Jinjrax Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
-2	Hundreds of men have died in prison from coronavirus. Nonviolent Men are still being denied being let out of prison, even with the coronavirus. Now a single woman dies from the coronavirus and it gets its own headline Okay so we've shifted the goalposts to only major headlines got it. By "nowhere are there any articles" you meant not on any major news source. Okay. Then when you said google and just see the first results you actually meant google but only look at major news sources. My bad homie. here's a couple major news source talking about male suffering. The guardian in particular discusses the issues with masculinity affecting men:https://www.telegraph.co.uk/health-fitness/body/men-suffering-coronavirus…	/r/MensRights	05/05/20 12:33 PM
-2	Hundreds of men have died in prison from coronavirus. Nonviolent Men are still being denied being let out of prison, even with the coronavirus. Now a single woman dies from the coronavirus and it gets its own headline You've pivoted away from all of my questions. Nowhere has any article placed any emphasis on male suffering Why would you make such a sweeping easily disprovable statement? First page for just changing women to men on covid men's advice line: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-and-domestic-abuse/coronavirus-covid-19-support-for-victims-of-domestic-abuse discussion on male suffering during the crisis: https://www.rsph.org.uk/about-us/news/covid-19-a-men-s-health-emerg…	/r/MensRights	05/05/20 11:43 AM
1	Hundreds of men have died in prison from coronavirus. Nonviolent Men are still being denied being let out of prison, even with the coronavirus. Now a single woman dies from the coronavirus and it gets its own headline This sub is only for men's issues is it also sexist? How does the headline "woman dies in prison" turn this into and us vs them situation? Or draw a line in the sand? The first men to die do get their own article. This is my country's. It even used man in the title. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/26/first-prisoner-in-uk-dies-from-coronavirus Making a headline about the first woman dieing when already by that point dozens of men died in the same way is incredibly ignorant. Multiple ar…	/r/MensRights	05/05/20 09:16 AM
-1	We’re now on Wikipedia’s list of controversial subreddits! Let’s go equality! Don’t use violence or hate against feminists, that is their weapon Right, so you don't actually care about the harm it entails on other people, it's the fact that it can be used against you. Be the most reasonable, kind people we can be. Okay sure good stuff. win the war against feminism’s beliefs, but we will know that we are truly the better people if we do this. Well that lasted four seconds. Don't treat feminism/feminists as an obelisk. It's a diverse ideology with diverse advocates to the p…	/r/MensRights	18/02/20 12:23 PM
2	What bs is this "What bs is this" Biology?	/r/MensRights	17/09/19 10:20 AM
1	Everything you see Where are you pulling these numbers from? Males naturally have something like 50% more upper body strength, and their upper bound is much higher. Of course they're going to be the bulk of physical labour. But more than that goes into construction. There's planning; admin; drawing; modelling; funding. Basically all the bits that have to be put into place for anything to get done. People don't just show up on a plot of land and magic some building supplies into existence.There's also the implicati…	/r/MensRights	08/09/19 02:42 PM
2	Everything you see I explained in my reply why that's clearly false. You are dogwhistling under the guise of a pure narrative that "Men build things" whilst intentionally excluding and demeaning women. Address the issue. If you actually wanted to celebrate men's contributions you wouldn't do so at the expense of women. "Men built everything around you" is clearly a dogwhistle. "Men helped build everything around you" would be much more innocuous and still clearly celebrate male achievement. But it's phrased the wa…	/r/MensRights	08/09/19 01:44 PM
1	Everything you see Engage with me. Why do you disagree with me? Are you posting this because it genuinely think it helps men? If so, you're only feeding a toxic culture that in turn hurts regular men because other people see this "toxic masculinity" and generalise it to all men. These kinds of anti women posts are hurting men in the long run and you should stop making them	/r/MensRights	08/09/19 11:36 AM
1	Everything you see Yes this is obviously anti women? If two people create a research paper and you leave one of the authors out, but don't explicitly say he didn't write it, you're still clearly fucking over the second author and demeaning their contribution via the exclusion. "wow author one wrote a fantastic paper great job" Author two reads that and feels like shit for getting zero credit.	/r/MensRights	08/09/19 01:07 AM
5	Everything you see This is a dogwhistle and it's very common on this sub. You make a pretty vacuous statement that touts male achievement whilst disparaging or discounting the role of women or men who don't fit the narrative (here specifically men supporting their families are the only ones who pass apparantly). If you oppose the idea that society was built solely by men supporting their families you're "against men's rights it's just supporting male achievement stop trolling". People see this and are duped into t…	/r/MensRights	08/09/19 01:01 AM
0	Suicide prevention should be more focused on men than women because that's where the problem is How is this post for men it's just anti women. You're not trying to empathise with depressed suicidal males you're just shitting on depressed suicidal females to make yourself feel good. And then you shit on everyone by saying suicide is easy! WHY THE FUCK HAVEN'T YOU MANAGED IT THEN. You've complete dodged my entire comment and gone on to talk about an easy hot button issue for victory points. There ARE marches for prostate cancer you'd know that if you were actually a mens rights activist and …	/r/MensRights	27/08/19 07:17 AM
3	Suicide prevention should be more focused on men than women because that's where the problem is You can change your mind about killing yourself. Taking a pill can seem like an easy solution and then it fails to work. It may well be a cry for attention but why is that so wrong? If someone is lonely and desperate enough to kill themselves for a bit of love and attention why are we villifying that? If they genuinely make up the attempt then we can ask why do they feel the need to do so, what's driven them to need attention so much? Society? The person themselves? Plain old genetics? Killing y…	/r/MensRights	27/08/19 12:53 AM
-1	Suicide prevention should be more focused on men than women because that's where the problem is The sub is supposedly the forefront of male empowerment and no one has any clue why males might be more prone to following through on suicide. Confidence. Self assuredness. Aggression. Pure fucking testosterone. Women are more typically introspective. Male traits tend towards swift action while female traits tend towards careful action. Both are valuable. Making a decision and sticking to it is something males excel at and I suspect the primary drive behind the difference. To suggest my outrage …	/r/MensRights	27/08/19 12:48 AM
0	Suicide prevention should be more focused on men than women because that's where the problem is Explain to me how calling women too stupid to commit suicide properly is not both irrational and hateful? It is clearly disparaging of their ability and clearly out of touch with the reality that women face issues.	/r/MensRights	27/08/19 12:41 AM
-2	Suicide prevention should be more focused on men than women because that's where the problem is This is the post that vindicates every single person who calls this sub a bunch of women haters. This is vile cruel shit spewed from a nonsensical hate monger with the sole purpose of making women feel shitty about themselves. Depressed? Considering suicide? Oh you're just doing it for attention. Don't worry you're too incompetent to kill yourself. Only males have actual issues. Female issues are fake bullshit. Fuck this post. It's not even trying to raise an issue all it does is shit on women. …	/r/MensRights	27/08/19 12:29 AM
4	Suicide prevention should be more focused on men than women because that's where the problem is Men follow through with suicide for the same reason they make up most of the fortune 500 CEO lists. They make decisions and stick to them where women will continue to question themselves and introspect. Both mindsets are valuable, one allows for swift action and the other for careful action. Don't ascribe your personal feelings onto women's reasons for not following through on attempts. You don't understand their reasons and that's okay, but to say it is all purely a cry for attention or down to…	/r/MensRights	27/08/19 12:13 AM
-4	Suicide prevention should be more focused on men than women because that's where the problem is This post made me cry. Try and let go of your hatred of women. The way you talk about female suicide: they're too incompetent to kill #@ themselves, they just want attention, it's not that hard then why the fuck are you still alive homie if it's that easy? You're being so fucking hateful. How can you make those claims suicide is so fucking hard and complicated and horrible. It's the biggest decision of your whole life because it is your whole life on the line. Don't trivialise women's suffering,…	/r/MensRights	26/08/19 11:56 PM
1	It's OK to have an abortion if the child is a boy Then be anti pos-mothers and stop projecting it onto all women	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 06:28 AM
1	It's OK to have an abortion if the child is a boy And everyone, not just this sub, thinks she's garbage for it. It's not men's rights material. You can argue about the rights of unborn children and of pregnant mothers but the gender of the baby is incidental	/r/MensRights	12/08/19 06:26 AM
1	It's OK to have an abortion if the child is a boy You're trolling, i'm dumb for replying, well played mate	/r/MensRights	11/08/19 09:23 PM
1	It's OK to have an abortion if the child is a boy Why would she prioritise a female child over a male child when he can grow up and get a proper job and do good for society? The girl will probably start facecamming to 40 year old neckbeards that are married by the time she’s 12. Yes?	/r/MensRights	11/08/19 09:21 PM
1	It's OK to have an abortion if the child is a boy it's not a discussion i'm literally just trashing you for women hating and being the personification of the "all men's rights advocates are just women haters" vibe if you want a discussion we can have that instead, shoot sport whats the buzz	/r/MensRights	11/08/19 09:18 PM
0	It's OK to have an abortion if the child is a boy Not what I said, get over your victim complex. People who say this shit are bad. Men are men and not inherently good or bad. This dude i'm replying to be they male or female is a fucking dick	/r/MensRights	11/08/19 09:14 PM
-1	It's OK to have an abortion if the child is a boy Yes misogyny isn't contingent on the truth of your claims you donkey. More women are housekeepers than men, if you then phrase that as "men can get real jobs all women are good for is keeping the household" it's women hating. Also bashing women for "not doing good for society" meanwhile you're out here doing god's work spending your free time throwing shade at women online you're a fucking saint my dude how can I support your cause let me make you a sandwich	/r/MensRights	11/08/19 09:13 PM
0	It's OK to have an abortion if the child is a boy Maybe she's worried her male child will spout misogynist garbage on the internet like you?	/r/MensRights	11/08/19 04:59 PM
1	It's OK to have an abortion if the child is a boy This isn't men's rights everyone thinks she's a piece of shit for this. We can't enforce or justify laws that stop people smoking etc while pregnant it's got nothing to do with the gender of the kid, it'd be just as legal if she was having a girl.	/r/MensRights	11/08/19 04:56 PM
132	In response to the anti-manspreading chair, here is the anti-bagspreading chair. A chair that bags will fall off of. That looks a tad rough on the jubblies	/r/MensRights	04/08/19 12:27 AM
1	Norah Vincent spent months disguised as a man and she was shocked to understand that life of a man is difficult and most privileges are held by women in this society, a society which strongly protects women This sounds fake as hell Edit: Well not fake, just out of context and warped to fit a narrative. She's sympathetic to the male cause anyway, why spin it to sound like being a man for 18mnths just drove her insane with nothing else going on. Pretty grim from OP. Her book looks really interesting give it a read.	/r/MensRights	27/07/19 09:47 AM
2	Having Sex With versus Rape. Media bias at its best... Yeah and maybe it would be a positive experience, maybe it would irreversibly fuck my view of sex/adult relationships for life. Kid might have been raring to go we still want to protect him from the consequences till he has developed enough to come to an informed decision	/r/MensRights	25/07/19 11:44 PM
-1	Having Sex With versus Rape. Media bias at its best... It's just the legal definition, not media bias. Rape requires penetration, hasn't been expanded to cover envelopment. Hope the poor kid's alright.	/r/MensRights	25/07/19 11:40 PM
1	Can we get this sub back on track and start posting more things like this rather than just any random crime a woman commits? Get the sub back on track with more top of all time reposts. It's my turn to post this next week.	/r/PussyPassDenied	15/07/19 11:50 PM
1	He ain't wrong I don't agree that men and women's football are directly comparable products in the first place. If anything they're complimentary rather than substitutes. Inferior is just wrong too. Subjectively people enjoy men's football more because of the skill ceiling etc so it's a more desired product it's not superior	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/07/19 03:07 PM
1	He ain't wrong It's fine if it's based on revenue the whole point is that it isn't based on revenue in the US and its unfair it's a double standard compared to elsewhere	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/07/19 03:05 PM
0	He ain't wrong Fifa choosing to just pay by gender rather than by country is inherently unfair. Because it's not even based on revenue at that point it's just pure ignorance. If that's their prerogative they can do it, but it's not "fair".	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/07/19 12:32 PM
1	He ain't wrong The female players are producing better results than the male players and are earning less. The issue as you said is the demand. Male football is in demand so you pay more for the supply even if it is of lower quality. Also they're not "inefficient" because that implies wasting of resources, they're limited by physiology (and talent but that's true for blokes too), they're putting in effort at the same rate but their effort is less in demand, which is why you can argue they should be paid the sa…	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/07/19 12:24 PM
1	He ain't wrong The players don't do most of those things. The only real effort they can give is playing the sport. Fan retention and marketing are down to the cultural perception of the sport and the management of the team for the most part. If we're talking about purely equal pay for equal work the women are doing the same thing as the men. Talent will result in different levels of production but the women are all limited by physiology as well so they cannot produce as high results. You can pay people based o…	/r/PussyPassDenied	09/07/19 12:18 PM
-4	He ain't wrong If equal pay for equal work is okay the the male and female players should earn the same. The women's team work just as hard but they're limited by physiology. As it stands they're paid based on result/revenue generated in theory, though the US women's football team makes more money than the men's	/r/PussyPassDenied	08/07/19 11:21 AM
10	She already had $100 off Officer I admitted to stealing the karma why are you still arresting me?	/r/PussyPassDenied	14/06/19 01:26 AM
-1	Toxic Masculinity: Showing why men are not as good as women at collaborating But, what I said... That it's only the men who do such ", is a true fact. I don't know if we should prevent saying that to make women feel better about themselves. Nah that's not true my dude and it's frankly misogynistic that you think that way. I don't think you mean to be hurtful but that sort of thinking is really harmful towards women. Men are more likely to commit to "selfless acts of valour" and we should applaud that, encourage that, but to say "only" men do such things as a fact is just…	/r/MensRights	12/06/19 07:40 PM
-4	Toxic Masculinity: Showing why men are not as good as women at collaborating yeah, which is why i said Takes a video about men working together and what they take away from it is Because OP with that title is explicitly celebrating men at the expense of women, as are most of the top comments. Your statements are perfectly reasonable, but fail to address bossman's concern that this isn't really about men's rights, it's an excuse to say men>women. It could have been purely a celebration of masculine traits and male achievement but OP made it immediately clear what their ag…	/r/MensRights	12/06/19 07:27 PM
-3	Toxic Masculinity: Showing why men are not as good as women at collaborating You can find thousands of videos just like this, of Men risking their lives to protect others. But I don't think you can find even a handful of women doing the same. I get that you want to give men a sense of value and pride in their masculinity, what the blokes did in this video is very commendable and a good example of how men and male traits are important and good for society. However there are ways to go about celebrating accomplishments like this without demeaning women and femininity at th…	/r/MensRights	12/06/19 07:10 PM
-3	Toxic Masculinity: Showing why men are not as good as women at collaborating Takes a video about men working together and what they take away from it is: men can collaborate women don't men good women bad. We don't know why the women didn't help. Footwear? Muscle strength? Just plain old fear? Didn't think about going off to look for help because they're panicking/drawn in? If you see a video like this and the first thing you think is "oh wow can't believe those women didn't help" you are being misogynistic and this is why they call us toxic. We should be able to celebra…	/r/MensRights	12/06/19 06:32 PM
-3	Who agrees with this? I do! Because we consider it a human right for children to be cared for by their parents, but you would be granting special rights if you forced parents to be medically hooked up to their children because it breaches their right to bodily autonomy and carries serious risks	/r/MensRights	08/06/19 08:06 PM
1	Faced with the prospect of reproductive Rights equal to men feminists suddenly decide that forcing someone to pay for a kid they never wanted is slavery. But only for women. can you at least link these studies Yeah fair enough: Schwarz, R. (1968) "Septic Abortion" Page 10 quotes 500,000 deaths from abortion, most of them self induced If you want a more recent study: Grossman, D. (2018) "Lifetime prevalence of self-induced abortion among a nationally representative sample os u.s women" found 13.4% of women had an abortion, and 1.4% had a self induced abortion. So atleast 10% of abortions in 2018 in the US, are self-induced, is what the study concludes. If Nathonson i…	/r/MensRights	08/06/19 02:05 PM
1	Faced with the prospect of reproductive Rights equal to men feminists suddenly decide that forcing someone to pay for a kid they never wanted is slavery. But only for women. Self induced abortions are well documented. A 1968 study concluded more people died in total from self induced abortions than when performed by others (medical professional or not) despite fewer cases of self induced abortion. In short it's concerning. Nathanson is a partisan source. He was a pro life advocate for much of his career. Any study or census carried out finds upwards of 50000 deaths annually from unsafe abortions. Pure convenience is important. Having another human (if we grant that …	/r/MensRights	08/06/19 01:35 AM
4	Gender double standards infographic Right. So you're degrading/denying their manhood, whilst simultaneously saying they have a victim complex and are making up the persecution they receive regarding their masculinity. You're a class act mate. Stop hating on aggrieved men and start working on a logically consistent position.	/r/MensRights	08/06/19 01:16 AM
5	Gender double standards infographic "Horror and pain brought on by lack of a circumcision" Explain? "The benefits vastly outway any imaginary downsides" The downsides are documented. Disregarding botched cases resulting in lifelong trauma, "successful" operations are still traumatic according to the CDC. Where do we draw the line on bodily autonomy? Should we give babies cosmetic surgery because the benefits outweigh the downsides? When robotic parts become superior do we give them bionic legs? Or more closely related: should we f…	/r/MensRights	08/06/19 01:10 AM
6	Gender double standards infographic It is by definition mutilation. You are permanently removing a functional part of the body. It has an impact on your quality of life and should not be forced upon an unwitting child. Let them choose to do it when they are fully aware of the consequences.	/r/MensRights	08/06/19 01:02 AM
16	Faced with the prospect of reproductive Rights equal to men feminists suddenly decide that forcing someone to pay for a kid they never wanted is slavery. But only for women. Okay they can discuss anything they like but the crux of the issue is that it takes TWO to make a baby and then takes ONE to decide what happens with the baby. I understand that it's her body her choice but the male has zero say in what happens to the child after he inseminates which is why they feel entitled to be able to leave. Generally speaking society puts the welfare of the child above the welfare of the father and so forces child support in all cases. It's a really difficult issue don't h…	/r/MensRights	07/06/19 01:16 AM
1	I sometimes wish stuff like this was fake I still think you're a troll and i'm wasting my time based on these loaded ass or otherwise inane questions but i've got time to kill are you subbd here? Completely irrelevant question do you agree with the MRA? You mean the MRM? Like any movement i would advocate for certain policies and positions (say recognition of gender disparity in male homelessness/suicide rates and attempting to provide greater support for males and masculinity in education and in centres/shelters for the mentally ill) b…	/r/MensRights	06/06/19 06:21 PM
1	I sometimes wish stuff like this was fake Yeah there's a precedent of women dismissing violence against their male partners but this post in particular seems too vitriolic it's almost a villainous charicature. I agree the public acceptance/tolerance of male abuse relative to female abuse is shameful.	/r/MensRights	06/06/19 09:10 AM
1	I sometimes wish stuff like this was fake We're here to circlejerk the integrity of the post is irrelevent. Be it shopped, scripted, or simulated, I don't want to hear it	/r/MensRights	06/06/19 09:07 AM
1	I sometimes wish stuff like this was fake You're an obvious troll. You've gone immediately for ad hominem and failed to address my concerns, and misrepresented my comment history to try and bait me. The post title is "sometimes I wish stuff like this was fake". Anyone else who posted that it was fake got downvoted. You're accusing me of trying to fight whilst posturing and trying to bait me with disinformation and insults. Good try mate, not feeding you anymore. Go back under your bridge.	/r/MensRights	06/06/19 09:04 AM
1	I sometimes wish stuff like this was fake Have we got any proof it isn't fake? It's a random Facebook post we have no idea if the accounts are real, what they're saying is real, or if the post is even real	/r/MensRights	06/06/19 01:52 AM
1	I sometimes wish stuff like this was fake Get your blighted critical thinking out of here	/r/MensRights	06/06/19 01:48 AM
3	What if men go on a sex strike? This crap is why people write the sub off as women haters and incels	/r/MensRights	29/05/19 05:12 PM
3	Man leapt from girlfriend’s balcony after she pulled a gun on him and demanded oral sex. Because she demanded oral, it would be classified as sexual assault, not rape EDIT: Scratch that, it's sexual assault as is because there was no penetration, but it was frankly attempted rape	/r/MensRights	25/05/19 01:43 PM
459	Man leapt from girlfriend’s balcony after she pulled a gun on him and demanded oral sex. She's being charged with attempted murder amongst others but no rape charges it seems	/r/MensRights	25/05/19 09:46 AM
0	The Circle of Diversity Men only clubs still exist, there are examples like the boy scouts or certain gyms of women making their way into mens only clubs, but other than the gender distribution ratio they don't change anything so it doesn't matter, or atleast the relative value of both genders being able to use the club trumps the value of males having a club for only males. Anything that actually necessitates being men only like a gentleman's clubs has remained male only	/r/MensRights	13/05/19 05:48 PM
0	The Circle of Diversity Any examples of this cycle actually happening though? Men aren't being pushed out of video games or comic books. Some games and comics have been changed to appeal to female demographics, but those pieces of media sell shit and don't get produced anymore, like the iron man comics from a while back (or alternatively produce decent content that can be enjoyed by all like the thor comics). There's no exclusion of men or changing of the rules at a systematic level, there are some attempts to make cha…	/r/MensRights	13/05/19 05:44 PM
1	The Circle of Diversity Then why do girls want to join the Boy Scouts? If camping and hiking is what your members want, then yes, their organization needs fixing. As I already said you can't do everything in one organization. Girl scouts cannot cater to the needs of every girl because those needs often conflict with one another. "Girls" aren't a collective they have individual needs, and you can't have girl scouts offer both their more traditional set of activities that 90% of girls want and the more traditionally boyi…	/r/MensRights	13/05/19 02:05 PM
-2	The Circle of Diversity You can't do everything in one organization? Girl scouts doesn't need fixing it just doesn't cater to people who want to hike and camp etc. How on earth does girls mere presence in activities "fuck up the safe space"?? They aren't changing anything, and we double the number of youths who can get that much needed development from boy scouts.	/r/MensRights	13/05/19 12:01 PM
-2	The Circle of Diversity These aren't cycles you're jamming pieces together to form a frankenstein's narrative. Captain marvel wasn't shoehorned any more than the guardians were. She didn't disrupt anything and was used sparingly. Brie larson not wanting criticism is just a single person being petty and deluded its not a decent example of a shift in opinion or an industry its one person being a div. Star wars has always had women in it a female protag doesn't change anything. She's a shit protagonist but that's endemic …	/r/MensRights	13/05/19 11:11 AM
-1	The Circle of Diversity I don't think this is happening in boy scouts. Stage 1 sure, girls want to be able to join and do more traditionally masculine activities I'm perfectly fine with that. More members more funding so you're not excluding blokes. Nothing else in boy scouts has changed? Activities aren't being banned, boys aren't being replaced or kicked out. I think boys and girls typically have separate regiments too so they're not even IN the same spaces as the boys.	/r/MensRights	13/05/19 11:01 AM
0	The Circle of Diversity That's not an example though that's just an assertion. I personally haven't encountered any workplace where men have been systematically replaced by women. Affirmative action results in some men losing access which is perhaps the kernel of truth I mentioned but we're not being kicked out etc	/r/MensRights	13/05/19 10:29 AM
-8	The Circle of Diversity Any examples of this happening? I think there's a kernel of truth to this idea but it's blown way out of proportion.	/r/MensRights	13/05/19 01:31 AM
2	Pay Gap? Non-executive isn't a job title, comparing apples with oranges... "Women working part time earn very large amount of money, not as much as man working full time earning ludicrous amount of money"	/r/MensRights	04/03/19 02:28 AM
1	Feminists' opinion on false rape accusations poe's law	/r/MensRights	23/02/19 02:27 AM
1	Girlfriend spermjacking boyfriend and crying "Rape!" top /legaladvice post got over 12,500 upvotes and got magically "[removed]" because it shows women can be criminals too Any evidence that was the reason for removal rather than the usual fare?	/r/MensRights	11/02/19 03:18 PM
2	If this was a woman she'd be praised, but since it's a man, he is made fun of for his appearance The woman would also be made fun of for her appearance, just by different equally assholish people	/r/MensRights	01/02/19 09:45 AM
3	Sarah Jeong is lying, her "cruel to old white men" wasn't a response to anything, she said it first. Never claimed that responding in kind justified her actions. The claim in the post is that she's lying; the evidence that she is lying is fallacious. You're misconstrueing me now lol.	/r/MensRights	03/08/18 10:36 AM
4	Sarah Jeong is lying, her "cruel to old white men" wasn't a response to anything, she said it first. Agreed. Hard to determine the veracity of her claims to be "responding in kind". Using the two examples she gave and interpreting then as the ONLY examples and that she was DIRECTLY responding to them is misconstrueing her statement.	/r/MensRights	03/08/18 02:25 AM
63	Fat women are "plus sized" but fat men are "overweight" Shocker, most people are shallow superficial and stupid. The 'plus sized' blokes should have been interviewed too. They're probably in the same position. You cant help what you're attracted to. What matters is how entitled you are and whether you can be realistic and settle.	/r/MensRights	08/10/17 11:32 AM