~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | Daily Beast Article Attacks Reddit's Red Pill Forum As A Site for "Women Haters", "Misogynists" and "Rape Sympathizers"Whataboutism is deflecting critique by pointing at something else and not directly answering the question/critique, so no, I have not engaged in it. People are criticising trp - you post your articles - that is whataboutism. It's a coined term with meaning, so it's not like I'm making this up. I'm also not crying. In fact I've been posting here (oh and I have been posting to this sub for years, just very very infrequently) in a very neutral tone. To be honest, you seem much more upset than me. Y… | /r/MensRights | 26/04/17 05:42 AM |
| 18 | Daily Beast Article Attacks Reddit's Red Pill Forum As A Site for "Women Haters", "Misogynists" and "Rape Sympathizers"Again, how does this make trp less of a shit hole? All your responses seem to go to "there are other bad things". I don't see the hypocrisy, I see a lot of whataboutism. I don't see anyone defending said articles that you posted. I don't see anyone arguing and linking to trp in order to make seem them less bad. And as for Cosmo, and similar magazines, they were (probably still are, but I really don't know) also frequently criticised for printing misogynistic articles by feminist groups (mainly d… | /r/MensRights | 26/04/17 05:23 AM |
| 22 | Daily Beast Article Attacks Reddit's Red Pill Forum As A Site for "Women Haters", "Misogynists" and "Rape Sympathizers"Do you honestly believe that these articles are a) the same tone/attitude as the examples linked in the imgur album, b) are all made by the same group and c) somehow making the trp people that said those things less bad? Like, I'll agree, those articles are shit. Still, the trp shit in that album is worse and a lot more hate filled. | /r/MensRights | 26/04/17 05:12 AM |
| 14 | Humans of New York drawing attention to the reality of domestic violence and paternity rightsThere's always at least a few comments in the top with "let's hear the other side" if a guy talks badly about his ex gf/wife on hony. Strangely enough, this does not happen when a chick talks bad about her ex bf/husband. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/15 06:35 AM |
| 11 | Surely everyone carrying out circumcisions should be registered? No! As the law currently stands, anyone can carry out surgery on a baby boy’s penis without qualification, training or regulation.How is the post before you "Jew hating"? Are you not allowed to say anything bad about a groups traditions without also "hating" them? This is about as stupid as it gets. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/14 06:48 PM |
| 1 | Two months ago I made an infographic on male privilege, well, it sucked, so here's a new and better one! [Fixed]What? You'd obviously also mention how many men and how many women are in the army /in industry jobs. The point here is easy: If 95 % of the personal in the army is male, it is absolutely expected that 95 % of deaths should be men. That there are more men in the army or in industrial jobs is also a problem, absolutely, but the graph is not talking about that. This is talking about deaths and accidents and those should include a weighting or at least the total numbers of men and women in those ar… | /r/MensRights | 26/09/13 11:49 PM |
| 12 | Two months ago I made an infographic on male privilege, well, it sucked, so here's a new and better one! [Fixed]Well, he still has a point. If 10% of the army is female, the statistic should reflect that. Same with industrial accidents. Will most likely still have men at disadvantages, but it's a bit more "honest" that way. For the other points, yup, weighting can be ignored. | /r/MensRights | 26/09/13 08:57 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter