TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JeremiahGuy Archive

View 22 posts and 87 comments by JeremiahGuy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
56

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:33 PM
17

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights08/03/12 07:46 AM
5

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:47 AM
5

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:38 AM
5

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:34 PM
3

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:55 AM
3

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:48 AM
3

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:30 PM
3

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights14/03/12 12:41 PM
1

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:26 AM
1

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:36 PM
1

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:11 AM
0

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:51 AM
0

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:45 AM
0

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:40 AM
0

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:38 AM
0

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:24 AM
0

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:35 PM
0

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:34 PM
0

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights14/03/12 12:43 PM
0

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights14/03/12 12:39 PM
0

JeremiahGuy/r/MensRights14/03/12 12:32 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Correct. By pressuring football players to wear pink, they are made to feel guilty for being men while ignoring the fact that men are the most vulnerable sex when it comes to health, dying 5 years earlier and receiving less funding. In reality it's women who should be wearing blue socks at the office and thanking men every day for the privilege.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:32 AM
0

I'm an MRA Yeah, and I'm Denzel Washington.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:22 AM
0

You sure agree with misandrists a lot. Manboobz really likes the job you're doing too: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qwmdl/is_this_subreddit_misogynistic/c41782d?context=3 Clap clap. Not to mention you're the darling of SRS.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 05:11 AM
5

Yeah I am flattered. I actually did just watch the movie again. I strive to be like Rorschach. ignatiusloyola is like a bumbling, retarded version of Ozymandias. Our manginas are represented by the Owl V2.0. And I sure feel like Dr. Manhattan sometimes, surrounded by the fools of humanity.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 04:56 AM
1

Because it's true. :)
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:24 AM
2

No, the same cannot be said of men. Even when men have their lives ripped away by divorce they still fight for their children. Of course people are selfish, but women are generally much moreso. It's in their nature. Regarding religion, Christianity sure has it right when it comes to the Garden of Eden. The Fall of Man was Eve's fault primarily, and Adam's fault for listening to Eve secondarily. Also it is revealed then that women ought be subordinate to men. The Bible has some very good teaching…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:13 AM
-2

Inmalafide is a great site, and that is a great article.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 03:03 AM
-5

I think it's more accurate to say you're just not smart enough to understand what I'm saying or to understand even when you are behaving like a white knight mangina. Note that I didn't call you a "feminazi, commie, leftist pinko" at all, nor do I ever use those terms, which demonstrates your disingenuous, childish behavior. I call you what you behave as: a white knight mangina. But I cannot cure your stupidity or your pussy-begging behavior. You'll make a very useful bottom bitch for ignatiusloy…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:31 AM
0

Thank you, he is a very principled and uncompromising man. I think I might watch that movie again now.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:21 AM
-1

Plus, not all women are dangerous. This one even understands my side of the story, MRA, and supports me in my beliefs. I hope one day there are more like her out there. All women are dangerous in some way. Do you understand what happens when women realize they don't have many years left to have a child? OOPSIES is what happens quite often. :) Yes, yes, you're different, you know what you're doing, we've all heard it before. Surely some women are better than others, but no woman is perfect, and i…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 12:10 AM
4

Of course, this is the same tactic ignatiusloyola uses. Not surprising considering he is an extreme Leftist.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:59 PM
-3

In cohabitation these days, women are infinitely more dangerous to men than men are to women. Simple fact. Have you ever read a men's rights article? Here's a starter: http://weddedabyss.wordpress.com/ You're acting like ignatiusloyola now, lol. Starting flame wars, telling MRAs to leave, because we aren't politically correct enough for you. You're the new Manboobz. I'm a bigot for pointing out the dangers of cohabitation for men with a light-hearted joke? You sound ridiculously like an SRS trol…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:38 PM
-12

Jesus, I can't even make a joke without you white knighting my ass like a Manboobz clone. When's the last time you had sex with a woman Qanan? If you don't know what you're talking about, perhaps you should shut up and let the big boys who actually have experience with women talk. You're just white knighting, clearly have little to no experience with women, and it's just pathetic to see you acting like a mangina like this. I don't blame you for being unattractive to women, but I do blame you for…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:13 PM
-1

There's no real difference in saying that men and women are physically different or psychologically different, other than that PC feminists like you want to get offended at the suggestion. No one said women were "inherently villainous", either, troll. The study shows quite clearly that women are generally psychologically different than men. That's the reality, no matter how much you whine about it.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:03 PM
-16

I've bought a home and am very happy with my girlfriend of 5 years Beware women, they are more dangerous than a car accident. :)
/r/MensRights14/03/12 10:53 PM
-7

Good article, basically demonstrating Rebecca Watson appears to have sociopathic tendencies. She enjoys tormenting people. God, she is so ugly too. And oddly she sounds exactly like Jessica Valenti: really nasally and spoiled.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 10:02 PM
1

I have donated $0 dollars to any cause. That is 100% irrelevant. It's 100% relevant. I don't care what whiny ignorant inactivists think because you don't matter. If you're not an activist in some way, you aren't helping the movement. And no, concern trolling on Reddit and bashing MRAs doesn't count. You are useless if not harmful to the movement. So I don't care about you or your naive and foolish opinions. The "radicals" make us all look like woman-hating dicks. They de-legitimize the movement …
/r/MensRights14/03/12 09:51 PM
1

Congrats guys! Hilarious video too. I couldn't stop laughing.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 09:41 PM
1

An article about how it's cool to hit an obnoxious woman, because women are beneath men and are actually sexually attracted to violence isn't anti-feminist, it's anti-woman. That's a mischaracterization of the article. You forgot to answer my question. You see, you're not only ignorant, you're not actually a men's rights activist. So why should I care what you think? You not only have no idea what you're talking about, but also you won't change squat. On the other hand, the radicals will continu…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 09:31 PM
2

Haha, no. The SLPC article complained about SAVE Services, too. They hate MRAs because we are anti-feminist. What you're doing is called "concern trolling". You might want to work on that. By the way, how much have you donated to men's rights organizations in the last year?
/r/MensRights14/03/12 09:19 PM
-2

Did you know men are generally vertically superior to women as well? Sexism!
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:55 PM
1

It was a normative statement, not a universal one, clearly.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:45 PM
2

You need to sever ties with her immediately. You might want to do some research into how to end a relationship without backlash, maybe in the Game community. She could very well falsely accuse you of something to get back at you. I suggest contacting a lawyer first. You could have the full force of the police state coming down on you for being male. Be careful.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:32 PM
1

Okay Uncle Tom.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:21 PM
-3

As an anti-male advocate, he wants men to act more feminine because in his view women are superior to men in every way.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:41 PM
-3

If I had a genie in a bottle I'd wish all Leftists and other idiots and evil people would fall off a cliff. In this way not only would I eliminate the majority of men's rights issues in a moment, but I'd set the course of human history on a much brighter path than we're on now.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:29 PM
0

Embogenous, a redditor for five days who thinks feminism is just grand. Feminists, pfft.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:18 PM
1

Oh please, the main point of your comment was to demonize the author for saying the word "negro" and me for posting it or you wouldn't have said anything about that part. Get over your victim complex and spare me your projection, you disingenuous fool of a fembot. Your female supremacist stance won't stop me from pointing out your bullshit even though you're a privileged feminist woman playing the victim. I'll treat you just like I'd treat a man. Get used to it sister.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 01:08 PM
-2

Well, he did lie. They were talking about "White Pride", not "White Power". Considering it's okay in this sub-reddit to call white people "crackers", an actually offensive term, I'm not sure I should be concerned about the term "negro", as in the United Negro College Fund. But oh yeah, that's right, I'm a white oppressor. And male to boot! It's not politically correct for me to have a say. Pardon me. Next time I'll have my black fiancee post. By all means, folks, up-vote the feminist. She is opp…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 12:57 PM
1

From a comment: The hypocrisy is the logical result of the Leftist concept of “oppression”. “Oppressed” groups can get away with anything, “Oppressors” can get away with nothing. Exactly. Just like with men and women, men are always considered oppressors by feminists, and women are always blameless victims.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 12:47 PM
-12

I'm pretty sure there's a ton of selfish, evil men out there, too. Sure, but a lot more selfish, evil women. They just aren't enabled by law and society. Oh, but when men were in charge of the household they were quite benevolent, sacrificing their lives slaving away for their families, fighting for their country. Yeah, it's safe to say that even when men are enabled by law and society to be selfish, to run away on their responsibilities, they don't. Women, on the other hand.... I'm not saying t…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 12:35 PM
0

Absolutely.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 12:19 PM
-10

Women more than men, it seems. Did you know women seek sole custody far more often than men, and initiate the vast majority of divorces? Did you know that when men were the head of household, the divorce rate was 5%? Sure seems to indicate men on average are much more responsible and less selfish than women, and in fact psychological studies prove it. This shouldn't be surprising considering male and female reproductive strategies vary so greatly, but of course it's not politically correct becau…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:52 AM
1

Good comment from NWOSlave there: Feminism was never about equality. If you have the right to life, freedom, property and vote, you have the same rights as men. Feminism is a communist hate movement designed to destroy the traditional family, and transfer all mens individual wealth and power to the state with women recieving privileges and entitlements above men.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 11:39 AM
-1

Another good question is why did she do it? And the answer is because she knew the government would force him and the taxpayer to provide for her if she got pregnant. If the government didn't force men to provide for women in this way, it never would have happened. And thus we see why child support and welfare must be eliminated in order to eliminate men's rights issues related to reproduction.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 10:52 AM
-10

It's amazing how evil women can be, even those you spend your life with. Look at all the poor men divorced by their wives, who take their money and their children, and care not a wit. There is something vindictive and cruel in women that men just don't seem to have so much. It must come from being the sex that benefits most from being a parasite on others.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 10:22 AM
5

Celda, I know it's fun to argue with idiot feminists, but what are you accomplishing? This can either be a place where we constantly argue the same old crap with feminists who clearly don't give a shit about men's rights, or it can be a place where real activism gets done and we don't waste time on this stuff so much. As Paul Elam said: If you let feminists, white knights, etc. gnaw away at the continuity of your discussions, when they are flat out lying or hopelessly obtuse, you diminish your p…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 04:04 AM
0

It's quite intentional I'm sure.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 03:51 AM
0

take your pick. VAWA may work well if it's rewritten to actually be gender neutral, but it'd be better to scrap it and look at all of the financing provisions. Yeah, I think it's best to simply eliminate VAWA. It's just big government intruding into people's lives to escalate domestic violence issues in many cases.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 03:38 AM
0

misseff is always intentionally obtuse. She's a feminist troll who constantly derails and ensures this sub-reddit is never a place for real activism. Instead, the sub-reddit is a hostile place where articles feminists don't like are trolled and down-voted heavily, and concern trolls like misseff thrive. As Paul Elam said: If you let feminists, white knights, etc. gnaw away at the continuity of your discussions, when they are flat out lying or hopelessly obtuse, you diminish your potential. http:…
/r/MensRights14/03/12 03:28 AM
2

I just think it's interesting and that you should be aware. Some more info here: http://www.reddit.com/r/AboutMensRights/comments/n4g58/ignatiusloyolas_attacks_on_everyone_who_is_not_a/
/r/MensRights14/03/12 02:57 AM
1

I am JeremiahMRA. See here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qrjos/important_update_on_the_splc_the_status_of_their/c407qo5?context=3 Sorry for the confusion. I don't post here as much these days so my comments are mainly focused on the most important issue, which is the weakening of the men's movement by catering to political correctness.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 02:30 AM
1

Your edit is better. Even just removing that last sentence improves it a lot because you are no longer really apologizing. Thanks for taking a look at it.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 08:51 PM
0

You should try to be more respectful. ignatiusloyola's behavior is well-documented, and you have no reason to insult me when I point it out. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qgdlb/a_couple_of_change_proposals_need_community_input/c3ydkgn Really Gareth, I enjoyed our last conversation, but now you're starting shit simply because I point out the truth. Not cool. But at least your trolling me got you a job as moderator, lol.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 07:15 PM
-4

Commenting about the feminist appropriation of this sub-reddit is not a "flame war", it's vitally important. Which is why ignatiusloyola has implemented policies that make it illegal for posters to have discussion about his moderation outside of the Meta Reddit that is rarely ever read. Here's a link: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qgdlb/a_couple_of_change_proposals_need_community_input/c3ydkgn But if you haven't noticed what ignatiusloyola is doing yet, I think you must be willingl…
/r/MensRights13/03/12 07:00 PM
-5

They are trying to perserve the current system by claiming and co-opting some of the ideas of the MRM You probably should have mentioned that's the same thing ignatiusloyola is doing here. Seems relevant.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 05:41 PM
3

Are you aware that the head moderator here is a Marxist feminist college educated liberal who wants power and who uses Marxist tactics to marginalize and silence those who oppose his extreme views?
/r/MensRights13/03/12 05:31 PM
1

"Is it defeatist or treacherous for a doctor to diagnose a disease correctly? My only intention is to cure the disease." - Lady Jessica, Frank Herbert's Dune
/r/MensRights13/03/12 04:58 PM
-3

The good mangina project indeed. http://noseriouslywhatabouttehmenz.wordpress.com/2012/02/27/his-black-dress-beyond-the-limits-of-menswear/ Androgynous fantasies.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 04:48 PM
7

The point is, yes the people who make up the loose grouping that is called the Men's Right Movement do have a few people who hate women, that call themselves MRAs. They are a small minority, but sometimes they are very vocal and obnoxious. Certainly, we need to do a better job of calling them out. Um, no we don't. Why do you keep repeating this kind of rubbish? Stop attacking MRAs. Stop handing feminists this weapon by claiming that there are a bunch of woman haters in the movement who we need t…
/r/MensRights13/03/12 04:21 AM
0

Two things. First, a person is not necessarily hypocritical if they were to take that stance. It's quite acceptable to believe that abortion has another name, murder, and that murder is unacceptable. Second, you shouldn't make light of MRAs being "mocked" here. That's trolling and users who go out of the way to mock and harass MRAs should be banned. And you should stop encouraging people to harass MRAs simply because they have a differing opinion than you. Funny to think that if we took the equi…
/r/MensRights13/03/12 04:07 AM
10

From the article: If I knew years ago that blogging about getting laid and travel would put me on a hate list by a civil rights organization, I would have stayed anonymous. Too late now. I will be silenced at some point, but until then I will go on with my big head held high. I’m far from done.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 03:56 AM
6

Yeah, I don't think it was a great idea to involve the police. That could have gone very badly. And now he's in the system with people who want to label him crazy, and who knows how this will affect his life. I think it would have been better to do it without involving the government if possible. Meh, I guess we'll see.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 03:45 AM
-8

You guys should probably start banning anti-male trolls so people like Black_Visions and Factory aren't constantly harassed by them when they try to spread the message of men's rights and so are more likely to consider suicide. It would also help if ignatiusloyola didn't encourage harassment and actively try to marginalize actual MRAs like Factory too, ya know. Start listening to the MRAs here and get rid of the anti-male trolls who are actively fighting against the men's movement and there won'…
/r/MensRights13/03/12 03:17 AM
-1

I can actually tell you are stupid. Next time try to argue against the points I make, like the fact that ignatiusloyola is an antimale control freak. Thanks, troll. That's all you are lately, a troll.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 10:32 AM
-1

You are an extreme leftist and that's all you care about. Why aren't you banned yet for wishing unlawful death upon me? Oh yeah, the moderators favor Leftists like you. I'm not sure why you support misandrists but you do harm the movement with yourbullshit.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 10:21 AM
-3

Says ignatiusloyola's bitchboy, you liar.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:42 AM
-1

Yes, yes you love to wish death upon anyone who's not leftist, why are you here again? Oh yeah you're Leftist just like ignatiusloyola.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:03 AM
1

True, but Leftists are the primary fools who think government are the answer for everything.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:52 AM
3

Self defense is a good thing.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 06:22 AM
2

If all men did this in self defense you couldn't arrest ten all. I fight injustice and am too principled to let unjust laws deter me. But I do try to keep my woman around which gives me some safety from these things, she is protection with her female privilege.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 05:25 AM
2

This demonstrates female privilege. Men need to know that the proper response to these things is not to stay seated and compliant but to stand up and be dominant so that privileged women like her are less likely to act on their privilege. And if she starts hitting you, it's time to throw a punch yourself.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 05:13 AM
1

No, the right are conservative which means getting the government out of our lives. Republicans are far to the left and are not actually conservative.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 04:30 AM
2

And? Unregulated capitalism isn't a problem. Regulation is the problem because the government subsidizes destructive practices with our tax dollars.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 04:13 AM
-4

The plutocracy = Leftists.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 03:42 AM
0

Nope, not even in "third world countries" like another poster mentioned. Women are privileged over men in every society. They are and always have been the protected, less disposable group. In some cases they may have fewer rights but they still retain far greater privileges and fewer responsibilities than men in all societies. Even women in the third world have it better than most men there. Always have.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 03:32 AM
-3

Yep, this is part of the feminist Leftist collectivist agenda. The goal is to eradicate freedom and male independence by instituting global fascist government. To counter this, vote for liberty, for freedom, for libertarians like Ron Paul.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 03:21 AM
-5

Laurelai's behavior reminds me of ignatiusloyola's except more self-destructive. Both are control freaks who seek to silence those they have disagreements with. Hence the new rules about meta discussion. You should listen to Paul, Kyle, as you never listened to me.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 02:26 AM
2

Easy, because women an white knights are viewers, and the media caters to them. At the same time they have a Leftist agenda and this is part of it.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 01:45 AM
0

No. I just don't feel it's appropriate to call myself an mra when I do very little in the way of activism these days. I also participate in unrelated discussions and so I find it inappropriate now to associate myself as part of the men's movement because pc people often will respond negatively to my views and I don't want their biased reactions to prevent them from joining the cause. Unlike certain folks here I actually care about progress in the men's movement.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 01:33 AM
-8

Id never heard of em till yesterday. But considering they're a leftist organization it shouldn't be surprising at all.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 03:24 AM
-4

We don't have a problem. Feminists hate men irrationally. Mras criticize women for the things they actually do. The truth is a good thing. We don't need to be pc we need to be true. And Qanan claiming he is "dead scared" by mras who aren't pc enough for his taste is a lie, not the truth.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 03:12 AM
-9

What hate? You are falsely claiming you are "dead scared" of mras. It's completely unacceptable. I call out stupid shit when I see it. Would a guy full of hate commend you for your YouTube video like I did? No. You are overreacting and acting a fool, and I'm calling you on it.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 02:59 AM
-16

He's also the guy who is "dead scared" of you and thinks you belong at a klan rally in the 1800s, so it's not a very big loss. Mras who demonize other mras for telling the truth and spread hysteria about mras are scum lower than even feminists because they do more damage to the movement.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 12:32 AM
-2

Gotta love big government leftism stealing tax dollars from men to fund an organization that calls mras a hate group.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 11:26 PM
-16

When clowns like you willingly make comparisons between mras and the klan, you're doing the feminists' job for them. Keep your mouth shut when you feel like disparaging mras and you'll get more respect. Claiming mras "scare" you is an asinine thing to say and damaging to the movement. Mras like you who say things like this to try to validate the bogus claim that mras are violent bigots are worse than even feminists.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 10:50 PM
0

Vinter is an antimale feminist troll, and the only thing I care about is the truth. Proud to be a doucebag too. Douchebag just means masculine these days.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:41 AM
-3

Because feminist sympathizers like to perpetuate the myth that women were important throughout history In advancing civilization, technology, and everything else. They weren't because they chose not to be, as they were quite content to stay home while men did the difficult work. The women's sectiOn is nOthing but an indication that many women and feminists are jealous of mens accomplishments and wish to rewrite history to make it seem like women contributed equally to men but were "oppressed".
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:20 AM
0

Save isn't partisan but conservatives are the only ones who give a shit about men's rights in the political sphere. I've attended save cOnference calls. They get much farther with conservatives than leftists who are very feminist.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:10 AM
3

Valiantpie is a feminist troll who should've been banned long ago.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 07:59 AM
5

Good. That means were getting attention. And you'll notice they aren't just attacking this place, they're attacking even the very moderate save services. So the arguments from feminist trolls like misseff and the_patriarchy that they're targeting us because of the "radicals" are lies. They attack ALL of us who dont cater to feminism.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 03:54 AM
0

i linked the comment I intended to link, and show some respect. You're trolling in a thread dedicated to a deceased mra. Grow up.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 03:43 AM
-3

All I'm hearing is your usual wah wah I'm a Leftist and that's all I care about, fuck the men's rights movement if it won't cater to my extreme anti-male ideology wah wah. As usual you're the one trying to make things political with your concern trolling.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 05:42 PM
-1

Yes, vintermann is a mangina/Leftist/feminist/PC clown and a troll, he should be banned. By the way you seem to have misinterpreted what I said: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qmuo4/veteran_mra_and_father_of_5_khankrumthebulgar_has/c3yygcx
/r/MensRights08/03/12 05:33 PM
5

Yet Hochschild brings up women again and again, as if they had no voice due to not having a vote. The rest of the “oppression” of women remains, as it has always done and probably always will, amorphous and evasive like the changeling it is. In the meantime, Hochschild ignores one of the most glaring, obvious, and truly awful examples of men being deliberately, directly, and decidedly oppressed due not to skin color, region of origin, or social class, but to their very sex.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 05:06 PM
-6

You're not allowed to talk about Leftism because then you might critique it, rawr! edit: But that's not even really what the article is about. You should troll less and contribute more, O.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 05:02 PM
2

I applaud you for putting yourself out there like that in defense of men and for sharing it here.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 07:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter