual predator registry!!! I agree totally with what you're saying, I just see a dangerous conundrum in regards to reality and the law.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:12 AM
1

No problems. Glad you get where I was coming from. It's hard not to be cynical and sarcastic, it's almost necessary though to point out how stupid some shit is these days, and then they go and get offended when you're only trying to point out how non existent their logic is.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:01 AM
1

"Someone simply saying that WE should believe/trust women when they claim they are sexually assaulted".....that someone 'simply' saying this is YOU.........let's think this through nnnnnkay......YOU is a different word than WE. YOU is not WE. With everything that is going on you come here 'simply' saying things like that and you have no idea why people are taking you to task? No idea at all? Sorry buddy but if you get ya femcentric goggles off it might just dawn on you the inherent problem with …
/r/MensRights29/11/17 11:55 PM
1

"Someone simply saying that WE should believe/trust women when they claim they are sexually assaulted".....that someone 'simply' saying this is YOU.........let's think this through nnnnnkay......YOU is a different word than WE. YOU is not WE. With everything that is going on you come here 'simply' saying things like that and you have no idea why people are taking you to task? No idea at all? Sorry buddy but if you get ya femcentric goggles off it might just dawn on you the inherent problem with …
/r/MensRights29/11/17 11:53 PM
1

I'll just keep it simple. You don't understand what a good analogy. Not arguing about that fact, but you don't. People that make bad analogies do it because they tend to make false equivalencies. You can argue about this all you like, it's a fact. Bad analogies are thanks to false equivalency because good analogies are thanks to correctly identified equivalencies. Once someone does that, it throws doubt over their entire logic. Its kind like how you only ever have to fuck one goat......just once…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 11:41 PM
1

You're not taking anything away from anyone buddy get over yourself. Nobody could give 2 fucks for your validation either. High opinion of yourself much? And ya not bringing much apart from typical snowflake highly moral horseshit! You do know a lot of words though don't ya. You should learn what they all mean before you start stringing them all together into stupid sentences.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 11:30 PM
1

You're not taking anything away from anyone buddy get over yourself. Nobody could give 2 fucks for your validation either. High opinion of yourself much? And ya not bringing much apart from typical snowflake highly moral horseshit! You do know a lot of words though don't ya. You should learn what they all mean before you start stringing them all together into stupid sentences.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 11:27 PM
2

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaat ? Run out of stupid meaningless progressive nonsensical illogical things to say. Beautiful! More text book! Hahaha
/r/MensRights29/11/17 11:22 PM
2

Hahaha gotta say, been following this a bit for a laugh. "You are a 'malevolent monster' blah blah blah, who only sees people as monsters blah blah blah, rapey rageboners blah blah blah, kill yourself blah blah blah, nobody will miss you blah blah blah hahahaha. This is just full of gold this is. Keep it up, text book, well done!!!
/r/MensRights29/11/17 11:20 PM
2

Thought the same thing, was wondering how long before he bought 'white fascism' into it. Still waiting for something about those 'neo-libralist ex right wing lefty progressive centralists' to pop up.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 11:11 PM
2

Thought the same thing, was wondering how long before he bought 'white fascism' into it. Still waiting for something about those 'neo-libralist ex right wing lefty progressive centralists' to pop up.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 11:11 PM
5

When a woman says that you get ya shit and RUUUUUN FOR THE HILLS !!!
/r/MensRights29/11/17 11:02 PM
3

Yep, it's real. And when women kill children and avoid jail we all get to see how truly valuable that pussy pass can be.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 11:01 PM
5

Justice is not revenge? Tell that to every dad out there that's lost his house, his dog, has had his children taken away and turned against him. Been chewed up, spat out by a system that will go exactly how far a scorned vengeful woman might want the system to go in order to destroy lives. How far the system goes is in direct proportion to how much revenge a woman might want. Get the picture? Tell all those people that 'justice' had nothing to do with revenge. Constantly making excuses for the b…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 10:32 PM
6

What percentage of men in jail are there in some way due to mental illness? Let em all out? Hell, why even put em in there in the first place, just sentence them to endless mental health consultations with a mental health expert like you. You wanna stop a few more kids dying? Then recognising the abuse that women commit as mothers for what it is and punishing them in line with everyone else (read: men) would be a great start. I'm surprised you weren't already on to that being a mental health exp…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 10:20 PM
1

The bloke you are responding to basically says that if someone says you are guilty, then you are guilty, police wouldn't investigate unless it were true, stuff knows how he worked that out but anyway. Obviously it's stupid, and isn't true, and I was just saying that as a dumb example of what he is saying. Was just a throw away really, wasn't having a go at you.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 08:46 PM
1

You really don't think that people should try to change this big cultural problem of FALSE ALLEGATIONS in any other way than TO STOP PRESUMING PEOPLE GUILTY ON ACCUSATIONS ALONE AND DEMANDING PROOF FROM THE ACCUSER????
/r/MensRights29/11/17 03:00 PM
1

"show me where you are confused about my argument"......that's easy, right from the start and you haven't been able to clear it up since baahaaaa
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:54 PM
1

Again, why should you have to check. If a girls says she is legal age, believe her, stick the plonker in, nothing could possibly go wrong could it? Well nothing that you've ever heard of right? 'Just ask them, why would they lie, why would women lie?' Hahahaha are you serious ? Hahaha
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:48 PM
2

If women are to be believed, why would there be any reason to to doubt a girl that says she is 18, 19? Shouldn't women be believed old mate. Or is it wise to have some doubts, sometimes, when a man's 'life' could be at stake? Are you sure women should always believed?
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:44 PM
1

You stole my car, because I said you did. So it's definitely true, especially of the police investigate my accusation....nnnnnkay /s
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:35 PM
1

No mate because it's nigh on impossible to make a false accusation of car theft stick on anyone without the stolen car actually turning up......so like you know, proving that a crime had been commited......as opposed to no evidence ever turning up......which proves that neither a crime has definitely been commited, or definitely hasn't been committed, it's purely a baseless accusation......sexual crimes are the only crimes where people get punishement often totally based on someone's word and ho…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:28 PM
1

"Are you sure about that?".......jeeezuz fucking Christ mate. Yes !!!! One hundred percent !!! NO WE DON'T assume guilt based on an accusation for every other crime because if you are going to jail for stealing a fucking car, it isn't happening without some pretty bloody good evidence that you actually lifted the vehicle. How hard is it to grab that basic concept? If my car vanished for any of a million reasons, and I wanted to accuse you of stealing it.....just because I thought you were a wank…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:13 PM
1

If you were a man and the president wasn't a woman, and you said the president 'sexually assaulted you' they would look into it, trust me. Just because the cops chose to investigate some things with more seriousness than others doesn't make every accusation they selectively chose to investigate 100% true. As another example, a man gets punched in the face, kicked in the shins, balls etc etc, often enough to get to the point of picking up the phone and dialing the DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOT LINE. Now …
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:53 PM
1

If someone accuses someone else of stealing their car, the accused person is not going to be thrown in jail based on the FEELINGS of the person that made the accusations. I'm not sure if it's dawned on you yet but it seems that a few people seem to think that more women make false accusations than what is being implied. Any idea why society has so much trouble believing that 40% of domestic violence victims are men and boys? Why aren't those victims always believed. Actually why aren't those vic…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 06:16 AM
1

Concept
/r/MensRights29/11/17 04:53 AM
2

"I don't see this kind of doubt with any other crime...". That's because most other crimes need actual hard evidence that there was a crime committed for there to be like, you know, a crime. Obviously that makes the kind of crimes that many people have doubts over different to the vast majority of other crimes that people don't have doubts about. As an example, someone that gets charged with stealing a car, usual has to be caught with the car or connected to the car. Like evidence n stuff. When …
/r/MensRights29/11/17 04:51 AM
2

The issue is double standards, not any individuals' standards in particular. As you say it's hard to be 100% accurate when talking about unreported things so therefore so it's only fear and sensationalism that 'attatches' any kind of numerical frequency to it. Obviously thanks to biased definitions and biased standards men face all kinds of repercussions for things that clearly aren't rape or sexual assault or even harassment, but because a female felt those things, it happened. When men get fou…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 04:26 AM
5

"But it's a far better policy"........eeeeer ya think. People believing the world to be flat is mind blowing now that we know the truth, but how any moron believed "believe all women" ever had an iota of merit as a policy and never seen this bullshit coming in the first place is hard to get ya head around.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 03:56 AM
1

Also, be careful trivialising biological roles around women, plenty of women are still very connected to their 'biological role' and may very well take offense to dissing that very important job, not all women are hell bent on a career, in actually fact many women are only really interested in being mothers with all respect, they're the kind of women that could take offense to "Pfff"
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:27 AM
1

Yep, correct. I'm not disagreeing with that. Capitalism has a lot to answer fit and as you say to a large degree both sides of the spectrum end up being pawns in a big game that most people don't really fully comprehend. I think there is a different 'left' and 'right' dynamic going at ground level amongst the masses. The 'left' are the progressive tone speech police that constantly argue over the nuances of defining things. The 'right' are obviously more of everything less moral according to the…
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:22 AM
1

I don't didsgree with that. Was just saying that prioritising careers has been an increasing factor in women delaying motherhood. There are always individual situation that go against generalisations. Generalisations aren't always right or wrong. What I said was in context of a reply to a comment. I fully agree that people should do what they want.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 02:18 AM
2

I would have thought that double standards and womens' generally shitty attitudes towards men that result from so many double standards was actually a big enough issue to talk about. It's just a discussion. So people talking about something that you think is irrelevant are "nobodies"?
/r/MensRights27/11/17 10:03 PM
2

Now that you've seen it, point it out to all your friends would ya
/r/MensRights27/11/17 09:13 PM
1

Now that you've seen it, point it out to all your friends would ya
/r/MensRights27/11/17 09:09 PM
2

Yeah, wouldn't that be a novel concept !
/r/MensRights27/11/17 09:04 PM
1

Women delaying motherhood for the career? Couldn't have anything to do with it at all? Who is it that has placed women's careers over and above any biological role women have? I don't have a problem with women working just to clear that up, but it wasn't the conservatives that made women the equivalent of men in terms of being slaves to the economy, it was the lefties. It's gone way past most women even having a choice so that's another thing that went just fantastically well too /s
/r/MensRights27/11/17 07:37 PM
1

Who runs the media and spreads the information? Left wing people, telling lies, controlling the narrative and silencing people that dissent that's who. It's a people problem.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 07:32 PM
1

You were under the correct impression. And the stupidity is all around the globe.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 07:27 PM
1

We've gone so far to the loony left that men laterally see no value, only risk in marriage and family. That's what the lefties have done. Driven along blindly by the feminists, they've destroyed the nuclear family. That seems to be going so well for everybody doesn't it. They're a crafty lot those lefties though, they still seem to have some people thinking it's right leaning conservatives that are to blame for everything.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 07:26 PM
1

We can once their birth rate has a couple of generations to get cranking.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 07:20 PM
1

You're right, it is propaganda that pushes bullshit ideologies. No doubt about it. It's not just the American political system that's full of stupidity, I'm from Australia and trust me it's the same here. People here are so pissed off and disillusioned because they know it doesn't matter who they vote for it ends up being against their own interests. The unionist party here have been doing deals with the marshmallow brain greens (the super weirdo lefties), the workers party has gone as lefty and…
/r/MensRights27/11/17 10:34 AM
1

I read the article and watched the video. I don't disagree with what you put up. I think most conservative and 'right' thinking people, anyone who's given politics in their local region or country any thought can see how democracy has given way to capitalism in the broader sense. I don't think it's right wing conservative people that are arguing about what you're saying. It's the definition crazy progressives that may argue against that. The very people who have hijacked the great left causes. T…
/r/MensRights27/11/17 09:20 AM
1

I don't even necessarily disagree with what you are saying. There's lots of history. If the CIA and all the capitalist foundations created it, who is to blame for continually perpetuating the stupidity since then? That's the question that the lefties can't answer. They've got an answer for everything else though haven't they. Sounds like the conservative 'right' are on to it. You're on to it. The left used to be on to it. They've held all the ethics and morals, truly they have, they have they ha…
/r/MensRights27/11/17 08:55 AM
1

Anyway, at least we agree that the left has lost the plot. We just disagree on who is to blame. We both don't like the result, so the fact that the left has been taken over by loons is the main problem.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 08:34 AM
1

That makes sense if you believe that conservative 'right' people are that bad that they are hell bent on destroying culture and humanity I don't agree with the outcome either nor do I like it. I just don't think conservative leaning people are responsible for the basket case that the left has become. I don't think the left are really that insidiously deranged on the whole, I'm not saying the opposite of what you are trying to say, it's more through naivety and a misunderstanding of basic human n…
/r/MensRights27/11/17 08:31 AM
2

Because we love misogynistic women just like we love other misogynistic men. I've always loved it over the years when my sisters have hooked up with women haters, men just love women haters /s
/r/MensRights27/11/17 08:12 AM
1

So it was smart that the left with all their moral ideas, knowing that they hold the key to world peace allowed the progressive word police to take over the good causes that every decent person person on the planet agrees with (that's most people of all kinds) to the point where it's impossible to take seriously anymore. Sounds real smart. Derail everything so that absolutely nothing gets done thanks to arguing over semantics all the time. I don't think the 'good old' lefties can believe what's …
/r/MensRights27/11/17 07:50 AM
3

Alastair is a smart bloke. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. BAM! There is so much in this it's unfortunate that it's beyond the comprehension of anyone that is even slightly tainted by feminist indoctrination. Really enjoyed reading that, nice work.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 07:39 AM
1

Idiots co opted the left. Pass the beer nuts.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 07:13 AM
1

Everything has been co opted by the leftists. So many definitions, so many discussions end up arguing about definitions, definitions definitions definitions. Apparently these days fascists aren't fascists as long as they are being violent in the name of 'down with big business' or something, the left is the centre, the right is extreme and alternative, words are violence, thoughts are the precursor to violence, those conservative baaaastards that just can't throw their old dictionary out, they'r…
/r/MensRights27/11/17 07:12 AM
3

Just do what they're doing now, leave absolutely nothing to the imagination, everyone can pick slutty promiscuous female behaviour can't they. Men are wary enough that promiscuous women have become the only kind of women many men feel 'safe' enough to approach. Ironically it's these kinds of women that have the most issues and can cause the most trouble.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:50 AM
1

Nah coz they weren't born as a rapist see. /s Not sure of the stats but would I be right saying that male to female switch is much more common than the other way around? If that's the case, given all the privilege that men have it's surprising more women don't just GO FOR IT and have a strapadictomy. Why do so many men swap a life of privilege for systematic oppression? Got me fucked! But yeah I'm always a bit wary of women who have transitioned to men just in case that violent side of the man c…
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:26 AM
1

Ok, THERE ISN'T A WAR ON BOYS AND MASCULINITY BY THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA !!!!.......GOT IT SHITLORD!!!!! I'm told that's supposed to clear that up, AND DON'T YOU FORGET IT YOU PRIVILEGED COCK A BALLS CARRIER !!! /s
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:07 AM
1

100 !
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:57 AM
1

"I will teach them to distrust".....aaaaaaand "real friendship is impossible without the ability to trust".......Jeeeeeee Zuz straight off the bat! And like close enough to be seen on the same screen shot while reading it. Fuck me dead!! Jaw dropping!
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:56 AM
6

When the stupidity gets that bad that feminists go into damage control it can't be too good eh. Given that feminism is constantly in damage control doesn't say much for itself.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:49 AM
1

Agreed one hundred percent !
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:35 AM
1

350 cash and we'll keep it off the books
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:29 AM
2

I've got mates of mine that have been career public servants. Years ago they thought they had it made when they were getting paid for sitting on their arses. Not sure why anyone would wanna get paid for doing that anyway but they used to take the piss out of us dirty tradies, apparently working hard and dirty for shit apprenticeship wages was below them, now they're stuck working for the government system thats spent the last 30 years advancing women and it isn't as much fun as it once was. Surp…
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:22 AM
1

They are planning for it to get worse, by employing exactly the logic I just explained. SEE LOOK, HE SEEMED LIKE SUCH A NICE MEEK AGREEABLE FEMINIST MAN AND HE'S GONE AND DONE/SAID (insert) !!!!!!! So let's start lecturing boys from the age of 5 at school instead of at 8 or 10 when their dad usually gets tossed out coz.....pool guy or something. It's hard not to be cynical.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 05:04 AM
1

Makes sense. Obviously they shield themselves from all versions of toxic masculinity so who else could be responsible for all this other than the nice guys. Being surrounded by nice guys doing terrible shit is what underpins the idea that 'ya can never knock too much masculinity out of a man' to make him safe.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 04:55 AM
1

Yeah I'm an Aussie mate and yeah I've noticed that. The Mo's have been getting a good run in general lately, me and the boys have had some fun and a lot of good laughs more over the last couple of years with the different styles. It's good to see the increasing awareness year on year at things like the cricket, maybe that's actually behind the increasing facial hair men seem to be sporting around these days.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 04:36 AM
2

I think there is definitely something in that. They're pointing out that women 'bounce' back to life after losing their husband. It's impossible for them to entertain what you're suggesting so they've turned women loving less into men being a bigger pain in the arse during a life of marriage.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 04:08 AM
2

It shows the power of shaming doesn't it given how many men fall for it and actually do take it seriously.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 03:47 AM
8

I guess it's obvious what the over reaction would be like if you put an ad in the Looking For Accomodation section saying you'd "be happy to live with anyone of any colour or any gender or any age as long as they aren't feminist". Goes without saying.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 03:29 AM
8

It seems denying entry to kids based on gender is no big deal when it's boys being excluded and girls are being included, elevated, empowered, educated etc etc
/r/MensRights27/11/17 03:05 AM
2

Misunderstood probably being the most important word. I think you misunderstood my intentions to start with. I seen a lot of constructive replies to the girl in general. Which is good. The OP sounds like she is genuinely interested ! Which is good! As you yourself pointed out, there are things that certain people don't seem to understand too well about men's rights or lack there of, and about the movement. I agree. It's important for someone who is interested in supporting men's rights issues to…
/r/MensRights26/11/17 10:57 PM
2

I'm not preaching to the choir af all. Many feminists try to 'help' men by lecturing to them. Doing all the things most people on here know. Im aware people know that champ, don't get ya y fronts in a knot. I'm not banging on about anything mate and hardly preaching. I guess that's at least 2 differing opinions we have. You basically said ALL help is welcome. I said you are entitled to your opinion, and explained what I thought was not constructive help. I made one comment, you made a comment, a…
/r/MensRights26/11/17 10:15 PM
1

Fair enough mate, and i'll agree on appropriate and constructive support. What I mean by that is, most feminists would like all men basically to sit down and listen. Men are supposed to just accept lectures about toxic masculinity from the time they are 5 years old, constantly told they are to blame for everything and if men do this, it helps with smashing the 'patriachy' which in their minds is the ONLY way to 'help' men. According to feminists. Feminists think telling men that their 'problem' …
/r/MensRights26/11/17 09:47 PM
1

Identity !
/r/MensRights26/11/17 07:12 PM
2

I thinks as has been pointed out, as long as it's not the kind of female 'support' that thinks men should just adopt feminist ideology and pedestalise women as the only way to receive validation for being male. There is plenty of that kind of female 'support' getting around, I thinks it's clear that kind of approach isn't going to get a woman very far if she's trying to convince MRA's that's she's in support of men is it? About as far as a male feminist is going to get. For a woman to support me…
/r/MensRights26/11/17 06:49 PM
2

It sounds very much like that actually. Shortly it just won't be the done thing to be around women at all without some kind of recording device if you're a man. It just won't be worth taking the risk. I wonder what she thinks the art of seduction will look like at that point?
/r/MensRights26/11/17 06:32 PM
1

Not everything. Everything else I said 'tells' probably says more about 'everything'. Lmfao is me just laughing there old mate. I do realise how traumatic this whole experience has probably been for you. You probably haven't been able to attend comic club for the last 2 days, oooooh the humanity!!!! Chin up chaz, you can be a big boy one day if you dream hard enough, just light a little candle and dream yourself into a fully fledged grown up nnnnnkay pumpkin. Hahahaha. Just coz you can't see any…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 03:15 PM
1

You might define the Alf rights' views on antifa as being manipulated. What I've seen from antifa is that they are a bunch of intolerant, hostile, and angry thugs who are often prone to using violence in order to intimidate people, while at the same time trying to claim victim status. We can argue over semantics all day, the reason that people see antifa this way is not because they are 'manipulated', it's because that's what they SEE. I've heard of crypto currencies, not crypto thuggery.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 02:54 PM
1

You might define the Alf rights' views on antifa as being manipulated. What I've seen from antifa is that they are a bunch of intolerant, hostile, and angry thugs who are often prone to using violence in order to intimidate people, while at the same time trying to claim victim status. We can argue over semantics all day, the reason that people see antifa this way is not because they are 'manipulated', it's because that's what they SEE. I've heard of crypto currencies, not crypto thuggery.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 02:53 PM
1

There you go again. You don't even realise you're doing it. I'll try and explain it to you again......argumentative skills and debating skills are like character, eventually they stand for themselves. The only person that got excited was you, and it was because you got offended. Oh cool, I can go for it then can I, why thank you oh wise one, because no I know I'm not a retard. You pat yourself on the back numb nuts for putting out the olive branch......I've tried to reasonably explain to you how…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 02:41 PM
1

"Crypto fascism" ???? Wholly fucking be Jeeeeeee Zuz. You literally have a thousand different brand new words and definitions, not 398. Wow! For the average old Layman, the 'alt right' if ya meaning conservative kind of people......well they may still be smoking pipes and not dying their hair stupid colours to get their point across but they understand exactly what is going on. It's the lefty marsh mellow hearts that clearly have a problem with the concept, which is evident by how often they tak…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 02:04 PM
1

Wrong again mr mcdreamy. I was never offended. I said I'm thick skinned. I also said someone and maybe someone else argued like a lefty. Sue me! Aaaaaaaaand then YOU got offended ya did ya poor little dear.....ON BEHALF OF SOMEONE ELSE !!! Fact ffff ffff fact fact !!! I did say those things. And YOU did get offended. I called you a "lefty" and you literally dropped your baby bottle. Haaaaaaaaaaa. You also spruiked off about not giving a shit about offending people. You rebel you. You said that n…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 01:17 PM
1

Interesting. You extended more than one olive branch. Well that's so gentlemanly of you. After you called me a retarded arsehole because my 'delivery' or something wasn't up to your standard. "because you think your character is graded on a curve"........maaaaate, this is some seriously deluded stuff. Firstly, "because".....because you say so right. Secondly, I've never gone to character, I've consistently said that you argue like a lefty basically. Which you continue to prove by making disjoint…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 10:42 AM
1

Yeah ok, if you say so. As I alluded to, there are millions and millions of definitions out there for things these days. Progressive social justice warrior circular nonsensical logic has overtaken the left. The right wing conservatives with their dastardly nationalistic views are finally standing up to the stupidity and it's happening broadly around the globe. I don't need 398 different words to explain what has become a fairly simple concept and an observable one. Before I get accused of being …
/r/MensRights23/11/17 09:59 AM
1

Yeah it did, you posted a comment without calling me a retarded arsehole and a whiny bitch, that's a change right? Hahahaha see, I did it again, can't help myself. Once a lefty cupcake has tied themselves into knots it just keeps getting better and better, comon, what else ya got, this is text book stuff.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 08:08 AM
1

How pompous of you to think that your validation means anything at all. You've put yourself down. I never mentioned Hitler in anything I said, do another example of you dreaming shit up to dramatise your feelings of offence, which started on behalf if someone else. I never called anyone Hitler, all I did was point out how through your own use of lefty doublespeak you inadvertently revealed a darker side to yourself. Homophobic, handicap person belittling chauvinist for a start. All you've done i…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 07:02 AM
1

Gear
/r/MensRights23/11/17 06:18 AM
1

Oh shit ya back. No, but we've established through your own words that you see women as second class, you're a homophobe and you like making fun of handicapped people, I was interested to see what you were going to divulge about yourself next. Is that why your comments are getting shorter? Back when you started this you were like all chatty n stuff, ya had lots to say. Could it have dawned on you that words that you don't understand properly fly out of your cake hole before you put the pea brain…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 06:17 AM
1

"Our problem is the right". Wut? The worlds problems are a result of the lunacy of the left wing progressives that have millions and millions of different and conflicting definitions for everything. The left wing idiocy that has been over running western political systems for decades, they're our problem. The reason everything is fucked is because the progressives were allowed to hijack the left, and take over everything with their PC bullshit speech and thought policing. The lefty snow flake sa…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 06:06 AM
1

"Our problem is the right". Wut? The worlds problems are a result of the lunacy of the left wing progressives that have millions and millions of different and conflicting definitions for everything. The left wing idiocy that has been over running western political systems for decades, they're our problem. The reason everything is fucked is because the progressives were allowed to hijack the left, and take over everything with their PC bullshit speech and thought policing. The lefty snow flake sa…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 06:06 AM
1

"Our problem is the right". Wut? The worlds problems are a result of the lunacy of the left wing progressives that have millions and millions of different and conflicting definitions for everything. The left wing idiocy that has been over running western political systems for decades, they're our problem. The reason everything is fucked is because the progressives were allowed to hijack the left, and take over everything with their PC bullshit speech and thought policing. The lefty snow flake sa…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 06:06 AM
1

"Our problem is the right". Wut? The worlds problems are a result of the lunacy of the left wing progressives that have millions and millions of different and conflicting definitions for everything. The left wing idiocy that has been over running western political systems for decades, they're our problem. The reason everything is fucked is because the progressives were allowed to hijack the left, and take over everything with their PC bullshit speech and thought policing. The lefty snow flake sa…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 06:06 AM
0

Hahahahaha I'm thinking how fucking stupid this shit is and BAM!!! Pinheads !!! Hahahaha aaaaaw that got me. Funny shit !
/r/MensRights23/11/17 05:38 AM
2

Yeah it does seem like that doesn't it. But don't dare try and mansplain that crazy idea to a feminist, couldn't possibly have anything to do with it....now apologise nnnnnkay /s
/r/MensRights23/11/17 05:30 AM
2

Um, um, that's a tough one, ummmmmmm....
/r/MensRights23/11/17 05:25 AM
1

Yes! An unfortunate fact that the dimwits pushing it all think isn't worth consideration. It's like watching an inevitable car crash.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 05:23 AM
1

Too many big words for you to understand obviously. You can't even follow the stupid things you say yourself and you go around policing the way people speak. You're really going places champ have they promoted you to head of 'safe spaces' in your local community yet.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 11:37 PM
1

Youre an amateur!
/r/MensRights22/11/17 11:30 PM
1

That's laughable considering this started with you chipping me about my 'approach' or something. Someone told me to stop 'using childish name calling' or something and I called that person a lefty and someone else a lefty or something....you've jumped in all highly moral and then you throw stuff like "You're like that chick who wrote......". Seriously? Like being "that chick" is somehow an insult. You don't have an issue with women do ya mate? I mean you demean retards by using it as a 'childish…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 11:23 PM
1

According to you, I'm a lefty? I got triggered? What planet do you live on? This literally started because you become offended on behalf of something that was said to someone else. This literally started thanks to your virtue signalling. My feelings? You're kidding yourself, how many doodles have you got buddy? you couldn't be that silly playing with only one all the time hahahahahahaha, oops, did it again. Settle there petal, it's just a joke, nnnnnnnkay bubsy wubsy.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 12:04 PM
1

Free time is the only reason I'd be playing along with a special case like you, no offence. At least you admit derailing, so that's something I didn't add to your comments. I think I've mainly used your own words against ya, it's not hard. Maybe I'm like you and don't give a fuck about offending people. I'm selective though. Say like, I wouldn't be deliberately offensive to my grandmother for example. Or your grandmother either. But I couldn't give 2 fucks about the feelings of progressive snowf…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 11:55 AM
1

Wut? How highly intelligent of you. And now you're homophobia is coming out too. Anything else your moral highness? Lefties just don't know how to stop do they eh champ
/r/MensRights22/11/17 11:43 AM
1

No people don't change their minds based on being a lefty or something else. And neither am I saying people should. I don't suppose you really think calling me a retard is going to change my mind on much either. I'm not offended, like you it seems I couldn't give a rats arse. You've spent a fair bit of time arguing about what a retarded arsehole I am but you've also said you agreed with what I was saying. So why bother derailing? Just a question. Yes I read every response from the guy, everyone.…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 10:58 AM
1

I'll play along. Blah blah blah, curses, blah blah blah, reality, blah blah blah, get ya principles straight dude.......got it! So like, all sit down, light a candle and hold hands, have a little hug and dream that world a better place nnnnkay chitlens! Hahaha Nice one. You're a funny guy hahaha
/r/MensRights22/11/17 10:39 AM
0

Yes ! Thank you I stand corrected. I think I've misused that word before accidentally, but I'm glad you understood what I meant. I've used the word eluded before too just as you defined it so it's kind of a silly mistake to make, thanks for pointing it out
/r/MensRights22/11/17 10:10 AM
1

Yeah mate, I know I don't have to thank you and what you've done hasn't directly affected me but I'm very aware of how terribly ex service people have been treated by governments. it's happened wholesale in my country too. It isn't new either, as you said all politicians do the same thing. Hillary's comment is just one comment, but it did become a talking point and was kind of a 'thing' that might have struck to her privileged attitude that's all. I definitely don't hate the player, I get what y…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 08:52 AM
1

You don't read too well do ya buddy, I'm not from America, I'm not a Trump voter. You calling people retards is hilarious. You're like an artificially inseminated cow, you know something is going on but you haven't a clue what it is. Hahaha that's a good one eh
/r/MensRights22/11/17 07:22 AM
1

Stop being a sooky sooky lala......just honestly ask yourself this. Is it more important to get the important details of a subject out on the table, or argue all day about the difference between being 'right' and super sweet so that no one gets their feelings hurt or being 'right' and a 'bit of an arsehole' about it? Seriously? I don't mean to be a cunt mate. When things get snakey and nasty nasty people say nasty nasty things and call people lefties n stuff, then as you say it's basically count…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 07:01 AM
1

You know all the words, now you just have to learn what they mean. Start by looking up PROJECTING in the dictionary. Then reread this exchange and see if you can work out who it is that's doing that. You're welcome!
/r/MensRights22/11/17 06:41 AM
1

I'm not sure what those acronyms are for either, but it sounds like you've been in the forces and if that's the case I honestly thank you for you service. I know there is many sides to everything and all honour to the people in our defence forces !!!
/r/MensRights22/11/17 06:37 AM
1

Well I don't disagree with much of what you said. I'm not arguing that either side is more righteous, I didn't mean to be taken that way. I did qualify my comments by saying I'm not from the States and I know I don't know everything. It was a world event though. I was actually laid up with a broken leg and watched a lot of it leading up. I know it's easy to say but it didn't surprise me thsg Trump won, not blowing my own trumpet (pun intended) but I did let my feelings known about how I thought …
/r/MensRights22/11/17 06:33 AM
1

Your ability to surprise me went to zero the moment you came in swinging, white knighting for a white knight hahaha, got all offended on behalf of another snowflake ya did aaaaaaw, hahaha how cute
/r/MensRights22/11/17 06:19 AM
1

Hahahaha ner ner, ner ner ner ner ner ner!!! Nnnnnnnnnnnn so there!!! Hahaha, brilliant!!!
/r/MensRights22/11/17 06:16 AM
1

I'm not from the US dunce. Left wing stupidity had infected the entire globe in case you haven't noticed. Where you been living, under a rock? Bit ironic you calling me a princess since the reason that you and I are even conversing in the first place is because you got offended on behalf of someone else. The lefty argument always works on lefties, because they always get bent and twisted about it every time it comes up. Like you did. And then hijack the direction of the original conversation, by…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 05:54 AM
1

Yeah and I agree with you in the main too. The entire political landscape throughout the entire western world has become a joke. I'm from Australia, the system is so broken here, it's a shame because people really want good strong leaders to look up to, but no one is there. You could hardly blame a lot of great people with lots to offer from avoiding politics all together. It's almost like all the worthy candidates couldn't be bothered with the shit show of it all and we're left with what we're …
/r/MensRights22/11/17 05:40 AM
1

Just by the way, when you paraphrase someone you shouldn't use full quotation marks, it's makes you look like you are putting words in someone's mouth. Another typical left wing tactic too by coincidence. Attatching you're interpretation or context to what someone else is saying is one thing, incorrectly quoting them is rude for a start and it's also intellectually dishonest. You didn't know that either did ya
/r/MensRights22/11/17 05:17 AM
1

Edit....the other lefty was calling someone a 'piece of shit' and you're using insults like disgusting. Lefties are the hypocrites, and ironically it's the lefty folks that are enabling the double standards that the entire thread started about in the first place. See, you didn't even know you were enabling it did you yada yada man. Hahaha
/r/MensRights22/11/17 05:09 AM
1

Well listen there little yada yada man, I was never discussing the issue from the point of having the high ground. Interesting you bought that up though. It's almost as though you think you decide who owns the moral high ground. Sounds familiar. You just proved yourself to be a snowflake lefty, because only lefties are concerned with the moral high ground, that's how they attempt to win every debate they ever enter into. Right wing kind of people are concerned with facts fella, not feelings firs…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 05:03 AM
1

Read the entire conversation, that which you admitted you haven't done. I called you triggered, because you WERE triggered, by a conversation that had been going a while, completely without your involvement. It's almost as though you're just sitting there waiting to assert your moral authority. All I've done is point out, like many people on here that there are many double standards, and just as some people keep proving, it's clear that some people are very dismissive of these very real issues. …
/r/MensRights22/11/17 04:42 AM
-2

So sorry you found yourself so triggered! I called someone a lefty. I don't need to use fucks to 'make my arguments stronger', my arguments can stand by themselves. I think you'll find that it is you that is rambling, and taking a very morally high stand on it too for someone that literally Interupted in a conversation to do nothing other than to attempt police the language. Didn't add one thing to the original subject what so ever. So well done on you for following the convo, but not as deeply …
/r/MensRights22/11/17 04:12 AM
1

That's what politicians do, it's well understood that this is what all politicians generally do, but all that statement does in regards to Hillary if you accept what a grub she is, is make her supporters look as bad as she is then doesn't it. We know universally that pollies play (pander) to the voters, so that applies to all of them. Not to be deliberately nitpicky, but you said you can't blame her, then you said she is certainly responsible. The way I see it is, yes they all pander to get vote…
/r/MensRights22/11/17 04:01 AM
-7

My argument hasn't changed. I think if you read all of my comments I'm pretty consistent about what i say. Calling someone who constantly derails a discussion that most people seem to be on the same page with a lefty is not something that would require language policing in my opinion. Calling someone a lefty wouldn't be my idea of insulting. And then someone coming in almost offended on behalf of someone else (also a very left wing trait too by the way) going on about bipartisanship and telling …
/r/MensRights22/11/17 03:43 AM
1

Everyone is aware of what politicians get up to. Pandering to say, old retired voters by giving them a financial break in the lead up to an election is one thing.....pandering to a bunch of spoiled rabid man hating feminist cry babies by making statements like "women are the primary victims of war etc etc" is a different level of pandering all together when you take into consideration how utterly disrespectful and ignorant and just bloody wrong the statement is.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 03:24 AM
1

While it's easy to understand the pathetic reasoning behind selling horseshit to appeal to the masses of progressives that will believe anything, who do you blame for it then? Who is to blame for Hillary, her statements, who is to blame for what Hillary stands for if you don't blame Hillary then?
/r/MensRights22/11/17 03:14 AM
1

They think consent is implied by way of having a dick.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 03:06 AM
1

What do you suggest?
/r/MensRights22/11/17 02:39 AM
1

Very insightful and well thought out comment, cheers!
/r/MensRights22/11/17 02:36 AM
-16

I'll call what ever shit out that I like thanks. I don't need you to tell me how to have a conversation. Who the fuck do you think you are. I'll call lefty idiocy lefty idiocy if I well feel like it. Thanks for joining in, just what every convo needs, yet another lefty moralising over everyone and attempting to police people's language. If you've got nothing to say about what people have been talking about, which is about the gender double standards that adversely affect men, fuck off. Go and te…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 11:45 PM
2

I'll provide another analogy. We're at an establishment having a quite beer somewhere. While I'm there minding my own business, when a woman, that just randomly happens to be the woman you are dating, grabs me on the junk and makes me spill my beer. I turn around instinctively and slap her across her face.......her hair bun flies out and her sun glasses hit the floor. You, being the big white knight that you are step up to defend your rude, offensive and abusive girlfriend. You fancy yourself as…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 11:21 PM
8

Men are put in jail for such behaviour, men lose their careers and their families for such behaviour.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 10:59 PM
5

You mean true crime like someone walking up and grabbing someone else on the genitalia without the owner of the genitalia's consent. That kind of crime? The very crime being discussed that puts men in jail when they do it and women are the victims, the very crime that men are told to man up when they are the victim of it and when it's a woman commiting the crime. Is that the true crime you are talking about?
/r/MensRights21/11/17 10:58 PM
3

Haha, I know, aren't I lucky duck! Sometimes people say the dumbest things, you know you almost can't stop 'listening', ya just hangin to see what comes next. It's also undercredited how much can actually be learned by trying to string together their illogical arguments as ya follow along......annoying? Can be. Frustrating? Definitely can be if you ever expect to win a fucking debate on anything with them. But it's almost like seeing how bloody ridiculous people can be is an essential part of le…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 10:38 PM
0

I agree, it's a little humurous and a little dumbfounding all at once......how they can not see it has got me haha, cheers mate
/r/MensRights21/11/17 10:17 PM
4

This is indeed a perfect example of a very very good analogy.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:50 PM
5

That isn't surprising since it seems you wouldn't know if your arse was on fire hahaha
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:44 PM
-17

What the fuck are you on about? That's all you've got? You lefties always show your true colours eventually don't ya.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:41 PM
7

Yes, men that put up with the shit women throw at them thinking it makes them more of a man, those kinds of men
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:36 PM
8

Yep, being one of millions and millions of fathers that have lost connect to their children thanks to double standards, they don't have problems do they. Or the millions and millions of kids, boys and girls, lost their fathers thanks to double standards, they don't have problems. The millions of men falsely punished for domestic violence crimes, they don't have problems. The millions of men that make up 40% of domestic violence victims being totally ignored because of double standards, they don'…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:33 PM
8

Well clearly the average bloke isn't going to be that worried about that is he. Pointing out that women can go around grabbing men on the junk when they like, actually do plenty of things without repercussions and a bloke looking sideways at a woman can get a man locked up for 'thought rape'......pointing out this double standard and the extended dangers it potentially places on men in relation to the entitlement of attitude many women exhibit thanks to these very double standards is not being a…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:21 PM
4

Any idea who and what it is that enables the childlike attitudes of women that you elude to mate? It's one thing to deny the sometimes disastrous affects of these obvious double standards, it's another thing to be an enabler and not even realise it!
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:52 PM
1

Any idea how you think that 'women should grow the fuck up' ? What's your thoughts on the double standards that you are dismissing as virtually a non issue genius? The fact that women aren't forced to take responsibility for their actions in the same way men are by society, hence the double standards, well that couldn't have anything to do with 'women needing to grow the fuck up' could it champ?
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:49 PM
6

You might consider yourself not a vindictive piece of shit.....maybe not, but you are as naive as a person can get. You might be extremely lucky, but it probably won't be long before you find yourself in a situation that makes you realise what an arse kissing white knight you are......any idea how much sympathy white knight's get when it all goes wrong? None !
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:41 PM
11

You can be fine with being assaulted by the very definition that lands men in jail, because that proves how alpha you are.....apparently putting up with that shit makes you an alpha, and only alphas are big enough men to take it.....oh yeah and it helps when you're a star athlete and 'not ugly' (read:highly desired after male) and admit that putting up with the abuse is better than the alternative, which sounds like getting punched in the face for sticking up for yourself.....or something......l…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:36 PM
88

Pointing out clear double standards to the very people complaining about double standards the most and the loudest is not damselling in distress. It's quite simply pointing out double standards, nothing more, and I can't remember the last time a man pointing out a double standard ever stopped him going to his dirty, dangerous job. I highly doubt that pointing out double standards will have anything to do with the lights going out. If you think that men pointing out feminist double standards is d…
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:23 PM
2

They want consequences, just not for themselves. They'll take the choices though th th thanks very much.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 01:21 AM
2

One hundred !!!
/r/MensRights20/11/17 01:11 AM
2

Hahahaha No you are!!! No you are!!! No you are!!! No you are!!!
/r/MensRights20/11/17 01:03 AM
2

It's the only way one can "win" when one has no plausible argument in the first place
/r/MensRights20/11/17 12:58 AM
13

Obviously the logic you use to make the point is spot on, not sure they'll see it that way. They don't like logic, it fucks with their heads
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:57 PM
1

That too, I agree, it is disgusting.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:34 PM
10

The point being that she is a hypocrite. And this is just one of many many examples. She's a man hating pig, and she makes herself look as stupid as ya can be every time shit flies out of her cake hole.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 08:23 PM
1

Yes mainly. The global population is growing, but western white women aren't doing their fair share of baby producing. Of course this has nothing to do with western white women naively making themselves slaves to the corporates against everyone's best best interests including their own, it's more like 'where have all the stand up guys gone?'
/r/MensRights18/11/17 09:53 PM
1

White western women aren't having enough babies to maintain a stable population but the world population is still growing. That tells us that someone is still having 'enough' babies and obviously we might find ourselves a more Muslim population across the globe. I see no problems there for the feminists can you? Well they don't seem to be complaining about that yet, with all that manspreading and mansplaining to fight against there mustn't have been time yet. Western women think they are here to…
/r/MensRights18/11/17 09:40 PM
3

How about........"Everything we say is being recorded on this little device I have sitting in my top pocket that's clearly heard me asking you to leave me the fuck alone 3 times now, I'd hate for you to be found out to be a persistently difficult and argumentative female that think you have the right to harass people with ya bullshit, people that have repeatedly asked you nicely to fuck off"
/r/MensRights18/11/17 09:30 PM
2

And makes about as much sense
/r/MensRights17/11/17 10:42 PM
1

So in other words, it's naturally understandable why beautiful women think their shit don't stink. But you've had some serious feminist circle jerkin goin on when so many very average females have adopted the 'every man wants to fuck me (rape me)' attitude haven't ya. The entitlement is totally linked to their vagina, only a feminist would deny it
/r/MensRights15/11/17 06:45 AM
1

Yep, and when ya sit down and weigh everything up, as a bloke, unless your woman is 'top 5' in the attitude stakes then the bullshit drama and histrionics isn't worth it. I think it seems to be clear that the maintenance level of women go up as their level of natural beauty, generally. Not always but beautiful women that everyone want to fuck, as you say have constant validation and wind blown up their arses. As well as being the reason that ugly man hating feminists hate pretty women, it's conn…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 06:39 AM
1

We could be on to something. I think someone already said "that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction". Haha I think he was a pretty smart dude! Yep, Tinder is about women choosing men almost entirely on appearance, and money, and status, and everything else that a 'good man' can provide for a woman that's looking for mister wonderful. And all without those precious little dears having to waste their time with the 95% of losers that aren't up to their standard. See, there I di…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:40 AM
1

You BASTAAARD !!!! /s
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:29 AM
1

Yep, and men often end up in trouble basically white knighting for women who dare douchebags and end up in trouble. Men are protective of women in general especially with female family members, it's a given. Some women may give a bloke a heads up if she thinks he's dating a trouble making ho, but I think women are less inclined to give a shit about the general well being of men and the trouble that men can be faced with as a result of toxic girlfriends and wives. I agree that the genders can be …
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:27 AM
2

Haha The vag has been known to draw many a man further than dynamite will blow him. There's 3 billion of the fuckin things not sure why they think having one is so special.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:19 AM
1

Accused of saying
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:13 AM
1

Adding.....stunningly beautiful women who every Chad Thundercock wants his way with marry short fat bald guys for money. I know there are acceptions to every rule and not all women are totally shallow heartless bitches which is what I would be accused of I'm sure
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:11 AM
2

Women prefer to be the financially less better off partner in the relationship because they almost universally want to marry up. Men don't give a shit about a woman's ability to provide for him. Men want to still find their women beautiful in 50 years, not see them like a nagging old fish wife. Women have large reservations about marrying men with less money than them, whether feminists acknowledge that about women or not. I know plenty of women that agree with this totally, and none of them are…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:08 AM
1

It's hard to not be cynical about it all too, as you seem to be aware of.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 04:56 AM
1

Yeah I guess there is the pick up gang that 'try to take advantage of it' kind of thing. But If you think about it, it's not that surprising that men will take advantage of how easy women have become to have sex with. It wouldn't matter if the 2 default genders were apples and oranges instead of men and women, when there are games to be played, both sides will use certain strategies to their advantage. In terms of Tinder, women are the losers again. Because as you say, male nature being male nat…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 04:53 AM
2

I think what would help with a fairer balance to the sexes is not what feminism about for a start. Feminists have done nothing but interfere in the household relationships. Men and women need to work it out between themselves. What I see is that the most successful kind of relationships between men and women are the ones in which both men and women understand what we are talking about. Relationships that are based around men being beta and agreeable doormats and women being feminist overlords of…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 04:00 AM
2

And I agree again. Women are never going to stop being attracted to Chad Thundercock and stop being bored with weak pathetic men that constantly beg for female approval all the time by kissing women's arses and stroking their fickle egos all the time. It is never going to happen. It isn't a social construct. It's called nature and the total denial of the nature of gender comes directly from feminism. Telling men that pedestalising women and hating your masculinity is the way to be successful wit…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 02:33 AM
2

I'm sure you and I are generally in agreement. As you say, young men stop listening to bleating feminists is a good start. And to be involved in conversations on sites like this where all of these 'terribly misogynistic' ideas about women and the well being of men and boys get tossed around. You're spot on, it is totally about education and being educated with the most helpful information by the people most equiped to deliver that information based on experience. That information will never come…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 02:22 AM
1

Wraps them up pretty well
/r/MensRights15/11/17 12:50 AM
2

And yes, when you have an understanding of these dynamics there is a 'bright side' for the alpha real man kind of men, because being surrounded by more beta arse kissers increases an alphas chance of poontang. I'm not criticising beta gentle men either by the way, just saying that in regards to the true nature of women, nice guys nearly always finish last, live in an eternity of friendzone, and then many of them get angry and resentful sometime down the track when they realise they've been had.,…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 12:44 AM
2

I think we're pretty well on the same page. You're correct it's about personal responsibility and if men chose to be pussy whipped beta's that is in fact up to them, I agree. But the reason that so many men do that is because they've been conditioned to be that way without being educated about what you and I know is the truth. You also point to the fact that many women agree on how high maintenance and difficult and entitled some women be and I agree with that too. They are the kinds of women th…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 12:36 AM
1

It's like 'ner ner, ner ner na ner ner ner, I've got the puss. I'm so sort after and I could have anyone I want because I have a vagina!!! ...but not you, you don't have a vagina that half the entire population yearns for'........this is the power play attitudes women are encouraged to have....then they stand there with a bewildered look on their face and blame toxic masculinity when the alpha chad they adore says "Franky my dear, I don't give a DAMN!" and walks away because he is sick of her hi…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 11:51 PM
3

Agree, and again, strikes directly to the core nature of women, that feminists insist everyone be in denial about. While being in denial about the true nature of women can cause men all kinds of life long struggles and drives many a good man to the end of a rope, the on going problems women's entitled attitudes cause themselves in regards to unsuccessful relationships with men are dismissed as part of the systemic oppression of women just like everything else. That's why women can actually affor…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 10:15 PM
9

Well apparently women aren't as interested in men's deep feelings and emotions as feminists try their best to lead people to believe. And again, as obvious as this is, if you dare point this is out after sitting back and observing women for more than 5 minutes and how they relate to the men in their lives, you're a naughty boy who doesn't understand the level of oppression women have experienced for thousands of years while men have and still enjoy all the privilege. Feminists have mastered the …
/r/MensRights14/11/17 09:41 PM
10

Yeah it would, but trying to explain that to feminists is like that scene from the Life of Brian where he tries to tell all the people that he isn't the messiah. When one of the crowd says "only the real messiah denies his identity!".,.....Brian then says "ok then I am the Messiah".........and the crowd cheers "GOOD GOOD HE IS THE MESSIAH!!!" It doesn't matter how obvious the double standard is, it doesn't matter how many different ways, with any amount of proof and how gently you try to explain…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 09:27 PM
10

The very truth they are in denial about while conditioning men more from an even younger age to be docile, self loathing beta creeps and can't wonder what's with all the face palming when they whinge, bitch and complain about 'where have all the good men gone'. The level of delusion amongst women thanks to feminism is only outdone by the irony of women constantly complaining about the very things they have and continue to create for themselves.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 09:10 PM
1

You are spot on. The landscape has definitely changed. But what makes a good woman is the same as it always was. Good staunch, emotionally women that understand and respect men are still around, they are just harder to find amongst the clusterfuck of lefty progressive feminist insanity. It's become harder for young men to negotiate female nature because society has seperated boys from their fathers and removed male school teachers from the education system. The message has always been to walk aw…
/r/MensRights13/11/17 09:05 AM
1

Thats why they have a problem with it. It is in direct conflict with their narrative that men can't live without the emotional guidance of women. Which is obviously horseshit, but it's empowering for feminist kind of women to believe that. The concept that men can provide something to other men that women can't drives feminist women insane. And there is lots of reasons that men have become less likely to commit to women long term, emotionally controlling and entitled female behaviour is just one…
/r/MensRights13/11/17 08:45 AM
1

Yes! Definitely! They've created a situation that is self perpetuating, and it's totally related to the fact that they know fuck all about men. The only thing they are in denial more about than men is themselves.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 04:06 AM
1

London to a brick he didn't see THAT comin'.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 03:57 AM
0

You're the one that started insulting people for disagreeing with you. Your angle from the start was "HEY ALL YOU MEN, WOMEN CAN'T HURT YOU, JUST DO WHAT I DO, JUST PUSH THEM AWAY OR RESTRAIN EM" This is literally your answer and your advice to young men is it? Hahahaha I wouldn't be calling anyone delusional if I were you, and the feminist line goes.....women are only ever victims and men are always perpetrators, women deserve defending and men don't because they can handle it. The feminist lin…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 05:41 AM
0

Yeah there is, it's usually what left wing morons like you do when you run of any decent argument. And then you start calling people names. At least you realise you're a half wit lefty, you admit being as left as can be. I think that's your problem for a start. Every single person on the planet with an ounce of brain knows that women are weaker physically. You trot that around like it's big news. Every single person knows why women get a pussy pass. You trot that around like your a genius that j…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 03:44 AM
1

The only reason I've said that you'd stand there and allow yourself to be beaten up by a woman on the basis of there being no threat is because that's what you said you'd do. I'm not being silly. You said that women get a pussy pass, well because they are women and therefore weak and therefore not dangerous. If you want to go through life with blinkers on that's fair enough, but it's the height of arrogance telling everyone how they should assess a level of personal risk in any given situation. …
/r/MensRights17/10/17 08:59 PM
0

Yeah mate, seeing clear double standards applied to the well being and personal safety of certain people compared to others can tend to make people annoyed. Actually, there's a whole lot of double standards basically, pushed and perpetuated by idiotic, soft cock, left wing cry baby progressive moron do gooders that are also the ones doing all the foot stamping and crying in the streets when they don't get their way. Many people are sick of seeing their sons being shat all over. Oh, and sick of t…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 08:41 PM
1

Anyone with a brain understands why excuses are made for women in a million different circumstances mate. Do you really think you are educating people by incessantly explaining why society doesn't take female abuse and violence seriously? You don't really think that most people on here are that fucking stupid do you buddy? Because that's the point in case you missed it. Some people in society care about tackling all kinds of violence, others are only interested in tackling the kind of violence t…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 01:19 PM
3

I'm not going 'full blown' SJW over anything. I'm saying that if a women is being violent and attacking someone I don't see that as a trivial issue. An abusive woman should be treated like anyone else who is sbusive. If you chose to stand there and be assaulted by someone without defending yourself on the basis that the assailant is a woman and therefore no threat it is you that is the SJW. Not me. It also makes you foolish because it is your very own social justice warrior beliefs that enables …
/r/MensRights17/10/17 01:00 PM
2

Women pay taxes on an individual basis. This is fact. They don't pay as much taxes on average as men do. This is fact. The reason for this is because men spend more time working. This is fact. Women collectively take out tons and tons and tons of those tax dollars in subsidies. This is fact. Men collectively get as close to fuck all as you can get. Zero! Zip! Zilch! This is also fact. There's are few facts for you, seeing how you are so big on facts. Hahahaha, you're a doctor and you sound like …
/r/MensRights17/10/17 12:47 PM
3

You are correct saying that women pay taxes too. I hate to spoil the party for you though but when the endless amounts of government subsidies that women receive are taken into consideration as well as the fact that men pay more tax in the first place thanks to being privileged enough to work longer hours it shows a glaringly wide tax burden gap. Heard of it? No? That would be a surprise given what a gigantic monstrosity of a tax burden gap it is. Ah no, in the nett tax paying department, men an…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 12:29 PM
2

Actually IQ is one of the only broad ways to measure an average intelligence across a lot of people, it doesn't mean it's accurate. In the big picture it's also quite vague because what 'quantifies' as intelligence is so complex that it makes it almost unquantifiable in any meaningful or useful way. An IQ test is not necessarily a very reliable measure of an individuals intelligence, especially if it is around the average, which most people are.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 12:04 PM
2

Just because someone keeps saying something over and over again doesn't prove anything as fact. If you look at the definition of feminism in the dictionary, and then have a good long hard look at modern feminism, you'll notice that they are two completely different things. Hence proving that feminism isn't even looking for equality by its own definition, let alone anyone else's.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:49 AM
2

Crikey you must of hit the jackpot, you've miraculously managed to find numerous feminists that are normally rational people. Jezuz, what are the odds of that? 'Rational feminist' is almost like an oxymoron /s
/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:38 AM
2

Hahaha little pisser !
/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:22 AM
4

And that's exactly how they try to silence you. It's up to you whether you let them or not. Watch The Red Pill for a great start, get more educated on the issues you see as a problem than the people calling you an idiot, which shouldn't be that hard and just bide ya time. People like that always lead with their chins eventually, then BAM !!! The look of confusion on their faces as the cognitive dissonance kicks in is totally priceless !
/r/MensRights17/10/17 11:02 AM
1

Yep, with MASSIIIIVE COOOOCK !!!! Hahaha
/r/MensRights17/10/17 09:26 AM
1

Very well explained, spot bloody on !!!
/r/MensRights17/10/17 09:11 AM
0

You can't testify coz ya dead. Because it's perfectly acceptable to injure or kill someone while defending yourself if the person you are defending yourself from is not a woman. But a tiny little fragile woman could walk up and stick a broken bottle in the side of your face and then successfully make you look like a monster and potentially ruin you through the courts because you caused her to break a nail when her abusive arse hit the ground after you gave her a reflex receipt right across the s…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:54 AM
6

Having your protests taken seriously is a luxury. Some might even say it's a privilege.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:03 AM
1

A lot of things are designed to be very cloudy by certain people. Try to remember that you don't need validation from anyone to believe in what you see. No one does. Obviously it's nice to have the people that are supposedly closest to us to 'get it', everyone wishes that, It's always easier when people agree and it can be extra reinforcing when it's family. Unfortunately that isn't always the case. You seem to have your eyes open enough, you've opened yourself to information and things like The…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:01 AM
3

At least you know what you're up against mate. And your mother is wrong too by the way, you can do something about it. Not being in denial about the issues you care about is a good start and will help you navigate through life. Talking about it when the time is right is also doing something about it. Talking about it when the time is 'wrong' (if ya know what I mean) is also doing something about it. Not always popular, but who cares. You may never convince your mother of what you see, it doesn't…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:16 AM
1

Quick sticks !!! /s
/r/MensRights17/10/17 03:54 AM
4

"That being said, most women do have the strength of an average young teenage male"......um, no. From 15 to 16 up the average boys exceed adult women in physical prowess. Shown by teenage male sports teams flogging national women's teams in things like soccer. The physical dominance is already there. Once the biological dominance of men is accepted as scientific fact as it should be, and not considered a social construct which it shouldn't be, it's mostly irrelevant at what point boys surpass wo…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:29 AM
5

Given a 50/50 guestimation on domestic violence perpetrators, how many of those average 50 women you randomly pluck from the street do you think could be abusing the men in their lives behind closed doors? Any idea? We know this happens. Given it any thought? How many of these random 50 harmless women have actively turned their kids against their fathers? Any idea? Women might be harmless little creatures to you because they are small. Having white knights like you on board make some women much …
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:21 AM
8

At the risk of repeating myself, one reason could be because you might have a bunch of white knight orbiters that think exactly like you do and think that you don't have a right to defend yourself, and take offence when you do, and then kick the stink out of you. How bout dat for a reason why HE may not be able to handle IT
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:12 AM
5

"I can just push her off or restrain her"......yeah righto mate, let me know how that goes for you that one time you also have half a dozen white knight orbiters trying to punch you in the face at the same time. Good luck with that
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:08 AM
4

"I can just push her off or restrain her"....ok mate, how does that little plan go down when you have half a dozen white knight orbiters trying to punch you in the face at the same time? I'm not sure the white knight types see much of a difference between hooking a woman in the face for attacking you and restraining a woman for attacking you but good luck with that.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 01:53 AM
4

"But we need to treat people based on what they are"....totally agree, an abusive woman should be seen as an abusive person, not a petulant child and have excuses made for them......."when it happens, you don't need the whole fucking crowd to get involved".......totally agree again, but what we need is for abusive women to be held accountable by law and for abuse committed by women to equally frowned upon by society at large, not laughed at and dismissed. That's what this highlights. Should we g…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 01:42 AM
7

Societal condemnation of men hitting women even when defending themselves (the very social dynamic that makes so many women feel they can hit men without repercussions in the first place) negates the fact that on average men are stronger than women on average are, because when someone doesn't hit back, in the context of this discussion that someone being men, size difference literally becomes irrelevant
/r/MensRights17/10/17 01:23 AM
2

Yeah mysteriously they care more about how they insist things look, fixing anything is impossible just ask them, what with all that evil toxic masculinity lurking in every shadow it's more about limiting the evil deeds white heterosexual men can do by actively positively discriminating against them. Deconstruct that white Patriachy!!! How dare men speak without a woman there to define everything for them. How dare privileged men speak at all. Those baaaastaaaards!! It's very important to look as…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 12:56 AM
7

The definition of 'definition police' is feminist. They defined it this way. They're expert definers those femaloons. And we're aaaall extremely lucky that they turned up when they did, who knows where the human race was heading with no understanding of what words meant and no one here to femsplain everything to everyone. /s
/r/MensRights17/10/17 12:03 AM
2

I see where ya comin from mate. I mean they could even go really radical and encourage women to resent their husbands for a million things like mansplaining and being an active agent of the Patriachy and leaving the toilet seat up. If they were to do that and cause as many women to divorce the shitlord father of their children as they can, then it would roolly and troolly be true, that we live in a society of dead beat dads that don't give a shit about their kids......well if they were to encour…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 11:41 PM
1

hahaha it's limitless the extent that we can play with the stupidity of feminist non reasoning. It's nigh on impossible not to be sarcastic about it and thankfully enough taking the piss is very high up on the lurky micro aggression list, worthy of academy award winning tantrum triggering performances if ya pickin up what I'm puttin' down. There, see, I just can't help myself
/r/MensRights16/10/17 10:54 AM
1

There's more often than not a lot more revealed than feminists ever realise or intend, every single time they open their mouths. A feminist doesn't have to open the gob for very long for the delusion to be on display. It's like a fog. And as you point out, attempting to explain this to them sends them into a cluster fuck of conflicting emotions and they curl up in the faetal position and suck their thumbs wike widdle baby people
/r/MensRights16/10/17 10:28 AM
1

Yeah it's kind of evolved very conveniently almost by design hasn't it. The mind boggles at how much mind bending mental gymnastics has been tossed about during that half a hundred years eh. It's like trying to fathom how big the universe is, ya know it's big but ya just can't quite get ya head around exactly how big haha. The feminist chalice of bullshit is well and truly overflowing.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:47 AM
5

Very well torn apart. Ripped it a newie! Nice work!
/r/MensRights16/10/17 08:44 AM
2

Yeah nah nothing could possibly go wrong.........
/r/MensRights16/10/17 08:25 AM
1

Anything and everything is a conspiracy against women, even when women run everything and it still goes to shit haha, it'd be easy to forget how feminists project if we weren't 'educated' on it every 3 and a half seconds. Apart from that, no one would notice
/r/MensRights16/10/17 07:40 AM
3

Silence is not so honourable when it results in others down the line suffering the same abuse. The silence was all to protect Hollywood privilege, not to protect potential future victims. Hollywood will do what Hollywood always does and that's to project all its guilt on to the broader community of commoners, mainly white men and conservative women, and go on indulging in the depravity that always made Hollywood what it still is to this day.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 07:26 AM
1

I'm well aware of that, you'd have to be living in a paint tin not to know that. If the Girl Scouts do the same things as Boy Scouts, why change? What benefit is there in making girls that could go into Girl Scouts eligible for the Boy Scouts? That's the point. There are lots of places that boys and girls have mixed activities including various sports and social groups, there's also lots of places that women and girls congregate without the opposite sex and that is actively promoted as an invalu…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 03:00 AM
1

And I agree that boys excel exactly how you said. What seems to have happened fairly consistently for quite some time now is that the entirety of the education system has evolved to cater for girls. The more the system is adapted to suit girls, the less boys thrive, and excel. This is what we are seeing. The only sure fire way to ensure this doesn't happen at this moment in time is to keep all boy schools. I'm not against boys and girls playing together or learning together in principle either b…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 02:00 AM
5

Good question, given the relentless attempts to move into male spaces you'd wonder what the benefit is, and to who. Why aren't men and boys allowed to do anything just by themselves? Can they not be trusted? Do they have something that women and girls can't provide amongst themselves, without the presence of men and boys? Why is it so important that women and girls have female only safe spaces like, um, like everywhere but it is seen as irrationally extreme to recognise the same needs in boys? W…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 01:41 AM
1

Girls do better at school because the entire education system is structured to suit them. I'm not knocking girls abilities, but boys results have been falling constantly as the education system has become more and more feminised including declining male teachers numbers. Boys aren't faulty because they aren't as docile and as good at sitting still as girls. The education system is faulty for failing to provide an environment where boys can thrive. That's why some people think boys can do better …
/r/MensRights16/10/17 01:23 AM
2

Actually I think it's obvious that boys do better in all boy environments but girls do better when they are in co Ed environments. It's still a conundrum, I just think you have that the wrong way around. Other than that I agree that what ever the situation, the outcomes will depend massively on the school involved, especially the teachers. If the majority of teaching staff are the lefty feminist types pushing progressive gender identity politics I don't think it matters what the gender make up o…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 01:06 AM
1

Well put. Great analogy!
/r/MensRights15/10/17 04:17 AM
1

Great vision, yes!!!
/r/MensRights15/10/17 04:06 AM
2

"I'm always doing something wrong" This is the only red flag you need to get out imediately!! At what point in the relationship do you anticipate this changing? Mmmmmm. HEAD FOR THE HILLS!!!
/r/MensRights15/10/17 03:58 AM
7

So men should do things in a way that doesn't stifle others. Wouldn't it be wonderful if this standard was employed across the board. I'm interested to know how a bunch of boys doing some activities all by themselves with 'no others' around is stifling those 'others' that are not around? Boys doing things by themselves is not stopping girls doing anything. It's not stifling anyone. Not allowing boys to have male only spaces is in fact stifling a certain demographic though. And it's boys, not gir…
/r/MensRights15/10/17 02:51 AM
1

I know that the concept of men being aware enough and wise enough to actually make conscious decisions that are roolly and troolly in their own best interests is totally foreign to feminists but you know what? I reckon you just might be on to something.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 02:32 AM
1

Left wing circular logic winding itself into and ever tightening spiral of nonsensical and meaningless nothingness.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 02:02 AM
0

TRIGGERED !!!
/r/MensRights15/10/17 01:45 AM
2

"The coach has the full support of the board!" Next day: SACKED !!!
/r/MensRights14/10/17 11:15 PM
1

The very real risks that men face in regards to interacting with women literally do not exist to feminists. They create the situation where men are walking more and more on egg shells and then complain that men have the audacity to feel at risk and behave appropriately based on the feminist belief that the risks don't exist. A similar scenario would be someone standing on the ocean shore knowing that a psunami is 20 minutes away and honestly being surprised that everyone is rushing like mad to g…
/r/MensRights13/10/17 10:54 PM
2

You are missing the point. It's not even about blaming anyone, men aren't playing the blame game either. Men are just discovering that they in fact do express their emotions in their own way and it's becoming more obvious to men that they gain more of certain kinds of emotional support from fellow men than they do from the women in their lives. You're short statement actually goes some way to proving what the actual point is to by the way
/r/MensRights13/10/17 09:49 AM
1

It's not very surprising that more gay men are starting to wake up to the fact that feminism and feminists care about as much for them as they do heterosexual men. The common denominator being MEN.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 01:43 AM
10

It's as silly as a 9 dollar note. You'd think men outsourcing the emotional needs that women don't want to be burdened with anymore would be good for women. Why would they care? They end up with emotionally healthier men in their lives without having to put in one ounce of effort in terms of emotional support. It seems that anything that benefits men without being completely about the benefits it directly provides women is an affront, even when it benefits women and society in a broader sense. A…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 10:36 PM
7

Yep, and nothing could possibly go wrong with that approach could it? Wait aaaaa minute......or could it. Where have all the good men gone again?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 10:19 PM
8

Yeah the right course of action would be to adjust their behaviour, you don't have to delve into male suicide too far to see that relationships with women (and kids) have a lot to do with it. But suggesting that women in general could be lacking in their emotional support towards the men in their lives is an unacceptable way to look at the issue. It's much more progressive to explain the problem away as 'men not expressing themselves' or 'men being emotionally stunted' etc etc. The very real fac…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 10:03 PM
1

"In a few years"......they've been screeching about that for a while now
/r/MensRights12/10/17 01:07 AM
2

The One Nation Party is the only party that is prepared to address the many inconvenient concerns of the majority of Australian people. They aren't interested in pandering to minority groups at the expense of non minority group members. The lefties criticise One Nation and its supporters with all the usual rhetoric but what is undeniable is that the support for Pauline Hanson and her party is growing, They tried to silence Pauline 20 odd years ago and threw her in jail but true to herself and fu…
/r/MensRights12/10/17 12:00 AM
25

"I hate weak men so much, probably because I hate my own weaknesses as a man"....Then maybe you should stop projecting your own self loathing as a man on other men and work on gaining an understanding of why so many men like you 'hate their weaknesses' like you do. It might help to look at some of the many ways men are disenfranchised in western societies and engage in the conversation rather than looking down on 'weak' men that off themselves in a round about way of making yourself feel less we…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 11:22 PM
0

By conservative do you mean boys doing all the traditional heavy dirty mens' work for the benefit of the overall group while the girls do all the cooking and washing up? Or do the boys do what they always do when girls are around and are then expected to cook and clean camp while the girls hold award ceremonies for themselves and hand out badges to each other to celebrate how well they've learned to organise people power. I hate to be cynical but if giving girls a 'more conservative' viewpoint i…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 09:59 PM
3

Yeah but boys learning leadership skills in an environment with no girls is very closely connected the fact that ALL MEN fill ALL positions of power in adult land. You would think that they'd just attempt to make Girl Scouts better at inducing leadership qualities into women. Given how feminists are so focused on creating female only spaces in order to foster leadership qualities in women this makes it look like women and girls struggle to lead without having men and boys around to show them how…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 09:46 PM
11

The thought of lobbying to make Girl Scouts less sucky has never crossed their minds? That would be too obvious wouldn't it.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 09:19 PM
9

Yes ! Rinse and repeat! Rinse and repeat!
/r/MensRights11/10/17 09:15 PM
5

If you remove the people that suffer the most from false allegations then the false allegations will go away. If all those privileged white men would step aside, lean out, quit, retire, basically just get out of everyone's way then all allegations would dissappear. Victim blaming is only ok when it's white men, how dare men see any potential danger in regards to interacting with women.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 08:58 PM
4

"I don't agree with all of your beliefs, but I do appreciate the lack of pure hatred/anger..." You don't have to agree, no one does, but if you hang here long enough and listen to why many men end up here in the first place you may end up appreciating the very real reasons and issues behind much of the anger and frustration connected to many men's issues such as suicide resulting from biased family law courts. Feminists and indeed many women that don't identify as feminists think men have no iss…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 08:43 PM
2

Yep, she would have been getting a receipt. Only way to deal with a bully
/r/MensRights11/10/17 12:10 PM
5

Poor Clemmy, she comes from a princess generation where daddy is supposed to agree with everything princess says in order to make her feel better about herself. Obviously daddy has other ideas. Triggered!!!!
/r/MensRights11/10/17 08:33 AM
1

Totally agree with what you're saying, I've experienced this in the work force too. It's not confined to the workforce either. Walking on egg shells, and the fact that men feel as though they're walking on egg shells is offensive because suggesting that women can make people feel uncomfortable makes them feel bad, and we can't have that can we. Even joking about how everything is offensive these days is offensive.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 10:55 PM
1

Yeah so like all wannabe bullies they are full of shit. Faced with the realistic possibility of being 'sorted out' they go to water but talk real tough when there is no one around to stand up to them. Bullies always dodge the people they fear will fight back, exactly like how feminists dodge any meaningful debate with the arsenal of shaming and silencing tactics they use. What self respecting man would take a feminist for a wife anyway? That's what dumbfounds me the most. Men should stop enablin…
/r/MensRights09/10/17 10:06 PM
1

They think that if you remove all the people that suffer at the hands of people that make false allegations, the false allegations will go away. Once all white men are removed from all positions of status they'll have nothing to lose anymore and therefore will have nothing to worry about.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 09:51 PM
2

They think that if you remove all the people that suffer at the hands of people that make false allegations, the false allegations will go away. Once all white men are removed from all positions of status they'll have nothing to lose anymore and therefore will have nothing to worry about.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 09:51 PM
3

Exactly! So this is just another feminist article that simplifies all of what you said and more to basically.... 'if we make women feel better and totally dismiss any part they play in anything apart from the good stuff' women would rightfully be running everything. Men clearly have no right to protect themselves and it's insulting that they even dare think they need to. Especially those pesky white men, especially them. How dare they!
/r/MensRights09/10/17 09:31 PM
1

Yes of course they do. But to feminists the way to fix everything is to make women feel better. So let's totally dismiss the truth about false allegations and pretend that if we could just stop people judging women from sleeping their way to the top all the road blocks facing women would disappear. We'll also pretend that women never ever actually do that, and never ever ever make false allegations when they don't get what they want, that way we can focus on zero percent of the problem, and neve…
/r/MensRights09/10/17 09:25 PM
1

"If you don't want people to judge you for going out with a senior leader, don't be a person that judges another person" How does this help the senior leader, white or not? How naive does someone have to be to dismiss the reason that many of these female career advancing meetings don't happen in the first place? Making women feel less judged for the perception of sleeping their way to the top doesn't change the fact that it's mainly men that fear having their lives ruined by allegations but men …
/r/MensRights09/10/17 09:12 PM
9

It's dumbfounding how obvious it is that feminism encourages man hate, anyone with a brain can see it, but if you point out the bleeding obvious it's considered misogyny
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:06 AM
0

Smart women do like smart men, it's the ignorant non smart man hating feminists that hate smart men. But they don't discriminate, they hate all men.
/r/MensRights25/09/17 01:37 AM
1

When a woman experiences regret it's a major affront to her dignity. It's very very very serious, it cuts soooooo very very deeply. And someone needs to be held responsible, somebody other than her. Of course there isn't a man on the planet that hasn't had to chew the arm off and back door it and live with the regret of a consensual night of debauchery with the last fatty at the local. But of the responsibility for a blokes' regret was to fall at the feet of someone other than the bloke himself …
/r/MensRights21/09/17 01:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter