TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jarstuck Archive

View 0 posts and 20 comments by Jarstuck on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

...What?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 03:27 PM
1

"Don't listen to anything anybody says, you're perfect as you are" is the definition of narcissism. You always have to listen to feedback of those around you to get some sense, some sort of concept, of where you are in life and how others perceive you. If you don't, and assume you're perfect instead, nobody will stand your insufferable self-assured posturing in light of obvious defects (see also: narcissism). There’s someone out there for everyone. Okay, and what if that person is in China? Fund…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 02:22 PM
1

And as I explained in that scenario women have no right to paternity test for the father and, therefore, should have no right to condemn a man to pay for her offspring. Fair is fair.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 10:30 PM
1

Right, okay, so now you're moving the goalpost. We were discussing the need for mandatory paternity testing to avoid EXACTLY this kind of gaming the system by "preponderance of evidence" (namely her testimony) or a male getting trapped by a woman into being responsible for a child that isn't his. You've shifted the goalpost so hard your transmission just fell out. The whole point of the conversation is that the system you just described is morally wrong, weighted heavily against men, and denies …
/r/MensRights18/07/18 10:05 PM
1

Riiiight, we're gonna slip right on past your horrible understanding of the law and move right along here: and how are you going to enforce mandatory child support without proving paternity which, according to you, requires all party consent?
/r/MensRights18/07/18 09:27 PM
1

The plaintiff is the mother, not the infant. Even if it were the infant, paternity by your own requirement must be consented to. Ergo, you cannot compel the suspected father to undergo a paternity test either. It's funny that you radically shift your opinion the second you're aware the female has to be held to the same standard. More Reddit white knighting.
/r/MensRights18/07/18 09:00 PM
–

You can maintain your right to privacy in this scenario. You just rescind, rightly, any legal obligation the supposed father has. If you wish for the father to be obligated it should be required to prove he IS the father with a paternity test. Otherwise, sure, keep your privacy. In this way it is completely optional. If the father doesn't consent to that same paternity test, oh well. Guess you shouldn't have sex with people you don't trust and carry an infant to term who won't have both parents.…
/r/MensRights18/07/18 04:53 AM
4

Are not feminists teaching women to hate men? Your own example is one of the fictions feminists use to teach women to hate them. Pointing out hate isn't hate. That's absurd.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 09:50 PM
1

Ah, so, now you're clarifying that you only meant what I meant and therefore there shouldn't be an issue. Okay, sure. But the problem remains in the following question: Who are MGTOW hurting? Most divorces are initiated by women, women get most child support claims, women take far more out of our society than they put in (in terms of taxes-benefits received). There are many empirical details where women are taking more than they're putting back, but here you are upset about MGTOW. Why? If men ar…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 04:09 PM
1

Right, I can't state something I've witnessed unless I have peer-reviewed studies indicating that my experience was representative of the whole. Yet you seem all too willing to disregard the possibility that the majority of women are taught to treat men badly. I'm detecting a double standard. Do you have any comprehensive studies of women to validate all of your assessments? Or do you only demand sources when dealing with stuff which goes against your world view? It must be said again: I never s…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 03:32 PM
1

I was talking about MGTOW communities when you decided to reply to me. I continued to talk about them, and you assumed I meant you specifically for no apparent reason. Do you have a comprehensive survey of these MGTOW communities to validate your assessment of them? No? Hmmm... wonder why I disregarded your topic then. Being in a more objective position to analyse something is worthless if you proceed to throw logic out the window and just start shit slinging. Quote where you think I've done thi…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 03:13 PM
1

I didn't say that you said "all women". I was saying what I take issue with in MGTOW communities. You're talking to me, not "MGTOW communities". Your "manager-racist" argument makes no sense if you understand what protected groups are and why they exist. This isn't an argument. The fact that you don't have a dog in the fight is irrelevant if this discussion is logical. And I rather coherently pointed out that I've a more objective position with which to analyze the behavior of women I've seen th…
/r/MensRights08/05/18 03:01 PM
1

My problem is mainly with the commonly stated assumption that all women do these things. That's a hugely sexist assumption to make. Oh? And where was this said? Did I say "all women"? I know some women who share my opinion and also absolutely hate how most women behave. Where was it said "all women"? If I said to you that I hate 95% of black people, would you think I'm racist? If 95% of the black people you met had done something to wrong you, no. I hate 95% of all my managers, and due to where …
/r/MensRights08/05/18 02:48 PM
1

If you really believe that most women say and do terrible things then you probably hate women. This doesn't follow at all. Women are taught to be despicable human beings, to only care for money, to want and get it all at the expense of whatever man they use. I'm gay and women have nothing to do with me, but I see how they treat men and I'm horrified. This is a far cry from "hating women", since that would imply the hatred is before the fact of anything a given woman has done. That's a different …
/r/MensRights08/05/18 02:05 PM
1

Unfortunately humans work on experience. This is "unfortunate" because experiential biases are incredibly easy to manipulate. While the U.S. has gotten safer ever since the 1970's, everybody thinks it's more dangerous due to the experiential bias. Because the news shows crimes at rates higher than it ever did before, and so people think there are more crimes than before. It has far-reaching implications on perception versus reality in this country, and is one reason why people are so distrusting…
/r/MensRights26/02/18 08:38 PM
–

The_Donald does not ban dissidents AFAIK. I wouldn't know, I don't bother to go there.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 12:37 PM
–

Oh yeah, that's totally how you legitimize your ideology to other people. Ban everyone who disagrees with you. That's the bestest idea.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 06:31 PM
–

Dude. Everyone should have equal rights. If women didn't have the right to vote I would be damn sure to be arguing for them. Right now, I honestly think people convicted of felonies should maintain the right to vote, because there are people who urinated in alleyways being convicted of felonies. Our legal system is broken as fuck. Just because I think some feminists are blind to the plight of some social issues that target men doesn't mean I think women don't deserve rights. It's about equal rig…
/r/MensRights01/12/16 05:29 PM
39

What, and have the equal protection doctrine of the constitution actually be upheld for men? Bahahahahahahahaha
/r/MensRights29/10/16 12:23 PM
–

What infuriates me is the term "wage gape". It is not a wage gap. It never has been a wage gap. IT IS AN EARNINGS GAP. EARNINGS. Women EARN less.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 04:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter