TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Japak121 Archive

View 0 posts and 37 comments by Japak121 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Ah thanks for clarifying, I get it now.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 06:32 PM
3

Out of curiosity.... the way you stressed 'you' makes me wonder if it's somehow not okay if you don't know you're recording? Is that right?
/r/MensRights20/10/17 04:45 PM
3

You realize that's a pretty sexist comment to make, yeah? Where are you getting this idea that women don't leave bruises on men? I've personally seen quite a few 'average' women leave bruises on men during domestic and bar fights. Also, they should be punished because it's all equal in the eyes of the law. Punishments based on the actions taken. Stabbing could kill someone, hitting/bruising cannot.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 02:51 PM
3

Yes they should be punished, same as men. Equality means holding them to the exact same standard. Women are capable of doing plenty of damage to men as well, life isn't a movie where all women are easily held down and smacked around. As many women can throw a punch as there are men who would cry after a solid hit to the face. However, if a women hits a guy in the face enough to cause a black eye... and another women stabs a guy, I'd expect the woman who stabbed someone to get a much tougher sent…
/r/MensRights14/10/17 08:40 AM
4

But they are two completely different sets of circumstances with two completely different outcomes. One resulted in bruising, a very mild medical condition that often results in nothing more than needing some mild painkillers. The other was a stabbing, the acts of shoving a sharp object inside a human being, which is a serious medical condition that results in stitches and other treatments as well as a longer hospital stay. You can't act like both acts are the same thing, they are not.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:09 PM
3

Guessing trust in people is a foreign concept to you. I also haven't seen any evidence to contradict the story. Nor have you said anything to refute my original point against the original comment I was replying too. Clearly, you have no interest in anything other than being a troll.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:04 PM
3

It's not a shitpost until it's proven false. I trust that those who post do their own research, as most of the higher posts on this sub ARE researched. Maybe you shouldn't come here if you're going to be so narrow minded. Or maybe you just came to argue with anyone you think you possibly can, which is what it seems like based on your post history.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 10:36 PM
3

Not knowing =/= making shit up. I took the graphic at face value. And considering the comment I'm replying too didn't mention that at all, my criticism of them still stands.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:09 PM
114

Seriously? The entire point is that the guy did less and got more jail time. Bruising someone compared to stabbing someone. Stabbing would obviously get more jail time, but it didn't in this case. This image points out that the man got jail time for a lesser thing while the woman got no jail time for doing something worse. Why is the title even a concern at all?
/r/MensRights12/10/17 10:14 PM
6

I completely get that the guy is rarely in a state to turn down sex, and I'm not saying people who randomly hook up are 'bad people' or anything like that. I'm really just trying to say we need to take a little responsibility for our actions, that's all. I'm really starting to think maybe I just explained it far too aggressively.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 03:03 PM
4

No, I'm making a point that responsibility is involved IF it does fail. If it sounds like that to you, then idk what to tell you. Maybe I could of added 'sometimes' a lot more or something, but the point still stands. Last I checked, we were all adults here.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:54 PM
3

For the reasons we were just talking about...? Obviously you don't have to protect yourself, but then you run the risk of all the bad things mentioned above. And if that's how you wanna run that's fine. But if you make that decision, you do it knowing you run a much higher chance of bad things happening, which means you are partly responsible for those bad things happening. See what I'm saying? If a random stranger comes over to your house and asks to be let in, you can by all means let him in. …
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:52 PM
4

If I'm behind you in line at a bank as you put in your pin number, are you going to let me have a look? No. So why would you be more protective about your bank info than your love life? That makes no sense. If you choose to do something that intimate with someone you don't know, you are taking a very real risk. Taking a risk = some responsibility on your part no matter what happens.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:44 PM
3

How do you figure that? Did you even completely read what I put out? Two people come together to get intimate and you think it's okay that they have no idea who they're with?
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:42 PM
4

Same deal, true. Although society has at least partially already accepted that women shouldn't have in the first place. I've personally heard 'it's her own fault for sticking with him in the first place' plenty already.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:40 PM
1

Not much choice when it comes to having a kid beyond condoms, which can easily be tampered with and break and so forth. How about taking the time to get to know someone before fucking them? This is the primary issue we as men face when it ultimately comes to all of these issues: We didn't know she was crazy/a bitch. In SOME cases, sure, she hid it well. But let's be honest, most of us don't turn down a good night very often, if at all. We hop in bed and then when something happens, like an unwan…
/r/MensRights19/09/17 02:37 PM
1

You just said above that a lot of people think that innocent and not guilty are the same thing. Clearly the "widespread knowledge" on the legal system isn't a reflection of how it actually works. People are getting knowledge of it's flaws, but unless you study law you aren't going to have all the information on how the system works. It's complex, sometimes needlessly so, and the average person isn't willing to spend the time to do all that research. Having the knowledge THAT the system is broken…
/r/MensRights16/09/17 01:38 PM
2

That's why courts rule "guilty" or "not guilty" - there are many cases (such as he-said-she said cases with no physical evidence) where it is literally impossible to fully establish innocence. And yet we still have times, many of which can be found in this very sub, where he-said-she-said cases still go the way of the accuser instead of the defendant when there is literally no evidence except her word against his. I get what the law IS and how it's SUPPOSED to be, my issue is that there are plen…
/r/MensRights16/09/17 01:17 PM
3

The lawyer phrase was just something that's regularly said and, to me at least, is synonymous with the entire legal system. As for 'not guilty does not mean innocent', not many people particularly believe that nowadays. They're rioting in St. Louis right now because of that very fact. To the average Joe, not guilty DOES mean innocent.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 12:20 PM
3

This is why people hate lawyers.
/r/MensRights16/09/17 11:42 AM
26

So what you're saying is... that the court has sided with him in saying that this event did not happen, an event she said did happen, but.. but they also aren't saying she lied? What kind of nonsense is that? If I say the ball is green and you say it's blue, then a judge says I was right it's green, in what world would people think you didn't lie about the color of the ball?
/r/MensRights16/09/17 11:26 AM
160

Following the one-day trial, magistrates handed Baron a conditional discharge of 12 months. He was also ordered to pay £620 in court costs, which included £300 in compensation. Miss Cooke will not face any criminal charges. Are you fucking kidding me? I get paying for the radio, justice should be blind and all sides should pay for any crimes no matter how small. But she lied under oath, perjury, falsified a police statement, defamation of character, and so many others that easily add up to MORE …
/r/MensRights16/09/17 10:26 AM
1

Right, but I think the overall point is that assumptions are bad, especially for a sub about right's. For all we know, one of the nurses is a gay male and that makes the statements most have been making completely moot points. We should be careful about crying foul if we don't have the important information about gender. In all likelihood you and all the rest are right, but at the end of the day no one can say for certainty because we don't have the necessary information.
/r/MensRights08/09/17 12:27 AM
2

I'll be damned, I hadn't even noticed that myself. You're absolutely right in that we don't know for sure that all the nurses involved are women. It's entirely possible that one or even all of the ones involved are men. Nice catch. Hope others take the time to read your response.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 08:18 PM
2

I know this might not make a difference to some, but I'd like to be clear that the nurses in this case were 'admiring' and not 'laughing'. Big difference between appreciation and humiliation.
/r/MensRights07/09/17 02:21 PM
3

I see you're getting downvoted but nobody has explained for some reason (bad voters, bad!). So please allow me. The double standard in the above situation is the way in which local law enforcement AND the media have reacted. If the genders of the nurses had been men, and all other details of this case were exactly the same, then the men would likely not only face being fired and jail time, but also public humiliation by local and national news media. Instead none of that has happened, because wo…
/r/MensRights07/09/17 02:16 PM
1

I know I shouldn't be surprised to see subreddits like that exist anymore but.... cmon, reeeaaaalllllyyyy?
/r/MensRights04/09/17 12:50 AM
3

That's good on ya', but you can understand why a lot of men just don't bother with it anymore for that reason.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 11:27 AM
8

Idk. On one hand I see what you're getting at, but on the other I think some men don't really do things like hold the door open and so on because women have become more and more aggressive against it. Either they're feminists who think we do it because we feel like the poor little lady can't manage (which is wrong), or they're stuck-ups who only like a very certain type of man to do nice things for them and anyone else is a creep.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 10:39 AM
2

Someone once said that the gender wage gap doesn't make any sense because it completely forgets the fact that companies want to make money. If they can hire women for less, then why in the world wouldn't most companies be staffed mostly by women? If they really can pay someone less, their is no logical reason a company wouldn't just entirely staff women. The fact people have been arguing about this for years genuinely makes me sad.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 09:17 PM
2

I think his point was more along the lines of 'we fucked up their childhood with this safe space nonsense, so they never grew up. They're still kids, so we need to treat them as such and do it right this time'.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 09:08 PM
-1

The issue is that Hollywood survives on 'cool' far more than 'being factual'. Also, he can be historically accurate and not show Indians. Compared to the size of the BEF at Dunkirk, maybe 1 percent were Indians. If you went back in time and stood on the shores there, you may never have actually seen any. The only Indian unit was an Animal Transport unit.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 08:39 PM
45

Has there ever been an instance of the word male being used in a positive light that didn't make feminists lose there shit? One day 'the boy who cried wolf' story will be replaced by 'the feminist who cried foul'. One day.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 04:41 AM
60

I dated a girl awhile back who claimed to have been raped while we were dating. The way she told the story didn't quite add up, so I asked a few very simple questions and she caved immediately, saying she cheated. Yes, I broke up with her immediately. We were 16 at the time by the way. The only 'rape culture' that MIGHT exist is the one in which women/girls think it's okay to toss the accusation around like it's candy.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 07:42 PM
13

What are you talking about? Have you even looked at most of the other posts? Occasionally this happens, yes, but MOST of the other posts AND the top comments aren't like this at all. THIS post IS very petty and detracting from other important posts on this sub, thus it SHOULD be called out.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 12:34 PM
3

Ah that's terrible news. Best of luck to him, I'm sure the NCFM will be able to provide more resources than I was. If it comes down to it, Cordell Cordell runs ads in my state as well (Maryland) about fighting false misconduct charges. They might be pricier, but it's worth a shot following up with that lead as well.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 06:53 PM
7

What are you looking for specifically? I only ask because most lawyers specializing in male right's do so for domestic issues like Divorce and Child Support or Custody. Just in case that's correct: http://cordellcordell.com/offices/texas/dallas/ http://www.fathersrightsdallas.com/ http://www.jenniferwiggins.com/fathers-rights.php
/r/MensRights28/04/17 05:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter