TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jimbohones Archive

View 0 posts and 48 comments by Jimbohones on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I don't totally disagree with you, but if you would say the same thing about an issue that negatively affects women more than men. Sure fine maybe it comes from patriarchal gender roles, but it's something that specifically hurts men way more than women so to say "what about the womenz" is similar to something that MR is constantly criticized for doing to women's issues. For example I could say that the prevalence of sexual violence against women hurts the men (like me) who don't actively partic…
/r/MensRights24/03/14 12:21 AM
247

Nobody should have to do it, but yes it is an example of female privilege.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 08:14 AM
1

I almost totally agree. The againstmensrights sub should be renamed "r/woman-splaining". I suggest you stop using the word whore as a derogatory term though because it gives those against men's human rights an easy target to avoid your actual point in addition to being degrading to women and sex workers. I wish they cared about not using name calling and ad-homs as much as they care about the fact that we do it but for now the best way to stop it is to lead by example I guess.
/r/MensRights27/05/13 05:04 AM
2

I'm not going to get into a 'discussion' with someone who doesn't understand what they're talking about Looks like that's a blatant lie because here we are. Spouting half baked ideas about how things work Why can't you attack my opinions without attacking me? Tell me what I said was wrong (and how); this "you're too ignorant for me to talk to" act is a little ridiculous. diverts attention from actual issues Like the boy that died because of body shaming while a feminist blog says male body issue…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 06:10 AM
3

So what CrossHook probably should have said is "Feminists have told me that the body image issues girls worry about are vastly more significant than boys", but because this is a discussion board by and for MHRAs we generally give ourselves a little leeway to use hyperbole and irony. I'm not arguing that feminists believe body shaming only affects women. I am arguing that this case is exactly the type of thing that feminists will go to a MHRA discussion board and whine about the fact that a few p…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 06:08 AM
2

Hahahahaha I'm so sorry I wasted your time dude... Can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen you selfish git.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:46 AM
2

I prefer the term discussion. You're correct that I wasn't actually trying to find out the answer, that's usually not the point of asking a question in this sort of context. I don't understand why you have a problem with using a rhetorical question to counter a point.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:39 AM
2

What does intersectionality have to do with anything that I said? Would you prefer "body issues are a result of the patriarchy and also racism, ableism"? The other part of your comment is an ad-hom.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:33 AM
2

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:25 AM
2

Legitimate criticisms of feminism on an anti-feminist discussion board? Oh no I better whine about it.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:17 AM
-3

Would you agree that the prevailing feminist position is that body issues are a result of the patriarchy? edit: Did a google search for "men don't have body issues", found a column entitled "Men May Have Body Image Issues, But They Don't Even Come Close to What Women Go Through" by one of the more mainstream feminist blogs. Clearly you're something of an expert on this ideology though so I'll take your word for it.
/r/MensRights22/05/13 05:14 AM
-7

Except that this namby-pamby feel-good "inspirational" stickfigure webcomic ruined an excellent childhood memory of my kindergarten class and I shouting the original rhyme at each other and having a blast doing it... I digress. I hate xkcd, and this is one of the worst in a while, but that's not the point. This has nothing to do with gender issues. Nobody except for the most radical sexists could possibly not "be able to get behind this." If this somehow warms the cockles of your heart go on and…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:21 AM
0

Please educate yourself a little more on what it means to be trans. You're making a mockery of some really serious shit and because you don't know what you're talking about you're not doing it well (nothing wrong with making light of sensitive topics, it just doesn't work if it comes from a place of ignorance). The word "privilege" is certainly overused and can make unfair blanket statements about huge diverse groups of people, but you cannot possibly deny that being born cisgendered is a huge a…
/r/MensRights24/04/13 06:16 AM
1

Yeah they're pretty touchy about slurs that they believe to be gender specific. I don't think it's even worth arguing about so I was always pretty polite about that sort of thing. (The fact that it didn't matter, still got banned, makes me think nothing is even worth arguing about with the AMR crowd).
/r/MensRights11/04/13 02:37 AM
2

I hope the downvotes aren't MRAs that don't think "there's value in listening to and considering what the people you strongly disagree with have to say."
/r/MensRights10/04/13 08:35 AM
6

I LOVE Sex Pistols and everything about this man's music, but really why did he have to bring gender into it? It's not egregious, it's just really fucking unnecessary.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:35 AM
15

Less of a badge of honor when you realize all you have to do to get banned from SRS is reply to literally any post or comment with "Personally, I disagree." Because the first rule of SRS is you're not allowed to disagree with anything anyone says on the sub. Those people literally admit right off the bat it's not worth discussing anything with them because if you don't buy in 100% to the patriarchy paradigm they will immediately tune you out. Your point was well thought-out, but your energy woul…
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:12 AM
1

The Patriarchy obviously. Q.E.D.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 07:20 PM
2

I don't disagree with them that gender roles are often the root of the problem for men's issues, but if there's an example (or twelve) of a case where it's significantly harder to be a man in this society, why would you call it patriarchy and not matriarchy? (I don't really think anyone should use either word) There's some logic behind the idea that women being seen as "weaker" in our culture can hurt men, but if patriarchy is the reason violence against men by women is either viewed as automati…
/r/MensRights05/03/13 06:44 AM
2

Anecdote? Check. Nothing to do with men's rights? Check. Get the fuck out.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:27 PM
1

DAE Women are stoopid and evil unlike us men who smartly only use logic and reason? This isn't /r/atheism.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 01:08 AM
2

...or it would be like that if their argument was that when a woman reveals "a bit of skin in public" they get raped every single time. I think their argument was: "we should be able to do this and not get raped" (and really, no rational person would disagree with that). I'm sure you can see the difference between "It's fucked up that people are raped because of how they dress" and "You are guaranteed to get raped if you dress a certain way." I think this is unwarranted bitching about a group th…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 05:53 AM
-1

You're making us all look bad...
/r/MensRights12/02/13 05:45 AM
7

pretty heavy citation needed.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 12:41 AM
4

I have found being against slut-shaming to be a crucial tenet of feminism. Does this woman really call herself a feminist when she's using the term "whore" and whining about how women don't dress the way she wants them to (not like "whores" apparently)?
/r/MensRights07/02/13 12:40 AM
1

You cannot possibly argue that it is not a fact that the vast majority of men are privileged to be better at sports than the vast majority of women. Just as women are biologically privileged to have longer orgasms. I'm not a feminist. This is one of those cases where men have an intrinsic, physiological advantage over women. Women have advantages in many areas as well.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 11:42 PM
-1

It doesn't make them bad people. Believe me there are many women who are far better than I, personally, at sports and general fitness.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 05:13 AM
-31

This kind of stuff gets posted all the time. It's because men are biologically privileged to be better than women at sports. When a man dominates a women's league it's just not something to be proud of. I don't give a shit about Sam Gordon, but what she's doing is much more impressive. The only reason sports are divided by gender is because there would be no female athletes otherwise. It's a double standard because this is one of those cases where men do have a huge competitive advantage. If the…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 03:15 AM
3

There are some good things in this. Maybe this writer is making progress towards supporting actual equality. It is disappointing though because in all her mentions of abuse against males she keeps coming back to how rare it is. "Hey sexual violence happens to everyone. Even, every once in a blue moon, to men." I like the sentiment in things like "we need to find ways to do this work that serve everyone who’s been targeted with sexual violence" and "Sadly, feminists end up perpetuating this exclu…
/r/MensRights05/02/13 03:05 AM
1

I think this is the type of shit that the MRM would care about if there weren't so many more pressing issues to deal with. See: feminists ranting for hours on end about being poorly represented in video games. Yeah it seems kind of fucked, but there are so many more serious examples of systemic oppression of men.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 01:23 AM
1

That's usually in nightclubs and other such scenarios where it's expected and desired, not a random person standing on the sidewalk.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 05:50 AM
1

The ad only shows male rapists (which is sexist), so it's actually implying only rapists can prevent rape (not sexist). The thinking that only men can rape is the root of the sexism, the thinking that only rapists can prevent rape is not. If only men were rapists, the phrase "only men can prevent rape" would not be sexist.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:23 AM
2

Not at all. It shouldn't be the victims responsibility to stop a crime from happening (it is sexist to imply only women can be victims of rape however). Nobody sees a mugging and says: "What a pussy for not just knifing the mugger." or a stabbing: "Why didn't they just wear body armor? Clearly asking for it." Like it or not some people think this way when it comes to rape. I contend it's not nearly as pervasive as feminists who rant about "rape culture" would have you believe, but it's still a r…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:15 AM
2

You don't agree with the first one that says if somebody tells their partner to stop having sex with them they should stop? Nobody owes anyone anything in return for a gift by the way (unless it's agreed upon beforehand in which case it's not really a gift).
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:08 AM
2

It had nothing to do with race or gender. It was about spinning the tragedy to garner support for gun control. Any charismatic president that wanted to ban guns would have done the same thing. Clinton would have done it no question.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 06:20 PM
1

I read it. It's only not about freedom because you don't see a problem with forcing other people to do what you want because "it would be better for all of us, trust me." This is the same logic of that feminist column posted on this sub recently that said there would be fewer rapes if all men within 20 miles of an accusation were imprisoned. It would probably help prevent rape, but it's truly beyond absurd to even consider implementing. Actually it's more like the logic of Islamic extremist gove…
/r/MensRights18/01/13 06:23 AM
0

Should they be allowed? It depends on the company, but generally speaking YES YOU FASCIST PIG. I think people should be allowed to choose what clothes they wear. Men should be allowed to wear high heels to work.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 05:59 AM
2

Yes a man could. Did you see Barack Obama weeping at his speech after the SHES shooting? All genders are capable of emotionally manipulating people.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 05:56 AM
-1

wat
/r/MensRights18/01/13 05:44 AM
21

So if it's a public school it is a first amendment issue. That being said, it's pretty obvious that it was a totally made up/highly embellished story.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 12:49 AM
2

50% of rapists are women You just made that the fuck up.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 07:20 AM
8

That's an excellent point NiggerJew944.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 05:56 AM
4

I have almost no problem with this (like it or not, rape is kind of a big deal and it does this movement no good to pretend otherwise) except I do think it's rather black and white/simplistic.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 06:17 AM
–

Back that up with some statistics that show "90% of women have money/resources/services as a prerequisite for sex" What is inherently bad about being a "prostitute"? Fuck you for thinking you are somehow entitled to have sex with whomever you please. You must have some prerequisites for sex, some people have more. Why do they owe you sex if you give them nothing in return?
/r/MensRights25/12/12 08:27 AM
–

Of course she shouldn't. I never said a man should need his wife's consent. I said it's not the absolute worst thing in the world if a few doctors prefer having it. Why is everyone being so dramatic? In the grand scheme of men's rights you have to realize how trivial this is right?
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:33 AM
2

There are absurd hoops women have to jump through to get abortions. I contend that this is a result of religious fanaticism rather than patriarchy, but this issue is just as much of a concern for women as it is for men (or more, because abortions are more common than vasectomies).
/r/MensRights20/12/12 10:59 PM
–

...and that right there is why nobody takes this movement seriously. You cannot honestly believe that a person being jailed for refusing to give up her seat is equivalent to certain doctors requesting spousal consent for serious, invasive, life-changing surgeries. Of course you should have the right to a vasectomy no matter what your wife thinks (just as women should have the right to an abortion), but please understand the difference between apartheid and one doctor's policy.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 10:54 PM
-1

hadn't got a clue My sides
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:36 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter