TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JayCoop410 Archive

View 6 posts and 59 comments by JayCoop410 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I've been told that it's "the aspects of masculinity that cause negative effects to oneself" that includes sacrificing oneself for the sake of another is toxic masculinity, how is that either not manly or "gay"?
/r/MensRights27/04/19 11:33 PM
3

Fair point
/r/MensRights11/01/19 08:21 PM
4

I didn't know thanks m8
/r/MensRights11/01/19 03:01 PM
1

Nah, I'm just a cynic
/r/MensRights18/12/18 08:00 PM
1

Dude... that's where the stereotype of the Passive Aggressive Grandma comes from
/r/MensRights18/12/18 07:43 PM
2

I personally hate everyone and aim to make it so that no one has it better than anyone else #NoLivesMatter /s
/r/MensRights18/12/18 07:35 PM
6

Shrugs I self ID as an egalitarian so I guess I'm the unholy combo of MRA & Male Feminist... evil laughter
/r/MensRights18/12/18 07:32 PM
13

Welcome, I'm not an MRA but I sympathize with the movement
/r/MensRights18/12/18 08:34 AM
15

So are you a woman? I'm sorry but that seemed to be implied and I'm just unsure
/r/MensRights14/12/18 05:40 AM
2

I did
/r/MensRights03/12/18 11:01 AM
1

Thank you, you've successfully summarized my POV
/r/AntiFeminists20/11/18 01:11 PM
1

They'll also ignore the Far-Right Feminists when it suits them
/r/MensRights20/11/18 01:09 PM
57

It'S aBoUt EQuaLiTy thOuGh
/r/MensRights31/10/18 05:04 AM
1

preparing to cringe
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/18 12:00 PM
2

Ugh, well at least his mother won't force him to live as a girl for his formative years at the behest of a quack doctor in order to justify his insane theories (David Reimer)(the Doctor is John Money the father of social constructionism)
/r/MensRights07/10/18 10:41 AM
1

By the way, Look up David Reimer & John Money John Money is one of the major proponents of Social Construction and in attempting to prove the theory he ruined the life of David Reimer
/r/AntiFeminists08/09/18 06:16 PM
2

be respectful Says the person who repeatedly strawmanned the person they were debating despite them repeatedly clarifying their position. I'm sorry but your glass house is damn near tangible, because if you can't do the most basic of courtesies in a debate, namely, listening to your position and not misrepresenting it, I feel no obligation to respect you So if you can't do that... Leave the serious discussion to the adults.
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/18 10:13 AM
2

By the way it's exceptionally ironic that you tell me to grow up when you have repeatedly used a false dichotomy of social construction or biological determinism, in addition to repeatedly requesting and receiving evidence against your presuppositions which you discarded for no apparent reason. On top of all that you repeatedly argued against a position that I have repeatedly stated that I disagree with and yet you ignored that and continued strawmanning. So me calling you a "dunce" isn't half a…
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/18 09:56 AM
1

Farewell
/r/AntiFeminists31/08/18 03:44 AM
1

Source? I'm willing to bet you're referring to Westernized cultures. Source for all your claims that socialization is the cause of the numerous sex differences?
/r/AntiFeminists30/08/18 06:33 AM
1

You can't compare physical skills to psychological traits, though. Why not?
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/18 06:45 PM
1

What relevance are hox genes here? Hox genes are genes that activate other genes a single hox gene may cause the activation of thousands of other genes. Though hox genes refer to a specific set to genes having to do with physiology, it's highly that similar genes exist for many different things including behaviors Again, please quote the relevant sections of your sources, thanks. "you have experienced a textbook case of fight-or-flight response. This response stems from the hormone adrenaline" A…
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/18 06:44 PM
1

What about traps? Persistence hunting? Cornering an animal? Fishing? None of these require male strength and endurance. Even children, of either sex, can do them. Killing doesn't require much strength either, especially if done in large groups. I listed persistence hunting you dunce, and fishing requires tools that didn't get exist hundreds of thousands of years ago namely fishing rod. And you're the one who needs to provide evidence of the apparently large number of female hunters and Male fora…
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/18 06:33 PM
1

Why are you pushing a false dichotomy? You seem unable to accept the existence of any third option besides Biological Determinism (which I've rejected) and Social Construction I accept it as a more viable hypothesis because all efforts to confirm biological determinism have fallen through. I've already explained this in some detail. So a False Dichotomy and a Begging the Question Fallacy Sure, but these other areas can be substituted to compensate for that damage. Again, the brain is a highly ad…
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/18 06:26 PM
1

Neither sex chromosomes contain thousands of genes. Congratulations on not knowing what a hox gene is First, please provide a source for that first claim. https://www.hormone.org/hormones-and-health/hormones/adrenaline Second, even if true, whether fight or flight occurs depends on context. High levels of adrenaline will not cause one or the other regardless of context. Remember, fight and flight are two related, but distinct responses. Right that's why a hightened stress has such consistent eff…
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/18 06:19 PM
1

there's no evidence that any such genes are specific to either sex Right except for the piles of evidence, which you disregard because of the fact that you're committing a "begging the question" fallacy and have already accepted your theory as true. As there's numerous studies which show differences between sexes on numerous areas but you've attributed that to socialization, which nessesarily means that you've already accepted social constructionism as true and thus are committing a "begging the…
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/18 06:11 PM
1

On top of that women have better peripheral color vision which would aid in gathering https://jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2191999 'men in the study showed "significantly greater sensitivity for fine detail and for rapidly moving stimuli," the researchers write that their hunter forebears "would have to detect possible predators or prey from afar and also identify and categorize these objects more easily."' https://relay.nationalgeographic.com/proxy/distribution/public/amp/news/20…
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/18 08:25 AM
1

thousands of genes You mean like what's in a chromosome? The same applies to hormones. That's false, Adrenaline in sufficient amount ALWAYS causes a fight or flight response, Endorphins in sufficient amount always causes calming and/or pleasure etc. Your argument falls apart due to the existence of addiction, if hormine's effects varied as much as you seem to think it would, then addiction wouldn't be possible
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/18 08:18 AM
1

In fact, energy-intensive hunting methods were counterproductive. Yeah that's why I'm not talking about those The Majority of early human Hunting has 3 phases 1) Injure the target 2) Follow injured target, at a walk 3) Kill Target 1&3 are what I'm refering to while you are focusing on 2 Color perception (like perception in general) is cultural. That's not accurate, as colorblindness is genetic. So there is a genetic connection this is attributable to differences in socialization Utter nonsense, …
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/18 08:11 AM
1

How do you mean? This is the evidence necessary to either confirm or falsify both hypotheses. If you discover that the brain actually contains genetically predetermined cortical modules tasked with processing specific psychological phenomena, and if you can identify the specific genes involved, then biological determinism is confirmed and social constructionism is falsified. You're strawmanning, I've literally never said anything supporting biological determinism, as that would mean there's no c…
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/18 07:56 AM
1

Can you cite any experiments that have established that specific genes are implicated in these sex differences? Why do you keep bringing genes up? It's the presence of absence of a Y chromosome, not a specific gene. Seeing as the Y chromosome is related to testosterone which causes aggression and also causes a number of "Male" traits
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/18 07:30 AM
1

There's no reason why women in these societies couldn't hunt as effectively as men, Besides on average less muscle mass, weaker bones, weaker cardiovascular system, slower running speed, slower reaction time etc. All of which would either increase the likelihood of injury or reduce endurance there's no reason to believe some men sometimes preferred to forage And some women go into STEM Additionally women have better vision on average (especially color vision) which makes foraging easier
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/18 07:16 AM
1

modularity of mind thesis is true, and you must also detail the specific genes implicated in these sex differences; all efforts to do this have failed, indicating biological determinism is not a scientifially viable hypothesis. Because of what's called the missing heritability problem, which is the failure of researchers to pin certain genes to specific behaviors (and not for lack of trying), the latter will likely never happen. There are no genes that produce specific behaviors regardless of en…
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/18 07:08 AM
2

I've yet to see one about politics sadly, sorry
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 03:13 PM
1

In the earliest human societies, which were classless, there was no patriarchy and men and women were likely not restricted to sex-specific roles (aside from some obvious exceptions) Wrong in early societies there were classes, in hunter gatherer tribes, males were predominately hunters and females were predominately gatherers I'm not necessarily suggesting patriarchy exists today in developed Western nations. Personally, I believe claims of patriarchy are exaggerated by feminists and that examp…
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 08:42 AM
1

Infant psychology is biologically determined, but like animals they are still capable of learning. A socialized infant, for example, behaves much differently from a neglected infant. No sh*t You have not provided sufficient evidence for the claim in bold. Except for that article I sent you that literally said "Human females exhibit greater social interest and skills relative to males, appearing in infancy, suggesting biological roots" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4726418/
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 08:39 AM
2

This wouldn't be my hypothesis. It would be yours. You are the one hypothesizing that specific behaviors are biologically determined You are the one arguing in favor of social construction which states that differences between sexes aren't biological in nature, so in order to test your hypothesis you MUST have males and females isolated from society until adulthood in order to check of your theory holds The way to test mine is find cross cultural trends Anyway, it wouldn't be necessary to raise …
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 08:35 AM
2

I feel like you're trying to make a point, but I don't know what you're getting at. If cross cultural similarities are born of similar challenges then what challenges are shared between mesoamerica and polynesia as in both astronomy was almost exclusively male
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 07:06 AM
3

Sure, culture is technically an aspect of the natural environment and is influenced by it. It shouldn't be surprising that environmental factors influence each other. Except when I pointed out cross cultural similarities you said that it was because of environmental factors...
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 06:55 AM
2

Hmm? No I'm not. I'm saying that even if your claim regarding newborn sex differences were true You said that there were differences (https://www.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/9a7j3i/cant_admit_im_right_just_ban_me/e4ukwbc?utm_source=reddit-android) this wouldn't support *your implication that social constructionists are wrong and that adult sex differences are biologically determined Basic Logic -Infant Psychology is mostly determined by Biology -There are observable sex differences with …
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 06:42 AM
2

Just because infant psychology is closer to animal psychology than it is to adult psychology doesn't mean it's close to animal psychology. Infant and animal psychology share a common origin (biology). This doesn't mean they are qualitatively similar. So your hypotheses are literally impossible to test without violating human rights, because infants and animals can't be used and so therefore It'd be necessary to raise multiple people in complete isolation for this to meet your wishes You're claim…
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 06:28 AM
3

Even if true You're back-tracking on your own statement these differences extend to adulthood, or even childhood for that matter, which is what you're implying So we can completely disregard infant psychology when it comes to human psychology? You're aware that numerous disorders are apparent from soon after birth, right?
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 06:17 AM
3

Even if true it would, again, be silly to think these results can apply to human infants, which possess particular behavioral traits and skills that other animals don't Except you literally said that infant psychology is closer to animal psychology than it is to adult psychology (https://www.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/9a7j3i/cant_admit_im_right_just_ban_me/e4ui18z?utm_source=reddit-android) Humans' environment is cultural. I'm not backtracking at all. Except you are, as you're saying th…
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 06:14 AM
2

There's a difference between open discussion and honest debate, Open discussion doesn't have a set subject
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 05:02 AM
3

At any rate, like animal psychology, infant psychology is biologically determined. You are aware that is my point, correct? I'm confused why you thought this supports your argument as I was pointing out that the divide is present in infants thus it's likely biological in nature
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 04:43 AM
3

Read the title: Experience-independent sex differences in newborn macaques Read the abstract, literally the first line "Human females exhibit greater social interest and skills relative to males, appearing in infancy, suggesting biological roots" It's a study on macaques in order to prevent cultural influence First, universality isn't the same thing as "natural." A few traits are cross-culturally observed because humans everywhere face similar challenges and opportunities. Just because a trait i…
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 04:38 AM
1

From my perspective a newborn is under a month old
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 04:24 AM
1

Let's just clarify our terms, At what age does a newborn stop being a newborn?
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 04:22 AM
2

Please quote the relevant sections of your source you feel support your claim. "in a human interaction test, females displayed more affiliative behaviors (e.g., facial gestures, close proximity) to familiar and unfamiliar social partners, compared to males when 4 to 5 weeks old. In sum, in the absence of different postnatal environments, across two tasks, females appeared more social than males. " Once they acquire culture, their behavior is organized around their culture's macro factors (instit…
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 04:20 AM
2

Also, the idea that newborns can be either social or analytical is silly. We're talking about interests, so it'd be more accurate to say People vs Things
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 04:14 AM
3

It is no sillier to compare infants to adults than to make comparisons between adults and, say, bees. That's seems rather foolish as infants become adults, so it's highly unlikely that their psychology would be completely altered Also here's my source https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4726418/
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 04:12 AM
1

People vs Things
/r/AntiFeminists26/08/18 03:48 AM
4

I got banned on an alt account so then I asked the mods why, and then was hit with a 72 hour mute
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/18 04:15 PM
5

I got banned for pointing out that social constructionism fails to account for the measured sex differences in interests are present in newborns
/r/AntiFeminists25/08/18 04:14 PM
1

Friend, singular, as all my other friends are red pilled so despite the fact that 75% of my friend group are leftists we only got 1 SJW but he's been a friend for a long while so we can't boot him out
/r/AntiFeminists24/08/18 11:08 AM
1

It's an ouroboros, its seemingly only application is making more of itself
/r/MensRights23/08/18 06:56 PM
1

The above is from my main account (this one) I got my alt banned less than a week ago (https://www.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/991up1/such_tolerance/?utm_source=reddit-android)
/r/AntiFeminists22/08/18 05:21 PM
2

"facts don't care about your feelings" "That's triggering! REEEEEEE!" Something like that?
/r/AntiFeminists21/08/18 11:25 AM
2

Ditto and I'm only banned on my "feminist" alt and I got muted when I contacted the mod
/r/AntiFeminists21/08/18 09:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter