TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JoBoltaHaiWoHotaHai Archive

View 0 posts and 48 comments by JoBoltaHaiWoHotaHai on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

Nope. That post wants to create a narrative that there is a higher number of men committing suicide because a lot of them are abusers who are doing it to make their victims suffer more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/26 04:53 AM
7

A lot of larpers and RW, centrists in this sub. One man here defined himself as "fiscally left, socially right".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/26 04:33 AM
21

This is outrageous
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 05:12 AM
20

I said the same thing to a friend of mine, when he mentioned this case. It's funny how feminists use that case to "prove" how all men are awful, and women are the biggest victim. But on this case, women had a complete different attitude
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 08:47 AM
38

There was a post on this sub about how there are men who play male feminist, and how women calling them "performative feminists" is actually sexist. And I really wanted to say (in that post, but I didn't) that it's not sexist at all. Them calling out those men is actually integral for us. It's basically how Conservative women being a yes woman to misogynist men actually uphold misogyny. In the same vein, these men who date/marry a men-hating woman uphold misandry. "Men from other tribes/races/na…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/26 06:34 PM
24

"Focused on a woman who you figured was unlikely to tell anyone if you kept going" Why do some researchers set very vague questions sometimes. It's not even like it's worded in a way to be more precise of a situation, it's vague af.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/05/26 12:29 PM
6

Love this song. The video really said, "but people aren't going to really see a man can be a victim"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/26 03:34 PM
45

Galloway is a grifter who wants to be Joe Rogan of the centre. Nothing he says holds much value.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 05:38 AM
6

Psypost 🥀
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 11:40 AM
-2

Its about people from left shaming and insulting him over cross dressing It's pretty vague though. This sub is infested with centrist men who don't want leftists to shame people om the right for their hypocrisy. Unless OP had mentioned the particular instances they are talking about. I'll assume that the interaction on this post, including by OP, is that of a centrist. The post also argues that the husband should be above the criticism of shaming for hypocrisy BTW. Which is absurd
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 06:23 PM
4

Bullshit argument! You cannot win against your oppressors by following the rules they made for you, which they themselves don't follow. Shaming him for his hypocrisy is a fair game. As it would have been if it were a woman and her politician husband
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 03:35 PM
3

Fair.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 03:33 PM
2

Why can't they focus on what Noam is doing and not her husband Por que no los dos Highlighting his cross dressing and shaming him for that ain't it. Shaming him for being a cross dresser is a no go. But shaming him for having anti-LGBTQ opinions while being a cross dresser is the only way
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 03:31 PM
3

What toxic shaming?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 03:17 PM
1

You are not. Your words "not like someone" makes it sound like the wife of this guy is a just a rude woman. Which is not the case. I’m just not allowing you to frame it the way you want You aren't allowing me to frame my comments the way I want? Tf does that even mean?! Your morals and ethics end when you declare the person on the other side evil. Holy shit, I spent all my energy arguing a fucking centrist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 02:30 PM
-2

How is shaming a person for their hypocrisy "throwing out all your usual moral values"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 02:11 PM
4

His wife's actions are a separate matter altogether. So, people don't check compatibility with their partners based on political stance?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 02:10 PM
-1

person that we don’t like Mate, please refer to another comment I made. I'll reply back to you when you don't misrepresent my comments
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 02:04 PM
33

Absolutely! Women of awful powerful men are always seen as a victim. You can see it in case of billionaires and politicians. Elon Musk's partners are victims, JD Vance's wife is a victim, Trump's wife is a victim, and various other examples. As if these women didn't choose their partner. The authority to choose partner is suddenly forgotten in such cases. Women are stripped of their responsibility, and are judged as if they are children who couldn't have made a better decision
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 02:04 PM
4

Is he know for political speeches By association, yes. Is he in a position of power By association, yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 01:56 PM
13

someone that we don’t like Not even close to what I said lmao gross misrepresentation of what I was actually saying, and changing the meaning of it as if being anti-LGBTQ is merely a preference. You should stick to countering things that I wrote instead of making up arguments in your head and fighting them in the comments
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 01:54 PM
5

Not of your sexuality. But shamed for your hypocrisy. These people want their cake and eat it too. Being in a powerful position gives them privilege to not face consequences of the actions they want other less-privileged people to face. Like how that anti-abortion republican woman changed her stance, when she went to get a procedure done due to health complications, but she was denied at first because of the anti-abortion rulings.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 01:46 PM
2

But he is the spouse of a powerful woman who is (even if by association) anti-LGBTQ.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 12:41 PM
21

Yes, because being a hypocrite is definitely same as being short
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 08:55 AM
105

To me it's the opposite. I find it hypocritical to only shame the spouse of a powerful person, when the spouse is a man and the powerful person is a woman. If this was a powerful hetero man who associated with anti-LGBTQ people, and the wife turned out to be a bisexual or something. The wife would be considered a victim. Both the spouses, man or woman, chose to be with a person who is anti-LGBTQ, so by association they are anti-LGBTQ as well. And shouldn't really be considered a victim in any wa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/26 08:23 AM
23

It's really funny how they are empathetic to both trans men and trans women, and calling it a humanitarian crisis. What an ugly truth
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/26 03:50 PM
8

This sub seems to have gone completely 180° on this topic seemingly. Imagine advocating for forced conscription of exclusively men. Shame
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 11:52 AM
13

Would you call your friends "short" in the same way, if they are acting badly?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 05:18 AM
23

I bet AOC works with men under 5'10 and isn't bigoted about them ... when they're on her side. human nature So, it's the "I have black friends, I cannot be racist"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 03:11 AM
1

Don't worry! Most people on this sub aren't leftists either
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/12/25 11:02 AM
24

Scott Galloway is just a liberal looking at men's issues from a feminist lens, or at least from the lens of a privileged old man with liberal morals. He insists that men embrace traditional roles, even if there are major changes in the society. Although he has some opinions on women which will be "not so palatable" to feminists, most "boss girl" feminists (feminists that he interacts with the most) wouldn't mind his opinions on women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/25 02:10 PM
-1

while Henry 8 abused his power for his own benefit, its not like he's representative of male royalty as a whole, or rich people How?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/25 03:07 PM
-1

I don't think discussing this topic here is valuable, unless we do some purging. There are lots of RW folks in this sub. Anyway, while I believe that patriarchy hurts both common women and men, men are also unintentional beneficiary of the system. We can all agree patriarchy exists to benefit a few powerful people at the top. Historically, those people have only been men. So, they made rules where they get more power, making it just not about class, but also gender. One example that I think high…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/25 03:13 AM
1

Gossip isn't evil. But gossip isn't public service announcement In fact, gossip could actually turn dark turn much easily than it will ever become a public service announcement. Gossips still get people killed. In India, you can be killed or arrested based on gossips about being a cow killer, or an instigator (of course, you have to be on the opposite side of the ruling party). Gossips got women killed in the past (Salem with trial), Gossips got men and women killed in the past for being homosex…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/25 03:01 PM
91

Funny thing is that US American women were claiming that the app was just help out women, when the app is called "tea"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/25 04:15 AM
-1

Then you basically want the society to keep hold of things which benefit you, but let go off things which don't? Lmao very progressive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 03:11 PM
2

You can be fiscally left and social moderate or conservative. What does that mean? I really hate when people go round about ways to just call themselves reactionaries on Reddit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/25 05:40 AM
63

Society believes women are morally superior to men and hence can't be superficial on any level, hence women would NEVER not be attracted to a man just because of his looks I wish I lived in the same delusional world as those people. I don't understand why women are so adamant on wanting to be proven morally superior anyway, this has always hurt them more. I guess because they can just blame men this time?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 12:26 PM
7

Exactly! There's a reason why the app was called "Tea". It wasn't made for social service or even from good faith
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/25 05:09 AM
0

What does that sentence even mean???
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/25 05:04 AM
9

Like for india it's farming skills and ability to not leave the family cause of attachment and find work or spiritual attainment What do you mean by farming skills? Women are very much involved in farming across the country. Not leave family because of attachment in what context? In marriages in India, women are considered to leave their parents' house to live with her now husband's family. Her husband's family becomes her primary family. I don't even know what you meant by spiritual attainment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/25 05:29 PM
2

Or cunt?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/25 03:04 PM
2

passing them off as American accounts would be more advantageous to them I have a news for you, buddy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/25 06:55 AM
6

Most Indians who wouldn't mind are happy about wars are currently wanking off to Israel, the "positive" sentiments towards Russia is mostly based on past relationships. No average Indian is more supportive towards Russia or against-Ukraine than people of other countries. Western nations are a little too focused on Russia-Ukraine because of white-people bias.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/25 06:52 AM
6

I highly doubt people hate Russians the way they hate Indian men. People aren't as racist towards Russian folks or even against Russian men in particular as compared to against Indian men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/25 06:40 AM
7

There is also a certain amount of geopolitical frustration with India because a lot of Indian people online have been defending Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and spreading Russian propaganda talking points. Unless you are talking about the paid ones, it's false. Propaganda for Israel on the other hand is completely different. India not taking stance against Russia being seen as anti-west by Western nations is absolutely dumb and self-centered.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/25 06:39 AM
7

Exactly this. You can never be "one of the good ones" in any context. One day if you keep accepting any form of bigotry, your head would be the next. No matter how much you'd like to prove yourself to be different.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/25 06:35 AM
7

By subscribing, you’re not just funding my work, you’re fueling a revolution. Your support allows me to travel, report, and even pull off pranks on the powerful, shining a light where they’d rather stay hidden. It’s independent journalism with a dash of mischief, and none of it happens without you. Together, we’re keeping powerful people accountable and proving that real change starts with bold, fearless action. Thank you for being part of this movement—you’re making it all possible "Give me mon…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/25 01:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter