TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JoeThankYou Archive

View 1 posts and 36 comments by JoeThankYou on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
94

this has "hello fellow edgy teens!" all over it.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 01:07 PM
70

We should all take it upon ourselves to take care of them. Wait...
/r/MensRights02/02/19 10:33 AM
2

Jesus Christ, that's not what I'm saying. I agree that the meaning of words matter in society as a whole. Censoring language, political correctness, doublespeak, thought control, etc. are all doubleplusungood. All I'm saying is that it's stupid to argue who gets to define words. People will say whatever they want to say and mean whatever they want to mean by it. The fact that they use masculine in a way that you might not approve of and they aren't a man means absolutley nothing about the intent…
/r/MensRights30/01/19 03:50 AM
1

No they don't. I can define feminism as equal rights for men and women and say that I'm a feminist. I can also define feminism as a belief that women deserve privilege over men and say i am against feminism. The word doesn't matter as long as i define it when i use it. Should i only use that word as a woman thinks i should just because she is a woman? That's a fucking stupid and useless argument.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 01:47 AM
1

That's not at all what I'm saying. of course you need to define your words to convey ideas. I'm saying how an individual uses or defines a word is not important, what matters is their ideas.
/r/MensRights30/01/19 12:20 AM
0

Discussions about ideas have value. Discussions about semantics do not.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 11:11 PM
1

This whole thing is stupid. Who cares how any individual uses a word? Language is not controlled by any individual or group, it's a tool of expression that just emerges chaotically. If "masculine" begins to have a negative connotation just like what happened to "retarded", I'm going to start using "Terry Crewsness" in the place of masculine
/r/MensRights29/01/19 08:49 PM
2

i did, what's your point?
/r/MensRights03/11/18 12:32 AM
1

how the fuck does that matter? it's still a racist statement. what if a white commentator said the number one threat to inner cities are black gang members? this is so blatant it's ridiculous
/r/MensRights02/11/18 11:54 PM
9

This man was literally enslaved to the state. They own us.
/r/MensRights29/03/17 02:40 PM
3

Get this petty bullshit outta here. Please stop ruining this sub.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 02:42 PM
2

Thomas sowell is my favorite intellectual-hating intellectual.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:37 PM
6

Human rights violations don't make economic injustices okay. This is just a step in the wrong direction if the ultimate goal everybody wants is equal pritection under the law.
/r/MensRights30/04/13 05:31 PM
5

There's quite a big difference between not hiring someone because of their race and not hiring someone because of their ideas.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 12:33 AM
2

International womens' day should be a day where the first world works to modernize the second and third world's standards of human rights and (almost) equality under the law that we all take for granted.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 10:55 AM
1

Relax dude, it's just an opinion. I've just never seen a guy that looked better with a ponytail than without.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 07:05 AM
-16

You should have just done that anyway... But yes, it undoubtedly makes you look more presentable, and I'm sure it was a tough thing to do. Good on ya. Edit: geez, I didn't realize men's fashion was such a touchy subject here. Apparenly having an opinion on hairstyles gets you more downvotes than shitty legal advice does.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 07:07 PM
6

no, it doesn't. But for the sake of completeness and to allay any fears of ambiguity, I've included it.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:47 PM
30

TL;DR Guy gets accused by g/f of seeing someone else. Denies it (truthfully), she punches him in the face, makes him bleed. She kicks him out, doesn't let him get his phone. He takes a breather, gets water, rides a bus to the library, (still feels ill and emotional through all of it) looks up number for domestic abuse hotline, eventually gets library to let him use their phone. Calls hotline. Gets rejected because it's only for women, children and supporters.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 05:10 AM
2

here's a video that outlines it pretty well.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 02:02 PM
1

There's a huge difference between what Hitchens is saying about what he prefers for his family, with how men and women should be treated under the law. Hitchens has always been an equal rights advocate. Also, he would never be in favor of any kind of legislation that would force any kind of social engineering with a goal of creating a male chauvinistic society. It's simply his view on what is more natural, and it's the way he chooses to live his life with his family.
/r/MensRights04/01/12 07:50 AM
-2

seriously, where is it reported that he was "assumed to be the aggressor", or was "almost charged"? That's all we're talking about here. I doubt that any detective would find the prints on the gun, the ownership record of the gun, and the fact that the dude was shot twice, and still say that he was the aggressor. The video definitely helped out his case immensely, but since there was no ruling to complain about, this is not a topic to get all up in arms about as a men's rights advocate. Relax.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 09:22 AM
-7

I mean obviously he's going to be a suspect if there's no evidence, but there was no ruling, everything else is hearsay legally, and should be considered hearsay from a men's rights advocate's perspective.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 12:28 AM
-7

is there another article about this or something, because I don't see anything about him "almost being charged".
/r/MensRights13/12/11 12:24 AM
3

since when is r/mensrights the place where we sit around and speculate about completely hypothetical unfavorable rulings? If this is what we want, I'm just going to post every murder of a man by a woman and say "I bet she'll get off easy", so we can sit around and hate the world for being stupider than us. Come on, people.
/r/MensRights13/12/11 12:10 AM
-1

I agree that there is bias, and that it's complete bullshit. However, this post doesn't make any rational argument. All it does is incite anger, so people upvote. If there was a ruling that came down unfairly for the man, then it would definitely be worth talking about. This post isn't about "men's rights" until we can have a discussion about how men are treated by the law and society differently than women.
/r/MensRights12/12/11 11:40 PM
-5

This post has to do with something shitty that a woman did to a man, that's about it. This has absolutely nothing to do with men being treated unfairly by the law or society. What argument for men's rights is to be made by posting this video? If the genders were reversed, would it change that argument? The whole argument of "I bet she wont even get a harsh penalty" is complete BS. If it were the case that she got of easily, then yes, that would be a story worth posting here. Speculation of what …
/r/MensRights12/12/11 11:36 PM
-2

Can we please admit that this has absolutely nothing to do with men's rights and should not have been posted here?
/r/MensRights12/12/11 10:34 PM
0

I was waiting for him to say, "y'all come back now ya hear"
/r/MensRights18/11/11 12:56 PM
8

How does this have upvotes? It has absolutely nothing to do with men's rights. Hell, it's taken completely out of context and doesn't necessarily even have anything to do with gender issues. Whining about every little thing that some woman says/does that hurts some man is not what the men's rights movement is about. Grow up.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:27 AM
3

Let's see, we complain about silly jokes being insensitive, but trivialize a seriously morally corrupt hypothetical course of action spelled out with complete sincerity. Really?
/r/MensRights06/04/11 08:23 AM
1

Do you have a source for that information? Thanks!
/r/MensRights11/03/11 07:50 AM
1

Lol, I didn't realize it was a Google translated German page until I got through the first couple paragraphs. I was thinking that some 5th grader wrote this.
/r/MensRights06/03/11 02:59 AM
2

I don't know why this is getting downvoted. This is a good point.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 10:21 PM
0

I think it could have been construed as a "short" joke, not a small penis joke. It's hard to tell while he's sitting, but that guy might be on the shorter side...
/r/MensRights17/02/11 05:20 AM
15

Thank you for being a mom that reads /r/mensrights
/r/MensRights07/02/11 08:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter