TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jazzeki Archive

View 0 posts and 1,530 comments by Jazzeki on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,530 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

right time to unsubscribe this is downright fucking embaresing. what in the holy hell is wrong with you people? it is a sub about legal advice the guy ask what his legal options are for hitting his girlfriend assualting his neighboor and stealing his phone. guess fucking what there aren't alot for those. maybe if he had asked about his legal options regarding haveing an abusive girlfriend but let's fucking face reality (as so many people here claim they are so good at) the main one is leaveing t…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 08:01 AM
1

a man has just spent 21 years in prison for a crime he didn't commit. but 21 years ago he did comit it. acording to you at least. and you call me delusional...
/r/MensRights19/12/16 07:14 AM
1

you do realise facts don't change over time? if it was a fact that he was a rapist then he's still factually a rapist. so please stop useing the word fact because it certainly doesn't mean what you think it means.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:36 AM
2

Well when a court rejects it, I consider it to be a decision dependable enough to be considered fact. so when the courts decalred years ago that this man DID in fact rape her that was fact? or is it only fact when the courts make a judgement you happen tyo agree with? What if the jury considered him to be guilty of rape, is the court decision only considered a fact then? acording to you it certainly would be then. fact is what the court says not reality. fuck that nonsense. it has not been in an…
/r/MensRights18/12/16 04:05 PM
2

Juries don't "believe", they evaluate evidence and make findings based on that evidence. if they don't "belive" then what? they "know"? talk about "magic truth tests" I stand by my contempt for the "justice" system. that's fair. but you're not exactly giveing a better altnative. and don't go around hateing the system whille saying what the system should have done. if you want to change the system work on that. don't falsely claim it should already work as you want it to. Almost. I think the poli…
/r/MensRights24/11/16 11:51 AM
6

She was older than him, and he was a virgin, so perhaps better said she had sex with him? i don't buy this shit when idiot selfproclaimed feminist suggest sex is something men do to women nor do i buy this bullshit perversion of it. they had sex with each other. the point the guy you're responding to was makeing was that he despite his claims otherwise did in fact have sex with her. just like she had with him. That's not how the law works. well... yes it is... how do you thin It's supposed to be…
/r/MensRights24/11/16 01:08 AM
-2

Being an adult means accepting the decisions and choices you made. i can't help but shake my head at how often this argument is repeated around here not seeing the irony of the men paroting refuseing to take responsibility for the decisions and choices they made. a lot is wrong with the current system i agree. but i guess men could just accept the results of the choices right? if you didn't go MgtOW it's entirely on you if the system screwed you over i guess.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 10:30 PM
6

are you saying women should stay in unhappy marriages? thereøs abseloutly a lot wrong with the law in these cases but to hear it from this BS you'd think this is choices women make with no input from men. what about the consequnces of the choices the men made?
/r/MensRights29/10/16 10:24 PM
2

It's not a favor and sacrifice she's doing out of altruism. it's also not her sole choice but the choice of the couple. don't act like the man is working to provide for them as some kind of alturism either.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 10:21 PM
1

thanks for confirming my suspecion that you are just a bad troll. congratulations on keeping me guessing for this long.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 07:54 PM
3

Basically it comes down to a huge and fundamental misunderstanding of feminism he said whille actively afirming everything i belived and understof about feminism. you're a joke. my only problem is telling if you are so intentionally.
/r/MensRights18/10/16 12:52 PM
2

how many people you know go to the zoo to engage in debates with the animals? do you consider them sane when they discuss philosophy with the lions?
/r/MensRights18/10/16 12:51 PM
2

I find it very telling that in none of the responses have been: "how is that a lie?". when you refuse to engage us you can't then complain that we aren't intrested in engaeing you. nobody cares to ask you that question because if you were a sane person you would have included any reply to that question you might have when you orginaly "called bullshit". but at least you admit you're merely baiting. My credentials have been put forward on this sub before and openly mocked. i haven't seen them nor…
/r/MensRights18/10/16 12:49 PM
3

You're always going to need plumbers, electricians, HVAC guys, road maintenance men ... well untill we can have robots to do that for us... then we just need a few guys to maintain and run those robots(far less than we would need actually doing the jobs). but that's a situation for the future to deal with.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 06:17 PM
36

okay you're right. if you make the kind of post you made in response to a post as retarded as you own it would fly. just going in being a retard doesn't. you didn't add anything to the conversation. the downvotes were justified. you didn't even atempt to break the jerk because doing that involves actually brining up a counter point or a different perspective. the fact that you think your comment is better than Men are all rapists and sexist pigs, blah blah blah other made up self affirming words…
/r/MensRights17/10/16 06:14 PM
2

first of but you also shouldnt expect the world to cater to you, and whille this is true IDEALLY yes they should do that. however it's a lot harder to ensure every single student has an enviroment that suits them. so as a start makeing sure the majority has a suiting enviroment is a step in the right direction. even if that means sadly the non-competitive boy is left worse of for the benefit of 10 competitive boys.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 03:18 PM
6

i seriously can not tell if that comment is sarcastic or serious.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 04:45 PM
1

in these times of digital hook-ups and later partnerships, not everyone keeps a black book of their sexual partners (nor probably ever did). well maybe women should learn to be responsible then? is it really that hard to keep track of who the farther of a chiuld might be? is the good of the child enough to ensure it has a parent not worthy anymore? i thought it was a childs undeniable RIGHT to have 2 parents support it but i guess that doesn't count when it's moms responsibility to rember who th…
/r/MensRights02/09/16 05:46 PM
16

you say that like they aren't just another extreme under the massive SJW umbrela.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 05:01 PM
5

This is a case of police abuse, not a false accusation. police abuse as a result of a false accusation. i agree that the actions of the police in this story is far more important but the treatment of a man in his own home is still entirely relevant and a problem worth talking about. this is not about hateing women for ruining mens lives or anything. if you want to get your woman hateing boner on you should find another place because this is about the injustice this man faced in part because of h…
/r/MensRights16/08/16 11:16 PM
2

sure. and it doesn't make a me a bad feminist either if i want my wife barefoot pregnant and ignorant in the kitchen. i just have preferences affected by society and i'm not responsible for the problems that made me this way. i'm a good feminist who despite wanting to oppress women because it's not my fault.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 07:15 PM
2

isn't it kind of insane that aparently "teach men not to rape" has suddenly become the less insane bullshit feminist say? no seriously feminist how about we "teach muslims not to rape" huh?
/r/MensRights06/07/16 06:47 AM
3

What the court did say was that his inability to consent doesn't mean anything when it comes to child support. the justice system should never ever attempt to right a wrong by adding another wrong. again i agree that the child has rights. including the right to be cared for. however you can not saddel that obligation on people randomly. it is not the kids fault that child was born so he can not reasonably be held responsible for the child. it would have been as reasonable to point at any othe ra…
/r/MensRights19/06/16 11:52 AM
20

intresting. so the court in fact held that 15 year old kinda can consent to sex? oh and if you don't imedietly complain and do everything in your power to fight it is not rape... what a disgusting verdict. as for the kid how about we force the fucking rapists to put the child up for adoption? there welfare of child considered and secured.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 07:10 AM
1

Just as bad as changing Johny Storm to a black man. no it's not as bad. you can argue it's bad sure but this one was especially bad because another of the main cast is his sister who wasn't black.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 06:40 AM
3

i'm pretty sure that's one of those evil feminazi rethorical devices. are you sure you're not a feminazi? you read like one.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 10:04 AM
1

yet so many people think raping rapists is deplorable, yet killing killers is a okay. i'm sorry but this an abseloute bullshit of an argument. for the record i'm firmly against the death penalty however i do understand the purpose of it. it is a final option in the case of people deemed iredemable. it should never be about inflicting on them what they inflicted on others and anyone who supports death sentence because of that are monsters. rapeing a rapists helps no one. it is sick.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 10:01 AM
134

because these people litteraly belive that the average 13 year old boy is multiple times more capable and responsible than the average adult woman.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 03:18 PM
1

For saying that young men and women need male role-models and teachers. i downvoted you for writeing this tribe. either you belive this in which case you can't possibly have anything worthwhille to add to the conversation as paranoid as you are or you don't and ithis is feeding the troll. either way this is dumb.
/r/MensRights07/05/16 10:16 PM
1

there is one way you don't "need prison". however that's only in case of crazy people who need psychiatric help and be locked up in a care facility on indefinate time. this however is absurd.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 01:56 PM
1

"us vs. them" is a horrible idea though so maybe drop that one before you further make a mockery of the potentially good ideas you support.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 11:49 AM
4

incorrect. only if it's used as an argument for WHY you are stupid. they didn't argue to prove you are stupid. no one is argueing with you. however since you like fallacies let me present you both of yours: the strawman and the fallacy fallacy.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 10:00 AM
3

so then why does the 16 year old initiating sex with them get a free pass? because the law has nothing what so ever to do with initiating. please find me a law on the subject that says anything about initiating.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 09:56 AM
4

to do justice what is the justice here? i mean you're person saying "the law is the law" as if that justifies what happens with no regards to what happens good or evil yet here you claim that the reason the law exists at all is to ensure JUSTICE for people considered sexually incapable... by punishing people considered sexualy incapable. if you are not a troll i have no idea how you can come to the contradictory conclusion except for the obvious possibility that you refuse to think.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 09:52 AM
19

what? higher personal risk means less responsibility? WHAT!?!?! next theire going to rule thatdriving drunk is legal because the one at the highest risk would be the fucking driver i guess.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 09:05 AM
1

I guess they need the gentleman's club too? certainly couldn't hurt. and even if they happen to live in the perfect nuclear family i don't see any harm either. but the sad fact is that some people are born with less oppertunities. you comeing here and questioning if giving people better oppertunities is a good thing honestly makes you seem dumb and makes me seriously question your motives behind doing something like that. But, isn't that just forcing binaries on them men and women are different.…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:06 PM
2

the question is: is women less than men and thus need a full human being to hold the door for them(unlikely given the phraseing) or is her son a sub-human? either way i don't think they get to teach others of common decency.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 12:33 PM
0

not only is is it sexists it actually managed to be sexists towards both men and women. i mean first there's the idea that men can't be victims aparently that's implied by it then it's further implied that only male bystanders actually have the ability to intervene in any way thus suggesting that women are incapable children that need the protection of men. THIS is patriachy. whoever printed that thing and put it up is a firm supporter of reestablishing "the good old days".
/r/MensRights12/02/16 06:47 PM
4

well they are not exactly wrong... now let's see huffpo post a list of lessons that your daugther's future spouse will thank you for: women are objects... edit: i honestly kinda regret writing this... mainly because it suggest 2 things that are blatantly false that all or even most guys would would want a woman who consider herself an object to be owned by men. very few horrible people want that. that the article was right the other way around that women want a guy who consider himself inferior …
/r/MensRights07/02/16 01:27 PM
6

isn't it just hillarious when these people who insists we will never understand their lived experiences as women think they get to speak for men and how easy it is to be man when they then go on to prove they don't get men what so ever? they are right. i'll never be able to live their experiences. but then again neither will other women... and i'm more likely to ascribe the shit they experience to their personality than their gender
/r/MensRights06/02/16 11:35 AM
6

it is untill the people who fought to make this a reality fight to enforce the same quotas on the less desirable jobs like garbage collecting as well as enfocing it on jobs primarily for women. i'll be happy to shut up when every single daycare has positions that are open only to men.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 07:05 PM
4

sorry yeah i should have been clearer. if your argument is simply that you didn't understand what you were signing however you're going to have a bad time however. ignorance of what you signed isn't a defence. if the actual argument is that he somehow lied intentionaly or otherwise to get her to sign again i'll be happy to take her side. but as presented this just sounds like a "this isn't fair because it's not what i wanted and therefor it shouldn't count because i didn't actually agree with it…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 07:02 PM
55

"has hidden bank accounts" and that "he was hiding money and assets" well feel free to show this and i'll happily stand by your side and say that you should have a piece of the cake. AFTER you show this to be true. and that, "she (my stepmother) didn't really understand or know what she was signing" try saying that to a judge... a contract is a contract even if you didn't understand it. that just ment you should not sign it. She says my father, " Owes it to her" ask her what she owes him... if i…
/r/MensRights31/01/16 04:23 PM
3

can you actually fucking read? he said as he selectivily read only the parts he wanted to read even ignoreing part of the same sentence... is accused of harassing David de Freitas for just under a year with letters, email and YouTube videos He also uploaded voice recordings to YouTube, Vimeo and Liveleaks and maintained a website about the allegations against him. he's being prosecuted for both... exactly as the orginal post said. now the question is did you not comprehend the basic information …
/r/MensRights30/01/16 12:07 AM
1

you're the kind of guy who punches your friend in the face and goes "it's a PRANK BRO" right?
/r/MensRights23/01/16 05:09 AM
15

sooo.... a man attacking a woman is litterally the same as attacking a child... i wonder how that comparison came to be... i'm expecting the feminists to be here any second now.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 10:08 AM
3

no the guy was a teenager. exactly the kind of idiocy i expect from any teen. but that doesn't mean he should be punished like this for it. he too is an innocent party. how it even got to the point that his rapists has his child is appaling to me. she should be alowed at best to decide to abort or not since i do in fact belive in her body her choice followed by if the child is born any and all choices falling with him. he want the child to be adopted. bye bye responsibility (and ofcourse alow he…
/r/MensRights12/01/16 08:31 AM
1

of course i do... you don't? you enjoy seeing people lying during a divorce? you enjoy seeing dishonest assholes succed?
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:04 PM
13

so those are your values huh?...(not you but the ashole rep you quoted) what are your values about leaving said "real american hero" in the dust after you've fucked him? maybe you should advocate that brtsitol should be barefoot in the guys kitchen since that's aparently your "values"? actually what does you "values" say about honoring these "real american heroes" since you seem to be happy to slam them?
/r/MensRights08/01/16 10:39 AM
34

they're paladins. just because the force is a real thing doesn't mean jedis aren't centered around their faith. it's also the only of all these classes that has an anti-version that can work as the sith.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 11:03 PM
3

you'll find that almost all of them translate to "don't be a woman." let's say i accept that. i also find that it's mainly women who says this. therefor i can conclude that thinking being a woman is bad is mainly a thing women do. misginy is therefor mainly done by women. there happy we concluded it's all womens fault.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 02:40 PM
2

allright i'll give you that... it's not even close to being a great choice even for the few people it would actually benefit.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 04:37 PM
8

vaccinating later doesn't work. circumscion later does work. it's only the same if you admit that the reasoning behind it isn't the effect.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 04:18 PM
7

allright it has equal benefits with teaching proper hygine. so it really is a great choice for those people too stupid to clean themself.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 04:15 PM
6

see just to go a tiny bit against the grain i'll add my own experiences that very much don't show this (or at least not the same version of this). see my mom got majpority custody of me because my dad didn't feel he could provide a stable home for me. it's not that he wasn't there for me but he couldn't have me around every other week. my mom not being happy that he couldn't comit decided that if he wasn't going to do it shared then he was going to do it her way. that ment no every other weekend…
/r/MensRights24/12/15 07:47 AM
2

honestly no reason to be combatative like the guy was however unjustified it is. just do as asked and leave and kindly ask if they would inform the friend that since they asked him to her ride will leave in 5 minutes.
/r/MensRights19/12/15 04:13 AM
0

are you one of those safe space, kill free speech college grads? he said trying to curb speech he didn't like...
/r/MensRights19/12/15 04:08 AM
1

No. I've said no before because I found someone not my preferred gender, and because I've found someone too fat. so if someone is hot enough it's just impossible to say no.... You're saying 18 year old adults have no responsibility for themselves and their future? let me quote myself if the teacher comes on to the students it's the students job to report the teacher. ofcourse they have a responsibility for themself. now you on the other hand is saying that teachers don't have any responsibility …
/r/MensRights14/12/15 11:13 AM
1

Person A who teaches a class gets involved with a random 18 year old they met on the street. Not called grooming. that could easily be grooming as well. neither of your examples gives anywhere near enough information to claim it either is or isn't grooming though. Apparently, you've never seen Roosh, been to a bar, or heard men OR WOMEN complain they haven't gotten laid recently. what is roosh, no i haven't and actually suprisingly i haven't no... but i guess that's mainly chance. what's your po…
/r/MensRights14/12/15 02:34 AM
8

what is your problem with the idea that people in positions of power have a responsibility in how they act? the cynical side in me says because you hate responsibility and hope to see yourself with such power in hand but i'd hope you could give me a better answer. P.S. stop talking about topics you have no ideas about. it makes you look fucking retarded. because that's not what grooming means. P.P.S. you seem to have an unhealthy fixation with having sex.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 01:55 AM
11

He very well could be a drug addicted crazed lunatic. sure. and the mother could be baby murdering maniac. why did she get the kid aagain? i mean obviosuly we should asume the childs life is in actual danger!!! I'm not saying he is, no you're just suggesting it and hideing behind "maybe" but judges usually have a good reason for doing this. sure. but no judge is involved in any part of this story. maybe you should spend more time reading the facts we have rather than conjure up your own? I'm don…
/r/MensRights24/11/15 11:50 PM
4

i'm sorry to hear you're too emotinally stunted to understand empathy but that doesn't make you somehow right.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 09:17 PM
36

“I was in a rage. He was a total fuckboy about consent,” she said. actually you're the one arguning against his right to withdraw his consent to a date. what do you have against consent huh?
/r/MensRights25/10/15 09:08 PM
1

oh i agree that alimoney rules need a serious overhaul. and yes there is a divorce problem. i just dislike the argument he presents because as i said i feel like it could just as easily be used in favour of alimoney as it could against it. also i do belive there are legitemate alimoney cases.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 09:59 PM
1

Why the heck is it that it's the person who worked the hardest who needs to be punished so that the person who was on easy lane could stay on easy lane? let me ask you a question as a response: Was someone holding a gun to their head and telling them what life choices to make? these a choices made as a couple. therefor both partners are equally responsible for both the good and the bad outcomes to themself personally.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 09:16 PM
1

that people would conduct themselves differently while they were actually in the relationship? the current climate doesn't stop men from having wives who don't work... are you saying it's their own fault? or is it "different" when men don't cover their bases? why is it exactly that men shouldn't have to safeguard your career as a backstop but it's okay to turn the tabels and make women do it? i mean if it's that simple i'd argue your argument is in favour of not changing anything... i mean men c…
/r/MensRights13/10/15 09:14 PM
1

i'm already not buying this rethoric from feminists... what makes you think i'll buy it from you?
/r/MensRights11/10/15 06:13 PM
2

that's actually kinda my point. that won't change untill those young women begin to understand what it's like being the guy at the end of that. playing "who's the bigger victim" doesn't help.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:36 PM
1

Also, I wonder how women and girls would react if someone said "The position of young boys and men is such at the moment that unless young girls understand what it's like to be a young man then you won't get them to change their behaviour" ... ? can't say anything about what this woman would say and can't say i would be suprised if the idea would offend her. that said i actually think that would be a pretty decent statement assuming we aply it to both genders. let's be fair: empathy is not a bad…
/r/MensRights11/10/15 12:30 AM
9

you want some intellectual discussion fair enough. he got 1.1 million. over half of that has allready been spent in HER name. NOT the kids. HER. it seems clear to me thgat she allready took the childrens part of the money and then some. too bad she squandered them. but oh wait she has a vagina can't hold her responsible for her actions. IF this was about taking a portion of the 1.1 million to care for her children... maybe. but it's fucking not. if it was seek child support. she is seeking to ta…
/r/MensRights21/09/15 08:55 PM
12

she should be free to go live her own life. for her own money.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 08:45 PM
6

i guess this many people speending this long in school can't be wrong then? or do they have to agree with you before they count?
/r/MensRights14/09/15 07:46 AM
3

This in combination with my religious views, I don't view it as genital mutilation do you buy that excuse when it's about FGM? because the women who cut their daugthers clitoris off don't view it as mutilation either.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 07:45 AM
2

i find this facinating. every time this idea is brought up people who are circumcised and doesn't have a problem with that fact get their arms up about the idea that people against circumsicion aparently want them to hate their penis. but then you find people who don't liuke what happened to them conclude they hate their penis and what was before the worst possile crime against you aparently uis worth pointing fingers and laughing at... just because it's not you it's happening to. it' really is …
/r/MensRights14/09/15 07:44 AM
6

and if you don't tolerate her antisocial behaviour, you're just an immature man-child who shouldn't be in a relationship." but good forbid you take this to mean you should leave the relationship...
/r/MensRights13/09/15 04:23 PM
2

it might be bad law but not on the judges acount as the titel here makes it sound like. if you feel the law is unjust or wrong i am with you but that doesn't mean the judge is to blame for carrying the law as it is currently written. it's not his job to challenge the law.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 07:00 AM
4

fuck this particular case even majorly editorialised this shit by intentionally leaveing out shit. notice how it was her relationship with her second husband which caused these offences, became it was her second husband which caused these offences, as if the 3 removed words doesn't even mean anything. for shame OP.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:40 PM
1

I was talking about factors that do not involve the involuntary involvement of another individual. you said it is easy to just look away. i say it's easy to just not listen to the music. learn to not be distracted by noise.
/r/MensRights22/08/15 08:40 AM
1

Ok, let's say I accept your premise that statistically women dressing "below the dress code" harms grades of boys. Ok, let's say that your strawman argument is valid. i gave a multitude of reasons. that was NOT one of them. Therefore only women are being required to change behavior. are you seriously claiming that there is no dress code for the boys? or are you claiming that only boys have the mental capacity to follow rules? Let's be honest. Many many things that adult women wear wouldnt pass a…
/r/MensRights22/08/15 08:39 AM
1

And if the only reason they shouldnt be allowed to is some bullshit Victorian era sense of morality, so if we ignore reality you argument is sound? the rules exists. feel free to argue that that rules and bad and try to change them. don't argue that because you may not like the rules you get to break them. But school clothing is a choice and an unjustified one. no school is an enviroment in which young people are suposed to learn to adapt to the professional world by following simple rules. ther…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 11:10 PM
2

It can also literally drown out the sound of the teacher's voice during a lesson, which is why it shouldn't be allowed. are you saying it's ditracting? but The notion that one needs to suppress their individuality simply because someone might be offended, bothered, or distracted by it is misguided at best. i guess it really is different when it's you. hypocrit. we should just teach the students not to be distracted by noise obviously.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 11:05 PM
0

Women's clothing is definitely more revealing and sexy than men's. i'm sorry but where does this idea that it's impossible to control what kind of clothes you wear come from? womens clothes don't have pockets but that's not girls fault. girls clothesa are simply revealing and sexy but that's not girls fault. who the fuck is forcing women to wear these sexy impractical clothes against their will? who the fuck is forcing 7 year old girls to have boyshorts with "JUICY" on their butts?
/r/MensRights21/08/15 06:45 PM
-1

that was a very long reply that didn'øt at all even touch upon the question that was asked. it's almost as if you're deflecting because you can't back up the stupid claim you made.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 06:42 PM
-1

The notion that one needs to suppress their individuality simply because someone might be offended, bothered, or distracted by it is misguided at best. trust me: you do not belive this. you may think you do but you really fucking do not belive this. or maybe you really do in which case fuck you for suggesting it's okay to bring loud music into the classroom to "express yourself" because we can't let the fact that it's distracting stop that. fuck you for suggesting it's okay to beat minorities to…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 06:39 PM
4

this. this is what quotas achive. it means that where before some women could get in on merit now every woman who gets in no matter if its on merit or because of a quota... got in because of a quota. maybe the really didn't. but there's allways gonna be doubt. this is what feminism achived this round. maing sure nobody belives in competent women.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:17 AM
13

They don't want to create a situation where dad is rich and has all the cool stuff, big house, and mom is stuck in a shitty apartment in the bad side of town because child support only covers food and basic requirements. so if daddy is willing to move into a 20K a year aparenment the weekends the kids visit that's where child support should be rules from yes? i get the point and it's not exactly a bad point. it's just not reasonably enforced.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 03:19 PM
63

fuck that noise even if he made that much. take anyone in the world making enouygh money that it isn't a problem. now imagine they have custody of their kids. now imagine a court ordering them to spend at least $900,000 on them a year. would never happen. no chance i hell CPS would take a visit for child neglect if he decided to live in a $200,000 a year apartment with them. if this is about the childs righst we need to enfoce those rights in homes where both parents are still together.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 03:16 PM
7

i guess we have scientific evidence that you are a massive twat then.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 09:20 AM
15

I found them at the time without having to dig, I don’t care what “well received by the Reddit Community” means. so if we can find a quote by a feminist without having to "dig" for it we are free to accuse that to be the well recived openion of all feminists? gawker of all people should not be willing to have the worst of the people they have be who represent them.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 10:29 AM
-1

In court, if it is a debate of "consent" we are not in court. these are not the arguments for court. Since when did I call men rapists? I kept saying men are men, rapists are rapists. yes and all men who can make women regret sex is a rapists. as you said here: And anyone capable of putting a woman in that spot, is NOT due to "miscommunication of consent", as those men know full well what they are doing. since that infers miscommunication in sex leads to legal terms of rape that is punishable by…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:24 PM
-1

so we're going to ignore reality in favor of a semnatics argument? is that it? "Miscommunication of consent" must mean there was no consent? you may claim to hate feminists but you desperately cling to their definitions and their view of the world. as those men know full well what they are doing. you claim to think most men are harmless? then why are you calling them rapists? you can claim to belive whatever you want but i can actually read what you write and i'm more inclined to belive what you…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 10:52 AM
1

That any normal guy can just turn into a rapist. any more words you'd like to shove down his throat? he's exactly saying that these kind of miscomunications are LABELED as rape and that isn't right because these people aren't rapists. he's arguing that the feminists big atempt to make every uncomfotable situation involving sex into a rape does in fact label harmless men who care for womens well being as rapists. YOU'RE in fact the one here calling them rapists for doing that. the fact is there d…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 08:54 AM
11

i wonder how many condeming the idea of financial abortion is condemeing this? not what the mother did. that this entire concept is even a thing. something tells me few are willing to fight for what they claim to belive in this case.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 10:25 PM
1

i'd ask them why they don't just pay the women that works for them what they pay the men that works for them.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 06:16 PM
4

Equal rights, equal fights. i do not support violence against men i disagree with either in cases like this. violence solves nothing.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 03:02 PM
13

never heard to those being refered to as groups before... nor have i seen them stand on a corner in america and anti-gay picket.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 02:59 PM
1

as long as you are willing to pay it they will work with you, and you aren't willing to opay those 11K i'm demanding off you just because you seem to think this is unfair and you have allready explained that that means you are weak willed as well as now we can add socially handicapped. again this is life right? so just deal with it and pay those 11 K. or can't you deal with life? the goal post seems to be shifting quite a lot when you speak.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 08:09 PM
1

You do realize that most grown up adults in the world are way more than 11k in debt you do realise that this guy most likely allready had all that debt allready and this was an extra 11K... right? seriously prove this is nothing. pay 11 K as if it was nothing. put your money where your mouth is... or is real life too hard when you practice what you preach?
/r/MensRights05/06/15 05:58 PM
1

If humans have been doing it that way for hundreds of thousands of years without any serious problems, first of all you knowledge of history is hillariously off here. second to say it went of without serious problems is ignorant at best. I just wonder if describing every single such encounter as unconsentual is actually helpful. the law say the minor is unable to consent. how can there be consent when one party is unable to consent? First of all, if we're actually concerned about the victim the …
/r/MensRights05/06/15 04:37 PM
1

i think we can safely assume you're the one making bad decisions in life if you think oweing 11K is just "life". but then again you're not even man enough to handle it yourself. i thought you were super alpha but i see you are the same kind of weakling you accuse the man of being. for shame.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 04:33 PM
2

well since this aparently peanuts and you're such a manly man why don't you just donate the money? or are you too weak for that? you know what you got what you wanted. i'm taking you super seriously as a male. as human being not so much. but you are an impressive alpha baboon.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:39 PM
1

So at what precise time and age does a person become capable of making those decisions? it varries from person to person. heck it is entirely possible i'm being unfair and you happened to be perfectly capable to make that choice at 14. you would then be a massive exception. the law is too concrete to not have a distinct line. so we need a line and it's gonna be arbitary. if we say 14 is good enough way to many not ready people get's left behind. just as if we say 18 arguably we are to strict eve…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 08:59 PM
4

Unless I was genius level intelligence when I was 14 (which I doubt) I was more than capable of making my own decisions i think the more likely answer is that you as immature now as you was back then if you truely haven't changed. only a 14 year old think 14 year olds make capable decisions in life.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 10:43 AM
26

Make all sex into rape unless consent is given by some authority... Like a king perhaps. The sex king. naah her dad should be good enough untill the day she has a husband to take over.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 12:26 PM
5

i agree. that's why i want to become a teacher so i can gift all those lucky 15 year old girls with my dick. thanks for the support.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 11:21 AM
29

Third, when feminists say "You'll just lose your job and friends but you'll be cleared eventually. You'll be fine!" and suddenly i start to realise why these same people insists a rape victim can never get over it. sinister is right.
/r/MensRights02/06/15 01:06 PM
6

i think we should listen to her though. this SHOULD be the case that brings attention to what mothers can get away with.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 04:12 PM
32

well at least they have come to the point where they freely admit that the only reason it's bad is because men do it. and only when they do it.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 06:53 AM
1

I'm pretty sure I can positively prove I have not raped You. ofcourse you can. but doing so invalidates everything you have so far argued. i identify as i victim of rape by you. acording to you me saying i am victim of rape mean we should never question that statement. Back to Grace Dunham: What would the lawsuit be titled? what lawsuit? please quote me saying anything about a lawsuit. So who is the offended party? You? Or the State? You better be DAMN careful what You wish for if You say "ofc t…
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:18 PM
2

so you're saying that the wife of a man who beats her daily but begs the police to not jail him him because "it was a misunderstanding and really her own fault" is not abused? what am i asking ofcourse she's not abused just because she's hit daily! here's an idea. maybe the mary koss research is bad because it's definition of rape is bad? maybe you shouldn't support that if i say i am something i am. but let's put if you actually belive what you said to the test? i am victim of rape by Sanguifer…
/r/MensRights24/05/15 06:29 PM
2

If Grace Dunham is fine with it, that's their business, and should be end of story. i'm amazed... i thought rape culture was just a fabrication but here you come and prove me wrong.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 09:26 AM
6

was she 7 years old when she insisted what she did was harmless? if not i'm not seeing the erelevance honestly. she can't be forgiven if she refuses to seek forgivness.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 08:55 AM
7

I was actually told to sit down, shut up, and let the women speak for once. ofcourse you were. they were just finished telling the world your openion and then you dare prove them wrong by stateing you actual openion? how dare you not let them lie and defame you? i mean think about what you just did. you asked a woman to engae a discussion with a real person instead of their own made up strawmern. you asked a woman to THINK!!! how much more opresive can you get?
/r/MensRights20/05/15 07:56 AM
8

good luck sueing the police for following protocol. that'll work wonderfully for you i guess. there is evidence simply in a DV call. that's your probable cause right there.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 08:00 PM
17

mainly because the law likes easily enforceable rules rather than judgeing every single case on a case by case basis. arguably it should always be case by case but the system would fall apart if you can't have these general rules in place. wether a 16 year old is actually capable of giving informed consent is debateable. some 14 year olds can some 18 year olds can't. the line needs to be drawn somewhere and yes it's gonna be a slightly arbitary line.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 10:27 AM
28

in reality, the law says you are incorrect. in your openion the law doesn't count in reality but reality doesn't give a shit about your openion.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 10:24 AM
0

If you shape yourself into a valuable individual by mastering a skill that is in demand, you will have success. some people can do that if they get the proper support. thank god we have people like you stanbding in the way of that. wouldn't want those poors to steal your hard "earned" jobs would we? tell me again what is it they should "earn"? the skill or the ability to earn the skill? i have to ask what is it you belive in? most the time the argument here is that we belive in equality of opert…
/r/MensRights25/04/15 10:18 PM
72

obviously. the man should have contacted her dad/husband/boyfriend/brother/uncle or at the very least nearest male police officer. can't let women go around making choices they'll regret later.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 07:54 AM
2

a fair point. again i should have been much clearer. if the law belivea a child to capable of making a similar choice (my best example will always be tatoos) i think a child should be consider capable here. but there is truth to the idea that parents can force this and i didn't think it entirely trough.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 02:41 PM
1

fair enough i guess i'm simply used to a more free aproch to when children can make this choice. a more correct way to say what i ment would be a child at the age where the law would generally alow them to make similar choices with parental aproval. so yeah that same kid should have the option to for instance get a tatoo legally before i'd support it.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:43 PM
-13

honestly i could even support a lower age with both parental and the child itself supporting it. if a 13 year old can say ok to it i would honestly not consider them incapable to make that choice.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 10:38 AM
11

so just because i can't imagine the mind set: how does it feel to look at your son as a possesion rather than a person?
/r/MensRights21/04/15 10:34 AM
10

as she said herself: most women would have left him LONG ago. but not her. no she choose to get vindictive. she choose to "endure" so she could get back at him. what better possible foundation for getting married?
/r/MensRights15/04/15 05:18 PM
2

i see you find context hard. here's a hint: i'm mocking the stupidity of the response. Ok you got some fucked up views on sex buddy. You expect sudden monogamy and love at an orgy? funny you should react in this way to a satirical representation of the view you just defended... if someone wanna be 18th in line that's none of my buisness. but he's not getting sympathy from me the day after if he suddenly regrets it.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 06:30 PM
211

it makes me angry that nobody is considering how the guys felt the next day... can you imagine being 18th in line and yet still know you are not going to be the last she had that night? maybe she should have put a stop to it herself? but those 2 ideas would require you to belive 1. that men have feelings and 2. that women are adults. clearly foreign concepts to this adviceperson.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:58 PM
14

so basicly if this woman dfidn't want to raise a child alone she wouldn't have been able to become pregnant i guess?
/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:55 PM
11

worse actually it's a good way to ensure that unskilled people are promoted because of seniority as long as they don't screw up too bad since the only ones who are going to stay around long enough to get seniority are those too bad to seek elsewhere. can't say i don't understand the sentiment of wanting your social skills to matter less when they are not actually relevant for the job but the solution is not to be inflexible. and i shudder to think about the implications that we need to change ho…
/r/MensRights06/04/15 03:30 PM
37

someone should think of the m,ale students and make sure they feel safe. i guess we need to ban women from campus. clearly it's the only solution. now obviously that's too bad for women but we have to think about the VICTIMS first. god this is stupid. EDIT: i would have assumed the sarcasm was obvious with "god thid is stupid" claim but i'm reminded that you can never be to sure so: /s.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:47 PM
1

Would you support a rule that only adults can get vaccines unless medically necessary? It is a medical procedure that the child has no say in whatsoever. you really don't get how any of this works do you? all children who can be vaccinated it is medically nececary for. though i'm not suprised to see pro-circumcion on the anti-vax side honestly. All I am currently interested in is if circumcision is a special case or if you're against all medical procedures that are not strictly medically necessa…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 06:27 AM
9

Most of my friends are as well. None of us mind, in fact most of us prefer it. so why must that mean you get to force it on others? nobody is trying to prevent you from doing it to yourself. i don't mind bdsm in fact i prefer it: do i get to chain you up and whip you? Yet, they tell us how we are mutilated and had our rights taken away and how we are victims that just aren't smart enough to realize how wronged we were by our shitlord parents. you're not a victim. the children you want to justify…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 07:55 PM
8

it's basicly like argueing that because a huge amount of women have a rape fetish(hello 50 shades of grey) raping women is totally for their benefit. yes you'd love to imagine being young and having your teacher have sex with you especially if this time around the teacher in question turned out to be hot!!!! because now we aren't discussing what actually happened to these boys but your sexual fanatsy where because it's your fantasy ironicaly you're still in control. you are not able to imagine t…
/r/MensRights19/02/15 06:01 PM
1

Don't tell me to shut up because you disagree with my viewpoint. i didn't though. feel free to talk just don't dicate how other people should live their lives you asshat. I know how a couple works you clearly don't otherwise you'd never bring up the argument It's never a smart decision to make it a possibility to be left flat on your ass. as if it's the sole decision by the recipient of any potential alimoney. I believe you are an asshole if you leave somebody with nothing in most cases. at leas…
/r/MensRights12/02/15 02:13 PM
3

in that case it's your own fault if you pay alimoney because you let your wife not work. dumb decision now you live with it. people who don't understand what being a couple is should really shut up about how couples should act. your solution is easy: don't get married. for the people who do want to work as partners in life it's not as simple as marking what's your stuff and letting everything else be someone elses problem.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 10:39 AM
4

Being extremely kind is no vice. you can be so kind that it hurts people. kindness to the extreme that you can't properly take care of yourself is bad. and it happens. all extremes are bad. no exception.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 09:07 AM
1

lol now I'm repeating myself, you're too confused to argue with. i've been doing nothing but repeat myself from the start. just because you keep repeating a false premise doesn't make it true. The second time was sarcasm. funny since you main argument against me is that i spout a lot of "selfevident feminists thruths" when i get sarcastic. then again this is a good example of why sarcasm on the internet is a bad idea. No, it was a "if A, then B" argument. I don't want A or B (compensations). no …
/r/MensRights03/02/15 08:40 AM
0

It shows how weak your justifications are, if you have any. the fact that you don't actually argue against my arguments beyond "lol you don't think" shows my arguments as weak now? that's a new one. Mere semantics. The point is, they do not walk away with nothing, as you claimed. please quote me actually writing any such thing. are you just making my arguments up as you go along or do you think you're arguing with someone else? you're the one who said that marital assets are owned by one partner…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 09:15 PM
1

Obviously you are far more invested in this than I am. This isn't a divorce court, and I'm not your ex-spouse. yes you don't care that's why you are still argueing this. Well no, the stay-at-home walks away with half of everything the other one owns as a result of his earnings. get back to me once you are old enough to understand how marriage actually works. they walk away with half of they own money. that's what marriage is. shared assets. there is no "my earnings". so nobody can go away with h…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 05:29 PM
-2

What's your point? If you're a halfway decent parent (no drugs, etc), you get shared custody if you want. my point is that obviously you are against that. it's not like we should compensate the life choice of not spending time with your kids and rather work and provide right? no full custody if you're the nuturing parent. As simple as that. alimoney is also quite simple. They made the decision together, so no one gets compensated. I don't see how that's contradictory. It's not just the non-worki…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 12:05 PM
-1

And people don't need to be compensated for their life choices anyway. so i guess full custody should in fact go to the stay at home parent? i mean we shouldn't "compensate" the working parent for their life choices right? who made that choice anyway? you're acting like such a choice is solely on the shoulders of the stay at home parent. as if they on their own decided they didn't wanna work anymore rather than the far more likely agreement between partners. Personnally, I think the stay-at-home…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 10:25 AM
15

Orphaned kids? Depending on where you live, they may receive other forms of 1a who's talking about orphaned kids? i'm talking about ONE dead parent. and what person are you claiming exactly will be legally forced to pay that child support? or is there in fact a nother system that does that instead of forcing it on an univolved person? in that case use that ALL the time. I'm saying that it's important to know the true rationale if you're actually going to change it. i do understand it. i'm just p…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 11:01 AM
42

But to the state, it's a matter of making sure SOMEBODY supports the child. i'll belive that the day an univolved woman is forced to pay child support payments like this. i'll belive that the day a child with a dead parent can get child support payments from someone because "every child deserve the income of 2 parents". One thing you have to remember is that this money isn't for the mother, it's for the child. and i'll belive this the day the goverment makes demands to parents who are still toge…
/r/MensRights31/01/15 10:28 AM
6

Girls outperform boys in educational achievement in 70% i wonder how much boys outperform girls on the football field? i wonder how much boys outperform girls in STEM education?
/r/MensRights29/01/15 07:46 AM
2

it's perfectly fine if they don't want to report it to the police( okay it's not but that's another matter entirely). but they are the ones able to deal with it. so if you don't eant to report it BOHOO you don't weant it to get dealt with. live with your choices and accept that because you didn't want to report the crime the criminal got away with it. it's a bullshit argument: having to report it in order to report it will deter reporting it? if that's the case you just admited that these people…
/r/MensRights29/12/14 11:23 PM
2

i know. i can in fact read. i also can figure out that "go kill yourself" in context isn't actually asking you to point a gun at your temple rather it is telling you to go away. if you honestly think anyone in this conversation was encourageing selfharm i suggest you learn a bit about general discourse. but then i don't belive you have any intrest in intellectual discourse since you ignored all other points. do you take everything litterally? i mean i'm a high functioning autistic and even i don…
/r/MensRights30/11/14 03:41 PM
7

being utterly unhelpful and trollish get's downvoted. telling a troll to fuck of does not. what monsters!!! you stand by this? why don't we abolish shelters then. they shpould all just go find jobs aparently. fuck people in need. WasteAmez got his how could we expect empathy from someone like that.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 01:44 PM
1

to say you are being "negatively" impacted by not being invited to take 10 minutes away from your exam schedule to pray to allah (because you're a non muslim) is like complaning about not having access to maternity/paternity leave, while pregnancy/newborn is not applicable to you. no it's not. paternity leave is available for me wether i use it or not. a break to "pray" must be provided to all or no-one. also congratualtions on being unable to fuckiong read since my complaint wasn't "they get a …
/r/MensRights25/11/14 06:31 PM
3

none of these actions would negatively impact my life, as a student or otherwise. would none of the things they could do impact you at all? how can you preemptively like this say it won't be negative if not? let's go back to your examples: a voice to appeal if a student's exam schedule is soo packed they don't have the time to pray even once during that day, oh hey that would in fact be a negative impact on me since i don't enjoy even short breaks in my schedule. it might be minor and petty sure…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 10:23 AM
8

so you are in fact saying that womens welfare is 100% a womens issue and men have nothing to do with it? that any policy that relies on men is wrong because "it's not our problem"? i don't think you understand how these whole proces works. this representative represents the entire student body but with special intrests groups as a focus. to say they don't in any way represent OP is to say that they can't make policies that influnce him at all. an insane proposal. a muslim students rep doesnt thr…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 11:46 PM
11

and is trying to back out of the contract. The court remains powerless to change the contract, oh so if i want to circumcise my daugther all i need is to make a contract and the courts can't do shit? what other loop holes work like this? if i have a contact can i lend my sons penis? i mean clearly it is my property and even if selling my son for sex is wrong it's not like the courts can do shit if i have contract first right? how anyone can have such a disgusting contempt for bodily integrity sc…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 07:41 PM
13

i'd object to anyone who asserts their right to force braces on their child because they prefer how braces look. get a medical condition that requires this/any similar medical procedure and it's another story entirely.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 07:35 PM
4

Are you serious tough guy? tough guy? where did i suggest i was tough? Every time some teacher has sex with a student there's a post about the guys saying he was lucky. and every time a girl was rapped there's a post about how she was asking for it. but i guess you belive that too? did your daugthers ask for it too? I, speaking about MY experience,' and i'm just speaking from my experience and your daugthers defiently want the D bad. what you can't handle being treated like you treat others? and…
/r/MensRights07/11/14 10:03 AM
-2

Yes, I'd never want that for my daughters, but I don't feel raped. so? do your daugthers want that to happen? it IS different for YOU. now either shut up and only speak for yourself or i will start speaking for your daugthers.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 09:11 AM
1

i guess "whites only" water fountains was a relatively minor issue as well that it wasn't worth bringing up? the fact is this picture shows quite clearly that in certain parts of the western world today men are offically second class citizens. to you this might seem like the most petty issue possible. to me it honestly isn't because it shows a trend i really really don't like. this opens some dangerous doors.
/r/MensRights04/11/14 09:03 AM
11

“I am sick of people telling me that a man’s First Amendment right is more important than my right to feel safe in public places.” i agree. i mean i'm very uncomfortable even feeling unsafe around women. basicly women don't have the right to be in public. it's just not feasible to alow them that. alowing women out in public infringes on my rights.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 10:31 PM
11

it does mean that people who know this is going to assume that any female doctor is worse than their male colleagues even if they are the best doctor there. it only helps people who shouldn't be doctors. everyone else is fucked. edit: colleagues not clients
/r/MensRights03/11/14 03:03 PM
1

i agree with you. but my point was mainly that if you remove gender it's at least a valid openion about justice. i might not agree with it but i can respect it.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 09:24 AM
33

the idea of loweing the requirement for what assault is to a single hit is fine. even great. bringing gender into it undermines any point you might have had and only serves to prove you a bigot.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 04:15 PM
2

As CEO he probably just doesn't want any of his employees to suddenly start demanding raises. to play the devils advocate what was he supposed to say? "go demand the raise you deserve"? good luck telling half the company the day after that no they don't actually qualify for a raise.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 05:36 PM
1

actually and this where it get's fun: a taxi could deny a customer. and by doing so they losse their spot in the line of taxis waiting for customers and have to go to the back. unless you are in the front of the line you must send customers forward to the front. even without discrimination laws this model doesn't work.
/r/MensRights28/09/14 11:34 AM
5

so either a troll or a guy who find rape victims hillarious... i'm not sure which i'd find sadder.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 07:21 AM
1

Tricking" a 14 year into sex is different than tricking a 14 year into buying a car. The car is not a child. you're right. the former is FAR worse than the later. you original argument points 1. and 3. doesn't excuse anything they are the fucking problem. the fact that you are arguing "this is just the way things are and that makes it okay" is disgusting at best. the simple fact of the matter is this story highligths yet another way you have no reproductive rigths if you happen to have an y-chro…
/r/MensRights05/09/14 02:34 PM
1

i'm put off by your vehement denial that alimony wasn't a factor in his depression. that's speculation at best. for all the accusations tht i simply don't "get" deprssion a lot of people can't let go of the idea that money troubles could be entirely unrelated to his dpression shocks me. sure they most likely didn't help but to claim that his money troubles was a major or even relevant factor is his suecide with no more proof than the fact that he had money troubles is making up a narrative to fi…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 09:04 PM
-2

So you're saying that depressives don't have triggers? where the hell did i say that? YOU said Robin Williams killed himself at least partly because of his alimoney. if you have a reliable source for that and not just "he paid alimoney and was depressed" i'd be happy to see it. untill then correlation isn't causation. All people who have suffered with depression can have a trigger that can make it return again. enitrely irrelevant to everything i have written ehre. You clearly know nothing about…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:56 PM
0

oh i'm sorry. do you also support feminists who drum up shit like this? or is it only when you cause stands to benefit shit like this is okay? the ends justify the means? alimony laws suck but this is NOT the way to talk about it. but sure dissent of any kind must mean i'm here brigading right? how often do people not complain that feminists don't call the bad appeles out? well MRA's should at least lead by example if they are going to complain about that and so i do. waving around Robin William…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 12:18 PM
1

his finacial trouble was related to his death : completly unfounded fearmongering. stop using a dead man to push your agenda. even if i agree with your goal i don't agree with your methods. FACT: you are fabricating a situation which this man killed himself because of money troubles to further your own agenda. i'm calling you out. your disgusting abuse of this great mans death makes you unfit to stand by this cause.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 08:27 AM
8

No, I'm not the problem. Feminism isn't the problem. this mentality of "us vs. them" on both sides are the problem. that you defend you side doing it whille attacking the other side for doing it makes you not just part of the problem but the fucking center of the problem. The hate your movement loves so much is the problem. you are AMR. a pure "Anti-movement". but when you love YOUR hate movement it means you aren't the problem right?
/r/MensRights02/07/14 07:45 AM
3

every time i have seen anyone being close to identify who or what "the patirachy" is it always seems to imply it's run by the feminists. and then either everything shuts downb or there comes a hillarious shouting match. either way i remain unconvinced.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 08:14 AM
5

Unless if you have a video of what happened in the bedroom you cant say she's lying, and why would she? and unless you have a video you can't say he's lying about not raping her. clearly unless we have video we should always assume rape didn't happen. actually the fact that SHE doesn't have a video of HIS enthusiastic consent is proof that SHE is the rapist!!!!
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:48 PM
-3

congratulations on proving him right.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 01:07 PM
1

doesn't make saying it any kind of productive.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 01:04 PM
2

maybe but chritians are always quick to denounce WBC. feminists in this case not so much. as long as these are the only feminists making noise they do in fact represent them.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 09:06 AM
5

doesn't change the fact that then it's feminists group A threathens men and feminists group B belives it's an injustice that men protect themself from feminists group A. it might very well be multiple different "they" but i have yet to see a "they" in this case that aren't raging misandrists. maybe the actually good feminists(let's call them feminists group C) should offer to fund the security all by themself? or at the very least do SOMETHING.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 09:03 AM
14

imagine sueing your spouse because you think they don't earn enough. imagine a judge actually look at said case and decided "well you could earn more so you have to". actually how much does judges earn? and do we really belive that is the best this judge can do? i say give him 30 days to find a job that pays at least twice what he earns now or lock him up.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 04:03 AM
12

just like aparently women enjoy defending their right to hit who ever the fuck they like right? so what exactly should the guy have done? left his daugther to fend for herself? maybe go get some popcorn and watch the catfight? oh i know i bet youtube would love it obviously he should get his phone out and record it right?
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:46 AM
1

its the same premise if you dont understand men and women are different. women get wet by sexual stimulus. men get erection by sexual stimulus. tottaly different not at all compareable!!!!!! so since you are so smart why don't you enlighten me? And good job on fighting a girl. Hope u won. good job on not just resigning myself to get knocked the fuck out by a girl bigger older and far better skilled at figthing? what's you point? i'm a guy so i should have used my magical guy powers to subdue som…
/r/MensRights04/04/14 11:01 AM
1

I'm saying during a rape you cant get a boner. and i'm saying that's the same premise as "during rape girls can't get wet". what's so hard to understand? P.S. i got a boner in a fight with a girl "LOL gay"? are you even trying?
/r/MensRights04/04/14 09:39 AM
1

You can rape a girl whether shes wet or not, you can't rape a guy who doesnt have a boner true. but we weren't talking about raping a non-wet girl. we were talking about wet girls. who clearly constented by being wet. acording to your line of reasoning at least.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 09:15 AM
1

This guys retarded logic is worse than feminism well since you aparently think feminist logic is retarded why did you use the feminist argument that boner = consent? do you even have a functional penis? because if you did you should have had plenty of boners whille scared or in a fight. i certainly have.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 09:14 AM
7

It's nearly impossible for them to hold men down, black mail or other forms of manipulation comes to mind. or does that only count if men do it as well? also plenty of women could easily hold down plenty of men. and if they did, through all the struggle and fear and what not the guy would not have an boner yeah yeah and if the woman gets wet it's not rape either, right? might want to retake that 7th grade biology class: boners are not logical and don't care if you want sex or not.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 11:53 AM
5

whille unreported rapes are by no means irrelevant overall when talking about false accusations comparing them to all rapes is meaningless. the only valid number to compare it to is reported rapes and whille we may be fumbeling a bit in the dark about rapes overall we are not with regards to reported rapes. basicly this is further proof that they are pulling numbers out of their ass because they don't actually compare them to anything meaningful.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 02:21 AM
23

these women themselves aren't feminists. but untill i see feminists go up in arms over these women and argue that these women should take on more responsibility i don't belive for one second that the ACTUAL feminist are for equality. whille the women in the story might not be feminists it still tells us quite a lot about feminists. we should not be the ones first in line to critique this... but we are.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 06:42 PM
2

yes i can because feminism and femnninst are the ones who did this. i say those who disagree with these sentiments but still call themself feminists are the ones acting foolishly due to cognitive dissonance. how else do you explain "i'm a feminsts i just don't agree with what feminist lobbies do"?
/r/MensRights18/02/14 01:50 PM
9

As soon as she gets home, he hands the kids off. god forbid they ever interact with the mother. see most likely when your sister in law "hands the kids off as soon as hubby is home" it's suddenly " he only have time for them when it's play time". it certainly wouldn't be the first time i've seen that sentiment.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 01:46 PM
3

yes you missed the part where what they really said "I don't understand how you can compare sexism AGAINST MEN to racism" if it had been sexism against women it would have been just as valid as racism. but it isn't so it doesn't count.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 11:05 AM
6

imagine what would happen if someone tried to remove the P-pill from the market because "well you can't really trust women who says their on it" the male pill is not for women. the fact that they even for a second think the impact it has on THEIR lives is even remotely relevant just goes to show how egocentered these owmen are. it's a question about reproductive choice so it MUST be about women. it makes me sick.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 05:51 AM
1

i didn't talk about taking advantage of anything. useing a system as it's set up to function is not taking advantage of it. eqaulity of options. if you don't like the consequnces of an option maybe you shouldn't take that option. we can't have it all so make your choices wisely.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:35 AM
1

and this is how you create welfare moms. now i'm not one who generaly screams about that issue because i fully belive the problem is smaller than most people who talk about it makes it out to be. i do however also think it's horrible to encourage that behaviour.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 04:32 AM
2

you're right. they made different choice and now a less worthwhille employe. it should be perfectly legal and okay for an employer to say "only childfree people aply for this job" right? different life choices, different consequnces.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 07:29 PM
12

anti-circumcision. just another guy against bodily integrity... wonder if he feels the same way about women though.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 05:49 PM
2

and i'm sure you tell that to all the women who wants abortions as well right? unless you aren't actually anti-abortion but if that's the case i'd suggest not using anti-abortion arguments.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 01:38 PM
0

i'm sadly reminded of "facts don't real only feels" though aparently our version of it is "law don't real only feels". fight the corruption and fight to change the laws that are unjust. don't wish death on the people who uphold the law when that's their job. i can't belive this isn't obvious.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 09:58 PM
1

People on this message board go on and on about dad, but forget the reason these laws are in place are to protect the child. this is the part where you are wrong and i want to correct it. i want to point out though that other than this i fully agree. the thing is though that most people here doesn't forget that. they just don't belive the child rights should supercede the mans rights. many people are in situations where they can't support themself but that doesn't mean you can force others to ca…
/r/MensRights23/01/14 09:44 PM
7

it is worse than that thought. it's maipulating language. it's first makeing rape something men do to women. and since men do it to women obviously we can't have men in this discususion. imagine if we redefined alimoney as money women take from men. and then said "women have no right to discuss alimoney".
/r/MensRights20/01/14 06:07 PM
3

it assumes that there are no moderates. no assumption. this is an observation. the major feminists groups you know the ones who actively go out and do shit? yeah they're run by the radicals. there are plenty of moderates. they are just irrelavent at best and supporting the radicals because of ignorance at worst. i don't care about their ideals i care about their actions and the result of said actions(or lack of actions) do what you analogy of conservatives have to do. if no candidate is worthy o…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 06:55 PM
2

your analogy falls apart because you are comparing faith to political ideology. being a chirtstian doesn't support WBC. being a muslim doesn't support the taliban or other estremists groups. being a feminists either does nothing or actively support the radicals. every feminist action taken is taken by the radicals. giveing money or support to feminism ends up in teh hands of the radicals because they are the ones who act.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 03:49 PM
3

One thing I think is surprising is the idea of both parents working but cheaper childcare. Is there any economic efficiency to this model or is it just fantasy? Certainly doesn't seem the best for the kids. i can not say anything for the economical viability for it but where i live (Denmark) stay at home parents are rare. very rare. pretty much unheard of. both parents work and the kids are put in child care. and i honestly belive it's better for the child. it gives them a peer group earlier tha…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 01:48 PM
11

well it always comes down to a very simple question. does the issue exists because it's a man or does it exists because he is homosexual? if the former he'll get support. if it's the later he'll get told this is not our issue but generally still be well respected and be pointed in the direction of people who does deal with said issues. which might include some of the same people here even. the way some feminists look at this honestly comes of the same way as the black person who belives everyone…
/r/MensRights08/01/14 09:32 AM
15

'It may be that became a mechanism she got used to and got used to responding to that by picking up a knife.' well ofcourse that changes EVERYTHING!!! now lock her up for good she's not qualified to be part of society.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 11:22 PM
11

so obviously it is also my right to tatto my infant if i so desire since said infant can't make that choice right? ofcourse you support that what am i asking?
/r/MensRights06/01/14 09:54 AM
3

if the solution wasn't as simple as having a mandatory paternity testing at birth for that exact reason i'd consider that a valid point. i didn't move any goal post. my goal post was always "this law is anti-male because if women were held to the same kind of laws they would be anti-female". the fact that there is baiscaly no way to hold a women to laws equal to those doesn't make it equal. this is the "biology isn't always fair" argument over again but every time it's brought up i have to ask: …
/r/MensRights02/01/14 03:51 AM
0

i don't appriciate people calling light hair blonde. i have light fair and i do not feel as though i am blonde. do you hear how stupid this is? wether or not you apriciate a description fitting you doesn't change the definition of said description. this is YOUR problem. don't invalidate the language just because you don't appriciate reality.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 07:09 PM
27

difference being a father is aparently ALWAYS in dispute. now make this standard procedure for every woman who ever had a child. one mistake and whoops suddenly it went to adoption...should have done the paparwork properly missy.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:25 AM
34

I sympathize that he is a victim here but it sounds like the law is already on his side despite the complaint of being anti-father. imagine if every mother ever had to sign that they are the mother, create a detailed plan of care prove they were finacialy involved(yeah no support here) "and more" and if they messed up at any point the state just swoped in and removed the child. tell me that wouldn't be labeled "anti-mother" faster than you can say "misogynist". the goals of the laws might have g…
/r/MensRights01/01/14 02:22 AM
2

that wasn't the argument. nobody here claimed it was okay. as it happens it can be wrong even if it isn't pedophilia. edit: It. Is. Not. Okay. To. Be. Sexually. Attracted. To. Prepubescent. Children. that's not exactly a choice either.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 12:06 PM
1

the context was r/childfree. it was a joke. sure it was at parents expense. the kind of joke that these people often happen to be at the expense of. this is the one place where these people get tell the jokes instead of being the joke. besides that you are sadly plain wrong. r/childfree likes parents. they hate breeders. they very much differentiates between the 2. ofcourse most people just see the word breeder and decide they hate parents. once again lacking context. and by now i'm pretty sure …
/r/MensRights30/12/13 06:35 AM
1

so are posts here saying feminists are not worthwhille people. ergo posts here hate feminsist = posts here hate women. also what strawman? i admited i jumped the gun with the child hate comment thing and the guy himself said he doesn't understand. again you ignore context. and the only reason i can imagien you keep ignoreing this context besides simply not understanding it would be that you are trolling. which i find even more unlikely. P.S. i have seen far worse get far more votes on this sub.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 06:04 AM
1

their argument still boils down to a negative judgement made about the front page material based on them having an openion they don't understand lacking the context of the posts and only having a cusory look at what the place is. the exact same thing that time and time again lead people to decide r/mensrights hate women. yes i would adovocate r/childfree to anyone who actually think like that or is intrested. no i don't think they are magically better people than the rest of reddit. they can lik…
/r/MensRights30/12/13 04:48 AM
1

so basicly your argument returns to "i don't understand, but they are happy and i don'øt understand why so they must look down on me"? there certainly is quite a lot of interpretation in your openion of them... not unlike how people come here and see we don't blindly support women so we must hate them... no i don't see the difference. maybe it's because i understand. maybe it's because i'm wrong. i don't know but i don't think we'll get anywhere with this.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 06:34 PM
2

all right i'll admit that post is just dumb. and yeah the sub can be full of assholes who act exactly the same way they claim to hate others for acting against them. guess what?i can find that here too often. though your example is hardly bigotry. don't get me wrong i too find that example to be quite sad but please don't cheapen the word bigotry like that.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 06:06 PM
1

i agree with all that. that doesn't change the fact that you are no different than the people who jump in to r/mensrights for 5 minutes do that and decide everyone here hates women because that's what a few posts on the front page has to offer. at least we do agree. i do admit i jumped the gun on the child hateing thing. i guess you just hate them because they have different desires than you and you can't understand that so they must be weird and wrong. face it. they wre no worse or better than …
/r/MensRights29/12/13 05:59 PM
0

Not as part of a general procedure applied to all. i see you can't read. i didn't write that either. i wrote "EXTREME CASES" That's the point. No arrangement was made. you're right. she wasn't a housewife. nothing happened. i don't think you understand what an arangement is. marriage IS a contract. alimony IS a part of that. if you don't want to risk having to pay that YOU should have negotiaed differently. that doesn't mean it's broken at the moment but nothing you said has anything to do with …
/r/MensRights29/12/13 05:54 PM
1

so what exactly are the "grown-ups" talking about. why don't you enlighten me on these functions i aparently don't understand? as a basic start when the "grown-ups" talk how about you actually say something and make sense instead of makeing vauge remarks about me pulling something out of my ass and not understanding something about how reddit functions.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 04:43 PM
0

i'm confused as to what exactly you find bigoted i'm not going to say the place couldn't benefit from more serious modding. as for poor quality of people i'd like to once again ask if you think we should judge this sub by the worst it has to offer?
/r/MensRights29/12/13 04:43 PM
6

ironicaly that would make you why they exists. i also find it ironic that THIS sub would just make a cusory glanse and then conclude that they all hate babies because a few trolls do that. it's almost like what we hate when people go here for 5 minutes and decide we all hate women.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 03:36 PM
2

in extreme enough cases alimony for the rest of your life is actually apropiate. i'll admit i only know of one story where it was apropiate but damn if it wasn't. man and wife has been amrried for over 30 years. she has been a stay at home wife/mom for this entire time. the husband on the other hand has started a small buisness that is is pretty sucesful. sadly this couple in their olden days decide to divorce. this woman can not go back into the work force. she has been part of it before but al…
/r/MensRights29/12/13 01:11 PM
0

though i do agree it seems off here. learn to read/drop the strawmen. all i did was explain why the whole "weekend prison"-thing is a thing.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 03:27 AM
3

so i guess when you/your wife (sorry no idea what gender you are) go into labour you don't care if you obstetrician knows how to deliver a baby? if you want to get into the army you need to qualify for the army. if you want to have any other job you need to qualify for that job. i don't understand why that is unfair.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 07:26 PM
1

because rape is a petty crime right? i didn't argue that the girl in the above story should get this kind of sentecing but why this kind of sentecing can make sense. if you are convicted for rape you don't get to walk free. i'm okay with that. but i also understand why ruining someones life by removing their ability be functional part of society over EVERYTHING that can land you jail time is counterproductive.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 07:22 PM
3

when the PT test came and she failed it, she would ask the ranking officer overseeing the test if when his wife goes into labor, will it matter to him if she was able to get over the wall or do however many sit-ups, pull-ups, ect so her argument was that she shouldn't be in the army but instead barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen?
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:25 PM
3

this weekend prison thing isn't a bad idea. though i do agree it seems off here. basicly the basic idea of prison ISN'T to ruin your life. we don't send people to prison with the goal of them never being able to reintegrate into society. most often we want them to do just that. so if someone get's a sentence for figthing or some petty theft for instance it's better for society to alow them to go to prison on the weekends so they still serve the sentence but alow them to work and thus stay functi…
/r/MensRights28/12/13 04:10 PM
5

enitrely irrelevant the CHILD comes first. she has no rights above that of a.. oh wait i forgot weomen do have rights higher than the children my mistake no need for anyoen to think of the children THIS time.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 09:41 AM
1

but you are the one perscribeing the subjective negative conotation to the word "mutilation". that was my point with the analogy.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 11:46 PM
2

is it insulting to call a lame man lame? is it insulting to call a retaded man retarded? would it be insulting to call a man who had his arm chopped of mutilated? i understand what your argument is but i still disagree with it. facts are not insulting. even if i subjectivly find blonde hair ugly calling me blonde isn't an insult.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 08:55 PM
1

The question is defined as religion with multiple answers, wrong. atheism and agnosticim are relevant to the question " do you belive in a god". a simple yes or no question. religion can certainly be a far more complicated discussion. but atheism and agnosticism aren't part of that. Answering the question "Do you believe in god?" with Ice-cream is far more relevant to the discussion because I at least possess proof of the existence of ice-cream in some commonly accepted form, where as I have no …
/r/MensRights14/12/13 10:07 AM
1

i didn't so that though. i was betting on the 3 other options. it's just those 3 options aside it's the only option. also we are not discussing openions. no matter how stupid i call him the facts won't change in his favor. the defintion of a word stays the same noi matter how much i insult him.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 09:54 AM
2

run out of real arguments already? guess that concludes that: troll it is.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 05:32 PM
2

you do realise that that doesn't actually mean anything? you might as well answer the question " do you belive in a god" by screaming "ICECREAM!!!" at the top of your lungs. either you don't understand the question, you don't understand the language, you are trolling or you are in fact too stupid to have an openion of your own.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 05:16 PM
2

yes, no, maybe. what the hell answer do you want to add?
/r/MensRights13/12/13 01:46 PM
2

my problem is just that tone is hard to convey in text. if it's a joke fien i don't have an issue with it i don't generally belive anything is sacred like that. but i also know that enough people(not just women either) actualy hold this belif. and THAT bothers me.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 01:38 PM
8

"it's irresponsible to alow women to make their own choices. that should be left to their fathers and husbands. no offense to women, but i don't know any woman who is able to take care of herself." and suddenly it's sexists. how strange.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 10:29 AM
2

i find it saddening how many here is attacking the victim. Discard72 may have given up on his sons and yeah it's sad when children can't even depend on their parents but... i can't blame him. in the end it was not him but the justice system who failed them. 5 years. FIVE YEARS!!!! he paitiently fought with the system and for 5 years they failed what should be a quite simple situation if just half of what Discard72 says is true. Appalling. Why did you think you'd get sympathy here, among so many …
/r/MensRights08/12/13 05:56 AM
3

but that's not really relevant here. i still thinks it's BS but i can understand that law. your actions caused it so you are responsible. but in this story the guys actions is NOT something you can reasonably hold responsible. it would be stupid. imagine all the bogus law uits to would pop up EVERYWHERE. "oh i thought he was robbing the store so i ran and broke my leg. it's his fault." if your actions are at fault i can somewhat understand the reasoning. but in this story his actions are NOT wha…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 01:35 PM
1

I think it's time for women to stop going Dutch when it comes to taxes. It's been a bad date. i agree. let's just split up and pay for ouir own meals and leave it at that. it was a bad date no more dates in future. pay for you own shit. oh wait that's not what you actually want. you want us to not only pay for the entire date buyt also your future dinner plans? what's in it for us men exactly? once again i fully agree... i think ANYONE should have the option to opt out of taxes... and by extensi…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 01:27 PM
1

You don't think it's harmful to deliberately make a child deaf instead of healthy? find the part in this argument that is relevant to gender. i personally have quite a few problems with this story. but none of them belong here.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 09:22 AM
5

have you cake and eat it? this is the same exact issue, just the other side of the coin. i find it shocking that you obviously consider the child property. she can decide that she doesn't want to be a parent. i support men's right to do this i have no problem with women being alowed to do the same. but just like i don't belive in giving women the right to force men to be parents nor do i belive in giving them the right to deny them to raise their children.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 08:42 AM
3

You can't just wish it away, brah. "YEAH we already wished it it to change, do you really think you get to wish it away now?!?!?!" seriously? i can't tell if you're trolling or really this stupid. poe's law is treacherous indeed.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 08:16 AM
3

you have seen exactly 0 women who lost everything to their supposed SO whille they were deployed. i'm not saying bad Things don't happen to women... but this bad thing doesn't happen to women.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 12:21 PM
2

So you belive the World revolves around you and that the rest of the World is yours to do with as you please with no regards for others? Got it.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 08:14 AM
3

when i think of women i think of people who belive they can do whatever the fuck they please and have everybody else deal with the consequnces.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 10:12 AM
3

no i entirely agree with this. this is just 1 more crime the mother commited in my book though.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 09:31 AM
2

and this is why i truely wished the judge had taken their fears into serious consideration.... and judges them guilty of this "chilling effect" i Wonder how high the penalty for doing that should be? lifetime in jail for these families?
/r/MensRights19/11/13 09:22 AM
1

Funny how statements are 'claims' when I make them, and 'facts' when you make them. funny how you make strawman arguments when you have nothing substantial to actually contribute anymore. i NEVER claimed my staments were facts. i'm saying they were "refutations" and "observations". funny how you can't actually go back and find a legitimate claim i made and just have to make strawman arguments about how i aparently claim to be factually right just because i say so. also Ah yes, because reality ex…
/r/MensRights19/11/13 09:12 AM
0

and he does. are you really telling me that if you want to be banned from this sub or any other sub for that matter. if you make it the goal of the day it's hard? just because i say he has a legitimate argument i don't say his entire argument is right. nor am i saying the argument Works in his favour.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 09:08 AM
-1

i said he had A point not that it was the one he tried to represent. he has A point. but it's not A point that Works in his favour.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 05:07 PM
0

no he does have a point. getting banned isn't hard. ever. it just doesn't prove anything meaningful.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 04:25 PM
0

actually he has a point. but then it's not hard to get banned ANYWHERE. if you want to. it's basicly admiting he's nothing but a troll. compare that to the fact that i have been banned from at least 3 feminist subs and i had not even heard of any of them before i was banned.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 02:32 PM
1

I think problem-solving is distinct from competitiveness, you can think whatever you want. but it doesn't change reality. i never said competivness was the ONLY reason to game and i agree that all those reason you name are decent reasons (if a bit niche gameing at times) but none of them would apply to the actions mentioned. stop moveing the goal post every time. i also have don't have claims to back up. i'm refuteing your claims with simple observations.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 11:59 AM
1

first of you avoid all my points. what a great debater you are. second I didn't start the argument, you know it very well I just posted links. neither did i. nor did i claim that you did. is lying and personal attacks the only arguments you can bring up or you just hideing that special ace up your sleve? then Again you go on to complain about how you aparently won the argument because you can't read and ignore more than half my post. at least you admited you don't have a point.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 09:02 PM
1

i have a problem with it and i will conteniue to have a problem with it as long as there are women WHO seek to "tear apart the boys Clubs" and aren't imediately laughed at. we seriously need to get VERY clear about this. either it's okay to discriminate or it's not. no "certain circumstances". yes or no. and whille i personally belive in yes i have problem with anyone doing this shit until we get a god damn final answer as to what it is these people want.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 08:42 PM
21

what really bothers me about stuff like this is you can be allmost sure these same people are those WHO bitches about how "Black history month is nececary because all other months are "White month"" well guess that every other fucking month is breat awareness month it's the hypocracy that really get's to me.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 04:16 PM
0

So the brain scans showing physical changes to your brain are an agenda ah the beloved strawman argument. i never said such changes didn't exists. in fact i said they do exists. they just don't prove what you say they prove. I should not believe what I see you didn't see a conclusion you saw data. i'm not telling you to question the data. i'm just saying the conclusions you are drawing from the data should be questioned. but I should believe you because you say so stop projecting. unlike you i n…
/r/MensRights14/11/13 04:03 PM
1

no there's an agenda. none of these studies prove me wrong. there's also studies proving that video games are addictive and makes you violent. they are not entirely lying and some not at all. but they confuse laypeople because some of them set out to do that are used to do that and the rest are read by laypeople confirming their incorrect belifs. i never once claimed porn can't be part of addictive behaviour.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 11:36 AM
0

It's not that heroin is addictive, it is that it becomes the source of addictive obsession. there is no addictive substance in porn. there is in heroin. if you are too stupid to unjderstand this you are too stupid to have this conversation. Dude, wake the fuck up from your la-la land. There's a whole world out there and you can't see it because you're stuck with your head up the video game and porn industry's asses. so what exactly am i missing? or do you just assume i'm an idiot because i disag…
/r/MensRights13/11/13 11:33 AM
2

Affirmative action is all about social Progress affirmative action is dying in a fire because your fire figther was incappable of saving you. if that's Progress i'll be happy to stay in the stone age.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 01:21 PM
7

you're right let's raise the standard with 1 minute it's not like such a small difference really matters. oh but wait then girl number 2 over here is only 3 seconds off. better raise it so she can join as well. oh wait fatass over here is only 16 seconds of now. wouldn't be fair if we didn't raise it Again so he could join too right? whille we are at it since everyone drives 5 miles to fast all the time anyway let's raise the speed limit by 5 everywhere. these rules exists for a reason. if you c…
/r/MensRights11/11/13 01:10 PM
1

and that's fine. as long as you activly try to ban abortions as you belive is right to do.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 10:38 AM
1

Nah, I just think that because of biology, women have 2 times where they can make a choice to not become parents/not become pregnant. ah yes the other cornor stone of this argument: "biology isn't fair"... guess what? you stole that from anti-abortion people as well. let's say we do this. let's say we ban abortion and if a girl get's pregnant and the guy says " i don't want to be a father". the girl is now left with the hard choice of aborting or raising the child on her own. and that's not fair…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 09:44 AM
2

is that because of biology, the man's right to opt out of parenthood occurs at a moment that is different than a woman's. so you are telling me you belive women are too stupid to understand that sex might lead to pregnancy? if men can stop at the "have sex"-part why can't women? if your argument, that men can control this issue at this point enough that no other protection is needed for them, holds Water so does it for women. there is no good reason to alow abortions if you belive this. as you s…
/r/MensRights09/11/13 10:09 PM
12

I'm sure that I would support their right to abort a fetus. hypocrit. you should tell them what you tell women: "if you don't want to get pregnant, control your eggs". or maybe you don't actually belive in the arguments you use? your argument has been used for decades against abortion. if you stand by that argument you are anti-abortion.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 10:01 PM
1

you're the one who claimed i voted. i said that was stupidly wrong partly because i can't fucking vote. as i said your trolling is bad.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 12:29 PM
7

and i belive men and women should be treated equal under the law, i just also think we shouldn't alow women to have a job outside the kitchen. a few sacrefices is needed to preserve society you know. i'm sorry but try to have an openion that isn't an oxymoron. even if i disagree entirely with it i'll still have far more respect for that.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 07:44 AM
1

i fully agree that pedophilles should not be alowed to indulge on their Desires. and we need to make sure they don't. i just see it very much as HELPING them. you are right. the difference between a homosexual and them is a homosexual could get consent. but i don't see that as reason to demonize them for their sexuality. that is still outside their control. heck in a very few cases i can even empathize with them AFTER they had sex witha child. ofcourse what they did was horrible, i'm never going…
/r/MensRights07/11/13 08:03 AM
0

so it's a fact that i voted for Obama yet i'm not even an American? P.S. your trolling is showing might want to tone it Down a bit.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 07:51 AM
1

Well, the young men who frequent this site voted for him. well that's not an assumption what so ever. don't worry though we remeber how much good your vote for bush did us all.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:02 AM
1

why are you even here if you dont belive in rights? to troll? or is it only wrong to be a bigot when it Hurts you?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:54 AM
4

pedophilia isnt harmful either you dolt. child molesting is. then Again i would consider it plenty harmful if a homosexual had sex with me. though i do agree i'm unharmed by their desire to have sex with me. just as much as any child is unharmed by a pedophiles Desire to have sex with them.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:53 AM
-1

Fuck these guys who are interested in sex with a 10 year old. do you hate homosexuals as well? sexuality isn't a choice, not their fault they have that intrest. fell free to hate them when they act upon that Desire but unless you formulated yourself badly here this is pure bigotry.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 07:46 PM
1

Portal was an amazing game that would have made for a less-than-exciting story. exactly. because the story wasn't the selling factor. the GAMEPLAY was. thanks for proving my point. but until you provide evidence I'll keep my own! says the one making claims without provinding any evidence to back it up. so if competitivness isn't the driving force behind those actions in games what is in your openion?
/r/MensRights03/11/13 01:22 PM
2

if you care about what people say about you, you are an idiot, you just have to ignore it. To win all you have to do is nothing as i said: spoken like a true ignorant. you argument is like saying fighting isn't that bad eveyone can take a slap on the cheek. i'm obviously not wrong but you'd call me delusional if i claimed that was everything "figthing" amounted to. i can ignore a slap on the cheek. clearly you are delusional when you claim that's a problem.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 12:29 PM
2

i'd rather have someone call me slut behind my back than someone hitting me in the face with an eraser spoken like someone who has never in their entire life experienced this. i have. a getting into a fist fight would at worst hurt momentarily. at best it would be great way of bonding. but the viscious shit of having people mentally break you Down? it's not just calling you nasty names behind you back. it is social isolation. your ignorance and openions doesn't make you factualy right. i have no…
/r/MensRights01/11/13 06:45 AM
1

so they are feminists just like you but we can't judge feminists based on what they say and do? basicly a Group can't be judged? come on you gotta know that isn't reasonable? it's also not Black and White like you make it out to be. as a Group MRA doesn't show any support for the extreame MRAs. as a Group feminism is about the extreme feminists. on the induvidual level it's obviously not like that but you can't just interchangebly use it. that's not even to begin talking about how you are going …
/r/MensRights31/10/13 10:25 AM
1

but i'm not judging all feminists. i'm judging feminists as a Group. to do that what the induvidual says and does is irrelavent. i'm not the one taking the worst the Group has to offer and baseing my judgement of everyone involved of that.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 10:13 AM
0

I would argue that the puzzle/exploration/world immersion/story aspect of most of those games are more significant than the click-to-kill combat system. fair enough. but that doesn't prove much. in fact it goes AGAINST your claims. in what World is puzzles not just another competition? same goes for exploring in these games as the goal is always to find hidden rewards wether those be loot or easter eggs. as for the stories, it's quite ignorant to say the story takes precedence over the gameplay …
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:53 AM
1

no. but i won't deny that MRA's have those openions. and that is where we are different.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:31 AM
4

you didn't exactly prove that to begin with. why don't you start over without baseing your entire arguemnet on the "no true feminist"-falacy? or do you think that the fact that NAWALT changes that fact that feminism is cancer to society?
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:29 AM
1

and that's worse than men leaglly haveing NO options because? is it a perfect solution? well no because nothing we could possibly achive here is. oh and before you use it i'm going to preemptivly steal your counter argument and use it against you: no she also had the option to keep her legs closed and not get pregnant in the first place.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 09:32 PM
2

I love the idea that, the minute things swing in the opposite direction, women – feminists – must now behave unimpeachably. either you are right and this behaviour is wrong and we are entirely justified to do so... or women can get the fuck back in the kitchen "where they belong". 2 wrongs don't make a right.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 09:53 PM
3

It's disheartening to se a men issue like this being bashed because some guys don't like people calling out porn as a think that's not that "ok" like we used to think. but it's not a mens issue. and it's not a porn issue. it's blaming the symptoms of the problem instead of the problem itself. it's suggesting these problem exists because of their gender not because they are human beings. are you deliberately missing the point or do you not understand this?
/r/MensRights23/10/13 04:42 PM
3

you are aiming so far off the mark that i can't even properly reply to your question. if you equte it to having anything to do with being male instead of being female yes it's sexists. it's not part of the male condition it's part of the human condition. but that's honestly not all that relevant. does it matter if a question is sexists if the question itself is flawed? if i started to ask questions about wether Black people were the cause for cancer would you honestly even bother with the racist…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 03:03 PM
5

i see no reason whatsoever to belive that pornography is addictive in any way. it's the same as the argument about vdeo games being addictive. it's not that pornography is addictive but that it can become the source of an addictive obssesion. ofcourse that is problem Matic and is an issue that should be dealt with but pornography isn't the core of the problem and dealing with that would only shit the problem onto another source. porn is nothing but an easy scapegoat for a much larger and much mo…
/r/MensRights23/10/13 02:01 PM
1

no. men don't run the World you could argue that the World is being run by men though. but that's another argument alltogether.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 01:36 PM
2

so why would he do so if they were class mates Again?
/r/MensRights20/10/13 06:01 PM
10

one day i'm going to call the police on every female with a child in tow i see. then when the police arrest me i'm going to demand these people come to my defense. let's see how long they stand by their so called principles.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 12:24 PM
8

so tell me Again what happened to best interest of the child? did we give up on it or did we decide that best interest of the child is to assume their parents abuse them? also we should remove all children from their mothers unless they are supervised by a male. i mean it is common knowledge that the majority of child abuse is by women so clearly all women should be treated as child abusers. can't trust a woman with a child.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 12:14 PM
2

If I have to shave my legs all the time, well you don't so shut the fuck up. so I prefer they shave and moisturize their head and i'd prefer you get a boobjob but for some reason this very reasonable demand is somehow sexists when i make it.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 08:27 AM
13

"Once you have a job, it's not about experimenting, where one day you have long hair and one day you have short hair and one day you're blond." can you imagine? oh or even better: "Once you have a job, it's not about experimenting, where one day you wear a skirt and one day you wear pants and one day you wear a dress."
/r/MensRights19/10/13 08:23 AM
1

If I suddenly decide to change careers (and going from a dedicated stay-at-home parent to working in the work force is a career change) it's absolutely stupid to think that my current company should continue paying me to maintain my lifestyle just because I'd need to go back to college and would take a pay cut starting in a new career. true. it's also bullshit to compare a choice you made to alone to a choice made as a couple. Feminism 101: rights without responsibilities. is not at all present …
/r/MensRights19/10/13 08:08 AM
1

Regardless of why she came out of the work force, it was her choice. i've allways said that men who want custody are idiots. it's their own choice to have a job whille mommy stays at home and get a relationship with the children. ofcourse dad isn't releant to these kids. he should just have chosen to not Work. do you not see how flawed this reasoning is? no she didn't make that choice you made that choice as a couple. If you chose to do that without working any compensation into the agreement, t…
/r/MensRights19/10/13 08:02 AM
0

Like the loss of time spent with kids? has not lead to lack of potential in spending time with kids. it's not the same argument. as for skill with household tasks sure he would be worse at it. but unless you bfind your self incappable it's not the same. and guess what? the law does come into play if you are reliant on your spouse takeing care of you and it is assumed they will do so. i'm not saying you are wrong. i'm saying you should argue against the actual areguments instead of strawmen.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 07:52 AM
-1

yeah better just kill you since you aren't worth anything. at least you admit you are a Waste of Space.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 07:46 AM
1

Just apologizing for and justifying it. when it's done it's horrible. it wasn't done here though. ignorance of the law doesn't except you from it. do you think his wife got married to him in order to steal his lotto winnings? otherwise this wasn't abuse. claiming this is abuse is what's disgusting because it twists the story into one where she planed this. if she had won he would have taken half of her prize and you'd be celbrating this as some kind of Victory. part of getting married is that wh…
/r/MensRights19/10/13 07:44 AM
-2

if you are not willing to live up to your part of a contract don't sign it. i'm not denying it's been abused many times and will be abused many times in the future. but this is EXACTLY what he signed up for.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 12:11 PM
1

now i'm going to asume that Well, everything but losing the street fight. I hate losing fights. wasn't just a bad joke even if it most likely is. this is the same thing. you Draw your worth from being a Manly man WHO doesn't lose in a fight. you're right. being raped doesn't reduce YOU to tears. losing a fight wouldn't reduce ´ME to tears. does that mean you are wrong for taking that badly though? does the shame you feel for losing not matter because i wouldn't be ashamed? if i don't fear death …
/r/MensRights18/10/13 11:30 AM
20

whille i understand your gripe that is not ACTUALLY the idea behind alimony. close but not quite. in theory alimony should cover the losses of not having been working. not as in keeping up the previous engagement of husband earns Money wife house keeps. the wife has been out of the Work force for a certain amount of time. let's say 10 years. that is a loss that will hurt her in her earning potential and that is what alimony is supposed to cover. the husband is to equally hurt in his potential to…
/r/MensRights18/10/13 11:19 AM
2

so why did you marry her Again? was that somehow not your choice? did she radically change so much the second you were married? then you should have ended the marriage right there and Thus she wouldn't be able to claim alimony anyway since there are certain conditions that need to be fullfilled which includes length of marriage.
/r/MensRights18/10/13 11:12 AM
7

no alimony and child support are 2 very different Things. child support is lifting your part of the burden of the finacial strain of raising the child. we can go into a long discussion about the justification and fairness about this but it's not what we are talking about here so let's not. alimony serves to compensate the spouse not the child but the spouse who gave up their ability to maintain their Financial gain in return for giving other help in makeing the household run. if a couple in agre…
/r/MensRights17/10/13 10:45 AM
2

run out of arguments? im not the one citeing american domestic laws as if they matter outside America. and im not the one claiming id never go to jail for breaking the law. you clearly dont understand how the law is actually used in cases like this and anyone with even a slight understanding of the law can easily see that. do you honestly think that the law suddenly doesnt Count anymore just because you feel threathend?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 09:16 PM
2

Ergo, I'm allowed and entitled to use reasonable force to protect myself and my property key word: reasonable. convince a judge that you were so threathend by a 14 year old girl that you felt forced to knock her out. i bloody dare you. second you said hes entiteled to do so. incorrect this doesnt give him the right to do so it is defense that can EXCUSE him if he does important difference For morons like you it's called the "Castle Doctrine". you mean the AMERICAN doctrine that doesnt aply outsi…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:41 PM
1

oh i'm sorry i'm not here too boost your ego 24/7 but i happen to have a life outside reddit. now that i have time to read your reply i'll be happy to reply to you.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 07:28 PM
1

5 years ago? did you forget a zero or are you that deluded? either way we dont commonly belive around here that its okay to hate someone for something outside of your control. the same amount of time ago it was also quite common to "disapprove" of Black people. is that another reason everything went to shit Mr. biggot?
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:51 PM
3

the problem is you are hell bent on seeing this as punishing the child. many of us sees it as not rewarding the mother/child. you are right the child did nothing. so why does it deserve to be rewarded? i'm fully with you that it's not fair to the child but when i have to chosse between a comfortable life for myself in Exchange of a slight inconvinience to a child that i'm not alowed to have a relationship with i'm not the one screwing the child over there has to be a limit to at what oint you mu…
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:43 PM
2

so why wouldn't you get arrested for breaking the law Again? how about you get the memo: the law you are citeing doesn't exists in Australia and you do NOT have the right do what you claim you would do. THAT'S a fact. you are not the law and takeing the law into your own hands is one of the fastest ways to get behind bars. but keep beliving you are above the law.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 03:02 PM
2

just like you obviously belive that rape victims should just kindly ask their rapists not to rape them Again right? oh wait you don't even belive that. you belive that's "men being men" and so an entirely justifiable act.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 12:02 AM
2

and so is knocking out people even if they commit that crime. or maybe you really do see going to jail" as a simple solution. i certainly don't.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 11:51 PM
7

Then join one of the many other car mechanics courses available to you? and that doesn't go for the girls because?
/r/MensRights13/10/13 04:27 PM
12

what a freaking strawman you managed to pull out of you ass. let's try this again: unqualified people figthing no matter gender = bad because they are unqualified. women not being forced to fight whille men are forced to fight = bad because it's sexists. now a question for you: are you this dumb are was this intentional intellectually dishonesty?
/r/MensRights13/10/13 11:16 AM
1

this is one of the dumbest things i have read in a whille. pretty much everything you wrote is simply wrong. then again you are simply trolling obviously but i still feel like refuting it all. date rape is simply rape. yeah and muggings aren't real either because they are just theft. If I rape someone at a theatre or outdoor park it doesn't become "theatre rape"or"park rape"it's just quite simple rape...no prefixes requires. true because where you rape someone is quite irrelevant. however the di…
/r/MensRights12/10/13 10:41 AM
0

Just so we're clear here, are you advocating for the encouragement on sex between 10 and 12 year olds? i'm encourageing that if they are doing it allready they shouldn't be punished for it since that doesn't server any purpose. but no i wouldn't encourage it whatsoever in you avarage 12 year old but if they are sexualy curious at that stage and don't harm anyone i belive it's far more beneficial to have the talk early and suport them than to villify them or sex. i'm saying there's room between e…
/r/MensRights12/10/13 06:25 AM
2

So what would you do, encourage the behavior? as much as i would in a 15 year old and a 20 year old yes. It's dangerous, an unhealthy because it can lead to pregnancy at that age, so teach them about safe sex and hand them a pack of condoms. problem solved. Not to mention, as crazy as it may sound, it could also lead to one or both of them being arrested, and being placed on the sex offender registry like in the link I posted above. wait we are discussing why it's wrong to put these people on th…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 06:55 PM
8

so now you are using the punishments serverity as justification for the punishments servrity? do you even have a point?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 09:15 AM
5

I'm assuming you don't mean a sexual relationship, kids that age shouldn't be thinking about sex). well considering the discusion we're having here that'd be a dumb assumption. trust me a significant amount of children that age are having sex. which leads me to the next question: why shouldn't they be thinking about sex at that age when it's perfectly normal to do so? obviously not the same way an adult or even a teen would think abotu sex and obviously not all of them. Then their parents should…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 09:13 AM
10

The departments can pick and choose. unless ofcourse we ask you then qualifications doesn't matter and we should have a 50/50 hireing pratice even if it means subpar employes. how about you try useing the argumentation to find a conclusion instead of starting with a conclusion and then finding the arguments to back it up?
/r/MensRights10/10/13 12:50 PM
1

That's not technically true. it's not just techincally true it's factually true. your will not be alowed to not pay your child support payments just because the other parent is denying you your rightful accses to the child because it is 2 seperate cases. The act of denying access goes towards fitness in general and could easily effect the assignment of custody and therefore support. true but this isn't related to anything i have said so i'm not sure why you are bringing it up. That being said, t…
/r/MensRights09/10/13 07:12 PM
1

if women can deny access and still recive child support so can men damn well do this. the court will allways treat it as 2 different unrelated cases when presented like this.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 03:23 PM
2

ofcourse he can. they are 2 seperate cases that have abseloutly nothing to do with each other and just because one of them isn't enforced correctly doesn't mean the other doesn't have to be upheld. if women can deny access and still recive child support so can men damn well do this.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:41 AM
5

basicly "fraud is legal" is the short version of this ruleing. i'd say this sets a dangerous precednt but to my knowledge it really doesn't. simply following what has allready been established.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 10:32 AM
5

I am beginning to think that there actually are quite a few MRA's who would say that men are oppressed by women. ofcourse there is. you'd be quite naive if you thought the MRM didn't have it's radicals. however i have never seen them be the main voice nor have i seen them be ignored nor condoned by their peers. they say stupid shit we berate them for it and say something more intelligent.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 01:31 PM
4

'I know very little about girls, but what I have seen I really haven’t liked. girls are dumb; they blame their siblings for all their missdeeds, are obsessed with (okay i have nothing for this one WTF!?!), casually ruin the lives of local men and turn into vapid teenage girls and then hysterical, entiteled women.'
/r/MensRights08/10/13 01:25 PM
7

on what basis? being unfaithful isn't a crime. why should it entitel her to a bigger share?
/r/MensRights07/10/13 04:45 PM
-3

"but I chose to be a mother, you must now compensate me because I earn less money due to my OWN CHOICES" you are delusional if you think every instance of stay at home mothers was a decision made solely by the woman. it is to be assumed in a marriage that such a choice is made mutually between the partners. but somehow you don't think men should be held responsible for this choice? don't ever get married. in your case not because it might be bad for you. but because you don't understand what mar…
/r/MensRights07/10/13 04:36 PM
2

Why should the government be allowed to presume that I'm not a parent? why should your feelings be alowed to potentially risk the medical history of the child? why does facts scare you? you seem to hold scarely tightly to the often mocked "no facts, only feels". but it's another to create a policy that places a burden on men - and only men - that they have an obligation to prove to the government that they are the father of a child. semantics. it could just as easily be argued that it puts a bur…
/r/MensRights06/10/13 06:51 PM
1

you know what? once again i'm perfectly williong to take this argument to heart. but do these people realise that this is an argument in FAVOR of refusing women the right to make their owen decisions and make the men in their lives make them for them? sure let's follow this belif ladies. now unless you have a husband to make decisions for you you are supossed to do what daddy says. either you are cappable of being responsible of your own actions or you are not. so what will it be ladies? no righ…
/r/MensRights06/10/13 09:32 AM
21

great! next time you have one my 300 pound cousin would like a ride. i mean you did consent.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 03:00 PM
2

yeah and a man who isn't a rapist? puh that CLEARLY is a "unicorn" as well. i mean the whole idea idea is just laughable isn't it? no no just give it time and you'll realise that induvidualty is just a lie and everyone is basicly the same. my god.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 06:47 PM
0

no that's actually my point. the basic idea is right but only when you aply it to both genders. both men and women have that final veto right where if they can't convice you that you are dateworthy material you won't get a date.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 08:26 AM
0

yeah that's tottally okay girls. no really it is. i mean it's no different from how WOMEN scare me what with them being prone to fits of being hysterical and irrational. it's not out of any kiund of malice i mean i do love girls... i just fear them sometimes you know and it's tottally not hate but fear that makes me say women have no buisness in the job market and that they should all stay subservient to a male. so yeah. you get to profile me based on your fear of my gender. as long as you agree…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 07:20 AM
7

well the statement isn't entirely incorrect. it simply cuts both ways and THAT'S where the problem lies when people deny this. women do get to decide and men do have to convince them. but men can eaqually decide if he so chosses. you as a man do need to prove yourself to a woman. at least if you want to have sex with them. it's a game and if you don't like the rules you do have the option to not play. and even if you do play you don't have to play by the rules. it just get's very much harder if …
/r/MensRights03/10/13 07:14 AM
3

the problem with here is that the statement is a conclusion not an argument. unless they back this crap up with an argument it carries no weight at all. what can be asserted without evidence can be refuted without evidence.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 05:58 AM
1

and i'd love to be crowned emperor of the universe. doesn't mean it becomes an undeniable fact.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 12:59 PM
1

never atribute to malice what can be just as easily atributed to ignorance or incompetence. i'm not gping to deny that nobody saw feminsism as a goodway to get a lot of benefits without having to give up any of their priviliges but for a far bigger group it wasn't some grand plan. my point is you keep saying "men pays" will allways be the case... well "women stay in the kitchen" was "always" the case as well. look how that turned out. if it happens to stay that way forever people like you are to…
/r/MensRights29/09/13 02:17 AM
2

most people against FGM happens to never have had it done FGM either and many who have had it support the pratice. i guess i can only assume you support FGM? wait no let me guess: "that's totally different".
/r/MensRights28/09/13 02:38 AM
1

100 years ago many would have said the same about women staying in the kitchen. as a matter of fact the man pays BECAUSE the woiman stays in the kitchen. so ever since women joined the job market the laws of society shouldn't have been "man pays". you want that rule to stay? better get the woman back in their place then.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 02:32 AM
1

Many women enjoy being pregnant. I know my wife did. Don't knock it until you try it. get back to me after you have tried torture. some people enjoy it. The child didn't ask to be put in there. and i didn't ask to get born. CLEARLY the only moral choice is to abort all children. just to be sure.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 03:16 AM
2

Well, I guess the majority of pediatricians that happen to be women should shut the hell up about circumcision. don't forget mothers. they also need to shut the hell up. i guess.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 03:12 AM
4

honestly all that sound like "women logic" to me... i mean if we are going to start generalising here.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 06:45 PM
5

"why are people so concered with what i feed my kid? if i say lead paint is good enough that's none of ANYONE ELSES buisness". seriously this is the dumbest question ever and a sign that this person is not qualified to be a parent.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 03:35 PM
2

She believes my opinion is based on the fact that my ex broke my heart and won't let me see my kid but in fact those events led me to /r/MensRights and I learnt a lot over the last year. i'd suggest that "men are biologically not inclinded to be petty, vindictive and cruel like women" just to see how well that would go over. i have as much basis for my statment as she has for hers.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 06:53 PM
4

At least how it is now the man does have a recourse in that he can use protection. and this is where your entire argument falls apart. why is it okay to say "men can use protection so it's okay to force them to be responsible for a child they do not want" but it's not okay to say " women can use protection so it's okay to force them to be responsible for a pregnancy they do not want"? why does this argument only aply to men?
/r/MensRights20/09/13 01:47 AM
0

I don't want her into ANY religion or ANY of my beliefs at all at her age. She is far from understanding ANY of it. When she's older, she can decide what to believe on her own and I will support her in every way, including taking her to church if that's what she wants. huh? Are there any child friendly evolution videos I could show her in the mean time? I'd like to her be able to understand at least a little bit about it. something doesn't add up here... HOW DARE YOU say that my daughter is bett…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 11:41 PM
2

You're saying that being critical of someone who would flee the country to avoid raising his own child is "victim blaming"? i'm saying you aren't doing any such thing. you are instead being critical of someone who has been denied that right but still holds the responsibility of PAYING for a child being raised. thgese people whould most of the time LOVE to actually be there raising their child. too bad mommy said they couldn't. i don't get the rest of you post. half seems to agree with me the oth…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:06 AM
-1

i actually read the original post and it did change my openion. thought not for the better. you seem to be quite vindictive and ironically quite indoctrinating towards your daugther. "gasp! my young daugther has taken to likeing the idea of god. quick how can i find videos to make her understand it's all lies and that my belif is the correct belif?" it's the exact behaviour that r/atheism would be up in arms about if it were a chirstian doing something like this. so from reading more from you: n…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 03:00 AM
2

acording to "tradition" if i pour alcholol on a date i get sex. the guy in story above is in the wrong but your comment isn't much better. whatever her intentions was when he agreed to the date he couldn't have know either so clearly she should pay for her own shit.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 07:24 PM
2

feminists tell me it's not applicable because you choose to drive you don't choose to be raped. well ofcourse not! the girl CHOOSE to have sex. rape is no where in sight. now if you want to claim she couldn't CHOOSE to have sex because she was too drunk i'll just decide that i couldn't CHOOSE to drive because i was too drunk. it wasn't my fault it was the cars!!!
/r/MensRights15/09/13 07:07 PM
1

He's not permitted access because he doesn't deserve access. I shouldn't have to defend myself of what I think is best for my daughter. i agree. also i think you should have your daugther removed from your custody. you don't deserve to have that. i don't have to defend myself for beliveing this either. I don't think a single person here, regardless of gender, would want to expose their children to that type of environment. and i'd guess he doesn't want his daugther exposed to you. i guess we rea…
/r/MensRights15/09/13 07:00 PM
8

People demanding the right to financial abortion you mean people who have been denied their right to live their own life? if anyone is hurting those children it's the mother who force them to be born without a father. or upvoting people who openly admit to fleeing the country to avoid financial responsibility. blameing the victim. in very rare cases are those people (at least the ones upvoted here) simply leaving because they have a finacial responsibility. it's because they have a responsibilit…
/r/MensRights15/09/13 06:57 PM
2

I'm not taking sides I just can't understand why she would plea unless she just didn't wanna deal with the shit and wanted it to go away. maybe she's guilty, knew she was guilty and thus wanted it to go away before it got worse? is that such an impossible idea? or do you assume that everyone who pleas is innocent?
/r/MensRights15/09/13 06:47 PM
-1

Black and white workd you live in i see? you know what? i HAVE been in that situation. my friends xbox and laptop was stolen because he forgot to leave his front door unlocked. you know what we agreed upon? that he was an idiot for leaving his door unlocked. that his xbox was stolen because he left his door unlocked. sure the asshole was who ever stole it. but my friend wasn't blameless. it's scary that you people seem to think it's all or nothing. if i jump into the lion pit at the zoo and get …
/r/MensRights15/09/13 04:25 PM
3

No, but you have the right to. never claimed you didn't Additionally, you ought to be able to expect to see it there when you come back. idealy yes. but if you think criminals play by what's fair you're so stupid you honestly deserve to get robbed. not because they have a "right" to though. Would you take a laptop or a GPS left inside a unlocked car? If you wouldn't, you don't really believe what you wrote. my god you are right. i wouldn't steal so obviously thives aren't real! better go leave m…
/r/MensRights15/09/13 04:19 PM
1

would you leave an expensive laptop in an unlocked car? your GPS? heck just in general leave your car unlocked? if not you don't really belive what you wrote.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 11:26 AM
4

too bad your parents weren't as lucky. you could do us the favour though.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 11:56 PM
9

Start seeing people vindicated after trials involving sexual offences as people who have made their own unpleasant, unfortunate, yet heroic sacrifice to a cause much bigger than them – the fight for justice for victims. Encourage those wrongly accused to see themselves that way. i don't know this sounds entitrely reasonable to me. we reallly should start seeing rape surviors as unfortunate but heroic scarefices to keep the innocent accused out of... oh this wasn't what you were going for? you ca…
/r/MensRights14/09/13 11:54 PM
3

better than putting down innocent children in order to feel better about yourself. please leave, i doubt you and you child mutilation support will be missed.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 05:05 AM
3

People do get infections and need to get their foreskin cut off. where i live only jews and muslims have this done to them and even amogst them not all. i have yet to meet a single person who have needed this procedure. i have meet women who needed their breasts removed because of cancer though. i guess we should do that to all infant girls as well. you know to cancel out those negatives of needing to have them removed later.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 05:01 AM
3

well shit maybe we shouldn't even name our kids, best leave that up to them when they are adults. why? if they want they can change their names. they can't grow their foreskin back. might want to try a starwman that is actually relevant. oh and before you try don't bother going for medical conditions that need imediate reaction. it's still not the same.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 04:57 AM
1

aply this to something else. let's say religion. let's say the primary caretaker is a very devout christian. must the other parent then also follow chritian doctrine when the child is in their care even if they are not christian themself? why should we aford more respect to the primary caretaker than the secondary? and why should we do it at the EXPENSE of the secondary caretaker. as we have allready established a vegitrarian diet especially for a child is hard to keep. and you wpould have a per…
/r/MensRights12/09/13 01:44 PM
9

really? and you're still concerning yourself with an ignorant irrelevant issue. if you belive reading your issue is irrelevant why even begin to share? I was ranting, not writing a novel. I must have missed the reddit memo on proper writing while ranting. well you need to if you want to get a message across and not simply rant for rantings sake. i'm not saying you can't do the later just that this isn't the place for it. go to r/off mychest or something if that's what you want. here it's simply …
/r/MensRights11/09/13 10:21 AM
15

Focus should be on the post, not grammar. i don't think you understand the point of grammar. the point is to make it possible to read so we CAN focus on the post itself. For someone to be so lazy to make the statement they can't read it without paragraphs is not only ridiculous, but irrelevant to the very point of what was written. when you are so lazy as to not properly write your story i don't belive you have anything worthwhile to contribute. you clearly don't care enough about this anyway, w…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 07:22 AM
1

you're right. lying about this is equivalent to rape. it's worse. clearly we need the death penalty here.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 10:40 AM
15

and you are encourageing the system to fail. please explain why it should be okay to lie in court.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 07:50 AM
0

don't have any real arguments? can't even find anything to prove your stupid claims that lions have laws? do you hate your parents for feeding you when you were born? what am i asking ofcourse you do. you are just a fucking leech who should have died since you couldn't even feed yourself.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 02:24 PM
0

Explain to me the differences. explain to me just a single law lions have. or any animal for that matter. also yeah those lions SHOULD leave their cubs. fucking leeches expecting to be feed just because they are still blind. what blights on lion society they are.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 01:04 PM
1

was that suposed to be poetic? insulting? or just an expresion of pure undiluted insanity?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 04:00 PM
-2

so how far do you think we'll get with your method of treating the symptoms whille ignoreing the illness? btw they did that for hundres of years with medicine as well and when we changed suddenly people didn't die from a small cough anymore. but no we better get back to when were were ignorant. the dark ages were the shit man!
/r/MensRights08/09/13 09:10 AM
3

i would be very happy if you died. so i guess who ever murders you is a true champion of justice. at least you agree you should just die for the greater good.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 09:04 AM
3

Rape: the most important problem women face on earth. or should we go with Not being payed as much because you work less: the most important problem women face on earth.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 08:19 AM
9

Your first step is to accept that "fighting for the betterment of women" is not the definition of feminists. The dictionary is wrong. Get over it and admit you are just litterally Hitler. this game is fun i have to admit.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 08:45 PM
1

I believe no parent should pay the other a dime for any reason under any circumstances. yeah parents should be alowed to ignore theior children. those 2 year olds should get a fucking job if they want food and sheelter. what fucking leeches. who do they think they are that they should be provided for by their parents? the mother may not owe OP a dime. but she sure as fuck owe her child. but no let's get back to "our roots" back when we threw our kids to the wolves the second they were born.
/r/MensRights06/09/13 02:00 PM
2

NO ONE should pay/receive alimony nor child support... unless they're a worthless leech. isn't it nice how you would deny your son HIS money? your children shouldn't get money from the parent they live with either obviously. unless they are a worthless leech. OP should be embaressed he provide for his son. what has our society come to when a parent is responsible for their children?
/r/MensRights06/09/13 01:56 PM
9

at which point the feminists started chanting "This is what men's rights look like." so men's rights = justice and freedom feminism = anarchy and oppression? well if that's the message feminists want to bring out there i'll be happy to help them spread it.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:32 PM
1

I just don't think there's any reasonable way to prevent that practice without unduly restricting the essential right of a woman to terminate a pregnancy. well i don't see how it would be UNreasonable to simply not tell them the gender before AFTER they have made the choice edit: i'd like to point out i ment don't tell the parents. you can still check that and everything else to ensure the child is healthy without telling the gender to the parents. can anyone give a reason why parents MUST know …
/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:29 PM
10

CertusAT might not exactly have formulated himself the best way. but the way you take this personal and go out of your way to be hurt by what he wrote i can't take everything you write seriously. wether or not the male body is physically superior or not depends entirely on what measure you use. if we go for strength yeah it's superior. but if take flexibility maybe not so much. and then you could weigh in with something subjective like beauty or incomparable like the abillity to carry a child. i…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:22 PM
19

i just realised: this is the exact same dumb argument as the people who say that because some soldier died for you freedom you can't use that freedom to not support the war he died in. seriously if these women fought to give you the right to choose who the fuck is this bitch to come and shit all over their legacy like this? though it does give me an imense satisfaction to know that it would be quite apt to name this woman "anti-feminist"
/r/MensRights05/09/13 06:11 PM
1

I think my point is pretty clear. That people need to back away from their narrative and think for themselves. that's funny. i think it's pretty clear as well. i think you point is undeniabley: "if you don't agree with me shut the fuck up" sorry but this isn't your little safe space. if you can't deal with the fact that not everyone here agrees with you maybe you should not be here. i agree with all your points but when i try to hold you to them you are not a friend but the exact enemy you tell …
/r/MensRights05/09/13 10:37 AM
2

According to Myers, corporations should not see people in terms of productivity, but instead should see people in terms of gender: reward women more for less work ... because "biology"! isn't the an argument is favor of"women in the work place? don't make me laugh back to the kitchen bitch" when you really think about it?
/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:03 AM
1

Don't you dare talk for me. and They only allow one narrative to be told there i'm not gonna say you don't have a point. i'm just gonna say you are either incredibly bad at formulating it or you need to take it seriously to heart before you start pointing fingers.
/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:00 AM
4

why we arrest child labourers when they break child labour laws plkease point me in the direction of the child labour laws that says children can not work? oh right they don't exists since they all say that you can't EMPLOY children. we arrest the ones who break the law. and the workers for choosing to work in unsafe conditions when companies break health and safety laws. again same deal. the law doesn't hold these people responsible they hold their employers responsible. even if the workers cho…
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:37 AM
2

so you admit that you are the problem? you don't want to fix the problem you want to enforce the problem? well at least you are honest about what an asshole you are.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:20 AM
7

the point it's a slipery slope argument. you can't argue that the law should have sympathy for someone because they are in a bad spot just because it might make a bad situation worse otherwise rapists and murderes could make the same claim.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:42 PM
2

i know it exists. and i don't need to follow any links to see you support making that problem the law. if you offered a SOLUTION i would be all ears. instead you just want the shoe on the other foot.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 09:32 PM
3

would you please stop disagreeing with your own postion when it doesn't suit your argument? it makes it really hard to figure out what stance you have when half your arguments goes against the other half.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:21 PM
3

I believe that women are as capable as men, you openions suggest otherwise. if you really belive this i can't understand why you support the idea that they should not have to prove this but should get a job based only on having tits. or do you belive "have tits" is a valid skill set for a CEO?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:12 PM
7

How do you know that less qualified men weren't getting hired just for being men already? you are right. let's solve a problem that MIGHT exists but we have no actual evidence does exists by making that problem the law. did you actually read what you wrote before you posted this stupid shit? you're right. it may be that some people are hired because of their gender and nopt their skills. and i'm apauled that you or anyone else would support that. Hiring unqualified people no matter their gender …
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:07 PM
1

and SOME people like you need to have the right to have an openion revoked. your comment is not welcome here. deal with it.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 09:06 PM
1

either you don't know what one-uping someone actually means or you are the most petty person i have ever had the misfortune of ecountering. first of one upping would require another solution to be at hand. there was none. even then after she did find another yet inferior solution OP didn't do anything further. he only brought up here that his solution would have been better, something that was actually relevant because it tells us how the woman actually behaved in the situation. teamwork is not …
/r/MensRights31/08/13 11:12 AM
2

yeah yeah. keep talking hypocrit. i might take advice from you the day you are willing to follow it. but please do go on making up what happened. like for instance if I saw one subordinate dropping his work to help another subordinate without asking or being invited, OP never claimed this happened. you however decided that this was how it went down because it suits your narative. here's my narative: they are a team and one's person job is everyones job. so by doingthis he WAS doing his job. ther…
/r/MensRights30/08/13 10:01 PM
6

you just offered me unsolicited advice. that is unacceptable. you should be banned from reddit for doing something so utterly rude... do you see how stupid this is? but please remove yourself from reddit since you seem to belive this is how the world should work.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 04:55 PM
2

Some people find unsolicited help, especially when it is not the offeror's responsibility, to be very patronizing. i am one of those people. but i'm not retarded enough to therefor conclude that any such instance is somehow harassment. because no matter what i feel it isn't. i might might construe her employment as sexism. is that basis for fireing her or should we just consider that to be my own personal problem? and please i don't want to know what kind of working enviroment you are in where t…
/r/MensRights30/08/13 04:52 PM
0

no no all those are serious issues men face every day as well. feminists really are terrible people for supporting all that.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 07:35 AM
-2

because nobody wants the girls there, right? you point is dumb. the only reason i have against this is that it would NOT be considered okay if you did the reverse. however i don't belive this behaviour should stopped i think the reverse should be possible without instant outrage. in a buiseness that profit from having females around yes a sausage fest is a terrible thing. you make it sound like it's a bad thing the buisness prioritises their profits over your feelings. if you have a problem with…
/r/MensRights30/08/13 07:28 AM
2

that's a lot of assumptions with very little backing you got there. and it still doesn't justify this behaviour. you're right that a single mother will never have the earnings potential of a man. it's not really a valid comparison though is it? no man is ever going to be in that same position(unless the mother is dead and then things will often become similar anyway). you say the assumption that only women cook, clean or raise children is sexist against women i however propose that it's sexists …
/r/MensRights30/08/13 01:59 AM
1

i'll admit that i'm a special case when this is concerned but i would have prefered less recess, no gym class and for the love of everything holy don't ever put me in a workshop again. i seriously think we need to start splitting kids up bassed on what sort of learning enviroment suits them.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:30 AM
2

this has nothing to do with the law anymore. the law can't take into acount EVERY possibility but it still needs to state what is and isn't legal. you do realise the law is never set in stone and always being interpreted right?
/r/MensRights29/08/13 11:27 AM
7

because vigilante justice is the only way to go. we shouldn't even have custody. just who ever get's to run away with the children first get's them so they can "protect them".
/r/MensRights29/08/13 12:57 AM
1

now imagine HE was the one who could simply decide that YOU shouldn't see the son because YOU are bad for him. would you still be against this if the shoe was on the other foot? i don't hate women. i hate bad parents. and if you think you should be above the law what's to say your ex shouldn't also be? what about all the kids who are in the hands of an abusive mother who won't let the kids father near them? why do you support them? why do you hate kids? or maybe we should drop this kind of falla…
/r/MensRights29/08/13 12:52 AM
3

now imagine instead of your dad it was your mother. and that your mother was the one who got to decide if it was "good" for you see your dad. the system failed you no doubt. but that's no reason to support setting it up for failure.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 12:25 AM
3

so you are against equality. good to know. P.S. yeah women in the western world have got it so horrible. lol
/r/MensRights28/08/13 03:45 AM
2

forget about it. soul greens is the kind of idiot who things if the public has acces to it it's a public buisness. aparently it's only a private buisness if you need a members card.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:39 PM
2

nor is a barber. it's a private buisness open to those who qualify. just like the breastfeeding cirle is.
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:19 PM
2

i'm sorry but why? you come in here witha conclusion already in hand but you haven't exactly justified it? i fully belive if you have reason you should be able to ban certain clientel in order to be able to provide the serviuce you want to provide. like no minors in bars. is that one unacceptable as well? why is women only gyms bad? the only reason they would be bad is if not similar male only gym could be provided. i can not for the life of me come up witha reason to ban blacks, but if you coul…
/r/MensRights27/08/13 01:17 PM
1

but if a woman is in a group makes them do better it means they are noticing something men dont which means women have some fundamental way of thinking that is better than how men think. that's assuming that men don't also notice things women don't. the idea is that one group does ceratin things better and the other group does other things better. together they cover both areas and thus work best. without the data of an all female group in this experiment we can only assume but this assumption i…
/r/MensRights26/08/13 02:53 AM
-1

Huh when did I ever mention freedom of speech? well you did say It is related however, in response to the guy who said it isn't about free speech so there. also right in next fucking sentence you do again. Those groups are blocking speech they disagree with and not letting other people view videos they don't like or disagree with. as i said it's not like you had free speech on youtube to begiun with. I don't pay for utube, but they get profit from me. and you think that entitels you to something…
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:24 AM
12

Mr. Wise took his case to the media, hoping to generate political support and contact other men in a similar situation. Instead, he angered the judge, who revoked his visitation rights to the children but left him responsible for $1,100 (U.S.) in monthly support. best intrest of the child ladies and gentle men. daddy is only a vallet and if you hope to be an actual parent to your own children best intrest of the child is to remove you but obviously not your money.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:11 PM
1

it is not okay in this particular or similar cases. but let's say petty theft or drug possesion. should we really work to get people like that fired? how is that going to help? if anything it just leaves less good options.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 10:36 AM
-4

so tell me how much did you pay for your youtube acount? oh that's right. it's a free service. you didn't pay anything. and just like facebook: if you don't pay for it you are the product being sold. youtube has NO obligations to uphold your free speech rights. it's a private entity not public and they can censor as they please. yes the false flag operations are a problem that should hopefully be dealt with. but youtube is not a human-right. it is a buisness. and they can and will take any actio…
/r/MensRights20/08/13 09:11 AM
5

this makes me wonder how long till we to hear about a kid pulling his/her mother in court since they didn't consent to being born.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:59 AM
4

well there is at the very least a smidgen of truth to it, though i'm not willing to take guess as to what extend exactly. it's kind of how blacks are more likely to be criminals in the US. take a bit of racism add ghetto culture and lack of education persecute the muslims and cover for the whites and suddenly they are primarily responsible for rapes. but it's not the problem. at worst it's a symptom of the real problem. and you don't deal with the symptoms, you deal with the cause.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:55 AM
3

funny. you do realise sweden wasn't in WWII right? in fact Sweden was were scadinavian jews fleed to since Germany wasn't there. then again what's the difference between Sweden and Denmark anyway? but since we got started on this retarded history lessoon exactly what was DENMARK suposed to have done? the danish military wouldn't have stod anything resmbeling a chance against the german forces. yes there was collaboration but it certainly wasn't voluentary. then again this all sounds rather troll…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:50 AM
27

any bets on how this woman would react to the much popular "neckbeards"? oh but ofcourse there's no such thing as men's fashion or beauty standards. i say we set this woman up on a date with a man in sweatpants who hasn't been shaved lately. nothing disgusting or smelly, just no effort. then we record the date and she's not alowed to critizie anything about his looks and if she does she pays for everything. would make awesome reality TV.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 06:27 PM
2

i think you have serious problem sif you have to make a concious decision to not murder people. even if it's an easy choice. because the rest of us don't need to do that.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:16 PM
4

i like how nobody took you seriously enough to respond.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 04:59 PM
10

so now sources are bullshit. basicly the only way to argue in feminism is to make claims and that makes them facts. P.S. 110% of child abuse is done by women. women are incapable of being near children without male oversight. that's a fact.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 07:41 AM
9

"You write well like a girl" and what I said was "You write bad like a man" basicly the problem are they are sexist assholes who put their own negative conatations on words and then get insulted by them. tell them you are insulted that they'd say "man = bad, girl = good."
/r/MensRights14/08/13 06:54 PM
2

Mother would have been hamstrung in her attempts to make household expenditures, which in turn could have negatively impacted her attempts at reunification, thereby harming child. as i said: mommy clearly wasn't working and thus earning hard enough. for men that's a offense you get jailed for. but thanks for proving my point.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 05:54 PM
6

so when do we takle this condition seriously and limit the rights of these people who are biologically incapable of taking responsibility for their own actions?
/r/MensRights14/08/13 09:49 AM
26

i'm sorry but the mom needs to be put in jail. she's CLEARLY not living up to her "earnings potential" and untill she does jail is the only option. oh wait she's female? disregard the rules they only aply to men.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 09:48 AM
0

nope i think that would just be you and your single digit IQ showing it's ugly head. don't assume that just because you can't function near women doesn't mean the entire gender is defect. it is just you who is unable to control yourself. well you and a few other people who happen to be the only ones you can connect with and thus know of.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:35 PM
26

feminism: the idea that rape is a favour.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 09:52 AM
18

Seriously, who would believe such a thing? people who seriously claim to be skeptics... i'm honestly not sure wether to laugh or cry.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 05:18 PM
1

i'm hardly even able to get mad at this because whille he lies and makes up shit to extreme extends he simply misses the point so fucking hard that i don't have a propor response. When I asked the mods and prominent members of the MRM why they don't advocate volunteering, in old age homes, in homeless shelters, for suicide hotlines, they have no good answer to give me. If the MRM was legitimate it would do these things instead of pretending like they're a movement online. Because the MRM isn't y…
/r/MensRights09/08/13 05:12 PM
1

Do you honestly think that MRAs don't want women to be able to vote or work? no? that's why i didn't say any such thing. i just said that if MRAM is illegitimate by these standards so is feminism... and by extension what they have achived.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 05:43 AM
3

I want to convince you the MHRM has no legitimacy as a stand-alone movement whille this might sound reasonable it also goes to reason that feminism is just as ilegitimate as a stand alone movement. is women voteing ilegitimate? women working? i thought not.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 05:19 AM
2

yes yes yes. rape is all just oner big favour and rapists are the unsung heroes of our lives. fuck you too buddy.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 06:09 PM
6

as long as you insists on being called "female gamer" i'm not going to take you seriously. nothing wrong with being a gamer who happens to be female. but either you are a gamer or you are not. no special qualifiers.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 11:33 AM
2

Stop trying to make personal decisions into major issues YEAH!!! my personal choice to tatto my son isn't ANYONE'S business. i should be alowed to do what ever the fuck i want assuming i'm happy with having it done to myself. so butt out whille i go having BDSM sex with my toddler daugther. oh wait this doesn't count because YOU actually disagree with this?
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:43 AM
3

except this is a blatant lie and has no basis in reality. i'm a guy. i post on reddit. if i say something stupid or make a joke that is not funny guess what happens? i get downvotes. i have been in a multiutude of arguments and i have been wrong in more than one of them. yes a majority of the posters are men. guess what. the majority of the population of the world is women. acording to you fallacious logic women can never be right in the face of men in the real world because the real world is "f…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:36 AM
-1

yeah and REAL men don't care about looks at all so the sexy babes in comics has nothing to do with... OH WAIT! just because one gender claim something what sells doesn't fucking lie.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:17 AM
1

First, once i tag someone as a troll i no longer read their comments. yet here we have a reply. are you admiting you are stupid enough to reply without reading? Second, there's something really wrong with someone who picks up an argument that's been over for days. been over? if you are going to walk away and thus make it "over" feel free. but you didn't prove anything. reality in fact still goes against every single of your claims. you could have been the bigger man and walked away. but you didn…
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:11 AM
2

Wow, really upset you, didn't i? not really. you simply amuse me. Your punctuation and spelling have gone to hell, it's like your brain is having a meltdown. have? it's allways like that. english isn't my native language and i'm bad at both even with my native language. however your brain seem to have started to rot what with not even being in contact with reality anymore. There's nothing as satisfying as pissing off a troll. you really think trolling pisses of trolls? you must be very new at th…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 11:39 PM
9

This gap faced by women is due to actual discrimination towards women, if this is such a big problem i suggest women stop discriminating against themself and work as hard as men do. what's the nest step? should women also be able to say they don't want to actually work a job but that shouldn't mean they don't get payed as much as the men who do? where does it end?
/r/MensRights02/08/13 06:44 AM
4

i'm sorry but if the majority sits around doing nothing of worth whille the minority is going around fucking things up in the name of the majority then yes the majority has been overpowered by the minority. and it is the responsibility of that majority to get into action and stop the madness and start something sane. as long as the radical ones are the only ones acting in a meaningful way they are the ones who hold the power in that group.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 06:37 AM
1

true but fact is we dealing with extremes here. and if you ever get in a situation where you are forced to chose between to 2 extremes the only reasonable choice is to refuse to particpate in the madness and find a sane alternative most likely somewhere in between the aforementioned extremes.
/r/MensRights02/08/13 06:32 AM
1

the law is the law and the law should aply equally to everyone. the law might be wrong. but as long as it's the law she like anyone else must face it as being just that. the fucking law.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 08:16 PM
1

and people like you who declare to have knowledge it is impossible for you to posses are so much better? people like you is why america is hated by the rest of the world. then again you should really eb proud. you are the best at being the worst.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 08:10 PM
2

do i think they were frithgtened? possibly? do i think they tried to get away? how the fuck is that releavnt. should we start judging rapes based on that? "yeah i know he threathed to kill you if you didn't have sex with him but you did not try to get away so it's not rape. sorry"? fuck no and do i belive that every girl involved in a similar case was "frigthed and tried to get away? fuck no i belive around half of them if not more instiogated and enjoyed it. but that doesn't make it less wrong.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 08:05 PM
1

and I keep waiting to hear the ending sarcasm i don't think you understand how sarcasm works. there isn't generally some end "btw i'm sarcastic".
/r/MensRights31/07/13 08:00 PM
4

so can i sue my parents for being "voluntarily underemployed"? any and all of these BS arguments about "best intrest of the child" should be held up in court against parents who are still together. untill it is i'll take it for the verbal diarrhea that it is.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 07:55 PM
2

well that data would be incredibly scewed anyway. i mean look at how society looks at sexual abuse when it comes to boys compared to girls. now how many girls compared to boys are going to admit they have partaken in it? i'm not claiming any kind of malice in this but girls have for a long whille been able to get away with it as simply a joke and why would you report it as sexual abuse if it was just a joke?
/r/MensRights31/07/13 07:49 PM
1

what you "belive" doesn't matter in face of facts. and facts are you came in here going on about the horrible experiences of women and how they should somehow silence those of men. both are valid. neither invalidate the other. Nothing is wrong in voicing an activism. But doing so at the expense of others is simply selfish and uncalled for. this is what you yourself said. and it also what you yourself did here.
/r/MensRights31/07/13 07:42 PM
10

if i think it's funny as hell to stab my coworker in the neck witha rusty screwdriver would that make it okay?
/r/MensRights30/07/13 09:30 PM
6

Downplaying another person's painful experience at the expense to further an agenda is hurtful and wrong. yet here you are doing just that.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 03:04 PM
1

you are clearly not welcome here. you don't get to call other "outsider" because you are not "inside".
/r/MensRights30/07/13 03:00 PM
3

you are not worth questioning. you are not gameing anyone you are simply trolling and doing a horrible job of it. you are not exactly proving anything by doing the exact same thing wrong and amongst people who admit it's wrong and then they call you our for not being any better. all you proved is that MRA's people who claim to combat sexism combat sexism. you then claim that the people in question are in fact not MRA's but instead hypocrits who only combat you because you turned it around? no yo…
/r/MensRights30/07/13 02:59 PM
5

Ya might not only find a bunch of unexpected allies (ahem. Feminists), why would our biggest enemy the people who fight against the idea becomes allies? should we also count alqeuda suecide bombers as allies in the war on terror? as long as you suggest we seek help from the people who are most activly shutting us down no wonder you don't see the activism you want. heck we even have proof. the last time an awareness campaign was started feminist everywhere went bonkers and started crying fowl. ma…
/r/MensRights30/07/13 02:51 PM
1

If a woman is drinking, and her choices can't be held accountable, then by the same logic, can't the man's choices not be held to the man? no. what you should take from this is it should be illgal to sell alchol to a woman just like it is to sell to a minor. women should not be alowed to drink. that is what they are telling you.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 02:44 PM
2

And it doesn't prevent anything health related, technically it could. knowing for sure who the father is would help with genetic illnesses. which is why this should be. i know feminists feelings might be hurt but honestly women don't matter in this case what so ever. you see "the best intrest of the child" mean you as a mom don't have rights.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 06:43 PM
7

seriously a quick skim of this post (i guess i could make similar observations of my own but honestly my brain would hurt without the funny observations to break the bullshit) has taught me one thing: feminist have no right to call them self allies of women. they can not live up to their own rules so by feminist dogma feminists are not with women they are against them. if that doesn't tell you how utterly retarded their ideology is nothing will. ofcourse it doesn't count when they do it because …
/r/MensRights28/07/13 12:53 AM
1

people who have devoted their lives to the study of child development agree almost unanimously that moms are better parents i have NEVER heard sucha thing. i hjave heard people with agendas say such things but if you have reputable sources saying otherwise bring them on. but don't demand that i know something i don't. further I never said most blacks are criminals maybe not but people who have devoted their lives to catching criminals agree almost unanimously that blacks are more criminal. so ob…
/r/MensRights27/07/13 10:02 PM
5

never atribute to malice what can be easily be atributed to incompetence
/r/MensRights25/07/13 12:25 PM
12

That they are both consenting adults who participate in this behavior does not make it acceptable to the rest of us. (Simple test: Would you want your daughter in that tableau?) "she's just a stupid woman she can't consent to staying with a guy if i consider him a scumbag!!!" yeah you're the feminist here. generally i agree with the message like cfornax said personal responsibility is a good thing. it just has to aply to everyone OR we need to accept that those who can't be personally responsibl…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 12:38 AM
1

but at the end of the day we all know that in MOST cases moms are better at the litle things i sure as fuck don't. i do know that statistically men do better at a focused task whille women do better at multitasking. however childrearing is both. some tasks are focused taskes some are multitasks. then again this arguement is exactly the same as saying "but at the end of the day we all know that in MOST cases blacks are criminals" bigorty is bigorty no matter how you try to justify it. you partici…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 12:29 AM
2

oh yeah lucky me not being one those many women who didn't get to cut in line at the bar. i know rape is serious. the police should have been called and she should have been forced to make a statement. she should have been removed from the general area of the bar... you know for her own protection.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 11:56 PM
1

that's fine. just remeber: you are what is dragging the masses down with you by doing that. also don't give yourself so much credit. the smart people(or as you call them goverment and rich people) do it without becoming part of the irrational masses. they stay above the people they push down. you just plunge yourself down into the deepths along with the filth.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:25 PM
5

i know people who think rape is hillarious. should we all just "get over that" as well? to an extend i agree with you. this is a joke. a tasteless bad and offensive joke but i'm personally of the belif that anything can be funny and no jokes are off limits. but either everyone can be offended by jokes and have it mean something or nobody can. further what is really offensive in this case is not so much the joke. it's BBB's way to handle it. if they had just said "get over it, it's a joke" i woul…
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:04 PM
1

she actually didn't deliver what she promised. if i go to 2 mcdonalds and order achesse burger and one gives me nothing and the other hands me a bun witha shit in it neither delivered what they promised me. anita didn't deliver the product she promised, what she did deliver was not on time and now it's pretty much proven she didn't even do what she promissed to do.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 01:17 PM
3

Why tolerate someone who is intellectually, logically and factually challenged and uses the same tired, ignorant straw man arguments to justify failed, unsupportable positions as "Grapeban" has done. you're right. this is why i don't tolerate either of you.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 01:14 PM
3

so how is it better exactly? oh i guess it makes it worse if you don't have a vagina.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 05:51 PM
1

so now you are against change because if things changed it wouldn't be like it is right now. by the way what you think will allways be an openion. i don't care if you are in the majority or the minority an openion never becomes a fact. it may be a fact that a majority of people don't consider shorts to be a profesional look. that doesn't make it a fact though. nor is it fact that it will allways be the majority openion.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 10:02 AM
1

acording to that logic you shouldn't be in r/mensrights either.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:44 PM
6

the kid defiently losses big time. i just have no idea why you are blaming the-final-word and not the mother for that. also how does the-final-word losse again?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:41 PM
3

now now let them speak. come on feminists go on explaing why it should be illegal for women to not be supervised by the much more capable men.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 10:19 AM
4

so grant him custody and if he decided not to take it put the child up for adoption. the woman is clearly unfit. best intrest of the child you know?
/r/MensRights14/07/13 01:29 PM
2

By consenting without making sure, LEARN TO READ!!! the situation in question specificals says the guy DID make sure but the woman lied. If that was the case, "He told me he loved me!" would be sufficient justification for a rape conviction. no it wouldn't having sex with a person who loves you and person who doesn't love you doesn't change the risk of having a child. the pill does. further "love" isn't nearly as definable as "are you taking the pill". maybe he did love her but then she was awfu…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 01:00 PM
2

no. it isn't a queation about keeping people "safe". it's a question about wether or not you belive in innocent until probven guility and justice as a whole. it's about if you belive human have a right to freedom. which you clearly don't.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 12:52 PM
4

just because youa nd the guys you happen to know alre all dumb brutes doesn't mean the law should aply differently to an entire gender. that said: women are more likely to lie so given the situation the cops should obviously have asumed the guy was telling the truth and the girls were lying. it may be unfair but it's just the reality of things. or does this suddenly count as bigotry now?
/r/MensRights13/07/13 03:13 PM
-7

someone should rape that woman. and anyone who belives that shit. they could gain from the experience. edit: i forgot how careful you have to be with sarcasm around here. i guess i really do deserve those downvotes.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:45 PM
4

He consented to having sex with her while she wasn't on the pill. you need to learn to read buddy. that was exactly what he didn't agree to.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:43 PM
0

i'm more intrested if said article then alowed for women to rape men that same way.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:41 PM
7

so you support removing children from christian parents as well? or is just who you arbitraily have decided have "evil" belifs? you are on a very dangerous slipery slope there and i suggest you get of it. for your own sake.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 03:39 PM
14

Just fuck off. You're trying to make me out to be some kind of villain, but I'm not trying to convict innocent people. no you just fight giving innocent people a chance What about murderers and thieves? Should we throw the whole justice system out the window because someone might have to defend themselves in court? if you don't want to throw the entire justice system out the window why are you complaing that we aren't throwing the entire justice system out the window? i'll give you the benefit o…
/r/MensRights11/07/13 12:57 PM
21

“It just doesn’t happen. Nobody would rape somebody needlessly because it is a grueling process to go through.” imagine if anyone made such a statment. but don't worry Karen Smith. you have convinced me rape isn't real.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 12:50 PM
6

don't worry. no one is going to rape you. oh is this offensive bullshit? maybe you should have thought of that before you made this your own argument.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 12:47 PM
4

i find this idea intreguing. maybe they are on to something. and maybe it apllies to women in the work force as well? yeah women spend far more time in the work place than they used to. but does it even come close to teh amount men allways and still do spend there? is it a tired assumption that holding a job makes them more feminine? suddenly this argument wouldn't fly near a selfrespecting feminist.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 12:40 AM
2

i belive that she didn't think.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 12:32 AM
0

i rape a girl. she get's pregnant. now she must "live with the consequnces" and give birth to the child because fuck her that child have rights. you live with the consequnces of your choices. not others choices. P.S. an unwanted child is not a beautiful thing and shame on your for suggesting that it is.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 12:09 AM
1

"Teach women not to falsely accuse men of rape" is too close too "Teach men not to rape". both yes and no. the problem is false rape acusations are rarely treated like aproper crime so for many girls it really isn't obvious that it's wrong. many really do not understand the consequnces of their actions before it's too late. nobody doesn't know rape is a serious crime. those who still comits it are deranged criminals and no amunt of telling them not to is gonna stop them. but i still think there …
/r/MensRights09/07/13 05:18 PM
29

In other words, their rebuttal is completely irrelevant to your point. You talk about Western society, they talk about the stoning of women in the Middle East? isn't this basicly an invitation to ask if they also belive dealing with WOMENS issues in the western world to be offensive by the same account. how can you even think of trying to secure reproductive rights when women in the middel east are being stoned?
/r/MensRights08/07/13 10:17 AM
0

how? i haven't even begun to say anything of my openion. it's funny i put your openion of yourself in words and you see regresive bullshit. or are my Christian avatisms condiering you to be worth something as human being? if you want me to treat you like an object i'm not one to deny you that. i just think it's sad.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 10:10 AM
0

you are the one who don't consider yourself a human. i think you are a human but you don't seem to think you deserve to be treated like one. nothing i can do about that. stop projecting your selfhatred on me.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 08:45 AM
2

so when will the companion piece about how women should aproch men if they don't want to be raped be made?
/r/MensRights04/07/13 06:32 AM
1

moral? this has nothing to do with morals. you told us you don't see yourself as someone worth having basic rights. you yourself just said that you'd love to lack rights. so you must consider yourself subhuman. and if you can''t even consider yourself human how can you do anything but hate yourself. but none of this has anything to do with morals. nor am i the one saying you aren't worthy.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 06:08 AM
2

but women can do everything men can and whille wearing high heels. go concern troll somewhere else.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 09:29 AM
1

so basicly: feminism is violence against men.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 05:39 AM
2

Male circumcision is proven to hinder the spread of HIV/AIDS no it has been proven to create a statistically insignificant lower chance that has been blown out of proportions by people with an agenda.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:15 AM
1

so basicly "what if we lived in the real world?" besides the few pointers that have nothing what so ever to do with reality.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 05:10 AM
0

so why do you think he should break the law? i'm honestly curious.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:58 AM
6

i feel sorry for guys who date. what you gonna do?
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:08 AM
2

so many buzzwords, so little substance.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 04:08 AM
2

so you don't have standards? and you're proud of this?
/r/MensRights30/06/13 08:52 AM
-1

congratulations on hating yourself. how does it feel to consider yourself sub-human?
/r/MensRights30/06/13 08:51 AM
2

nobody here besides you have call anyone a fairytale creature. also you seem to be quite alone in having those images evoked so maybe the problem here isn't so much the metaphor as much as it is you.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:39 AM
1

so when he was a minor and not able to enter a contract. ergo said contract should be void and can not be re-established later.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:36 AM
5

go back to 7th grade buddy. they have a class on metaphors that you aparently missed entitrely.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:37 AM
1

few here isn't allready aware of "the best intrest of the child". i also find it intresting that you have concluded that you decide "what this debate is about" Ding_batman kind of has a point. when did he enter the contract? when he was unable to enter it or years after it was relevant? in either case this is something that in other case would be highly suspecious.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:30 AM
6

yet another proud rape supporter i see.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:26 PM
1

just to be sure you are saying this is reasonable because it has nothing to do with the fact that she is a woman and anyone can qualify for it for any crime assumeing this "modest means"-thing aply to you? because if that is the case at least this isn't bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:21 PM
18

so? easy solution make him responsible for the child suport then enforce that his rapist must pay HIM the same or greater amount in damages. the rights of the child are upheld without the rights of the victim being trampled. but even then upholding the law when the law itself is wrong is not something you should support. the law SHOULD protect victims like this. the fact that it causes an undesirable situation for the child can not be an excuse. otherwise being a parent shopuld be a get out jail…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:15 PM
6

i'm far more intrested in the fact that this woman aparently suports the idea that if a woman have an abortion it should come with a hysterectomy. i mean if men must be sterelized to opt out of parenthood the same ideal must aply to women. also you only get pregnant if you are careless about birth control so no woman ever has had a reasonable excuse to have an abortion. they were simply lazy and careless.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:09 PM
0

Isn't that the problem? Age, race, demographics? and so you have the power to include all that in your anecdotes? Downvote me all you like. I call it like it is. Be offended or whatever. Thats what feminists do. I'm drunk. Fuck off. no you call it like you want it to be. a statistical data doesn't aply to you personally so it's suddenly a lie. It was meant to be humorous, next time remeber the funny part.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:29 AM
6

feel free to explain the difference.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:59 AM
4

i'm not taking this bullshit at face vaule because i have yet to see such behaviour. do this sub jump the gun too often and upvite crap? sure. so does every fucking sub out there especially those with ideological motivation. but if you read the comments most the time the top will be people critizing just that and explaining WHY the post is bad. should a story from 4chan be taken with a grain of salt? ofcourse it fucking should. but i find it far more likely this story is true than your bullshit …
/r/MensRights27/06/13 01:57 AM
2

because you clearly have relevant experience with both secnarios. so pray tell how long have you cohabitated with you non-wife but sexually active partner again?
/r/MensRights25/06/13 04:02 PM
2

if you belive "The default should be to believe the victim, not the perpetrator." you are going to have to explain why you are against freedom. "innocent until proven guilty" is one of the cornorstones of freedom.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 04:15 PM
2

If you see someone who looks like a man say but I am a woman, you would immediately call them a liar or a fake. no that's what you would do. don't blame you bigotry on the rest of us. you'd do this and that's your problem.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 11:55 AM
3

i copuld say the same for FPS game but people still like them. actually i couldn't say that. no way in hell any FPS is gonna entertain me for even a single hour. thank god we don't have to enjoy all the same things.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 12:52 AM
18

precisely because they can't talk about their problems without revolting animals like you telling them they should "handle them better", so what do you suggest should have happened? just ignore the victim in this case who happens to be a girl who was secually harased? if i'm scared enough of the police to kill myself after i rob a bank do i get to not have them pay me a visit and keep the loot? so he was scared of the police. even if the police could ruin his life we don't buy it when women use …
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:40 PM
4

"Don’t punish them as though they’re the same as the men" fair enough. i will treat you as my inferior. now back to the kitchen, bitch. and don't you try having any more openions now.
/r/MensRights17/06/13 12:11 AM
13

being downvoted for suggesting anyone here suggested otherwise
/r/MensRights14/06/13 11:35 AM
2

no men is saying they are owed a date. she claims and you defend the claim that she is owed a date for wanting one.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 11:13 AM
1

they are not the problem. don't help them because the goverment will punish you for it. suport them in getting big brother to get out of their lives but as long as you are the one taking a risk for helping them just don't.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:39 PM
3

i'm sorry but when you don't consider the reasons why men and women earn different amounts relevant we can't prove anything. you are not willing to learn so we can't teach you.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:36 PM
1

but a man should be. i prefer not going to jail. Don't pretend women and men are the same strength. because all men are stronger than all women. brb i'll just go get a woman for you to fight and you'll show me how easy it is to win every time, allways. by the way this girl i know happens to be a judo master but obviously that shouldn't be an issue for you right? P.S. go tell women in abusive relationship they just need to pull their shit together because obviously it's their own fault. stand by …
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:04 PM
1

this is what happens when you make rigths into a zero sum game. feminists: we can't help men because women are more important MRA's: let's help those who have problems no matter gender if you call the later the sexists idea your "openion having rights" have just been revoked
/r/MensRights10/06/13 06:09 PM
9

she isn't owed a date. maybe she should try to "woo" few men instead of crying that nobody is "wooing" her.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 10:20 AM
10

so every battered woman EVER is not a victim but it's their own fault? seriously go tell that to women. go on, you clearly belive if you get attacked it's your own fault. no thank you for explaining to me that it's okay to beat women because i'm not violent it's their own fault and they should have known i'd do that and stayed away from me. thank you for justifying and defending abuse.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 09:38 AM
3

also it's simply not true. you are the one claiming patriachy is even a thing. burden of proof is on them. burden of proof is never to prove a negative. to say so is about as anti-scientific as you can get.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 09:42 AM
1

says the guy who changed the topic in a petty atempt to be relevant. if you ever care to answer the question feel free to come back until then fuck off.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 09:17 AM
1

which is why i said you need male role model and not that you must have a father. learn to fucking read.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 02:39 PM
1

We're not arguing whether the law should be valid, we're arguing whether or not the the state follows the law. no we're not. i aksed you a question and that is not related to my question. don't try to change the fucking subject just because it doesn't suit you. if you don't have an answer fine but don't try to be right by bringing another subject ytou can be right about into it. Emotional arguments are not valid. I forgot you were raped. /s and this is why you can be ignored. because you have NO…
/r/MensRights05/06/13 02:35 PM
1

i'm sorry but i think a game has to have an actual plot and not just a vauge justification before it counts.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 02:27 PM
13

also, when you say that providing money is a valid form of showing love, it is only as valid as the receiving person deems it to be. true. in fact just as true as the fact that how worthy of reciving his money they happen to be is entirely up to the giver. he deemed them unworthy. he can't deamnd love and they can't demand money. simple.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 03:46 AM
2

what gamnes though? honestly the only game in whcih the death of a female is in any way siginificant to the plot that i can think of would be final fantasy 7. and that's hardly the first 3 minutes. am i simply out of the loop? is this a thing now? i mean sure the revenge motivation is nothing new but just as much as it might be dead woman it might be the much more obvious KIDNAPPED woman or hell anything from dead parents to dead mentor to they destroyed my village or heck a dead love intrest. h…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 09:38 AM
2

so what can she offer him? draining his vallet? SCORE!
/r/MensRights02/06/13 03:57 PM
5

I find it funny the outrage here when people proclaim, "but I was TOLD THAT women want a nice, sensitive guy!!"" you must be lost. i have certainly never seen such proclamations around here. nobody around here is that naive anymore. then again i guess it is easier to beat strawmen in an argument.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 03:53 PM
1

I said "child support is for the child"... your logic is illogical. the child that is not my responsibility because i had no agency in it's birth. if a guy get's shot in bank robbery should we hold the bank manager responsible for that as well? Because the child did the raping? illogical. Please stop communicating. because i did the raping? how is it my responsibility? unless you decide i don't have any rights. what other option did i have? no no you are right. better to make a me a victim than …
/r/MensRights02/06/13 08:46 AM
1

The point is Patriarchy is a system that inherently favours men. Which our society does. this a claim. now prove it. untill then i will do the only reasonable thing and disregard it. You are overly sensitive and easily angered by my denial of white men being disadvantaged because they are white men. i have never made such a claim. i have however said that being a white man CAN be a disadvantage. not that it inherently is. that's my point. nothing is inherently a disadvantage. but you don't even …
/r/MensRights02/06/13 08:32 AM
9

because learning is pure magic and you don't a need a source for your learning.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 08:19 AM
9

they don't need a father they need a male role model. i'm all for homosexual parents but i would have a problem with lesbian mothers raising kids in a male free enviroment. now if one of the mothers brother or just a good male friend comes around once in a whille and is there to be an active part of the kids life this issue goes away but all children need both male and female role models.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 10:20 PM
20

learning from the mistakes of those around me this is why you need male role models.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 10:17 PM
9

well if the goal is to simply change the language used fair enough. canceling the event certainly isn't. even if this is about protecting her son fuck her. her sons well being does not gain precedent over that of the entire fucking school. imagine if we shuy everything down every time something didn't fit perfectly with everyone.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 10:15 PM
1

rewply. i know of 1 case against men. i know of 0 against women... at least personally. thus i have now proven no women anywhere at any point in time have been in an abusive relationship without being the abuser.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 06:12 PM
3

whille in reality it's simply because trolls. when a troll attacks someone on the internet they don't care what they make fun of. they take the easiest target and goes for it. and when women take it this personal when you attack their gender ofcourse trolls are going to attack it. they can't do this to men because men would simply laugh it of. it wouldn't make sense and it'd be more fun than insulting to almost every male out there. you don't deserve extra praise for doing something worthwhille …
/r/MensRights30/05/13 06:06 PM
1

you don't become lawyers to challenge the laws, i'm becoming a lawyer. your talking out out of your ass trick is very uimpresive but maybe you should go join a circus instead of trying to claim it is in anyway meaningful. even then no you do not have a point. so what if child support is for the child. yes children have a rights. but the fundamental aspects of rights is that no roghts can trump another right. so my right to decide for myself if i want to have a chiuld or not CAN NOT be overwriten…
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:41 AM
16

and if i don't want a child at all? oh my bad, i'm a man i'm not suposed to have rights.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 01:25 AM
13

i'm sorry reality doesn't live up to your expectations lady.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 06:05 PM
1

how will i have an easier go at these jobs exactly? the reason they don't get them have nothing to do with skin color but everything to do with how you know. and i know exactly as many people as the average black women. ZERO! allright let's be fair i have a slightly better shot. if this slight improvement is enough to disregard any problem i have black in USA(or where ever else in the first world) people do not have the right to complain about privilege whatso ever because of the huge amount of …
/r/MensRights26/05/13 08:07 PM
1

why wouldn't it? what exactly did women contribute in any capcity? unless were are going into how nothing would exists if there weren't any women for the same reason nothing would without men. do you honestly think war would exists in a society without women? to me the argument sounds about the same.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 08:02 PM
1

honestly this ad is about the most disrespectful thing to women i have seen in popular media in a whille (that doesn't aim to offend at least). so how about you hold yourself acountable for your own actions think progress?
/r/MensRights23/05/13 06:53 PM
2

because as we all know shakesphere was in fact a woman. men contributed a large part of culture as well buddy. heck in many time periodes if you weren't man you weren't considered able to contribute anything valid to culture anymore than you would be able to contribute to sience.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 12:13 PM
2

i'm actually stumped as to how one would explain that the laws of physics however much undeniably they are actually only aplies to PHYSICS!!!
/r/MensRights21/05/13 12:05 PM
2

hey the statistics still fit. if these people want to belive this i will assume they also belive it about black people.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 08:05 PM
1

this would be true if the world was as simple as "those who aren't with me is against me". however the world is not black and white. this is not "either or and i need an answer right the fuck now!!!!" however even if we go by this logic the correct response is to expel both parties. because i mean not imediatly expeling the aleged victim assumes the other party is rapists without the evidence to back it up. clearly everyone who reports rape should be expeled. for justice!!!.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 04:49 PM
16

and the fact that this 0.1% of white hetero males hold these positions matters how to the rest of us? i am a white male heterosexual and no matter if those jobs will always be in the hands of white hetero males i will never get nearer to having them than any of these hypocritical bigots.
/r/MensRights18/05/13 07:14 PM
1

i honestly wonder. do these people hear themself or is there justa lot of white noise when ever they discuss this subject?
/r/MensRights16/05/13 05:14 AM
1

i didn't say the law was right here. i agree this is not how the law should be. but as long as this IS in fact the law it must be aplied evenly.
/r/MensRights07/05/13 09:39 AM
2

the law must be aplied evenly. this is not how we aply the law in cases where the genders arew revesed it can not be tolerated here either. the kids openion doesn't matter. this is obviously in the best intrest of the kids so fuck their openion! and women who have in fact made deals with dads that they do not wish child suport has also been over ruled by the law in previous ocasions so his inaction is irrelevant as well. the only thing here that matters is the state. the law must be aplied equal…
/r/MensRights05/05/13 03:24 PM
1

well aren't we being miss entiteled twat today huh? so if the missus doesn't satisfy me i have your Blessing to sleep around? well hot damn i might just go for it. or maybe i won't because i'm not an idiot. one Things for sure whille women might be able to be faithful in your World they aren't able to be adults responsible for their actions.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 08:41 AM
0

now now people. if this person want's to argue that women are inferior to men they are alowed to have that openion. unless they are woman ofcourse since being a woman would invalidate said openion. acording to themself at least. i mean how can we trust someone who can't even trust themself?
/r/MensRights29/04/13 08:44 AM
1

I've already given examples of the obstacles I faced as a woman and you've rejected them by simply saying, "that happened to me too!" (but I'm sorry they likely didn't...). i'm sorry i'm the denyier here? fuck you. you know what i don't belive they happened to you either. you are a lying cunt and obviuously you are making all this up only to serve your victim complex. dear god how can you expect other people to respect the problems you face in life when you can't even offer to do the same to oth…
/r/MensRights26/04/13 08:45 AM
1

first of for the love of god would you stick with a single reply? it's exhausting to gather you thoughts when you spread them like this. http://www.metrac.org/programs/safety/downloads/why.safety.for.women.marginalized.groups.pdf ah yes the the belif that only women and other minority groups can possibly be unsafe. despite the fact that statistics shows that men are more likely to be the victim of violence. again claiming that women are somehow more likely to be the victim of violence isn't proo…
/r/MensRights25/04/13 05:38 AM
1

It's not about who is more of a victim that's not my postion to begin with. quote me on anything suggesting the problems women face shouldn't be dealt with. maybe you should listen to your own advice and not throw men under the bus on the bullshit idea that they don't have problems worth dealing with. it's about acknowledging and trying to change cultural attitudes that give rise to sexual and physical violence against women and other manifestations of sexism. and it's about ignoring the ones ag…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 07:07 PM
1

You seem like an angery person who wants to blame others for their personal short comings. funny. considering you are the one blaming a being a woman for YOUR shortcomings. why does MY experience not count? no no it must be a woman who belives her failings are because she's a woman and not simply because she's incomepetent. those are the feelings that matter. you are a misoginists. simple as. i belive that women when they don't limit themself can do just as well as men. personal incompetence is …
/r/MensRights23/04/13 11:11 AM
1

When I said women are attacked because they are women, I'm talking about physical and sexual violence. This happens because they are women. no it doesn't. it happens because they are around assholes. this obviously doesn't make the assholes right, but these are no more victims because they are women than i'm a victim because i'm a man. you keep saying there's this huge difference. but you can't explain what it is. Your deranged misogyny is showing. no more than you your deranged misandry is show…
/r/MensRights23/04/13 11:01 AM
3

bring palin onboard for a double whammy.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 01:54 AM
1

I am talking about unwanted attention. i'm a man. i get unwanted attention quite a lot. i'm not even a good looking man. i have friend who's at least decent looking. he get's allmost no attention from femlaes besides unwanted attention. but you. YOU personally like that attention so it doesn't count as unwanted attention. acording to your logic i'm as oppressed as these women by being a man. who experienced this kind of behaviour on a number of occasions, to a straight man, who has never, ever e…
/r/MensRights22/04/13 07:38 AM
1

you're not exactly going to convince me of anything but your own bias by linking to jezebel.
/r/MensRights22/04/13 07:13 AM
2

clearly grapeban here is thinking and enjoying thinbking of limiting other peoples freedom. we need to get grapeban behind bars before we have an actually kidnapping and lock them up in a dungeon in the basement story on our hands!!!!
/r/MensRights21/04/13 07:52 PM
6

and yet here you are hurting people because you don't feel they deserve better.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 07:42 PM
1

which I'm sorry to say is far worse for women, unbelievably worse for women and that is just one example so you refuse to read what i write? as i said PERSPECTIVE!!! what you consider horrible someone else might consider desirable. i'd much rather get sexualized in the way women are than the way men are. does that somehow make me wrong? stop presenting subjective openions as facts. Mtfs notice they lose male privilege and now they put up with the disadvantages of being women. true but i have see…
/r/MensRights21/04/13 08:51 AM
1

you calling this creepy says quite a lot more about you than me.
/r/MensRights21/04/13 08:39 AM
2

Look at my posts here. Really. Note how even the reasonable ones are deep in negative karma? i can't find any such comments. if you point me in the direction of them i'll reevaluate my openion but so far all i see is trollbaiting. but thank you for proving me right. yeah my little triade here insulting you easily get a reply from you. but the guy above me actually making a point without calling you a dumbass? nope still no reply. the one guy who made a valid point(maybe i did too but certainly n…
/r/MensRights21/04/13 08:34 AM
4

just pointing out why I won't be engaging in any serious, in-depth conversations here. so you can't post a lot and decide that what you can post is better spent on this inane bullshit "this is why i'm not being reasonable" instead of adding something of worth to the discussion? maybe there's a reason you get such massive negative karma here. i notice that the people who gave serious well thought out responses doesn'ty get a 4reply for you and you instead go after the ones who cursed at ypu are o…
/r/MensRights20/04/13 09:54 PM
23

i hope you someday are in trouble like this and everyone simply looks at you and says "yeah that sucks... but i just can't care about you". empathy. it's a thing now.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 12:40 PM
1

people treat you different, you are expected to be the one to pursue relationships., if a woman hits you you problably deserved it, if anyone hits you it's your own fault, if you are the victim of domestic abuse you will be the one who's arrested anyway, a majority of homless shelters will deny you help, you will be drafted... i could go on. you are right we are treated differently. that's NOT allways a good thing. people also treat women "differently" therefore i have now proven female privileg…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 10:00 AM
1

Being a white man doesn't invalidate your opinion, but it does exclude you from experiencing discrimination based on gender and race. so what is it then when i'm being discriminated against for being White or male? because as it happens both can and have happenend to me. White men are disproportionately privileged, that's the issue false. the elite who ARE disproportanately privileged happen to be primarily White males true but i gain no benefit from that just because i happen to share those tra…
/r/MensRights18/04/13 08:06 AM
1

It seems like your saying male privilege is met by female privilege and therefore they cancel each other out. no that is how you decide to take it. maybe if you stoped deciding what my openion is we could have a reasonable discussion. what i mean by it is that "privilege is a meaningless term like this. sure i have benefits for being a man. i also have benefits for being white. there are also ways i suffer because of these things. ways that women and blacks for instance wouldn't suffer because t…
/r/MensRights17/04/13 09:18 AM
2

find me an instance of me denying i have privilege. you can't because i never have. so how about you drop the strawmen? come on engae me in an inteligent debate instead of acusing me of percived sleigths. or does reasonable discussion scare you because you actually have to be reasonable?
/r/MensRights16/04/13 05:36 AM
1

ofcourse this should obviously aply for men as well, right? or is it somehow irrelevant when kids lose daddy? what else should be a get out jail free Card? how about if i'm caring for my old infirm parent. do i get a free pass untill they die? what if i have a disabled sibling or spouse i care for?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 07:45 AM
1

depending on how we define "privilege... sure it's a thing. but any definition that alows for "male privilege" also creates Mountains of "female privilege". but then you went NAFALT, so i doubt you'll be reasonable about this.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 07:39 AM
0

we should. by the way how is that thing going where men don't get custody because they are seen as not careing? the legal system builds entirely upon precedent. we don't want to get a precedent in which women are assumed to be liars as much as we don't want one where they are assumed to always tell the truth.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:37 AM
0

did i say he wasn't? why this "LOOK AT THIS PROBLEM OVER HERE !!!! IT'S FAR MORE IMPORTANT!!!! DON'T LOOK AT THAT PROBLEM LOOK AT THIIIIISSS!!!!!!!"?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:33 AM
1

that there is a real victim in this case doesn't change the fact that this is FURTHER horrible because of what it does to REAL victims OF ABUSE.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 12:19 PM
4

to add to this. saying no in the moment doesn't help. it get's part of the "hard to get misunderstanding". talk to her about it seriously in an instance where it hasn't just happened.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 10:03 AM
1

yeah but how often does it come in the form of spendning too much money in subpar service?
/r/MensRights12/04/13 07:02 PM
2

funnily enough this idea is pretty much the most racists and sexists thing i have heard in years. these assholes are proclaiming "women and black people are worthless. they can not have "power"."
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:15 AM
4

remeber to not fall for the trap of beliving a problem is insignificant or worse not even a problem because someone else somwhere else has it worse. all problems are problems and whille not all are equal they all deserve to be recognized and dealt with.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 05:14 AM
2

then remind her you asked for proof not claims. if she doesn't back down point to all of documented history as your proof.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 04:58 AM
3

so you have low standards. that doesn't give you the right to aply those low standrads to every male ever. you said it yourself what's important is that people understand that men can object to sex. handwaving that by saying " i'd love to get raped by a pretty girl" is destructive not helpful as you seem to imply.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 04:00 AM
1

While feminism is also about fighting women who tear down other women, ah you mean like fighting the women who wants to be stay at home moms? or in general are content or even wishes to follow old gender roles? because you can't possibly mean fighting the women who laugh when a woman assualts her boyfreinds genitalia. or suggest the world would be better of with men as cattel. If a man does it, he gets a pass, because it's "The nature of the beast." find me one instance on this subreddit where a…
/r/MensRights09/04/13 05:01 AM
12

It isn't the end of the world as long as people know that men can and have the right to reject sex. is that why you fight so hard against that idea?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 04:57 AM
4

let's face it, you can only talk for yourself, reducing this post to you admitting you think with your dick. i can also only talk for myself and i would in fact complain even if it was fucking Emma Wattson or who ever is considered the sexsiets girl right now by the internet.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 04:56 AM
-18

maybe women are only getting paid less(oh wait no they aren't) because they insists on being in places reserved for men? maybe we could solve this "pay gap" by disalwing women in the workplace? sounds progresive to me. /s.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:01 AM
0

These are two very unspecific and grammatically poor sentences. I have no idea what you're saying here. this is a typo. i have corrected it but i fully admit it was my own fault to not double check i wrote it right. It didn't bring up men's problems. now did i claim it did. it did however bring up womens rights. and if it doesn't want to talk about womens righst it shouldn't do that. bringing up the idea that somehow women have less rights than men is incredibly vaild around here. if that's not …
/r/MensRights05/04/13 12:15 AM
0

what part do you have difficulty understanding? the part where this isn't about who have it the hardest? the part where bringing multiple subjects up ISN'T being clear and concise? i can't help you unless you explain to me what part of this is so hard to understand for you.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 05:53 PM
1

comics like these should be able to stand without context. lotherwise they are a failure as well. such is the medium of comics. if you can't fit your entire message into a comic without context using a comic is wrong.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 12:18 PM
0

It was clear and concise about the issue it was discussing. no it wasn't.bringing up other discussions like that isn't being clear or conconcise. this is not the oppression olympics. it should not bring up mens problems as well it should have kept out of those subjects entirely. why is that so hard to understand?
/r/MensRights04/04/13 12:17 PM
2

because it's as simple as "1 mom 1 dad is allways the best" right? oh wait it isn't? what is important is a stable loving family and good role models of both gender. a gay household or a single parent may be able to provide this perfectly. and a nuclear family might fail at this utterly. world views as simplistic as the one you protrayed is incredibly destructive. it's not and never will be that simple. nothing is that simple really.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 04:35 AM
2

no we got the point. but the message got muddled because they foolishly decided to bring another albit less discussed issue onboard. when you send a message like this it is vital that you do everything to not confuse your messages. be clear and be concise. this comic failed that. and as long as you belive being "the bigger victim" matters you have missed the point yourself. it's not about the bigger victim. no matter how small every victim count.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 01:53 PM
8

also remeber that if her kids should be unfortunate enough to meet this 1 in a million person the chances are high that it's going to be herself or someone otherwise close to them in the family or family friends.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 05:50 AM
1

i still only hear these women say we should lock all women in the world up and never let them see daylight since clearly their fragile minds can't handle it. entirely unreasonable ofcourse i'm just confused why they hate themself so much.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 10:40 AM
3

should what? i didn't suggest anyone should do anything. and starwman? are you claiming you didn't say we should circumsise people because you were happy it eas done to you? or should we read the future minds of babies so we know which ones will want it in the future?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 04:23 PM
9

so we should remove the breast-buds of new born females in order to combat breastcancer? how about we don't start doing preemptive invasive surgeries without consent?
/r/MensRights30/03/13 11:19 AM
7

oh thank good. so because you like it and YOU don't want to remeber it EVERYONE should be subjected to it? so if i'm happy i got minor brain damage from being beat as a child (for whatever retarded reason) but don't want to remeber the beatings it's okay for me to want every child in the world to be beat? what if i see it as a benefit to only have one arm? get a tattoo? just because YOU want a cosmetic surgery you don't get to inflict it on everyone. that's YOUR pain to deal with not ours. other…
/r/MensRights30/03/13 11:17 AM
3

what whine? i don't think you understand what that word means. succes stories rarely count as whineing.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 09:11 PM
1

this is man who hates children so much he wishes them to have parents who hates them. only consider his openion valid if you think people who hate children that fucking much matters.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 06:07 PM
4

this is actually correct. it's because of these things and the fact that some people can't handle the idea of not being nice to a woman simply because she's a woman everything else be damned. could he have handled it better? obviously. does that mean he's somehow obligated to? is a woman who get's beat up by her husband daily obligated to saying goodbye before she leaves for the shealter?
/r/MensRights27/03/13 06:04 PM
4

see i'm betting the idea is that these girls would feel "unsafe" if guys were around looking at the jobs as well. my counter argument to that is if that's true they are not ready to be part of the real world and thus should not even think about entering the workforce yet.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 09:40 AM
-4

or we could go with : "you want an abortion? well too bad because that's nature. when a man doesn't want a child he should not be forced to. you should have kept your legs closed instead of getting pregnant by a man who doesn't want a child. too bad we gotta make this invasive surgery on you now. maybe you'll learn something from this" again just because "that's biology" it has to fall out in favour of women? no it doesn't it could just as easily fall out in favour of men. but you'll notice that…
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:56 PM
13

you are aware that these first female "programers" didn't do anything close to what we call programing today but rather what we'd call production line work. but even if they were the first real programers i don't see how that's relevant. the point was the culture haa allready been established for years. she can either fit in or fuck off. it's not the cultures job to suit her.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:45 AM
19

or ask them if it isn't rape is the girl gets wet.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:40 AM
8

she's a woman they aren't capabel of being responsible for their actions. they are basicly adult babies. at least feminists and white knights belive so. mra's belive they can be so much more(yes i'm making fun of that retrdaet picture claiming feminists hold men to a higher standard somehow.)
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:24 AM
3

which is why she needs to not only be fired but fired on the understanding that she is fired because she taught us that she is not eligble to have the job. she offended us and thus she should not be alowed to have a job. acording to her that's how the world works. that she is a victim of her own thought process nothing more.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 02:18 PM
3

well isn't that also why we call women incompetent? so that they get a break and don't have to be productive. don't worry girls we only consider you incompetent for YOUR BENEFIT!!! /s.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 04:56 PM
4

You think that women arbitrarily call out rape when they feel like it. you're the one who said they should be able to, not us.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:44 AM
1

i'm not telling you anything whatso ever. i'm only interpreting what you are telling me. and since you are using anti-abortion argument i can only assume you are anti-abortion. my point is you have just stated that protection BEFORE is enough so there' no reasonw aht so ever to have options AFTER. thus ban abortion no good reason to have it. I think men's rights is fucking stupid obviously you think the idea of men having rights is stupid. you don't need to tell me it your openions clearly show …
/r/MensRights18/03/13 09:29 AM
4

oh you ment "feminist". or was it "woman"? or were you simply an idiot?
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:39 PM
2

they belive we are able to be more than sex crazed animals... isn't it nice that SOMEONE actually belives we can be more? oh wait feminists are the only ones who currently belive that's nwhat we are. it's like saying the KKK really suport black people because they really belive blacks could be more than worthless drain on humanity(by taking up their rightful place beneath whites)
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:36 PM
10

i have a plan that if i ever want sex i'm just gonna rape a girl. but don't iover dramatize it!! i only planed it havn't done it so rape isn't a real problem!!!
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:23 PM
1

well when you use anti-abortion arguments verbatim how am i supposed to know it's not what you belive? you said it yourself. If you don't want a kid wear a fucking condom clearly you must belive if women don't want kids they should use condoms and abortions are unnececary to the point where they should not be alowed.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:55 PM
0

true but i think it's important to make a distinction between patting on the back AFTER the fact compared to encouraging the action before it happens. both are terrible but far from the same.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:53 PM
5

basicly she called us stupid but then admited she's even stupider. and we are the misoginists.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 04:50 PM
6

i actually think this is a horrible comparison. because women(well to be fair not limited to them) will not just not call it out. they will in many cases actively encourage this. how many stories have we seen where the girl in question pretty much knows that despite her regreting it it wasn't rape only to have freinds and family freak out and insist it is? in comparison i seriouslty doubt that any guy is ever going to get encouragement to rape. i might be wrong though.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 04:48 PM
4

so how long have you been against abortion?
/r/MensRights14/03/13 04:40 PM
10

also if you are woman enough to let a dude cum inside you better be ready to birth a child. none of this, but i'm not ready to have child.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 04:37 PM
2

the only rational response is "the problems you are attributing to the patriachy is a result of feminism. enjoy your responsibility or go back to being a child that needs to be protected and cared for."
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:05 AM
1

is this image terrible? yes. should we be insulted? maybe. but i'd like to point out this is far more insulting to women than men. despite it most likely not trying to. see what i hear is " a man who loves you will do anything for you. a woman is siimply an irrational crazy cunt .sorry about that guys no good women out there". is this the message they are trying to send? i don't know but it's what i'm getting.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:41 AM
4

whih is uteerly irnoic seeing as quite often the "crime" in these instances are entirely in the womans head. she's decided in her head that the man is throwing hungry eyes at her. maybe he's looking at something behind her(i've had this happen often enough to know it happens) or maybe there's omething completly unrelated to sex making him look at you. maybe he thinks he knows you and is trying to place who he thinks you look like. maybe he's trying to read your shirt. end of the line is the prob…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 09:36 AM
2

i'm more confused if this is truth... then why are so many women crying that men won't grow up and marry them? i mean is anyone going to try and deny that it is primarily women who value marriage?
/r/MensRights11/03/13 08:36 AM
1

What an assy response. because your response right here is such a sinhing great example of what a response should be. Go take your authoritarianism elsewhere. i don't belive in authorithy. especially not that it cover always. but please why don't you take you anti-responsibility viewpoints somewhere else douche?
/r/MensRights09/03/13 04:26 PM
1

i asked you a question try to answer it instead of brining up a strawman. why should you be alowed to do as you please? do i also have the right to cover my head and go into a bank? there are good reasons we don't alow this. unless you can give me a good reason you should be alowed to do this you shouldn't be alowed to do so. alowing you to do so is a rrisk. and an unnececary one. so no you don't have the right to cover your head at events like this because it infringes on my right to safety. no…
/r/MensRights09/03/13 04:24 PM
2

you do have point but i'd like to say i find your parallel to be misguiding wanting anonymity in general and wanting anonymity at events like protest are not the same. your previous point about CoS abusing the law "forcing" these people to wear masks at these protest suggest a bigger problem that needs to be tackled. in this case abuse of the law. anonymity can be a good thing but at times we need people to be responsible for their actions. personally i think protest are one such place but this …
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:12 PM
-5

why? why should you be alowed to do as you please? please give a reason. your rights end where mine begin buddy.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:07 PM
8

a far more disturbing thing here is when you look deeper. THIS is why they think MRA's assert that rape doesn't exists. it's quite heavy projecting. this is how they handle these kind of issues. so they assume everyone else does as well.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 05:13 PM
2

so he doesn't pay for these kids. none of his money pay for the roof over their heads or the food on the table? further there's a vital difference to man who has been cut out of his kids lives compared to you who chosses not to be part of it because of other priorities. even then that isn't the actual issue. here's a wild idea. he's their father. why not make it so the kids are with him 50% of the time and make him the one acountable for them during that time? that would cover it just as well if…
/r/MensRights07/03/13 05:09 PM
0

so you belive men should have options after conception? this is a yes or no question. think hard before you answer.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:26 AM
0

Don't want kids against your will? Don't hook up with random sluts. and that obviously also apllies to women. don't want kids? don't hook up with random dudes. no need for abortions what so ever. If you're talking about slaves, then we're talking about two entirely different issues because black women weren't granted the right to vote at the same time as white women, I'd say that's a condition... i'm talking about most people but then you arec talking about revisionist history so you don't know …
/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:25 AM
1

What?! I've just spent over a week diligently entertaining other peoples ideas on the topic. At this point I don't hold much hope that the idea of sunk cost wouldn't stop you from seeing the light. I personally pride myself on conceeding points when I feel I am wrong. yes your analogy which comes out to "women who work hard enough can become men" you steadfastly hold on to despite admitting that's not correct. you also hold quite tightly to the idea that any difficulties women face in getting th…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 11:31 AM
1

your point is even if you run out the door the second she rammed it up there it's still not rape. which is wrong. you may have just been incredibly horrible at voicing your openion though but it is in fact what you said.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 11:23 AM
0

No I didn't. I said men didn't have any options after the fact, not that we don't need any ding ding ding: MEN don't need options. and we have a winner. you found the bigotry. if you don't support anti-abortion maybe stop using anti-abortion arguments?
/r/MensRights06/03/13 11:21 AM
1

So not having to carry the child inside you for 9 months causing wild hormonal imbalances is the short end of the stick? i'd rather some responsibility and all the choice than some responsibility and no choice. Being able to vote over 100 years before women was the short end of the stick? revisionist history makes for bad arguments. most men couldn't vote either buddy. and when women got the right to vote they got it on no conditions. men today can't even say that. Not bleeding for 25% of the fi…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 11:20 AM
2

it's universally know that men are objectivly better ion every way compared to women. there now it's everyone elses job to disprove it... i'm sorry but don't you see how bullshit that is?
/r/MensRights05/03/13 08:51 PM
1

i wish that one day the kid in this story attack the teach/counselor/whatever adult is in the story... because no matter gender how do you defend attacking a child as an adult? clearly you as an adult is at fault no matter what. then again i wouldn't be suprised if they would still manage to twists it into being about a violent child an seeing as it's allways the non-violent child in this situation this will most likely never happen. guess that's a good thing.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 10:11 AM
1

I never felt it had much bearing on the actual argument but I still think it's valid. so you still belive women can become men with enough work. yeah this is why this argument is pointless. Yes the nature vs. nurture debate is very interesting, i also don't belive we have to go into that either. see this is the other big problem. you have decided your conclusions are right and thus refuse to even entertain the idea of speaking of anything but them as right. you are so sure of yourself that even …
/r/MensRights05/03/13 10:05 AM
2

i don't know about this article specifically but these often also come from people who simply don't understand what's going on one of the main reasons the gap is closing is because men's life expectancy rises but womens isn't rising with it. this sounds terrible to these people because they don't realise women are pretty close to the ceiling(at least the one we for now can reach) and thus no matter how much advancement we make it'll have little impact for them whille men have a good few years to…
/r/MensRights05/03/13 10:02 AM
0

Women got the long end of the stick on that one. It's one of the few areas where that has happened. name on place where it happened to men in a biologically irrefutable way where we don't try to even it out anyway. there's none. women get the long end of the stick every single time there is one. Also, there are many places in the world where abortions aren't possible, as your argument clearly says it should be. at least they did 30-40 years ago when they were last used.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 09:54 AM
1

I'm sorry, but unless you're sterile, creating a child is one of the possible outcomes of every sexual encounter, even with properly used birth control. this is a quote of you. if you do not want to have a child do not have sex. obviously that means women who don't want to carry a child to term should just keep their legs closed. oh wait no it means you are a sexist asshole. my bad. go on hating men for being men. you said it yourself. you don't need options after the fact. she should just not h…
/r/MensRights05/03/13 09:52 AM
1

she ask if doing anal on you is okay. you say no. you start to have normal sex. she has adildo nearby you didn't see. she shoves it in your ass. this stuff can happen. and it is rape. consent to sex is not consent to all sexual acts. it's like saying if a woman agrees to have sex with one man she agrees to have sex with everyone and thus only virgins can be raped. just because you don't understand what consent is and how it works doesn't change the rules.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 09:48 AM
1

I think we're done on the analogy, I don't feel I have anything more to explain that I couldn't already point to in a previous post. as long as you base your entire argument on an invalid analogy we are far from done with it. it's a major flaw in an otherwise at least intresting argument. I don't say it's possible for every life to be absent of influence. I do say education and the workplace should be free from strong systematic gender influence. true but you are also the one making the claim th…
/r/MensRights05/03/13 09:46 AM
3

If you really want sex to end and this is the point that goes so far over your head that even if you looked up you wouldn't see the point. this is not "wanting sex to end" this is "wanting sex to conteniue but without getting that big black dildo shoved up your ass". consent to sex is not "consent to any sexual act you can possibly imagine".
/r/MensRights04/03/13 06:22 PM
0

so you agree that if i knock a girl up and want to be a dad she should not be alowed to abort it? not because "it's a life" or whatever pro-lifers argument is these days but simply because i want a child and she consented to sex and thus to give me a child if i want one right? i'm sorry i'm not sure why i ask. obviously you belive this.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:45 PM
0

because we have so many know cases of women who had an abortion but still have the child today... your statement is only true for men. if a woman do not wish to have a child she is in no way limited to not have sex. she can at any point after sex still refuse to consent to motherhood.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:43 PM
3

now you are discussing pointless semantics because even if they call it that it still doesn't end up in child support payments. it's still a crime by definition.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:32 PM
1

Sorry you're right - what I meant there was that you can't choose to be a CEO, i'm a white middel class male. i still can't "chose to become CEO". i might have a sligthly easier road but honestly i seriously doubt it. and with regards to making the choices that could lead to me becoming CEO a woman have all the same options i do in that regard. i might have better resources of insipration but we have the same options of choice. the stereotypes will not hinder me more than i or anyone let them hi…
/r/MensRights04/03/13 12:21 PM
2

just remeber it's just another way of admiting you are actually against human rights. and they want to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 09:15 AM
1

With poverty the lacking resource is money. and with out those resources (money) you will be denied the choice. without the resources of role models you STILL have the choice. are you telling me that women out there is being told "no you can't have this job you don't have a role model"? it is not compareble because one respurce will directly prevent you whille the other whille hindering will not stop you unless you let it. No the whole point of the analogy is it's technically possible to overcom…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 09:11 AM
1

An analogy by definition is using different things that share one similarity to elucidate that similarity. correct. and that is why coparing 2 different things that doesn't is an invalid analogy. poverty comes with a lack of options compared with that of a rich person. being female compared to being male does not. following trough on the options might be harder but they are there. your analogy doesn't live up to the requirement of a valid analogy. My whole point is that it's technically possible…
/r/MensRights02/03/13 12:59 PM
1

you keep saying 2 opposing views and claiming you hold both. either you are lying or an idiot. your analogy still doesn't work by the way.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 12:55 PM
1

becoming a parent is not the only choicce in life that will affect your income like that. also i have no need to look up such things i live that life. it's not that simple. whille it certainly does help it doesn't change the fact that men and women make different choices so a man and woman who was equally qualified 10 years ago when they both syarted the same job will not be equal today. also there's still a distubing lack of sources to your claims.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 08:48 AM
5

i'd say it still depends on how we define "doing it".. is it someone who is actually getting it done whille someone else is simply being a negative idiot, OR is it someone concluded it can't be done and someone else is wasting time trying to do it anyway? because i have been in the later situation multiple times sitting back for an hour or 2 before they get back to me and confirm it could in fact not be done. in the mean time i figured out how it might be done instead(or went on reddit).
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:05 PM
3

they get paid less in the same positions, even when they have identical qualifications. because they took a few years off to raise kids so they are not "identically qualified" anymore. beyond that citation needed.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 04:00 PM
10

the difference is "no means no" say if they say no, stop. "only yes means yes" is the idea that everything short of a yes is no.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 03:49 PM
1

so basicly you are backing out of your orginal argument because you realised it doesn't hold up. it still means your analogy doesn't work.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:20 AM
0

Again reference the other post about poverty. The analogy proves a single point. The extremity of the difference is the exact thing that makes the point. so basicly your point works because it doesn't work? are you trying to tell me your point is you don't have a point? or what? it's like saying a dog and spaceshuttel is kinda the same because look at how different they are!!! And I already have said (quoting myself): "I'm tired of repeating myself. I'm going to do it once more. The crux of my p…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:18 AM
-1

If it is technically possible for a group of people to work themselves out of poverty (it is), and technically possible for women to overcome stereotypes (it is), then the analogy works. no it doesn't because that's not what you analogy said. your analogy compared the OPTIONS. and that is not equal. unless you consider it a lack of option to not have an intrest in a given field. but then the majority of this argument boils down to one big strawman. wether this is because you really don't underst…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 08:21 AM
0

I'm saying they're capable in the absence of negative influences. Problem to fix. The reason why women are doing well in those fields is because of a concerted effort to combat stereotypes. either they are capable to work in the given field or they are not. if they can't do as well because the enviroment doesn't suit them they aren't as suited. if they are able to perform as well there is no problem. Where are your studies to show that naturally hostile workplaces are beneficial i'm not gonna di…
/r/MensRights26/02/13 08:17 AM
-1

Well I don't see much evidence showing that women aren't capable. On the other hand if you look at female domination of biology fields or researchers in certain countries it seems women are capable just fine. so now you're saying there isn't a problem? great no problem nothing to fix. How could I produce something in the same way to something you haven't presented? because you keep saying it happens. you say women can go into fields dominated by men and face the same hostility men going into fem…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 09:30 AM
0

Sure you can, feminism is living proof that it's easy to change social views on gender. All change comes through "force". You act as if natural development will solve discrimination but there is no evidence of this. That is the naturalistic fallacy. no you can't force it trough. you can't make laws to fix this and you can't make people act or belive any differently trough force. they need to leade by example. that's what feminsim did in the past. if these women want more women in these fields th…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 09:19 AM
2

i actually have a bigger problem with what she said than this part. i'm quite amused at the part where she's an expert on male problems. but we as men can't understand her problems because we are not women. basicly she herself told us she can not and never can have a valid openion on this subject. simply because she don't have a dick. she's also not the first feminist i have heard this bullshit from either. i just don't get how they can have any idea about how easy it is to be a man if we can't …
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:50 AM
0

isn't it time to stop trolling? but sure i should go to bed at 7 Am sounds reasonable.(oh the entire world isn't USA? shocking i know)
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:37 AM
-2

i didn't even see you provide the evidence that a woman who goes into such a fiels will be view as having ulterior motives. does women face harashment in the workplace? i'm certainly not denying that. but i seriously question wether this is actually genderbased or just women not being able to handle the enviroment that is simply present in these work enviroments. i'm also not denying that you have most likely gotten a few blind stupid upvotes for the openion when you make the same points for men…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:36 AM
-1

but the problem is you can't force that trough. it has to come by natural development. you can't set out to change this by some arbitrary time. if women do not fight to break this stigma themself they can't blame anyone but themself that they don't have rolemodels. nobody is standing in the way except yourself. stop blaming others for that.(not directed at you personally) Anyway, regardless of whether you can get a loan you could work 3 extra jobs because jobs hangs on trees right now and nobody…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 08:29 AM
-2

no you are getting downvoted for advocating equal outcome instead of equal oppertunity. you are getting downvoted for claiming anything but womens own biases are holding them down. you will never get a job if you don't go for it and if an entire gender doesn't nobody is going to be representing you. i have not once seen evidence to the idea that women are somehow not welcome the same way i have seen evidence that men are not welcome in feilds like teaching. if you can provide me with such eviden…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:12 AM
-1

getting a loan i'm sorry notting stands in the way of a poor person getting a loan? what world do you live in that everyone is magically eligible for a loan? also what is the compariable thing women have to do to get into these fields? what "loan" must a woman take to get into these jobs? all women need is the inrest and a bit of personal drive. the women who do have those qualities succeced quite a lot of the time. but they are rare. what we need is equality of oppertunity not equality of outco…
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:09 AM
0

really? i didn't know being a stay at home mom made enough money to do that. though you do have a point. women have monopolized being alowed to not have a job the second they have a child.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:02 AM
0

Just like the time when you are stupid and don't know what words mean? (all the time) wow so many wonderful examples to go from. why don't you try to give an example instead of pull shit out of your ass? Just like the time when you are too stupid to understand simple concepts that tiny children get on the first try. says the guy who belives everything is black and white enough that you can say "either your with us or against us" Just like the time you keep using terms that you obviously have no …
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:59 AM
-1

poor people and rich people do not have the same choices. men and women do. you comparison doesn't work.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 08:43 AM
-1

D'you wanna know why dads are less likely to be the primary childcarer? because the law says "mommy first"? now show me the law that say "men first" in these fields.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 08:41 AM
0

quite the compeling argument. it's almost as convincing as when you tried to convince me you knew my openion better than me. or when you twisted my words. or when you realised your argument was rubish and acused me of being the one having used it.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 08:18 AM
0

allright this is pointless. i'm gonna call troll, because otherwise this is sad casestudy in an abusive relationship. if you can't argue without fallacies i'm not gonna bother. you ae too busy putting words in my mouth and praising feminsim for doing nothing. it's sad that you think we should support our biggest enemy just because they say they wanna help us whille they beat us with a bat at every chance. i'm not gonna fall for such an abusive relationship.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 10:35 AM
2

A woman's status was always seen as lesser than a man and she was viewed more as property, or something to be protected. she was also seen as superior and it was the man who should gain the favour of the woman before he could gain said possesion. it's importnat to realise that it was a system in place at the time and that hostiry has been heavily edited to make it add up with some peoples narratives of history. also it's important to remeber that in a family whille the man ruled outwards in the …
/r/MensRights23/02/13 10:29 AM
9

it's because neither explanation has any truth to it. it's simply because women long ago broke the barrier. men haven't yet. it's simply because women are alowed to break their gender roles but men aren't. not because of any value prescribed to either role. also history has been quite rewritten. sure we have situations where men "owned" so they could be protected. but then we also the situation where women were in fact protected. it all comes down to perspective (is it the man that's the master …
/r/MensRights23/02/13 04:15 AM
0

You did, and your about to do it again. My reason, and the reason of a lot of other MRA's is to try an achieve equality. Notice, I am not saying I or we can achieve equality, just that is the goal. you are not the voice of MRA's either. drop your strawmen i never said MRA alone will achive equality that's your projecting combined with a nice little strawman you have made of me. i also never said MRA's don't strive for equality. i said very few claim MRA's alone can achive it. You most certainly …
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:56 AM
2

ah so the PARANTS matter more than the child. got it. no need to worry about the fact that you are sending a person away from all they know to satisfy the wishes of another person. i mean obviously they OWN that kid since they gave birth to it. just remeber the child doesn't matter. what matters is her mom get's her trophy back. also i asked you to name a benefit. you didn't mention a benefit. it's not fair. but it's certainly not fair to uproot someones life either. your logic only works if you…
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:32 AM
1

so don't act like your views represent all MRAs, i didn't. i explained a vital difference between feminism saying they alone can create equality and MRA's seeking equality for men not claiming it will create equality for all. Exactly, that is the exact same argument that you just made against feminism. i never said that. yet another strawman. Saying that because they weren't explicitly for men's rights, that they aren't for men's rights. so just because they are not for it they can still be for …
/r/MensRights22/02/13 02:14 PM
2

Oh, you mean exactly like the Mens Rights Movement is focused on mens rights? yes. exactly like that. we just don't lie about it. Are you saying that you are a MRA because you are against equality? I certainly am not. well this is a strawman argument. just because you are not for something you are against it? this is not this black and white. Actually, it doesn't make that assumption at all. The only assumption it makes is that some feminists are genuine when they say they want equal rights. yes…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 07:17 AM
14

once again i just hear womens groups say" women are not responsible enough to make a choice". fine womens gropus here's what we'll do: revoke your rights to sex. you can only have sex if men preaprove it. sounds good right?
/r/MensRights22/02/13 04:32 AM
2

Do you understand what the word 'equality' means? we fully understand what it means. that's why we understand that you can't achoive equality by focusing everything on on group like feminsim does. your point is wrong because it makes quite a big assumption. that what they'll achive is equality at all. they can't get there with the system they have in place. you can't get equality by working on achiving it for one gender. it can not be done. their goal is a lie. simple as. It's really not. You ar…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 04:28 AM
5

name on benefit to justify doing that. seriously name one good reason to uproot a persons life like that.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 04:15 AM
4

if you're really in advertising i'd hope you understand the conspet that it's easier to sell a product by suggesting it will make you better than to insinuate that you suck without it.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 12:19 PM
2

I support anybody and everyones right to discriminate. that's fine. but that isn't the reality now. come back to me once your argument is rooted in reality You are being a victim because you want the state to protect you. no i want the rules to be equal for all. if men can't have "male only spaces" then "females only spaces" aren't okay either. i could honestly care less if this was resolved by alowing male onl spaces or disalowing female only spaces. my problem is that this inequallity is alowe…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 01:06 AM
0

either you missed the entire point or you are just here trolling. this is not "no women are cappable firemen". this is "most female firefigthers are not living up to the requirements". if your girlfriend can live up to the requirements no problem she should be afirefigther if that's her wish. but less women than men are able to live up to these rerquirements and that's not sexism. that a policy set in place because peoples lives are at stake. if you are going to be a firefigther you must live up…
/r/MensRights21/02/13 12:41 AM
11

there's a lot of bullshit misandry to go for in the article but really there is a much bigger ugly stupidity that needs to be pointed out here: you can't make crime, ANY crime, go away by telling people not to do it. not theft, not assault, not murder, not vandalism and not rape. the idea that it can be done is pure delusion.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 12:34 AM
2

so this is what you resort to when faced with reality? ad homiens: instead of going after the ball( that the solution you proposed doesn't exsist) you start to call me whinny. this is not about victimhood. this is about equallity. it's sad to see you have a problem with equallity. also you last sentence is bullshit. this is acting on principles. this is based on the principle that discrimination like this is not okay. but these are not YOUR prinicples so they are wrong right? i am not a victim. …
/r/MensRights21/02/13 12:21 AM
5

Then go to a business that has males only. maybe we would if such a thing would be alowed. have you seen what happens to "mens only"-clubs? if we can't have those then women should not be permitted "women only"-clubs either. your argument is not rooted in reality. either we alow such discrimination based on wether or not buisness think it's worth it for them or we don't. we don't halfass it and say we can discriminate against one gender. women made these laws go trough that you can't discriminat…
/r/MensRights20/02/13 07:29 AM
1

Does it all have to be perfectly equal? the options should ideally be equal all around yes. that is what we seek. equallity. i have no problems witha mixed sauna. i have problem with a one gendered for 1 but not one for the other gender. if they make a third for men only i'll be just as happy as if they decided everyone could deal with a mixed.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 07:25 AM
10

i suggest they both get partial custody. and get 50% time each. only fair.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 01:27 AM
7

remeber to also say that to the women going for abortions. go ahead we'll be waiting here.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:34 AM
5

whille this is the reason i think the question should be "Why would you extened that right when the parent in question has been voided of agency as well?" agreed that adults are responsible for their actions in a way that children are not. but sometimes(like here) it wasn't his actions that resulted in this so it's not fair to hold him acountable.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 09:10 PM
8

well they created it to begin with so i don't think they consider it in their favor to get rid of it. being a perpetual victim can be quite lucrative.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:47 AM
1

first of you go into an enviroment you are not suited for it's you own damn fault if you don't fit in. find your strong suits and make those matter more than your faults. nobody is saying you don't have to adapt but again when you empazise trying over succseding you will fail. yes the guy who looks inatentive might not keep his job long. do you know who surely won't? the guy who is unable to do his job.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:51 PM
1

want an example? when i learn i have to avoid to much input. if i get too much input i'll be distracted and learn nothing. thus the best way for me to learn is to completly shut out everything not nececary to learning. often this will involve laying with my head facedown into the desk so i have no visual input(this is assuming i don't need to look at something on the blackboard obviously). this looks like i'm not paying attention to most people. according to you it's better that i look like like…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:31 PM
15

you are a bad teacher. very bad. you are not intrested in the kids learning. you are intrested in them doing things your way because you can't understand anything else. some kids learn better in a way that to you will look like "Not giving a crap" if you hold that against them you hold them back. shame on you.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:28 PM
3

"you don't know what feminism is" = " i hope they'll be more concerned with what i say than what i do".
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:24 PM
7

justice? what's that?
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:22 PM
2

so it's the people who excuse his behaviour who's to blame... except the people who excuse the behaviour are still these fucking women. they are the ones forgiving the abuse. they are the ones creating the culture. we can't stop people like chris brown from being abuseive as long as people are encouraging him to be like that. and guess what these women are the ones who does that. these women are the problem and the ONLY way you can argue that they are not solely at fault is if you claim women ca…
/r/MensRights11/02/13 07:14 PM
2

fine i have meet trolls who did. i don't exactly normally count them but yeah their around. happy now?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 04:12 AM
0

i have yet to see anyone do that around here. i have seen the claim that mnaybe 1% of girls are not worthy of being associated with. but you can't know which before it's too late and 1% is too big a gamble.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 12:26 AM
9

i have never meet a male who thought rape was okay. i have meet quite a few females who think it is as long as they aren't the victim... who needs to be taught this again?
/r/MensRights10/02/13 01:14 PM
4

"the patriachy" is run by feminists. this almost sounds like it could be good fiction what with the suposed freedom figther group bravely figthing the big corroupt goverment all on their own... all just for it to turn out they are the ones who run said goverment. almost.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 11:39 PM
5

of course he is shocked. his entire worldview is falling apart rapidly. he either have to make these excuses to keep it in place or look reality in the face. and reality is honestly scary.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 11:51 PM
5

i personally see MRA and egalitarian views as seperate but not incompatible. my idea is there's nothing wrong with having special intrest groups(in theory this includes feminism) as long as those groups do not try to gain their benefits at the unfair cost of others. sometimes it's okay to go into a situation ensuring that a certain group get's their needs covered and taking special care to ensure that. and some issues matter to MRA's that doesn't matter to egalitarians. or the other way around. …
/r/MensRights08/02/13 11:52 AM
4

equal outcome says a black guy and a white guy must have the same options to get a job. if there's not enough black people we change the rules untill there is and everyone is equal(lowered expectations, don't hire white people etc.) equal opportuinity says they both have the chance to get a job. but it is their seperate qualifications that matter. thus if more white people are qualified more white people get the job. this is incredibly oversimplified but it get's the basic idea across.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 11:48 AM
2

you get back in this life what you giev out... unless ofcourse you're female in which case people defend your every action. also if "abuse" deserves murder... then what does murder deserve? should we torture her to make up for what she did? murder is never justified. NEVER.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 09:25 PM
7

i find that generally people who demand respect are those people unworthy of it.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 05:28 AM
1

that's my point. blueoak9 claimed she "should just have married him" but that's not exactly her decision. at least not her's alone. also this is not about her getting part of his income. it's about her getting part of the company she was a partner in. it has nothing to do with cohabitation laws since it has nothing to do with their living arangements and everything to do with their company.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 05:05 AM
1

so since when can women decide on their own that they wanna get married to their SO? because that's a really scary thought.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 02:56 AM
2

in this case that was the woman. in this case it was unfair to the woman. the woman, not women. my argument is that if she did in fact act as partner that should be recognised somewhere and thus act as proof she is entiteled to be treated as a partner. and this should aplly no matter gender.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 07:52 PM
1

honestly this case does seem to be honestly unfair to the woman. but it is entirely unrelated to cohabitation laws. what is unfair is that it is somehow possible for her to act as a partner and yet still have no claim in the buissnes. that sounds fishy at best.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 07:17 PM
42

here's the thing to remeber though: that is entirely justified. for both genders. if you have high standards so be it. even if you yourself isn't a catch you can have whatever standards you wish. you just have to deal with the fact that the higher the standard the lesser the chance you get anyone is. and if you yourself isn't a catch the chances fall further. this is not unfair. this is equallity. this is giving everyone the same right to say no as you have. the kind of sentiment in this post is…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:55 PM
5

i generally don't care what people say they belive. doing so is an utterly reatrded pratice. judge people based on what they say or do, not what they claim to say and do.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:50 PM
11

The claims frequently involve aspects of conspiracy theory, as MRAs are quick to invoke the "Feminist Media," the "Feminist Government," and the "Feminist Agenda." Clearly, "patriarchy" and "rape culture" are not "conspiracy theories". actually just for second consider what things it's denying exsists. "feminist goverment": they deny that the goverment generally take the feminsts side. fair enough but... "feminists media": so they are saying no media portray feminists ideas? "feminists agenda" n…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 11:48 PM
10

let's see them keep true to this after a female is accused. somehow i'll bet it falls to the ground fast.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 05:08 PM
2

Had multiple cases where father complained about us collecting child support while he was caring for the children. We'd stop her support, she'd immediately retrieve kids, we'd start support again, she'd dump kids back with father. Mother could retrieve kids anytime she wanted since she had legal custody. After going through cycle a couple times (very hard on kids) remeber this clear abuse of children is done "in the best intrest of the child". stable home lives are overrated anyway.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:26 PM
1

so does he get to file for custody for children that are not his as well? there's a big difference in wether seperation/divorce should be a free of the hook for a bioparent and a non-bioparent. it's just the the same.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 12:25 PM
8

i'm downvoting because he doesn't add to conversation. in fact he detracts from it by distracting from it like this. he deserves downvotes based on reddiquette.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 06:10 AM
4

my god... am i the only who is having major deja vu here? didn't this exact bullshit cause a backlash last year with that yougurt comercial? this right here is proof that not only is this okay. it's so okay that even "they don't know better" is the excuse they wanna use anymore.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 07:17 PM
3

i wouldn't be so fast to assign blame here either. sure lauch a fucking inestigation asap to find out where it comes from but children are both smarter and more observant than most people think. and they are easily impresionable. most likely someone failed here yes but not nececarily in a negilent way.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 03:15 PM
7

it's easy. in this case it was not only mom viewing him as a wallet. remeber we are dealing with a 20 year old and 17 year old. they need "daddys" money for college. ofcourse there's also the the much simpler and more innocent answere that mom is simply that manipulative but at that age i just don't buy it. as i said elsewhere this case was not about the children personally. his reaction to the children is a seperate issue and as you said he could just as much embrace being their stepfather as h…
/r/MensRights04/02/13 06:03 AM
13

ehh i'll still say we should remeber just because there are bigger issues out there doesn't mean we can't deal with the smaller issues like this. but i agree nothing major to get up in arms about.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 10:55 PM
32

They think he is the bad guy for breaking off contact with children that were never his. even worse: he didn't. they cut of contact to him.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:25 PM
13

What state do you live in? Most states have a presumption of paternity created by a marriage relationship. Unfortunately, DNA results CAN disturb that presumption yes so terrible that you proof somehow make you unable to lie. i'd still love to see these womens responses if some woman got the wrong child home from the hospital. i bet it would be "unfortunate" if they could get the right child back in those cases too. Deceit is a deplorable condition in any relationship but hey, don’t tell me he d…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:22 PM
13

porn is a fantasy. these women admit their fantasy is killing men. so what these women honestly think of all men no exceptions is that they should be violently killed... yet they are not hateful?
/r/MensRights03/02/13 11:22 AM
8

whille the stupidy of it is astounding i'm far more intrigued about the irony of how much it describes these women. projection much?
/r/MensRights03/02/13 11:20 AM
23

basicly they don't like reality. that's why the so fevertly anti-reality.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 11:14 AM
21

To what degree does violence affect them or not? Can they only be affected by violence, and nothing else? Do they only understand violence? hey lady? you do realise you are the one who keeps bringing up violence here... it's allmost as if it's the only way you can comunicate....
/r/MensRights03/02/13 11:12 AM
3

i can't help but notice that this is in fact not something MRA is generally against. what we are against is that women can do this whille men can't. that said this is perfect proof that we need change NOW! how many times have we heard that thios needs to be discussed before this comes up? all these feminists usally against us must in this instance stand up and say "no, no abortion for you lady you made that decision long ago"... but ofcourse they won't. nobody is willing to stand up and say that…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 10:35 AM
5

okay let's then assume this. women are more likely to underperform at work and as a result doesn't recive the same benefits from work as men. and in the latter case violence is encouraged in men through macho culture where? SERIOUSLY WHERE? i challenge you to find ANYTHING encouraging violence.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 04:01 AM
5

are you saying that her horrible behaviour is based on her being a woman? all women are irrational mean people like this? i'd call you the misogynist here.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 05:51 PM
12

Not against a women in the Oval Office... just against this one in there.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:37 AM
1

Biting is assault, I'll warrant that, but how does persuade = molest? I question how this judgement was reached... The language that Daily Mail gets away with here is reprehensible. It's like it can say whatever it wants because it's popular to villainaize even if it's not accurate. maybe i did miss what you ment by this but as far as i can understand you have problem with them calling molesting molesting... and seemingly only because they are boys.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:18 AM
12

"dealing with it" happens to be illegal. but if you don't care about going to jail as long as you get to be "right" be my fucking guest. P.S. not all men are stronger than all women.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 09:32 PM
1

eh she came on to him (it was well known she was even weirdly proud of it) and it caused a shit storm when it got out at the school where he subbed.... 4 years into their relationship after she had graduated. sure it's not a blanket excuse that such relationships are allways okay either but it is valid to show that people blow this shit out of proprtions.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 09:23 PM
1

intent of what? she consented. you said that makes it okay. so what if a 42 year old dude "persuaded" a 14 year old girl... it's all okay right?
/r/MensRights30/01/13 09:20 PM
1

actually there is truth in the statement. just not anything near as profound as they think there is. and it's true for both genders anyway.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 08:07 PM
4

But getting a tattoo is not a medical procedure for health issues. nor is circumscion in over 99% of the cases. Do you oppose the removal of tonsils as medical procedure too? i oppose doing it before there is need for it. last i checked we don't remove every childs tonsils just because. Are you seriously comparing cutting off foreskin to rape? And you wonder why people laugh at this movement. i'm comparing trauma to trauma. if you can't say mutilation is mutilation because it might cause mutilat…
/r/MensRights30/01/13 06:46 PM
4

You can't just wait till they're 18, it's too late then. then why can a 18 year old get a circumcision if they want/need it? or is it you can't force them to have it when they are 18? if so that justifies this tatto as well. she couldn't have forced the kid to get it at 18. And calling this mutilation(not saying you did, but others here do) actually has negative effects on the psychology of those who did get a circumcision when they were young, especially because they didn't have a choice. maybe…
/r/MensRights30/01/13 02:08 PM
2

at least half my teachers were men (i don't know if this sheer chance or if denmark is simply better at diversity. think a bit of both) and the closest we ever got to a child molester was a substitute who had a relationship witha student. however thsi was a university student and he was a young techer so both were over 20 and the age difference about 5... still caused a shit storm. but when a female teacher subbing in gym refused to get out of the boys changing room until she was sure everyone h…
/r/MensRights30/01/13 01:47 PM
2

i guess you are lining up to defend every man who has ever picked up 14 year old girls on the internet as well?
/r/MensRights30/01/13 01:18 PM
3

no no no... you get to go around and remove the hair roots in infant children.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:47 AM
1

i thought girls could do anything boys could just as well if not better... guess i was wrong.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:43 AM
11

it seems to me the perfect response to this is to simply accuse everyone involved in pushing this of rape...
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:30 AM
16

even then i think we need to add another thing here... it's techincally not okay for girl either to look like boys. sure they'll get trough it easier but if they go into ACTUAL "mens clothes" they won't be popular at least. oh they can wear jeans? if i put those same jeans on i'd still be fucking rediculed. the definition of "womens clothes" is simply so much broader. pants were never REALLY "mens clothes" it's just that a dress certainly wasn't.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 09:16 AM
2

you are the one claiming it's a tiny minority. let's see some numbers... oh right nobody has those numbers because nobody has actually looked into it. even then laughing at a matter because "it's rare so it's not importnat" is disgusting. it shows a clear lack of empathy. do you honestly belive those cruel tactics have never been used on someone innocent? because if you do you are deluded.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 09:07 AM
4

rape isn't the norm... let's just ignore it maybe it'll go away...
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:10 PM
-4

no i can get behind this. we just need to remind them that if you don't want responsibilities you can't get rights either.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 03:51 PM
2

am i the only who feels like that now they have broken marriage to the degree that no sane man wants to participate they (hillariously stpidly) decided they need to do the exact same thing to relatinships in general? now we here "where are the good men, i can't get married!!!". in 30 years i won't be suprised to hear "where are the good men nobody wants to have a relationship!!!".... and then we can only fear they'll make casual sexual encounters count as a rason she get's all your stuff.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 10:38 PM
5

i happen to disagree with people like him/her and i disagree with terrorists. does this mean people like him/her are terrorists? or in a similar group? no then fucking judge people as they are instead of covering multiple very different groups with a single stroke of the brush.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 08:11 AM
23

so you can feel all special and entitled too so wanting help when you are abused is "entitelment"... what else is "entitelment"? not wanting to go to jail for a crime you didn't commit? Tell your friend to man the fuck up and go talk to a paychiatrist or a counselor or a relationship advisor yes that will surelky help when the problem is those people can't or won't help but will instead accuse him right? But no women get something you don't so you want to cry about it like the feminists would if…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:33 AM
3

clarification: MRA advocate that given the same time a woman have the choice of wether or not to abort the man has the choice to surrender his rigths and obligations as a parent. it is then up to the woman to conclude wether a child is burder she can carry on her own. you are right that it should not be taken out on the child. but that doesn't mean you just take it out on someone else either. also the oipenion you voiced can easily be turned into "women should not be alowed to abort. if they do …
/r/MensRights18/01/13 05:10 AM
2

well to be fair don't we adovcate that both genders should be able? just because one is allready able don't mean we aren't for it, does it?
/r/MensRights18/01/13 04:24 AM
1

woman want to abort child. how do i get to raise that child? you are right adoption is a horrible example because it doesn't actually apply properly there if at all. but to suggest there isn't an inequallity favoring women at the moment is ignorant at best and disingenious at worst.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 04:22 AM
2

i'm sorry when did men get equality in this matter. i can't remeber that i got the option to have child without a womans consent nor do i remeber being able to terminate an unwanted preganacy without the womans consent. not a lot we can do about those things so as long as those rights lie with women(as they damn well should) so should the responsibility. as allways i dare you to express the same openions about women.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 04:19 AM
2

and as allways i assume you have the same feelings about abotions. i mean obviously you belive women should handle that responsibility, right?
/r/MensRights17/01/13 11:23 AM
7

ever heard of "playing hard to get"? quite often no does in fact mean PRECISLY "try harder". it's not our fault that some womens double speak doesn't fall in line with what you want to be reality.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:31 AM
1

so why is being a white male a "priviledge" and not just an "advantage"?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:47 AM
3

it fucking to does matter. when the party NOT willing to follow the message tries to blame the party that IS trying to follow it and you then defend those NOT willing to follow the message it's god damn relevant. when extremists religious terrorists defend their actions by exclaiming "WE DESERVE TO BE TOLERATED AND RESPECTED!" do you also call that a good message and the source of it irrelevant?
/r/MensRights14/01/13 08:24 AM
11

so have someone with an actual case go undercover. if the system works great a person who needed help got it. if not we have evidence that the system is broken. win-win.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 08:00 AM
2

feel free to question this joke all you want. don't go around claiming double standards and hypocrisy so fats thought because that's a surefire way to kill all discussion imediatly and then we don't get to actually talk about it. nothing is sacred and everything should be open to satire the problem is when you can't talk about it seriously.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 01:23 AM
0

oh amnerican women. of course because you egt to decide who counts right? those white american women and all their rights they don't have any problems at all how DARE they think any of their problems matter enough when we men have REAL problems. wait where have i heard this one before?
/r/MensRights12/01/13 01:08 AM
1

congratulations you found one instance where men lack rights. did i claim no such thing exists? no i pointed out that YOU fallaciously claimed there is NO instance where women lack rights. but please take my arguments out of context more. let the oppresion-olympics begin.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 01:59 AM
-1

whoa whoa whoa. yeah women have it good and we might even argue women generally have it better thyan men. but to suggest that women don't have any problems based on their gender is plainly wrong. just as much as "women have every single right that men have (that it is biologically possible for them to have)" so to do "men have every single right that women have (that it is biologically possible for them to have). let's not discredit ourselves and comit the same fallacies we complain about femini…
/r/MensRights10/01/13 12:25 PM
1

no the point here is you BOTH fucking missed the point. the point here is about the feminists who keep clamoring about how men earn more and have better jobs and the like whille ignoring they also have the harder jobs. it sucks at the bottom and it sucks for both genders i won't deny it. but this argument is aimed at these women who belive they should have all the good stuff and none of the bad. the ones who want to be carried by the men below them because they can't be bothered to do that work.…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:58 PM
1

you should have pointed out that acording to themselves you can't help them. the box is too heavy, they told you so.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:48 PM
1

i'd like to see the reaction when we adress that these 3 cases are the main point of why these women who dislike the men's rights movement. heavy amounts of projecting is all i'm saying.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 01:18 AM
0

if you have been raped come forward. it's no ones fault but your own that YOU didn't do that. the world isn't fair. it really really isn't but if you can't prove that a crime have been comited we can't as a society act like it has. when you acusse someone of a crime as horrible as rape you should be questioned. not because "you are most likely lying" but because like with every crime we need to be sure. it is especially important to be sceptical when it comes to rape again not because you might …
/r/MensRights09/01/13 12:55 AM
-2

sounds perfect to me. my defense would be "she falsly accused me" obviously it's now her job to prove she didn't and if she can't that's proff she did lie. and that means i didn't do it. oh wait i forgot you are only guilty if you are male.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:22 AM
2

ehh i think you have the same stance. the thing is the neutral point where nobody has done anything yet (as in they hasn't done anything good to gain aproval but hasn't done anything stupid or mean to gain disaproval either) has a different name for the 2 of you. some claim this neutral stance is respect others that it's not earned yet. but i highly doubt that you'd treat someoine in this neutral respect area much differently.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:10 AM
0

well generally there is a higher chance for males to be more logically inclined which is what draws these fields. ofcourse this is not everyone it just means a majority of guys compared to girls will have natural intrest. you can ofcourse influnce it further in the formative years but there are some general patterns.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 06:07 AM
3

why are you asking the side that has admited this whille defending the side that hasn't?
/r/MensRights03/01/13 05:49 PM
0

i once meeet a woman who have better rights than me. that means no women deserve better rights. not a single one of you. /s.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:17 PM
41

if you are not close to mom you could make a point by refering to her as "incubator".
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:12 PM
2

basicaly most here don't have issues with gay men(or women for that matter) but if the issue you as gay man are dealing with is because you are gay and not because you are male it falls into "not our problem territory". ofcourse being an MRA doesn't limit what you can stand up for so quite a few MRA's whille not figthing for for said gay problem as an MRA might simply don their "gay rights-hat" instead of their "MRA-hat" and still be on your side. however should a problem arise where the problem…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 02:20 PM
2

see this is more my sentiment. i don't want ladies night to be banned. i want the free market to come in to play. and if men are willing to come to these places in search for women who get free drinks that påratice is up to the owners. if you don't like that vote with your vallet and don't go to establishments that does this. if enough men do this bars will get tired of giving cheap/free drinks.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 09:58 PM
5

to be fair if you are going to belive women can't be responsible you need to be behind protecting them from themselves.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 09:54 PM
1

fine you are discussing definitions now. i'll concede that when you use your definitions you are indeed correct, i don't agree with your definitions but that is not something i care to argue.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 08:17 PM
1

avoiding what question? yes if you enjoy things you don't like you are fucking fucked in the head. rape is inherently sex you do not want to happen. if you do enjoy it it's not rape. so when you do then go on to "enjoy rape" we might as well talk about enjoying torture. not bdsm where everyone is in on it no plain torture. if you enjoy people doing things to you you do not like because they enjoy it you are the anti-thesis to selfestem. you have so little selfestem that your don't even have happ…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 03:22 PM
1

upset? no i find you anoying. i can hear the braging. i have no interest in a girlfriend. i might be slightly pissed that a jackoff like you could get a girl if i was trying myself but i know for a fact that the main reason i don't currently have a girlfriend is i don't talk to girls unless i have to. and this is by the way noy related to this subreddit in any kind of way before you get all holy on me.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 01:19 AM
0

this is sub about men's rights not womens rights. that's why you don't see posts about womens rights. it's also why you don't see discussion about what's the best the new game on the market, see posts aboutcute cats or questions about how to properly make a cheesecake. it's not what this subreddit is about. we ackowledge that these thing happen that they are terrible and that in many cases men were behind them. it still does not make it our problem or our subject. you want that? make a womens' r…
/r/MensRights29/12/12 12:14 PM
17

Everything Men’s Rights Activists label as “female privilege” is really patriarchy backfiring against men. intresting thought... let me try another one to follow up "Everything feminists label as “male privilege” is really feminism backfiring against women." yeah that works just as well... maybe they are on to something?
/r/MensRights29/12/12 11:57 AM
24

well good for you you have girlfriend so this doesn't aply to you at fucking all. there is still a pretty much universal truth to this joke. when you expect guests the house get's cleaned. when you expect guests and hope to have sex with said guests the house get's cleaner than it has ever been. i have yet to meet anyone for which this does not aply. oh and you don't trade your sexual favors because you have common respect for each other? well i'm sure that common respect for each other still re…
/r/MensRights29/12/12 12:42 AM
15

so what is it when "women dodge sex with undesirable men for so long that they defraud entire generations of their male counterparts of the right to sex? rape?" women get to say "baby now!" the day i get to say "sex now!" actually no. women get to say "baby now!" the day i get to tell THEM "baby now!"
/r/MensRights27/12/12 08:01 PM
0

... are you deliberately this dense?
/r/MensRights27/12/12 11:02 AM
1

same reason not complaing about getting assaulted would.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 12:30 AM
1

enjoying rape means you are fucked in the head. it means you enjoying something you don't want to happen.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 12:30 AM
1

it doesn't matter what the majority belives if it's a minortiy that actually makes themself heard. you don't want those extremists feminists to represent you? then either stop aligning yourself with them or be the first in line to decry them when they get out of line. until you do either these feminists area respresentation of feminists everywhere majority or no majority. P.S. so you have proven we got a bit disgruntled when it was okay to show men being beaten as justice but never women? i aske…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 07:48 AM
12

quite a few feminists don't agree with you. but hey no true scotsman, am i right? also please point me in the direction of when a video of a woman getting beaten up was posted here and people then just laughed at it.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 11:54 AM
1

and yet i'm the one not intrested in a logical discussion? fucking hypocritical fallacious logic haters like you. go troll someone else.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 08:01 AM
1

i'm sorry but fucking what? you have done nothing but useing those exacr logical fallacies on me the entire discussion and now you acusse me of being the one doing it? i'm not putting any words in your mouth i'm argueing the definition of a word. i'm not claiming you said those things. i'm pointing out why the openions you give become problematic when you actually adhere to them instead of just having them when it's convenient. if i make an incorrect assumption about your argument clearly you di…
/r/MensRights21/12/12 05:52 AM
1

i honestly don't remeber. something about suggesting that we are claiming only our problems matter.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 05:44 AM
0

That's fucked up and stupid. How old are you? i'm 21. why does that matter though? please point me in the direction of the time where i agreeded to take on such a responisbility. because i sure as fuck can't remeber it. also who the fuck are you to judge wether i should go on living in pain just because you have a hard-on for "life"? If that's the only reason, you need to talk to somebody. why? i'm not exactly going to commit suecide. i have thought this trough and i have concluded that i have n…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 09:26 PM
9

i'd suggest having your wife come in do it berating the doctor for wasting her time. might send a message. most likely not but if you have to.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 06:09 PM
1

I think there are plenty of justified uses of violence. just not against women? Someone says something that offends you, you punch him in the face, call it a night. unless that someone is a girl then you just sit there and take it because "hitting women is not okay".
/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:35 PM
13

because oppression is a zero sum game.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:30 PM
0

What if your parents shared your view? You wouldn't exist. so? it's still their choice. if that guy who got the job i wanted didn't take it i might have gotten it. but that's just how it is. what if my parents shared your view and still didn't want me? oh right i still wouldn't fucking exists because they wouldn't have gotten pregnant at all. Just because you're killing something before they become someone doesn't mean you're not killing them. You're saying their "life" is destroyed but they're …
/r/MensRights20/12/12 11:10 AM
1

well that is actually still incorrect by your definition. it would be if men ruled because we need men toi rule. but when it as now could (at least in theory) be women in control the gender isn't related to who leads at all. it doesn't become a patriachy because a guy is in charge. a guy is in charge because it's a patriachy.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 04:21 AM
0

you don't think i could achive so much more if i didn't have to give up my life in order to care for a retardet kid i don't give 2 shits about? you are making it black and white because you refuse to look at the nuances. you don't care to look at the situations or the people involved. there's a fetus so fuck everyone else involved. fuck their dreams, fuck their needs and fuck them in general. you are right when you make a choice you deal with the consequnces but the idea that dealing with the co…
/r/MensRights20/12/12 04:08 AM
4

also i'd still call it killing when she drops that beehive thing on the group of bad kids camped below her tree. maybe this was only in the movie though never read the books.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 02:47 PM
0

so you would rather give this child parents who when they look at this child don't see a son or daugther but only see "the thing that broke my dreams"? generally your right's don' t overwrite other peoples rights so whille i can agree that this unborn child has the right to live that right to live doesn't overwrite the womans right to not have it growing inside her. and the same should be forwarded to men. it's right to be doesn't overwrite his right to not be a dad. but even then i dislike open…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:21 AM
-1

why go for the easy one? let's go for the big guns of ridiculousness and label "women" as a hate group
/r/MensRights18/12/12 09:47 AM
0

what do you mean? it's a perfectly valid quote of you. there's no fallacy. you taught me that. either it's a fallacy or it's not.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 09:36 AM
0

please for the love of god look up what entrapment actually means. you literally have no idea what you are talking about. entrapment makes it irrelevant if he is guilty or not. you're also attacking padophiles quite a lot for someone who addmited to being one yourself. but no you are not worth arguing with. then again it's hardly worth calling me repeatedly proving that you don't know what you are talking about or repeatedly using fallacies argueing. it is a fallacy because you took my argument …
/r/MensRights18/12/12 05:22 AM
0

oh you don't have a relevant argument? color me suprised it has only been the case since the start. well what else should we expect from a criminal paedophile? by the way i'm intrigued now. please explain how pointing out your repeated fallacies is petulant exactly? or do you really think it doesn't matter that all your arguments are fallacies? because if you want we can have a fallacy debate instead of a real discussion.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 05:03 AM
0

sure ignore context. when is that ever relevant? by the way remeber when you wrote I am a paedophile who has knowingly broken the law the context of my quote was about entrapment not about the guilt or innocence of the guy in question. so either admit your argument is fallacious or i will withdraw from this argument based on the fact that i'm not gonna discuss this with a selfproclaimed pedophile.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 04:49 AM
0

so you are not even relating to what i said? how can we have any kind of discussion when you deliberately talk about something i'm not talking about? you just admited that at no point in this entire discussion have you been talking to me you have only been talking to your own strawmen of me. if you at some point decide you'd care to speak to ME instead of your strawmen get back to me.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 04:23 AM
0

sorry to tell you but the real world is not as back and white as you make it. as i said can't have this discussion with you since you refuse to understand the subject.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 04:02 AM
-2

missed the point where in her age bracket it's the other way around and she as a girl has the biological adavantage and it'd be surprising if the boys were better than her.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 03:35 AM
0

If I meet you down the street and say 'Hey Jazekki, I'm going to break into a house - come with me!' - and you do - are you not guilty of breaking and entering because you did not intend to until I offered for you to come with me? nice strawman you got there. but that's not what i said. first of unless you are an officer of the law this isn't even relevant to my argument. second until you care to actually understand what entrapment means it is imposible to have this discussion with you. but to s…
/r/MensRights18/12/12 03:24 AM
3

i want just once in these kind of sick cases that girlfriend simplyb acuse her parents of having sexualy abused her and insist that the boyfriend and herself have never had sex. it would be so satisfying to see the girl in these cases simply thorw her parents for the lions in order to save her boyfriend. and to prove how utterly broken the system is. then again i might only really wish this happened in theory. in practise this would be terrible.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 04:01 PM
0

there is so much wrong with your statement. not even going into the mess that is "what is a child exactly and when can they make their own choices" because that's a messy can of worms all by itself. but all that aside i was expresing a problem with how this is at the very least uncomfortably close to entrapment. and whille you could argue that an adult shouldn't be swayed by the offer fact is the police can not and should not be able to arrest you for crimes you only commited because they made y…
/r/MensRights17/12/12 03:35 PM
1

oh my mistake. yeah when i said that in this case children do have SOME rights clearly i said they have all the same rights as adults, right? seriously you need to troll better. either you don't belive children have human rights(and thus you don't belive children are human) this is based on your statement thus it is not a strawman and thus i have proven you don't even consider children human. why should we even consider you when you can't even ackowledge children as human? then again you conside…
/r/MensRights16/12/12 08:48 PM
1

a strawman is an argument presented as if it is held by your oponet and then dismanteling said argumentr instead of what your oponet actually said. I never said children have the same rights as adults. you said that i said it. thus it is a strawman argument. you claiming this is not the case further proves you have no idea what you are talking about. you are not even getting xlose to argueing against anything i have said. i have never claimed anything about rights to not be detained searched arr…
/r/MensRights16/12/12 08:33 PM
1

I'd like to know why you think children have the same rights as adults. i'd like to know why you default to such petty strawmen. but yes children do in fact like adults have all the rights known as human rights. i'd like to know why you don't think children are humans.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 04:22 PM
1

i have problems with parading them around like this. i have bigger problems with how incredibly close this BS comes to entrapment sure punish people acording to the law but i'm sure that more than once the guy showed no iniative to do more than internet flirting untill the bait invited him to sex.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 10:10 AM
1

ike it or not, a 10 year old doesn't have very many rights at school, human rights aply everywhere. "in loco-parentis does not aply in this case since it can't overwrite civil liberties. thank god you pointed out that you really have no idea what you are talking about and only making a lot of asumptions. P.S. but I don't think any of you can legitimately say that the teachers actions were perverse or disgusting. i very well can since that is an entirely subjective statement. that's like saying n…
/r/MensRights16/12/12 10:07 AM
1

we could have video it would still be "allegedly"
/r/MensRights16/12/12 09:56 AM
1

only zealous idiots are "permanently labeling her as a pedophile". the rest of us what her to be permanetly labeled as the woman who sexually molsted a child. yes people makes misrakes and ideally a single mistake (even as far as murder, rape and other worse things) should not be an eternal judgement. but she did it. she can't make that go away. nobody else can either. what can happen is she can be forgiven for it, but that is up to first society(which really needs to learn to do this) and secon…
/r/MensRights16/12/12 09:53 AM
2

it depends on how you break though. if you break simply because the magic is gone or it was never really there but there are no hard feelings you can still have a reasonable relationship. however not many people break like that. most people have problems that made them break or need to move on.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 01:49 PM
2

“Well that just tells me you have something to hide.” no i just don't have anything to share with you.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 01:46 PM
2

here's the thing: you don't get to be part of a silent majority unless you are okay with the extremists being your face to the world. if you do decide to stay silent the people who don't stay silent are going to be who represents you. if you are unhappy with that reprensentation either get the majority to be non-silent so we can get a new better reprensentation or lose the label so as to not suport the extremists that until now has acted on your behalf. you only get to be a silent majority if th…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 12:29 PM
3

in that case men to have a debilitating health condition that a vasectomy can prevent. it's this weird parasite that eats all our money despite it being nowhere near us and often actually kept away from us. it's kind of hard to explain but it certainly would be nice to be able to not worry about it.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 12:16 PM
1

funny how i see this slide do what it itself claim is male priviledge. or am i the only one seeing it trying to define gender roles? men havn't been the defining force behind gender roles for quite some time it's almost cute to blame it on male oriviledge. based on all i learn about it it seems to me women are the ones who have this magical "male priviledge" more so than anyone.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 12:12 PM
4

no i'm going to look at person who only gave 50% effort and say " you only get 50% resources. want more work harder" as someone pointed out earlier men who want to live this lkifestyle still need to find women that will be stay at home moms or make this sacrefice. so either women make the sacrefice or they find a stay at home dad. it's not so hard to understand. these buisnesses care about the productivity and results. if you can't live in world where your feelings do not matter you should not v…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 09:07 AM
27

the why is the goal to do this to benefit WOMEN and not everyone of these people? why did it only begin to matter when women were affected by this? if these people can't make that sacrefice they should make way for the people who can. men have been able to do this for decades women either can do the same or they are not qualified to be part of this elite.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 03:25 AM
1

no it's called safety. do you know what happens when you implement "women and children first"? you spli wives and husbands, children and farthers and brother and sister. this is not going to go down quitely. when you waste time splitting people up instead of focusing on saving who can be saved there is unnececary deaths and you cause panic confusion despration and overall chaos. women and children first is not only satupid it's downright dangerous. which has been proven EVERY TIME some stupid ca…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:44 PM
25

I would never even THINK about making unwanted sexual advances or suggestions toward anyone because that's incredibly invasive and uncomfortable. so you never make any sexual advances on anyone unless they have told you beforehand it's okay? not that they have signaled it that they have told you flat out "if you want to make advances on me you can" yeah great let's aply this to everyone then nobody will ever have sex again. you can't know beforehand if you advanced will wanted or not the only wa…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 10:52 AM
6

i just love 1 and 3. 1: oh nobody take your horrible fanfic seriously? clearly it's because you are a woman and not just because you suck. 3: yeah so unfair that you get treated like eveyone else. i mean there are ones far mors tupid than these but these really stick out as people who simply refuse to be a part of the real world and want to live in their own little LaLa-land where everything is perfect.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:07 PM
1

so you have aproblem with the 1% but you'd rather blame men? why should i value your openion when you are so utterly clueless?
/r/MensRights08/12/12 06:35 PM
29

i'm sorry but unless she issued a refund how is this legal?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:09 PM
2

i didn't know you could block an entrance with "hurtful words". you must tell me more of this sorccery.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:13 AM
1

no you just left your circle of other anarchists. around here we don't take kindly to people who incite violence in the name of free speech. we are peaceful people even if we have a cause.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:58 PM
1

then clearly it's not an insult. so you are challenging nothing.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 07:56 PM
4

it means i can go out and have sex with a 14 year old girl because i'm an immature nerd who spend his days on immature video games and cartoon shows. oh wait this defence only works for women. seriously this is a dangerous precedent.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:06 AM
7

so free speech means you get to break the law? "no no your honor it wasn't murder i had the free speech to kill him because i felt like it" breaking the law is breaking the law. fucking anarchists.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:00 AM
2

no it's an insult because YOU felt offened. it's an insult because YOU didn't want to be compared to a woman. sure it could very well be you were not insulted at all because you realise that it says more about the person trying to insult you than it does about you. but if it works as an insult YOU are the misogynist.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:50 AM
1

oh so you don't agree that we should wait with passing judgement until we have proof? i'm sorry i thought you agreed with innocent untiul proven guilty? but maybe you only do when it serves your cause? it's not about proving mom lied. it's about proving it really is dads kid.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:18 AM
1

well at least the bad comments have been serverly downvoted though i hope not from an invasion from here. then again it would have been intresting to see the comment used in the titel survive.... i mean rape is pretty common in society as well does that make it no big deal? common doesn't exactly mean okay.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:16 AM
1

i agree innocent until proven guilty. so not father until proven "guilty". thanks for agreeing with us.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:07 AM
2

well no in calvinball both sides at least get to play that part of the game.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:53 AM
0

yeah because it's so easy to adopt right? this family will just be able to with no problems get a new adoption trough right? i also still have a problem with the "just put her in jail"-idea. but yeah i'm just overly mad at bullshit like this. nobody who does things like this deserves sympathy of any kind. she played with at least 4 lives with not a care in the world that these lives will be dramaticaly hurt by what she is doing. i'm not saying this is what should be done to her. i'm saying i wis…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 11:05 PM
0

yeah because that will bring these peoples child back right? i know it's irrational. it's utterly fucking insane. but look at what she did. now no matter what happenes here somebody is going to losse their daugther forever. because of her selfishness. she deserves utter insanity.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:00 PM
1

"There has never been any question to us that she is OURS!!!" and there is no question that legally your openion is wrong and doesn't matter lady. i'm sure her intentions are good and she is a victim here as much as the father is. it doesn't mean she get's to steal his baby.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:16 PM
-4

now this might be slightly harsh but i belive the child should be returned to the farther and the mom should be forced to give birth to a new baby that should be given to the adoptive family wether she wants to or not. she promised the adoptive family a child she should be forced to give them one. her womb belongs to them until she delivers. edit: honestly i have no idea what i was on when i wrote this. i will still stand by the fact that i belive the so called mom deserve no sympathy at all and…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 04:11 PM
-1

don't worry, maybe one day you might think your wishes matter and that you are more than just a sextoy.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 07:47 PM
11

oh so you don't want to hear that reality doesn't match up with your expectations. feminists should be the last to endorse censorship like this. if they want censorship we can damn well get censorship back in the game. let's start with "women should shut up. period."
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:21 PM
-2

as i said must be nice to not need selfworth. i'm quite envious that you are perfectly okay with the idea that the world consider you nothing.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:16 PM
1

basicaly she is telling you the only thing she understands is violence. she just told you that the only way you could possibly get trough to her is a well placed punch to the face. now i'm not telling you you should do this. i'd like to make it clear that SHE said the only way you can get trough to her and have any kind of conversation with her is troigh violence. she just admited she is basicly at the cave-man level. if this is truely what she belives then this is why she isn't heard. not becau…
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:56 AM
6

somebody just got an f in biology AND sex ed. actually quite a few did.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:51 AM
2

it must be nice to have no selfestem at all and be happy about that.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 05:44 AM
3

then because the farther didn't give birth to the kid is the reason he doesn't have to pay for the kid. want to go on playing this game? because trust me it's not rigged in your favor.
/r/MensRights01/12/12 01:51 PM
9

how about we force the rapists to have an abortion if the farther does not wish to care for the child? then we get around that pesky "the child comes first". oh that would be violation of the womans body? too bad i think she gave up that right when she violated a childs body herself. seriously a rapist that get's preganant should not have the right to say no to an abortion.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:07 PM
17

these women need to stop telling me as man how i feel about them. women make me incredibly uncomfortable. and everyone makes me uncomfotable when i'm changing clothes.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:05 PM
3

well let's assume this guy is not just trolling.... no buddy just because you are such an iredeamable prick doesn't mean all men are. it's just you that is this kind of sick bastard.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 07:27 PM
8

no he sai'd there's allmost no risk of death as a complication. complications a plenty still. that's just how it goes in the medical world. you'll find hardly anything that doesn't have a significant amount of complications.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 03:13 PM
3

piercings and plastic surgery is certainly mutilation. but if you chose to let a trained profesional mutilate you that's your choice. i just know for a fact that these babies did in fact not consent. also mutilation is mutilation even if done "appropiately".
/r/MensRights27/11/12 04:26 PM
1

it's kinda the same system as why you don't see the quite muslims who think their jihad screaming breathen are insane and would hate their ghetto ganglike counterparts. you don't see them but they are certainly the majority.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 11:23 AM
2

i'm not gonna waste my time reading the crap article just to get mad over it but assuming the quote that is the headline here isn't take massively out of context he might have a slight point. then again i have never heard anyone claim there's a "war on men" either. just a system that currently don't care and intrest groups that fight them for personal gain. the same argument should be apllied to women though. and i have heard about the "war on women".
/r/MensRights27/11/12 11:17 AM
1

and i fully agree. but you don'øt give him responsibility then. to go further with that expresion the current system means that when the other man rams his nose into your fist it's still your fault. fairness is having the choice and the responisbility fall on the same person. so if men should be responsible they should have part of the choice. but as you pointed out giving men the choice over womens body is comnpletly unreasonable. therefor the only just solution is have the responsibility at th…
/r/MensRights27/11/12 11:10 AM
1

since i forgot the word "not". this is kind of embaresing to say the least.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 10:06 PM
10

now these people should go tell women who didn't fight back that they weren't raped. that one will go over great i bet.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:26 AM
3

why? what is wrong with intrest groups figthing for their own intrests? the difference is MRA's will (generally at least. not exactly a unified movement) not fight AGAINST womens rights. it's like saying if you don't give to chairty you want people to be poor. not helping is not the same as being against someone. edit: missing words make me say something completly wrong.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:21 AM
1

you suport prochoice for women. you stance is impressivly anti-choice for men. if those women wanted a choice about not being a parent they should have thought about it BEFORE they spread their legs right? or is it only men who should be responsible for their actions like that?
/r/MensRights26/11/12 07:59 AM
12

wouldn't it be easier to point out how dangerous it can be to take such a strong "either you are with us or you are are against us" policy? i mean to start of it's discriminatory and as such they can't be for equality.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 05:14 PM
3

i actually don't see any of the arguments here as that. simply put the arguments are that it is a an irreversible choice that has a lasting impact. some of it might be good but that's irrelevant because some of it is undeniablý bad and when that is the case nobody but the person living with the consequnces should be alowed the choice.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 10:09 AM
6

agreeing to sex is not agreement to becoming a parent. i hope you are at least just as vigoursly fighting abortion. can't have those women not owe up to their kids right?
/r/MensRights25/11/12 09:59 AM
7

change "murder" with "rape". it get's the message across better. at least for the people not so far out that you can't get a message across anymore.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 09:51 AM
2

so basicly an 11 year old can get away with anything i'm guessing murder includded because we can't hold them acountable for their own actions?
/r/MensRights23/11/12 08:03 AM
9

bingo. nobody is suggesting á system where it's either the guy or the girl who goes to prison. it's not a case of either or. it's simply that if we can prove that person 1 raped person 2 person 1 goes to jail. can we prove person 2 lied person 2 goes to jail. if we can't prove what happened nobody goes to jail.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 08:02 AM
2

to be just as honest most women won't either. maybe more women than men but certainly not most women over all.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 05:44 AM
1

it would be real funny to me to stab this lady in the throath. how many here get's the joke?
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:38 PM
2

and all this bullshit comes from people who have never tried being a "white hetero male" and thus can't comment what so ever about what it's like. no matter what they say or do their arguments in this will be automaticly void. at least assuming their logic.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:32 PM
1

no i'm not. one barber refusing to ignore his religion does not deny you a haircut. she was never unable to get a haircut. she was unable to get a haircut from this one particluar guy. he has the basic human right of personal freedom. that includes the right to say "no".
/r/MensRights20/11/12 09:29 PM
1

no no just trying abolish the human rights of those who belive in it.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 05:43 AM
1

well the original purpose of the ring was to serve as a kind of "insurance" so i'm poretty sure there was some kind of worth it should match once but it's anything but relevant today.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:21 PM
3

the homemaker is generally the one with the hands on the cash the breadwinner brings in. i'd say that is holding the true power.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:14 PM
1

Religion doesn't give you the right to discriminate against others. very much right. neither does lack of religion though. you bigot. I'd dare say that you're the most hateful, intolerant cunt I've ever met. This isn't a war on religion. But you're too stupid to comprehend that. says the guy who refuses to tolerate religion at all.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:54 PM
1

ran out of viable arguments? wait that would presume you had one to begin with. how about you try again this time without resorting to fallacies?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:53 PM
1

oh i'm sorry i don't normally read the names in these discusions. congratulations on managing to troll me. really proves that i'm a troll that you could troll me like that. trolls trolling trolls. this why the internet is so great.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 07:52 PM
1

actually he is right. we need to make sure men never do anything femininate. and ofcourse the solution to misoginy is that women never do anything masculine. like have a job or vote or rule or think logicaly. this man is so right the solution is to uphold the stereotypical gender roles like it was the fucking law. or maybe that would be really stupid idea. P.S. How do you expect men to be free from the peripheral effects of misogyny when you refuse to even fucking believe it’s real. i have never…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:25 AM
1

We don't dumbass. Apparently you have no clue about nuance. would you please take a stance and stay with it? either it's okay or it's not. if it is we agree if it is not then you said it's okay for her to demand he cuts her hair. There is nothing ok about him denying her service because she's female. That doesn't mean he should be forced to do so. you do realise this is self contradictory right Sure he's legally allowed to refuse, but it's still dumb, small minded, sexist and unprofessional so y…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:13 AM
1

who is censoring you? nobody here is censoring you. you however are trying to censor us because you don't like that we don't agree with you. so you want us silenced. you want this to be a "safe space"? then kindly fuck of with your censorship atempts.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:12 AM
1

and this people is a clasic example of "intolerance". notice especially how this argument relies entirely upon the idea that the action taken is wrong simply because something the person giving the argument finds undesirable(in this case religion) is involved. please go away troll. we don't need assholes like you adding fuel to the fire and actually start a war on religion. you are a extremists and i'd dare say you are worse than most of the people your hate is directed at.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:10 AM
1

trust me trolling for the last word ain't gonna fly. you want the last word so at least you can have the fact that i gave up... problem is i'm just as petty. if this is going to be reduced to worthless trolling so be it. it's not like i have much better to do right now anyway.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:06 AM
13

i've also heard they are incredibly unpopular at those establishments and are only alowed in because they bring money.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 01:39 AM
3

basicly the answere is "for every place you can name i can name one. we can then continue to have me parot the places you mention until the sun rises if you wish"
/r/MensRights19/11/12 01:37 AM
11

actually the point is "it's okay as long as nobody challenges it" well guys i think it's time to challenge EVERY women's only space because the second we ask them to serve us by this logic it's no longer okay to say no.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 01:35 AM
2

But the legal system is not generally skewed towards women—as survivors of sexual assault and domestic violence can attest to. who are they talking about here? because i'm pretty sure it wouldn't be thoise men who was jailed for being on the reciving end of domestic violence and mocked for being sexualyv assaulted. oh right those don't exists at all. what sexism?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 01:28 AM
1

western batist church says hi and ask if we want to join that club. i for one vote no but...
/r/MensRights19/11/12 01:21 AM
1

Where did I say that? oh you didn't say that? then i'm happy we agree that it's perfectly okay for him to deny to cut her hair. P.S. your evasion tactics are getting quite pathetic.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 01:18 AM
0

how is religion a male priviledge? to my knowledge women can be religious just as well as men. even if we assume religion and male priviledge often go hand in hand(something i'm not ready to since you have yet to prve any such thing but let's assume for now that i do) just because you have one at play doesn't magicaly inovke the other. point out the priviledge. getting a haircut is hardly a priviledge neither is having a religion. it's not my fault that you don't know what the word priviledge ac…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 01:17 AM
1

nobody here is getting censored. do you see any deleted comments? besides the trolling which don't deserve that freedom but that's another argument? no he presented his openion and we said we thought that was dumb openion. why do you want to censor us? so we don't hurt your feelings?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 01:13 AM
0

what rights does it oppress? since when did we have the right to demand haircuts of other people? and please for the love of everything holy come up with something better than "religion = male priviledge!!!!" what is the male priviledge in this case that she is being denied? holy hell even r/atheism isn't this intolerant of religions.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 06:00 AM
5

i'm more confused about the part where they need to point out that she can make her own choises... whille arguing that he can't. what happened to "no means no"?
/r/MensRights18/11/12 05:41 AM
1

yes i'm the troll. you are the one who in the end use fallacies to try and discredit me when you realise you can't even follow my basic argument ( btw bonus points for acusing me of lack of reading comprehension since that was your major flaw in this argument). but i'm the troll.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 05:33 AM
1

Circular reasoning. please desribe said circle. they don't cater to women so women don't get served is not circular reasoning. Yes to all except the statement "do they discriminate because they don't have clothes for me?" That's obviously not discrimination. well at least you are consistent in your insanity. but let's go on then since you didn't want to give me your profession i need a few more shots in the dark. is it unfair when a resturant bans kids? how about when they demand you wear a tie?…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 05:26 AM
1

clearly you aren't as if you were you'd have simply not replied. no you are here still to get the last word because doing that will give you further satisfaction as being "right". as i have said previously this is why we can't have a reasonable debate. because for you this is not about having a debate. it's about being right. you done? then please let this be the end. stop replying. but i'm more than willing to go on so don't expect me to stop if you keep going on.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 05:11 AM
0

why? why do you have to be intolerant of his religion. why does his personal freedom not matter because the cause of his actions is religion? what happened to his basic human rights? and please you conviniently forgot to explain how this is a male priviledge.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 05:08 AM
2

because I'm not seeing anywhere that they were stalking the male actors. well i didn't use the word stalking now did i? they did however often follow them around to meet them like the fan girls they were to get close to them. and again i'm not saying this not okay. but secutiry would be all over the 40 year old guys who was everywhere emma wattson faced the public. You continually state that they are doing something that is clearly predatory i have naver made such claim. i described a behaviour …
/r/MensRights17/11/12 09:43 AM
1

Then you can never do anything about discrimination in employment because all they have to do is say "we can refuse them for any reason we want" and you walk away satisfied. so do you often only react to the part you want to and ignore the rest? What makes it male oriented is not the hair but the resulting styles they specialize in. If she wanted one of the styles, then that was the right place to go to and she was the right customer. clearly not since the establishment doesn't cater to women. t…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 09:33 AM
2

either you are purposely distracting from the point as eithe trolling or because you have an agenda OR you really don't understand the argument. first of those starwars fans are going into a fantasy world. star wars do not come even close to being a valid comparison. especially not when you compare people who seek out the actors because they think the charecters (and actors) are hot and they want to BE WITH them, to people who dress up as the charecters because they want to BE them. second. whil…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 09:03 AM
1

Very well. Then I'll ask you: If an employer refuses to hire somebody because of their gender (or skin color if you want) and then when challenged, then says they can refuse anyone, would you accept that? sure i would. assumeing he has an actual reason for that choice. the problem is the correct anaology would be would it be okay to not hire a woman(or black person) because they weren't what they were looking for. the man never argued about refuseing women because he can or because he has someth…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 08:52 AM
0

i'm sorry male priviledge? what exactly is the priviledge here? the priviledge of getting our hair cut?`nope she can still do that. or is this guy some magical genious at hair cutting to the degree that getting exactly him to do it is a priviledge? i belive she is a horrible person because she either went in meaning to shake things up just for the attention OR when meet with something not going EXACTLY her way decided that it was time to start sue people. either way it's a toxic personality that…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 08:34 AM
4

all that is true. it still doesn't change the fact that an equal fan club consisting of men would be reviled, shuned and shamed. my problem isn't that these women did this. it's that men can't be alowed to have the same passion for something without being labeled as creeps.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 08:26 AM
0

boo fucking hoo. how about you find one of those nice "safe spaces" that can censor all the stuff you don't like to see for you?
/r/MensRights17/11/12 08:23 AM
0

is my quote of you your argument yes or no? does it aply to yes or no? this is the entire argument. it's a basic yes or no question and you keep changing your answere. i have later gone into the problem that you have decided that your moral stance is somehow superior but this has never been the topic of debate. i'd offer to take that debate up with you if you wanted but knowing your track record you are the one person i have ever meet that i outright rtefuse to have any kind of debate with consi…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 08:22 AM
3

basixly you are pissed that you can'øt take a piss standing. or to put it even more bluntly : PENIS ENVY! no my penis doesn't come with magical social dominance powers. if you could give me an example of how to use them i'd be happy.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 04:22 AM
6

please find me even a shred of evidence that there was any kind of "club" these men could proudly be a "member" of at the time akin to "twilight mom's". the problem isn't that they are there. it's that they can display themselves like this whille the equal men would be shoed out as perverts before getting a meaningful word in.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 04:15 AM
0

if you unknowingly go into a "men's only" place an expect to be served as a woman a woman who genuinly didn't know would upon learning this fact go: "oh i didn't know i'm sorry if i was an inconvinience" not "I'LL SUE ALL YOUR ASSES!!!" and even if the later is the case. such a terrible human being does not deserve the benefit of the doubt.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 04:06 AM
1

i'm sorry? don't you tell me what i would or wouldn't except you intolerant dick. her personal freedom to chose who cuts her hair ends where the person personal freedom to chose if he or she wishes to cut her hair begins. fact is YOU deny HIM his basic personal freedomn a basic human right because it's based on his religion something you have a personal problem with. i hate religion as much as the next guy here on reddit. i think it's a toxic thing that destroys a large part of society. but i'm …
/r/MensRights17/11/12 04:01 AM
0

would you be so kind as to give an example of something like this happenening where MRA's happened to bitch about it then? i see quite a lot of claims that it happen but no examples.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 03:09 PM
2

what about the human right called "personal freedom"? all you guys saying his religious freedom should not protect him... you are denying him the basic human right of personal freedom to chose for himself.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 03:07 PM
0

that's not nececarily what got him downvoted. you are fighting strawmen. there's certainly no place for assholes like you around here. now go troll somewhere else please.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 02:48 PM
0

This entire conversation between us has been you attributing an argument to me which I never made and we are back to you refuseing that my qutoation of you was never said by you. this is why this is pointless. you keep admiting what i say is right then turn around and deny that it's right. it's worthless to even have any kind of converation with you because it'll never hold any substance like this.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 02:46 PM
0

actually no. fuck you. you are not mature enough to get rid of me that easily? you want to make this a fight between retardet kids? i can sink to your level even if i don't stand a chance at beating you at it. your sense of being better than everyone else, clearly based on the idea that you are morally superior to everyone else witch you have gotten from the idea that you are better than everyone else is really gettting on my nerves. see you could have come to these points from the start but you…
/r/MensRights15/11/12 03:41 PM
2

if you don't hear the story i don't belive you have EVER heard a woman talk about her relationships. at all. i know very few girls. i know few people in egneral but girls are extreamly rare. all of them have multiple stories of downright insane exboyfriends. none of them have tried to kill them.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 03:09 PM
1

we don't. but when you say stupid shit we happen to agree is useless bullshit yeah you will get burried. since when is that bad? his BS crap is not what the MRA comunity wants to be associated with. if you want to be an ignorant bigot feel free but don't expect to be able to do it in our name.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 01:05 PM
0

feel free but i haven't been passive agresivly downvoteing. i have downvoted 1 or 2 when reddiqute called for it but that's about it. also fine. then i'm right when i say that your argument about the guy is still wrong. it doesn't matter what the law is where YOU live his punishment is still not fair. you made 2 arguments. 1(the one i happened to quote) negate the rest of your arguments. either what i quoted all the time is wrong OR it apllies to you as well. something you from the start have de…
/r/MensRights15/11/12 01:03 PM
13

he did deal with his parents. they don't belive him. not exactly a lot he can do then? or what obvious solution is there where parents who don't belive you isn't a problem?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:03 AM
1

safe areas are bad... safeareas are the ones that define what you can and can't say. this guy said what he wanted no he needs to take the consequnces for people here not agreeing with him. if we made it a safe area he wouldn't have those consequnces he himself belived should be there. beyond that it's whollely insulting as well as a defeatists attitude we don't need around here.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 11:18 PM
2

i can't even think of an equivilant for the fact that men should not wear dresses. i mean that's and entire subgroup of clothing that is simply cut of for men. it's not like girls can't wear pants or really anything. i mean they can even wear suits without it being nearly as big an issue if it even is one.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 11:14 PM
12

majority of advice is good. but there was no need to split it into genders. if anything MEN are the ones who really need to know it could happen to them, for example. but then we also have the overall terrible ones like saying there's some kind of stereotype that no means yes. no sane person actually belive that and it's certainly not a stereotype. if anything it's a stereotype that men belive it.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 11:10 PM
0

the one i have been quoting from the start. why do you think i quote it every time you ask "which argument" as well as every time you acuse me of having invented said argument?
/r/MensRights13/11/12 11:00 PM
1

equality of opportunity means men and women get judged under the same law with the same rights. they might not get the exact same punishment at all times because let's face it that's the point of our current legal system. to not have set in stone laws but actually judge the cases ona case by case basis. and as a result every case might not end exactly the same. but much close than it is now. equal opportunity would mean we classified what crime you commited. like let's say "theft". then after th…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 09:16 PM
4

it depends... what age are we talking about? sure 20 year old girl will have it easier than 20 year old guy. 30? 35? 40? now it's suddenly not nearly as easy and if the lady want some it's not unlikely she'll have to pay. ofcourse that's entitrely reasonable. if she is willing to pay and he is willing to recive payment for said service who the fuck are we to get involved in that?
/r/MensRights13/11/12 07:23 PM
1

the diference is in wanting to put focus in goals only if they benefit yourself and putting focus in goals because you are the one affacted and thus you are the one who should deal with the problem. but yeah it's a minor difference but it is important.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 07:07 PM
3

i think the fact that men allready have far fewer claims proves that wrong. also driving safer is not going to lower my premium. changing gender will but not driving safer. because aparently i'm still a risk even if i drive safely. hell i'll still be a bigger "risk" than awoman who don't drive safely.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 09:08 AM
1

no equality of outcome is allways bad. equality of opportunity is the one we want.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 09:02 AM
1

i have never claimed you were wrong in your argument. i do claim your argument is wrong. conslusion right argument wrong. but then you managed to point that out so since we did reach agrement long ago i'm not even sure why this argument is still going on.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 08:55 AM
1

I understand and agree with your (and many other people here's) position about wanting to focus on mens rights only, because it specifically applies to you, whereas women's right don't. that's actually kinda off from what i said. it's not that i want to focus on men's issues. it's just that fighting for issues that only affect you should be a priority for you because expecting others to fight for that is quite self centered. if an inssue hurts men and women obviously we should work together abou…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 08:51 AM
2

personally i don't see the problem with men's rights fighting exclusivly for the rights of men. just as i don't see a problem when feminism fight exclusivly for women. the problem is when feminism starts fighting AGAINST men. i'd have a problem with men's rigths foing out specifcly to fight womens rights. personally i don't see the problem in fighting for a personal intrest group. i don't personally benefit from women's rights so they don't mean as much to me personally as men's rights. therefor…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 01:09 AM
1

and when i pointed to why you personal morality should count for anything special you called people who don't agree with you retardet. if it's meaningless to point out in his case it's just as meaningless in her case. i don't get how you can so easily conslude that your moral compass is so infalible. i mean ofcourse you are going to think you are right i wouldn't expect anything else but to go to point of calling everyone disagreeing with you retardet? also the law in other countries are very re…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:58 AM
1

Again, you're not actually using my argument against me. You're making up a new argument and attributing it to me, then claiming it undermines my position. This is a strawman. This is not proof...this is sophistry and posturing. fuck you. fuck you so hard. you said "I don't care if it's legal in your state or your country, it obviously isn't in that country." i said the same apllies to your argument about the girl. her having premarital sex is illegal so there is no reason to care what you think…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 07:06 PM
1

This was in response to the people saying it was legal in other countries, as if that somehow made it okay. okay. so why doesn't it apply when it works against your argument? But you did write: "YOU MADE THE ARGUMENT YOU MORON!!!". yes because when i used your argument against you suddenly the argument was wrong. only it wasn't as long as it was your argument. basicly it was in some kind of flux where it is right when you say it but wrong when i say it.... or maybe you are just a moron. that's m…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 06:57 PM
-7

sure we can revoke all your rights and responsibilties if you want girls. if you want to be treated like a 2 year old i'm fine with that. now get back in the kitchen... wait i need 5 minutes to remove all the sharp objects.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 06:45 PM
1

oh great now we reach the point of "my argumentr is rational because i sday so". please you must be able to back your argument up with far more fallacies than just "i'm right because i say so". you are so caught up in being right that you don't even notice i'm not even arguing that point rather i'm argueing that your arguments are horrible since they are nbothing but a long line of fallacies and anything but rational. you conclusion might be rational your arguments are not since as i have repeat…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 06:41 PM
1

"I don't care if it's legal in your state or your country, it obviously isn't in that country." you wrote this this. i copy pasted it from you comment. it just so happens the same thing apllies to the girl. either it is valid to aplly it to her or it is invalid to aplly to him. my only argument is that this argument that you made IS WRONG!!!!! I'm not the one freaking out and calling people "moron" because they disagree with me. neither am i. i call you a moron because you shoot you in yourself …
/r/MensRights12/11/12 06:38 PM
2

some people would say there's something wrong with you if you can't see that it's clearly wrong to have sex with someone you are not married to. openions come in all flavors buddy and just because you have yours doesn't make everyone who doesn't share it wrong.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 12:09 PM
2

YOU MADE THE ARGUMENT YOU MORON!!! you can't make this argument when it suit your case then cry when it's turned against you that it's not fair. your argument invalidates you other arguement. 1 of your arguments are wrong. end of discusion. you are fully entiteled to your openion. so is everyone else funnily enough even if they don't agree with you. people can think unmarried sex is the same kind of morally bankrupt that you consider having sex with a 16 year old is and they are no more wrong th…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 12:06 PM
10

no. by that logic women should not be alowed to have alcohol. like children. if they are going to behave like children they should be treated as such.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 08:23 AM
1

he is being punished for having sex with a 16 year old. i see nothing wrong with having sex with a 16 year old. you are the one who said "I don't care if it's legal in your state or your country, it obviously isn't in that country." it's not my fault that the same argument aplies to her punishment.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 08:05 AM
1

if you are not willing to read what i write and draw conclusions from that i can't spend my time repeating myself. if that is caused by my admitedly bad spelling so be it i'm not going to blame you for that.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 08:01 AM
1

you are the one claiming that the only options are "wait for cops" or "hit her". as i said forceful removeal should be a very possible solution and if that DOESN'T work we have THAT on tape and then if hitting is nececary it should be an option. Jazzeki, I have to say I'm a little disappointed that you've decided to join the gang and behave as if I said what she was doing is okay. and i'm dissapointed that you'd go so low as to put words in my mouth as i have never claimed you said that. i have …
/r/MensRights11/11/12 07:49 PM
6

do i get to decide what benefits women have that excuses any and everything i could possibly do against them? i'm not denying those things can suck or that they can suck bad. doesn't give them a free pass though. i personally have problems most people will never have to deal with yet i don't get any free passes.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 07:44 PM
1

following the same logic that "it's the law there it's just the punishment for the crime" the same aplies to the girl. she had sex when she shouldn't so she get's the whip. nothing to be upset about that's just how it works there. no need to worry.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 07:42 PM
10

congratulations you found 2 aspects where they don't have it easier. that completly negates the many areas where they have it easier right? please be reasonable nobody here is saying women have it easy all the time. simply that often women have it easy and just as much as we should work on making it easier and more fair in cases where women are not in luck so should we help men when they are the ones getting the short stick. it's not a zero sum game we are playing here.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:29 PM
1

i never claimed violence was the answer. you however claimed it was worth taking the chance that the police will be on your side. further i do in fact belive i should be able to defend myself. i should not be limited by how long it takes for the police to come to my defence even assuming they will defend me instead of attack me. does that mean i should simply be able to smack her? of course not. but i should have the right to use whatever means nececary to get away from her. if i can remove her …
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:13 PM
1

calling a girl a dumb slutty bitch would fall under same catagory i guess. i mean sure do call epople creppy like that if you want just don't cry when you get know as the dumb slutty bitch.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 01:57 AM
2

why should you take the chance? there's no good reason to take the chance.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 01:47 AM
4

So, people seem to expect men to defend themselves without actually using any sort of physical force. i'd like to correct you on this one because it's not true. they expect you to use no kind of force at all physical or otherwise. can't let the poor women be afraid now can we?
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:55 AM
1

i can't hate something that i don't belive in. other than that i admit i should learn to spell it.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:50 AM
-6

i'm starting to consider a way we could mess with these peoples head. once they begin to talk about how men have this magical priviledge just invoke it. tell them "i invoke my priviledge and by that it means i'm right. since i am male and you are femnale clearly i am right since i have invoked "PRIVILEDGE"!!!" should they dare to refute that you are right by extension of priviledge start asking them if they can decide if you have priviledge or not. then again i would only use this in a discusion…
/r/MensRights10/11/12 01:09 AM
6

it's also a blatant lie. find me the child who will tell me he was taught that it's okay to abuse women. in the same time i'll find a few hundred who have be taught "never hit a girl/woman" to the point of not being able to be objective in this regard.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:44 AM
16

you clearly have not read that many good cartoons.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 07:34 AM
1

Thor is a norse god. unless it's wiking armor it's damn well not any kind of factual. might not be "unrealitic" but it's not factual.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 04:55 AM
2

you are however hostile to those people by suggesting that THEY the allready established group should change their behavior to acomodate newcommers. it might not be what everyone means but when I say "if you can't deal with it don't play" i'm not saying don't play the game at all. but rather find like mionded people out there. we have 2 possibilities. either enough people feel like you and you can come together and make your own gaming scene where you behaviour is the acsepted behaviour. or ther…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 05:21 PM
2

because by suggesting they should not be alowed to act like that you offend them. why is it only okay when you assholes do it but not when these assholes do it? you don't solve "hostility against the minority" by instead being hostile against the majority. if you don't like how these people act it's on you to not play with them and on your own find people you are in fact comfortable to play with. it's just like the real world. if you friends all behave in a way you don't like instead of spending…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:22 AM
88

which is why the default reply to "call the police!!" in these cases is "just a sec need to get a hold of child protective services first". smack them with just a tiny amount of reality.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 04:38 PM
6

well no lady. men has the right to think that women with body hair is disgusting. they can belive women with hair on the head is disgsting. they can belive that women who shave at all is disgusting. they can have whatever preference they want. and then you can cater to that or not. now if it does so happen you don't cater to the majority while other women do that means you are most likely going to be the one left out. on the other hand should women all decide they don't want to shave anymore the…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:06 AM
5

did i just see a femninist argue that a "change in power between the sexes" is anti-feminists? well let's get those owmen back in the kicthen with no right to vote then. can't have such a change in balance slip by can we now?
/r/MensRights05/11/12 06:49 AM
2

Whatever the fuck a private business wants to do is on them. in this argument this translates into "if private buisnesses want to be bigots we should alow them to. it's not our job to get involved in that". now if you were talking about MRM not getting involved i might have let it slide but you were saying that we as PEOPLE should not get involved and MRM should be "above" caring about that bigotry. i got no problem if someone don't want to deal with black people. or homosexuals. or men. but tha…
/r/MensRights05/11/12 06:19 AM
1

if that "or" is supposed to be "is" that is exactly what i was trying to say but not good enough to express. everyone should be given equal opertunities (which in this case would mean it's not okay for even private buisnesses to differinciate like this) but the problem becomes when you force equality to issues where people are unequal not because of sexism or discrimination but simply because the people are not physically or mentaly equal.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 06:08 AM
-3

i don't know. does good writing involving a stereo typical female lead = misogyny?
/r/MensRights04/11/12 08:48 PM
3

actually discrimination is still illegal. just because these places have found some way to proclaim "it's not discrimination" and thus have get out of jail free card. i admit as a blanket statement i was wrong. but that was me formulating myself badly, not me not understanding the situation. i will admit though i didn't even consider the law internationally. i didn't even conbsider it might be different in the states not to mention different from state to state.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 07:57 PM
4

try to tell that to blacks. try to tell that to homosexuals. actually fuck that. do tell that to men facing discrimination. discrimination is not okay. it never has been and it never will be. i very much belive that you should have the right to say no to service assuming you can give an even slightly valid reason. but MRM should NOT become a platform defending bigotry.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 07:54 PM
31

whoa whoa whoa. "this subreddit has been against cases like this" ≠ "it's not illegal". currently discrimination (which this is) based on gender IS illegal even in a privately owned buisness. we can talk all we want about wether that is right or not. personally i'm not sure alowing people to discriminate is a good idea. what do we do if someone gains a monopoly in smaller society and starts discriminateing? these laws were made for a reason. forced equality is only bad if it's done solely for th…
/r/MensRights04/11/12 04:18 PM
6

i heard this argument once a twice. i suggested we follow this argument to it's logical conclusion and lock women up in the kitchen without human rights. then we can work on women having rights once starvation in africa has been solved.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 07:45 PM
-3

in an ideal world this cop would have been stabed by OP followed by all his peers laughing at how a "big strong male cop" was "beaten" by a highschool kid. then brutally punished if he had dared do anything thing in any kind of selfdefence. sadly i can only dream of such pure justice.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 02:07 AM
1

if we apllied this way of thinking against feminists we would have found a group of people so hateful that even satan is looking up it and saying "what the hell could he have possibly done to deserve THAT!?!" all the whille we all know the induvidual reciving this hate has not be able to do ANYTHING yet.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 01:24 AM
0

i agree fully. however i'm not entirely of the idea that this SHOULD be used as an "either this or the other"-situation. obviously only one of the 2 is fair but it's also only fair if at least on of them is passed. if nothing else it's gives a bit of perspective.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 08:32 PM
6

what happened to "no means no. also in the case of men saying no"? or maybe you are one of those people who means if you are horny it doesn't matter if SO is up for sex they owe it to you and it's just about delivering? also what is this hatred of compromises about?
/r/MensRights31/10/12 03:11 PM
3

and now here you are victim blaming someone else because that's the only way you can deal with having once been a victim aparently. OP is male and that makes it impossible for him to be a victim right? just remeber those people who blamed you for that sexual explotation and then remeber: you are one of them.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 08:56 AM
-11

some tries to pull that shit with me they better not need that arm the next few months since i will break your arm if you do that to me. hell the last time a friend did that to me because i was about to walk into the street i allmost broke his arm in selfdefence. i'm slightly jumpy and react violently if you egt to close. don't do that shit unless you are ready to possibly get hurt.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 08:40 AM
1

Averages. The car goes from 100% male use to, say, 50% male, 50% female. The car is unlikely to be used much more than it already is, but the usage is now split between a risky driver and a careful driver, when it was previously only the risky driver. WRONG!!!!!! in the argument above it was CLEARLY stated that it is driven just as much by the male driver but now at occasion a female driver will be useing it as well. let's say it's the car the man drives to work. he will still use it as much as …
/r/MensRights31/10/12 08:15 AM
1

someone failled biology. and failled it hard. i mean if you get an F for not understanding anything and F- for being wrong about everything... this must be below Z- somehow. i mean it allready falls aparet long before you take it out of the simple biological BS she has set up but then you start to think about how it would be impossible for women to reproduce in an enviroment where there are no Y chromosomes. basicly the X chromosome is worthless without the Y.
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:58 PM
1

no. i'm not going to argue with you if you refuse to stand by what you are saying. nobody in this argument has at any point argued about genders as a whole. they have argued on an induvidual basis. and when a male driver with no accidents have a higher premium than a female driver with multiple accidents you are still basicly wrong. risk will dictate that the woman who have had 3 crashes is a higher risk than the man who have had zero. also explain to me how a car witha male driver suddenly beco…
/r/MensRights30/10/12 12:44 PM
1

NO! you do not get to argue against reality. it doesn't "depend" on shit. clearly the argument stated she has had crashes often he has had none. there isn't ANY reality in which he is a higher risk acording to any math. you have NO idea how math works that much is obvious. you are the one argueing against the math at hand. the argument is exactly that no matter how bad the female driver she is going to be considered a lesser risk no matter how good the male driver. you do not understand the argu…
/r/MensRights29/10/12 08:38 PM
0

person 1 is male. he is a good driver. he has had no accidents ever. person 2 is female. she is a bad driver. she has had multiple accidnts in a short while. acording to your math of probability and risk person 1 is more likely to be in an accident than person 2 because he is male.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 10:15 AM
0

so? when a good male driver still pays more than a bad female driver that argument is irrelevant. or are you claiming the best male driver is still worse than the worst female driver? there is also many studies that clearly prove that men are better suited at driving so acording to your logic men should pay LESS! but the fact is still you are argueing AGAINST the idea that your premium should be based on YOUR driving risk rather than that of OTHER PEOPLE that you happen to share ome kind of trai…
/r/MensRights29/10/12 09:23 AM
1

i haven't i have however pointed you in direction of the math at hand that the OP gave. i don't care if you do the math yourself but please anything based on reality instead of "i'm sure it's somewhere!!!" would be a start to convincing me. again justify why the bad driver get a lesser rate because of gender. any kind of math that justifies that a driver that is a higher risk should pay less only based on gender.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 09:02 AM
1

sure MRA has an agenda it's broad but we are ope about it like you. problem is you are the one forcing yourself in to a broad discusion with your own very limited discusion. feel free to bring it up when it's relevant to the discusion but turn every discusion into your discusion is not okay.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 06:41 PM
1

well sure if that's the topic. but it wasn't. SRS was a short mention. they do an awful lot more than just shit on transgender men. allright i might even admit it was slightly relevant. only if we agree that you changed the subject to server your goals of brining that word to use. so basicly you have an agenda. i find i rarely find people with an agenda to be worthwhile people in a discusion.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 06:21 PM
2

he's not saying it shouldn't have a name. he's saying there's an apropiate time to take the term to use. it should not a be defualt. just like you by default don't add "white" "male" or "herterosexual". you add it when it's releveant and assumeing you could be anything else was reasoanble or pointing it out changes something. that sistuation is incredibly rare when we are talking about the word "cis". it's not useless but it's useses is servely limited.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 06:12 PM
3

obviously needs to be taken witha grain of salt and obviously doesn't magically apply to all women out there. beyond that there's a lot of truth to this.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 12:37 PM
7

so basicly it's degradeing to be female? is this a common feminist view or just a crackhat on reddit who has no idea what is going on?
/r/MensRights27/10/12 12:32 PM
2

whoa buddy nobody said piracy isn't illegal just that it isn't theft. and it isn't theft. if it was it would be called theft not piracy. theft has a definiotion that the act of piracy does not fall under. that's why we defined the acts that is piracy as piracy. a crime is a crime sure but not all crimes are the same crime. and piracy is not theft no matter how much some people want it to be.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 12:23 PM
0

and i really don't think there's a casual link between gender and car accidents but i still have pay more(well had). but what we think doesn't matter when the numbers don't lie does it? but hey then these premiums should work the same way you just described. identify who are a risk and then make them be the high payers instead of simply dumping the blame on an entire gender. to do this everyone starts out equal and then good drivers are rewarded and bad drivers are punished. like the new system …
/r/MensRights27/10/12 12:12 PM
0

so basicly "magic numbers that i don't have prove i'm right" OP pays more than objectively worse drivers that are objectively a bigger risk. maybe yes male drivers overall are worse than female drivers overall. but that's still not a reasonable reason to make good male drivers pay more than bad female driver as long as the bad female drivers are a bigger risk. that has been proven and numbers don't lie. the only math that can make this possible is "you're male that means you are worse than femal…
/r/MensRights27/10/12 12:05 PM
-1

no no no. this is not about me. it's about you. you DON'T belive women should be held to that standard so why should i? in the above story you did NOT wait until you had detarmined if it was reasonable or not. i do in fact hold both myself and women to teh standard that there need to be verifiable proof. you don't so unless you wanna be the sexists asshole around here you need to blindly defend me.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 11:58 AM
3

acording to you what matters is they got close and i felt treathened. it was enough for you saying the above case was justified you can't turn around and decide i need to answer more questions.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 12:53 AM
1

huh i didn't know that was in fact a crime. better add the police to speed dial since i can think of at least 10 instances just this month where i have aparently been assaulted. or does me being man exclude me from this? hecdk in the future i'll most likely not be able to get of the train without having to call the police because someasshole assaulted me.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 12:41 AM
0

oh i get it. so what we should do is make "white only banks" in order to prevent black people from stealing from them? "white only neighborhoods" so they don't have to fear black crime. also it's relevant because normally if you can exchange "gender" with "race" and it becomes racists the original statement was sexists.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:03 PM
0

aren't you just the one who made the claim "numbers don't lie"? it's entirely pointless to point out if the insurance company "thinks" he'll be more likely claim if the numbers prove something else. as i said try to disprove the numbers OP gave with real numbers instead of "i'm sure they are doing this right and not just out to earn mre money". OP has proven he is statistically a smaller risk than a bad female driver yet a bad female driver would pay less. you facts don't add up with reality. yo…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:59 PM
1

so men are not alowed to go up staris if a woman is useing them? as i said it's very possible that he need to go in the same direction. heck it's posssible as long as she wasn't in her home yet. and then it's not assault it's tresspassing.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 05:53 PM
2

now obviously you didn't have any reasonable reason to know this but i happen to be an asperger(not self-diagnosed either. i still say those bastard doctors and pshycologists are all wrong) so yeah i very much know what personal space is. mine is broken allmsot daily. but that isn't a crime. i'd have to have the police on speed dial if it was. second yes i very much belive that is how it happened since the report it self says that's what happened. third going in the same directions nor asking "d…
/r/MensRights26/10/12 02:32 PM
20

in that case it's a crime to be a woman. makes me uncomfortable and since that's a crime...
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:38 AM
25

suspect of what exactly? would someone please point me in the direction of the law he suposedly broke? or how can he be a "suspect" if there hasn't be comited a crime?
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:52 AM
1

you still don't argue very well, do you? just a tip: try an argument instead of a fallacy next time.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 07:48 AM
5

oh i'm sorry does it make you feel bad when people start to read between the lines and point out what you are really saying? i read very well. you only belive these cruel ideas should aplly to men for some unexplainable reason so when i point out how cruel they are by apllying them to women suddenly that's not what you said right? but please try an argument instead oif a fallacy if you have anything worthwhille to contribute. conbsider this my answere for all 3 times you dumbly replied with this…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 09:21 PM
0

i'm sorry but what would happen if i argued that being raped would "ideally initiate a process of self-exploration". i'm pretty sure these people wouldn't see that as a good reason to rape women.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:58 PM
3

men have all the responsiblity women all the rights is consistent to you? or are you trying to tell us you want abortion/adoption to be illegal because then at least you are consistent. if a woman decides whe wants to a keep a child she should take responsibility for that decision and care for the child alone if the farther did not make the same choice. no rules without exceptions i guess.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:56 PM
6

actually feminism seems to be bussy attacking any female who doesn't fall in line and do as they tell them to. kind of like what you are doing. but please if gender roles is a postive to you go out there and beat a few women back in the kitchen and tell them you are doing it for their sake.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:53 PM
6

so basicly women should not be alowed to abort a child if the man wants to be a farther. i mean you just said But as long as you're contributing to the genetics voluntarily so basicly if women coulentairly have sex that ends up a child they just need to woman up and go trough that pregnancy if dad wants. she knew the possible consequnces when she spread her legs, right? oh and f you're really set on not having kids, get yourself a vasectomy. Then there's no question, is there? so if i'm willing …
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter