TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jaykaykaykay Archive

View 13 posts and 502 comments by Jaykaykaykay on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

They can´t be held to the same standard.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 02:57 PM
1

Yep, that´s true.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 05:53 PM
-1

Despite the fact that men are more likely to be incarcerated? Men being more likely to be incarcerated doesn´t mean that men are more of a victim of the prison system.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 03:11 PM
2

I think you´re totally right, i´d point out that this is a small excerpt of a bigger thing, i can´t totally remember but i think he did say on average, or in general when talking about this issue, but it´s understandably easy to not watch your words at every moment to be entirely accurate in your wording all the time. And i don´t really like how we expect this more from the right than the left, and easily concede just because of some semantic gripe, but that´s a whole other thing too, but i do t…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 10:49 AM
1

It´s a joke.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 02:17 PM
2

The pyramid of reality made my day xD
/r/MensRights29/12/15 12:47 PM
3

Yeah, pretty much. There was a big Gender Studies program that lost all funding, millions, a lot to do with it was this documentary. But theres still small parts of gender studies-ish things within other programs though.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 04:20 PM
10

Still working, not held in any particular high regard. Probably lower than before the documentary, and people are more critical of social science it seems even though it´s still pretty dominated by leftists.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 05:17 PM
8

It was viewed by a lot of people, and initially got good reviews by the largest newspapers. Usually they use dice (1-6) and got 5 by the three biggest newspapers. It was kind of quickly forgotten though, i think. I´d say it was mostly positively received by the vast majority of everyday people, but obviously some academics, feminists and very leftist people didn´t like it but never really had any good criticism of it other then a few quibbles in columns about it after. But largely positive recep…
/r/MensRights23/11/15 04:36 PM
7

I´m Norwegian, if anyone has any questions about the documentary i might be able to help with feel free to ask. It´s a great documentary.
/r/MensRights23/11/15 03:49 PM
2

Yeah, kind of. Your brain atleast, but your body might be more female..
/r/MensRights04/11/15 06:28 PM
1

On average slightly more autistic, but i´d be that men would cluster a lot more at both ends of the bell curve than women.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 06:25 PM
1

Sorry to break it to you but women are not the same as men.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 05:03 PM
2

I think it´s great that he has the balls to disagree with his core audience on something. I disagree with him about that, but you can´t expect to agree with him on everything. Just about every person falls under the category of "has good points sometimes, but other times does not."
/r/MensRights16/10/15 04:38 PM
1

That´s not his argument.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 04:32 PM
1

Yeah, show certain female behaviors done by male character and then people are able to appreciate much easier how horrible and irrational it is.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 06:20 PM
1

Still bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 05:31 AM
1

Don´t waste your time.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 05:29 AM
1

I thought this reporter would be way more cringy but that was actually not that bad
/r/MensRights14/09/15 07:49 PM
-1

You forgot the /s
/r/MensRights08/09/15 12:28 PM
1

If it´s exhausting to you to give a lot of effort into your opinions to make sure they´re on point maybe not offer them so freely? I feel like this should go for everyone.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:36 PM
2

He´s the exact opposite haha, you a derp.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:22 PM
5

“I’m a modern man, a man for the millennium. Digital and smoke free. A diversified multi-cultural, post-modern deconstruction that is anatomically and ecologically incorrect. I’ve been up linked and downloaded, I’ve been inputted and outsourced, I know the upside of downsizing, I know the downside of upgrading. I’m a high-tech low-life. A cutting edge, state-of-the-art bi-coastal multi-tasker and I can give you a gigabyte in a nanosecond! I’m new wave, but I’m old school and my inner child is ou…
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:20 PM
0

Better a racist than a child molester like Bernie Sanders, now that we are just throwing out slanders.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 07:38 PM
-2

I obviously didn't actually think you were a racist you moron. This is a waste of my time.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 12:40 PM
-2

It's blatant white nationalist/supremacist propaganda when the point being implied is that whiteness is the cause of that success. He never implied that, so that´s all in your head you filthy racist.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 06:01 AM
7

Starting? I´m way ahead of you :)
/r/MensRights11/08/15 12:23 PM
1

If it´s Trump or hillary, i know who i´d vote for.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 10:08 PM
2

Insults individuals who are women =/= Insults women
/r/MensRights09/08/15 10:06 PM
2

Im pretty sure the comic doesn´t say all marriages are like this.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 10:41 AM
2

I agree with that, some people don´t like following gender roles, some do, but no one here wishes to force it upon anyone.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 07:20 PM
1

I dont disagree, but he´d be better than Hillary.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/15 11:08 AM
-2

Not a big fan but rather him than Hillary... and that was hilarious.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 03:23 PM
1

She's making you feel bad for a reason. Don't let that shit work.
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 12:50 PM
0

He´s not a conservative lol. He's an anarchist/libertarian.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 04:09 PM
2

The first half of the video is complete drivel, but the second part is great.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 02:07 PM
0

I guess thats a nice thing to say but thats not true though.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 02:02 PM
1

Well that was shit.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 01:54 PM
2

Lol, no she wouldnt.
/r/MensRights03/08/15 01:51 PM
3

Ofcourse she does.. I'm not surprised
/r/MensRights03/08/15 01:50 PM
2

Its obvious that you're being a cunt, theres no need for me to explain it to you.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:40 PM
4

Every legitimere cause were fighting for is already discrediting us by fighting for them.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:09 PM
3

You're a fucking moron.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:07 PM
1

Not all accounts. Maybe all accounts you're aware of.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:06 PM
2

That woman at the end was eerily symbolic of the women in my life.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:04 PM
0

Still, don't go to those colleges. Im pretty sure theres alot of other options. Id never go to a college or take a class supporting outdated racist or manhating ideas. I don't want to be a part of or support that in any way.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 06:04 PM
1

So that makes it ok?
/r/MensRights31/07/15 02:36 PM
1

Why is your sister having anything to do with womens studies and why would you help her?
/r/MensRights31/07/15 02:34 PM
2

Ofcourse it is, don't be silly.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 08:02 AM
1

Everone in mma knows the judging is often bullshit, just last ufc card a guy was obviously robbed a W by all serious accounts, all the actual experts, fighters, analysts I've seen talk about the fight thinks Mcgregor was hurting him bad on the feet. If you listen to rogan commentating he mentions this several times. Obviously 2 weeks is part of it, just like how Mcgregor couldnt to any wrestling and having a knee injury is part of it. Its not like Mendes was the only one suffering from two weeks…
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 02:01 PM
1

He wasnt controlling the match at all, he was being hurt bad and lost every exchange on the feet so he looked to bring the fight to the ground, where he did little damage, but even if he had the gas to go five rounds he was being too hurt on the feet anyway. Not to mention a large part of why he was gassed is the liver shots. Theres a reason people who fight Mcgregor gas out and get knocked out early.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/15 10:49 AM
1

Theres far too many things it might mean, so i just wanted to ask you to make this exchange as simple as possible.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 03:45 PM
-1

Got him to the ground before he got knocked the fuck out.., something Aldo couldnt do against Mendes. Yeah Conor should be real worried.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/15 03:19 PM
-1

I'm not sure what you mean by society is being programmed?
/r/MensRights27/07/15 03:02 PM
1

Everything that falls under sexual fitness would be way more real than sex discrimination against women, for women might be up there.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 03:00 PM
4

I don't think he took them out an then rejected them lol..?
/r/MensRights27/07/15 02:58 PM
0

Nothing wrong with that.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 02:57 PM
1

Perhaps? Lol i hope that was more rhetorical than you actually being unsure.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 02:56 PM
3

At a certain point one has to accept that many women don't care if theyre wrong, they just want as many priviliges and benifits they can possibly get their hands on.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:37 AM
0

I'm no fan of Donald trump but the way the media has deliberately distorted and lied to the point where everyone casually dismisses and hates him for something he never said is disgusting. Hate him if you want i don't particularly like him but atleast know what He actually said.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 10:09 AM
1

Funny how she's objectifying herself, her culture makes her do what she does because ofcourse she's not an agent in control of herself, she's just an object pushed around by society.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 09:30 AM
3

This is the guy that just got threatened to be beat up by a trans person for being "hateful", if only for that hilarious irony i like this guy.
/r/MensRights19/07/15 12:03 AM
1

As long as they do it, you should.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 07:22 PM
1

I don't neccecarily agree with you, but its shitty that you're being downvoted. Makes me wish to agree with you more.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 07:21 PM
-1

He didnt though.. Oh, its tyt. That explains it.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 07:15 PM
3

Milo could easily do a better job than most gender Studies professors are doing
/r/MensRights29/06/15 06:32 PM
2

Haha this is great
/r/MensRights27/06/15 01:25 PM
2

Completely agree.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 01:24 PM
1

I don't, and thats not an argument just childish bs.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 12:23 AM
1

I don't think theres one definition of racism. I don't think tests that overwhelmingly fail black people are neccecarily racist, or the drug policy example. Its possible, they can be, but not neccecarily so.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 03:16 PM
1

As expected i guess
/r/MensRights22/06/15 02:27 PM
1

The effects alone affects blacks more, but thats about it. If thats all you mean by racism i guess thats fine.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 12:17 PM
2

From a mens rights pov. Hes not advocating shit that will hurt men in the way Hillary is.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 12:16 PM
2

Ofcourse theres ever a right to shoot someone.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 03:13 PM
1

You finding it derogatory is different from saying its derogatory, as if its some intrinsic truth about it and not just your opinion. So sure you can demand people to stop having views you find derogatory, but i said that doesn't have any sort of moral weight to it than that that many enjoy to attach to it. If you don't theres no quarrel. I don't get how "using words" and "supposing the objectification were talking about is neccecarily or intrinsically disrespectful and shaming" to control peopl…
/r/MensRights20/06/15 10:30 PM
1

To some thats all he is, and i don't see anything wrong with that. He's selling his body, wether its his abs or his acting. If people feel disrespected because theyre not valued by others the way they want to, thats really their problem. You cant legitemaly demand for others to see you a certain way and attempt to shame it or call it wrong or neccecarily disrespectful. This stuff is really just a tactic to control people, it has no other merit.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 09:29 PM
2

I kind of get where hes coming from. But i don't think men and women will even want to objective eachothers equally and in the same way. Hes an actor though, no reason to shit on him if his views arent exactly what you'd want them to be i think.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 10:05 AM
1

Cmon dude.,
/r/MensRights20/06/15 10:01 AM
1

I treat store clerks entirely as objects and were both better off for it. Many sexual partners use eachother entirely for their bodies. As long as its voluntary and everyones better off i don't see the problem.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 10:01 AM
1

Marry me.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 09:54 AM
1

The market? You poor-hating cumbag!
/r/MensRights20/06/15 09:53 AM
1

I'm not so sure i buy the being defined by your features is objectification and thats presumably bad, although I'm not even really clear on what you mean. Treating people as objects, utilities to some extent or even completely seems like a neccecary thing, which can be great and terrible. But objectification or utilization of a person in and of itself doesn't seem to have to be bad to me.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 09:50 AM
2

Its kind of funny, before i wouldnt really care if Bond was black, but now i hate the idea. Pretty ironic.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 09:43 AM
0

Mmm, thats an interesting point and a valuable contribution.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 09:42 AM
1

Hes shit but Better than Hillary.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 09:40 AM
1

Sure, but lets not pretend he wouldnt shame male and female parents more equally if liberals didnt just scream sexist at the republicans all the time, so that has to distance himself from that. Thats atleast a big factor, although both sides have some weird ideas about men and women.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 09:37 AM
0

Black men are viewed as hyper masculine, in the bad sense of masculinity. So in that way theyre affected worse by bias against masculinity. Thats how i look at it anyways. I don't know if saying feminism is racism is smart though.
/r/MensRights19/06/15 03:29 PM
2

I love how people who are on this sub still buys into the demonization of the right and fox news. People suck.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 11:39 AM
1

Cant argue with that though
/r/MensRights15/06/15 07:01 PM
1

I does it really matter if every other country has it or not?
/r/MensRights13/06/15 08:42 AM
6

God i love Milo.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 10:32 PM
2

Also being a victim gives you the moral right to strike back at whatever group is "oppressing" you.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/15 07:32 PM
1

Oh you're a retard. You should have made it even more clear than you did earlier so i'd know not to engage. Kbye.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 01:21 PM
2

Seems like the majority of people here Lena left, and are pretty intolerant towards conservatives, continually downvoting etc. So this question seems a bit out of place as it comes up again and again while there's very little interest if conservatives are being included etc. I'm not a conservative btw, but it's hard not to notice and i feel like i should say something.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 01:20 PM
1

Lol traditional and deadbeat the same? Id say it was almost the opposite.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 08:37 PM
1

Yeah i know, hence the /s.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 08:35 PM
-1

Traditionalist, easy.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 04:40 PM
1

You're gross.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 04:38 PM
1

Oh good to have a woman here i guess you could say if you want a feminist or traditional man............. /s
/r/MensRights31/05/15 04:36 PM
5

The one about what men should work on brilliantly made this womans point. One girl: Don't be so abrasive! Another: Guys are so timid now!
/r/MensRights31/05/15 03:47 PM
-2

You're pretty spot on which obviously gets you downvoted by the many unfortunate losers here who's largely in the matrix still and care more about feelings than reason.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 03:43 PM
1

Seems to me its not that theyre wrong about anything but people feel like theyre bad.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 03:39 PM
-1

"That which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence". Perhaps you weren't aware, but a strawmann fallacy and a poisoning the well fallacy doesn't make much of an argument.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 03:50 PM
5

Why?
/r/MensRights30/05/15 03:23 PM
-3

Go play in the street.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 03:19 PM
1

If you/we let it become the norm that you can't be rude about feminism/religion/communism/capitalism i think thats worrying. Or maybe you have just been annoying and unproductive i wouldn't know.. But if people start getting sensitive when you criticize something thats often a sign that this needs criticism even more. Also i think you shouod look into the original feminist movement, for example some things Karen Straughan has highlighted about it. You've probably been misled about that too as ma…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 03:27 PM
0

Seems like alot of people do it just fine.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 04:21 PM
1

Id rather you wouldnt and im hopefull you'll be argued out of it as soon as possible in a friendly and respectful way.. especially as someone from a scandinavian social democracy i might be able to rid you of this idea of us thats so prevalent in the US... But im sure you could be a liberal mra just fine as its kind of its own thing.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 04:17 PM
-1

And we were supposed to think care and think it was awful..
/r/MensRights19/05/15 09:40 AM
0

You're completely right.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 09:36 AM
0

Its not a silly instict lol. Its pretty essential.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:35 PM
0

Well..
/r/MensRights14/05/15 05:35 PM
5

Well any such explanation which isnt focused on white europeanw = bad will get you into trouble with certain ideological academic types, no matter what the data says, so i wouldnt take that too seriously.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 12:25 PM
0

Why would you think the daily show has their facts straight though?
/r/MensRights12/05/15 06:52 AM
3

Oh no he deserves it alright.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 04:34 PM
6

Im glad they're growing. We need both subreddits to grow.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 09:38 PM
1

I love miles
/r/MensRights01/05/15 08:32 PM
1

I dont feel like stats alone though important will make as much difference as a general framework will to compete with feminism. But it's great that you're taking such initiative.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 05:56 PM
1

Egalitarianism is blatantly false in a literal sense, but also if you have some sort of abstract metaphysical belief in the equality of all which i won't bother arguing against as theres no evidence for that. I don't think egalitarian thinking is the least biased way of thinking at all, especially concidering how it's been battered by reality again and again. I might be in a minority, because egalitarianiwm masquerades as something nice and people want to be nice but it's incredibly flawed and l…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 06:26 AM
9

Ministry of equality? Thats some creepy shit..
/r/MensRights28/04/15 08:15 PM
1

Me too :)
/r/MensRights16/04/15 07:41 PM
7

Katherine timpf is brilliant.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 12:10 PM
2

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=H0swWR-kYaw Watch this instead.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:28 AM
0

Lol that was pretty funny, and factual, which just makes it even more awsome.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:17 PM
1

I was just about to share this myself. Great video with information that everyone needs to know.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 03:41 PM
0

Lol, ok.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 08:58 AM
19

Which would be a better candidate if your priorities are to decrease the chance of war with iran and get away from fiat?
/r/MensRights10/04/15 04:55 PM
31

So Rand paul?
/r/MensRights10/04/15 04:07 PM
1

I wonder what they concider sexist attitudes...
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:57 PM
4

Im not really sure what to make of this guy lol... But the video was great, thanks for sharing :)
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:53 PM
1

Works for me :)
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:48 PM
1

Do you fight crime by night?
/r/MensRights31/03/15 08:21 AM
2

Yeah.. i dont think thats a very accurate picture of them.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 08:37 PM
0

Economic equals? Thats retarded.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 07:39 PM
1

When did she muse about our monetary syststem/what did ahe say that was wrong/boring?
/r/MensRights20/03/15 03:42 PM
3

This is dumb.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 10:56 AM
1

Its funny yet maybe more sad to me how even here everyone buys into the kind of things you claim to oppose. Feels like all hope is lost.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 09:49 PM
3

Great now i know not to support the green party in any way.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 07:50 PM
-1

Wow even here people are falling for this bullshit. Wow.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 07:44 PM
1

Are you british? Because that's quite an understatement.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 11:52 PM
2

If i hear strong female lead one more time ill.. be annoyed and move on but you get my point.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 01:17 AM
3

Theyre making careers out of it, its not them who suffer.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 12:11 AM
1

yeah, no :)
/r/MensRights23/02/15 12:20 PM
1

Its an internet tabloid basically.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 05:26 PM
1

Only half their age?
/r/MensRights22/02/15 05:18 PM
8

Id love for a man to talk at a ted on how women should be less emotional. Should be interesting.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 09:08 PM
2

Its more culturally dependent than youre implying, which theres plenty of examples of.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 11:15 AM
0

Rich people dont have 10 times better lives than poor people, in many ways its better to be middle class than super wealthy.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 11:12 AM
1

Where did he say this? Had no idea
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:14 PM
2

I bet somehow theyre still powerless victims.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:12 PM
1

Ooh yes i can definatly see how my lack of apostrophes mean its highly unlikely i have anything valid to say about history... yeah.. makes perfect sense. I guess youre right then.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:34 PM
1

I have no idea where youre getting your anthropological information which backs up what youre saying but id be interested to find out ecause its not what ive read or heard of anywhere, the idea that prehistorical cultures have been monogamous in particular is almost just laughable but ill hold off in case youll amaze me. I dont care about your respect for childless couples, i was merely pointing out if marriage was about children thats something you need to adress. Why would they get married why…
/r/MensRights10/02/15 10:19 PM
1

If you wish to concider marriage as purely something in relation to children have at it, you can treat it as you like that's not what i'm arguing. I'm not by any means against all traditions or anything like that, i do think some are less optimal or misguided, but its really irrellevant to what i was arguing. Do i need to repeat or rephrase it or can you go back and see what im actually saying? This is a different thing but yes, fidelity is about paternity for the woman, and mens fidelity is to …
/r/MensRights10/02/15 08:08 PM
1

Historically there have been many points to marriage and its constantly changing, children have played some part some of the time but you shouldnt be too locked into your own tradition. Although even there couples unable to have children are not excluded from partaking in the union. It's also not only about sexual fidelity, that's really only for the women while in exchange the man in responsible for providing recources, safety etc. So thats only from our perspective if youre a guy too.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 07:01 AM
3

100% agree.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 05:15 PM
1

Yep
/r/MensRights09/02/15 05:14 PM
3

There are many reasons and some i guess many are aware of, but a few things would be that women are much more collectivists, they lobby and organize and do whatever it takes to gain whatever ground they can for women. If a woman is suffering or inconvenienced in any way, any way, this is a crime against womanhood. There's studies that show men are biased in favor of women and women even more so, also actually treating a woman equally is perceived as sexist, while treating them better is concider…
/r/MensRights09/02/15 03:02 PM
1

I see where youre coming from, but that doesnt really make sense, marriage isnt only or even neccecarily mostly about kids.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 12:46 PM
4

Im norwegian, feminism and feminist ideas are the norm here in a way i dont think it is in the us although its hard to compare, its constantly taught in public schools, the media and dominates the political and social sphere even if on a private and individual basis people aren't as rabid about it.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 11:24 AM
2

Please stop speaking for everyone as youre getting downvoted its just silly.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:07 PM
3

Im actually really glad she wont concede this meme of feminism was great before but isnt needed now or has become radicalized, something people believe because they havent actually read the history.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:05 PM
0

Im so tired off women playing victim successfully, especially when authority figures always take the side of the woman..
/r/MensRights06/02/15 03:01 PM
1

You usually like tyt? huh.. I cant watch them without pulling my hair out.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:22 PM
5

They weren't listening at all.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 11:19 PM
1

Thats just dumb.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 01:22 AM
1

Genes dont exist thats racist and sexist.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 11:44 PM
1

I don't quite see how blacks not winning in races they couldn't participate in means they weren't viewed as faster runners but i guess that makes sense in your head. Im not a scholar but i'd venture to guess black people and ideas relating to hypermasculinity, athleticism, running fast etc have been around a bit more then 30 years.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 11:42 PM
1

If youre asking me if i mean always in an absolute sense like since the big bang, then no not always, but thats a pretty dumb question so i hope you meant something else but youll need to be more specific.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 06:36 PM
0

Its a joke.
/r/MensRights25/01/15 05:07 PM
2

Im pretty sure white runners have always been thought of as generally worse at running then black runners..
/r/MensRights25/01/15 05:05 PM
6

Am I the only one who kinda think these questions have been answered enough times already?
/r/MensRights24/01/15 06:21 PM
2

I dont get it, does anyone care if girls play soccer or not?
/r/MensRights23/01/15 09:48 PM
9

The answer to your question is as you said yourself, you're a dad.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 04:04 PM
8

Could anyone tell me when liberals started their "its 2015, its 2008 etc line" ive been hearing it for years now, its annoying and nothing but a rhetorical tool, someone please where did this come from?
/r/MensRights23/01/15 04:03 PM
4

Theres so many things so obviously wrong with these women's ideas im baffled that they have the prominent positions in society and are largely unchallenged.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 05:16 PM
1

Who is john waters?
/r/MensRights21/01/15 04:40 PM
9

Wait what? Men make more than women = Men bad Men make less than women = Men bad. Kafka is nothing compared to this kind of thinking
/r/MensRights16/01/15 11:57 AM
21

It's actually kind of funny that they experience how men are treated and their interpretation is how badly women have it. This stuff is kafkaesque as hell.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 05:24 PM
1

Thats interesting, women over the age of 35 crash more apparently, younger ages its identical and in their teens men crash more. Apparently its pretty simplistic just to say women crash way more.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 10:49 PM
2

No one is implying putting yourself in a risky situation is an excuse or it being consensual, you're arguing with ghosts.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 08:00 PM
1

Citation needed.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 05:28 PM
0

This is unrelated but is Shia Lebouf still crazy or is he sane again?
/r/MensRights12/01/15 02:25 AM
0

Wrong again, im not offended. I would like it if you'd stop it with the false assumptions though.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 02:16 AM
2

No one expects that, so you can happiiy retreat from namecalling.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 09:35 PM
5

He forgot you cant critizize a movie if you didn't make it yourself, im sure it won't happen again.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 08:31 PM
1

It doesnt seem like its easier at all though.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 09:54 AM
1

Why do people need labels? Is it that hard to be an individual?
/r/MensRights10/01/15 01:13 AM
0

Well theyve got a point, feminism is crushing mens rights like a baws.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 03:02 PM
1

Your description is very misleading.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 04:54 PM
2

This is a bit from a comedians act. Jim jefferies.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 01:02 AM
3

Please concider not labeling yourself people, its does more bad than good.
/r/MensRights06/01/15 05:32 PM
26

Also how she tellingly refers to this objective test as "the problem".
/r/MensRights05/01/15 04:36 PM
1

You said: If researchers in this field are going to postulate that women are generally regarded as 'more wonderful' than men,.. Im saying theyre not postulating that. What you referred to on the wiki isnt something the researchers have said, atleast i cant find it.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 09:37 PM
1

I have found the links, and they dont say what you claim, as far as i can tell.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 02:52 PM
1

Yet you find it so difficult to back up your claim. I cant find it, hopefully you can since you claimed it.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 09:28 AM
1

I know it says that in the wiki, but i was asking if they said that.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 12:23 AM
2

I didn't see that they postulated that it is universal.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 08:39 PM
1

It possibly being simply a cultural phenomenon doesn't mean it's not a phenomenon.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 06:07 PM
1

Ofcourse they would, so what? Theres nothing you can do? LOL. Weak bitch.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 09:47 AM
17

People need to start treating feminists the way they treat others.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 08:25 PM
6

Doubt it.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 07:12 PM
1

I dont think theres any reaching out to someone whos as far gone as tyt, but good on you for trying.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 09:59 PM
0

Yes, it most ceirtanly is.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 11:46 PM
1

Oh ok, it seemed like he started out with feminist/progressive assumptions and logic and it ended up very traditionally, kind of to show how progressivism and traditionalism both have some connection or share some assumptions which often leads them to the same bad place. Ive kind of noticed a similar thing happening before and found it really interesting and i dont really understand it, but yeah maybe it wasnt really what i thought.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 10:48 PM
1

Thats a false choice.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 10:38 PM
19

Its an interesting phenomenon that progressivism so often leads back to traditionalism.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 05:03 PM
3

I think the issue is seperating students based on sex which is too generalizing as opposed to their individual characteristics, although some might be universally against seperating students. Theres pros and cons either way but we wont find the right solution because we get too emotionally charged about it.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 04:59 PM
1

Wow..
/r/MensRights30/11/14 05:56 PM
2

"Made to feel that way" because obviously as a woman you have no autonomy or control of your emotions... who's really the midogynist here?
/r/MensRights30/11/14 09:37 AM
1

Huh? I might be wrong, but i think boys/men need more physical activity than girls/women.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 05:26 PM
0

Why do you assume he's a taxpayer?
/r/MensRights29/11/14 09:12 AM
0

They were both abusive.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 09:11 AM
3

Greater need for physical activity to function optimally, a need which is largely unmet in todays society.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 12:07 PM
10

Thats dishonest of you, obviously he meant fake relationship as in not being honest.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 11:15 PM
2

Ohh yeah that makes sense.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 04:24 PM
2

I dont like "women need to learn to stop raping us". Too many things wrong with that sentence.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 01:10 PM
1

Atleast one says shes going to sue.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 02:09 AM
21

Huh? You dont know theyre false accusations? Or are you saying if mere accusations yet to be proven can destroy a mans reputation that opens up for false accusations to do so?
/r/MensRights22/11/14 05:25 PM
6

Or both.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 03:39 PM
2

Great job :)
/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:57 PM
4

Its complicated, but it is problematic whenever anyone loses work or something so substantial simply based on accusations.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 05:48 PM
1

Using the word kill in reference to a fetus does not make the philosophical presumption that a fetus is a living human.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:18 PM
1

So in one sense you're a conservative and traditionalist.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:14 PM
2

Yeah, because the oppression of black people in america was really due to voluntary trade and not the state sponsored initiation of force. Riight.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 04:09 PM
-4

You can sue private businesses for discrimination? That's no good. Clubs should be able to let in or not let in whoever they want for whatever reason and for whatever price they want.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 02:14 PM
2

This is kinda creepy.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 01:09 PM
7

And more importantly in my mind infantilizes women, perpetuating the age old, quite patriarchal notion of men as actors and women being acted upon, to serve womens interests.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 11:05 PM
1

Fake feminists giving feminism is so annoying, just like the third reich gave real nazis a bad name, mao and stalin gave socialism and communism a bad name.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 10:55 PM
4

I dont think the point is to defend him at all, the point is that hope solo shouldnt be treated lighter because shes female..
/r/MensRights18/11/14 10:44 PM
2

Complaining about the sub squashing debate in all caps while providing no substantiation to your claim but some ajectives. Thats pretty funny.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 02:06 PM
2

I really just think their promoting their own interest rather than it being about thinking anything about men
/r/MensRights15/11/14 07:55 PM
5

And i'm not really an activist for any side, i'm just interested in learning about men and women, what are the best ideas, theories out there to gain a wider perspective on these issues.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 07:50 PM
4

You're on point.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 07:43 PM
3

Unfortunately theres too many false assumptions and lack of perspective in this post for it to lead to a fruitful discussion, shame really..
/r/MensRights15/11/14 01:40 PM
2

Good point.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 01:33 PM
3

Im not an american so i might be wrong, but isnt republicans better at sticking together, and although both sides have their flaws this is one thing the left is more guilty of?
/r/MensRights14/11/14 10:53 PM
3

And how you define statistics..
/r/MensRights12/11/14 11:15 PM
3

You should both be substantiating instead of simply asserting things an calling things sexist, that'd be way more productive.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 11:12 PM
1

You desember shit for alot of things in this scenario, but i don't think giving up your rights to your daughter is one of them.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 04:24 PM
1

Well that makes him quite important in todays society.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 11:18 PM
1

I saw one of Karen Straughan's videos.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 11:15 PM
3

I think things are worse, which is reflected in a stronger counter-reaction.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 11:14 PM
1

I didn't, but i could be in the minority.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 11:13 PM
1

They're awsome, thx.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 11:07 PM
5

Change guys to black people.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 11:28 AM
1

I don't see the problem.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 12:34 PM
1

Why is it that bathrooms get so much attention compared to the more important things we could be doing?
/r/MensRights05/11/14 12:28 PM
3

We are trying limiting women from harming children, thats not a strawman.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 10:56 AM
8

Yeah touching your little sisters vagina, having her touch you, touching your vagina next to your younger sister until you're 17 makes you look pretty damn bad.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 06:33 PM
1

There might well be a party out there like that.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 05:39 PM
20

Its so disgusting how women feel entitled to mens bodies and intimidate and make them feel weak by complimenting them in public..
/r/MensRights31/10/14 10:17 PM
1

Well you simply treat it the same way you treat all other conversation, just like when you go to a fancy resturant i could worry that the people there think less of me, and theres a malicious intent by every word spoken. People are gold at finding the patterns theyre looking for even if theyre not there. But how do you treat most interactions? I know if i were to take every you look pretty as an intimidation tactic to dominate me rather than someone appreciating my looks or simply wishing to hav…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 08:30 PM
1

People are generally pretty bad when reading into or "intuiting" what other people actually mean or whats really in their minds, so I'm careful about doing that.. Also your experience might be perfectly valid and other people have different but equality valid experiences, its different for everyone. The idea that no matter what people say to you it still means the same thing , I'm incredibly skeptical of, its also unfalsifiable. You cant read minds. You're also being disingenious with your langu…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 06:21 PM
-1

Yeah shame is just great.. Wow.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 04:01 PM
0

He didnt actually call them vindictive cunts,...hold yourself to a higher standard friend.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 03:56 PM
2

Unfortunately feminists wont have any problem spinning videos like these to fit their narrative.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 03:46 PM
-1

So public shaming kids for making mistakes and doing wrong is becoming an accepted and applauded way of parenting now? Jesus christ we need a parenting revolution because we suck at raising kids.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 03:38 PM
2

Yeah I'm Norwegian too.. You could show Norwegians a video of someone saying hi or have a nice day to anyone anywhere in public and it would make them uncomfortable and feel it was inappropriate. Getting Norwegian men being this is like shooting fish in a barrel.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 08:24 AM
1

Some of it is acceptable, alot of it isnt, which is one of many big problems with the video. Rules of social conduct is pretty complicated, os relative, keeps changing and theres alot of things to concider. Walking next to someone for 10 minutes who doesn't engage with you isnt acceptable anywhere id think, damn you got a fat ass gurl i guess is a bit rude and inconvinient for most women but some like it, and you look beautiful have a nice day really cant be said to be an issue. Also this is mos…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 08:10 AM
1

Alot of the problem, as even tyt was able to point out, is that the video mixes in a few perfectly fine have a nice days with some obnoxious bullshit.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 08:09 AM
1

No, by not being easily aware of how the video is pathetically flawed propaganda. Rude cat calling is bad? Duhh.. This is a very common tactic by feminists, theres a set of propositions some or just one obvious and some batshit crazy and if you disagrees with the batshit crazy things you don't think catcalling is bad, women arent people, women shouldn't earn as much for the same job as men etc.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 08:05 AM
-2

This speaks more of people, like you, and how easily manipulated by feminists they are.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 07:26 PM
1

So people here seem to agree that the double standard is wrong, but which of the standards in the right one? It seems because people want to same the double standard they instantly go to how horrible this is for the boy etc but I'm not so sure thats the right way to go about it.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 07:20 PM
-1

Yeah that might be the reason why its more common for black men, seems probable.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 06:55 PM
1

Well, the norm is serial monogamy, or just sleeping around much more then being with just one person. But yeah there is monogamy which is upheld as morally good, mostly by women.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 06:53 PM
1

The upper eschelant of males in terms of social status id say would be fewer, especially concidering growing inequality, so i wouldnt say more then top 20% is what most or many women would aim for in terms of trading up. But thats just what I'm thinking i don't have any data on it.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 06:46 PM
1

Did anyone else kinda like Jon stewart and stephen colbert a few years ago but now find watching a single episode intolerable? Either I've gained more perspective and learned more of theyre getting much worse.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 06:42 PM
1

Why would colbert do that theyre pretty left leaning in all the generic ways..?
/r/MensRights30/10/14 06:38 PM
1

You didnt expect this from colbertreport? Really though?
/r/MensRights30/10/14 06:36 PM
2

I might be completely off here as i don't know american culture very well, but isnt catcalling a bit more common for black guys than white guys
/r/MensRights30/10/14 06:31 PM
1

Our society which is muss less violent then most if not all other models, and have quite an amount of hypergamy. Its not really regulated at all, only minor social sanctions. You've yet to respond to the premises i disagrees with and you should notice it and respond because an educated discussion is impossible when one part isnt striving to understand the others arguments.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:19 PM
1

Thats quite too high a percentage i think. Have you ever read about slavemorality because you seem to be practicing it.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:09 PM
1

I gave you shit for not being reasonable in answering a reasonable honest question about a proposition, which is different from being unreasonable to an unreasonable, dishonest and denigrating mischaracterization of people. But you keep at it you're being hilarious.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 09:03 PM
-1

Yeah i already got from your previous reply you werent interested in a reasonable discussion so no need to repeat yourself. You get going.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 08:59 PM
1

That which is asserted without reason or evidence can be dismissed without reason or evidence.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 08:56 PM
1

I'm pretty sure you're not intimimately familiar with eminem? If you understand context etc and not just regurgitate what others have said and assumptions about him or his Music you'd sing a different tune. But if you can find something hes said about homoseksualitet or women that really isnt simply quote mining and stands up to scrutiny and analysis id love to hear it because i havent so far but if I'm wrong that'd be really interesting to find out.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 06:52 PM
0

I'm well aware you do.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 06:45 PM
1

I was mostly joking, but also pointing out that wether hypergamy is good or bad like anything is subjective and depends on the pov. Also terror rarely if ever affect the highest status males, and its much more complex then hypergamy, minority of men having the majority of men -> unstable society and terror. Though hypergamy doesn't mean that so thats a false inferral.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 06:43 PM
2

I'd argue in general women are more attractive, especially sexually to men then the reverse.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 06:37 PM
1

Is it more acceptable for men to be horny then women? We always hear this but I'm not so sure, women can be very outwardly horny without it seeming threatening or creepy as it does when most men are.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 06:36 PM
1

I'm not sure how to phrase this but women as a whole are more sexually attractive to men, then men as a whole are to women. Women are concidered more attractive then men, even to other women in a way. If that makes sense.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 06:34 PM
1

Its an interesting thing, its sexual power/privilege for sure, but i wouldnt call it exploitation.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 06:31 PM
-4

If you're not an incredibly high status male like me i can see why you'd feel that way, but i think hypergamy is great.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 06:26 PM
1

you're assuming Pride is something which is only justified when you've had a choice in the matter, or its invalid if you didnt.. Thats not neccecarily a valid assumption.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 06:24 PM
3

What a sophisticated take on libertarians, please tell us more.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 06:17 PM
0

Haha moron.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 06:16 PM
1

I agree.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 06:13 PM
0

I don't get why someone would downvote your comment but offer no refutation, thats kinda lame.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 12:29 AM
1

Yeah.. I don't think so.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 12:22 AM
3

You can't believe a person would like you to substantiate the claims you make? If so yeah this place might not be right for you but i'd argue it's not the board that's the problem. Also for someone complaining about offensive language not calling a board retarded might be a good idea.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 01:45 AM
4

You mean the same song where straight after he says "i like gay men"? This kind of lazy quote mining shit doesn't hold up to any real scrutiny, please do better or this'll be a waste of a conversation.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 10:37 PM
1

And white athletes should get paid the same as black athletes.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 10:29 PM
3

Yes.
/r/MensRights25/10/14 10:22 PM
2

Care to substantiate?
/r/MensRights25/10/14 08:47 PM
1

Nope
/r/MensRights23/10/14 07:24 PM
8

Yes, it would..
/r/MensRights23/10/14 07:21 PM
2

Makes more sense to be to base it off age difference, though thats not perfect either.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 07:19 PM
0

I'm just being nitpicky. Some people can't afford great costumes, or they might have a different taste then you do. Many people don't have much choice in what kind of clothes to wear either. People can get a nosejob. I'm sure if i see all your clothes i can mock you for them in some way, but its just douchey.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 09:15 AM
0

And some people have big noses, doesn't mean you have to mock them for it.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:08 PM
-1

I thought telling people what to wear and what not to wear, that their clothes are shitty.. kind of makes you a bad person, it bullying and snobbish. Why should she impose and project her western imperialist normalized standards? :o
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:33 AM
6

One of the most hilarious things about feminists for me is how they talk about how everone is blind to their own privilige, but if you even hint at women having privilige and men being discriminated against theyre shocked and appaled by the mere thought of it.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:27 AM
1

You try so the people watching the debate which are in a better position then her to reflect on it, theres not really any changing the person one to one, especially not in the moment as people get defensice. But the good thing is you have truth on your side so it should be fun demolishing her arguments and making her look a fool. I find that thinking more effective then really wanting her to change her mind, getting frustrated etc.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:20 AM
2

Hey its up to you, i just think generally responding and standing up to bs is a good thing, and if feminist rhetoric becomes dominant and whats normalized and acceptable in the public sphere we all suffer. Doesnt mean you hace to go back and forth just make a point as clear and inarguable as you can and leave it at that. Then maybe people like her wont feel as confortable throwing that bs around.. just my thoughts. Also why is she your friend if shes like this, surround yourself with better peop…
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:12 AM
73

Being scared of someone who disagrees with you isn't really something to boast about.. If the person is scared of someone who advocates for male rights they should probably take a look in the mirror. Also by their own logic, theyre anti male if theyre not an mra we can play that game of rhetoric too. I hope you respond, such things shouldnt go unadressed if we want change.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 12:29 AM
1

I dont understand how so few men commit suicide from being subjected to this kind of shit.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 01:16 PM
1

Theres no need for you to have a complete picture of tyt and their biases, im not sure if that kind of argumentation has a name, but i feel like it should. I dont need a complete picture of bill oreillys biases, political stances etc to know he doesnt usually have a very balanced opinion, the same goes for Ana.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 07:33 AM
1

I find this type of sympathy for Ana from some people on here quite funny
/r/MensRights21/10/14 07:24 AM
1

He said democrats, plural, and you're just one person, so technically..
/r/MensRights21/10/14 07:16 AM
7

I dont agree with both of you.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 07:06 AM
1

Sam Harris is doing an interview with them this wednsday..lol.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 05:39 PM
1

You have incredibly low standards for what makes a "very balanced opinion".
/r/MensRights19/10/14 05:38 PM
1

Hilarious seems a bit strong, but yeah he's largely right for once..
/r/MensRights17/10/14 08:37 PM
1

I keep reading this headline the wrong way round.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 08:31 PM
1

Only a specific kind of equality. Equality means different things to different people.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 10:40 PM
3

Either way both those terms are dumb and biased and misleading.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 09:01 PM
21

If anyone even thinks of attacking Norway they'll repeal it.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:58 PM
10

... now that it's safe.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 08:56 PM
0

Yeah its impossible to be born to a woman who didnt want you and be adopted to a couple who did for example, which is what would be best for the child.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:00 PM
1

Looking for a definition to even remotely encapsulate a words meaning is pretty silly though.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 01:23 PM
-2

This isnt slut shaming.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 01:21 PM
-1

No one is suggesting that having a penis makes one good at fixing cars etc, so why are you even throwing such misleading things out there?
/r/MensRights11/10/14 07:35 PM
2

Everytime i hear something about the Skandinavian countries it's about how awsome they are, i'm starting to think maybe Hitler was onto something there :p
/r/MensRights09/10/14 05:05 PM
8

Thefuck?
/r/MensRights08/10/14 02:45 PM
1

Calling people less intelligent, another thing to add on the list of things ive not said or done but yet make it into your summation. I dont think i'll bother responding to you anymore.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 01:53 PM
1

I never expressed the idea that fight club fans or people holding it up as gospel are annoying, thats entirely on you. You know, a big part of having an intelligent discussiob is making a bit of effort to realky listen to the other person, not misrepresent what theyre saying etc. Youre really failing at that. #ilikehowdumbpeoplearesoconfident
/r/MensRights07/10/14 09:46 AM
1

No, you're confused.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 11:50 PM
1

You said fight Club fans who hold it up like gospel were annoying, so i said you find some peoples tastes annoying. Yeah, i can totally see where i lost you on that one. /s
/r/MensRights06/10/14 11:34 AM
1

Louis c.k makes me laugh, wouldnt call myself a fan though. I doubt its that im tired of his fans, ive had little to no contact or talks with someone about him. Could you point to something that doesnt make him middle of the road or why youre a fan? And im not saying theres anything wrong with it btw. If you want me to name others that have made me laugh or interested me hedberg, steve Wright, carlin, chapelle, burnham, pryor, hicks, burr, galifinakis, cross, tosh, stewart lee, minchin, demetri …
/r/MensRights05/10/14 05:52 PM
1

Well i'm not a comedy geek or anything, like i'm not very into fashion for example. So i'm not going to claim to really know everything like i wouldnt really know what's unique and different in the fashion world. But i do think Louie is one of the less inventive, unique etc to my admittedly imperfect knowledge. Like i can get why someones really a fan of brazil, the seventh seal, fight club or something like that as it plays with ideas that are rarely adressed, in unique ways in a way i don't ge…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 08:13 AM
1

I realize i might come off as pretty assholeish and hipsterish or something by asking this, but i don't get how you can be a big fan of someone like Louis ck, i mean he's good at what he does but it's so broad and bland, and all the Bagatelle that comes with appealing to as many people as possible. Its like someone being a big fan of a really good quality casual attire or a t shirt and jeans as a style out of everything in the model world. I guess its just taste and all, but i cant help but need…
/r/MensRights04/10/14 11:15 PM
0

Inaccurate title
/r/MensRights04/10/14 11:00 PM
9

Marriage dying is much too vague to make a sensible judgement either way.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 10:59 PM
0

More like credit us.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 10:58 PM
1

I guess i asked for a precice answer where none is available really. It's just weird how people are so ready to judge in cases like these that are actually super tricky, if there even is a right answer to it and were not just making judgements based on how we feel about it which makes arguing about it kind of pointless.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 10:56 PM
1

So then what precicely makes it abuse? (Not that i think you're wrong that they enjoying it at the time doesn't make it abuse).
/r/MensRights04/10/14 07:07 PM
1

Was a good thing. The same way restrictions on sexuality made more sense earlier than it does now.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:25 PM
4

From what? He's freakin Stephen Fry.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:18 PM
7

I bet white and male trumps gay.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 02:16 PM
3

Why are you even watching them? They're full of shit, to put it politely.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 05:13 AM
1

No, theyre too far gone for sure.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 11:42 PM
1

Thaddeus Russel is kind of a boss, atleast what I've seen of him before. You people should check out hos book and stuff.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 03:19 PM
1

It's certainly possible some, possibly more, are less likely to rape when drunk and some are more likely to. I do think a few people could go too far due to alcohol lowering their inhibitions. But you're right, lowering the inhibitions of i'm assuming most men won't make them more likely to rape because they don't have those impulses to hold back. Women are potential targets regardless, but their overall likelyhood of victimization might increase, but i don't know that. It would depend on how dr…
/r/MensRights25/09/14 03:08 PM
2

Well, it might make a few people more likely to rape, like drinking might make you more vulnerable to being raped?
/r/MensRights24/09/14 05:23 AM
1

Like he says himself, I'm paraphrasing here, but if you think he's good that says alot more about how shitty the rest of media is.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 05:20 AM
5

I really wonder what kind of person is able to watch tyt.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 02:59 PM
1

Why u on omegle tho?
/r/MensRights21/09/14 05:36 PM
1

Going by the fergusun ordeal, they seem to say the same thing there.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 05:28 PM
1

Joss whedon has been pandering to feminists forever, and women more generally. So thats not even really worth mentioning. It's great to respond, but after a certain amount of responding you've said what you need to say, or you're doing it wrong. We don't need a couple of people obsessing over feminists that are winning over the general public.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 05:23 PM
1

I guess because Tyt wasnt full of shit for once?
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:20 AM
1

I thought it was the other way around lol.. Damn assumptions.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:13 AM
1

I thought he was done with her already? I've never really padde that much attention to their beef because its kinda silly to be so obsessed about one person, but now its getting sad how he cant stay away from her..
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:10 AM
0

I really wish she could be a prominent person when it comes to gender issues iwho wouldnt simply be regurgitating old rhetoric, alas..
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:07 AM
24

Except ofcourse this is men's own fault and women play no part in this cycle if only men would stop supressing women, because it's really the men who's the problem. It seems she's bought some of these quite false and damaging feminist assumptions that soil the good ideas and intentions involved..
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:04 AM
1

Jesus christ, this guy should apply for a job at Tyt, he'd fit right in.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 10:50 AM
1

Wow i just discovered alot of people here accept the kind of thinking i thought we were against. Bummer.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 07:18 PM
1

You don't know their motives, so don't act like you do.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 07:15 PM
1

That's dumb.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 07:07 PM
1

If she chose the good guy in the end or something like that, then yeah.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 07:06 PM
1

She might very well agree with you, but it's a pretty big paycheck i can't honestly blame her as long as she does speak out when she can and doesnt ultimately put money over morals.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 07:05 PM
3

This person needs a heavy dose of Karen Straughan because that's so dumb it's embarrassing.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 06:56 PM
1

I'd be doing something different with my hands then typing this.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 06:48 PM
1

I'm sure this is in some way the fault of the white male patriarchy.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 06:41 PM
1

Vaguely, i guess.
/r/MensRights18/09/14 06:39 PM
1

Tyt can suck a bag of dicks. Its hard to wrap your head around the discouraging fact of their mere existence.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 12:30 PM
1

Yeah i'm not wasting time on you in the future.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 06:08 PM
1

They quote him saying it. Dont know what else to tell you.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 07:53 AM
1

I think the word you're looking for is more like partisan, not political.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:45 AM
1

He claimed to be a victim of abuse, he wasn't as specific as we might like about what kind of abuse he suffered, or to what degree he was a victim or not but he certainly claimed to suffer from abuse, intimidation etc. Either way It was also a general comment, not intended to be specific to this situation, but any situation where a man would respond in this way to a female who concidered herself a victim.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:41 AM
3

But if you said that about a female victim...
/r/MensRights12/09/14 07:16 AM
2

Also, if a guy was slapping his wife all bets would be off, no one would care if she hit him back too hard.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 04:25 PM
2

A little gross yet factual? That whole part was just weird.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 03:49 PM
1

That's certainly interesting, another person just replied that there was found somewhat of a difference between men and women, but it's very valuable that you point out the studies you are aware of.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:43 PM
1

Yeah it would be so incredibly raysis.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:10 PM
1

Obviously a joke. Stop being a dumb person.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:52 PM
1

I doubt short height is as negatively correlated when concerning income for women as it is for men?
/r/MensRights29/08/14 08:35 AM
1

Just watched the first one, not clear at all that's, going by the things he said and acted.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 04:49 PM
-6

Most beta shit i've ever read.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 04:40 PM
1

This is all incredibly weird.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:59 PM
1

That doesn't really work, calling a gay person straight wouldn't really offend them. Calling someone a house when they're clearly not isn't offensive, so it's not simply calling someone something they're not which makes something an insult.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 03:43 PM
1

Equal treatment for all in society? Nope.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 03:40 PM
1

This really made me sick to my stomach.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:25 AM
3

Other than portraying the guys as idiots, it's not as bad as i thought it would be.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 08:31 PM
9

Well, I just watched the trailer and it's possible you're more supposed to laugh at the women then the men. Then again, I've just watched the trailer and not an episode, so I might be completely wrong. Could anyone back up that we're supposed to laugh at the men and support the women etc? Because this might be a show to get behind and help spread if it's more about shining a light on negative female tendencies, biases etc..
/r/MensRights18/08/14 03:24 PM
-2

What's the point of this? Also she didn't rationalize it as in making ecuses or saying it wasn't bad.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 01:37 PM
11

May be barred from working with children? Please someone assure me she definitely won't be able to work with children?
/r/MensRights09/08/14 07:17 PM
1

Well from my experience I know that people at any age do stupid things and make stupid mistakes, and it often seems like older people are even more fucked up and do more irrational things and make worse choices in the sexual domain then young people often do. Obviously unwanted pregnancies are a problem irrellevant of age, although worse in certain situations but young age is just one of those unfortunate situations, and measures to be safe should always be highly encouraged, and people don't ge…
/r/MensRights09/08/14 10:00 AM
2

I can't really refute much of what you said just now either, although i might question the assumption that "in most cases it doesn't", somewhat because i'm not exactly sure what that means. The relationship in most cases doesn't "work out" or "last"? Most relationships no matter what age difference or not doesn't last. It doesn't work out to be a good experience for the people involved? Well i don't know how you know that's true. I've heard many accounts about significant age difference relation…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 06:33 AM
2

Well you say it's not right really confidently.. but it's tricky. I know 14 year olds who are more mature then 16 year olds, but 16 sounds better then 14 when you don't know the person, or that the 16 year old is actually more mature and capable then the 14 year old. You can't generalize. You can imagine two relationships with a 14 year old and a 18 year old and one would seem much more ok than the other, because there's so many other factors involved then simply their age. There's very few peop…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 09:36 PM
1

What? I wasn't saying this is the case legally, but morally.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 02:45 PM
2

Just because feminists don't understand jokes, irony or sarcasm doesn't mean we shouldn't. But it might be a good strategy to pretend we're not and be outraged, create a backlash and pressure politicians though...
/r/MensRights07/08/14 02:18 PM
3

Why did you use the example if you said men are stronger then women, and not men are smarter then women?
/r/MensRights07/08/14 02:17 PM
-1

Lol a woman has no right to not have an abortion if she raped someone and got pregnant from it. She kinda lost that when she RAPED someone. Equally if a man rapes someone and gets them pregnant they can abort it, he lost the right to a child when he raped someone.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 02:16 PM
1

Age of consent is fucking confusing.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 02:12 PM
11

It's incredibly annoying how she continually reinforces the idea that men= perpetrators and women=victims. And the anecdote of the man at the dinner party was pretty worthless except for emotionally reinforcing that idea. But she also explained the ambiguity when it comes to consent well. I guess you take what you can get.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 10:44 AM
1

It's like marriage, except now she's paying him, so i see it as a good thing.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 12:45 AM
1

I really dislike the whole "feminism was great before" and "feminism has done so much good" spiel, it's bs and i'm annoyed she believes that.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 09:27 PM
0

Well, to be fair to me, that is the best king of moral system.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 10:09 PM
-1

It's morally the same.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 03:34 PM
-1

Teenage girls aren't fully mature yet, so even if they choose to be friends with you, or choose to have sex with you, they're not neccecarily ready to make that decicion, and it's the older persons responsibility to say no, this is inappropriate. Predators like this often play on the young persons ignorance and immaturity, which is no better then forcing themselves on them.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:12 AM
-1

hahhahaha so original. atleast i'm not creeping young girls.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 11:08 AM
-15

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy on the street either but it's still creepy to follow young girls!
/r/MensRights30/07/14 09:57 PM
-17

Related? That's even creepier!
/r/MensRights30/07/14 09:56 PM
-3

Oh, yeah that makes sense.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 08:01 PM
-31

Why are you watching what a teenage girl share's on facebook? Creep!
/r/MensRights30/07/14 06:54 PM
0

I know a guy that doesn't like nice woman and a woman who likes a nice guy, this study is false.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:32 PM
1

Well, there might be in my mind some validity to have gender, race etc neutral symbols in groups, or symbols where everyone is represented, so everyone can feel included and a valid part of the organization, this would go for places men are in a minority aswell. Especially concidering it's the state, which should represent people no matter their religion, gender, sexuality etc no matter what the majority is. But i do agree with you this probably wasn't as much about that, as puritanical values, …
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:30 PM
1

Yep, if it was enforced for men only there'd be a legitimacy to the outrage, but as you say it isn't..
/r/MensRights28/07/14 10:21 PM
2

Why is this something to be outraged about? To not have a gender specific symbol seems like an ok idea, maybe a waste of time but in no way misandry. Am i missing something?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 06:22 PM
5

U want the D.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 06:18 PM
2

how'd you reach that conclusion?
/r/MensRights22/07/14 12:33 AM
3

Well that makes men even more victims really..
/r/MensRights22/07/14 12:33 AM
113

Wouldn't call it a sexist assumption, but the comment was nice and informative so that's good.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 12:29 AM
9

The reason we get upset, i hope, isn't because people are pointing out factually how issues are gendered, it's because they're factually inaccurate while doing so, the problem isn't that they're accurately portraying the gendered nature of a "bad" thing instead of ignoring the gendered nature of it. Taking into account how gender, gender perceptions etc influence "bad" issues is neccecary to solving the issue, you don't tackle racial issues by just ignoring the racial aspects and focus simply on…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 06:29 PM
3

If you don't mention it, most people won't notice or care..
/r/MensRights21/07/14 05:58 PM
2

Eerily similar to another not so great ideology...
/r/MensRights21/07/14 04:41 PM
1

If that's true i'd like to see some examples of it, that's all. Shouldn't be so hard if you're right.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 10:17 AM
1

In the second example I wouldn't exactly call that coming out on the side of men's rights.. And in the two prison examples they care about it not because it's affecting men, but because of how it affects minorities, young people getting too harsh penalties etc. Which is great. But no/little talk about how the prison system is affecting men, how men from single mothers are vastly overrespresented, women's sentences for the same crimes are lower etc.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 04:59 PM
1

But they're men.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 12:11 PM
2

Could you give me some examples of TYT coming out on the side of Men's Rights issues?
/r/MensRights13/07/14 04:43 PM
1

yep..
/r/MensRights08/07/14 07:57 AM
1

I don't think it's that women have a larger sex drive than men, i'm not so sure that's true, more importantly i think is that they have different reproduction strategies, for a man there's not as much potential harm sleeping around but for a woman it's more crucial to pick the right mate.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 05:02 PM
1

You're under the false asusmption that's the one and only way a woman would rape a man/boy. Also a man in power over a young woman, like a woman in power over a young man can force them to have sex, and to get themselves aroused, you seem to only be thinking about the minority of cases where it's direct violent rape, i don't think that's usually how it goes.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 04:57 PM
3

or 4, 3, 2, 1 or 0.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 12:44 AM
1

It's a weird thing when there's a double standard people seem to double down with their moral outrage and treating both genders unfairly instead of looking at the whole issue in a new way.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 10:22 AM
1

Well doing a good job at it wouldn't be a priority. I could close my eyes and pretend either way, and there'd be no need for me to get an erection etc.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 06:34 PM
1

Yep i'm sure.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 11:06 AM
1

Because it's easier to distance yourself from it.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 11:03 PM
1

Give i'd guess.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 09:02 PM
1

Oral sex with my mom would probably be the lesser of three evils in that scenario.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 11:19 AM
1

I said i don't know, so i answered your question. I don't know if there's any harm in a 3 year old seing someone having sex, my guess is it would depend on the circumstances, but if there is, as i said, then i have a problem with it. If there isn't, i don't.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 08:52 PM
1

I don't know. If it's all consensual and no harm is being done i don't see a problem with it.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 10:13 AM
1

I've heard of cultures where it's normal to be naked in front of eachother, where they don't neccecarily have sex in private, i've heard of a culture where as a ritual young boys drink old mens semen, so it's not that far fetched.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 07:59 PM
1

As far as i'm aware that would be the only bad consequence, yes. Then again in some cultures that might be normal behavior, maybe i'm the one with the problem, it's not for her to stop doing something just because I have a digust response to it. It's not neccecarily a fixed thing, I don't know.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 07:22 PM
1

Emotions aren't rational. Emotions and rationality are fundamentally different things. There's a rationality to them, but they're not neccecarily rational. Who's to say what one should or shouldn't feel, there's fundamentally not a rational answer to that.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 07:06 PM
1

It wouldn't be completely non-sexual, going by the definition i provided. But there are also non-sexual reasons why that would be gross.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 08:31 PM
1

Yep, might be colored by me thinking doing things for religious reasons is gross though.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 05:53 PM
1

Of, relating to, involving, or characteristic of sex, sexuality, the sexes, or the sex organs and their functions. Seems to fit this definition, and to that extent i'd be grossed out. And ofcourse i'd be grossed out by washing dirty pussy of a disabled person, also if it was my mom.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 05:49 PM
1

Well it's the same as if i were to put my penis in and out of her pussy for religious reasons, still would be gross and sexual.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 05:43 PM
1

Big difference between seeing her, and sticking things in her pussy..
/r/MensRights27/06/14 10:30 AM
1

A little.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 08:42 PM
1

I've seen my mom nude and i weren't grossed out, just indifferent, maybe slightly uncomfortable as i'm with anything that's not a common experience. I'd be lying if i said i knew exactly why i'd be grossed out by her masturbating. I could guess throw some shit at the wall, but that's what i'd be doing.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 08:36 PM
1

I don't think I could really answer that, atleast my answer would be so skewed it wouldn't have any meaning. Imagine you killing a person, how would that make you feel, but in this hypothetical they're not harmed and won't really die. You'd still probably feel awful, but that answer is so skewed by actual upbringing and biology there's no way to tell wether that means killing someone is inherently a bad experience or it's the other persons harm and death that makes it wrong. If she really was my…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 06:46 PM
1

As far as i'm aware there's an effect by some name, which creates an aversion to sex with people that live near you as you grow up, so it probably wouldn't change anything. I've heard stories about adoptive sons meeting their sister or mom, so maybe the effect is something arises and isn't innate. I do think Angelina Jolie is attractive, alas not as attractive as most people seem to think she is.. maybe that means she is my biological mom? Just kidding. Either situation i think would be problema…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 06:23 PM
1

I guess many if not most female celebrities you could come up with would have sexually attractive features, it's kind of a big part of getting to be a female celebrity. It's like asking me to name one of the top 50 soccer players i like watching play, well it's just about all of them it's largely for that reason why they're there. You could probably pick any female celebrity and i'd find her or something about her sexually attractive.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 10:09 AM
1

I'm equally grossed out by both.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 06:54 PM
1

It's easier to take the place of people more similar to you, also it's easier to take the place of someone that's not your mom when it's in a sexual scenario.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 09:02 AM
1

I'm not grossed out by a man having sex with a woman, because in that situation i'm abstractly taking the place of the man, having sex with a woman that isn't my mom.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 11:41 PM
1

For some reason i'm not quite aware, but i'm sure has a simple explenation, children have an aversion to view their parents in a sexual way. It's probably very cultural and varies, but i'd be suprised if it didn't also have biological reasons. I'd probably be less grossed out by a lesbian sex act, for reasons previously discussed.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 10:42 PM
1

Concidering i'm even grossed out by the question, i'd say yes.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 10:06 PM
1

I think incest is different then homosexuality because it's more abstract. Homosexuality is pretty straightforeward as it appears to you, thedifference between incest and women and a man is some more abstract, distant knowledge. Also, maybe more importantly if you project yourself into the situation, which i think people often and easily do, it becomes disgusting to be kissing another man, yet in the other scenario you're projecting yourself having sex with a woman that isn't your mom. This woul…
/r/MensRights24/06/14 06:18 PM
1

Please stop wasting my time.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 08:32 AM
1

It doesn't disgust me unless I think there's harm involved, otherwise it's pretty irellevant. Sometimes I feel grossed out when I see two men kiss, but that doesn't have anything to do with wether I think it should be legal or not. I don't think theres any difference between a woman having consensual sex with her son and a man having sex with his daughter in my disgust response.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 11:37 PM
-1

What are you even talking about, are you trolling?
/r/MensRights23/06/14 09:50 PM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 09:15 PM
-1

I didn't say women are appreciated for beauty while men are not and that this is biological, so saying that's wrong is irrellevant. Neither have i said the masculine form wasn't or isn't celebrated. You weirdly enough seem now to be making the point that the male form was/is celebrated, which I completely agree with so I have no idea why you bring that up as if it's in any way a counter point or adressing what i've said. Disappointing.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 09:01 PM
1

Most of what i've read on the subject.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 08:56 PM
1

With the information i have presently i probably wouldn't. At the moment with what the information i have indicates i probably would, but i haven't looked very much into how i would do that, concidering i probably never will have the chance.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 06:12 PM
-1

You can put it as simply as you want that i'm wrong, but if you want to convince me, or anyone who doesn't already agree with your conlusion, you'd have to substantiate your rebuttal a bit better. You should be more specific when you say something is an issue. Issues are a matter of opinion, when you say something is an issue so blatantly without any qualifications, it's atleast perceived by me as if you're claiming it's intrinsically or objectively an issue, which would be mistaken. Perhaps it'…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 05:46 PM
1

Well would my best guess be that the age which people are able to consent is closer to 15 then 16? According to the science i'd say it's 16. Also is the development the same for men and women? It's not obvious to me that it would be the exact same. Also it seems silly that people can't consent until they're 25 and their brain is fully mature, and what does it mean to be fully mature, one learns and develops always, when is one at the point when they can decide to have sex or not? It's possibly i…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 05:39 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 05:12 PM
6

The term objectifying is completely inane, please stop using it.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 05:06 PM
-3

Tell me again how this is discrimination? I don't think this is a matter of "conditioning" at all, it's largely biological that women are concidered more beautiful, possess qualities people perceive as more beautiful and have become more beautiful as that's more selected for then with men. This isn't some cultural conditioning which if we could get rid of if we only had enough awareness campaigns. Are men's naked bodies the stuff of nightmares? That's for you to say either way, individual people…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 05:02 PM
1

It's a scientific consensus that a 17 year old's cognitive faculties aren't completed. Maybe they're all wrong, but that seems unlikely. 25 is the number where most people reach full brain maturity, for women it's two three years earlier then that. So to your question. No, believing that doesn't make my mind up that 17's too young to consent. Today we don't see it as criminal if two fifteen year olds have sex, atleast in my country i think where the age of consent is 16, it's divided into age br…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 10:59 AM
1

If you by initiating the sexual relationship you mean the father not doing anything to contribute to such behavior in any way, i take your point, in that case grooming isn't an issue. Although i suppose it's possible someone underage, might be taken advantage of even if they're the one initiating, because they're not yet truly capable of making such a decicion. Someone young may be initiating, but the person they're initiating with is especially an authority figure like a father or a teacher, bu…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 10:22 PM
1

That makes sense, I failed to concider that. It would raise red flags largely because of what I guess americans call "grooming". The issues of consent, when is someone old enough to consent, is consent really the issue or is it about harm, parents get to make plenty of choices for children without them neccecarily fully consenting, because it's not harmul, it's a source for pleasure, it may be in their best interest etc. Also wether the age difference of the two people involved is an important f…
/r/MensRights22/06/14 03:42 PM
1

It's the oral sex part I was talking about... It would raise red flags in my mind, yes.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 06:14 PM
1

That was odly specific? I don't think I could substantiate sufficiently my thinking behind such complex issues as age of consent, mental and physical development, the issues of what I guess people call "grooming", and a moral theory who would take all that into account, right now. My initial reaction though is that it raises a bunch of red flags in my mind, and there's alot of undecided variables about this situations i'm not aware of so it's hard to judge.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 07:42 AM
2

What should and/or shouldn't be, or if that kind of concept is at all valid, is a whole discussion in and of itself. But I don't have a problem with it, particularly between adults.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 08:16 PM
1

Then who gives a fuck?
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:39 PM
3

Is O'hara someone who'd do well in a debate/discussion in todays media format and be a good represantative? Sorry for not knowing who he is I suppose.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 01:09 PM
2

Right or wrong, tactically it's probably not a good move..
/r/MensRights15/06/14 09:58 PM
1

We can prove with the scientific method that at the moment men and women largely have biologically different temperaments for example, which is what i was talking about. That something is biological doesn't mean it's hardwired. Hardwired sounds like it's permanent, but biology evolves. It's a predisposition. Atleast this is what i've gathered from looking into this stuff, i'd be very interested to hear of some counter-evidence or ideas and explanations. It's interesting for example if you look a…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 06:27 PM
1

I'm pretty sure it's both environment and biology, that's kind of what culture is.. To say we're either taught to be different or wired to be different is silly, it's both. The media and advertising are appealing to what's already there, enhancing it, which can be unhealthy. But they're not making shit up. We can engineer our society if we want, humans are pretty plastic, although engineering like that never really turns out so good.. I'm for people being free, wether that means men and women be…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:27 PM
0

I'm sure the feeling would be mutual if they were aware of this.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:55 AM
2

If it's your own car you're an idiot, if it's half your car you're an idiot, and if it's not your car you're an idiot and a criminal. No matter how you look at this she's an idiot.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:03 PM
0

Really? It's pretty funny they're able to have a bad relationship with everyone, even some hair and skincare company.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 08:55 PM
2

I don't think being less happy then before should be called "empowerment", but maybe that's just me.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 12:41 PM
4

16? Isn't 16 legal where you're from?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:02 AM
3

Yeah, obviously. It's not safe.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 04:01 PM
1

This doesn't sound like a friend, or like someone you should be friends with.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 09:07 AM
62

"Because the rights of women in first world countries has become more important than people everywhere" Dayum.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 08:59 AM
2

Haha wow, that's hilarious.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:30 AM
3

Soo.. we're fucked?
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:50 PM
3

I hope so, I just love seeing people who encourage insanity get bit in the ass by it.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:52 PM
1

Yeah, you're probably right.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:48 PM
1

I wouldn't say it's doing the same shit they do, because we wouldn't mean it. And we would call them out and explain by example why it's wrong. Doing what they're doing would be #YesAllBoys, and something about how women are more likely to commit infanticide. That would just be crude and committing the same fallacy they are. I'm really not suggesting that, I would just like to see a reply to their idiocy that would catch people's attention so they'd see how dumb they are being. This probably wou…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:47 PM
0

Yeah, I was thinking more of the general public and media then feminists that will never see sense. And #YesAllRacists would make it less sarcastic and more obvious and shaming, something feminists could understand. But yeah maybe it's dumb, i was just really annoyed.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:43 PM
4

just dumb.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 10:19 PM
1

I've watched some of his videos, nothing he says has anything to do with mens rights so where did that link up come from, and why are we accepting it?
/r/MensRights24/05/14 10:14 PM
2

Well there was no talk about how this would hurt of affect men, plus there was mention of women buying these things might cause them trouble, they might get in trouble with the law, how such a relationship might not be good for them in the long run, they might not want to start a relationship like that etc. Also a more minor thing at the end they used "people" several times instead of women, with how "people" are weird etc while when men do something it's part of their maleness and they're quite…
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:21 PM
7

And all that's talked about is how this might hurt women..
/r/MensRights22/05/14 02:10 PM
3

Props for challenging her.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 01:18 PM
3

Less nuanced youtube videos are more popular? Nooo..? I can't believe people don't respond to more nuance.. :)
/r/MensRights18/05/14 08:39 PM
1

Pointless wars is male behavior? Fucking insane thing to say.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 02:05 PM
2

At exactly how many years/months/days/hours does it arbitrarily shift from 'not okay' to 'okay'? Now that's a loaded question if i ever saw one.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 11:53 AM
1

And I would say your answer takes you out of the running when i hire my fact vs aesthetic opinion distinguisher....... and you might not have heard of that but it's definitely a real thing.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 06:28 PM
1

I disagree.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 05:34 PM
1

Except for a dead woman being roasted on a fire, the link's all good lol.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:47 PM
1

Except for a dead woman being roasted on a fire, the link's all good lol.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:47 PM
1

Barely a mention, i guess it's something.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:44 PM
3

I completely agree with you, although there's no reason a boy wearing girl clothes shouldn't be accepted. I don't think she was saying boys should be encouraged to do so, just that it should be accepted, as we accept girl wearing boys clothes.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 03:25 PM
3

aahh you just don't get it!!
/r/MensRights24/03/14 05:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter