TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JoePesciOfGoneFishin Archive

View 0 posts and 86 comments by JoePesciOfGoneFishin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

None of those reports said anything about "she was mad he had a girlfriend so she claimed she was raped." You made that part up.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/18 02:20 PM
-4

. She tells her friend she was raped cause shes pissed. Got a source on this one? Because ive never read that anywhere and sounds like something you just made up
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/18 04:38 AM
-21

That all has absolutely nothing to do with the incorrect statement you made above. I don't care about debating the facts of the case and I'm not defending the girl, just pointing out that your statement was totally wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/18 04:26 AM
1

Well you must not remember it too well now because none of the stuff you said actually happened. She reported it as a rape that very same night. It was widely reported that she didn't actually identify Winston until weeks later. https://sports.vice.com/en_us/article/wn33gm/the-jameis-winston-rape-lawsuit-has-some-damaging-new-information
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/18 04:12 AM
2

You wouldn't need a court case because the university decision is to a different standard than an actual court decision.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/18 04:03 AM
1

That's not true at all. Winston's accuser went to police that night and said she was raped, got a rape kit and everything within a couple hours of the incident. She had no idea who the guy was, didn't identify him until she saw him on campus weeks later. Also her friends didn't really say anything because she left them at the bars they had been at to go back to Winston's apartment.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/18 04:01 AM
1

Could also be that they are actually guilty of some kind of school violation given that this happened at Sacred Heart University.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/05/18 03:51 AM
5

I think the American "antifa" is like when there would be some wannabe gang in Little Rock, Arkansas, and they called themselves the Bloods because they heard of a gang in Los Angeles with the same name. Antifa in Europe have been a thing for decades, and they actually go out and beat the shit out of fascist groups. I remember 10 plus years ago going to the rabbit hole watching antifa brawl videos on YouTube and they were pretty badass.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/18 02:58 AM
1

Newspapers don't paint anyone as a potential rapist they just report on allegations being made against someone. Newspapers don't invent those allegations. If people make their own assumptions based on those legal (and public) allegations, then isn't your problem really with those people and not with newspapers?
/r/MensRights19/12/17 09:19 PM
0

There is no law about minors, newspapers can report on it if they want to. Libel is a civil action that relates to newspapers printing something that is untrue and harms someone's reputation. There's no law against the newspaper printing something that's wrong (that's called prior restraint and is unconstitutional), but there are consequences after the fact if they do so. Gag orders only apply to people within the court (lawyers, witnesses, defendant) and tells them they can't talk about the pre…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 09:17 PM
1

Sorry I meant only the USA
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:58 PM
0

Nope. There is no law that in any way inhibits what the press can report
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:55 PM
1

So somewhere in there you created a new law abridging freedom of the press? Wouldnt that be unconstitutional?
/r/MensRights19/12/17 02:34 AM
1

Newspapers don't demonize though, they just report on allegations. Your problem isnt the media, its how people react to it and forget about innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 02:01 AM
2

Sometimes they do like the 12 year old girls who stabbed their friend becausr they thought Slenderman wanted them to
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:54 AM
1

Lol
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:45 AM
2

No, Congress actually can make no law abridging the press. I'm sure I've heard that somewhere.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:23 AM
1

I've never heard of that case, but the court has consistently ruled that the First and 14th amendment rights of reporters trump any state laws, so that would not hold up. As long as the information is legally obtained, there's nothing the government can do to stop you from reporting on it. You know how I know that Wisconsin law you cited has been overruled ... because we know who Anissa Weier and Morgan Geyser are.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:18 AM
1

That's not true at all. I've been a reporter and editor for two decades, covered the courts for a lot of that. It absolutely is not prohibited to name minors or rape victims, but newspapers generally do so as an editorial decision. They do publish names of minors or rape victims if the circumstances call for it, however.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:08 AM
1

What if a reporter obtains that information of their own initiative... why can't they publish it now?
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:04 AM
1

Sorry, I assume we're talking about the United States ... even on stories from the UK. Since most people on Reddit are from America.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:03 AM
1

There is no such thing as a legal protection from printing the names of minors. Newspapers can do it if they want to, there's nothing stopping them.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:02 AM
1

There is no such thing as a right to keep accusations against you from being published. The court system is open to the public.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 01:00 AM
1

There is no law requiring anonymity for children or for victims of crimes, newspapers just do that as an editorial decision. And newspapers don't publish "so the public can drag accused people through the coals" but because they have a duty to the public to report on allegations against someone. There is nothing wrong in them doing that, it keeps an informed society and shines light on the legal system.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 12:59 AM
2

The media should be able to publish anything because Congress can't make any law determining what they can or can't publish.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 12:54 AM
2

You are incorrect. There is no law prohibiting the media from reporting the name of victims or minors, though they often so so out of courtesy. I know this because I have been a newspaper reporter and editor for the past 20 years and covered the courts for much of that. But you don't need to be a journalist to complete a simple Google search and see that you are wrong. http://www.splc.org/blog/splc/2013/03/reporting-on-steubenville-rape-case-a-timely-reminder-on-publishing-names-of-juveniles-cri…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 12:45 AM
0

Rape shield laws do not trump the First Amendment and do not prohibit news outlets from reporting the name of victims if they want to publish it... You do know that, right? The Supreme Court cases are Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn and Florida Star v. B. J. F. You literally don't know the law, and you clearly didn't even read the site you linked because it says nothing about publications.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 12:35 AM
1

Ao you want the government be able to decide what the press can and cannot publish? You realuze how terrifying that is...right?
/r/MensRights18/12/17 11:11 PM
0

There is no law keeping the victims name secret. They are free to publish it if they want to and do in some circumstances. So again. How do you prohibit them from publishing the nake of the accused?
/r/MensRights18/12/17 11:10 PM
-1

So abridging freedom of speech and of the press, then? Wow that's a terrifying solution to a nonexistent problem.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 11:09 PM
9

It would seem pretty clear-cut wouldn't it?
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:00 PM
4

Florida newspapers always published the name of the accused the "Florida man" thing is a meme.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:29 PM
2

You mean the sedition act that has been repeatedly proven unconstitutional and is not ever prosecuted because of it being unconstitutional. The one that was fully rebuked in Brandenberg v. Ohio? Because if you do then that's not a good argument.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:22 PM
1

It's 100 percent true that the person is accused of rape. That's why newspapers say someone is accused of rape and not that they raped someone. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:19 PM
–

Too bad for the Duke lacrosse players. Their trial took place in secret and they're all in prison now. We gotta trust that the process worked though because we weren't allowed to see any of it.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:03 PM
1

Reporting on public allegations made by police does no harm. It does good.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:02 PM
1

The public has a right to know public allegations against someone in the community, though. If you kept the name of defendants secret, you know where the Duke lacrosse players would be right now? Some prison outside of Durham.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:01 PM
–

Well I found out about an ongoing investigation and decided to report on it. I have a duty as a journalist to keep the public informed and that's what I'm doing. How, realistically, do you think you can stop me?
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:00 PM
0

Seems like you probably haven't actually read the first amendment. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:58 PM
–

Freedom of the press is a cornerstone in American democracy. It's a very bad thing to take it away for no good reason.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:55 PM
0

Yeah that's true I assume we're talking about the United States, since most people on the site are from the US. I mentioned in other comments assuming were taling about the US but forgot in this one.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:36 PM
-2

So how do you "keep his name a secret" without violating the First Amendment, if you please? If the trial isn't secret, as you say, what stops me as a reporter from walking in and reporting on the trial?
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:33 PM
–

If you want a real and non-sarcastic answer, police say proving anything regarding rape is really, really hard. It's really hard to bring enough evidence to move a rape case forward and it's equally hard to prove that an allegation is false. It's why so few cases go all the way to trial compared to other crimes.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:31 PM
5

That's not true at all.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:30 PM
-2

If you're not being sarcastic, the First Amendment says the government can't tell a news outlet what they are or aren't allowed to report about.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:29 PM
-1

There are no "anonymity rules" for rape victims and children involved in criminal cases. It's up to the media outlet if they choose to report those, but there are absolutely no laws against it and there CAN be no laws against it as that would be unconstitutional.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:28 PM
–

In your scenario, what if the mayor of a town is accused of raping a bunch of little boys. Say I'm an investigative reporter for the local paper. Using my investigative skills, I found out about those allegations and report on them. Then what would happen?
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:26 PM
-7

OK, assuming we're talking about the United States, how do you keep his name a secret without destroying the First Amendment?
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:21 PM
-3

That's unconstitutional, though. Unless you want to tear up the First Amendment.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:17 PM
–

It's very UNconstitutional, actually. You can't have a First Amendment, an open court system, AND keep the names of defendants secret.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:16 PM
1

Who intervened? No one ever stopped the dude from beating them up, they held back the little dude from continuing to go after him when the victim backed away.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/17 04:43 AM
–

I think the issue from the state's perspective is that there was no prosecutorial/police wrongdoing that sent him to prison. It really wasn't the state's fault he was convicted like other cases where prosecutors or police lie or hide evidence. It was just a terrible lie that put him in jail.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 04:08 AM
–

I mean, that's kinda what she said. In the video she said "I may go to jail, but I have to right this wrong."
/r/MensRights15/05/17 04:07 AM
3

Hey what's that 88 at the end of your username mean?
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/17 01:38 AM
2

"the thing in the yellow shirt" "I harbor no prejudices based on sex or race"
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/17 01:34 AM
5

Nah they just like seeing feeeemales get hit. It probably makes them feel better for all the girls ignoring them all the time.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/17 01:30 AM
2

You seem legit triggered.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/17 01:28 AM
1

Someone else linked to the full video above, you can see that the people are surrounding those two girls laughing at them. You wanna talk about pussy pass? How about a full grown dude picking on a girl for who the fuck knows what reason knowing that there's not really anything she can do about it. Good on her for not taking the bullying. Fuck all the virgins in here who just like to see girls get hit because it satisfies their hatred of all the girls who won't ever talk to them.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/17 01:21 AM
4

She didn't start the fight. She is surrounded by people bullying her. She just had enough and fought back.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/17 06:06 PM
-2

Yeah but why did the fight start? In the video, theres a group of people surrounding and bullying the white girls. Why are we celebrating that she had enough and hit back?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/17 06:04 PM
–

The horse on the right has a bunch of saddles and one of them says "Different career choices." That's an advantage, not a disadvantage.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 03:17 AM
-1

You just linked me to some random dude bullshitting some theory from his ass about what he thinks happened.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 03:05 AM
-1

This wasn't a case of false accusation, it was mistaken accusation.
/r/MensRights16/07/16 01:43 AM
–

In one case, Kost threatened, harassed and told one of the victims to kill herself, deputies said. The girl attempted suicide and was hospitalized, Ramirez said. KPHO reports that even with the victim in the hospital, Kost continued to harass her, causing her to leave the state. In another case, the station says, a victim became pregnant after she was allegedly raped, according to PCSO. "One of the victims actually became pregnant because of the sexual assault, and she subsequently had an aborti…
/r/MensRights20/06/16 06:12 PM
–

He was indicted by a grand jury and sentenced by a judge on the strength of the death threats he made, which the prosecutors would have presented in court. He's also (presumably) going to trial, where this will all come out. It's only his side that's using the media to win public support, so people prone to that narrative are eating it up and assuming that everything his defense lawyer said are true.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 04:51 PM
0

They were ready to go to trial last summer but defense motions pushed it back. And yes, they fought the defense motion to go searching through thousands of Facebook messages because that sounds and awful lot like a fishing expedition and that's exactly what a prosecutor is supposed to do... just like his defense is supposed to push for all of it. This is all just normal court proceedings in what sounds like a very solid case of a kid who's a serial rapist. They've said over and over in these sto…
/r/MensRights20/06/16 12:50 PM
–

Who is dragging their feet? The trial was set to start last summer but defense motions have pushed it back
/r/MensRights20/06/16 12:39 PM
–

They have evidence, though. The prosecutor sounds very, very confident that they're going to win the case based on the physical evidence they've got against him.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 05:40 AM
–

What makes you think they have no evidence at all?
/r/MensRights20/06/16 05:39 AM
–

The police and prosecutors have said in previous update that they have plenty of physical evidence against him. I guess it will all come out in trial.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 05:38 AM
–

He's being held without bail because police and prosecutors have text messages from him to at least one (possibly more) accuser threatening to kill her.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 05:37 AM
–

You're right I copied the same link by accident. Here's the correct one: http://www.trivalleycentral.com/san_tan_valley_sentinel/local_news/kost-attorneys-tell-judge-alleged-victims-may-have-set-him/article_416718d4-da31-11e4-8c7e-ef10eef086b2.html
/r/MensRights20/06/16 05:35 AM
–

Police and prosecutors do have the text message threatening to kill one of the girls, it was the reason he wasn't given bail. Here's the conversation where they say he raped them: Girl 1: Oh well, for Tyler what were you all thinking Girl 2: He needs to be taught a lesson Girl 3: We need to come up with a plan. And yes. We should sacrifice him to Satan. Girl 4: We'll teach him a lesson alright. Girl 2: Yes!!! Girl 3: Agreed >:) Later in the conversation: Girl 3: Lets (expletive deleted) with his…
/r/MensRights20/06/16 05:13 AM
–

There's no evidence that 13 girls conspired to falsely accuse him. There's evidence that three girls were conspiring on Facebook to enact some kind of revenge, but even in their conversations they said it was because he had raped them. And the prosecution says they have plenty of other evidence, including messages he sent threatening to kill them if they spoke out. It will all come out in trial, if it gets that far and he doesn't plead out. This is not the case and this is not the kid to hitch y…
/r/MensRights20/06/16 04:33 AM
1

Should people convicted of rape be raped too? A justice system built on vengeance is a terrible idea
/r/PussyPassDenied24/12/15 08:36 PM
–

Well... He did it though.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:58 AM
–

What's even wrong with this story though? Seriously, there's nothing outrageous about this other than the dishonest title
/r/MensRights05/12/15 03:55 AM
–

How about for less men to be jailed instead?
/r/MensRights17/11/15 05:27 AM
–

This story said it started with a male tipster: http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-arizona-teen-serial-rapist-18-girls-victims-police-say-20140502-story.html The same story has police accusing him of raping by force. Seriously, is there anything you're gonna say about about this case that isn't 100 percent fabricated?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 12:28 AM
–

Huh? All the stories I read say the tip was anonymous? Can you give me a source where it was identified as one of the same three? Also all the other stories I see say he's accused of using force, not just a statutory situation... Do you have anything backing up your side?
/r/MensRights09/04/15 12:15 AM
–

This started when police got a tip he had raped some girls and they uncovered other victims through their own investigation. That doesn't mean all or some are telling the truth, but this isn't a case where someone went shouting rape and others joined in.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 09:40 PM
0

In the story the DA said he's got a lot of evidence on the kid, with or without these three. I can't find where but the reason he was denied bail last year was the sheriffs investigation found he threatened to kill or blackmail his alleged victims.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 09:32 PM
–

What evidence is that? Even the kids defense attorney isn't claiming that they conspired to make false claims, cause that's not anywhere in their conversations. In fact in the private conversations they DO say he raped girls. Even if they are somehow lying, that still leaves 10 other girls accusing him. This is a terrible fucking wagon to hitch the MRA cause to.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 02:44 AM
-23

Other than the fact that the title has the word "bully" in it, how do you know any context at all to this? It's a video that starts mid-fight with no clue as to why it started or who started it.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/02/15 05:54 AM
-1

Is there anything at all written about this that can corroborate the story? Because all I see here is a women's bathroom and what's likely a family/handicapped accessible one. I've seen a lot of places where the women's room is next to a family room and the men's is a little further down the wall. Do you have anything that proves this is what you say it is?
/r/MensRights04/11/14 03:10 AM
1

How can you say she hasn't been affected? She had to drop out of school, and I doubt she is welcome in Tallahassee ever again.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 02:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter