TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jesus_marley Archive

View 11 posts and 3,163 comments by Jesus_marley on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,163 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The problem lies in the "extrajudicial" punishments where an accusation is enough to get you fired, make you homeless, or even be murdered.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 06:47 AM
7

Ummm... ew...
/r/MensRights28/04/23 10:18 AM
9

Luke Harwood in the UK was kicked until his head caved in because of a false accusation.
/r/MensRights28/04/23 10:16 AM
8

When female privilige backfires...
/r/MensRights27/04/23 10:46 AM
2

The slaves didn't end slavery. It was the people with influence that accomplished it. There is no shame in enlisting or accepting help from people who can leverage their voice where you can not.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 10:05 AM
3

If you don't want people questioning how you got a job, then you can't have policies that prioritize irrelevant characteristics over ability and knowledge.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 09:50 AM
1

Johnson controls. Truth in a name...
/r/MensRights23/04/23 09:44 PM
4

Fom the moment they are born, boys are steered down the path of stoicism. Boys don't cry, little man, tough little guy. We are trained to stifle our emotions from an early age to make our transition to disposable adults easier.
/r/MensRights22/04/23 12:40 AM
46

As I always say, it is not my responsibility to alter my innocuous behaviors to assuage your irrationality. You do not get to dictate where I go or how I get there. If you feel threatened by my mere existence, you are more than welcome to walk away, cross the street, and/or lock your door. I will live as I choose with no regard for your childishness.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 01:01 PM
4

It's called intentional unfalsifiability. Defining a term such that There is no possible scenario wherein it does not fall outside the parameters.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 03:20 PM
1

You replied to me. Someone needs to teach you the very real difference between "I don't like it" and "you can't do it".
/r/MensRights31/03/23 01:07 PM
1

Well duh. Those are things that don't just affect yourself. As an adult, Me getting a tattoo does nothing to you. Me getting circumcised affects you in no way, shape, or form. Me buying a bottle or rum has no impact on your life. As an adult, Personal choices that affect only Me, are none of your concern.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 12:14 PM
1

Whatever floats your boat, dude. We tax tobacco heavily to discourage consumption. Same with alcohol and tattoos, body mods or any other plastic surgery. And yet I can go out, buy smokes and beers, and get a tattoo.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 07:45 PM
1

As a consenting adult you can do whatever you want to your body, though. I am not going to stop you if you want to be circumcised as an adult. That is your right. So, no. It's not the practice itself that is the issue, but who it is performed on.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 07:04 PM
1

The issue Is not circumcision. It's circumcision on children. The entire purpose of circumcision as a religious practice was to offer up a personal sacrifice to God as a show of faith. A child cannot make that kind of decision. Instead of giving a sacrifice, they become one.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 01:33 PM
2

Allowing someone to put their penis inside you, knowing that semen will come out of it, is your choice. Full stop.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 04:54 PM
2

Either the fetus is living person and abortion is murder, or it isn't. You cant have it both ways. If the fetus is not a person, then there is no innocent life to worry about. Walking away from a pregnancy is as difficult as crossing the street.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 04:52 PM
6

Run away back to 2XC, troll.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 03:34 PM
5

And there it is...
/r/MensRights23/03/23 03:33 PM
24

He was put in prison for "contempt of court". Debtors prison is illegal. This is the work around that they use.
/r/MensRights20/03/23 08:49 PM
71

That's the whole point of social aggression. The exercise of power to bully and control others. The three primary avenues are, ostracism and isolation, reputation destruction, and proxy violence.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 11:23 AM
1

As you should.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 03:21 AM
0

waste of time, you are.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 02:32 AM
0

So you take issue when the "opinion" that killing a person is "forced" upon others. Who exactly do you believe is being "forced" here? And try not to be a condescending shitheel.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 10:49 PM
-2

So you think that it's ok to kill a person if you don't acknowledge their humanity?
/r/MensRights15/03/23 06:14 PM
5

As odious as it sounds, make arrangements to always have someone (a woman) with you when your daughter is there with you. it's basically the Pence rule. At least until the issue of custody is resolved.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 09:21 AM
12

Perfect example of education being no substitute for intelligence.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 09:38 PM
62

Dude. This is Google we're talking about. They are so ideologically possessed You'll sooner see a doodle celebrating David Duke's birthday than anything acknowledging, never mind celebrating, men as a group.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 02:19 PM
5

This screed of yours has nothing to do with your previous statement. If you believe it does, you have extremely poor communication skills.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 07:05 PM
5

Not even. The state gets paid to enforce child support. The federal government gives the state incentives for "strong child support enforcement" under title IV-D.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 06:52 PM
2

The suffering she claimed was of her own making. She should have been left to reflect on the reality that she murdered all 5 of her children.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 12:29 PM
12

It's not the parent going for the money. It's the state. The state doesn't want to pay for the kid, so while they will initially fork out the welfare payments to the mother, they will sue the dad to recoup the money. They'll take away his driver's license as punishment first (because that makes perfect sense), then they will send him to jail for "contempt". This rape victim faces 18 years of indentured servitude to his rapist. Forced to provide money for a child he had zero choice in or face deb…
/r/MensRights04/03/23 10:14 AM
1

The whole point of equality is to acknowledge the issues that affect both men and women.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 12:13 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 10:37 PM
1

Pay equality is a garbage metric. Fight to be paid what you are worth.
/r/MensRights26/02/23 10:10 PM
1

She flinched back when he put his hand up and she then grabbed it. He said " don't touch me" an she slapped him. He then responded.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/23 03:17 PM
5

He put his right hand up to her and she grabbed it and pushed it away. Then she hauled off and hit him.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/23 11:50 AM
6

I disagree. As they were married at the time of the win, it became a marital asset. It's no different than when this woman tried to hide her lottery win from her soon to be ex... https://www.theguardian.com/world/1999/nov/18/3
/r/MensRights16/02/23 09:35 AM
3

Those boys ARE Boko Haram now.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 10:28 AM
3

No, vulnerability is strength. Men make ourselves vulnerable every moment of our lives. It is only in emotional vulnerability that men are reviled because it invites compassion for the disposable class.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 09:30 AM
1

Women are the razor, men are the blade. You don't care about the part that gets thrown away. Men are conditioned to not share trauma because to share trauma invites compassion. And men are taught from childhood that no one is interested in showing compassion to men or boys because they have no intrinsic value. Their worth to society is measured in their productivity. Why do you think that when men are mentioned in tragedy stories, they are identified by their occupation? That's when they are ide…
/r/MensRights12/02/23 09:27 AM
12

Disable all biometric unlock features, like face recognition, fingerprint, or retina. Only use a passcode. Passcodes are classed as speech so you cannot be compelled to give it up. Biometrics are not. You can be compelled to provide biometric information.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 01:04 AM
2

People hold tightly to their religions and don't appreciate having them criticized.
/r/MensRights24/01/23 08:03 AM
4

Yeah whatever, dude. Equivocate all you want.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 09:33 PM
6

I agree, in and of themselves, dominance and privilege are not discrimination but that was not your original claim. Your claim was a social system in which positions of dominance and privilege are primarily held by men.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 02:34 PM
3

a social system in which positions of dominance and privilege are primarily held by men. Then what else is it if not a claim of discrimination?
/r/MensRights18/01/23 12:30 PM
22

The presence of disparity is not proof of discrimination. You need to provide evidence, beyond the fact of disparity, that indicates a social system designed to create said disparity.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 01:29 AM
6

You are welcome to make that choice for yourself if that is how you want to go through life. No judgement. All it requires to not feel obligated though, is to accept the truth that no one is entitled to your obsequience.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 10:42 PM
39

I am not responsible for the irrational reactions of strangers while I engage in innocuous activities. It is not my responsibility to alter those behaviours to assuage your fear, regardless of your personal history.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 06:54 PM
24

People who call men privileged are falling for the Apex Fallacy. The look at the small percentage of spaces at the highest echelons of achievement, note that they are occupied by a majority of men, and then extrapolate that small percentage to men as a whole.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 01:23 AM
9

Easy now. That's shit a fascist would say.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 12:53 AM
5

If you view Feminism as a religion, it makes infinitely more sense. Women are both the chosen people, but also endlessly oppressed and persecuted. Patriarchy is the Enemy. It is the ethereal force that Feminism is righteously working to defeat. It is the unfalsifiable nemesis. Women aren't doing as well as men? Patriarchy. Men arent doing as well as women? Also patriarchy. Meanwhile Feminism is the way to enlightenment.
/r/MensRights08/01/23 12:03 PM
1

It doesn't . That's the point. The process is the punishment.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 03:56 PM
9

Mandatory with reasonable room for opt out. The waiver is an affirmative claim by both involved parties that fulfills the purpose of paternity test.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 06:08 PM
14

Then they can both sign a notarized waiver.
/r/MensRights02/01/23 05:59 PM
4

Here's an example. In Canada, a man named Ahmed Borhot was part of a puff piece praising him for giving back to the community as a barber during COVID by a large mainstream news org. Fine. A couple weeks later, a small "extreme right" news org called Rebel, posted a story about two homosexual men who were threatened and assaulted by Mr. Borhot and his brother (on video no less). None of the "main stream" sources touched the story. Then when it finally became necessary to acknowledge what happene…
/r/MensRights01/01/23 09:31 AM
15

I don't see any laws restricting girls from engaging in STEM from an early age. If they choose to enter the field later than boys how is that anyone's fault but their own?
/r/MensRights30/12/22 01:03 PM
25

Sounds like the consequences of choice to me.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:30 AM
20

"EXCUSE ME SIR, ARE YOU SUGGESTING THAT I AM KIDNAPPING MY OWN DAUGHTER? WHY WOULD YOU MAKE THAT KIND OF AN ASSUMPTION? DO YOU BELIEVE THAT A LARGE MAN SUCH AS MYSELF IS INCAPABLE OF BEING A LOVING RESPONSIBLE PARENT? IS THIS HOW YOU TREAT MOTHERS IN YOUR STORE, SIR? DO YOU FEEL THAT YOU CAN ACCUSE MEN OF BEING PREDATORS? DO YOU THINK IM A PREDATOR, SIR? WHY DO THINK IM A PREDATOR, SIR? AM I EMBARRASSING YOU FOR YOUR SEXIST ASSUMPTIONS? " Keep this up until they ask you to leave, then contact a …
/r/MensRights28/12/22 05:33 PM
1

Asked and answered. Twice.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 11:15 AM
1

All war is conflict. Not all conflict is war.
/r/MensRights28/12/22 04:11 AM
1

Asked and answered. Several times. That you didn't like the answer given is not my problem.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 07:34 AM
1

Well, it's pretty clear now that you are adamant about not accepting any view except your own. It's already been explained to you quite clearly. I'm not going to give you answers for each ever more obscure hypothetical scenario you can imagine.
/r/MensRights27/12/22 12:42 AM
1

Substitute One that takes the place of another; a replacement. A word or construction used in place of another word, phrase, or clause. A person put in the place of another; one acting for or in the room of another; theatrical, an understudy; specifically (military), one who for a consideration serves in an army or navy in the place of a conscript; also, a thing serving the purpose of another. competition is the thing serving the purpose of conflict. It's the methadone to heroin. It's the "lesse…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 03:32 PM
5

People have an inherent affinity for conflict. How it manifests is a function of choice.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 10:22 AM
9

That doesn't change what it is. Methadone is a substitute for heroin. That doesn't mean that methadone is the same as heroin, just that it is a stand in.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 09:45 AM
13

It is a substitute. Just as play for predators is a substitute for hunting. It's skill training, fitness training, and muscle development. All things required for physical conflict. The "war" is not in the modern sense with guns and rockets. Just look at lacrosse for example. In the traditional aboriginal Canadian version, each team consisted of about 100 to 1,000 men on a field several miles (several kilometers) long. These games lasted from sunup to sundown for two to three days straight and w…
/r/MensRights26/12/22 09:33 AM
24

The process is the punishment.
/r/MensRights26/12/22 03:13 AM
70

There is a big difference between offensively hitting someone and using force to defend oneself. The use of reasonable force as a means of defence is always acceptable. The idea that women are untouchable because of strength difference is absurd. Weaker than =/= harmless.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/12/22 01:48 PM
1

A person being raised to live in fear of their environment is not my problem. I don't care if you "feel" safe or not. You Are allowed to feel that way, but don't expect me to do anything about it. It's an iss-you not an iss-me.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 02:52 PM
19

The gay kid being gay wasn't the problem. Every male character was portrayed as incompetent. Either physically, emotionally, or both. Well, except for the gay kid because to portray the gay kid as toxic in any way would be verboten. Every female character was genius level smart, and incapable of personal failure.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 11:36 AM
1

Where did I say I avoid work parties?
/r/MensRights21/12/22 08:54 PM
1

Where did I say i avoid normal parts of human life?
/r/MensRights21/12/22 08:42 PM
2

Why would you think I was afraid? I recognize the risk and take steps to avoid it.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 07:03 PM
2

Already answered in my previous post.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 04:48 PM
2

But the problem isn't that you might get in an accident. A more accurate analogy is that someone could file a false accident report against you. I have very little fear of that as there are rigorous safeguards in place to prevent that kind of fraud. If there was suddenly a new campaign called "believe all pedestrians" where anyone could say you hit them with your car and you could go to jail and your insurance rates would skyrocket without evidence of wrongdoing, you would see a sharp decline in…
/r/MensRights21/12/22 04:19 PM
1

Carcrashes are also fully investigated to determine who is at fault. Insurance adjusters examine claims and root out fraud. It really quite difficult to falsely claim damage to your vehicle when every claim is thoroughly examined.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 02:53 PM
2

It's not like he needs the money. He already won. Her being an insufferable twat shows her character. JD being the classy Chad shows his.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 03:35 AM
1

I don't live in the UK. I have no idea about the range of available options that may be there. Therefore, I am unable to recommend a specific vendor/product. That said, similar to buying a pregnancy test, I would recommend going with a product/vendor with a strong reputation for accuracy/reliability versus simply cost. Telling that poster they should not have commented is just arrogance writ large. Be better. Edit- and like a coward, you block and run away when someone dares to say something you…
/r/MensRights20/12/22 06:23 PM
4

Dont be a tool. Just because he can't recommend a specific brand, he can still offer advice on what criteria to prioritize when shopping.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 06:05 PM
2

You wouldn't hit your spouse so much if they didn't make you angry, right? I mean if they would just stop antagonizing you all the time you wouldn't have to teach them a lesson.
/r/MensRights20/12/22 12:25 PM
1

I agree. Especially when you have one with a disability. The way I see it, the guy is 50% responsible for the pregnancy and so realistically should bear some of the cost to end it.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 05:17 PM
1

Why should anyone besides the mother pay? It was her sole choice to bring the child into the world, therefore it is her sole responsibility. Regarding pregnancy, where the man has no say regarding the choice for abortion, I would suggest that he, upon relinquishing rights/responsibilities provide half the cost of an abortion to be held in escrow. The money is either given to the mother when the procedure is complete, or returned to the father if she carries to term. Either way, the end result re…
/r/MensRights10/12/22 04:17 PM
-1

Except that consent to sex is not consent to Parenthood. This precedent exists, not only in the establishment of legal abortion, but also in safe haven laws which exist in all 50 states. A mother is allowed to abdicate personal responsibility to the child not only during the pregnancy but also afterwards with zero legal or financial repercussions. Contrast that against the father who, not only does not have any legal say regarding whether a child is born, is also held financially responsible, ag…
/r/MensRights10/12/22 12:31 PM
11

What if it's not up to me? What if I'm not staring at all but someone thinks I am? This is why subjective and arbitrary criteria for determining whether a crime has been committed are inherently unjust.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 04:19 PM
8

Ah yes. The old "stare at the ground and shuffle your feet". The way black men were expected to behave in the 19th and early 20th centuries so they didn't "appear threatening" to the white women.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 04:08 PM
14

What qualifies as "persistently"? 10 seconds? 2? 60?
/r/MensRights09/12/22 02:40 PM
3

Nothing to do with the existence of the child. There is no child until it is born, which is at the sole discretion of the mother. It is her completely solo and independent decision that I have no legal part in making.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:52 PM
5

Consen to sex is not consent to Parenthood. They are mutually exclusive. if the woman does nothing at all but allow her body to do what it does a baby will come from your actions. No. By her choice. I had nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 12:40 PM
3

All your choices are passive when a woman has to actively make a decision whether to keep it or get an abortion. Not passive. Non existent. . You do absolutely nothing besides irresponsibly impregnate someone then leave them to deal with the consequences of your actions. It has been made clear in law, that my role regarding the pregnancy is non existent. I have zero input regarding how the pregnancy proceeds. I therefore have zero responsibility for the outcome. You dont want children then keep …
/r/MensRights01/12/22 11:10 AM
3

I'm not concerned with the pregnancy. What concerns me is that I am held responsible for a child that I had no say in regarding its existence. She has the full and sole choice regarding it. If she chooses to carry to term, that is her choice. Thus her responsibility. Imposing responsibility upon someone who has no choice in it is morally wrong. If I choose to speed, can I force you to pay the fine?
/r/MensRights01/12/22 05:44 AM
3

Don't throw if you don't want to catch.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 05:28 AM
3

There is only risk if the woman chooses to take on that risk. If she does not, then that is also her choice. I have no input. By law. That means that because of her sole choice to bring forth a child, I would then be required to use my body against my will for the benefit of another person. That is debt bondage. A form of slavery.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 05:24 AM
9

Men will never and should never have equal decision making on an entity residing in someone else's body. I don't care what a woman does with her body. I do care about my own. That is my point. If she she has the sole power decide whether the child exists, then the sole responsibility for that choice lies with her. The only thing I chose to do is engage in sex. That's it. Everything else is her choice. Whatever choice she makes is hers and hers alone. As such, the idea that I am beholden to her f…
/r/MensRights30/11/22 11:09 PM
11

Nope. Consent to sex is not consent to Parenthood.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 10:27 PM
5

First off, many two parent households exist at or below the poverty line. Children live in poverty all the time. Secondly, living in poverty does not equate to a child with no viable future. Thirdly, the child only exists because of the unilateral choice of the mother to bring it into the world. Why should a person who was not given the choice of being a parent be held responsible? Remember consent to sex is not consent to any other following condition, such as Parenthood. Should you be required…
/r/MensRights30/11/22 10:24 PM
3

Consent to sex is not consent to Parenthood. Men have no say in whether or not a child is born by the mother. That choice lies solely with her. Yet men are expected to be responsible for the choices made by another person. Responsibility without choice is slavery.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 10:14 PM
2

Or only 9 years...
/r/MensRights30/11/22 09:54 PM
11

"But women have it worse!" "It's not a competition" is the only correct response to this. Also turnabout is fair play. When she starts slagging off men for whatever reason, do the same for women. People don't recognize how their behaviours affect others until those behaviours affect them.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 03:13 PM
2

Counterpoint. I hated it even before I knew who the main villain even was, nevermind whatever "comeuppance" they received at the end. Also, calling someone an "incel" is sex shaming akin to calling someone a slut. Fight me.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 07:32 PM
6

I support equality under the law. If the law of the land says abortion is legal, then men also have the choice to walk away from a pregnancy. If the law says that abortion is illegal, then both parents must accept responsibility for their choices. It's an inherently biased and unjust system that imposes responsibility upon one party for the choices made by the other.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 04:16 PM
1

Her defence is that she's a "respectable woman and mother" so there is no way she did it.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 06:14 PM
24

Luke Harwood was killed by two men. They acted on a false accusation of rape made by a woman. Women murder using men as their weapons.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 04:59 AM
30

Before all that, the only thing they had was pussy.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/22 09:39 PM
-1

It isn't. The death penalty has no effect on crime rates.it also kills innocent people.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/22 08:41 AM
-8

Regardless of the level of certainty in this case, the death penalty still kills innocent people. It is invalid as a means of justice.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/22 03:20 AM
4

The unlikeliness alone warrants paying attention to it.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 03:38 AM
8

Wow. For the author to put that level of deliberate ignorance on full display has got to be arguably the weirdest flex I have ever seen.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/22 01:27 PM
5

The irony is that women demanded to be treated equally to men, then called it misogyny when we started doing it.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 10:28 AM
40

Stop ovary acting.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 09:18 AM
105

A man's illusion of strength is his weakness. A woman's illusion of weakness is her strength.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 07:46 AM
3

Many FAs are "extrajudicial". That is, they don't go through legal channels and follow the formula of social aggression (isolation, rumour, proxy violence, and reputation destruction).
/r/MensRights31/10/22 11:44 AM
1

Flowers. My wife buys me flowers. I think it's nice.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 07:30 AM
5

There is no pay gap. There is an earnings gap. Same work same pay = same earnings. Change either of the first two and you change the third.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 07:19 PM
1

In the religion of Feminism, patriarchy is it's devil. It is the adversary that leads the unwashed astray and is the cause of all the world's suffering. If only they could accept the truth and freedom from thought the Feminism provides.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 10:48 AM
1

And these are just the ones that go through channels. Then there are the "extrajudicial" accusations where an accusation results in the accused getting beaten and or killed.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 12:33 PM
16

Only if they didn't earn it. I don't care if someone has more than me if they earned it. I do care if they have more than me because of an immutable characteristic. Being a woman isn't a skill. It has no more inherent value than being a man. Giving women extras simply because they are women is discrimination and it is illegal*.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 03:11 PM
2

"What women have had to put up with throughout history and in many cases still in this day and age, you suggesting misandry is a big problem is just cringey and embarrassing." Expressio unius est exclusio alterius. The express mention of one thing excludes all others.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 02:14 PM
3

Pick me men? We always called them pussy beggars.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 07:40 AM
8

What women and men have had to put up with... That being the absolute catastrophe of existence that men and women have had to face together. This idea that in a world where survival was a daily struggle, only women suffered in it is such an absurd proposition. Like , did you even once stop to consider just how ridiculous you sound making such a claim? Do you seriously believe this? I mean, seriously? Seriously???
/r/MensRights23/10/22 12:55 AM
5

They also killed her dog...
/r/MensRights22/10/22 07:37 AM
3

If they had played favourites the daughter would still be there. As I said, they played the "believe women" role as they have been trained to do. They are still responsible for their lack of due diligence, as is every other person who accepts an accusation without question. That said, there's a world of difference between negligence and malice. Justice requires that we understand that.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 07:21 PM
2

This is going to sound horrible, but the parents acted both "in good faith" AND without due diligence. They believed they were doing the right thing at the time despite the fact that they never bothered to question the story (as they have been socially trained). This does not absolve them of the responsibility of their actions. I just don't believe their actions were done with mailce. The stepsister however, intentionally lied about being sexually abused. That is an egregiously malicious and evi…
/r/MensRights21/10/22 01:05 PM
3

Weird autocorrect. fixed now.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 11:10 PM
11

What exactly is wrong with two adults acting on physical attraction? Why does there need to be more than that? It's not like I would lie to them or make them think I wanted more. You seem to be trying way too hard to find something to disagree with. That said, this is all hypothetical as I'm happily married anyway and have been for 17 years.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:44 PM
8

I never said anyone had to follow the formula. But as a general rule, large age gaps tend to carry disparate SEPARATE priorities from the parties involved. But whatever floats your boat.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:27 PM
4

I'd argue more so. I can guarantee that I would shoot myself if I had to date someone in their 20's. I won't lie, I'd have sex with them, but that's about it.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:25 PM
-56

Exactly, although the saying goes that half your age plus 7 is the minimum age if you want to have anything in common.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 02:00 PM
6

Yes it is, Absolutely without question, a big deal.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 10:03 AM
47

Turns into a witch-hunt? That was the entire point from the beginning.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 11:28 AM
8

All first dates should be separate checks. The purpose is to get to know the person you're out with and see if you're compatible. If they're worth a second date, then the person who asks, pays.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 04:03 AM
13

Every time youre alone in a room with a woman, there is a proverbial gun on the table. Not every woman will use it against you, but they all know it's there waiting to be used.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 07:23 PM
4

When dealing with the one up game, tell her that it isn't a competition. The fact that women are victims does not negate male victims. Two things can be true at the same time. Remember the phrase "it's not a contest".
/r/MensRights10/10/22 09:18 PM
7

When she listens openly to the "men are trash" tictoks or other videos, ask her straight up if she believes what she is hearing. Keep asking questions. Don't argue, just ask questions about her positions. every time she gives you an answer, ask her clarifying questions. Make her think about what she is actually supporting and why. Ask her if she thinks you are trash. Ask her why or why not? Lead her to her own logical inconsistencies. She will be resistant, but if she gets there on her own she w…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 09:15 PM
9

You do your job and investigate. Take statements, get info. It's not hard. There is a lot of information to be garnered from a simple examination of the scene and initial interview with those who are present.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 04:55 PM
13

They outright refused to acknowledge any exculpatory evidence he claimed to have. That makes the investigation incomplete. That's like arresting someone for theft and refusing to look at his receipt.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 08:11 PM
5

Castreau
/r/MensRights30/09/22 06:52 PM
17

He was charged based on an, apparently intentional, incomplete "investigation". Due process applies to all stages of a criminal complaint. Not just the ones you want it to.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 06:51 PM
6

Calling a person stupid is indeed an Ad Hominem attack. Being wrong does not equate with stupidity. Calling a person stupid when they make a poor argument is a direct linking of A with B.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 06:20 PM
2

So what? Hes human like everyone else. His isn't perfect. He's not a Messiah. He makes mistakes like the rest of us. Although I'd argue he's far more willing to admit to them. His failure to adhere doesn't invalidate the advice. My question to you. Why are you so invested in his failures? Isn't the good he has done for disaffected young men and women enough for you to give credit where it is due?
/r/MensRights30/09/22 06:14 PM
2

Ok. You've been heard. What else do you want from this?
/r/MensRights29/09/22 05:30 PM
1

You aren't answering my question.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 05:27 PM
1

Ok
/r/MensRights29/09/22 05:27 PM
3

Asked and answered in a seperate thread.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 02:28 PM
3

That wasn't my question.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 02:27 PM
3

But he never told you to shut up, yet you made that the crux of your response. That's the point. Fomenting conflict unnecessarily.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 02:27 PM
7

Your responses. You seem to be highly conflict driven. Even going so far as to intentionally misrepresent others arguments so as to feed that drive.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 01:46 PM
3

But where exactly in his post was he saying anything specific about women?
/r/MensRights29/09/22 01:42 PM
5

You seem to have a lot of pent up rage. Maybe you should see a therapist about your irrational hatred?
/r/MensRights29/09/22 01:40 PM
2

Where exactly in OPs post does it say anything about a woman?
/r/MensRights29/09/22 01:34 PM
9

No. It's just projection. At best its women complaining about the men in there lives finally trusting them enough to open up with their feelings and the feeling of disgust these women then develop from seeing that vulnerability.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 09:05 PM
4

Ask yourself how old they are. People in power tend to stay in power til they die. Women have just as much opportunity as the men to rise to fill those holes but it takes time as well as the ambition to do so. Men tend to have more of that ambition, so men will naturally comprise a greater percentage of positions, simply by virtue of there being more men than women to fill them.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 02:22 AM
8

And? Women have just as much opportunity to rise to the upper echelons of government as men do. The fact that more men than women WANT TO, does not alter that basic truth. The basis of patriarchy is built entirely upon an Apex Fallacy. That is, the extreme top end of the social heirarchy is primarily men so therefore all men benefit at the expense of women. It's absurd.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:32 AM
3

Still waiting for your first...
/r/MensRights20/09/22 05:33 AM
2

Well a retainer is standard practice. They're going to have a lot of billable hours for this level of work.
/r/MensRights19/09/22 01:40 AM
1

Like, all of them? Why would the lawyers in Toronto be accusing you of the same stuff? This is starting to sound a little weird.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 06:01 PM
1

Look you still have options here. If you don't pursue them, that's your choice, but don't complain about "no justice" if you don't even try to get it.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 05:57 PM
1

Contact your ombudsman.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 05:52 PM
1

Wow. You need to file a complaint against the officer and the department. Not only did this officer threaten and intimidate you into withdrawing a sexual misconduct complaint, but he then chose to directly interfere further with the process by contacting the regulatory body and use the weight of his authority to sabotage your complaint.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 09:44 AM
10

Thank you.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 02:35 AM
19

When men get killed they aren't people. They are identified by their profession.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 02:20 AM
1

My point is that who you determine to be a threat, and how, is entirely up to you. I have no control over that aspect of another person's thinking. What I won't do, though, is allow their bigotry to determine my actions. I don't really care if someone is afraid of me. If I'm doing nothing wrong and going about my day, I am not going to alter my innocuous behaviours to assuage someone else's irrationality. Their feelings are not my responsibility.
/r/MensRights15/09/22 02:20 AM
3

To be fair, I as a man, view all unknown people as potential threats. That doesn't mean I live in fear, it just means that I exercise situational awareness. I'm not going to run away or cross the street if someone is walking behind me on the street, but I also won't dismiss them. If someone is walking towards me, I acknowledge them with eye contact, sometimes a nod. I'm never looking for a confrontation but I'm always ready for one. That's just how it is. I don't complain about it because it's b…
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:04 PM
237

Anything bad happens to men. "Women most affected!"
/r/MensRights03/09/22 01:51 AM
26

Well, the left also tried to equate Peterson with the Red Skull for fucks sake.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:16 PM
10

"meant to" and "are" are two very different realities.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:32 PM
2

Up until the mid to late 1980s, it was accepted practice that neonate babies did not feel pain.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 01:03 PM
17

We have a similar saying. Dont shit where you eat.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:31 AM
2

Going to the deletion discussion page, the votes are overwhelmingly in favour of keeping the article, so there is that.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 01:59 PM
26

social aggression. It takes the form of criticism, shunning, rumours, insults, and proxy violence (utilizing another entity to exert physical violence on you behalf).
/r/PussyPassDenied29/08/22 06:26 PM
28

Meanwhile, Bruce was actively hunted by the US Army for years, lived in hiding and pursued every possible avenue on self control he could think of, not only to protect himself but everyone around him. Even going so far as to leave the planet. And she has the audacity to think that being mansplained (barf) to is worthy of complaint? GTFO.
/r/MensRights22/08/22 05:35 PM
3

Sadly I have no doubt that some exist. People can be irrational.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 10:27 AM
15

Dude. You're the victim in this. You're parents might be a bit upset about it, but you are not going to be in legal trouble. Chances are they'll be more pissed off at the pedo blackmailing you.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 09:50 AM
54

Ok. How about this. It's not illegal to be in debt. Good luck getting a job with a security clearance if you have a lot of debt.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/22 10:40 PM
2

Vasalgel is a North American Version of RISUG. A procedure developed in India around 40 year ago. It's been undergoing trials but has had funding issues. Also marketing is a concern since it's a single use procedure and has no long term profitability.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 02:16 PM
6

https://www.wptv.com/news/national/during-confusion-of-aurora-theater-shooting-jamie-rohrs-left-behind-his-baby-girlfriend-daughter Dude was lambasted for weeks because of this.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 10:55 AM
9

And 1 was shamed openly for not doing the same.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 03:33 AM
16

Welcome to the Kafkatrap. Where denial of guilt is proof of guilt.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 07:55 PM
18

When demand outstrips supply...
/r/MensRights10/08/22 05:20 PM
3

"it's not a competition" is the only response you require.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 12:45 PM
18

Men are the villains in the DV narrative. The villain is not allowed to be a victim.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 05:26 AM
8

The Medal of Honour series had an entire game about a female French Resistance fighter. 22 years ago. Medal of Honor: Underground (2000) is a World War II first-person shooter. In Underground, the player takes the role of Manon Batiste (Basedon Helene Deschamps Adams), a French woman who appeared in the firstgame as an advisor. The plot of the game begins before the originalMedal of Honor, when Manon fights for the French Resistance beforeAmerica entered the war. As the plot progresses, Manon is…
/r/MensRights03/08/22 12:36 AM
0

of course it is, and schizophrenics really have people living in their ears.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 04:57 PM
0

your own twisted mind is enough.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 04:29 PM
5

name one thing that a white person can do today that a black person is prevented from doing.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 12:48 PM
3

The bigotry of low expectations. The idea that blacks are inherently incapable of performing as well as whites and so must be given special consideration to mitigate that inherent incompetence.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 12:46 PM
3

incorrect. The best candidate is the one who can perform the functions of the position better than any other. Immutable characteristics are irrelevant. Saying a white male is less qualified because "white male" is racism. full stop.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 12:44 PM
0

meh. words are just words. You arent going to change the mind of a mindless zealot. Let them spew their bile and then step over the puddles.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 12:38 PM
3

It's upsetting to the masses to witness a woman experiencing violence. Therefore it is rarely if ever shown, only suggested. You see it quite a lot in the actual CM movie. It's a lot of tell, don't show.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 04:45 PM
5

"Women ovary act to being condescended to."
/r/MensRights24/07/22 08:26 PM
4

Now read what you just wrote, and then go back to your first comment.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 01:34 PM
1

But they are the same. That's the thing. The difference isthat only one side is being heard. Expressio unius est exclusio alterius. The express mention of one thing excludes all others.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 12:55 PM
1

In an environment where men are conditioned from childhood to never complain, you use the rate of complaint by gender as an accurate metric? Seriously? So again, why focus solely on women's safety, instead of the safety of all users?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 10:53 AM
1

Why is women's safety of a higher priority than the safety of all users?
/r/MensRights22/07/22 10:34 AM
3

Not sure about the states but a criminal background check in Canada, required for all municipal jobs, looks for unpardoned criminal convictions. If you require a security clearance, the check is more indepth, often looking at financial history and debts to determine a risk of vulnerability to bribery.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 03:38 AM
11

Feminism is an ideology. Arguably it can be classified as a religion. In either case, it is absolutely subject to examination and criticism of its failings, specifically in the assumptions that inform it's various conclusions.
/r/MensRights20/07/22 03:09 AM
11

You mean accept responsibility for their choices...
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:24 AM
85

The conditions required for a man to have a realistic chance WRT contestation is a significant factor. Ei. Documented and repeated instances of abuse by the mother, drugs and or alcohol, neglect, etc. Under normal circumstances, thanks to the Tender Years Doctrine (fought for and won because of feminism, BTW) women are considered by default to be the parent of choice when determining custody.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 09:15 AM
6

Abuse victims often refuse to admit that they are, and believe that it is in their power to "fix" their abuser.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 10:25 PM
6

Saying Someone has a small dick is an insult meant to ridicule their success at reproduction, and to suggest that a behaviour is an overcompensation tactic.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 01:01 AM
1

Here's one I found with a simple Google search... https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2014/09/woodland-hills-youth-development-center-the-dark-secret-of-juvenile-detention-centers-is-sexual-abuse-perpetrated-by-female-staffers.html
/r/MensRights11/07/22 09:02 PM
9

Lene Nystrøm.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 11:29 AM
39

Men in the west are circumcised without their consent. They are also compelled by law to provide labour in benefit to children they had no legal say in regarding their existence.
/r/MensRights05/07/22 09:22 PM
37

To be respectable, men have to abide by the doctrine of disposability. That is, always be willing, ready and able to sacrifice their wants, needs, desires, and safety, for the well being of others, primarily, women and children.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 11:50 AM
39

Why is that woman commenting about men?
/r/MensRights04/07/22 03:00 AM
6

Probably a female victim.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 01:57 AM
15

Brian banks, Soner Yasa, Dominic Scullion, Luke Harwood, Paul Nungesser... The list goes on...
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/22 04:35 PM
77

Self defence is reasonable force sufficient to stop the attack. If biting a person's penis is the only reasonable option that you have, then it is justifiable as self defence.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:38 PM
8

Ironically, if the alleged victim of the attempted rape stopped the attack by rendering the attacker unconscious, then bit the attackers penis, then the alleged victim would actually be a rapist by putting their mouth on the penis of an unconscious person...
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:35 PM
3

Never before in the history of humanity has an oppressor worked so hard to ensure the comfort of the oppressed.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 09:45 AM
1

Brian Banks...
/r/MensRights01/07/22 12:28 PM
1

So did Brian Banks...
/r/MensRights01/07/22 12:25 PM
5

This is in response to Gian Ghomeshi trial when Lucy Decoutere was caught out in her lies with evidence in Gians possession. The judge in his decision outright called Lucy a liar and lambasted her and the other accuser for colluding with each other regarding their testimony. Unsurprisingly, they were never prosecuted for any of it.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 02:31 AM
1

Communist Russia was a utopia on paper as well.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 02:05 AM
12

One! One crazy Karen! Hah hah hah! Thunder and lightning
/r/MensRights26/06/22 10:21 AM
78

Tell them to stop ovary acting.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 01:11 AM
9

If someone owes you money and you never see them again, it's money well spent.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 02:39 PM
3

The dependapotomus in her natural habitat
/r/PussyPassDenied14/06/22 02:52 PM
15

I think you're just ovary acting.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:22 AM
2

I wouldn't pick her last for dodgeball.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 09:42 PM
9

Still, the idea that they impersonated FBI agents in order to entice accusers is epic.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 07:48 PM
1

Technically Camille Vasquez won the argument. He had to hire a woman to beat a woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/22 02:10 PM
47

A pretty face, and the influence of JD goes a long way toward advancing ones career, even without the requisite talent.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/22 10:29 AM
7

Except Heard accidentally admitted on the stand that Depp was who she wrote the article about.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 11:30 AM
8

Patriarchy is to feminism as Satan is to Christianity.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 10:22 PM
8

I haven't stated otherwise. Yet you are still trying to argue about the relative values of male vs female violence. It's not a question of severity. It never was. No amount of violence is acceptable from either sex. Yes, men are objectively stronger than women on average and can inflict greater damage in a shorter time, but think of it like this. If your answer to the question of 2+2 is 5 or 50, does matter how much you were off by? I rather not get punched at all.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 01:52 PM
8

No. They are both assault. You are trying to create a false dichotomy using severity as a metric, when the simple truth is that whether it's one punch or ten, it's still the same crime. Violence is violence regardless of who does it.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 12:22 PM
7

It's not a contest. It's like asking which is worse, a punch in the dick or a punch in the throat. It doesn't matter since they are both acts of violence.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 11:24 AM
3

you have no idea if that person has been assaulted in the past and carries trauma from it, If I had nothing to do with the initial trauma, then I bear no responsibility to mitigate it. It's not my job to accommodate your "trauma based bigotry". If you are unable to perform your assigned task with impartiality then you have no place doing that job.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 09:24 AM
28

The nisvs survey estimates approx. 1.1 million women were raped in 2011. That same survey, using the exact same criteria for men showed 1.06 million. Except men were listed under a different category "other sexual violence". This was done specifically to preserve the narrative by only counting female victims under the "rape" category even though those questioned answered the exact same questions.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 02:55 AM
35

Incorrect. Women and men are nearly equal +- 4% on rates of physical violence.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 02:47 AM
31

Doesn't matter. It's still true.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 02:27 AM
47

it's because a man could easily overpower a woman Weaker than =\= harmless. A woman can inflict significant damage as well.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 02:04 AM
7

Take a second look at what I wrote.
/r/MensRights19/05/22 07:50 PM
28

Because the women work for 23% less pay. /S
/r/MensRights19/05/22 02:34 PM
15

Do you enjoy being followed whenever you go shopping because you might be a thief?
/r/MensRights19/05/22 12:16 AM
2

Not sure how it works in the UK, but you may want to consider contracting with a reputable property management firm to take care of the rental. It's what I do and it's 10% of the rent which I can claim as an expense for tax purposes.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 11:27 AM
1

Don't you know? Being stared at means that you have drawn attention. Attention means that you stand out. Standing out means you don't pass, so being stared at is a constant reminder that people see through your facade, which makes you feel bad that others won't participate in your fantasy, which is violence of a fundamental level.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 10:03 AM
19

Likely both.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/22 11:46 PM
27

Men are still entitled to the same treatment. If women get 12 extra days off a year, so do men. The reason for those days is iirrelevant.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/22 11:45 PM
3

Because the dregs will find comraderie amongst themselves.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 07:18 PM
2

It's possible but it took two years from the letter to the arrest. I'm thinking the investigation in that time uncovered some significant evidence.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/05/22 04:17 PM
2

Did you just assume their gender??!?! REEEEEEEEEEE
/r/MensRights01/05/22 10:08 AM
31

No. Intentionally evil.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 11:15 PM
3

Sounds to me like she grew some self awareness.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/22 12:02 AM
3

The thing is, different activities require different physical standards. There are tasks which require short bursts of great strength to accomplish, such as lifting and carrying a wounded 250 lb comrade out of immediate danger. The ability to endure a 20 mile march won't help with that as much as being able to do 50 pull-ups will. It's the difference between the muscles a runner uses when doing long versus short track.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 04:55 PM
4

I was going for "it doesn't need to be a big problem in the state for the state to take measures against it before it becomes a bigger problem".
/r/MensRights10/04/22 03:28 PM
8

Why wait for your cancer to hit stage 4 if you can fix it before that?
/r/MensRights10/04/22 03:20 PM
3

JBP speaks a lot about accountability and personal responsibility. Of course that is going to be a red flag to a feminist.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 04:31 PM
12

Harrison Bergeron is not fiction
/r/MensRights08/04/22 03:29 AM
4

For years women have fought to be treated like men. Then when they are, they call it misogyny.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 03:24 AM
10

People who need to justify their hate.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 02:18 PM
2

Just gearing up for his next role as Captain Save-a-Ho.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 05:15 AM
10

If you have to spend extra time finding a key holder just so you can take care of regular bodily functions, while another person, based solely on an immutable characteristic is exempt from that requirement, then you are being restricted and actively discriminated against. That girl you like is never going to fuck you, no matter how much you debase yourself.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 12:00 PM
8

Tell them to stop ovary acting.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 04:01 AM
4

I onlypay money for things o consider to have value
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/22 09:55 PM
0

When I had mine done, the doctor asked me if felt that my family was complete. I said yes. That was it. The doctor has a responsibility to ensure that such a decision as sterilisation is entered into rationally and freely. That's it.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/03/22 02:28 PM
2

Just remember. To those who call men trash, trash is found in dumpsters.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 11:55 AM
2

There's a reason that it's called a thought terminating cliche.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 09:19 AM
13

>As a rape victim this was the last thing I needed to hear, it made an already scary world more scary. Creating the very problem they are claiming to fight. When demand for oppression outstrips supply.
/r/MensRights27/02/22 06:20 PM
1

Reductio ad absurdem argument and one I have already addressed. Nowadays, nobody ever gets the death penalty unless it's ABSOLUTELY certain that that person was the perpetrator of the crime. According to the Death Penalty Information Centre, there have been 37 exonerations between 2010 and 2022, alone. That is 37 people on death row were found factually innocent of the crime they were found ABSOLUTELY certain to have committed. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/policy-issues/innocence-database?filter…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 06:56 PM
1

I understand what you are saying. What I am saying is the death penalty kills both guilty and innocent people. In order to use the death penalty on the guilty you must also accept that the innocent will die as well. You are placing more value on your desire to kill the guilty than on the lives of innocent people on death row.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 06:24 PM
1

The death penalty kills innocent people. This is an incontrovertible truth. In order to kill the people you hate, you are willing to kill innocents to accomplish that goal. That is what you are telling me.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 06:10 PM
1

That's where prison comes in. It's really not a difficult concept. Removing the death penalty Does not mean people avoid consequences for crime.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 02:17 PM
1

No. It is not worth the death of an innocent to kill the guilty.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 02:11 PM
0

So are you...
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 02:09 PM
1

Ok. 👌
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 10:57 AM
0

So you just want to see someone die? Are you hoping to be the one to do it?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 09:34 AM
-1

So that's a yes then.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 02:34 AM
-3

Not even them.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 02:32 AM
-1

You certainly seem overly interested in seeing her dead though...
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 02:31 AM
-5

Doesn't matter. The issue is not what she did. The issue is that capitol punishment kills innocent people. The death of an innocent is not an acceptable price to slake your bloodlust.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 01:14 AM
2

Still better than killing innocents.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 01:11 AM
2

A rehabilitative approach to justice is a step towards civilization. There is no method of determining guilt which is 100% infallible. That means innocents will face the death penalty if it is utilized as a punishment. Do you believe killing innocent people is acceptable in order to punish the guilty?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 01:10 AM
1

The aim of prison is rehabilitation, not retribution. The idea is to re-integrate offenders back into society if possible. Of course it is not always possible. For some rehabilitation requires a lifetime or beyond.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 01:03 AM
-3

its not an opinion. it is an incontrovertable fact. Innocent people die as a result of capital punishment. Do you believe that innocent people should die so that guilty people can be punished to your satisfaction?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 12:24 AM
0

there are. Sometrimes it is necessary in an immediately life threatening situation. While that death may have been inevitable, it is no less tragic.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/22 12:22 AM
3

we already do. Its not a perfect system, but receiving compensation for an injustice is better than nothing at all and certainly better than an "oops" chiselled onto your gravestone.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 10:45 PM
3

I agree it shouldn't be used if there's a shred of doubt about guilt. But also sometimes there is clear guilt. Even a person who is "clearly guilty" can still be innocent. There is no possible way to be completely correct when judging innocence or guilt 100% of the time. even if you are wrong once in 10,000 judgements, it means an innocent person was murdered by the state. That single death is enough to invalidate the lawful executions of the other 9,999. As for punishment, murderers and rapists…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 10:43 PM
2

I've already addressed the prison argument. We have mechanisms in place to "make whole" those who suffer an injustice. You can't make "make whole" a corpse.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 10:29 PM
-4

Holy leaps in logic, batman! Where do you get the idea I want guilty people to go free? I said they don't deserve to die. Not avoid legal consequences.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 10:26 PM
2

Every person on death row was put there by 12 people who were certain of guilt. Some of those Convicted are not guilty. Should we kill innocent people so you can feel good about killing guilty ones?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 10:24 PM
7

How can she slap/kick/cry/scream/cry/punch/kill?
/r/MensRights02/02/22 10:16 PM
2

It is what we are talking about. You cannot guarantee with 100% certainty that an innocent person won't be executed by the death penalty, in fact it has already happened multiple times. The innocence project exists because innocent people are sentenced to execution all the time. It doesn't matter how many guilty peoples lives are spared. The death of one innocent person invalidates capital punishment. full stop.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 10:10 PM
-2

Lol. Anyone who disagrees with me is a bad person. Grow up.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 10:06 PM
-2

No one. Deserves. To die.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 09:54 PM
2

This person's guilt is irrelevant to the fact that innocent people are killed by the death penalty. The argument is not to save guilty people but to save the innocent who will inevitably be caught up in the machine. No one deserves death as a punishment. Especially the innocent.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 09:35 PM
-1

Do you think David Milgaard would be deserving of the death penalty? He was convicted and served 23 years for rape and murder. The only reason he wasnt executed was because the death penalty was no longer used. If it was it would have been a capital crime. So, given that he was believed guilty of rape and murder, you would be in favour of executing this man, even though he was proven innocent of the crime at a later time.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 09:32 PM
2

Innocent people are killed by the death penalty. You cannot guarantee with 100% certainty that an innocent won't be killed therefore it is invalid as a punishment.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 09:21 PM
-6

in your attempt to justify death as punishment? indeed. My argument is solid and consistent. tell me how killing an innocent person is in any way a justifiable risk for your pathological need to deliver death to those you judge as deserving of it?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 08:33 PM
-6

nope. Death penalty is still invalid. It doesn't matter how many downvotes you want to throw at me, the truth will not change. Retribution is not justice. death is not justice. Vengeance is not justice. If you want people to die as a means of punishment, then you are no better then they are.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 08:30 PM
-5

still not death.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 08:22 PM
-16

it doesn't matter if *she* is guilty. The punishment is invalid because guilt cannot be guaranteed 100% for all cases.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 08:21 PM
-15

No you don't. You forfeit your free movement within society and must be separated from it as punishment. You do not deserve to die. David Milgaard is a Canadian who was wrongfully convicted for the 1969 rape and murder of nursing assistant Gail Miller. He was released and compensated after spending 23 years in prison. When did he deserve to die? 1969? did he still deserve to die in 1992 when he was exonerated? Did he deserve death at any point?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 07:44 PM
-11

nope. Punished? absolutely. Killed? no.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 07:39 PM
-83

a living person can have an injustice mitigated. In legal terms they can be "made whole" through compensation for the injustice suffered. A dead person cannot. The imperfection of our system means that innocent people will inevitably be convicted. as such, because we cannot be 100% certain of guilt 100% of the time, the death penalty is invalid as an innocent person will ( read: has already) inevitably die through wrongful conviction.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 07:28 PM
-12

It doesn't matter who commits the crime. man, woman, black, white, or anything else. The death penalty is inherently invalid. no one deserves death as a punishment.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 07:21 PM
-252

no she doesn't. You don't forfeit your life for committing a crime. The death penalty kills innocent people. It is therefore inherently invalid as a form of justice.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 07:07 PM
-384

No. No one deserves to die. not even her. Not even You.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/22 06:45 PM
2

Pethaps but you still need to try. It does zero good to make assumptions and use them as the basis for not acting.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 04:41 PM
1

No. If we as a society are going to insist that women be afforded avenues to relinquish parental responsibility, then we must also allow similar for men. If we are to insist that men are afforded zero avenues to relinquish parental responsibility, then we must also deny the same for women. The issue is the double standard. A fair and equitable approach that affords avenues for both parties is the correct answer.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 03:01 PM
1

She sounds gangrenous.
/r/MensRights30/01/22 04:13 PM
6

It's the proverbial gun on the table. In every interaction you have with a woman imagine there is a gun on the table. Only she can use it. She can use it at any time she wants. Not every woman will. Many, in fact. But it is always there. Waiting to be used. That is the threat of a false accusation.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 04:30 PM
70

I mean, if I'm only going to get access to 70% of the workout space that the women get, why am I paying full membership price?
/r/MensRights27/01/22 08:59 PM
22

She was an adult. He was not in a position of authority over her. What he does on his time is his business. Losing his job for that is wrong.
/r/MensRights14/01/22 12:55 PM
3

Weaker than =\= harmless.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 09:54 AM
21

Being a man.
/r/MensRights11/01/22 09:36 AM
3

Puppies and sweater puppies
/r/PussyPassDenied10/01/22 02:38 PM
7

Here you go. The case of Vladek Filler. https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/casedetail.aspx?caseid=4694
/r/MensRights09/01/22 01:21 AM
1

Money is beautiful.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:04 PM
9

It's not hate. Ill grant that it's dumb, but so is the idea that he's not allowed to say it because you think it's bad.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 01:00 AM
7

No. Speech protections exist so people are free to say things you don't like. Just as you are free to say things I don't like. Part of being an adult is accepting that you are not in control of other people's opinions no matter what they are and you do not get to silence them.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 12:58 AM
8

Speech protections don't exist for the things we like to hear.
/r/MensRights05/01/22 12:53 AM
9

The gifts were an allegory for the expectations they were under and the pressure to always be using those gifts for others benefit. Mirabels "gift" was that she was under no such expectation and thus didn't have to wear a mask and pretend to always be happy for the grandmother. This allowed her to see the truth that was the fracturing of the family from that pressure.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 03:47 AM
3

Hahahaha.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 05:07 AM
2

>You might be forgetting that the one group you're talking about(males) are the main aggressor for the other group(females). That is simply incorrect. From Wikipedia, "social activist Erin Pizzey, who established the first women's shel ihe U.K. in 1971, found that 62 of the first 100 women admitted to the centre were "violence-prone," and just as violent as the men they were leaving.[50] The 1975 National Family Violence Survey found that 27.7% of IPV cases were perpetrated by men alone, 22.7% b…
/r/MensRights23/12/21 07:51 PM
7

Yeah but she wanted 2 BILLION. So she got screwed by the court. /s
/r/PussyPassDenied21/12/21 03:15 PM
3

Sadly there are incidents where people experience trauma at the hands of others. When that happens fear is an understandable reaction. That said, allowing fear to rule over you is not sustainable. While what happened was not your fault, it is your responsibility to get past it. It is also vital to remember that your experience is with an individual and not half of the human population. Now, it is also important to understand that individual experience aside, I'm referring to an overall trend tha…
/r/MensRights20/12/21 11:57 PM
6

Its the "wolf in the woods" mindset. If you are raised your entire life being told that the wolves are vicious and horrible, you will always live in fear of them. Women and girls are inundated with similar messaging about men and boys.
/r/MensRights20/12/21 01:59 AM
13

Well they were really quick to name that SUV that blasted through the parade...
/r/MensRights18/12/21 05:12 PM
7

You know what else is done for religious reasons? Rape and beheadings.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 04:18 PM
1

Bart Huskey got 70.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/21 09:21 AM
2

Two sentences of incomprehensible "logic" is too much for anyone. Seriously you have now expended more effort not clarifying your post than you would have doing it, assuming you could to begin with.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/21 06:09 PM
2

I understand that your position is inherently flawed and your refusal to clarify and instead flounce away is indicative of someone who lacks a capacity for rational thought.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/21 05:54 PM
4

So you're saying that this woman might have hit the cop because he might have shot her dog. Let's examine this. In your hypothetical scenario, we have a cop who is apparently unhinged enough to simply draw down and shoot a dog because fuck it. The woman, outraged at this callousness feels compelled against all reason to simply march up to this same cop and hit him then run away, never once considering the implication of hitting a cop who just shot a dog for seemingly no reason. What the fuck hav…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/21 05:38 PM
25

It doesn't really matter why.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/12/21 12:59 AM
33

Wasn't she in The 24 hr Breakfast Club?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/21 11:57 PM
3

It isn't bigotry to employ merit based policies. If the only way you can succeed is through special consideration, that is your failing, not the systems. The solution is for you to step up your game.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 06:57 PM
7

Who the fuck would want that filthy mouth on their dick? Id sooner fuck the dog than that low class skank.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/21 05:39 PM
172

The direction that intentionally favours one sex over the other in the name of "equality".
/r/MensRights24/11/21 12:39 AM
67

Every comparison you provided were fully fledged adults attacking minors. The guy was a minor himself and I don't know if the rape charges were forceful or statutory.
/r/MensRights22/11/21 03:50 PM
185

If this is in the US, file a title IX complaint.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 03:00 PM
1

No. Fuck that. Good bye.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 03:58 AM
3

So they are purposely creating a disincentive to hire based upon a person's skin colour by adding a 25% tariff for white people. I doubt there will be many new hires of the non POC variety. They are proving the fatal flaw of the wage gap with this stunt by showing that no company will choose to hire an employee that costs more for the same work.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 02:18 AM
21

It's their version of "God works in mysterious ways". Every cult needs an unfalsifiable position on which to fall back on when challenged on their bullshit.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 08:25 PM
2

Sorry. This was supposed to be in the thread regarding recording.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 12:06 PM
32

"Someone needs to eat the bullet. Better you than me".
/r/MensRights08/11/21 01:03 AM
2

Check to see if you live in a one party consent state. If you are in Canada, single party consent is countrywide.
/r/MensRights07/11/21 05:25 PM
45

The justice system is flawed. That does not equate to police officers being horrible people.
/r/MensRights06/11/21 11:31 PM
13

I mean it possible that the forces of the universe came together to form a chemical at the exact location of her drink at the exact time that she was not there to witness the occurrence. But in terms of probability, I would sooner expect to see a whale and a bowl of petunias fall from the sky. Twice.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 04:44 PM
1

When king George ruled, his wife was the queen. When he died, the rules of succession made his eldest daughter, Elizabeth, the Queen. Victoria, her mother, only held title by virtue of marriage. While she had knowledge and experience, she had no official rank when Elizabeth took the throne. Queen mother was an honorific.She was like a sergeant advising a new lieutenant in terms of offering advice, but didn't make the decisions. Had Elizabeth been a child when King George died, Victoria would hav…
/r/MensRights04/11/21 11:38 AM
6

Well Feudalism was an inherently hierarchical system. It's undergone some modern revisions over the years, but essentially the hierarchy remains. Like all hierarchies, there is always an apex. But it isn't necessarily men> women. If it were the Queen's husband would be king as the man would naturally outrank her. The highest rank is reserved for the male monarch. In the absence of a male monarch the Female monarch is considered the highest. As such the spouse of the ruling monarch is always of a…
/r/MensRights04/11/21 12:48 AM
13

The problem is that "king" as a title is of higher rank than queen. The reigning monarch cannot be outranked. Thus if the queen is the reigning monarch, her spouse cannot hold a rank that is higher than hers. It's why Prince Phillip was not King Phillip. Queen Elizabeth II is the reigning monarch.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 09:42 PM
38

He doesn't want a say in how it is spent. He wants transparency. It is not unreasonable to make that a condition of such a large monetary amount, especially with an org with a less than stellar history with regards to spending. That doesn't make Musk a bad person for withholding when the conditions are refused.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 04:59 PM
34

How do you know? He can't control the other guys refusal to cooperate, and isn't foolish enough to give money to someone who won't. That you mysteriously believe this to be evil is beyond irrational.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 03:52 PM
65

So let's get this straight, he is perfectly willing to donate the money they ask for provided they accept accountability and outside scrutiny. They refuse and he's the bad guy?????
/r/MensRights02/11/21 03:47 PM
124

So let's get this straight, he is perfectly willing to donate the money they ask for provided they accept accountability and outside scrutiny. They refuse and he's the bad guy?????
/r/MensRights02/11/21 03:46 PM
10

At no time in history has an oppressor ever concerned themselves with the safety and comfort of the oppressed.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 11:55 AM
29

If she looks 16 and says she's 20, she's 12.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 11:46 AM
1

In the same way people can be sexually excited by shit, or dogs, or horses or corpses. People's brains are are weird and you don't have to understand why they do the shit they do. Just make sure they face the consequences.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/21 11:51 PM
5

It was a sloppy attempt to describe a reversal of the generally accepted "direction" of discriminatory behaviours.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/10/21 03:19 AM
10

Since that is impossible, the death penalty is invalid.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 03:05 AM
1

The death penalty kills innocent people. Unless you can give that life back to them, don't be in such a rush to deal out death as punishment.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 03:03 AM
1

So you're refusing to support your argument. Ok.
/r/MensRights27/10/21 10:57 PM
21

The Hugo's are notoriously bad for this.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 05:04 PM
8

If you have a differing opinion, then be an adult, and support your argument. Don't just come in, say "no you're wrong" and then flounce away on a shit accusation. Be better.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 10:47 AM
4

But she felt it when he did it.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/21 10:27 AM
0

Ok. Whatever you say, tough stuff.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 02:29 AM
1

Lol. Beta. Projection much?
/r/MensRights22/10/21 11:32 PM
0

Frankly, if you are unable to provide an honest beginning, there is no point in reading the rest of your argument. Once you can provide an honest argument, I will be happy to address your points. Until then, nothing else you say is of any importance. This is not me declaring a "win" as you (again) falsely state, but rather me choosing not to waste my time on someone who will not show the basic courtesy of being honest. In other words, you have demonstrated a 2 for 2 proclivity to be outright dis…
/r/MensRights22/10/21 11:26 PM
1

Of course you did. You specifically claimed it wasn't a baby by first calling it a fetus then saying "not a baby". It doesn't get any clearer than that. The rest of your argument is irrelevant if you are going to lie in your first sentence.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 08:32 PM
0

Fetus is Latin for baby. Trying to hide behind simple semantics is poor argumentation. Try again.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 08:11 PM
1

A dress code that says all students are barred from revealing their undergarments is an acceptable rule that affects all students even if it may impact some students more than others. Setting specific sex based criteria on hair length/style/colour is unreasonable, as well as intentionally and specifically discriminatory.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 08:10 PM
4

Getting served at the funeral isn't on the ex-wife. It would be on the process server hired to deliver the documents.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 04:13 PM
18

Feminism thrives on a narrative of unbroken female victimhood and oppression since the dawn of civilization. Any act or piece of evidence that contradicts this narrative must necessarily be ignored, suppressed, and actively forgotten so as to maintain the Narrative. The reality of Amber Heards abusiveness towards JD is an existential threat to the carefully constructed and maintained illusion. Therefore, said reality is quietly silenced and swept away so as not to bring attention to the Lie.
/r/MensRights20/10/21 10:44 PM
5

The irony of a supposed fascist standing calmly in front of a person while they are screaming "FUCK YOU" in his face is glorious. It is only when said screaming person escalates to violence that the "fascist" responds. And yet the screamer will invariably claim to be the victim.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/10/21 12:21 PM
19

And that's just it. Women portray men as either too incompetent or untrustworthy to use birth control responsibly, while still demanding that men trust women implicitly. Projection at its finest.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 11:20 AM
17

No they aren't. Despite all their complaints, feminists in general squarely come down on the side against viable male birth control options. The reason is right in the term. male control.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 10:38 AM
5

Not surprising. It can be exceedingly difficult to handcuff a resistant suspect. It is the reason police tend to respond with overwhelming force. A "fair fight" tends to result in greater risk of injury for both suspect and officers or escape.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/10/21 04:22 PM
3

A combination of thought terminating cliche and outrage porn.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 12:27 PM
4

Penis
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/21 08:54 PM
6

Mental illness is not an excuse for shitty behaviour.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/21 02:18 PM
10

Not an insult so much as a thought terminating cliche. They point to something about their opponent they disagree with, and use that as a convenient excuse to dismiss rational arguments.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 02:17 PM
9

Thus the idiom "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing".
/r/MensRights05/10/21 10:17 PM
6

Patriarchy is an unfalsifiable position. It is simultaneously the cause of women's oppression in favour of men, and the source of men's failure despite such favour. It's designed to be the catch all answer to why things happen. Much like how God is great when good things happen and God works in mysterious ways when they don't. It's a thought terminating cliche that allows True Believers to dismiss any challenge to their belief in the One True Religion of Feminism.
/r/MensRights03/10/21 08:30 PM
1

Call yourself a woman and take advantage of the benefits. If every man on earth called themselves a woman, then what?
/r/MensRights01/10/21 01:14 AM
1

Look up the act of proxy violence. Where women induce men to enact violence on the woman's behalf. Luke Harwood had his skull crushed because of proxy violence via a false rape accusation.
/r/MensRights27/09/21 08:39 PM
17

This is MAGA COUNTRY!!!
/r/MensRights27/09/21 08:34 PM
6

So they were a bunch a sweet guys?
/r/MensRights27/09/21 08:33 PM
0

"her punch could not have done as much damage" weaker than =\= harmless. Its that simple.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/21 04:40 AM
1

It doesn't give guys "ideas" but it is distracting. Its distracting and ultimately disruptive because it is outside of the prescribed acceptable parameters for the group.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 02:44 PM
43

He used a grapple instead of striking her. Her actions showed that she was not going to voluntarily stop her assault. He stopped as soon as the immediate threat was ended. Reasonable force.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/09/21 01:27 AM
42

It is not your responsibility to validate the feelings of strangers.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 01:19 AM
2

10 year sentence. Served 4. Then wrote a book.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 12:41 PM
7

Only when it's the right targets.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/21 04:17 AM
1

You could see if any will do pro bono work or maybe on a slider.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 12:01 PM
7

reverse it. Every time she says something denigrating men, immediately use her exact words back at her about women. Same tone, same emotional weight. don't engage beyond that.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 02:13 AM
3

the last thing a dying billionaire is going to want is an organ from a street hooker.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/09/21 08:03 PM
1

if women are being considered for promotions, call yourself a woman and get promoted.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 01:14 PM
3

"it is difficult to get someone to understand something when their livelihood depends upon them not understanding it. " -Upton Sinclair
/r/MensRights12/09/21 12:17 AM
2

Considering the fact that being sarcastic or condescending to an internet strange will serve no useful purpose whatsoever, then yes, you, and I, and everyone else should be nice to each other. Even in the face of the most outrageous opinions, getting angry or upset will do little good, if any.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 10:25 AM
4

But you are acting like a douche. No one will take you seriously.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 05:10 AM
7

I'm in a long lasting and happy relationship with the love of my life, Yourself?
/r/MensRights09/09/21 05:04 AM
7

Can you link it?
/r/MensRights09/09/21 01:37 AM
6

Because they only value women's opinions.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 01:37 AM
16

You got hit with the banbot. It's a mark of pride.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 01:36 AM
2

Men can be compelled by court order to undergo genital examinations to find evidence. (IE presence of semen or pubic hairs). There is no logical reason that a woman could not also be so compelled in light of an official complaint.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 05:07 PM
5

The death penalty kills innocent people. No one deserves to die. Not even the worst of us.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/21 01:06 PM
1

Indifferent. It's not my responsibility to accommodate your irrationality.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 11:57 AM
7

Words are not blinding.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 10:38 AM
16

Turnabout is fair play. Sometimes you need to be forced to feel empathy. Don't ovary act when it happens.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 10:27 AM
1

Remember. The beads are meant to come out sssssllloooowwwlllyyyyyy. If you pull on them like you are starting a lawnmower, all you'll get is a weird noise, some poop and a whole lot of embarrassment.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/21 11:30 PM
1

This is what I was aiming for.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/21 03:41 PM
1

Does she dress up as a 9?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/21 01:59 PM
3

more than a bit.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 06:49 PM
5

the thing is though, the definition says the penetration of the mouth vagina or anus by fingers, penis or other object without consent of the victim. There is nothing in that description that says the victim is the one being penetrated, only that penetration occurs and there is no consent.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/21 01:17 AM
1

Then you reap the consequences for assault as it is not self defense.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/21 10:31 PM
-7

The point stands. If they throw themselves on the ground they are no longer an immediate or imminent threat. If they do get back up, then you respond accordingly to any new threat.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/21 12:11 PM
-7

Self defence is the neutralization of an immediate or imminent threat. As soon as someone attempts to leave (run away) the immediate threat has ended. Chasing after a person in response is retaliation as you are choosing to actively pursue. It is in no way considered reasonable to say you are protecting yourself from a person who is attempting to disengage, even if they instigated the encounter.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/21 11:05 AM
-2

This is the right answer. There is a huge difference between self defense and retaliation.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/21 12:34 AM
6

To get him shitfaced...
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/21 05:53 PM
1

No bad tactics. Just bad targets.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 08:22 AM
5

The character of Ripley in Alien was originally intended to be male. They didn't change anything about it when they gave it to Sigourney Weaver.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/21 04:18 PM
20

Three reasons GB16 was objectively bad. The original had a cast that respected each others contributions to the scene. Gb16 had a cast that all tried too hard to be "the funny one" in a group where no one was funny. Two. The movie went out of its way to portray every male character as utterly incompetent, idiotic or evil. Three. They shot the logo in the dick.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/21 04:10 PM
4

Ok. You do you.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 03:13 PM
1

No.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/21 10:31 AM
1

Uh huh.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/21 08:35 PM
-1

Whatever dude.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/21 05:37 PM
2

Dude. I have an 11 year old daughter. When she is hurting, the only thought on my mind on that moment is comforting her because she is my priority. My own rage serves no useful purpose so I set it aside for her. I know myself quite well. I know that I am capable of great violence. As such I work very hard to keep that part of me under tight control. I try to live my life as free of violence as I can. I have failed exactly twice and I have regretted the result in both cases. I admit freely that I…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/21 05:34 PM
-2

Okay sorry Mahatma Gandhi What's truly depressing is that you honestly intended that as an insult.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/21 04:54 PM
2

I am also not a mindless animal beholden to whatever urge that happens to sit at the forefront of my brain in the moment. But you do you.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/21 04:52 PM
2

Is this the first time someone didn't play pretend so you wouldn't throw a tantrum? I'm not interested in lying to spare your feelings. If you want to act like a child and go around beating people up because you can't control your violent urges, that's your choice. It doesnt make you cool or tough. It just tells the world you are looking for an excuse to hurt people.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/21 04:48 PM
2

Your cat is not a child. Sorry to break it to you.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/21 04:36 PM
2

I bet you own a pair of nunchucks.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/21 04:34 PM
2

It's always a treat talking to people with no ability to rationalize beyond a third grade mindset.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/21 04:31 PM
-9

Self defense (or immediate defense of another) against an ongoing attack is not retaliation. Retaliation is violence after the fact.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/21 04:25 PM
-19

If I see someone abusing my child I will go full HAM on their ass, no questions asked. If I find out after the fact, there are other ways of solving the issue. That's what it means to be an adult.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/21 04:20 PM
-30

Violence as an act of defense is acceptable. Violence as an act of retaliation is not.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/21 04:09 PM
7

Shut up rapist
/r/MensRights01/08/21 06:45 PM
7

The point is that an accusation is all that is needed. All of your blather is just a smokescreen. Until you have been exonerated, then you are guilty by default.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 05:21 PM
14

Lmfao am I, though? Yes. I heard an accusation from an anonymous source (who will stay anonymous for fear of retaliation), that they were raped by you. That is all I need to consider you guilty until you can sufficiently prove your innocence. As I said, you can leave. We don't like your kind round here.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:41 PM
17

Without a conviction, you're just as likely to be a "shitass likely-rapist" as he is. We don't want rapists here, so you can leave.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:05 PM
3

No honey. Being able to throw 12 hotdogs down your hallway isn't because they're cocktail wienies.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 08:25 PM
4

No bats an eye when mens disposability is compared to male bees or spiders, but when JBP makes comparisons between humans and lobsters regarding the response to serotonin, he's a quack.
/r/MensRights22/07/21 04:46 PM
14

That's the joke
/r/MensRights18/07/21 03:56 PM
3

It stems from the prevailing attitude that sex is something that men do and is something that women have done to them.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 10:24 AM
13

If women get exclusive access to 30 percent of the facility, men should only have to pay 70% as much for a membership to reflect that
/r/MensRights08/07/21 03:57 PM
19

yeah but his wifes boyfriend is always first in line.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/21 05:23 AM
10

It's fun to watch the "anti" subs use it as an example of misogyny.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 01:52 PM
6

He's saying if he did get married she'd be a skanky ho for marrying him. So he won't get married so she won't be a skanky ho.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 11:48 AM
2

Don t doubt for a second that there was at least one meeting where they tried to spin it such that he was the perpetrator before settling for the euphemistic language.
/r/MensRights29/06/21 09:42 PM
48

They're complaining about the fact that the men chose a contract that is pay for play, has no attached health insurance or benefits, but has a larger overall payout while they chose a lower but guaranteed salary, health benefits, injury and maternity leave, and pay even if benched. They are presenting the fight as one against discrimination but the truth of it is that they want all the stuff they agreed to on their contract plus the pay schedule of the men, despite the fact that don't bring in e…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/21 01:01 AM
7

Tell them you're trans.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 09:51 PM
0

I disagreed with you initial comment because you are incorrect. You then attempted to completely mischaracterize my position. You have still failed to acknowledge the simple fact that jurisdictional differences exist and that what may be true for your little corner of the world is not so for the rest, which I again clearly stated in my original post. At this point neither of us know what the specific tenancy laws are for OP, so it makes sense to understand what possible options may exist and the…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 04:27 PM
1

What the fuck are you even talking about? At what point did I ever remotely suggest that I would do such a thing as what you wrote above? I mean, I get it, the only way you can win your cases is to strawman your way through them. That University of American Samoa law degree is really working for you. I honestly don't care what you think or believe. Your entire "rebuttal" has nothing to do with what I said which shows me that your comprehension skills are on par with those of a rabid chinchilla. …
/r/MensRights07/06/21 01:27 AM
2

Landlord here. I am intimately familiar with the ins and outs of tenancy law as well as I deal with tenants every damn day so don't try to flex as it means nothing to me. As I stated quite clearly, it is all dependent upon jurisdiction. There are no true standards for tenancy law and every state/province has their own rules regarding how and or when tenancy agreements can be terminated.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 08:08 PM
18

There's a huge difference between "not enough evidence" and " lying". No reasonable prosecutor will go after a woman who simply failed to provide enough evidence on a rape claim. Not punishing actual false claims though encourages the behaviour thus poisoning attitudes towards actual legit claims. A simple trust but verify approach to rape claims with swift and memorable punishments for false accusers would go far in securing better justice for everyone.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/21 05:58 PM
1

Even if he lived alone, he can't just terminate unless under very specific circumstances. That's a given. Renewals are generally automatic. Depending on jurisdiction, he could be in a fixed term, standard renewable, month to month, or something else entirely. For standard renewables you generally have a limited window where you can file notice to terminate at the end of the current lease, generally 3 months prior to end date is the cut off.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 04:43 PM
5

Yes he can. At least he can serve notice of non renewal if the signing date is coming up.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 04:04 PM
36

That's how she gets the drugs...
/r/MensRights05/06/21 08:12 AM
4

I seriously doubt that the hospital staff were told he hit his head after being pushed down the stairs on the first visit. Otherwise they would have ordered an X-ray. A fall from as little as three feet can result in death. So for a doctor to dismiss a fall down the stairs with a head strike as just a concussion is arguably malpractice.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 10:06 AM
2

I figure if they want to throw sexism at me I'll throw it right back at them.
/r/MensRights30/05/21 08:07 PM
7

Tell them to stop ovary acting
/r/MensRights30/05/21 04:52 PM
7

Be sure to add "Condescend means 'talk down to'."
/r/MensRights30/05/21 04:44 PM
4

I prefer "know your place."
/r/MensRights30/05/21 04:42 PM
2

Seems she definitely needs someone to explain good manners.
/r/MensRights30/05/21 04:39 PM
34

"Rape" is good business. The government and private donations fund an entire industry built around rape victimization. Lower crime stats are a threat to funding. Therefore, it is in the interest of the sexual grievance industry to keep rape convictions artificailly high in order to secure funding. The livelihood of the sexual grievance industry relies upon the narrative of female victimhood. Keeping that in the public eye is of paramount importance. Truth be damned.
/r/MensRights25/05/21 01:35 AM
1

Then that's entirely on those misinterpreting it.
/r/MensRights23/05/21 06:59 PM
5

The fact that your mother misused the phrase to excuse bad behaviour does not make the phrase invalid. BWBB is a phrase to describe harmless irreverent fun and comraderie among boys. It's from a Latin proverb that says children should be expected to act in a childish way.
/r/MensRights22/05/21 10:59 PM
6

They obviously just showed their white card and gave the secret handshake to get the job. Everyone knows white people have no skills and just coast through life entirely on their privilege.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 06:34 PM
10

Competence is rooted in white supremacy now.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 06:28 PM
1

The ME report indicated no trauma or occult hemoraging in any of the tissues of the neck. There would at least be a bruise if there was enough pressure on his neck to interfere with his breathing.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 04:48 PM
8

It's misogyny because she clearly is trying to get him to match her own emotional level in the moment. She yells and screams, while he remains calm and refuses to engage. So she escalates to hitting, trying to elicit a reaction, still with no success. Lastly she pouts and fumes having failed to force him to empathize with her suffering and then turns away, feeling victimized by his indifference.
/r/MensRights19/05/21 08:36 PM
8

The kid in this story doesn't likely even exist. This is such a tailored story, it reeks of a Penthouse Letters submission in its execution.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 01:29 PM
10

She played the cops like fiddles to get that plea deal. Just goes to show what assumptions regarding the gender of evil can lead to.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/21 06:41 PM
60

Look up Paul Bernardo and Karla homolka for a truly rage inducing story.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/21 04:57 PM
2

And that is precisely why it must be explored so that we can gain understanding. Jealousy has been a root cause of many sins. Abuse, murder, even war. Obviously, there is more behind the actions that simply the emotion, but it can't simply be discounted.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 01:46 PM
1

Reasons are not excuses. Understanding the causes of abusive behaviour is how we learn to recognize and prevent future abuse.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 12:58 PM
8

Your so called friend is a self appointed solution in search of a problem. Ditch her
/r/MensRights15/05/21 04:03 PM
31

To a starving man, plain rice is a feast. For many men, something even as simple as touch outside of sex or work, is exceedingly rare. It helps keep the focus of male value in the realm of accomplishment. Attention is earned through personal sacrifice. There is no inherent worth. A person so stripped of connection is of course going to see any kind of valuation as a great gift and will of course seek more of it.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 05:43 PM
4

Incompetence does not negate intent.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 02:54 AM
2

Get a safety razor. One time purchase of a razor and then cheap replacement blades. I bought 100 blades for 11 dollars on eBay years ago. I also use a brush and soap cup instead of buying foam in a can. Best part is that if you live in an old building, your bathroom medicine cabinet likely has a slot on the back to put your old blades inside the wall for disposal.
/r/MensRights07/05/21 11:12 PM
16

Here's a question for you. To what extent should you be obligated to validate my feelings?
/r/MensRights07/05/21 01:06 PM
6

I believe the solution here is to cultivate deeper male emotional connections. It's not about female attention, but rather any attention. Men are increasingly isolated, emotionally, even among friends. If you are getting emotional support from your peers, you'll be less likely to be drawn toward the first person who gives you attention. I myself grew up in a world with very little in the way of physical touch. When I joined a mixed friend group as a young adult that regularly gave platonic hugs,…
/r/MensRights04/05/21 11:00 AM
1

Porn stars interact with the people around them. They don't interact with you. Porn is just voyeurism writ large. These streamers are different in that in addition to the purely voyeuristic aspect, they pretend to like you specifically. They acknowledge you but only for a price. Porn isn't an illusion. You know exactly what you are getting in terms of personal interaction. I said it in another thread. The participants are adults and can do what they want. If they want to throw money at a pair of…
/r/MensRights26/04/21 12:40 PM
2

When you called me Maude Flanders, and waxed disdainfully about coercion. Voluntary exploitation is still exploitation. As for porn, I have little interest. My wife and I do just fine without it.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 10:52 PM
2

where did I say that people couldnt use it? Its unfortunate that they feel the need to turn to it. More unfortunate that there are people ready and willing to exploit them. But I won't stop them. They're adults and can do what they want. The exploiters are still pieces of shit though.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 08:40 PM
1

That realise a question though. Are the balloons made of meat? Or are they filled with meat?
/r/MensRights25/04/21 04:17 PM
98

Imagine being such a piece of shit that your entire business model is exploiting the loneliness of others by offering an illusion of intimacy.
/r/MensRights25/04/21 01:04 PM
1

I presented the GAE case to highlight the ease with which courts impose heavy handed "conditions" which infringe upon basic freedoms. To wit in GAE's case, simple access to a ubiquitous communications system based upon spurious (at best) accusations. So you think the court pick a random bloke and go "You can go to jail now" and puts him in jail? Directly? no. Indirectly? Absolutely. Telling a man he is not allowed to use his name. Then citing him for "contempt" when he does so. Telling a man he …
/r/MensRights21/04/21 08:01 PM
1

>There is no way he would go to court because he identified himself and that's it. Gregory Alan Elliot was charged with harassment for criticising a feminist who was engaged in harassing and bullying *him* and was prevented from using the internet in any capacity for 3 years until he was acquitted. Are you truly so naive as to think this man has to actually do anything illegal to get put in jail?
/r/MensRights21/04/21 03:16 PM
6

Think about what you said. He went to jail for identifying himself. He was under a court order that he was not allowed to reveal his OWN identity. A man with no criminal history was precluded by law from the simple freedom of self identification and went to jail for it.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 01:06 PM
3

The new mighty ducks show on Disney has a single dad whose wife left him. Which is shocking since it's Disney...
/r/MensRights21/04/21 04:15 AM
6

No, they suppress it out of necessity. Boys learn from an early age that no one cares about their fears, their pain, or their feelings. They learn that the only one they can rely upon is themselves, and so accept the danger they face, daily, as simply a matter of course.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 11:02 PM
2

The only difference between the danger that men and women face is that women can freely talk about it.
/r/MensRights19/04/21 10:59 PM
11

How very odd.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/21 12:30 PM
39

Let's not forget the fact that the MNT gets their benefits from their second jobs playing in other leagues.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/04/21 11:35 AM
24

They can fix their own cars. They can fight their own fights. If women are as strong and independent as they claim to be, if they are just as capable as men in all aspects of life, then they can handle all of life's troubles on their own, just like a man. I'm tired of being told over and over that women want to be treated equally to men but then cry misogyny when they are.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 10:01 AM
10

What about the extrajudicial punishments men receive for being falsely accused? These accusations are mostly about power. Going through the police or the courts carries the risk of being discovered as a liar. Why do that if you can just say to your friends that X guy raped you? Luke Harwood had his skull crushed. Dominic Scullion was beaten so bad he look like he was hit by a car. Soner Yasa had to call the police himself because he was being swarmed by a bunch of guys after he kicked 4 girls ou…
/r/MensRights04/04/21 05:44 PM
7

Also, as someone who has written so many incident and investigation reports the thought of it gives me writers cramp, when giving your account, write in the third person. Don't use "I" statements. Refer to yourself as "the writer". Stick to purely observable information. Don't make assumptions or suppositions. State clear facts.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 07:10 PM
250

Only fans isn't simply porn. It's paying for the illusion of a relationship.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/03/21 08:22 PM
1

I used to be the same. Until I realized that 1) it doesn't matter what you do, you are already viewed as a lesser being, and 2) I will not apologize for my existence no matter how much it bothers another person. I will not compromise my sense of self worth for your sense of entitlement.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 05:34 PM
3

Don't change your innocuous behaviours to assuage the irrationality of others.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 02:24 PM
3

Look to the case of Brian Banks if you want to know why.
/r/MensRights28/03/21 04:28 PM
1

Genetic testing should be a standard practice for all births. Not only does it establish paternity, but it can also reveal any occult disorders that would otherwise go untreated.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 01:28 PM
1

You need to be the 'no' parent too. Your kid will pick up on the disparity and try to play you. You need to show a united front and always support your partner (and they, you) in front of your child. If you disagree with them ( on a disciplinary issue, for example) talk with them privately about it. Then modify the discipline as a team, citing parental prerogative to do so.
/r/MensRights27/03/21 12:52 PM
10

Just listen to the crickets over the WW84 rape issue.
/r/MensRights25/03/21 04:40 PM
29

The cop used the energy required. Heavier target, more power.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/03/21 03:55 PM
26

No worries.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 02:08 AM
92

No she didn't. She was cancelled because everyone assumed she was comparing Republicans to Jews during the Holocaust. She said the Holocaust happened because the Nazis successfully convinced non Jews to hate their Jewish neighbors. Making it easier to round them up, later. And that hate is no different than hating your neighbors based upon their political views.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 01:41 AM
19

#menslivesmatter
/r/MensRights23/03/21 03:47 PM
4

How convenient for you to find a way to not answer the question.
/r/MensRights19/03/21 08:14 PM
4

Receiving a warning is not necessarily a PP, though. Only if she got it because female, which I don't believe was the case.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/21 01:13 PM
38

No. She tried to make herself into a victim of a vindictive police officer when she got called out with facts. So PPD.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/21 01:03 PM
1

Youre missing the point. He is legally obligated to maintain her lifestyle but she is not obligated in any way to maintain his.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 10:15 PM
16

So adjudicate based on specific circumstance rather than a general "he has to maintain her accustomed lifestyle" nonsense.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 12:44 AM
17

But that doesn't answer why he is obligated to support her after the end of the marriage contract while she is not obligated to continue her agreed upon duties.
/r/MensRights16/03/21 12:29 AM
23

If he is paying her because she took care of the home he lived in while he worked, why does he still have to maintain her when she isn't taking care of the home he lives in anymore?
/r/MensRights15/03/21 11:58 PM
3

This looks unsurprisingly very much like the anti Semitic cartoons of the early 20th century.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 05:41 PM
3

Any level of retaliation, even in self defense is treated as male violence. Thanks to the Duluth Model of domestic violence, mandatory arrest policies, and Primary Aggressor doctrine, defending oneself from female violence is a one way ticket to prison.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 11:58 AM
1

Its the "wolves in the woods" syndrome. Women have been told every day of their lives that they have inherent value, there are monsters that want nothing more than to hurt them and that it is societies job to keep them safe. Men are taught that they are the cause of all of societies ills and that they aren't worth saving at all. That the only way to have value in society is through personal sacrifice and that their safety is secondary to women's comfort.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 11:21 AM
2

looks at thumb * You can't be doing any damage with that now. Maybe it should of been "rule of wrist?"
/r/MensRights14/03/21 10:10 AM
22

There is no wage gap except that incurred by individual choice.
/r/MensRights11/03/21 01:53 PM
1

Are they all English words or are some of them brand new inventions?like hrllo and avtiallt?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/21 01:26 PM
2

What evidence do you have that teaching is overrepresented for pedophiles? Female perpetration often masquerades as caregiving, so it is much harder to see than the traditional predator/prey dynamic we expect.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/21 03:09 PM
2

Do you honestly believe that the only female pedophiles are teachers?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/21 01:49 PM
1

I'm sure he'll still try to find a way to justify her actions.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/21 11:29 AM
2

And then, for absolutely no reason at all...
/r/MensRights27/02/21 01:18 AM
1

Again with the assumptions. You don't know any of this. Why would a person who you yourself admit is weaker than her target, attack said target unless she felt safe in doing so? People should have intervened sooner. She should get punished for starting the fight. They didn't. She did. Or maybe people just hesitated to intervene because you don't want to get in between two people being aggressive. They had no issue with one person being aggressive... well until it was the wrong one.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/21 02:02 PM
3

Maybe she didn't think about consequences at all. That's exactly the point. She didn't need to in her mind because she felt entitled to violence without consequence. Maybe she did some slapping and scratching, expecting the same level of violence back. Or she never had to learn how to throw a proper punch because flailing like a 3 year old on pixie sticks has worked for her her entire life to this point.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/21 12:41 PM
18

Melanistic.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/21 11:36 AM
26

You could see her GPA dropping with each hit.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/21 11:33 AM
6

He has an absolute right to defend himself from physical violence regardless of who does it. It doesn't matter if he is stronger than his attacker, she relied on social pressure to render him defenseless. She attacked what she believed to be a defenseless target.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/21 11:30 AM
8

Her incompetence is irrelevant. She felt entitled to physically attack him with impunity. He taught her otherwise.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/21 11:07 AM
5

She brought a girl to a man fight.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/21 11:05 AM
15

Weaker than =\= harmless. She chose to attack while counting on social pressure preventing him from responding. Essentially she believed he was defenseless. Think about the mindset required to attack a defenseless target and what kind of damage you can do.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/21 11:03 AM
11

And yet nothing was lost...
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/21 10:53 AM
1

As I said before I never said I wouldn't do it. This is about the expectation that I must.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/21 11:22 PM
2

It's a legitimate question. Let me ask you this. To what extent are you required to validate my life choices?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/21 11:21 PM
1

The issue is not about courtesy. "Courtesy" is just the means by which compassion is weaponized and pressure is exerted to force compliance with expectation. When I stated simply that I should not be expected to treat a woman differently than a man, this entire thread was the result, where numerous strangers felt it was necessary to call me every name in the book in order to show me why I am a heretic and a garbage human.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/21 09:25 PM
1

Why do you say this? At no point have I said that I would not give up my seat. What I said was that whether I do or not is dependent solely upon my choice and not the expectations of others. Everyone has lost their collective shit over this. Over the idea that I claim the right to say "no" when someone demands something of me that I may not want to give.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/21 04:13 PM
3

I know I am. Me being a good person is wholly separate from the entitled expectations of others that I behave in ways that benefit them.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/21 04:05 PM
1

No one should HAVE to. If they choose to do it, that's fine. But I don't expect them to. See this is the point. Everyone here thinks I'm saying I won't give up my seat. I never said that. I said that I should not be EXPECTED to give up my seat simply because a woman wants it and everyone lost their collective shit.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/21 01:09 PM
0

And you've cemented your irrelevance.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/21 06:11 AM
-1

I don't give a fuck about the downvotes. I don't give a fuck about your disapproval. Just don't piss on my leg and tell me its raining. This entire thread has been people actively trying ( and failing spectacularly) to use shame as a means of coercion because I refuse to treat women as a special class. It's fucking comical just how butthurt the lot of you are because you can't force me to do what you want me to. Even your mockery is so pathetic you can't even use an honest quote. Here's a tip. I…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/21 04:53 AM
-1

Nothing concrete. The point is that should I choose to do it, it is for no other reason than my own. As it should be.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/21 02:39 AM
-1

The comment above mine said "no one is requiring you to give up your seat". Yet every comment is telling me I'm a bad person because I said I shouldn't be expected to do so. If I am not required to, why then are you making it your personal mission to try and shame me into doing it? I never claimed to be a victim. I'm pointing out the blatantly coersive behaviour towards me because I said I shouldn't be expected to treat women differently because they're women. Its like your reading from a fuckin…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/21 02:37 AM
-1

They can sit in another empty seat.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/21 02:27 AM
-8

And yet I am being inundated by moral scolds trying to use shame as a means of forcing me to capitulate to their expectations.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/21 01:48 AM
1

When I choose to. Not when others demand it.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/21 01:45 AM
3

Why am I expected to validate other people's life choices?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/21 12:04 AM
0

Then one of them can move out of designated seating that doesn't need it.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/02/21 12:03 AM
5

There are designated seats for people who need them. I don't sit there because I don't want to have to move.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/02/21 10:18 PM
4

and the only people who care are the other loser incels. So you do care what I think
/r/PussyPassDenied22/02/21 10:08 PM
11

Then don't comment on a public forum
/r/PussyPassDenied22/02/21 09:26 PM
-10

You haven't answered my question. How is refusing to give up my seat a failure of human decency? When someone gets on a bus should we all just give our seats to each other because it is "basic human decency" to give your seat to a random stranger?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/02/21 08:49 PM
15

You could be the victim of chronic cakefallitis where cakes randomly fall out of the sky and down your gullet. Still not my problem.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/02/21 08:17 PM
15

How is treating women as you would treat a man , being an asshole.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/02/21 08:14 PM
-9

So tell me, to what degree are you required to accommodate my life choices? Clearly you believe her life choices should be accommodated.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/02/21 08:12 PM
0

You can separate the songs, sure. Even iconic ones like Eye of the Tiger can exist very well separate from the movies they are featured in. What I am talking about is that a movie can live or die by its sound design. Whether the songs can thrive without the film is not the issue. The music of a movie is a vital part of it. Done well, it can influence your emotional responses without your awareness. Done poorly, it's like being beaten with reeds. And CM is done poorly. As an example watch the pro…
/r/MensRights22/02/21 08:04 PM
0

The soundtrack is an integral part of the movie. You can't separate them. Whether No Doubt is a good band is irrelevant to the tone deaf usage of their music. Just like it doesn't matter how good of an artist Mozart was if you're being bludgeoned to death with his piano. And for the record, I love No Doubt. Consider how the music was used in this film and compare it to how music was used in GotG. It's the same problem that CM had in establishing the character compared to how it they introduced S…
/r/MensRights22/02/21 04:46 PM
2

Nevermind the fact that she legit rapes a complete stranger because Steve is possessing his body, and the filming implies strongly that they slept together.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 04:03 PM
0

Christ. That 90's soundtrack was garbage. Come on, playing "just a girl" during a climactic fight scene? That was beyond cringe. There was zero fucking subtlety in the writing of that turdburger film. If I want to get repeatedly hit in the nuts I'll coach T-ball.
/r/MensRights22/02/21 03:55 PM
11

Why? It's not like the state wants the responsibility of raising the children. They don't care who raises it, as long as they can get the federal payments for enforcing the child support statutes. Even better, child support payments are not tax deductable for the payer, nor are they taxable income for the recipient.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 06:42 PM
2

You can thank Mary Koss for that one.
/r/MensRights20/02/21 12:20 PM
1

Separate but "equal".
/r/MensRights20/02/21 12:18 PM
9

So a typical Friday night?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/21 11:49 PM
6

>Yes, and? Its not "cheering for someone else to get less just so you feel better". It's bringing the salary for each person in the position into line with each other without overpaying 2 people. > she WASN'T being overpaid You just agreed with me that she was. At least try to be consistent.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 07:10 PM
15

She was being overpaid for the position.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 01:39 PM
3

Also look up the Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka case for a perfect example of how men and women are treated differently.
/r/MensRights11/02/21 12:45 PM
3

Which also serves to inform government policy and funding regarding how women are the sole victims of rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/21 12:44 PM
3

Or their extensive and prolonged search history for "plan B".
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/21 11:01 AM
57

Never waste an opportunity at self promotion. It also gives her armour against criticism. Now, anyone who calls her out on her bullshit is just a homophobe.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/21 10:56 AM
3

This. Him being a putz is a mark of his character. If he had truly been falsely accused, then how we respond to his plight is a mark of ours. That is not to say we can't enjoy a "we told you so", but like speech, defending what we agree with is easy. It is defending that which we detest that defines our stance.
/r/MensRights31/01/21 06:43 PM
1

The point is that you don't have all the available data and yet still insist on extrapolating. Do you always go off half cocked?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 05:28 PM
1

There is nothing but forced incredulity indicating there was not a malfunction in 80% of the cameras. Even the manufacturer supported the officers account by admitting his account was possible. Out of all five there is only evidence of one offering up a false account of his own deeds. Even the article itself reads like a conclusion on a quest for evidence. Hardly world class journalism.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 05:25 PM
1

That... Wasn't me. Go back and read again.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 03:40 PM
2

I don't know. I said it could be. Did anyone bother to check?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 03:24 PM
3

I never said "widespread". Why would you choose to add that word ? Could it be to change the narrative?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 02:39 PM
2

Depends on the case and the facts.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 02:37 PM
11

Are there individual bad cops? Sure. Is every cop bad? No Do cameras malfunction? Sure. Does every camera malfunction? No. Should we examine the available evidence for each case individually rather than make unsupported assumptions? Absolutely.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 12:37 PM
7

That's just it. We both don't know. Its certainly a reason, but you choose to force your narrative as the only one.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 12:22 PM
4

Supplied by the lowest bidder
/r/PussyPassDenied30/01/21 11:07 AM
1

Others propose that we read these verses not as Paul’s instructions, but as a dialogue between Paul and the Corinthian men. Verses 34-35 would be the voice of the men of Corinth, insisting the women keep silent, and verse 36 would be Paul’s response, effectively, “Do you think you’re the only ones who have a word to share?” There are several other instances in this letter where such a dialogue between Paul and the Corinthians is apparent (1 Cor 7:1; 8:1).
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/21 10:33 PM
1

Paul's letters to the church and other individuals are Paul's message as Pastor to follow the words of Jesus.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/21 02:47 PM
1

Go ahead. I did too.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/21 02:35 PM
2

From the Jusuit Review... The best measure of Paul’s egalitarian sensibility lies in the way he talks about different Christian women. Paul was no lone ranger in his apostolic ministry, and many of his co-workers were women. Looking at the passages in Paul’s letters and in the Acts of the Apostles in which these women are mentioned, one finds a great sense of collegiality and many examples of women given authority. Phoebe, deacon of Cenchreae. The last chapter of Paul’s Letter to the Romans is a…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/21 02:07 PM
4

That's what I meant. Thanks.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/21 12:46 PM
24

If Jamie there had read it, he'd know that Timothy Paul wasnt issuing a command from God but giving his own opinion.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/21 11:42 AM
17

Feminism is not about equality. It never was. It's a religion that teaches it adherents that they are in constant battle with the evil non believers who hate them. What you want feminism to be is not what it is. You are the outlier here. The "crazy manhaters" are the true believers. I understand that the lie is attractive and that you want to belong to a group that you see as fighting for equality. But you are being deceived.
/r/MensRights18/01/21 01:57 PM
1

They're called thought terminating clichés.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 06:41 PM
1

Antifa eyes. Lazy AND crazy.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/21 07:12 PM
1

Buy they won't ever be. Humans are flawed creatures so these conditions will forever be present. also, the very idea of retributive justice is a flawed concept that leads to vigilantism. If murderers deserve death as you suggest, what then happens when a murderer does not get the death penalty? Is it now up to you to "correct" that error? Or what if you believe that an accused would not be convicted even though you believe they're guilty? You could ask Luke Harwood about that, except he's dead. …
/r/MensRights12/01/21 10:18 PM
1

Duress, torture, mental incapacity. Those are just a few. You seem quite eager to deal out death in judgement. Perhaps a little too eager.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 09:42 PM
1

In fully half of the 20 death row convictions that were overturned, the defendants had falsely confessed their crime. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/news/false-and-contaminated-confessions-prevalent-in-death-row-exonerations You don't get much more "absolutely proven" than a confession.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 08:42 PM
1

Imprisonment is not death. There is no comparison there. Crimes require consequences. That is not the argument. The argument is whether those consequences are justice or retribution. You can't have both. And my question remains, are you comfortable killing someone knowing you could be wrong about their guilt?
/r/MensRights12/01/21 08:34 PM
1

All death is a tragedy. Killing their killer won't bring them back. Also let's not forget that the innocence project exists for a reason. Far too many innocent lives were ended because of capital punishment. If a mistake is made with any other method, there is a way to correct it. Not so with death. Are you comfortable with pushing that button knowing you could be wrong? That you would be ending an innocent persons life?
/r/MensRights12/01/21 08:01 PM
3

The death penalty is an inherently unjust practice. Arguing over who gets it and who doesn't misses the point entirely that NO ONE should be getting it. Abolish the death penalty entirely. No one *deserves* to die.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 03:00 PM
2

everyone deserves compassion. Retribution is not justice. The problem is that men are not getting compassion while women are.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 02:55 PM
5

I agree that men on death row have a much harder time getting commutations to sentencing. The practice of capital punishment itself is barbaric and simply needs to be abolished entirely. No one deserves to die.
/r/MensRights12/01/21 02:52 PM
-1

It depends on whether he acted on a reasonable belief that the accusation was credible. If someone tells "stop that thief!" and I stop them, I am protected because I was acting under a reasonable belief. If it turns out that the accuser was lying, the full responsibility falls on them.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/21 02:18 AM
2

We aren't disagreeing. I posted this to point out that the FBI definition is actually not gendered even though people allow their own biases to influence their interpretation to make it so.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/20 05:22 PM
6

"Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” Note that this definition specifically does not indicate that the victim must be the person penetrated. Only that penetration must occur and the victim does not consent. So being forced to penetrate another person against your will, meets the definition.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/20 05:16 AM
2

Sydney is fucking awesome. The Ameristralian accent takes a bit of getting used to, though.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/12/20 03:17 PM
2

Meh.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 04:48 PM
0

That is the link to the ME report. If you are of the opinion that the report is not a "source", then there is nothing else for us to discuss.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 04:46 PM
1

http://letmegooglethat.com/?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hennepin.us%2F-%2Fmedia%2Fhennepinus%2Fresidents%2Fpublic-safety%2Fdocuments%2Ffloyd-autopsy-6-3-20.pdf
/r/MensRights20/12/20 02:15 PM
1

I already told you the evidence is freely available. The report even makes clear that Floyd suffered no contusions on the shoulder or neck areas or any petichiae on any mucosal membranes. Ergo, he was not asphyxiated.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 01:47 PM
0

Can you link me evidence that explicitly states that aliens are running the government? It's a ridiculous, unanswerable question and you know it. That's why you asked it trying for a "gotcha" moment. Try harder, scrub.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 12:35 PM
4

It is in the MEs report which is freely available online. And the idea that innocent people are never charged is patently absurd. People get charged for crimes in the name of political expediency all the time. Regardless, the evidence is clear.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 12:22 PM
7

He was a dead man walking before they even tried getting him in the car. He had enough fentanyl in his system to kill a horse and he had multiple 75%+arterial blockages. His "I can't breathe" statements which he was uttering before he was ever put on the ground were due to heart failure.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 12:05 PM
8

Then blame the fentanyl and heart disease that killed him.
/r/MensRights20/12/20 11:05 AM
1

Once. And it was false, proven with video evidence. I was playing pinball on my lunch break, and the girl kept bumping her ass into my hand "as a joke" to ruin my game. I told her to fuck off and she went to my boss. The video proved she was lying. Unsurprising, no one cared. Like I said previously. I fully support investigation for all allegations. I believe all victims should receive justice. The purpose of the investigation is to determine who exactly the victim is.
/r/MensRights17/12/20 01:53 AM
0

If your asking if it's possible that an 13 time acquitted defendant could be guilty, then yes. It's possible. It's also possible our government is run by Lizard Aliens. The point is that the probability is exceedingly low. Which makes the probability of the allegations being false higher.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 03:49 PM
0

Which is why an investigation is absolutely warranted when such a thing occurs. After which, once evidence is collected and examined, resulting in 13 acquittals, it is no longer reasonable to assume that.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 03:31 PM
2

The problem with punishing false accusers is you risk dissuading real victims from coming forward. How? if you are not lying, then you have no reason to fear being charged with falsely accusing someone. This idea that punishing people for committing a crime will dissuade others from reporting a crime is patently absurd.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:28 AM
2

I would agree with you if it were 1 or perhaps 2 charges. But when we start getting into the realm of 13 charges all of which resulting in a not guilty verdict, the probability that the accused is simply 'getting away with it' is exceedingly low.
/r/MensRights16/12/20 05:25 AM
16

There weren't any until you showed up.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/20 11:23 AM
8

"men can't be taped" comes from a perfect storm of ridiculous assumptions. 1) that sex is something that men do to women therefore, women lack the agency required to tape. 2) that men on average are stronger than women therefore women lack the ability to rape. 3) that men are always interested in and seeking sex therefore women always have a man's consent.
/r/MensRights06/12/20 06:33 PM
3

Students pay a lot of money to get degrees in Woke. That then translates into big money through government grants. Feminism is an industry.
/r/MensRights28/11/20 04:04 AM
10

Yes but does stand in the marketplace of moneymaking grievance studies programs for universities? Feminism and identity politics are cash cows. No one is going to willingly give up that kind of a guaranteed revenue stream. No one cares if the narrative is false anymore. It makes money and therefore it can say anything.
/r/MensRights27/11/20 10:05 PM
2

it'll never be perfect. There will always be a point where there has to be a cutoff concerning what is covered.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 05:04 PM
2

Ditto here. I paid the 200 bones because it allowed me to "skip the line". If I had waited the 2 years, it would have been done at the hospital at zero out of pocket expense. By paying the tray fee, it was done at the local urology clinic a month after the consultation. No regrets.
/r/MensRights22/11/20 05:02 PM
7

It shit the bed like Amber.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/20 02:48 PM
9

You need to get in line, apparently.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/11/20 11:41 AM
11

Gave her a little "percussive maintenance".
/r/PussyPassDenied08/11/20 09:06 AM
37

Not equal, reasonable, and only so far as to end the immediate threat. As an example, if you punched me, I would be able to use as much force as necessary to get you to stop. If that means I hit you and knock you down, then I must stop and disengage as you are no longer an immediate threat. If I chose to kick you while you were down, that is now excessive force.
/r/MensRights03/11/20 01:16 AM
53

You need to exert a reasonable effort to disengage. That does not mean taking no physical action. Even taking the opportunity to leave may not be successful and a physical altercation becomes inevitable.
/r/MensRights03/11/20 01:09 AM
17

He got better.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/20 02:55 PM
3

Generally women are about 30% weaker than men. That said, being weaker than =\= being harmless.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/20 11:03 AM
13

Don't misrepresent me. I didn't say "women bad". I said that women who are violent (which is about the same amount as men who are violent) enact their violence in a different way.
/r/MensRights22/10/20 01:06 PM
8

The thing is though that when women kill or hurt others, the weapon they use most often is a man. Proxy violence is a very real aspect of female perpetration. Look into the cases of Soner Yasa, Dominic Scullion or Luke Harwood as just a few examples.
/r/MensRights22/10/20 12:54 PM
29

A good example would be... Haikus are easy. But sometimes they don't make sense. Refrigerator.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/20 01:44 PM
6

The Salem witch trials were a warning, not an instruction manual.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 02:58 AM
10

The process is the punishment.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 02:57 AM
4

Which just further exposes their irrationality.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 11:40 PM
2

Just tell them "you're an adult. Act like one".
/r/MensRights08/10/20 07:47 PM
14

Correction, Gucci sells a 2600 dollar "dress for men" to virtue signal to the woke crowd and avoid being targeted.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 03:01 AM
1

Aggravated Sexual Battery Laws governing sexual battery and other sex crimes vary by state. However, the crime of aggravated sexual battery is a more serious form of sexual battery in any jurisdiction. Aggravated sexual battery involves any of the following during commission of the battery: The use of force, coercion, or a weapon Physical harm or injury to the victim The use of more than one perpetrator The victim is mentally or physically incapacitated The victim is a minor (usually under a spe…
/r/MensRights05/10/20 12:49 AM
2

Look up the case of Gregory Alan Elliott. That will boil yer blood.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/10/20 07:58 PM
3

What has she done that would make you think she's a blade?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/09/20 09:20 PM
1

If People can demand that I use their preferred pronouns, why can't I demand that they use my preferred adjectives?
/r/MensRights29/09/20 12:06 AM
16

She's still wouldn't fuck you.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/09/20 09:08 PM
7

If patriarchy is the cause of sexism against men and feminism is also the cause of sexism against men then feminism and patriarchy are the same thing.
/r/MensRights27/09/20 08:27 AM
21

elected by a woman majority, at least in North America
/r/MensRights25/09/20 06:23 AM
18

It was made in direct response to the ridiculous "don't be that guy", ads. Nothing like biting satire to activate the almonds.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 11:25 PM
6

Forced labour for the benefit of another person?
/r/MensRights13/09/20 10:36 AM
20

It the attitude of that op that led to me facing 5 security personnel in a men's room when I brought my infant daughter with me to change her diaper. I did nothing wrong, but the assumption that male= evil that pervades Western society is something I face every single day. It destroys me inside that I can't tell my daughter why I won't bring her to the park. That if I do so, some moral scold will question my motives, that I will have to avert my eyes and shuffle my feet so I don't get the cops c…
/r/MensRights26/08/20 10:31 AM
8

Didn't meet the threshold.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/20 05:01 AM
24

It was the state going after him. The women had nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 11:45 PM
1

At least you're honest about it.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 09:55 PM
1

Then why would you ask me a question that was already answered?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 09:54 PM
1

Yes and I also said that you can withdraw it at anytime. If you are going to challenge my argument, at least know what it is before you make a fool of yourself.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 09:08 PM
1

No. You speak the fuck up and say no. What part of "you can withdraw consent at any time you like" didn't you understand?
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 06:46 PM
1

The point is that he agreed to play a game that has the sole purpose of pushing boundaries. The consent was given. If the dare pushes too far for comfort, you are absolutely free to withdraw said consent, but the consent exists as a part of agreeing to play by the rules of the game. The brother didn't withdraw consent.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/08/20 12:48 PM
1

No. But nice try. You are obviously determined to intentionally mischaracterize everything I say. Here's the breakdown... The rollercoaster is the analogy to the game of TorD. Paying your fare is the equivalent of agreeing to play the game. Getting secured in the seat is the equivalent of the girl getting dared to kiss the brother The failure to speak up is the same in both scenarios The end of the ride and the kiss are the result of not saying anything beforehand which could have been done at a…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/20 04:20 PM
1

They were both wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/20 03:45 PM
1

They were drugged. There was no reasonable expectation unlike in the game. You are attempting to make false equivalencies and failing miserably at it. Think of it this way. You decide to get on a rollercoaster. You pay your fare and you sit down. The guy comes around and starts securing everyone into the cars. You decide that maybe it's a bit too much for you, but you don't say anything. The ride starts and finishes. You get off the ride. You had an opportunity before it started to get off but d…
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/20 03:33 PM
0

I'm saying he said yes when he agreed to play the game with a clear purpose of pushing boundaries.. If he changed his mind after that, it was his responsibility to make it known.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/20 02:42 PM
1

and?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/20 05:01 AM
1

When OP was dared to kiss the boy, his sister said to stop but he said nothing until after the kiss. The sister cannot grant nor withdraw consent.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/20 02:28 AM
1

What if it was your sister telling you what you could do?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 11:15 PM
0

Keep going...
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 09:09 PM
1

I didnt ask if your family member needed your consent. I asked if you needed your family members consent to kiss/touch a third party.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 09:07 PM
0

You're still entertaining me. Now dance, puppet! dance!
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 09:01 PM
1

Laugh at you.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 08:57 PM
0

Called it. "Rage". Lol. This is entertaining as fuck. I love watching little pissants try to act all big and tough on the internet. You are irrelevant beyond what entertainment value you provide.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 08:54 PM
0

You know what's really funny? You're likely going to respond to this comment because you can't possibly let this go without having the last word. Or you won't respond because I said you would. Either way, I win.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 08:49 PM
1

snerk go away child.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 08:44 PM
-1

Do you require the consent of your spouse or other family member to do things related to your own body?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 08:41 PM
-1

The point that you're a creepy ass stalker?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 08:33 PM
-4

I imagine playing TorD by yourself would be like that though.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 08:28 PM
-16

Your feelings would be incorrect. Which is unsurprising. The outrage was that the brother did not "consent". My argument was that by agreeing to play the game, with the rules being known, he agreed to having his boundaries pushed like everyone else playing the game, and if he did not wish to be kissed it was his responsibility to make that known, which he did not do until after the fact.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 08:22 PM
-16

You are allowed to say "no" at any time, as I have stated repeatedly throughout this thread.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 08:13 PM
-13

They were playing truth or dare. It's a game with a specific purpose of pushing social boundaries. Agreeing to play such a game is giving consent to have your boundaries pushed. If the brother didn't want to be kissed he should have spoken up about it.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/07/20 07:35 PM
2

Platapennies.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/20 04:09 AM
9

Koalabucks
/r/PussyPassDenied19/07/20 10:46 PM
15

To say otherwise is abominable.
/r/MensRights19/07/20 07:05 AM
1

"weaker than" =\= "harmless"
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/20 06:22 PM
5

Same thing happened to a guy named Soner Yasa in Winnipeg Manitoba a few years ago. 4 women in the cab were told to stopsmoking and when he kicked them out for refusing they tried to enlist some strangers nearby into proxy violence on their behalf. HE had to call the cops and even then he almost got arrested.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 10:30 AM
3

Because he didn't need to flaunt who he was to gain status or adulation. The disdain of the irrelevant is itself irrelevant.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 11:40 AM
33

What did the 5 fingers say to the face? SLAP!
/r/PussyPassDenied15/06/20 11:51 PM
388

Even in death, men are described by their occupation.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 04:40 PM
1

The feeling is mutual.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 05:52 AM
1

They are different reactions. But that is completely immaterial to the actual point of disrespecting your partner because you're a petulant child. I don't give a shit whether theres a hypothetical phone or a car or anything else. It's fucking irrelevant.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 12:51 AM
4

You're missing the point. The objects are irrelevant.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 02:12 PM
1

Every man adjusts his balls. None of us like the factory settings.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 01:05 PM
5

You also need to realize that with the isolation from this virus, it may be all the has right now. The other "eggs" may not be accessible at the moment so he is doing the only thing available to him while stuck in his house.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 12:54 PM
4

It's not about the objects. It's about the respect you shoe to your partner who is engaged in something not related to you. Do you respect that they have a right to not pay attention to you 100% of the time? Or do you act like a petulant child and disrupt what they are doing to satisfy your own ego?
/r/MensRights24/05/20 12:47 PM
2

By educated they mean "indoctrinated".
/r/MensRights22/05/20 07:14 PM
9

That's me every day ;)
/r/MensRights14/05/20 02:33 PM
4

The same women who complain that they want to be treated equally to men are also the first to cry "misogyny" when they are.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:12 PM
0

Every child deserves a good father and a good mother.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 12:36 PM
1

There is nothing wrong with a bit of humility.
/r/MensRights15/04/20 12:34 PM
26

This is a perfect example of unfalsifiability. It is a typical position in ideologically motivated "theories". Its truly Kafka-esque. Basically any objection to a claim is further proof of that claim.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 04:00 PM
24

They should replace her with Johnny Depp.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/20 01:39 PM
21

Jfc, she looks like a cat attacking a vacuum cleaner.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 12:48 PM
7

As a former 14 year old, I would have absolutely jumped at that chance. No lie. That said, as a full adult, I know that 14 year old me was a hormone riddled idiot that wasn't capable of fully understanding the consequences of jumping at that chance. And that's the point.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 12:31 PM
3

Am I The Asshole.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/20 12:00 PM
6

Delusions of humanity?
/r/MensRights25/03/20 12:19 PM
2

All it takes is one win and the precedent is set.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 06:32 PM
59

AITA is completely cucked. Any post that isnt a slobbery blowjob to progressive ideology gets DVed to hell.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/20 05:32 PM
16

What's your point? The only people who seem to care about what women wear are other women.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 12:55 AM
8

Like with any currency of sufficient value, when demand outstrips supply, counterfeits will inevitably be created.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/03/20 02:35 AM
2

Women can give children up for adoption without the consent of the father. Some states like Utah, actively assist mother's in this task. Let's not even mention the anonymous abandonment (safe drop) stations in many cities where women can put their kid and just walk away as if it never existed.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/03/20 07:48 PM
1

I know. I thought she was 50.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/20 11:13 PM
5

I would settle for putting in a burlap sack and beating them with reeds.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/03/20 12:03 AM
13

"It's difficult to get someone to understand something when their livelihood depends upon them not understanding it." Upton Sinclair Knowledge is a direct threat to indoctrination and indoctrination is their bread and butter.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 08:52 PM
2

Richard Roundtree, motherfuckin Shaft, had breast cancer.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 12:08 PM
4

"I assumed you were a troublemaker until you proved your worth to me by taking on a responsibility that wasn't yours."
/r/MensRights18/02/20 08:59 PM
2

Honestly, I have had far fewer (one) shaving incidents with the safety razer than with modern disposables which would leave me looking like a Sweeny Todd meat pie. I wouldn't switch back if you paid me. I mean even the ritual with the soap cup, brush and lather is relaxing. I find shaving to be an enjoyable process now.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 03:08 PM
32

I switched from disposables to a safety razor. Bought a hundred blades on eBay from Sweden for 12 dollars. Never gonna buy a Gillette product again.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 03:24 AM
97

"If innocent men go to jail as a consequence of stopping Violence against women, that's a price I'm willing to make them pay." - Feminism
/r/MensRights03/02/20 03:59 PM
1

Neither am I...
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/20 01:04 PM
21

See the issue is that it was still his responsibility to take all reasonable steps to ensure she had and reached the age of consent. Reasonable, of course being, three kinds of government issued photo ID, a polygraph test, birth certificate, and 2 notarized letters from family members and the pet dog.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 03:47 PM
8

I wish there was a word to describe when a person is obligated to provide the fruits of their labour to another person under penalty of law without having the choice to do do...
/r/MensRights31/12/19 12:41 PM
4

Maximum victim points?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/19 01:12 PM
1

50? Days?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 10:50 PM
8

They did. Generally because the accuser either recanted or the accused confessed so there was no need for the test to be completed.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 08:54 PM
11

Piss all over the door. When they come at you for doing it, tell them it wouldn't have happened if you had access to the facilities like the girls do.
/r/MensRights01/11/19 10:04 PM
1

The problem is that he had to split his attention between the two. If he was able to simply concentrate on the girl he was arresting it would have been a simple task. But by taking his attention off the other person he leaves himself vulnerable to possible attack from behind.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/19 04:01 PM
18

Everytime I see one of these types of posts my only response is to say "it is not my responsibility to assuage your irrationality."
/r/MensRights28/09/19 04:54 PM
39

As long as there is pussy to beg, there will be pussy beggars.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/09/19 01:28 AM
37

looks like its a school record, but even so, its ridiculous. any school official delving into his past is going to see this. what is it going to mean when he's a teenager?
/r/MensRights25/09/19 05:29 PM
81

complaining or speaking up, sure, not putting a 5 year old on a sex offender registry. There is absurd and then there is this.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 04:34 PM
4

Don't forget about Dominic Scullion and Luke Hardwood in the UK. Dominic was beaten so badly he looked like he was hit by a car and Luke had his skull crushed.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 11:31 PM
1

Poofter?!? Seriously? What are you? 12?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/09/19 12:14 PM
1

ok. Given the choice of your eloquent rebuttal against 20+ years of NVCI, physical restraint, and Use of Force training, I go ahead and ignore you now.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/19 11:30 AM
1

his back was turned and was moving away when she grabbed him to turn him around.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/19 11:25 AM
10

The purpose of self defence is to use enough force to stop the threat against you. She showed no signs of stopping on her own even though he tried to walk away. He responded to her attacks with a single retaliation. As soon as she was made into a non threat by it he stopped.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/09/19 10:26 AM
6

That sounds an awful lot like advocating for personal responsibility which is the same as victim blaming. REEEEE!!!!
/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:12 AM
5

Sometimes you have to take the beating to prove the point.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/19 11:49 AM
12

Whenever someone says that men are trash, just remind them that trash comes in dumpsters.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 03:21 PM
23

Charges are based on the age of the accused at the time the crime was committed.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/07/19 11:23 AM
6

No one wants to fail, but everyone wants the freedom to do so.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 11:37 PM
2

Jessie Jackson opened the door. jussie Smollet smashed through the wall like the fucking Kool-Aid Man.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/19 10:31 PM
17

I remember seeing a newspaper ad in the early nineties from McGill University that stated "males need not apply" for a job posting. It sticks in my mind because of just how blatantly discriminatory it was and that no one thought twice about posting it.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 11:35 PM
12

I'm pretty sure they're thinking about it quite a lot and seeing many of their compatriots walking away with a slap on the wrist convinces them to take that extra step.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 11:46 PM
3

All women want equality until they get it.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/19 10:28 PM
16

If the truck stops,the activists have an opportunity to slip foreign matter into the trailer with the animals. If the animals consume what they are given, they then can't be slaughtered as there could be toxic substances present.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/06/19 11:49 PM
11

Al Capone went to prison for tax evasion. Sometimes you take your justice where you can find it.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 12:39 PM
3

X Ma'am!
/r/MensRights14/06/19 12:53 AM
1

Meh. Sounds to me like someone is trying to rev up the hype machine with some controversy....
/r/MensRights14/06/19 12:52 AM
23

white knight is just a polite term for pussy beggar.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/19 02:42 PM
18

"The beatings will continue until you realize we are actually the good guys." - Feminists
/r/MensRights17/05/19 04:36 PM
3

By simply pushing him off, that would have been criminal negligence. Injury or death was a reasonable outcome to her action and it was easily foreseeable as a consequence of her action. The fact that he died as a result elevates her culpability to manslaughter. She might not have intended to kill him but he died as a direct result of her committing a lesser crime.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 04:41 PM
4

At the very least, I would be involuntary manslaughter.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 01:00 PM
2

Don Cheadle.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 07:29 PM
2

It's awesome that they did it when you asked. It sucks that you had to ask.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 11:09 AM
7

Men can get and do get raped, people just don't care. Male privilege.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 07:11 PM
34

She kicked him in the pills. Then she went for a second shot. I'd say she got off easy all things considered.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/19 04:08 PM
50

Of course. Cultists gonna cult.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 04:20 PM
54

See, for these folks, their failure can't be theirs. It has to be because they bravely tried to withstand the slings and barbs of Teh Patriarchy but ultimately succumbed. They can't understand that no one cares that they are lesbians or not. They have wrapped themselves so tightly in that identity that it colours every single thing that happens. Failed at business? Men hate me. Criticized for being a raging bigot? Men hate me. Stubbed my toe? Men hate me. Its comical really that they have transl…
/r/MensRights25/04/19 01:41 PM
6

Munchausen syndrome by Patriarchy.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/19 03:26 PM
14

They are absolutely comparable. Neither victim was able to give consent. And this isn't a "Romeo and Juliet" scenario. She was over twice his age. She had full knowledge that what she was doing was illegal and she did it anyway.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 01:39 PM
39

weaker than =/= incapable of harm. I don't care if you are weaker than me. if you can cause me injury, and you try to do so, you will be dropped like a bag of potatoes.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/19 09:21 AM
14

sadly a lot of businesses will quickly settle and let their insurance foot the bill since it's cheaper than fighting and winning.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/03/19 09:19 AM
3

The objective standard, generally, is medical necessity. Except in very rare cases, there is no medical necessity to perform a circumcision.
/r/MensRights21/03/19 09:06 AM
18

Ignoring the religious aspect, it's inherently bad because the act is mutilating the genitals of an infant that is unable to understand or give consent. It's an entirely unnecessary violation of bodily autonomy for the purposes of religion and/or aesthetics.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 10:13 PM
2

She's like the us corn industry. Only kept alive and popular through immense subsidy.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 12:24 PM
223

"I didn't talk down to you because you're a woman. I talked down to you because you are an idiot."
/r/MensRights17/03/19 11:22 AM
25

The Narrative must be preserved. The Narrative is Truth. The Narrative is Life. The Narrative is what keeps the bureaucracy running.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/03/19 10:19 PM
2

"enjoy the ride but don't rock the boat." -Disney.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 04:43 PM
2

You can throw your fancy words around but it doesnt change the fact... That Chick- Fill-A is using intentionally sexist language in offering a service. > how does this effect me other than you being slightly annoyed by it There isn't even a CFA in my area so it doesn't affect me at all beyond noticing that they are using intentionally sexist messaging. The fact that you are apparently getting all up in arms about my response to you suggests that you are trying to project your own unease with the…
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:01 PM
1

Expression unis EST exclusio alterius. The express mention of one thing excludes all others. While if you went out of your way to ask, they would likely oblige, by calling it "mom's valet service" they are specifically identifying who it is intended for and who is expected to be using it.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 01:42 PM
8

And this is why Feminism is a religion. Start with the conclusion and selectively edit in the facts that support it .
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/19 03:40 PM
6

I'd just start calling him IMAX since he projects so much. There comes a point where you just need to adopt a scorched earth policy and stop giving a fuck what other people think.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 09:20 PM
29

The fastest way to eliminate the draft is to make it mandatory for women.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/02/19 08:52 PM
13

You are a material witness and will likely be the only thing that keeps him from going to jail instead of her.
/r/MensRights19/02/19 05:13 PM
32

There is a really easy way to fix that guilt problem, you know....
/r/MensRights19/02/19 04:04 PM
2

The problem is a system that enables abusive behaviour from a specific class of people. In any interaction a man has with a woman, there is a proverbial gun on the table between them. This gun, if used, will destroy the mans career, his reputation, even his life. Every woman has access to the gun. Even though not every woman will choose to use it, every woman can if they want to.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/02/19 08:52 PM
9

Look at her and say " I know. I hate it when people are selfish too."
/r/MensRights18/02/19 02:09 AM
21

Yeah society is that bad. Women have been trained to see men as predators. That's why I can't even take my kid to the park without talking to a cop within 15 minutes of being there. Its why someone at the mall called security on me when I took my then infant daughter into the bathroom to change her diaper. Its why the "pence rule" is a thing. The reality is that in every single interaction men have with women now there is a proverbial gun on the table between them. It's a weapon that every woman…
/r/MensRights14/02/19 02:22 PM
2

Get woke, go broke.
/r/MensRights14/02/19 12:37 AM
120

It isn't that men don't care when their space is invaded. It's that men know that no one else cares so they just move on because there is no point in doing anything else.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 02:10 PM
16

In this case, he hit her with one punch. It is not reasonable to assume a single punch would render a person comatose. Further to this, given that she swung and connected on him, it *is* reasonable to expect him to defend himself from further aggression. That he only hit her once shows that he engaged in reasonable force to end the altercation.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/19 06:21 PM
6

Whew. I bet you feel good now that you've done your part to make the world better by insulting a bunch of strangers on the internet. God knows we were on the brink of disaster there until you pulled that bit of slacktivism out of your pocket at the last minute. I was seriously worried for a moment. Thank you for your service.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 12:57 PM
499

you guys are clearly misunderstanding the sign. The woman in the picture is defending herself from the man who has his hands up in the "I'm going to grab your boobs" position. He is clearly the one acting in a threatening manner, but as usual, the artist only captured what happened immediately afterwards and is depicting the woman, who is merely defending herself from the mans patriarchal entitlement, as the aggressor.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 12:22 PM
9

So, as a rational and intelligent being, should it not also be incumbent upon each of us to acknowledge our emotional outbursts and take responsibility for them? That is, should we allow our hormones to become convenient scapegoats for undesirable behaviours? And if not, how should we as a society react to those who do?
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/19 11:51 PM
22

In the eyes of society, "protect" is world's apart from "care". The mother cares for the family, the father is supposed to stand apart while still providing all the necessary resources for the mother. That is why men who raise children are viewed as dangerous anomalies. They are attempting to usurp the mother's role while abandoning their own.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 11:38 PM
15

Doesn't matter. If you buck the narrative, you are either a patriarchal oppressor, or a gender traitor.
/r/MensRights26/01/19 03:29 PM
1

It becomes an issue of due diligence. This guy was cited numerous times for unsafe operation and the defects were a known issue. If you are test driving a car and there is a maintenance record showing that the owner took reasonable steps to keep the vehicle in working order, then the owner would not be at fault. At best it would simply be a freak occurrence.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 10:40 PM
6

I don't care if you say you're not a feminist. you are acting like one and frankly you are beginning to bore me. we're done.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:43 PM
13

Don't blame the sub because someone took what they wanted from an article. The fact that we are sitting here talking about how the original post title is misleading and have clarified what really happened shows that having accurate information is seen as a priority here. Your own shitposting here is doing the exact same thing OP did. You see what you want to see and use that as a way of broad brushing everyone. Take your foolishness back to r/ feminism.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 05:17 PM
1

Please explain how being convicted for knowingly operating a defective vehicle, while intoxicated, and letting another person who is also inebriated to operate it is a gender issue. Take your time.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 04:50 PM
12

the article states that the boat had "numerous defects" so I would say that no, it should not have been in the water.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 02:53 PM
455

The issues apparently stem from the fact that the boat was mechanically defective and he had a duty of care to not allow operation of the boat by anyone, and (this is assumption on my part) she was not properly licensed to operate. Also, as the owner of the boat, he should not have allowed her to operate the boat in her inebriated state. This is a classic example of the confusion between fault and responsibility. As the operator, the accident was the fault of the woman. As the owner, it was his …
/r/MensRights25/01/19 02:34 PM
3

Don't misunderstand, I am a full supporter of equality and that includes the notion that if you instigate violence, regardless of your gender, the defender has an absolute right to protect themselves.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/19 04:28 PM
9

There is a societal taboo about physical violence against women. The idea is that because men are generally larger and have disproportionate upper body strength, it is not OK to hit a girl. Even when women are violent towards men, it is generally accepted as "cute", "harmless", or "funny" whereas, male violence is always interpreted as toxic and harmful, even when done defensively. Even in Law, Primary aggressor policies target men as perpetrators in Domestic Violence calls even when they are th…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/19 01:44 PM
9

Except that she made one of the classic blunders. We already know the first two. The third is if you are a girl and you decide to hit someone, you no longer classify as a girl for the purposes of the ""never hit a girl" rule.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/19 12:15 PM
17

Validated.
/r/MensRights17/01/19 01:06 PM
5

"I heard a stat that if you have 1000 random men throw a baseball, and then an average woman, she will not go as far as the baseball."
/r/PussyPassDenied07/01/19 10:39 PM
7

it's a deliberate misrepresentation of the facts. Yes, all the facts are there. The age of the complainant, the age of the accused, the time it allegedly took place. But by presenting the facts in the manner they did, the intention is to lead the reader to making incorrect assumptions.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 12:19 PM
124

Chade. Pronounced Chaw-day.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/18 01:06 PM
3

call yourself a woman and reap all the benefits.
/r/MensRights25/12/18 12:07 PM
1

would you still hold that opinion if you were the one who had to do the killing?
/r/MensRights24/12/18 09:15 PM
4

Lived experience is the only experience apparently.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 05:43 PM
2

Freshly Hatched Ideological Rage. ​
/r/MensRights24/12/18 12:39 PM
7

why would you want to show such mercy? Let her live with the knowledge that she killed her own child for the rest of her natural life.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/12/18 06:59 PM
2

>The court ruled ye acted well outside of the Continuum and well beyond any action that an officer should take.if you have such a hard-on for justice, then respect with the court say and sit back down. The same court system that sees innocent people on death row. Yeah, just because the court ruled in a specific way does not mean they ruled correctly. We can disagree on whether the officer acted poorly but unless you can allow for the possibility that the court was incorrect despite the ruling be…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/18 01:37 AM
1

The threat was in the fact that she felt free to attack the officer and there is no indication that she would stop of her own accord. It's obvious that being restrained by cuffs was not enough of a deterrent for her. She was resistant and combative. Despite your snotty attempt at disparaging my intelligence, I am well aware of force and energy and how to apply those principles when restraining suspects. I am also well aware of just how much energy is required to subdue an actively resisting susp…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/18 01:47 PM
16

Because they believe that our self worth is inherently tied to sexual conquest. By calling us virgins it is an attempt to call us failures as men.
/r/MensRights17/12/18 05:36 PM
-2

Please, enlighten me as to where my 20+ years in security and law enforcement is in error here.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/18 02:15 PM
0

Police are meant to de escalate situations not make them more violent. She escalated. He de-escalated her quite decisively. > She learned her lesson but a charge with some jail time would have been more effective and far more punishing. Not in the immediate time frame. She showed zero rationality at that moment. She was beyond verbal instruction and was engaged in direct violence. telling her she was going to be charge with further crimes in that moment would have been fruitless and if nothing e…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/18 01:42 PM
-1

and how exactly do you know what level of threat she was? She clearly demonstrated that even while restrained she was combative and there was no indication that she would have stopped her assault of the officer. More likely, she would have continued to escalate in the absence of response. as it is, she made her choice, and the officer responded with a single decisive response that immediately ended the threat. Had he continued striking her after the first hit, that would have been excessive, but…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/18 12:17 PM
1

this is a lesson in immediate consequence for poor decision making on her part.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/18 12:09 PM
2

when you have to explain a joke....
/r/MensRights08/12/18 02:33 PM
0

Has anyone else noticed that the app user is looking for all children? EDIT- you people need to find a sense of humour. seriously.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 01:45 PM
3

Accusing people of rape isn't an addiction, nor is there much money involved. Tell that to Wanetta Gibson. She walked away with a cool 1.5 million. Good thing she turned out to be an idiot though. Her confession eventually got Brian Banks out of prison and she got sued for the money
/r/PussyPassDenied06/12/18 09:16 PM
2

It's because as males, the prisoners have authority over the female guards. The women are actually being raped because they can't consent under that kind of power differential.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 11:54 AM
9

Yes, exactly! If you don't trust you partner to take it, take it yourself.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/18 12:05 PM
128

The Parsemus Foundation is working on it but they need support.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/18 11:32 AM
34

It's lobbied against by Feminists. The "logic" is that men supposedly can't be trusted to take it reliably so it is therefore misogynistic to force women to rely on men's inability to reliably take a pharmacological birth control. Of course the real real reason it is lobbied against is because of male birth control threatens the gravy train.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/18 11:30 AM
19

The thotpolice are coming...
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/18 11:52 PM
15

They helped him stay out of jail. She got enough of a tune up that the annoying noise went away. It's all good.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/11/18 08:41 PM
13

It's not about who is in charge. It's about to whom those who are in charge direct the resources.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 07:26 PM
1

It's really very simple, Alcohol consumption as a factor of consent is treated very differently depending on whether the victim is male or female. I personally think the idea that the mere consumption of alcohol voids consent is ridiculous, but that idea, much to the detriment of society, is taking greater and greater hold. Thus, my comment facetiously holding both men and women to the same absurd standard. With regard to the actual case, the teacher still was in a position of trust or authority…
/r/MensRights16/11/18 10:04 PM
4

Even if it is the result of a mental disorder, that does not mean the person is incapable of understanding the consequences of their actions. Narcissists or cluster B Personality disorders do not alleviate a person's culpability for what they do.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 08:17 PM
4

the point though, is that, in the case of accused rapists, the accused is arrested, even without evidence, and jailed pending trial or even psychiatric exam if there is cause to do so. Yet, in this case, where the accuser has admitted to police that she made it all up and there is physical evidence that the claim is false, no action is being pursued to charge her and people are offering up excuses without corroboration that she has a mental illness and is thus exempt from facing justice. Sauce f…
/r/MensRights16/11/18 06:23 PM
2

so its best to simply not bother then?
/r/MensRights16/11/18 03:07 PM
6

and according to Widom and Morris, Only 16% of men with documented histories of sexual abuse considered themselves to have been sexually abused, compared to 64% of women with documented histories in the same study. This means that 84% of provably abused men reframed their abuse in their minds such that they see themselves as willing participants.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 01:44 AM
46

plied them both with alcohol. According to the accepted narrative, drunken consent is not real consent.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 09:04 PM
27

so this woman separated from her husband 12 years ago and in that time has done absolutely nothing to better herself. No training, no education beyond basic schooling. She has been divorced for longer than she was married and has the gall to think that her lazy ass should be supported for life??!?! Fuck that noise. Send her down to the meat clown to flip burgers.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/18 05:19 AM
22

Step 1- create the dystopia you claim to oppose. Step 2- blame the dystopia on an ethereal boogeyman. Step3 - push your ideology as the solution. Step 4 - profit
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/18 01:23 PM
4

Sunanda Kumariratana, The fucking QUEEN of SIAM, drowned in 1880, because it was a death sentence for anyone to touch her. This what ridiculous puritanical and pedestalizing attitudes regarding women has wrought. In a world of "MeToo" where even the smell of impropriety is enough to result in ruined lives, then you're on your own. You want a world where men will help women? Then stop demonizing men for giving you attention and shaming them when they don't. Stop making every single interaction a …
/r/MensRights10/11/18 01:23 AM
5

Did either of those examples involve a guy saving a woman's life? doesn't matter. it's not what the guys did or didn't do that got them attacked. > Fuck, you idiots are using the same "all men are rapists" shit that you give them shit for. Nope. Not accusing anyone of anything. Just being pro-active in my own safety by not touching another person. >You would let someone die. Disgusting. The first rule of saving someone else is be sure that it's safe to intervene. Nuff said.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 12:44 AM
12

As opposed to letting someone die because of a made-up non-existent fear? ​ Except that it's not made up or non-existent as false accusation is a very real phenomenon. Did you look at the two examples I provided? Or is this one of those "What you say is the only possible way of things so that's the end of any reasonable discussion!" moments? >You might as well tell men to quit their job if they have any interactions with women because MeToo is out to get them. Quit? Naw. Take reasonable precauti…
/r/MensRights10/11/18 12:34 AM
18

>but find one example of a person properly giving CPR or using an AED who was accused and tried in the court of public opinion. Do you want to be the first?
/r/MensRights09/11/18 10:23 PM
39

you don't need to be sued. Extra-judicial consequences are real. Just ask Luke Harwood or Dominic Scullion. This is the danger of a false accusation. The law never needs to be involved for the accusation to ruin or even end your life.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 09:53 PM
42

Even if you do know how you are not obligated to give it. But once you start you are obligated to keep doing it until you can't anymore.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 09:48 PM
1

cool story, bro.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/18 05:20 PM
1

and I'm sure you believe you're the only one capable of making that decision...
/r/PussyPassDenied02/11/18 02:46 PM
-4

The point of prison is to separate offenders from the rest of the population for the purpose of eventually rehabilitating them back into society. For the few that cannot be rehabilitated does not mean that they are simply to be thrown away. We have an obligation to try even if it doesn't look like it will work. > It’s irresponsible to risk people’s lives to perpetuate childish utopian ideals. And yet a knife wielding, decapitating cannibal murderer was successfully reintroduced into society once…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/18 10:12 PM
-17

40-year-old Chinese-Canadian Vincent Weiguang Li stabbed, beheaded, and cannibalized Tim Mclean while on a bus. Li was deemed not criminally liable due to mental illness or defect. He has since been released after receiving treatment. Being a threat in the moment does not equate to being a threat for the rest of your life. People make mistakes. Some are horrible and deserve more severe consequences, but so long as we live in a society that values retribution over rehabilitation we can't rightly …
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/18 07:30 PM
-12

Do you think it to be even remotely plausible that a person who can stomp anyone, let alone a toddler to death is not at that moment in an entirely rational state of mind? This is not to suggest that a person who commits such a heinous crime should not be punished, but that being said, to suggest that anyone is "irredeemable" is to open a very dangerous door regarding just who we deign to be worthy of compassion, justice or mercy. “The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by enterin…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/10/18 06:27 PM
15

yeah she'll get moved to a healing lodge in less than 2 though.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 11:05 PM
1

Sadly, it takes that kind of comparison to kickstart peoples brains into recognizing men as actual people instead of some ethereal representation of "patriarchal oppression".
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/18 06:47 PM
2

She played the cops like a fiddle. She played up the "abused victim" angle that the cops had already assumed and used that to get a plea deal for testifying against Bernardo. As soon as the deal was signed, she sang like a bird. After the tapes were discovered, the Crown and the cops realized that she was just as much of an active participant as he was but by then, it was too late to back out on the deal and she got 12 years for raping and murdering 3 people.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 11:50 AM
16

or when they make assumptions about the woman being an abused and unwilling participant like they did with Karla Homolka.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 12:02 PM
4

Not every woman is going to abuse the law to their advantage, but so long as the law exists to be abused, there will be some women who will do so. The solution is to fix the law.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 10:58 PM
4

>nobody is entitled to respect Exactly. At best, you get indifference until you can earn anything else.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/18 06:10 AM
11

It disrupts the narrative. That's why.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 05:03 PM
51

it's a "gotcha" tactic. She was constantly conflating "rape" and "rape culture". The existence of one does not equate to the existence of the other. Rape can exist in a society that does not accept or tolerate it.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/10/18 07:42 PM
27

just the distribution rights to the story.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/10/18 07:39 PM
14

If snow White was a man the huntsman would not have returned to the queen with a deer heart in the box.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 12:06 AM
51

because the idea is to create more grist for the prison mill. Had you continued to remain in arrears, you would have been jailed for "contempt of court" where your presence and labour would benefit the private prison system.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:00 PM
13

It's interesting that women claim they only received the right to vote 100 years ago. Men OTOH, still have to buy that same privilege with a compulsory blood oath and face imprisonment if they refuse...
/r/MensRights15/09/18 02:14 PM
3

Boko Haram killed thousands of boys and no one cared. They *kidnapped* 300 girls and the world lost it's collective shit.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 02:09 PM
1

Ok.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 12:09 AM
13

whether everybody does it is irrelevant. The majority of drivers go over the speed limit but only a small fraction get caught. that doesn't absolve the others from what they are doing. The same goes for coaching. Serena got caught. and she pitched a fit. ​
/r/MensRights12/09/18 03:39 PM
29

The coach admitted outright that he was giving hand signals but dismissed the act as "everyone was doing it". But in the end it isn't giving the hand signals but getting caught giving the hand signals that gets you the fine.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 04:24 AM
5

She's claiming discrimination because she says when male tennis players have tantrums they aren't penalized but she always is.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 04:04 PM
71

She played a stronger game even though Serena could bench press a bus.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/18 04:02 PM
8

I prefer the old Reddit didgeridoo, myself. Mwoooooowoooooooooowowwoooowowwwooooowowwwoooo
/r/MensRights01/09/18 04:02 AM
8

It's shit apple and shit tree, Randy.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/08/18 05:01 PM
1

All claims should be believed insofar as they create an investigation that can support or discredit said claim.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 04:26 AM
9

except she was never the hero to start with. just a villain in a hero's cape.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/18 03:23 PM
6

he was a minor when she fucked him. he signed the papers as an adult.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/18 03:14 PM
79

It generally is legal but unless you have video or reliable witnesses, you run the very real risk of a false sexual assault allegation. Hell you don't even need to touch anyone and you can get one. Look up the case of Soner Yasa. A Winnipeg cabbie who was saved by video evidence that he did nothing wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/08/18 03:05 AM
1

Please explain then how any of her actions in GG were not abusive?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/18 04:18 AM
-2

No she isn't. Abuse is not strength.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/18 12:32 AM
5

"your enemy cannot pull a trigger if you cut off his hand" /Sgt. Zim
/r/PussyPassDenied22/07/18 11:40 AM
1

The context is vitally important. It goes directly to what he said to her in light of her comments regarding that "men shouldn't rape". First off WE ALL KNOW THAT RAPE IS BAD. We also know that there is a subset of the population, both men and women who will act without consent. No law will change this. His response to her, as he explained was one of, to paraphrase, "If you think that men are the problem, why then, are you still getting down with them? That seems rather idiotic." All told, its a…
/r/MensRights20/07/18 04:15 AM
10

You know we'd be more inclined to listen if you would at least be honest and include the proper context.
/r/MensRights19/07/18 06:22 PM
1

Even ABB doesn't deserve to die. NO ONE *deserves* to die.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/18 04:32 PM
3

enough that the Innocence Project exists to keep people from being murdered by the state.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/18 11:01 PM
4

which is why the entire concept of capital punishment is inherently flawed. There is already enough precedent that innocent people have been murdered by the state in the name of Justice. The Innocence Project exists precisely because innocent people face the death penalty. There is no reason other than vengeance to support the death penalty and vengeance has no place within the justice system.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/18 10:58 PM
7

going by the trailers, I was really afraid they were going to pull the old "Uncle Buck" incompetent routine. I too was pleasantly surprised when it was clearly just a matter of inexperience rather than idiocy. It was a refreshingly honest and positive portrayal of fatherhood.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 03:29 PM
3

settling because you can not afford to fight is not "voluntarily agreeing" to anything. It is taking the only option available to you and still surviving. Sure he could have fought it in court, bankrupted himself with legal fees and gone out of business, but that was not a viable option.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 04:25 PM
1

The work around is make the woman sign a waiver of liability stating that she is fully aware that the barber is not qualified to do what she is asking him to do and he is not in any way responsible for the outcome. Then when he fucks it up, she is left with a shitty haircut.
/r/MensRights11/07/18 04:11 PM
28

I like to imagine that he yells "SHAZAAM!!" when he takes that swing.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/07/18 03:59 PM
1

She did win her riding in the 1988 election and was a Member of Parliament. She then ran for Party leader of the PCs after Mulroney retired. Her position as PM was wholly legitimate, but given the incredibly short time in office, a major military scandal, and a disastrous campaign ad that appeared to mock Jean Chretien's Bells palsy, the PCs went from a Majority Government to only winning 2 seats in 1993.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 01:50 PM
1

she ran and won the position of party leader after Mulroney retired. Under the Canadian system, the leader of the party with the most seats in Parliament is PM.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 01:08 PM
12

Kim Campbell was handed a flaming turd when she took over after Mulroney. While she was one of the shortest sitting PMs, she never had a chance to actually BE a PM as she took over during the summer break and asked the GG to dissolve Parliament in September as she was statutarily required to do.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 05:16 AM
114

Truth be told, regarding the allegation, he deserves the exact same assumption of innocence as anyone else when an allegation is made. That said however, Trudeau has set a strong precedent within his government to remove party members based on nothing more than allegations. whether we agree with that is irrelevant to the larger story that Trudeau, now when faced with his own allegation, is shucking and jiving around the fact that he won't step down. The issue is the blatant hypocrisy he is showi…
/r/MensRights07/07/18 05:05 AM
2

We've got to remember the outliers. Absolutely. the issue arises when we are expected to cater to them.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 08:14 PM
10

Well, it would appear that as a society's egalitarianism increases, the divergence between "gendered" professions increases as well. In the above link, there is a documentary out of Norway, arguably one of the most egalitarian countries on the planet that explores this very phenomenon as well as looks at the question regarding natural male and female affinities towards "gendered" playthings.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 06:32 PM
12

More that the culture teaches men and women to behave a certain way. Nature. Nature did this. Sexual dimorphism particularly. >In a traditional patriarchal society, men are almost always the ones in places of power and are typically looked to as having more agency than women. Perhaps, but they are also tasked with the majority of responsibility to go along with it. In fact when given the choice, women willingly trade agency for security. A glaring example of this was during the women's suffrage …
/r/MensRights24/06/18 06:03 PM
23

Except that, in your world view the culture is formed by men since they are the oppressors. So again, your premise cannot stand without the exterior framework of religious doctrine to support it.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 04:30 PM
34

>To be fair here, the idea of patriarchy is supposed to also indicate the problems men face. That's awfully convenient though isn't it? Women as a class are so oppressed that their oppressor class will go out of its way to inflict willful damage on itself? That's just straight up narcissism in action wrapped up in a victim narrative. > Rather, it's important to recognize that patriarchy is supposed to encompass bad things that men suffer because of gender inequality. Of course it is. The entire …
/r/MensRights24/06/18 04:01 PM
25

It's not ok to put your hands on anyone. That being said, you absolutely have the right to defend yourself from physical aggression. It doesn't matter who commits it. Being a woman is not a shield if you decide to escalate to the point of physicality.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/18 10:09 PM
3

Perhaps "arrest" wasn't the right word. "Remove" is more accurate. basically, Your GF can beat the snot out of you, and when you call the cops, you either get arrested, or you find yourself sleeping in a hotel (at your expense) for the night.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/18 04:19 PM
8

Primary Aggressor Doctrine. Police are trained to arrest the person who they deem the most likely to have committed violence. Since men are bigger and stronger, men are assumed to be the primary aggressors.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/18 03:33 PM
2

>what's with the crowd turning on him? White Knight Syndrome.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/05/18 03:31 PM
1

BY accident!
/r/MensRights26/05/18 12:02 AM
3

Calling someone a skinhead as an epithet is as much an attempt at dehumanization as using any other form. There is no argument as to the depravity of Nazism. To suggest that a person ascribes to such, is to strip them of their humanity in a way that is far worse than using a racial slur as you are making the argument that the so called Nazi has given up their humanity by their own choice whereas a racial epithet is an outward attempt to strip humanity from another based on an immutable character…
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/18 03:47 AM
2

So, they are both racist slurs.... but one is more racist than the other? Because reasons? Isn't it much more the intent behind the utterance, rather than the utterance itself that denotes the level of racism involved? In the end though, Arguing about Racist Power levels, like we are talking about characters in DBZ is stupid.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/18 04:36 PM
16

Not a wage gap. An earnings gap. Two people making the same wage will not earn the same amount if one works more than the other.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 04:04 PM
1

So, what? Just shrug your shoulders and walk away? I get it, it's not your problem.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:40 AM
14

until now there has not been a precedent. Until now, male rape in prison has always been "just one of those things". Everyone knows it happens, but no one cared. Now though, A trans woman has been raped in a mens prison. The threat has been exposed. No one can just shrug their shoulders and pretend it doesn't happen because now something was done about it. To now go back to pretending just won't work anymore. The dam has a crack in it. No one ever said it would be easy. But now, it's no longer f…
/r/MensRights19/04/18 04:01 PM
2

apparently so. Now bear in mind that I also have an extensive background with use of force and tactical communication. I am used to seeing how quickly situations can escalate and how people will continue an attack if they receive no resistance to it. Ideally, a situation is best handled if violence can be avoided while achieving compliance and in all my dealings that has always been my ultimate goal. That said, when situations require it, actions need to be swift and decisive in order to minimiz…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/18 02:39 PM
1

taunting, trash talk, and finally a threat display. that is called escalation. There is nothing that would suggest it was a one time occurrance, and entirely reasonable to believe that she would continue to engage in violent behaviour. So the guy responded swiftly and decidedly. He used enough force to ensure that she would stop, then he stopped and walked away, back to the car. If he had continued to pound on her, then I would agree that it was excessive, but that didn't happen. He knocked her …
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/18 11:19 AM
0

given that she showed a clear pattern of escalation, it is reasonable to conclude that she would have continued to hit him had he not taken steps to stop her.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/18 11:14 AM
2

cool story, bro.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 10:46 PM
2

Like I said.... It has nothing to do with knowledge or ability. I know how to drive a bus. But i don't have a license to do it, right now. so I am prevented from doing so.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 10:20 PM
2

Except that OP's linked article says that there was NO regulation prior to two years ago. So anyone could be a barber without any need for training. "“I explained I’m not qualified to cut women's or girls’ hair. I’ve never done it." seems to me that he was likely an unlicensed barber until he qualified as a licensed barber.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:38 PM
3

http://www.news.com.au/finance/work/new-training-means-barbers-can-cut-their-teeth-for-men-not-women/news-story/bdde8cf2e65f31288604d4f3ff4d3748 well according to this article, A certificate in barbering is wholly separate from a certificate in hairdressing and people who take the barbering course can cut mens hair but not womens... So it would appear that your assertion is false. Have a good day.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 08:03 PM
4

It doesn't matter what he uses as a cutting device. The fact that she is female precludes him from being able to cut her hair as he has not received the proper certifications to do so. The hair is irrelevant. the style is irrelevant. Licensing and training are the only things that matter here.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 07:05 PM
2

he's absolutely qualified to be a barber. He does not have a stylists licence, which is what he needs to cut women's hair. Not only that, but there are significant expectations when it comes to cutting womens hair that simply aren't there when cutting men's. That is one of the biggest reasons why it costs more to cut womens hair than mens. The point here though, is that the woman wanted something that he was not able to give, and in a fit of pique, brought down the power of the state upon him to…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 05:28 PM
20

being able to do a thing and being qualified to do it are very different things.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 12:46 PM
57

If i walk into a shop asking for a service, and the shopkeeper tells me that they are not qualified to perform that service, I am not going to insist they do it. If this guy is smart, he should offer to demonstrate for the court and then proceed to completely butcher the girls hair as proof that he was not qualified to perform the task being demanded of him. If the complainant wishes to pay for his training so that he can cut women and girls hair, then I'm sure there wouldn't be an issue. but un…
/r/MensRights09/04/18 11:03 AM
7

oh they know. But it is imperative that they redefine them to support their bullshit narrative.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 06:10 PM
10

Because strong independent women are simply incapable of making decisions about their own bodies, when those decisions go against the narrative...
/r/MensRights31/03/18 03:56 PM
4

while the state can restrict its citizens from the possession and use of certain substances, even when one claims religious significance, that is an entirely different animal than one person imposing religious rites and practices upon another.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 03:55 PM
6

while drinking a glass of milk.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/18 02:14 AM
169

ding ding ding!
/r/MensRights18/03/18 04:59 PM
2

what is your reasoning?
/r/MensRights17/03/18 04:07 PM
4

you had one job...
/r/MensRights17/03/18 11:22 AM
24

Her first mistake is to assume that not hating a person means you must love and respect them. This is simply not true. Nobody deserves arbitrary respect. But by the same token, nobody deserves arbitrary disrespect either. Her second mistake is to assign the sins of one person to the entirety of maleness. While it is perfectly reasonable to dislike an individual who has behaved poorly, it is entirely unacceptable to translate that behaviour to a collective. So her question regarding "unquestioned…
/r/MensRights10/03/18 09:17 PM
8

not even close. You have two students. One plays a joke on the other by initiating a "jump scare". The other student then retaliates not once but twice against the first. Even if one concedes that the first hit was purely instinctual, there is no way one could justify the kick to groin.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/03/18 03:14 PM
1

Canada does not have an active Selective Service like in the US. but Canada has also utilized conscription in the past during times of conflict.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 05:56 AM
1

Meh. Any person who demands I do their work for them can fuck off because by telling me to do their work that's exactly what they're saying to me.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 05:53 AM
16

pro tip - It's not. Tell them to fuck off, since that is what they are telling you.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 01:37 PM
1

reduced to 28 days of house arrest on "compassionate grounds".
/r/MensRights25/02/18 09:09 PM
0

Rape is not about sex, it's about power.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:20 AM
19

'If any country with next to no Christian inhabitants would ban a central rite in Christianity, like communion for instance, we are certain that the whole Christian world would react as well.' If communion involved cutting off the tongues of children against their will, I most certainly would ban it. This has nothing to do with "religious freedom". As an adult you are free to do to your own body whatever you want and for whatever reason. Go get circumcised. That is your choice to make. This is a…
/r/MensRights18/02/18 12:48 PM
13

US law makes debtors prisons illegal. By making it impossible for men to comply with court orders, they are jailed not for the money they owe, but for "contempt" of the court order. The men are then imprisoned and are subject to forced servitude under the provisions of the 13th amendment and the state is able to further fund their bureaucracy through federal funds earmarked for the enforcement and distribution of child support. Basically, the state gives out the money to the custodial parent (mo…
/r/MensRights18/02/18 12:24 PM
3

Gee, I thought adverts were for selling products not pushing agendas. Agendas are products.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:27 PM
3

Never take a shit test. The only way to pass is to walk away.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 05:39 PM
60

The big guy in the grey is Tiny Toese. He's either with he Proud boys or Patriot Prayer guys who show up to stand against the Antifa fuck wads.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/18 05:35 PM
191

"Wow John, That was mean." "You're right. That was mean of Jane. I don't need someone loudly telling me about my hair loss."
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/18 10:33 PM
1

I'm just curious as to why you seem to be trying so hard to push that opinion as correct. I mean, you're free to hold whatever opinion you want, but you are doing more than just holding it. That's why I ask why you car so much.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 01:59 PM
1

You didn't answer the question. I understand that you think a rich person is somehow obligated to spend their wealth or else they are "paranoid" but I asked you why that is any concern of yours?
/r/MensRights11/02/18 05:55 AM
4

why do you care how anyone but yourself lives?
/r/MensRights10/02/18 06:01 PM
17

Women need to understand the idea of "the gun on the table". In every single interaction that a man has with a woman, there is a proverbial "gun" on the table between them. This gun is an accusation of harassment or assault, or any one of a myriad claims that can be made against the man and is generally only available to the woman to use. Now, we all know that there are many women who would never pick up that gun and use it. But the gun is always there, regardless. That is why men are becoming i…
/r/MensRights10/02/18 05:57 PM
52

"It is difficult to get someone to understand something when their livelihood depends upon them not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair
/r/MensRights10/02/18 03:17 PM
3

yet, she is still trying. why else would she go public with a campaign of shame? It doesn't matter if she is successful at it, the fact remains that she is still trying, crying about how hard done by she is, but is still pulling in at least 4500 a month in a million dollar house that she can sell and still come out in the black. So it sounds like she actually cares about them. If she really cared about them, she shut the fuck up, sell the house and live within her means.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/18 12:12 AM
3

If they weren't meal tickets she wouldn't be trying to cash in on them.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/02/18 10:35 PM
6

dude made 100k /year. Take off 1/3 for taxes. that leaves about 67000. now take out 48000 for "support" payments. and he is left with less tan 20000/ year for rent, food and bills, while his ex wife lives in a 1.2 million dollar house, gets another 2k from rent and 2500 for the kids from the government. or 48k + 24k + 30K = 102k/year.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/02/18 03:46 AM
5

Why would she give up her meal tickets?
/r/PussyPassDenied06/02/18 03:37 AM
1

you keep saying that, but you bring no proof.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 03:19 AM
3

we'll never know. It was more important to pander than to produce quality work.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 02:28 PM
12

but do you go front to back, then inside out and front to back again?
/r/MensRights04/02/18 02:20 PM
23

Yes there are sex differences in the brain. Tiny ones. They might account for some of the tiny differences between men and women, and between straighties and otherwise. and when backing up a 53 foot trailer, small steering corrections translate into huge trailer movement. The point being that it doesn't take a lot of difference to make a lot of difference.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 11:45 PM
4

Pointing out that circumcision itself is not the issue. But the practice of inposing it upon children who are unable to consent is a violation of their bodily autonomy. Circumcision in Abrahamic tradition is supposed to be done as a willing sacrifice to God. Children who cannot understand or consent are not making a sacrifice, but are being offered up as one instead.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 12:18 PM
5

LOBSTERALITY!
/r/PussyPassDenied25/01/18 10:08 PM
2

"If it's good enough for the Salem Puritans, It's good enough for me."
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:39 AM
1

that was in Edmonton right? fucking shit show.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/12/17 12:18 PM
5

regardless of whether she was driving erratically, that is still no excuse to go 96 mph to "get ahead of her". If you are worried about her erratic driving, slow down, let her go ahead, and call 911 for a suspected drunk driver. If she was intoxicated, trying to out race her, would only trigger further bad choices on her part and put more people at risk.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/17 01:17 PM
1

When I get pulled over, I stop the car, roll down the window and put my keys on the roof. That way, I stay in the vehicle and it is obvious that I intend to be fully compliant.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/17 01:12 PM
20

She's just jealous that the wrestlers are better actors.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/17 01:06 PM
1

if you are referring to my comment, then No, it wasn't.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/17 12:35 PM
256

"“In its rush to claim the high ground in our roiling national conversation about harassment, the Democratic Party has implemented a zero tolerance standard,” Ramsey said in a statement Friday. “For me, that means a vindictive, terminated employee’s false allegations are enough for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) to decide not to support our promising campaign."" So how's that "listen and believe" working for ya?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/17 08:44 PM
5

There are no words that justify battery of a man or a woman. As vile and reprehensible as they were, none of the words that girl spoke were a justification for him to engage in violence. If someone threatens to kill or fuck someone’s kids, then I’m going to say that that is a fair reason to physically correct them, Only if there is a reasonable belief that the threat is a credible one. Otherwise, a physical response to speech is wholly unwarranted. Self-control is the mark of a man, but some lin…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/12/17 05:48 AM
50

"you don't know who my brother is!" judging from the behaviour my guess is that he's your boyfriend.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/12/17 05:03 PM
3

It is not irrelevant. yes, it is. the reasons why have been established. Men are already capable of permanent damage to another man with a punch. and so are women. we have already established quite clearly that just because you may be weaker than your opponent, that does not make you harmless. As such, it is entirely reasonable and acceptable to respond physically to said weaker opponent if they choose to engage in violent behaviour. Men hitting women is uncalled for, That is nothing but sensele…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/12/17 07:12 AM
9

Woman should never hit a man, either. agreed. You are however willingly blind if you think men are not physically stronger. I never suggested otherwise. That said, men being stronger than women is irrelevant to the discussion.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/12/17 05:09 AM
20

I am just a "skinny dude," and would never pick a fight Because you understand that fighting someone who outclasses you is fucking stupid and they don't care how small you are. but when the time has come for self defense even I have KO'd people, and broken my hand in the process, and one even tried to sue for brain damage (failed) You just proved precisely why women who hit others must be still be treated as dangerous. Just because you are smaller or weaker than your opponent, doesn't mean that …
/r/PussyPassDenied01/12/17 01:17 AM
7

WTF line of life/work are you in? Loss prevention, labour dispute security, executive protection, mental health. That kind of thing. I have zero doubt I could rape your ass; in response to your final comment. You are more than welcome to try. You will not succeed. But you can try. I would put money on it. You should save it for a personality transplant.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/17 04:29 PM
21

You will meet a knife weilding woman? twice so far. plus 3 with dirty needles and one with a broken bottle. I won't go into the number of times I've had to deal with simple assault. I have legit been stabbed by one woman devoid of her mental capacities (straight up crazy) at the time. you obviously must have done something to deserve it. /s I proceeded to grab my attacker, lift her over my head, and the attack ended without a punch ever having to be thrown. Cool story, bro. I still won't condone…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/17 01:05 PM
37

"fantasizing". You know when feminist ideologues ask men when was the last time they took steps to protect themselves when they go outdoors? Thinking that only women have to do this? Well, here is one example. We consider scenarios that we are inevitably going to encounter in public and we talk about the difficulties we face not only in dealing with the aggressors but with society at large when we transgress the "acceptable" responses against a social class that is protected from the consequence…
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/17 12:08 PM
30

Its a dominance display. She achieves that by berating the guy with the tacit understanding that she is protected by the social conditioning of "never hit a girl". Then when she takes that shot to the blowhole she doubles down. She needs to be in the dominant position even though she has clearly lost it so she begins to rationalize. "It wasn't that bad" and "It was worth it" is an attempt to re-establish her position in her own perception. She is simply trying to convince herself with her endles…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/11/17 01:14 AM
43

well, I doubt it will amount to much of anything but you can email them at proposals(at)google.com and submit a request that they recognize IMD in the future.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/11/17 01:31 PM
2

but sovereign nations do have the authority to withdraw support from nations whose "cultural practices" are in direct violation of basic human rights and dignity.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 12:14 AM
1

none of your damned business. The fact that it happens doesn't mean that it is correct.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/17 07:58 PM
1

no, the first amendment protects you and your speech from anyone who would try to suppress it. there was a recent case in Fresno where a professor was ordered to pay 17000 dollars and attend 1st amendment training for his interference of students speech that he objected to. So obviously your assertion is incorrect.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/17 04:52 PM
1

Only if you are at work at the time. What you do on your own time has nothing to do with your work life.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/17 04:46 PM
1

I think there are actions that are legal and so wreckless and stupid and damaging to the employer that they warrant dismissal. It doesn't matter how reckless and stupid a person behaves. if they are not doing it on company time or acting as said company's representative, it's none of the company's business what they do.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/17 08:10 PM
2

You cannot be fired for your vote ahem and I think there is a massive difference between yelling "nigger" at a crowd of people and saying fuck when you're a teacher. The woman in question here did not yell "nigger" though. She told the POTUS to fuck off. and she lost her job because she exercised her right to speak out. Corporations have the power to wield political influence and in some cases coercion over their employees. As such, they must necessarily be restricted by law from using that powe…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/17 07:27 PM
3

There was one video last year from a guy slinging racial epithets and harassing a group of people and his behaviour was so egregious that his termination IMO was entirely warranted. This is where you and I disagree. There is one's personal life, and one's professional life. Except in some rather unique instances, the two are entirely separate. what one does as a private individual and not "on the clock" has no bearing on their employer. As far as I am concerned, what you do outside of work is yo…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/17 03:05 PM
3

"unless it's criminal activity, what you do outside of your workplace should not be of any concern to your employer and last I checked, exercising your freedom to express yourself was not illegal. At least not yet."
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/17 05:02 AM
3

If you publicly Flick off the president that makes you look bad, Possibly. It can also make you a hero in the eyes of others. that's the beauty of subjectivity. which in turn makes your employer look bad because people then question the people you hire. Here's the disconnect. one does not follow the other. Further to this, unless you are directly representing said business when you engage in questionable behaviour, your personal actions, on your personal time are your personal business. period. …
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/17 04:35 AM
5

if I call you an asshole, it's logical to assume that you won't like me or you'll respond in kind. That is an acceptable consequence to exercising one's freedom of speech. If I call you an asshole and I get arrested or lose my job that is not, especially if the freedom being used is entirely within a personal sphere and wholly separate from ones professional relationships.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/17 01:47 AM
4

unless it's criminal activity, what you do outside of your workplace should not be of any concern to your employer and last I checked, exercising your freedom to express yourself was not illegal. At least not yet.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/17 12:15 PM
68

I'm of two minds regarding this one. On the one hand, I am firmly on the side of free speech for all and fuck your feelings. If someone wants to flip off the POTUS, go right ahead. More power to you and you shouldn't face losing your job for doing so. On the other hand, in the world in which we are currently living, where professional offendatrons enact enormous social pressure against anyone who falls outside of "acceptable" speech, and those affected can and do lose their jobs, I appreciate th…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/17 06:28 PM
3

It could also be a convenient cover to get out of continuing the series without having to deal with RW.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 02:31 PM
2

lol. looks like i'm robo-banned for having "incorrect associations".
/r/MensRights23/10/17 08:14 PM
8

If you did that, you would end up being banned from events. The offendatrons would spin it so that you were such a misogynist neck beard that you wouldn't even compete against a girl. They would create a petition to ban you and Blizzard would bend over so they could assfuck the company with it.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 01:11 PM
4

the law was also written and enacted years before homosexual marriage was legalized. At the time the surrogacy law was enacted, there was no reason to consider homosexual parents in the equation. After the marriage laws were changed, married lesbians simply fell neatly into the wording of the law whereas homosexual men were excluded. Again, I don't believe the net effect was malicious in its intent but it still needs to be fixed.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 12:22 PM
3

The issue stems from the fact that the father wants his child to be vaccinated and the mother refused to do it. Given that there was no seeming medical reason why the vaccinations should not be given, she was ordered to have them done which she refused to do. This was not a case of the court superseding the legal rights of the parents. this was the court agreeing with the father that the vaccinations were in the best interest of the child and ordering the mother to stop being selfish.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/17 12:12 AM
6

This seems to me to be nothing more than an oversight in the way the Law is written. It's only illegal because of sloppy wording. It sucks that it takes a legal challenge to get this kind of thing fixed but kudos to the AG's office for not fighting this.
/r/MensRights07/10/17 11:51 PM
131

given the number of times she's been filmed assaulting people and not been arrested for it, then I would say, yes. This is a PPD. The woman is a liar, an instigator, and a hate filled bigot using "diversity" and weaponized compassion to push her authoritarian agenda.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/09/17 10:43 PM
2

Dude, You know absoultely nothing about me or my life. Stop now before you embarrass yourself even more.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 08:18 PM
3

His children were already deprived, and not by him. That's the point.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 10:40 AM
8

providing love, and contact to your children is parenting. when the court takes those away and turns you into a glorified ATM, your value as a "parent" becomes next to nothing, not through any fault of your own but through a draconian system hell bent on reducing fathers to objects whose sole purpose is to keep their offspring off of the government teat. Nothing else matters in the eyes of society so long as the father provides. Well, that simply isn't enough, and this man felt he had no other o…
/r/MensRights26/09/17 08:14 PM
3

Or we could be reasonable and decent human beings and GIVE choice to both parties instead of either maintaining the current system wherein one person is held responsible for the choices of the other, or both parties have no choice at all. All in all, Any argument for any scenario other than the first is nothing but selfishness and pettiness.
/r/MensRights19/09/17 06:05 PM
8

Mutilation is such an ugly word. We need to clean it up a bit. Instead lets use a word like "procedure". Yeah. And we can also sell the idea by telling parents that it's cleaner and it makes their lives easier.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:21 PM
3

I guess my question here is, Do you do any of the heavy lifting? You obviously see the disparity, but are you perpetuating it or are you doing your share? More importantly, if you DO do your share, do you tell the other women to do theirs as well? or do you let them slack off?
/r/MensRights13/08/17 12:05 PM
16

I went into a fast food restaurant in Victoria BC once and they had these wierd orange lights installed in the washrooms. Under the light they made your skin the crazy olive green colour. When I commented to the manager about it, he reluctantly admitted that they are used because it makes it impossible to see your veins so tit discourage drug addicts from shooting up there.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 11:29 AM
215

After hearing about what her friend had witnessed on the weekend, Ms Jeanious said she was "thinking of heading over to see if [Hawleywood's] had any appointments available to trim [her] pubes. Perhaps you [all] should do the same." so her reaction to not having her sense of entitlement massaged to orgasm is to sexually harrass a business owner and encourages others to do so as well?
/r/MensRights07/08/17 11:36 AM
2

"slammed her to the benches..." Bull fucking shit. That was a controlled drop. Almost textbook in execution. then he even gave her another controlled lowering to the floor. All while she was freaking out like she was at the Freakers fucking Ball..
/r/PussyPassDenied05/08/17 10:22 PM
2

Feminists and white nationalists can be good teachers. Absolutely. Provided of course the only thing they are teaching is how shit their respective ideologies actually are.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 08:15 PM
5

Thats why they went off on him when he opened the truck door. That black man didn't know his proper place. Then he had the nerve to actually lay hands on a white woman! /s
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/17 04:41 AM
1

if it's genetic, it removes your responsibility. But its not genetic, but if you say it is, then that's close enough to convince the lazy.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/07/17 12:58 PM
1

But the argument can be made in the application that the imposition of CS (and the subsequent persecution for failure to pay) is a contravention of his human rights. If nothing else it brings the injustice to a greater light.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 03:06 AM
124

but it isn't simply child support. It is an enforced enslavement by the authority of the state for a child that is demonstrably not his. If he doesn't pay this imposed debt, he faces jailtime. That is persecution.
/r/MensRights28/07/17 12:32 PM
18

My grandmother would stand at the gates of the railyard on pay day when my grandfather would get off work. He would dutifully remove 20% for himself and then hand over the rest to her. But she had no freedom at all. No sir. not a lick.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 04:36 PM
3

Children and even adults of age are afraid of injections, yet they have to do it, even if they don't want to do it. Medical necessity means that parents are able to make some decisions for the best interests of their children. A wholly cosmetic unnecessary body modification is not such a case. And I don't want to discuss about politically correct consents, etc. So, leave off that SJW bullshit as I said already. Whose talking about PC consent? I'm talking about basic understanding of consequence …
/r/MensRights17/07/17 06:37 PM
5

Consent is exactly that. If you are incapable of fully understanding the consequences of a choice, you are incapable of consenting to it. Don't think people pierce ears of infants Parents do it all the damn time and any licensed medical practitioner who would do this shouldn't have a medical license as it violates the most basic level of medical ethics. As far as consent is concerned, I don't want to take it to the level of SJW bullshitting. Which is why you are engaging in calling any disagreem…
/r/MensRights17/07/17 05:34 PM
6

There are numerous issues with child piercings even if its only ears. Most reputable piercing shops won't pierce an infant or child for obvious reasons. That leaves untrained mall employees with an unsterilizable piercing "gun" that can damage the tissue. Nevermind the issues of informed consent for a purely cosmetic and wholly unnecessary procedure. Consent isn't something that can simply be disregarded because you think what you are doing is trivial. It doesn't work like that.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 03:50 PM
3

The message doesn't hit every single one of their talking points exactly how they want them, so that means the entire message is a construct of the patriarchy. You can never appease a zealot because nothing you do will ever be enough.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 03:41 PM
31

When being a victim is the path to success, you make yourself into a victim.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/17 03:55 PM
0

You are defending his right to lock up his wife and force her to lose abandon her reproductive rights against her will. Show me where I said that. Until you do you are a liar.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 04:01 PM
0

You're defending that a man should have to right to lock his wife No, I'm not. I've stated this clearly several times now. and refuse her wish to have a family as horrible as that is, he has the right to determine whether he has sex or not, for whatever reason. You and I or anyone else don't have to like it. but it is his body and his choice to use it or not. and use that denial of her reproductive rights as a means to further emotionally and psychologically abuse her. Again, I am not stating he…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 03:48 PM
0

Lets walk through this then shall we? The judge is an abusive person. Check. He abused his wife. Check. This was a bad thing. Check. The courts said that his refusal to have sex was abusive and his wife has a right to a full sex life. Check. This last portion is both correct and incorrect. His wife does have a right to a full sex life, and his acts of isolating her from that was indeed abusive, but he is simultaneously not required to subjugate his own autonomy to the demands of another for thei…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 03:35 PM
0

I did read the article in full and have stated numerous times that he has clearly engaged in abusive behaviours. I have not in any way attempted to deny or justify those acts. Your statements to the contrary are thus wholly incorrect. His acts not withstanding, that does not however, mean that anybody should be required to engage in sexual intercourse against their will, regardless of the reasons why they choose not to.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:57 PM
0

You think that locking and abusing someone for 11 years and using her wish for a family as a means to further torment her is acceptable? Given the fact that I have clearly stated the exact opposite of this more than once, then no. Are you mentally retarded? I'm not the one here reaching wholly incorrect conclusions from clearly stated condemnations.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:23 PM
0

Again, it is one thing to condemn him for the clearly illegal actions he committed and I have in no way tried to absolve him of those actions. That does not in any way mean that he himself is also to be denied the rights of personal autonomy with regard to sexual choice.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:04 PM
0

"if you think locking someone inside without being allowed contact with friends and family and forcing them to stay virgins until they're no longer fertile and lost their chance of having the family they wanted is the same as a guy not wanting to have sex then I very much fear for any future partner of yours." My feelings on this aspect are entirely separate from the other. It is not a difficult task to both condemn the actions of a person while simultaneously being sympathetic to the injustices…
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:00 PM
1

Regardless of motivation, is he not allowed to choose who he has sex with?
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:52 AM
-1

If he committed the acts you describe here, than the justice (or injustice) received rests entirely on those acts. The fact remains that regardless of all else, he was punished for not having sex. all else aside, that still sets a hugely dangerous precedent in law regarding the rights of bodily autonomy. It is every other man now that will be subject to it. THAT is what is truly appalling here. EDIT - For anybody still reading this thread, what you see from u/CountDodo in the following comments …
/r/MensRights10/07/17 02:49 AM
14

Of course what she did was an "aberration". Rapists are aberrant people.
/r/MensRights08/07/17 05:20 PM
3

It looks like you may have shot yourself in the foot by being "irreplacable". That is, you are too good at the job you have so they don't want you in another one. I'm with HiredMind on this. get yourself a way out and don't be afraid to take it if you don't get what you are looking for at your current job.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 04:05 AM
23

My question here is, How many of those "single" men are divorced with the majority of their paychecks going to the "single Mum with Kids"?
/r/MensRights02/07/17 11:17 AM
1

She's what I call Handi-fat.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/06/17 04:10 AM
10

group dynamics. People invariably will behave differently when part of a group than they will as individuals. It's why "agent provocateurs" in protest or march situations can be so dangerous. The actions of a small cabal of people can shift a peaceful demonstration into a riot simply by breaking a window or throwing a bottle.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/17 11:52 AM
4

Ok, OK. Michael Jackson didn't come to my house to use the bathroom. But his sister did!
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/17 11:45 AM
4

Not really in this case. It's common practice for people who have reached the age of majority to be charged as juveniles for crimes committed while they were juveniles. It's also common for people to be charged for crimes based upon the time they were committed. as an example, up until the mid nineties, the age of consent in Canada was 14. It was then changed to 16. Any person who had engaged in sexual activity with a person who was at least 14 and younger than 16 prior to that change in the law…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 09:59 PM
2

No doubt that it was a travesty. But she played the system like a fiddle to get that deal. When Paul Bernado was first arrested, Homolka played up the abused woman angle. The Crown Prosecutors offered her a deal for Manslaughter with immunity if she provided evidence against PB. It was only after the deal was in place that she gave them video tapes that showed her as a full participant in the rape and murder of 3 young teenagers, one of them her baby sister. The woman really is a blight on human…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:54 AM
2

fingerprint on glass? too easy. if its a smooth body construction on the phone, it's also a strong likelihood. Textured surfaces are the ones that rarely give up good prints
/r/MensRights30/05/17 07:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter