TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JerfFoo Archive

View 3 posts and 495 comments by JerfFoo on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

And there's even more frumpy old men who obsess over women half their age.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 04:23 AM
2

OOF, that recent Reddit history. Literally full of comments of you talking about how this woman got what she deserved for doing nothing more than standing around.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 04:36 PM
1

/u/fjorden: Where the pussies at! /u/JerfFoo: Says the white supremacist fluffer /u/MyXthAccount: WHOA! Why would you bring up someone's sexuality? Fucking pussy.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 03:54 PM
2

... Wait, you aren't? You're literally heralding an ex-convict white supremacist, who was sentenced to 5 years for holding up a taxi driver at gun point because "he thought the driver was Iraqi," and is a leader of Identity Evropa as your hero?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 02:18 PM
0

Saying you're a fluffer for a literal white supremacist is homophobic???????? Do you think every single instance of male-on-male sexual intercourse is homophobic too? Dawg, you don't have to be ashamed, be fucking proud of it. Just like everybody, even white supremacists need get off, and you fluffing Nathan Damigo's cock up so he maintains a full erection between street fights is something I'm sure he appreciates.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 01:51 PM
-3

Wait, so you can't quote me saying homosexuality is bad? If I didn't say anything bad about homosexuality, why would you randomly assume it's such a negative thing then? Hmmmmmm.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 01:35 PM
-2

What did I say that was negative about being gay? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 01:20 PM
-2

Where are all the white knight pussies Says the dude in a thread full of hundreds of accounts who are all fluffers for white supremacists like Nathan Damigo. I hear he likes a pincer grip using just your thumb and pointer finger right in the middle of his shaft. Shouldn't be too difficult, he only has to keep it up from this street brawl to the next.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 12:49 PM
1

One of the games sympathetic to the alt-right.
/r/PussyPass29/03/17 01:11 AM
1

Here you are criticizing some lady for embracing sexism by covering her skin, and then two days later you shared a post on r/Tinder about how this chick on Tinder is begging for a hookup because she's wearing a bra and showing too much skin. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
/r/PussyPass14/03/17 03:21 PM
2

Another feminist here. I care about men's issues too, and very unfortunately, /r/MensRights is not a place that cares about male issues. It's just a bitter place where bitter people try to prove their the victimyest-victim in the room.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 01:14 PM
-1

It also makes sense to give women custody of kids more frequently if you believe men and women do different jobs because of genetic and cultural reasons, which is a massive MR talking point.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 06:27 PM
1

... it's amazing how many people I come across on the left and right who are so openly hostile to the idea of individuals making their own life choices Showing kids they can make their own life decisions is the entire point of the class. You're on SJW-levels of emotionally irrational arguing. Can you say one single thing that makes any sense whatsoever? You're so blatantly tilted and dripping with vitriol at the mention of anything women.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 01:09 PM
1

How else do you expect me to respond to such an irrational community? These students are being shown they can whatever they want to do with their lives, /u/Lethn called it man-hating-feminist-propaganda trying to brainwash kids, than proceeds to rant about how these students should be able to do whatever they want to do with their lives. Seriously, what the fuck.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 08:53 PM
1

Oh, of course. I don't actually think men are biologically more aggressive and violent, that wasn't the point of my comment. The point was to point out the hypocrisy of people who pick and choose which male traits are biologically influenced and which aren't.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 12:35 PM
1

Is testosterone responsible for men being prone to depression and committing suicide too? Is testosterone responsible for men being more violent? So, yeah, still asking. Why do people who think a chemical can decide a man's life pick and choose which traits are determined by testosterone and which traits are determined by culture?
/r/MensRights16/10/16 02:26 AM
-2

Why do people like you pick and choose which traits are biologically designed in men? I can't understand it. Why be so blatantly hypocritical?
/r/MensRights16/10/16 12:53 AM
1

Uh oh, someone who thinks culture doesn't play a massive role in how people are raised. Suuuuuure, and men being more prone to depression and committing suicide because of biology too.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 12:27 AM
1

You can't be bothered to read the source. You can't be bothered to read what I quoted from the source. I don't know what you expect me to say other than... They do.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 12:05 AM
-9

Showing boys they can be things like a receptionist is the equivalent of imposing your beliefs on children? You don't know what hysterical means.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 06:15 PM
-10

This program is most certainly a mixed bag, but far from making things strictly worst. Primary school students will be exposed to images of both boys and girls doing household chores, playing sport and working as firefighters and receptionists. The material includes statements including "girls can play football, can be doctors and can be strong" and "boys can cry when they are hurt, can be gentle, can be nurses and can mind babies". That's some valuable shit in there, and /u/Lethn in this very s…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 06:04 PM
-15

What the fuck. We're talking about doing chores. You don't do your laundry? You don't do your dishes? You don't clean your room? What "real reality" are you talking about? Are you telling me my girlfriend is a man-hating feminist because she doesn't scrub the stains out of my underwear?
/r/MensRights15/10/16 05:54 PM
-20

Showing boys it not weak or negative to do tasks typically assigned to women is brain washing?
/r/MensRights15/10/16 04:08 PM
18

Men have been taught to be tough, athletic, emotionless and super-hetero long before Feminism was even a word. You're taking crazy pills if you think Feminism is to blame for all that stuff.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 03:58 PM
-6

Try defamation. Inciting a mob resulting in threats of violence. And underlying it all this is a hate crime against men. Feminists are made fun of for saying shit like this all the time. My brain can't handle it. You're really going for the gold.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 01:44 AM
-1

If I told you... "Men who sexually assault and rape women are just the tip of the big, toxic iceberg. However, they couldn't and wouldn't sexually assault people if they weren't supported by huge mass of fellow misogynists who share their beliefs and goals" ... What would you say? Oh, we know, because you already said what you think of feminists saying the exact same sentiment who are.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 12:17 AM
-6

Jesus Christ, this subreddit is a training ground for Olympic level mental-gymnastics. Every time a woman complains about how they're treated online, this sub is rampant with people telling them to just shut Twitter off. Now some dude who falls on the scale of autism might have been an asshole in public is getting called names online, and "how dare these anonymous internet strangers from dark corners of the Internet call him names for it."
/r/MensRights12/10/16 11:56 PM
1

Can you say anything that isn't stupid? I won't bother arguing how physically moving a person is different than re-assigning someone's seat before they even stepped foot on the planned. Jesus Christ dude. America has been down that road before. Thankfully, we stopped such segregation... No. Ending segregation was never about getting black and white students to sick next to each other. Ending segregation was about giving colored adults and children access to the same resources, facilities and opp…
/r/MensRights08/10/16 12:16 PM
1

Lol, well, women's studies is an academic course too. :<sup>)</sup> I'm convinced the MRA solution to all the problems they hate about feminists is simply to adopt every single trait they discredit feminist of having. Enjoy your men's studies.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 01:20 PM
0

Oh dear. That took a sharp turn in to crazy town. Men don't get enough credit for being completely irrational. Thanks for that.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 12:13 PM
2

More silly and completely worthless semantics? Can't say I'm surprised. Also not surprised you don't understand what happened. You realize she wasn't "physically moved" right? She wasn't made to get out of her chair. At the check out in the airport, they told her she was going to sit in a different seat then she was originally going to. They planned it and took care of it well in advance of anyone ever even stepping foot on the plane.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 03:23 AM
1

Yeah, sodomy is some weird shit. Why is that in law at all? If you're talking about sexual assault, why not just say everything sexual without someone's consent is bad? If you're talking about sexually abusing minors, why does anal have a special mention? Why not just say any sexual contact between a minor and an adult is bad? MensRights tries to play stuff like this off as feminist influence in laws. Shit like sodomy has been around forever. It's a relic of how perverse Christian values are in …
/r/MensRights06/10/16 11:28 PM
1

Why did you even bother responding? K, I couldn't stand it, I looked it up. Overview of California Rape Laws. Rape laws criminalize sexual intercourse that happens without the consent of at least one of the participants. ... The defendant used physical force, intimidation, duress, or threats to persuade the victim to engage in sexual intercourse. That's only from the top of the page on the Google search. So much for that gender-biased-narrative everyone you're talking about here is pushing.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 06:19 PM
1

I'll never cease to be amazed at how hard it must be to click on the link for source material. It's right there in the article. Maybe I have some kind of super power I was never aware other people don't have? So if the law says that if a person inserts their penis into a vagina, anus, or mouth then it's not sex specific. Do you expect me to disagree with that? If a law said that, of course it would be gender specific. But... It doesn't say that. Where the hell did you even get that from? This bi…
/r/MensRights06/10/16 04:28 PM
-2

Where did I mention anything about OP's title? See, that's your problem. My comment was made in the context of the top comment and OP's title. Both of which, hilarious enough, literally omitted the section of the law about "being unconscious or incapable," because they were either too gullible to read the sourced material or they're pushing a self-victimizing/fear-mongering narrative. You wanna completely remove that context my comment was made in? Sure, you'd be right. Ya got me. Why are you (d…
/r/MensRights06/10/16 12:28 PM
-10

Uuuhhhh, no. Not in the same sense the above comment means or in the same sense conveyed by OP's title. If the law meant it's illegal to have sex with an intoxicated person like OP's title says, it would say it's illegal to have sex with an intoxicated person. And uuuhhhhh it doesn't. It says it's illegal to have sex with someone unconscious or incapable of giving consent due to intoxication. Nice fear mongering though.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 09:58 AM
12

> This bill would prohibit a court from granting probation or suspending the execution or imposition of a sentence if a person is convicted of rape, sodomy, penetration with a foreign object, or oral copulation if the victim was either unconscious or incapable of giving consent due to intoxication. That's actually what the bill linked in OP's article says. It says "person," not "he" or "men." And people say Feminism pushes a narrative of self-victimizing. Also, "unconscious or incapable of givin…
/r/MensRights06/10/16 09:24 AM
6

Jesus Christ, that was an obstacle course of semantics that left me covered in bruises. Sitting next to someone causes zero objective harm? So does having your seat moved. Maybe she should stay on the ground? Being uncomfortable with the person sitting next to you is a subjective choice? So is being uncomfortable with someone handing you a new boarding pass with a new seat. Why choose to let that bother you?
/r/MensRights06/10/16 03:03 AM
3

Equating having your seat moved with having your freedom infringed upon? That's a little crazy. It's funny OP is ridiculing how feminists would act in a hypothetical situation with a white man when the very comments in his thread are this ridiculous.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 07:52 PM
-14

Those are two separate paragraphs. Are those even said within the same context or by the same person? Looks like fishy journalism to me. He also referred to them as targets, not standards.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 02:55 PM
1

You should tell that to the bunch of replies I'm getting defending your comment. Also, to the rest of the comments in the thread.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 05:36 PM
-9

> I don't remember the original ghostbusters shooting goser in the vagina as some kind of statement. ... What statement? It's a comedy first and foremost. Someone getting hit in the dick has been funny forever. It's not a statement, it's just silly and ridiculous. > I don't remember the original ghostbusters making every female character completely evil/dumb, and every male characters complete marie-sues. Why is it controversial there's a dumb dude, a bad dude, and a few other goofy dudes in the…
/r/MensRights30/09/16 03:40 PM
1

Which lines? The ones from the trailer? I agree there's an argument for Winston not being compatible with how Leslie Jone's character is written, but there's plenty of black male comedians who fit in to Jone's character like a glove.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 03:20 PM
-123

The movie itself had next to nothing to do with feminism or "girl power." You could swap the gender of the cast and not have to change a single thing aside from a handful of jokes like the queefing one. The fact they were women was hardly referenced.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 10:11 AM
2

I don't think laws are written in a blog that links to another blog as a source. You have anything that actually has weight in the real world?
/r/MensRights22/09/16 08:22 PM
8

It isn't.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 03:16 PM
-7

The skittles bowl is way off. In the US at least, 3 skittles out of the entire bowl would kill a fraction of a fraction of people. You're more likely to be killed by a car while crossing the street.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 01:18 PM
1

Your comment is there. I can scroll up and read it. You weren't asking for context. You're a regular. You scroll past dudes being hostile and threatening every day in these comments, and then singled out a girl who doesn't agree with you for exactly those same reasons. This isn't hard. Quote yourself to prove otherwise.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/16 11:22 PM
1

You're talking about how a hostile comment in /r/pussypassdenied is telling? Fucking laaaaaaaawls.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/16 08:03 PM
1

Ohhhhhhhh. Nope, even worse, just a little senile. Why would I be upset? Because you refuse to acknowledge shitty and scary attitudes in your hugbox and because you refuse to even explain what you "really meant" without being incredibly vague?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/16 12:21 PM
1

A dude insisted that kind of attitude she's complaining about doesn't exist, and I showed you examples of it in this very thread. I'm literally handing you straws.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/16 08:59 AM
1

Judging by the fact you can't coherently state what you were discussing in the first place, I doubt that.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/16 08:56 AM
-1

Semantics much? I can't believe we're arguing over what is written down on the internet. How hard can this be? Just go read it. Her: "Yeah, I'm a girl. Aww y'all upset? Why don't you cry some more?" Him: "Yep that's the exact attitude this sub is dedicated to." He denied this sub ever partakes in bitter and hateful attitudes toward women, she talked about the bitter and threatening comments that got thrown at women in their group, and I literally gave you examples of bitter and threatening attit…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/16 10:19 PM
-2

She literally made a comment asking if she should be happy about her friends being threatened You literally responded saying that has nothing to do with the comments here. I literally gave you an example of someone saying threatening things about women. Another example? /u/nonameyetgiven made a comment in this thread asking for a link to the facebook page so he could have a good reason to punch his monitor repeatedly. If you meant something else entirely, you'll have to go back and edit your com…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/16 09:34 PM
0

Yup! Because every instance of a woman being threatened is just a dude being a troll, right? In fact, every comment here degrading or threatening women was me under a different account. The comment about a dude who wants to find the Facebook group so he could give his monitor a good punching? That was me too!
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/16 05:15 PM
-2

I didn't say anything except about the validity of your claim that no one here has anything to do with any threats. You really aren't paying attention.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/16 05:05 PM
-50

Some brown people set off a bomb in public, every Muslim in the world is expected to answer for it. Some dudes threaten women with violence and rape, the dudes here deny it could have ever possibly been one of them. Nevermind that someone literally paid cash to gild a comment down below saying women should be denied 99.99% of their rights. Totally no bitterness or hostility towards women here bro.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/16 02:51 PM
-102

Making a point means you're upset? Every comment in here is making a point. What a retarded thing to say.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/16 02:42 PM
1

Oh! You... You're asking me to not do something? Is this where you tell me your wants don't extend to wimpy boys that ask to reply to you? Guess I better keep lighting up your inbox! Be BOLD! How can I get what I want out of you if I don't take a chance? Even if someone doesn't want you to do something, you gotta be aggressive! If I act meek, you might think I'm a pushover. Or worse, a naging SJW!(gasp!) Commenting is fun, and in no way will you not like it even if you tell me not to do it. Try …
/r/MensRights16/09/16 11:15 PM
1

What are you even talking about? If someone doesn't want you to do something, don't do it to them. How on Earth could you be confused on that? > As opposed to just wrapping yourself in a full body condom, and never speaking to anyone for fear of offending them, as you seem to be advising. I've arranged rape-dates in hotel rooms with FWBs. I don't think I need your arm-chair-PUA advise or your incoherent ramblings about offending people.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 12:28 PM
1

Try 100 times, win 10 = win. Welp! You finally admitted it. You admitted your approach has absolutely nothing to do with the approach, it's just a pure numbers game. If women actually liked a dominant man as you say, how do you explain flunking 90 out of 100 times? Again, nobody said anything about touching in unwanted ways. You're still the only one saying that. Oooohhhh, I'm an idiot! I finally get it now. You only read the thread's title. You never even clicked on OP's link and didn't even re…
/r/MensRights16/09/16 02:44 AM
1

Fact is, you'll strike out with a girl much faster (and fail in general with all people) by being so meek that everyone sees you as a pushover. That's quite the backstep from what you said before. First, you said if you wanna score you gotta be assertive and throw yourself at women. Then you admit most women reject you regardless. Now you've down-graded to saying that you merely strike out less often if you're a *"real man who can go in for a kiss"*(whatever that means). Or worse, a SJW nag TIL …
/r/MensRights16/09/16 01:19 AM
1

The shit is just plain wrong... No matter how you try to spin it ... Wut? Slapping dudes is wrong? No shit it is. Who ever said otherwise? Dude, that "soul-slapping" example is in a subway car. The dude literally can't escape. He is trapped on that subway with some crazy women who are bullying him insistently. He even did do everything possible to de-escalate it by not letting them verbally fire him up and keeping to himself until she finally hit him. And when he had the opportunity to, he got o…
/r/MensRights15/09/16 08:43 PM
1

100% wrong. If a dude only hits you, and then you go out of your way to hit him and you escalate it in to a fight, none of those laws will protect you. If you're being cornered or if a dude is beating you up, than those laws will protect you. Even George Zimmerman was only protected by the Stand Your Ground law because they decided he was actively being beaten up on the sidewalk. If Trayvon and Zimmerman were dating, and Trayvon decided to slap him, and then George Zimmerman just shot him, he'd …
/r/MensRights15/09/16 01:46 PM
0

She's not talking about women hitting women.. Oh, typo. The lady in the video talked about how women shouldn't hit men, that's what I meant to say. I'll correct that. #NotAllWomen ... what are the police to do. Like I said, you have no idea what you're talking about. If you call them with nothing but your word that you were hit, they'll make a report. Of course they won't be charged for anything, but the police will 100% file a report in to their system with what you say happened. And now that t…
/r/MensRights15/09/16 01:36 PM
1

... Wut? You agree with me on how tickling can be bad? This entire thread is full of people asserting that tickling can never ever bad. Even you yourself are insisting that you have to be assertive and tickle a girl even if she doesn't want you to tickle her. If you think no one else in this thread disagrees with my points about tickling, you can't have actually read the rest of the thread.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 12:11 PM
1

You'll have to explain this mental gymnastics for me. More rejection than scores is par for the course, but, you said women want you to be assertive and dominant? You can't say that women want you to be assertive and dominant and then contradict yourself by admitting most women reject you while being assertive and dominant. You say one thing, but the reality you just meekly owned up to says something completely different.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 11:54 AM
-3

Wouldn't you be angry or at the very least insulted if someone believed you were genuinely so morally retarded and reprehensible that you had to be told murder and theft are wrong? I literally just watched OP's video where this lady thinks women are so morally retarded and reprehensible that they need to be told hitting men is wrong. If you think the behavior of feminists is stupid, why is this an entire thread that's perfectly replicating that stupid behavior?
/r/MensRights15/09/16 04:31 AM
-2

The gaslighting that's rampant in a lot of MensRights communities is pretty amusing too. Gals will talk about their experience with a good portion of dudes, and MR people will insist they're imagining it. Than, they turn right around and expect people to believe them when they share their experience with a good portion of gals.
/r/MensRights15/09/16 04:20 AM
-2

The difference is that people telling men not to hit women usually imply that women can still hit men That's literally what I just watched in this video though. A woman is talking about how women can't hit men. So, according to your logic, this lady is implying that it's OK for men to hit men, right? I think you'll find here that nobody wants anyone to get hit. But everyone should be able to defend themselves. No, being slapped or sucker punched does not give you a right to "defend yourself"(ass…
/r/MensRights15/09/16 04:08 AM
1

Welp, for whatever reason you wanna throw out your arm-char-PUA advise, and now we're about to veer off in to a completely new topic. IF you have learned the tiniest bit of social competence, you go in for the kiss. Be BOLD. Girls may tell you this, but they'd still rather fuck someone much more assertive To the few people that may be reading, if you ever hear a guy giving you this kind of advise, he's 100% a full-of-shit-incel. Anyone who's ever actually gone outside to the bar to try out the "…
/r/MensRights15/09/16 03:56 AM
1

... You realize going for a kiss isn't exactly edgy/alpha behavior, right? Being brave enough to what most people usually start doing as young as Middle School age doesn't make you a "real man." Comparing yourself to the bottom-of-the-barrel-beta-fucks to make yourself appear manly isn't a good look either. That's like me comparing myself to a 6th grader to make myself look taller.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 11:16 PM
-16

This is a weird subreddit. Talk about how men shouldn't hit women, people here flip out. But then stuff like this gets posted. It's weird watching a subreddit eagerly embracing every single trait they complain about in other communities. Should I take a que from other top comments in this very sub and flip out because this video shouldn't be focusing on women abusing men, because men and women both abuse men?
/r/MensRights14/09/16 10:46 PM
1

No babies would be born because you can't fuck a girl regardless of whether she wants to or not?
/r/MensRights13/09/16 04:02 PM
1

by bringing up silly examples that nobody would actually do. Those are actual examples of things people have dealt with. Nobody (except you) is talking about anything you are. A room full of men aren't talking about how men can be trashy? What a shocker. Aside from the actual women who have had to deal with those kinds of things, you got me, no one ever has ever mentioned or dealt with these things. Now, make an actually intelligent argument if you want to be taken seriously. How unintelligent o…
/r/MensRights13/09/16 03:50 PM
2

Listing the ways tickling can be potentially abusive and manipulative isn't strawmans, that's literally the topic at hand. Next time you're having a "juvenile argument" with another customer in line at the grocery store, try tickling them. Let me know how that works out for you.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 03:13 AM
1

WELP, now you're just saying something that contradicts what you said before. I'm glad that you agreed with me that tickling can be used manipulatively and abusively. This is going no where now.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 08:55 PM
1

For you and /u/Terminal-Psychosis You think so? Try it out. Every single time you and your SO has a serious discussion or get into an argument, tickle her. It's fun, right? If she says she doesn't want you to tickle her, tickle her anyways. She laughs, right? If she's laughing, she must be happy about the situation. If she didn't like it when you tickled her, she wouldn't be laughing... right? She wants to know why you didn't text her about coming home so late? Tickle her. She wants to talk abou…
/r/MensRights12/09/16 03:25 PM
2

They're being mentally lazy and immature, rather than malicious. This is actually the reality for most abusers. They aren't evil masterminds like Killgrave in Jessica Jones. That's a fairytale. They often are lazy and immature people. People like to credit abusers as diabolical and powerful, but they aren't. There's a reason victims are often younger people with low self-esteem and less experience.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 03:12 PM
6

So you think tickling isn't a manipulative/abusive behavior, you just think people use tickling treat their SO as an inferior person, to get a desired reaction out of them, or to avoid a topic all together? ... So you're saying it's abusive and manipulative.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 02:30 AM
1

... Do you really need a lecture about what it means to kiss someone who doesn't wanna be kissed? This isn't 1992 when you were legally allowed to sexually assault your wife. If you two are fighting or she's trying to have a serious talk, and you respond by forcibly kissing her when she doesn't want you to, that's sexual assault. Have anything else retarded to add?
/r/MensRights11/09/16 10:24 PM
8

If your GF is bitching about every little irrelevant thing, hopefully you're man enough to actually have a simple talk with her about it instead of tickling her to avoid the topic.
/r/MensRights11/09/16 08:30 PM
-6

But tickling? No tickling doesn't lead to men beating the shit out of women. I mean, tickling someone who doesn't want you tickling them isn't exactly harmless either. Obviously it doesn't lead to men beating the shit out of women, but it can be a red flag for abusive and manipulative behaviors. There was a AskWomen thread the other day about which traits an ex had that would instantly disqualify a potential boyfriend if they exhibited the same trait. The top comment was about a tickler. Apparen…
/r/MensRights11/09/16 04:42 PM
-2

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2016/aug/19/men-breadwinners-health-effects-wellbeing https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/sep/05/straight-while-men-suffering-sex-feminism https://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/nov/11/cassie-jaye-red-pill-feminism-mens-rights A simple google search later and here's a few links from The Guardian about men's issues and MRA-POVs. Not quite sure what this "political correctness" you're talking about is.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 12:17 PM
-1

I wonder if you've ever read an article about male issues and then "debated" it by insisting "what about the women?" Hhhehhehe...
/r/MensRights10/09/16 12:07 PM
1

"1 in 6 women and 1 in 33 men are sexually assaulted at one point in their life" How does that ignore the fact that men have these experiences too?
/r/MensRights10/09/16 12:42 AM
1

... She was disgusting because of her actions or because of her looks? Anywho, you know stating facts doesn't take away from how shitty that is, right? I can talk about stats that say 1 in 6 women have dealt with sexual assault, and that shouldn't belittle how you feel about a disgusting woman groping you.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 12:26 AM
1

There are people who didn't vote for him because he was black too.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 10:13 PM
3

The worst case I was close to, I was at a party where a girl took a wasted dude in to the bathroom. I found out about it because it was another girl who nosed her way in and pulled them apart. Apparently a few guys and girls(all his friends) knew what was going on and didn't do anything until this one girl did. But again, it really doesn't happen that much. Girls don't really make those kinds of moves on guys and most guys want (or were taught they should want) that kind of attention. I've asked…
/r/MensRights09/09/16 01:17 PM
2

Spez had people downvote him and reply to hi? Pao's face in Nazi garb was littered all over the top 25 of /r/all in multiple threads from multiple subreddits. Her personal life was picked up pretty publicly too. Calling Spez getting downvotes and replies "huge" when I'm comparing it to Pao's treatment is a gross overstatement.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/16 03:20 PM
0

Spez never hid the fact he is following Pao's policies by the T. What you're saying doesn't explain why Pao was virtually lynched and then Spez has been basically ignored while enforcing the same exact rules and policies.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/16 03:18 PM
0

That's my point though. If they hated her for the direction she took Reddit, where's the outrage over /u/Spez? It should be huge, but no one on Reddit really cares. No one's picking through his personal life, no one is calling him out. The most he gets is snide remarks from certain mods. Maybe Redditor's went berserk on her because she's a girl, maybe Redditor's finally learned their place after measures were taken to remove certain parts of it. ~shrug~
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/16 01:36 PM
6

Was she really that incompetent, or did Reddit just hate the direction she took Reddit? Tbh, I'm not convinced Reddit was only against her goals for Reddit either. /u/Spez is CEO now, and he made a comment shaming Reddit for how they treated Pao and when he become CEO clearly and loudly proclaimed he'd be continuing the same exact policies Pao started.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/09/16 01:29 PM
3

Most dude's brag about girl's verbally and physically hitting on them. More Guy's bragged about it when we were younger, not so much as we get older.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 01:16 PM
3

Yes I have. Besides, OP's image is sourced from a survey that literally asked 8,000 men about their experience with sexual assault. Did you miss that part? https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/172837.pdf
/r/MensRights08/09/16 12:08 PM
1

I'm expecting because /u/FractalGlitch cares so much about accuracy and facts, he'll promptly add a second edit to his comment above after reading what you said. That survey covers non-sexual assault too, and found that men are more frequent victims of physical assault.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 09:57 AM
3

While your study may be more recent(2014), it's the result of 284 guys who were surveyed on their personal experience with sexual assault. The source for OP's image may be much older(1998), but it's the result of 8,000 guys who were surveyed about their personal experiences, which /u/vtschoir found the source for in his comment. It also covers non-sexual assault too, and finds that men are more frequent victims of physical assault then women are. You might argue it's more acceptable now for men …
/r/MensRights08/09/16 09:42 AM
6

It's from a survey where they asked 8,000 men and 8,000 women about their personal experience. Have you ever asked the women in your life about their sexual assault experience? Almost every single girl I've ever talked to about it has had some kind of unwanted experience.
/r/MensRights08/09/16 09:25 AM
2

Really? It was the most mundane of stories, and you thing it belongs there? Ok.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 09:30 PM
19

I'd agree that male tribes are more accepting of dudes than female cliques are of other girls. After spending the night at a bar, pretty much only the guys came back to me and my room mate's apartment to hang out. One dude goes on a rant about one girl who was hanging out with us, and basically called her slutty and promiscuous because she "was approaching every dude there." I was there. What she was doing was actually hanging out with us and being friendly/jovial with the whole group. Apparentl…
/r/MensRights01/09/16 04:37 PM
1

Why do you think men are ridiculed? If you look far enough in the past, that tends to come with the feminist movement. Negative stereotypes about what a real man is, or how men can't be weak or can't cry or can't be victims comes from the feminist movement? Show me. but discrimination against gay men now exists in LGBT environments LGBT environments discriminate against gay men? I think you mixed up the phrase "LGBT environments" with "the Republican Party." we're speaking up about it NOW, and l…
/r/MensRights27/08/16 04:48 PM
-1

Talking about the problems men have DOES NOT mean that all men are the only problem. I think it's bizarre that this sub makes such a huge deal over feminists victimizing themselves but engages in self-criminalization all the time.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 12:54 PM
-2

You took a huge leap here. Feminism is the cause of government defining rape in a way that men can't be victims? That's complete bullshit. It's because men haven't spoken up about it sooner, and they haven't spoken up about it sooner because everyone ridicules men as weak if they present themselves as a victim. What's next, you're gonna tell me discrimination and violence against gay men is a result of feminism too?
/r/MensRights26/08/16 09:01 AM
-2

If you're interested in an alternative to MR, the best alternative I've seen is the MensLib subreddit.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 12:46 AM
4

Ugh, I did. I just got a little too overdramatic. My comment was definitely hyperbolic. EDIT: Didn't to did
/r/MensRights26/08/16 12:23 AM
-26

The government is restricting men's ability to talk about their sexual assault experiences? That's news to me.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 11:31 PM
4

One day there will be MensRights threads and comments that aren't about feminism, and dudes will actually be talking about dude issues instead of this constant who's-the-victimyest-victim-in-the-room-game. I say one day, but there actually are, they just aren't in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 10:49 PM
1

This thread is about how often women are targeted by unwanted sexual advances, not where our user histories overlap. Try to keep your self-victimizing to a minimum please. Again, have you ever even asked a single woman about her personal experience? Considering that /u/SimCity8000 is a self-proclaimed girl, I think that alone guarantees she has +1 more experience in the subject than you do.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 10:27 PM
2

Oh dear, I engaged you on two topics I disagree with you on, and now I'm stalking you? Could you straw man any harder? Have you ever even asked a single woman about her personal experience?
/r/MensRights23/08/16 09:52 PM
2

Every single girl I've been involved with in any capacity has some kind of sexually charged harassment/assault story. If you think the women in your life haven't, they probably have good reasons for not sharing them with you.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 09:33 PM
0

Did you even read the article? It says there's a 6% conviction rate for sexual assault cases. "Better" is a stretch here. Also, in the same vein that 12 men can be better than 1, sometimes 12 men can be exponentially more biased than 1.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 11:11 AM
3

... Wait, you think Juries can never be prejudiced? Hint: They can.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 09:19 PM
1

When did /r/MensRights become a circle jerk/meme-fest?
/r/MensRights11/08/16 05:36 PM
1

You're clearly butt hurt over me saying this... put the important part in all caps. So, for whatever reason, you completely made up what you said, or you confused it with a different study. K You did! You confused it with a different study! Thanks for being man enough to own up to it. What you linked isn't the source OP used. OP sourced his image from a Brandwatch study(which is linked) that is 100% misleading because it does zero filtering. You literally linked an entirely different study that …
/r/MensRights08/08/16 10:30 AM
1

Jesus Christ, did you even read what I said or what you linked? I didn't realize facts were this difficult. You linked an entirely different study than the one OP sourced that finds that women slut shame on Twitter as often as men do. OP linked an image from a Brandwatch study trying to claim women slut shame twice as much as men do on Twitter, but that study did not filter anything. It just included every tweet ever with the two key words in it, which makes it misleading and useless. "Women slu…
/r/MensRights08/08/16 10:21 AM
0

The dude literally shared a stat that was 100% misleading. "On Twitter, women slut shame twice as much as men" VS "On Twitter, women slut shame as often as men" are two entirely different degrees. Sorry you think calling out BS is "muddying the waters." I'm glad you actually used google to check for yourself instead of blindly accepting statistics because you want them to be true. Facts are nice.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 12:49 AM
14

They'll probably just link to your comment.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 12:15 PM
0

You realize some of those links, including some of the ones about violence aimed at men, actually did make the front page?
/r/MensRights07/08/16 09:07 AM
-2

This dataset includes all gender-categorized mentions WITHOUT ANY FILTERS ON AUTHORS, meaning there is inclusion of authors who regularly post NSFW content and mentions from spam accounts that may not have a real person behind the specific tweets I put the important part in all caps. So, for whatever reason, you completely made up what you said, or you confused it with a different study. K
/r/MensRights07/08/16 08:56 AM
-57

The bullshit in your comment is rampant. ... Is that a "Men Who Go Their Own Way" watermark in your linked image? That probably explains why you're linking blatantly misleading statistics. Anti-slut shaming and anti-whore shaming is a HUGE topic on Twitter. Come back when you figure out if those uses of "slut" and "whore" are actually people using it offensively or if those uses are simply people talking against the usage of "slut" and "whore." In order for it to be censorship when /r/Videos del…
/r/MensRights06/08/16 05:33 PM
91

My favorite idea someone posted in response to the mod comment was "Fuck you." Followed closely by "Yeah, fuck you."
/r/MensRights06/08/16 01:53 PM
1

... Did it ever even have 20% neutral voices? I remember over a year ago when users loved making text posts about how they got banned from /r/Feminism. This subreddit has always been pretty trashy. If anything, I'd say it's gotten a lot better.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 11:13 PM
9

Maybe you're new here. For whatever reason, anything and everything that has feminism attached to it is a /r/MensRights issue.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 03:27 PM
1

You realize the judge considered both of their stories in the ruling, right? He didn't just pick a side to believe in. Anyone who thinks that clearly didn't read the court transcripts, which I finally finished tonight. They had the entire text message history. He and her both had their own versions of how everything went. Their stories were examined and cross examined.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 05:53 AM
0

I didn't bother addressing it in my first comment, guess I will now. ... What text? "The court heard..." He didn't actually bring a text and show it to court, this article says he told the court how she sent him that text.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 04:30 PM
6

"She didn't fight me off, so she must have wanted it." You really think calling that creepy is SRS-tier craziness?
/r/MensRights27/07/16 04:12 PM
-1

even if a woman offers no resistance it can be considered rape? You couldn't have worded that any creepier. It's really a fairly common thing for a victim to offer as little resistance as possible so they get hurt as little as possible and so it finishes as little as possible.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 02:23 PM
-21

If he actually made that point, sure, I would agree I missed it. But he didn't.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 02:11 PM
-1

Jesus, you're a little nuts. The actual example used by the judge is if you climb on top of a dude and ride the shit out of him, then you decide you don't want to have sex anymore, and then he forces you to keep having sex, that's rape.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 01:50 PM
-31

It's mind-boggling that you think because a woman asks a guy to have sex later in the day, she can't ever change her mind or be raped by that guy.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 01:40 PM
0

Seriously? Vera claims she was introduced to the victim's parents as "his girlfriend..." She also told investigators the boy’s family accepted the relationship... The pregnancy could also potentially be 100% made up as a way for her to cover up her predatory behavior. Like /u/surpriseprofessional said in the top comment chain, "ok, I know this is a hard concept to grasp, but take everything a suspected rapist says happened with a dash mine's worth of salt." Also, that was exactly what /u/Reveren…
/r/MensRights02/06/16 01:56 AM
1

No. It's statutory rape because the law doesn't recognize a minor's ability to consent. It's not that minor's can't consent, it's that the law legally takes away their ability to consent until they reach adulthood. The word "rape" is entirely different, and willy-nilly conflating the terms "statutory rape" and "rape" together is actually incredibly ignorant and demeaning to "victims"(quoated because it depends on the context) of statutory rape and victims of rape.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 01:15 AM
0

Who said it was acceptable?
/r/MensRights02/06/16 12:03 AM
-1

I've had this argument with a raving mad feminist, and now I guess I'm about to have it with a raving mad menimist. "Rape" and "Statutory Rape" are two completely different terms in every sense. They didn't say rape, but they did call it sexual abuse, and they did refer to the boy as the victim. They even quoted the school who said this behavior was a violation of the safety and security of students.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 11:33 PM
-1

Complete and utter bullshit. The media quoted her to say she said she was romantic with the boy. It's NOT the words of the media.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 08:39 PM
1

Technically you can file a police report no matter what. Are you really this detached from reality? Do you really think that's a realistic option for a cashier, and a realistic option for more "mundane" forms of creepness like people asking you for your number? Let me know how repeatedly calling the police while you're at the register works for you. Let me know how calling the police over a person who asked you for your number works out for you too. I have stories, as a man, from both men and wo…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 03:59 PM
1

She isn't staying at home, she's going out with self-defense. What the fuck, do you really expect me to argue for a woman staying home and hiding from the world? Where did you even get that notion from? I didn't say anything about how women should handle dealing with harassment, I was just saying that it happens. I also have stories of being harassed as a male by both male and female colleagues. Well, what do you need MR for then? Maybe instead of staying at home and hiding in this subreddit, yo…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 03:37 PM
1

even filing a complaint (whether or not its true, or a misunderstanding) can get people fired. You can't claim to know that magnitude that kind of thing happens. Also, you're only considering worker-worker harassment. Can't file a complaint with the company against a customer. So much so that many companies have zero tolerance policies Some companies have zero tolerance policies. And even in companies that do, it's still a problem. Try asking your girlfriend or any lady friends you have about th…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 10:23 PM
1

Just out of curiosity, where do you think women are in a disadvantageous position compared to their male counterparts? Sexual harassment on the streets and in the work place.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 09:04 PM
1

That's not a widespread problem. It's absolutely A problem men face, and lots of other similar problems, but it's far from widespread. Of course it's something you should care about.
/r/MensRights19/05/16 08:48 PM
-1

Since women are no longer disadvantaged compared to their male counterparts, feminism has no place other than to further increase the disparity of rights into women's favor. So that's it? Because you think women collectively have it better then men, they don't have a right to bring awareness to the areas where they don't have it better then men? That's... Stupid. The main difference between feminism and the MRM, is that the MRM has always been about true egalitarian equality. I've never once see…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 01:46 AM
-4

TIL that if I'm a guy who doesn't think the feminist movement is building a glass cage around me, I just haven't been paying attention. Yup, no possible way I could ever have a legit disagreement or different POV, I'm simply ignorant to the fact that men everywhere suffer and face the same exact challenges as every other man. Ya got me.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 10:42 PM
-12

There's a laundry list of shit that feminists have done to impede our progress and make life worse for men. Duluth Model... Why would you care about the Duluth Model? Do you really think the Duluth Model, who's purpose is to protect women from domestic abuse, comes at the expense of male victims? If you really care so much about Men's Rights, where's your Duluth Model? What are your PSAs and models for protecting male victims? teach men not to rape Teaching men not to rape is impeding our progre…
/r/MensRights18/05/16 10:30 PM
-3

Addressing that problem would literally undermine the raison d'etre for feminism K, so in your words, what is the most important reason for Feminism's existence?
/r/MensRights18/05/16 10:13 PM
-18

On that same note, being for Men's Rights and being anti-feminist are two very different things too. It's a shame this sub has never been for the former.
/r/MensRights18/05/16 03:30 PM
1

Uh, wut? I said statutory rape, who said anything about about pedophelia?
/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:38 PM
1

As someone who can google, you're scenario isn't even statutory rape. Learn to google once in a while. Almost every state includes a clause stating that people only 2 or 3 years apart(depending on the state) is perfectly fine.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:32 AM
4

How is that any worse then the MR subreddit rallying behind statutory rapists? Literally 1/3 of the 15 most upvoted MR threads of all time are about dudes who got convicted for sleeping with underage women.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 08:05 AM
0

So, is this where we all make condescending comments about how MensRights should be punished lying and inciting others? Can't believe this thread made it to the top 50 on the front page. What a joke. At least the title got ''girl'' and ''man'' right.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:33 AM
-1

Has to be a troll. Just add him to your ignore list and move on.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:23 AM
-1

I am also sure that the vast majority of those comments are never acted upon. This is a REALLY weird thing to say. Almost every aspect of modern civilization disagrees with this, /r/MensRights sidebar-rules included. A physical threat in person to a person's face is often never followed through, but is still illegal almost everywhere in the US. Making that same threat through the internet is illegal in almost half the states in the US. Doing it in the comments here will have it removed and poten…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 12:56 AM
-4

REALLY? The woman who considered suicide in response to having revenge porn of her shared to the world is a professional victim? You have a very interesting point of view.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 06:49 PM
-2

The daily show is a comedy show - still, people rely on it for political information[1] . People trust the daily show as a news source more than actual news sources[2] Absolutely right actually. I am totally downplaying it, and I should quit that. People DO get information from these political Comedy Central shows. if you later found out that it was all entirely invented and completely untrue Let's steer the conversation towards what this thread is about. What was completely invented or untrue i…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 06:48 PM
-2

The nature of Sarkessian's threats is relevant because Oliver argued that they represented sexism against women. Can I just link the same exact study you linked? A recent PewResearch study. Women, especially younger women, get more severe levels of harassment then men do. And on particular locations of the internet, such a social media, women are harassed A LOT more then men are. Sexism against women happens. It's not a controversial statement. However, in many instances the threats and harassme…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 06:36 PM
0

You and Anita would make GREAT friends. It's stupid of Anita to assume every single criticism of her ideas is misogynistic. It's stupid of you to assume Anita has never had to deal with physical threats or stalkers. Now, kiss...
/r/MensRights23/06/15 06:06 PM
-1

Right! And Rick Rolling/potty mouth humor is the fresh, hot new Democratic debate-tactic soon to be unleashed upon the Presidential Race in 2016.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 05:51 PM
-7

Women and men DO actually get treated differently. Another commenter in this thread linked a PewResearch study. It shows a lot of interesting results related to online harassment. Where you are on the Internet, your age, and, gasp, gender, actually influences how people are treated. As well as other results. That said, let's match tones. I NEVER SAID ANITA WAS HARASSED BECAUSE SHE IS A WOMAN!!1! ARE YOU SURE YOURE RESPONDING TO THE RIGHT COMMENT11? OR ARE YOU ARGUING AGAINST AN IMAGINARY ARGUMEN…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 05:41 PM
-1

There is literally no hypocrisy. President Correa is a bully who uses a live, public forum to encourage his supporters to harass people who criticize him. You realize John Oliver is a comedian, and the speech at the end is satire right? It's funny because President Correa is as immature as the people he publicly denounced as being immature.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 05:27 PM
-3

Oh look, I see you responded, but I set you to ignored so your comment is blank. It's as if I had you blocked this entire time.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 04:02 PM
-4

You are not so special that you are granted dispensation to declare the nature of reality. And yet you had said... That someone "actually fears for their lives" says far more about the "victim" than it does about the nature of the threat... I'm just pointing out that people like you are awfully enthusiastic to disregard the "credible" qualifier of "credible threat." Is there a point to "debating" with you when you tear down your own arguments? You're clearly not interested in any kind of rationa…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 03:45 PM
-3

I'm just pointing out that people like you are awfully enthusiastic to disregard the "credible" qualifier of "credible threat." It's not up for debate. It has nothing to do with how much of an idiot she is or 'how much she asks for it.' It doesn't matter she blindly points at EVERY criticism she receives and accuses them of being misogynistic. It doesn't matter that we BOTH disagree with her. She DOES receive very credible threats against her. She HAS stalkers who know where she lives. People do…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 03:32 PM
-6

Whoa, whoa, whoa. ENTIRELY different subject. It's great you're passionate about that, but your comment is way off topic. Another thread tried to paint John Oliver as encouraging harassment against males by taking him entirely out of context. That's what this is about. President Correa is a bully who was advocating the harassment of people who criticize him, and John Oliver rightfully showed Correa how hypocritical he was being. EDIT: Also, the study you linked says a lot of DIFFERENT things. It…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 03:26 PM
-2

People talking shit on the internet is an old, old game. We're not just talking about Sarkeesian here. This is so far removed from reality. How could you possibly compare death matching to people who actually fear for their lives and/or consider suicide after being stalked, harassed, and threatened? Are you even a member of this community? If you think you are, you should check again. /r/MensRights ITSELF has rules against doxxing, anything threatening action, AND rules against advocating for vi…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 03:23 PM
-10

I hate Sarkessian and her own personal agenda too... But have a little empathy. She actually DOES receive LOTS of harassment and threats of violence. She deservedly fears for her life. Just because she's an idiot doesn't mean suddenly has to be accepting of threats of violence and rape.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 02:36 PM
-9

Not as troubled as someone who thinks a guy wears Vibrams to get noticed. Seriously? Have you seen Vibrams? They're ugly as fuck. Not a single person on the face of the Earth wears them to impress women. How dense do you have to be?
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 09:45 PM
0

Sure, I don't have MUCH trouble, but I'm not terribly successful or anything. Keeping in mind, of course, that sexual success is entirely subjective. I guess ilimitable has some good advise? But there is a lot of things that different kinds of women desire that I have zero interest in doing and actively avoid. And there are women who SAY or signal that they are interested in the kinds of things I am, but they display red flags that I look for so I actively avoid them too. When I read ilimatable'…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 09:38 PM
-11

Personal style does not equal Good style. What are you getting at? That my Vibrams are ugly? Well, duh.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 08:56 PM
0

Oh, you're making a point about what traits females find most attractive? Sure, that's definitely a factor. What you described would have a lot more success then most other guys. Hell, there's a high-end male escort service called Cowboys for Angels, and they specifically only employ males who are AT LEAST 6 feet 4 inches. And the owner has never once received a complaint that they don't have enough shorter men available, and clients have never called back to complain someone was too tall. Me, I…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 08:13 PM
-9

There's nothing wrong with a fetish. Lots of people have fetishes, and there are lots of fetishes people want nothing to do with. It's perfectly fine. Again, you're arguing against a point I never made. I always encourage and support people trying things they're interested in. I never shamed anyone's desire to sleep with lots of women, and you'd never catch me shaming someone for having a fetish that I don't have...Which this sub does all the time. Such as in OP bashing LTR-oriented males.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 07:59 PM
-1

INTERESTING. You grew as an individual, explored yourself personally and sexually, and arrived to a life-style you particularly enjoy a lot. Then joined TRP. Where you encourage others NOT to explore themselves personally and sexually, and encourage them to NOT live beta/LTR-lifestyles, and should instead pursue as many simultaneous sexual encounters as possible because you said they should.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 06:43 PM
-11

Oh for sure, I mean I have my own very well-developed filter, but I've definitely read select things in TRP and nodded my head along while reading going Right on!
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 06:42 PM
-8

You linked a study through CARM. Christan Apologetics & Research Ministry, a biased organization that has every incentive to display homosexuality in as bad a light as possible. You're arguing against points I didn't make. I didn't say most men aren't non-monogamous. You don't know what fetish means, because it has nothing to do with majority VS minority. The fact you used biological imperative and then used studies referencing homosexuals in the same argument means you have no idea what you're …
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 06:32 PM
-6

If you do not want to sleep with multiple partners, but you were raised and surrounded by guys telling you "sleeping with as many women as possible is what every man should do," and you do exactly that, that's a type of self-abuse. Everyone handles it differently, some people handle it worst then others, most people will probably be perfectly fine for the most part. Fact is you're grooming men/young boys into what you want them to be, and displaying others that don't follow your "advise" in a ne…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 06:04 PM
-9

This is probably the very first comment I have ever seen regarding safe-sex-practices in my months and months and months of being a sub here. Hundreds of sexual advise/strategy guides, zero about protection. But I don't read every single thing, so my point is probably biased due to me not having read 100% of everything that goes through this sub. Also. Self-abuse: 1) reproach or blame of oneself. 2) abuse of one's health. 3) masturbation. Self-harm: 1) the practice of cutting or otherwise woundi…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 05:51 PM
0

You can sleep with a ton of people and never have children. It's all about how safe you are. I'm sure NPIF is totally safe and supports others being safe.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 05:34 PM
-20

Lol, the THREE women you're sleeping with are entirely representative of the female population? OK buddy. You got me there. And CLEARLY not a single woman rejects you, because you're sleeping with three women at the same time, which is clearly 80% of all sexually available women. Wow m8, my beta boner is raging. /s As for the rest of what you said, I have no idea what you're responding to. I didn't say you were lying about seeing multiple partners I didn't say you were lying to the women you're …
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 04:48 PM
-11

I wouldn't say either of those different options are bad things though. As long as he's fully self-aware and doing it because it's what he enjoys. There's obvious appeal in both of those things, being a man-slut is fucking awesome for some people. And some women love that shit. And there's nothing automatically wrong with either of those things. But, there are definitely guys who shoe-horn themselves into that life style for toxic reasons. They were told quantity for quantity's sake makes a man …
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 04:21 PM
-16

Lol, if you're opening sentences didn't include "This behavior is bad(Beta), this behavior is good(Alpha)," I'd believe your copy-paste response pretending you actually believe "to each their own." Have you slept with more then one person? You DID say there are women who reject you because they aren't into sleeping with more then one partner, right? GEE, I wonder why that is? You're not learning the mental gymnastics of women. You're learning the mental gymnastics of a hyper-specific kind of wom…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 04:11 PM
-7

Word of advise for everyone: if someone suggests playing into someone's desires, don't listen to a word they say. They're idiots. Advise like this just leads to adolescent guys trying to convince a girl how madly in love they are just to sleep with them for one night. If you're scared to tell a woman you have the worst-of-intentions with her because she might reject you, you're just a chicken-shit-rapey-fuck. Besides, why bother putting all that work into tricking a woman to sleep with you who r…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/15 06:19 PM
3

As an adult, I have zero expectations and feelings towards the women who went to my high school. Seriously, who the fuck cares? It was high school. And if you ARE in school, just wait a few years after you graduate. You won't care either.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 09:22 PM
-2

It's not about what people look like at 50. you have to put forth an effort for people to want you. The fact you don't think being physically fit doesn't make you a sexually desirable person leads me to think you have no idea what you're talking about. I'm not saying it's the only factor, but it is one.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 06:33 PM
-1

Maybe you're a fit stud, and that's good for you. Pretty sure this lady isn't talking about you though. Maybe you haven't seen most 50 year olds, but most women AND men at 50 are slobs or at least aren't putting in the effort to stay in shape. When 50-year-old-slobs are passing up their peers to drool in the direction of 20 somethings they'll never have a chance with there's something perverse going on. I guess I'll add this, obviously I'm not talking about people who are fooling around and peop…
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 04:17 PM
6

You probably shouldn't be telling others how to structure their lives and relationships. But, if that's how you live your life, good for you. If two people get married, it's entirely their business how they structure it. If both of you are into the man working and the woman not working, wonderful. But fuck you if you think everyone should live to your standards. You MUST be a privledged/sheltered snob if you can't comprehend the fact that most couples can't afford to have a partner out of work. …
/r/MensRights23/02/15 03:53 PM
-4

I've never had a problem being just friends with women. That's probably because I don't let centuries-old-social-delusions live my life for me.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 02:39 AM
1

Have you had the birds and bees talk yet? You realize a man and a woman being alone in a room does not equal sex/infidelity? It's a bit more involved.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 02:29 AM
-6

What are you even talking about? What does polygamy/open relationships/monogamy have anything to do with this? You realize if they WERE polygamous, and the MIL did all the very same exact actions she did, she would still be a massive bitch right? Also, maybe your parents haven't had the talk yet, but a man and a woman sharing the same room alone does not equal sex. It's a bit more complicated then that.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 10:57 PM
-11

You're making that up. I saw multiple comments near the top suggesting she should have called 911 and get an ambulance to him ASAP to cover all her bases. The guy would have gotten help if he was hurt, or they would have found roofies in his system if he did roofie himself. Also, he pretty clearly wasn't having a stroke. Not even close. Are you sure you know what a stroke is? EDIT: Ohhh, I was on mobile. Responded to the wrong comment. Meant to respond to the comment below yours. But if you upvo…
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 07:22 PM
0

Yeah, I never actually once complained about or disputed the facts stated on the poster. Not sure where your last two comments are going with that. If you're trying to convince me people aren't victimizing themselves or assuming imaginary conflicts, you're kinda doing the opposite.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 03:53 PM
0

"Domestic violence is about everyone!" Explicitly put it next to another poster as a challenge, is expecting a reaction from women, going to record the reaction of a female who has to approve them. What a juvenile joke.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 12:00 AM
-1

1/4 of Female are sexually assaulted Does not equal males don't get sexually assaulted. Unless you make a profession out of being offended. If I say I had the worst day That does NOT in fact mean My day was literally the worst day, everyone else is over-reacting about how bad their day was because mine was literally worse. Unless, again, being offended is a personal profession of yours. This is a fun semantics game though, why don't you throw some more word-games my way.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 11:49 PM
0

It's sad this has to be mentioned in relation to Men's Rights. I think it's as dumb and self-serving to use Feminism as your go-to-punching-bag as it is for feminists to blame patriarchy.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 10:36 PM
-1

Your entire second paragraph is conjecture. Who is them? What people tearing down his poster? I don't have to give people a pass, OP is encouraging negative reactions from extremist/immature people, then is acting baffled when the exact people have the exact reaction he knew they would from a specific stimulus. There was zero effort here in actually encouraging a positive/curious response. He is a 6 year old who is poking his sister, his sister tells him not to touch her, so he just starts almos…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:37 PM
0

But it isn't assumed. He IS acting exactly like that. The entire point of his submission here is more about the drama caused by putting up a Men's Rights poster and less to do with actual Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 03:34 PM
-2

Huh? I've never had a problem having an exchange in that subreddit. Not sure what you're problem with it is. As long as you aren't going in there to troll, derail, or dismiss the female perspective you should be fine.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 02:55 PM
-5

You're not getting it. I'm saying women can act logically, exactly how the "female approvet" acted according to OP, who was eager for her to have a negative reaction. You think I'm protecting them? Uhh, what exactly am I protecting then against? OP's thoughts? OP isn't doing anything to anyone, not sure what you think I'm "protecting women against." You realize YOU are white-knighting OP's victim complex? He put up a poster and is expecting to be attacked for it. Literally the same exact qualiti…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 02:45 PM
-10

cares more about how other poster "conveniently ignores" men's issues surprised woman wasn't offended by men's rights poster Don't you think it's funny how the real world played out different then the fictional world in your head?
/r/MensRights10/02/15 09:55 PM
-8

Some are worse than others though.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 08:26 PM
-9

...Because I'm on Reddit? Not sure what kind of answer you're expecting.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 08:00 PM
-17

That's exactly my problem with /r/MensRights, bias is the key ingredient here.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 07:09 PM
-23

If this wasn't /r/MensRights, I'd believe everything you're saying.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:18 PM
-19

I should take some spelling lessons from OP, he could spell "eager for a female reaction" really well.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 06:08 PM
-30

"Domestic violence is about everyone!" Explicitly put it next to another poster as a challenge, is expecting a reaction from women, going to record the reaction of a female who has to approve them. What a juvenile joke.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 05:38 PM
-4

Asking for logic from /r/MensRights subscribers is a tall glass. I tried it before, but the people here don't really care how much they embarrass/lie to themselves.
/r/MensRights10/02/15 04:19 PM
1

I read your update. More details is good. It's a bummer she wasn't comfortable talking to you afterwards. For me, being able to debrief after a first-time sexual encounter is a great tool, and often makes us both more comfortable and more open with each other. And you learn about how people perceive you! a) she felt like I only wanted her for sex and thought I was a player and assumed I would end up just using her Did you only want her for sex? That's totally fine if you did, but were you up fro…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/15 12:04 AM
-3

I've never had an online-dating encounter that didn't go so well and instantly blamed the other person. My first thought is always, "what could I have done differently?" OP, I would assume you have terrible filtering skills. You shouldn't be trying to have casual encounters with every person who messages you back from Match.com. If you're trying that, you're gonna run into this situation again and again. She was obviously OK with kissing, but why did you try to fuck her a second time after she s…
/r/TheRedPill06/02/15 01:58 PM
0

Suggesting the Reddit will sink itself is hilarious. /r/TheRedPill is a niche community, most people will never notice it's gone.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/15 05:56 PM
1

Makes fun at projecting argument Is constantly making claims about feminist-projections sure m8. They didn't insinuate a thing. Does not equal They didn't say a thing. You're arguing there's an emphasis on women being abused by their partners, I'm arguing they aren't making that emphasis at all but are in fact leaving it very open-ended. If that makes sense to you, welcome back to the conversation.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 08:45 PM
1

I never said it isn't her partner. You're still doing it, projecting your own agenda/ignorances/prejudices into everything you see. I think your problem doesn't have anything to do with feminism.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 07:33 PM
-23

You have to be a disgustingly niche and incestual forum for opinions like this to get upvoted.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 06:06 PM
0

They didn't even insinuate it was her partner/husband/boyfriend. What does it matter what most relationships are? You're on your own planet.
/r/MensRights03/02/15 12:26 AM
-2

YOU GOT 'EM! Pretty sure he's not coming back after that retort.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 06:38 PM
0

Wow. I just saw that commercial. They don't even mention a guy, the "offender's" gender is never even referred to. You're crazy. Have fun with that.
/r/MensRights01/02/15 11:40 PM
1

Is this submission a joke? I hope you never have to call 911 while under some kind duress. It's a terrifying feeling.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 06:22 PM
-3

Uhh...Every feminist and male I share this same information with has been entirely accepting of it. None of them has called it misogyny.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 04:27 AM
1

Why do people get so rustled in social-justice subreddits? I don't get it. It's like people don't know how to empathize, talk or compromise with each other. Everyone is so eager to take each other out of context.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 08:56 PM
1

Hhhehhehe
/r/MensRights23/08/14 08:31 PM
1

Yes, I am a white knight. So? I don't see any problem. I embraced my inner-SJW soul long ago and I am happy together with my girlfriend(who is a cute feminist!). We have a lot of fucking friends in and outside of the movement and I am very empathetic and considerate of what women go through. But thanks anyway asshole. Go and stay subscribed to your stupid /s/MensRights shit while I have SEX with my girlfriend.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 06:19 PM
1

I want to keep trolling you because you're just baiting, but I can't. Dude, for your own mental wellbeing, unsubscribe from /r/MensRights, /r/Feminism, and everything social-justice-related. If not right now, consider it later. Unsubscribe from all of them, take a break, and go back at it in a few weeks. That's all I got.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:59 PM
1

Huh, funny. Your account is three days older then my comment.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:42 PM
1

My job isn't to argue with you. So tell me, do you have anything to contribute, beyond characterizing normal masculinity as "sexually-dominant-sadistic-exhibitionist-rich-Alpha-male-anti-feminist"? Any new insights? Any interesting ideas? Anything besides your own personal moral outrage? So you aren't here to argue with me, but you're arguing with me...I really mean it when I say this is a fetish/role-play community. Here you are, pretending to role-play as a moderator interested in non-hostile …
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 11:56 PM
1

Hold on, I think I see a typo. Lemme fix that for you. Welcome to the 21st century bud. Thanks to keyboard warriors like you, people don't have to bother learning the English language and use the appropriate words for what they're trying to convey. We just kinda' say what we think sounds cool and edgy within our vocabulary, and hope the people across the screen reading can read our minds. The dictionary no longer has a monopoly over the English language. Stupid is as stupid does.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 11:26 PM
1

You're right, it's absurd to compare those faggots to TRP. Hey, hey... I don't look down on homosexuals. Maybe one day, Social Justice Faggots like yourself will understand. Right. How silly of me to call you a homophobe. Where could I have possibly gotten that idea from. How stupid of me to read the words you typed and submitted Maybe in the future, at least pretend other people are reading your comments. The only force I am changing is myself, everyone else can act however the fuck they want t…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 04:20 AM
0

Why is it every argument used in favor of TRP a perfect argument against TRP? How blind do you have to be to not realize TRP is just Feminism 2.0? "Hey, you forgot we hate men. Everyone knows Feminists are just misandrists, right? And gold-diggers? And terrorists? And abortion-forcing SJWs? And we are tearing down the patriarchy?" You're balking at me generalizing TRPers when TRP is a community that thrives off of doing exactly that. What a joke. How do you justify looking across the fence at th…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 04:01 AM
0

What a waste of a comment. Could you be any more indirect in responding to an argument? There's a lot of trolls here who argue around the topic. Oh, you don't like my post history? What a cop-out to use that as an argument against anything. Do you think it emasculates you to address someone and their arguments directly? Why go off on a tangent about my post history? We can play the post-history game, if you really want to. When you wanted men to see you as another scientist and take you seriousl…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 03:44 AM
0

Very argument. Much edgy. So rebuttals. And, uh, no, I wouldn't go much further past calling TRPers fetishist/role-players/feminism-incarnate.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 09:37 PM
1

Anyone else notice an increase of butthurt trolls ever since TRP surpassed SRS in subscribers? You're delusional if you really think that TRP members aren't growing. Every subscriber is a show of support. How petty do you have to be to get a boner out of comparing SRS subscribers to TRP subscribers? How delusional do you have to be to think every subscriber is a show of support for TRP? You realize you have to be subscribed to TRP just to comment, right? If you aren't subscribed, you can't comme…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 05:21 PM
-3

...your protest has been addressed in this subreddit numerous times already... Then it should be easy for you to respond since my argument is such a stock-exchange. Apparently not... Spare us your sarcasm and false indignation. Sorry you have to veil an argument against TRP as sarcasm. And also...TRP is an idea that THRIVES off of self-fullfilling-indignation and Nirvana Policy's. I've seen all the arguments against my points throughout the subreddit. And hilariously. every single argument I've …
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 02:41 PM
-3

I like how your comparing TRP to SRS. You have to have some abysmal standards to even bother addressing SRS in any serious conversation. SRS is a troll community. The only way they ever become relevant is because silly people recognize them and give them justification.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 02:07 PM
-3

You haven't been reading very closely. That's okay. Lurk some more. Typical, disregarding comment. Great way to mask avoiding an exchange. Just to expand a little bit on how TheRedPill behaves exactly as it parades against, I'm gonna quote another comment from this thread and replace all the instances referring to "Women's Studies" with red pill references. "It's funny because it's true. I once subscribed to TheRedPill because they called themselves Men's Rights. I thought it wouldn't be that ba…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 04:55 AM
0

I'd like to imagine people having access to a platform to share their perspective from benefits everyone. Well, everyone who's willing to listen that is.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 03:38 AM
0

One day you'll expand your vocabulary beyond stock-phrases and have an interactive conversation that actually has a productive end goal, as opposed to just ticking in self-satisfying circles.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 03:32 AM
1

Maybe? You don't know if guys actually DO find bigger breasts attractive though. Maybe they do? Maybe they do only because big breasts are typically glorified by media and peers? Maybe it's not genetic? Maybe it is? And either way...You still wrote an entire piece basically saying "Women need to have big breasts for a man to be attracted to them, but guys are also attracted to other breast sizes too." Can you see how weirdly you're limiting yourself to make a predetermined-point, and then admitt…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 02:43 AM
-1

Annnnnd comments like yours is why generalizations are the ultimate cancerous-death-incarnate. It's the perfect stupid-defense. Ever hear the moniker, "The best defense in an election is to accuse your opposition of exactly what you do"? It's the ultimate tool for non-productivity. You have a community who gets off on generalizing others into a hyper-specific boogey-man. As soon as you point out that behavior, they accuse you of doing exactly what they do. It's a circular argument that literally…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 01:47 AM
-2

Nothing you said is true. TRP is a fetish/role-play community.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 01:30 AM
-2

"That doesn’t mean TRP is wrong, it just means that there are a lot of other factors to consider when discussing relationships." ...Doesn't that make your 300 word essay pointless? It's like you wrote 300 words about how colors relate to each other strictly in terms of how dark and light they are. You attempt to extrapolate actionable steps and goals from that information. Than in your last sentence you OPENLY admitted to intentionally restricting yourself by reducing all the colors to grayscale…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 01:27 AM
-3

Anything that paints the world and the people in it as simple shades of right and wrong isn't breaking through the bullshit, it's contributing just as much bullshit. If you aren't addressing how complex/mixed up/diverse groups, people, attractions and ideas are you're just wasting your breath. Or flooding the discussion with cancer. Probably the latter, in this case.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 12:55 AM
-11

...Says the Alpha Male who subscribes to a corner of the internet with his Alpha-cult, where they create boogeymen they can feign as superior to. Evening ceremonies at the Alpha-cult consists of members patting each other on the back to reaffirm each other of their Alphaness. Ya know, because when you're Alpha the first thing you need is people upvoting your field reports where you plate spin your made-up language. /r/TheRedPill is the equivalent of Women's Studies. It's bizarre to watch a commu…
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 12:14 AM
1

"Abuse" and "Neglect" isn't my words... By even the most conservative definition she is willfully enduring emotional and physical (spanking, hair pulling, being pushed into walls) abuse. That's OP's words. And it doesn't matter who's words they are, there's nothing wrong with wanting to be abused and abusing someone who wants it. That's fantastic! If someone wants to be treated like that, please do. Feminism, and grown adults in general are 100% all for adults treating each other whatever way th…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 09:46 PM
-2

YA know, if this was /r/Sex, this'd be great! You have a woman who's into being made fun of, abused and neglected. You have a man who's into making fun of, abusing and neglecting his woman, AND he loves gloating about it. /r/Sex is super open with people bragging about their sexual feats. Submissions like this would be accepted with open arms. No sarcasm intended, it's great! It's how the adult world was meant to function. Two grown adults consentually and mutually benefiting from each other. Bu…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 09:28 PM
-1

Talk about calling the kettle black. You're having your own private little argument. It's kinda cute to watch.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 10:45 PM
1

If you look for the devil, you'll find him where you want him most.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 09:45 PM
0

If you're going to argue that Feminism is a wide/broad umbrella that encompasses various groups of Feminists who all believe in and pursue different ideals, get ready to be downvoted. Diving into specific and complex conversations is frowned upon by a lot here. Trying to have a productive conversation outside of the Anti-Feminist doctrine here will get you labeled a concern troll or a nitpicker. Also a favorite of mine, you'll often get told not to generalize MRers because they aren't all the sa…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 12:32 PM
1

It's great that you think both parents should have equal opportunities to have custody. That's exactly what I said. Thanks for providing a link about it. But there's NOTHING saying a child is best served by splitting him up equally between two separated parents. Saying a child needs to have equal access to a father and mother figure has been a tactic of certain(usually religious) homophobic people campaigning against gay parents and gay marriage. Of course Fathers for Justice isn't homophobc(I t…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 10:18 AM
-7

So you're telling me it's unfair to presume a mother is better suited to raise a child, BUT it's fair to presume both parents are equally capable? Sorry, sounds like a case where you're using the same exact logic as what you're fighting against. I don't like Father's for Justice, I don't like the legal presumption of a 50/50 custody. There's got to be a better way to do it. And a 50/50 split isn't ALWAYS the best thing for the child, even in cases where each parent are equally capable. Sometimes…
/r/MensRights15/06/14 10:12 PM
-8

So feminists wanting to make sure that children end up primarily in custody of the mother by painting all men who fight for their children as evil, is somehow related to caring about the children? Feminists wanting to make sure it's the men paying the women is by default is somehow in the best case of women? Feminists, who literally compare the MRM and father's rights movement to Hitler, are somehow the only group who is reasonable? Did you respond to the wrong comment? I said none of those thin…
/r/MensRights15/06/14 09:47 PM
-5

Interesting. I remember reading about another group fighting for something similar. It was a Canadian group I think, fighting to change custody laws and make them more "equal." There was a Canadian feminist group that opposed it, as when is first heard the story posted here that was the end of it. Feminists opposing laws that would encourage more 50/50 split custody. Then I read into it myself, because I never trust anyone. Turns out the group fighting to change custody, what they were proposing…
/r/MensRights15/06/14 05:40 PM
15

There's a difference between being emotionally vulnerable and overly sensatitive.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:12 PM
0

There's that word again, "generalize." Again, where were you hiding when the original comment rolled around? Oh, that's right, we talked about this already. Generalized and emotion-laden rhetoric is ok as long as it's aimed at women. My mistake.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 12:49 AM
-2

You want to dictate what is and isn't appropriate. ...That's EXACTLY what you're doing! What a fucking joke. Since when was "Men's Rights" a club exclusively for the cool kids? Gosh, why do I even bother with this trashy excuse for "Men's Rights." Few here actually care about Men's Rights, except by proxy when it coincidentally crosses the Anti-Women objective here.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 11:33 PM
-2

Concern trolling is the most childish anti-productive argument I've ever heard. What does that even mean? Because I can make the distinction that this women isn't representative of anything Feminism I'm a "concern troll?" This is a joke, right? #NotAllMen was trended because men felt like women were saying all men are rapists and abusers. Yet here are the same people who trended #NotAllMen, saying all women encourage each other to lie, assault, harass men and victimize themselves. "We don't want…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 11:17 PM
0

And how does any of that relate to the lying, violent, paranoid bitch who is the subject of this discussion? I wish you said that in response to this Remember guys, men are the oppressors. It was really brave of that woman to repeatedly assault him, harass him, and then lie to the police because patriarchy. I think we all know who is really privileged in this society. What did THAT comment have to do with the "the lying, violent, paranoid bitch from the video"...? Where was this same criticism y…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 11:06 PM
-2

I agree with everything you said.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:52 PM
1

Well for the record, I'm a Masculist. There are real women who are assaulted, harassed and abused, just like men. When you say... Remember guys, men are the oppressors. It was really brave of that woman to repeatedly assault him, harass him, and then lie to the police because patriarchy. I think we all know who is really privileged in this society. You're calling all of those real women who suffer "phonies who are just feigning at being abused and encourage each other to play the victim." He's p…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 08:59 PM
-2

Why is it every argument for someone from this subreddit is a perfect argument against Anti-Feminism/Anti-Women? You tell me not to project, but the comment I responded to is projecting "Women encourage assault, harassment of men." This troll subreddit is a fucking joke. Everyone is starting to generalize /r/MensRights and MRM as a mysoginistic/Anti-Female movement EXACTLY the same way /r/MensRights generalized Feminism as a anti-male movement. This whole subreddit is digging it's own grave. I'm…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 08:47 PM
-18

This submission is a big male issue that's needs to get worked on. It's not a joke. But why is it that both top comments, including yours, are foaming with vitriol and contempt for woman suffering? It's not a victimyest-victim-arms-race.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:30 PM
0

Wow, that thread could have at least tried to put some effort into finding actual evidence. How lame. But it was probably at the top of the thread because it's kinda' true. /r/MensRights puts zero effort into censoring or distancing itself from hateful/anti-women users or comments. I've seen it. Of course, there's definitely a small community of people in here who upvote and encourage those hateful comments. But just as many discourage/downvote it usually. I only have to go back 8 hours in my me…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 03:46 AM
0

Didn't they create /r/AskFeminists for people to debate? I'm pretty sure that's the whole point of it. Ya know, I bet I can create a thread starting a discussion about rape-related-laws and not get banned. As long as you talk about male issues without being dismissive of female problems, you should be fine.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 01:24 AM
1

I didn't say you asking questions was complaining...Where'd you get that idea from? I was talking about the very common opinion people have here that Feminism should be more egalitarian. Please tell me with a straight face you never complained Feminism isn't egalitarian enough. Please tell me you never upvoted a thread submission here where someone posts an imgur of them getting banned from /r/Feminism for trying to talk about "egalitarian issues."
/r/MensRights11/06/14 11:46 PM
-3

Complains Feminism isn't an egalitarian movement Complains they "rope" trans people into their discussions sometimes Ok, have fun with that logic. Also, most of the world associates Feminism with Women's Rights. Wikipidia associates Feminism with Women's Rights. Dictionary's associate Feminism with Women's Rights. This is one of the few communities that disassociates them, and then gasp when some people associate /r/MensRights with Anti-Women opinions. I don't know how you're surprised people ca…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 10:22 PM
-2

Maybe that was confusing. Also, the fact is, Feminism is now starting to address Men's Rights as an Anti-Women movement exactly how Men's Rights has been addressing Feminism as an Anti-Male movement.* It's a badge of honor here to have been banned from the feminism subreddits. When you have that kind of attitude in such a large subreddit(In comparison to the feminist subreddits), I really don't understand how you expected anything else to happen.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 09:02 PM
-3

No it's cool. I think it's kinda' obvious I DO consider myself an ally of feminism, so it's an easy assumption to make. Can you show me a time /r/MensRights wasn't flooded with anti-feminism comments and threads? If you could do a Thread+Comment search in /r/MensRights for "Feminism+Feminists", the front page of that search would probably be almost identical to the front page of /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 08:04 PM
-6

When you accuse the character trait of Empathy as being Apologetic, you've lost all hope of having any sort of productive discussion. Empathy is really the greatest human trait there is. Also, the fact is, Feminism is now starting to address Men's Rights as an Anti-Women movement exactly how Men's Rights has been addressing Feminism as an Anti-Male movement.* It's a badge of honor here to have been banned from the feminism subreddits. When you have that kind of attitude in such a large subreddit…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:52 PM
-2

It's not a generalization if I'm talking about the subreddit. Its A Fact And yes, generalizing is terrible. I shouldn't be doing it. If only this subreddit would actually practice that. And nope, not a feminist. Just a masculist.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:42 PM
-4

I don't understand how you say... Yet the feminists insist it is still a banworthy sin to dare ask why feminists, who claim to be seeking "equality," don't ever once address issues that effect both men and women equally? And then tell me... you'd be in no position to make such an absolute statement about the entirety of the moderation on an entire forum. You're not contributing anything at all if I can just copy+paste your comments in response to what you're trying to say. Also, chill out dude. …
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:31 PM
-6

Ugh, the reason you got banned is really shitty and is representative of some deep-seated issues sparking up that I constantly try to argue against here. I constantly argue here it's stupid to generalize feminists as all anti-male, right? I do. I believe you have to be specific about who you're talking about. As soon as you start generalizing anything, you start to ruin any chance at having a productive conversation. Go through my user history, you'll see I also make the point lots of people use…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:20 PM
-6

You're kind of taking my words outside of the bubble they were given in. We're talking about the subreddits. Sure, there are real-life-feminist-communities who attack Mens Rights events. I didn't say there wasn't. It's NOT a goal of /r/Feminists to have Feminism be the go-to-voice for men. Go ahead and ask them. They're perfectly fine with and encouraging of men to have their own platform. Why wouldn't they be? Other then the fact a lot of men are using that platform to destroy the Feminist plat…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:00 PM
-9

...Wait, are you telling me you live with a mod? Were you over the mods shoulder as a "Reported Comment!" notifier pops up, and then he just shrugged and hit report without reading the comment? Because I'm pretty sure you weren't.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 06:50 PM
-7

There was never a person who was banned from /r/Feminism for only bringing up an issue that effected both men and women.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 06:38 PM
-10

As to being overwhelmed, you'll never know if you just ben people. That makes no sense. If you're the mods who have to decide on banning-policies and give out the bans, you WOULD know EXACTLY how overwhelmed the subreddit would be. SRS would be happy to brigade for /r/femism[1] , they do what they want. How does SRS brigading justify anything? If you think they shouldn't do it, you shouldn't be doing it. What're you even trying to say? Also, isn't there a theory that SRS is a troll community? Ju…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 06:27 PM
-10

Only "the feminists" are getting hundreds of trolls, jerks, offensive attacks, and off-topic comments. The others do too, but it's magnitudes less for them. If the mods stopped modding, and everyone knew about it, the feminists in feminist subreddits would be drowned into obscurity in hours. They're small subreddits in comparison to their counterpart subreddits.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 06:13 PM
-28

That's not true. No one who ever claims this is telling the whole truth. You were either... 1. Arguing for Men's Rights in the Feminist subreddit. That's stupid, quit it, go to /r/MensRights to talk about Men's Rights. Or go to /r/AskFeminists if you want a conversation. People forget there is MAGNITUDES more /r/MensRights subscribers then /r/Feminism subscribers. If they let you guys argue Men's Rights in their subreddit you'd drown them out into obscurity. 2. You were trying to argue Feminism …
/r/MensRights11/06/14 05:52 PM
1

Correction. ...if you say something stupid that's against the Men's Rights Anti-Feminists attitude, expect it to be pulled apart. Of course I'd never take it personally. My point is there's a million arguments and rationalizations used against anyone in here who's against the Anti-Feminists/Anti-Women vitriol. But in other cases, if you say something stupid, it's ignored as long as what you said is Anti-Feminism/Anti-Women. Or Anti-Religion, in this case. In the end, few here are actually intere…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:00 PM
1

Men's Rights guy here!(sort of) I actually prefer calling myself a Masculist more, I think you'll understand why later on... I love your submission. You're approaching this outreach of yours in all the right ways. I'm convinced that by now, 5 days since you've made this thread, you've probably already figured out what you wanted to figure out. That's awesome. I'll share my thoughts anyways though. And of course, I can really only specifically talk about Men's Rights. I'm super interested in post…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 10:40 PM
6

I was gonna say the same thing. How does a situation like this video even get started? I don't understand. She was being really rough with him. The kid clearly didn't want to take his shirt off. He CLEARLY didn't want his pants taken off. And after she got shoo'd away by the guy taking the video, he looked really apathetic and exhausted. It's a terrible thing for this to happen to someone...But then to also have happen to you in public, on a bus, with people watching and a hyena laughing? What w…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 07:24 PM
-1

You know, I say a LOT of things in this thread. A lot of times I get pretty emotionally tilted and say stupid things. Most of the time I do my best to be perfectly objective. The split-second a "Men's Rights" person from here sees the tiniest crack in anything I say, they attack it like flies to shit, while ignoring anything else I might have said. And here your comment hangs.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 07:07 PM
-5

No one said the words "Feminist" and "Priestess" are misogynistic. Who said that? I was talking about how he was foaming from the mouth with vitriol. He's taking the /r/Atheism approach to religion, which is that Religion is a joke, and applying it to feminism. Who the hell upvoted you? How toxic.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 06:56 PM
-23

Feminist...priestess? I'm impressed at how disregarding you can be to women and religious folk in two words.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 01:42 PM
1

Well put post, thanks for responding. Ya know, this whole Elliot Rogers thing. I'm just gonna vent and be honest about it a little bit. I've had a LOT of different opinions about it and I've already changed my mind a few times. I argued he was a misogynist, changed my mind and argued it was a mental illness case. He DID have serious mental problem, it's definitely a part of it. But a mental illness doesn't give you intentions, or tell you who to target, or plan how to kill people. But even those…
/r/MensRights10/06/14 01:13 AM
2

You know, I think everything you said might be right. You sound super reasonable and care a lot about not taking things to extremes or out of context. I think I got a emotionally charged on the subject. I'll take a breather and come back.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 10:40 PM
-2

Holy shit. Isn't this a discussion about how bullying and harassing men should be taken seriously? And then he tells you to get out of the subreddit because of where you've posted before. He doesn't give a single fuck about men being bullied, he's just worried about winning the victimyest-victim-arms-race.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 06:30 PM
-2

Well gee, I didn't even have to go looking. It only took half an hour for one to show up. No, we complain that women have more access to help do to traditionalism(which is exacerbated by feminism)
/r/MensRights09/06/14 06:08 PM
-3

Is this a real question? This subreddit is constantly calling out Feminism for having created a more privileged world for women in education, getting jobs, access to support groups, and probably a few more things I can't think of. And please, don't mistake me for a Feminist or an anti-MRA just because I don't share your views. I'm a Masculist who doesn't agree with the direction this subreddit has taken.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 05:32 PM
-5

...What? If you've seem someone attack or shame men for under eating, just share it. If you've seen a woman be pitied for how society pressured her into taking steroids, share it. Eating disorders in women and men are treated the same. They are "disorders." Not women's disorders. Men and women who take steroids are both often criticized and ridiculed. Do you really need proof for that, or are you just arguing for argument's sake?
/r/MensRights09/06/14 04:27 PM
-4

Isn't this the Men's Rights subreddit? Isn't it the job of Men's Rights to spread awareness and advocate for male problems? Instead, you complain women have more access to help and have more empathy from society thanks to the efforts of feminism. You could mimic those efforts, but instead those men are left by the wayside because Men's Rights have abandoned them in favor of attacking what women have built up. Instead of fighting for equality by building up support for men, you're fighting for eq…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 04:11 PM
-17

A lot of the comments in this thread are childishly seeking a scapegoat issue they can parade with. Men AND women suffer from eating disorders, and there is no one alive who treats those two people differently. Men AND women use steroids, and there is no one alive who treats those two people differently. I see no double standards here.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 02:35 PM
1

Ohhh I see. Those comments...are weird. They look useless. I'm convinced InterestingCoincidence and CL38 are the same person, due to their argumentative style. And really, I'm not surprised to see some anonymous person in a tiny, shadowy corner of the internet spamming random articles and links that don't work(Some of them don't).
/r/MensRights09/06/14 10:32 AM
1

Oh no no every single question I asked was out of curiosity! I didn't mean to say you said anything bad about him. You said a lot without explaining it, I wanted you to share more. I thought what you might have to say would be interesting. Venting isn't a bad thing either, I think venting is great. I totally understand how you felt like I was calling you out though, I've been subscribed here for a month, and there's a very combative attitude whenever people in and outside of MR post in this subr…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 09:45 AM
2

Studied? I mean I guess it was obvious he wasn't writting a paper in regards to gender-issues-history, but that's a weird thing to say. The whole point was that he was offering his perspective on what being a guy is like for people today. He's opening up about thoughts that are really personal too him in hopes that doing so will encourage other men to do the same. You said he was emotionally charged? That's how people sound when they vent, and just let thoughts fly off their tongue on a topic wi…
/r/MensRights09/06/14 01:00 AM
3

TLDW: Youtuber spends 11 minutes discussing the impact of grooming males from their early childhood into being "Manly Men who are Unemotional and Stoic" and the kinds of problems that brings. This was really good! So good, I feel like I almost don't have anything to add. Thanks a lot for submitting this, I'd actually love to see more of this kind of content posted here. Not enough guy stuff gets talked about in this subreddit.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:48 AM
2

I reported a comment yesterday for telling me to go kill myself and it got removed. I'm on my phone and don't know how to report through the app, but if no one reports it the mods can't remove it. Well, unless they by chance stumble across it.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 08:31 PM
9

This is some Eliot Roger's levels of bullshit and conspiracy right here. Are you serious? Did people really upvote you?
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:03 PM
1

I'm not sure what you're asking? But I'll respond to what I think you're asking and what you might be asking. Sure, feminism cares and responds to a bunch of toxic problems men deal with. And sure, other feminists address men as a toxic problem that needs to be dealt with. I don't think you have to believe those things. It's almost a natural law that if there's a hat with a label people can decide to wear, all sorts of different intelligent, toxic, stupid, or empathetic people will reach for tha…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 04:33 PM
1

Sure, what you said is right. A few people pointed it out. I added an Edit to my original comment that was calmer and put less intentions into people's mouths. Here, read this, http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/27k1xw/a_debate_tactic_im_gettin_real_sick_of/ci1wjh7 And then feel free to respond to either that comment or this comment with how you feel about what I said.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 04:23 PM
2

Well, you seem to be having fun. Is this a thing you do a lot? I guess I'll indulge you once more...Take three. But still, there was never a person alive who wanted to add meaningful context to data and was banned, silenced, or debated for it. If you're having a problem with getting banned for asking what 22 million being raped means, that's because you're not trying to add meaningful content. You're probably being banned because you're saying 22 million being raped, on it's own, is a useless st…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 05:41 AM
2

It's coming from the previous comments I was responding to. You jumped in the middle. That's fine though, I'll Link It Here Thanks for asking for context. And you're right, what I'm saying needs a little work. Here, lemme try. But still, there was never a person alive who said "Women are getting treated better every year," and was banned, silenced, or debated. If you're having a problem with getting banned for saying the treatment of women is improving, that's because you're not saying the treat…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 05:23 AM
3

For sure, a couple of people pointed it out. I was definitely being extreme with putting intentions into people's words. But still, there was never a person alive who said "Women are getting treated better every year," and was banned, silenced, or debated. It's weird to suggest there's data you can put next to "22 million women were raped" that would either increase or decrease it's validity. If you're having a problem with getting banned for saying the treatment of women is improving that's bec…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 05:01 AM
0

I'm sure a lot of downvotes are in part do to my display of hostility. It's really hard not to get upset at comments here, but I always try my hardest to respond objectively, non-personally and empathetically. This time I did not. :P And I agree with you 100%. It happens far too often that some random troll/extremist gets quoted, and is then held up as the representative for the banner they happened to be hoisting. People have created a boogey-man, and seek out the examples that will fill it the…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 04:33 AM
-1

There was never a person alive who said "The treatment of woman is improving every year" and was then banned, silenced or debated.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 04:21 AM
-2

Thanks for linking. Ahhh, I see, an article discussion Eliot Rogers. That explains a lot. BTW, the link you linked me too was weird. I think you linked me to your comments? I clicked Return to Article, which brought me to http://www.alternet.org/gender/our-best-hope-fighting-male-rage-why-yesall-women-matters Which I'm 100% sure is what you wanted me to read. So... Ya know, I agree in the Eliot Roger's discussion his mental illness is part of the problem. But Mental Illness doesn't tell you to p…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 03:46 AM
-8

Oh no, not the MRA! Trust me, they've already been dealing with me. If you Actually Care about Men's Rights, you get downvoted. If you Actually Care about having productive conversations and being empathetic, you get called "Concern Troll" or they call it "Nitpicking". If you Submit Content that has nothing to do with Feminism, you get ignored. Thanks for noticing me though! Figured I'd share my appreciation by giving you a little tour of the subreddit. As you can see, it's a harsh world here fo…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 03:20 AM
-12

I don't remember saying that... ... All the stats were standing on their own. Nothing to compare them with. Implying that if you compared it to certain data, it would either increase or decrease the "validity" of 22 million women being raped. Also, when you say things like this. All the stats were standing on their own. It was clearly designed to make out that women are the oppressed sex. Those two things don't match each other. Maybe the specific case you were talking about was different, but t…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 03:09 AM
-13

What comment/thread are you responding too?! The word "Men" was not used once in OP's link. Interestingly, they use the word "Intimate Partner" The word "Female Oppression" is not used once in OP's link. Neither is there a SINGLE reference to that idea in any shape or form. It's literally just a list of numbers and labels. If you wanna talk about how happy or sad men are, just talk about it! If you wanna talk about men being raped or beaten, just talk about it! You have to have a SICK mind to lo…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 02:45 AM
-24

"Ya know, 22 million woman being raped isn't that bad. It's better then last year!" I'd ban and silence you from the subreddit too if you said that. Seriously. So you're saying if I don't compare 22 million women being raped to some "frame of reference," then for all we know those 22 million rapes might be a great thing? What in the fucking fuck are you trying say? And please explain how if the data was standing alone, how you got the vibe the data was intended to "trick people into being convin…
/r/MensRights08/06/14 02:28 AM
2

Sounds like a great idea to me. Kinda' related...It's a common complaint that women get away with more then men. If that's a point you genuinely believe and care about, you'd be concerned about judges being predominately male and you'd encourage more women to become judges. I think that's true across all the different positions of power. More diversity can't hurt.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 09:17 PM
0

Now if only you'd use that same logic, and disregard the toxic-feminists as not being worth responding to. Then we'd actually get some where. Instead, you charge right at them, hold them representative of all feminists, and in that single move those same toxic-feminists are instantly justified of their vitriol towards you and MRA.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 08:55 PM
1

There's no one that would argue against that reasoning. I agree with you. There's no one saying the exact quote you used, the message that men are evil, violent and misogynist rapists is a lot more subtle then that. But just as toxic. I also wouldn't hold Feminism accountable for that message. Sure, some feminists do say that, but just as many men say and believe those things too.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 07:37 PM
0

Free speech is over rated. It's people like /u/46n2arejustaheadofme that convince me censorship is required for productive conversations.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 07:25 PM
0

Nothing is stopping women from voicing their concerns outside of the framework of feminism (besides feminism...). Did you mean something else? If you did, I misunderstood. I read that as women should find alternatives to Feminism.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 07:09 PM
-1

Did the rest of my post you ignored make you uncomfortable or something? Please stop derailing yourself under the bed covers to hide from what I'm saying to you. I'm not the boogey man. I'm not responding to attack you. I'm holding up a mirror to the subreddit to show it they're the same as those feminists. A lot of people here don't seem to like that.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 06:56 PM
0

It starts good but quickly becomes apparent that there's not much content By which you mean you had to suffer barely 15 minutes of the video before you started to experience Anti-Feminists-Withdrawal-Symptons. Nothing is stopping women from voicing their concerns outside of the framework of feminism (besides feminism...). Two things. First, Feminism IS the framework for women to voice your concerns(Like Men's Rights for men). When you broadly attack Feminism without being specific, that is liter…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 06:40 PM
-1

You can't say you're for equality of women when you're an Anti-Feminist. Feminism is the platform for women to share their perspective. You're attacking that platform instead of attacking the select trash that uses that platform. And the fact you're so hyper-focused on how women specifically have crossed men says a lot about you're genuine interests. Men's Rights is a magnitudes-wider-discussion then simply the part Feminism plays into it. Instead of debating, lets play a game. Try posting This …
/r/MensRights07/06/14 05:44 PM
0

If you're serious, I'll give you the advantage of providing which links you want to use as examples. I've seen all the posts you're talking about before. This is a conversation I'd be very interested in having. I might be slow though, but if you're actually subscribed to providing that evidence I'm just as subscribed to talking about each piece with you. EDIT: I was banned for simply illustrating the differences between the various men's movements (MGTOW, RP, MHRM), and trying to explain that th…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 05:31 PM
-2

I'm a concern troll? I've posted numerous times I don't care if someone is Anti-Feminist. I've posted numerous times Feminism can definitely be part of the Men's Rights discussion. I'm pretty sure that's the opposite of a concern troll. Feminism is an idea and a platform for anyone to step up on and share the female perspective(Just like Men's Rights/Masculism). It's not a political party. It's not a sports team. Sure, sometimes people step up and use that platform for bullshit, exactly like you…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 05:18 PM
-1

When you're pumped full of as much vitriol as the anti-male feminists you parade against, you're not interested in social justice and you're not any different. The Anti-women who parade around with the Men's Rights banner are the counterpart to the anti-men who parade around with the Feminism banner. The bottom-of-the-barrel-trash on both sides fuel and justify each other. You're apart of that tango. Don't you see that? I don't understand when people chose to take the path of demonizing, victimi…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 04:55 PM
-3

Again, thank you for admitting you're just an Anti-Feminist who uses Men's Rights as a ruse-shield. Stop eluding everyone, and just call yourself an Anti-Feminist. Anti-Feminism needs to be Anti-Feminists. Men's Rights does not need to be Anti-Feminism. But it can be Anti-Feminism, thanks in part to you.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 03:27 PM
-2

The reason the Civil Rights Movement didn't call itself blackism is because they called themselves the Civil Rights Movement. There was NEVER a person alive who even considered the word Blackism...Are you for real? Are you and the clowns who upvoted you trolling...? I can't tell if you're serious or not because the English language disagrees with you. Here, these Wikipedia links paint a FAR simpler picture then the silly naming-associations you're trying to use to feign superiority. An Ideology …
/r/MensRights07/06/14 03:12 PM
-3

Wow. Thank you for not even trying to argue the point I made that for most people Men's Rights is just used as their ruse-shield for being Anti-Feminists.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 02:31 PM
-8

A Feminist is simply an advocate for women's rights. It says nothing about their views on Men's Rights. Aside from me having fun re-wording your comment to make a point...I just call myself a masculist, which makes it super easy to explain my views. Not hard at all, I'm not sure why you think it would be. It's also a great subreddit(albeit small)! /r/Masculinity. They actually talk about Men's issues!
/r/MensRights07/06/14 12:26 AM
0

Oh I'm sorry if I mis-represented you, ya know I think my post was clearly submitted with a little hostility. I never said there was anything wrong with being Anti-Feminist. If that's what you're passionate about, have at it. Just please wear the right hat. Also, Feminism is not opposed to Men's Rights. Feminism is opposed to the ant-feminist trolls who parade with Men's Rights hats. Get it right. Generalized statements like that literally destroy any chance at productive conversations. It's chi…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 12:11 AM
3

Thanks for looking out for me! :D But yeah, /u/RobotBuddha said it right, don't read too much into downvotes. Depends on the area, depends on the topic. As long as you're not being offensive or hostile, downvotes are ok. But seriously, too many people root for social issues like how people root for football teams.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 11:23 PM
-2

Is it terrible that when I read all of your posts in this thread, I was excited to find a fellow, genuine Men's Rights fellow? I mean I think you are, it looks like it reading through your posts. My bad if you're just visiting. Anywho yes, exactly your post. There's so much back and forth between different social issues, but no one is actually intercepting each other. Instead, there's two parallel arguments going on that never intersect.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 11:09 PM
-8

Do us all a favor. You can make things A LOT simpler for everyone by just not labeling yourself as a Men's Rights Activists anymore. If you wanna be an anti-feminist, don't use "Men's Rights" as your personal ruse-shield. Just call yourself an Anti-Feminist. If you did that, I could finally call myself a Men's Rights Activist without worrying people will instantly label me as an anti-feminist. Feminists and the media will stop critisizing the MRA because you'll have stopped hiding under it. Look…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 10:46 PM
-5

Seriously. A lot of people put in zero effort trying to understand a discussion. Instead they just take the argument to the extreme, which destroys the chance of anything productive ever being discussed.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:49 PM
28

"Reject the victim mentality..." And in that same sense, when you approach a group/kind of people with an "They're evil, anti-male bigots" you kind of turn them into that. Reject the the "Us vs. Them" mentality.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:59 PM
-3

It's comments like these and the people who upvote them that leads to Men's Rights earning the stigma of misogynists/anti-feminism.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 02:47 PM
0

Either prove they ban people for censorship, and not for being 6 year old trolls, or I submit a user ID request to Conde Nast and organize a group lawsuit against you for libel. Hhhehhehe
/r/MensRights06/06/14 04:14 AM
-1

I've never had a problem discussing Mens Rights without generalizing it as an Anti-Feminist movement. I've never had a problem talking about shitty-extremist-feminist without generalizing feminism. I've never had a problem discussing patriarchy without generalizing patriarchy. No one has ever had a problem talking about tax-frauds without generalizing criminals. Right to the guy's face, Niel DeGrasse Tyson in this video didn't have a problem talking about extremist religious people without gener…
/r/MensRights06/06/14 04:02 AM
1

Aside from you excusing generalized statements, I agree with everything you just said. If this subreddit started practicing those exact values I'd be SOOOO happy.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 10:06 PM
-4

You can't claim to understand patriarchy if you preface it with the words "buying into." It means a lot of things and is used in a lot of different contexts. There's plenty of examples of patriarchy. I play EVE Online, there's a patriarchy-element to that game. And definitely, there's PLENTY of crazy/extremist implementations of the patriarchy concept. So YES, when he says "...buying into patriarchy..." he is literally declaring his ignorance of the neighboring country while telling others they …
/r/MensRights05/06/14 09:32 PM
1

Well, you can't know why someone downvoted you. Sure, maybe a few people downvoted me because they think I'm wrong. OR, maybe some of them reasonably downvoted me because they don't agree with me calling out the subreddit/posting comments that could invite hostility(Which some from this subreddit do all the time, then race back here to post about it for that anti-feminism-karma.)
/r/MensRights05/06/14 09:13 PM
-5

In one hand, you congratulated a a person for being empathetic with issues that effects others across the fence. On the other hand, you totally disregarded the feminist idea of patriarchy. I wish people held themselves to the standards they held others too.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 02:26 PM
0

You got banned for being a 6 year old. This isn't a complicated issue. First off, /r/feminism is about feminism. It's pretty retarded to go in every thread and bring up Men's Rights. Quit that shit, go to the right subreddit. Second, if you wanna start a conversation about gender issues...Just start a conversation about gender issues! Seriously, it was 100% obvious you had zero interest in a discussion and every intent to try to bait someone there to say something extreme you could quote and the…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:01 PM
-1

I saw this before, and loved it! I first saw this on the front page of /r/feminism like two months ago... But wait, that can't be right? Can it? Everyone here upvote comments like this one all the time.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 12:43 PM
3

Ya know, I think it's pretty funny. People hold up shitty-extremists-feminists like this as representative of what feminism is about, but then when people hold Eliot Rogers as representative of Mens Rights those same people toss their hats. Ya know what, forget Eliot. The first woman who started #YesAllWomen recieved SO many death threats, rape threats and threats of people tracking her down she had to remove her Twitter account entirely. When people hold THOSE people as representative of Men's …
/r/MensRights04/06/14 10:22 PM
-1

...Did anyone else get the vibe this entire video was sarcastic? Every word out of her mouth was dripping with venom. The entire video she is encouraging extremist feminists to attack them, directly and indirectly. The only person who seemed serious in this video and actually cared about a real discussion was Warren Farrell.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:39 AM
6

I mean I agree, Eliot wasn't representative of Men's Rights at all...but neither is /r/MensRights. And /r/MensRights is pretty similar to /r/TheRedPill. They're both anti-feminist-havens. The real difference is that /r/TheRedPill actually has more content then that, and /r/MensRights is ONLY about anti-feminism. Now don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the Men's Rights movement is anti-feminist, I'm saying /r/MensRights the subreddit is anti-feminist. Come on, it's no secret. I came here and subbe…
/r/MensRights04/06/14 09:25 AM
-1

I disagree that his Manifesto is proof of his intentions. Seriously, he wrote his Manifesto and made a YouTube series because he WANTED the world to find them and peruse them. He wrote himself and his intentions exactly as he wanted everyone to see them. People are reacting to the whole situation exactly how he wanted them to react, instead of addressing reality like /u/c0mputar pointed out. This whole thing is really just a mental health issue. Also, can we stop pretending Feminism is special? …
/r/MensRights31/05/14 02:11 AM
1

You know, you're kinda' right, what I said doesn't really have anything to do with if someone is interested in MR or not. I don't know why anyone downvoted your response to me. Maybe they say what I say? I'll explain. When I read the original comment you responded to, the word "Genuinely" really stuck out to me. I thought he was talking about self-proclaimed Men's Rights folk who were only actually interested in being hateful.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 01:09 AM
2

I'm just responding to this comment because it's an example of how I feel about this. We hold the dredges of feminists up as the representatives of feminism, and then they hold the dredges of MR(like the above comment) up as representatives of Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 05:46 PM
1

It's not a hard concept. Men's Rights as an idea is very different from how people who hold the banner choose to act. Men's Rights isn't about being anti-female, even if the majority of MR people were anti-female.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 09:37 AM
2

/u/danredux that's really well put. I can understand that. What scares me the most is people and outlets talking about Rogers as if he's representative of anything MRA should be(Well, lets be honest, people talking about a murderer so much in any light kinda' scares me.) Sure, he might be representative of the trashy MRA folks who are just anti-feminists/misogynists. But when you start comparing him to MRA folks in general, that's just attacking the ability for males to have a voice and our abil…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:32 PM
-5

It usually takes me more work to get someone to admit they're retarded. Thanks. Another example of someone turning this into an issue of personal agendas instead of just talking about the victims. Also, good work keeping it classy fella'.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:20 PM
-4

Yes.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:10 PM
0

This is pretty standard behavior in /r/MensRights. A thread, and all the comments in it, complain the male victims aren't getting any attention anywhere. And throughout the entire thread, not a single person talks about the male victims. It'd be nice if people here at least tried to pretend they cared about male issues.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:47 AM
22

...but that's exactly what the title of this thread is doing.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:39 PM
2

It makes me laugh when people say that. I like to call it "Knowing how to use Reddit's provided features."
/r/MensRights15/05/14 08:34 PM
1

I didn't say I want Men's Rights to be a feminist movement? I think Men's Rights needs to be it's own independent thing. /u/Chicagorunner did say that, but I chose not to respond to it. If you want to know, I don't agree at all with what he/she said about Feminism, Men's Rights, and Patriarchy. Also, it's kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy when you claim "The two are fundamentally incompatible" after you say things like this. Seriously, think about that.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 08:21 PM
1

When you say people disregard the words of feminists in an anti-feminism subreddit, you're really not saying anything special.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 04:35 PM
1

I know right? It's a whole sub dedicated to fighting feminism because they think feminism is anti-male. They have literally become what they hate most. It's disgusting to watch. This is one of the few places getting downvotes makes me feel empowered. FYI, head over to /r/masculism and /r/feminismformen if you want some male-related social discussion without all the vitriol.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 04:24 PM
1

Yay I'm not alone! Thanks, seriously, that means a lot. I've given up on /r/MensRights though. It's just an anti-feminism subreddit hiding under the guise of Men's Rights. I feel betrayed the obvious place I thought I could go to to talk about guy stuff(and a tiny bit about feminism, sure) openly and safely is just a ruse. I've never been more disappointed in Reddit. I'm ashamed to have been subscribed here. So should everyone else.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 12:22 PM
-2

That's funny, because saying being a feminists is a middle finger to equal-rights activists everywhere is exactly what I would call a reductio ad absurdum.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:28 PM
1

I like how you're suggesting a women's subreddit shouldn't be a default because they take offense at trolls showing up as a result of being defaulted. What you said is literally the definition of victim-blaming. /r/TwoXChromosomes was defending itself against trolls, you blame /r/TwoXChromosomes for being too immature to handle trolls.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:14 PM
-2

The comic does not say believing in equality makes you a feminist. The trope is saying being a feminist means you don't believe in equality, which is disingenuous. I'm using zero sarcasm when I say those two things, it's just that you said almost the exact opposite of what the comic is talking about, so figured I'd demonstrate that by mirroring what you said.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:06 PM
-5

"If you think a woman reaching down to another woman who tripped on the ground to help her up is an act of retaliation towards men, there's not much I can say to you to change your mind." --> I never wrote that; are you insane? Except you explicitly did. The double standard in the comic is when the feminist says she is mainly focused on inequality for women... If one's solution is to focus on only one set victims, one is out for retaliation... And then here. You wrote: "When you say women can't …
/r/MensRights14/05/14 05:36 PM
-7

If you think a woman reaching down to another woman who tripped on the ground to help her up is an act of retaliation towards men, there's not much I can say to you to change your mind. The problem isn't women caring about women or men caring about men. The problem is when people find a shared umbrella to huddle under, then decide to throw stones at the people under the other umbrellas. When you say women can't be women, it really sounds like you're attacking the experiences and traits unique to…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:55 PM
-15

Oh! Your'e right, you aren't the original comment. My mistake, I just saw "W's" and went from there. :P You're making the same exact mistake the comic is making fun of. You're assuming to care about female issues means you exclusively care about female issues. You're assuming to care about male issues means you're against all other issues. And please, don't justify the trash who resort to calling me a troll when I try to engage them with an opposing argument.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:40 PM
-1

Haha well after you laid it out for me, I had zero argument for what you said, took a step back to re-align myself and completely agreed with it. I've called out other people for doing the same exact thing I'm doing before. I actually care about if something is right, wrong, or reasonable. Poe's Law! Never read that before. Interesting. Thanks for mentioning.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:27 PM
0

if you have an opinion, you back it up. RIGHT! Like how you've been demonstrating, right? Boring. Troll harder And this. Use of bold, caps and fake laughing is pretty lame trolling. Which, after the fact, you edited in this addition. Use of bold, caps and fake laughing is pretty lame trolling. Run back to /r/feminism and cry about it with your buddies. But if you want to stick around here I suggest you quit demanding censorship of other peoples views and try to make an argument for your own. And…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:08 PM
-4

I'd take you seriously if you actually bothered to call out the people around you for similar behavior, but instead you're picking and choosing. I checked the time stamps, you're right! You aren't practicing double standards at all. I responded to your comment 14 minutes after you called me out, you called out /u/ThePigmanAgain for the same exact thing 13 minutes before I responded to you. I am calling out /u/ThePigmanAgain as well. Or maybe you only see what you want to see here? You did! I'm w…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 03:53 PM
-11

The comic is talking about trolls who try to attack feminism without explicitly attacking feminism. See, the guy is making the incorrect assumption that if a girl cares about girl things, she must be against all other things. That's a huge leap in logic. He uses the phrase "Then you should call yourself egalitarian" as a gateway to leap to the conclusion "So if you caring about women is your main interest, then obviously you must be sexist and be against everyone else's rights." He assumes being…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 03:36 PM
-8

/u/ThePigmanAgain disregards my entire argument and calls it shit, says he has better things to do with his time then bother reading it. /u/JerfFoo responds in kind. /u/deleteseverything calls me out for acting childish. Such double standards. Wow. I'd take you seriously if you actually bothered to call out the people around you for similar behavior, but instead you're picking and choosing.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 03:26 PM
-6

Sure, double standards are obvious in society. I agree. But I'm talking about this comic. That's not what trolling is. I asked a question that was 100% on topic. I'm trying to add content. When you make vague statements without explaining them, you're leaving the floor open for other redditor's to read it and make assumptions about your possible intentions and meanings. People responding to what they think you're saying leads to conversations going off topic, people wasting time, and comments go…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 03:09 PM
2

De_Facto, I 100% empathize with how you feel. Be careful about contributing to the "Us VS. Them," "MensRights VS. Feminists" mentality though, it's already toxic enough. And also, realize some of us here are having the same exact problems you're having. /r/MensRights is not a happy place for people serious about Men's Rights. It's been taken over by trolls, anti-feminists and people who think it's /r/SubredditDrama. Sorry they stole our banner to break your things. :/ That's all I can offer.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 02:59 PM
-10

I'm in the same exact boat as you. It's weird people don't realize we have a limited ability to empathize with others. If women never told me about their problems directly, there's a lot of things that hurt women(Whatever magnitude of hurt that may be) I'd never realize was a thing. The people upvoting OP's content confuse me, because it's as if they're suggesting /r/Feminism do all the work for men in advancing Men's Rights. Relying on white people to advance black rights a century ago would ha…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 02:48 PM
2

[Troll](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet) a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people,[1] by posting inflammatory,[2] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[3] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[4] DavidByron2 User History Off-topic Submission Comment trying to derail an argument Obvious extraneo…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 02:35 PM
-8

For future reference, a great way to tell if a user is trolling or not, take a look at their user history. It's usually pretty telling. You'll usually get a better answer then asking the potential troll directly. Look at my user history, do I look like a troll to you? Anywho, is the comic saying feminists lay claim to be the only legitimate social justice issue? Is the comic saying feminists can't be egalitarian? Is the comic saying men can't have their own safe place to discuss social problems?…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 02:25 PM
-13

Given that you don't have the attention span to read past 7 words, that probably explains why you're reposting shit content from the front page of /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 01:47 PM
-45

What double standards?
/r/MensRights14/05/14 01:33 PM
-42

First a question, what does this have at all to do with /r/MensRights? It really looks off topic. I don't think the point of /r/MensRights is to get /r/Feminism to do all our work for us, is it? That's a weird thing to propose. You say you found this in the feminism subs? The fact you're confused on why they liked it but everyone here doesn't like it speaks volumes on why Feminism is a female-focused issue. I can't believe you typed out the phrase "Women liked this comic, and the guys hate it, h…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 01:23 PM
0

http://www.acbr.com/biglie.htm I was reading that, and that's why I'm confused. From the first paragraph... ...the book's claim that in the year after divorce women's standard of living decreased by a whopping 73 percent while men enjoyed an increase of 43 percent caught the attention of pundits, legislators, and judges. This statistic has become one of the philosophical bases for deciding child custody and property division in divorce cases. So the "statistic" that men have a 73% increase after…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 12:34 PM
2

Who could have said no? The mods? Yeah, the mods could have said no. I'm not sure why you think they should have said no? They wanted to be on the front page so they said yes. FYI, it wasn't the mods spamming /r/TwoXChromosomes with menstruation and toilet habits, it was the subscribers. Ya know, like how the subscribers of /r/MensRights(Like OP) like to spam /r/MensRights with subreddit drama.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 12:20 PM
-3

/u/SS_Idiot_Finder. Reddit history consists of one comment. Redditor for 55 minutes, Sent above comment 50 minutes ago. Are you my new troll-familiar? Are you gonna follow me around in all the subreddits I post in? Are you gonna mass-downvote all of my comments? Sincerely, I'm flattered you did all this for me. I feel super-special to you, like I've made a huge impact on your life. You wouldn't be here if it wasn't for me. Imagine how far we can go together?
/r/MensRights14/05/14 05:07 AM
7

LULZ, you didn't even read it. Thank you for giving up the argument. Glad I could help exhaust your bitterness. Lets try a new point! Your post literally has nothing to do with /r/MensRights. It's off-topic. This is not /r/Subredditdrama. This is not /r/RedditInsider. This is not /r/AttackAllTheWomenThings. This is not /r/GotchaFeminists. This is not /r/FemRADebates. This is a subreddit for talking about the male perspective, not for talk about how girls are being too girly in the girl's subredd…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:57 AM
9

Oh gawd, who're the cancer-users who trolled down here to upvote you? Please speak up. spamming their own board with pointless and off-putting posts It's not pointless, the submissions you're talking about are 100% on topic with the subreddit they were posted in. 2X are making the assumption that these posts will put men off Actually, they aren't trying to put off men, they're trying to put off people that come there to troll or ruin subreddits. Presumably their view of men is that this stuff di…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 04:33 AM
-1

"Recognized" and "Evolution" aren't words that suggest there's no bias. They are words that suggest things are slowly changing or that the slow change is beginning to become recognizable.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 03:10 AM
1

I guess, I really don't understand the study(It looks dumb though) and how the study plays into any real-world stuff. What were the reasons Lenore claimed people's income changed after divorce? Did she just tell people it magically changed?
/r/MensRights14/05/14 02:39 AM
1

Sure, that's shitty. No one is arguing that's not fair. A legal presumption that forces both parents having 50/50 shared custody in almost all cases is also just as shitty and unfair, though. It really needs to be a case by case thing.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 02:25 AM
0

So I'm confused about the study and wondering if you can answer it for me. The study is talking about percentage drops and increases for men and women after a divorce. How does a person's income change at all after a divorce? I don't get it. If I have a job, and get divorced, I still have the same job. How does getting divorced increase or decrease my income?
/r/MensRights14/05/14 02:14 AM
1

Oh wow, the "Tender Years Doctrine" is interesting. Apparently my assumptions about certain cultural history was super wrong. As interesting as it is, it's good to see the "Tender Years Doctrine" is pretty much disregarded in all courts now in favor of the "Best interests of Chilren" doctrine of custody. "Tender Years" was definitely way to extreme and biased. I looked, I don't see what you're talking about. If there's something specific you're refering to, I'm not finding it. It's not here and …
/r/MensRights14/05/14 02:02 AM
-3

What is this? Why did you link it? I'm not sure what you're linking it for and what part of it I'm supposed to read. You just threw this link in my face as if it's supposed to explain itself. FYI, it's a good habit to elaborate what you're trying to say, instead of waiting for others to make assumptions about what you're trying to say. EDIT: Oh, you actually edited in text after I complained. Thanks. Why is saying not all children served by it is irrelavant? In the realm of custody, there is no …
/r/MensRights14/05/14 01:47 AM
-1

Do you have any sources? Any links? Proof that this wasn't something that happened before feminism? Any links to Feminists actively trying to encourage court bias in favor of women? What kind of court cases are you talking about? Cases with estranged fathers? Cases where the fathers are incompetent? Cases where the parents are pretty much equal but the courts decide to favor the mother with huge bias? This is a super complicated issue that you're carelessly simplifying and approaching with a pur…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 01:37 AM
-3

I couldn't find anything on the Leaf.CA site, at least not easily. Here's a link to the old thread that I think /u/SarcastiCook is talking about. This is Bill-C560. Here's a link to a Yahoo questions I found about the topic. This is about Bill-C422 Here's another link that I found through the Yahoo questions page where the Feminist lawyers we're citing their problems with the bill. This is about Bill-C422. I'll just copy and paste some of what the Yahoo user pasted that I think is very interesti…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 01:27 AM
-1

There's a large feminist group that's really popular in Canada, I'm talking about these classy folks. I'm pretty sure Canada as a whole apologizes for having spawned them every time they make it on TV for the vile shit they do. I don't know if that's the same group, but if it is saying they're representative of Feminists is like saying the Westboro Baptist Church is representative of Religion. They're not, they're absolute trash. Don't give them any more accreditation then they deserve or make t…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 12:30 AM
0

No one is saying stuff like what happens to you isn't terrible, I just never realized or considered that courts are getting better, even if a little bit at a time. Thanks for sharing though, people need to hear.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 12:18 AM
4

Did a word search for the word "Censorship," was not found. Maybe you're confused about what censorship is? Censorship is when you take down comments or ban users. Someone submitting a post =/= censorship. Please stop suggesting posting female-related content in a subreddit dedicated to women is censorship. It's not. Hey man, don't get mad. Just because the cookie jar you were reaching in was empty doesn't mean you have to flip your shit.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 10:46 PM
13

Hold on. You're telling me posting content related to the female body inside of a subreddit dedicated to females is censorship? I think they're making the assumption posting that content will keep the subreddit on topic, and will deter people who aren't interested in seeing content like that. They are giving the influx of new people a fair warning about the kind of stuff that gets talked about in there so they don't waste their time hanging around and wondering what /r/TwoXChromosomes is all abo…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 10:28 PM
-1

This was REALLY refreshing to read. I didn't realize I was out of touch with how courts were treating the two parents in custody battles. Kinda' related/not related, I think it's juvenile a lot of people complain about mothers being favored in custody battles and point a blaming finger at feminism. The stereotypes of "Father is the breadwinner" and "Mother raises the children" are MAGNITUDES older then feminism. Those are stereotypes that have been enforced by men, women and cultures for centuri…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 10:09 PM
9

Please explain to me how menstruation and toilet habits are anti-male.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 09:59 PM
-1

I don't see the connection between "Men's Rights" and "Patriarchy, male privilege and toxic masculinity." I think your confused.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 09:25 PM
1

It's like no one noticed the threatening comment in /r/Feminisms actually got downvoted. Did OP report the threat? It makes it kind of hard for mods to do their job if people aren't reporting being threatened. To be fair, he was probably too busy trying to post this thread as fast as possible for maximum Karma to bother reporting a threatening comment. Wanna make a bet? I bet it's been deleted by the mods since he posted this. Here's a link OH WOW! It WAS deleted. Well jee-willickers, it's almos…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 09:03 PM
1

Correct. That's what was originally said.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 08:50 PM
-3

Then, by definiton, they're /r/Feminism* Glad I could correct that for you.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 08:15 PM
13

I think it's a pretty deliberate move to use "abortion" in an insultive manner was a pretty deliberate action in a feminism subreddit. I'm ALSO pretty sure that fact he came RACING back to /r/MensRights to post about some random threatening him is a pretty clear indicator he was fishing for upset nerves to cash in on. This might be news to you, but this is /r/MensRights, not /r/SubredditDrama. What the fuck is this submission even doing here? This is the second post I've seen related to this /r/…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 08:04 PM
-1

Correction, they said "That's like saying every doctor should ALSO be a brain-surgeon." NOT "That's like saying every brain-surgeon should ALSO be a doctor." You're suggesting every single person should 100% empathize with every other different race/gender/culture/class, and when you say that it's clear you don't understand the limitations of humans.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 07:53 PM
1

Of course there's no laws against it, but it still is vigilantism. And vigilantism is always an action I would think twice about.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 08:21 AM
1

I'm saying it's not uncommon for people to post people texts to social media(And also anonymously to stuff like /r/CreepyPMS), but I'm also suggesting there's probably legal channels you can handle it through that might be better. Why not show it to the local police and ask them about what your options might be?
/r/MensRights12/05/14 01:58 AM
1

More people might agree with you then you think. Ever see /r/CreepyPMs? Or blogs where people post the similar content? Usually it's women posting messages from guys, and usually it's just petty creepy nonsense. EXCEPT, everything is also done totally anonymously. As far as something as threatening as this, I'm sure there have got to belegal channels you could go through instead of your own vigilantism, and still achieve the same result of protecting yourself and others in the future.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 01:29 AM
12

Showing a single text does not prove how common it is, and the "threat of being called a rapist" doesn't mean anything. Did she actually follow through with it? And that's if this is even real. Honestly, If this was an example of the "common threat of being accused a rapist" no guy would ever have a problem, he just shows his phone to the court/officer. Serious question since we're on the topic and I don't think I saw anyone discussing it, as a guy what should you do if a situation like this occ…
/r/MensRights11/05/14 07:02 PM
-9

I could literally swap the word "Feminists" for "MensRights" and swap the word "MensRights" for "Feminists" in your post and you'd be describing most of the people on /r/MensRights perfectly. I don't understand how people think acting exactly like the people they complain about is intelligent at all. It makes you look really bitter and petty.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 03:22 AM
1

Oh, absolutely, attacking poor grammer is super-scumbag status. You probably wrote that on mobile and it auto-corrected everything you wrote wrong. I know that. The difference between us is I don't have any delusions about when I'm acting like total trash.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 12:24 PM
1

Tell you what, you got me. You really hit the point home with this bit. As as fucking mean are some strange alien species that women could never understand enough to advocate for. You should really spend your free-periods at school studying your English instead of hogging the internet. I think your allotted computer time is up.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 03:13 AM
1

Now kiss
/r/MensRights10/05/14 12:34 AM
1

Now kiss
/r/MensRights10/05/14 12:23 AM
1

Did you...really just do that...? I was saying you disregarding certain struggles was disgusting, you called me a vapid cunt, and then you proceeded to tell me I was wrong because I'm disregarding certain struggles. What in the fucking fuck? Who the hell gave you computer permissions? Call the teacher's board, this 7th grader has exceeded his allotted computer time and needs to be forced outside to have fun in the playground.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:56 PM
1

Occam's Razor much? Geez, what a bore. It's disgusting to watch you act as foul-mouthed and hate-fueled as the "feminists" you claim are destroying MensRights. It's the utlimate irony. I do encourage you to keep reading the conversation you jumped in the middle of though, I think it's pretty stellar what me and /u/ScrapinDaCheeks are talking about.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:31 PM
1

But if you see any hate here know that it's because many among us are not as patient. I wish they could be, but I know better than to expect the best from humanity. Absolutely. I totally understand MensRights is necessary and that there's no replacement for it, just like feminism. I'd never glance at the bottom-of-the-barrel trash who use "MensRights" as a crux to hate others as representative of the community. I know you said that last, but figured I'd respond to it first because it's important…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 10:21 PM
-2

When you say someone can't judge a movement based on it's worst parts, then you are essentially defending the worst parts. No one said that. But, are you actually subscribed to /r/MensRights? I know you are because I'm a creep, but literally almost all the comments in every thread are anti-feminism. I mean sure, there's definitely things that can be said about feminism in relation to MensRights and how they can hurt each other, but EVERYTHING that's talked about is feminism. There's no discussio…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:21 AM
1

Seriously, 100% no sarcasm, what you just said is a great point. It IS totally fucked up men are expected to be the sole casualties in war. It's a serious MensRights issue with no easy solution. But why can't you just fucking say it as an independent issue? Why do you have to wrap it in a burrito of vitriol that you stuff full of "I'm victimimized WAY more then feminists EVER WILL BE!" Why do you have to make it a contest where the winner is the victimyest-victim in the room? It makes you look p…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:45 AM
-1

FYI, you sounded super-concerned not enough discussion was going on. Just wanted to update you, it has been now. Can't wait to see what you contribute! :D
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:33 AM
1

Oh sure thing, I'm a super-slow responder too even when I'm not on mobile. I always view this like e-mail and texting, you get to it when you get to it. Feminists don't claim to fight for equality, they claim to fight for female equality...how could they do any more then that? I don't know how you expect a woman to fight for gender rights through a male's perspective. I could explain more, but excuse me for linking you to a previous comment I made instead to save myself some effort.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:16 AM
-4

FYI the discussion you were so anxious to see has been happening. I figured since it was such an important concern for you, I'd update you so you can join in. Can't wait to see what you have to contribute. :D
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:06 AM
1

women only have to deal with being catcalled, guys get jailed all the time. "Actually women DO have to deal with some terrible things in some places." BUT THESE LITTLE BOYS OVER THERE DIED! THAT'S WAY MORE IMPORTANT THEN WOMEN IN ISLAM! I love it when I don't have to argue my point(Which is This), and can just sit back as Redditor's respond and prove my point for me.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 02:55 AM
0

/\Is it terrible that I think this is the FIRST comment I've read in /r/MensRights that's actually talking about Feminism in a non-hateful and none anti-feminism manner? Wow, seriously, thank you for the quality response /u/ScrapinDaCheeks. demanding extra funding for women's issues and attempting to silence men who ask for some of their own This has NEVER happened. There was never a person who said "Men need access to more shelters" then a woman responded with "Sorry, you don't deserve it." I'v…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 02:39 AM
1

PLEASE, get on a plane headed overseas and say EXACTLY what you just said to these women But sure, lets assume you intended to merely have a discussion on social issues within the context of the US borders. When did Feminism and MensRights become a race to the bottom of the barrel? When did it become a competition to see who can be the victimyest victim in the room? It's tragic because you listed some real issues, but the vitriol you have it wrapped in is not a conversation I want to be a part o…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 02:04 AM
1

TLDW: Hip-hop artist Akala discusses men, sexual, and racial taboos, focusing around the Western world's festishisation of the black male's supposed physical and sexual prowess. His talk is 16.5 minutes. You can watch from 5.5 minutes to 22 minutes if you only wanna hear his piece. 0 to 5 minutes is just the introduction, and 22 minutes to the end is a short Q&A he has with the audience.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:39 AM
1

...That's funny, because in this clip he says "Eugenics is complete pseudoscience nonsense." Tell me again how much you watched?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 01:23 AM
-1

I could read Wikipedia to you, but I'd rather just link it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:45 AM
-1

Who upvoted this crack-pot? If you think women(or men) don't have any real general problems you're in dire need of empathy classes.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 12:32 AM
0

I realized "Rule" was a terrible word for me to use, that didn't convey what I meant to say at all and led to a few responders to talk about something I didn't actually intend to engage people over. But whatever it's the past. In all honesty, if you read about feminism and get to the idea of patriarchy, and after reading it you think... "patriarchy implies that all men and got together and decided to rule over women and they all only benfited," ...you're kind of daft. It's way more complicated a…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:31 PM
-4

I don't understand. I literally mirrored word for word what another frequent user here said, but I get called out for looking to start a fight? Those are some classy double standards you have there. If you actually spent time calling out the people who are frequently around you I'd take what you said seriously, but you don't. You just turn a blind eye to it. You're a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:20 PM
1

Do I agree with Shailene? Kind of? Not really? Both? It's really important for "a kind of people" to be able to provide their perspective. I can't fight for the rights of a kind of people that I don't understand...lemme explain. I have a half-black brother, right? He's told me it's often happened to him that when he's in a store, sometimes people follow him and keep an eye on him because they think he's trying to shoplift. Whenever he tells me that, I think it's super weird, right? I'm different…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 11:09 PM
0

Sure, there absolutely is. It's not 50/50 middle ground, it's way too complicated to say anything that broad about it.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 10:48 PM
-28

O.o EDIT: I had to go back to my comment and realize I used the word "rule" to understand why you were responding with a list of queens. Also, I never said women aren't just as fucked up as men...? Not sure why you thought that.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 01:09 PM
-39

It's like I'm responding to what you say, do, and speak and not responding to what you convince people you say, do, and think. Let's play a game. I'll browse through /r/MensRights, and you browse through /r/feminism. Whoever finds the most instances of anti-masculism and anti-feminism in comments and posts wins.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 01:09 PM
-35

Well clearly women hate men. no/s
/r/MensRights08/05/14 12:59 PM
-38

Holy fuck. Well first, sure, women weren't ruled over by men through all of history everywhere. But to say women never lived under men...that's like denying the holocaust. EDIT: I've realized using the word "rule" was a terrible choice, because lots of people went off on a super-tangent about kings and queens and nazis. It was definitely the wrong word to use to convey what I meant, if I wasn't at work I would have edited it.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 12:58 PM
-86

Well, she DID say out right feminism is about hating men. If you don't understand how that would upset both the fair-minded feminists and the exterminist-feminists...wait, scratch "if", I forgot I forgot we're in Men's Rights. You obviously don't understand.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 12:55 PM
-15

What a shitty and ironic comment chain.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 12:48 PM
6

Certainly there's bound to be a time and a place where feminism will be part of the conversation of Men's Rights. But every.single.fucking.thread? It's as if people here forgot about the thousands of years of history that's shaped our culture before feminism even existed.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:46 AM
14

Seriously? There are parents who post excitingly to Facebook when their kid takes their first poop. I wonder how anti-feminists would interpret that. PLEASE show me the Facebook post where a mother posts about how her son loves pink and dolls and she's proud he won't be a rapist now. I'd LOVE to see it.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 09:33 AM
2

What? Read your mind? I don't have to, I just read what you said. I'm just mirroring what I read from feminists all the time. Which directly translates too "But mommy, he hit me first!" And FYI, when I said bratty behavior, I was referring to what you were doing, not feminists(Though sure, anyone can be bratty.) I'm glad you at least acknowledged that they are assholes. Nope. I acknowledged assholes are assholes. Not "they." Feminists, men, women, black people, Muslims, Christians, Transgenders,…
/r/MensRights04/05/14 10:34 PM
2

FYI I just realized /r/masculism is a thing. I literally started checking it out today, looks pretty reasonable. Figured I'd just share with you.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 09:51 PM
2

Sure, when I have an ignorant and asshole attitude, I tell people I'm just mirroring other assholes, because that totally justifies it. /s I can't believe you just outright admitted to it. That's not feminist-exclusive behavior, that's middle-school logic.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:50 PM
4

That's really cool you had a pretty fleshed out conversation with her over it. Sure she's a feminist, but when someone says a man can't be raped we call that being an asshole.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 04:29 PM
1

Sure, in this specific case, she "got out good" in terms of not having to face any official consequences. If he did say that, I wouldn't have bothered to respond.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 02:55 PM
0

You're a brat. It's not a contest about who's the victimyest victim in the room. If you... And punishing one but not the other is... sexist stop it there and take away the sarcastic tag, and that's true. Why is it so hard for people so say that here without making it a contest over how guys actually get it worst every time? And without completely disregarding the feminist perspective? "I don't care what you go through, because THIS happened to me and THAT makes what happened to you irrelevant." …
/r/MensRights04/05/14 09:42 AM
1

Oh ok. So you're a troll. Well it was fun talking to you.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:34 AM
1

Nope, now you lost me. The difference is the women benefit from this 'intrinsically linked sexism' and the men don't. It REALLY sounds like you're saying women benefit exclusively in all matters sexism. But wait... but don't tell me I articulated myself poorly while you understood me perfectly :D Wait, I said you worded yourself poorly? I thought what you said was really clear and well understood. What're you talking about? Did I misinterpret your post? Are you saying you meant to say what I sai…
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:06 AM
3

I don't even know what you said. It was way too wordy. It's simple. Saying a woman isn't responsible for her sexual encounters is sexist. Saying the men are solely responsible for all their sexual encounters is sexist. It's not a difficult concept /u/AustNerevar is talking about. Sexism is an effect sometimes. Sexism is intent. Lots of times sexism is unintentional.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 02:38 AM
2

Depends on what specific issue you're talking about. There's lots of different issues that have different consequences and benefits for people on either side of the fence. You're generalizing and making it sound like men get the shaft in every interaction.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 02:28 AM
2

Maybe it's me, but I'm not sure what you're saying, can you say something instead of asking an awkwardly worded rhetorical/sarcastic question? I'll pretend you're asking a direct question. No, feminism is not a biological characteristic. It's an idea.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 02:13 AM
2

Oh I see what you're talking about in your submission post by putting "feminists" in quotes. Sorry, there IS a lot of trolls and people here just as terrible as the "feminists" they claim to hate. The ignorant women you were talking about that said you can't have an opinion because of your dick and balls? I assure you just as many people like that exist here in MensRights. Being hateful and ignorant is not a trait "special to feminists." You actually seem reasonable. FYI I re-read what you wrote…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 09:22 PM
-3

You're making the same mistake a lot of people here make. They link to some obscure opinion or article or individual, and then claim everyone acts like that. Feminism is the exact same thing as Mens Rights. There's really no difference. They both have their trash and ignorant folk. It's funny, you were talking about feminists generalizing men through privilege, and the first thing you do here is generalize them. You're gonna fit RIGHT in! Lots of people here complain about a certain behavior, an…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:29 PM
0

Is there where we tell people what turns them on and what doesn't turn them on? Ho'ok, have fun with that. Can I join in making assumptions too? I'm pretty sure no one is turned on by green paper. But both genders are turned on by the freedom, success, and better opportunities that money gives.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 12:46 PM
0

This is a great issue to bring up and definitely a thing that people should be more aware of...BUT why does a lot of the /r/MensRights submissions feel like a pissing contest? It's like MensRights is trying to prove it's the victimiesty-victim in the room. It's not hard. You can provide awareness about the male perspective, and you can even actually address the problems with feminism, but why do we have to do it like brats?
/r/MensRights02/05/14 12:27 AM
2

I got nothin' but love for you
/r/MensRights28/04/14 10:58 PM
2

I see I see, I am confused. Haha sorry I made you use a thousand words so I can get it. :P Those are definitely serious semantics. Seriously though, your initial post was super-misleading if that's what you meant to say. No one who voted on your post knew you meant the semantics were serious, everyone thought you were saying it was silly. If you could take a straw poll of the voters, you'd see what I mean.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 10:22 PM
1

...I must be an idiot, I don't know what you just said at all. Are you confused? You realize when they said commit vs. attempt, they meant "commit" as in "successfully committing suicide", and they meant "attempt" as in "trying and failing?" Nothing is semantics in the comment. "Attempt vs. Commit" isn't a pointless way to say the same thing, they are actually two very different words with two very different meanings in the redditor's usage.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 09:24 PM
1

I guarantee everyone who voted on your comment didn't even consider the chance you might not be calling the previous comment silly. What are you saying then? 99% of the time people refer to semantics, it's to say someone is making a pointless distinction.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 08:50 PM
-1

...That's not silly semantics. That actually is an important distinction to make, if it's true.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 09:30 AM
2

/u/poopfacemcgiggles, I was in the same boat as you! And will gladly join you in being downvoted. It's really bizarre /r/MensRights is the equivalent of /r/Atheism. It's barely about the self-title, and instead is mostly about proving Feminism/Christianity wrong with "Gotcha!" moments. Articles, blogs and individual opinions from the most obscure and questionable sources are submitted constantly and no one bats an eye. It's pathetic. I wish it was actually about providing the male perspective fo…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 10:21 PM
-10

Last time I checked, articles didn't decide the issue of whether it's consent or not in court. I agree, the law shouldn't be biased in the face of gender/race/class, buuuut a little devil's advocate. As far as gender goes...isn't sentencing biased because in reality, sexual acts between different genders is biased? You'd think behaviors like this would be relics by now, but men and women are treated very differently when it comes to who their sleeping with when it's public knowledge among their …
/r/MensRights26/04/14 03:33 PM
1

Oh, an opinion opposing MensRights? Downvotes. No, we don't have a with us or against us mentality. I like how the entire list says nothing special, because EVERY single thing in that list is representative of all groups and individuals everywhere. You could post that same exact list in /r/Republican and it'd be perfectly in context.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 10:09 AM
1

That was the dumbest thing I've seen in this thread so far. Women "have all the advantages listed" and they STILL work at Best Buy. How did /u/Will_Im_Not get downvoted for pointing this out?
/r/MensRights26/04/14 01:38 AM
2

Is /r/MensRights still anti-feminism? The threads here are ok, but the moment you jump into the comments here it just goes to shit...for the most part.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 01:25 AM
1

I think that says a lot more about you then anything else.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 12:47 AM
1

If you read every comment, then you wouldn't be confused. It's clear you're just arguing for arguments-sake. Do I need permission to respond to you, or express a point I want to you?
/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:01 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/23paek/bear_grylls_creates_show_to_examine_modern/cgz9cn4 Did you not read a single other comment in this thread? Is this what you do, post in a conversation and then become baffled when someone has a point that expands on something you or everyone is saying? What kind of game are you playing? It's great you specified what you're not saying, for whatever that's worth.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:25 PM
1

You realize we're talking about the thread title and some of the common themes in comments right? Did you just hop in the middle of the conversation? Sorry if I or anyone else wasn't clear enough, but no one is talking about you. Believe it or not, there's a whole conversation going on around you.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 11:27 AM
-2

Whoa, be careful what you typo, here lemme fix it for you. It's funny when a woman walks into the room saying people who mistreat and harass women in the industry are assholes, most of the room responds. You'd think humans would understand how addressing specific people works by now.* Good thing I corrected your mistake there, other people might have thought you were an asshole. Don't want that! :)
/r/MensRights24/04/14 10:23 AM
-1

I like how in OP's mind, attacking a woman in the comments who got hired by GitHub proves she's lying about women being mistreated and harassed in the industry.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 10:05 AM
0

That's exactly what I just said... Look, call it what it is, bigotry and anti-masculine. Feminism and MRA =\= anti-the-opposite-gender.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 09:41 AM
-1

You really don't understand feminism, and by extension Men's Rights if you think Feminism is equivalent with anti-male. A couple of people in the thread have mentioned it's weird the title and people in the comments are referring to the women as feminists. But it's not weird because it wasn't mentioned in the article, it's weird because it doesn't matter if they're feminist or not. Being anti-male/masculinity has nothing to do with feminism. Also, have you seen Bear Grylls? As a straight guy, I'…
/r/MensRights24/04/14 03:32 AM
1

Why in the ever loving fuck is your definition of feminism anti-male?
/r/MensRights24/04/14 03:14 AM
-1

How is that any worse then mocking people for "Err" and "Umm"? You're absolutely right, it's petty and dumb to mock someone's typos. That was the point.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 03:05 AM
-6

This is the point where we've gone past rational and considerate arguments. It's CLEAR you're a troll only here to get a reaction out of people. Oh no, you called me a lady, I'm so offended. OH, you're your own boss? Wow, you're such a big boy. LOL, that explains it. Everyone under you in your day-to-day-life is too busy dick-riding you for promotions to let you know what they think of your relic and ignorant opinions. Gosh, it must be a power trip to know you can just disregard the opinions of …
/r/MensRights23/04/14 10:16 PM
-6

I'll respond to both of your comments here for simplicity's sake? She hasn't made an legal claims nor ant civil suit claims and upvoting articles where feminists interviewed as sources. Since we're in the throwing insults boat, maybe YOU could have used a minor in English while you were in college? Maybe Julie can give you some lessons?? Of course, those are really stupid and petty for me to bring up, but you seem to like to bring up petty nonsense so I thought I'd join in on the fun. Using phra…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 09:36 PM
-3

On the twitter /u/readilyso linked, there's a link to a podcast Julie Ann Horvath is talking on right now. It's pretty good. She sounds well spoken and fair-minded. She just talked about how she's been constantly attacked by the same exact people who are claiming women don't face a hostile work environment in the field.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:39 PM
-1

"Look, I'm not sexist. I'm just saying we need men to rule the field so women don't encourage other women to get into the field." You're really blowing it out of proportion. Making special cases where a single girl is hired =/= hiring unqualified people. Also, you're kinda forgetting there's lots of different paths into the technology field. People who are unqualified get hired ALL THE TIME. Whether through beginner career positions, internships for people interested in the field, and random stu…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:20 PM
-5

I like how in your mind, empathy = white knight.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:10 PM
2

Ummm, I know it was woman in the article complaining about this male-only desert island show, but the word feminist's isn't used once. Woman =/= Feminist I understand it does kinda' seem like it though. But even if they were feminists, the women in this article =/= all feminists.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 07:41 PM
0

I....I don't even....What is this?
/r/MensRights28/03/14 11:15 PM
1

I really think the social-justice threads should do a little more to filter out attack-submissions, like this, that're targeted at other social-justice subreddits.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 10:44 PM
2

It's a special kind of stupid-irony when a piece warns us about how feminism is the tool for "bullying and fear."
/r/MensRights28/03/14 10:32 PM
2

They pretend to not be serious, until you try to engage them and then they spew links and talk about serious statistical fact, and if you manage to get an upper hand then they just pretend they were trolling and never cared the entire time or that it's just their opinion and if you think differently you shouldn't be here. Ever hear about the story of the guy who was found out to be jerking off into a box for decades and never threw it out? I like to imagine that box as this subreddit, and the gu…
/r/PussyPass19/03/14 07:40 PM
0

Real?! This is the first internet argument I've ever won! I'm so excited right now! I'm gonna call my mom.
/r/PussyPass19/03/14 07:38 PM
-1

What're you...trying to say? The sky is blue when you look at it. So I'm right...? Thanks, I guess.
/r/PussyPass19/03/14 05:35 PM
1

Um, you don't have to assume they're being non-biased or leaning. It has a decades long reputation. And it's media, just consume it! Watch it. MOST people would agree BBC is pretty reliable and fairly objective. If you bother to watch and read lots of different kinds of news media forms and outlets, I can't imagine how you wouldn't come to the opinion BBC is pretty fair. Of course it's not perfect, but my goodness it's far from sensationalist. I thought the fact that you read it and were bashed …
/r/TheRedPill16/03/14 09:37 PM
1

The flip side? I guess you might be making a point? I don't actually know. I don't know how Jewish and Israel laws work, nor how their culture works. I'm not Jewish, nor a lawyer, nor educated at all in any related field to this, nor have any special insight that would give me the ability to call out a BBC journalist for sensationalism. I'm pretty sure you don't either. So I don't know, maybe you're right? Maybe you're not? It seems to be an issue that causes a lot of controversy among Jewish pe…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/14 06:04 PM
1

Nah bruh I'll pass on that. I went through that phase when I was in high school, I can do without revisiting it.
/r/PussyPass14/03/14 01:39 AM
8

Oh, my mistake. What's the Meta tag used for? I always thought it was used when discussing the subreddit itself inside the subreddit, to distinguish it from a subreddit's geared content. So what is this subreddit about?
/r/PussyPass14/03/14 01:23 AM
-1

Damn, /u/thedarkerside. You are very well read. I am impressed. I still think you're retarded and you're 100% wrong, but that was a high quality rebuttal. No sarcasm. Ya know what? I'll honor your clever retort by wearing the insult, shame included. And now I'll retreat, in search of a damsel in need! OH! Another rejection by a fair maiden. My armor must not be shiny enough!
/r/PussyPass14/03/14 12:34 AM
2

/u/rj88631, you're wrong. Your first quote is counting how many "Aguna" exist in all of Jewish Society, which is counting Jewish people that live all around the world. Your second quote is counting how many "Aguna" exist in Israel, which is...counting Jewish people that live in Israel. It's simple when you realize not all Jewish people live in Israel. They live everywhere, like Christians and Atheists do! And the numbers aren't painting different pictures if you read the article. Inside the Jewi…
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 12:17 AM
0

Logic: The use of valid reasoning. You're reasoning, is that if it was a son, the father would have let him spend a night in jail before springing him out. My reasoning, is that if a daughter went through the same exact situation you proposed, you'd post the link to the story here because clearly she only spent one night in prison because she's a girl, when "some cop" sprung her out. We're both pulling assumptions out of our asses. The logic sounds parallel to me.
/r/PussyPass13/03/14 10:34 PM
1

No I think this is a good point. You'd submit the link for the story and then you'd title it, "Woman who almost killed several people drunk driving spends 1 night in jail, then cop springs her out. Guys, can we talk about how if this was a guy he would have served the entire sentence?" Sorry you don't like it when I use your logic.
/r/PussyPass13/03/14 09:40 PM
0

If a dad wanted to "spring his daughter," but he decided to let her spend a night in jail before pulling the cop card, you'd be the first one to post it here.
/r/PussyPass13/03/14 08:39 PM
0

You hit the wrong reply button. I'm a creep though, so I found it no problem. For the record this response is a continuation from here in our conversation. Vague motive? Where'd you get that word? Try zero motive. What you're saying is actually the entire proof of her mental illness. She understood what she did was wrong, but still did it despite having zero motive. For clarification, the court, the victim and the deaf woman all agreed there was zero motive for her cyberstalking. When you don't …
/r/PussyPass13/03/14 01:18 AM
1

"This is a cop family pass aided by Pussy pass." Oh my goodness how determined are you on this set outcome? A cop would have a hard time getting his son out of harm's way? No he wouldn't, he's a cop, he has all the power in the world to get his son out of harm's way. You can't SAY that, you're making it up. "Bystanders would have been even more outraged." How the heck do you measure outrage? And it was midnight, at 12:30am. Maybe THAT actually had a real role in the fact there wasn't outrage hap…
/r/PussyPass11/03/14 01:53 PM
0

I love how after the very first paragraph there's a link to the daughter who costed her family 80,000 dollars from bragging on Facebook. If that was a guy, they would have charged the family 300,000 dollars, amirite guys?
/r/PussyPass11/03/14 03:42 AM
2

Yeah, this subreddit is getting trashy. It's just such a mixed bag of legit issues and waste-of-time-toxic-nonsense. No one even knows what this guy said and they're pretending it doesn't matter.
/r/PussyPass11/03/14 03:39 AM
1

Lol you're full of shit. You don't KNOW if that would have happened. If it was a police officer's son, the very same thing might have happened. You make it so obvious how biased and dead-set on an outcome you are when you stick with such a wild and far-reaching assumption like that. It's morons like you that're tarnishing a real issue and turning it into something hateful and insulting.
/r/PussyPass10/03/14 08:29 PM
9

This isn't an example of pussy pass? The fuck. Are people only reading the title and upvoting? How stupid do you have to be? The video, the description, the news story, all say the cop on scene was the girl's father. Which means the neglect to enforce the law here has everything to do with family relations, and almost nothing to do with simply her gender. Classic example of the hive mind of reddit taking a totally legitimate issue of men's rights and turning into something toxic and useless.
/r/PussyPass08/03/14 05:09 PM
1

So which part actually bothered you? Seriously, I'm confused. She's pro everything this subreddit is about. What did Kathleen write on the stick she forcibly shoved up your rear?
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:46 PM
0

Title: Sex after drinking and the war on men. She mentions recent California legislature that says saying Yes isn't enough, now the female has to say yes persistently through the whole drunken sex act. She calls that law comical. She asks everyone to question the ideal that the male should be absolutely responsible in drunken sexual encounters. And right after that she addresses how silly it is that if you even bring up that point the kingdom will banish you(Referring to James, though she doesn'…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:34 PM
0

Isn't she just saying don't get shit-faced-retarded? I feel like you're reading into it too much. If you want perfect equality, then you clearly don't live in the real world. Have you watched the Olympics? Guess which gender is faster and stronger? Maybe since we're seeking perfect equality here, we should petition for mixed-gender-Olympics, because separating females and men is just sexists? When I read Kathleen's quote you have there, I instantly thought of construction equipment. If you're dr…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 10:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter