TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jermeiah Archive

View 14 posts and 141 comments by Jermeiah on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
36

Social IssuesJermeiah/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:11 PM
35

Social IssuesJermeiah/r/MensRights23/01/18 04:50 PM
21

Marriage/ChildrenJermeiah/r/MensRights13/01/18 01:50 PM
16

Social IssuesJermeiah/r/MensRights10/01/18 05:11 PM
16

DiscriminationJermeiah/r/MensRights12/01/18 03:46 PM
12

Activism/SupportJermeiah/r/MensRights08/01/18 02:21 PM
9

False AccusationJermeiah/r/MensRights08/01/18 02:32 PM
8

Marriage/ChildrenJermeiah/r/MensRights13/01/18 04:45 PM
6

Jermeiah/r/MGTOW06/02/18 11:25 PM
4

Social IssuesJermeiah/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:14 AM
2

Legal RightsJermeiah/r/MensRights04/02/18 11:15 PM
2

Jermeiah/r/MensRights06/02/18 09:00 PM
0

GeneralJermeiah/r/MensRights17/04/18 05:06 AM
0

Jermeiah/r/MensRights17/01/18 07:13 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

superior?
/r/MensRights18/04/18 01:51 AM
-1

Only because society? Who creates society? Who loves society most? Women. Does the chicken come before the egg? Is it not women's DEMANDING to be granted privileges, subltly or otherwise, that grants them privileges? Oh, but that would grant them the onus of RESPONSIBILITY, and we can't have that, now can we, fellow slave to the femme? We should, instead, blame men.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:27 AM
0

Thou hatest true & verifiable data differentiating the sexes? Thou feminist, please parlay; oh, please parlay.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:24 AM
1

spread the word dragonbreath
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:20 AM
2

Regardless, if there are differences in ANY test, it means there are differences between the sexes - which obviously, there are.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:18 AM
2

Why the hell is it feminists are complaining about this stuff? MEN should be complaining that they aren't allowed to express their natural sexuality. Males - men and boys - are constantly shamed and blamed for being ourselves. That's toxic as hell, and indeed, evil as hell.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 06:15 AM
1

Women are less inclinced to reality and more inclined toward whatever is convenient (thus their greater tendency toward expediency). Men are more inclined toward what is actually true. Yet, here comes the issue - to find the truth in this modern society is a journey, a battle, that takes many decades to fulfill.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 05:31 AM
-3

Men and women are different, you must be a retard to think otherwise. (Males are the more kind, thoughtful, honest, and caring sex.)
/r/MensRights17/04/18 05:18 AM
1

I spelled Myers wrong, ah fuckin well
/r/MensRights17/04/18 05:09 AM
1

oh no no no, she has a vagina - she cannot be a predator, nor manipulative, my dear; nor toxic, nor evil funny, tho - femmes are the toxic, evil sex
/r/MensRights17/04/18 03:15 AM
39

just typical female manipulation - drama, attention, emotional vindictiveness, mental torture
/r/MensRights15/04/18 07:01 AM
14

Hate sells (to bad people).
/r/MensRights15/04/18 05:07 AM
1

You could see how they handle this- Elizabeth Gilbert, author of Eat Pray Love: In a 2015 article for The New York Times titled “Confessions of a Seduction Addict,” Gilbert wrote that she “careened from one intimate entanglement to the next—dozens of them—without so much as a day off between romances.” She acknowledged, “Seduction was never a casual sport for me; it was more like a heist, adrenalizing and urgent. I would plan the heist for months, scouting out the target, looking for unguarded e…
/r/MensRights15/04/18 05:05 AM
2

Foolish? No. Best to get those shitty people out of your life by speaking your mind.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 05:04 AM
36

metoo Gilbert is an emotional rapist.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 04:56 AM
1

You're already only heard on there if you're a twit. Only what's popular gets seen.
/r/MensRights15/04/18 04:53 AM
68

How about Elizabeth Gilbert, author of Eat Pray Love? In a 2015 article for The New York Times titled “Confessions of a Seduction Addict,” Gilbert wrote that she “careened from one intimate entanglement to the next—dozens of them—without so much as a day off between romances.” She acknowledged, “Seduction was never a casual sport for me; it was more like a heist, adrenalizing and urgent. I would plan the heist for months, scouting out the target, looking for unguarded entries. Then I would break…
/r/MensRights15/04/18 04:47 AM
1

TBH, it sounds a lot like muslim heaven
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 06:28 AM
1

Innocence is a fine trait, and there is innocence out there. It is usually rewarded with brainwashing and betrayal at this time, resulting in corruption. A world of only serious men would become quite boring. I don't particularly like having to be in a position of wisdom, it's a lot of work, and life must leave room for play.
/r/MGTOW07/02/18 10:36 PM
1

Would we sacrifice their beauty? I know I myself have purged many of my own undesirable traits. I am sure some women are capable as well, given the right stimuli. In fact I have something of both the male and female aspects, so I know their value. It is only that the forms have been thoroughly corrupted. There is goodness in the feminine, the main danger being a tendency to seek comfort at the expense of justice - expediency. That is the viciousness of lack of care they expose to the world. And …
/r/MGTOW07/02/18 10:34 PM
1

Here's some good ones. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtue#Roman_virtues It's worth noting we're going to want women who are more than just beauties, though they might have their place too. Vindictiveness and manipulative traits will be undesirable in both sexes. Men, especially, should have the highest desires in mind, willing to do the honorable for the good of all, not ruled by selfish desires or delusions. It could actually be a place of love and joy, instead of constant drama and conflict …
/r/MGTOW07/02/18 10:26 PM
1

And which women will reproduce, then? Only the best. Men, too, best up their standards, for to be guided by the lowest principles common to the average person would lead us into a mire from which the only escape will be apocalypse. Or they need to learn to accept leadership from their superiors.
/r/MGTOW07/02/18 10:20 PM
1

that matter is the great determiner, or that all humans will enter the new earth regardless of worth (aka, the two great delusions of this age - mechanics over spirit, "equality" over merit)
/r/MGTOW07/02/18 10:14 PM
1

They breed dogs to be obedient, you know.
/r/MGTOW07/02/18 09:18 PM
1

That's based on certain assumptions that need not hold true.
/r/MGTOW07/02/18 09:17 PM
1

That is a nonsensical statement. Adieu.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 02:48 AM
2

It is sometimes good to look to the future, because the future will certainly contain many more awakened souls who have witnessed the destruction wrought by the mistakes of today, and will be ready to hear the answers. We write to the future, more than the present.
/r/MGTOW07/02/18 02:47 AM
1

Not my style. I do not recognize your authority to determine what others read and think for themselves, and it's your burden to take responsibility for your own actions and their correctness - not mine. Take care
/r/MensRights07/02/18 02:40 AM
0

There's nothing uniquely magical about the taco. Many alternatives exist. As men continue to elevate themselves, they will demand higher quality women. It is unsatisfying to mate with creatures who are uninteresting, and the more one's mind expands, the more one expects. Furthermore, there are practices that can use those energies toward other activities or ends that need not always require another body present. This is the beginning of a great awakening, and we are not bound by these mortal for…
/r/MGTOW06/02/18 11:44 PM
1

Piggy, you only ever believe what you wish to believe. You haven't changed in a decade. In this way, you are female. You are exactly as the lowly pussy-beggars and Futrelles of the world, lacking honor. Your kind will dissipate along with the other fish.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 11:26 PM
1

That is a defeatist attitude. The notion that the universe is uniformly cyclical is anti-human. There may be cycles, but to be ruled by them is to damn us to a uniformity of hell. The paradise can be extended to near infinite limits. By extending the limits, and surpassing them. We are not mere mortal shells.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 11:21 PM
1

Did no such thing. Those, such as yourself, who confuse the term "hate" breed hate themselves.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 11:19 PM
1

Depends on whether the laws are just in the first place.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 12:27 AM
0

Tacopina said Brinkley went against the recommendations of the district attorney and Mill's probation officer, who recommended "no incarceration for technical violations," and accused Brinkley of "taking an inappropriate personal interest in (Meek Mill) that goes above and beyond her role as a judge." Tacopina called Brinkley's behavior "a little stalkerish," alleging that she showed up at Mill's "community service for the homeless" last year and "watched him do community service." He also alleg…
/r/MensRights04/02/18 11:17 PM
3

Depends. Most of the shit they do is rote regurgitation or cheap sideshowing. I'd even say that the actors that do improvise and add genuine talent to a scene are far less likely to be granted big roles. Most of the big actors are just followers, they are cliche. Acting can be a real discipline, but it usually is bastardized into something corrupt. The ones you see on Twitter and Instagram are almost always going to be the latter. That's our "fame-infused" society. Ain't about talent anymore, an…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 06:06 PM
1

Nah, that's better. It's indefensible, providing a beautiful target for us to pierce with our gigantic penises.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 06:04 PM
4

They're thoroughly indoctrinated by the ludicrous ideology that men are to blame for everything. Of course they cannot fathom that a female could be guilty of crimes, even when they are factually the primary abusers of children. Are you still a fan of democracy, when most people are this stupid?
/r/MensRights19/01/18 06:02 PM
0

You're criticizing debate, not ideas. I agree, words can be manipulated. But that doesn't mean they always are. Tell abusers of a term not to use it, but don't tell me not to, when I know my motives are right and my usage pure! If you do, you are not for truth but for something else, and that's no good!
/r/MensRights19/01/18 05:56 PM
1

Let's face it, nothing good will come of limiting discussion. The truth will only be revealed through the chaos of unrestricted debate. Otherwise we will be constrained to the old patterns that were just as tyrannical as the new. Until we have something that we all love, we know we don't have it yet.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 05:45 PM
1

Feminist motto is not "coherence". It's "lust for material things by any means".
/r/MensRights19/01/18 05:39 PM
3

They're like spice. They add something to what already exists. Whether it was originally bland or not. It's sort of like sales. They're selling something, and most of them don't care at all what it is. That's why their political opinions should be the opposite of valued. They don't know anything, they only know how to append to something that already exists. They don't think for themselves, and thus - they are not true creatives. I'm sure there are some, but they usually won't be stars in Hollyw…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 05:30 PM
1

There may be some truth to that but there is a subtle difference between using "personal attack" and "ad hominem". Ad hom at least intrinsically includes the assertion that personal attacks are irrelevant, whereas saying "personal attack" leaves open room for the person to say "so what? it's like totally valid dude". That's the strength of ad hominem, and in most cases I've been involved with, it's used by actual victims of the attack. Yet it wouldn't surprise me if 'liberals' are starting to us…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 05:22 PM
6

If this were honestly about the future, it would at least say "to be left to only men". Then it would be about female inclusion in the future. Instead, it implies men should not be included in the future. The future is less important to them than to shame men. Their message isn't The future is important. Their message is Men suck and women should decide based only on short term desires - because that is what they are doing here, focusing on a cheap attack instead of focusing on a future which ob…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 05:16 PM
0

Regardless, immature catfighting among feminists is showing their weak points. I highly doubt "ad hominem" is vocabulary in feminist indoctrination schools, considering I've never met a feminist who doesn't engage in it immediately at onset. Pretty surprising to see one admit it's a real thing, and why? Because their ego was shamed by another feminist.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 05:09 PM
1

It's both. We have to stand up for ourselves, because we aren't surrounded by people who stand up for us. The old society is dead, dormant, asleep, and inactive. We can either create a new one that is alive, or rely on the dead to save us, which clearly won't work.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 05:06 PM
2

You too man. Good on ya.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 05:05 PM
1

Noble of you not to /r/ link to twox. Twox. Toxic. Sounds the same to me.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 04:39 PM
4

Lack of any male reproductive rights is the #1 men's rights issue. As long as males have no reproductive rights, wise men will choose to check out of society, and the world will only become more depraved. Only stupid people who make poor choices and who are easily swayed by women & a corrupt system will breed. It is impossible today for a man with real principles to allow himself to love a woman when he has no reproductive rights. No real man puts himself in the position of being utterly beholde…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 04:24 PM
0

You do have a subconscious unwillingness to act. I believe you could have done more. You didn't have to just stand there. Someone like that is going to take that as a sign that it's okay to do what they are doing. edit: What I'm really getting at is if you don't do something to stand up against this sort of thing, something real and active, you are going to be ashamed of yourself for not doing more. It's good that you posted it here, that means you care. So just keep your ears open for opportuni…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 04:23 PM
1

The entire system is too deeply flawed. It will have to collapse before any real change can take place. It's endless bureaucracy to fight for freedom, and endless ease to campaign for tyranny.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:33 PM
1

Democracy sucks.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:31 PM
3

Here's the video I probably should've linked in the first place: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjRYbR_-Dhw&t=1m49s She starts talking about interviewing Yasir Arafat and she sounds like one of those popular girls in the tween movies trying to diss another girl based on how "high class" she is.... It's unbelievable that these women fail to mature past high school drama and ego.... They only want to succeed so they can talk about it in front of a camera to nourish their fragile self-esteem.... N…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:18 PM
1

Pretty sick that the populace tends to grant leniency in their "verdicts" toward people already in power in a dying, corrupt system, and little leniency toward those heroes who stand up to it, who they label as "degenerates" for standing up for truth, justice, honor, and integrity.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 02:53 PM
-6

You don't seem very good at dodging or defending yourself. It sounds like you subconsciously like being beaten by women. This is an indication of a victim mentality, due to the hateful environment toward males. You need to stand up for yourself and block attacks. If you act like you don't mind and you're a willing victim, no cop's going to stand up for you. You have to stand up for yourself first. You have to value yourself more. Not surprising, given the state of the environment. They literally…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 02:30 PM
2

Are not the majority of the population complacent? Indolent? Uncaring? Selfish? The people only be getting what they want. Until the Leaders stand up. (And I sure as fuck don't mean the politicians.)
/r/MensRights19/01/18 02:23 PM
12

Note that he actually created something, whereas most people with a lot of followers are merely phonies (actors/idols), leeches, and softcore pornstars. That's the Feminized Instagram Nation for ya. FIN
/r/MensRights19/01/18 02:15 PM
50

"On matters of sex, women are not expected to tell the truth, hence cases of rape on grown women should be thoroughly investigated. I have heard some of these cases in New York police courts, some of which were white women who accused Negroes of attacking them, and in nearly every case it turned out that both had been lovers, and that the woman was trying to be revenged on the man... It will at least... be admitted that cases of rape should not be heard with the mob as judge and jury. ... Dr. Wi…
/r/MensRights17/01/18 08:45 PM
2

The accuser.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 08:45 PM
5

Because underlying our culture is an underlying assumption that women are not capable of taking responsibility for their own actions and should have the privilege of not being expected to. Feminists agree with this if you look at the policy they advocate for, although they claim with empty words that they are fighting against it. Such a society infantilizes the female and abuses the feminine aspect of the male, thereby creating gross imbalance and extremes of drama to be sold for a price at the …
/r/MensRights17/01/18 08:40 PM
15

As the biased editors do with many loaded terms used to push propaganda on Wikipedia, they use the term "misogyny" far too loosely. Actual "misogyny" would be hatred of women. Instead they use it to refer to any judgment that slightly inconveniences females or is honest about how women as a group tend to behave.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 08:33 PM
1

A Tibetan Buddhist nun confirms: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kUoTS3Yo4g
/r/MensRights17/01/18 07:41 PM
1

When males are forced into monogamous relationships by society and females so as to avoid being shamed for getting sex, there can be no such thing as "cheating" for males - again, it is just more shaming to allow females control over what males are doing. Monogamy favors only females, empowering them to manipulate and abuse male power, usually to the lowest ends. No woman owns my body or my soul. No woman gets to tell me who I hang out with or who I have sex with. I can have deep and lasting rel…
/r/MensRights17/01/18 07:14 PM
1

I'm too busy worrying about Donald Trump's hairdo.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 11:44 PM
4

I'm not sure that constitutes "rape".
/r/MensRights13/01/18 10:03 PM
1

The issue is that it's either sloppy or shows a genuine lack of faith in any males. It is written as a distinct universal statement with a strong usage of "disobey" as well, which may be for effect to satirize the feminist mindset, but I think it more likely that the author lacks empathy for males and has not been impressed by very many at all in his life, to write it in that way. It would have been better to write "total inability" to make it more outrageous to subtly sign its sarcasm, but I su…
/r/MensRights13/01/18 09:16 PM
1

Only base material needs and that often not at a very satisfying level. Spiritual needs are left out, psychological as well. I do not accept the definition of "need" as the bare minimum level for survival. Only an insane culture could.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 09:02 PM
1

Uh, no, you're arguing for a one-sided equation. I would like to see a comprehensive holistic approach. You're turning it into an absurdity, an extreme over-simplification. You're advocating for abuse, you're just turning it against parents in place of children, exacerbating the situation. No wonder, because you are supporting an abusive system. I am always rational. Your lack of care for people so you can blind yourself and continue to support an ideology, over people, is grotesque to me. Keep …
/r/MensRights13/01/18 08:53 PM
1

Are you insane? Give me some more of your wisdom. Sarcasm, the last vestige of the erring. Biology doesn't give uou the right to abuse or neglect a child. Never said it did. A corrupt government does not have the right to take away a father's children. A corrupt society riddled with anti-male hostility has a much lesser right than a father to determine what to do with his children. You seem to worship the government as infallible, which is pretty damn stupid. edit: If the choices are an idiotic,…
/r/MensRights13/01/18 04:30 PM
2

Yup, that's what it was: https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2018/01/13/amber-alert-issued-2-week-old-detroit-girl/1031163001/ Cordney Osterman had demanded entry to see his child and was denied by the girl's mother. That evil bastard! How dare he demand such a thing as to see his own child! Send him to prison so that he never will again! Good job, corrupt society.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 04:18 PM
1

Can't kidnap your own kids. Simple as that. Only way you can think that's possible is if you agree with the insanity that the government owns your children, and you. For that matter, the government is the one doing the kidnapping.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 04:08 PM
-24

Hm, he stood up without actually being accused himself, plus I can't find anything easily on Google of him castrating himself loving on feminist man-hate, so sounds like he's much less of a bitch than most of the males in Hollywood. Good for him for standing up without being forced to and without an ulterior motive. Maybe it's a thing with being a non-American. Less brainwashed. Connery, Gibson. Ireland, Scotland, Australia. But the British are obviously fairies. Daniel Craig disgraced himself h…
/r/MensRights13/01/18 04:03 PM
1

That's sick. While the media ignores actual abductions, they focus on trivial BS for sensationalism and easy ratings. Pigs will burn.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 03:58 PM
1

The thing that irritates me about this is they are covertly trying to use ME to hunt down fathers. And instead of being open about it, they blend it in with a valid alert system for actual abductions. So if I hear an alert, see a vehicle, I have no way of knowing if I am catching a criminal or robbing a man of his children. In that case, I don't know that I could in good conscience report even if I did see a vehicle. I'd have to either ignore it or track down the vehicle and see for myself if an…
/r/MensRights13/01/18 02:04 PM
2

He's on Fox News right now.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 03:47 PM
1

I could say "almost always" or perhaps "all else being equal". The main point is that a man is much more likely to be targeted than a woman by a group of thugs in most cases. It is much less "serious" a thing in the eyes of such to attack a male than it is to attack a female, so they are far more likely to attack a male. This is also because the government is much less likely to care when a male is attacked, and because even thugs have been indoctrinated with the idea that females are special an…
/r/MensRights12/01/18 03:27 PM
8

You are correct to assert that such a thing is symbolic cannibalism, regardless of whether the flesh is eaten, it is consumed, which is the important consideration. It is little different than stealing organs to "enhance" one's own life. It is basically the same mindset. Terminology contains archetypal data that is beyond the strictly limited definitions agreed to by modern society.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 01:36 PM
1

When we value merit, and we consider actual virtues rather than the manufactured ones that support a greedy capitalistic system, then we will have changed the foundation so that we can manifest these solutions. If we just revert to using the old tools of shaming women for making shallow, society-destroying choices, we won't have solved the underlying problems and they will continue to manifest in some way. Most males make pretty shallow choices too. We shame genuine superiority and worship medio…
/r/MensRights12/01/18 11:26 AM
1

Depends what they do with it. Do they stand up and change the world in whatever way they can? Do they change lives, touch souls? Do they use their knowledge for the good of mankind, and find something to do to help people? A lot of them do. Whether I reproduce physically on this planet is not quite as important as whether I spread truth, justice, and genuine love here. Those are my children.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 11:23 AM
1

Oh, haha, "is"? I didn't know it was that bad. I was thinking of the "sexual relations" part. "is" is better. Liberals....
/r/MensRights12/01/18 11:20 AM
1

Nah, that ain't true. It is not endless. The only way it is endless is if we endlessly ignore the problem and don't solve it at its core. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy then.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 09:05 PM
1

Depends what they're putting in it.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 07:49 PM
2

I'm not Latina.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 07:11 PM
3

Those are not men.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 07:10 PM
5

To be fair, you have to realize that it is true that they can't bear the thought to be seen of as slut, because of the way our society shames individuals for their natural sexuality and desire to get ahead through the use of it, while simultaneously hypocritically promoting sex as a vehicle to make money. Who would support them if they were honest about what they did and took responsibility? You? What's in it for them to face that public scrutiny, when no one will support them for it?
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:59 PM
8

It was definitely a male and written as satire. The main part I take issue with is the idea that men are unable to disobey their penii.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:46 PM
7

That is an astute observation, that this, and all other victimhood movements that are not genuine, are about a desire for attention, a desire to feel important. We as a society must evaluate why people are so insecure in this way, because it is not really all on them, but rather the failure of our culture to adequately meet the needs of the people and address these deep-seated insecurities. We do that, and we won't have to worry about it again.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:42 PM
1

It is good that the true perpetrators of hateful bigotry are so fully exposing themselves, showing their rhetoric to be little more than psychological projection and blind, vitriolic lynch-mobbing to attack those who might reveal it.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:37 PM
1

Except the study OP linked looked into this exact question, and found that women disproportionately experienced stalking and sexual harassment when they were harassed online. Now that I have some idea of what you were referring to, I will respond in kind. Based on what you have said (I have not looked at the article), stalking and sexual harassment do not run the full gambit of possible scenarios that I spoke of when I said "an unbiased and comprehensive study" regarding online harassment.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:31 PM
1

The OP linked an image, not an article. Be precise in your commentary about what you are talking about, rather than being imprecise and then using it as an excuse to snipe.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:21 PM
2

This sign seems like a good opportunity for street activism, whether in posters or news commentary.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:43 PM
29

You can respond directly if you don't think the attacker would be a risk to you An individual man is always going to be more at risk from several thugs than an individual woman, unless he has a weapon and training. An individual woman is protected by her female privilege of being seen as less disposable. The OP's sign is basically saying telling the more at risk victim to step up in place of the less at risk victim. Rather insane, really.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:42 PM
18

Bravo, meat shield! A woman not being cat-called is more important than you retaining your life!
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:38 PM
2

I've not lived there. Only America. I get my data from the pictures I've seen on things like OKCupid and Instagram. That particular picture is not pretty. The women are a little better, but they are not much better. Ah, so the culture is more cut off. They are more in touch with the everyday realities of survival. Thus, the structure of family would naturally be more important to keep the hearth fire lit in the cold. Not so much freedom to explore when sustenance is on the line. I do like the se…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:20 PM
1

I didn't say society needed feminism. I said society was in need of change before feminism came into being. Feminism is Lilith, an incarnation of chaos, a malformed but representative catalyst, naturally causing a reaction to cure the disease created by its own twisted field. We are a spiritually fallen species. We were fallen before feminism. We were fallen after any supposed liberation. We are still beasts of the field, toiling away, lost, in pain. We are not perfect, and until we are, we will…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:08 PM
2

Don't I know it. Regardless, society was in need of change before feminism. We can either use it as a trigger to correct the age old abuses and errors, or we can expect to repeat history. Without all this chaos, I doubt that order could have had the potential to be restored. Justice, spirit, sanity, love, freedom, balance. It is certainly the time for illumination of this dreary world. We need only step forward.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:48 PM
43

said that female engineers were less capable of leading others. Feminists have a way of interpreting the word "said" similar to the way Bill Clinton interpreted the word "sex". edit: Based on what /u/oursland said, this might be better phrased as: Feminists have a way of interpreting the word "said" similar to the way Bill Clinton interpreted the word "is".
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:44 PM
2

Do you enjoy the culture? The women? What is your purpose there? My impression of the women there is that most of them are, on a fundamental level, just as awful as most of the women in the west. It is merely that they are not allowed to express their awfulness as freely, and they have a motivation to pretend to be kinder. Yet they are still perpetuating the same gross and base lack of morals and genuine soul compassion. It is really sad how spiritually degenerate most of the women in this world…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:40 PM
1

I don't know what you are referring to. The main OP link has no information on stalking or sexual harassment. Well it isn't about whether you are right or wrong, it's about the discussion toward the truth. Which also leads us to... Who cares? I do, we do. We discuss these matters, we learn what's going on, we fix society. QED. As long as there are problems in the world, and especially obvious systemic dysfunction and disorder, only those who fear correction of that system, whether it's because t…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:34 PM
1

People have taken in this idea that positivity means blindly believing whatever you want to believe and expecting everyone to support you even if what you believe destroys lives. They are so afraid to criticize because of the "judge not lest ye be judged" paradigm, that they have become nothing but pedestals upon which dreams are dashed as good men do nothing, because they are no longer good. What the world needs is heroes, brave warriors who stand up for truth and do not compromise it.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:28 PM
1

Police do that all the time, to a lot of different people. The media ignores it. White girls do not get attention by the mainstream media when murdered by a protected group (cops, blacks, etc.), it does not fit the narrative of whites bad and privileged. Furthermore, even the media knows feminists are kinda gross, and you don't want to mingle a feminist who supports the police state system with her being murdered by that system, that creates too much mental confusion, and you have to keep the fo…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:05 PM
2

The cats could be seen as an analogy for how the feminist mind becomes riddled with nonsense. The more nonsense they accumulate, the more nonsense they need to sustain the delusion - cognitive dissonance, logical fallacy... and cats. Eventually, the entire neural network comes crashing down, you can't do math, two plus two equals r/twoxchromosomes, you incarnate as Zombie Jessica Valenti, and the reason your cat food costs so much isn't that you acquired a catacomb of 25 cats that smells of piss…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:51 PM
11

Come to think of it, perhaps we should think of feminism in the Darwinian sense. The best outcome is that feminists do not breed, or that they breed more feminists who will not breed. Anyone gullible enough to be infected by feminism will be destroyed by it. I don't see how this is a bad thing, in the long-term, as it breeds out weakness, stupidity, and, I daresay, evil. Perhaps this is a lesser cruelty. In that case, our job is merely to limit the fallout effects while allowing feminists the ro…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:44 PM
3

Yeah, it's all rather juvenile. Neither of the people in this story understand how to be mature in life. I guess you could say they were made for each other. So why aren't they dating?! Damn you, Feminism, another of Cupid's arrows has missed its targets because of your whimsical meddling! Just think of all the messy, skanky, stale cigarette breath infused copulation that will never be sighted or smelled between these two wanderlust vixens on account of your deviousness.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:34 PM
3

Stay away from women who smoke cigarettes, fellas. In women it is a strong indication of psychological volatility.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:31 PM
3

So if women experience a higher intensity of online harassment, then we would expect that women would find it more upsetting, if the type of harassment they are experiencing is more upsetting. The study you linked actually shows this - women tend to receive a higher proportion of serious online harassment like stalking. Men just get insulted. It does not show that women receive more serious harassment. It only shows that women react more strongly. Given that men are cultured to build up a strong…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:01 PM
0

There is nothing in that graphic that says men are harassed more often than women. Only the text says that, with no support for the claim. You will need a companion graph that shows the rate of harassment between the sexes. This chart is percentage-based, with the columns for each sex added to 100%. edit: Furthermore it is clear we would desire a chart regarding the intensity, severity, and types of harassment as well, from an unbiased source (I doubt such a thing exists yet because corporate-fu…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 01:50 PM
5

You can put some blame on the false accusers, but you must also put the blame on those who empower them - the weak men, the cowardly people, and the people in charge of the system and all those who support it. It is a systemic problem that can only be solved by changing our culture to the core. Individuals are, in a way, merely symptoms of a larger disorder. I would say, personally, that the people who enable females to falsely accuse are more guilty than the false accusers themselves. The femin…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 01:38 PM
4

Those aren't biases. When you are aware that the system does not allow male rape defendants to be properly defended, you CANNOT in good conscience convict a male accused of rape without serious, unquestionable evidence that an actual rape occurred against the will of the other who did all that could reasonably be expected to put an end to the encounter. The only way to do this is video evidence. Because there is always A REASONABLE DOUBT, otherwise, because the system in place is known to hide e…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 01:30 PM
9

Gals just defending they right to gossip. Justice ain't nearly as sexy as drama, and women* be lovin' they soap operas. *Using term loosely
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:42 AM
-6

Please be careful of women until you've matured (at least age 35). We "grower, not shower"'s take time to mature and are vulnerable to being manipulated until we have developed a strong sense of self.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:36 AM
5

Ha.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:19 AM
19

It's crabs in a bucket.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:18 AM
-3

No.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:12 AM
-7

Wow, I would not want you covering my 6.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:10 AM
19

Who's your "us"? Concern trolls?
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:08 AM
3

Had to? That's pretty spineless.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 02:04 AM
13

Reddit is the same way.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 01:58 AM
18

You must be joking. The man is a hero.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 01:46 AM
4

He's their darling- they want to fuck him. Simple as that. These people are not deep- they are ruled by lust for superficial traits, and actors like Franco are superficiality incarnate. It's the ones who do not have the image of the "sexy 'cool' playboy" archetype that will be given over to the sacrifice.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 01:24 AM
0

Monogamy has largely become sanctioned jealousy, quite appropriate for a culture based on fear and conflict. Any culture that encourages its women to bitch at its men for putting their dicks in someone else's hoo-ha grants far too much power to the irrational, heedless, selfish, and short-sighted side of the female gender and the species in general, creating a situation of endless brutish hostility and preventing any sort of lasting peace. The only fairytale is that monogamy has ever worked to m…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 01:16 AM
4

Full interview of Monsieur Franco: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpEuHHMy-Z8 Note that he makes a point to mention (as an excuse) that he fully supports racist, sexist affirmative action policies that guarantee positions for the underqualified based merely on skin color and lack of penis. Such actors cannot be trusted or relied upon to be anything but puppets for the system the way it is, the very system that encourages and supports any and all misandry. When targeted, such cowards as Franco w…
/r/MensRights10/01/18 08:22 PM
1

When it comes to age of consent, I'm more interested in consistency of thought rather than where the age is set. As far as people using their power for personal gain. I don't disagree that it's a human trait. I don't disagree that tribalism is a human trait. We see how cry bullies like Lena Dunham have abandoned "principles" when members of her "tribe" were caught up. There is no "age after exiting the womb" that is valid for an age of consent. It is not a valid criteria that can be set and be c…
/r/MensRights10/01/18 08:16 PM
5

Sarah Tither-Kaplan The entire industry is built on exploitation. For that matter, so is our society. It's a money-based slave system that turns humans into machines. I'm not sure what you mean about Kidman. I do think the people in our society are chock-full of hypocrisy, seeing as they idolize all these stars for their sex appeal rather than substance, yet they're going to complain about this sort of thing. Perhaps Kidman was using her position of power to get laid? If you think about it, what…
/r/MensRights10/01/18 07:34 PM
-2

Keep in mind the people who want to paint men as sexual deviants by nature don't have a lock on the #metoo tag. Males too could use the tag to point out instances of sexual harassment and abuse by females or against males, not just the case when it's a male abusing a female. Going further, we can use the #metoo tag for basically any injustice we face that doesn't get enough attention, from disenfranchising of males in university and the workplace, to biased domestic violence law, to being ostrac…
/r/MensRights10/01/18 07:08 PM
5

Yep. We have to see it through all the way, look beyond the surface. Evaluate sexual harassment policy in the workplace, through to affirmative action racism and sexism, abuses of the prison industrial complex and favoritism for women in sentencing, allowance of domestic violence by females in the media and real life, etc. etc. etc. Understand the true dynamics of sexual interaction and stop criminalizing and shaming normal healthy behaviors. Evaluate the effectiveness of current social policy a…
/r/MensRights10/01/18 06:14 PM
11

It's kind of sad in a way if they are really just doing it to preemptively excuse their own harassment. When females start calling out females, demanding they face the penalty for their abuses, I'll be impressed. When you only have mercy once you've been caught and you're the one being targeted, or you can see you're about to be, then to allow you to get away with a free pass is the antithesis of justice.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 05:59 PM
10

That's a good start. Next they need to acknowledge women's abuses [edit: and demand they face justice], to show that they aren't merely campaigning further for female privilege to do as they please without consequence.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 05:56 PM
3

Do your own thing, what seems right to you. Then you will find those who are of like mind.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 03:35 PM
3

Anger is a symptom of a feeling of impotence. I hope that one day Humanity can embrace a more empathetic nature and realize that people who lash out in not-so-helpful ways are merely expressing their sorrow (in this case because of a lack of attention to the bigger picture) in the only way they've been taught.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 03:30 PM
1

Any communication method that can be seen by wider audiences is effective, I'm sure. Twitter has its negatives, websites do as well due to restricted commenting policies, even Facebook can be effective.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 03:15 PM
5

Every comment on a piece like this that leads people to the wider picture - not just the sanitized version designed for the general populace - is valuable. That will grant you the outliers, people who had never considered the wider men's issues but care about the truth. It is up to US to provide the connection, the bridge between the story and the wider issues.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 03:12 PM
2

It's NBC. She probably felt strongly about the story.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 03:10 PM
3

Brian Banks
/r/MensRights08/01/18 02:47 PM
11

Seems like a rare case where a trial by jury could be worse due to the ignorance and prejudice of the general population? (Though most judges, I'm sure, are just about as bad as the general population in terms of misandry.)
/r/MensRights05/01/18 09:08 AM
1

Correlation != causation
/r/MensRights05/01/18 08:35 AM
-1

Yeah, the world really does not need a bunch of unrestrained mindless sluts running around either. That path leads to depravity. If we refuse to learn to control ourselves and expand our minds, we will continue to be relegated to the dust, because we won't be able to handle more freedom. A spiritual practice can be helpful in this regard.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 03:34 PM
0

I'm not worried. Monogamy as a standard is a surefire way to destroy civilization through guaranteed stagnation because excellence is not prioritized, only conformity at the lowest level. Either humans will continue to choose to be selfish and prioritize their own shallow and short-sighted desires over the good of the race, or people will realize that we should favor the traits that will get us to the stars rather than forcing a false equality at a very low level. Either we think long term and s…
/r/MensRights28/12/17 03:07 PM
1

Sure. Other variables are the ratio of males to females and whether marriage is taking place, also whether sex is tied explicitly to reproduction. Human males are naturally polygamous. Only our obscenely restrictive culture shames males enough into fooling themselves otherwise, causing widespread neurosis and inability to think rationally - because thinking rationally means you'll realize what has been done to you to make you ashamed of your own natural sexuality. It is much the same as how male…
/r/MensRights28/12/17 02:11 PM
-4

No need. You cannot conclude that polygamy itself creates violence. A lack of sex can create violence, but there are other factors that may be adjusted to allow both polygamy and ensure all beings are sexually satisfied. Polygamy is the natural state of things. And monogamy tied to reproduction is a very poor strategy for optimization of human potential, extremely limiting and stagnating.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 12:14 PM
-5

Monogamy is a sin. It would be irrational to conclude that polygamy is the cause of this violence. Rather, there are other solutions.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 11:57 AM
7

Let's face it, those indoctrinated into the "feminist" cult are nuts. They have no understanding of sexual dynamics or anything really. The following clip from Empire Strikes Back demonstrates some subtleties of human male-female courting that only an incredibly addled mind could blaspheme with the label of rape: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMk0-pZfx5Q&t=55s But according to feminist ideology and what they hope to make law, Han did indeed rape Leia in the Millenium Falcon, and Leia totally d…
/r/MensRights24/12/17 05:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter