TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jepekula Archive

View 0 posts and 544 comments by Jepekula on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Cultural erasure and dehumanization is not genocide. As far as I know, according to all international legal definitions, it is. Russia's aim is to destroy Ukraine as a nation, as a country, as a people and as a culture. It's aim is to destroy the Nation itself. If that is not genocide, nothing is.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 10:55 PM
8

And so is Ukraine.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 03:21 PM
4

I'm not surprised if it bombed since this is the first time I have even heard of it.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 05:15 AM
6

I haven't read the article, it seemed like clickbait bullshit. What you were saying was completely conclusions, or so it seemed.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 10:15 PM
19

...I've never denied that, nor have I said anything about not appreciating a female perspective. I think you are jumping into conclusions.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 06:14 PM
45

The world wasn't built by exclusively men. The world was, and is, built by both men and women.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 04:39 PM
10

Legally blind means that their vision is impaired, they can not get license to operate vehicles and are legible for certain benefits and support. It will be added to the government database pretty much as soon as it is found out about by an optician.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 03:12 AM
5

Nah. Only sexist when towards the man; it is completely the woman's choice to stop loving and caring about her man, where as a man losing his job is very rarely by choice or even his fault.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 04:00 PM
22

Men only leave their sperm where they're let to leave it.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 06:39 PM
31

If all men start being celibate civilization will end. An individual man doesn't have to, well, you know, but men as a group need to get women pregnant and give birth or there will be no one to wipe your ass when you are in the old folk's home.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 06:33 PM
10

"Now that there is forced birth" ...what? Where is this gal from? Fucking China?
/r/MensRights04/12/22 06:29 PM
1

It should, or give tax benefits to those who served, but doing away with conscription is not an option in Eastern Europe.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 10:09 PM
1

So you really think that Estonians just deserve to die because there arent a hundred million of them? Because that is what you are suggesting here.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 09:55 PM
1

And how do you think they would be able to afford that? The issue is the lack of population, and a volunteer army would not be possible nor economical to a country of that size.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 09:41 PM
1

And they cant recruit enough volunteers because the nation is small. Maybe stop trying to defend your nonsense and actually accept what you said.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 09:17 PM
3

Nothing out of the ordinary right now, but they border Russia, meaning that if they dont have a large and well equipped military, they will be a victim to genocide before you can say "cat".
/r/MensRights23/09/22 08:05 PM
-2

I read it, fucker, and thats exactly what you said. That Estonians don't deserve to exist. Take a fucking brick and shove it down your throat.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 08:04 PM
-4

"Estonians don't deserve to exist because there's no a hundred million of them" Holy shit what is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights23/09/22 07:27 PM
2

Do you have any idea where Latvia is? The other option is genocide, and I think that's a fair bit worse than "rights being infringed".
/r/MensRights23/09/22 07:25 PM
5

Abolishing conscription would do nothing but invite the Russiana to come and genocide us all. Would that not increase suffering?
/r/MensRights20/09/22 10:05 PM
1

Good luck. I was in a similar situation, once. Hopefully your ending will be much happier than what we had.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:20 PM
1

Which is sad. But the fact of the matter is that we can not afford abolishing conscription, since it is the only way to keep up a credible defence. A volunteer force would be much more expensive and much less effective. Conscription is the only solution we have to keep us away from Russian extermination camps.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 10:41 PM
3

Yeah, sure. I would also be okay with conscripts being given proper compensation in the form of, say, tax benefits or something.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 10:32 PM
1

No, we shouldn't demand abolishing conscription, because conscription is the only way we can maintain a credible defence force. I don't know about you, but I prefer doing service rather than being murdered by Russians.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 10:27 PM
8

Nah. Only people looking at this sub in particular are seeing it. No one else gives a thought about the prevalent female-on-male violence.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 07:46 AM
2

So long with feminism being against sexism lmao. Good job on not being to keep that facade up for even two comments.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:38 PM
1

Conspiracy theory? Really now?
/r/MensRights15/06/22 07:47 AM
2

Facts? Lmao, ittybitty Z warrior talks about facts! How many times did you masturbate to footage of your Russian heroes raping todders today?
/r/MensRights17/04/22 06:53 PM
2

It is unprovoked. You’re supporting literal genocide. You are a fascist.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 06:34 PM
2

You’re supporting an unprovoked illegal invasion and mass murder, ethnic cleansing and genocide. Eat shit, nazi fuck.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 02:10 AM
3

Fuck off, fascist.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 12:47 PM
5

Patriarchy doesn’t exist, mate. It’s just a conspiracy theory.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 12:55 PM
1

You got it wrong, the Nazis took over in Donbas, in 2014, and the Nazis now invaded Ukraine on 24th.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 11:21 PM
11

Why on earth would men want to go to women’s restrooms? Second, why should men not be allowed to have male spaces? That is what these people are against.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 03:19 PM
23

Feminism is categorically opposed to equality. Trying to say it’s for equality is a bad, sad lie.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 01:40 PM
2

Yes. And I doubt the military can just decide whatever they want with no oversight. I don’t think that the Indian military doesn’t answer to he parliament or the government or what have you.
/r/MensRights13/02/22 03:23 AM
6

Most likely it's less "Army can do what it wants" and more "the military can explain what and why is going on".
/r/MensRights13/02/22 02:33 AM
3

"UK government sets out plans to close gender health gap by expanding gender health gap."
/r/MensRights03/02/22 10:12 AM
3

I'd agree with you on some things with some caveats. There's a lot of repetition in here, it's generally the same few topics brought up in cycles of roughly a few weeks. There's very little new things to say about those topics. I do, occasionally, though, see something constructive or insightful put to the table, which is why I still lurk here.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 10:24 PM
24

Honestly? Tells me more abput you.
/r/MensRights26/01/22 09:36 PM
38

The irony
/r/MensRights26/01/22 08:48 PM
23

She hates a strawman of a religion.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 11:13 AM
2

The only reason anyone ever tells someone to “open up” and yadda yadda is because they want to use their sensitivities as weapons against the person.
/r/MensRights07/01/22 11:32 PM
1

On what fucking earth can laws like that be fought fair? It’s not debatable in the slightest.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 03:33 PM
5

The thing is, that time never existed. The childbirth comparison is apt.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 10:28 AM
2

You're one angry little fellow. Are you all right?
/r/MensRights28/12/21 09:26 AM
3

The only thing pathetic here is you. What can lead a person to believe that 50% of humanity is just inherently toxic, with nothing good about them?
/r/MensRights28/12/21 09:22 AM
3

You need help. Your conspiracy theories are unfounded and they are clearly having a negative impact on your life.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 08:56 AM
3

You’re an ass. Fuck off with your “toxic masculinity” bullshit and other conspiracy theories.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 07:55 AM
3

When you get jumped on the street as a guy, that's it. When it's over it's over. You get murdered and cease to live.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 09:38 PM
17

Has feminism ever addressed a single problem men face? Of course not, the whole ideology is founded on hating men.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 06:01 AM
26

“Now” meaningless?
/r/MensRights24/12/21 05:37 AM
9

No its not.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 05:28 AM
4

Twenty-eight people upvoted it. It had fuck-all exposure.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 06:58 PM
10

You don’t think that a desperate human that has been driven to the corner with nothing but ultimate despair can not snap because of it?
/r/MensRights12/12/21 03:12 PM
22

...Russia invaded Ukraine seven years ago and are still there.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 11:56 AM
8

You're assuming positions I do not hold.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 06:01 PM
10

Yes, and that has never been contested. There is also a question of whether or not it is better to be killed or to have a disadvantaged childhood.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 05:41 PM
28

Walking away is less harmful than killing the kid. The point the people advocating for paper abortions are making is that if the mother has the right to kill a baby at will, the father should have the right to not be forced to pay child support for the baby he would have had the right to kill if he was the mother.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 02:24 PM
9

Yup. That’s why we advocate for it.
/r/MensRights03/12/21 11:20 AM
1

what
/r/MensRights29/11/21 07:39 PM
2

As an example, they are patriarchal how? Most, if not all, have conscription, that only men are forced to partake in. In all of them, women have as much of a vote as men do. Men have more duties and responsibilities, and no privileges to speak of. How is that patriarchal?
/r/MensRights29/11/21 06:53 PM
23

Give me a single example of patriarchy existing anywhere in Europe. Your "patriarchy" theory is as credible as ZOG or flat earth.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 08:46 PM
14

No matter how old she is, she hasn’t come from a generation where women were oppressed.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 11:07 AM
30

Feminism is an enemy, because feminism, as its core tenet, says that men are evil. Feminism is all about hating men.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 01:43 PM
1

Being a socialist isn’t “far left”. Being a socialist is just “left”.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 11:31 AM
1

No it's not? Common people don't want to help other people.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 07:13 PM
2

Says you, who hates half of the population based on gender.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 03:59 AM
3

If you believe men should have basic rights, you can not be a feminist. You doubly can not be a feminist if you believe both men and women should have rights. And there is no status quo that advantages men and disadvantages women. E:typos
/r/MensRights13/11/21 02:18 PM
4

No it isn't. The aim of feminism is to further women's socioeconomic power at the expense of men. It is all based only on one thing, and that is hatred of people based on born attributes.
/r/MensRights12/11/21 09:15 PM
1

It would be much more probable than adjusting votes, though.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 02:47 PM
1

That’s an option, but I do not imagine the powers that be would accept that.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 02:17 PM
0

Tax cuts after the fact, for instance. Numbers malleable.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 02:05 PM
-1

It would be fine and fair if we got compensated. We can’t just abolish the military, conscription is the only way to maintain a credible defence.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 02:02 PM
-2

So what you are saying is that proper compensation would justify conscription. Which is exactly what I said. Correct?
/r/MensRights06/11/21 11:12 PM
1

I doubt it.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 07:40 PM
1

Ukraine has been at war since 2014. Do you expect them to loosen their conscription laws while being invaded?
/r/MensRights06/11/21 05:50 PM
-5

The only problem is that men do not get a proper compensation for it. If we got tax cuts after service, it would be fine.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 05:49 PM
5

It is categorically impossible to hate men for their gender and to support men's rights movements.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 01:44 PM
3

Might as well have killed the dude.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 01:45 AM
22

I can assure you, I do not live in any kind of a fantasy. I wish you could say the same, feminist.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 02:58 PM
26

It's disgusting to you because you are a toxic, man-hating feminist. Good fucking riddance. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 02:18 PM
1

Your whole original point was that society is unadvantegous to men because it hates women and is unadvantageous to women. It's not a strawman. It's just insane. There has never been any kind of magical patriarchy that has just made men be better off. All this patriarchy bullshit is just a ruse to make people ignore the real socioeconomical issues at hand by destroying any kind of hope there ever was for class solidarity.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 01:42 AM
2

It isn't a strawman. What you said makes no sense. It is an imagined conspiracy theory, on par saying that the earth is hollow and the center is inhabited by reptile people.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 08:04 PM
3

"The real reason why your sociological circumstances are sexist against you is because the sociological circumstances are actually sexist in your favour!" Fuck off, lunatic.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 07:11 PM
3

"Too many people here are not conspiracy theorists!"
/r/MensRights07/10/21 03:42 PM
27

Conspiracy theorists believing that Hitler is alive and well in the center of the earth does not mean that it is so. Similarly feminists believing their conspiracy theories does not mean that those conspiracy theories have any grounding in reality whatsoever. Also, MRAs do actually help people, unlike feminists, who'se only goal and objective is to further female supremacy and hurt men. Saying that MRAs should not criticize feminism is like saying that abolitionists should not have criticized sl…
/r/MensRights07/10/21 11:52 AM
17

How big proportion of men are on the top? Exactly. Not to mention that being an owner of a small enterprise doesn't mean that you're well off, nor does women being able to not work mean that they're worse off than men. You're a sexist idiot, simple as that.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 11:42 AM
0

That's not what 50% increase means. 50% of 16 = 8 16 + 8 = 24.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 11:36 AM
56

The difference is that patriarchy or snything of that nature doesn't exist, but feminism is a very real force of sexism that opposes human rights being extended to males.
/r/MensRights07/10/21 11:30 AM
7

I dunno. It might just be an American cultural thing or something. i've never had issues with being expected to pay. In most dating relationships we either paid in turns or split the bill, or in my currebt one just pay for our own part. I haven't heard pf any of my friends experiencing it, either.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 09:39 PM
3

Hell, there are parties for my religious minority, but even that party doesn't automatically represent my own interests.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 07:57 PM
8

And feminism is misandry. You can't be a feminist without hating men, that's the whole basis of the ideology.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 03:39 PM
6

Misogyny and sexism.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 03:36 PM
21

That's because there is no patriarchy. Nonexistent things rarely benefit anything.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 10:15 AM
33

Oh wow you found someone who says that the earth is hollow and the centre is inhabited by reptilian nazis. Not to mention that the "proof" doesnt prove anything. Congress people being male does not mean there is a system that benefits men.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 09:15 AM
36

There is no patriarchy. It's a conspiracy theory on par with earth being hollow and the center being inhabited by reptilian nazis.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 08:32 AM
5

the patriarchy Ok, what next? ZOG? Flat earth?
/r/MensRights24/09/21 05:21 PM
10

Hope you got your bicycle fixed, because it wasn't street-worthy.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 01:04 AM
8

Oh, sorry. I actually misread at first. Just last year there was a petition to ban infant mutilation, that was met with ridicule and derision by feminists. If it wasnt legal, that wouldn't have happened.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 01:08 PM
8

You are disputing it's immorality, though.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 12:56 PM
4

You support mutilation of children? Really?
/r/MensRights20/09/21 12:43 PM
2

Why do you hate people based on gender?
/r/MensRights20/09/21 09:48 AM
10

You can't be a feminist without being sexist.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 09:46 AM
1

Yes, I do. And it still has nothing to do with the topic of discussion.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 01:37 PM
1

He never said anything like that. Stop being an idiot.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 01:26 PM
2

No. Feminism is a bourgeoisie movement that was doctored to seem at a glance like a righteous cause for equality like socialism, while in fact being a hate movement that only furthers the privileged upper classes.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 05:08 AM
23

Yup. They just want to hurt you.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:27 AM
2

It's a reality forced on us by geopolitics. The only other option is annihilation.
/r/MensRights28/08/21 09:41 AM
1

Where are you getting the idea that he "needs" to prove it? From what I see, it's up all fine and hasn't been pruned. Has the story been confirmed? No? Calling a blue tit a bird isn't dismissive.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 01:59 PM
1

That's not derogatory at all, what are you talking about?
/r/MensRights20/08/21 01:36 PM
6

Circumsision is not a Christian tradition.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 10:25 AM
-8

Even if we accepted that, then would we still not even prevent any kind of bodily autonomy from the child would have after being born?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 10:00 AM
-14

It has nothing to do with bodily autonomy. How can bodily autonomy allow to kill another? Isn't that the most egregious offence against bodily autonomy?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:05 AM
2

Yes.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 08:03 AM
-25

The argument sbout morality of abortion is the argument about the morality of infanticide.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 05:31 AM
1

What? So you're a racist, too, huh.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 07:44 PM
1

Weird how that still doesn't mean jack nor shit. Around 70-80% of money is consumed by women, meaning that women are in control of the economy of the household. Add to this the social and emotional power women hold over the man in relationships. If there is one gender which is in control to "oppress" the other, it sure as shit ain't men.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 04:51 AM
11

Your "basic social science" is a fucking conspiracy theory.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 01:36 PM
1

That proves fucking nothing, and has nothing to do with a presumed system that somehow benefits men. You do understand that 99,99% of people are not rulers, you fucking hack?
/r/MensRights29/07/21 06:53 PM
1

It's as objective as ZOG. What conspiracy theory sre you going to spout next? Flat earth? Nazis fled to the moon?
/r/MensRights29/07/21 12:58 PM
1

Yup. Your nonsense about the patriarchy is nothing more than ZOG with a new pink coat of paint. You should be ashamed.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 06:35 AM
1

Jews have been oppressors for most of human history. The power structures and current world are set up largely to benefit them. But no, I do not think all jews currently are evil oppressors, but the higher the net wealth the higher the likelihood of the two being true are. I want you guys to actually worry about jews' shit instead of attacking the gentiles and nazis. Being told you're even slightly wrong turns you all into the most defensive little kids. Just focus on your shit instead of lookin…
/r/MensRights24/07/21 03:39 PM
7

No, it is not. Feminism has always and only been a movement for female supremacy and against men.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 05:06 PM
3

No. Autocracy is not an economic ideology. Autocracy, literally translated is "rule of the few". And what it actually means is pretty much "rule of nobility". Autocracy has nothing to do with economy.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 01:52 AM
19

a pink painted version of the ZOG.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 10:57 AM
0

You'll be much less depressed once you start working out.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 03:11 PM
10

In Neuchatel 80% were men, so 80% of all accused pf witchcraft were men. As you can see, this does not hold up.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 02:57 PM
8

Then you're not feminist. That would be contradictory.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 12:56 PM
10

Incorrect. If you're a feminist, you hate men. Any advocation for women's rights is accidental.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 12:27 PM
13

Feminism does not advocate for women's roghts, bit for female supremacy and male oppression.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 12:02 PM
14

No. Supporting women's rights and being a feminist are completely detached from each other.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 11:38 AM
3

Yeah? They're all taxed with the same VAT.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 08:49 PM
4

It doesn't.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 08:35 PM
3

That's just utter nonsense. There is no male privilege or other conspiracy theory drivel.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 07:44 PM
12

The only agenda of feminism is to oppress men and strip them of their rights. It's a hate movement.
/r/MensRights09/07/21 06:18 PM
1

What the fuck?
/r/MensRights08/07/21 01:05 PM
1

I have. If you got nothing sensible to say, then please, piss off.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 02:50 AM
1

You havve never been to a school?
/r/MensRights07/07/21 02:45 AM
1

That's just false. Conscripts are not "far less effective than regulars". Not to mention that conscripts are much cheaper to train in the moment. The problem is that we either give tax breaks for personal freedoms, or we are all genocided off in extermination camps. Do you support Holocaust 2.0?
/r/MensRights07/07/21 01:51 AM
1

Conscripts are provably effective soldiers. Female ones are provably less effective. It makes sense to conscript men and then reimburse them with less taxation for years. The options are to either conscript women and have them do much less, or conscript no one and have us all be killed in extermination camps. Or, we reimburse the conscripts with tax breaks, and have the few women who volunteer also helped with similar tax breaks. And have everyone who comes of age to either be conscripted or to …
/r/MensRights07/07/21 01:44 AM
1

Perhaps so, but a silver lining on a pile of shit is much better than a pile of shit without. Conscription is something that we need or we will all be killed off. Do you really think that getting "just" tax breaks is worse than being taken to an extermination camp?
/r/MensRights07/07/21 01:27 AM
1

Nah. If men who go through conscription and are reservists are reimbursed with taxbreaks, that will be completely fair.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 01:22 AM
1

They do have a choice. But that is not enough; those who sacrifice a year and then weeks and weeks until they're old should be reimbursed, easiest and best way of doing that would be with tax breaks.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 01:13 AM
-3

Nah. It is fair to reward privileges for duties.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 01:01 AM
1

Critical race theory is a very lucrative profession, particularly in the public sector. What? It's very easy; just look at Hungary. I'd been down for a voluntary draft (tax benefits) and the Hungarian model (tax benefits that increase per child you have). Yes, which is what I am saying would be the practical and enforceable model; to reward instead of punishing. No, it isn't. I have been invested in as a child, by society. I have been invested in as a student, by society. Yes, so you have been i…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:54 AM
1

In the west, yes it has been Yeah, well, I never talked about "the west", but just how things are here. Back in the 50s and 60s they were treated awful for "being nazis", but that was decades ago. It got a lot better with time. Of course, it should have never been bad in the first place. If you can spend millions on racist lecturing about the evils of the Huwites, what I would take the traditional position that men and women have different responsibilities. Men have a responsibility to defend th…
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:40 AM
-4

Treatment of vets has not really been too awful. They were treated the best they could've with the resources of the time. And yes, having one gender subject to conscription and not the other is unequal, when not rewarded with privileges. Hence, I think the conscripted should be taxed less for a few years as a way of reimbursing conscription.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 11:47 PM
-9

It might be more progressive, but conscription is a necessary evil. We would not be able to defend our nation and survive as a nation and a people without the manpower conscription provides. What we should do, is give people who do go through conscription tax breaks. They spend up to a year of their prime age training to defend all of us, and then participate in refresher exercises for years after. E: downvotes are by those who want genocide, which would be possible if there was no conscription.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 11:28 PM
1

So are you excluding crimes due to mental health or not? You're contradicting yourself.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 02:34 PM
-3

You do understand that the overwhelming majority of all crimes are committed in suck circumstances, yes?
/r/MensRights06/07/21 02:32 AM
33

Majority of people only care about themselves. Each and every person on the face of this planet is a selfish, manipulative fuckhead. It's not a sex-specific thing.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 02:55 AM
7

No shit, but tht has nothing to do with men. The absolute majority of all people are horrible.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 10:59 AM
7

Ah yes, protesting genital mutilation of children means you're a skinhead.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 02:14 PM
15

The hell is he even trying to say? "According your logic as racist white people love to use..." What is it even supposed to mean? English is not my bative language, so I'm having some trouble here.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 11:14 PM
4

What Circumcision is not a Christian tradition, at all. Never has been.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 05:42 PM
1

That's nonsense, and not even tangentially related to what I was talking about. Did you reply to a wrong comment by mistake?
/r/MensRights08/06/21 07:11 AM
3

If we didn’t have a significant reserve ready to defend ourselves, the Russians would walk in and start killing everyone. They already did that do our neighbors, once.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 01:29 PM
3

The conscription is the only thing deterring a complete genocide.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 01:22 PM
8

Which makes no sense, especially when there is no patriarchy. Saying that people are treated worse because they are appreciated more is absolutely bonkers.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 12:05 PM
6

Feminism is a form of bourgeoisie champagne socialism. It is a way of distracting and disorganizing the proletariat and preventing class solidarity.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 11:50 AM
9

What the fuck are you talking about
/r/MensRights06/06/21 07:28 AM
4

Feminism has nothing to do with rights, equality or empowerment. Feminism is only about hatred, disenfranchising, and violence against men. Feminism is toxic.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 11:46 AM
3

Yeah, good luck with that. How could you work with someone who categorically hates you for just existing?
/r/MensRights03/06/21 06:11 AM
1

That’s like saying to a black man “Of course you don’t view the KKK as me bc you’re not white!” and then continuing to tirade on and on about how it’s about equality.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 05:58 AM
2

"The current conversation around men's mental health and male suicide is really..." Can somebody get the rest of the description? I don't got Instagram or anything nowadays.
/r/MensRights30/05/21 07:45 PM
18

Approximately one third of men are mutilated. What are you on about?
/r/MensRights20/05/21 02:59 AM
18

Patriarchy only exists in fairy tales and conspiracy theories. So no, it is not a “patriarchy problem”.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 10:39 PM
7

Take a shower, go to sleep and come back when you’re sober. Seriously, you’re making no damn sense.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 09:44 AM
3

Crying gets you hurt. Do you want to hurt yourself?
/r/MensRights16/05/21 04:10 PM
23

No. She’s telling you that it’s okay to be violent and abusive.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 01:59 AM
2

It's not insecurity, it's common sense. Only talk about shit that weights you down to someone who has a legal responsibility to never spill the beans.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 12:09 AM
15

I don’t know what country your talking about, but statistically, in most countries, black women certainly do have an easier time in court than white men.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 01:25 AM
1

Where on earth did you get that?
/r/MensRights02/05/21 04:42 PM
4

You just called that dude a nazi for no damn reason at all. Take a breather.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 04:36 PM
3

What the fuck? That makes no damn sense, get a grip.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 04:33 PM
-8

You haven't heard of A Modest Proposal? I suggest you read it, it's quite funny, too.It's free on Project Gutenberg.
/r/MensRights02/05/21 01:44 PM
-14

You do know that one of the most influential pieces of written satire suggested to eat babies, right?
/r/MensRights02/05/21 01:20 PM
5

What’s so wrong with us?
/r/MensRights29/04/21 11:38 PM
8

No. The way the term racism is used is only based on racial discrimination. It has nothing to do with "history of oppression".
/r/MensRights29/04/21 07:21 AM
12

Your source says “typically”, not “exclusively”. Your view is simplified at best, as white people arent always the majority, and it completely ignores the ethnic diversity under the term “white”. Would you say that, for example, Catalans or Basques have always enjoyed some notion of privilege?
/r/MensRights29/04/21 04:10 AM
16

What? Racism is racial discrimination, nothing more, nothing less.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 03:58 AM
14

Of course you can be racist to white people. Racism is discrimination based on racial characteristics, if you discriminate white people due to them being white, you're being racist towards whites.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 03:38 AM
4

I see.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 03:36 AM
11

Wouldn't that also apply to the woman, too, then?
/r/MensRights29/04/21 03:21 AM
64

Not telling him that he is a father is fucked up and she deserved to be called out on it.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 10:07 AM
5

Understandable. Have a good day.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 11:19 AM
16

You believe that discrimination based on race and religion is acceptable?
/r/MensRights27/04/21 10:32 AM
1

Feminism is a hate movement and if you support human rights and equality in any way, you aren’t a feminist.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 08:39 PM
4

I'm writing clear English. What is hard to understand? Feminism is a sexist incel movement. If you dislike incels, why do you support incels?
/r/MensRights26/04/21 01:26 PM
4

Yes. and feminism is an incel movement. If you hate incels, why do you follow an ineel movement?
/r/MensRights26/04/21 01:23 PM
4

You called yourself a feminist. Feminism is an incel hate movement.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 01:14 PM
4

Yet you said that you follow an incel ideology. You're being quite contradictory, here.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 01:08 PM
4

So why on earth would you identify yourself as one?
/r/MensRights26/04/21 12:52 PM
5

Correct. But feminism is still sexism, and there's no way around that. It's an incel hate movement.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 12:35 PM
5

Feminism is sexism. Stop trying to defend it.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 12:17 PM
-1

What?
/r/MensRights25/04/21 08:09 AM
-6

I hope she'll find Christ and be saved from herself. I can't hope for anyone to go to hell.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 11:31 PM
10

That's because in most places in the Anglosphere, women raping men can't be legally classified as rape unless they penetrated the man's rectum with something. If the papers called a woman raping a child normally without further violating them, they would be open to a libel charge.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 08:26 PM
10

Feminism is not an immutable characteristic you're born with. Every feminist has voluntarily and actively chosen to be sexist.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 12:32 PM
10

Advocating for human rights is misogynistic.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 10:31 PM
2

Yeah, some hater is posting to a hate subreddit about how they should hate this sub. What's the big deal?
/r/MensRights23/04/21 10:24 PM
3

I've been a part of this sub for months now, and every misogynistic post has been downvoted to the underworld. What on earth are you talking about?
/r/MensRights23/04/21 08:03 PM
1

Problem: How do you defend a small country against a large foe without conscription? Or should we just roll over and die, just be genocided like it was 1942?
/r/MensRights23/04/21 07:12 PM
4

You don't think that forcing a group to do something that sets them back compared to other groups would be problematic?
/r/MensRights23/04/21 07:05 PM
10

Indeed, which is why you can't understand the guy's position at all.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 09:15 PM
11

What you're asking for is not empathy.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 09:06 PM
7

Fuck off. He asked for a source, which is completely fine.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 09:03 PM
4

As idiotic as the sub is, I don't think that the statement They're suggesting men shouldn't use cars because women invented the windshield wiper is true. From what i saw, they just said "haha men rule shit and they say misogyny doesn't exist, btw women invented windshield wipers", which, while also fucking dumb, isn't the same as "suggesting men shouldn't use cars". E: Nevermind, I somehow managed to completely miss the last sentence of their comment, which was "If you hate women so much stop us…
/r/MensRights22/04/21 08:40 PM
2

Apparently I did miss the word “women”, I apologize, carry on.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 01:22 AM
925

You’re correct, it’s not a big deal; it’s a small, individual detail. But it’s still bullshit, and many small grains of sand make up a big desert.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 12:16 AM
2

How is that relevant to anything? Most of them are still feminists and regressives.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 12:09 AM
2

”ZOG was never made to oppress goyim, but to let Jews assume positions of power.” It’s still nothing but an insane conspiracy theory, even if you dragged it closer to sensible by a notch.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 02:27 PM
7

It's the police's job to investigate, and then it's the prosecutions job to decide if there's enough evidence to sue, then it's the court's job to come to a correct and just conclusion. Expecting the victim to gather the evidence is outlandish. Of course, we don't live in an ideal world where all the cogs in the machine actually do those aforementioned jobs consistently well.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 10:23 PM
2

What the fuck? Especially when being a virgin at 23 is completely normal. Most people are.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 11:25 PM
0

Nah. Feminists have demonstrated it by themselves. This is like saying that the KKK is for racial equality and only has a few bad apples.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 10:09 AM
9

No. Guys know worse because female abuse is so normalized that most guys in abusive relationships just accept it. And oftentimes when they get into a new relationship, it’s just as abusive as the last.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 09:59 AM
2

Are rights worth lives?
/r/MensRights12/04/21 12:31 AM
23

Exactly. And it goes both ways. Most guys in abusive relationships don’t even think they’re in an abusive relationship.
/r/MensRights12/04/21 12:22 AM
2

Attacking her based on her looks is tasteless, to say the least, and has no relevance to the subject at hand.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 10:41 PM
1

You didn’t. There’s nothing about how the position is “incompatible”. Only thatvyou don’t like it.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 10:34 PM
9

Then, just like you, they aren’t feminists.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 04:33 PM
1

How is that position incompatible with their profession?
/r/MensRights10/04/21 04:04 PM
5

If she was sexually assaulted, all of my empathy is with her. However, I can't with good conscience presume that he is guilty, without any proof either way.
/r/MensRights10/04/21 02:12 AM
20

Lmfao, thanks for the chuckle.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 05:59 PM
2

Everything you say WILL be used against you. Never open up to anyone but a professional with a legal obligation not to talk about what you have told them. The only people who want you to “open up” and “be vulnerable” are people who want to hurt you. There is no other reason to telling people to be more vulnerable.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 11:04 AM
8

lmfao
/r/MensRights08/04/21 05:11 PM
2

Not just famine, but clear-cut, Honest-to-God genocide.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 06:57 PM
18

Men have always been the ones forced into war and heavy labour.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 06:38 PM
20

Yup. It has, and does. Men have always been affected by it much more.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 10:18 AM
17

The “official definition” doesn’t matter when it’s for all intents and purposes only a sexist movement. I’m not contradicting myself at all here, pal.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 04:17 PM
17

That makes no sense. Not advocating for sexism means that you advocate for a different breed of sexism? Where do you get this?
/r/MensRights06/04/21 03:58 PM
12

I do think hat, and that’s exactly why I am not a feminist.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 03:56 PM
2

How can you be reasonably sexist?
/r/MensRights05/04/21 07:53 AM
1

Okay. Them making statements in favour of a political position means that medical professionals should not be in favour of a different political position why?
/r/MensRights04/04/21 09:07 AM
3

Feminism is a clear ideology about hating men. It has nothing to do with “individual personality.”
/r/MensRights03/04/21 11:45 AM
2

A lot of the mainstream churches are... losing their way, and have for a while now. There are however a lot of smaller churches that are still focused on what they should be.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 02:12 PM
1

Interesting, for me it has been the opposite.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 02:10 PM
2

The idea of a woman raping her husband was also considered impossible. It goes both ways. You can’t say that it’s just oppression of women. Nor does “most people in power were men” mean that men are in power or that men had it better. The elite didn’t rule in favour of the common man at all.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 01:55 PM
4

The only thing you can do is suffer in silence.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 11:50 AM
3

I'm intrigued. Why do you think someone who believes in gun rights should not be in the medical profession?
/r/MensRights01/04/21 04:28 PM
19

What?
/r/MensRights01/04/21 04:03 PM
6

Construction managers need to understand what is being built, why, and how. Same as a logistics manager needs to know what a forklift is.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 02:26 PM
9

Don’t fret, your pastor being wrong about societal issues doesn’t undermine the underlying truth in Christ in the slightest.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 05:26 AM
15

While intersectionalism and other bourgeoisie plots have infested most (if not all) left wing parties and groups, it does not mean that left wing is inherently feminist.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 02:01 AM
21

20 years? What the fuck did they charge you with? Genocide and nuclear terrorism?
/r/MensRights22/03/21 01:11 PM
3

We don't live in an ideal world, so conscription is a necessity. Just saying "if things were perfect, there wouldn't be [disagreeable thing]" is a completely empty and meaningless statement.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 08:26 PM
2

Yeah, including in sports outlets. Women just spend a lot more money in all kinds of clothes in general.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 08:09 PM
2

Systemic oppression?
/r/MensRights21/03/21 07:51 PM
5

"Incel" is hardly an insult at this point.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 04:32 AM
1

I don’t think that is “forced” except in the unconscious scenario, but without her being wet you can’t penetrate a woman. This is just an extremely hypothetical scenario too, I doubt such thing ever happened. To say there is a problem of women being raped by men is totally absurd.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 06:43 PM
1

USA, Canada, Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Cuba, Haiti, Dominican Republic, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Panama, Jamaica, Belize, Trinidad & Tobago, Bahamas, Barbados, Saint Lucia, Grenada, and a few others I don’t remember from the top of my head. I might be innumerate, but I’m pretty sure that is not three.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/21 07:22 AM
2

I have no idea who she is or what her job is, but I can’t think of a single “target audience” that would think higher of her for being a rapist.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 02:42 AM
1

Yeah, no. In most circumstances, both parents keep on working like normal in order to be able to afford the kids.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 06:38 AM
-1

Does that even happen outside movies? I haven’t heard or seen of any couple where only one works.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 01:24 AM
5

what the fuck
/r/MensRights15/03/21 11:01 PM
1

r/intactivism?
/r/MensRights14/03/21 09:34 PM
32

According to feminists, it's never the time or place to talk about it. It is time we refuse to let feminists dictate the discussion.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 06:40 PM
8

Well, that might be the end goal, or the end goal might be the opposite: Be as provocative as possible and then show that men are not angry, women-hating violent rapists when no aggression is shown. I find it a lot less likely than the first option, though.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 04:37 PM
25

Yeah, it sounds like something that was deliberately provocative, to what end, I do not know. But damn, they really need to be taught some manners in school, it's basic journalistic ethics to at least buy your victim a coffee after that kind of a provocation.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 02:54 PM
1

"The things jews suffer from in society is from the zionists, which ultimately is what nazis are trying to stop, so not being a nazi means upholding zionism. Nazism is about justice for everyone but you have to name your problem, and the problem is it has been aryans that have been excluded."
/r/MensRights13/03/21 11:02 PM
1

You're not a feminist. Don't insult yourself.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 10:55 PM
11

Most countries with conscription draft only men. It would be fair if service brought privileges, such as tax breaks.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 07:13 PM
8

"#NotAllWomen" is a # for attention seeking women who want a pat on the back for managing to not murder children or abuse their partners, weirdos.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 06:59 PM
2

The patriarchy exists just as much ZOG does.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 06:35 PM
5

The narrative that women are disproportionally unsafe is nonsense. Or, well, I guess it isn't, since women are overwhelmingly safer than men.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 05:24 PM
3

The officers make money off of it, and Russian military culture is so fucking toxic, in lack of a better term, that they think that the conscripts are supposed to tolerate all kinds of abuse and torture. And the authorities just don't care.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 04:27 PM
-1

what?
/r/MensRights12/03/21 04:22 PM
30

This is some clown world bullshit. What are they smoking to make this shit up?
/r/MensRights12/03/21 05:33 AM
4

About your edit, where did you ever get that impression that the responses are anti-women? This sub is for gender equality, and thus is against feminism. You can't support equality and be a feminist.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 05:23 AM
7

That logic doesn’t follow through. Most sexual harassment or rape not being reported doesn’t mean that most men harass women.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 02:30 AM
6

Most men are completely normal individuals who do not commit a crime in their life, ever. Calling for a general, indefinite curfew is nonsense. What problem would it even address? Especially when the suspect as is in this case has already been detained.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 02:17 AM
1

Now that’s an assumption and a half, lmao.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 02:15 AM
2

He did. There is a second image in the post.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 02:02 AM
5

From what I’ve seen, a lot of the discussion about the UK case has been how men are inherently violent and evil, and politicians even calling for a curfew to be placed exclusively on men. How is it “derailing” to push back against that kind of nonsense? Do you think there would ever be a time and place for it, or is it only ever “derailing”?
/r/MensRights12/03/21 01:57 AM
4

Why do you think it’s a bad thing that he advocates for equality?
/r/MensRights12/03/21 01:14 AM
1

I'm curious why you think I do not believe it is not a serious issue? I have never said anything of the sort. In fact, I've said that it should be something that should be dealt with, preferably with a systematic strategy comprising of multiple different methods, as those work best with societal issues in general. And that's an interesting link, I don't have the time to read through it with thought right now as the clock is approaching 3 AM, though. I'll be getting back at it later, if I remembe…
/r/MensRights12/03/21 12:48 AM
1

There very well may be better ones, but nobody has suggested any yet. No, A dataset of 970 would be enough. I just don't find the sourceless, exorbitant claims trustworthy.
/r/MensRights12/03/21 12:29 AM
1

I did not say this - however, 100% would be the most effective strategy - why are we settling for 50% that's coming from action on the potential victims part, rather than considering strategies that tackle the criminal? Why is the burden of rape placed entirely on the likely victim (women) rather than the likely perpetrator (men)? 50% is much better than nothing, don't you think? Why should we not do something that can improve things by 50%? The YouGov survey of more than 1,000 women, seen exclu…
/r/MensRights12/03/21 12:15 AM
7

The fact that it's such a hot topic proves her wrong immediately.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 11:54 PM
4

How does this even remotely begin to make any kind of sense? What? Court verdicts are public by default.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 11:51 PM
6

Criticizing her looks is unnecessary.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 10:14 PM
8

Who the hell said anything about maternity leave not being sensible? Are you sure you are replying to the correct person?
/r/MensRights11/03/21 08:18 PM
7

In Finland, which is what this post is about, maternity leave lasts 105 working days, paternal leave lasts 1-54 working days and then there is parental leave that is 158 work days the couple can allocate to either as they wish. Paternal leave is unpaid.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 07:52 PM
4

Yeah, I googled a bit, and apparently the government put forward a proposal about it in February, and it's supposed to be implemented in August 2022. Here's a link. Didn't have time to read through the whole thing yet, though.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 07:48 PM
31

Don’t consider yourself a feminist; there is no reason to hate yourself for being a man.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 07:18 PM
16

Men literally make up over 90% of all rape, assault, domestic abuse cases. You guys might be the 10% that doesn’t do that stuff What? How do you get from "90% of perpetrators are men" to "90% of men are perpetrators"? Maths do not work this way.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 06:51 PM
13

Safer in general. Women suffer less violence because of their gender.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 06:33 PM
9

We’rent they updating the laws surrounding paternal leave a while back, giving fathers the possibility for longer paid leave? I remember reading something like that on the news a while ago.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 03:44 PM
28

Doesn’t matter. The fact still is, that women are safer because of their gender.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 03:39 PM
138

She’s wrong in all accounts. There is no such expectation at all, nor has there been in decades.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 02:54 PM
5

That’s either fraud or aggravated fraud. The max sentence for the former is two years in prison and for the latter four years. She doesn’t even seem to understand that she’s a criminal.
/r/MensRights10/03/21 11:09 AM
9

When women start suffering from it.
/r/MensRights10/03/21 05:01 AM
0

Sometimes. The Russian, or any post-Soviet, for that matter, military isn't a nice place to be either due to how rampant, widespread and extreme Dedovshchina is. tfw getting downvoted for saying that Russian military is not a fun place to be lmao
/r/MensRights10/03/21 04:33 AM
3

Or to be a prostitute in St. Petersburg.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 09:48 PM
1

What? How?
/r/MensRights08/03/21 10:56 PM
5

He didn't, the name was just typoed. It has two f-s.
/r/MensRights08/03/21 02:53 PM
1

Minor breaches of physical inviolability are given minor penalties because they are minor breaches of physical inviolability. If breach of physical inviolability was "not a big deal", the law would not penalize it. As it stands, physical inviolability is one of the fundamental human rights on top of which our whole legal code rests on.
/r/MensRights06/03/21 09:19 PM
1

The whole legal system is based on the idea of human rights that are not to be infringed upon, there’s a reason they’re pretty much the first thing in the constitution. No clue if the US or UK law works differently, and I don’t really care either. The harm done by violent crimes is exactly what is breaching physical inviolability. I don’t really understand your point, as you just seem to be saying the same thing as I but put differently.
/r/MensRights06/03/21 11:34 AM
8

I am pleasantly surprised that your logic is consistent. But no, I would not demand men to not be jailed for the same crime, which I uphold is a crime, because it infringes on the fundamental human right of physical inviolability. E: Well turns out his logic was, in the end, inconsistent. Too bad he never replied with that nonsense to me.
/r/MensRights05/03/21 08:26 PM
17

It's absurd to jail men for rape, they give women pleasure and raise their self-esteem. You heard it here first, lads.
/r/MensRights05/03/21 06:48 PM
6

Yeah, I know about Milgram's experiment, but it's not what I was talking about, I was saying that the precedent for "just following orders" being an unacceptable defense in a court of justice is centuries old.
/r/MensRights03/03/21 06:15 AM
7

"Just following orders" being thrown into the trash in court is a much older thing than the Nüremberg trials, by the way. In Sweden in 1721, a man who was enslaved by the Russians and forced to fight in the war on their side was found guilty of countless acts of extreme cruelty, and his defense of him following orders didn't hold up at all in the face of the court.
/r/MensRights03/03/21 04:53 AM
12

It's positive because it encourages the charity to be against domestic abuse on every day of the week instead of just on Thursdays. It provides an incentive for the charity to do what they say they're doing.
/r/MensRights02/03/21 08:32 AM
9

Feminism is not and never was an eqalitarian movement. It is, always has been, and in all likelihood will always stay as an inherently hateful movement.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 06:23 PM
4

Because it is what feminism is fundamentally based on.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 03:17 AM
19

You cant be a feminist without hating men.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 12:05 AM
12

It’s not about revenge, there never was anything to avenge in the first place.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 01:43 AM
23

How can you study English literature without studying Shakespeare? That’s like ignoring Dostoyevsky and Tolstoy when studying Russian literature, or Cicero and Cato when studying Latin literature.
/r/MensRights16/02/21 01:47 PM
92

Man, this is fucking sad. I've posted and commented about some MR issues on my own country's subreddit and even though I usually got some flack, nobody ever even thought of banning me for it.
/r/MensRights14/02/21 07:45 PM
0

This is clearly the most equal of any possible settlements. I hope this kind of arrangement becomes popular.
/r/MensRights13/02/21 03:01 AM
2

Sir, this is reddit. Of course not.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 05:38 PM
1

Maybe with that attitude. Improvement takes effort, and lots of it.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 08:12 AM
2

Everyone’s bad. That’s how we’re born, as humans. Horrible, disgusting, corrupt and evil. But wallowing in self pity won’t help anyone, only acknowledging this and striving to be better will.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 07:45 AM
1

There is no light, and this cutesy feelgood motivational poster nonsense won’t change it.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 05:53 PM
10

No. Old doesn’t mean it’s not happening, just that it’s, well, old.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 12:01 PM
3

Holy shit, you really didn’t think about this at all, did you?
/r/MensRights09/02/21 04:18 AM
-1

The thing is, that removing conscription would be a very, very popular move, but no politicians try it because it would be effective suicidal on a national level.
/r/MensRights07/02/21 03:48 AM
0

Our defense is founded upon a sizeable reserve, which is only achievable through conscription. If it was a waste of time, we wouldn't be wasting money on it.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 10:25 PM
2

Uncle Tom is an insult originating from Uncle Tom’s Cabin, a 19th century anti-slavery novel. It refered to black people trying to act more “white” and “less black”. Basically an accusation of a member of a group working against the group from within. In the novel, Uncle Tom is an old slave who gets beaten to death, for refusing to snitch on escapees, if I recall correctly.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 08:45 PM
2

It’s a necessary evil, but it would be better if service came with privileges, like tax benefits.
/r/MensRights06/02/21 08:19 PM
5

Yeah.
/r/MensRights05/02/21 11:57 PM
5

Yeah, but that still ain’t all; more marriages where one or both have divorced before also end in a divorce compared to “new” weddings. So when people get married less there less people who get divorced in the first place and those divorcees get remarried less.
/r/MensRights05/02/21 07:30 PM
10

You can’t be a feminist without hating men, that’s what it’s all about and nothing else.
/r/MensRights05/02/21 11:37 AM
8

I just googled and it's certainly less than 18 in most places, and there's plenty of places in Europe with age of consent as low as 14, like Albania.
/r/MensRights04/02/21 01:50 PM
8

Isn’t it 16 most everywhere?
/r/MensRights04/02/21 12:56 PM
2

Bloody hell mate. It’s music. It’s theatrics. It’s entertainment. I’m a church going Christian and I listen to Ghost every so often.
/r/MensRights03/02/21 09:45 AM
1

Ah yes. Being healthy is a waste of time and means you’re an alt-right nazi retard. Would you please listen to what you’re saying?
/r/MensRights30/01/21 03:52 PM
18

Right now, the kit of the average infantryman is the heaviest it has been in a while, according to one of my instructors back in 2016. It is still relevant. And not every war means a nuclear strike, and it's not granted that a peer-to-peer war would lead into one either. Nuclear warheads are the absolute last resort, even for the most deranged dictators, because it will absolutely and completely ruin them.
/r/MensRights29/01/21 05:40 PM
18

I once did the mistake of telling my (then)gf of a bad dream I had, because she had noticed I woke up trembling and covered in sweat. I told her, I laughed at it, she laughed at it. After that, every time she had a bad dream of any kind, she’d just be awful to me, berate me, punch me, so on all day, and if I said she was being ridiculous she’s just say that I “had complained about a dream before”.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 11:11 PM
48

She should be handled with the same kid gloves as any man in a similar situation.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 11:05 PM
5

And the reason people think that is because of intentional misdirection. Not helping men isn't an oversight, it's the objective.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 04:34 PM
12

This is idiotic. The king was never more important than the queen because the king is male, but because he’s the king. The offices of king and queen are different, and when a queen reigns, she takes the office of King.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 12:19 PM
64

It’s not an oversight, it’s intentional.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 09:11 AM
0

You can't be a feminist without being a sexist. Either you're a sexist and a feminist, or you're not a sexist and thus not a feminist.
/r/MensRights23/01/21 04:52 PM
1

No, Russia has been a member since 1996. Belarus had "Special Guest Status" during 1992-1997, and applied for full membership, but was rejected due to human rights concerns.
/r/MensRights23/01/21 04:27 PM
1

The dumbest shit is that almost without error, the most vocal of these "cant oppress the oppressor" are from the oppressor bourgeoisie classes, and not from the working class, and the reason for their bullshit is nothing but justification for their own privilege, as they try to make themselves seem moral while still enjoying the benefits skinned off from the working man's back.
/r/MensRights22/01/21 10:53 AM
59

Crying would only make matters worse for him. It will never bring any sympathy to a man, under no circumstances.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 04:13 PM
7

"privilege of male" lmao
/r/MensRights21/01/21 06:51 AM
90

Hell, women should probably be taught not to rape more, since there’s this prevalent idea that they can’t, and a lot of them force their partners to sex just because they feel entitled to it.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 08:00 PM
2

what?
/r/MensRights17/01/21 05:57 AM
3

It’s a discriminatory hate group. Nothing more, nothing less.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 02:33 PM
6

Obviously they can, but it is not a rare occurrence that people tell me I “support a pedophilic institution”, referring to the Roman Catholic Church. And I’m not Catholic. Blaming people for actions of those in at best loosely related groups is in vogue these days.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 04:22 AM
1

The idea of telling anyone to take responsibility for your race/religion is not acceptable How do you mean? People tell me that all the damn time lmao.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 04:01 AM
1

Ah yes I too would gladly just go to the extermination camps, war and soldiering is bad you know!
/r/MensRights15/01/21 04:58 PM
1

“The only bad Nazis are like the ‘kill all Jews’ or ‘aryans should be better off than Jews, and if you don’t agree, you’re a Zionist a-hole’. Otherwise, they’re mostly good.”
/r/MensRights14/01/21 11:34 AM
9

Nah, I don’t believe in ungrounded conspiracy theories.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 12:35 PM
4

Found a mirror?
/r/MensRights12/01/21 04:51 PM
4

This is a fucking trainwreck.
/r/MensRights08/01/21 05:33 PM
1

From what I’ve heard, not in the anglosphere, where I understood you’re from, not well at all. They’re still better than nothing, mind.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:37 PM
3

Well, in that case, unless you can get crowdfunded, you’re fucked. Sorry bro.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:12 PM
1

The people who want you to open up want you to open up because they want to be able to attack you with the stuff you open up about.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 11:03 PM
4

Best you can do is ask your family and/or friends to loan you enough money to afford a lawyer.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 10:53 PM
1

Was in an abusive relationship for some time, and I can’t trust people anymore, and I’m constantly tended up and wondering what they’re planning behind their backs all time.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 11:02 PM
2

Yeah. Hell, we even have a proverb here, “A name doesn’t worsen a man, if the man doesn’t worsen the name.”
/r/MensRights02/01/21 06:59 PM
3

The government in Finland said that masks hadn’t been proven effective in any way and so citizens have no need to use them. And people also say that the government handled the pandemic well.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 06:10 PM
4

Europe. It’s still common.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 10:00 AM
2

Strangest thing is, Adolf and it’s variations are quite common and neutral names, are they not?i couldn’t imagine any potential employer batting an eye at it.
/r/MensRights02/01/21 02:27 AM
10

what
/r/MensRights01/01/21 09:38 PM
1

It's a point worth considering because right to privacy is a fundamental human right, and thus has to be taken into account.
/r/MensRights29/12/20 12:06 PM
-20

He raised a point worth considering, stop being a wanker.
/r/MensRights27/12/20 04:06 PM
4

The global Zionist conspiracy hurts everyone. It is the Zionist that saturated our society with the idea that only goyim are victims. The Zionist hurts Jews by upholding the idea that Jews don’t need to be protected just as much as goyim because Jews are supposed to be the rulers and goyim the ruled. A few twisted people views on what Jewry is has hurt the rest of us.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 10:47 AM
28

Uhh, nazism isn’t a hate group, nazism is about German’s rights. The extremist Nazis are a hate group, but regular nazism isnt a hate group.
/r/MensRights23/12/20 03:53 AM
3

Excuse me, could you please elaborate? I'm not quite sure what you mean.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 01:16 AM
2

So the judge lied under oath, and as such is clearly unfit to be a judge and must never be allowed to work in anything related to the law ever again.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 09:39 AM
4

I got news for you, buddy. If you’re fighting against feminism, like you said you are, you’re not a feminist.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 12:01 PM
1

There wasn't really a situation to walk away from. Anyway, it was all a long time ago.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 01:09 PM
6

Apparently those people, me almost damn near breaking my fucking knuckles punching a wall because I was frustrated my then-girlfriend was doing something that hurt her very much was domestic abuse. Where the fuck do these geniuses come from?
/r/MensRights13/12/20 11:14 PM
7

Even still, no doctor has ever even thought of doing that. I'm just wondering how that kind of blatant crime against humanity came to be widespread in the American continent
/r/MensRights13/12/20 10:27 PM
10

Yeah, but even so, that's just completely unthinkable. How did it come to that?
/r/MensRights13/12/20 10:13 PM
15

Hell, even thinking that a doctor would actually recommend genital mutilation of a child is unheard of here, let alone saying that it would be "necessary". What the fuck is going on in that part of the world?
/r/MensRights13/12/20 10:00 PM
3

"Because of this, a woman terminating her pregnancy because the fetus is a male will not have any bearing on any male's life." What about, you know, the boy being killed? That's a pretty big bearing on a life.
/r/MensRights13/12/20 05:59 PM
1

Lucifer is not Satan. That's from Paradise Lost, not from any Christian tradition. The "Lucifer" in the Bible mentioned in Isaiah 14 is the King of Babylon.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 10:13 PM
2

I think you’re talking about Paradise Lost, a 17(?)th century English poem.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 09:05 PM
3

Wait, you were serious? I could’ve sworn that you were satirical in your first comment.
/r/MensRights10/12/20 04:13 PM
5

It’ll all go to shit, that’s what happens. Just as our trajectory has only been spiraling into even more shit for the century we’ve been independent.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 04:21 AM
1

While I agree at the greater point, I don't think that the psychological damage is in learning that people can not be trusted, that is just a general truth.
/r/MensRights06/12/20 07:02 PM
4

So, you’re telling him he should cut all people from his life. Got it.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 02:50 AM
2

Funnily enough, never in my life have I turned a conversation sexual. It’s always been the women who’ve done it, and sent me unsolicited nudes.
/r/MensRights01/12/20 04:14 AM
13

Patriarchy and male privilege is nothing but the feminist ZOG.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 09:34 PM
1

The thing is, those are violence, insofar as violence is legally understood and defined.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 06:03 AM
1

I am, and have been, completely sober.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 04:46 AM
2

I... uh, want? That is how violence is defined in the law.
/r/MensRights26/11/20 04:19 AM
2

That's not a typical case of assault at all (lievä pahoinpitely), a typical case is that someone's talking shit at a bar and you start talking shit back and you shove him and he falls on his ass. Or you spat on someone, that's a slight case of assault as well. Of course, the police investigates these only if the victim demands a legal punishment. The reason even pushing and shoving are counted as slight assault, is because the constitution counts the right to life, freedom of injury and right to…
/r/MensRights26/11/20 03:44 AM
1

Power is never given, only taken.
/r/MensRights25/11/20 10:59 PM
9

Violence is an unjustified attack against another person with the aim to cause harm or pain, or is otherwise very likely to cause harm or pain. In the eyes of the law, pushing and shoving is violence, in most cases.
/r/MensRights25/11/20 10:40 PM
17

Amnesty is a fucking joke and always has been.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 03:57 PM
11

What patriarchal systems? Patriarchy is nothing but the new ZOG.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 03:30 PM
7

Absolutely this. Hell, it's not even about just changing people's minds, after all, there's a reason they say "a claim without backing can be dismissed without backing". Source your claims, bros.
/r/MensRights19/11/20 06:55 PM
17

Unsourced statistical claims are completely useless. Even if I did go and search for information regarding whatever is being claimed, there is always the possibility I'll find a different study, article, or book that would have different numbers. Also unsourced numbers are backed up by absolutely nothing, and anyone could make them up on the spot.
/r/MensRights19/11/20 03:38 PM
9

Well, if that's the case, the system certainly works faster there than it does here. As far as I know, the average is pretty much a week.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 04:08 PM
19

I’m not concerned about her not being jailed, I’m concerned she was let out of a mental ward in three days. I very much doubt that’s enough time for even a proper evaluation.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 03:46 PM
24

I greatly doubt that this is enough to aid the suspect in the rehabilitation and integration to society.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 07:49 PM
81

Which is true, but, you can not be rehabilitated from doing aggravated assault nine times in just 180 days of not even being in a rehabilitational institute.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 07:20 PM
0

Wow, now this is some polemic, and you’re jumping to quite a few conclusions. Especially how you conclude the whole essay with “conscription is never acceptable”, which is absolute nonsense. Conscription is the only way for a small nation to have a defensive force large and effective enough to deter attackers and total genocide.
/r/MensRights12/11/20 01:11 AM
9

Interesting. I’ll have to make a mental note and read through the paper when/if I have the time.
/r/MensRights11/11/20 01:57 AM
2

Most likely isn’t even about wanting sex, but wanting to not be screeched at and scratched and hit. Much easier to just comply with whatever you think the recipient wants to hear.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 03:59 AM
27

“Sexual relations” is not what you say you had after you make someone want to cut their own dick off.
/r/MensRights09/11/20 02:15 PM
4

Why would anyone in their right mind go to a sub named like that. That’s like going to a sub named r/kukluxklan and expecting them to be supportive of civil rights.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 01:05 AM
3

For every one person who supports equality, there’s a dozen feminists.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 12:59 AM
2

I agree, the comments riddled with emojis are immature. I would still be wary of saying that the posters of those comments are categorically immature. But, I would say, that piracy is still not quite the same as outright stealing, and that discussion would probably go outside the scope of this sub.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 05:03 AM
3

I refuse to believe that adult people do things just because they’re “immature” or “entitled”. Some people are, certainly, but even if their moral compass doesn’t point to the same direction as mine or yours doesn’t mean that they don’t have one.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 04:41 AM
1

Well, that generally is how boycots go. The people who are mad enough to deliberately boycott whatever company seldom are the target audience of the said company.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 04:38 AM
2

I don’t know why you’re being downvoted, the stance you’re taking is valid. E: of course there’s a lot of discussion about wether or not piracy is actually outright stealing or not, but in any case, the stance of the upper comment dude is morally valid and reasonable.
/r/MensRights07/11/20 04:34 AM
1

Nah, it's not that hard. I can understand some Dutch based on my understanding of English and basic understanding of German.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 07:47 PM
6

Nah. It will be branded as antisemitist and fascist. Doesn’t help that the petition is apparently made by members of PS youth.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 06:14 PM
7

Never gonna be passed, and never gonna even get the 50k signatures.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 05:18 PM
2

By that logic: "rape is necessary for the continuation of the species" anyway you do realize the severity of rape comes from culture! What? That’s- what? That has nothing to do with military. How did you jump into that conclusion? The injuries/physical/mental stress from the military will be greater than rape Most people sustain zero injuries during their military training, and neither is the mental or physical stress in any way crippling in most cases. if men are obligated to provide protection…
/r/MensRights27/10/20 08:37 PM
2

Yes, it certainly can be, and in most cases, is. It is not in any way equable to conscription. Conscription is something that is required for the existence of the nation and society it is practiced in. There is always an army in any country, either your own or foreign. The problem is not conscription itself, or even that it is only for men, but that it is not compensated enough. It would be easily fixed by giving tax cuts to men who’ve gone brought it and are in the reserve.
/r/MensRights27/10/20 08:03 PM
0

TIL I got lasting mental trauma because I underwent military training. You really should consider slowing down a bit there, hotshot.
/r/MensRights27/10/20 02:07 PM
5

This is just false on every account.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 09:57 AM
2

The EU way. I like it.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 07:09 AM
1

What are you testing to say?
/r/MensRights24/10/20 03:43 AM
17

Eh. Sometimes you just got to cut people out, even close ones. My brother hasn’t talked to anyone in the family for a few years now.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 01:03 PM
6

“Toxic masculinity”.
/r/MensRights20/10/20 12:53 PM
4

The metoo movement is nothing but a front for a witch-hunt. It does not help anyone and it never was meant to help anyone. It was only ever meant to be an excuse for people to cry wolf and steal reparations from men and ruin their lives.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 02:51 PM
2

What do you mean? Beating the child up with a branch is a completely normal thing and nothing extraordinary.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 11:54 PM
3

It often is used by women to shame men into sex when they don't want to, and because it's never talked about, a lot of guys give into it, and think they don't got no right to choose or complain.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 04:14 AM
1

Funnily enough, my sister did her master's thesis about domestic violence in LGBT couples a few decades ago.
/r/MensRights16/10/20 02:11 AM
28

Because men are not taken seriously when they are the targets of violence or threat of violence, and have no right to parenting.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 06:35 PM
20

"more men commit suicide because men lack basic human empathy" This is, without doubt, the most ironic statement I've seen all week.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 02:49 PM
19

The fact that you’re calling him malding is the epitome of irony. Hell, you don’t even know if the source is far right, you just said “probably” yourself earlier. Chill.
/r/MensRights13/10/20 10:15 AM
10

Yeah, nope the fuck out.
/r/MensRights12/10/20 03:20 AM
2

How is he glorifying violence? Quite the contrary, he's calling it out.
/r/MensRights11/10/20 06:06 PM
14

Ok. You first.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 07:49 PM
1

Taking selfies is narcissistic, you heard it here first, boys.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 07:19 PM
0

It isn’t besides the point when you’re saying that killing the child would be justified because young pregnancy is “life ruining”. Which it isn’t in most cases, and which is why we have social security.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 11:12 AM
0

Yeah, it's difficult, but it's not life ruining. You are saying that because it's difficult, the child should be killed. I do not understand this leap.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 10:48 AM
0

It is difficult, but it’s not life-ruining, especially not to the capacity that it would justify killing a child.
/r/MensRights06/10/20 08:06 PM
0

...what?
/r/MensRights06/10/20 05:51 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights03/10/20 10:11 PM
8

Here in the northern Baltic no woman is ever holding any door from what I’ve seen, and about a quarter of the women I hold a door open for complain about it and call me a creep. At least theee quarters still got some actual manners, though.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 09:56 PM
3

They’re outright defending child abuse. What the fuck.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 06:07 AM
3

There’s no “sounding like” about it.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 05:29 AM
0

The Roman Catholic Church isn’t a cult. Come on. They’re not cultish at all.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 05:09 AM
45

Have you heard of "fraud"? Because that's a crime.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 12:21 PM
6

I think you are replying to the wrong comment chain? I have no clue what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 03:06 AM
5

What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights28/09/20 02:47 AM
2

what
/r/MensRights28/09/20 02:22 AM
2

"You can only rape someone with a penis"? I guess women can't be raped then, since they don't got penises.
/r/MensRights25/09/20 06:45 PM
12

"wow why do you people not like malnourishment"
/r/MensRights22/09/20 04:20 PM
10

what
/r/MensRights21/09/20 08:00 AM
4

Someone saying that something is a fact does not make it a fact. And are you actually linking something called marxists.org?
/r/MensRights20/09/20 05:19 AM
1

I wholeheartedly agree with you, and what you said seems to contradict with anything I had previously stated.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 09:04 PM
1

You have yet to prove that women we're oppressed contra men in general. Also the OP of this whole damn post (not this thread, the actual post), already talked about women having right to own property and the "right" to employment. I do not accept your premise that feminism arose from any actual oppression.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 06:59 PM
2

I don’t completely agree with u/lefty929 but he does have a point: we should not look to the society for validation, but to become valuable an sich ourselves. This also does not mean ignoring society or even not trying to influence it, rather we should be confident and find self-worth by ourselves rather than externally from society.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 04:02 PM
2

Okay.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 03:11 AM
1

And I do not accept your premise that feminism arose from any actual oppression. You are yet to prove that it did.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 02:06 AM
1

Yet your whole point was that because feminists claim that this "patriarchy" exists it has to exist. The Nazis also claimed a lot of things which you yourself just said we're false, yet when feminists claim oppression, they are automatically right about it?
/r/MensRights19/09/20 02:00 AM
1

I'm not sure how you quoting a tertiary source is supposed to prove me wrong or to prove you right.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 01:47 AM
0

Well, I have to say, you got me intrigued. If you want to share, I'm open to hearing you out.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 01:41 AM
1

You were claiming that if there had been no oppression, then the ideology claiming this oppression would not exist, hence the oppression did historically exist. By that logic, the nazis, who claimed that the Germans had been oppressed by Jews, would not have existed if the Germans would not have been oppressed by the Jews. It is a simple reductio ad absurdum with the intent to show that your premise does not lead to the conclusion. There is no conflating of the two here.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 01:39 AM
1

A horny woman can force her husband into sex and not go to jail in that era. Hell, if the wife thought that the husband was not virile enough, that was grounds for divorce most of the time. Even though men are generally stronger physically, that does not mean that men are or were domineering in every way of life, women had their own fields where they overpowered men, and could use that to coerce their husbands. It was not a gendered issue.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 01:32 AM
1

Men had the right to vote as long as they participated in military defence of their locale. For all of the rest of your claims, I'm gonna need some sources. Oh, and martial rape was not illegal because it was thought that the wife had the right to have sex with her husband whenever she wanted, and the husband had the duty to fulfill that desire, and that the husband had the right to have sex with his wife whenever she wanted and the wife had the duty to fulfill that desire. It went both ways and…
/r/MensRights19/09/20 01:18 AM
1

And these were inequal how? E: Or rather, I should say: These are historical inequalities how?
/r/MensRights19/09/20 01:07 AM
1

Are you seriously comparing feminists with nazis? That's the stupidest thing I have heard. No. I am comparing an ideology which stated that a group was oppressed with another ideology which stated that a group was oppressed. After all, you straight up said "If women were not oppressed then feminism would never have been founded.". I.E, if a group had not been oppressed, an ideology saying that this group had been oppressed would not have formed. That's not ideology but a movement in response to …
/r/MensRights19/09/20 01:00 AM
1

What? The fact that an ideology that says that a group has been oppressed does not mean that this group has been oppressed. That's like saying that the Jews ruled over the world, otherwise national socialism would have never been founded. "The fact that the Nazis rebelled, suggests to us that there existed some form of unfair system that favoured Jews over Aryans, that caused Aryans to rebel against men."
/r/MensRights19/09/20 12:38 AM
5

When women incite violence, it’s toxic masculinity, clearly. Is it toxic feminity when men incite/commit violence by their own accord then? Fucking disgusting, and impossible to understand.
/r/MensRights19/09/20 12:14 AM
3

Yes, they did. And neither men nor women were really oppressed.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 10:19 PM
5

If I want credible information, I'll go somewhere else than Wikipedia. But yes, oftentimes there are actual sources listed in articles there, but that still does not mean that the articles themselves are right or even well sourced; not every article has even a single source. Also you never even addressed what I actually said before.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 10:18 PM
3

Most of the time when a person doesn't "want to have this conversation right now", they'll be giving that excuse to you forever and ever until they find someone else to feed it to. Repeated "dont want to talk about it right now" is a red flag by itself.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 10:14 PM
7

Yeah, and I am sure that not all Wikipedia articles are moderated in the good way. Hence now most of the Scots language wiki is unusable and there’s even a call to burn it down and start anew. If all Wikipedia articles were moderates as rigorously as you think, nothing of this calibre could ever happen.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 08:44 PM
5

I am sorry, I do not quite understand what you are saying. Do you mean that there were no mines in the ancient times? Or that coal was not mined in the ancient or classical period mediterranean?
/r/MensRights18/09/20 08:30 PM
6

"All wikipedia articles are moderated" Yet just a few weeks ago it turned out that like half of the Scots Wikipedia was not even in the Scots language, and furthermore, attempts to fix that we're silenced.
/r/MensRights18/09/20 08:28 PM
2

This is why bullying is such a problem in schools. “Just ignore them! They won’t bother bullying you then!” That’s plain wrong, dipshit, they’ll bully you even worse because you showed ‘em you’ll do nothing. And go to the principal? Really? They’ll just give the same inane bullshit as you.
/r/MensRights17/09/20 06:46 PM
2

what
/r/MensRights16/09/20 04:44 AM
1

I understand your anxieties, and hell, ever since my training, I’ve occasionally had some sleepless nights thinking about the possibility of having to go to the front. Could I do it? Could I kill another man for the survival of me, my family and my people? It’s some grim shit. Thankfully, though, the chances of a war in here, or the US being involved in a conventional total war, are quite slim, to say the least.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 02:39 PM
2

Chauvinism is for everyone, not just men, check I’m a female chauvinist myself and I feel great.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 01:04 PM
3

what
/r/MensRights13/09/20 09:45 PM
1

The only way those numbers make any sense is if they are used as a front for money laundering. Those numbers just dont make sense.
/r/MensRights12/09/20 01:33 AM
3

The only way any of these numbers would make any modicum of sense is money laundering, no other way about it.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 08:43 AM
2

How on Earth does that convince you that all cultures share one inherent set of morals, I never said that. Of course people have different ideas of things, but that does not mean that because there are different ideas of these things that all those ideas are equally factual.
/r/MensRights06/09/20 10:21 AM
2

Different people and different cultures have different ideas on what constitutes right and wrong, yes. Different people also think that the earth is flat, or that Hitler did nothing wrong. What different people think has no bearing on what actually is correct. If you think that morality is relative, you also think that Hitler did nothing wrong, and nazism is just what those people thought was morally right. Do you see how insane the idea of absolute moral relativism is?
/r/MensRights05/09/20 10:38 PM
1

So we should force our culture, beliefs and morals on all the different countries of the world, literally forcing them to comply through starvation tactics? I think you probably need to get some of that shit off your ears now. Yes. Morals are not relative.
/r/MensRights05/09/20 05:57 PM
4

left wing literally stands for progress what
/r/MensRights27/08/20 08:45 PM
2

He is absolutely correct. "Opening up" does nothing but make you vulnerable, and people want to exploit that vulnerability. Only the people who aim to exploit you want you to be vulnerable.
/r/MensRights25/07/20 09:51 PM
2

Yes, that is not special. That is literally what a normal man is. Not "should be", but "is".
/r/MensRights10/07/20 06:05 PM
7

A genocidal dictatorship is never "on a good track".
/r/MensRights04/06/20 03:18 PM
12

The basis of any civilized court system is the presumption of innocence. This means that any accusation is presumed to be wrong until proven true. So yes, it is good to assume someone accusing someone of rape is lying.
/r/MensRights07/05/20 04:38 PM
1

The point of conscription in Finland is to be such a costly target even the Russians would think twice before trying. If they for some reason decided to try, there is a very good chance their invasion would be stopped in its tracks. Despite low population, the Finnish Defense Forces are one of the top militaries in Europe, and even have the largest artillery after Russia.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 01:24 PM
3

There’s also messenger bags which are essentially purses in an useful size, and those don’t attract any extra eyes, although a proper backpack would still be the best option, I’d say. I’ve never seen nor heard of anyone not being allowed to a store with a backpack, that sounds crazy.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 04:46 AM
1

Well, the terms "native" or "indigenous" are still useful when talking about different cultures which do still co-exist in at least some form in the region discussed. I don't think it would be a good idea to completely throw away the terms when talking about the history of certain regions, but I think the general terms of "Native X" should be replaced with more specific terms. Just as we do not talk about the 1800s British Empire as being a "Germanic culture", we should not band all Native Siber…
/r/MensRights24/04/20 11:25 PM
3

Franks, the ancestors of the French, moved in to Gaul in the timespan between 500-700 or so. I'd say that the descendants of Franks definitely are native French.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 03:22 PM
1

Why would you punish an innocent to punish another?
/r/MensRights24/04/20 10:30 AM
7

Commendable. Have a good day.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 10:08 AM
5

And why exactly are you quoting the most genocidal maniac Europe has ever seen? Doesn’t seem to have anything to do with the topic at hand.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 09:41 AM
3

And I would say that this, lets say, “societal gynocentrism” is nothing more than a continuation of biological gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 05:52 AM
3

Gynocentrism is something we have inherited from our prehistoric ancestors, not something invented in modern times. Back in those days, gynocentrism was virtually necessary for a tribe to survive the harsh conditions our Hunter-gatherer forefathers faced, due to the risks of child-birth and the relative physical weakness of women.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 05:20 AM
10

There was a new MiB movie? I thought the last Men in Black was from the 90s.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 01:16 PM
2

Alright, seems like you were talking about the gradual democratization and liberalization of western society and not the (Protestant) Reformation I thought you were talking about. Honestly makes a lot more sense lol, my b
/r/MensRights21/04/20 08:29 PM
5

I think of men's rights as just an offshoot of the Reformation movement that started 500 years ago. That sounds interesting, to say the least. Could you elaborate?
/r/MensRights21/04/20 03:56 AM
30

Well, she did say “some folks”. I’m one of those “some folks” who don’t trust a woman further than I can throw her, but the same applies to men, kids and youths as well. There is nothing bad about not trusting people.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 04:02 AM
3

Being downvoted for disagreeing with the consensus is a fault of Reddit itself, not of the sub.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 08:26 PM
3

My wife decided she wanted to fix the lawnmower today and she’s popped out to ask me questions every 2 minutes. She’s adorable! She never ever fixes things and rarely touches anything mechanical. I am an intermediate mechanic who’s fixed almost all the vehicles during quarantine. Today, I think purely out of boredom, my sweet wife exclaimed with a big smile “That lawnmower has sat unmoving for too long, I think I’m going to fix it by myself!” So he texted back and forth with her dad, a master la…
/r/MensRights12/04/20 05:17 AM
1

Marin handling Covid well Excuse me what lmao
/r/MensRights12/04/20 02:59 AM
1

That’s a really dumb metaphor, since the swadtika is not and was not inherently bad in any way. By itself, the swastika is an aesthetically pleasing symbol with various meanings, which was then ruined by nazis overtaking it. Feminism, on the other hand, has always been about female supremacy and more priviliges and less responsibilities for females.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 02:55 AM
1

Might be cultural differences, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights10/04/20 10:40 PM
2

Hookups are hookups, not dates, they're very much distinct. At least, where I've grown up and lived in. Might be a different thing in America or the West. I disagree, women date for free food and entertainment when they see no romantic prospects When there is no romantic prospects, then I would say it is not dating, but either just hanging out, or, if done just for the free food and entertainment on the other's paycheck, just outright manipulation.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 06:06 PM
1

That ain’t dating though? Dating is by definition a long term romantic relationship, or the mutual pursuit of one.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 05:05 PM
1

No, I’m saying that being an antinatalist limits your dating pool to other antinatalists. People who want to have kids won’t date people who don’t want to have kids under any circumstances.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 08:17 AM
8

Any board which was actually about discussing a particular lifestyle would accept and even encourage discussion of the negative aspects of said lifestyle, and child-free lifestyle has the negative aspect of being a quite limiting dating factor. I doubt they are actually on a grand crusade, but rather, choose to stifle any criticism, valid or not, over that lifestyle in order to protect themselves and their world views. Reddit inherently has a very bad format for any kind of discussion, as the up…
/r/MensRights09/04/20 06:19 PM
-26

Any system which allows any person to outright murder a child is immoral.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 12:38 AM
2

He was a child who didn't want a child and wanted to kill that child. That's not just "saying mean things". That's something worthy of a lot of suspicion. And while the story only has one side of it told, if the dude actually wanted to do right for the kid, he would not be threatening to get custody of her as alleged.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 06:12 AM
2

The only people who want to entice you to cry are people who want to hurt you. The only people who want you to show weakness are people who want to exploit that weakness.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 12:05 AM
23

This can't be legal.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 12:32 PM
2

Harvard and the rest of the Ivy League is “prestigious” only in their corruption.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 11:54 AM
1

Don’t cry or show emotions to anyone, except to a real close friend over a bottle. Showing emotions does nothing but make you vulnerable to people wanting to hurt or manipulate you.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 11:23 AM
9

Fun fact: women actually earn more for the same work when you take into account experience, expertise and hours.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 10:41 AM
1

True, but most things can, and it is important to not lose sight of that.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 04:54 AM
1

Try to fix them. The idea isn't ignoring it or trying to "change reality with perception" or anything, but to change your perception, and to change yourself to be more motivated to work for things to be better.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 04:50 AM
1

No. I never said that. I deliberately used the word "focus".
/r/MensRights31/03/20 04:29 AM
1

You don't look at the negatives and view the negatives in a positive light, you look at the whole and focus on the positive and think "Hmm, how can I work on to make this even better?"
/r/MensRights31/03/20 03:48 AM
1

True, however, focusing one’s perception on the positive aspects can help one be more optimistic about the thing in question which may lead to increased motivation to work to progress the issue further. Conversely, focusing on the negatives may lead to a lack of motivation to do so.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 02:08 AM
18

The CDC only recognizes forcibly penetrated as rape, meaning their stats on rape of men are worthless. They hide those under other monikers, such as “forced to penetrate” or “other sexual violence”.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 01:26 AM
2

I'm a citizen in my own country. The one who said he was a non-citizen is u/HaroldOfTheRocks.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 03:49 PM
3

Non-citizens can't vote, that's pretty standard. Non-citizens taking part in drafts is weird, though.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 03:42 PM
3

Both chivalry and gentleman-ness in contemporary colloquial language mean virtuosity. It is never time for virtuous life to die.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 01:04 PM
2

...What? So you are now saying that females do in fact have an unfair advantage in the job market?
/r/MensRights30/03/20 10:09 AM
1

Bad bot
/r/MensRights30/03/20 07:10 AM
30

That's all just nonsense based on absolutely nothing except their own fantasies. Nothing much else to say, really.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 02:55 AM
1

It does say "Archaic".
/r/MensRights29/03/20 11:39 PM
5

It's such an insane thing, I actually had to check my calendar to double check it wasn't April 1st already. How the hell are you supposed to post or comment anything in English without using Y?
/r/MensRights29/03/20 02:51 AM
1

First of all, pretty much everything in your OP is clear-cut bullshit. And immediately when people showed that, you only started tone-policing as if that would make nonsense be more worthwhile. Welcome to adulthood, where tone and feefees don't trump over facts. You did never bring up anything of relevance to the sub, and you did not once actually defend any of your points except by with a flimsy "no true scotsman". Also, you never got personally attacked. Grow a skin.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 08:15 PM
1

Have you never actually had a discussion? Calling out bullshit does not make your "point automatically invalid". There is nothing that makes any point automatically invalid other than clear and dry-cut contradictions and nonsense. If you really want a discussion, cut your bullshit and have one.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 08:03 PM
4

Innovation does not mean "being the first to come up with a concept". Improving an existing concept or application is innovation in and of itself.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 07:50 PM
1

Misfires don’t just happen. They’re user-errors.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 09:50 AM
1

Nah. I’m not scared at guns. I respect them. I know first hand what they can do, I’ve handled them since I was a child, hunted with them and got military training. The gun itself is not scary, it is an inanimate object with no agency. Fear the person holding the gun.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 09:29 AM
3

Exactly this. Both parties in a relationship have the duty to satisfy each other’s needs to the best of their ability and without compromising their own.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 11:03 AM
14

You’re very wrong. It’s not uncomfortable or difficult at all.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 04:52 PM
2

Feminism is not for women’s rights, and no one here is advocating for stripping any rights from women.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 08:31 PM
1

How? With nearly all European education systems being blatantly biased against men, it is becoming more and more difficult for men to get a higher education, and as technology advances, more and more jobs will absolutely require higher education. I don’t see how it’s a minor issue at all.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 11:33 AM
2

And you would be absolutely correct, thank you.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 09:40 PM
2

It might also just mean that women are more readily diagnosed with mental illnesses than men. I'm not saying it's impossible* that women suffer more from mental issues, but these statistics could be because of a variety of reasons.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 03:04 PM
2

We might have been misunderstood. What I understand as "Women's health centers" are literally health centers which just serve women. As far as I know, there are no such centers for men, meaning that men have to go to general health centers. I have no problem with there being women's health centers, but I do think that there should be also men's health centers, because men do also have plenty of health issues which are pretty much just pertaining to men.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 12:42 AM
2

Yeah, and close down all women's health centers and even maternity wards. It's all gynecologists' problem now. Do you see how insane your suggestion is?
/r/MensRights22/03/20 03:11 AM
1

Yes. They're called urologists and are a thing.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 03:01 AM
2

And, if you do get gender reassignment surgery, you may kill yourself. It doesn't actually help none.
/r/MensRights20/03/20 04:13 PM
17

You risked your son’s health in a completely cosmetic operation. I don’t see how that’s a good idea or comparable to vaccinations at all.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 06:12 AM
8

The pay gap exists, but in the opposite direction. Women work less (in general) yet have comparable, smaller, but comparable pay, but receive retirement pensions for 5-6 years longer.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 08:58 AM
6

STEM fields are just as hard to get into for women as it is for men. All it takes is being able to take a test, and unlike in humanities, those test results are not subjective. Hell, it's even easier for women to go into STEM fields, you could argue, since nearly all western education systems are gynocentric.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 07:42 AM
5

That doesn’t mean they ought to be treated like dirt. The primary function of prisons is to rehabilitate the convicts back into society, and that does not happen if you treat them like dirt.
/r/MensRights14/03/20 03:34 AM
1

I am not provoking xenophobia, but I accept the stats and I accept what they imply, which is that there is a problem in the integration of ethnic minorities. USA does not work as an analogy as well as you might think, as USA has always been ethnically diverse, and more importantly, there has been actual racism in USA. Finland, however, has been very homogenous by ethnicity, and Finland has been very open to immigrants and refugees, and, infact, Finland offers the largest sums of welfare money to…
/r/MensRights01/04/15 01:18 PM
1

Excuse me? I do not seem to understand what you're getting at. I never said that all North Africans are rapists or anything, I just used an example to point out how mass media are using censorship on comments. And frankly, the statistics show that there is a problem, which is that these ethnic minorities do not integrate to the Finnish society properly, as in they do not seem to acknowledge and respect the social norms and laws in what should be their new home. And, unfortunately, I do have to s…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 02:32 PM
2

That has already started happening in Finland, except not about feminism, as this new wave of feminism has not, thankfully, invaded the mainstream in Finland. However, the main medias do outright ban comments from articles about crimes committed by those with a foreign ethnic background, so I guess it is very much comparable. As a slight explanation, the ethnic demographics of Finland are quite homogenous. Ethnic minorities are minorities, the largest, the Swedish-speaking minority, about 5%. Ho…
/r/MensRights29/03/15 01:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter