TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jayrate Archive

View 0 posts and 104 comments by Jayrate on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Is that a thing? Gender-based reserved parking spots? What next, drinking fountains?
/r/MensRights06/03/14 08:30 PM
2

How would a woman being required to enlist somehow harm the war effort? Even supposing they were somehow less capable to push a trigger (I know, some top tier exertion here) an extra 3/4ths of a capable soldier is better than none! Even assuming that isn't true. Then why not make women pay an amount roughly equal to a soldier's pay? After all, it takes more than just boots on the ground to win a war. Money and supplies are just as important. The bottom line is that there is no excuse for women h…
/r/MensRights12/02/14 08:05 AM
0

And? They're still clearly reaping the benefits of the activism against the outdated concept of the wage gap. There is still clear discrimination against men going on. If you decide to drop out of your job for a long period of time (for whatever reason), you can't expect to just hop back in complete with promotions and advancement as if you hadn't left.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 05:53 AM
3

To me it's more that feminists as a whole ignore the issues of anyone who is not a middle class white woman. For example, they'll fight for affirmative action protection for women even while they drastically outnumber men on campuses. Then these so-called equality-minded folk completely ignore things like the draft and circumcision. In addition, a very common mistake among feminists is that Patriarchy means all men benefit and all men perpetuate a super secret conspiracy to "oppress" women, alth…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:54 AM
4

Also important to note that among new workforce recruits in 147/150 major US cities, women are earning as much as 15-20% more than their male counterparts. The pay gap among non-parents has nearly reversed.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 10:48 AM
2

Do something? Yeah I'll vote for the party that supports a gender-neutral draft/the elimination of the draft. Just kidding, both parties are controlled by the majority voter base and wealth base who supports sending everyone else to war to die for their interests.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 05:54 AM
1

"it won't happen" So for all of human history up until about 40 years ago (in the US, some places this is not the case), young adulthood for men (and also generally teenage years) was defined by going to war. War was an almost constant reality that most men had to deal with. We as humans have have drafted/conscripted warfare since prehistoric times, yet you think a mere 40-year lapse means that the age of drafting is over? I think you're the deluded one. Not to mention, the state (the people in …
/r/MensRights31/01/14 03:47 AM
5

Yeah, those whiny assholes that are in arms about being FORCED INTO A DRAFT. You're the fucking moron, here. NOBODY is a "whiny asshole" for not wanting to be involuntarily airdropped into a Vietnamese warzone because of his gender.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:52 PM
2

It's not biological. It probably has more to do with men being more physical throughout their life and statistically working far more back-breaking labor jobs while women statistically earn a lot more college degrees. Biologically a female cannot reproduce after a certain point in her life, so there's no reason that natural selection would favor longer-living females compared to males, especially since men can reproduce virtually up until they're on their death-bed.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:51 PM
1

Even so, the situation with sexes reversed would be "cultural brainwashing" women to not apply or something. It's also nice to point out the huge collegiate imbalance when feminists get up in arms about fewer women being in STEM fields (and fewer applying as well!). It goes to show that they'll look at any issue and find the best way to spin it as victimizing women.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:49 PM
2

He's saying that culturally it is probably more important who spends money than who earns it. An advertising campaign will target the spenders. Politicians will tailor their platform to benefit donors.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:47 PM
2

That's because we elect politicians or appoint political leaders based on their performance, ideology, etc., not their gender. Politicians are politicians first, gender second. Nobody votes using their genitals.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:43 PM
2

Very true. They have to mail a letter, but if it gets lost you are SOL.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 06:34 AM
5

In the US, on average 2 men are admitted for every 3 women. Specific programs can vary, but as a statistical mean the admittance rate is severely slanted.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 04:28 AM
6

Honestly, the fact that Feminists go crazy about the lower levels of female students in STEM majors while there are 3 women for every 2 men being admitted to colleges and Affirmative Action sets quotas for women is indicative of an underlying disregard for men's issues. Like, I'll point out the obvious gender disparity in higher education and they immediately jump to STEM majors specifically, as if women being underrepresented in a specific major is more important than men being underrepresented…
/r/MensRights05/01/14 04:26 AM
7

Yeah those are mythical creatures. While there are "good" feminists who actually believe in equality, the ones with any political clout are most definitely not. Organizations that lobby the government for feminists legislation are decidedly not aligned with MRAs in any way. And what's more important, equality-driven feminists or female supremacists who have influece on the state?
/r/MensRights28/12/13 10:19 PM
13

This is the scariest part. When people read over a statistic like that and don't realize that women aren't the primary victim here.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:32 AM
2

Still, I would bet this has a lot more to do with judges making semi-conscious discriminatory decisions based on gender mixed with some good ol' male disposability.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:20 AM
0

To be fair, though, SAT scores correlate most strongly with income and race.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:18 AM
1

Prison* I wonder what the statistic would be if it included both jail and prison sentences.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 09:16 AM
1

But her viewing audience is most certainly largely heterosexual women.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 09:22 AM
2

And SRS will pick this one up and pass it around even though it gets downvoted like crazy. Thanks trolls!
/r/MensRights15/12/13 09:21 AM
1

I heard a person day Porn was "degrading to women." As if there aren't make actors.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:39 PM
1

Rewording sexism doesn't change what it is
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:38 PM
3

A discount for male travelers would surely attract them. After all they won't be using the "woman floor" of the hotel.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:37 PM
2

When it benefits women it's "smart business." Anything else is sexism.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:36 PM
1

I ask people not to call me that. It's like saying "be a typical housewife and do x." Except for guys.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:33 PM
2

There's more that can be done to help a war effort than being at the front lines. If we're to keep the SS system, women, if not required to fight on the front lines, should at least have to give some sorry of auxiliary or financial support to the war. They could be required to take on wage garnishments or something in lieu of actual military service. The point is there's more to war than soldiers, yet the US acts as if men are the only ones who should suffer from war.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:24 PM
2

Yeah I think the modern definition of patriarchy has more to do with misogyny than actually giving women a disadvantage. However, a lot of feminists are confused by this and think that an action done for misogynistic reasons must leave women add victims. Selective Service is a prime refutation, but I've had people tell me that women are the "real victim" of selective service because it is based on misogyny.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:21 PM
2

Check your privilege shitlord.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:14 PM
2

It's interesting that after living the life of a man she had to be hospitalized for depression.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 06:11 PM
1

And now that expensive steak/wine on one part wasn't such a good idea ;)
/r/MensRights11/12/13 04:58 AM
1

Yes. Men should pay even though in 147/150 cities in the United States young (dating age) men are earning as much as 20% less.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 04:57 AM
1

True.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 08:30 PM
33

Saying/typing "yes" would not be considered consent. In reality it appears that consent from a woman can never be given, it just depends on whether she decides afterwards that she regrets her decision. "Consent" means that she doesn't regret the decision, so it's impossible to obtain beforehand in the eyes of the law.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 03:04 AM
6

What are you even doing here? And as for reddit hating people, go post somewhere that some rape victims deserved it and see what they have to say. Sick fuck.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 09:54 PM
11

You are an awful person. Suggesting that someone deserves to be raped is probably one of the most disgusting things I've read here. You're just the worst kind of person.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 09:53 PM
0

Yes. The Press, which somewhat reflects the attitudes of society, clearly shows a love for female sexuality and a condemnation of heterosexual male sexuality. Google search "LuLu" and look at the media's response compared to this. Could you even imagine a major news source calling a group of women "perverts?" Sheesh.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 06:50 AM
1

It's not women, it's society. That sounds cliche, I know. But a quick Google search for one site or the other clearly shows that one is way more accepted by the supposed Patriarchy. A big logical fallacy both of MRAs and feminists is that it is one gender against the other or something. That's just not true. It's typically societal values against certain genders, not genders on genders.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 06:48 AM
2

This is very true. To me, rating people on such a systematic scale is very degrading and makes the people rating assholes. But that doesn't make them perverts.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 06:44 AM
3

When feminists refuse to acknowledge the most radical of their group (such as these sickos) or condemn them, they allow the discrimination and abuse to continue. If I posted a thread here called "Kill All Women" it would be widely condemned. Feminists typically just ignore stuff like that, though. They don't acknowledge the crazies out there who want organized male genocide and such nonsense. Any MRA will tell you that there are sexist men out there.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 08:44 PM
2

Did you even read the link? These are real people...
/r/MensRights21/11/13 06:52 AM
8

No MRA would say "Happy Kill All Men Day as one of these comments read. You're delusional if you think MRA's want literal genocide like these women.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 06:51 AM
2

Exactly. The victory was that women are well-represented in a field. It was Pyrrhic because these women went on to be systematically discriminatory, turning public opinion against feminism.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 01:34 AM
11

Regarding your last sentence, this can be evidenced by the continued push for increasing women's education in places like the United States, where women consistently outperform men and have higher graduation rates and college attendance. A 50% split isn't equality in their eyes. They essentially just keep pushing for more and more privilege for women. If that passes the "equality" threshold, they just keep pushing out of habit or some misguided sense of justice.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 01:31 AM
21

It's like when educators are "worried" that young boys' test scores are merely catching up to those of their female classmates. God forbid the gap close.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 01:23 AM
2

Squirrels are banned from leaving the school during lunch now!
/r/MensRights16/10/13 07:54 PM
4

But it's not exclusive to men. And if you say they're generally men, they're also generally extremist. You can draw the line wherever you want. And besides, these are boys, not ideologically-insane adults.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 04:33 AM
35

Most bombers are also religiously motivated. Better eliminate everyone following a religion, then. Yeah. You, Hitler, and the Far Right all agree. EDIT: Oh yeah. Bombers are also typically human. Better eliminate those too.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:39 PM
10

Or somehow, because it's male on male, it doesn't count. Like we're on Gender Teams and life is one big game of "who has it worse?"
/r/MensRights11/10/13 10:18 AM
4

I don't doubt this statistic, but could you give us a source? It'd be very helpful.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 10:17 AM
1

Just look at this subreddit's recent postings. We practically have daily submissions showing female teachers/bosses raping and having very light sentences.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 05:09 AM
0

It's the same in the United States. The crime of "rape" is defined by unwanted penetration. Women are charged with "sexual assault," with the associated weaker sentencing.
/r/MensRights07/10/13 12:44 AM
1

When questioned, individual feminists might tell you they agree that men have gender issues too, but in practice little is done to address them. When was the last time feminists marched to end the Draft? Or let men wear skirts?
/r/MensRights27/09/13 11:06 PM
1

The fact that some feminists fight for state sponsored contraception before they fight against the all-male draft shows their real priorities.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 03:13 PM
-1

When I turned 18, in order to vote, I had to sign up for the Draft. I'm American.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:03 AM
2

That's hilarious.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 04:42 PM
19

Statistics also don't apply to every circumstance. Let strong people lift. Not "statistically strong as a class of humans" lift.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 05:31 PM
7

In the 1800's women were oppressed so she has every right to stab OP's acquaintance with a broken bottle. #justice
/r/MensRights05/09/13 01:53 AM
3

Male employee is clueless and was hired based on gender.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 06:05 AM
1

I want equal pay as you, but you should still be the provider or you're a deadbeat. I'm just as strong as you, but I still want you to open doors for me and take care of anything close to a menial task.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 04:59 PM
1

I certainly did. I'll be sure to contact my nearest disabled veteran female Asian small business owner to let them know they can have an endless supply of government contracts and money.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 03:43 PM
3

A highschool (feminist) teacher of mine once tried to shock the students by telling them that women had to wear skirts or dresses (no pants) to school even into the 70s. Obviously it hasn't even crossed her mind that it was the 21st century and men still had to wear only pants and no skirts/dresses. The fact that the double standard is never even considered just goes to prove the idea of "disposable males."
/r/MensRights19/07/13 03:39 PM
48

They don't want to focus on actual discrimination in many non-western nations because that would make obvious the fact that they have accomplished and exceeded equality in the west.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 03:29 PM
0

That's it! The next poster will show a woman with a horribly infected and deformed sex organ. Maybe she's missing some teeth, too. The man is a quadruple amputee and screaming.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 01:13 AM
12

He can't even go to a local college because of ridicule. He might have brought it on himself, but he's a child. She was supposed to be the adult here and take care of the situation instead of allegedly having sex with him and abusing it.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 09:04 PM
1

I'm just glad that many women I know don't really realize the extent of the authority their gender has in their ability to basically temporarily detain any male.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 06:15 AM
3

It's insane to think that men live in a world where half of the people around them can at any time have them shipped off to a jail and probably lose significant amounts of money on a whim and a little lie with likely no repercussions upon discovery of said lie.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 03:37 AM
2

Yes, and women are statistically more focused by the same token. Are they, then, expected to help me out with anything that requires focus? Are they held to a higher performance standard in any intelligent fields? Also, it's perfectly acceptable to say that strong people should help out weaker ones, but that statement is not identical to saying men are obliged to protect women.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 11:22 AM
1

A penis does not make me any more valuable in a combat situation. Think about what you are saying. Assuming that my sex organs somehow give me the responsibility to put myself in danger for others with different organs is seriously screwed up. Sure, people should have helped, but it's not based on gender, it's based on humanity. The guilt felt by each individual on that subway for not helping out should not depend on what organ they have in their pants.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:23 AM
1

One of the commenters even used the word "women" as a derogatory towards the men involved. What a twisted person who can insult men and women both in one comment.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:19 AM
1

I know at my workplace our clients always treat me as the one in charge or the more knowledgeable one when I'm with a female coworker, solely on the basis that I'm a man. Questions are directed at me, etc., and if I was a female coworker of mine I would be very insulted. I'm astounded when speaking to female friends of mine that they aren't constantly insulted by the way people assume they're unable to do certain tasks.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:14 AM
4

The amount of double standards that are justified by this extremely supportive mentality surrounding women is astounding. Just look at the difference between a woman staying single and a man. On the one hand, she's called independent. On the other, he's called a bum, deadbeat, or man-child. It's like it's only okay to pursue your own individuality if you're a female. Men are just there to fulfill the roles expected of them to fit into each woman's world.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 04:38 AM
1

What you're saying is, "separate but equal." As if that ever worked.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 08:30 PM
5

I know what you mean! Homosexuals don't have to worry about all the gender inequality issues between the two partners in a relationship. I mean, they definitely have other inequality issues to deal with, but not amongst one another. And it's more or less socially acceptable for a homosexual to get outraged at orientation discrimination, but this is definitely not the case for being upset over men being treated wrongly based on gender.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 02:07 AM
7

Yes. Men are sent off to foreign lands against their will and are killed, tortured, or at the least have issues for the rest of their life and an interrupted career path, but women are still the victim.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 07:25 AM
5

My high school had one of these, and the guys who weren't on the list were all visibly affected by it the day the lists came out. Of course, they had to play it off like it was no big deal because that's what they're expected to do. Meanwhile, the girls felt perfectly acceptable just openly crying about it and making Facebook statuses about "everyone is beautiful."
/r/MensRights09/05/13 09:47 PM
3

Only these "rejected" girls are constantly bombarded with advertisement and support telling them that they're beautiful no matter what. Boys, on the other hand, have no such support network. The rejected boys are just told to silently deal with esteem issues by themselves without showing that anything's wrong, because that wouldn't be "manly."
/r/MensRights09/05/13 09:44 PM
8

This is absolutely true. I've almost never heard anyone in the modern day west seriously advocate that women obey traditional gender expectations, but telling a male to "man up" is not only acceptable but often encouraged. I just bristle every time I hear the phrase, "be a man," especially when coming from a woman, who receives no real pressure from society to conform to any gender expectations, yet imposes the same archaic gender roles on men. I'm certainly not opposed to the freedom women have…
/r/MensRights06/05/13 05:23 AM
13

I know exactly what you mean. Whenever a woman goes noticeably outside her "gender role," all I hear are comments akin to, "you go girl!" and the like. There's endless support for women being able to do whatever they want with their life, wear whatever clothes they want, etc. but the moment a man decides to sing or dance he's met with ridicule. I just can't stand the complete lack of support for men to independent and be themselves when there is such massive support for independent women.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 04:38 AM
7

In my experience most US women just flat-out expect men to do most of the work in creating a relationship, whether that means settling for lower expectations, paying for everything, or initiating all dates and meetups. Men are demonized for simply daring to want an equal relationship.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:03 AM
1

Yes. The hospital for my (admittedly, Midwestern) county is at some like 100 women and 2 men as nurses. There are probably just about as many or more female doctors as male, too.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 03:43 PM
2

I always hate how casualty listings during war are "x casualties including X WOMEN AND CHILDREN. I understand it's terrible to kill anyone, but there's always extra demonizing of the aggressor if the individuals killed were women or children instead of only "expendable" men. My take on the situation is that children should probably be treated with respect to their age and development. A child has a legitimate claim on needing special treatment because of their "condition." Women have no excuse t…
/r/MensRights17/03/13 01:30 AM
2

Could you imagine the uproar if the writer was a male complaining about the lack of sex from his spouse? He'd probably be labelled a rapist for suggesting that his partner have sex when she's not in the mood.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 05:46 AM
5

This is hopefully more than a "rage post." This way of thinking is widespread and seemingly accepted: that pedophilia is strictly a male disorder. What are quick ways to shoot down this bogus logic? (statistics, etc.)
/r/MensRights07/03/13 12:01 AM
2

you forgot deadbeats and pedophiles.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 11:52 PM
4

Yeah like that'll happen. If a she doesn't want jail time, she can just call "rape" and he'll suffer for the next few decades. If a man did this to his ex, he'd be labelled as literally psycho, and would be in for a restraining order or worse.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 07:43 PM
1

stayed behind. and subsequently died. That's why it's wrong when people say that "ladies first," is a trivial custom that's not worth getting riled up about.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 02:37 AM
2

Seriously. The single most sensitive part of a natural man's body is literally cut off at birth. One of the first things a baby boy experiences after coming out of the womb is probably the most painful moment of his entire life. There is absolutely no way that that doesn't do psychological damage.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 02:31 AM
8

Number 4 is just glaringly hypocritical. How can it not even respond to obvious question of, "if he can't spy on you, why are you literally in the process of spying on him?"
/r/MensRights12/02/13 02:23 AM
3

Yeah. Then she can give a jury one look at that bruise and now you're the rapist.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 01:01 AM
1

"...small situations" is a poor choice of words here. For example, when the Titanic sunk, "ladies first," cost literally hundreds of men their lives.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 04:59 AM
1

Unfortunately, in practice most feminists differ. People (in general, women) don't like being called out for bigotry when they throw around Victorian-era practices like "Ladies First."
/r/MensRights10/02/13 04:56 AM
8

Yeah, clearly removing people's organs against their will is non-violent.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 04:51 AM
3

So you're saying that bringing attention to the widespread systematic genital mutilation of males is being a "pathetic little whiner"? That's pathetic.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 04:16 AM
8

According to current estimates, we'll soon be hearing that 150% of women will be raped in their lifetime. If the progression continues.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 04:32 AM
3

God forbid you finally get it through a woman's head that you aren't a predatory rapist monster. Then you're assumed to be gay.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 02:03 AM
9

Often a substantial amount of money put toward a war effort in lieu of service is more effective than a single additional soldier being put onto the battlefield. It's a nasty truth, but a truth nonetheless. i.e. a fine.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 04:39 AM
1

"Feminism," isn't about equality for women any more, it's about superiority and, more importantly, making up women's "issues" in order to convince women that feminist organizations are still needed and should continue to exist. If they were for equality, they would be called "humanists," or something similar.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 11:04 PM
41

My personal views are that no person should be coerced into the military. That said, if we are to have a draft at all, it needs to be universal and not gender-specific. Imagine the reaction if this was a matter of specific races being drafted.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 11:01 PM
2

Just imagine if there was something like this for rating women. The femo-supremecists would go ballistic.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:58 AM
1

If a male doesn't reciprocate a woman's affections, he's called a jerk. That's what would happen.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 02:08 AM
1

Bingo.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 02:05 AM
1

I cannot agree with this comment more. This outlines EXACTLY what the current issues with gender roles are.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 03:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter