TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jero79 Archive

View 0 posts and 59 comments by Jero79 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Perhaps you don't look at it as goals but as milestones. Once you reach you first milestone you already have a new goal to work towards. Right now I'm in the process of losing weight. I want to lose 90kg(or 200 lbs) I've already lost 57 of those. But when I reach that milestone I already know that I've just reach the point for me to start gaining muscle. (right now I can't 'cause I'm doing a 500cal a day diet, lifting would destroy more that it would build up). Perhaps this works only for self i…
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 05:05 PM
19

"In societies where men heavily outnumber women -- in what's known as a 'high-sex-ratio society' -- women are valued and treated with deference and respect and use their power to create loving, committed bonds with their partners and raise families" That was her world 10 years ago and she didn't use her 'power' to create a family.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 06:39 AM
18

The problem is the flow of the money. Not every coin comes in at the exact time you need to spend it. Sometimes you have to wait for it and spend money you saved up to overcome the gap. When the money finally comes in, it goes back to the savings or you treat yourself. I can't see anything wrong with that.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 12:58 PM
18

Just not part of the family
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:54 AM
6

It IS a misleading title. The full quote from the article: Blachman believes that in modern Denmark, where there are strict equal opportunities laws, men have become emasculated by powerful women and silenced under a cloak of political correctness. If you want to shorten the title in proper context it would be: "Blachman believes that in modern Denmark men have become emasculated by powerful women and silenced under a cloak of political correctness." One guys opinion, not based on facts.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 07:36 AM
18

That is not how you cite sources. You can't just add the URL www.wikipedia.org to the bottom and leave it at that. You need to be a bit more specific. We expect feminists who argue their case to do the same and dismiss them if they don't.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 06:51 AM
10

Seriously fun read. Thank you for posting this.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 09:11 AM
3

Never mind the fact that it's a repost from one of the top 20 all time submissions in mensrights. (even the title is ripped off)
/r/MensRights24/05/13 08:12 AM
-3

Thursday April 12, 2007
/r/MensRights10/05/13 12:45 PM
0

of course he's at -36. Why should we let someone we disagree with and who we don't like voice his opinion? He might sound resonable. We might come to the conclusion he's not such a bad guy. Others might think he's not a bad guy. We can't let that happen. Downvote everything!!
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:29 PM
10

It's sad that the most controversy spawned because qfyh2 is a mod of /r/feminisms. We don't like it when feminists automaticly assume you're against female rights when you say you are MRA. Why are we doing the same?
/r/MensRights04/04/13 08:52 PM
64

/u/qgyh2 is a pretty well known reddit user. One of the first ones. He/She's probably a moderator on a lot of subreddits for his own subreddit /r/tldr Maybe it's just one of his/her tasks to add sponsored links and isn't the one who paid for said link. I would like to see more proof before I'll join the lynchmob.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 07:04 PM
1

Please don't downvote people trying to explain their actions and opinions. You might not agree with them, but they do contribute and are very relevant to the discussion.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 09:26 AM
2

Thou shalt not kill.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 09:08 AM
-14

I agree with you. Sadly this is a forum where women are the enemy and whenever she does something wrong all actions of the male involved are instantly forgiven. Till the moment she still had that baby inside her she had power over you, OP. Now she did everything to make it right with you and she just went through a horrible procedure. She redeemed herself. I can understand that this doesn't make the lying and deceit go away. The trust is broken and might never be repaired. I can understand you w…
/r/MensRights27/03/13 09:03 AM
39

Losing friends is never something to celebrate about.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 02:50 PM
2

only 14? January 2011 was 26 months ago.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 07:29 PM
7

January 23, 2011 by menareangrynow
/r/MensRights18/03/13 12:43 PM
-2

Yeah. You signed an obligation to take care of the child. You didn't make that promise to the state or the mother. You made that promise to the child. No matter how much changes, the child didn't do anything wrong to you and you should keep that promise. The fucked up thing about all of this is, that the mother benefits equally from that promise. Something should change about that, but I can't see what that should be without hurting the child. It's fucked up, but the law is not wrong.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 11:19 AM
-9

I'm nog saying she is blameless. She could've done more to stop it, but what happened was rape. Amy Dickinson is an american and writes for the Chicago Tribune. Such a pairing being legal in Canada is not relevant. The age of consent in some countries is 12. I can't imagine myself pushing onwards when she told me where to stop and with her body language thinking no. I would at least look her in the eyes and ask: Ok?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 03:52 PM
6

Yes this is rape. Read the article again. Se says: "I wanted to make out with him, but I did not want to go all the way and told him so." It's not that hard to imagine a girl being paralyzed by fear when being that intimate for the first time. She didn't say no when he pushed, but he should've asked. He didn't. So he didn't have concent, she did say no. He raped her. and that's even besides the fact that she was 16 and he was 19.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 03:22 PM
1

Here's what can also be logically derived from his brave and chivalrous statement There is one universal truth, applicable to all countries, cultures and communities: violence against men is acceptable, excusable, and tolerable. You do realize that logic is flawed, right? Lets change the quote to: "There is one universal truth, applicable to all countries, cultures and communities: violence against humans is never acceptable, never excusable, never tolerable." If we apply your logic to that stat…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 08:51 AM
1

I can see where they come from, and how this can be justified. I'm not agreeing with them, and I'm glad where I live the laws make a little more sense, but I can make an argument where they get the idea in the name of equality. When a man cheats on his wife, he leaves no physical evidence behind. There is nothing to hide, to keep the truth from coming out. A woman, being stupid enough not to use a rubber (or two, to make sure) isn’t that lucky. To level that playing field a law could be made for…
/r/MensRights15/02/13 10:06 AM
-1

And you can't blame a male without being sexist. I never said it wasn't. It's not even that sublte. All I'm saying is if the genders were reversed, the article would still hold true. There is no gender bias here.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 01:55 PM
0

She does have culpability. She agreed. She allowed. It was her choice to go along, even though it was within her power to say 'No.' She's an incredibly immature 18 year old. Maybe I just hang out with smart teenagers, but most of the young adults I know are smart enough not to do something as drastic as this. Apart from the example she used, in this case the manipulator being Rouslan there is nothing in there blaming men in that article. She is writing about a manipulator, and nothing points out…
/r/MensRights11/02/13 10:45 AM
13

Most MRAs are good at this. It's feminists who... In a reply about finger pointing. I can see the irony in that.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 10:27 AM
1

the last state to revoke the right to vote for women was New Jersey in 1807. They got it back in 1920.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 04:39 PM
5

People were sexist in the 19th century? I would've never guessed. Is this from before or after women got the right to vote?
/r/MensRights04/02/13 02:31 AM
9

It is professional and proper. I wouldn't want it any other way. He is in a custody battle which is a red flag: "When asked why I informed them it was regarding a custody issue." With a woman he isn't married to: "I correct people who label my son's Mother as my ex-wife." and who has sole custody: "She did have sole custody" How could you not double check? I can understand that the whole ordeal trying to get some rights about the well being of your son, and wanting to be there for him, but pleas…
/r/MensRights01/02/13 11:25 AM
3

But it is adding a different view to the discussion. Disagreeing with it doesn't make it any less relevant and therefore should not be downvoted.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 10:56 AM
6

Yeah, cause that's the main thing that's wrong with this. The money. Why is it that MR always thinks first about the money? What about if the child wants to know who his real father is. What if he finds out? They meet. "Why did you ran out on me, daddy?" What if they both never find out? What if the father is carrying and obscure genetic disease that could complicate the childs life if he doesn't know about it? But above all the fucking moral implications that you just don't do that against some…
/r/MensRights17/12/12 02:45 PM
-3

/r/atheism has a bad name here on reddit. The subreddit is a giant circlejerk filled with post mocking religion and self glorification, decent content is nowhere to be found on that subreddit. It's the example used for other subreddits prone to circlejerking.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 05:38 PM
1

I'm not that outraged by this judgement. The judge made a sound argument why he made it. And it's not like she's completely free. I was thinking if jail isn't a good fit for here. Why not place her under house arrest, but after reading this: At Smith’s sentencing Thursday, Judge Robert Higinbotham imposed the shortest jail sentence with the longest possible probation period. He ordered Smith to continue treatment with the VisionQuest Recovery Society at Harte House in Surrey, where she has essen…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 03:34 PM
-1

The woman was arrested within 3 hours after he reported her to the police Mr. Nock alerted police shortly after 4am and Goode was arrested at 6.21am. This happens all the time, in every gender combination. Party A files charges against party B. Party B says "It wasn't me, it was party A." And NO! people will often not get arrested for reporting false charges. What else was the police to do? Not take one of the claims seriously? It's post like these that make this place look more like an atheist …
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:49 PM
12

You know... Hitler was a charismatic, intelligent and articulate man. Godwin's law in /r/mr. I know I'm gonna be downvoted for that one. Just to be clear though. He makes an excellent point and I agree with him all the way. But I'm just saying: Don't let the way a point is presented sway you into giving it more credibility. Listen to what he says, not just the way he said it.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 11:02 AM
0

Yeah. These kind of post really take down the appeal of this subreddit for me. It's just too damn hypocrite. Right now the top post of mensright is this. A post explaining that a single event of heinous acts don't represent a gender and have nothing to do with gender equality. There is nothing to see here. 3 people commited a violent crime against a person. The 2 adults got sentenced jailtime 8 and 7 years. The minor also pleaded guilty. Justice was served. What has gender to do with it?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:46 AM
3

Perhaps the stigmata about women being weak, about being the victim, would not have been there if all the women who felt threatened would kick males in the crotch. Perhaps we would be the ones needing the protection, or would not feel safe walking home. It makes me wonder. Just to be clear. That was a little what if thought popping up here. I never condone violence and if she would've kicked him in the crotch she should've been arrested for assault. Would the world be a different place if for th…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 01:08 PM
1

But that's just the point, though. Isn't it? The black and white view doesn't work. Otherwise this would be a non issue, and the CSA statement below would be final. The CSA said that if Mr Langridge had used an official sperm donation centre he would not have to pay child support – but informal arrangements are not covered by the law. Or should we cherrypick the black and white views that work in our favour?
/r/MensRights29/10/12 10:01 PM
1

"The answer to both those questions is because they're woman." A spokesman for the CSA confirmed the situation. "The law covering unlicensed sperm donation has always been very clear. Only anonymous sperm donors, at licensed centres, are exempt from being treated as the legal father of a child born as a result of their donation. Seems that being women has nothing to do with it. Don't you agree it's just as stupid for the man not cover his as, when there are clearly laws in place to protect this …
/r/MensRights29/10/12 06:52 PM
-4

How long should you be looking in the distance for that one? A couple wanted a kid. They couldn't get one of their own, so they seek help. They found it and got said kid, which they could easily support. More than TEN FUCKING YEARS LATER, the partner split and the mom can't make ends meet. How was the decision to get a child stupid? Please, enlighten me.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 06:28 PM
6

Sorry. I've had an inbox full of replies with false assumptions, turning this thread into the same gender bashing the wrong kind 'feminists' do. I'll try not to sound condescending next time.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 03:41 PM
3

I meant her partner. Her ex.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 03:35 PM
4

Get your facts straight, please. She wanted a child with her partner. And they could support a child. Now that the partner split after a decade, she can't afford it. But she should've looked into the future and realized that 10 years from now her partner would leave her and her kids.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 03:34 PM
5

No she doesn't. She wants money from the government. Which she is entitled to. The government wants money from Mark. Learn to read.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 03:30 PM
-12

wasn't it his choice to help her without using an official sperm donor center? Nice black and white view. It wasn't her choice to be a single parent, but things do change. We scold feminists here for having such black and white views, and think of ourselves as better than that. Nice way to prove that.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 02:29 PM
2

Perhaps she feels that way. But some people really do need financial support from the state to get by. Who is to say she has that money to send back? Perhaps the government could admit they made a mistake and remedy the situation. It would probably all boil down to that in the long run, but that's a plainfully slow process. In the mean time, I'm not gonna decide who has to fork over that money and who has to starve.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 01:33 PM
5

If they even asked her. The name of the birth father is known to the government. Before donation he had to fill in all kinds of forms with name and signature to donate his juice of life. The CSA probably didn't need to ask the mother who the father was. They already knew.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 01:26 PM
9

In the UK donors aren't allowed to have anonimity. The child has a right to know who the biological father is. Link wiki table that says no anonimity
/r/MensRights29/10/12 01:12 PM
2

First of: It's not his fault. That being said though, I don't think this is rape. It's hard to judge what happened with only a few lines of tekst. Did she force herself on him? I mean physicaly or with forms of blackmail? If not I have to agree that he could've done more. If I would reverse the genders here and the guy would be sent to prison for years because he raped her, it wouldn't seem just to me. I wouldn't call him a rapist. Sexual harrasment yes, but not something that should destroy his…
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:44 PM
39

Never trust a woman? The problem here isn't with the woman. She just filed for support from the state. Any parent would file for such a support. The CSA then wanted money from the father. It's more clear in the guardian link below. Mark Langridge, who has been with his partner for 16 years (and in a civil partnership for the last five), has called on the government to review the law after the CSA suddenly demanded that he start paying £26 a week for two children he technically fathered over a de…
/r/MensRights29/10/12 12:23 PM
1

This is the best thing I've ever read in this subreddit. This should have more upvotes. I'm off to watch her youtube channel. Tnx for posting this.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:25 AM
1

Every so often I like to catch up on this subreddit. It's not one I'm subscribed to. I didn't see this when it was posted, but I still wanted to say something. That's why you are getting a reply 20 days late. The thing that's bothering me here most (and one of the reasons, I don't want to read this subreddit daily) is that you have to explain being overprotective and assure the readers of your post that you would never harm your little sister. Don't. It's the natural state. You should never have…
/r/MensRights27/09/12 11:07 AM
11

"before we finish this foreplay and head down to where we know this is going, could I request you sign these consent forms?" "Thank you, and here's your copy. Now let's get nasty."
/r/MensRights27/09/12 10:51 AM
19

What's this doing in Mensright? She is being charged with three felony counts. She's still in jail. and won't get out unless she can fork over $500,000. Where's the injustice? Is it the reason she's giving? Depressed people need help. Who are we to judge what she felt?
/r/MensRights05/09/12 02:48 PM
-2

"Only you can prevent skincancer" What? How dare they imply my cells are anything but top notch? This sticker is making you aware that rape exists. It's not saying you rape people. It's not even close. It's saying. "Think about what rape is." 0,5% of the women in the US are victim of rape. Over half a million women in the US were victim of rape. Don't you think something should be done about it? A soft touch just isn't helping. It's a scale only going up. The only thing that seems to help is to …
/r/MensRights29/05/12 01:44 PM
-7

Trying to add to the discussion: I don't see the harm in this. Sure, it wouldn't stop a person who is set out to rape someone. But everybody needs to be aware that rape exists, what rape is and when you need to stop actions, you didn't think are harmful. There are tons of horny teenagers around. And they are drinking an aweful lot. One of those horny teenagers takes a girl home and gets invited in for a drink. A real drink, not a "drink", like he thought it was. He doesn't know his own strength …
/r/MensRights29/05/12 10:32 AM
3

do priests count?
/r/MensRights20/10/11 03:12 PM
-1

Crime Victims Support Association president Noel McNamara said the sentence was a disgrace. "If it was a man on those charges it would have been a different story," he said. Not sure about that one. Akwijsobj said it best in r/WTF Men have had the same luck as this woman had. Other women didn't get off that easy, the same way other men didn't get off that easy. There is no double standard here.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 08:59 AM
2

Crime Victims Support Association president Noel McNamara said the sentence was a disgrace. "If it was a man on those charges it would have been a different story," he said. Not sure about that one. Akwijsobj said it best in r/WTF Men have had the same luck as this woman had. Other women didn't get off that easy, the same way other men didn't get off that easy. There is no double standard here.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 08:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter