TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jeffrey-Weinerslav Archive

View 0 posts and 102 comments by Jeffrey-Weinerslav on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

lol yes, I notice you edited your comment to make it make sense. Wise move, you looked very silly for a few hours there :)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 03:26 AM
5

You.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 02:27 PM
6

Because a lot of young women also aren’t having sex or dating by choice. haha do you really think women aren't having sex because they cant You really struggle to follow basic threads of logic, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 02:25 PM
3

So no help for the men so they can be accessible to women in their own country? Where did I say this? Why do the Eastern European women deserve more help than the men paying for them? Who said they did? Why can't you argue against what I've actually said? Why do you have to be dishonest and invent things?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 02:23 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 07:23 AM
1

Well then maybe we should rethink capitalism.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 06:24 AM
3

So you're refuting this guy's argument on the grounds that it doesn't make you feel warm and fuzzy inside? Super cogent argument, dude. Much objective. Very science.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 06:24 AM
1

Which is why we should unite internationally to help these women not be beggars.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 06:02 AM
2

Women in the 21st century don't really complain about this, ime.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 06:02 AM
2

I'm not talking about men who necessarily identify as MGTOWs, I'm talking about men who believe this particular piece of MGTOW rhetoric. In my experience, most redpillers in this sub believe that high-quality men in general are opting out of marriage. The evidence presented suggests this isn't true.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 01:51 AM
2

Because most redpill contributors to this board believe the fundamentals of MGTOW dogma? EDIT: at least, most of the redpillers here believe that desirable men in general are opting out of marriage. They believe that much MGTOW dogma.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/21 01:04 AM
0

Playing with this it looks like obesity and marital status gate the average quite a bit. To my mind what this site really demonstrates is not that women have unrealistic standards, but that the MGTOW/blackpill line that desirable men are opting out of marriage en masse is patently untrue. It's mostly the undesirables who are GTOW. I'd keep assortative mating in mind and the fact that the partner pool for each individual is not the entire range of men 20-30. We aren't randomly assigned a date - y…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 11:37 PM
18

I'd fully support this if I thought the immigrant women were getting a particularly good deal here. From what I've seen from this and other RP forums though, it seems like the most vulnerable immigrant and Eastern women are getting the scraps that Western women won't go near, and for good reason. When you look at their profile, the kind of guy that talks about getting a mail order bride is almost always super creepy and unpleasant. Maybe a step up financially for Eastern women, but hardly ideal.…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 11:34 PM
0

To my mind what this site really demonstrates is not that women have unrealistic standards, but that the MGTOW/blackpill line that desirable men are opting out of marriage en masse is patently untrue. It's mostly the undesirables who are GTOW.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 11:31 PM
1

Tbf marriage takes a massive chunk of men out of the pool at that age range, but even if I tried to steal a married man only 61.5% of men meet my hypothetical standards. Damn. I mean, that's over half. And not every woman has these standards. Some don't care about height. Some don't care about income. To my mind what this site really demonstrates is not that women have unrealistic standards, but that the MGTOW/blackpill line that desirable men are opting out of marriage en masse is patently untr…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 11:30 PM
1

The rule is “one word responses like “cope” will be removed or any other content that signals incels the woe is me train “rope” stuff.” Ahh, fair enough. As far as obscuring a single letter. Redaction is a standard in journalism as well. I mean yeah, I see this everywhere and I really don't see what it actually accomplishes. Like I'll see people in survivor's groups talk about "r*pe" instead of "rape". I find it hard to believe that fewer people are triggered by the former than the latter, perso…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 11:13 PM
2

I have a question. Isn't talking about "c*pe" against the rules of PPD? And aren't you a mod? Is it ok to talk about c*pe in this sub as long as you obscure a single letter? That seems like a pointless rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/21 10:57 PM
1

Yep, no worries.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 05:27 AM
1

So is it that men are more valued in the workplace, culture and society, as was your original claim, and is alluded to by your indicating the greater share of CEOs, political leaders, business magnates, and such? Or is it that men are participating more in the workplace, culture and society? It's both? Men occupy most of the top positions in society, but also most of the middle and bottom positions. They dominate most areas of culture generally. I don't understand why you think these things are …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 05:20 AM
1

If you promise to be together and fall out of love which causes you to break up Uhh, no. Falling out of love and leaving your partner are two separate things. One doesn't necessitate the other. If a woman promises never to leave her partner, then falls out of love with him, but maintains the relationship out of duty, then she hasn't broken any promises. If her partner feels unhappy not being loved and ends the relationship himself, then the woman still hasn't broken any promises. The relationshi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 03:16 AM
1

It does show it, because I am taking the study as is. Yes, you are accepting things prima facie without thinking about them critically. This is how redpillers engage with science (or rather, this is the more rational end of that spectrum.) Here's another hypothetical. Two women know exactly what they want in a quality husband. One woman is highly valued by men, so she has numerous male suitors, she then filters out the ones that don't meet her standards and picks one of the many men left all wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 02:07 AM
0

That's literally the only assertion you've made, and you think this scientific expertise put on display? No? I never said that. I just said I have scientific expertise, not that I'm displaying it. What an embarrassingly simple-minded mistake... I'd probably delete that comment if I were you...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 02:02 AM
1

Falling out of love isn't the same thing as breaking up. You're just wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 02:00 AM
1

It's narrow in that you seem to be habitually taking the experiences of the minority of men at the top of society (i.e. the men least likely to struggle attracting women) and universalizing thier outcomes to all men. I'm not talking about the men at the top, I'm talking about the vast majority of people in most fields. The majority of people in science, politics, medicine etc. are male. While I'll concede that outreach for men's inclusion being "completely unheard of" is an unfair and innacurate…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 01:43 AM
1

consensual polyamory isn't breaking a promise. falling out of love with your partner also isn't breaking a promise.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 01:10 AM
0

The things you've said aren't supported by science. There's no evidence that female sexuality is motivated mostly by fear and gratitude. That's the simple tuth.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/21 01:09 AM
1

Correct, I'm the only person in this thread who's read any science and actually knows what they're talking about. That's the case in most threads.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 01:46 PM
1

If you'd express yourself more clearly, you wouldn't have to.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 01:41 PM
1

If you'd express yourself more clearly, you wouldn't have to.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 01:40 PM
1

Did you mean to reply to somebody else? Why are you talking about leaders?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 01:28 PM
0

It's not the emotional or relationship factors you're claiming.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 01:08 PM
1

I wouldn't say memories count as personality, myself. That's context, not personality. Other characters in the movie wouldn't have a personality either if we don't. Fair.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 11:38 AM
1

The personality she had is fake and gets taken away from her The criticism being made here is that she has no personality to be taken away. I haven't read the book so I can't comment, but that's what she's arguing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 11:22 AM
1

Why do you say that? She's been implanted with a personality, there's no in-universe reason she can't have a full-blown personality crisis. I don't really care, I just don't understand your reasoning. There's just no good reason she can't have a strong personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 10:58 AM
1

Since she is a replicant all the personality she had was implanted. She can't have her own personality from the start she has to build one on her own. I disagree. I think it's more interesting if she has a personality crisis.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 10:37 AM
1

Here's hoping :)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 10:23 AM
1

I'm not sure I agree with that. I think it would be compelling to see a woman with a strong character come to doubt herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 10:20 AM
1

That’s literally what the data shows. Did you even bother looking at the link? Yes, I did. It doesn't show what you think it shows. That’s contradictory - women take time to settle down because they are selective and presumably won’t marry with someone who is not a good partner but then also the majority of men aren’t seen as attractive by women. So where are all these new men popping up from when a women turns 30? Here's a hypothetical: Two women are in the market for a quality husband. One of …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 09:08 AM
1

Is this what you actually believe? Because everything you've said after this represents a very narrow view of men's roles and experiences in society. "Everything other than dating" is a narrow role in society? Science, medicine, politics, athletics, engineering, technology, business, all of this is a "narrow view of men's roles in society"? In any case, western society is heavily invested in correcting imbalances such as these that favor men, with numerous outreach, activism and funding campaign…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 08:48 AM
1

All of that is creative and interesting but it's not a personality, it's a scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 08:19 AM
2

Sounds like you're aromantic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 08:16 AM
0

I didn't say you were indecently gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 06:52 AM
0

I think you replied to the wrong person.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 06:19 AM
1

I hope things get better for you. You're a great girlfriend for standing by him through all of this.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 06:18 AM
2

That's not enough people to use that to extrapolate the results to millions of people Yes it is. Where the researchers biased? Yes, every researcher is biased. Do other studies contradict that one? Not that I've seen. Where the variables the same? Yes, that's how science works.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 06:13 AM
1

By this logic no study can tell us anything about anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 06:11 AM
1

Women much more often than men feel stifled in a long term monogamous relationship. (and evolution even helps us understand why) Horseshit. You'd expect evolution to make men lose interest in a long-term partner, not women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 06:09 AM
1

That's called confirmation bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 06:07 AM
1

her sexual performance is basically derived from sexual urgency (If I don't give it up, he can get it elsewhere, easily), and/or gratitude (happy that she was wifed up by you). Female sexual performance is actually motivated by emotional and relationship factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 06:06 AM
1

https://www.cnn.com/2014/11/21/health/womens-sexual-appetite/index.html
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 06:01 AM
2

I mean, she was a fourteen year old slave girl. By modern standards, that is indisputably rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 06:00 AM
-1

Bottom line, men are more happy being with one person forever than women. We have evidence for that. Hence women are the less moral sex. How can redpillers say stuff like this with a straight face? There's nothing immoral about consensual polyamory. There's also nothing immoral about falling out of love with your partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 05:55 AM
1

Now in some cases not often there were consensual relationships happening. Sally Hemmings is a well known example. I don't know how consensual that was...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 05:51 AM
-2

Every comment you post here is just incredibly gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 05:48 AM
8

It's almost like women aren't a monolith.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 03:34 AM
13

Redpillers don't let facts get in the way of a good time.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 03:10 AM
2

To me these don’t really seem like masculine bad boys that girls like or are these those so called “alpha chads” I keep hearing about? Correct. This is one of the many things TRP is factually wrong about.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 03:05 AM
1

Well yeah, some people just shouldn't be married. And sometimes it takes them two or three attempts to figure that out. That's just how life is sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/21 01:08 AM
1

Although anecdotal, it seems women seem to desire scarcity despite claiming otherwise emphatically and often Everyone desires scarce resources. This is a fundamental axiom of human psychology. We've evolved to prize scarce resources because historically, our survival depended on it. If we didn't instinctively ration food and water during lean times, our species would have died out. TRP is very good at taking universal human foibles and demonizing women for them exclusively. It's very disingenuou…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:42 PM
1

Why isn't it A-OK? In any population of married people, you'll see some percentage that isn't happy or compatible. What should those people do, stick it out and be miserable so as not to make you uncomfortable?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:13 PM
1

What is the scarcity that she is “responding well” to? Scarcity of attention. Humans value a resource more when it's limited. If a person pays you attention only occasionally, you will value that attention more than you otherwise would. And yes, that’s my experience with women. Two guys are the same… the guy who doesn’t really care whither or not she likes him will be seen as more attractive Have you considered that this might be a universal quirk of human psychology, and not something that wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 10:48 PM
1

No I didn't, I said everyone issues ultimatums not that this exact situation happens to everyone. Yes, I understand that. You think everyone has to issue ultimatums because you have to issue ultimatums. So you'd just allow your gf to continue disrespecting you right in front of your face for how long? As long as it took me to figure out what the problem was. But, as I've said repeatedly, and as you keep ignoring, this situation wouldn't transpire. It's the kind of thing that would happen to you,…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 10:42 PM
1

You said it happens to everyone. Ergo, it happens to you. The situation I'm referring to I've already tried taking her to the side and talking to her but it's happening AGAIN. Would you just dump her? How's that any better? I'd sit and watch the situation play out for a while and hope that I can figure out what's going on.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 10:29 PM
1

Single parent households… but even single mothers can’t be single moms without absent fathers. You’re the one who keeps making the accusations placing the blame on single moms… What are you talking about? I have never once blamed single mothers for the world's social ills. What do you think is making us poorer? There's a lot of factors, but generally it's a global shift towards a more neoliberal economic model. We know, we have very robust evidence, that a social democratic model is the best way…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 10:27 PM
1

I've already responded to the hypothetical. If this incredibly unlikely event occurred, I'd take my partner aside and talk with them about it. I wouldn't issue an ultimatum. It's funny that this situation is a common occurrence in your relationships, and something that's literally never happened in mine. Must be a coincidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 10:18 PM
1

I was talking about female attraction, not sexuality which can be more complex I agree Female attraction is more complex than male attraction. But in terms of initial attraction, the top percent of men dominate female interest while the bottom majority share the scraps. No. They don't. That's not what that says. Women would of course rather be with someone they’re attracted to, but seems like those standards shift downward over time as a higher percentage of women over 30 become paired up than w…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 09:50 PM
1

So you're saying she responded well to scarcity, as literally all humans do, and you think this proves some kind of fundamental redpill truth about specifically female psychology?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 09:32 PM
1

It wouldn't happen. I've explained why. Your way of dealing with relationship problems is toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 09:31 PM
1

I take them aside somewhere private and ask them what's going on. But, like I said, I take excellent care of my relationships, so this wouldn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 01:01 PM
1

Again, don’t really abide by the terms “alpha” and “beta”… I think they’re dumb Well yeah, they are dumb. This: I was alpha in the fact that she had crazy monkey sex with me (more than I even wanted), and even sent me tons of naked pics and tried to fly out to see me WHILE she was dating him. doesn't tell me anything about you, or in what sense you're an alpha. It just tells me that one woman was very attracted to you. It's a circular definition. You're an alpha because she's attracted to you. S…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 12:10 PM
1

And I agree that the average person is getting poorer because the government incentivized low income single parent households ...are you joking? This is nowhere NEAR the primary reason people are getting poorer. This is transparent redpill propaganda, trying to blame all the world's ills on single mothers. It's a really nasty philosophy. But men are also checking out of marriage… its multi-faceted. A relatively small number of men are checking out of marriage - and, let's be honest, they're most…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 12:07 PM
1

In what way are you alpha and in what way was he beta? These are very nebulous terms. Why do you think he would have been able to give her more attention than you were?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 11:46 AM
0

Men aren't leaving. This is redpill fanfiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 10:29 AM
2

Why do you think the marriage rates are so low and both male and female happiness is at an all time low? Because secularization, contraception, and the sexual revolution have reduced the necessity of marriage and normalized cohabitation Because the average person has been getting poorer, more alienated, and less empowered for decades These are the standard explanations among people who actually study socioeconomic trends for a living. All that stuff about men checking out of marriage because fem…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 10:17 AM
0

If a woman is waiting fir sex because she wants a relationship that’s that. That sentence doesn’t make any sense. It makes perfect sense. Is English not your first language?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 10:06 AM
1

I'm talking about women generally being more valued in society than men are, and a man's worth being judged on whether or not he can attract a woman. "Society" is very broad. In the dating realm, (certain) women are more highly valued than men. In virtually every other field, men are more highly valued than women. Men are viewed as smarter, more competent, and more desirable employees. Most art and culture is designed with male tastes in mind. Male is seen as the default. Men have a lot of power…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 08:16 AM
1

I'm not sure that there is a way to convey this to you without it feeling a little offensive Maybe next time don't use an analogy which suggests that women are ruthlessly exploiting men by refusing to sleep with them. Men aren't entitled to women's bodies in the way that workers are entitled to a living wage. Defending traditionalism makes my skin crawl tbh, but fuck, we need to do something. Women aren't happy. Men aren't happy Women are unhappy because of their economic and social burdens. Not…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 06:22 AM
1

I have literally never issued an ultimatum in a relationship. Well maybe you've just not been put in the position to have to? They don't say to issue ultimatums just for the fun of it. Correct, I've never been in the position to have to issue an ultimatum because I work on my relationship every day to keep it healthy. That doesn't make sense. Say your partner is hitting on someone in front of you, would you not say to them that you'd leave if they did it again? My partner would never do that for…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 05:52 AM
0

It's not a good solution for women, but then women are the powerful in this arena. That's like calling a minimum wage "not a good solution" because multinational corporations might suffer in some way from it. This is a really weak and kind of offensive analogy. I said that these people need "mercy" and I meant it. The only solutions are going to involve women voluntarily relinquishing some of thier power I disagree, and I find the way redpillers talk about this very annoying. The alternative is …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 05:47 AM
1

I'm not sure what you mean by "dual mating strategy" in this context. Are you saying that you're an alpha and he's a beta?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 05:01 AM
–

But, let's be honest, this also means that, in this new free market, a lot more people (especially men) are going to end up alone for no other reason than a bad roll of the various dice we play in life. I agree, and I think there are a lot of steps we can take as a society to help these people. But the standard redpill solution to this problem seems to be just steamrolling over female preferences and desires, and that isn't a good solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 05:00 AM
–

What is the evidence that suggests the Pareto principal doesn’t apply in terms of female attraction? There's a lot of evidence. In spite of what TRP tells you, female sexuality is actually a lot more complex than "hypergamy" or "AWALT". Women have more divergent sexual tastes than men. Their preferences vary according to their time of the month. Their sex drive is influenced more by emotions and life factors than by hormones. There's just no good evidence that the Pareto principle applies here i…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 04:57 AM
–

I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 03:26 AM
–

If 80% of women are attracted to only the top 20% of men They aren't. The Pareto principle (the 80/20 rule) comes from business management. There's no evidence that it applies to human sexuality (other than a misunderstood and overgeneralized OKC study) and quite a lot of evidence suggests that female sexuality in particular is more complex than this. there will naturally not be enough men for the women to date / marry unless we embrace mainstream polygamy Women are generally happier being singl…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 03:23 AM
1

I didn’t. I told them bitching about not being able to keep a man while exclusively vetting fir fuckboys was counter-productive. This isn't something women do, this is something redillers complain about women doing because they need to explain their own sexual inadequacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 02:35 AM
1

Firstly, not everyone does these things. I have literally never issued an ultimatum in a relationship. By the time that course of action becomes necessary, you have already seriously dropped the ball somewhere along the line. It's very revealing about you and your psyche and your relationship habits that you think "everyone" does this. Secondly, Everyone tries to make the one they like want sex with them Yes, everybody tries to be attractive. But the reason redpillers in particular do this is to…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 02:28 AM
1

When did I say I’m entitled to anyone’s time or body? Demanding that women lower their standards in order to date you is entitlement. No woman owes you a damn thing, no matter how "unrealistic" you feel her standards are that exclude you. I know I’m not, just like she’s not entitled to a boyfriend because she sucked a dude off when he called her over at 2AM… I agree. Let’s all just be toxic You are indeed being toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 02:26 AM
1

You're just calling normal stuff manipulative. The lack of self-awareness among the redpill crowd is truly terrifying.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 02:19 AM
1

By making them want sex. By instilling fear and insecurity. By chipping away at their self-esteem. By issuing ultimatums. Lots of ways TRP teaches men to manipulate and control women. It's interesting that you can't see how insecure and controlling your community is.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 02:09 AM
–

For all the talk about women in traditional societies being forced to settle with men they don't want, there is never any talk about whether or not what they "want" is at all realistic or healthy. People want what they want. There's no way for a woman to engineer attraction to a man she naturally feels nothing for, and she shouldn't be expected to. Attraction is important in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 02:08 AM
1

In order to control them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 02:00 AM
1

Realistic standards are bad now? I can bitch about not getting laid in a week but if I reject all women’s advanced in order to stalk Jennifer Anniston because “I’m worth it” I’m not being realistic… People are attracted to who they're attracted to you. If a woman doesn't find you attractive, then cultivating a relationship between the two of you is a bad idea. It isn't in your long-term interests, or hers. Doesn't matter if you're "equals". Doesn't matter if you're the best she's ever likely to …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 02:00 AM
1

The hypocrisy. TRP is a philosophy designed specifically to help men control women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 01:51 AM
2

The market is regulated, which "superimposes some needs over others freedom". Why not the dating markets? Because that's literally sexual slavery. The complaint is that women won't date or sleep with men who match up with them. Nobody has to fuck or date anyone just because that person is their social equal. This attitude is male entitlement writ large. /u/blue_dandelions is absolutely correct to call it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 01:48 AM
1

if men shouldn't commit monogamously, then it's irrelevant if TRP tactics attract "AWALT-type" women It is absolutely relevant. There are plenty of people in long-term, committed polyamorous relationships, and plenty of people who are serial monogamists. You're discussing the relative virtues of short-term versus long-term relationships, not polyamory versus monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 01:30 AM
1

I mean, I still think the article was pretty irrelevant to the discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 01:24 AM
1

Polyamory isn't the same thing as not being committed.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 01:21 AM
1

Nobody in this thread mentioned monogamy until you brought it up? The discussion was about LTRs versus STRs.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 01:17 AM
1

I responded with this article to demonstrate that indeed AWALT Yeah, this is what confused me initially, because this article does not at all demonstrate AWALT. It says that men are better suited to monogamy and women are better suited to polyamory. That's all it says. This is why I said I'm confused that redipillers use this article like some kind of gotcha, because it's not at all unflattering to women. It's just a value-neutral exploration of the differences between male and female sexual pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 01:15 AM
1

I brought up the article in response to a specific point being made by the commenter I was responding to I don't see the connection between what anantha said and what you said.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 01:09 AM
1

It's not really a study is it? You're correct, I misspoke. My gotcha is that monogamy is dumb Okay. Don't engage in it then? How is monogamy being dumb relevant to anything in the OP?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 01:02 AM
2

I see redpillers cite this fact all the time like it's some kind of gotcha. Why is it bad that women prefer polyamory? In a post sexual revolution world, we have plenty of room for polyamorous unions. Women are getting to know their sexual likes and dislikes and concluding that they prefer multiple partners. In progressive communities like the one where I live, this results in maybe a half to a third of women pursuing happy, committed polyamorous relationships. This is a good thing. It should be…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/21 12:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter