TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jean-Valjean Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by Jean-Valjean on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Lol by your own profile you are a kissless virgin so no wonder you are so wound up over this conversation.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/18 01:17 AM
1

Wanna know how I know you have autism? Because you can’t read basic social cues and have trouble understanding human interactions. When someone asks “do you wanna know how I know you’re a __?” The basic presupposition is that they think ___ is a negative thing and they’re insulting you. Now he could just insult random people by calling them women but that wouldn’t make sense - hence the obvious implication that he disagrees with me. I know you won’t agree or understand but these are all things t…
/r/PussyPassDenied08/05/18 12:40 AM
–

Wanna know how I know you’re a retard? You assume anyone who doesn’t agree with you is a woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 08:47 PM
–

It's advice from someone who could never have casual sex anyways. He is likely too much of a loser to get with women so he says "never have sex" and pretends like he is not an incel but a vocel instead. It's just cope.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/05/18 07:41 PM
-5

Of course but I'm using that as an example. There are so few women in CEO positions or director positions so the fact that 5% of them slept there way to the top means that only something like 0.2% of the total population fucked their way to the top (assuming no men did).
/r/MensRights22/02/17 06:22 AM
-16

There are currently 27 female CEO's in the fortune 500. That means maybe 1 has been promoted at sometime due to fucking around. Not very significant at all considering that 1 female ceo who fucked around accounts for .2% of the ceo positions. As I said, statistically insignificant.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 06:14 AM
-31

5% is statistically insignificant.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 05:44 AM
-15

Learn some match please. 15% of women in director positions have fucked their boss. Only 37% of those women got promoted for it. So 5.2% of women in director positions got their from fucking around. So small an amount its not worth mentioning.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 04:20 AM
0

No I'm not alimony is meant to support the wife because she sacrificed her career to raise the children.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 07:58 PM
-7

Except the guy still walks away with the benefit of his children haven been raised by the women. So without alimony he would of gotten to work on his career and get the benefit of his ex wife raising his kids.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 04:31 PM
-32

Except for all the times women out their careers on hold to raise a mans children only to end up getting divorced. During hat time the man is advancing his career while he women is building the home so of course in an equal split she would get money.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 04:16 PM
-4

It has nothing to do with the mother Jesus you people are obsessed with punishing women for having sex. A mother raising a child without a father will likely be at an income level that qualifys them for welfare. The mothers bad decisions are completely irrelevant because the child is innocent and blameless and we as a society have determined it needs support.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 12:02 AM
-3

Then please come up with any sort of credible evidence for your outlandish claims. As it stands men commit rape at a much much larger rate than women. You think that there is a silent majority of men who are raped who stay silent? Sure, there is probably some - but if you have such a crazy claim you need to support it.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 09:48 PM
1

What the fuck does alimony have to do with child support? And men only commit suicide at 3 the rate as woman not 8.5x and that's simply because they use guns instead of pills. And again you compare the forcible rape of woman to child support; you're pathetic and this discussion is over. I would say I wish you have to pay your entire income in child support and alimony but the likelihood of you fucking a woman with your abhorrent worldviews are slim to none.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 08:01 PM
2

Yeah a child's needs care. Two incomes obviously provides more care than a single income are you being dense on purpose? The primary guardian (man or woman) of course is responsible with paying for the child as well as actually raising it. The non primary parent (man or woman) doesn't have to raise the child but since they are responsible for the child (you know since they created it) they are and should be required to support it financially. Nothing you have said has contradicted this. Edit: it…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 04:43 PM
0

Huh? Are you autistic? How does having both parents be responsible somehow equate to forcing woman to have sex (rape) or forcing her to carry a child? This isn't some rediculous fantasy land where everything is equal there are biological differences between men and woman if you haven't noticed so of course there has to be different laws and regulations regarding them in certain areas. I'll state it again incase you have trouble reading: a woman's right to bodily autonomy >a fetuses(not a person)…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 04:13 PM
0

Except he does get a say, he gets the say of having sex or not. And pleeeassseeee cry me a fucking river calling child support ruining someone's life it's 17% of a man's income caped at a max of 35% if he has more than 2 children he's abandoning. And you're ignoring everything I said. The child's right to support trumps the fathers right to income. This has nothing to do with a woman's right to control her body. If men can abort their parental right that either fucks over the child or it fucks o…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 06:24 AM
-2

Except the child also has rights in this case. The child has the right to a 2 parent income.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 05:34 AM
-2

You're argument is rediculous. A woman's right to bodily autonomy > the rights of an unborn fetus. A child's right to a stable home > the fathers right to his income. One has nothing to do with the other.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 04:57 AM
-2

How is a woman supposedly to be entirely responsible for her vagina and you to not be at all responsible for your dick?
/r/MensRights08/02/16 04:54 AM
-5

Of course a man should be legally obligated to financially support his own child what a rediculous argument! You equating a man paying for his own child to forcing a woman to bear a child she doesn't want to bear makes the entire mrm look sad and pathetic. Why do you seriously think a woman and or the state (because let's face it alot of single mothers without child support would need welfare) should be forced to raise the child without compensation from the person responsible for it? I get it i…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 04:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter