Jimithyashford Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
27	What is the most pressing or important issue facing men that has nothing to do with women?	General	Jimithyashford	/r/MensRights	10/06/25 03:50 PM
1	What is an example of you personally having had your rights infringed upon, or otherwise having suffered or been harmed, due to feminism?	Debate	Jimithyashford	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/10/21 03:04 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	Really feeling down right now. Don't know where else to vent Well here is why I am saying that. Cause there is no gender bias when it comes to being an asshole. Some people are ungrateful pricks, that's just how it is, but among the many things in this world there may be a gender bias on, that isn't one of them. Men and women are shitheads and assholes at about the same rate. SO, since you came to a men's rights group and phrased it the way you did, it certainly seems like you are presenting this as being uniquely or especially a problem you have with wom…	/r/MensRights	24/09/25 11:19 PM
-3	Really feeling down right now. Don't know where else to vent basically, if you are doing things for people to win their favor, stop. that doesn't work. Doesn't work professionally, romantically, among friends. pretty much the only place that works is with neighbors for stuff like borrowing a mower or feeding their dog while their out. But for almost any other relationships, trying to win favor by doing things for people isn't the way to go. I'm not saying dont help people. Sure, help them, but trying to win their favor shouldn't be the reason why. Help th…	/r/MensRights	24/09/25 10:49 PM
-5	Really feeling down right now. Don't know where else to vent Is it just women? I mean the world is full of selfish shitty people, but it's not normally just women. Why do you feel this way specifically about women?	/r/MensRights	24/09/25 10:31 PM
-5	Something I recognized from US progressive politics of the past 3 years or so. I mean....getting laid is a powerful motivator no? It's far from the only motivator of course, but a strong one on the behavior of especially young men. Back when I was more into incel stuff, I'm not now cause I realized it's dumb, but back when I was into it, a common argument went somewhere along these lines "Men are assholes and abusive dicks because of women, because women sleep with men who are like that, and reward and reinforce that behavior. If women stopped sleeping with men who act lik…	/r/MensRights	24/09/25 02:39 PM
2	Amazing This is gross of course, but I am like 110% sure men say this shit about women too. I spent about year and a half in a mens rights telegram group, and the kind of shit they would say about women and wish on women was absolutely wretched. Eventually the group disbanded, and I dunno why, but very frequent calls for graphic violence against women and wide spread posting and violent rape porn and snuff videos of women being killed might have had something to do with it. Not excusing her behavior of …	/r/MensRights	23/09/25 10:52 PM
0	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. Oh geee, the guy who is incredibly confident that he is right refuses to provide examples. Who called that 4 replies ago? Yall are nothing if not predictable.	/r/MensRights	07/08/25 08:31 PM
-1	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. At this point sure, I’ll take some rando on Facebook. You find me just three examples. I don’t care where they are from, of a woman making this claim and I’ll eat crow and admit it’s more common than I thought and it is a problem. If it’s really as common as you say then finding me three measly little examples from anywhere on the internet should be incredibly simple. Trivial even. But you wont, cause you know they aren’t out there. Or you know this belief is SO rare and SO obscure that it would…	/r/MensRights	07/08/25 06:35 PM
-1	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. Look man, if what your talking about is so rare and infrequent that literally the only examples that exist a few unverifiable supposed instances from your personal life that I have to take “trust me bro” on…..then no. I’m not accepting that. I have no way to know if you’re lying or massive exaggerating, which you almost certainly are, and even if it were true. Ok so what? You saw some very rare unusual belief a few times? The world is full of crazy belief. It has been be large and common enough …	/r/MensRights	07/08/25 03:09 PM
0	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. Yeah, except the problem is you havnt either. Probably almost nobody on this sub has. In fact I’d dare say you’d be REALLY hard pressed to find even a paltry tiny handful of examples of this. It doesn’t literally never happen. I mean fuck there are 8 billion people, someone out there will have said just about anything you can imagine at some point or another, but this is an almost non-existent position. Prove me wrong, link me to a few examples. If it’s such a common position that should be easy…	/r/MensRights	07/08/25 12:00 AM
0	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. What makes you think I don’t think violence by proxy is common? I didn’t say anything like that. I said a man who is naturally peaceful and even tempered who otherwise would not have engaged in violence doing so out of gender based obligation to engage in proxy violence for a woman….is exceedingly rare. In fact, in the entire 300k plus membership of this subreddit, I bet you couldn’t find more than a dozen or so stories of it ever happening to anyone here. That’s like, less than .01%. But you ha…	/r/MensRights	06/08/25 08:29 PM
0	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. I mean, people do lie. People who have an ideological axe to grind especially. It’s not a crazy idea. And this particular ideology is like widely and well known for being especially prone to lying and twisting and deceptive framing. Lay with dogs, get fleas. And no, not everyone who disagrees with me is automatically liar, but I am saying that you are, in this case, either lying, or massive exaggerating, which is just a different form of lying.	/r/MensRights	06/08/25 04:28 PM
0	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. Not what I was saying or getting at. You all REALLY don’t do nuance. Like your brain shuts off and reading comprehension goes right in the shitter as soon as nuance is introduced.	/r/MensRights	06/08/25 04:27 PM
1	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. I am saying that you, and most of the men on this sub, are highly prone to SERIOUS exaggeration or even outright lies. I don’t believe you’ve NEVER seen a woman pick a fight. Of course. Women are people and people do dumb shitty things sometimes. What I believe you have seen is hot headed short tempered men who are drunk or in a haze of a party atmosphere get their dander up and fight, and yeah sure sometimes maybe a woman is part of the instigation. What I DONT believe you’ve seen, or if you ha…	/r/MensRights	06/08/25 03:04 AM
0	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. An idiot fighting because of a woman is not the same as a woman making/pressuring you to fight. There have been a million fights in history of men fighting over women who do not want and have no desire for them to fight. And in my experience 99% of the time if men fight “over a woman” they are the kind of men who like and want to fight anyway, and the women is just a pretense. The number of men in this world who have no desire to fight what so ever and have no natural inclination toward violence…	/r/MensRights	06/08/25 01:43 AM
-4	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. "I hear women start fights using their boyfriends as leverage every weekend at the bar." No you don't. If you really believe in your position you shouldn't have to lie to back it up. "If a guy mistreats your sister at school, it’s implicit understood you need to have words and protect her." Speaking out and talking isn't violence. Speaking up if someone is being a shit bag is something we could all stand to do more. This neither demands nor expects violence from you. "Every day online I see wome…	/r/MensRights	06/08/25 01:33 AM
1	Protestant work ethics and how it really works So are men superior or aren’t they? Jesus Christ man you beat around the bush more than a hunting dog. You refuse to say men are superior, but will say that men should have the power and influence and authority and that their role is more critical, but they aren’t superior? You also refuse, despite me asking over and over on multiple topics now, to say anything about what pressured or systems should be used to get women to comply with the role you want of them, or what happens to those who don’t…	/r/MensRights	05/08/25 04:58 PM
-19	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. “ Women outsourced their violence to policemen“ We all do, that’s not a woman thing. When was the last time you had to engage in violence? The overwhelming majority of violence is outsourced to the police, that’s not a woman thing, that is an all of us thing. You’re not chasing down a shoplifter are you? You’re not going vigilante on muggers? No, you, a man, also outsource your violence. Don’t pretend like that’s a woman thing. And if your point is that she’s capable of squishing a bug, but want…	/r/MensRights	05/08/25 03:51 PM
-29	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. I have literally never had a woman ask me to do violence for her, well squish a bug yes, but actual real violence and danger out there in the world against other humans? No. Have you? When did a woman ask you to go do violence for her? This isn't the 1500s, I don't think that kind of thing really happens anymore, at least not among civilized folks. Generally, the application of violence has been institutionalized (police and military), and those institutions are thoroughly co-ed. I very much dou…	/r/MensRights	05/08/25 02:45 PM
-11	There is a difference between trying to ensure women ARE safe. . .& trying to ensure all women FEEL safe. I'm not gonna say you're wrong neccesarily, but I'm curious what this is in response to. I'm a man, I've been one for almost 40 years now, so I'd say I have a bit of experience, and I don't think I've ever a single time encountered a woman saying it's each individual man's obligation to make every women in the world feel safe? I think the closest I've ever seen to that is maybe a general statement that men should do what they can to make the women in their presence and in their lives feel as saf…	/r/MensRights	05/08/25 02:39 PM
-1	Based on real world research: Men have equal capacity for emotional intelligence Lol, sure thing guy. "You were mean, so I WON". I'll let you have it, since it clearly means at lot to you.	/r/MensRights	05/08/25 02:02 AM
-1	Based on real world research: Men have equal capacity for emotional intelligence “Insults are not logical argument” ah but you see, they are fun though. So for example if I JUST insulted you, and made no other point, then u would be illogical, sure. But if I insulting AND ALSO provide several examples and elaborations, then I am engaging with the topic and also having a bit of fun at your expense. Win win. Now, you’re talking about women getting upset when someone asks “what is a woman”? Well first of all they don’t get upset at all when a well meaning person is having an ea…	/r/MensRights	04/08/25 11:32 PM
1	I feel like more men would be happier to break free from gender expectations if we change the terminology surrounding "toxic masculinity". What do you mean? I’ve done it. Nobody is stopping you. I don’t do it like, constantly all the time, but I have many times and it was perfectly fine. I guess I did have someone tell me it’s called “internalized misogyny” once, that is ringing a bell. But so what? Call toxic masculinity “internalized misandry” then? And I dunno, I’ve used the term “toxic masculinity” with other men many time to describe things like unnoticed stoicism that hurts men, not as a form of attacking men but as a genuine…	/r/MensRights	04/08/25 11:25 PM
0	I feel like more men would be happier to break free from gender expectations if we change the terminology surrounding "toxic masculinity". If I were talking about toxic femininity I would just say that. I don't talk about it as often, but like overbearing positivity, the expectation to be submissive, when beauty standards lead to things like anorexia, "pick me" girls, stuff like that, I do talk about toxic femininity sometimes and I just call it that.	/r/MensRights	04/08/25 09:18 PM
1	Protestant work ethics and how it really works Separate but equal eh? You're in good company.... One isn't better than the other, neither is superior, they are both equally important, they are just different.... If that isn't "language of the oppressor" 101. And it's just happy accident that the gender you belong to gets basically all of the power and influence and bounty and reward in this arrangement. Oh but that's actually a burden, the people with all of the power are actually the ones doing the hard work, those who have less or no power…	/r/MensRights	04/08/25 08:55 PM
1	I feel like more men would be happier to break free from gender expectations if we change the terminology surrounding "toxic masculinity". What do I call it is I am referring to the toxic gender norms around a specific gender and its expectations? For example, the common example of emotionless stoicism. The is clearly NOT a toxic gender expectation placed on women, that is one places on men. So do I need to say "Toxic gender norm and expectations of masculinity" when I am referring specifically to the ones that are masculine, and then "toxic gender norms and expectations of femininity" if I'm talking about like being coquettish and…	/r/MensRights	04/08/25 08:52 PM
-18	Indian man arrested for breaking promise of marriage There are some places in this world where women are not permitted or expected to be financially independent, when they come of age, they essentially require a caregiver, a marriage is as much a business arrangement as it is out of love, and in many cases it is almost entirely a business arrangement and love has very little to do with it. I trust you all understand what I'm referring to. So, in such an environment, the breaking off of an intended marriage can, and historically has, had legal cons…	/r/MensRights	04/08/25 07:52 PM
1	Protestant work ethics and how it really works Which gender gets to be more in control, have the power, control the resources, give the orders, have the influence etc? And what happens to members of the other gender who refuse to comply or go along with the role expected of them?	/r/MensRights	04/08/25 07:31 PM
4	The Trouble with Wanting Men, response article: Lovelorn feminist in open marriage blames men - John Mac Ghlionn I was talking about the original article that this article is about.	/r/MensRights	04/08/25 07:28 PM
1	Protestant work ethics and how it really works Oh it’s you again. The coward who beats around the bush of male superiority but is too afraid to come outright and say it.	/r/MensRights	04/08/25 07:04 PM
1	Protestant work ethics and how it really works So you are just overtly saying you do not agree with the message and the logo for this group, that being male equality, and you are actually directly promoting male superiority? I just want to be very clear on that.	/r/MensRights	04/08/25 05:54 PM
-2	Based on real world research: Men have equal capacity for emotional intelligence Women have very little emotional control? I have never seen a population of people flip their shit quicker over the most inanely tiny of slights than men. Women maybe tend to be more emotive? I guess. But go to a video game sub reddit when a new entry in the franchise makes the female character marginally less fuckable and see just how emotionally disciplined men are. Hint: Not very. There weren't very many women out there mad when they made the green M&M less sexy, but you have the primetime an…	/r/MensRights	04/08/25 05:46 PM
0	Based on real world research: Men have equal capacity for emotional intelligence Nobody hats you cause you are a man. The only people telling you that are other men. edit- Well, there are 8 billion people on the world, there are always some small number of people who will have just about any crazy belief you can think of, so there are SOME people out there who hate members of the other gender just cause they are that other gender, but those people are very rare.	/r/MensRights	04/08/25 05:43 PM
1	Based on real world research: Men have equal capacity for emotional intelligence I don't think anyone ever thought men have less CAPACITY, I believe the argument is that they have less PROCLIVITY, largely due to social conditioning but maybe very slightly due to natural differences between the genders.	/r/MensRights	04/08/25 05:43 PM
2	The Trouble with Wanting Men, response article: Lovelorn feminist in open marriage blames men - John Mac Ghlionn Women in non-traditional love life gripes about romantic woes... MRAs: Ah see! Feminism and progressivism and the last century of gender and sexual progress are refuted! As if women and men did also have romantic woes under checks notes ah yes literally every single romantic or gender or societal norm that has ever existed since the start of written history. We have texts in freaking Cuneiform of people griping about their love lives and that state of the dating scene. The Epic of Gilgamesh ha…	/r/MensRights	04/08/25 05:17 PM
2	Protestant work ethics and how it really works Question, the Symbol at the top of this sub is the Male Sign with an "=" in it. Ostensibly the jist of this Sub is to stop oppression of men and promote male equality. But your position is not that, you position is overtly and unabashedly male social dominance and the control of women as a properly distributed sexual resource.....right? That is not male equality, this seems to be overtly male superiority.	/r/MensRights	04/08/25 04:29 PM
-4	I feel like more men would be happier to break free from gender expectations if we change the terminology surrounding "toxic masculinity". What would you call it? Regressive Masculinity? Toxic Masculine Expectations? Destructive Masculine Norms? I feel like just about anything you call it, the kind of people who don't like the term "toxic masculinity" would still not like it?	/r/MensRights	04/08/25 03:53 PM
1	Australian study finds men and women experience intimate partner violence at the same rate "I have no idea what you are talking about." I know you don't, cause you didn't read the study. You skimed it and drew a hasty and crap conclusion based on a wrong understanding and rather than doing what you should do, which is either A: delete your post and re-post it with a non-misleading title and better understanding or B: Place an Edit on the post explaining that you had it wrong, you instead are trying to justify your position and you look silly. What you just stated above DOES NOT EQUAL …	/r/MensRights	02/08/25 04:59 AM
1	Another AWDTSG user anonymously asking 65,000 members to harass, stalk, and set up her husband in the name of “safety” Women pay alimony as well. I don't think you know what you're talking about.	/r/MensRights	02/08/25 04:50 AM
1	Australian study finds men and women experience intimate partner violence at the same rate Why are you lying? You: "so they need to expand the definition in order to make the number bigger and hence men badder." you are clearly not "simply stating that in most western jurisdictions emotional abuse is considered a form of IPV". You bluntly and clearly are trying to make it seem like they are doing it so somehow juke the numbers. I don't know why you keep just lying on repeat in this thread. If you think your position is correct, which I assume you do, then you should be able to defend …	/r/MensRights	02/08/25 01:55 AM
1	Australian study finds men and women experience intimate partner violence at the same rate Yes, but you seem to be implying that they are using emotional abuse to juke the numbers in some way. The study clearly breaks down all three types. You cant see the stats for just sexual or just physical abuse as well. It's not manipulating at all, and you seem to imply it is. You REALLY just barely skimmed this to take the conclusion you want and didn't bother to understand it at all.	/r/MensRights	02/08/25 12:51 AM
1	Australian study finds men and women experience intimate partner violence at the same rate The study breaks the abuse down into three categories. Emotional Abuse, Non-sexual physical abuse, and sexual abuse, and they give the full breakdown of the rates for each of these three categories. The study isn't hiding or inflating anything, it looks at all three types of abuse.	/r/MensRights	01/08/25 11:33 PM
5	Australian study finds men and women experience intimate partner violence at the same rate You didn't read the study did you? The study does not conclude or indicate or support or in any way hint towards "Men and women experience intimate partner violence at the same rate". In fact, this study doesn't feature women AT ALL. There is no mention of women anywhere in the thing. It is only comparing recent self reports by men to another similar self reporting study by men from about a decade ago. There is no comparison to women at all. The study tells us that: - 1 in 3 Australian men repor…	/r/MensRights	01/08/25 10:25 PM
6	Australian study finds men and women experience intimate partner violence at the same rate Your headline is misleading. The study is interesting, I'm not saying it's not. But your headline is NOT what this study concludes. You're being deceptive. An accurate headline would be more like: "Of men who admit to having used intimate partner violence, 2/3rds of them also report having experienced it". Which is a VERY different conclusion than your headline makes it out to be. Still interesting, but not what you say.	/r/MensRights	01/08/25 05:03 PM
1	Science on r/mensrights : Rise of the Far Right Because I did go on at length about how no two people are actually equal, did I not? I believe I went into pretty great detail about how what and who and who a person is, and their own behaviors and actions and natural strengths and weaknesses should determine how they end up in life….didn’t not? You seem to have glossed over all of that as if I didn’t say it. And well, If you’re willing to admit I didn’t say anything about a classless society. Then I won’t bother defending the point. We both ag…	/r/MensRights	01/08/25 02:52 AM
1	Science on r/mensrights : Rise of the Far Right If women and men naturally distribute that way, if left completely to their own devices, with no social force whatsoever being exerted based on gender one way or the other, then ok, cool. That's just how people are. And if you genuinely and truly think that is how people are, then you should have no problem with an egalitarian approach, as the genders will naturally distribute the way you think they should. But ok, let's pretend you are completely right, ok so then what? You think there SHOULD b…	/r/MensRights	31/07/25 05:58 PM
1	Science on r/mensrights : Rise of the Far Right "How does pretending that everyone starts inherently equal support these goals?" I don't think your reading comprehension is very good. I am 100% sure I went on at length about how no two people are equal, and everything is different. So not sure where you got that. "Just look at the historical attempts to form a classless society." I didn't ask to form a classless society. I don't think a strictly egalitarian society is possible in practice, more a goal to aim towards, but even a perfectly egal…	/r/MensRights	31/07/25 04:19 PM
1	Science on r/mensrights : Rise of the Far Right I don't think you understood me. Yeah sure, men TEND to be more this or that, and women TEND to be more this or that. But obviously some men are the exception, and some women are the exception. The point of egalitarianism is that society doesn't treat you any different based on the random chance of your birth, only on what you actually do and are and become with your life. So if more women tend to do X and more men tend to do Y or naturally the genders express different distributions in the way …	/r/MensRights	31/07/25 04:13 PM
1	Science on r/mensrights : Rise of the Far Right Well that's not really what egality means. It doesn't mean we are all literally equal, we all obviously know that's not true. People are different, as you rightly point out. What egality means is the we are all treated as being inherently equal, and from that point out own capacities and preferences and actions differ us. Egalitarianism does not demand that we consider and treat all people as being equal in all regard. I'm an egalitarian, but I also know I'm a lot smarter than many people, I'm a…	/r/MensRights	31/07/25 02:45 AM
1	Jealous ex murdered father of six after he joined Tinder Ok well. That’s what I understood. Did I get it right?	/r/MensRights	31/07/25 12:15 AM
-2	Jealous ex murdered father of six after he joined Tinder So you all are calling her a misandrist knowingly wrongly in order to spite other people who you think are also wrong? Is that it?	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 11:40 PM
-2	Jealous ex murdered father of six after he joined Tinder I mean she could be a misandrist for all I know, of course. I'm just saying nothing in the article gives any indication of that. So I don't know why people are saying that. It seems like people are literally only saying it cause she is a woman who did a bad thing, as if every bad thing a woman does must be misandry, which is obviously not the case.	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 09:10 PM
1	Science on r/mensrights : Rise of the Far Right Ok so, the basic jist here is that you are not at all concerned with the overlap between Men's Rights and authoritarian conservatism cause you fully support and endorse and envision an authoritarian conservative world, at least as it pertains gender roles. So, do your conservative hierarchical leanings stop there, or do you support these kinds of caste-based hierarchical and authoritarian systems when it comes to race or culture or any other demographic lines? Or are you like, egalitarian about …	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 09:04 PM
-3	Jealous ex murdered father of six after he joined Tinder So people knowingly wrongly label this misandry out of spite towards a different thing they also think is wrong? Like, if I insist a pair of pants is green even when u know they are blue just to spite the people who insist they are red? Something like that?	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 08:59 PM
-6	Jealous ex murdered father of six after he joined Tinder Some people hate a person not a gender. A jealous or rage filled or spiteful or hateful person can take negative action, up to and including murder, against a person without that meaning they hate that person’s demographic. Obviously people can and do murder out of hatred for a gender or race or religion or ethnicity. But that’s doesn’t automatically mean a murderer hates whatever demographics their victim belonged to. It could have been personal and not demographic based at all.	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 08:43 PM
1	Science on r/mensrights : Rise of the Far Right And it's not self serving at all that you are a member of the gender that would have greater authority and influence and autonomy in this arrangement? The gender getting "rewarded" with the sex and the desirable mates under this arrangement? That's just a happy accident?	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 05:54 PM
-33	Jealous ex murdered father of six after he joined Tinder You think she did this cause she was a misandrist? Is it automatically misandry any time a woman does something bad to a man? Or can a woman do something bad for reasons that have nothing to do with misandry? Obviously plenty of men kill other men, are they all misandrists? Some women kill other women, are they misogynists? A person certainly CAN commit murder due to their misandry, of course that can happen, but what makes you think that is the reason in this case? People can kill for MANY reas…	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 05:51 PM
1	Science on r/mensrights : Rise of the Far Right Pretty sure egalitarianism way predates Feminism, like, by centuries. As to your point about women also getting to bear children. I mean....but nobody can do anything about that, that's just baked into nature? Like, there's nothing you can do to account for that. I am saying equality everywhere we can, with reproduction being like the one notable place where we are biologically required to be different. What are you proposing then? That because the two genders are reproductively different that e…	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 05:43 PM
-7	Another AWDTSG user anonymously asking 65,000 members to harass, stalk, and set up her husband in the name of “safety” I dunno what you are talking about? Men use proof of infidelity in court all the time? What makes you think they dont/cant?	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 05:39 PM
1	Science on r/mensrights : Rise of the Far Right So there is no version of men’s rights that can be pursued in an egalitarian fashion? Men’s rights demand a gender hierarchy? We can’t just be equals? I am interested in a world where neither gender oppresses the other, where we are basically equals, and other than the few instances, mostly surrounding reproduction, where a biological difference is unavoidable, that we otherwise are basically equals.	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 05:12 PM
2	Science on r/mensrights : Rise of the Far Right So question: Is it true though? Is it actually true that male identitarian movements are a common entry point to the pipeline for radical far right or fascist or authoritarian or traditionalist groups? If it is true, then what is the solution? How do you create a men's rights movement that does NOT serve as a reliable pipeline to those ideologies? And if it can't be done, that it's inexorable that getting into Men's Rights will lead down those pipelines, then.....well isn't that a problem? What …	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 04:25 PM
-33	Another AWDTSG user anonymously asking 65,000 members to harass, stalk, and set up her husband in the name of “safety” Are they? I don't feel like this has even been that weird or secret of a thing. I also don't really see how this is a Men's Rights thing since trying to "catch" your partner you suspect of cheating is not a gendered issue, both genders do it. Maybe men don't tend to do it this exact same way, but they have shitty behavior they also do when they think their partner is cheating. I think that's just a human thing, not a man vs woman thing.	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 04:17 PM
-14	Another AWDTSG user anonymously asking 65,000 members to harass, stalk, and set up her husband in the name of “safety” Are they asking another lady to "fake" flirt with their husband to see if he bites and if he's faithful? That's kinda shitty, but haven't people been doing that since forever? That's not exactly new?	/r/MensRights	30/07/25 03:38 PM
1	Why are so many female celebrities feminists? Well, I mean I guess a person could do that. But no, most feminists are not doing that. And since you, I assume, know very few of them, and know even fewer of them well, I don’t think you’re hot take from a position of extremely limited experience and insight is worth much. In this instance, I just do know better than you. It’s not an insult. I just do. Like if we were going for a wilderness hike, you’d listen to the guy who had done it a lot over the guy who had only mostly heard people who don…	/r/MensRights	26/07/25 12:58 PM
1	I've noticed we get a lot of misandrist lurkers here. Can someone tell me if the feminist subreddits experience such problems with misogynist lurkers? I didn’t say anything like that. I don’t believe that and didn’t say that. You’re fighting ghosts man. Do you even need me for this conversation? Seems like you’re just ranting to yourself.	/r/MensRights	26/07/25 04:24 AM
0	Why are so many female celebrities feminists? Well, if dinosaurs or aliens were why many influential women are feminist I would have written that. But it isn’t. So I didn’t. You are not correct. But since we don’t have a magic helmet I can put on your head that will allow you to read the inner most truth of even a single woman, let alone thousands of them, I have no way to prove it to you. Suffice it to say I probably know a lot more feminists then you do and probably know them a lot better than you do, and probably know them as an ally, me…	/r/MensRights	26/07/25 04:21 AM
0	Why are so many female celebrities feminists? I wasn’t trying to give a blow by blow rigorous historical list. I was trying to explain what thoughts would make it pretty easy to understand why most affluent women today, particularly celebrity affluent women, would be feminist. It’s not a hard equation. If you wanna get nitpicky about this or that not really “counting” for feminism then, ok….cool I guess? But it’s a commonly believed thing and as such serves as perfectly sufficient motivation to be feminist, even if I agree with all of your …	/r/MensRights	26/07/25 01:25 AM
1	I've noticed we get a lot of misandrist lurkers here. Can someone tell me if the feminist subreddits experience such problems with misogynist lurkers? “why are you differentiating between feminist and anti-feminist? Someone can be a feminist and they can also disagree with posts — or even specific aspects of feminism.” Cause you brought up and quoted where I said “anti feminist men” I also said “contrarians” which could be of either gender and wouldn’t necessarily be anti-feminist per se. I feel like most of this is just me referring back to what I wrote in the first place which you didn’t read very well. And as far as how I know they are men:…	/r/MensRights	26/07/25 01:19 AM
1	I've noticed we get a lot of misandrist lurkers here. Can someone tell me if the feminist subreddits experience such problems with misogynist lurkers? No, that’s true, I bet what I said. there is a ton of dog piling by anti feminist men. There are, of course, some women in there, too, I never meant to imply there are no women who disagree. Just that the choking flood, the sheer volume, is because of anti-feminist men. The anti-feminist women are a much much smaller percentage, if it was just the anti-feminist women it probably wouldn’t be as big of a problem, because there would be few enough that it would be able to be handled easier Without …	/r/MensRights	26/07/25 12:23 AM
1	I've noticed we get a lot of misandrist lurkers here. Can someone tell me if the feminist subreddits experience such problems with misogynist lurkers? What makes you think I think that? I didn’t say that, or anything like that.	/r/MensRights	26/07/25 12:08 AM
-2	I've noticed we get a lot of misandrist lurkers here. Can someone tell me if the feminist subreddits experience such problems with misogynist lurkers? Well, great question. The truth is that I, unlike about 80% of the folks on here, do genuinely care about the wellbeing and prosperity of men. Groups like this are a pipeline that sucks young men into a nasty self defeating worldview that will absolutely and without fail make their lives worse than they otherwise would be. Of course none of you can see that, cause your in it, and people in the cult or stupid ideology never realize how bad it is. If they did, then they wouldn't be in it. But lite…	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 08:52 PM
0	I've noticed we get a lot of misandrist lurkers here. Can someone tell me if the feminist subreddits experience such problems with misogynist lurkers? lol. No.	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 08:46 PM
-1	I've noticed we get a lot of misandrist lurkers here. Can someone tell me if the feminist subreddits experience such problems with misogynist lurkers? I've spent a decent amount of time here, and while of course plenty of people here have had sex and relationships and stuff, I have 100% certainty that a decent number of guys on here are actual incels. Yeah. And outside of those that are actual incels, I see a LOT of stuff on here that maybe isn't technically incel, but has like a 90%+ overlap with incels. So strongly incel adjacent, yeah. There is a lot of that on here, that is true.	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 08:25 PM
-8	I've noticed we get a lot of misandrist lurkers here. Can someone tell me if the feminist subreddits experience such problems with misogynist lurkers? what.....? I duno what you are banging on about. I said that feminist subreddits get inundated with misogynists and contrarians unless they are heavily moderated. We are talking about subs that are NOT inundated with misogynists and contrarians because they ARE heavily moderated....which is exactly what I said. I dunno what you are disagreeing with. If two X didn't have heavy moderation there probably wouldn't even be a TwoX, cause it would get strangled out by being beaten to death by contraria…	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 05:21 PM
0	I've noticed we get a lot of misandrist lurkers here. Can someone tell me if the feminist subreddits experience such problems with misogynist lurkers? Both? The answer is both? Well if you're talking about two x anyway. And nah, two x is nothing like the incels. As someone who has spent a LOT of time deeply embedded in both communities, they are not at all the same.	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 05:17 PM
-23	I've noticed we get a lot of misandrist lurkers here. Can someone tell me if the feminist subreddits experience such problems with misogynist lurkers? You were probably in one that is heavily moderated. That's how they keep it that way, heavy moderation. If they didn't, it'd be inundated with contrarians. Most of those die off, cause the experience is so rough. The big ones that stick around have very heavy moderation.	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 04:54 PM
-25	I've noticed we get a lot of misandrist lurkers here. Can someone tell me if the feminist subreddits experience such problems with misogynist lurkers? auto mod removed my examples, askfeminist and twox are good examples. Writing them out shorthand so automod doesn't get me.	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 04:45 PM
1	How can I date comfortably when a woman can easily make a false claim or defame me online via Tea App or similar apps? I don't think you know what defamation is. Can you give me an example, just make one up, doesn't have to be real, but give me a for instance scenario where a man is suffering defamation due to material on Tea that he is not aware of?	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 04:22 PM
1	How can I date comfortably when a woman can easily make a false claim or defame me online via Tea App or similar apps? What I'm "sure" of is that with how much a certain slice of men are mad about this, and how that slice of men are committed with almost crusader like passion to defeating feminism or whatever, that if there is good grounds for a valid defamation suits, they will be brought, in multitudes, by these men. I trust you are with me so far, that we can be reasonable sure of that. I then further am "sure" that if there is legit genuine defamation going on, that among the multitude of suits, at least one…	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 03:32 PM
1	How can I date comfortably when a woman can easily make a false claim or defame me online via Tea App or similar apps? Well, if it's as bad as you say, then I'm sure a mass flood of lawsuits will gave the site crippled in due course, and you'll be able to come back here and say "I told ya so". But I'm not too worried about it. This is the kind of thing that gets a LOT of play somewhere like r/mensrights, ya know, a notoriously misguided echochamber of butt hurt men with a ratio of about 1000 terrible hottakes to every 1 decent ok point. So yeah, in a place like this, it seems like a big looming terror. But in th…	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 02:56 PM
-1	Why are so many female celebrities feminists? Well, almost every female celebirty would not be able to be where she is in life without feminism. If we rewind the clock say 100 years, women had only JUST gained the right to vote a few years earlier, they couldn't down their own home, have their own bank account, take out their own credit, they were expected to dress very modestly, be very sexually chaste, act as a helpmate to their man even if they themselves were famous, couldn't marry who they wanted, spousal rape didn't exist as a legal c…	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 02:45 PM
-41	I've noticed we get a lot of misandrist lurkers here. Can someone tell me if the feminist subreddits experience such problems with misogynist lurkers? Oh good lord yes. How much time have you spend on Feminist subreddits? Unless they are EXTREMELY heavily moderated, damn near every post gets dogpiled by anti-feminist men and an endless parade of whataboutisms. It's pretty bad. They ones that aren't like that, where it actually does seem to be mostly just actually a feminist space, are the ones that are heavily moderated and quick with the ban hammer. If they aren't, they get flooded with anti-feminists.	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 02:40 PM
1	How can I date comfortably when a woman can easily make a false claim or defame me online via Tea App or similar apps? "Well, I’ve got news for you. People change over time" Oh my god! How could I have possibly over looked this well known and basic fact about people. Well that really does just entirely change my mind I guess.... Setting sarcasm aside, I guess I wasn't super clear. If you do what I've said above, conduct your lovelife in that way, then you don't need to be worried about Tea....anymore than just the general always there worry that an ex could turn out to be either crazy or vile and do something af…	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 02:03 PM
-1	How can I date comfortably when a woman can easily make a false claim or defame me online via Tea App or similar apps? Facebook and Reddit and Instagram are full of lies, and lies by non-anonymous people. Millions of millions of em. But the tons of nasty little gossip circle groups on those platforms havnt resulted in them being sued into oblivion yet. So if these lawsuits aren’t manifesting even where the lies are not anonymous, then I think it’s a pretty good sign that there just isn’t much grounds to sue on. Also “I heard it from a friend” which is just the irl version of an anonymous post, has been part of g…	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 12:57 PM
0	How can I date comfortably when a woman can easily make a false claim or defame me online via Tea App or similar apps? Facebook and twitter an Instagram and Reddit are FULL of lies and gossip and untrue comments millions upon millions of them. If what you were saying were true….why havent they been sued into oblivion yet?	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 12:54 PM
-9	How can I date comfortably when a woman can easily make a false claim or defame me online via Tea App or similar apps? I genuinely don't think there is a case. The problem is that most angles for a lawsuit would be some form of defamation, which requires both that the claims be actually false, AND that there be material damages, and I don't think there is any legal precedent for women not wanting to fuck you being a form of damages. And, you'd also have to have a guy for whom the claim is actually completely false. It's not defamation if it's not a lie. So like, it may be REALLY shitty to tell people you've got …	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 03:20 AM
-16	How can I date comfortably when a woman can easily make a false claim or defame me online via Tea App or similar apps? I date just fine, Tea doesn't worry me at all. It really could not be less bothering. But I also date good women and am on good terms with almost all of my exes. If you just conduct your love life thoughtfully and responsibly with good, sane, women with a level headed disposition, then you don't need to worry about things like this. But if you run around dating crazy chicks and have a bunch of relationships that ended horribly with a lot of bad blood, then yeah, your messy love life can certainl…	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 03:13 AM
-15	How can I date comfortably when a woman can easily make a false claim or defame me online via Tea App or similar apps? There is not now and never has been a time or place where people weren't able to lie and gossip about you. It's not like in 1950s women could gossip and tell lies at the bake sale. It's not like in the 1600s they couldn't gossip and tell lies in the sewing circle. Same goes for men, or, well, anyone. People gossip and lie. It's just a thing humans seem highly prone to do. People can tell lies about you right now on Facebook if they wanted to, or here on reddit, or on X or anywhere. Tea is just a…	/r/MensRights	25/07/25 03:07 AM
1	Are studies about labour division in the household even reliable? The thing you're talking about, where a partner has really high standards and is really nitpicky so it's not so much that the other partner doesn't do chores, but that they don't spend as much time do it to a crazy high standards.... That does happen, but that's not just a woman thing, plenty of guys are really anal about things being just so. The reverse is also true, where plenty of people "do the chores" but do a really shit sloppy job of it, and the other partner has to some along as re-do i…	/r/MensRights	21/07/25 02:14 PM
6	Tea app life ruined How is your life ruined? I ask because if a lie was spread about you that actually caused material damages, then you can take legal action. But if the content is either not a lie, or has not resulted in something you can claim to be damages, then you probably can't do anything. If a law was broken, you can go after them criminally perhaps? Like if you live in a state where sharing screen shots of your convo without your consent is illegal. But I don't think there are many laws against that. So r…	/r/MensRights	18/07/25 02:51 PM
-1	The feminist conundrum I’m gonna try really hard here. Cause I genuinely don’t understand what you are getting at. If I tell you that I feel simultaneously demeaned by but also valued by some standard or expectation or behavior, if I tell you that I simultaneously am glad the harassment or mistreatment has stopped but also can’t help but feel a twinge of sorrow at the absence of the affirmation that it came coupled with…. If I tell you that….are you: A: just denying the validity if such a feeling, just nope, a reasona…	/r/MensRights	18/07/25 12:12 AM
-1	The feminist conundrum ? What is she showing lack of accountability for. All she is saying is that beauty standards are a cruel double edged blade, that on one hand leads to objectification and predatory behavior, which is bad, but on the other hand can be a source of worth and validation and also leads to bad feelings once you age out of it. Have you ever seen "The Substance"? that's basically the entire jist of that movie. Beauty standards are, to many women, a lot like the Ring was to Gollum, they both love and hat…	/r/MensRights	17/07/25 08:47 PM
-7	The feminist conundrum Ok, then you know it's not as simple as the picture is making it out to be, like a just blatant self-contradiction. You don't have to agree with her point, but the meme is lazy dog shit.	/r/MensRights	17/07/25 08:29 PM
-4	The feminist conundrum You didn’t read the article did you?	/r/MensRights	17/07/25 08:02 PM
-14	The feminist conundrum Mens Rights = Poking fun at the least charitable possible interpretation of articles you didn't read based on headlines. If you read it, the seeming contradiction in the headline is actually part of a point she is making. Now of course you would not agree with or like the point, but it's not just a complete self-contradiction, she is making a point.	/r/MensRights	17/07/25 02:30 PM
0	Some patterns I've observed in female attraction towards men & female dating strategies Are you all interesting in actually making the lives of men better? Or just having a giant circular pity jerk and outrage off? If you actually care about men’s rights, and men’s well being, you will disabused your fellow men of false stupid defeatist ideas like these that will only make themselves more miserable and in turn spread misery to any other men they convince. Trapping thousands of men in an endless and miserable cycle of rage and desperation and pity and self loathing, all based on lie…	/r/MensRights	15/07/25 10:40 PM
-4	Some patterns I've observed in female attraction towards men & female dating strategies It is very clear from your post that you are very young, very inexperienced, terminally online, bitter, and are grotesquely generalizing your very limited scope of experience. 1- "Women never see men as their equal. A woman either admires a man or she looks down on him, but she never sees him as an equal." You can admire an equal. In face a partnership between equals who respect and admire each other is ideal. The fact that a woman admiring a man, in your mind, means she doesn't see him as an eq…	/r/MensRights	15/07/25 07:31 PM
1	Reproductive Rights Incorrect. The laws and requirements are identical. I checked 10 different states, and in all 10 the requirements are identical. What state are you referring to? I’ll go check.	/r/MensRights	26/06/25 01:28 PM
0	Reproductive Rights Incorrect. If you really felt this way, then you’d shudder in horror at the crusty socks under your bed. You are not correct biologically, and more importantly, I know for a fact you don’t really feel that way and are only pretending to in this one case to try and make a bad point. You do not think of your sperm as part of your body. And if you REALLY are that concerned, then be more careful who you give it to.	/r/MensRights	26/06/25 02:13 AM
1	Reproductive Rights You are incorrect. A mother cannot give up child without consent of the father. In not state is it legal for one parent to secret adopt out the child against the wishes of the other parent. The only circumstance where this would be possible is if the father is not in the picture and has no parental rights or if a court has declared a case of child abandonment or something like that. So, No, the mother cannot take the child and adopt it out against the father’s wishes.	/r/MensRights	25/06/25 11:38 PM
1	Reproductive Rights Both parents have equal right. Both parents have full autonomy over their own bodies during the duration of the pregnancy. Now obviously the man's body isn't doing anything different than it normally does, so his bodily autonomy is just business as usual. But the woman, as the bearer of the pregnancy, her body is doing a bunch of different stuff, so her bodily autonomy is not business as usual, there is a bunch of extra shit going on, and as such, a bunch of different options available to her. B…	/r/MensRights	25/06/25 03:00 PM
1	Reproductive Rights Right. And nobody forces men to give birth. Men can’t be pregnant, so they obviously have no pregnancy related rights. Only the person who is pregnant can have pregnancy related rights. Outside of that, woman and men have the same rights. Giving men pregnancy related rights when they do not bear the risks and realities of being pregnant is not making things more fair. It’s making things less fair.	/r/MensRights	25/06/25 01:12 AM
0	Reproductive Rights You've given a lot of individual disconnected points. I know you have a vision, I just dont' want to misunderstand as I try to piece the parts together. I am kindly asking for you to lay it out for me. Doesn't have to be a long detailed thing, unless you want to be detailed of course. Just a paragraph or two summarizing your vision please. You clearly write and post a lot on this topic, I trust a couple of paragraphs is not too much of a request.	/r/MensRights	24/06/25 05:24 PM
-1	Reproductive Rights So are you just anti-abortion in general? There should be no physical abortion OR paper abortion? Most of you MRA fellas agree that abortion should be legal, you just want to ALSO be able to abandon at the pregnancy stage. Are you one of the rare ones that actually thinks there should be no abortion? How about this, I wont even disagree with you or rebut you or anything. I am genuinely curious at this point. If reproductive rights worked the way that YOU think they should, just pretend you get t…	/r/MensRights	24/06/25 04:34 PM
-1	Reproductive Rights Yeah I did misread your use of hypothetical there, my bad. I'm fielding about a dozen of these discussion at once and you all really blend together. Lemme ask this: Is there ANY version of events or law you would be happy with, that you think it totally fair and equal and good, that DOES NOT involve a man being able to stick a mother with a kid and run off with no responsibility at all? It seems like all MRA solutions to this question always boils down to that. If you knock some chick up, and do…	/r/MensRights	24/06/25 04:15 PM
-1	Reproductive Rights Clearly I was talking about reproductive rights you dunce. So i'm gonna ignore the first two paragraphs. "Why can’t I have a say in whether my hypothetical kid lives or dies?" Nobody has any rights over a "hypothetical" child. It doesn't exist. You can't have rights to it. You can have rights to an actual child that does exist, but not a hypothetical child that doesn't. Once the child exists, and you are a parent, then you get parental rights. "My body, my choice" What part of this process invol…	/r/MensRights	24/06/25 03:06 PM
-1	Reproductive Rights Maybe you haven’t? I’ve probably thought about and studied this more than the average person. More than you? I dunno. I don’t know you. But more than most people no doubt.	/r/MensRights	24/06/25 12:57 AM
0	The reason women are mean to each other is because of men. Why can't women just be accountable? Nope, that is not at all what I said. In fact, I struggle to even see how that could be your take-away from what I said.	/r/MensRights	23/06/25 09:18 PM
0	The reason women are mean to each other is because of men. Why can't women just be accountable? I'm interested in what you THINK my point was, cause I get the distinct feeling it went whoosh right past you.	/r/MensRights	23/06/25 09:06 PM
-23	Reproductive Rights One of those is bodily autonomy, the other is not. They are radically different. You are conflating them out of a desire for sexual power over the other gender.	/r/MensRights	23/06/25 09:03 PM
0	The reason women are mean to each other is because of men. Why can't women just be accountable? It does not "ignore it". I am well aware of it. My comments and views take that into account and exist in addition to it. I think that patriarchy was a biological inevitability born of the fact that women were uniquely burdened by the animal cycles of reproduction. It is understandable why it ended up that way. But my comments still hold true regardless of the Why. And yes, the fact that people have to compete is not inherent to the patriarchy, but like 90%+ of the standards and expectations and…	/r/MensRights	23/06/25 08:36 PM
-2	The reason women are mean to each other is because of men. Why can't women just be accountable? No, throughout the vast majority of human history even the average low-class or peasant man was still the patriarchal leader of his family and he and other commoners were still the patriarchal leaders of their tribe/club/village/neighborhood/whatever.	/r/MensRights	23/06/25 08:33 PM
-31	Reproductive Rights Men have the exact same rights, except for the right to abort. But that's not a legal problem, that's a biological fact. You cannot abort because you cannot become pregnant. What you are asking for is not the same rights as women, you as asking for a new extra power that is unique to men, and also uniquely disadvantages a child. You see when a woman exercises the right of abortion, well, there then is no child. That child never exists. There is nothing there to take care of. Nothing there to pro…	/r/MensRights	23/06/25 08:31 PM
-7	Reproductive Rights Are you talking specifically about abortion? you cannot abort. You cannot be pregnant therefore you cannot abort. That's just mother nature's rules. No law can change that. But aside from abortion, you have identical rights as the woman. And technically you even have abortion rights. If you, by some medical miracle, became pregnant, you would have the same right. But the fact that you can't abort is just a biological fact. There is no way to legislate around that.	/r/MensRights	23/06/25 08:23 PM
-3	The reason women are mean to each other is because of men. Why can't women just be accountable? Well, some might suggest that, gosh what....4 thousand years, possibly 10 thousand depending on how you want to count it, of social programming and conventions and modes of interaction doesn't just evaporate in the historic blink of an eye. like yeah, the strict patriarchy of yesteryear may be dead (at least in the younger generations of the modern west), but undoubtedly a huge amount of what we still do to this day is inherited directly from and due to that many centuries long patriarchal world…	/r/MensRights	23/06/25 07:43 PM
-6	Reproductive Rights You do have the right to choose everything a woman does. You have the exact same rights as her? Now obviously since you can't be pregnant, you wont ever be able to exercise rights over your pregnancy, since, ya know, you wont ever have one. But you have the same rights as her. It sounds like what you are wanting is EXTRA rights, rights over HER pregnancy? Is that right? But yeah, you have identical right to her. If you end up with the child, you can also put it up for adoption. You can also surr…	/r/MensRights	23/06/25 07:36 PM
-8	The reason women are mean to each other is because of men. Why can't women just be accountable? But the world was patriarchal for most of human history up until like, what, the last 2 generations? No? Like surely you agree with that.	/r/MensRights	23/06/25 07:26 PM
-46	Reproductive Rights You don't have a say over the one part that doesn't apply to you, being pregnant. Everything else, you have equal say. Technically, you actually do have all of the same rights as the woman, but as you cannot be pregnant, you can never exercise them. But if by some biological miracle a man did end up pregnant, yes, he has all of the same rights.	/r/MensRights	23/06/25 06:51 PM
-18	Reproductive Rights Men have every reproductive right women do. The only rights women have that men don't are the ones men literally cannot exercise because they cannot be pregnant.	/r/MensRights	23/06/25 06:49 PM
4	Reproductive Rights Men can also give children up for adoption and can also use safe havens/safe surrender sites. Literally the ONLY place women have options that men don't is the part of the process that applies only to them and doesn't apply to men, the actually bearing the pregnancy part. But that's not really the law making it that way, that's just mother nature. No law can circumvent the fact that only women endure pregnancy. But in every other way, men have the same rights and options. It makes sense to me th…	/r/MensRights	23/06/25 06:46 PM
-8	Please don't forget to sign the petition for world wide mandatory paternity testing at birth Can't everyone already get a paternity test anyway? What's stopping you? I guess if you can't afford it maybe, but you can get one around here for like $450, which factored into the rest of the costs associated with having a baby, isn't very much. If you have parental rights, then you can go get the test on your own if you want. I guess if you didn't have any parental rights but were still being asked to provide child support, but can't you request paternity testing in those cases as part of the…	/r/MensRights	23/06/25 06:41 PM
-14	The reason women are mean to each other is because of men. Why can't women just be accountable? Is this not more or less the same thing you guys say? The replies seem to be "some women are just bitches and are mean, but also competition for men, and to appeal to them, basically competition for mates, can drive people to be nasty to each other who otherwise probably wouldn't be?". Isn't that more or less exactly what many of you believe also?	/r/MensRights	23/06/25 06:39 PM
1	Society may have overestimated risk of the ‘manosphere’, UK researchers say Proper representative government means that you representatives bodies should be roughly demographically aligned to the population they represent, by whatever demographics are most relevant to the culture and time. So, Australia, where it's almost 50/50, that is proper representation. Obviously from year to year it can shift +/- a few seats this way or that, but overall should be around 50/50. In the UK overall it's more like 63/37, that's a 13% over representation by men, that is, certainly, wh…	/r/MensRights	18/06/25 05:25 PM
0	Society may have overestimated risk of the ‘manosphere’, UK researchers say Good for Australia. Britain still has a good ways to go, and obviously the US has a hell of a long way.	/r/MensRights	18/06/25 04:47 AM
1	Society may have overestimated risk of the ‘manosphere’, UK researchers say I didn't bring up the 50/50 thing, you did. If you're not willing to elaborate, then don't bring it up. I'm content to just ignore it if you're abandoning that point.	/r/MensRights	17/06/25 07:51 PM
0	Society may have overestimated risk of the ‘manosphere’, UK researchers say Ok so, 50/50 would mean men's rights are stomped on forever. Can you give me a ball park of what the ratio would need to be to satisfy you? For you, in your personal opinion, to go "this position of power ratio seems about right, I am comfortable with this." 50/50 is way to much power for women, according to you, so what does the ratio need to be. You don't need to be exact or anything, just ball park.	/r/MensRights	17/06/25 06:13 PM
0	Society may have overestimated risk of the ‘manosphere’, UK researchers say What on earth makes you think I think men wouldn't harm other men. Throughout human history the vast majority of men who have been seriously harmed, killed, laid off, bankrupted, displaced, rounded up, imprisoned, etc, has been at the hands of other men. I am quite aware that many men hurt other men. But they don't do it because women make them.	/r/MensRights	17/06/25 06:10 PM
1	Society may have overestimated risk of the ‘manosphere’, UK researchers say Well see that's the neat thing about data right. If you exclude the parts that make your point look worse, you can always make your point look better can't you? But ok, fine, even if I play your game. The most gender diverse Parliaments ever in history, cutting edge of representation, and men has just shy of a supermajority. Still a pretty damn strong majority my political and social standards. And that's the best its ever been in the lifetime of anyone alive today.	/r/MensRights	17/06/25 06:08 PM
-2	Society may have overestimated risk of the ‘manosphere’, UK researchers say Women are soldiers too? Like literally millions of them.	/r/MensRights	17/06/25 04:49 AM
1	What should be done about the Male Loneliness epidemic that is 1- Feasible and 2- Does not involve oppression Wow, you’re a real shit friend. How do you think they’d take it if they knew you talked like this about them? You’re clearly clueless, and also condescending. I don’t think there are any tools at my disposal to explain it to you. I’d strong advise you actually listen to your friends.	/r/MensRights	17/06/25 03:51 AM
-11	Society may have overestimated risk of the ‘manosphere’, UK researchers say " note how horrible it is for the average man in the UK?" Lol, it's not? Well I guess I can't speak for the UK, since I live in the US, but idiot butthurt men here say all of the same stuff. I am a man. I've been one for all 39 years of my life. Not a rich man. Not a hot man. Not a many from a well connected family. Just a very average joe typically every-man. So with the authority of having decades under my belt at this point being a typical middle of the road man..... I gotta say, that shit is…	/r/MensRights	17/06/25 02:01 AM
-9	Society may have overestimated risk of the ‘manosphere’, UK researchers say I don't think anyone calls society using women as a resource in the same way as men "misogyny". I think that governments and upper classes use all of us as resources. That's not a man vs woman thing.	/r/MensRights	17/06/25 01:55 AM
-2	Society may have overestimated risk of the ‘manosphere’, UK researchers say Well, let's see why don't we? I'm not going to get into small local governing bodies, since that's WAY too much research for a reply to some random guy on reddit who isn't going to change his mind anyway, but I will deal with the national level legislatures. The national legislative bodies of the UK would be the British Parliament, The Northern Ireland Assembly, The Parliament of Wales, and The Scottish Parliament. So, looking at those, here is what we get: Name of House -Current Members - #Men-…	/r/MensRights	17/06/25 01:52 AM
1	Tomi Lahren went on Fox News to blame men for low fertility rates. Wait, haven't I seen on this very Sub that men being terminally online and de-socialized and not getting out is the problem, well maybe not THE problem but certain A problem?	/r/MensRights	16/06/25 09:45 PM
-21	Society may have overestimated risk of the ‘manosphere’, UK researchers say Aren't the overwhleming majority of legislators, magistrates, mayors, ceos, cfos, vps, svps, chairmen, presidents, editors in chief, college deans, millionaires, and billionaires in the UK, men? Weird to call them "man-hating" when men occupy the majority of positions of financial, political, or social power. Most cultures in human history that "hate" a demographic, don't allow that demographics to control the majority of positions of authority and power. Pretty weird.	/r/MensRights	16/06/25 09:29 PM
1	What should be done about the Male Loneliness epidemic that is 1- Feasible and 2- Does not involve oppression So more than half your social circle is women and you still think "they (women) generally do not have to seek out or struggle to find love or sexual intimacy the way men do." Do you....listen to them? If you did, you would know better. Or do you listen to them but just don't believe them?	/r/MensRights	16/06/25 07:07 PM
1	What should be done about the Male Loneliness epidemic that is 1- Feasible and 2- Does not involve oppression Tell me you have few or no close female friends without telling me you have few or no female friends. You are not actually talking about the reality of women's love lives. You know what this reminds me of? Those like late 1800s lad adventure novels written about the dark heart of africa or the mysteries of the far east, written by guys who had never been there, didn't even know anyone who had ever been there, based only on crude caricatures and most fictional accounts they heard from other adven…	/r/MensRights	12/06/25 02:53 PM
1	What should be done about the Male Loneliness epidemic that is 1- Feasible and 2- Does not involve oppression "Lucky for you. Really -- it's good to have that and you're lucky to." It's not luck, anyone can do it. There is not a thing in the world, to my knowledge, stopping you from doing all of those same things I mentioned right now. Unless you don't have guy friends of course. But there is nothing on earth stopping you and these other guys that also presumably need friends from becoming friends? It's like....it's like I am sitting here stuffed and patting my belly after eating a good meal, and you're…	/r/MensRights	12/06/25 04:55 AM
1	What should be done about the Male Loneliness epidemic that is 1- Feasible and 2- Does not involve oppression The true heart of your complaint here doesn't seem to be about men's rights at all, or really anything that is even particular to men. The real crux of your complain seems to be romantic woes. To put it very simply and crudely, women won't love and fuck me as often or readily as I want them to. And yeah, I get that, that sucks. But...short of returning to a time of arranged marriage and forced companionship through dependency, there is no changing that. And even if you could go back to that some…	/r/MensRights	12/06/25 04:35 AM
1	What should be done about the Male Loneliness epidemic that is 1- Feasible and 2- Does not involve oppression That really and genuinely sounds terrible. My heart goes out to you. But surely you do not think that kind of horror story is somehow a tribulation of men in particular. I don’t know what exactly your area of law is, but I would assume you have ready access to a soul crushing entire library of such horror stories that have occurred to women as well, no? I’m not saying it’s not terrible. I just don’t understand considering it a men’s rights thing. These sorts of abuses, maybe not identical in for…	/r/MensRights	12/06/25 01:57 AM
1	What should be done about the Male Loneliness epidemic that is 1- Feasible and 2- Does not involve oppression No. That is not what happened. You implied. Well not even implied you directly stated, that the reason you need a boys club is because you and your mates literally can’t help but get competitive to the point it messes without ability to socialize if a woman is present. Wanting a boys club is fine. Wanting a boys club because you are that incapable of being chill around women….THAT is a reason for therapy. Get a grip man.	/r/MensRights	12/06/25 12:49 AM
1	What should be done about the Male Loneliness epidemic that is 1- Feasible and 2- Does not involve oppression I didn’t say they don’t act different. I said it doesn’t compromise the experience and the difference isn’t in the form of like, suddenly becoming competitive. Like when it’s me and boys, the dynamic is different than when it’s be and the boys and the wives. But it’s not like we are all hitting on each others wives. We just maybe aren’t quite as crass if juvenile as we might be if it was just the boys. But my inclination is that if you and your mates can’t hang out if there is a girl cause you a…	/r/MensRights	11/06/25 11:51 PM
1	What should be done about the Male Loneliness epidemic that is 1- Feasible and 2- Does not involve oppression Well Jesus man, if we are taking about a literal schizophrenic then we aren’t talking about a men’s issue at all. It should really go without saying that your spouse literally developing clinical psychopathy is the kind of thing that it horrible and life crushing for the other partner no matter the gender.	/r/MensRights	11/06/25 11:44 PM
3	Women are drawn to unchangeable traits in men such as height, face, jawline, voice, frame, size. Men, on the other hand, value changeable traits in women like low body count, natural look, healthy weight, minimal surgery. One side wants what you’re born with. The other wants what you choose. PT2. Is this based off of anything? It looks like just a screenshot of a word doc. I hate to be THAT guy but.....sources please. Cause if this is just going off of your personal observation, I am go down to walmart right now and sit and people watch for about an hour and personally observe a hell of a lot of men who are not, well, any of the things you mention (I guess I can't know how big their weiners are, but all of the others I can look at and tell). So yeah, your little uncited word doc is no be…	/r/MensRights	11/06/25 09:30 PM
-1	What should be done about the Male Loneliness epidemic that is 1- Feasible and 2- Does not involve oppression Sounds like you have bad taste in women? I've had a fair few relationships in my adult life and only ever been with one woman who was like that, it was very early in my adult hood, and never again. The long term serious relationships I've been in have very much been a situation where we are a couple, yes, but we both understand it's important to have hobbies and time and an identity outside of the relationship, and that it's not good for your partner to be your only emotional resource, and it's …	/r/MensRights	11/06/25 04:53 PM
1	What should be done about the Male Loneliness epidemic that is 1- Feasible and 2- Does not involve oppression This is, perhaps, the most reasonable answer in this whole thread, and no surprise, it has zero upvotes.	/r/MensRights	11/06/25 04:21 PM
1	What should be done about the Male Loneliness epidemic that is 1- Feasible and 2- Does not involve oppression I'm not saying those aren't valid issues. But I don't see how any of that prevents you or I or any man from going out and joining a club or a hobby or taking woodwork classes or joining a pub trivia league or a slow pitch softball team or getting involved in the neighborhood association, or joining a hunting club, or a fishing club, or a board game night or...ya know, whatever, all of the million different ways you meet more people and make more friends and have a better social network. Like, ev…	/r/MensRights	11/06/25 04:20 PM
1	What should be done about the Male Loneliness epidemic that is 1- Feasible and 2- Does not involve oppression And you think those are the reasons men don't have good friend networks and community involvement? I get what you're saying, but like, what part of ANY of that listed above keeps men from going to a pub night or joining a club or taking up a hobby and joining a local group dedicated to that hobby, or joining a local sports league, or a board game night, or a debate club, or volunteering, or taking classes, or inviting colleagues out for drinks, or getting to know their neighbors, or joining a ch…	/r/MensRights	11/06/25 04:14 PM
1	What should be done about the Male Loneliness epidemic that is 1- Feasible and 2- Does not involve oppression Can I ask, in what way does feminism prevent you personally from having male friendships and a community? You say that it destroys and polices. But like, I have a pretty robust social circle. We hang out. We go to movies. We sometimes go out to karaoke or pub trivia, we go to the park and play pickleball or basket ball or whatever. A few of my buddies also like to fish and we go fishing. A few like to hike and we go hiking. Once in a while we go camping. About once a year we do a kayaking day tr…	/r/MensRights	11/06/25 04:08 PM
2	What should be done about the Male Loneliness epidemic that is 1- Feasible and 2- Does not involve oppression "Men act different around women, its harder to bond as friends as we innately start competing for women;s attention." I don't? Well I do if it's a woman I'm romantically interested in, but I'm only ever romantically interested in a few women at a time. I don't like, just inherently compete for every woman I'm around. One at a time when I'm in a relationship and even when I'm single and dating around I'm only pursuing or "competing" for maybe two or three women's affections at a time. I can't say…	/r/MensRights	11/06/25 04:04 PM
0	What should be done about the Male Loneliness epidemic that is 1- Feasible and 2- Does not involve oppression "It needs to be ok to come home, have your buddy come over, and drink beer in the garage while watching a baseball game." is....is that not acceptable? I do that. Well it's not beer and baseball, but I have buddies over for our hobbies and game nights and movie nights. Who is saying that's not acceptable?	/r/MensRights	11/06/25 04:02 PM
1	A great video of female manipulation I'm not isolating. I feel like i am fairly assessing the reality of the situation. The problem is not that I am isolating, it's that the maker of this video, and presumably the OP who agreed with it, and presumably you who also seem to agree with it, are crudely and more importantly, inaccurately, generalizing. I don't mind a generalization, as long as it is generally true. Gendering this issue is not generally true. Therefore it should not be generalized in this way.	/r/MensRights	10/06/25 08:51 PM
5	Researchers back The Dad Shift protest calling for paternity leave reform Yeah I understand that. I was trying to say that I think the amounts and benefits of these leaves should be basically equal, although I could see a longer allotment for the person actually giving birth for the sake of the physical recovery. But otherwise, long generous paid parental leave that applies to both parents.	/r/MensRights	10/06/25 08:48 PM
1	A great video of female manipulation "When men as a whole, tend to take shit from women as a class. " Do you? I don't. I get along quite well with woman. I also get along quite well with men. I tend to just not associate with people I don't get along with or feel like I have to take a lot of shit from. Is that not the same for you?	/r/MensRights	10/06/25 07:35 PM
25	Researchers back The Dad Shift protest calling for paternity leave reform I have always felt that parental leave should apply equally to both parents, and should be generous in both cases. There is likely some good reason for some additional leave to recover from the very physically taxing and sometimes injuring process of giving birth, but it should be like "3 weeks medical leave for the one who gave birth, AND ALSO 3 months (or whatever amount) for both parents"	/r/MensRights	10/06/25 07:12 PM
1	A great video of female manipulation If it's a thing that men actually, in fact, do more than women, or vice versa. Then that is fine. Like if the issue is actually gendered, and many issues are, then framing them in a gendered way is fair. Nothing in my lived experience shows me that women are any more prone to be abusive or controlling or manipulative or emotionally toxic etc etc etc than men are. And I've known plenty of fuck boys who completely get away with this behavior and run really good women through the emotional wringer …	/r/MensRights	10/06/25 07:03 PM
0	A great video of female manipulation But I still don't understand the angle of portraying this as a woman thing. Look, I've known a lot of people in this ole world, and people that are brats or never grew up or are toxic or irresponsible or throw a fit if they don't get their way or are emotionally manipulative, etc etc etc. In my experience that is just NOT a gendered issue. It's a shitty thing that people in general do. So none of what the video or you or anyone else here is saying is untrue, and I agree, men SHOULD be on the loo…	/r/MensRights	10/06/25 06:21 PM
-2	A great video of female manipulation I obviously don't know your relationship. So I wont take sides. Clearly stuff like that can and does happen. Again, I just don't understand somehow treating it as a woman thing. I've know plenty of shitty men who were also completely unreasonable. More or less this same message as a lesson about identifying toxic or problematic relationship dynamics would be probably just fine. I don't get the angle of making it a "women are the problem" thing. But generally, I find not getting intimately involv…	/r/MensRights	10/06/25 03:44 PM
-7	A great video of female manipulation I mean, I'm not trying to say emotional abuse or even toxic emotional feedback loops aren't a thing. But it's a little odd to seemingly highlight that as a woman issue, as if this is a foible of those darned females. And not a thing that can infect basically any relationship or be an abuse that comes from either end. And, the women I am close to or involved with don't act like that. Well a few have, but I stop associating with them. The same as I stop associating with guys that have similar bad …	/r/MensRights	10/06/25 02:59 PM
-21	A great video of female manipulation And entire video about how women are the problem with and anti-aging product plug in the middle. This video is basically the modern equivalent of the "grumpy old man hates his wife" section of the funny pages sandwiched between ads for rogain.	/r/MensRights	10/06/25 01:58 PM
-4	Long Island baby now faces heart transplant after botched circumcision, dad says “As bad”. As in “as bad as they say it is”. Which does seem to be what you’re sayin, no?	/r/MensRights	06/06/25 09:17 PM
-10	Long Island baby now faces heart transplant after botched circumcision, dad says I really don't know what we are arguing about here man. I already said I think both are wrong and bad and that it's a good think that female circumcision is exceedingly rare in the US, and believe that should also be the case with male circumcision. I don't really care to get into a drawn out dick measuring contest, so to speak, about which is worse. Can we just agree they are both bad? If you want to think female circumcision isn't as bad, well, it's never going to effect you so whatever, keep …	/r/MensRights	06/06/25 08:31 PM
-15	Long Island baby now faces heart transplant after botched circumcision, dad says Hey man, put your fangs away. Nobody is here trying to like, i dunno, trick you into thinking your dick is less important or something. I'm not making a gendered observation here at all, I'm making a very simple just medical statement. Female circumcision is more invasive and more prone to infection than male circumcising, due to just the biological fact that the clitoris is not, anatomically, equivalent to foreskin. The clit is equivalent to the head of the penis, the labia is equivalent to for…	/r/MensRights	06/06/25 08:08 PM
-7	Long Island baby now faces heart transplant after botched circumcision, dad says "I never heard so many girls die due to fgm in the USA" That's cause it's very very rarely done in the US, while Male circumcision is extremely common. Female circumcision is more dangerous, that's just a medical fact, but it's, thankfully, extremely rare in the US. I personally don't think this should be a gendered issue at all. I'd say "don't circumcise/surgically alter the genitals of any babies" and just leave it there. It's bad for both. (exceptions for some rare case where it's actually me…	/r/MensRights	06/06/25 06:45 PM
1	Women hate it when men have ANY standards at all I don't think I've ever known a woman, IRL (of course you can find whackos on the internet who will believe anything) who thinks men should have no standards at all. Now, do people get grumpy when a person they like doesn't like them back because of some standard the other person has? Of course they do. But that's human nature. Just about anyone has or sometimes will do that.	/r/MensRights	06/06/25 06:40 PM
-10	Why is a Woman’s Body Her Own, But a Man’s Body Belongs to the Country? I have literally never had anyone place an expectation on my body that wasn't my choice..... I mean I certainly CAN serve the military or do hard labor or whatever, but I've never felt expected or obligated to. I've only ever felt obligated to follow the law and do what I can to take care of myself without needing welfare, beyond that, every other obligation or responsibility has been of my choosing. And I've sure as hell never been obliged or forced or compelled to do anything even remotely in …	/r/MensRights	03/06/25 09:06 PM
1	Explain to monke Lol fight back? Tell me my guy, how exactly are you fighting back? Regale me with your bravery.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/10/21 08:59 PM
1	Explain to monke Correct. I do not see that. I believe you are incorrect. And probably a bitter loveless young man lashing out. Which means there is no rational conversation to be had.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/10/21 08:59 PM
1	Explain to monke I can’t tell if you’re trolling to genuinely that clueless. But either way I am 100% sure a conversation with you would be frustrating and fruitless. So I’m gonna do literally anything else.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/10/21 07:35 PM
0	Explain to monke Oh I understand the logic completely. I just don’t believe for one second this is an earnest appeal gender equity and not some ploy to allow even more men then already do to abandon their offspring, gussied up to look like an appeal to ethics.	/r/PurplePillDebate	30/10/21 05:58 PM
2	A lot of men are actually advocating for women to be more picky (you’re choosing the wrong men), while simultaneously whining that women are being too picky (80/20) The vast majority of women do not…. only date men in the 95th percentile of attractiveness. only date men 6 inches or more taller than them The vast majority of women do: seek men as romantic partners who are respectful/kind/charming/thoughtful/loyal/ etc etc etc. In other words, all of the things you suggest women do, almost every woman you know or have ever known (who is actively seeking a romantic partner anyway) already is doing all of those things. The fact that you have the impression that…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/10/21 10:37 PM
2	A lot of men are actually advocating for women to be more picky (you’re choosing the wrong men), while simultaneously whining that women are being too picky (80/20) Maybe you just have terrible taste in women. Maybe most women aren’t like that and you have shitty judgment and self select for bad ones? Or maybe you are lying. Cause out there in the real world and real life adult dating pool, yeah sure people like that exist, but they are the minority. And frankly I hear WAY more men bitch about not finding a good woman online than I do women bitch about not finding a good man. But the funny thing about someone who just doesn’t know any better is there is no …	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/10/21 10:21 PM
2	A lot of men are actually advocating for women to be more picky (you’re choosing the wrong men), while simultaneously whining that women are being too picky (80/20) You’re either lying about your experience or you’ve got a colossal raging case of confirmation bias going. But of course a person suffering from terrible confirmation bias is impossible to convince they are. How about this, let’s ask some of these female friends of yours if that’s true about them? Pull them in? Ask them to PM me, they can use a burner account so they can delete it after. Would they agree with your assessment? Or be shocked at hurt that their supposed friend thinks this little of…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/10/21 09:59 PM
2	A lot of men are actually advocating for women to be more picky (you’re choosing the wrong men), while simultaneously whining that women are being too picky (80/20) I am guessing you have little to no experience with dating or women. Would that be accurate? I'm gonna guess you aren't even close platonic friends with many women. I'm also hoping you are fairly young. Your comment reminds me a lot of the kind of stuff I used to say when I was like 19 and had never had a date and was super bitter about it. Fortunately I outgrew it. But, to actually respond to the point you made, yeah, the vast majority of real world women in the real world dating pool already d…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/10/21 08:15 PM
1	A lot of men are actually advocating for women to be more picky (you’re choosing the wrong men), while simultaneously whining that women are being too picky (80/20) Ok, then why don't you tell me... "raise your standards in the aspects of an individual conducive to an actually healthy long-term relationship" Like what? List some of those aspects for me. Doesn't have to be a comprehensive list, just a handful, 4 or 5 such "aspects"? You already listed one, be willing to date men not in the top 5th percentile of attractiveness. What are some others?	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/10/21 04:29 PM
3	A lot of men are actually advocating for women to be more picky (you’re choosing the wrong men), while simultaneously whining that women are being too picky (80/20) It all boils down to "fuck me even if you aren't attracted to me, cause the gym and diets are hard." That's what you mean, don't care if they are hot, don't care that I'm not.	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/10/21 03:16 PM
4	A lot of men are actually advocating for women to be more picky (you’re choosing the wrong men), while simultaneously whining that women are being too picky (80/20) It's because they are self absorbed idiots. We can whole novels worth of words trying to beat around the busy, but at the end of the day, they just want a hot woman to date them and meet their standards, while having whatever their natural comfort zone already is be the woman's standards so they don't have to change or do any work, or at least not any work they were not already predisposed to in the first place. The ones who aren't like this, well they get girlfriend and outgrow this bitter rese…	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/10/21 03:14 PM
2	Is it safe to assume that single women in their thirties haven't had their brains warped by porn? So.....I'm not saying you're totally wrong.....but it's suuuuuper weird to frame this as an issue with women. While maybe it's true for some women, surely its even more true of men, who generally consume more porn. Why did you frame this as an issue with women instead of with people in their 30s in general? That has been my experience. People in their 30s just get kind of kinky.	/r/PurplePillDebate	25/10/21 03:07 PM
1	Modern dating and the Laffer Curve. "Our difference is you think all men are mad and I think almost all don't give a fuck." People who don't give a fuck don't go online and do a bunch of research and quantify and theorize and rant and form communities and identities based around the thing they don't give a fuck about. And you specifically have done some of that right here, and sexless men online more broadly have done a LOT of that. That is not what "almost all don't give a fuck" looks like. Obviously they are mad. Obliviously you…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/10/21 09:15 PM
1	Modern dating and the Laffer Curve. So if I understand you correctly. You agree that men are not willing to do, insert XYZ things that would be required to get a woman. I also agree with that. So then where is our difference? I believe the XYZ that is required from women is a perfectly reasonable and easily achieved set of standards that the vast majority of well adjusted adults should already be achieving regardless of the romantic question, and the “problem” is on lazy or otherwise disaffected men who aren’t interested in meetin…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/10/21 06:08 PM
1	Modern dating and the Laffer Curve. I think it's pretty clear that 99% of what you think you know about dating and romance in the current year comes from having read internet rants by other angry resentful men, and not from actual experience. Cause basically everything you're saying is like a weird fracture mirror incel hate-fantasy version of reality, but not actually what it's like out there. Now here's the thing. I don't think there is anything I can say that will convince you. Any broad data I present you will actively choose …	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/10/21 05:00 PM
1	Modern dating and the Laffer Curve. No, they aren’t getting lazy quickly. They always were. The thing that has changed quickly is women’s independence and ability to tell those men no. And yes it has happened in the last decade. Not all of it, the change has been a slow but escalating process since like the late 70s early 80s, with each successive generation expressing the change more. But let’s try this. Let’s step away from speculating about inter generational data trends for a moment and look at personal experience. I have a de…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/10/21 03:56 PM
1	Modern dating and the Laffer Curve. The rise in early adulthood male sexlessness is due to laziness among those men. There is a certain % of men out there who, in yesteryear, only ever had a woman because women had no independence and by societal convention a woman was basically dispensed to them right out of high school. If left to court a woman by their own devices and of their own effort, and court among a group of women who they had to attract as independent equals, they never would have attracted a mate. Cause they are lazy, …	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/10/21 02:33 PM
1	Modern dating and the Laffer Curve. "At what point is there a laffer curve in dating were men say "You're telling me I have to work a 60 hour week for a decade to maybe be able to have some success at dating? I think I'll just work part time, hang out with my friends, smoke weed, watch porn and play videogames" If that's what you wanna do then go for it. If that makes you more happy, cool. Also what you have said is untrue. The average difference in dating age in the US is 2.5 years or so. So most people date within a few years of…	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/10/21 03:21 AM
1	What are the ways in which women enforce Toxic Masculinity? There are women who like and endorse and celebrate every single trait that is typically associated with toxic masculinity, thinking that is sexy or what makes a real man or an alpha or whatever. In my experience those women are the minority, but they do exist, and I generally advise people to consider that a big red flag and steer clear.	/r/PurplePillDebate	21/10/21 03:08 AM
3	Why do a lot of you talk badly about men, even though you have a loving boyfriend/husband at the moment? So there are over 600 replies, meaning that whatever I am about to say has probably already been said, but..... 1> It is possible to be getting along fine with some men, aka your loving boyfriend, while also having a whole lot of problems with many many more men who act badly. 2> I have heard men complain about women while having loving committed wives my entire life. I grew up in the midwest, the good ole boy with the loving committed wife who constantly talks down to her and bitches about wome…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/10/21 06:03 PM
3	When you walk outside and look at couples walking around, how often is the man/woman more attractive than the other in the pair? I would say the vast majority of average couples are within a point or so of each other (10 point look scale is pretty crummy, but for the short hand of answering this question I think it works), like if the guy is a 5 the woman will be a 4, 5, or 6. You occasionally see a person with someone who is way more attractive than them, but not often. And usually this is a case where they were around the same level when they first became a couple, but one member either got on a health kick and got in a…	/r/PurplePillDebate	20/10/21 05:56 PM
1	Explain to monke Is consenting to making a baby consent to parenting? In most cases of an unwanted pregnancy the woman didn’t consent to pregnancy either. It was either forced on her in the case of rape or was an accident. In the latter case neither biological contributor consented to being a parent, they both equally partook in the activity that inadvertently lead to it.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/10/21 10:52 PM
1	Explain to monke I don’t know if a single case where a man was like legally bound to pay for the abortion of a pregnancy he contributed to. Can anyone cite a source on this? It sounds made up to me.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/10/21 10:50 PM