TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JimmyLongnWider Archive

View 0 posts and 100 comments by JimmyLongnWider on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Go ahead, get it off your chest, big boy.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 07:03 PM
0

You're just projecting your own paranoia into it. But that is about all that goes on in this sub. Men being delusional while they complain how women are delusional.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 07:02 PM
2

No, that is not what it is saying. It says that no one wants to roll back the progress that women have made. It is poorly worded.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 09:27 AM
-1

It's true that it is not getting talked about much because men have always been in the de facto position of power. It will happen.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 09:25 AM
-9

These comments....sheesh. Methinks a lot of you guys are just a bit unhappy that you will have to do some laundry now. This is really why this sub is embarrassing - all the article points out is that more women are attaining higher degrees and are looking for men who they are on par with educationally or even emotionally. You would do the same thing unless you intentionally marry women who you plan to keep helpless because they lack education. Like the article points out, we are socialized to th…
/r/MensRights14/05/18 01:26 AM
77

...his girl makes him pay for his honesty. Yessssssssss
/r/MensRights12/05/18 08:08 PM
8

Truth is, no one likes getting told what to wear. I don't. It's just a part of getting by in the world and showing others you take it seriously even if you do not. She'll get that eventually.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 02:07 PM
11

Thing is, you can't have equality just in areas where women had less of a voice. If people want feminism, equality or whatever they want to call it, they lose ladies first, men picking up the bill, wife is always right, and so on. To have a society where women have equality but still retain special privilege would be madness! (Although this seems to be what many "feminists" want.) This is right on the money. I don't mind men and women being different. Hell, I want them to understand they are dif…
/r/MensRights10/05/18 08:17 PM
1

Well, if a religious man posted here with a real men's rights issue, I can't imagine how their religious beliefs would even factor into it. If a religious man posts here complaining how so-and-so isn't respecting their beliefs, then they indeed can take a hike. I have no patience for the religious acting offended.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 04:33 PM
3

Well, lead the way.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 01:57 AM
6

What do we boycott here? Meth? Utah? I hear what you're saying but it isn't feasible to always be trying to find a way to organize. Sometimes just discussing things to keep us thinking about issues helps.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 09:01 PM
4

Everybody loved boobies and wants to protect them. Hard to get too excited about a prostate. I barely know what it is and I have one, or so they tell me.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:52 PM
2

I don't believe there is a worldwide conspiracy to train fewer doctors. I don't believe doctors are being exploited and I certainly do not believe that women have magically seen through that conspiracy and are gaming the system. Doctors are doing just fine and can fend for themselves. I think you are mostly claiming to be coming to the defense of all doctors to justify women simply not doing what the profession demands.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 03:20 PM
3

Medicine is not just a skilled trade or something where you put in the time in school and then get a job. It requires a grueling residency and long days just to get them up to speed and keep them there. It's lives we are talking about, not plumbing or fixing cars. Women need to commit to the profession like men do, or they can go into nursing or something where they have greater say as to their hours and less pay. Taking up a seat in medical school and then not providing that return on investmen…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 12:26 PM
4

Understood. But I don't think doctors often feel exploited. They work long hours and they feel a calling to do that work...and they are compensated well for doing what very few can do. If we find ourselves in a position where people are training to do the work at enormous public expense and then don't really want to do it, well, then we have to identify why that is. The men are still willing for the most part but women are not. Apparently, you want to dial back the work requirements until women …
/r/MensRights09/05/18 11:40 AM
4

I guess the point here is how feminism gaslights men. I know I experience it quite a bit with my wife and daughter who consistently act like I am being extremist and outrageous talking calmly about men's rights issues and news. They so firmly embrace the notion that women have gotten the short end of the stick in the world, how could a man be dissatisfied with the situation?
/r/MensRights09/05/18 09:28 AM
14

It is funny that this is the first I have heard of her attacks on the looks of male opponents. Just goes to show you that it isn't really newsworthy unless a woman is the target. And to top it off, she might be bragging about it, or maybe just as incredulous as I am that no one has said a word.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 12:26 AM
6

Men take on career responsibilities and they sacrifice for them. There is no way you can reasonably argue that the men are at fault because they are willing to make that sacrifice. Women, overall, just don't make the same sacrifice.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 12:17 AM
1

I got similar results for men but all I got for women was "Why are women's nipples sore?" huh?
/r/MensRights08/05/18 10:11 AM
-4

Going to have to hold opinion until I learn what comes of it. I imagine there will by scolding all around for boy and girls. Disappointed the article didn't have pictures.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 08:01 PM
1

He still does not want the child, but sure, what could go wrong?
/r/MensRights03/05/18 07:49 PM
402

The article can be translated on the Chrome browser at least. The part that bothers me is no one is bringing up the fact that she forged his signature, just that he originally consented to IVF. The medical people are acting like the fact that he originally wanted to use IVF with her makes all further actions, like forgery and deceit, justified once she is pregnant. I would be hopping mad at this if it were me.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 04:12 PM
1

It's a weird angle to play. I mean, I guess this is a female at work and some male told her she couldn't do it or something?
/r/MensRights03/05/18 03:34 PM
25

You're in good company and lots of it. I was banned. I lost count of all the other people around here who are banned. It's why I wish that this sub were less on the hateful side. I wish I could parade MensRights as the voice of reason, but there is still too much stupid here as well.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 03:23 PM
1

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think the Girl Scouts forced their way into the Boy Scouts, the Boy Scouts just changed their admitting criteria. While plenty of GSA people might be happy with it, they didn't force anyone to make the changes.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 03:05 PM
6

My wife and I were talking about this earlier. We both agree that boys need places to be boys and girls need places to be girls as well as places to mingle. There are just different dynamics in play. She used to volunteer with Campfire Girls and told me how there were boys present at one outing and one girl was all weepy all weekend because some boy she liked wouldn't pay attention to her. If the boys had been elsewhere, she would have had a great weekend. The boy as well.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:41 PM
2

Atheists. Atheists are the last group still forbidden in the Scouts. I think that is completely unacceptable. And if allowing girls is about the money, then they should rescind their ban on nonbelievers.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:17 PM
9

Instead of fighting this statement, I would want to argue that men "kill against a backdrop of victimisation and hopelessness" as well. Humans can be shitty creatures, but men and women together often commit the worst things out of desperation. The implication in this statement is that men are just naturally evil things that wake up in the morning and go out to cause pain and suffering.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:13 PM
1

Well, if it really is just a money grab, why can't nonbelievers join the Scouts?
/r/MensRights03/05/18 01:59 PM
0

Maybe they should let nonbelievers in. Or is that just going too far?
/r/MensRights03/05/18 01:13 PM
6

The Boy Scouts, err, the Scouts, will allow absolutely anyone in...except atheists - still.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 04:10 PM
2

I reckon that would need a citation. A quick search on my part shows the opposite.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 05:45 PM
1

Did you even read the article?
/r/MensRights01/05/18 05:20 PM
2

I don't think this is true. Men are riskier drivers and more frequent drivers and pay more, at least through certain age categories. This is really not a gender inequality issue to me.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 03:32 PM
1

What is reported as true in stories of adultery is that when a man cheats, it is because he is a bad person. And when a woman cheats, it is because the man didn't take care of her.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 06:31 PM
2

When I was in high school a million years ago, they tried to enforce a dress code where skirts were allowed but shorts were not...so we all wore skirts. Now that was distracting.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 06:20 PM
2

Hmph. Saw a lot of newsletters from a former boss who was one. Every. Single. Person. Holding. A. Beer. Said so to him and he smiled and never denied it.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 11:08 PM
0

It's a drinking club.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 12:30 PM
3

As a guy who doesn't want to hug anyone anyway, I would welcome a completely hug-free world. I hope that women will stop assuming that it is OK to hug people all over the place, but I suspect this no-hugging rule will only apply to men. Women will still be able to say "you need a hug" and force them on me. And when I refuse, I will still be the weirdo. Go figure.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 12:03 PM
0

uhhhhhhhhhhhkaaaaaaaaaywhaaaaaaaateeeeeverrrrrrr
/r/MensRights24/10/17 12:11 AM
1

I guess you are positively negative.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 11:05 PM
1

Wow, what's amazing to me is how so many are forming emotional attachments to them.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 11:49 AM
1

That's the spirit! Stay positive!
/r/MensRights23/10/17 11:45 AM
1

Where are these...sex-bot brothels of which you speak?
/r/MensRights23/10/17 11:03 AM
1

I think it would be more like transitioning people to part time work along with a Basic Income system. There is absolutely nothing magical or impossible about everyone living lives of leisure while machines do the work. Right now, however, we have machines displacing humans without any way to repurpose the humans.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 11:00 AM
1

Jobs across the spectrum of human effort will be replaced eventually. And it is not like all the soft positions all of sudden are held by women. Come on. Anyway, I welcome jobs being taken by machines and AI as long as regulations are in place to transition humans to jobs that only (for the time being) humans can do.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 11:52 PM
1

If true then you are correct that it is a BS question. You might as well ask if a man would 'rape' a blow up doll if there were no consequences. From your excerpt, however, it is unclear if this was made clear to participants. If you asked me if I would 'have my way' with a sexualized fembot or something that did not feel or suffer, my answer might be quite different from whether I would with an actual human female who would experience it.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 12:06 AM
2

Get back to me when there is less "allegedly" in the story.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 08:04 PM
2

I'm looking at this comment stream of four including my previous comment and it is apparent that no one actually read the article since they all think this has to do with companies hiring STEM candidates.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 06:11 PM
3

I have to wonder if these faculty panels are working at universities where, for example, 90% of the biology department is male already, and they want to right the ship a bit, or are they under pressure to make the departments top-heavy with females. I know it is a raw deal for male applicants, but their male counterparts hired some years previously apparently had an advantage.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 06:00 PM
1

The original question was not some existential question about whether or not a man would rape a woman in a universe where there are no consequences for any actions, it was whether or not a man would do so if they would not be caught.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 05:36 PM
1

I'm pretty sure getting raped is the consequence of getting raped.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 05:26 PM
2

Even if I knew I could get away with it, I wouldn't rape anyone. It isn't the consequences that keep me from raping women. Are you saying you would? I might be reading too much into it.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 03:47 PM
1

Statistically, I stand a higher risk of assault than a woman does of rape, but I also know that I have to get on with life, so I avoid situations and behaviors that increase my risk of assault. I want women to do the same thing instead of trying to restrain and reprogram all men because they are potential rapists.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 01:37 PM
2

Two issues that I think women face: On many occasions in my working life I have found myself working in predominately female workplaces and never enjoyed the gender expectations placed upon me. So I can definitely see how women would dislike the same thing - being in a mostly male work environment and be expected to do things because they are female or having limitations projected upon them due to their sex. This extends to society as a whole - gender expectations go both ways and really need to…
/r/MensRights21/10/17 01:14 PM
-1

Proof for his affair? "AN OXFORD University philosopher who was suspended after the suicide of a female student with whom he had an affair has won his job back." Where I come from, 'having an affair' is also called 'banging.' More: "Ketland first met Coursier in 2008 when he was working at Edinburgh University and she was an undergraduate. They developed an intense, platonic relationship. In February 2009 she overdosed on paracetamol and he took her to A&E. The next month she sent him a birthday…
/r/MensRights30/12/16 07:08 PM
-1

The dates are unclear in the article I pulled but it I guess banging vulnerable and suicidal students is OK, right? And a professor is a mentor. She was a student.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 05:54 PM
0

So...you're mad she's wealthy. OK.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 05:45 PM
3

I understand what college administrations are doing when they try to foster a safe college environment by forming these investigative committees, I do not understand how police are not automatically involved and investigations are taken over by them. If I were Chief of Police, and I read in the paper about a rape allegation at my local college, I think I'd be heading over there to deal with it - and ask a few questions about why it was not reported. The same goes for the Catholic Church and abus…
/r/MensRights30/12/16 05:17 PM
1

The thing here is that this is family court. It says in the article how no one can cross-examine their alleged victim in criminal court for obvious reasons and that this is about updating family court procedures. Many seem to repeatedly and incorrectly assume this means that the woman does not face scrutiny or fact finding. She just doesn't have to be intimidated by the guy she fled.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 05:05 PM
1

I haven't seen the documentary "The Mask You Live In" and I only know of Jennifer Newsom because of her husband. I'm not really sure I see what your outrage is about. From what I can tell, Jennifer Newsom is making the point that societal pressures put on males to gauge their success, worth, and masculinity by their bank balance is harmful. I agree with that completely. Don't you? Maybe it bothers you that she and her family are wealthy, and you believe this must invalidate her opinions of what …
/r/MensRights30/12/16 04:47 PM
1

He really should know better than to move out on his family and shack up with a BSC student half his age. He's a grown-ass man and an Oxford University professor. All's well that ends well, except for Charlotte, and I imagine he'll think twice next time before thinking it's a good idea to knock off a piece with a suicidal girl he is supposed to be mentoring. I'm not excusing the smear campaign but damn, it's hard to find sympathy for this guy.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 04:15 PM
1

Feel free to share your evidence for how this is a legal runaround to target men. You seem to have some inside knowledge of the situation.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 09:35 PM
7

I wasn't too keen on even seeing this but I might just to see what all the fuss is about. I wonder if it just boils down to a movie having a male character with more than 2 dimensions that bothers some women.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 08:56 PM
1

Well, we likely will never know. But leave it to r/MensRights to spin the worst possible scenario out of a story when it doesn't actually say that. And domestic abuse statutes are often worded to specify men and those seem to survive legally just fine.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 08:49 PM
15

Does that ever happen? Teaching? Any field?
/r/MensRights29/12/16 06:35 PM
1

Karen Straughan's Youtube channel has some great historical information concerning why men are last in the lifeboats and all that. In short, men are expected to be stoic, not complain and die valiantly and foolishly. Women can express just a little discomfort and the world rushes to make things right for her. But you're right. Society could protect men to the same degree as women, but it does not. And neither do men, oddly.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 03:28 PM
1

They do, but there is such fear, founded or not, that women are in danger on campus. Parents of female college students are making it clear that they expect colleges to protect their girls or they will go somewhere that will. I think many of the parents of male students and the male students themselves are often blindsided by this practice.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 12:01 PM
6

I'm in the process of sending my daughter off to college next year and I have been on numerous tours of colleges she is interested in and have programs she wants. Something people may not realize about colleges these days is the enormous pressure they are under to serve their clientele, that being students and parents. I was floored completely by the perks of campus living. Boy, has it changed since my time. Internet-connected washers and dryers, catered food for testing, they bring in kittens a…
/r/MensRights29/12/16 01:00 AM
0

I'm circumcised. I'm not really outraged by the procedure but I'm against it in the same way I am against other unnecessary medical procedures. It's archaic and we should just stop doing it. But all this wailing about how it's mutilation and all that - I think that's going to far.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 09:19 PM
11

Like the article says, it is a poorly thought-out policy, but it doesn't seem to be worded to target men in particular. "All adults unaccompanied by a child..."
/r/MensRights28/12/16 09:02 PM
0

I didn't watch the entire video so they might have touched upon it, but there is also an expectation that a man would not welcome intervention in a case like this. Men are expected to 'fight their own battles,' so onlookers could be giving in to this thinking.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 10:22 AM
2

To be clear, the story wasn't from the bride, it was related in order to gather feedback about something the person had witnessed so I wasn't attacking the bride. But, you're right, that post still probably was designed to be a pity party for women in general. r/Feminism isn't just a place where women go to vent. It's full of calls to activism with statistics-laden posts and reportedly factual explanations of how the world wrongs women. But its adherents are not interested in calm, factual count…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 10:03 AM
7

Someone was talking about an example where a bride was making a speech at her wedding about all the men she dated in the past who couldn't handle her "strong personality," but she finally found a man who could. (All those other men had problems, see?) I pointed out that if everything were reversed and a man talked about all the women he dated and didn't marry, people would automatically and comically assume he was the reason, meaning he is hard to live with, like a woman cannot be difficult. Aft…
/r/MensRights19/12/16 01:15 AM
27

Was banned myself. Go figure. As a male, you can participate in only three ways within r/Feminism: You can say nothing. This means you are part of the problem you misogynistic piece of shit. You can agree that women have legitimate issues and point out how men face the same issues sometimes, and other issues other times. Men face issues? I don't think so, you misogynistic piece of shit. You can grovel and apologize for your very existence and agree wholeheartedly with every single thing your fem…
/r/MensRights18/12/16 10:24 PM
1

I like the calm approach in any debating of asking questions of the other side. "If women actually do make less than men for the same work, why do they put up with that? Why aren't all jobs filled by women working for less money?" They either have to admit somehow that women are unable to take care of their pay negotiations, admit that pay disparity is not true or explain why employers aren't wisely hiring only women. Acting foolish and asking what seem to be simple questions can take you far.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 03:31 PM
1

So you really think that a defense attorney walks in and is told that he or she cannot be given any of the basic information needed to defend the client? I wonder how that plays out in court. "Does the defense want to make an opening statement?" "About what, Your Honor?" "About the case." "I wasn't given any information about the case." I'm quite interested in men's rights issues but the paranoia level of some men around here is amazing and discouraging. By all means, question it. Discuss it. Bu…
/r/MensRights30/10/16 03:21 PM
1

Please explain how due process is in jeopardy here. All I'm saying is that keeping the name of the accuser from the accused changes absolutely nothing at all about the investigation. Nothing. Nothing. Everyone here is reading all sorts of nonsensical shit into it.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 03:01 PM
1

Jesus, nowhere does it say that the defense attorney is kept in the dark about anything. This is purely about not giving an accused rapist someone to stalk and taunt while on bail. Think about it. The defense is fully informed and able to mount a defense. The accused simply is not given a name. That is all.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 02:26 PM
1

I don't think it is an 'absolute right.' A judge can deny it if he or she feels the defendant is unable to do it for whatever reason. In any case, it's a mistake to do so almost all the time. In these cases, I imagine a judge would deny the right at least for the anonymity of the accuser - and that judge would be doing the defendant a favor.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 02:17 PM
1

Everyone is reading a lot into this. All that the accused will not have is a name to ponder and look up while on bail. The defense attorney still has to know the name of the accuser as well as all information the prosecution has to mount a defense. Otherwise, this isn't really a legal proceeding anymore.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 01:31 PM
1

Representing yourself in court is often restricted and you would be a fool to do so otherwise. You can play the 'what if' game forever.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 01:05 PM
1

These comments are pretty tiring. Let's look at how this works. Scenario A - Woman is walking down the street and a man pulls her down an alley and rapes her. She goes to the police, describes the assailant and requests to remain unidentified to him if/when they catch him. They find a man who fits the description, arrest him and tell him he is charged with rape. He gets a lawyer who IS TOLD the woman's identity. The lawyer knows the law and does not reveal her name to the client. Investigations …
/r/MensRights28/10/16 02:37 PM
1

The odds of anyone, male or female, 'becoming rich' are slim, so joking advice to go find a rich person to marry sounds pretty balanced.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 02:14 PM
1

You may not know the woman's name but your attorney does. Nothing is different. Your attorney is free to pursue any defense you two decide on.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 10:13 AM
2

This applies only to stranger attacks. These are not college dorm "was it consensual" cases. I'm not convinced a person would have to know a person's name to mount a defense about being in a place at a certain time leaving semen at the scene. Someone accused of a mugging doesn't need to know the name of the accuser to mount a defense, correct? Cases like these presuppose that the accused does not know the accuser's name anyway.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 08:37 AM
1

"...be mindful of the labels you use." Yes, yes and yes. Everybody on both sides of the issue and everywhere in between could stand to pause a moment before a label is applied.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 08:51 PM
1

I know someone who is a spay/neuter advocate for dogs and cats, so I talk to people about it and am around for conversations. I cannot recall a conversation with women who have not lit up at the thought of neutering a male cat or dog. They seem to love the idea of ball removal. I always tell them that their glee is a bit offputting.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:27 PM
6

I, for one, agree with what you're saying. As a recently banned poster on r/Feminism I know how that subreddit treats even mild dissent from the mission statement. And while r/MensRights doesn't ban people, it does shout them down or downvote them into oblivion before they can even explain themselves. It's just the nature of such forums, I think.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 06:04 PM
4

A suicidal man is considered to be weak and/or dangerous. Not a sympathetic poster item.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 04:16 PM
3

I'm sorry, I don't follow you. Do you mean that when a man commits suicide, the story is always about the women effected by it? I've noticed that. I've also noticed that when a woman commits suicide, it was because of how the world acted upon her to cause it, and when a man commits suicide, it is because he was 'troubled' and was aggressive, meaning the act came from within.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 03:44 PM
12

Locker Room Talk: "I'm going to pretend to take my pill and get her pregnant so we'll be together forever." Sound silly? Yeah, me too.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 03:39 PM
5

She sounds pretty dumb. He sounds pretty smart. Let's call it a wash and move on, shall we?
/r/MensRights23/10/16 02:13 PM
1

I've only followed this little saga lightly, so I have no first-hand knowledge of amounts of trolling either way, but I have little doubt that angry MRM proponents would do it. That being said, I wish she would take a look at how viciously a man can be attacked online for just expressing a little doubt about pay disparity or campus rape culture, or ask for a simple example of the horrible Patriarchy in action. Self-described Valkyries for Feminism descend swiftly and with sharpened swords, I'll …
/r/MensRights23/10/16 02:05 PM
28

Two things really jump out at me from this article. 1. She retains custody of the two surviving children....kill me now, you have to be kidding. And 2. Police finally looked to her as the possible cause of bruising and wounds on the babies only after exonerating the father. I give up.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 01:39 PM
4

This needs a sarcasm mark. Please tell me it does.....please.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 01:37 PM
1

Some people just party very differently than I do.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 12:45 PM
3

I missed that top-level FAQ. I guess that answers the question - not men. I wonder if they just hang up on males.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 12:22 PM
1

Traditionally men dated women for looks and women dated men for their ability to provide - both approaches have the welfare of offspring in mind, so why are men thought of as the shallow ones? And in a world of increased female independence and financial power, women going for a pretty face shows they are just as shallow.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 12:19 PM
3

Tried to load the FAQ page in the hope that someone out there asked the question: "What about men experiencing domestic violence?" but it will not load for me. Maybe it knows I'm male....
/r/MensRights22/10/16 12:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter